src/HOL/Int.thy
author paulson <lp15@cam.ac.uk>
Fri Nov 13 12:27:13 2015 +0000 (2015-11-13)
changeset 61649 268d88ec9087
parent 61609 77b453bd616f
child 61694 6571c78c9667
permissions -rw-r--r--
Tweaks for "real": Removal of [iff] status for some lemmas, adding [simp] for others. Plus fixes.
wenzelm@41959
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Int.thy
haftmann@25919
     2
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
wenzelm@41959
     3
    Author:     Tobias Nipkow, Florian Haftmann, TU Muenchen
haftmann@25919
     4
*)
haftmann@25919
     5
wenzelm@60758
     6
section \<open>The Integers as Equivalence Classes over Pairs of Natural Numbers\<close>
haftmann@25919
     7
haftmann@25919
     8
theory Int
blanchet@55404
     9
imports Equiv_Relations Power Quotient Fun_Def
haftmann@25919
    10
begin
haftmann@25919
    11
wenzelm@60758
    12
subsection \<open>Definition of integers as a quotient type\<close>
haftmann@25919
    13
huffman@48045
    14
definition intrel :: "(nat \<times> nat) \<Rightarrow> (nat \<times> nat) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
huffman@48045
    15
  "intrel = (\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). x + v = u + y)"
huffman@48045
    16
huffman@48045
    17
lemma intrel_iff [simp]: "intrel (x, y) (u, v) \<longleftrightarrow> x + v = u + y"
huffman@48045
    18
  by (simp add: intrel_def)
haftmann@25919
    19
huffman@48045
    20
quotient_type int = "nat \<times> nat" / "intrel"
wenzelm@45694
    21
  morphisms Rep_Integ Abs_Integ
huffman@48045
    22
proof (rule equivpI)
huffman@48045
    23
  show "reflp intrel"
huffman@48045
    24
    unfolding reflp_def by auto
huffman@48045
    25
  show "symp intrel"
huffman@48045
    26
    unfolding symp_def by auto
huffman@48045
    27
  show "transp intrel"
huffman@48045
    28
    unfolding transp_def by auto
huffman@48045
    29
qed
haftmann@25919
    30
huffman@48045
    31
lemma eq_Abs_Integ [case_names Abs_Integ, cases type: int]:
huffman@48045
    32
     "(!!x y. z = Abs_Integ (x, y) ==> P) ==> P"
huffman@48045
    33
by (induct z) auto
huffman@48045
    34
wenzelm@60758
    35
subsection \<open>Integers form a commutative ring\<close>
huffman@48045
    36
huffman@48045
    37
instantiation int :: comm_ring_1
haftmann@25919
    38
begin
haftmann@25919
    39
kuncar@51994
    40
lift_definition zero_int :: "int" is "(0, 0)" .
haftmann@25919
    41
kuncar@51994
    42
lift_definition one_int :: "int" is "(1, 0)" .
haftmann@25919
    43
huffman@48045
    44
lift_definition plus_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
huffman@48045
    45
  is "\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). (x + u, y + v)"
huffman@48045
    46
  by clarsimp
haftmann@25919
    47
huffman@48045
    48
lift_definition uminus_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int"
huffman@48045
    49
  is "\<lambda>(x, y). (y, x)"
huffman@48045
    50
  by clarsimp
haftmann@25919
    51
huffman@48045
    52
lift_definition minus_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
huffman@48045
    53
  is "\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). (x + v, y + u)"
huffman@48045
    54
  by clarsimp
haftmann@25919
    55
huffman@48045
    56
lift_definition times_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
huffman@48045
    57
  is "\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). (x*u + y*v, x*v + y*u)"
huffman@48045
    58
proof (clarsimp)
huffman@48045
    59
  fix s t u v w x y z :: nat
huffman@48045
    60
  assume "s + v = u + t" and "w + z = y + x"
huffman@48045
    61
  hence "(s + v) * w + (u + t) * x + u * (w + z) + v * (y + x)
huffman@48045
    62
       = (u + t) * w + (s + v) * x + u * (y + x) + v * (w + z)"
huffman@48045
    63
    by simp
huffman@48045
    64
  thus "(s * w + t * x) + (u * z + v * y) = (u * y + v * z) + (s * x + t * w)"
huffman@48045
    65
    by (simp add: algebra_simps)
huffman@48045
    66
qed
haftmann@25919
    67
huffman@48045
    68
instance
wenzelm@61169
    69
  by standard (transfer, clarsimp simp: algebra_simps)+
haftmann@25919
    70
haftmann@25919
    71
end
haftmann@25919
    72
huffman@44709
    73
abbreviation int :: "nat \<Rightarrow> int" where
huffman@44709
    74
  "int \<equiv> of_nat"
huffman@44709
    75
huffman@48045
    76
lemma int_def: "int n = Abs_Integ (n, 0)"
huffman@48045
    77
  by (induct n, simp add: zero_int.abs_eq,
huffman@48045
    78
    simp add: one_int.abs_eq plus_int.abs_eq)
haftmann@25919
    79
huffman@48045
    80
lemma int_transfer [transfer_rule]:
kuncar@56525
    81
  "(rel_fun (op =) pcr_int) (\<lambda>n. (n, 0)) int"
kuncar@56525
    82
  unfolding rel_fun_def int.pcr_cr_eq cr_int_def int_def by simp
haftmann@25919
    83
huffman@48045
    84
lemma int_diff_cases:
huffman@48045
    85
  obtains (diff) m n where "z = int m - int n"
huffman@48045
    86
  by transfer clarsimp
huffman@48045
    87
wenzelm@60758
    88
subsection \<open>Integers are totally ordered\<close>
haftmann@25919
    89
huffman@48045
    90
instantiation int :: linorder
huffman@48045
    91
begin
huffman@48045
    92
huffman@48045
    93
lift_definition less_eq_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
huffman@48045
    94
  is "\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). x + v \<le> u + y"
huffman@48045
    95
  by auto
huffman@48045
    96
huffman@48045
    97
lift_definition less_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
huffman@48045
    98
  is "\<lambda>(x, y) (u, v). x + v < u + y"
huffman@48045
    99
  by auto
huffman@48045
   100
huffman@48045
   101
instance
wenzelm@61169
   102
  by standard (transfer, force)+
huffman@48045
   103
huffman@48045
   104
end
haftmann@25919
   105
haftmann@25919
   106
instantiation int :: distrib_lattice
haftmann@25919
   107
begin
haftmann@25919
   108
haftmann@25919
   109
definition
wenzelm@61076
   110
  "(inf :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int) = min"
haftmann@25919
   111
haftmann@25919
   112
definition
wenzelm@61076
   113
  "(sup :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int) = max"
haftmann@25919
   114
haftmann@25919
   115
instance
haftmann@25919
   116
  by intro_classes
haftmann@54863
   117
    (auto simp add: inf_int_def sup_int_def max_min_distrib2)
haftmann@25919
   118
haftmann@25919
   119
end
haftmann@25919
   120
wenzelm@60758
   121
subsection \<open>Ordering properties of arithmetic operations\<close>
huffman@48045
   122
haftmann@35028
   123
instance int :: ordered_cancel_ab_semigroup_add
haftmann@25919
   124
proof
haftmann@25919
   125
  fix i j k :: int
haftmann@25919
   126
  show "i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> k + i \<le> k + j"
huffman@48045
   127
    by transfer clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   128
qed
haftmann@25919
   129
wenzelm@60758
   130
text\<open>Strict Monotonicity of Multiplication\<close>
haftmann@25919
   131
wenzelm@60758
   132
text\<open>strict, in 1st argument; proof is by induction on k>0\<close>
haftmann@25919
   133
lemma zmult_zless_mono2_lemma:
huffman@44709
   134
     "(i::int)<j ==> 0<k ==> int k * i < int k * j"
wenzelm@42676
   135
apply (induct k)
wenzelm@42676
   136
apply simp
webertj@49962
   137
apply (simp add: distrib_right)
haftmann@25919
   138
apply (case_tac "k=0")
haftmann@25919
   139
apply (simp_all add: add_strict_mono)
haftmann@25919
   140
done
haftmann@25919
   141
huffman@44709
   142
lemma zero_le_imp_eq_int: "(0::int) \<le> k ==> \<exists>n. k = int n"
huffman@48045
   143
apply transfer
huffman@48045
   144
apply clarsimp
huffman@48045
   145
apply (rule_tac x="a - b" in exI, simp)
haftmann@25919
   146
done
haftmann@25919
   147
huffman@44709
   148
lemma zero_less_imp_eq_int: "(0::int) < k ==> \<exists>n>0. k = int n"
huffman@48045
   149
apply transfer
huffman@48045
   150
apply clarsimp
huffman@48045
   151
apply (rule_tac x="a - b" in exI, simp)
haftmann@25919
   152
done
haftmann@25919
   153
haftmann@25919
   154
lemma zmult_zless_mono2: "[| i<j;  (0::int) < k |] ==> k*i < k*j"
haftmann@25919
   155
apply (drule zero_less_imp_eq_int)
haftmann@25919
   156
apply (auto simp add: zmult_zless_mono2_lemma)
haftmann@25919
   157
done
haftmann@25919
   158
wenzelm@60758
   159
text\<open>The integers form an ordered integral domain\<close>
huffman@48045
   160
instantiation int :: linordered_idom
huffman@48045
   161
begin
huffman@48045
   162
huffman@48045
   163
definition
wenzelm@61076
   164
  zabs_def: "\<bar>i::int\<bar> = (if i < 0 then - i else i)"
huffman@48045
   165
huffman@48045
   166
definition
wenzelm@61076
   167
  zsgn_def: "sgn (i::int) = (if i=0 then 0 else if 0<i then 1 else - 1)"
huffman@48045
   168
huffman@48045
   169
instance proof
haftmann@25919
   170
  fix i j k :: int
haftmann@25919
   171
  show "i < j \<Longrightarrow> 0 < k \<Longrightarrow> k * i < k * j"
haftmann@25919
   172
    by (rule zmult_zless_mono2)
haftmann@25919
   173
  show "\<bar>i\<bar> = (if i < 0 then -i else i)"
haftmann@25919
   174
    by (simp only: zabs_def)
wenzelm@61076
   175
  show "sgn (i::int) = (if i=0 then 0 else if 0<i then 1 else - 1)"
haftmann@25919
   176
    by (simp only: zsgn_def)
haftmann@25919
   177
qed
haftmann@25919
   178
huffman@48045
   179
end
huffman@48045
   180
wenzelm@61076
   181
lemma zless_imp_add1_zle: "w < z \<Longrightarrow> w + (1::int) \<le> z"
huffman@48045
   182
  by transfer clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   183
haftmann@25919
   184
lemma zless_iff_Suc_zadd:
wenzelm@61076
   185
  "(w :: int) < z \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>n. z = w + int (Suc n))"
huffman@48045
   186
apply transfer
huffman@48045
   187
apply auto
huffman@48045
   188
apply (rename_tac a b c d)
huffman@48045
   189
apply (rule_tac x="c+b - Suc(a+d)" in exI)
haftmann@25919
   190
apply arith
haftmann@25919
   191
done
haftmann@25919
   192
haftmann@25919
   193
lemmas int_distrib =
webertj@49962
   194
  distrib_right [of z1 z2 w]
webertj@49962
   195
  distrib_left [of w z1 z2]
wenzelm@45607
   196
  left_diff_distrib [of z1 z2 w]
wenzelm@45607
   197
  right_diff_distrib [of w z1 z2]
wenzelm@45607
   198
  for z1 z2 w :: int
haftmann@25919
   199
haftmann@25919
   200
wenzelm@60758
   201
subsection \<open>Embedding of the Integers into any @{text ring_1}: @{text of_int}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   202
haftmann@25919
   203
context ring_1
haftmann@25919
   204
begin
haftmann@25919
   205
huffman@48045
   206
lift_definition of_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> 'a" is "\<lambda>(i, j). of_nat i - of_nat j"
huffman@48045
   207
  by (clarsimp simp add: diff_eq_eq eq_diff_eq diff_add_eq
huffman@48045
   208
    of_nat_add [symmetric] simp del: of_nat_add)
haftmann@25919
   209
haftmann@25919
   210
lemma of_int_0 [simp]: "of_int 0 = 0"
huffman@48066
   211
  by transfer simp
haftmann@25919
   212
haftmann@25919
   213
lemma of_int_1 [simp]: "of_int 1 = 1"
huffman@48066
   214
  by transfer simp
haftmann@25919
   215
haftmann@25919
   216
lemma of_int_add [simp]: "of_int (w+z) = of_int w + of_int z"
huffman@48066
   217
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: algebra_simps)
haftmann@25919
   218
haftmann@25919
   219
lemma of_int_minus [simp]: "of_int (-z) = - (of_int z)"
huffman@48066
   220
  by (transfer fixing: uminus) clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   221
haftmann@25919
   222
lemma of_int_diff [simp]: "of_int (w - z) = of_int w - of_int z"
haftmann@54230
   223
  using of_int_add [of w "- z"] by simp
haftmann@25919
   224
haftmann@25919
   225
lemma of_int_mult [simp]: "of_int (w*z) = of_int w * of_int z"
huffman@48066
   226
  by (transfer fixing: times) (clarsimp simp add: algebra_simps of_nat_mult)
haftmann@25919
   227
eberlm@61531
   228
lemma mult_of_int_commute: "of_int x * y = y * of_int x"
eberlm@61531
   229
  by (transfer fixing: times) (auto simp: algebra_simps mult_of_nat_commute)
eberlm@61531
   230
wenzelm@60758
   231
text\<open>Collapse nested embeddings\<close>
huffman@44709
   232
lemma of_int_of_nat_eq [simp]: "of_int (int n) = of_nat n"
nipkow@29667
   233
by (induct n) auto
haftmann@25919
   234
huffman@47108
   235
lemma of_int_numeral [simp, code_post]: "of_int (numeral k) = numeral k"
huffman@47108
   236
  by (simp add: of_nat_numeral [symmetric] of_int_of_nat_eq [symmetric])
huffman@47108
   237
haftmann@54489
   238
lemma of_int_neg_numeral [code_post]: "of_int (- numeral k) = - numeral k"
haftmann@54489
   239
  by simp
huffman@47108
   240
lp15@61609
   241
lemma of_int_power [simp]:
haftmann@31015
   242
  "of_int (z ^ n) = of_int z ^ n"
haftmann@31015
   243
  by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@31015
   244
haftmann@25919
   245
end
haftmann@25919
   246
huffman@47108
   247
context ring_char_0
haftmann@25919
   248
begin
haftmann@25919
   249
haftmann@25919
   250
lemma of_int_eq_iff [simp]:
haftmann@25919
   251
   "of_int w = of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> w = z"
huffman@48066
   252
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: algebra_simps
huffman@48066
   253
    of_nat_add [symmetric] simp del: of_nat_add)
haftmann@25919
   254
wenzelm@60758
   255
text\<open>Special cases where either operand is zero\<close>
haftmann@36424
   256
lemma of_int_eq_0_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   257
  "of_int z = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> z = 0"
haftmann@36424
   258
  using of_int_eq_iff [of z 0] by simp
haftmann@36424
   259
haftmann@36424
   260
lemma of_int_0_eq_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   261
  "0 = of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> z = 0"
haftmann@36424
   262
  using of_int_eq_iff [of 0 z] by simp
haftmann@25919
   263
lp15@61234
   264
lemma of_int_eq_1_iff [iff]:
lp15@61234
   265
   "of_int z = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> z = 1"
lp15@61234
   266
  using of_int_eq_iff [of z 1] by simp
lp15@61234
   267
haftmann@25919
   268
end
haftmann@25919
   269
haftmann@36424
   270
context linordered_idom
haftmann@36424
   271
begin
haftmann@36424
   272
wenzelm@60758
   273
text\<open>Every @{text linordered_idom} has characteristic zero.\<close>
haftmann@36424
   274
subclass ring_char_0 ..
haftmann@36424
   275
haftmann@36424
   276
lemma of_int_le_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   277
  "of_int w \<le> of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> w \<le> z"
huffman@48066
   278
  by (transfer fixing: less_eq) (clarsimp simp add: algebra_simps
huffman@48066
   279
    of_nat_add [symmetric] simp del: of_nat_add)
haftmann@36424
   280
haftmann@36424
   281
lemma of_int_less_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   282
  "of_int w < of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> w < z"
haftmann@36424
   283
  by (simp add: less_le order_less_le)
haftmann@36424
   284
haftmann@36424
   285
lemma of_int_0_le_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   286
  "0 \<le> of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> z"
haftmann@36424
   287
  using of_int_le_iff [of 0 z] by simp
haftmann@36424
   288
haftmann@36424
   289
lemma of_int_le_0_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   290
  "of_int z \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> z \<le> 0"
haftmann@36424
   291
  using of_int_le_iff [of z 0] by simp
haftmann@36424
   292
haftmann@36424
   293
lemma of_int_0_less_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   294
  "0 < of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < z"
haftmann@36424
   295
  using of_int_less_iff [of 0 z] by simp
haftmann@36424
   296
haftmann@36424
   297
lemma of_int_less_0_iff [simp]:
haftmann@36424
   298
  "of_int z < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> z < 0"
haftmann@36424
   299
  using of_int_less_iff [of z 0] by simp
haftmann@36424
   300
lp15@61234
   301
lemma of_int_1_le_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   302
  "1 \<le> of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> 1 \<le> z"
lp15@61234
   303
  using of_int_le_iff [of 1 z] by simp
lp15@61234
   304
lp15@61234
   305
lemma of_int_le_1_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   306
  "of_int z \<le> 1 \<longleftrightarrow> z \<le> 1"
lp15@61234
   307
  using of_int_le_iff [of z 1] by simp
lp15@61234
   308
lp15@61234
   309
lemma of_int_1_less_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   310
  "1 < of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> 1 < z"
lp15@61234
   311
  using of_int_less_iff [of 1 z] by simp
lp15@61234
   312
lp15@61234
   313
lemma of_int_less_1_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   314
  "of_int z < 1 \<longleftrightarrow> z < 1"
lp15@61234
   315
  using of_int_less_iff [of z 1] by simp
lp15@61234
   316
haftmann@36424
   317
end
haftmann@25919
   318
lp15@61234
   319
text \<open>Comparisons involving @{term of_int}.\<close>
lp15@61234
   320
lp15@61234
   321
lemma of_int_eq_numeral_iff [iff]:
lp15@61649
   322
   "of_int z = (numeral n :: 'a::ring_char_0)
lp15@61234
   323
   \<longleftrightarrow> z = numeral n"
lp15@61234
   324
  using of_int_eq_iff by fastforce
lp15@61234
   325
lp15@61649
   326
lemma of_int_le_numeral_iff [simp]:
lp15@61649
   327
   "of_int z \<le> (numeral n :: 'a::linordered_idom)
lp15@61234
   328
   \<longleftrightarrow> z \<le> numeral n"
lp15@61234
   329
  using of_int_le_iff [of z "numeral n"] by simp
lp15@61234
   330
lp15@61649
   331
lemma of_int_numeral_le_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   332
   "(numeral n :: 'a::linordered_idom) \<le> of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> numeral n \<le> z"
lp15@61234
   333
  using of_int_le_iff [of "numeral n"] by simp
lp15@61234
   334
lp15@61649
   335
lemma of_int_less_numeral_iff [simp]:
lp15@61649
   336
   "of_int z < (numeral n :: 'a::linordered_idom)
lp15@61234
   337
   \<longleftrightarrow> z < numeral n"
lp15@61234
   338
  using of_int_less_iff [of z "numeral n"] by simp
lp15@61234
   339
lp15@61649
   340
lemma of_int_numeral_less_iff [simp]:
lp15@61234
   341
   "(numeral n :: 'a::linordered_idom) < of_int z \<longleftrightarrow> numeral n < z"
lp15@61234
   342
  using of_int_less_iff [of "numeral n" z] by simp
lp15@61234
   343
hoelzl@56889
   344
lemma of_nat_less_of_int_iff:
hoelzl@56889
   345
  "(of_nat n::'a::linordered_idom) < of_int x \<longleftrightarrow> int n < x"
hoelzl@56889
   346
  by (metis of_int_of_nat_eq of_int_less_iff)
hoelzl@56889
   347
haftmann@25919
   348
lemma of_int_eq_id [simp]: "of_int = id"
haftmann@25919
   349
proof
haftmann@25919
   350
  fix z show "of_int z = id z"
huffman@48045
   351
    by (cases z rule: int_diff_cases, simp)
haftmann@25919
   352
qed
haftmann@25919
   353
haftmann@25919
   354
hoelzl@51329
   355
instance int :: no_top
wenzelm@61169
   356
  apply standard
hoelzl@51329
   357
  apply (rule_tac x="x + 1" in exI)
hoelzl@51329
   358
  apply simp
hoelzl@51329
   359
  done
hoelzl@51329
   360
hoelzl@51329
   361
instance int :: no_bot
wenzelm@61169
   362
  apply standard
hoelzl@51329
   363
  apply (rule_tac x="x - 1" in exI)
hoelzl@51329
   364
  apply simp
hoelzl@51329
   365
  done
hoelzl@51329
   366
wenzelm@60758
   367
subsection \<open>Magnitude of an Integer, as a Natural Number: @{text nat}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   368
huffman@48045
   369
lift_definition nat :: "int \<Rightarrow> nat" is "\<lambda>(x, y). x - y"
huffman@48045
   370
  by auto
haftmann@25919
   371
huffman@44709
   372
lemma nat_int [simp]: "nat (int n) = n"
huffman@48045
   373
  by transfer simp
haftmann@25919
   374
huffman@44709
   375
lemma int_nat_eq [simp]: "int (nat z) = (if 0 \<le> z then z else 0)"
huffman@48045
   376
  by transfer clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   377
huffman@44709
   378
corollary nat_0_le: "0 \<le> z ==> int (nat z) = z"
haftmann@25919
   379
by simp
haftmann@25919
   380
haftmann@25919
   381
lemma nat_le_0 [simp]: "z \<le> 0 ==> nat z = 0"
huffman@48045
   382
  by transfer clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   383
haftmann@25919
   384
lemma nat_le_eq_zle: "0 < w | 0 \<le> z ==> (nat w \<le> nat z) = (w\<le>z)"
huffman@48045
   385
  by transfer (clarsimp, arith)
haftmann@25919
   386
wenzelm@60758
   387
text\<open>An alternative condition is @{term "0 \<le> w"}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   388
corollary nat_mono_iff: "0 < z ==> (nat w < nat z) = (w < z)"
lp15@60162
   389
by (simp add: nat_le_eq_zle linorder_not_le [symmetric])
haftmann@25919
   390
haftmann@25919
   391
corollary nat_less_eq_zless: "0 \<le> w ==> (nat w < nat z) = (w<z)"
lp15@60162
   392
by (simp add: nat_le_eq_zle linorder_not_le [symmetric])
haftmann@25919
   393
haftmann@25919
   394
lemma zless_nat_conj [simp]: "(nat w < nat z) = (0 < z & w < z)"
huffman@48045
   395
  by transfer (clarsimp, arith)
haftmann@25919
   396
haftmann@25919
   397
lemma nonneg_eq_int:
haftmann@25919
   398
  fixes z :: int
huffman@44709
   399
  assumes "0 \<le> z" and "\<And>m. z = int m \<Longrightarrow> P"
haftmann@25919
   400
  shows P
haftmann@25919
   401
  using assms by (blast dest: nat_0_le sym)
haftmann@25919
   402
haftmann@54223
   403
lemma nat_eq_iff:
haftmann@54223
   404
  "nat w = m \<longleftrightarrow> (if 0 \<le> w then w = int m else m = 0)"
huffman@48045
   405
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: le_imp_diff_is_add)
lp15@60162
   406
haftmann@54223
   407
corollary nat_eq_iff2:
haftmann@54223
   408
  "m = nat w \<longleftrightarrow> (if 0 \<le> w then w = int m else m = 0)"
haftmann@54223
   409
  using nat_eq_iff [of w m] by auto
haftmann@54223
   410
haftmann@54223
   411
lemma nat_0 [simp]:
haftmann@54223
   412
  "nat 0 = 0"
haftmann@54223
   413
  by (simp add: nat_eq_iff)
haftmann@25919
   414
haftmann@54223
   415
lemma nat_1 [simp]:
haftmann@54223
   416
  "nat 1 = Suc 0"
haftmann@54223
   417
  by (simp add: nat_eq_iff)
haftmann@54223
   418
haftmann@54223
   419
lemma nat_numeral [simp]:
haftmann@54223
   420
  "nat (numeral k) = numeral k"
haftmann@54223
   421
  by (simp add: nat_eq_iff)
haftmann@25919
   422
haftmann@54223
   423
lemma nat_neg_numeral [simp]:
haftmann@54489
   424
  "nat (- numeral k) = 0"
haftmann@54223
   425
  by simp
haftmann@54223
   426
haftmann@54223
   427
lemma nat_2: "nat 2 = Suc (Suc 0)"
haftmann@54223
   428
  by simp
lp15@60162
   429
haftmann@25919
   430
lemma nat_less_iff: "0 \<le> w ==> (nat w < m) = (w < of_nat m)"
huffman@48045
   431
  by transfer (clarsimp, arith)
haftmann@25919
   432
huffman@44709
   433
lemma nat_le_iff: "nat x \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> x \<le> int n"
huffman@48045
   434
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: le_diff_conv)
huffman@44707
   435
huffman@44707
   436
lemma nat_mono: "x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> nat x \<le> nat y"
huffman@48045
   437
  by transfer auto
huffman@44707
   438
nipkow@29700
   439
lemma nat_0_iff[simp]: "nat(i::int) = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> i\<le>0"
huffman@48045
   440
  by transfer clarsimp
nipkow@29700
   441
haftmann@25919
   442
lemma int_eq_iff: "(of_nat m = z) = (m = nat z & 0 \<le> z)"
haftmann@25919
   443
by (auto simp add: nat_eq_iff2)
haftmann@25919
   444
haftmann@25919
   445
lemma zero_less_nat_eq [simp]: "(0 < nat z) = (0 < z)"
haftmann@25919
   446
by (insert zless_nat_conj [of 0], auto)
haftmann@25919
   447
haftmann@25919
   448
lemma nat_add_distrib:
haftmann@54223
   449
  "0 \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> z' \<Longrightarrow> nat (z + z') = nat z + nat z'"
huffman@48045
   450
  by transfer clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   451
haftmann@54223
   452
lemma nat_diff_distrib':
haftmann@54223
   453
  "0 \<le> x \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> nat (x - y) = nat x - nat y"
haftmann@54223
   454
  by transfer clarsimp
lp15@60162
   455
haftmann@25919
   456
lemma nat_diff_distrib:
haftmann@54223
   457
  "0 \<le> z' \<Longrightarrow> z' \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> nat (z - z') = nat z - nat z'"
haftmann@54223
   458
  by (rule nat_diff_distrib') auto
haftmann@25919
   459
huffman@44709
   460
lemma nat_zminus_int [simp]: "nat (- int n) = 0"
huffman@48045
   461
  by transfer simp
haftmann@25919
   462
haftmann@53065
   463
lemma le_nat_iff:
haftmann@53065
   464
  "k \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> n \<le> nat k \<longleftrightarrow> int n \<le> k"
haftmann@53065
   465
  by transfer auto
lp15@60162
   466
huffman@44709
   467
lemma zless_nat_eq_int_zless: "(m < nat z) = (int m < z)"
huffman@48045
   468
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: less_diff_conv)
haftmann@25919
   469
haftmann@25919
   470
context ring_1
haftmann@25919
   471
begin
haftmann@25919
   472
lp15@61609
   473
lemma of_nat_nat [simp]: "0 \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> of_nat (nat z) = of_int z"
huffman@48066
   474
  by transfer (clarsimp simp add: of_nat_diff)
haftmann@25919
   475
haftmann@25919
   476
end
haftmann@25919
   477
lp15@60162
   478
lemma diff_nat_numeral [simp]:
haftmann@54249
   479
  "(numeral v :: nat) - numeral v' = nat (numeral v - numeral v')"
haftmann@54249
   480
  by (simp only: nat_diff_distrib' zero_le_numeral nat_numeral)
haftmann@54249
   481
haftmann@54249
   482
wenzelm@60758
   483
text \<open>For termination proofs:\<close>
krauss@29779
   484
lemma measure_function_int[measure_function]: "is_measure (nat o abs)" ..
krauss@29779
   485
haftmann@25919
   486
wenzelm@60758
   487
subsection\<open>Lemmas about the Function @{term of_nat} and Orderings\<close>
haftmann@25919
   488
wenzelm@61076
   489
lemma negative_zless_0: "- (int (Suc n)) < (0 :: int)"
haftmann@25919
   490
by (simp add: order_less_le del: of_nat_Suc)
haftmann@25919
   491
huffman@44709
   492
lemma negative_zless [iff]: "- (int (Suc n)) < int m"
haftmann@25919
   493
by (rule negative_zless_0 [THEN order_less_le_trans], simp)
haftmann@25919
   494
huffman@44709
   495
lemma negative_zle_0: "- int n \<le> 0"
haftmann@25919
   496
by (simp add: minus_le_iff)
haftmann@25919
   497
huffman@44709
   498
lemma negative_zle [iff]: "- int n \<le> int m"
haftmann@25919
   499
by (rule order_trans [OF negative_zle_0 of_nat_0_le_iff])
haftmann@25919
   500
huffman@44709
   501
lemma not_zle_0_negative [simp]: "~ (0 \<le> - (int (Suc n)))"
haftmann@25919
   502
by (subst le_minus_iff, simp del: of_nat_Suc)
haftmann@25919
   503
huffman@44709
   504
lemma int_zle_neg: "(int n \<le> - int m) = (n = 0 & m = 0)"
huffman@48045
   505
  by transfer simp
haftmann@25919
   506
huffman@44709
   507
lemma not_int_zless_negative [simp]: "~ (int n < - int m)"
haftmann@25919
   508
by (simp add: linorder_not_less)
haftmann@25919
   509
huffman@44709
   510
lemma negative_eq_positive [simp]: "(- int n = of_nat m) = (n = 0 & m = 0)"
haftmann@25919
   511
by (force simp add: order_eq_iff [of "- of_nat n"] int_zle_neg)
haftmann@25919
   512
huffman@44709
   513
lemma zle_iff_zadd: "w \<le> z \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>n. z = w + int n)"
haftmann@25919
   514
proof -
haftmann@25919
   515
  have "(w \<le> z) = (0 \<le> z - w)"
haftmann@25919
   516
    by (simp only: le_diff_eq add_0_left)
haftmann@25919
   517
  also have "\<dots> = (\<exists>n. z - w = of_nat n)"
haftmann@25919
   518
    by (auto elim: zero_le_imp_eq_int)
haftmann@25919
   519
  also have "\<dots> = (\<exists>n. z = w + of_nat n)"
nipkow@29667
   520
    by (simp only: algebra_simps)
haftmann@25919
   521
  finally show ?thesis .
haftmann@25919
   522
qed
haftmann@25919
   523
huffman@44709
   524
lemma zadd_int_left: "int m + (int n + z) = int (m + n) + z"
haftmann@25919
   525
by simp
haftmann@25919
   526
huffman@44709
   527
lemma int_Suc0_eq_1: "int (Suc 0) = 1"
haftmann@25919
   528
by simp
haftmann@25919
   529
wenzelm@60758
   530
text\<open>This version is proved for all ordered rings, not just integers!
haftmann@25919
   531
      It is proved here because attribute @{text arith_split} is not available
haftmann@35050
   532
      in theory @{text Rings}.
wenzelm@60758
   533
      But is it really better than just rewriting with @{text abs_if}?\<close>
blanchet@54147
   534
lemma abs_split [arith_split, no_atp]:
haftmann@35028
   535
     "P(abs(a::'a::linordered_idom)) = ((0 \<le> a --> P a) & (a < 0 --> P(-a)))"
haftmann@25919
   536
by (force dest: order_less_le_trans simp add: abs_if linorder_not_less)
haftmann@25919
   537
huffman@44709
   538
lemma negD: "x < 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. x = - (int (Suc n))"
huffman@48045
   539
apply transfer
huffman@48045
   540
apply clarsimp
huffman@48045
   541
apply (rule_tac x="b - Suc a" in exI, arith)
haftmann@25919
   542
done
haftmann@25919
   543
wenzelm@60758
   544
subsection \<open>Cases and induction\<close>
haftmann@25919
   545
wenzelm@60758
   546
text\<open>Now we replace the case analysis rule by a more conventional one:
wenzelm@60758
   547
whether an integer is negative or not.\<close>
haftmann@25919
   548
wenzelm@60758
   549
text\<open>This version is symmetric in the two subgoals.\<close>
lp15@59613
   550
theorem int_cases2 [case_names nonneg nonpos, cases type: int]:
lp15@59613
   551
  "\<lbrakk>!! n. z = int n \<Longrightarrow> P;  !! n. z = - (int n) \<Longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P"
lp15@59613
   552
apply (cases "z < 0")
lp15@59613
   553
apply (auto simp add: linorder_not_less dest!: negD nat_0_le [THEN sym])
lp15@59613
   554
done
lp15@59613
   555
wenzelm@60758
   556
text\<open>This is the default, with a negative case.\<close>
wenzelm@42676
   557
theorem int_cases [case_names nonneg neg, cases type: int]:
lp15@59613
   558
  "[|!! n. z = int n ==> P;  !! n. z = - (int (Suc n)) ==> P |] ==> P"
wenzelm@42676
   559
apply (cases "z < 0")
wenzelm@42676
   560
apply (blast dest!: negD)
haftmann@25919
   561
apply (simp add: linorder_not_less del: of_nat_Suc)
haftmann@25919
   562
apply auto
haftmann@25919
   563
apply (blast dest: nat_0_le [THEN sym])
haftmann@25919
   564
done
haftmann@25919
   565
haftmann@60868
   566
lemma int_cases3 [case_names zero pos neg]:
haftmann@60868
   567
  fixes k :: int
haftmann@60868
   568
  assumes "k = 0 \<Longrightarrow> P" and "\<And>n. k = int n \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> P"
paulson@61204
   569
    and "\<And>n. k = - int n \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> P"
haftmann@60868
   570
  shows "P"
haftmann@60868
   571
proof (cases k "0::int" rule: linorder_cases)
haftmann@60868
   572
  case equal with assms(1) show P by simp
haftmann@60868
   573
next
haftmann@60868
   574
  case greater
haftmann@60868
   575
  then have "nat k > 0" by simp
haftmann@60868
   576
  moreover from this have "k = int (nat k)" by auto
haftmann@60868
   577
  ultimately show P using assms(2) by blast
haftmann@60868
   578
next
haftmann@60868
   579
  case less
haftmann@60868
   580
  then have "nat (- k) > 0" by simp
haftmann@60868
   581
  moreover from this have "k = - int (nat (- k))" by auto
haftmann@60868
   582
  ultimately show P using assms(3) by blast
haftmann@60868
   583
qed
haftmann@60868
   584
wenzelm@42676
   585
theorem int_of_nat_induct [case_names nonneg neg, induct type: int]:
huffman@44709
   586
     "[|!! n. P (int n);  !!n. P (- (int (Suc n))) |] ==> P z"
wenzelm@42676
   587
  by (cases z) auto
haftmann@25919
   588
huffman@47207
   589
lemma nonneg_int_cases:
huffman@47207
   590
  assumes "0 \<le> k" obtains n where "k = int n"
haftmann@54489
   591
  using assms by (rule nonneg_eq_int)
huffman@47207
   592
huffman@47108
   593
lemma Let_numeral [simp]: "Let (numeral v) f = f (numeral v)"
wenzelm@60758
   594
  -- \<open>Unfold all @{text let}s involving constants\<close>
wenzelm@60758
   595
  by (fact Let_numeral) -- \<open>FIXME drop\<close>
haftmann@37767
   596
haftmann@54489
   597
lemma Let_neg_numeral [simp]: "Let (- numeral v) f = f (- numeral v)"
wenzelm@60758
   598
  -- \<open>Unfold all @{text let}s involving constants\<close>
wenzelm@60758
   599
  by (fact Let_neg_numeral) -- \<open>FIXME drop\<close>
haftmann@25919
   600
wenzelm@60758
   601
text \<open>Unfold @{text min} and @{text max} on numerals.\<close>
huffman@28958
   602
huffman@47108
   603
lemmas max_number_of [simp] =
huffman@47108
   604
  max_def [of "numeral u" "numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   605
  max_def [of "numeral u" "- numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   606
  max_def [of "- numeral u" "numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   607
  max_def [of "- numeral u" "- numeral v"] for u v
huffman@28958
   608
huffman@47108
   609
lemmas min_number_of [simp] =
huffman@47108
   610
  min_def [of "numeral u" "numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   611
  min_def [of "numeral u" "- numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   612
  min_def [of "- numeral u" "numeral v"]
haftmann@54489
   613
  min_def [of "- numeral u" "- numeral v"] for u v
huffman@26075
   614
haftmann@25919
   615
wenzelm@60758
   616
subsubsection \<open>Binary comparisons\<close>
huffman@28958
   617
wenzelm@60758
   618
text \<open>Preliminaries\<close>
huffman@28958
   619
lp15@60162
   620
lemma le_imp_0_less:
huffman@28958
   621
  assumes le: "0 \<le> z"
huffman@28958
   622
  shows "(0::int) < 1 + z"
huffman@28958
   623
proof -
huffman@28958
   624
  have "0 \<le> z" by fact
huffman@47108
   625
  also have "... < z + 1" by (rule less_add_one)
haftmann@57514
   626
  also have "... = 1 + z" by (simp add: ac_simps)
huffman@28958
   627
  finally show "0 < 1 + z" .
huffman@28958
   628
qed
huffman@28958
   629
huffman@28958
   630
lemma odd_less_0_iff:
huffman@28958
   631
  "(1 + z + z < 0) = (z < (0::int))"
wenzelm@42676
   632
proof (cases z)
huffman@28958
   633
  case (nonneg n)
haftmann@57512
   634
  thus ?thesis by (simp add: linorder_not_less add.assoc add_increasing
lp15@60162
   635
                             le_imp_0_less [THEN order_less_imp_le])
huffman@28958
   636
next
huffman@28958
   637
  case (neg n)
huffman@30079
   638
  thus ?thesis by (simp del: of_nat_Suc of_nat_add of_nat_1
huffman@30079
   639
    add: algebra_simps of_nat_1 [where 'a=int, symmetric] of_nat_add [symmetric])
huffman@28958
   640
qed
huffman@28958
   641
wenzelm@60758
   642
subsubsection \<open>Comparisons, for Ordered Rings\<close>
haftmann@25919
   643
haftmann@25919
   644
lemmas double_eq_0_iff = double_zero
haftmann@25919
   645
haftmann@25919
   646
lemma odd_nonzero:
haftmann@33296
   647
  "1 + z + z \<noteq> (0::int)"
wenzelm@42676
   648
proof (cases z)
haftmann@25919
   649
  case (nonneg n)
lp15@60162
   650
  have le: "0 \<le> z+z" by (simp add: nonneg add_increasing)
haftmann@25919
   651
  thus ?thesis using  le_imp_0_less [OF le]
lp15@60162
   652
    by (auto simp add: add.assoc)
haftmann@25919
   653
next
haftmann@25919
   654
  case (neg n)
haftmann@25919
   655
  show ?thesis
haftmann@25919
   656
  proof
haftmann@25919
   657
    assume eq: "1 + z + z = 0"
huffman@44709
   658
    have "(0::int) < 1 + (int n + int n)"
lp15@60162
   659
      by (simp add: le_imp_0_less add_increasing)
lp15@60162
   660
    also have "... = - (1 + z + z)"
lp15@60162
   661
      by (simp add: neg add.assoc [symmetric])
lp15@60162
   662
    also have "... = 0" by (simp add: eq)
haftmann@25919
   663
    finally have "0<0" ..
haftmann@25919
   664
    thus False by blast
haftmann@25919
   665
  qed
haftmann@25919
   666
qed
haftmann@25919
   667
haftmann@30652
   668
wenzelm@60758
   669
subsection \<open>The Set of Integers\<close>
haftmann@25919
   670
haftmann@25919
   671
context ring_1
haftmann@25919
   672
begin
haftmann@25919
   673
wenzelm@61070
   674
definition Ints :: "'a set"  ("\<int>")
wenzelm@61070
   675
  where "\<int> = range of_int"
haftmann@25919
   676
huffman@35634
   677
lemma Ints_of_int [simp]: "of_int z \<in> \<int>"
huffman@35634
   678
  by (simp add: Ints_def)
huffman@35634
   679
huffman@35634
   680
lemma Ints_of_nat [simp]: "of_nat n \<in> \<int>"
huffman@45533
   681
  using Ints_of_int [of "of_nat n"] by simp
huffman@35634
   682
haftmann@25919
   683
lemma Ints_0 [simp]: "0 \<in> \<int>"
huffman@45533
   684
  using Ints_of_int [of "0"] by simp
haftmann@25919
   685
haftmann@25919
   686
lemma Ints_1 [simp]: "1 \<in> \<int>"
huffman@45533
   687
  using Ints_of_int [of "1"] by simp
haftmann@25919
   688
eberlm@61552
   689
lemma Ints_numeral [simp]: "numeral n \<in> \<int>"
eberlm@61552
   690
  by (subst of_nat_numeral [symmetric], rule Ints_of_nat)
eberlm@61552
   691
haftmann@25919
   692
lemma Ints_add [simp]: "a \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> a + b \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   693
apply (auto simp add: Ints_def)
haftmann@25919
   694
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@25919
   695
apply (rule of_int_add [symmetric])
haftmann@25919
   696
done
haftmann@25919
   697
haftmann@25919
   698
lemma Ints_minus [simp]: "a \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> -a \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   699
apply (auto simp add: Ints_def)
haftmann@25919
   700
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@25919
   701
apply (rule of_int_minus [symmetric])
haftmann@25919
   702
done
haftmann@25919
   703
huffman@35634
   704
lemma Ints_diff [simp]: "a \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> a - b \<in> \<int>"
huffman@35634
   705
apply (auto simp add: Ints_def)
huffman@35634
   706
apply (rule range_eqI)
huffman@35634
   707
apply (rule of_int_diff [symmetric])
huffman@35634
   708
done
huffman@35634
   709
haftmann@25919
   710
lemma Ints_mult [simp]: "a \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> a * b \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   711
apply (auto simp add: Ints_def)
haftmann@25919
   712
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@25919
   713
apply (rule of_int_mult [symmetric])
haftmann@25919
   714
done
haftmann@25919
   715
huffman@35634
   716
lemma Ints_power [simp]: "a \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> a ^ n \<in> \<int>"
huffman@35634
   717
by (induct n) simp_all
huffman@35634
   718
haftmann@25919
   719
lemma Ints_cases [cases set: Ints]:
haftmann@25919
   720
  assumes "q \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   721
  obtains (of_int) z where "q = of_int z"
haftmann@25919
   722
  unfolding Ints_def
haftmann@25919
   723
proof -
wenzelm@60758
   724
  from \<open>q \<in> \<int>\<close> have "q \<in> range of_int" unfolding Ints_def .
haftmann@25919
   725
  then obtain z where "q = of_int z" ..
haftmann@25919
   726
  then show thesis ..
haftmann@25919
   727
qed
haftmann@25919
   728
haftmann@25919
   729
lemma Ints_induct [case_names of_int, induct set: Ints]:
haftmann@25919
   730
  "q \<in> \<int> \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>z. P (of_int z)) \<Longrightarrow> P q"
haftmann@25919
   731
  by (rule Ints_cases) auto
haftmann@25919
   732
eberlm@61524
   733
lemma Nats_subset_Ints: "\<nat> \<subseteq> \<int>"
eberlm@61524
   734
  unfolding Nats_def Ints_def
eberlm@61524
   735
  by (rule subsetI, elim imageE, hypsubst, subst of_int_of_nat_eq[symmetric], rule imageI) simp_all
eberlm@61524
   736
eberlm@61524
   737
lemma Nats_altdef1: "\<nat> = {of_int n |n. n \<ge> 0}"
eberlm@61524
   738
proof (intro subsetI equalityI)
eberlm@61524
   739
  fix x :: 'a assume "x \<in> {of_int n |n. n \<ge> 0}"
eberlm@61524
   740
  then obtain n where "x = of_int n" "n \<ge> 0" by (auto elim!: Ints_cases)
eberlm@61524
   741
  hence "x = of_nat (nat n)" by (subst of_nat_nat) simp_all
eberlm@61524
   742
  thus "x \<in> \<nat>" by simp
eberlm@61524
   743
next
eberlm@61524
   744
  fix x :: 'a assume "x \<in> \<nat>"
eberlm@61524
   745
  then obtain n where "x = of_nat n" by (auto elim!: Nats_cases)
eberlm@61524
   746
  hence "x = of_int (int n)" by simp
eberlm@61524
   747
  also have "int n \<ge> 0" by simp
eberlm@61524
   748
  hence "of_int (int n) \<in> {of_int n |n. n \<ge> 0}" by blast
eberlm@61524
   749
  finally show "x \<in> {of_int n |n. n \<ge> 0}" .
eberlm@61524
   750
qed
eberlm@61524
   751
haftmann@25919
   752
end
haftmann@25919
   753
eberlm@61524
   754
lemma (in linordered_idom) Nats_altdef2: "\<nat> = {n \<in> \<int>. n \<ge> 0}"
eberlm@61524
   755
proof (intro subsetI equalityI)
eberlm@61524
   756
  fix x :: 'a assume "x \<in> {n \<in> \<int>. n \<ge> 0}"
eberlm@61524
   757
  then obtain n where "x = of_int n" "n \<ge> 0" by (auto elim!: Ints_cases)
eberlm@61524
   758
  hence "x = of_nat (nat n)" by (subst of_nat_nat) simp_all
eberlm@61524
   759
  thus "x \<in> \<nat>" by simp
eberlm@61524
   760
qed (auto elim!: Nats_cases)
eberlm@61524
   761
eberlm@61524
   762
wenzelm@60758
   763
text \<open>The premise involving @{term Ints} prevents @{term "a = 1/2"}.\<close>
haftmann@25919
   764
haftmann@25919
   765
lemma Ints_double_eq_0_iff:
wenzelm@61070
   766
  assumes in_Ints: "a \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   767
  shows "(a + a = 0) = (a = (0::'a::ring_char_0))"
haftmann@25919
   768
proof -
haftmann@25919
   769
  from in_Ints have "a \<in> range of_int" unfolding Ints_def [symmetric] .
haftmann@25919
   770
  then obtain z where a: "a = of_int z" ..
haftmann@25919
   771
  show ?thesis
haftmann@25919
   772
  proof
haftmann@25919
   773
    assume "a = 0"
haftmann@25919
   774
    thus "a + a = 0" by simp
haftmann@25919
   775
  next
haftmann@25919
   776
    assume eq: "a + a = 0"
haftmann@25919
   777
    hence "of_int (z + z) = (of_int 0 :: 'a)" by (simp add: a)
haftmann@25919
   778
    hence "z + z = 0" by (simp only: of_int_eq_iff)
haftmann@25919
   779
    hence "z = 0" by (simp only: double_eq_0_iff)
haftmann@25919
   780
    thus "a = 0" by (simp add: a)
haftmann@25919
   781
  qed
haftmann@25919
   782
qed
haftmann@25919
   783
haftmann@25919
   784
lemma Ints_odd_nonzero:
wenzelm@61070
   785
  assumes in_Ints: "a \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@25919
   786
  shows "1 + a + a \<noteq> (0::'a::ring_char_0)"
haftmann@25919
   787
proof -
haftmann@25919
   788
  from in_Ints have "a \<in> range of_int" unfolding Ints_def [symmetric] .
haftmann@25919
   789
  then obtain z where a: "a = of_int z" ..
haftmann@25919
   790
  show ?thesis
haftmann@25919
   791
  proof
haftmann@25919
   792
    assume eq: "1 + a + a = 0"
haftmann@25919
   793
    hence "of_int (1 + z + z) = (of_int 0 :: 'a)" by (simp add: a)
haftmann@25919
   794
    hence "1 + z + z = 0" by (simp only: of_int_eq_iff)
haftmann@25919
   795
    with odd_nonzero show False by blast
haftmann@25919
   796
  qed
lp15@60162
   797
qed
haftmann@25919
   798
wenzelm@61070
   799
lemma Nats_numeral [simp]: "numeral w \<in> \<nat>"
huffman@47108
   800
  using of_nat_in_Nats [of "numeral w"] by simp
huffman@35634
   801
lp15@60162
   802
lemma Ints_odd_less_0:
wenzelm@61070
   803
  assumes in_Ints: "a \<in> \<int>"
haftmann@35028
   804
  shows "(1 + a + a < 0) = (a < (0::'a::linordered_idom))"
haftmann@25919
   805
proof -
haftmann@25919
   806
  from in_Ints have "a \<in> range of_int" unfolding Ints_def [symmetric] .
haftmann@25919
   807
  then obtain z where a: "a = of_int z" ..
haftmann@25919
   808
  hence "((1::'a) + a + a < 0) = (of_int (1 + z + z) < (of_int 0 :: 'a))"
haftmann@25919
   809
    by (simp add: a)
huffman@45532
   810
  also have "... = (z < 0)" by (simp only: of_int_less_iff odd_less_0_iff)
haftmann@25919
   811
  also have "... = (a < 0)" by (simp add: a)
haftmann@25919
   812
  finally show ?thesis .
haftmann@25919
   813
qed
haftmann@25919
   814
haftmann@25919
   815
wenzelm@60758
   816
subsection \<open>@{term setsum} and @{term setprod}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   817
lp15@61649
   818
lemma of_nat_setsum [simp]: "of_nat (setsum f A) = (\<Sum>x\<in>A. of_nat(f x))"
haftmann@25919
   819
  apply (cases "finite A")
haftmann@25919
   820
  apply (erule finite_induct, auto)
haftmann@25919
   821
  done
haftmann@25919
   822
lp15@61649
   823
lemma of_int_setsum [simp]: "of_int (setsum f A) = (\<Sum>x\<in>A. of_int(f x))"
haftmann@25919
   824
  apply (cases "finite A")
haftmann@25919
   825
  apply (erule finite_induct, auto)
haftmann@25919
   826
  done
haftmann@25919
   827
lp15@61649
   828
lemma of_nat_setprod [simp]: "of_nat (setprod f A) = (\<Prod>x\<in>A. of_nat(f x))"
haftmann@25919
   829
  apply (cases "finite A")
haftmann@25919
   830
  apply (erule finite_induct, auto simp add: of_nat_mult)
haftmann@25919
   831
  done
haftmann@25919
   832
lp15@61649
   833
lemma of_int_setprod [simp]: "of_int (setprod f A) = (\<Prod>x\<in>A. of_int(f x))"
haftmann@25919
   834
  apply (cases "finite A")
haftmann@25919
   835
  apply (erule finite_induct, auto)
haftmann@25919
   836
  done
haftmann@25919
   837
haftmann@25919
   838
lemmas int_setsum = of_nat_setsum [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
   839
lemmas int_setprod = of_nat_setprod [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
   840
haftmann@25919
   841
wenzelm@60758
   842
text \<open>Legacy theorems\<close>
haftmann@25919
   843
haftmann@25919
   844
lemmas zle_int = of_nat_le_iff [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
   845
lemmas int_int_eq = of_nat_eq_iff [where 'a=int]
huffman@47108
   846
lemmas numeral_1_eq_1 = numeral_One
haftmann@25919
   847
wenzelm@60758
   848
subsection \<open>Setting up simplification procedures\<close>
huffman@30802
   849
haftmann@54249
   850
lemmas of_int_simps =
haftmann@54249
   851
  of_int_0 of_int_1 of_int_add of_int_mult
haftmann@54249
   852
wenzelm@48891
   853
ML_file "Tools/int_arith.ML"
wenzelm@60758
   854
declaration \<open>K Int_Arith.setup\<close>
haftmann@25919
   855
huffman@47108
   856
simproc_setup fast_arith ("(m::'a::linordered_idom) < n" |
wenzelm@61144
   857
  "(m::'a::linordered_idom) \<le> n" |
huffman@47108
   858
  "(m::'a::linordered_idom) = n") =
wenzelm@61144
   859
  \<open>K Lin_Arith.simproc\<close>
wenzelm@43595
   860
haftmann@25919
   861
wenzelm@60758
   862
subsection\<open>More Inequality Reasoning\<close>
haftmann@25919
   863
haftmann@25919
   864
lemma zless_add1_eq: "(w < z + (1::int)) = (w<z | w=z)"
haftmann@25919
   865
by arith
haftmann@25919
   866
haftmann@25919
   867
lemma add1_zle_eq: "(w + (1::int) \<le> z) = (w<z)"
haftmann@25919
   868
by arith
haftmann@25919
   869
haftmann@25919
   870
lemma zle_diff1_eq [simp]: "(w \<le> z - (1::int)) = (w<z)"
haftmann@25919
   871
by arith
haftmann@25919
   872
haftmann@25919
   873
lemma zle_add1_eq_le [simp]: "(w < z + (1::int)) = (w\<le>z)"
haftmann@25919
   874
by arith
haftmann@25919
   875
haftmann@25919
   876
lemma int_one_le_iff_zero_less: "((1::int) \<le> z) = (0 < z)"
haftmann@25919
   877
by arith
haftmann@25919
   878
haftmann@25919
   879
wenzelm@60758
   880
subsection\<open>The functions @{term nat} and @{term int}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   881
wenzelm@60758
   882
text\<open>Simplify the term @{term "w + - z"}\<close>
haftmann@25919
   883
haftmann@25919
   884
lemma one_less_nat_eq [simp]: "(Suc 0 < nat z) = (1 < z)"
lp15@60162
   885
  using zless_nat_conj [of 1 z] by auto
haftmann@25919
   886
wenzelm@60758
   887
text\<open>This simplifies expressions of the form @{term "int n = z"} where
wenzelm@60758
   888
      z is an integer literal.\<close>
huffman@47108
   889
lemmas int_eq_iff_numeral [simp] = int_eq_iff [of _ "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@25919
   890
haftmann@25919
   891
lemma split_nat [arith_split]:
huffman@44709
   892
  "P(nat(i::int)) = ((\<forall>n. i = int n \<longrightarrow> P n) & (i < 0 \<longrightarrow> P 0))"
haftmann@25919
   893
  (is "?P = (?L & ?R)")
haftmann@25919
   894
proof (cases "i < 0")
haftmann@25919
   895
  case True thus ?thesis by auto
haftmann@25919
   896
next
haftmann@25919
   897
  case False
haftmann@25919
   898
  have "?P = ?L"
haftmann@25919
   899
  proof
haftmann@25919
   900
    assume ?P thus ?L using False by clarsimp
haftmann@25919
   901
  next
haftmann@25919
   902
    assume ?L thus ?P using False by simp
haftmann@25919
   903
  qed
haftmann@25919
   904
  with False show ?thesis by simp
haftmann@25919
   905
qed
haftmann@25919
   906
hoelzl@59000
   907
lemma nat_abs_int_diff: "nat \<bar>int a - int b\<bar> = (if a \<le> b then b - a else a - b)"
hoelzl@59000
   908
  by auto
hoelzl@59000
   909
hoelzl@59000
   910
lemma nat_int_add: "nat (int a + int b) = a + b"
hoelzl@59000
   911
  by auto
hoelzl@59000
   912
haftmann@25919
   913
context ring_1
haftmann@25919
   914
begin
haftmann@25919
   915
blanchet@33056
   916
lemma of_int_of_nat [nitpick_simp]:
haftmann@25919
   917
  "of_int k = (if k < 0 then - of_nat (nat (- k)) else of_nat (nat k))"
haftmann@25919
   918
proof (cases "k < 0")
haftmann@25919
   919
  case True then have "0 \<le> - k" by simp
haftmann@25919
   920
  then have "of_nat (nat (- k)) = of_int (- k)" by (rule of_nat_nat)
haftmann@25919
   921
  with True show ?thesis by simp
haftmann@25919
   922
next
haftmann@25919
   923
  case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: not_less of_nat_nat)
haftmann@25919
   924
qed
haftmann@25919
   925
haftmann@25919
   926
end
haftmann@25919
   927
haftmann@25919
   928
lemma nat_mult_distrib:
haftmann@25919
   929
  fixes z z' :: int
haftmann@25919
   930
  assumes "0 \<le> z"
haftmann@25919
   931
  shows "nat (z * z') = nat z * nat z'"
haftmann@25919
   932
proof (cases "0 \<le> z'")
haftmann@25919
   933
  case False with assms have "z * z' \<le> 0"
haftmann@25919
   934
    by (simp add: not_le mult_le_0_iff)
haftmann@25919
   935
  then have "nat (z * z') = 0" by simp
haftmann@25919
   936
  moreover from False have "nat z' = 0" by simp
haftmann@25919
   937
  ultimately show ?thesis by simp
haftmann@25919
   938
next
haftmann@25919
   939
  case True with assms have ge_0: "z * z' \<ge> 0" by (simp add: zero_le_mult_iff)
haftmann@25919
   940
  show ?thesis
haftmann@25919
   941
    by (rule injD [of "of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> int", OF inj_of_nat])
haftmann@25919
   942
      (simp only: of_nat_mult of_nat_nat [OF True]
haftmann@25919
   943
         of_nat_nat [OF assms] of_nat_nat [OF ge_0], simp)
haftmann@25919
   944
qed
haftmann@25919
   945
haftmann@25919
   946
lemma nat_mult_distrib_neg: "z \<le> (0::int) ==> nat(z*z') = nat(-z) * nat(-z')"
haftmann@25919
   947
apply (rule trans)
haftmann@25919
   948
apply (rule_tac [2] nat_mult_distrib, auto)
haftmann@25919
   949
done
haftmann@25919
   950
haftmann@25919
   951
lemma nat_abs_mult_distrib: "nat (abs (w * z)) = nat (abs w) * nat (abs z)"
haftmann@25919
   952
apply (cases "z=0 | w=0")
lp15@60162
   953
apply (auto simp add: abs_if nat_mult_distrib [symmetric]
haftmann@25919
   954
                      nat_mult_distrib_neg [symmetric] mult_less_0_iff)
haftmann@25919
   955
done
haftmann@25919
   956
haftmann@60570
   957
lemma int_in_range_abs [simp]:
haftmann@60570
   958
  "int n \<in> range abs"
haftmann@60570
   959
proof (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@60570
   960
  show "int n = \<bar>int n\<bar>"
haftmann@60570
   961
    by simp
haftmann@60570
   962
qed
haftmann@60570
   963
haftmann@60570
   964
lemma range_abs_Nats [simp]:
haftmann@60570
   965
  "range abs = (\<nat> :: int set)"
haftmann@60570
   966
proof -
haftmann@60570
   967
  have "\<bar>k\<bar> \<in> \<nat>" for k :: int
haftmann@60570
   968
    by (cases k) simp_all
haftmann@60570
   969
  moreover have "k \<in> range abs" if "k \<in> \<nat>" for k :: int
haftmann@60570
   970
    using that by induct simp
haftmann@60570
   971
  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
paulson@61204
   972
qed
haftmann@60570
   973
huffman@47207
   974
lemma Suc_nat_eq_nat_zadd1: "(0::int) <= z ==> Suc (nat z) = nat (1 + z)"
huffman@47207
   975
apply (rule sym)
huffman@47207
   976
apply (simp add: nat_eq_iff)
huffman@47207
   977
done
huffman@47207
   978
huffman@47207
   979
lemma diff_nat_eq_if:
lp15@60162
   980
     "nat z - nat z' =
lp15@60162
   981
        (if z' < 0 then nat z
lp15@60162
   982
         else let d = z-z' in
huffman@47207
   983
              if d < 0 then 0 else nat d)"
huffman@47207
   984
by (simp add: Let_def nat_diff_distrib [symmetric])
huffman@47207
   985
huffman@47207
   986
lemma nat_numeral_diff_1 [simp]:
huffman@47207
   987
  "numeral v - (1::nat) = nat (numeral v - 1)"
huffman@47207
   988
  using diff_nat_numeral [of v Num.One] by simp
huffman@47207
   989
haftmann@25919
   990
haftmann@25919
   991
subsection "Induction principles for int"
haftmann@25919
   992
wenzelm@60758
   993
text\<open>Well-founded segments of the integers\<close>
haftmann@25919
   994
haftmann@25919
   995
definition
haftmann@25919
   996
  int_ge_less_than  ::  "int => (int * int) set"
haftmann@25919
   997
where
haftmann@25919
   998
  "int_ge_less_than d = {(z',z). d \<le> z' & z' < z}"
haftmann@25919
   999
haftmann@25919
  1000
theorem wf_int_ge_less_than: "wf (int_ge_less_than d)"
haftmann@25919
  1001
proof -
haftmann@25919
  1002
  have "int_ge_less_than d \<subseteq> measure (%z. nat (z-d))"
haftmann@25919
  1003
    by (auto simp add: int_ge_less_than_def)
lp15@60162
  1004
  thus ?thesis
lp15@60162
  1005
    by (rule wf_subset [OF wf_measure])
haftmann@25919
  1006
qed
haftmann@25919
  1007
wenzelm@60758
  1008
text\<open>This variant looks odd, but is typical of the relations suggested
wenzelm@60758
  1009
by RankFinder.\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1010
haftmann@25919
  1011
definition
haftmann@25919
  1012
  int_ge_less_than2 ::  "int => (int * int) set"
haftmann@25919
  1013
where
haftmann@25919
  1014
  "int_ge_less_than2 d = {(z',z). d \<le> z & z' < z}"
haftmann@25919
  1015
haftmann@25919
  1016
theorem wf_int_ge_less_than2: "wf (int_ge_less_than2 d)"
haftmann@25919
  1017
proof -
lp15@60162
  1018
  have "int_ge_less_than2 d \<subseteq> measure (%z. nat (1+z-d))"
haftmann@25919
  1019
    by (auto simp add: int_ge_less_than2_def)
lp15@60162
  1020
  thus ?thesis
lp15@60162
  1021
    by (rule wf_subset [OF wf_measure])
haftmann@25919
  1022
qed
haftmann@25919
  1023
haftmann@25919
  1024
(* `set:int': dummy construction *)
haftmann@25919
  1025
theorem int_ge_induct [case_names base step, induct set: int]:
haftmann@25919
  1026
  fixes i :: int
haftmann@25919
  1027
  assumes ge: "k \<le> i" and
haftmann@25919
  1028
    base: "P k" and
haftmann@25919
  1029
    step: "\<And>i. k \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> P i \<Longrightarrow> P (i + 1)"
haftmann@25919
  1030
  shows "P i"
haftmann@25919
  1031
proof -
wenzelm@42676
  1032
  { fix n
wenzelm@42676
  1033
    have "\<And>i::int. n = nat (i - k) \<Longrightarrow> k \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> P i"
haftmann@25919
  1034
    proof (induct n)
haftmann@25919
  1035
      case 0
haftmann@25919
  1036
      hence "i = k" by arith
haftmann@25919
  1037
      thus "P i" using base by simp
haftmann@25919
  1038
    next
haftmann@25919
  1039
      case (Suc n)
haftmann@25919
  1040
      then have "n = nat((i - 1) - k)" by arith
haftmann@25919
  1041
      moreover
haftmann@25919
  1042
      have ki1: "k \<le> i - 1" using Suc.prems by arith
haftmann@25919
  1043
      ultimately
wenzelm@42676
  1044
      have "P (i - 1)" by (rule Suc.hyps)
wenzelm@42676
  1045
      from step [OF ki1 this] show ?case by simp
haftmann@25919
  1046
    qed
haftmann@25919
  1047
  }
haftmann@25919
  1048
  with ge show ?thesis by fast
haftmann@25919
  1049
qed
haftmann@25919
  1050
haftmann@25928
  1051
(* `set:int': dummy construction *)
haftmann@25928
  1052
theorem int_gr_induct [case_names base step, induct set: int]:
haftmann@25919
  1053
  assumes gr: "k < (i::int)" and
haftmann@25919
  1054
        base: "P(k+1)" and
haftmann@25919
  1055
        step: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>k < i; P i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(i+1)"
haftmann@25919
  1056
  shows "P i"
haftmann@25919
  1057
apply(rule int_ge_induct[of "k + 1"])
haftmann@25919
  1058
  using gr apply arith
haftmann@25919
  1059
 apply(rule base)
haftmann@25919
  1060
apply (rule step, simp+)
haftmann@25919
  1061
done
haftmann@25919
  1062
wenzelm@42676
  1063
theorem int_le_induct [consumes 1, case_names base step]:
haftmann@25919
  1064
  assumes le: "i \<le> (k::int)" and
haftmann@25919
  1065
        base: "P(k)" and
haftmann@25919
  1066
        step: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>i \<le> k; P i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(i - 1)"
haftmann@25919
  1067
  shows "P i"
haftmann@25919
  1068
proof -
wenzelm@42676
  1069
  { fix n
wenzelm@42676
  1070
    have "\<And>i::int. n = nat(k-i) \<Longrightarrow> i \<le> k \<Longrightarrow> P i"
haftmann@25919
  1071
    proof (induct n)
haftmann@25919
  1072
      case 0
haftmann@25919
  1073
      hence "i = k" by arith
haftmann@25919
  1074
      thus "P i" using base by simp
haftmann@25919
  1075
    next
haftmann@25919
  1076
      case (Suc n)
wenzelm@42676
  1077
      hence "n = nat (k - (i + 1))" by arith
haftmann@25919
  1078
      moreover
haftmann@25919
  1079
      have ki1: "i + 1 \<le> k" using Suc.prems by arith
haftmann@25919
  1080
      ultimately
wenzelm@42676
  1081
      have "P (i + 1)" by(rule Suc.hyps)
haftmann@25919
  1082
      from step[OF ki1 this] show ?case by simp
haftmann@25919
  1083
    qed
haftmann@25919
  1084
  }
haftmann@25919
  1085
  with le show ?thesis by fast
haftmann@25919
  1086
qed
haftmann@25919
  1087
wenzelm@42676
  1088
theorem int_less_induct [consumes 1, case_names base step]:
haftmann@25919
  1089
  assumes less: "(i::int) < k" and
haftmann@25919
  1090
        base: "P(k - 1)" and
haftmann@25919
  1091
        step: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>i < k; P i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(i - 1)"
haftmann@25919
  1092
  shows "P i"
haftmann@25919
  1093
apply(rule int_le_induct[of _ "k - 1"])
haftmann@25919
  1094
  using less apply arith
haftmann@25919
  1095
 apply(rule base)
haftmann@25919
  1096
apply (rule step, simp+)
haftmann@25919
  1097
done
haftmann@25919
  1098
haftmann@36811
  1099
theorem int_induct [case_names base step1 step2]:
haftmann@36801
  1100
  fixes k :: int
haftmann@36801
  1101
  assumes base: "P k"
haftmann@36801
  1102
    and step1: "\<And>i. k \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> P i \<Longrightarrow> P (i + 1)"
haftmann@36801
  1103
    and step2: "\<And>i. k \<ge> i \<Longrightarrow> P i \<Longrightarrow> P (i - 1)"
haftmann@36801
  1104
  shows "P i"
haftmann@36801
  1105
proof -
haftmann@36801
  1106
  have "i \<le> k \<or> i \<ge> k" by arith
wenzelm@42676
  1107
  then show ?thesis
wenzelm@42676
  1108
  proof
wenzelm@42676
  1109
    assume "i \<ge> k"
wenzelm@42676
  1110
    then show ?thesis using base
haftmann@36801
  1111
      by (rule int_ge_induct) (fact step1)
haftmann@36801
  1112
  next
wenzelm@42676
  1113
    assume "i \<le> k"
wenzelm@42676
  1114
    then show ?thesis using base
haftmann@36801
  1115
      by (rule int_le_induct) (fact step2)
haftmann@36801
  1116
  qed
haftmann@36801
  1117
qed
haftmann@36801
  1118
wenzelm@60758
  1119
subsection\<open>Intermediate value theorems\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1120
haftmann@25919
  1121
lemma int_val_lemma:
lp15@60162
  1122
     "(\<forall>i<n::nat. abs(f(i+1) - f i) \<le> 1) -->
haftmann@25919
  1123
      f 0 \<le> k --> k \<le> f n --> (\<exists>i \<le> n. f i = (k::int))"
huffman@30079
  1124
unfolding One_nat_def
wenzelm@42676
  1125
apply (induct n)
wenzelm@42676
  1126
apply simp
haftmann@25919
  1127
apply (intro strip)
haftmann@25919
  1128
apply (erule impE, simp)
haftmann@25919
  1129
apply (erule_tac x = n in allE, simp)
huffman@30079
  1130
apply (case_tac "k = f (Suc n)")
haftmann@27106
  1131
apply force
haftmann@25919
  1132
apply (erule impE)
haftmann@25919
  1133
 apply (simp add: abs_if split add: split_if_asm)
haftmann@25919
  1134
apply (blast intro: le_SucI)
haftmann@25919
  1135
done
haftmann@25919
  1136
haftmann@25919
  1137
lemmas nat0_intermed_int_val = int_val_lemma [rule_format (no_asm)]
haftmann@25919
  1138
haftmann@25919
  1139
lemma nat_intermed_int_val:
lp15@60162
  1140
     "[| \<forall>i. m \<le> i & i < n --> abs(f(i + 1::nat) - f i) \<le> 1; m < n;
haftmann@25919
  1141
         f m \<le> k; k \<le> f n |] ==> ? i. m \<le> i & i \<le> n & f i = (k::int)"
lp15@60162
  1142
apply (cut_tac n = "n-m" and f = "%i. f (i+m) " and k = k
haftmann@25919
  1143
       in int_val_lemma)
huffman@30079
  1144
unfolding One_nat_def
haftmann@25919
  1145
apply simp
haftmann@25919
  1146
apply (erule exE)
haftmann@25919
  1147
apply (rule_tac x = "i+m" in exI, arith)
haftmann@25919
  1148
done
haftmann@25919
  1149
haftmann@25919
  1150
wenzelm@60758
  1151
subsection\<open>Products and 1, by T. M. Rasmussen\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1152
haftmann@25919
  1153
lemma zabs_less_one_iff [simp]: "(\<bar>z\<bar> < 1) = (z = (0::int))"
haftmann@25919
  1154
by arith
haftmann@25919
  1155
paulson@34055
  1156
lemma abs_zmult_eq_1:
paulson@34055
  1157
  assumes mn: "\<bar>m * n\<bar> = 1"
paulson@34055
  1158
  shows "\<bar>m\<bar> = (1::int)"
paulson@34055
  1159
proof -
paulson@34055
  1160
  have 0: "m \<noteq> 0 & n \<noteq> 0" using mn
paulson@34055
  1161
    by auto
paulson@34055
  1162
  have "~ (2 \<le> \<bar>m\<bar>)"
paulson@34055
  1163
  proof
paulson@34055
  1164
    assume "2 \<le> \<bar>m\<bar>"
paulson@34055
  1165
    hence "2*\<bar>n\<bar> \<le> \<bar>m\<bar>*\<bar>n\<bar>"
lp15@60162
  1166
      by (simp add: mult_mono 0)
lp15@60162
  1167
    also have "... = \<bar>m*n\<bar>"
paulson@34055
  1168
      by (simp add: abs_mult)
paulson@34055
  1169
    also have "... = 1"
paulson@34055
  1170
      by (simp add: mn)
paulson@34055
  1171
    finally have "2*\<bar>n\<bar> \<le> 1" .
paulson@34055
  1172
    thus "False" using 0
huffman@47108
  1173
      by arith
paulson@34055
  1174
  qed
paulson@34055
  1175
  thus ?thesis using 0
paulson@34055
  1176
    by auto
paulson@34055
  1177
qed
haftmann@25919
  1178
haftmann@25919
  1179
lemma pos_zmult_eq_1_iff_lemma: "(m * n = 1) ==> m = (1::int) | m = -1"
haftmann@25919
  1180
by (insert abs_zmult_eq_1 [of m n], arith)
haftmann@25919
  1181
boehmes@35815
  1182
lemma pos_zmult_eq_1_iff:
boehmes@35815
  1183
  assumes "0 < (m::int)" shows "(m * n = 1) = (m = 1 & n = 1)"
boehmes@35815
  1184
proof -
boehmes@35815
  1185
  from assms have "m * n = 1 ==> m = 1" by (auto dest: pos_zmult_eq_1_iff_lemma)
boehmes@35815
  1186
  thus ?thesis by (auto dest: pos_zmult_eq_1_iff_lemma)
boehmes@35815
  1187
qed
haftmann@25919
  1188
haftmann@25919
  1189
lemma zmult_eq_1_iff: "(m*n = (1::int)) = ((m = 1 & n = 1) | (m = -1 & n = -1))"
lp15@60162
  1190
apply (rule iffI)
haftmann@25919
  1191
 apply (frule pos_zmult_eq_1_iff_lemma)
lp15@60162
  1192
 apply (simp add: mult.commute [of m])
lp15@60162
  1193
 apply (frule pos_zmult_eq_1_iff_lemma, auto)
haftmann@25919
  1194
done
haftmann@25919
  1195
haftmann@33296
  1196
lemma infinite_UNIV_int: "\<not> finite (UNIV::int set)"
haftmann@25919
  1197
proof
haftmann@33296
  1198
  assume "finite (UNIV::int set)"
wenzelm@61076
  1199
  moreover have "inj (\<lambda>i::int. 2 * i)"
haftmann@33296
  1200
    by (rule injI) simp
wenzelm@61076
  1201
  ultimately have "surj (\<lambda>i::int. 2 * i)"
haftmann@33296
  1202
    by (rule finite_UNIV_inj_surj)
haftmann@33296
  1203
  then obtain i :: int where "1 = 2 * i" by (rule surjE)
haftmann@33296
  1204
  then show False by (simp add: pos_zmult_eq_1_iff)
haftmann@25919
  1205
qed
haftmann@25919
  1206
haftmann@25919
  1207
wenzelm@60758
  1208
subsection \<open>Further theorems on numerals\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1209
wenzelm@60758
  1210
subsubsection\<open>Special Simplification for Constants\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1211
wenzelm@60758
  1212
text\<open>These distributive laws move literals inside sums and differences.\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1213
webertj@49962
  1214
lemmas distrib_right_numeral [simp] = distrib_right [of _ _ "numeral v"] for v
webertj@49962
  1215
lemmas distrib_left_numeral [simp] = distrib_left [of "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1216
lemmas left_diff_distrib_numeral [simp] = left_diff_distrib [of _ _ "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1217
lemmas right_diff_distrib_numeral [simp] = right_diff_distrib [of "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1218
wenzelm@60758
  1219
text\<open>These are actually for fields, like real: but where else to put them?\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1220
huffman@47108
  1221
lemmas zero_less_divide_iff_numeral [simp, no_atp] = zero_less_divide_iff [of "numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1222
lemmas divide_less_0_iff_numeral [simp, no_atp] = divide_less_0_iff [of "numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1223
lemmas zero_le_divide_iff_numeral [simp, no_atp] = zero_le_divide_iff [of "numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1224
lemmas divide_le_0_iff_numeral [simp, no_atp] = divide_le_0_iff [of "numeral w"] for w
haftmann@30652
  1225
haftmann@30652
  1226
wenzelm@60758
  1227
text \<open>Replaces @{text "inverse #nn"} by @{text "1/#nn"}.  It looks
wenzelm@60758
  1228
  strange, but then other simprocs simplify the quotient.\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1229
huffman@47108
  1230
lemmas inverse_eq_divide_numeral [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1231
  inverse_eq_divide [of "numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1232
huffman@47108
  1233
lemmas inverse_eq_divide_neg_numeral [simp] =
haftmann@54489
  1234
  inverse_eq_divide [of "- numeral w"] for w
haftmann@30652
  1235
wenzelm@60758
  1236
text \<open>These laws simplify inequalities, moving unary minus from a term
wenzelm@60758
  1237
into the literal.\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1238
haftmann@54489
  1239
lemmas equation_minus_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1240
  equation_minus_iff [of "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1241
haftmann@54489
  1242
lemmas minus_equation_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1243
  minus_equation_iff [of _ "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1244
haftmann@54489
  1245
lemmas le_minus_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1246
  le_minus_iff [of "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1247
haftmann@54489
  1248
lemmas minus_le_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1249
  minus_le_iff [of _ "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1250
haftmann@54489
  1251
lemmas less_minus_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1252
  less_minus_iff [of "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1253
haftmann@54489
  1254
lemmas minus_less_iff_numeral [no_atp] =
haftmann@54489
  1255
  minus_less_iff [of _ "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1256
wenzelm@60758
  1257
-- \<open>FIXME maybe simproc\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1258
haftmann@30652
  1259
wenzelm@60758
  1260
text \<open>Cancellation of constant factors in comparisons (@{text "<"} and @{text "\<le>"})\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1261
huffman@47108
  1262
lemmas mult_less_cancel_left_numeral [simp, no_atp] = mult_less_cancel_left [of "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1263
lemmas mult_less_cancel_right_numeral [simp, no_atp] = mult_less_cancel_right [of _ "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1264
lemmas mult_le_cancel_left_numeral [simp, no_atp] = mult_le_cancel_left [of "numeral v"] for v
huffman@47108
  1265
lemmas mult_le_cancel_right_numeral [simp, no_atp] = mult_le_cancel_right [of _ "numeral v"] for v
haftmann@30652
  1266
haftmann@30652
  1267
wenzelm@60758
  1268
text \<open>Multiplying out constant divisors in comparisons (@{text "<"}, @{text "\<le>"} and @{text "="})\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1269
huffman@47108
  1270
lemmas le_divide_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1271
  pos_le_divide_eq [of "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral]
haftmann@54489
  1272
  neg_le_divide_eq [of "- numeral w", OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w
huffman@47108
  1273
huffman@47108
  1274
lemmas divide_le_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1275
  pos_divide_le_eq [of "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral]
haftmann@54489
  1276
  neg_divide_le_eq [of "- numeral w", OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w
huffman@47108
  1277
huffman@47108
  1278
lemmas less_divide_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1279
  pos_less_divide_eq [of "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral]
haftmann@54489
  1280
  neg_less_divide_eq [of "- numeral w", OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w
haftmann@30652
  1281
huffman@47108
  1282
lemmas divide_less_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1283
  pos_divide_less_eq [of "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral]
haftmann@54489
  1284
  neg_divide_less_eq [of "- numeral w", OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w
huffman@47108
  1285
huffman@47108
  1286
lemmas eq_divide_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1287
  eq_divide_eq [of _ _ "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1288
  eq_divide_eq [of _ _ "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1289
huffman@47108
  1290
lemmas divide_eq_eq_numeral1 [simp] =
huffman@47108
  1291
  divide_eq_eq [of _ "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1292
  divide_eq_eq [of _ "- numeral w"] for w
haftmann@54489
  1293
haftmann@30652
  1294
wenzelm@60758
  1295
subsubsection\<open>Optional Simplification Rules Involving Constants\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1296
wenzelm@60758
  1297
text\<open>Simplify quotients that are compared with a literal constant.\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1298
huffman@47108
  1299
lemmas le_divide_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1300
  le_divide_eq [of "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1301
  le_divide_eq [of "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1302
huffman@47108
  1303
lemmas divide_le_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1304
  divide_le_eq [of _ _ "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1305
  divide_le_eq [of _ _ "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1306
huffman@47108
  1307
lemmas less_divide_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1308
  less_divide_eq [of "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1309
  less_divide_eq [of "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1310
huffman@47108
  1311
lemmas divide_less_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1312
  divide_less_eq [of _ _ "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1313
  divide_less_eq [of _ _ "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1314
huffman@47108
  1315
lemmas eq_divide_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1316
  eq_divide_eq [of "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1317
  eq_divide_eq [of "- numeral w"] for w
huffman@47108
  1318
huffman@47108
  1319
lemmas divide_eq_eq_numeral =
huffman@47108
  1320
  divide_eq_eq [of _ _ "numeral w"]
haftmann@54489
  1321
  divide_eq_eq [of _ _ "- numeral w"] for w
haftmann@30652
  1322
haftmann@30652
  1323
wenzelm@60758
  1324
text\<open>Not good as automatic simprules because they cause case splits.\<close>
haftmann@30652
  1325
lemmas divide_const_simps =
huffman@47108
  1326
  le_divide_eq_numeral divide_le_eq_numeral less_divide_eq_numeral
huffman@47108
  1327
  divide_less_eq_numeral eq_divide_eq_numeral divide_eq_eq_numeral
haftmann@30652
  1328
  le_divide_eq_1 divide_le_eq_1 less_divide_eq_1 divide_less_eq_1
haftmann@30652
  1329
haftmann@30652
  1330
wenzelm@60758
  1331
subsection \<open>The divides relation\<close>
haftmann@33320
  1332
nipkow@33657
  1333
lemma zdvd_antisym_nonneg:
nipkow@33657
  1334
    "0 <= m ==> 0 <= n ==> m dvd n ==> n dvd m ==> m = (n::int)"
haftmann@33320
  1335
  apply (simp add: dvd_def, auto)
haftmann@57512
  1336
  apply (auto simp add: mult.assoc zero_le_mult_iff zmult_eq_1_iff)
haftmann@33320
  1337
  done
haftmann@33320
  1338
lp15@60162
  1339
lemma zdvd_antisym_abs: assumes "(a::int) dvd b" and "b dvd a"
haftmann@33320
  1340
  shows "\<bar>a\<bar> = \<bar>b\<bar>"
nipkow@33657
  1341
proof cases
nipkow@33657
  1342
  assume "a = 0" with assms show ?thesis by simp
nipkow@33657
  1343
next
nipkow@33657
  1344
  assume "a \<noteq> 0"
wenzelm@60758
  1345
  from \<open>a dvd b\<close> obtain k where k:"b = a*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast
wenzelm@60758
  1346
  from \<open>b dvd a\<close> obtain k' where k':"a = b*k'" unfolding dvd_def by blast
haftmann@33320
  1347
  from k k' have "a = a*k*k'" by simp
haftmann@33320
  1348
  with mult_cancel_left1[where c="a" and b="k*k'"]
wenzelm@60758
  1349
  have kk':"k*k' = 1" using \<open>a\<noteq>0\<close> by (simp add: mult.assoc)
haftmann@33320
  1350
  hence "k = 1 \<and> k' = 1 \<or> k = -1 \<and> k' = -1" by (simp add: zmult_eq_1_iff)
haftmann@33320
  1351
  thus ?thesis using k k' by auto
haftmann@33320
  1352
qed
haftmann@33320
  1353
haftmann@33320
  1354
lemma zdvd_zdiffD: "k dvd m - n ==> k dvd n ==> k dvd (m::int)"
lp15@60162
  1355
  using dvd_add_right_iff [of k "- n" m] by simp
haftmann@33320
  1356
haftmann@33320
  1357
lemma zdvd_reduce: "(k dvd n + k * m) = (k dvd (n::int))"
haftmann@58649
  1358
  using dvd_add_times_triv_right_iff [of k n m] by (simp add: ac_simps)
haftmann@33320
  1359
haftmann@33320
  1360
lemma dvd_imp_le_int:
haftmann@33320
  1361
  fixes d i :: int
haftmann@33320
  1362
  assumes "i \<noteq> 0" and "d dvd i"
haftmann@33320
  1363
  shows "\<bar>d\<bar> \<le> \<bar>i\<bar>"
haftmann@33320
  1364
proof -
wenzelm@60758
  1365
  from \<open>d dvd i\<close> obtain k where "i = d * k" ..
wenzelm@60758
  1366
  with \<open>i \<noteq> 0\<close> have "k \<noteq> 0" by auto
haftmann@33320
  1367
  then have "1 \<le> \<bar>k\<bar>" and "0 \<le> \<bar>d\<bar>" by auto
haftmann@33320
  1368
  then have "\<bar>d\<bar> * 1 \<le> \<bar>d\<bar> * \<bar>k\<bar>" by (rule mult_left_mono)
wenzelm@60758
  1369
  with \<open>i = d * k\<close> show ?thesis by (simp add: abs_mult)
haftmann@33320
  1370
qed
haftmann@33320
  1371
haftmann@33320
  1372
lemma zdvd_not_zless:
haftmann@33320
  1373
  fixes m n :: int
haftmann@33320
  1374
  assumes "0 < m" and "m < n"
haftmann@33320
  1375
  shows "\<not> n dvd m"
haftmann@33320
  1376
proof
haftmann@33320
  1377
  from assms have "0 < n" by auto
haftmann@33320
  1378
  assume "n dvd m" then obtain k where k: "m = n * k" ..
wenzelm@60758
  1379
  with \<open>0 < m\<close> have "0 < n * k" by auto
wenzelm@60758
  1380
  with \<open>0 < n\<close> have "0 < k" by (simp add: zero_less_mult_iff)
wenzelm@60758
  1381
  with k \<open>0 < n\<close> \<open>m < n\<close> have "n * k < n * 1" by simp
wenzelm@60758
  1382
  with \<open>0 < n\<close> \<open>0 < k\<close> show False unfolding mult_less_cancel_left by auto
haftmann@33320
  1383
qed
haftmann@33320
  1384
haftmann@33320
  1385
lemma zdvd_mult_cancel: assumes d:"k * m dvd k * n" and kz:"k \<noteq> (0::int)"
haftmann@33320
  1386
  shows "m dvd n"
haftmann@33320
  1387
proof-
haftmann@33320
  1388
  from d obtain h where h: "k*n = k*m * h" unfolding dvd_def by blast
haftmann@33320
  1389
  {assume "n \<noteq> m*h" hence "k* n \<noteq> k* (m*h)" using kz by simp
haftmann@57512
  1390
    with h have False by (simp add: mult.assoc)}
haftmann@33320
  1391
  hence "n = m * h" by blast
haftmann@33320
  1392
  thus ?thesis by simp
haftmann@33320
  1393
qed
haftmann@33320
  1394
haftmann@33320
  1395
theorem zdvd_int: "(x dvd y) = (int x dvd int y)"
haftmann@33320
  1396
proof -
haftmann@33320
  1397
  have "\<And>k. int y = int x * k \<Longrightarrow> x dvd y"
haftmann@33320
  1398
  proof -
haftmann@33320
  1399
    fix k
haftmann@33320
  1400
    assume A: "int y = int x * k"
wenzelm@42676
  1401
    then show "x dvd y"
wenzelm@42676
  1402
    proof (cases k)
wenzelm@42676
  1403
      case (nonneg n)
lp15@61649
  1404
      with A have "y = x * n" by (simp del: of_nat_mult add: of_nat_mult [symmetric])
haftmann@33320
  1405
      then show ?thesis ..
haftmann@33320
  1406
    next
wenzelm@42676
  1407
      case (neg n)
wenzelm@42676
  1408
      with A have "int y = int x * (- int (Suc n))" by simp
haftmann@33320
  1409
      also have "\<dots> = - (int x * int (Suc n))" by (simp only: mult_minus_right)
haftmann@33320
  1410
      also have "\<dots> = - int (x * Suc n)" by (simp only: of_nat_mult [symmetric])
haftmann@33320
  1411
      finally have "- int (x * Suc n) = int y" ..
haftmann@33320
  1412
      then show ?thesis by (simp only: negative_eq_positive) auto
haftmann@33320
  1413
    qed
haftmann@33320
  1414
  qed
haftmann@33320
  1415
  then show ?thesis by (auto elim!: dvdE simp only: dvd_triv_left of_nat_mult)
haftmann@33320
  1416
qed
haftmann@33320
  1417
wenzelm@42676
  1418
lemma zdvd1_eq[simp]: "(x::int) dvd 1 = (\<bar>x\<bar> = 1)"
haftmann@33320
  1419
proof
haftmann@33320
  1420
  assume d: "x dvd 1" hence "int (nat \<bar>x\<bar>) dvd int (nat 1)" by simp
haftmann@33320
  1421
  hence "nat \<bar>x\<bar> dvd 1" by (simp add: zdvd_int)
haftmann@33320
  1422
  hence "nat \<bar>x\<bar> = 1"  by simp
wenzelm@42676
  1423
  thus "\<bar>x\<bar> = 1" by (cases "x < 0") auto
haftmann@33320
  1424
next
haftmann@33320
  1425
  assume "\<bar>x\<bar>=1"
haftmann@33320
  1426
  then have "x = 1 \<or> x = -1" by auto
haftmann@33320
  1427
  then show "x dvd 1" by (auto intro: dvdI)
haftmann@33320
  1428
qed
haftmann@33320
  1429
lp15@60162
  1430
lemma zdvd_mult_cancel1:
haftmann@33320
  1431
  assumes mp:"m \<noteq>(0::int)" shows "(m * n dvd m) = (\<bar>n\<bar> = 1)"
haftmann@33320
  1432
proof
lp15@60162
  1433
  assume n1: "\<bar>n\<bar> = 1" thus "m * n dvd m"
wenzelm@42676
  1434
    by (cases "n >0") (auto simp add: minus_equation_iff)
haftmann@33320
  1435
next
haftmann@33320
  1436
  assume H: "m * n dvd m" hence H2: "m * n dvd m * 1" by simp
haftmann@33320
  1437
  from zdvd_mult_cancel[OF H2 mp] show "\<bar>n\<bar> = 1" by (simp only: zdvd1_eq)
haftmann@33320
  1438
qed
haftmann@33320
  1439
haftmann@33320
  1440
lemma int_dvd_iff: "(int m dvd z) = (m dvd nat (abs z))"
haftmann@33320
  1441
  unfolding zdvd_int by (cases "z \<ge> 0") simp_all
haftmann@33320
  1442
haftmann@33320
  1443
lemma dvd_int_iff: "(z dvd int m) = (nat (abs z) dvd m)"
haftmann@33320
  1444
  unfolding zdvd_int by (cases "z \<ge> 0") simp_all
haftmann@33320
  1445
haftmann@58650
  1446
lemma dvd_int_unfold_dvd_nat:
haftmann@58650
  1447
  "k dvd l \<longleftrightarrow> nat \<bar>k\<bar> dvd nat \<bar>l\<bar>"
haftmann@58650
  1448
  unfolding dvd_int_iff [symmetric] by simp
haftmann@58650
  1449
haftmann@33320
  1450
lemma nat_dvd_iff: "(nat z dvd m) = (if 0 \<le> z then (z dvd int m) else m = 0)"
haftmann@33320
  1451
  by (auto simp add: dvd_int_iff)
haftmann@33320
  1452
haftmann@33341
  1453
lemma eq_nat_nat_iff:
haftmann@33341
  1454
  "0 \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> z' \<Longrightarrow> nat z = nat z' \<longleftrightarrow> z = z'"
haftmann@33341
  1455
  by (auto elim!: nonneg_eq_int)
haftmann@33341
  1456
haftmann@33341
  1457
lemma nat_power_eq:
haftmann@33341
  1458
  "0 \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> nat (z ^ n) = nat z ^ n"
haftmann@33341
  1459
  by (induct n) (simp_all add: nat_mult_distrib)
haftmann@33341
  1460
haftmann@33320
  1461
lemma zdvd_imp_le: "[| z dvd n; 0 < n |] ==> z \<le> (n::int)"
wenzelm@42676
  1462
  apply (cases n)
haftmann@33320
  1463
  apply (auto simp add: dvd_int_iff)
wenzelm@42676
  1464
  apply (cases z)
haftmann@33320
  1465
  apply (auto simp add: dvd_imp_le)
haftmann@33320
  1466
  done
haftmann@33320
  1467
haftmann@36749
  1468
lemma zdvd_period:
haftmann@36749
  1469
  fixes a d :: int
haftmann@36749
  1470
  assumes "a dvd d"
haftmann@36749
  1471
  shows "a dvd (x + t) \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd ((x + c * d) + t)"
haftmann@36749
  1472
proof -
haftmann@36749
  1473
  from assms obtain k where "d = a * k" by (rule dvdE)
wenzelm@42676
  1474
  show ?thesis
wenzelm@42676
  1475
  proof
haftmann@36749
  1476
    assume "a dvd (x + t)"
haftmann@36749
  1477
    then obtain l where "x + t = a * l" by (rule dvdE)
haftmann@36749
  1478
    then have "x = a * l - t" by simp
wenzelm@60758
  1479
    with \<open>d = a * k\<close> show "a dvd x + c * d + t" by simp
haftmann@36749
  1480
  next
haftmann@36749
  1481
    assume "a dvd x + c * d + t"
haftmann@36749
  1482
    then obtain l where "x + c * d + t = a * l" by (rule dvdE)
haftmann@36749
  1483
    then have "x = a * l - c * d - t" by simp
wenzelm@60758
  1484
    with \<open>d = a * k\<close> show "a dvd (x + t)" by simp
haftmann@36749
  1485
  qed
haftmann@36749
  1486
qed
haftmann@36749
  1487
haftmann@33320
  1488
wenzelm@60758
  1489
subsection \<open>Finiteness of intervals\<close>
bulwahn@46756
  1490
bulwahn@46756
  1491
lemma finite_interval_int1 [iff]: "finite {i :: int. a <= i & i <= b}"
bulwahn@46756
  1492
proof (cases "a <= b")
bulwahn@46756
  1493
  case True
bulwahn@46756
  1494
  from this show ?thesis
bulwahn@46756
  1495
  proof (induct b rule: int_ge_induct)
bulwahn@46756
  1496
    case base
bulwahn@46756
  1497
    have "{i. a <= i & i <= a} = {a}" by auto
bulwahn@46756
  1498
    from this show ?case by simp
bulwahn@46756
  1499
  next
bulwahn@46756
  1500
    case (step b)
bulwahn@46756
  1501
    from this have "{i. a <= i & i <= b + 1} = {i. a <= i & i <= b} \<union> {b + 1}" by auto
bulwahn@46756
  1502
    from this step show ?case by simp
bulwahn@46756
  1503
  qed
bulwahn@46756
  1504
next
bulwahn@46756
  1505
  case False from this show ?thesis
bulwahn@46756
  1506
    by (metis (lifting, no_types) Collect_empty_eq finite.emptyI order_trans)
bulwahn@46756
  1507
qed
bulwahn@46756
  1508
bulwahn@46756
  1509
lemma finite_interval_int2 [iff]: "finite {i :: int. a <= i & i < b}"
bulwahn@46756
  1510
by (rule rev_finite_subset[OF finite_interval_int1[of "a" "b"]]) auto
bulwahn@46756
  1511
bulwahn@46756
  1512
lemma finite_interval_int3 [iff]: "finite {i :: int. a < i & i <= b}"
bulwahn@46756
  1513
by (rule rev_finite_subset[OF finite_interval_int1[of "a" "b"]]) auto
bulwahn@46756
  1514
bulwahn@46756
  1515
lemma finite_interval_int4 [iff]: "finite {i :: int. a < i & i < b}"
bulwahn@46756
  1516
by (rule rev_finite_subset[OF finite_interval_int1[of "a" "b"]]) auto
bulwahn@46756
  1517
bulwahn@46756
  1518
wenzelm@60758
  1519
subsection \<open>Configuration of the code generator\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1520
wenzelm@60758
  1521
text \<open>Constructors\<close>
huffman@47108
  1522
huffman@47108
  1523
definition Pos :: "num \<Rightarrow> int" where
huffman@47108
  1524
  [simp, code_abbrev]: "Pos = numeral"
huffman@47108
  1525
huffman@47108
  1526
definition Neg :: "num \<Rightarrow> int" where
haftmann@54489
  1527
  [simp, code_abbrev]: "Neg n = - (Pos n)"
huffman@47108
  1528
huffman@47108
  1529
code_datatype "0::int" Pos Neg
huffman@47108
  1530
huffman@47108
  1531
wenzelm@60758
  1532
text \<open>Auxiliary operations\<close>
huffman@47108
  1533
huffman@47108
  1534
definition dup :: "int \<Rightarrow> int" where
huffman@47108
  1535
  [simp]: "dup k = k + k"
haftmann@26507
  1536
huffman@47108
  1537
lemma dup_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1538
  "dup 0 = 0"
huffman@47108
  1539
  "dup (Pos n) = Pos (Num.Bit0 n)"
huffman@47108
  1540
  "dup (Neg n) = Neg (Num.Bit0 n)"
haftmann@54489
  1541
  unfolding Pos_def Neg_def
huffman@47108
  1542
  by (simp_all add: numeral_Bit0)
huffman@47108
  1543
huffman@47108
  1544
definition sub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> int" where
huffman@47108
  1545
  [simp]: "sub m n = numeral m - numeral n"
haftmann@26507
  1546
huffman@47108
  1547
lemma sub_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1548
  "sub Num.One Num.One = 0"
huffman@47108
  1549
  "sub (Num.Bit0 m) Num.One = Pos (Num.BitM m)"
huffman@47108
  1550
  "sub (Num.Bit1 m) Num.One = Pos (Num.Bit0 m)"
huffman@47108
  1551
  "sub Num.One (Num.Bit0 n) = Neg (Num.BitM n)"
huffman@47108
  1552
  "sub Num.One (Num.Bit1 n) = Neg (Num.Bit0 n)"
huffman@47108
  1553
  "sub (Num.Bit0 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = dup (sub m n)"
huffman@47108
  1554
  "sub (Num.Bit1 m) (Num.Bit1 n) = dup (sub m n)"
huffman@47108
  1555
  "sub (Num.Bit1 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = dup (sub m n) + 1"
huffman@47108
  1556
  "sub (Num.Bit0 m) (Num.Bit1 n) = dup (sub m n) - 1"
haftmann@54489
  1557
  apply (simp_all only: sub_def dup_def numeral.simps Pos_def Neg_def numeral_BitM)
haftmann@54230
  1558
  apply (simp_all only: algebra_simps minus_diff_eq)
haftmann@54230
  1559
  apply (simp_all only: add.commute [of _ "- (numeral n + numeral n)"])
haftmann@54230
  1560
  apply (simp_all only: minus_add add.assoc left_minus)
haftmann@54230
  1561
  done
huffman@47108
  1562
wenzelm@60758
  1563
text \<open>Implementations\<close>
huffman@47108
  1564
huffman@47108
  1565
lemma one_int_code [code, code_unfold]:
huffman@47108
  1566
  "1 = Pos Num.One"
huffman@47108
  1567
  by simp
huffman@47108
  1568
huffman@47108
  1569
lemma plus_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1570
  "k + 0 = (k::int)"
huffman@47108
  1571
  "0 + l = (l::int)"
huffman@47108
  1572
  "Pos m + Pos n = Pos (m + n)"
huffman@47108
  1573
  "Pos m + Neg n = sub m n"
huffman@47108
  1574
  "Neg m + Pos n = sub n m"
huffman@47108
  1575
  "Neg m + Neg n = Neg (m + n)"
huffman@47108
  1576
  by simp_all
haftmann@26507
  1577
huffman@47108
  1578
lemma uminus_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1579
  "uminus 0 = (0::int)"
huffman@47108
  1580
  "uminus (Pos m) = Neg m"
huffman@47108
  1581
  "uminus (Neg m) = Pos m"
huffman@47108
  1582
  by simp_all
huffman@47108
  1583
huffman@47108
  1584
lemma minus_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1585
  "k - 0 = (k::int)"
huffman@47108
  1586
  "0 - l = uminus (l::int)"
huffman@47108
  1587
  "Pos m - Pos n = sub m n"
huffman@47108
  1588
  "Pos m - Neg n = Pos (m + n)"
huffman@47108
  1589
  "Neg m - Pos n = Neg (m + n)"
huffman@47108
  1590
  "Neg m - Neg n = sub n m"
huffman@47108
  1591
  by simp_all
huffman@47108
  1592
huffman@47108
  1593
lemma times_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1594
  "k * 0 = (0::int)"
huffman@47108
  1595
  "0 * l = (0::int)"
huffman@47108
  1596
  "Pos m * Pos n = Pos (m * n)"
huffman@47108
  1597
  "Pos m * Neg n = Neg (m * n)"
huffman@47108
  1598
  "Neg m * Pos n = Neg (m * n)"
huffman@47108
  1599
  "Neg m * Neg n = Pos (m * n)"
huffman@47108
  1600
  by simp_all
haftmann@26507
  1601
haftmann@38857
  1602
instantiation int :: equal
haftmann@26507
  1603
begin
haftmann@26507
  1604
haftmann@37767
  1605
definition
huffman@47108
  1606
  "HOL.equal k l \<longleftrightarrow> k = (l::int)"
haftmann@38857
  1607
wenzelm@61169
  1608
instance
wenzelm@61169
  1609
  by standard (rule equal_int_def)
haftmann@26507
  1610
haftmann@26507
  1611
end
haftmann@26507
  1612
huffman@47108
  1613
lemma equal_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1614
  "HOL.equal 0 (0::int) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1615
  "HOL.equal 0 (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1616
  "HOL.equal 0 (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1617
  "HOL.equal (Pos k) 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1618
  "HOL.equal (Pos k) (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal k l"
huffman@47108
  1619
  "HOL.equal (Pos k) (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1620
  "HOL.equal (Neg k) 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1621
  "HOL.equal (Neg k) (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1622
  "HOL.equal (Neg k) (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal k l"
huffman@47108
  1623
  by (auto simp add: equal)
haftmann@26507
  1624
huffman@47108
  1625
lemma equal_int_refl [code nbe]:
haftmann@38857
  1626
  "HOL.equal (k::int) k \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1627
  by (fact equal_refl)
haftmann@26507
  1628
haftmann@28562
  1629
lemma less_eq_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1630
  "0 \<le> (0::int) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1631
  "0 \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1632
  "0 \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1633
  "Pos k \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1634
  "Pos k \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> k \<le> l"
huffman@47108
  1635
  "Pos k \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1636
  "Neg k \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1637
  "Neg k \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1638
  "Neg k \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> l \<le> k"
huffman@28958
  1639
  by simp_all
haftmann@26507
  1640
haftmann@28562
  1641
lemma less_int_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1642
  "0 < (0::int) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1643
  "0 < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1644
  "0 < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1645
  "Pos k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1646
  "Pos k < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> k < l"
huffman@47108
  1647
  "Pos k < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
huffman@47108
  1648
  "Neg k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1649
  "Neg k < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
huffman@47108
  1650
  "Neg k < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> l < k"
huffman@28958
  1651
  by simp_all
haftmann@25919
  1652
huffman@47108
  1653
lemma nat_code [code]:
huffman@47108
  1654
  "nat (Int.Neg k) = 0"
huffman@47108
  1655
  "nat 0 = 0"
huffman@47108
  1656
  "nat (Int.Pos k) = nat_of_num k"
haftmann@54489
  1657
  by (simp_all add: nat_of_num_numeral)
haftmann@25928
  1658
huffman@47108
  1659
lemma (in ring_1) of_int_code [code]:
haftmann@54489
  1660
  "of_int (Int.Neg k) = - numeral k"
huffman@47108
  1661
  "of_int 0 = 0"
huffman@47108
  1662
  "of_int (Int.Pos k) = numeral k"
huffman@47108
  1663
  by simp_all
haftmann@25919
  1664
huffman@47108
  1665
wenzelm@60758
  1666
text \<open>Serializer setup\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1667
haftmann@52435
  1668
code_identifier
haftmann@52435
  1669
  code_module Int \<rightharpoonup> (SML) Arith and (OCaml) Arith and (Haskell) Arith
haftmann@25919
  1670
haftmann@25919
  1671
quickcheck_params [default_type = int]
haftmann@25919
  1672
huffman@47108
  1673
hide_const (open) Pos Neg sub dup
haftmann@25919
  1674
haftmann@25919
  1675
wenzelm@60758
  1676
subsection \<open>Legacy theorems\<close>
haftmann@25919
  1677
haftmann@25919
  1678
lemmas inj_int = inj_of_nat [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1679
lemmas zadd_int = of_nat_add [where 'a=int, symmetric]
haftmann@25919
  1680
lemmas int_mult = of_nat_mult [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1681
lemmas zmult_int = of_nat_mult [where 'a=int, symmetric]
wenzelm@45607
  1682
lemmas int_eq_0_conv = of_nat_eq_0_iff [where 'a=int and m="n"] for n
haftmann@25919
  1683
lemmas zless_int = of_nat_less_iff [where 'a=int]
wenzelm@45607
  1684
lemmas int_less_0_conv = of_nat_less_0_iff [where 'a=int and m="k"] for k
haftmann@25919
  1685
lemmas zero_less_int_conv = of_nat_0_less_iff [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1686
lemmas zero_zle_int = of_nat_0_le_iff [where 'a=int]
wenzelm@45607
  1687
lemmas int_le_0_conv = of_nat_le_0_iff [where 'a=int and m="n"] for n
haftmann@25919
  1688
lemmas int_0 = of_nat_0 [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1689
lemmas int_1 = of_nat_1 [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1690
lemmas int_Suc = of_nat_Suc [where 'a=int]
huffman@47207
  1691
lemmas int_numeral = of_nat_numeral [where 'a=int]
wenzelm@45607
  1692
lemmas abs_int_eq = abs_of_nat [where 'a=int and n="m"] for m
haftmann@25919
  1693
lemmas of_int_int_eq = of_int_of_nat_eq [where 'a=int]
haftmann@25919
  1694
lemmas zdiff_int = of_nat_diff [where 'a=int, symmetric]
huffman@47255
  1695
lemmas zpower_numeral_even = power_numeral_even [where 'a=int]
huffman@47255
  1696
lemmas zpower_numeral_odd = power_numeral_odd [where 'a=int]
haftmann@30960
  1697
wenzelm@60758
  1698
text \<open>De-register @{text "int"} as a quotient type:\<close>
huffman@48045
  1699
kuncar@53652
  1700
lifting_update int.lifting
kuncar@53652
  1701
lifting_forget int.lifting
huffman@48045
  1702
wenzelm@60758
  1703
text\<open>Also the class for fields with characteristic zero.\<close>
lp15@59667
  1704
class field_char_0 = field + ring_char_0
lp15@59667
  1705
subclass (in linordered_field) field_char_0 ..
lp15@59667
  1706
haftmann@25919
  1707
end