src/HOL/simpdata.ML
author oheimb
Sat Feb 15 17:48:19 1997 +0100 (1997-02-15)
changeset 2636 4b30dbe4a020
parent 2595 548f8ed89a80
child 2718 460fd0f8d478
permissions -rw-r--r--
added delcongs, Delcongs, unsafe_solver, safe_solver, HOL_basic_ss,
safe_asm_more_full_simp_ta, clasimpset HOL_css with modification functions
new addss (old version retained as unsafe_addss),
new Addss (old version retained as Unsafe_Addss),
new auto_tac (old version retained as unsafe_auto_tac),
clasohm@1465
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/simpdata.ML
clasohm@923
     2
    ID:         $Id$
clasohm@1465
     3
    Author:     Tobias Nipkow
clasohm@923
     4
    Copyright   1991  University of Cambridge
clasohm@923
     5
clasohm@923
     6
Instantiation of the generic simplifier
clasohm@923
     7
*)
clasohm@923
     8
paulson@1984
     9
section "Simplifier";
paulson@1984
    10
clasohm@923
    11
open Simplifier;
clasohm@923
    12
paulson@1984
    13
(*** Addition of rules to simpsets and clasets simultaneously ***)
paulson@1984
    14
paulson@1984
    15
(*Takes UNCONDITIONAL theorems of the form A<->B to 
paulson@2031
    16
        the Safe Intr     rule B==>A and 
paulson@2031
    17
        the Safe Destruct rule A==>B.
paulson@1984
    18
  Also ~A goes to the Safe Elim rule A ==> ?R
paulson@1984
    19
  Failing other cases, A is added as a Safe Intr rule*)
paulson@1984
    20
local
paulson@1984
    21
  val iff_const = HOLogic.eq_const HOLogic.boolT;
paulson@1984
    22
paulson@1984
    23
  fun addIff th = 
paulson@1984
    24
      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (#prop(rep_thm th)) of
paulson@2031
    25
                (Const("not",_) $ A) =>
paulson@2031
    26
                    AddSEs [zero_var_indexes (th RS notE)]
paulson@2031
    27
              | (con $ _ $ _) =>
paulson@2031
    28
                    if con=iff_const
paulson@2031
    29
                    then (AddSIs [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD2)];  
paulson@2031
    30
                          AddSDs [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD1)])
paulson@2031
    31
                    else  AddSIs [th]
paulson@2031
    32
              | _ => AddSIs [th];
paulson@1984
    33
       Addsimps [th])
paulson@1984
    34
      handle _ => error ("AddIffs: theorem must be unconditional\n" ^ 
paulson@2031
    35
                         string_of_thm th)
paulson@1984
    36
paulson@1984
    37
  fun delIff th = 
paulson@1984
    38
      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (#prop(rep_thm th)) of
paulson@2031
    39
                (Const("not",_) $ A) =>
paulson@2031
    40
                    Delrules [zero_var_indexes (th RS notE)]
paulson@2031
    41
              | (con $ _ $ _) =>
paulson@2031
    42
                    if con=iff_const
paulson@2031
    43
                    then Delrules [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD2),
paulson@2031
    44
                                   zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD1)]
paulson@2031
    45
                    else Delrules [th]
paulson@2031
    46
              | _ => Delrules [th];
paulson@1984
    47
       Delsimps [th])
paulson@1984
    48
      handle _ => warning("DelIffs: ignoring conditional theorem\n" ^ 
paulson@2031
    49
                          string_of_thm th)
paulson@1984
    50
in
paulson@1984
    51
val AddIffs = seq addIff
paulson@1984
    52
val DelIffs = seq delIff
paulson@1984
    53
end;
paulson@1984
    54
paulson@1984
    55
clasohm@923
    56
local
clasohm@923
    57
paulson@1922
    58
  fun prover s = prove_goal HOL.thy s (fn _ => [fast_tac HOL_cs 1]);
clasohm@923
    59
paulson@1922
    60
  val P_imp_P_iff_True = prover "P --> (P = True)" RS mp;
paulson@1922
    61
  val P_imp_P_eq_True = P_imp_P_iff_True RS eq_reflection;
clasohm@923
    62
paulson@1922
    63
  val not_P_imp_P_iff_F = prover "~P --> (P = False)" RS mp;
paulson@1922
    64
  val not_P_imp_P_eq_False = not_P_imp_P_iff_F RS eq_reflection;
clasohm@923
    65
paulson@1922
    66
  fun atomize pairs =
paulson@1922
    67
    let fun atoms th =
paulson@2031
    68
          (case concl_of th of
paulson@2031
    69
             Const("Trueprop",_) $ p =>
paulson@2031
    70
               (case head_of p of
paulson@2031
    71
                  Const(a,_) =>
paulson@2031
    72
                    (case assoc(pairs,a) of
paulson@2031
    73
                       Some(rls) => flat (map atoms ([th] RL rls))
paulson@2031
    74
                     | None => [th])
paulson@2031
    75
                | _ => [th])
paulson@2031
    76
           | _ => [th])
paulson@1922
    77
    in atoms end;
clasohm@923
    78
nipkow@2134
    79
  fun gen_all th = forall_elim_vars (#maxidx(rep_thm th)+1) th;
nipkow@2134
    80
nipkow@2134
    81
in
nipkow@2134
    82
paulson@1922
    83
  fun mk_meta_eq r = case concl_of r of
paulson@2031
    84
          Const("==",_)$_$_ => r
paulson@1922
    85
      |   _$(Const("op =",_)$_$_) => r RS eq_reflection
paulson@1922
    86
      |   _$(Const("not",_)$_) => r RS not_P_imp_P_eq_False
paulson@1922
    87
      |   _ => r RS P_imp_P_eq_True;
paulson@1922
    88
  (* last 2 lines requires all formulae to be of the from Trueprop(.) *)
clasohm@923
    89
paulson@2082
    90
val simp_thms = map prover
paulson@2082
    91
 [ "(x=x) = True",
paulson@2082
    92
   "(~True) = False", "(~False) = True", "(~ ~ P) = P",
paulson@2082
    93
   "(~P) ~= P", "P ~= (~P)", "(P ~= Q) = (P = (~Q))",
paulson@2082
    94
   "(True=P) = P", "(P=True) = P",
paulson@2082
    95
   "(True --> P) = P", "(False --> P) = True", 
paulson@2082
    96
   "(P --> True) = True", "(P --> P) = True",
paulson@2082
    97
   "(P --> False) = (~P)", "(P --> ~P) = (~P)",
paulson@2082
    98
   "(P & True) = P", "(True & P) = P", 
paulson@2082
    99
   "(P & False) = False", "(False & P) = False", "(P & P) = P",
paulson@2082
   100
   "(P | True) = True", "(True | P) = True", 
paulson@2082
   101
   "(P | False) = P", "(False | P) = P", "(P | P) = P",
paulson@2082
   102
   "((~P) = (~Q)) = (P=Q)",
nipkow@2129
   103
   "(!x.P) = P", "(? x.P) = P", "? x. x=t", "? x. t=x", 
paulson@2082
   104
   "(? x. x=t & P(x)) = P(t)", "(? x. t=x & P(x)) = P(t)", 
paulson@2082
   105
   "(! x. x=t --> P(x)) = P(t)", "(! x. t=x --> P(x)) = P(t)" ];
clasohm@923
   106
lcp@988
   107
(*Add congruence rules for = (instead of ==) *)
oheimb@2636
   108
infix 4 addcongs delcongs;
clasohm@923
   109
fun ss addcongs congs = ss addeqcongs (congs RL [eq_reflection]);
oheimb@2636
   110
fun ss delcongs congs = ss deleqcongs (congs RL [eq_reflection]);
clasohm@923
   111
clasohm@1264
   112
fun Addcongs congs = (simpset := !simpset addcongs congs);
oheimb@2636
   113
fun Delcongs congs = (simpset := !simpset delcongs congs);
clasohm@1264
   114
clasohm@923
   115
fun mksimps pairs = map mk_meta_eq o atomize pairs o gen_all;
clasohm@923
   116
paulson@1922
   117
val imp_cong = impI RSN
paulson@1922
   118
    (2, prove_goal HOL.thy "(P=P')--> (P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P-->Q) = (P'-->Q'))"
paulson@1922
   119
        (fn _=> [fast_tac HOL_cs 1]) RS mp RS mp);
paulson@1922
   120
paulson@1948
   121
(*Miniscoping: pushing in existential quantifiers*)
paulson@1948
   122
val ex_simps = map prover 
paulson@2031
   123
                ["(EX x. P x & Q)   = ((EX x.P x) & Q)",
paulson@2031
   124
                 "(EX x. P & Q x)   = (P & (EX x.Q x))",
paulson@2031
   125
                 "(EX x. P x | Q)   = ((EX x.P x) | Q)",
paulson@2031
   126
                 "(EX x. P | Q x)   = (P | (EX x.Q x))",
paulson@2031
   127
                 "(EX x. P x --> Q) = ((ALL x.P x) --> Q)",
paulson@2031
   128
                 "(EX x. P --> Q x) = (P --> (EX x.Q x))"];
paulson@1948
   129
paulson@1948
   130
(*Miniscoping: pushing in universal quantifiers*)
paulson@1948
   131
val all_simps = map prover
paulson@2031
   132
                ["(ALL x. P x & Q)   = ((ALL x.P x) & Q)",
paulson@2031
   133
                 "(ALL x. P & Q x)   = (P & (ALL x.Q x))",
paulson@2031
   134
                 "(ALL x. P x | Q)   = ((ALL x.P x) | Q)",
paulson@2031
   135
                 "(ALL x. P | Q x)   = (P | (ALL x.Q x))",
paulson@2031
   136
                 "(ALL x. P x --> Q) = ((EX x.P x) --> Q)",
paulson@2031
   137
                 "(ALL x. P --> Q x) = (P --> (ALL x.Q x))"];
paulson@1948
   138
berghofe@1722
   139
clasohm@923
   140
paulson@2022
   141
(* elimination of existential quantifiers in assumptions *)
clasohm@923
   142
clasohm@923
   143
val ex_all_equiv =
clasohm@923
   144
  let val lemma1 = prove_goal HOL.thy
clasohm@923
   145
        "(? x. P(x) ==> PROP Q) ==> (!!x. P(x) ==> PROP Q)"
clasohm@923
   146
        (fn prems => [resolve_tac prems 1, etac exI 1]);
clasohm@923
   147
      val lemma2 = prove_goalw HOL.thy [Ex_def]
clasohm@923
   148
        "(!!x. P(x) ==> PROP Q) ==> (? x. P(x) ==> PROP Q)"
clasohm@923
   149
        (fn prems => [REPEAT(resolve_tac prems 1)])
clasohm@923
   150
  in equal_intr lemma1 lemma2 end;
clasohm@923
   151
clasohm@923
   152
end;
clasohm@923
   153
clasohm@923
   154
fun prove nm thm  = qed_goal nm HOL.thy thm (fn _ => [fast_tac HOL_cs 1]);
clasohm@923
   155
clasohm@923
   156
prove "conj_commute" "(P&Q) = (Q&P)";
clasohm@923
   157
prove "conj_left_commute" "(P&(Q&R)) = (Q&(P&R))";
clasohm@923
   158
val conj_comms = [conj_commute, conj_left_commute];
nipkow@2134
   159
prove "conj_assoc" "((P&Q)&R) = (P&(Q&R))";
clasohm@923
   160
paulson@1922
   161
prove "disj_commute" "(P|Q) = (Q|P)";
paulson@1922
   162
prove "disj_left_commute" "(P|(Q|R)) = (Q|(P|R))";
paulson@1922
   163
val disj_comms = [disj_commute, disj_left_commute];
nipkow@2134
   164
prove "disj_assoc" "((P|Q)|R) = (P|(Q|R))";
paulson@1922
   165
clasohm@923
   166
prove "conj_disj_distribL" "(P&(Q|R)) = (P&Q | P&R)";
clasohm@923
   167
prove "conj_disj_distribR" "((P|Q)&R) = (P&R | Q&R)";
nipkow@1485
   168
paulson@1892
   169
prove "disj_conj_distribL" "(P|(Q&R)) = ((P|Q) & (P|R))";
paulson@1892
   170
prove "disj_conj_distribR" "((P&Q)|R) = ((P|R) & (Q|R))";
paulson@1892
   171
nipkow@2134
   172
prove "imp_conjR" "(P --> (Q&R)) = ((P-->Q) & (P-->R))";
nipkow@2134
   173
prove "imp_conjL" "((P&Q) -->R)  = (P --> (Q --> R))";
nipkow@2134
   174
prove "imp_disjL" "((P|Q) --> R) = ((P-->R)&(Q-->R))";
paulson@1892
   175
nipkow@1485
   176
prove "de_Morgan_disj" "(~(P | Q)) = (~P & ~Q)";
nipkow@1485
   177
prove "de_Morgan_conj" "(~(P & Q)) = (~P | ~Q)";
paulson@1922
   178
prove "not_iff" "(P~=Q) = (P = (~Q))";
nipkow@1485
   179
nipkow@2134
   180
(*Avoids duplication of subgoals after expand_if, when the true and false 
nipkow@2134
   181
  cases boil down to the same thing.*) 
nipkow@2134
   182
prove "cases_simp" "((P --> Q) & (~P --> Q)) = Q";
nipkow@2134
   183
oheimb@1660
   184
prove "not_all" "(~ (! x.P(x))) = (? x.~P(x))";
paulson@1922
   185
prove "imp_all" "((! x. P x) --> Q) = (? x. P x --> Q)";
oheimb@1660
   186
prove "not_ex"  "(~ (? x.P(x))) = (! x.~P(x))";
paulson@1922
   187
prove "imp_ex" "((? x. P x) --> Q) = (! x. P x --> Q)";
oheimb@1660
   188
nipkow@1655
   189
prove "ex_disj_distrib" "(? x. P(x) | Q(x)) = ((? x. P(x)) | (? x. Q(x)))";
nipkow@1655
   190
prove "all_conj_distrib" "(!x. P(x) & Q(x)) = ((! x. P(x)) & (! x. Q(x)))";
nipkow@1655
   191
nipkow@2134
   192
(* '&' congruence rule: not included by default!
nipkow@2134
   193
   May slow rewrite proofs down by as much as 50% *)
nipkow@2134
   194
nipkow@2134
   195
let val th = prove_goal HOL.thy 
nipkow@2134
   196
                "(P=P')--> (P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P&Q) = (P'&Q'))"
nipkow@2134
   197
                (fn _=> [fast_tac HOL_cs 1])
nipkow@2134
   198
in  bind_thm("conj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   199
nipkow@2134
   200
let val th = prove_goal HOL.thy 
nipkow@2134
   201
                "(Q=Q')--> (Q'--> (P=P'))--> ((P&Q) = (P'&Q'))"
nipkow@2134
   202
                (fn _=> [fast_tac HOL_cs 1])
nipkow@2134
   203
in  bind_thm("rev_conj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   204
nipkow@2134
   205
(* '|' congruence rule: not included by default! *)
nipkow@2134
   206
nipkow@2134
   207
let val th = prove_goal HOL.thy 
nipkow@2134
   208
                "(P=P')--> (~P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P|Q) = (P'|Q'))"
nipkow@2134
   209
                (fn _=> [fast_tac HOL_cs 1])
nipkow@2134
   210
in  bind_thm("disj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   211
nipkow@2134
   212
prove "eq_sym_conv" "(x=y) = (y=x)";
nipkow@2134
   213
nipkow@2134
   214
qed_goalw "o_apply" HOL.thy [o_def] "(f o g) x = f (g x)"
nipkow@2134
   215
 (fn _ => [rtac refl 1]);
nipkow@2134
   216
nipkow@2134
   217
qed_goal "meta_eq_to_obj_eq" HOL.thy "x==y ==> x=y"
nipkow@2134
   218
  (fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac refl 1]);
nipkow@2134
   219
nipkow@2134
   220
qed_goalw "if_True" HOL.thy [if_def] "(if True then x else y) = x"
nipkow@2134
   221
 (fn _=>[fast_tac (HOL_cs addIs [select_equality]) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   222
nipkow@2134
   223
qed_goalw "if_False" HOL.thy [if_def] "(if False then x else y) = y"
nipkow@2134
   224
 (fn _=>[fast_tac (HOL_cs addIs [select_equality]) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   225
nipkow@2134
   226
qed_goal "if_P" HOL.thy "P ==> (if P then x else y) = x"
nipkow@2134
   227
 (fn [prem] => [ stac (prem RS eqTrueI) 1, rtac if_True 1 ]);
nipkow@2134
   228
(*
nipkow@2134
   229
qed_goal "if_not_P" HOL.thy "~P ==> (if P then x else y) = y"
nipkow@2134
   230
 (fn [prem] => [ stac (prem RS not_P_imp_P_iff_F) 1, rtac if_False 1 ]);
nipkow@2134
   231
*)
nipkow@2134
   232
qed_goalw "if_not_P" HOL.thy [if_def] "!!P. ~P ==> (if P then x else y) = y"
nipkow@2134
   233
 (fn _ => [fast_tac (HOL_cs addIs [select_equality]) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   234
nipkow@2134
   235
qed_goal "expand_if" HOL.thy
nipkow@2134
   236
    "P(if Q then x else y) = ((Q --> P(x)) & (~Q --> P(y)))"
nipkow@2134
   237
 (fn _=> [ (res_inst_tac [("Q","Q")] (excluded_middle RS disjE) 1),
nipkow@2134
   238
         stac if_P 2,
nipkow@2134
   239
         stac if_not_P 1,
nipkow@2134
   240
         REPEAT(fast_tac HOL_cs 1) ]);
nipkow@2134
   241
nipkow@2134
   242
qed_goal "if_bool_eq" HOL.thy
nipkow@2134
   243
                   "(if P then Q else R) = ((P-->Q) & (~P-->R))"
nipkow@2134
   244
                   (fn _ => [rtac expand_if 1]);
nipkow@2134
   245
oheimb@2263
   246
local val mktac = mk_case_split_tac (meta_eq_to_obj_eq RS iffD2)
oheimb@2263
   247
in
oheimb@2263
   248
fun split_tac splits = mktac (map mk_meta_eq splits)
oheimb@2263
   249
end;
oheimb@2263
   250
oheimb@2263
   251
local val mktac = mk_case_split_inside_tac (meta_eq_to_obj_eq RS iffD2)
oheimb@2263
   252
in
oheimb@2263
   253
fun split_inside_tac splits = mktac (map mk_meta_eq splits)
oheimb@2263
   254
end;
oheimb@2263
   255
oheimb@2263
   256
oheimb@2251
   257
qed_goal "if_cancel" HOL.thy "(if c then x else x) = x"
oheimb@2251
   258
  (fn _ => [split_tac [expand_if] 1, fast_tac HOL_cs 1]);
oheimb@2251
   259
nipkow@2134
   260
(** 'if' congruence rules: neither included by default! *)
nipkow@2134
   261
nipkow@2134
   262
(*Simplifies x assuming c and y assuming ~c*)
nipkow@2134
   263
qed_goal "if_cong" HOL.thy
nipkow@2134
   264
  "[| b=c; c ==> x=u; ~c ==> y=v |] ==>\
nipkow@2134
   265
\  (if b then x else y) = (if c then u else v)"
nipkow@2134
   266
  (fn rew::prems =>
nipkow@2134
   267
   [stac rew 1, stac expand_if 1, stac expand_if 1,
nipkow@2134
   268
    fast_tac (HOL_cs addDs prems) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   269
nipkow@2134
   270
(*Prevents simplification of x and y: much faster*)
nipkow@2134
   271
qed_goal "if_weak_cong" HOL.thy
nipkow@2134
   272
  "b=c ==> (if b then x else y) = (if c then x else y)"
nipkow@2134
   273
  (fn [prem] => [rtac (prem RS arg_cong) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   274
nipkow@2134
   275
(*Prevents simplification of t: much faster*)
nipkow@2134
   276
qed_goal "let_weak_cong" HOL.thy
nipkow@2134
   277
  "a = b ==> (let x=a in t(x)) = (let x=b in t(x))"
nipkow@2134
   278
  (fn [prem] => [rtac (prem RS arg_cong) 1]);
nipkow@2134
   279
nipkow@2134
   280
(*In general it seems wrong to add distributive laws by default: they
nipkow@2134
   281
  might cause exponential blow-up.  But imp_disjL has been in for a while
nipkow@2134
   282
  and cannot be removed without affecting existing proofs.  Moreover, 
nipkow@2134
   283
  rewriting by "(P|Q --> R) = ((P-->R)&(Q-->R))" might be justified on the
nipkow@2134
   284
  grounds that it allows simplification of R in the two cases.*)
nipkow@2134
   285
nipkow@2134
   286
val mksimps_pairs =
nipkow@2134
   287
  [("op -->", [mp]), ("op &", [conjunct1,conjunct2]),
nipkow@2134
   288
   ("All", [spec]), ("True", []), ("False", []),
nipkow@2134
   289
   ("If", [if_bool_eq RS iffD1])];
nipkow@1758
   290
oheimb@2636
   291
fun unsafe_solver prems = FIRST'[resolve_tac (TrueI::refl::prems),
oheimb@2636
   292
				 atac, etac FalseE];
oheimb@2636
   293
(*No premature instantiation of variables during simplification*)
oheimb@2636
   294
fun   safe_solver prems = FIRST'[match_tac (TrueI::refl::prems),
oheimb@2636
   295
				 eq_assume_tac, ematch_tac [FalseE]];
oheimb@2443
   296
oheimb@2636
   297
val HOL_basic_ss = empty_ss setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac
oheimb@2636
   298
			    setSSolver   safe_solver
oheimb@2636
   299
			    setSolver  unsafe_solver
oheimb@2636
   300
			    setmksimps (mksimps mksimps_pairs);
oheimb@2443
   301
oheimb@2636
   302
val HOL_ss = HOL_basic_ss addsimps ([triv_forall_equality, (* prunes params *)
oheimb@2636
   303
				     if_True, if_False, if_cancel,
oheimb@2636
   304
				     o_apply, imp_disjL, conj_assoc, disj_assoc,
oheimb@2636
   305
				     de_Morgan_conj, de_Morgan_disj, 
oheimb@2636
   306
				     not_all, not_ex, cases_simp]
oheimb@2636
   307
				    @ ex_simps @ all_simps @ simp_thms)
oheimb@2636
   308
			  addcongs [imp_cong];
paulson@2082
   309
nipkow@1655
   310
qed_goal "if_distrib" HOL.thy
nipkow@1655
   311
  "f(if c then x else y) = (if c then f x else f y)" 
nipkow@1655
   312
  (fn _ => [simp_tac (HOL_ss setloop (split_tac [expand_if])) 1]);
nipkow@1655
   313
oheimb@2097
   314
qed_goalw "o_assoc" HOL.thy [o_def] "f o (g o h) = f o g o h"
oheimb@2098
   315
  (fn _ => [rtac ext 1, rtac refl 1]);
paulson@1984
   316
paulson@1984
   317
paulson@1984
   318
paulson@1984
   319
paulson@1984
   320
(*** Install simpsets and datatypes in theory structure ***)
paulson@1984
   321
oheimb@2251
   322
simpset := HOL_ss;
paulson@1984
   323
paulson@1984
   324
exception SS_DATA of simpset;
paulson@1984
   325
paulson@1984
   326
let fun merge [] = SS_DATA empty_ss
paulson@1984
   327
      | merge ss = let val ss = map (fn SS_DATA x => x) ss;
paulson@1984
   328
                   in SS_DATA (foldl merge_ss (hd ss, tl ss)) end;
paulson@1984
   329
paulson@1984
   330
    fun put (SS_DATA ss) = simpset := ss;
paulson@1984
   331
paulson@1984
   332
    fun get () = SS_DATA (!simpset);
paulson@1984
   333
in add_thydata "HOL"
paulson@1984
   334
     ("simpset", ThyMethods {merge = merge, put = put, get = get})
paulson@1984
   335
end;
paulson@1984
   336
paulson@1984
   337
type dtype_info = {case_const:term, case_rewrites:thm list,
paulson@1984
   338
                   constructors:term list, nchotomy:thm, case_cong:thm};
paulson@1984
   339
paulson@1984
   340
exception DT_DATA of (string * dtype_info) list;
paulson@1984
   341
val datatypes = ref [] : (string * dtype_info) list ref;
paulson@1984
   342
paulson@1984
   343
let fun merge [] = DT_DATA []
paulson@1984
   344
      | merge ds =
paulson@1984
   345
          let val ds = map (fn DT_DATA x => x) ds;
paulson@1984
   346
          in DT_DATA (foldl (gen_union eq_fst) (hd ds, tl ds)) end;
paulson@1984
   347
paulson@1984
   348
    fun put (DT_DATA ds) = datatypes := ds;
paulson@1984
   349
paulson@1984
   350
    fun get () = DT_DATA (!datatypes);
paulson@1984
   351
in add_thydata "HOL"
paulson@1984
   352
     ("datatypes", ThyMethods {merge = merge, put = put, get = get})
paulson@1984
   353
end;
paulson@1984
   354
paulson@1984
   355
paulson@1984
   356
add_thy_reader_file "thy_data.ML";
oheimb@2636
   357
oheimb@2636
   358
oheimb@2636
   359
oheimb@2636
   360
oheimb@2636
   361
(*** Integration of simplifier with classical reasoner ***)
oheimb@2636
   362
oheimb@2636
   363
(* rot_eq_tac rotates the first equality premise of subgoal i to the front,
oheimb@2636
   364
   fails if there is no equaliy or if an equality is already at the front *)
oheimb@2636
   365
fun rot_eq_tac i = let
oheimb@2636
   366
  fun is_eq (Const ("Trueprop", _) $ (Const("op =",_) $ _ $ _)) = true
oheimb@2636
   367
  |   is_eq _ = false;
oheimb@2636
   368
  fun find_eq n [] = None
oheimb@2636
   369
  |   find_eq n (t :: ts) = if (is_eq t) then Some n else find_eq (n + 1) ts;
oheimb@2636
   370
  fun rot_eq state = let val (_, _, Bi, _) = dest_state (state, i) in
oheimb@2636
   371
	    (case find_eq 0 (Logic.strip_assums_hyp Bi) of
oheimb@2636
   372
	      None   => no_tac
oheimb@2636
   373
	    | Some 0 => no_tac
oheimb@2636
   374
	    | Some n => rotate_tac n i) end;
oheimb@2636
   375
in STATE rot_eq end;
oheimb@2636
   376
oheimb@2636
   377
(*an unsatisfactory fix for the incomplete asm_full_simp_tac!
oheimb@2636
   378
  better: asm_really_full_simp_tac, a yet to be implemented version of
oheimb@2636
   379
			asm_full_simp_tac that applies all equalities in the
oheimb@2636
   380
			premises to all the premises *)
oheimb@2636
   381
fun safe_asm_more_full_simp_tac ss = TRY o rot_eq_tac THEN' 
oheimb@2636
   382
				     safe_asm_full_simp_tac ss;
oheimb@2636
   383
oheimb@2636
   384
(*Add a simpset to a classical set!*)
oheimb@2636
   385
infix 4 addss;
oheimb@2636
   386
fun cs addss ss = cs addSaltern (CHANGED o (safe_asm_more_full_simp_tac ss));
oheimb@2636
   387
(*old version, for compatibility with unstable old proofs*)
oheimb@2636
   388
infix 4 unsafe_addss;
oheimb@2636
   389
fun cs unsafe_addss ss = cs addbefore asm_full_simp_tac ss;
oheimb@2636
   390
oheimb@2636
   391
fun Addss ss = (claset := !claset addss ss);
oheimb@2636
   392
(*old version, for compatibility with unstable old proofs*)
oheimb@2636
   393
fun Unsafe_Addss ss = (claset := !claset unsafe_addss ss);
oheimb@2636
   394
oheimb@2636
   395
(*Designed to be idempotent, except if best_tac instantiates variables
oheimb@2636
   396
  in some of the subgoals*)
oheimb@2636
   397
(*old version, for compatibility with unstable old proofs*)
oheimb@2636
   398
fun unsafe_auto_tac (cs,ss) = 
oheimb@2636
   399
    ALLGOALS (asm_full_simp_tac ss) THEN
oheimb@2636
   400
    REPEAT   (safe_tac cs THEN ALLGOALS (asm_full_simp_tac ss)) THEN
oheimb@2636
   401
    REPEAT   (FIRSTGOAL (best_tac (cs addss ss))) THEN
oheimb@2636
   402
    prune_params_tac;
oheimb@2636
   403
oheimb@2636
   404
type clasimpset = (claset * simpset);
oheimb@2636
   405
oheimb@2636
   406
val HOL_css = (HOL_cs, HOL_ss);
oheimb@2636
   407
oheimb@2636
   408
fun pair_upd1 f ((a,b),x) = (f(a,x), b);
oheimb@2636
   409
fun pair_upd2 f ((a,b),x) = (a, f(b,x));
oheimb@2636
   410
oheimb@2636
   411
infix 4 addSIs2 addSEs2 addSDs2 addIs2 addEs2 addDs2
oheimb@2636
   412
	addsimps2 delsimps2 addcongs2 delcongs2;
oheimb@2636
   413
val op addSIs2   = pair_upd1 (op addSIs);
oheimb@2636
   414
val op addSEs2   = pair_upd1 (op addSEs);
oheimb@2636
   415
val op addSDs2   = pair_upd1 (op addSDs);
oheimb@2636
   416
val op addIs2    = pair_upd1 (op addIs );
oheimb@2636
   417
val op addEs2    = pair_upd1 (op addEs );
oheimb@2636
   418
val op addDs2    = pair_upd1 (op addDs );
oheimb@2636
   419
val op addsimps2 = pair_upd2 (op addsimps);
oheimb@2636
   420
val op delsimps2 = pair_upd2 (op delsimps);
oheimb@2636
   421
val op addcongs2 = pair_upd2 (op addcongs);
oheimb@2636
   422
val op delcongs2 = pair_upd2 (op delcongs);
oheimb@2636
   423
oheimb@2636
   424
fun auto_tac (cs,ss) = let val cs' = cs addss ss in
oheimb@2636
   425
EVERY [	TRY (safe_tac cs'),
oheimb@2636
   426
	REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (fast_tac cs')),
oheimb@2636
   427
	prune_params_tac] end;
oheimb@2636
   428
oheimb@2636
   429
fun Auto_tac () = auto_tac (!claset, !simpset);
oheimb@2636
   430
oheimb@2636
   431
fun auto () = by (Auto_tac ());