src/HOL/Divides.thy
 author huffman Sun Mar 25 20:15:39 2012 +0200 (2012-03-25) changeset 47108 2a1953f0d20d parent 46560 8e252a608765 child 47134 28c1db43d4d0 permissions -rw-r--r--
merged fork with new numeral representation (see NEWS)
 paulson@3366  1 (* Title: HOL/Divides.thy  paulson@3366  2  Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory  paulson@6865  3  Copyright 1999 University of Cambridge  huffman@18154  4 *)  paulson@3366  5 haftmann@27651  6 header {* The division operators div and mod *}  paulson@3366  7 nipkow@15131  8 theory Divides  haftmann@33318  9 imports Nat_Numeral Nat_Transfer  haftmann@33340  10 uses "~~/src/Provers/Arith/cancel_div_mod.ML"  nipkow@15131  11 begin  paulson@3366  12 haftmann@25942  13 subsection {* Syntactic division operations *}  haftmann@25942  14 haftmann@27651  15 class div = dvd +  haftmann@27540  16  fixes div :: "'a \ 'a \ 'a" (infixl "div" 70)  haftmann@27651  17  and mod :: "'a \ 'a \ 'a" (infixl "mod" 70)  haftmann@27540  18 haftmann@27540  19 haftmann@27651  20 subsection {* Abstract division in commutative semirings. *}  haftmann@25942  21 haftmann@30930  22 class semiring_div = comm_semiring_1_cancel + no_zero_divisors + div +  haftmann@25942  23  assumes mod_div_equality: "a div b * b + a mod b = a"  haftmann@27651  24  and div_by_0 [simp]: "a div 0 = 0"  haftmann@27651  25  and div_0 [simp]: "0 div a = 0"  haftmann@27651  26  and div_mult_self1 [simp]: "b \ 0 \ (a + c * b) div b = c + a div b"  haftmann@30930  27  and div_mult_mult1 [simp]: "c \ 0 \ (c * a) div (c * b) = a div b"  haftmann@25942  28 begin  haftmann@25942  29 haftmann@26100  30 text {* @{const div} and @{const mod} *}  haftmann@26100  31 haftmann@26062  32 lemma mod_div_equality2: "b * (a div b) + a mod b = a"  haftmann@26062  33  unfolding mult_commute [of b]  haftmann@26062  34  by (rule mod_div_equality)  haftmann@26062  35 huffman@29403  36 lemma mod_div_equality': "a mod b + a div b * b = a"  huffman@29403  37  using mod_div_equality [of a b]  huffman@29403  38  by (simp only: add_ac)  huffman@29403  39 haftmann@26062  40 lemma div_mod_equality: "((a div b) * b + a mod b) + c = a + c"  haftmann@30934  41  by (simp add: mod_div_equality)  haftmann@26062  42 haftmann@26062  43 lemma div_mod_equality2: "(b * (a div b) + a mod b) + c = a + c"  haftmann@30934  44  by (simp add: mod_div_equality2)  haftmann@26062  45 haftmann@27651  46 lemma mod_by_0 [simp]: "a mod 0 = a"  haftmann@30934  47  using mod_div_equality [of a zero] by simp  haftmann@27651  48 haftmann@27651  49 lemma mod_0 [simp]: "0 mod a = 0"  haftmann@30934  50  using mod_div_equality [of zero a] div_0 by simp  haftmann@27651  51 haftmann@27651  52 lemma div_mult_self2 [simp]:  haftmann@27651  53  assumes "b \ 0"  haftmann@27651  54  shows "(a + b * c) div b = c + a div b"  haftmann@27651  55  using assms div_mult_self1 [of b a c] by (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@26100  56 haftmann@27651  57 lemma mod_mult_self1 [simp]: "(a + c * b) mod b = a mod b"  haftmann@27651  58 proof (cases "b = 0")  haftmann@27651  59  case True then show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@27651  60 next  haftmann@27651  61  case False  haftmann@27651  62  have "a + c * b = (a + c * b) div b * b + (a + c * b) mod b"  haftmann@27651  63  by (simp add: mod_div_equality)  haftmann@27651  64  also from False div_mult_self1 [of b a c] have  haftmann@27651  65  "\ = (c + a div b) * b + (a + c * b) mod b"  nipkow@29667  66  by (simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@27651  67  finally have "a = a div b * b + (a + c * b) mod b"  haftmann@27651  68  by (simp add: add_commute [of a] add_assoc left_distrib)  haftmann@27651  69  then have "a div b * b + (a + c * b) mod b = a div b * b + a mod b"  haftmann@27651  70  by (simp add: mod_div_equality)  haftmann@27651  71  then show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@27651  72 qed  haftmann@27651  73 haftmann@27651  74 lemma mod_mult_self2 [simp]: "(a + b * c) mod b = a mod b"  haftmann@30934  75  by (simp add: mult_commute [of b])  haftmann@27651  76 haftmann@27651  77 lemma div_mult_self1_is_id [simp]: "b \ 0 \ b * a div b = a"  haftmann@27651  78  using div_mult_self2 [of b 0 a] by simp  haftmann@27651  79 haftmann@27651  80 lemma div_mult_self2_is_id [simp]: "b \ 0 \ a * b div b = a"  haftmann@27651  81  using div_mult_self1 [of b 0 a] by simp  haftmann@27651  82 haftmann@27651  83 lemma mod_mult_self1_is_0 [simp]: "b * a mod b = 0"  haftmann@27651  84  using mod_mult_self2 [of 0 b a] by simp  haftmann@27651  85 haftmann@27651  86 lemma mod_mult_self2_is_0 [simp]: "a * b mod b = 0"  haftmann@27651  87  using mod_mult_self1 [of 0 a b] by simp  haftmann@26062  88 haftmann@27651  89 lemma div_by_1 [simp]: "a div 1 = a"  haftmann@27651  90  using div_mult_self2_is_id [of 1 a] zero_neq_one by simp  haftmann@27651  91 haftmann@27651  92 lemma mod_by_1 [simp]: "a mod 1 = 0"  haftmann@27651  93 proof -  haftmann@27651  94  from mod_div_equality [of a one] div_by_1 have "a + a mod 1 = a" by simp  haftmann@27651  95  then have "a + a mod 1 = a + 0" by simp  haftmann@27651  96  then show ?thesis by (rule add_left_imp_eq)  haftmann@27651  97 qed  haftmann@27651  98 haftmann@27651  99 lemma mod_self [simp]: "a mod a = 0"  haftmann@27651  100  using mod_mult_self2_is_0 [of 1] by simp  haftmann@27651  101 haftmann@27651  102 lemma div_self [simp]: "a \ 0 \ a div a = 1"  haftmann@27651  103  using div_mult_self2_is_id [of _ 1] by simp  haftmann@27651  104 haftmann@27676  105 lemma div_add_self1 [simp]:  haftmann@27651  106  assumes "b \ 0"  haftmann@27651  107  shows "(b + a) div b = a div b + 1"  haftmann@27651  108  using assms div_mult_self1 [of b a 1] by (simp add: add_commute)  haftmann@26062  109 haftmann@27676  110 lemma div_add_self2 [simp]:  haftmann@27651  111  assumes "b \ 0"  haftmann@27651  112  shows "(a + b) div b = a div b + 1"  haftmann@27651  113  using assms div_add_self1 [of b a] by (simp add: add_commute)  haftmann@27651  114 haftmann@27676  115 lemma mod_add_self1 [simp]:  haftmann@27651  116  "(b + a) mod b = a mod b"  haftmann@27651  117  using mod_mult_self1 [of a 1 b] by (simp add: add_commute)  haftmann@27651  118 haftmann@27676  119 lemma mod_add_self2 [simp]:  haftmann@27651  120  "(a + b) mod b = a mod b"  haftmann@27651  121  using mod_mult_self1 [of a 1 b] by simp  haftmann@27651  122 haftmann@27651  123 lemma mod_div_decomp:  haftmann@27651  124  fixes a b  haftmann@27651  125  obtains q r where "q = a div b" and "r = a mod b"  haftmann@27651  126  and "a = q * b + r"  haftmann@27651  127 proof -  haftmann@27651  128  from mod_div_equality have "a = a div b * b + a mod b" by simp  haftmann@27651  129  moreover have "a div b = a div b" ..  haftmann@27651  130  moreover have "a mod b = a mod b" ..  haftmann@27651  131  note that ultimately show thesis by blast  haftmann@27651  132 qed  haftmann@27651  133 bulwahn@45231  134 lemma dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [code]: "a dvd b \ b mod a = 0"  haftmann@25942  135 proof  haftmann@25942  136  assume "b mod a = 0"  haftmann@25942  137  with mod_div_equality [of b a] have "b div a * a = b" by simp  haftmann@25942  138  then have "b = a * (b div a)" unfolding mult_commute ..  haftmann@25942  139  then have "\c. b = a * c" ..  haftmann@25942  140  then show "a dvd b" unfolding dvd_def .  haftmann@25942  141 next  haftmann@25942  142  assume "a dvd b"  haftmann@25942  143  then have "\c. b = a * c" unfolding dvd_def .  haftmann@25942  144  then obtain c where "b = a * c" ..  haftmann@25942  145  then have "b mod a = a * c mod a" by simp  haftmann@25942  146  then have "b mod a = c * a mod a" by (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@27651  147  then show "b mod a = 0" by simp  haftmann@25942  148 qed  haftmann@25942  149 huffman@29403  150 lemma mod_div_trivial [simp]: "a mod b div b = 0"  huffman@29403  151 proof (cases "b = 0")  huffman@29403  152  assume "b = 0"  huffman@29403  153  thus ?thesis by simp  huffman@29403  154 next  huffman@29403  155  assume "b \ 0"  huffman@29403  156  hence "a div b + a mod b div b = (a mod b + a div b * b) div b"  huffman@29403  157  by (rule div_mult_self1 [symmetric])  huffman@29403  158  also have "\ = a div b"  huffman@29403  159  by (simp only: mod_div_equality')  huffman@29403  160  also have "\ = a div b + 0"  huffman@29403  161  by simp  huffman@29403  162  finally show ?thesis  huffman@29403  163  by (rule add_left_imp_eq)  huffman@29403  164 qed  huffman@29403  165 huffman@29403  166 lemma mod_mod_trivial [simp]: "a mod b mod b = a mod b"  huffman@29403  167 proof -  huffman@29403  168  have "a mod b mod b = (a mod b + a div b * b) mod b"  huffman@29403  169  by (simp only: mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29403  170  also have "\ = a mod b"  huffman@29403  171  by (simp only: mod_div_equality')  huffman@29403  172  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29403  173 qed  huffman@29403  174 nipkow@29925  175 lemma dvd_imp_mod_0: "a dvd b \ b mod a = 0"  nipkow@29948  176 by (rule dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[THEN iffD1])  nipkow@29925  177 nipkow@29925  178 lemma dvd_div_mult_self: "a dvd b \ (b div a) * a = b"  nipkow@29925  179 by (subst (2) mod_div_equality [of b a, symmetric]) (simp add:dvd_imp_mod_0)  nipkow@29925  180 haftmann@33274  181 lemma dvd_mult_div_cancel: "a dvd b \ a * (b div a) = b"  haftmann@33274  182 by (drule dvd_div_mult_self) (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@33274  183 nipkow@30052  184 lemma dvd_div_mult: "a dvd b \ (b div a) * c = b * c div a"  nipkow@30052  185 apply (cases "a = 0")  nipkow@30052  186  apply simp  nipkow@30052  187 apply (auto simp: dvd_def mult_assoc)  nipkow@30052  188 done  nipkow@30052  189 nipkow@29925  190 lemma div_dvd_div[simp]:  nipkow@29925  191  "a dvd b \ a dvd c \ (b div a dvd c div a) = (b dvd c)"  nipkow@29925  192 apply (cases "a = 0")  nipkow@29925  193  apply simp  nipkow@29925  194 apply (unfold dvd_def)  nipkow@29925  195 apply auto  nipkow@29925  196  apply(blast intro:mult_assoc[symmetric])  nipkow@44890  197 apply(fastforce simp add: mult_assoc)  nipkow@29925  198 done  nipkow@29925  199 huffman@30078  200 lemma dvd_mod_imp_dvd: "[| k dvd m mod n; k dvd n |] ==> k dvd m"  huffman@30078  201  apply (subgoal_tac "k dvd (m div n) *n + m mod n")  huffman@30078  202  apply (simp add: mod_div_equality)  huffman@30078  203  apply (simp only: dvd_add dvd_mult)  huffman@30078  204  done  huffman@30078  205 huffman@29403  206 text {* Addition respects modular equivalence. *}  huffman@29403  207 huffman@29403  208 lemma mod_add_left_eq: "(a + b) mod c = (a mod c + b) mod c"  huffman@29403  209 proof -  huffman@29403  210  have "(a + b) mod c = (a div c * c + a mod c + b) mod c"  huffman@29403  211  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29403  212  also have "\ = (a mod c + b + a div c * c) mod c"  huffman@29403  213  by (simp only: add_ac)  huffman@29403  214  also have "\ = (a mod c + b) mod c"  huffman@29403  215  by (rule mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29403  216  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29403  217 qed  huffman@29403  218 huffman@29403  219 lemma mod_add_right_eq: "(a + b) mod c = (a + b mod c) mod c"  huffman@29403  220 proof -  huffman@29403  221  have "(a + b) mod c = (a + (b div c * c + b mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  222  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29403  223  also have "\ = (a + b mod c + b div c * c) mod c"  huffman@29403  224  by (simp only: add_ac)  huffman@29403  225  also have "\ = (a + b mod c) mod c"  huffman@29403  226  by (rule mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29403  227  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29403  228 qed  huffman@29403  229 huffman@29403  230 lemma mod_add_eq: "(a + b) mod c = (a mod c + b mod c) mod c"  huffman@29403  231 by (rule trans [OF mod_add_left_eq mod_add_right_eq])  huffman@29403  232 huffman@29403  233 lemma mod_add_cong:  huffman@29403  234  assumes "a mod c = a' mod c"  huffman@29403  235  assumes "b mod c = b' mod c"  huffman@29403  236  shows "(a + b) mod c = (a' + b') mod c"  huffman@29403  237 proof -  huffman@29403  238  have "(a mod c + b mod c) mod c = (a' mod c + b' mod c) mod c"  huffman@29403  239  unfolding assms ..  huffman@29403  240  thus ?thesis  huffman@29403  241  by (simp only: mod_add_eq [symmetric])  huffman@29403  242 qed  huffman@29403  243 haftmann@30923  244 lemma div_add [simp]: "z dvd x \ z dvd y  nipkow@30837  245  \ (x + y) div z = x div z + y div z"  haftmann@30923  246 by (cases "z = 0", simp, unfold dvd_def, auto simp add: algebra_simps)  nipkow@30837  247 huffman@29403  248 text {* Multiplication respects modular equivalence. *}  huffman@29403  249 huffman@29403  250 lemma mod_mult_left_eq: "(a * b) mod c = ((a mod c) * b) mod c"  huffman@29403  251 proof -  huffman@29403  252  have "(a * b) mod c = ((a div c * c + a mod c) * b) mod c"  huffman@29403  253  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29403  254  also have "\ = (a mod c * b + a div c * b * c) mod c"  nipkow@29667  255  by (simp only: algebra_simps)  huffman@29403  256  also have "\ = (a mod c * b) mod c"  huffman@29403  257  by (rule mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29403  258  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29403  259 qed  huffman@29403  260 huffman@29403  261 lemma mod_mult_right_eq: "(a * b) mod c = (a * (b mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  262 proof -  huffman@29403  263  have "(a * b) mod c = (a * (b div c * c + b mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  264  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29403  265  also have "\ = (a * (b mod c) + a * (b div c) * c) mod c"  nipkow@29667  266  by (simp only: algebra_simps)  huffman@29403  267  also have "\ = (a * (b mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  268  by (rule mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29403  269  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29403  270 qed  huffman@29403  271 huffman@29403  272 lemma mod_mult_eq: "(a * b) mod c = ((a mod c) * (b mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  273 by (rule trans [OF mod_mult_left_eq mod_mult_right_eq])  huffman@29403  274 huffman@29403  275 lemma mod_mult_cong:  huffman@29403  276  assumes "a mod c = a' mod c"  huffman@29403  277  assumes "b mod c = b' mod c"  huffman@29403  278  shows "(a * b) mod c = (a' * b') mod c"  huffman@29403  279 proof -  huffman@29403  280  have "(a mod c * (b mod c)) mod c = (a' mod c * (b' mod c)) mod c"  huffman@29403  281  unfolding assms ..  huffman@29403  282  thus ?thesis  huffman@29403  283  by (simp only: mod_mult_eq [symmetric])  huffman@29403  284 qed  huffman@29403  285 huffman@29404  286 lemma mod_mod_cancel:  huffman@29404  287  assumes "c dvd b"  huffman@29404  288  shows "a mod b mod c = a mod c"  huffman@29404  289 proof -  huffman@29404  290  from c dvd b obtain k where "b = c * k"  huffman@29404  291  by (rule dvdE)  huffman@29404  292  have "a mod b mod c = a mod (c * k) mod c"  huffman@29404  293  by (simp only: b = c * k)  huffman@29404  294  also have "\ = (a mod (c * k) + a div (c * k) * k * c) mod c"  huffman@29404  295  by (simp only: mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29404  296  also have "\ = (a div (c * k) * (c * k) + a mod (c * k)) mod c"  huffman@29404  297  by (simp only: add_ac mult_ac)  huffman@29404  298  also have "\ = a mod c"  huffman@29404  299  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29404  300  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29404  301 qed  huffman@29404  302 haftmann@30930  303 lemma div_mult_div_if_dvd:  haftmann@30930  304  "y dvd x \ z dvd w \ (x div y) * (w div z) = (x * w) div (y * z)"  haftmann@30930  305  apply (cases "y = 0", simp)  haftmann@30930  306  apply (cases "z = 0", simp)  haftmann@30930  307  apply (auto elim!: dvdE simp add: algebra_simps)  nipkow@30476  308  apply (subst mult_assoc [symmetric])  nipkow@30476  309  apply (simp add: no_zero_divisors)  haftmann@30930  310  done  haftmann@30930  311 haftmann@35367  312 lemma div_mult_swap:  haftmann@35367  313  assumes "c dvd b"  haftmann@35367  314  shows "a * (b div c) = (a * b) div c"  haftmann@35367  315 proof -  haftmann@35367  316  from assms have "b div c * (a div 1) = b * a div (c * 1)"  haftmann@35367  317  by (simp only: div_mult_div_if_dvd one_dvd)  haftmann@35367  318  then show ?thesis by (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@35367  319 qed  haftmann@35367  320   haftmann@30930  321 lemma div_mult_mult2 [simp]:  haftmann@30930  322  "c \ 0 \ (a * c) div (b * c) = a div b"  haftmann@30930  323  by (drule div_mult_mult1) (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@30930  324 haftmann@30930  325 lemma div_mult_mult1_if [simp]:  haftmann@30930  326  "(c * a) div (c * b) = (if c = 0 then 0 else a div b)"  haftmann@30930  327  by simp_all  nipkow@30476  328 haftmann@30930  329 lemma mod_mult_mult1:  haftmann@30930  330  "(c * a) mod (c * b) = c * (a mod b)"  haftmann@30930  331 proof (cases "c = 0")  haftmann@30930  332  case True then show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@30930  333 next  haftmann@30930  334  case False  haftmann@30930  335  from mod_div_equality  haftmann@30930  336  have "((c * a) div (c * b)) * (c * b) + (c * a) mod (c * b) = c * a" .  haftmann@30930  337  with False have "c * ((a div b) * b + a mod b) + (c * a) mod (c * b)  haftmann@30930  338  = c * a + c * (a mod b)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@30930  339  with mod_div_equality show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@30930  340 qed  haftmann@30930  341   haftmann@30930  342 lemma mod_mult_mult2:  haftmann@30930  343  "(a * c) mod (b * c) = (a mod b) * c"  haftmann@30930  344  using mod_mult_mult1 [of c a b] by (simp add: mult_commute)  haftmann@30930  345 huffman@31662  346 lemma dvd_mod: "k dvd m \ k dvd n \ k dvd (m mod n)"  huffman@31662  347  unfolding dvd_def by (auto simp add: mod_mult_mult1)  huffman@31662  348 huffman@31662  349 lemma dvd_mod_iff: "k dvd n \ k dvd (m mod n) \ k dvd m"  huffman@31662  350 by (blast intro: dvd_mod_imp_dvd dvd_mod)  huffman@31662  351 haftmann@31009  352 lemma div_power:  huffman@31661  353  "y dvd x \ (x div y) ^ n = x ^ n div y ^ n"  nipkow@30476  354 apply (induct n)  nipkow@30476  355  apply simp  nipkow@30476  356 apply(simp add: div_mult_div_if_dvd dvd_power_same)  nipkow@30476  357 done  nipkow@30476  358 haftmann@35367  359 lemma dvd_div_eq_mult:  haftmann@35367  360  assumes "a \ 0" and "a dvd b"  haftmann@35367  361  shows "b div a = c \ b = c * a"  haftmann@35367  362 proof  haftmann@35367  363  assume "b = c * a"  haftmann@35367  364  then show "b div a = c" by (simp add: assms)  haftmann@35367  365 next  haftmann@35367  366  assume "b div a = c"  haftmann@35367  367  then have "b div a * a = c * a" by simp  haftmann@35367  368  moreover from a dvd b have "b div a * a = b" by (simp add: dvd_div_mult_self)  haftmann@35367  369  ultimately show "b = c * a" by simp  haftmann@35367  370 qed  haftmann@35367  371   haftmann@35367  372 lemma dvd_div_div_eq_mult:  haftmann@35367  373  assumes "a \ 0" "c \ 0" and "a dvd b" "c dvd d"  haftmann@35367  374  shows "b div a = d div c \ b * c = a * d"  haftmann@35367  375  using assms by (auto simp add: mult_commute [of _ a] dvd_div_mult_self dvd_div_eq_mult div_mult_swap intro: sym)  haftmann@35367  376 huffman@31661  377 end  huffman@31661  378 haftmann@35673  379 class ring_div = semiring_div + comm_ring_1  huffman@29405  380 begin  huffman@29405  381 haftmann@36634  382 subclass ring_1_no_zero_divisors ..  haftmann@36634  383 huffman@29405  384 text {* Negation respects modular equivalence. *}  huffman@29405  385 huffman@29405  386 lemma mod_minus_eq: "(- a) mod b = (- (a mod b)) mod b"  huffman@29405  387 proof -  huffman@29405  388  have "(- a) mod b = (- (a div b * b + a mod b)) mod b"  huffman@29405  389  by (simp only: mod_div_equality)  huffman@29405  390  also have "\ = (- (a mod b) + - (a div b) * b) mod b"  huffman@29405  391  by (simp only: minus_add_distrib minus_mult_left add_ac)  huffman@29405  392  also have "\ = (- (a mod b)) mod b"  huffman@29405  393  by (rule mod_mult_self1)  huffman@29405  394  finally show ?thesis .  huffman@29405  395 qed  huffman@29405  396 huffman@29405  397 lemma mod_minus_cong:  huffman@29405  398  assumes "a mod b = a' mod b"  huffman@29405  399  shows "(- a) mod b = (- a') mod b"  huffman@29405  400 proof -  huffman@29405  401  have "(- (a mod b)) mod b = (- (a' mod b)) mod b"  huffman@29405  402  unfolding assms ..  huffman@29405  403  thus ?thesis  huffman@29405  404  by (simp only: mod_minus_eq [symmetric])  huffman@29405  405 qed  huffman@29405  406 huffman@29405  407 text {* Subtraction respects modular equivalence. *}  huffman@29405  408 huffman@29405  409 lemma mod_diff_left_eq: "(a - b) mod c = (a mod c - b) mod c"  huffman@29405  410  unfolding diff_minus  huffman@29405  411  by (intro mod_add_cong mod_minus_cong) simp_all  huffman@29405  412 huffman@29405  413 lemma mod_diff_right_eq: "(a - b) mod c = (a - b mod c) mod c"  huffman@29405  414  unfolding diff_minus  huffman@29405  415  by (intro mod_add_cong mod_minus_cong) simp_all  huffman@29405  416 huffman@29405  417 lemma mod_diff_eq: "(a - b) mod c = (a mod c - b mod c) mod c"  huffman@29405  418  unfolding diff_minus  huffman@29405  419  by (intro mod_add_cong mod_minus_cong) simp_all  huffman@29405  420 huffman@29405  421 lemma mod_diff_cong:  huffman@29405  422  assumes "a mod c = a' mod c"  huffman@29405  423  assumes "b mod c = b' mod c"  huffman@29405  424  shows "(a - b) mod c = (a' - b') mod c"  huffman@29405  425  unfolding diff_minus using assms  huffman@29405  426  by (intro mod_add_cong mod_minus_cong)  huffman@29405  427 nipkow@30180  428 lemma dvd_neg_div: "y dvd x \ -x div y = - (x div y)"  nipkow@30180  429 apply (case_tac "y = 0") apply simp  nipkow@30180  430 apply (auto simp add: dvd_def)  nipkow@30180  431 apply (subgoal_tac "-(y * k) = y * - k")  nipkow@30180  432  apply (erule ssubst)  nipkow@30180  433  apply (erule div_mult_self1_is_id)  nipkow@30180  434 apply simp  nipkow@30180  435 done  nipkow@30180  436 nipkow@30180  437 lemma dvd_div_neg: "y dvd x \ x div -y = - (x div y)"  nipkow@30180  438 apply (case_tac "y = 0") apply simp  nipkow@30180  439 apply (auto simp add: dvd_def)  nipkow@30180  440 apply (subgoal_tac "y * k = -y * -k")  nipkow@30180  441  apply (erule ssubst)  nipkow@30180  442  apply (rule div_mult_self1_is_id)  nipkow@30180  443  apply simp  nipkow@30180  444 apply simp  nipkow@30180  445 done  nipkow@30180  446 huffman@29405  447 end  huffman@29405  448 haftmann@25942  449 haftmann@26100  450 subsection {* Division on @{typ nat} *}  haftmann@26100  451 haftmann@26100  452 text {*  haftmann@26100  453  We define @{const div} and @{const mod} on @{typ nat} by means  haftmann@26100  454  of a characteristic relation with two input arguments  haftmann@26100  455  @{term "m\nat"}, @{term "n\nat"} and two output arguments  haftmann@26100  456  @{term "q\nat"}(uotient) and @{term "r\nat"}(emainder).  haftmann@26100  457 *}  haftmann@26100  458 haftmann@33340  459 definition divmod_nat_rel :: "nat \ nat \ nat \ nat \ bool" where  haftmann@33340  460  "divmod_nat_rel m n qr \  haftmann@30923  461  m = fst qr * n + snd qr \  haftmann@30923  462  (if n = 0 then fst qr = 0 else if n > 0 then 0 \ snd qr \ snd qr < n else n < snd qr \ snd qr \ 0)"  haftmann@26100  463 haftmann@33340  464 text {* @{const divmod_nat_rel} is total: *}  haftmann@26100  465 haftmann@33340  466 lemma divmod_nat_rel_ex:  haftmann@33340  467  obtains q r where "divmod_nat_rel m n (q, r)"  haftmann@26100  468 proof (cases "n = 0")  haftmann@30923  469  case True with that show thesis  haftmann@33340  470  by (auto simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  haftmann@26100  471 next  haftmann@26100  472  case False  haftmann@26100  473  have "\q r. m = q * n + r \ r < n"  haftmann@26100  474  proof (induct m)  haftmann@26100  475  case 0 with n \ 0  haftmann@26100  476  have "(0\nat) = 0 * n + 0 \ 0 < n" by simp  haftmann@26100  477  then show ?case by blast  haftmann@26100  478  next  haftmann@26100  479  case (Suc m) then obtain q' r'  haftmann@26100  480  where m: "m = q' * n + r'" and n: "r' < n" by auto  haftmann@26100  481  then show ?case proof (cases "Suc r' < n")  haftmann@26100  482  case True  haftmann@26100  483  from m n have "Suc m = q' * n + Suc r'" by simp  haftmann@26100  484  with True show ?thesis by blast  haftmann@26100  485  next  haftmann@26100  486  case False then have "n \ Suc r'" by auto  haftmann@26100  487  moreover from n have "Suc r' \ n" by auto  haftmann@26100  488  ultimately have "n = Suc r'" by auto  haftmann@26100  489  with m have "Suc m = Suc q' * n + 0" by simp  haftmann@26100  490  with n \ 0 show ?thesis by blast  haftmann@26100  491  qed  haftmann@26100  492  qed  haftmann@26100  493  with that show thesis  haftmann@33340  494  using n \ 0 by (auto simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  haftmann@26100  495 qed  haftmann@26100  496 haftmann@33340  497 text {* @{const divmod_nat_rel} is injective: *}  haftmann@26100  498 haftmann@33340  499 lemma divmod_nat_rel_unique:  haftmann@33340  500  assumes "divmod_nat_rel m n qr"  haftmann@33340  501  and "divmod_nat_rel m n qr'"  haftmann@30923  502  shows "qr = qr'"  haftmann@26100  503 proof (cases "n = 0")  haftmann@26100  504  case True with assms show ?thesis  haftmann@30923  505  by (cases qr, cases qr')  haftmann@33340  506  (simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  haftmann@26100  507 next  haftmann@26100  508  case False  haftmann@26100  509  have aux: "\q r q' r'. q' * n + r' = q * n + r \ r < n \ q' \ (q\nat)"  haftmann@26100  510  apply (rule leI)  haftmann@26100  511  apply (subst less_iff_Suc_add)  haftmann@26100  512  apply (auto simp add: add_mult_distrib)  haftmann@26100  513  done  haftmann@30923  514  from n \ 0 assms have "fst qr = fst qr'"  haftmann@33340  515  by (auto simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def intro: order_antisym dest: aux sym)  haftmann@30923  516  moreover from this assms have "snd qr = snd qr'"  haftmann@33340  517  by (simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  haftmann@30923  518  ultimately show ?thesis by (cases qr, cases qr') simp  haftmann@26100  519 qed  haftmann@26100  520 haftmann@26100  521 text {*  haftmann@26100  522  We instantiate divisibility on the natural numbers by  haftmann@33340  523  means of @{const divmod_nat_rel}:  haftmann@26100  524 *}  haftmann@25942  525 haftmann@33340  526 definition divmod_nat :: "nat \ nat \ nat \ nat" where  haftmann@37767  527  "divmod_nat m n = (THE qr. divmod_nat_rel m n qr)"  haftmann@30923  528 haftmann@33340  529 lemma divmod_nat_rel_divmod_nat:  haftmann@33340  530  "divmod_nat_rel m n (divmod_nat m n)"  haftmann@30923  531 proof -  haftmann@33340  532  from divmod_nat_rel_ex  haftmann@33340  533  obtain qr where rel: "divmod_nat_rel m n qr" .  haftmann@30923  534  then show ?thesis  haftmann@33340  535  by (auto simp add: divmod_nat_def intro: theI elim: divmod_nat_rel_unique)  haftmann@30923  536 qed  haftmann@30923  537 haftmann@33340  538 lemma divmod_nat_eq:  haftmann@33340  539  assumes "divmod_nat_rel m n qr"  haftmann@33340  540  shows "divmod_nat m n = qr"  haftmann@33340  541  using assms by (auto intro: divmod_nat_rel_unique divmod_nat_rel_divmod_nat)  haftmann@26100  542 huffman@46551  543 instantiation nat :: semiring_div  huffman@46551  544 begin  huffman@46551  545 haftmann@26100  546 definition div_nat where  haftmann@33340  547  "m div n = fst (divmod_nat m n)"  haftmann@26100  548 huffman@46551  549 lemma fst_divmod_nat [simp]:  huffman@46551  550  "fst (divmod_nat m n) = m div n"  huffman@46551  551  by (simp add: div_nat_def)  huffman@46551  552 haftmann@26100  553 definition mod_nat where  haftmann@33340  554  "m mod n = snd (divmod_nat m n)"  haftmann@25571  555 huffman@46551  556 lemma snd_divmod_nat [simp]:  huffman@46551  557  "snd (divmod_nat m n) = m mod n"  huffman@46551  558  by (simp add: mod_nat_def)  huffman@46551  559 haftmann@33340  560 lemma divmod_nat_div_mod:  haftmann@33340  561  "divmod_nat m n = (m div n, m mod n)"  huffman@46551  562  by (simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@26100  563 haftmann@26100  564 lemma div_eq:  haftmann@33340  565  assumes "divmod_nat_rel m n (q, r)"  haftmann@26100  566  shows "m div n = q"  huffman@46551  567  using assms by (auto dest!: divmod_nat_eq simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@26100  568 haftmann@26100  569 lemma mod_eq:  haftmann@33340  570  assumes "divmod_nat_rel m n (q, r)"  haftmann@26100  571  shows "m mod n = r"  huffman@46551  572  using assms by (auto dest!: divmod_nat_eq simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@25571  573 haftmann@33340  574 lemma divmod_nat_rel: "divmod_nat_rel m n (m div n, m mod n)"  huffman@46551  575  using divmod_nat_rel_divmod_nat by (simp add: divmod_nat_div_mod)  paulson@14267  576 haftmann@33340  577 lemma divmod_nat_zero:  haftmann@33340  578  "divmod_nat m 0 = (0, m)"  haftmann@26100  579 proof -  haftmann@33340  580  from divmod_nat_rel [of m 0] show ?thesis  haftmann@33340  581  unfolding divmod_nat_div_mod divmod_nat_rel_def by simp  haftmann@26100  582 qed  haftmann@25942  583 haftmann@33340  584 lemma divmod_nat_base:  haftmann@26100  585  assumes "m < n"  haftmann@33340  586  shows "divmod_nat m n = (0, m)"  haftmann@26100  587 proof -  haftmann@33340  588  from divmod_nat_rel [of m n] show ?thesis  haftmann@33340  589  unfolding divmod_nat_div_mod divmod_nat_rel_def  haftmann@26100  590  using assms by (cases "m div n = 0")  haftmann@26100  591  (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc [of "m div n"])  haftmann@26100  592 qed  haftmann@25942  593 haftmann@33340  594 lemma divmod_nat_step:  haftmann@26100  595  assumes "0 < n" and "n \ m"  haftmann@33340  596  shows "divmod_nat m n = (Suc ((m - n) div n), (m - n) mod n)"  haftmann@26100  597 proof -  haftmann@33340  598  from divmod_nat_rel have divmod_nat_m_n: "divmod_nat_rel m n (m div n, m mod n)" .  haftmann@26100  599  with assms have m_div_n: "m div n \ 1"  haftmann@33340  600  by (cases "m div n") (auto simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  boehmes@35815  601  have "divmod_nat_rel (m - n) n (m div n - Suc 0, m mod n)"  boehmes@35815  602  proof -  boehmes@35815  603  from assms have  boehmes@35815  604  "n \ 0"  boehmes@35815  605  "\k. m = Suc k * n + m mod n ==> m - n = (Suc k - Suc 0) * n + m mod n"  boehmes@35815  606  by simp_all  boehmes@35815  607  then show ?thesis using assms divmod_nat_m_n  boehmes@35815  608  by (cases "m div n")  boehmes@35815  609  (simp_all only: divmod_nat_rel_def fst_conv snd_conv, simp_all)  boehmes@35815  610  qed  haftmann@33340  611  with divmod_nat_eq have "divmod_nat (m - n) n = (m div n - Suc 0, m mod n)" by simp  haftmann@33340  612  moreover from divmod_nat_div_mod have "divmod_nat (m - n) n = ((m - n) div n, (m - n) mod n)" .  haftmann@26100  613  ultimately have "m div n = Suc ((m - n) div n)"  haftmann@26100  614  and "m mod n = (m - n) mod n" using m_div_n by simp_all  haftmann@33340  615  then show ?thesis using divmod_nat_div_mod by simp  haftmann@26100  616 qed  haftmann@25942  617 wenzelm@26300  618 text {* The ''recursion'' equations for @{const div} and @{const mod} *}  haftmann@26100  619 haftmann@26100  620 lemma div_less [simp]:  haftmann@26100  621  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  622  assumes "m < n"  haftmann@26100  623  shows "m div n = 0"  huffman@46551  624  using assms divmod_nat_base by (simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@25942  625 haftmann@26100  626 lemma le_div_geq:  haftmann@26100  627  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  628  assumes "0 < n" and "n \ m"  haftmann@26100  629  shows "m div n = Suc ((m - n) div n)"  huffman@46551  630  using assms divmod_nat_step by (simp add: prod_eq_iff)  paulson@14267  631 haftmann@26100  632 lemma mod_less [simp]:  haftmann@26100  633  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  634  assumes "m < n"  haftmann@26100  635  shows "m mod n = m"  huffman@46551  636  using assms divmod_nat_base by (simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@26100  637 haftmann@26100  638 lemma le_mod_geq:  haftmann@26100  639  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  640  assumes "n \ m"  haftmann@26100  641  shows "m mod n = (m - n) mod n"  huffman@46551  642  using assms divmod_nat_step by (cases "n = 0") (simp_all add: prod_eq_iff)  paulson@14267  643 haftmann@30930  644 instance proof -  haftmann@30930  645  have [simp]: "\n::nat. n div 0 = 0"  haftmann@33340  646  by (simp add: div_nat_def divmod_nat_zero)  haftmann@30930  647  have [simp]: "\n::nat. 0 div n = 0"  haftmann@30930  648  proof -  haftmann@30930  649  fix n :: nat  haftmann@30930  650  show "0 div n = 0"  haftmann@30930  651  by (cases "n = 0") simp_all  haftmann@30930  652  qed  haftmann@30930  653  show "OFCLASS(nat, semiring_div_class)" proof  haftmann@30930  654  fix m n :: nat  haftmann@30930  655  show "m div n * n + m mod n = m"  haftmann@33340  656  using divmod_nat_rel [of m n] by (simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def)  haftmann@30930  657  next  haftmann@30930  658  fix m n q :: nat  haftmann@30930  659  assume "n \ 0"  haftmann@30930  660  then show "(q + m * n) div n = m + q div n"  haftmann@30930  661  by (induct m) (simp_all add: le_div_geq)  haftmann@30930  662  next  haftmann@30930  663  fix m n q :: nat  haftmann@30930  664  assume "m \ 0"  haftmann@30930  665  then show "(m * n) div (m * q) = n div q"  haftmann@30930  666  proof (cases "n \ 0 \ q \ 0")  haftmann@30930  667  case False then show ?thesis by auto  haftmann@30930  668  next  haftmann@30930  669  case True with m \ 0  haftmann@30930  670  have "m > 0" and "n > 0" and "q > 0" by auto  haftmann@33340  671  then have "\a b. divmod_nat_rel n q (a, b) \ divmod_nat_rel (m * n) (m * q) (a, m * b)"  haftmann@33340  672  by (auto simp add: divmod_nat_rel_def) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33340  673  moreover from divmod_nat_rel have "divmod_nat_rel n q (n div q, n mod q)" .  haftmann@33340  674  ultimately have "divmod_nat_rel (m * n) (m * q) (n div q, m * (n mod q))" .  haftmann@30930  675  then show ?thesis by (simp add: div_eq)  haftmann@30930  676  qed  haftmann@30930  677  qed simp_all  haftmann@25942  678 qed  haftmann@26100  679 haftmann@25942  680 end  paulson@14267  681 haftmann@33361  682 lemma divmod_nat_if [code]: "divmod_nat m n = (if n = 0 \ m < n then (0, m) else  haftmann@33361  683  let (q, r) = divmod_nat (m - n) n in (Suc q, r))"  huffman@46551  684  by (simp add: prod_eq_iff prod_case_beta not_less le_div_geq le_mod_geq)  haftmann@33361  685 haftmann@26100  686 text {* Simproc for cancelling @{const div} and @{const mod} *}  haftmann@25942  687 haftmann@30934  688 ML {*  wenzelm@43594  689 structure Cancel_Div_Mod_Nat = Cancel_Div_Mod  wenzelm@41550  690 (  haftmann@30934  691  val div_name = @{const_name div};  haftmann@30934  692  val mod_name = @{const_name mod};  haftmann@30934  693  val mk_binop = HOLogic.mk_binop;  haftmann@30934  694  val mk_sum = Nat_Arith.mk_sum;  haftmann@30934  695  val dest_sum = Nat_Arith.dest_sum;  haftmann@25942  696 haftmann@30934  697  val div_mod_eqs = map mk_meta_eq [@{thm div_mod_equality}, @{thm div_mod_equality2}];  paulson@14267  698 haftmann@30934  699  val prove_eq_sums = Arith_Data.prove_conv2 all_tac (Arith_Data.simp_all_tac  haftmann@35050  700  (@{thm add_0_left} :: @{thm add_0_right} :: @{thms add_ac}))  wenzelm@41550  701 )  haftmann@25942  702 *}  haftmann@25942  703 wenzelm@43594  704 simproc_setup cancel_div_mod_nat ("(m::nat) + n") = {* K Cancel_Div_Mod_Nat.proc *}  wenzelm@43594  705 haftmann@26100  706 haftmann@26100  707 subsubsection {* Quotient *}  haftmann@26100  708 haftmann@26100  709 lemma div_geq: "0 < n \ \ m < n \ m div n = Suc ((m - n) div n)"  nipkow@29667  710 by (simp add: le_div_geq linorder_not_less)  haftmann@26100  711 haftmann@26100  712 lemma div_if: "0 < n \ m div n = (if m < n then 0 else Suc ((m - n) div n))"  nipkow@29667  713 by (simp add: div_geq)  haftmann@26100  714 haftmann@26100  715 lemma div_mult_self_is_m [simp]: "0 (m*n) div n = (m::nat)"  nipkow@29667  716 by simp  haftmann@26100  717 haftmann@26100  718 lemma div_mult_self1_is_m [simp]: "0 (n*m) div n = (m::nat)"  nipkow@29667  719 by simp  haftmann@26100  720 haftmann@25942  721 haftmann@25942  722 subsubsection {* Remainder *}  haftmann@25942  723 haftmann@26100  724 lemma mod_less_divisor [simp]:  haftmann@26100  725  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  726  assumes "n > 0"  haftmann@26100  727  shows "m mod n < (n::nat)"  haftmann@33340  728  using assms divmod_nat_rel [of m n] unfolding divmod_nat_rel_def by auto  paulson@14267  729 haftmann@26100  730 lemma mod_less_eq_dividend [simp]:  haftmann@26100  731  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@26100  732  shows "m mod n \ m"  haftmann@26100  733 proof (rule add_leD2)  haftmann@26100  734  from mod_div_equality have "m div n * n + m mod n = m" .  haftmann@26100  735  then show "m div n * n + m mod n \ m" by auto  haftmann@26100  736 qed  haftmann@26100  737 haftmann@26100  738 lemma mod_geq: "\ m < (n\nat) \ m mod n = (m - n) mod n"  nipkow@29667  739 by (simp add: le_mod_geq linorder_not_less)  paulson@14267  740 haftmann@26100  741 lemma mod_if: "m mod (n\nat) = (if m < n then m else (m - n) mod n)"  nipkow@29667  742 by (simp add: le_mod_geq)  haftmann@26100  743 paulson@14267  744 lemma mod_1 [simp]: "m mod Suc 0 = 0"  nipkow@29667  745 by (induct m) (simp_all add: mod_geq)  paulson@14267  746 haftmann@26100  747 lemma mod_mult_distrib: "(m mod n) * (k\nat) = (m * k) mod (n * k)"  wenzelm@22718  748  apply (cases "n = 0", simp)  wenzelm@22718  749  apply (cases "k = 0", simp)  wenzelm@22718  750  apply (induct m rule: nat_less_induct)  wenzelm@22718  751  apply (subst mod_if, simp)  wenzelm@22718  752  apply (simp add: mod_geq diff_mult_distrib)  wenzelm@22718  753  done  paulson@14267  754 paulson@14267  755 lemma mod_mult_distrib2: "(k::nat) * (m mod n) = (k*m) mod (k*n)"  nipkow@29667  756 by (simp add: mult_commute [of k] mod_mult_distrib)  paulson@14267  757 paulson@14267  758 (* a simple rearrangement of mod_div_equality: *)  paulson@14267  759 lemma mult_div_cancel: "(n::nat) * (m div n) = m - (m mod n)"  nipkow@29667  760 by (cut_tac a = m and b = n in mod_div_equality2, arith)  paulson@14267  761 nipkow@15439  762 lemma mod_le_divisor[simp]: "0 < n \ m mod n \ (n::nat)"  wenzelm@22718  763  apply (drule mod_less_divisor [where m = m])  wenzelm@22718  764  apply simp  wenzelm@22718  765  done  paulson@14267  766 haftmann@26100  767 subsubsection {* Quotient and Remainder *}  paulson@14267  768 haftmann@33340  769 lemma divmod_nat_rel_mult1_eq:  bulwahn@46552  770  "divmod_nat_rel b c (q, r)  haftmann@33340  771  \ divmod_nat_rel (a * b) c (a * q + a * r div c, a * r mod c)"  haftmann@33340  772 by (auto simp add: split_ifs divmod_nat_rel_def algebra_simps)  paulson@14267  773 haftmann@30923  774 lemma div_mult1_eq:  haftmann@30923  775  "(a * b) div c = a * (b div c) + a * (b mod c) div (c::nat)"  bulwahn@46552  776 by (blast intro: divmod_nat_rel [THEN divmod_nat_rel_mult1_eq, THEN div_eq])  paulson@14267  777 haftmann@33340  778 lemma divmod_nat_rel_add1_eq:  bulwahn@46552  779  "divmod_nat_rel a c (aq, ar) \ divmod_nat_rel b c (bq, br)  haftmann@33340  780  \ divmod_nat_rel (a + b) c (aq + bq + (ar + br) div c, (ar + br) mod c)"  haftmann@33340  781 by (auto simp add: split_ifs divmod_nat_rel_def algebra_simps)  paulson@14267  782 paulson@14267  783 (*NOT suitable for rewriting: the RHS has an instance of the LHS*)  paulson@14267  784 lemma div_add1_eq:  nipkow@25134  785  "(a+b) div (c::nat) = a div c + b div c + ((a mod c + b mod c) div c)"  bulwahn@46552  786 by (blast intro: divmod_nat_rel_add1_eq [THEN div_eq] divmod_nat_rel)  paulson@14267  787 paulson@14267  788 lemma mod_lemma: "[| (0::nat) < c; r < b |] ==> b * (q mod c) + r < b * c"  wenzelm@22718  789  apply (cut_tac m = q and n = c in mod_less_divisor)  wenzelm@22718  790  apply (drule_tac [2] m = "q mod c" in less_imp_Suc_add, auto)  wenzelm@22718  791  apply (erule_tac P = "%x. ?lhs < ?rhs x" in ssubst)  wenzelm@22718  792  apply (simp add: add_mult_distrib2)  wenzelm@22718  793  done  paulson@10559  794 haftmann@33340  795 lemma divmod_nat_rel_mult2_eq:  bulwahn@46552  796  "divmod_nat_rel a b (q, r)  haftmann@33340  797  \ divmod_nat_rel a (b * c) (q div c, b *(q mod c) + r)"  haftmann@33340  798 by (auto simp add: mult_ac divmod_nat_rel_def add_mult_distrib2 [symmetric] mod_lemma)  paulson@14267  799 paulson@14267  800 lemma div_mult2_eq: "a div (b*c) = (a div b) div (c::nat)"  bulwahn@46552  801 by (force simp add: divmod_nat_rel [THEN divmod_nat_rel_mult2_eq, THEN div_eq])  paulson@14267  802 paulson@14267  803 lemma mod_mult2_eq: "a mod (b*c) = b*(a div b mod c) + a mod (b::nat)"  bulwahn@46552  804 by (auto simp add: mult_commute divmod_nat_rel [THEN divmod_nat_rel_mult2_eq, THEN mod_eq])  paulson@14267  805 paulson@14267  806 huffman@46551  807 subsubsection {* Further Facts about Quotient and Remainder *}  paulson@14267  808 paulson@14267  809 lemma div_1 [simp]: "m div Suc 0 = m"  nipkow@29667  810 by (induct m) (simp_all add: div_geq)  paulson@14267  811 paulson@14267  812 (* Monotonicity of div in first argument *)  haftmann@30923  813 lemma div_le_mono [rule_format (no_asm)]:  wenzelm@22718  814  "\m::nat. m \ n --> (m div k) \ (n div k)"  paulson@14267  815 apply (case_tac "k=0", simp)  paulson@15251  816 apply (induct "n" rule: nat_less_induct, clarify)  paulson@14267  817 apply (case_tac "n= k *)  paulson@14267  821 apply (case_tac "m=k *)  nipkow@15439  825 apply (simp add: div_geq diff_le_mono)  paulson@14267  826 done  paulson@14267  827 paulson@14267  828 (* Antimonotonicity of div in second argument *)  paulson@14267  829 lemma div_le_mono2: "!!m::nat. [| 0n |] ==> (k div n) \ (k div m)"  paulson@14267  830 apply (subgoal_tac "0 (k-m) div n")  paulson@14267  839  prefer 2  paulson@14267  840  apply (blast intro: div_le_mono diff_le_mono2)  paulson@14267  841 apply (rule le_trans, simp)  nipkow@15439  842 apply (simp)  paulson@14267  843 done  paulson@14267  844 paulson@14267  845 lemma div_le_dividend [simp]: "m div n \ (m::nat)"  paulson@14267  846 apply (case_tac "n=0", simp)  paulson@14267  847 apply (subgoal_tac "m div n \ m div 1", simp)  paulson@14267  848 apply (rule div_le_mono2)  paulson@14267  849 apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp))  paulson@14267  850 done  paulson@14267  851 wenzelm@22718  852 (* Similar for "less than" *)  paulson@17085  853 lemma div_less_dividend [rule_format]:  paulson@14267  854  "!!n::nat. 1 0 < m --> m div n < m"  paulson@15251  855 apply (induct_tac m rule: nat_less_induct)  paulson@14267  856 apply (rename_tac "m")  paulson@14267  857 apply (case_tac "m Suc(na) *)  paulson@16796  878 apply (simp add: linorder_not_less le_Suc_eq mod_geq)  nipkow@15439  879 apply (auto simp add: Suc_diff_le le_mod_geq)  paulson@14267  880 done  paulson@14267  881 paulson@14267  882 lemma mod_eq_0_iff: "(m mod d = 0) = (\q::nat. m = d*q)"  nipkow@29667  883 by (auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [symmetric] dvd_def)  paulson@17084  884 wenzelm@22718  885 lemmas mod_eq_0D [dest!] = mod_eq_0_iff [THEN iffD1]  paulson@14267  886 paulson@14267  887 (*Loses information, namely we also have r \q::nat. m = r + q*d"  haftmann@27651  889  apply (cut_tac a = m in mod_div_equality)  wenzelm@22718  890  apply (simp only: add_ac)  wenzelm@22718  891  apply (blast intro: sym)  wenzelm@22718  892  done  paulson@14267  893 nipkow@13152  894 lemma split_div:  nipkow@13189  895  "P(n div k :: nat) =  nipkow@13189  896  ((k = 0 \ P 0) \ (k \ 0 \ (!i. !j P i)))"  nipkow@13189  897  (is "?P = ?Q" is "_ = (_ \ (_ \ ?R))")  nipkow@13189  898 proof  nipkow@13189  899  assume P: ?P  nipkow@13189  900  show ?Q  nipkow@13189  901  proof (cases)  nipkow@13189  902  assume "k = 0"  haftmann@27651  903  with P show ?Q by simp  nipkow@13189  904  next  nipkow@13189  905  assume not0: "k \ 0"  nipkow@13189  906  thus ?Q  nipkow@13189  907  proof (simp, intro allI impI)  nipkow@13189  908  fix i j  nipkow@13189  909  assume n: "n = k*i + j" and j: "j < k"  nipkow@13189  910  show "P i"  nipkow@13189  911  proof (cases)  wenzelm@22718  912  assume "i = 0"  wenzelm@22718  913  with n j P show "P i" by simp  nipkow@13189  914  next  wenzelm@22718  915  assume "i \ 0"  wenzelm@22718  916  with not0 n j P show "P i" by(simp add:add_ac)  nipkow@13189  917  qed  nipkow@13189  918  qed  nipkow@13189  919  qed  nipkow@13189  920 next  nipkow@13189  921  assume Q: ?Q  nipkow@13189  922  show ?P  nipkow@13189  923  proof (cases)  nipkow@13189  924  assume "k = 0"  haftmann@27651  925  with Q show ?P by simp  nipkow@13189  926  next  nipkow@13189  927  assume not0: "k \ 0"  nipkow@13189  928  with Q have R: ?R by simp  nipkow@13189  929  from not0 R[THEN spec,of "n div k",THEN spec, of "n mod k"]  nipkow@13517  930  show ?P by simp  nipkow@13189  931  qed  nipkow@13189  932 qed  nipkow@13189  933 berghofe@13882  934 lemma split_div_lemma:  haftmann@26100  935  assumes "0 < n"  haftmann@26100  936  shows "n * q \ m \ m < n * Suc q \ q = ((m\nat) div n)" (is "?lhs \ ?rhs")  haftmann@26100  937 proof  haftmann@26100  938  assume ?rhs  haftmann@26100  939  with mult_div_cancel have nq: "n * q = m - (m mod n)" by simp  haftmann@26100  940  then have A: "n * q \ m" by simp  haftmann@26100  941  have "n - (m mod n) > 0" using mod_less_divisor assms by auto  haftmann@26100  942  then have "m < m + (n - (m mod n))" by simp  haftmann@26100  943  then have "m < n + (m - (m mod n))" by simp  haftmann@26100  944  with nq have "m < n + n * q" by simp  haftmann@26100  945  then have B: "m < n * Suc q" by simp  haftmann@26100  946  from A B show ?lhs ..  haftmann@26100  947 next  haftmann@26100  948  assume P: ?lhs  haftmann@33340  949  then have "divmod_nat_rel m n (q, m - n * q)"  haftmann@33340  950  unfolding divmod_nat_rel_def by (auto simp add: mult_ac)  haftmann@33340  951  with divmod_nat_rel_unique divmod_nat_rel [of m n]  haftmann@30923  952  have "(q, m - n * q) = (m div n, m mod n)" by auto  haftmann@30923  953  then show ?rhs by simp  haftmann@26100  954 qed  berghofe@13882  955 berghofe@13882  956 theorem split_div':  berghofe@13882  957  "P ((m::nat) div n) = ((n = 0 \ P 0) \  paulson@14267  958  (\q. (n * q \ m \ m < n * (Suc q)) \ P q))"  berghofe@13882  959  apply (case_tac "0 < n")  berghofe@13882  960  apply (simp only: add: split_div_lemma)  haftmann@27651  961  apply simp_all  berghofe@13882  962  done  berghofe@13882  963 nipkow@13189  964 lemma split_mod:  nipkow@13189  965  "P(n mod k :: nat) =  nipkow@13189  966  ((k = 0 \ P n) \ (k \ 0 \ (!i. !j P j)))"  nipkow@13189  967  (is "?P = ?Q" is "_ = (_ \ (_ \ ?R))")  nipkow@13189  968 proof  nipkow@13189  969  assume P: ?P  nipkow@13189  970  show ?Q  nipkow@13189  971  proof (cases)  nipkow@13189  972  assume "k = 0"  haftmann@27651  973  with P show ?Q by simp  nipkow@13189  974  next  nipkow@13189  975  assume not0: "k \ 0"  nipkow@13189  976  thus ?Q  nipkow@13189  977  proof (simp, intro allI impI)  nipkow@13189  978  fix i j  nipkow@13189  979  assume "n = k*i + j" "j < k"  nipkow@13189  980  thus "P j" using not0 P by(simp add:add_ac mult_ac)  nipkow@13189  981  qed  nipkow@13189  982  qed  nipkow@13189  983 next  nipkow@13189  984  assume Q: ?Q  nipkow@13189  985  show ?P  nipkow@13189  986  proof (cases)  nipkow@13189  987  assume "k = 0"  haftmann@27651  988  with Q show ?P by simp  nipkow@13189  989  next  nipkow@13189  990  assume not0: "k \ 0"  nipkow@13189  991  with Q have R: ?R by simp  nipkow@13189  992  from not0 R[THEN spec,of "n div k",THEN spec, of "n mod k"]  nipkow@13517  993  show ?P by simp  nipkow@13189  994  qed  nipkow@13189  995 qed  nipkow@13189  996 berghofe@13882  997 theorem mod_div_equality': "(m::nat) mod n = m - (m div n) * n"  berghofe@13882  998  apply (rule_tac P="%x. m mod n = x - (m div n) * n" in  berghofe@13882  999  subst [OF mod_div_equality [of _ n]])  berghofe@13882  1000  apply arith  berghofe@13882  1001  done  berghofe@13882  1002 haftmann@22800  1003 lemma div_mod_equality':  haftmann@22800  1004  fixes m n :: nat  haftmann@22800  1005  shows "m div n * n = m - m mod n"  haftmann@22800  1006 proof -  haftmann@22800  1007  have "m mod n \ m mod n" ..  haftmann@22800  1008  from div_mod_equality have  haftmann@22800  1009  "m div n * n + m mod n - m mod n = m - m mod n" by simp  haftmann@22800  1010  with diff_add_assoc [OF m mod n \ m mod n, of "m div n * n"] have  haftmann@22800  1011  "m div n * n + (m mod n - m mod n) = m - m mod n"  haftmann@22800  1012  by simp  haftmann@22800  1013  then show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@22800  1014 qed  haftmann@22800  1015 haftmann@22800  1016 huffman@46551  1017 subsubsection {* An induction'' law for modulus arithmetic. *}  paulson@14640  1018 paulson@14640  1019 lemma mod_induct_0:  paulson@14640  1020  assumes step: "\i P ((Suc i) mod p)"  paulson@14640  1021  and base: "P i" and i: "i(P 0)"  paulson@14640  1025  from i have p: "0k. 0 \ P (p-k)" (is "\k. ?A k")  paulson@14640  1027  proof  paulson@14640  1028  fix k  paulson@14640  1029  show "?A k"  paulson@14640  1030  proof (induct k)  paulson@14640  1031  show "?A 0" by simp -- "by contradiction"  paulson@14640  1032  next  paulson@14640  1033  fix n  paulson@14640  1034  assume ih: "?A n"  paulson@14640  1035  show "?A (Suc n)"  paulson@14640  1036  proof (clarsimp)  wenzelm@22718  1037  assume y: "P (p - Suc n)"  wenzelm@22718  1038  have n: "Suc n < p"  wenzelm@22718  1039  proof (rule ccontr)  wenzelm@22718  1040  assume "$$Suc n < p)"  wenzelm@22718  1041  hence "p - Suc n = 0"  wenzelm@22718  1042  by simp  wenzelm@22718  1043  with y contra show "False"  wenzelm@22718  1044  by simp  wenzelm@22718  1045  qed  wenzelm@22718  1046  hence n2: "Suc (p - Suc n) = p-n" by arith  wenzelm@22718  1047  from p have "p - Suc n < p" by arith  wenzelm@22718  1048  with y step have z: "P ((Suc (p - Suc n)) mod p)"  wenzelm@22718  1049  by blast  wenzelm@22718  1050  show "False"  wenzelm@22718  1051  proof (cases "n=0")  wenzelm@22718  1052  case True  wenzelm@22718  1053  with z n2 contra show ?thesis by simp  wenzelm@22718  1054  next  wenzelm@22718  1055  case False  wenzelm@22718  1056  with p have "p-n < p" by arith  wenzelm@22718  1057  with z n2 False ih show ?thesis by simp  wenzelm@22718  1058  qed  paulson@14640  1059  qed  paulson@14640  1060  qed  paulson@14640  1061  qed  paulson@14640  1062  moreover  paulson@14640  1063  from i obtain k where "0 i+k=p"  paulson@14640  1064  by (blast dest: less_imp_add_positive)  paulson@14640  1065  hence "0 i=p-k" by auto  paulson@14640  1066  moreover  paulson@14640  1067  note base  paulson@14640  1068  ultimately  paulson@14640  1069  show "False" by blast  paulson@14640  1070 qed  paulson@14640  1071 paulson@14640  1072 lemma mod_induct:  paulson@14640  1073  assumes step: "\i P ((Suc i) mod p)"  paulson@14640  1074  and base: "P i" and i: "ij P j" (is "?A j")  paulson@14640  1081  proof (induct j)  paulson@14640  1082  from step base i show "?A 0"  wenzelm@22718  1083  by (auto elim: mod_induct_0)  paulson@14640  1084  next  paulson@14640  1085  fix k  paulson@14640  1086  assume ih: "?A k"  paulson@14640  1087  show "?A (Suc k)"  paulson@14640  1088  proof  wenzelm@22718  1089  assume suc: "Suc k < p"  wenzelm@22718  1090  hence k: "knat) mod 2 \ m mod 2 = 1"  haftmann@33296  1118 proof -  boehmes@35815  1119  { fix n :: nat have "(n::nat) < 2 \ n = 0 \ n = 1" by (cases n) simp_all }  haftmann@33296  1120  moreover have "m mod 2 < 2" by simp  haftmann@33296  1121  ultimately have "m mod 2 = 0 \ m mod 2 = 1" .  haftmann@33296  1122  then show ?thesis by auto  haftmann@33296  1123 qed  haftmann@33296  1124 haftmann@33296  1125 text{*These lemmas collapse some needless occurrences of Suc:  haftmann@33296  1126  at least three Sucs, since two and fewer are rewritten back to Suc again!  haftmann@33296  1127  We already have some rules to simplify operands smaller than 3.*}  haftmann@33296  1128 haftmann@33296  1129 lemma div_Suc_eq_div_add3 [simp]: "m div (Suc (Suc (Suc n))) = m div (3+n)"  haftmann@33296  1130 by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)  haftmann@33296  1131 haftmann@33296  1132 lemma mod_Suc_eq_mod_add3 [simp]: "m mod (Suc (Suc (Suc n))) = m mod (3+n)"  haftmann@33296  1133 by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)  haftmann@33296  1134 haftmann@33296  1135 lemma Suc_div_eq_add3_div: "(Suc (Suc (Suc m))) div n = (3+m) div n"  haftmann@33296  1136 by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)  haftmann@33296  1137 haftmann@33296  1138 lemma Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod: "(Suc (Suc (Suc m))) mod n = (3+m) mod n"  haftmann@33296  1139 by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)  haftmann@33296  1140 huffman@47108  1141 lemmas Suc_div_eq_add3_div_numeral [simp] = Suc_div_eq_add3_div [of _ "numeral v"] for v  huffman@47108  1142 lemmas Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod_numeral [simp] = Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod [of _ "numeral v"] for v  haftmann@33296  1143 haftmann@33361  1144 haftmann@33361  1145 lemma Suc_times_mod_eq: "1 Suc (k * m) mod k = 1"  haftmann@33361  1146 apply (induct "m")  haftmann@33361  1147 apply (simp_all add: mod_Suc)  haftmann@33361  1148 done  haftmann@33361  1149 huffman@47108  1150 declare Suc_times_mod_eq [of "numeral w", simp] for w  haftmann@33361  1151 haftmann@33361  1152 lemma [simp]: "n div k \ (Suc n) div k"  haftmann@33361  1153 by (simp add: div_le_mono)  haftmann@33361  1154 haftmann@33361  1155 lemma Suc_n_div_2_gt_zero [simp]: "(0::nat) < n ==> 0 < (n + 1) div 2"  haftmann@33361  1156 by (cases n) simp_all  haftmann@33361  1157 boehmes@35815  1158 lemma div_2_gt_zero [simp]: assumes A: "(1::nat) < n" shows "0 < n div 2"  boehmes@35815  1159 proof -  boehmes@35815  1160  from A have B: "0 < n - 1" and C: "n - 1 + 1 = n" by simp_all  boehmes@35815  1161  from Suc_n_div_2_gt_zero [OF B] C show ?thesis by simp  boehmes@35815  1162 qed  haftmann@33361  1163 haftmann@33361  1164  (* Potential use of algebra : Equality modulo n*)  haftmann@33361  1165 lemma mod_mult_self3 [simp]: "(k*n + m) mod n = m mod (n::nat)"  haftmann@33361  1166 by (simp add: mult_ac add_ac)  haftmann@33361  1167 haftmann@33361  1168 lemma mod_mult_self4 [simp]: "Suc (k*n + m) mod n = Suc m mod n"  haftmann@33361  1169 proof -  haftmann@33361  1170  have "Suc (k * n + m) mod n = (k * n + Suc m) mod n" by simp  haftmann@33361  1171  also have "... = Suc m mod n" by (rule mod_mult_self3)  haftmann@33361  1172  finally show ?thesis .  haftmann@33361  1173 qed  haftmann@33361  1174 haftmann@33361  1175 lemma mod_Suc_eq_Suc_mod: "Suc m mod n = Suc (m mod n) mod n"  haftmann@33361  1176 apply (subst mod_Suc [of m])  haftmann@33361  1177 apply (subst mod_Suc [of "m mod n"], simp)  haftmann@33361  1178 done  haftmann@33361  1179 huffman@47108  1180 lemma mod_2_not_eq_zero_eq_one_nat:  huffman@47108  1181  fixes n :: nat  huffman@47108  1182  shows "n mod 2 \ 0 \ n mod 2 = 1"  huffman@47108  1183  by simp  huffman@47108  1184 haftmann@33361  1185 haftmann@33361  1186 subsection {* Division on @{typ int} *}  haftmann@33361  1187 haftmann@33361  1188 definition divmod_int_rel :: "int \ int \ int \ int \ bool" where  haftmann@33361  1189  --{*definition of quotient and remainder*}  huffman@47108  1190  "divmod_int_rel a b = (\(q, r). a = b * q + r \  haftmann@33361  1191  (if 0 < b then 0 \ r \ r < b else b < r \ r \ 0))"  haftmann@33361  1192 haftmann@33361  1193 definition adjust :: "int \ int \ int \ int \ int" where  haftmann@33361  1194  --{*for the division algorithm*}  huffman@47108  1195  "adjust b = (\(q, r). if 0 \ r - b then (2 * q + 1, r - b)  haftmann@33361  1196  else (2 * q, r))"  haftmann@33361  1197 haftmann@33361  1198 text{*algorithm for the case @{text "a\0, b>0"}*}  haftmann@33361  1199 function posDivAlg :: "int \ int \ int \ int" where  haftmann@33361  1200  "posDivAlg a b = (if a < b \ b \ 0 then (0, a)  haftmann@33361  1201  else adjust b (posDivAlg a (2 * b)))"  haftmann@33361  1202 by auto  haftmann@33361  1203 termination by (relation "measure (\(a, b). nat (a - b + 1))")  haftmann@33361  1204  (auto simp add: mult_2)  haftmann@33361  1205 haftmann@33361  1206 text{*algorithm for the case @{text "a<0, b>0"}*}  haftmann@33361  1207 function negDivAlg :: "int \ int \ int \ int" where  haftmann@33361  1208  "negDivAlg a b = (if 0 \a + b \ b \ 0 then (-1, a + b)  haftmann@33361  1209  else adjust b (negDivAlg a (2 * b)))"  haftmann@33361  1210 by auto  haftmann@33361  1211 termination by (relation "measure (\(a, b). nat (- a - b))")  haftmann@33361  1212  (auto simp add: mult_2)  haftmann@33361  1213 haftmann@33361  1214 text{*algorithm for the general case @{term "b\0"}*}  haftmann@33361  1215 haftmann@33361  1216 definition divmod_int :: "int \ int \ int \ int" where  haftmann@33361  1217  --{*The full division algorithm considers all possible signs for a, b  haftmann@33361  1218  including the special case @{text "a=0, b<0"} because  haftmann@33361  1219  @{term negDivAlg} requires @{term "a<0"}.*}  haftmann@33361  1220  "divmod_int a b = (if 0 \ a then if 0 \ b then posDivAlg a b  haftmann@33361  1221  else if a = 0 then (0, 0)  huffman@46560  1222  else apsnd uminus (negDivAlg (-a) (-b))  haftmann@33361  1223  else  haftmann@33361  1224  if 0 < b then negDivAlg a b  huffman@46560  1225  else apsnd uminus (posDivAlg (-a) (-b)))"  haftmann@33361  1226 haftmann@33361  1227 instantiation int :: Divides.div  haftmann@33361  1228 begin  haftmann@33361  1229 huffman@46551  1230 definition div_int where  haftmann@33361  1231  "a div b = fst (divmod_int a b)"  haftmann@33361  1232 huffman@46551  1233 lemma fst_divmod_int [simp]:  huffman@46551  1234  "fst (divmod_int a b) = a div b"  huffman@46551  1235  by (simp add: div_int_def)  huffman@46551  1236 huffman@46551  1237 definition mod_int where  huffman@46560  1238  "a mod b = snd (divmod_int a b)"  haftmann@33361  1239 huffman@46551  1240 lemma snd_divmod_int [simp]:  huffman@46551  1241  "snd (divmod_int a b) = a mod b"  huffman@46551  1242  by (simp add: mod_int_def)  huffman@46551  1243 haftmann@33361  1244 instance ..  haftmann@33361  1245 paulson@3366  1246 end  haftmann@33361  1247 haftmann@33361  1248 lemma divmod_int_mod_div:  haftmann@33361  1249  "divmod_int p q = (p div q, p mod q)"  huffman@46551  1250  by (simp add: prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1251 haftmann@33361  1252 text{*  haftmann@33361  1253 Here is the division algorithm in ML:  haftmann@33361  1254 haftmann@33361  1255 \begin{verbatim}  haftmann@33361  1256  fun posDivAlg (a,b) =  haftmann@33361  1257  if ar-b then (2*q+1, r-b) else (2*q, r)  haftmann@33361  1260  end  haftmann@33361  1261 haftmann@33361  1262  fun negDivAlg (a,b) =  haftmann@33361  1263  if 0\a+b then (~1,a+b)  haftmann@33361  1264  else let val (q,r) = negDivAlg(a, 2*b)  haftmann@33361  1265  in if 0\r-b then (2*q+1, r-b) else (2*q, r)  haftmann@33361  1266  end;  haftmann@33361  1267 haftmann@33361  1268  fun negateSnd (q,r:int) = (q,~r);  haftmann@33361  1269 haftmann@33361  1270  fun divmod (a,b) = if 0\a then  haftmann@33361  1271  if b>0 then posDivAlg (a,b)  haftmann@33361  1272  else if a=0 then (0,0)  haftmann@33361  1273  else negateSnd (negDivAlg (~a,~b))  haftmann@33361  1274  else  haftmann@33361  1275  if 0 b*q + r; 0 \ r'; r' < b; r < b |]  haftmann@33361  1285  ==> q' \ (q::int)"  haftmann@33361  1286 apply (subgoal_tac "r' + b * (q'-q) \ r")  haftmann@33361  1287  prefer 2 apply (simp add: right_diff_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1288 apply (subgoal_tac "0 < b * (1 + q - q') ")  haftmann@33361  1289 apply (erule_tac [2] order_le_less_trans)  haftmann@33361  1290  prefer 2 apply (simp add: right_diff_distrib right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1291 apply (subgoal_tac "b * q' < b * (1 + q) ")  haftmann@33361  1292  prefer 2 apply (simp add: right_diff_distrib right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1293 apply (simp add: mult_less_cancel_left)  haftmann@33361  1294 done  haftmann@33361  1295 haftmann@33361  1296 lemma unique_quotient_lemma_neg:  haftmann@33361  1297  "[| b*q' + r' \ b*q + r; r \ 0; b < r; b < r' |]  haftmann@33361  1298  ==> q \ (q'::int)"  haftmann@33361  1299 by (rule_tac b = "-b" and r = "-r'" and r' = "-r" in unique_quotient_lemma,  haftmann@33361  1300  auto)  haftmann@33361  1301 haftmann@33361  1302 lemma unique_quotient:  bulwahn@46552  1303  "[| divmod_int_rel a b (q, r); divmod_int_rel a b (q', r') |]  haftmann@33361  1304  ==> q = q'"  haftmann@33361  1305 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff split: split_if_asm)  haftmann@33361  1306 apply (blast intro: order_antisym  haftmann@33361  1307  dest: order_eq_refl [THEN unique_quotient_lemma]  haftmann@33361  1308  order_eq_refl [THEN unique_quotient_lemma_neg] sym)+  haftmann@33361  1309 done  haftmann@33361  1310 haftmann@33361  1311 haftmann@33361  1312 lemma unique_remainder:  bulwahn@46552  1313  "[| divmod_int_rel a b (q, r); divmod_int_rel a b (q', r') |]  haftmann@33361  1314  ==> r = r'"  haftmann@33361  1315 apply (subgoal_tac "q = q'")  haftmann@33361  1316  apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1317 apply (blast intro: unique_quotient)  haftmann@33361  1318 done  haftmann@33361  1319 haftmann@33361  1320 huffman@46551  1321 subsubsection {* Correctness of @{term posDivAlg}, the Algorithm for Non-Negative Dividends *}  haftmann@33361  1322 haftmann@33361  1323 text{*And positive divisors*}  haftmann@33361  1324 haftmann@33361  1325 lemma adjust_eq [simp]:  huffman@47108  1326  "adjust b (q, r) =  huffman@47108  1327  (let diff = r - b in  huffman@47108  1328  if 0 \ diff then (2 * q + 1, diff)  haftmann@33361  1329  else (2*q, r))"  huffman@47108  1330  by (simp add: Let_def adjust_def)  haftmann@33361  1331 haftmann@33361  1332 declare posDivAlg.simps [simp del]  haftmann@33361  1333 haftmann@33361  1334 text{*use with a simproc to avoid repeatedly proving the premise*}  haftmann@33361  1335 lemma posDivAlg_eqn:  haftmann@33361  1336  "0 < b ==>  haftmann@33361  1337  posDivAlg a b = (if a a" and "0 < b"  haftmann@33361  1343  shows "divmod_int_rel a b (posDivAlg a b)"  wenzelm@41550  1344  using assms  wenzelm@41550  1345  apply (induct a b rule: posDivAlg.induct)  wenzelm@41550  1346  apply auto  wenzelm@41550  1347  apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  wenzelm@41550  1348  apply (subst posDivAlg_eqn, simp add: right_distrib)  wenzelm@41550  1349  apply (case_tac "a < b")  wenzelm@41550  1350  apply simp_all  wenzelm@41550  1351  apply (erule splitE)  wenzelm@41550  1352  apply (auto simp add: right_distrib Let_def mult_ac mult_2_right)  wenzelm@41550  1353  done  haftmann@33361  1354 haftmann@33361  1355 huffman@46551  1356 subsubsection {* Correctness of @{term negDivAlg}, the Algorithm for Negative Dividends *}  haftmann@33361  1357 haftmann@33361  1358 text{*And positive divisors*}  haftmann@33361  1359 haftmann@33361  1360 declare negDivAlg.simps [simp del]  haftmann@33361  1361 haftmann@33361  1362 text{*use with a simproc to avoid repeatedly proving the premise*}  haftmann@33361  1363 lemma negDivAlg_eqn:  haftmann@33361  1364  "0 < b ==>  haftmann@33361  1365  negDivAlg a b =  haftmann@33361  1366  (if 0\a+b then (-1,a+b) else adjust b (negDivAlg a (2*b)))"  haftmann@33361  1367 by (rule negDivAlg.simps [THEN trans], simp)  haftmann@33361  1368 haftmann@33361  1369 (*Correctness of negDivAlg: it computes quotients correctly  haftmann@33361  1370  It doesn't work if a=0 because the 0/b equals 0, not -1*)  haftmann@33361  1371 lemma negDivAlg_correct:  haftmann@33361  1372  assumes "a < 0" and "b > 0"  haftmann@33361  1373  shows "divmod_int_rel a b (negDivAlg a b)"  wenzelm@41550  1374  using assms  wenzelm@41550  1375  apply (induct a b rule: negDivAlg.induct)  wenzelm@41550  1376  apply (auto simp add: linorder_not_le)  wenzelm@41550  1377  apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  wenzelm@41550  1378  apply (subst negDivAlg_eqn, assumption)  wenzelm@41550  1379  apply (case_tac "a + b < (0\int)")  wenzelm@41550  1380  apply simp_all  wenzelm@41550  1381  apply (erule splitE)  wenzelm@41550  1382  apply (auto simp add: right_distrib Let_def mult_ac mult_2_right)  wenzelm@41550  1383  done  haftmann@33361  1384 haftmann@33361  1385 huffman@46551  1386 subsubsection {* Existence Shown by Proving the Division Algorithm to be Correct *}  haftmann@33361  1387 haftmann@33361  1388 (*the case a=0*)  haftmann@33361  1389 lemma divmod_int_rel_0: "b \ 0 ==> divmod_int_rel 0 b (0, 0)"  haftmann@33361  1390 by (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1391 haftmann@33361  1392 lemma posDivAlg_0 [simp]: "posDivAlg 0 b = (0, 0)"  haftmann@33361  1393 by (subst posDivAlg.simps, auto)  haftmann@33361  1394 haftmann@33361  1395 lemma negDivAlg_minus1 [simp]: "negDivAlg -1 b = (-1, b - 1)"  haftmann@33361  1396 by (subst negDivAlg.simps, auto)  haftmann@33361  1397 huffman@46560  1398 lemma divmod_int_rel_neg: "divmod_int_rel (-a) (-b) qr ==> divmod_int_rel a b (apsnd uminus qr)"  haftmann@33361  1399 by (auto simp add: split_ifs divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1400 haftmann@33361  1401 lemma divmod_int_correct: "b \ 0 ==> divmod_int_rel a b (divmod_int a b)"  haftmann@33361  1402 by (force simp add: linorder_neq_iff divmod_int_rel_0 divmod_int_def divmod_int_rel_neg  haftmann@33361  1403  posDivAlg_correct negDivAlg_correct)  haftmann@33361  1404 haftmann@33361  1405 text{*Arbitrary definitions for division by zero. Useful to simplify  haftmann@33361  1406  certain equations.*}  haftmann@33361  1407 haftmann@33361  1408 lemma DIVISION_BY_ZERO [simp]: "a div (0::int) = 0 & a mod (0::int) = a"  haftmann@33361  1409 by (simp add: div_int_def mod_int_def divmod_int_def posDivAlg.simps)  haftmann@33361  1410 haftmann@33361  1411 haftmann@33361  1412 text{*Basic laws about division and remainder*}  haftmann@33361  1413 haftmann@33361  1414 lemma zmod_zdiv_equality: "(a::int) = b * (a div b) + (a mod b)"  haftmann@33361  1415 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1416 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in divmod_int_correct)  huffman@46551  1417 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1418 done  haftmann@33361  1419 haftmann@33361  1420 lemma zdiv_zmod_equality: "(b * (a div b) + (a mod b)) + k = (a::int)+k"  haftmann@33361  1421 by(simp add: zmod_zdiv_equality[symmetric])  haftmann@33361  1422 haftmann@33361  1423 lemma zdiv_zmod_equality2: "((a div b) * b + (a mod b)) + k = (a::int)+k"  haftmann@33361  1424 by(simp add: mult_commute zmod_zdiv_equality[symmetric])  haftmann@33361  1425 haftmann@33361  1426 text {* Tool setup *}  haftmann@33361  1427 huffman@47108  1428 (* FIXME: Theorem list add_0s doesn't exist, because Numeral0 has gone. *)  huffman@47108  1429 lemmas add_0s = add_0_left add_0_right  huffman@47108  1430 haftmann@33361  1431 ML {*  wenzelm@43594  1432 structure Cancel_Div_Mod_Int = Cancel_Div_Mod  wenzelm@41550  1433 (  haftmann@33361  1434  val div_name = @{const_name div};  haftmann@33361  1435  val mod_name = @{const_name mod};  haftmann@33361  1436  val mk_binop = HOLogic.mk_binop;  haftmann@33361  1437  val mk_sum = Arith_Data.mk_sum HOLogic.intT;  haftmann@33361  1438  val dest_sum = Arith_Data.dest_sum;  haftmann@33361  1439 haftmann@33361  1440  val div_mod_eqs = map mk_meta_eq [@{thm zdiv_zmod_equality}, @{thm zdiv_zmod_equality2}];  haftmann@33361  1441 haftmann@33361  1442  val prove_eq_sums = Arith_Data.prove_conv2 all_tac (Arith_Data.simp_all_tac  haftmann@33361  1443  (@{thm diff_minus} :: @{thms add_0s} @ @{thms add_ac}))  wenzelm@41550  1444 )  haftmann@33361  1445 *}  haftmann@33361  1446 wenzelm@43594  1447 simproc_setup cancel_div_mod_int ("(k::int) + l") = {* K Cancel_Div_Mod_Int.proc *}  wenzelm@43594  1448 haftmann@33361  1449 lemma pos_mod_conj : "(0::int) < b ==> 0 \ a mod b & a mod b < b"  haftmann@33361  1450 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in divmod_int_correct)  huffman@46551  1451 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1452 done  haftmann@33361  1453 wenzelm@45607  1454 lemmas pos_mod_sign [simp] = pos_mod_conj [THEN conjunct1]  wenzelm@45607  1455  and pos_mod_bound [simp] = pos_mod_conj [THEN conjunct2]  haftmann@33361  1456 haftmann@33361  1457 lemma neg_mod_conj : "b < (0::int) ==> a mod b \ 0 & b < a mod b"  haftmann@33361  1458 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in divmod_int_correct)  huffman@46551  1459 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def prod_eq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1460 done  haftmann@33361  1461 wenzelm@45607  1462 lemmas neg_mod_sign [simp] = neg_mod_conj [THEN conjunct1]  wenzelm@45607  1463  and neg_mod_bound [simp] = neg_mod_conj [THEN conjunct2]  haftmann@33361  1464 haftmann@33361  1465 huffman@46551  1466 subsubsection {* General Properties of div and mod *}  haftmann@33361  1467 haftmann@33361  1468 lemma divmod_int_rel_div_mod: "b \ 0 ==> divmod_int_rel a b (a div b, a mod b)"  haftmann@33361  1469 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1470 apply (force simp add: divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1471 done  haftmann@33361  1472 bulwahn@46552  1473 lemma divmod_int_rel_div: "[| divmod_int_rel a b (q, r) |] ==> a div b = q"  bulwahn@46552  1474 apply (cases "b = 0")  bulwahn@46552  1475 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1476 by (simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN unique_quotient])  haftmann@33361  1477 bulwahn@46552  1478 lemma divmod_int_rel_mod: "[| divmod_int_rel a b (q, r) |] ==> a mod b = r"  bulwahn@46552  1479 apply (cases "b = 0")  bulwahn@46552  1480 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1481 by (simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN unique_remainder])  haftmann@33361  1482 haftmann@33361  1483 lemma div_pos_pos_trivial: "[| (0::int) \ a; a < b |] ==> a div b = 0"  haftmann@33361  1484 apply (rule divmod_int_rel_div)  haftmann@33361  1485 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1486 done  haftmann@33361  1487 haftmann@33361  1488 lemma div_neg_neg_trivial: "[| a \ (0::int); b < a |] ==> a div b = 0"  haftmann@33361  1489 apply (rule divmod_int_rel_div)  haftmann@33361  1490 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1491 done  haftmann@33361  1492 haftmann@33361  1493 lemma div_pos_neg_trivial: "[| (0::int) < a; a+b \ 0 |] ==> a div b = -1"  haftmann@33361  1494 apply (rule divmod_int_rel_div)  haftmann@33361  1495 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1496 done  haftmann@33361  1497 haftmann@33361  1498 (*There is no div_neg_pos_trivial because 0 div b = 0 would supersede it*)  haftmann@33361  1499 haftmann@33361  1500 lemma mod_pos_pos_trivial: "[| (0::int) \ a; a < b |] ==> a mod b = a"  haftmann@33361  1501 apply (rule_tac q = 0 in divmod_int_rel_mod)  haftmann@33361  1502 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1503 done  haftmann@33361  1504 haftmann@33361  1505 lemma mod_neg_neg_trivial: "[| a \ (0::int); b < a |] ==> a mod b = a"  haftmann@33361  1506 apply (rule_tac q = 0 in divmod_int_rel_mod)  haftmann@33361  1507 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1508 done  haftmann@33361  1509 haftmann@33361  1510 lemma mod_pos_neg_trivial: "[| (0::int) < a; a+b \ 0 |] ==> a mod b = a+b"  haftmann@33361  1511 apply (rule_tac q = "-1" in divmod_int_rel_mod)  haftmann@33361  1512 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1513 done  haftmann@33361  1514 haftmann@33361  1515 text{*There is no @{text mod_neg_pos_trivial}.*}  haftmann@33361  1516 haftmann@33361  1517 haftmann@33361  1518 (*Simpler laws such as -a div b = -(a div b) FAIL, but see just below*)  haftmann@33361  1519 lemma zdiv_zminus_zminus [simp]: "(-a) div (-b) = a div (b::int)"  haftmann@33361  1520 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1521 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN divmod_int_rel_neg, simplified,  haftmann@33361  1522  THEN divmod_int_rel_div, THEN sym])  haftmann@33361  1523 haftmann@33361  1524 done  haftmann@33361  1525 haftmann@33361  1526 (*Simpler laws such as -a mod b = -(a mod b) FAIL, but see just below*)  haftmann@33361  1527 lemma zmod_zminus_zminus [simp]: "(-a) mod (-b) = - (a mod (b::int))"  haftmann@33361  1528 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1529 apply (subst divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN divmod_int_rel_neg, simplified, THEN divmod_int_rel_mod],  haftmann@33361  1530  auto)  haftmann@33361  1531 done  haftmann@33361  1532 haftmann@33361  1533 huffman@46551  1534 subsubsection {* Laws for div and mod with Unary Minus *}  haftmann@33361  1535 haftmann@33361  1536 lemma zminus1_lemma:  haftmann@33361  1537  "divmod_int_rel a b (q, r)  haftmann@33361  1538  ==> divmod_int_rel (-a) b (if r=0 then -q else -q - 1,  haftmann@33361  1539  if r=0 then 0 else b-r)"  haftmann@33361  1540 by (force simp add: split_ifs divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff right_diff_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1541 haftmann@33361  1542 haftmann@33361  1543 lemma zdiv_zminus1_eq_if:  haftmann@33361  1544  "b \ (0::int)  haftmann@33361  1545  ==> (-a) div b =  haftmann@33361  1546  (if a mod b = 0 then - (a div b) else - (a div b) - 1)"  haftmann@33361  1547 by (blast intro: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zminus1_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_div])  haftmann@33361  1548 haftmann@33361  1549 lemma zmod_zminus1_eq_if:  haftmann@33361  1550  "(-a::int) mod b = (if a mod b = 0 then 0 else b - (a mod b))"  haftmann@33361  1551 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1552 apply (blast intro: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zminus1_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_mod])  haftmann@33361  1553 done  haftmann@33361  1554 haftmann@33361  1555 lemma zmod_zminus1_not_zero:  haftmann@33361  1556  fixes k l :: int  haftmann@33361  1557  shows "- k mod l \ 0 \ k mod l \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1558  unfolding zmod_zminus1_eq_if by auto  haftmann@33361  1559 haftmann@33361  1560 lemma zdiv_zminus2: "a div (-b) = (-a::int) div b"  haftmann@33361  1561 by (cut_tac a = "-a" in zdiv_zminus_zminus, auto)  haftmann@33361  1562 haftmann@33361  1563 lemma zmod_zminus2: "a mod (-b) = - ((-a::int) mod b)"  haftmann@33361  1564 by (cut_tac a = "-a" and b = b in zmod_zminus_zminus, auto)  haftmann@33361  1565 haftmann@33361  1566 lemma zdiv_zminus2_eq_if:  haftmann@33361  1567  "b \ (0::int)  haftmann@33361  1568  ==> a div (-b) =  haftmann@33361  1569  (if a mod b = 0 then - (a div b) else - (a div b) - 1)"  haftmann@33361  1570 by (simp add: zdiv_zminus1_eq_if zdiv_zminus2)  haftmann@33361  1571 haftmann@33361  1572 lemma zmod_zminus2_eq_if:  haftmann@33361  1573  "a mod (-b::int) = (if a mod b = 0 then 0 else (a mod b) - b)"  haftmann@33361  1574 by (simp add: zmod_zminus1_eq_if zmod_zminus2)  haftmann@33361  1575 haftmann@33361  1576 lemma zmod_zminus2_not_zero:  haftmann@33361  1577  fixes k l :: int  haftmann@33361  1578  shows "k mod - l \ 0 \ k mod l \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1579  unfolding zmod_zminus2_eq_if by auto  haftmann@33361  1580 haftmann@33361  1581 huffman@46551  1582 subsubsection {* Division of a Number by Itself *}  haftmann@33361  1583 haftmann@33361  1584 lemma self_quotient_aux1: "[| (0::int) < a; a = r + a*q; r < a |] ==> 1 \ q"  haftmann@33361  1585 apply (subgoal_tac "0 < a*q")  haftmann@33361  1586  apply (simp add: zero_less_mult_iff, arith)  haftmann@33361  1587 done  haftmann@33361  1588 haftmann@33361  1589 lemma self_quotient_aux2: "[| (0::int) < a; a = r + a*q; 0 \ r |] ==> q \ 1"  haftmann@33361  1590 apply (subgoal_tac "0 \ a* (1-q) ")  haftmann@33361  1591  apply (simp add: zero_le_mult_iff)  haftmann@33361  1592 apply (simp add: right_diff_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1593 done  haftmann@33361  1594 bulwahn@46552  1595 lemma self_quotient: "[| divmod_int_rel a a (q, r) |] ==> q = 1"  haftmann@33361  1596 apply (simp add: split_ifs divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  1597 apply (rule order_antisym, safe, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  1598 apply (rule_tac [3] a = "-a" and r = "-r" in self_quotient_aux1)  haftmann@33361  1599 apply (rule_tac a = "-a" and r = "-r" in self_quotient_aux2)  haftmann@33361  1600 apply (force intro: self_quotient_aux1 self_quotient_aux2 simp add: add_commute)+  haftmann@33361  1601 done  haftmann@33361  1602 bulwahn@46552  1603 lemma self_remainder: "[| divmod_int_rel a a (q, r) |] ==> r = 0"  bulwahn@46552  1604 apply (frule self_quotient)  haftmann@33361  1605 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1606 done  haftmann@33361  1607 haftmann@33361  1608 lemma zdiv_self [simp]: "a \ 0 ==> a div a = (1::int)"  haftmann@33361  1609 by (simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN self_quotient])  haftmann@33361  1610 haftmann@33361  1611 (*Here we have 0 mod 0 = 0, also assumed by Knuth (who puts m mod 0 = 0) *)  haftmann@33361  1612 lemma zmod_self [simp]: "a mod a = (0::int)"  haftmann@33361  1613 apply (case_tac "a = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1614 apply (simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN self_remainder])  haftmann@33361  1615 done  haftmann@33361  1616 haftmann@33361  1617 huffman@46551  1618 subsubsection {* Computation of Division and Remainder *}  haftmann@33361  1619 haftmann@33361  1620 lemma zdiv_zero [simp]: "(0::int) div b = 0"  haftmann@33361  1621 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1622 haftmann@33361  1623 lemma div_eq_minus1: "(0::int) < b ==> -1 div b = -1"  haftmann@33361  1624 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1625 haftmann@33361  1626 lemma zmod_zero [simp]: "(0::int) mod b = 0"  haftmann@33361  1627 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1628 haftmann@33361  1629 lemma zmod_minus1: "(0::int) < b ==> -1 mod b = b - 1"  haftmann@33361  1630 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1631 haftmann@33361  1632 text{*a positive, b positive *}  haftmann@33361  1633 haftmann@33361  1634 lemma div_pos_pos: "[| 0 < a; 0 \ b |] ==> a div b = fst (posDivAlg a b)"  haftmann@33361  1635 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1636 haftmann@33361  1637 lemma mod_pos_pos: "[| 0 < a; 0 \ b |] ==> a mod b = snd (posDivAlg a b)"  haftmann@33361  1638 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1639 haftmann@33361  1640 text{*a negative, b positive *}  haftmann@33361  1641 haftmann@33361  1642 lemma div_neg_pos: "[| a < 0; 0 < b |] ==> a div b = fst (negDivAlg a b)"  haftmann@33361  1643 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1644 haftmann@33361  1645 lemma mod_neg_pos: "[| a < 0; 0 < b |] ==> a mod b = snd (negDivAlg a b)"  haftmann@33361  1646 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1647 haftmann@33361  1648 text{*a positive, b negative *}  haftmann@33361  1649 haftmann@33361  1650 lemma div_pos_neg:  huffman@46560  1651  "[| 0 < a; b < 0 |] ==> a div b = fst (apsnd uminus (negDivAlg (-a) (-b)))"  haftmann@33361  1652 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1653 haftmann@33361  1654 lemma mod_pos_neg:  huffman@46560  1655  "[| 0 < a; b < 0 |] ==> a mod b = snd (apsnd uminus (negDivAlg (-a) (-b)))"  haftmann@33361  1656 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1657 haftmann@33361  1658 text{*a negative, b negative *}  haftmann@33361  1659 haftmann@33361  1660 lemma div_neg_neg:  huffman@46560  1661  "[| a < 0; b \ 0 |] ==> a div b = fst (apsnd uminus (posDivAlg (-a) (-b)))"  haftmann@33361  1662 by (simp add: div_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1663 haftmann@33361  1664 lemma mod_neg_neg:  huffman@46560  1665  "[| a < 0; b \ 0 |] ==> a mod b = snd (apsnd uminus (posDivAlg (-a) (-b)))"  haftmann@33361  1666 by (simp add: mod_int_def divmod_int_def)  haftmann@33361  1667 haftmann@33361  1668 text {*Simplify expresions in which div and mod combine numerical constants*}  haftmann@33361  1669 huffman@45530  1670 lemma int_div_pos_eq: "\(a::int) = b * q + r; 0 \ r; r < b\ \ a div b = q"  bulwahn@46552  1671  by (rule divmod_int_rel_div [of a b q r]) (simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  huffman@45530  1672 huffman@45530  1673 lemma int_div_neg_eq: "\(a::int) = b * q + r; r \ 0; b < r\ \ a div b = q"  huffman@45530  1674  by (rule divmod_int_rel_div [of a b q r],  bulwahn@46552  1675  simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  huffman@45530  1676 huffman@45530  1677 lemma int_mod_pos_eq: "\(a::int) = b * q + r; 0 \ r; r < b\ \ a mod b = r"  huffman@45530  1678  by (rule divmod_int_rel_mod [of a b q r],  bulwahn@46552  1679  simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  huffman@45530  1680 huffman@45530  1681 lemma int_mod_neg_eq: "\(a::int) = b * q + r; r \ 0; b < r\ \ a mod b = r"  huffman@45530  1682  by (rule divmod_int_rel_mod [of a b q r],  bulwahn@46552  1683  simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  huffman@45530  1684 haftmann@33361  1685 (* simprocs adapted from HOL/ex/Binary.thy *)  haftmann@33361  1686 ML {*  haftmann@33361  1687 local  huffman@45530  1688  val mk_number = HOLogic.mk_number HOLogic.intT  huffman@45530  1689  val plus = @{term "plus :: int \ int \ int"}  huffman@45530  1690  val times = @{term "times :: int \ int \ int"}  huffman@45530  1691  val zero = @{term "0 :: int"}  huffman@45530  1692  val less = @{term "op < :: int \ int \ bool"}  huffman@45530  1693  val le = @{term "op \ :: int \ int \ bool"}  huffman@45530  1694  val simps = @{thms arith_simps} @ @{thms rel_simps} @  huffman@47108  1695  map (fn th => th RS sym) [@{thm numeral_1_eq_1}]  huffman@45530  1696  fun prove ctxt goal = Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop goal)  huffman@45530  1697  (K (ALLGOALS (full_simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps simps))));  haftmann@33361  1698  fun binary_proc proc ss ct =  haftmann@33361  1699  (case Thm.term_of ct of  haftmann@33361  1700  _  t  u =>  haftmann@33361  1701  (case try (pairself ((snd o HOLogic.dest_number))) (t, u) of  haftmann@33361  1702  SOME args => proc (Simplifier.the_context ss) args  haftmann@33361  1703  | NONE => NONE)  haftmann@33361  1704  | _ => NONE);  haftmann@33361  1705 in  huffman@45530  1706  fun divmod_proc posrule negrule =  huffman@45530  1707  binary_proc (fn ctxt => fn ((a, t), (b, u)) =>  huffman@45530  1708  if b = 0 then NONE else let  huffman@45530  1709  val (q, r) = pairself mk_number (Integer.div_mod a b)  huffman@45530  1710  val goal1 = HOLogic.mk_eq (t, plus  (times  u  q)  r)  huffman@45530  1711  val (goal2, goal3, rule) = if b > 0  huffman@45530  1712  then (le  zero  r, less  r  u, posrule RS eq_reflection)  huffman@45530  1713  else (le  r  zero, less  u  r, negrule RS eq_reflection)  huffman@45530  1714  in SOME (rule OF map (prove ctxt) [goal1, goal2, goal3]) end)  haftmann@33361  1715 end  haftmann@33361  1716 *}  haftmann@33361  1717 huffman@47108  1718 simproc_setup binary_int_div  huffman@47108  1719  ("numeral m div numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1720  "numeral m div neg_numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1721  "neg_numeral m div numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1722  "neg_numeral m div neg_numeral n :: int") =  huffman@45530  1723  {* K (divmod_proc @{thm int_div_pos_eq} @{thm int_div_neg_eq}) *}  haftmann@33361  1724 huffman@47108  1725 simproc_setup binary_int_mod  huffman@47108  1726  ("numeral m mod numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1727  "numeral m mod neg_numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1728  "neg_numeral m mod numeral n :: int" |  huffman@47108  1729  "neg_numeral m mod neg_numeral n :: int") =  huffman@45530  1730  {* K (divmod_proc @{thm int_mod_pos_eq} @{thm int_mod_neg_eq}) *}  haftmann@33361  1731 huffman@47108  1732 lemmas posDivAlg_eqn_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1733  posDivAlg_eqn [of "numeral v" "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral] for v w  huffman@47108  1734 huffman@47108  1735 lemmas negDivAlg_eqn_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1736  negDivAlg_eqn [of "numeral v" "neg_numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral] for v w  haftmann@33361  1737 haftmann@33361  1738 haftmann@33361  1739 text{*Special-case simplification *}  haftmann@33361  1740 haftmann@33361  1741 lemma zmod_minus1_right [simp]: "a mod (-1::int) = 0"  haftmann@33361  1742 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = "-1" in neg_mod_sign)  haftmann@33361  1743 apply (cut_tac [2] a = a and b = "-1" in neg_mod_bound)  haftmann@33361  1744 apply (auto simp del: neg_mod_sign neg_mod_bound)  haftmann@33361  1745 done  haftmann@33361  1746 haftmann@33361  1747 lemma zdiv_minus1_right [simp]: "a div (-1::int) = -a"  haftmann@33361  1748 by (cut_tac a = a and b = "-1" in zmod_zdiv_equality, auto)  haftmann@33361  1749 haftmann@33361  1750 (** The last remaining special cases for constant arithmetic:  haftmann@33361  1751  1 div z and 1 mod z **)  haftmann@33361  1752 huffman@47108  1753 lemmas div_pos_pos_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1754  div_pos_pos [OF zero_less_one, of "numeral w", OF zero_le_numeral] for w  huffman@47108  1755 huffman@47108  1756 lemmas div_pos_neg_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1757  div_pos_neg [OF zero_less_one, of "neg_numeral w",  huffman@47108  1758  OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w  huffman@47108  1759 huffman@47108  1760 lemmas mod_pos_pos_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1761  mod_pos_pos [OF zero_less_one, of "numeral w", OF zero_le_numeral] for w  huffman@47108  1762 huffman@47108  1763 lemmas mod_pos_neg_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1764  mod_pos_neg [OF zero_less_one, of "neg_numeral w",  huffman@47108  1765  OF neg_numeral_less_zero] for w  huffman@47108  1766 huffman@47108  1767 lemmas posDivAlg_eqn_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1768  posDivAlg_eqn [of concl: 1 "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral] for w  huffman@47108  1769 huffman@47108  1770 lemmas negDivAlg_eqn_1_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  1771  negDivAlg_eqn [of concl: 1 "numeral w", OF zero_less_numeral] for w  haftmann@33361  1772 haftmann@33361  1773 huffman@46551  1774 subsubsection {* Monotonicity in the First Argument (Dividend) *}  haftmann@33361  1775 haftmann@33361  1776 lemma zdiv_mono1: "[| a \ a'; 0 < (b::int) |] ==> a div b \ a' div b"  haftmann@33361  1777 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1778 apply (cut_tac a = a' and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1779 apply (rule unique_quotient_lemma)  haftmann@33361  1780 apply (erule subst)  haftmann@33361  1781 apply (erule subst, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  1782 done  haftmann@33361  1783 haftmann@33361  1784 lemma zdiv_mono1_neg: "[| a \ a'; (b::int) < 0 |] ==> a' div b \ a div b"  haftmann@33361  1785 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1786 apply (cut_tac a = a' and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1787 apply (rule unique_quotient_lemma_neg)  haftmann@33361  1788 apply (erule subst)  haftmann@33361  1789 apply (erule subst, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  1790 done  haftmann@33361  1791 haftmann@33361  1792 huffman@46551  1793 subsubsection {* Monotonicity in the Second Argument (Divisor) *}  haftmann@33361  1794 haftmann@33361  1795 lemma q_pos_lemma:  haftmann@33361  1796  "[| 0 \ b'*q' + r'; r' < b'; 0 < b' |] ==> 0 \ (q'::int)"  haftmann@33361  1797 apply (subgoal_tac "0 < b'* (q' + 1) ")  haftmann@33361  1798  apply (simp add: zero_less_mult_iff)  haftmann@33361  1799 apply (simp add: right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1800 done  haftmann@33361  1801 haftmann@33361  1802 lemma zdiv_mono2_lemma:  haftmann@33361  1803  "[| b*q + r = b'*q' + r'; 0 \ b'*q' + r';  haftmann@33361  1804  r' < b'; 0 \ r; 0 < b'; b' \ b |]  haftmann@33361  1805  ==> q \ (q'::int)"  haftmann@33361  1806 apply (frule q_pos_lemma, assumption+)  haftmann@33361  1807 apply (subgoal_tac "b*q < b* (q' + 1) ")  haftmann@33361  1808  apply (simp add: mult_less_cancel_left)  haftmann@33361  1809 apply (subgoal_tac "b*q = r' - r + b'*q'")  haftmann@33361  1810  prefer 2 apply simp  haftmann@33361  1811 apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: right_distrib)  huffman@44766  1812 apply (subst add_commute, rule add_less_le_mono, arith)  haftmann@33361  1813 apply (rule mult_right_mono, auto)  haftmann@33361  1814 done  haftmann@33361  1815 haftmann@33361  1816 lemma zdiv_mono2:  haftmann@33361  1817  "[| (0::int) \ a; 0 < b'; b' \ b |] ==> a div b \ a div b'"  haftmann@33361  1818 apply (subgoal_tac "b \ 0")  haftmann@33361  1819  prefer 2 apply arith  haftmann@33361  1820 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1821 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b' in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1822 apply (rule zdiv_mono2_lemma)  haftmann@33361  1823 apply (erule subst)  haftmann@33361  1824 apply (erule subst, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  1825 done  haftmann@33361  1826 haftmann@33361  1827 lemma q_neg_lemma:  haftmann@33361  1828  "[| b'*q' + r' < 0; 0 \ r'; 0 < b' |] ==> q' \ (0::int)"  haftmann@33361  1829 apply (subgoal_tac "b'*q' < 0")  haftmann@33361  1830  apply (simp add: mult_less_0_iff, arith)  haftmann@33361  1831 done  haftmann@33361  1832 haftmann@33361  1833 lemma zdiv_mono2_neg_lemma:  haftmann@33361  1834  "[| b*q + r = b'*q' + r'; b'*q' + r' < 0;  haftmann@33361  1835  r < b; 0 \ r'; 0 < b'; b' \ b |]  haftmann@33361  1836  ==> q' \ (q::int)"  haftmann@33361  1837 apply (frule q_neg_lemma, assumption+)  haftmann@33361  1838 apply (subgoal_tac "b*q' < b* (q + 1) ")  haftmann@33361  1839  apply (simp add: mult_less_cancel_left)  haftmann@33361  1840 apply (simp add: right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1841 apply (subgoal_tac "b*q' \ b'*q'")  haftmann@33361  1842  prefer 2 apply (simp add: mult_right_mono_neg, arith)  haftmann@33361  1843 done  haftmann@33361  1844 haftmann@33361  1845 lemma zdiv_mono2_neg:  haftmann@33361  1846  "[| a < (0::int); 0 < b'; b' \ b |] ==> a div b' \ a div b"  haftmann@33361  1847 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1848 apply (cut_tac a = a and b = b' in zmod_zdiv_equality)  haftmann@33361  1849 apply (rule zdiv_mono2_neg_lemma)  haftmann@33361  1850 apply (erule subst)  haftmann@33361  1851 apply (erule subst, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  1852 done  haftmann@33361  1853 haftmann@33361  1854 huffman@46551  1855 subsubsection {* More Algebraic Laws for div and mod *}  haftmann@33361  1856 haftmann@33361  1857 text{*proving (a*b) div c = a * (b div c) + a * (b mod c) *}  haftmann@33361  1858 haftmann@33361  1859 lemma zmult1_lemma:  bulwahn@46552  1860  "[| divmod_int_rel b c (q, r) |]  haftmann@33361  1861  ==> divmod_int_rel (a * b) c (a*q + a*r div c, a*r mod c)"  haftmann@33361  1862 by (auto simp add: split_ifs divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff right_distrib mult_ac)  haftmann@33361  1863 haftmann@33361  1864 lemma zdiv_zmult1_eq: "(a*b) div c = a*(b div c) + a*(b mod c) div (c::int)"  haftmann@33361  1865 apply (case_tac "c = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1866 apply (blast intro: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zmult1_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_div])  haftmann@33361  1867 done  haftmann@33361  1868 haftmann@33361  1869 lemma zmod_zmult1_eq: "(a*b) mod c = a*(b mod c) mod (c::int)"  haftmann@33361  1870 apply (case_tac "c = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1871 apply (blast intro: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zmult1_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_mod])  haftmann@33361  1872 done  haftmann@33361  1873 haftmann@33361  1874 lemma zmod_zdiv_trivial: "(a mod b) div b = (0::int)"  haftmann@33361  1875 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1876 apply (auto simp add: linorder_neq_iff div_pos_pos_trivial div_neg_neg_trivial)  haftmann@33361  1877 done  haftmann@33361  1878 haftmann@33361  1879 text{*proving (a+b) div c = a div c + b div c + ((a mod c + b mod c) div c) *}  haftmann@33361  1880 haftmann@33361  1881 lemma zadd1_lemma:  bulwahn@46552  1882  "[| divmod_int_rel a c (aq, ar); divmod_int_rel b c (bq, br) |]  haftmann@33361  1883  ==> divmod_int_rel (a+b) c (aq + bq + (ar+br) div c, (ar+br) mod c)"  haftmann@33361  1884 by (force simp add: split_ifs divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1885 haftmann@33361  1886 (*NOT suitable for rewriting: the RHS has an instance of the LHS*)  haftmann@33361  1887 lemma zdiv_zadd1_eq:  haftmann@33361  1888  "(a+b) div (c::int) = a div c + b div c + ((a mod c + b mod c) div c)"  haftmann@33361  1889 apply (case_tac "c = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  1890 apply (blast intro: zadd1_lemma [OF divmod_int_rel_div_mod divmod_int_rel_div_mod] divmod_int_rel_div)  haftmann@33361  1891 done  haftmann@33361  1892 haftmann@33361  1893 instance int :: ring_div  haftmann@33361  1894 proof  haftmann@33361  1895  fix a b c :: int  haftmann@33361  1896  assume not0: "b \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1897  show "(a + c * b) div b = c + a div b"  haftmann@33361  1898  unfolding zdiv_zadd1_eq [of a "c * b"] using not0  haftmann@33361  1899  by (simp add: zmod_zmult1_eq zmod_zdiv_trivial zdiv_zmult1_eq)  haftmann@33361  1900 next  haftmann@33361  1901  fix a b c :: int  haftmann@33361  1902  assume "a \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1903  then show "(a * b) div (a * c) = b div c"  haftmann@33361  1904  proof (cases "b \ 0 \ c \ 0")  haftmann@33361  1905  case False then show ?thesis by auto  haftmann@33361  1906  next  haftmann@33361  1907  case True then have "b \ 0" and "c \ 0" by auto  haftmann@33361  1908  with a \ 0  haftmann@33361  1909  have "\q r. divmod_int_rel b c (q, r) \ divmod_int_rel (a * b) (a * c) (q, a * r)"  haftmann@33361  1910  apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def)  haftmann@33361  1911  apply (auto simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  1912  apply (auto simp add: zero_less_mult_iff zero_le_mult_iff mult_le_0_iff mult_commute [of a] mult_less_cancel_right)  haftmann@33361  1913  done  haftmann@33361  1914  moreover with c \ 0 divmod_int_rel_div_mod have "divmod_int_rel b c (b div c, b mod c)" by auto  haftmann@33361  1915  ultimately have "divmod_int_rel (a * b) (a * c) (b div c, a * (b mod c))" .  bulwahn@46552  1916  from this show ?thesis by (rule divmod_int_rel_div)  haftmann@33361  1917  qed  haftmann@33361  1918 qed auto  haftmann@33361  1919 haftmann@33361  1920 lemma posDivAlg_div_mod:  haftmann@33361  1921  assumes "k \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1922  and "l \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1923  shows "posDivAlg k l = (k div l, k mod l)"  haftmann@33361  1924 proof (cases "l = 0")  haftmann@33361  1925  case True then show ?thesis by (simp add: posDivAlg.simps)  haftmann@33361  1926 next  haftmann@33361  1927  case False with assms posDivAlg_correct  haftmann@33361  1928  have "divmod_int_rel k l (fst (posDivAlg k l), snd (posDivAlg k l))"  haftmann@33361  1929  by simp  bulwahn@46552  1930  from divmod_int_rel_div [OF this] divmod_int_rel_mod [OF this]  haftmann@33361  1931  show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@33361  1932 qed  haftmann@33361  1933 haftmann@33361  1934 lemma negDivAlg_div_mod:  haftmann@33361  1935  assumes "k < 0"  haftmann@33361  1936  and "l > 0"  haftmann@33361  1937  shows "negDivAlg k l = (k div l, k mod l)"  haftmann@33361  1938 proof -  haftmann@33361  1939  from assms have "l \ 0" by simp  haftmann@33361  1940  from assms negDivAlg_correct  haftmann@33361  1941  have "divmod_int_rel k l (fst (negDivAlg k l), snd (negDivAlg k l))"  haftmann@33361  1942  by simp  bulwahn@46552  1943  from divmod_int_rel_div [OF this] divmod_int_rel_mod [OF this]  haftmann@33361  1944  show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@33361  1945 qed  haftmann@33361  1946 haftmann@33361  1947 lemma zmod_eq_0_iff: "(m mod d = 0) = (EX q::int. m = d*q)"  haftmann@33361  1948 by (simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [symmetric] dvd_def)  haftmann@33361  1949 haftmann@33361  1950 (* REVISIT: should this be generalized to all semiring_div types? *)  haftmann@33361  1951 lemmas zmod_eq_0D [dest!] = zmod_eq_0_iff [THEN iffD1]  haftmann@33361  1952 huffman@47108  1953 lemma zmod_zdiv_equality':  huffman@47108  1954  "(m\int) mod n = m - (m div n) * n"  huffman@47108  1955  by (rule_tac P="%x. m mod n = x - (m div n) * n" in subst [OF mod_div_equality [of _ n]])  huffman@47108  1956  arith  huffman@47108  1957 haftmann@33361  1958 huffman@46551  1959 subsubsection {* Proving @{term "a div (b*c) = (a div b) div c"} *}  haftmann@33361  1960 haftmann@33361  1961 (*The condition c>0 seems necessary. Consider that 7 div ~6 = ~2 but  haftmann@33361  1962  7 div 2 div ~3 = 3 div ~3 = ~1. The subcase (a div b) mod c = 0 seems  haftmann@33361  1963  to cause particular problems.*)  haftmann@33361  1964 haftmann@33361  1965 text{*first, four lemmas to bound the remainder for the cases b<0 and b>0 *}  haftmann@33361  1966 haftmann@33361  1967 lemma zmult2_lemma_aux1: "[| (0::int) < c; b < r; r \ 0 |] ==> b*c < b*(q mod c) + r"  haftmann@33361  1968 apply (subgoal_tac "b * (c - q mod c) < r * 1")  haftmann@33361  1969  apply (simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  1970 apply (rule order_le_less_trans)  haftmann@33361  1971  apply (erule_tac [2] mult_strict_right_mono)  haftmann@33361  1972  apply (rule mult_left_mono_neg)  huffman@35216  1973  using add1_zle_eq[of "q mod c"]apply(simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  1974  apply (simp)  haftmann@33361  1975 apply (simp)  haftmann@33361  1976 done  haftmann@33361  1977 haftmann@33361  1978 lemma zmult2_lemma_aux2:  haftmann@33361  1979  "[| (0::int) < c; b < r; r \ 0 |] ==> b * (q mod c) + r \ 0"  haftmann@33361  1980 apply (subgoal_tac "b * (q mod c) \ 0")  haftmann@33361  1981  apply arith  haftmann@33361  1982 apply (simp add: mult_le_0_iff)  haftmann@33361  1983 done  haftmann@33361  1984 haftmann@33361  1985 lemma zmult2_lemma_aux3: "[| (0::int) < c; 0 \ r; r < b |] ==> 0 \ b * (q mod c) + r"  haftmann@33361  1986 apply (subgoal_tac "0 \ b * (q mod c) ")  haftmann@33361  1987 apply arith  haftmann@33361  1988 apply (simp add: zero_le_mult_iff)  haftmann@33361  1989 done  haftmann@33361  1990 haftmann@33361  1991 lemma zmult2_lemma_aux4: "[| (0::int) < c; 0 \ r; r < b |] ==> b * (q mod c) + r < b * c"  haftmann@33361  1992 apply (subgoal_tac "r * 1 < b * (c - q mod c) ")  haftmann@33361  1993  apply (simp add: right_diff_distrib)  haftmann@33361  1994 apply (rule order_less_le_trans)  haftmann@33361  1995  apply (erule mult_strict_right_mono)  haftmann@33361  1996  apply (rule_tac [2] mult_left_mono)  haftmann@33361  1997  apply simp  huffman@35216  1998  using add1_zle_eq[of "q mod c"] apply (simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  1999 apply simp  haftmann@33361  2000 done  haftmann@33361  2001 bulwahn@46552  2002 lemma zmult2_lemma: "[| divmod_int_rel a b (q, r); 0 < c |]  haftmann@33361  2003  ==> divmod_int_rel a (b * c) (q div c, b*(q mod c) + r)"  haftmann@33361  2004 by (auto simp add: mult_ac divmod_int_rel_def linorder_neq_iff  haftmann@33361  2005  zero_less_mult_iff right_distrib [symmetric]  haftmann@33361  2006  zmult2_lemma_aux1 zmult2_lemma_aux2 zmult2_lemma_aux3 zmult2_lemma_aux4)  haftmann@33361  2007 haftmann@33361  2008 lemma zdiv_zmult2_eq: "(0::int) < c ==> a div (b*c) = (a div b) div c"  haftmann@33361  2009 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  2010 apply (force simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zmult2_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_div])  haftmann@33361  2011 done  haftmann@33361  2012 haftmann@33361  2013 lemma zmod_zmult2_eq:  haftmann@33361  2014  "(0::int) < c ==> a mod (b*c) = b*(a div b mod c) + a mod b"  haftmann@33361  2015 apply (case_tac "b = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  2016 apply (force simp add: divmod_int_rel_div_mod [THEN zmult2_lemma, THEN divmod_int_rel_mod])  haftmann@33361  2017 done  haftmann@33361  2018 huffman@47108  2019 lemma div_pos_geq:  huffman@47108  2020  fixes k l :: int  huffman@47108  2021  assumes "0 < l" and "l \ k"  huffman@47108  2022  shows "k div l = (k - l) div l + 1"  huffman@47108  2023 proof -  huffman@47108  2024  have "k = (k - l) + l" by simp  huffman@47108  2025  then obtain j where k: "k = j + l" ..  huffman@47108  2026  with assms show ?thesis by simp  huffman@47108  2027 qed  huffman@47108  2028 huffman@47108  2029 lemma mod_pos_geq:  huffman@47108  2030  fixes k l :: int  huffman@47108  2031  assumes "0 < l" and "l \ k"  huffman@47108  2032  shows "k mod l = (k - l) mod l"  huffman@47108  2033 proof -  huffman@47108  2034  have "k = (k - l) + l" by simp  huffman@47108  2035  then obtain j where k: "k = j + l" ..  huffman@47108  2036  with assms show ?thesis by simp  huffman@47108  2037 qed  huffman@47108  2038 haftmann@33361  2039 huffman@46551  2040 subsubsection {* Splitting Rules for div and mod *}  haftmann@33361  2041 haftmann@33361  2042 text{*The proofs of the two lemmas below are essentially identical*}  haftmann@33361  2043 haftmann@33361  2044 lemma split_pos_lemma:  haftmann@33361  2045  "0  haftmann@33361  2046  P(n div k :: int)(n mod k) = (\i j. 0\j & j P i j)"  haftmann@33361  2047 apply (rule iffI, clarify)  haftmann@33361  2048  apply (erule_tac P="P ?x ?y" in rev_mp)  haftmann@33361  2049  apply (subst mod_add_eq)  haftmann@33361  2050  apply (subst zdiv_zadd1_eq)  haftmann@33361  2051  apply (simp add: div_pos_pos_trivial mod_pos_pos_trivial)  haftmann@33361  2052 txt{*converse direction*}  haftmann@33361  2053 apply (drule_tac x = "n div k" in spec)  haftmann@33361  2054 apply (drule_tac x = "n mod k" in spec, simp)  haftmann@33361  2055 done  haftmann@33361  2056 haftmann@33361  2057 lemma split_neg_lemma:  haftmann@33361  2058  "k<0 ==>  haftmann@33361  2059  P(n div k :: int)(n mod k) = (\i j. k0 & n = k*i + j --> P i j)"  haftmann@33361  2060 apply (rule iffI, clarify)  haftmann@33361  2061  apply (erule_tac P="P ?x ?y" in rev_mp)  haftmann@33361  2062  apply (subst mod_add_eq)  haftmann@33361  2063  apply (subst zdiv_zadd1_eq)  haftmann@33361  2064  apply (simp add: div_neg_neg_trivial mod_neg_neg_trivial)  haftmann@33361  2065 txt{*converse direction*}  haftmann@33361  2066 apply (drule_tac x = "n div k" in spec)  haftmann@33361  2067 apply (drule_tac x = "n mod k" in spec, simp)  haftmann@33361  2068 done  haftmann@33361  2069 haftmann@33361  2070 lemma split_zdiv:  haftmann@33361  2071  "P(n div k :: int) =  haftmann@33361  2072  ((k = 0 --> P 0) &  haftmann@33361  2073  (0 (\i j. 0\j & j P i)) &  haftmann@33361  2074  (k<0 --> (\i j. k0 & n = k*i + j --> P i)))"  haftmann@33361  2075 apply (case_tac "k=0", simp)  haftmann@33361  2076 apply (simp only: linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  2077 apply (erule disjE)  haftmann@33361  2078  apply (simp_all add: split_pos_lemma [of concl: "%x y. P x"]  haftmann@33361  2079  split_neg_lemma [of concl: "%x y. P x"])  haftmann@33361  2080 done  haftmann@33361  2081 haftmann@33361  2082 lemma split_zmod:  haftmann@33361  2083  "P(n mod k :: int) =  haftmann@33361  2084  ((k = 0 --> P n) &  haftmann@33361  2085  (0 (\i j. 0\j & j P j)) &  haftmann@33361  2086  (k<0 --> (\i j. k0 & n = k*i + j --> P j)))"  haftmann@33361  2087 apply (case_tac "k=0", simp)  haftmann@33361  2088 apply (simp only: linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  2089 apply (erule disjE)  haftmann@33361  2090  apply (simp_all add: split_pos_lemma [of concl: "%x y. P y"]  haftmann@33361  2091  split_neg_lemma [of concl: "%x y. P y"])  haftmann@33361  2092 done  haftmann@33361  2093 webertj@33730  2094 text {* Enable (lin)arith to deal with @{const div} and @{const mod}  webertj@33730  2095  when these are applied to some constant that is of the form  huffman@47108  2096  @{term "numeral k"}: *}  huffman@47108  2097 declare split_zdiv [of _ _ "numeral k", arith_split] for k  huffman@47108  2098 declare split_zmod [of _ _ "numeral k", arith_split] for k  haftmann@33361  2099 haftmann@33361  2100 huffman@46551  2101 subsubsection {* Speeding up the Division Algorithm with Shifting *}  haftmann@33361  2102 haftmann@33361  2103 text{*computing div by shifting *}  haftmann@33361  2104 haftmann@33361  2105 lemma pos_zdiv_mult_2: "(0::int) \ a ==> (1 + 2*b) div (2*a) = b div a"  haftmann@33361  2106 proof cases  haftmann@33361  2107  assume "a=0"  haftmann@33361  2108  thus ?thesis by simp  haftmann@33361  2109 next  haftmann@33361  2110  assume "a\0" and le_a: "0\a"  haftmann@33361  2111  hence a_pos: "1 \ a" by arith  haftmann@33361  2112  hence one_less_a2: "1 < 2 * a" by arith  haftmann@33361  2113  hence le_2a: "2 * (1 + b mod a) \ 2 * a"  haftmann@33361  2114  unfolding mult_le_cancel_left  haftmann@33361  2115  by (simp add: add1_zle_eq add_commute [of 1])  haftmann@33361  2116  with a_pos have "0 \ b mod a" by simp  haftmann@33361  2117  hence le_addm: "0 \ 1 mod (2*a) + 2*(b mod a)"  haftmann@33361  2118  by (simp add: mod_pos_pos_trivial one_less_a2)  haftmann@33361  2119  with le_2a  haftmann@33361  2120  have "(1 mod (2*a) + 2*(b mod a)) div (2*a) = 0"  haftmann@33361  2121  by (simp add: div_pos_pos_trivial le_addm mod_pos_pos_trivial one_less_a2  haftmann@33361  2122  right_distrib)  haftmann@33361  2123  thus ?thesis  haftmann@33361  2124  by (subst zdiv_zadd1_eq,  haftmann@33361  2125  simp add: mod_mult_mult1 one_less_a2  haftmann@33361  2126  div_pos_pos_trivial)  haftmann@33361  2127 qed  haftmann@33361  2128 boehmes@35815  2129 lemma neg_zdiv_mult_2:  boehmes@35815  2130  assumes A: "a \ (0::int)" shows "(1 + 2*b) div (2*a) = (b+1) div a"  boehmes@35815  2131 proof -  boehmes@35815  2132  have R: "1 + - (2 * (b + 1)) = - (1 + 2 * b)" by simp  boehmes@35815  2133  have "(1 + 2 * (-b - 1)) div (2 * (-a)) = (-b - 1) div (-a)"  boehmes@35815  2134  by (rule pos_zdiv_mult_2, simp add: A)  boehmes@35815  2135  thus ?thesis  boehmes@35815  2136  by (simp only: R zdiv_zminus_zminus diff_minus  boehmes@35815  2137  minus_add_distrib [symmetric] mult_minus_right)  boehmes@35815  2138 qed  haftmann@33361  2139 huffman@47108  2140 (* FIXME: add rules for negative numerals *)  huffman@47108  2141 lemma zdiv_numeral_Bit0 [simp]:  huffman@47108  2142  "numeral (Num.Bit0 v) div numeral (Num.Bit0 w) =  huffman@47108  2143  numeral v div (numeral w :: int)"  huffman@47108  2144  unfolding numeral.simps unfolding mult_2 [symmetric]  huffman@47108  2145  by (rule div_mult_mult1, simp)  huffman@47108  2146 huffman@47108  2147 lemma zdiv_numeral_Bit1 [simp]:  huffman@47108  2148  "numeral (Num.Bit1 v) div numeral (Num.Bit0 w) =  huffman@47108  2149  (numeral v div (numeral w :: int))"  huffman@47108  2150  unfolding numeral.simps  huffman@47108  2151  unfolding mult_2 [symmetric] add_commute [of _ 1]  huffman@47108  2152  by (rule pos_zdiv_mult_2, simp)  haftmann@33361  2153 haftmann@33361  2154 huffman@46551  2155 subsubsection {* Computing mod by Shifting (proofs resemble those for div) *}  haftmann@33361  2156 haftmann@33361  2157 lemma pos_zmod_mult_2:  haftmann@33361  2158  fixes a b :: int  haftmann@33361  2159  assumes "0 \ a"  haftmann@33361  2160  shows "(1 + 2 * b) mod (2 * a) = 1 + 2 * (b mod a)"  haftmann@33361  2161 proof (cases "0 < a")  haftmann@33361  2162  case False with assms show ?thesis by simp  haftmann@33361  2163 next  haftmann@33361  2164  case True  haftmann@33361  2165  then have "b mod a < a" by (rule pos_mod_bound)  haftmann@33361  2166  then have "1 + b mod a \ a" by simp  haftmann@33361  2167  then have A: "2 * (1 + b mod a) \ 2 * a" by simp  haftmann@33361  2168  from 0 < a have "0 \ b mod a" by (rule pos_mod_sign)  haftmann@33361  2169  then have B: "0 \ 1 + 2 * (b mod a)" by simp  haftmann@33361  2170  have "((1\int) mod ((2\int) * a) + (2\int) * b mod ((2\int) * a)) mod ((2\int) * a) = (1\int) + (2\int) * (b mod a)"  haftmann@33361  2171  using 0 < a and A  haftmann@33361  2172  by (auto simp add: mod_mult_mult1 mod_pos_pos_trivial ring_distribs intro!: mod_pos_pos_trivial B)  haftmann@33361  2173  then show ?thesis by (subst mod_add_eq)  haftmann@33361  2174 qed  haftmann@33361  2175 haftmann@33361  2176 lemma neg_zmod_mult_2:  haftmann@33361  2177  fixes a b :: int  haftmann@33361  2178  assumes "a \ 0"  haftmann@33361  2179  shows "(1 + 2 * b) mod (2 * a) = 2 * ((b + 1) mod a) - 1"  haftmann@33361  2180 proof -  haftmann@33361  2181  from assms have "0 \ - a" by auto  haftmann@33361  2182  then have "(1 + 2 * (- b - 1)) mod (2 * (- a)) = 1 + 2 * ((- b - 1) mod (- a))"  haftmann@33361  2183  by (rule pos_zmod_mult_2)  haftmann@33361  2184  then show ?thesis by (simp add: zmod_zminus2 algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  2185  (simp add: diff_minus add_ac)  haftmann@33361  2186 qed  haftmann@33361  2187 huffman@47108  2188 (* FIXME: add rules for negative numerals *)  huffman@47108  2189 lemma zmod_numeral_Bit0 [simp]:  huffman@47108  2190  "numeral (Num.Bit0 v) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 w) =  huffman@47108  2191  (2::int) * (numeral v mod numeral w)"  huffman@47108  2192  unfolding numeral_Bit0 [of v] numeral_Bit0 [of w]  huffman@47108  2193  unfolding mult_2 [symmetric] by (rule mod_mult_mult1)  huffman@47108  2194 huffman@47108  2195 lemma zmod_numeral_Bit1 [simp]:  huffman@47108  2196  "numeral (Num.Bit1 v) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 w) =  huffman@47108  2197  2 * (numeral v mod numeral w) + (1::int)"  huffman@47108  2198  unfolding numeral_Bit1 [of v] numeral_Bit0 [of w]  huffman@47108  2199  unfolding mult_2 [symmetric] add_commute [of _ 1]  huffman@47108  2200  by (rule pos_zmod_mult_2, simp)  haftmann@33361  2201 nipkow@39489  2202 lemma zdiv_eq_0_iff:  nipkow@39489  2203  "(i::int) div k = 0 \ k=0 \ 0\i \ i i\0 \ k ?R" by (rule split_zdiv[THEN iffD2]) simp  nipkow@39489  2207  with ?L show ?R by blast  nipkow@39489  2208 next  nipkow@39489  2209  assume ?R thus ?L  nipkow@39489  2210  by(auto simp: div_pos_pos_trivial div_neg_neg_trivial)  nipkow@39489  2211 qed  nipkow@39489  2212 nipkow@39489  2213 huffman@46551  2214 subsubsection {* Quotients of Signs *}  haftmann@33361  2215 haftmann@33361  2216 lemma div_neg_pos_less0: "[| a < (0::int); 0 < b |] ==> a div b < 0"  haftmann@33361  2217 apply (subgoal_tac "a div b \ -1", force)  haftmann@33361  2218 apply (rule order_trans)  haftmann@33361  2219 apply (rule_tac a' = "-1" in zdiv_mono1)  haftmann@33361  2220 apply (auto simp add: div_eq_minus1)  haftmann@33361  2221 done  haftmann@33361  2222 haftmann@33361  2223 lemma div_nonneg_neg_le0: "[| (0::int) \ a; b < 0 |] ==> a div b \ 0"  haftmann@33361  2224 by (drule zdiv_mono1_neg, auto)  haftmann@33361  2225 haftmann@33361  2226 lemma div_nonpos_pos_le0: "[| (a::int) \ 0; b > 0 |] ==> a div b \ 0"  haftmann@33361  2227 by (drule zdiv_mono1, auto)  haftmann@33361  2228 nipkow@33804  2229 text{* Now for some equivalences of the form @{text"a div b >=< 0 \ \"}  nipkow@33804  2230 conditional upon the sign of @{text a} or @{text b}. There are many more.  nipkow@33804  2231 They should all be simp rules unless that causes too much search. *}  nipkow@33804  2232 haftmann@33361  2233 lemma pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff: "(0::int) < b ==> (0 \ a div b) = (0 \ a)"  haftmann@33361  2234 apply auto  haftmann@33361  2235 apply (drule_tac [2] zdiv_mono1)  haftmann@33361  2236 apply (auto simp add: linorder_neq_iff)  haftmann@33361  2237 apply (simp (no_asm_use) add: linorder_not_less [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2238 apply (blast intro: div_neg_pos_less0)  haftmann@33361  2239 done  haftmann@33361  2240 haftmann@33361  2241 lemma neg_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff:  nipkow@33804  2242  "b < (0::int) ==> (0 \ a div b) = (a \ (0::int))"  haftmann@33361  2243 apply (subst zdiv_zminus_zminus [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2244 apply (subst pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff, auto)  haftmann@33361  2245 done  haftmann@33361  2246 haftmann@33361  2247 (*But not (a div b \ 0 iff a\0); consider a=1, b=2 when a div b = 0.*)  haftmann@33361  2248 lemma pos_imp_zdiv_neg_iff: "(0::int) < b ==> (a div b < 0) = (a < 0)"  haftmann@33361  2249 by (simp add: linorder_not_le [symmetric] pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff)  haftmann@33361  2250 nipkow@39489  2251 lemma pos_imp_zdiv_pos_iff:  nipkow@39489  2252  "0 0 < (i::int) div k \ k \ i"  nipkow@39489  2253 using pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff[of k i] zdiv_eq_0_iff[of i k]  nipkow@39489  2254 by arith  nipkow@39489  2255 haftmann@33361  2256 (*Again the law fails for \: consider a = -1, b = -2 when a div b = 0*)  haftmann@33361  2257 lemma neg_imp_zdiv_neg_iff: "b < (0::int) ==> (a div b < 0) = (0 < a)"  haftmann@33361  2258 by (simp add: linorder_not_le [symmetric] neg_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff)  haftmann@33361  2259 nipkow@33804  2260 lemma nonneg1_imp_zdiv_pos_iff:  nipkow@33804  2261  "(0::int) <= a \ (a div b > 0) = (a >= b & b>0)"  nipkow@33804  2262 apply rule  nipkow@33804  2263  apply rule  nipkow@33804  2264  using div_pos_pos_trivial[of a b]apply arith  nipkow@33804  2265  apply(cases "b=0")apply simp  nipkow@33804  2266  using div_nonneg_neg_le0[of a b]apply arith  nipkow@33804  2267 using int_one_le_iff_zero_less[of "a div b"] zdiv_mono1[of b a b]apply simp  nipkow@33804  2268 done  nipkow@33804  2269 nipkow@39489  2270 lemma zmod_le_nonneg_dividend: "(m::int) \ 0 ==> m mod k \ m"  nipkow@39489  2271 apply (rule split_zmod[THEN iffD2])  nipkow@44890  2272 apply(fastforce dest: q_pos_lemma intro: split_mult_pos_le)  nipkow@39489  2273 done  nipkow@39489  2274 nipkow@39489  2275 haftmann@33361  2276 subsubsection {* The Divides Relation *}  haftmann@33361  2277 huffman@47108  2278 lemmas zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  2279  dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [of "numeral x::int" "numeral y::int"]  huffman@47108  2280  dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [of "numeral x::int" "neg_numeral y::int"]  huffman@47108  2281  dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [of "neg_numeral x::int" "numeral y::int"]  huffman@47108  2282  dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [of "neg_numeral x::int" "neg_numeral y::int"] for x y  haftmann@33361  2283 haftmann@33361  2284 lemma zdvd_zmod: "f dvd m ==> f dvd (n::int) ==> f dvd m mod n"  haftmann@33361  2285  by (rule dvd_mod) (* TODO: remove *)  haftmann@33361  2286 haftmann@33361  2287 lemma zdvd_zmod_imp_zdvd: "k dvd m mod n ==> k dvd n ==> k dvd (m::int)"  haftmann@33361  2288  by (rule dvd_mod_imp_dvd) (* TODO: remove *)  haftmann@33361  2289 huffman@47108  2290 lemmas dvd_eq_mod_eq_0_numeral [simp] =  huffman@47108  2291  dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [of "numeral x" "numeral y"] for x y  huffman@47108  2292 huffman@47108  2293 huffman@47108  2294 subsubsection {* Further properties *}  huffman@47108  2295 haftmann@33361  2296 lemma zmult_div_cancel: "(n::int) * (m div n) = m - (m mod n)"  haftmann@33361  2297  using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="m" and b="n"]  haftmann@33361  2298  by (simp add: algebra_simps)  haftmann@33361  2299 haftmann@33361  2300 lemma zpower_zmod: "((x::int) mod m)^y mod m = x^y mod m"  haftmann@33361  2301 apply (induct "y", auto)  haftmann@33361  2302 apply (rule zmod_zmult1_eq [THEN trans])  haftmann@33361  2303 apply (simp (no_asm_simp))  haftmann@33361  2304 apply (rule mod_mult_eq [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2305 done  haftmann@33361  2306 haftmann@33361  2307 lemma zdiv_int: "int (a div b) = (int a) div (int b)"  haftmann@33361  2308 apply (subst split_div, auto)  haftmann@33361  2309 apply (subst split_zdiv, auto)  haftmann@33361  2310 apply (rule_tac a="int (b * i) + int j" and b="int b" and r="int j" and r'=ja in unique_quotient)  haftmann@33361  2311 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def of_nat_mult)  haftmann@33361  2312 done  haftmann@33361  2313 haftmann@33361  2314 lemma zmod_int: "int (a mod b) = (int a) mod (int b)"  haftmann@33361  2315 apply (subst split_mod, auto)  haftmann@33361  2316 apply (subst split_zmod, auto)  haftmann@33361  2317 apply (rule_tac a="int (b * i) + int j" and b="int b" and q="int i" and q'=ia  haftmann@33361  2318  in unique_remainder)  haftmann@33361  2319 apply (auto simp add: divmod_int_rel_def of_nat_mult)  haftmann@33361  2320 done  haftmann@33361  2321 haftmann@33361  2322 lemma abs_div: "(y::int) dvd x \ abs (x div y) = abs x div abs y"  haftmann@33361  2323 by (unfold dvd_def, cases "y=0", auto simp add: abs_mult)  haftmann@33361  2324 haftmann@33361  2325 lemma zdvd_mult_div_cancel:"(n::int) dvd m \ n * (m div n) = m"  haftmann@33361  2326 apply (subgoal_tac "m mod n = 0")  haftmann@33361  2327  apply (simp add: zmult_div_cancel)  haftmann@33361  2328 apply (simp only: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)  haftmann@33361  2329 done  haftmann@33361  2330 haftmann@33361  2331 text{*Suggested by Matthias Daum*}  haftmann@33361  2332 lemma int_power_div_base:  haftmann@33361  2333  "\0 < m; 0 < k\ \ k ^ m div k = (k::int) ^ (m - Suc 0)"  haftmann@33361  2334 apply (subgoal_tac "k ^ m = k ^ ((m - Suc 0) + Suc 0)")  haftmann@33361  2335  apply (erule ssubst)  haftmann@33361  2336  apply (simp only: power_add)  haftmann@33361  2337  apply simp_all  haftmann@33361  2338 done  haftmann@33361  2339 haftmann@33361  2340 text {* by Brian Huffman *}  haftmann@33361  2341 lemma zminus_zmod: "- ((x::int) mod m) mod m = - x mod m"  haftmann@33361  2342 by (rule mod_minus_eq [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2343 haftmann@33361  2344 lemma zdiff_zmod_left: "(x mod m - y) mod m = (x - y) mod (m::int)"  haftmann@33361  2345 by (rule mod_diff_left_eq [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2346 haftmann@33361  2347 lemma zdiff_zmod_right: "(x - y mod m) mod m = (x - y) mod (m::int)"  haftmann@33361  2348 by (rule mod_diff_right_eq [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2349 haftmann@33361  2350 lemmas zmod_simps =  haftmann@33361  2351  mod_add_left_eq [symmetric]  haftmann@33361  2352  mod_add_right_eq [symmetric]  haftmann@33361  2353  zmod_zmult1_eq [symmetric]  haftmann@33361  2354  mod_mult_left_eq [symmetric]  haftmann@33361  2355  zpower_zmod  haftmann@33361  2356  zminus_zmod zdiff_zmod_left zdiff_zmod_right  haftmann@33361  2357 haftmann@33361  2358 text {* Distributive laws for function @{text nat}. *}  haftmann@33361  2359 haftmann@33361  2360 lemma nat_div_distrib: "0 \ x \ nat (x div y) = nat x div nat y"  haftmann@33361  2361 apply (rule linorder_cases [of y 0])  haftmann@33361  2362 apply (simp add: div_nonneg_neg_le0)  haftmann@33361  2363 apply simp  haftmann@33361  2364 apply (simp add: nat_eq_iff pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff zdiv_int)  haftmann@33361  2365 done  haftmann@33361  2366 haftmann@33361  2367 (*Fails if y<0: the LHS collapses to (nat z) but the RHS doesn't*)  haftmann@33361  2368 lemma nat_mod_distrib:  haftmann@33361  2369  "\0 \ x; 0 \ y\ \ nat (x mod y) = nat x mod nat y"  haftmann@33361  2370 apply (case_tac "y = 0", simp)  haftmann@33361  2371 apply (simp add: nat_eq_iff zmod_int)  haftmann@33361  2372 done  haftmann@33361  2373 haftmann@33361  2374 text {* transfer setup *}  haftmann@33361  2375 haftmann@33361  2376 lemma transfer_nat_int_functions:  haftmann@33361  2377  "(x::int) >= 0 \ y >= 0 \ (nat x) div (nat y) = nat (x div y)"  haftmann@33361  2378  "(x::int) >= 0 \ y >= 0 \ (nat x) mod (nat y) = nat (x mod y)"  haftmann@33361  2379  by (auto simp add: nat_div_distrib nat_mod_distrib)  haftmann@33361  2380 haftmann@33361  2381 lemma transfer_nat_int_function_closures:  haftmann@33361  2382  "(x::int) >= 0 \ y >= 0 \ x div y >= 0"  haftmann@33361  2383  "(x::int) >= 0 \ y >= 0 \ x mod y >= 0"  haftmann@33361  2384  apply (cases "y = 0")  haftmann@33361  2385  apply (auto simp add: pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff)  haftmann@33361  2386  apply (cases "y = 0")  haftmann@33361  2387  apply auto  haftmann@33361  2388 done  haftmann@33361  2389 haftmann@35644  2390 declare transfer_morphism_nat_int [transfer add return:  haftmann@33361  2391  transfer_nat_int_functions  haftmann@33361  2392  transfer_nat_int_function_closures  haftmann@33361  2393 ]  haftmann@33361  2394 haftmann@33361  2395 lemma transfer_int_nat_functions:  haftmann@33361  2396  "(int x) div (int y) = int (x div y)"  haftmann@33361  2397  "(int x) mod (int y) = int (x mod y)"  haftmann@33361  2398  by (auto simp add: zdiv_int zmod_int)  haftmann@33361  2399 haftmann@33361  2400 lemma transfer_int_nat_function_closures:  haftmann@33361  2401  "is_nat x \ is_nat y \ is_nat (x div y)"  haftmann@33361  2402  "is_nat x \ is_nat y \ is_nat (x mod y)"  haftmann@33361  2403  by (simp_all only: is_nat_def transfer_nat_int_function_closures)  haftmann@33361  2404 haftmann@35644  2405 declare transfer_morphism_int_nat [transfer add return:  haftmann@33361  2406  transfer_int_nat_functions  haftmann@33361  2407  transfer_int_nat_function_closures  haftmann@33361  2408 ]  haftmann@33361  2409 haftmann@33361  2410 text{*Suggested by Matthias Daum*}  haftmann@33361  2411 lemma int_div_less_self: "\0 < x; 1 < k\ \ x div k < (x::int)"  haftmann@33361  2412 apply (subgoal_tac "nat x div nat k < nat x")  nipkow@34225  2413  apply (simp add: nat_div_distrib [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2414 apply (rule Divides.div_less_dividend, simp_all)  haftmann@33361  2415 done  haftmann@33361  2416 haftmann@33361  2417 lemma zmod_eq_dvd_iff: "(x::int) mod n = y mod n \ n dvd x - y"  haftmann@33361  2418 proof  haftmann@33361  2419  assume H: "x mod n = y mod n"  haftmann@33361  2420  hence "x mod n - y mod n = 0" by simp  haftmann@33361  2421  hence "(x mod n - y mod n) mod n = 0" by simp  haftmann@33361  2422  hence "(x - y) mod n = 0" by (simp add: mod_diff_eq[symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2423  thus "n dvd x - y" by (simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)  haftmann@33361  2424 next  haftmann@33361  2425  assume H: "n dvd x - y"  haftmann@33361  2426  then obtain k where k: "x-y = n*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast  haftmann@33361  2427  hence "x = n*k + y" by simp  haftmann@33361  2428  hence "x mod n = (n*k + y) mod n" by simp  haftmann@33361  2429  thus "x mod n = y mod n" by (simp add: mod_add_left_eq)  haftmann@33361  2430 qed  haftmann@33361  2431 haftmann@33361  2432 lemma nat_mod_eq_lemma: assumes xyn: "(x::nat) mod n = y mod n" and xy:"y \ x"  haftmann@33361  2433  shows "\q. x = y + n * q"  haftmann@33361  2434 proof-  haftmann@33361  2435  from xy have th: "int x - int y = int (x - y)" by simp  haftmann@33361  2436  from xyn have "int x mod int n = int y mod int n"  huffman@46551  2437  by (simp add: zmod_int [symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2438  hence "int n dvd int x - int y" by (simp only: zmod_eq_dvd_iff[symmetric])  haftmann@33361  2439  hence "n dvd x - y" by (simp add: th zdvd_int)  haftmann@33361  2440  then show ?thesis using xy unfolding dvd_def apply clarsimp apply (rule_tac x="k" in exI) by arith  haftmann@33361  2441 qed  haftmann@33361  2442 haftmann@33361  2443 lemma nat_mod_eq_iff: "(x::nat) mod n = y mod n \ (\q1 q2. x + n * q1 = y + n * q2)"  haftmann@33361  2444  (is "?lhs = ?rhs")  haftmann@33361  2445 proof  haftmann@33361  2446  assume H: "x mod n = y mod n"  haftmann@33361  2447  {assume xy: "x \ y"  haftmann@33361  2448  from H have th: "y mod n = x mod n" by simp  haftmann@33361  2449  from nat_mod_eq_lemma[OF th xy] have ?rhs  haftmann@33361  2450  apply clarify apply (rule_tac x="q" in exI) by (rule exI[where x="0"], simp)}  haftmann@33361  2451  moreover  haftmann@33361  2452  {assume xy: "y \ x"  haftmann@33361  2453  from nat_mod_eq_lemma[OF H xy] have ?rhs  haftmann@33361  2454  apply clarify apply (rule_tac x="0" in exI) by (rule_tac x="q" in exI, simp)}  haftmann@33361  2455  ultimately show ?rhs using linear[of x y] by blast  haftmann@33361  2456 next  haftmann@33361  2457  assume ?rhs then obtain q1 q2 where q12: "x + n * q1 = y + n * q2" by blast  haftmann@33361  2458  hence "(x + n * q1) mod n = (y + n * q2) mod n" by simp  haftmann@33361  2459  thus ?lhs by simp  haftmann@33361  2460 qed  haftmann@33361  2461 huffman@47108  2462 lemma div_nat_numeral [simp]:  huffman@47108  2463  "(numeral v :: nat) div numeral v' = nat (numeral v div numeral v')"  haftmann@33361  2464  by (simp add: nat_div_distrib)  haftmann@33361  2465 huffman@47108  2466 lemma one_div_nat_numeral [simp]:  huffman@47108  2467  "Suc 0 div numeral v' = nat (1 div numeral v')"  huffman@47108  2468  by (subst nat_div_distrib, simp_all)  huffman@47108  2469 huffman@47108  2470 lemma mod_nat_numeral [simp]:  huffman@47108  2471  "(numeral v :: nat) mod numeral v' = nat (numeral v mod numeral v')"  haftmann@33361  2472  by (simp add: nat_mod_distrib)  haftmann@33361  2473 huffman@47108  2474 lemma one_mod_nat_numeral [simp]:  huffman@47108  2475  "Suc 0 mod numeral v' = nat (1 mod numeral v')"  huffman@47108  2476  by (subst nat_mod_distrib) simp_all  huffman@47108  2477 huffman@47108  2478 lemma mod_2_not_eq_zero_eq_one_int:  huffman@47108  2479  fixes k :: int  huffman@47108  2480  shows "k mod 2 \ 0 \ k mod 2 = 1"  huffman@47108  2481  by auto  huffman@47108  2482 huffman@47108  2483 huffman@47108  2484 subsubsection {* Tools setup *}  huffman@47108  2485 huffman@47108  2486 text {* Nitpick *}  blanchet@34126  2487 blanchet@41792  2488 lemmas [nitpick_unfold] = dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 mod_div_equality' zmod_zdiv_equality'  blanchet@34126  2489 haftmann@35673  2490 haftmann@33361  2491 subsubsection {* Code generation *}  haftmann@33361  2492 haftmann@33361  2493 definition pdivmod :: "int \ int \ int \ int" where  haftmann@33361  2494  "pdivmod k l = (\k\ div \l\, \k\ mod \l$$"  haftmann@33361  2495 haftmann@33361  2496 lemma pdivmod_posDivAlg [code]:  haftmann@33361  2497  "pdivmod k l = (if l = 0 then (0, \k\) else posDivAlg \k\ \l\)"  haftmann@33361  2498 by (subst posDivAlg_div_mod) (simp_all add: pdivmod_def)  haftmann@33361  2499 haftmann@33361  2500 lemma divmod_int_pdivmod: "divmod_int k l = (if k = 0 then (0, 0) else if l = 0 then (0, k) else  haftmann@33361  2501  apsnd ((op *) (sgn l)) (if 0 < l \ 0 \ k \ l < 0 \ k < 0  haftmann@33361  2502  then pdivmod k l  haftmann@33361  2503  else (let (r, s) = pdivmod k l in  huffman@47108  2504  if s = 0 then (- r, 0) else (- r - 1, \l\ - s))))"  haftmann@33361  2505 proof -  haftmann@33361  2506  have aux: "\q::int. - k = l * q \ k = l * - q" by auto  haftmann@33361  2507  show ?thesis  haftmann@33361  2508  by (simp add: divmod_int_mod_div pdivmod_def) ` haftmann