src/HOL/Library/Product_Vector.thy
author huffman
Sun Jun 07 17:59:54 2009 -0700 (2009-06-07)
changeset 31492 5400beeddb55
parent 31491 f7310185481d
child 31562 10d0fb526643
permissions -rw-r--r--
replace 'topo' with 'open'; add extra type constraint for 'open'
huffman@30019
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Library/Product_Vector.thy
huffman@30019
     2
    Author:     Brian Huffman
huffman@30019
     3
*)
huffman@30019
     4
huffman@30019
     5
header {* Cartesian Products as Vector Spaces *}
huffman@30019
     6
huffman@30019
     7
theory Product_Vector
huffman@30019
     8
imports Inner_Product Product_plus
huffman@30019
     9
begin
huffman@30019
    10
huffman@30019
    11
subsection {* Product is a real vector space *}
huffman@30019
    12
huffman@30019
    13
instantiation "*" :: (real_vector, real_vector) real_vector
huffman@30019
    14
begin
huffman@30019
    15
huffman@30019
    16
definition scaleR_prod_def:
huffman@30019
    17
  "scaleR r A = (scaleR r (fst A), scaleR r (snd A))"
huffman@30019
    18
huffman@30019
    19
lemma fst_scaleR [simp]: "fst (scaleR r A) = scaleR r (fst A)"
huffman@30019
    20
  unfolding scaleR_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
    21
huffman@30019
    22
lemma snd_scaleR [simp]: "snd (scaleR r A) = scaleR r (snd A)"
huffman@30019
    23
  unfolding scaleR_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
    24
huffman@30019
    25
lemma scaleR_Pair [simp]: "scaleR r (a, b) = (scaleR r a, scaleR r b)"
huffman@30019
    26
  unfolding scaleR_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
    27
huffman@30019
    28
instance proof
huffman@30019
    29
  fix a b :: real and x y :: "'a \<times> 'b"
huffman@30019
    30
  show "scaleR a (x + y) = scaleR a x + scaleR a y"
huffman@30019
    31
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq scaleR_right_distrib)
huffman@30019
    32
  show "scaleR (a + b) x = scaleR a x + scaleR b x"
huffman@30019
    33
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq scaleR_left_distrib)
huffman@30019
    34
  show "scaleR a (scaleR b x) = scaleR (a * b) x"
huffman@30019
    35
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq)
huffman@30019
    36
  show "scaleR 1 x = x"
huffman@30019
    37
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq)
huffman@30019
    38
qed
huffman@30019
    39
huffman@30019
    40
end
huffman@30019
    41
huffman@31415
    42
subsection {* Product is a topological space *}
huffman@31415
    43
huffman@31415
    44
instantiation
huffman@31415
    45
  "*" :: (topological_space, topological_space) topological_space
huffman@31415
    46
begin
huffman@31415
    47
huffman@31492
    48
definition open_prod_def:
huffman@31492
    49
  "open (S :: ('a \<times> 'b) set) \<longleftrightarrow>
huffman@31492
    50
    (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>A B. open A \<and> open B \<and> x \<in> A \<times> B \<and> A \<times> B \<subseteq> S)"
huffman@31415
    51
huffman@31415
    52
instance proof
huffman@31492
    53
  show "open (UNIV :: ('a \<times> 'b) set)"
huffman@31492
    54
    unfolding open_prod_def by auto
huffman@31415
    55
next
huffman@31415
    56
  fix S T :: "('a \<times> 'b) set"
huffman@31492
    57
  assume "open S" "open T" thus "open (S \<inter> T)"
huffman@31492
    58
    unfolding open_prod_def
huffman@31415
    59
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
    60
    apply (drule (1) bspec)+
huffman@31415
    61
    apply (clarify, rename_tac Sa Ta Sb Tb)
huffman@31492
    62
    apply (rule_tac x="Sa \<inter> Ta" in exI)
huffman@31492
    63
    apply (rule_tac x="Sb \<inter> Tb" in exI)
huffman@31492
    64
    apply (simp add: open_Int)
huffman@31415
    65
    apply fast
huffman@31415
    66
    done
huffman@31415
    67
next
huffman@31492
    68
  fix K :: "('a \<times> 'b) set set"
huffman@31492
    69
  assume "\<forall>S\<in>K. open S" thus "open (\<Union>K)"
huffman@31492
    70
    unfolding open_prod_def by fast
huffman@31415
    71
qed
huffman@31415
    72
huffman@31415
    73
end
huffman@31415
    74
huffman@31339
    75
subsection {* Product is a metric space *}
huffman@31339
    76
huffman@31339
    77
instantiation
huffman@31339
    78
  "*" :: (metric_space, metric_space) metric_space
huffman@31339
    79
begin
huffman@31339
    80
huffman@31339
    81
definition dist_prod_def:
huffman@31339
    82
  "dist (x::'a \<times> 'b) y = sqrt ((dist (fst x) (fst y))\<twosuperior> + (dist (snd x) (snd y))\<twosuperior>)"
huffman@31339
    83
huffman@31339
    84
lemma dist_Pair_Pair: "dist (a, b) (c, d) = sqrt ((dist a c)\<twosuperior> + (dist b d)\<twosuperior>)"
huffman@31339
    85
  unfolding dist_prod_def by simp
huffman@31339
    86
huffman@31339
    87
instance proof
huffman@31339
    88
  fix x y :: "'a \<times> 'b"
huffman@31339
    89
  show "dist x y = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = y"
huffman@31339
    90
    unfolding dist_prod_def
huffman@31339
    91
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq)
huffman@31339
    92
next
huffman@31339
    93
  fix x y z :: "'a \<times> 'b"
huffman@31339
    94
  show "dist x y \<le> dist x z + dist y z"
huffman@31339
    95
    unfolding dist_prod_def
huffman@31339
    96
    apply (rule order_trans [OF _ real_sqrt_sum_squares_triangle_ineq])
huffman@31339
    97
    apply (rule real_sqrt_le_mono)
huffman@31339
    98
    apply (rule order_trans [OF add_mono])
huffman@31339
    99
    apply (rule power_mono [OF dist_triangle2 [of _ _ "fst z"] zero_le_dist])
huffman@31339
   100
    apply (rule power_mono [OF dist_triangle2 [of _ _ "snd z"] zero_le_dist])
huffman@31339
   101
    apply (simp only: real_sum_squared_expand)
huffman@31339
   102
    done
huffman@31415
   103
next
huffman@31415
   104
  (* FIXME: long proof! *)
huffman@31415
   105
  (* Maybe it would be easier to define topological spaces *)
huffman@31415
   106
  (* in terms of neighborhoods instead of open sets? *)
huffman@31492
   107
  fix S :: "('a \<times> 'b) set"
huffman@31492
   108
  show "open S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>e>0. \<forall>y. dist y x < e \<longrightarrow> y \<in> S)"
huffman@31492
   109
    unfolding open_prod_def open_dist
huffman@31492
   110
    apply safe
huffman@31415
   111
    apply (drule (1) bspec)
huffman@31415
   112
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   113
    apply (drule (1) bspec)+
huffman@31415
   114
    apply (clarify, rename_tac r s)
huffman@31415
   115
    apply (rule_tac x="min r s" in exI, simp)
huffman@31415
   116
    apply (clarify, rename_tac c d)
huffman@31415
   117
    apply (erule subsetD)
huffman@31415
   118
    apply (simp add: dist_Pair_Pair)
huffman@31415
   119
    apply (rule conjI)
huffman@31415
   120
    apply (drule spec, erule mp)
huffman@31415
   121
    apply (erule le_less_trans [OF real_sqrt_sum_squares_ge1])
huffman@31415
   122
    apply (drule spec, erule mp)
huffman@31415
   123
    apply (erule le_less_trans [OF real_sqrt_sum_squares_ge2])
huffman@31415
   124
huffman@31415
   125
    apply (drule (1) bspec)
huffman@31415
   126
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   127
    apply (subgoal_tac "\<exists>r>0. \<exists>s>0. e = sqrt (r\<twosuperior> + s\<twosuperior>)")
huffman@31415
   128
    apply clarify
huffman@31492
   129
    apply (rule_tac x="{y. dist y a < r}" in exI)
huffman@31492
   130
    apply (rule_tac x="{y. dist y b < s}" in exI)
huffman@31492
   131
    apply (rule conjI)
huffman@31415
   132
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   133
    apply (rule_tac x="r - dist x a" in exI, rule conjI, simp)
huffman@31415
   134
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   135
    apply (rule le_less_trans [OF dist_triangle])
huffman@31415
   136
    apply (erule less_le_trans [OF add_strict_right_mono], simp)
huffman@31492
   137
    apply (rule conjI)
huffman@31415
   138
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   139
    apply (rule_tac x="s - dist x b" in exI, rule conjI, simp)
huffman@31415
   140
    apply clarify
huffman@31415
   141
    apply (rule le_less_trans [OF dist_triangle])
huffman@31415
   142
    apply (erule less_le_trans [OF add_strict_right_mono], simp)
huffman@31415
   143
    apply (rule conjI)
huffman@31415
   144
    apply simp
huffman@31415
   145
    apply (clarify, rename_tac c d)
huffman@31415
   146
    apply (drule spec, erule mp)
huffman@31415
   147
    apply (simp add: dist_Pair_Pair add_strict_mono power_strict_mono)
huffman@31415
   148
    apply (rule_tac x="e / sqrt 2" in exI, simp add: divide_pos_pos)
huffman@31415
   149
    apply (rule_tac x="e / sqrt 2" in exI, simp add: divide_pos_pos)
huffman@31415
   150
    apply (simp add: power_divide)
huffman@31415
   151
    done
huffman@31339
   152
qed
huffman@31339
   153
huffman@31339
   154
end
huffman@31339
   155
huffman@31405
   156
subsection {* Continuity of operations *}
huffman@31405
   157
huffman@31405
   158
lemma dist_fst_le: "dist (fst x) (fst y) \<le> dist x y"
huffman@31405
   159
unfolding dist_prod_def by simp
huffman@31405
   160
huffman@31405
   161
lemma dist_snd_le: "dist (snd x) (snd y) \<le> dist x y"
huffman@31405
   162
unfolding dist_prod_def by simp
huffman@31405
   163
huffman@31405
   164
lemma tendsto_fst:
huffman@31491
   165
  assumes "(f ---> a) net"
huffman@31491
   166
  shows "((\<lambda>x. fst (f x)) ---> fst a) net"
huffman@31491
   167
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
huffman@31492
   168
  fix S assume "open S" "fst a \<in> S"
huffman@31492
   169
  then have "open (fst -` S)" "a \<in> fst -` S"
huffman@31492
   170
    unfolding open_prod_def
huffman@31491
   171
    apply simp_all
huffman@31491
   172
    apply clarify
huffman@31492
   173
    apply (rule exI, erule conjI)
huffman@31492
   174
    apply (rule exI, rule conjI [OF open_UNIV])
huffman@31491
   175
    apply auto
huffman@31491
   176
    done
huffman@31491
   177
  with assms have "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> fst -` S) net"
huffman@31491
   178
    by (rule topological_tendstoD)
huffman@31491
   179
  then show "eventually (\<lambda>x. fst (f x) \<in> S) net"
huffman@31491
   180
    by simp
huffman@31405
   181
qed
huffman@31405
   182
huffman@31405
   183
lemma tendsto_snd:
huffman@31491
   184
  assumes "(f ---> a) net"
huffman@31491
   185
  shows "((\<lambda>x. snd (f x)) ---> snd a) net"
huffman@31491
   186
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
huffman@31492
   187
  fix S assume "open S" "snd a \<in> S"
huffman@31492
   188
  then have "open (snd -` S)" "a \<in> snd -` S"
huffman@31492
   189
    unfolding open_prod_def
huffman@31491
   190
    apply simp_all
huffman@31491
   191
    apply clarify
huffman@31492
   192
    apply (rule exI, rule conjI [OF open_UNIV])
huffman@31492
   193
    apply (rule exI, erule conjI)
huffman@31491
   194
    apply auto
huffman@31491
   195
    done
huffman@31491
   196
  with assms have "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> snd -` S) net"
huffman@31491
   197
    by (rule topological_tendstoD)
huffman@31491
   198
  then show "eventually (\<lambda>x. snd (f x) \<in> S) net"
huffman@31491
   199
    by simp
huffman@31405
   200
qed
huffman@31405
   201
huffman@31405
   202
lemma tendsto_Pair:
huffman@31491
   203
  assumes "(f ---> a) net" and "(g ---> b) net"
huffman@31491
   204
  shows "((\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) ---> (a, b)) net"
huffman@31491
   205
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
huffman@31492
   206
  fix S assume "open S" "(a, b) \<in> S"
huffman@31492
   207
  then obtain A B where "open A" "open B" "a \<in> A" "b \<in> B" "A \<times> B \<subseteq> S"
huffman@31492
   208
    unfolding open_prod_def by auto
huffman@31491
   209
  have "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> A) net"
huffman@31492
   210
    using `(f ---> a) net` `open A` `a \<in> A`
huffman@31491
   211
    by (rule topological_tendstoD)
huffman@31405
   212
  moreover
huffman@31491
   213
  have "eventually (\<lambda>x. g x \<in> B) net"
huffman@31492
   214
    using `(g ---> b) net` `open B` `b \<in> B`
huffman@31491
   215
    by (rule topological_tendstoD)
huffman@31405
   216
  ultimately
huffman@31491
   217
  show "eventually (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x) \<in> S) net"
huffman@31405
   218
    by (rule eventually_elim2)
huffman@31491
   219
       (simp add: subsetD [OF `A \<times> B \<subseteq> S`])
huffman@31405
   220
qed
huffman@31405
   221
huffman@31405
   222
lemma LIMSEQ_fst: "(X ----> a) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. fst (X n)) ----> fst a"
huffman@31405
   223
unfolding LIMSEQ_conv_tendsto by (rule tendsto_fst)
huffman@31405
   224
huffman@31405
   225
lemma LIMSEQ_snd: "(X ----> a) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. snd (X n)) ----> snd a"
huffman@31405
   226
unfolding LIMSEQ_conv_tendsto by (rule tendsto_snd)
huffman@31405
   227
huffman@31405
   228
lemma LIMSEQ_Pair:
huffman@31405
   229
  assumes "X ----> a" and "Y ----> b"
huffman@31405
   230
  shows "(\<lambda>n. (X n, Y n)) ----> (a, b)"
huffman@31405
   231
using assms unfolding LIMSEQ_conv_tendsto
huffman@31405
   232
by (rule tendsto_Pair)
huffman@31405
   233
huffman@31405
   234
lemma LIM_fst: "f -- x --> a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. fst (f x)) -- x --> fst a"
huffman@31405
   235
unfolding LIM_conv_tendsto by (rule tendsto_fst)
huffman@31405
   236
huffman@31405
   237
lemma LIM_snd: "f -- x --> a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. snd (f x)) -- x --> snd a"
huffman@31405
   238
unfolding LIM_conv_tendsto by (rule tendsto_snd)
huffman@31405
   239
huffman@31405
   240
lemma LIM_Pair:
huffman@31405
   241
  assumes "f -- x --> a" and "g -- x --> b"
huffman@31405
   242
  shows "(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) -- x --> (a, b)"
huffman@31405
   243
using assms unfolding LIM_conv_tendsto
huffman@31405
   244
by (rule tendsto_Pair)
huffman@31405
   245
huffman@31405
   246
lemma Cauchy_fst: "Cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy (\<lambda>n. fst (X n))"
huffman@31405
   247
unfolding Cauchy_def by (fast elim: le_less_trans [OF dist_fst_le])
huffman@31405
   248
huffman@31405
   249
lemma Cauchy_snd: "Cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy (\<lambda>n. snd (X n))"
huffman@31405
   250
unfolding Cauchy_def by (fast elim: le_less_trans [OF dist_snd_le])
huffman@31405
   251
huffman@31405
   252
lemma Cauchy_Pair:
huffman@31405
   253
  assumes "Cauchy X" and "Cauchy Y"
huffman@31405
   254
  shows "Cauchy (\<lambda>n. (X n, Y n))"
huffman@31405
   255
proof (rule metric_CauchyI)
huffman@31405
   256
  fix r :: real assume "0 < r"
huffman@31405
   257
  then have "0 < r / sqrt 2" (is "0 < ?s")
huffman@31405
   258
    by (simp add: divide_pos_pos)
huffman@31405
   259
  obtain M where M: "\<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. dist (X m) (X n) < ?s"
huffman@31405
   260
    using metric_CauchyD [OF `Cauchy X` `0 < ?s`] ..
huffman@31405
   261
  obtain N where N: "\<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (Y m) (Y n) < ?s"
huffman@31405
   262
    using metric_CauchyD [OF `Cauchy Y` `0 < ?s`] ..
huffman@31405
   263
  have "\<forall>m\<ge>max M N. \<forall>n\<ge>max M N. dist (X m, Y m) (X n, Y n) < r"
huffman@31405
   264
    using M N by (simp add: real_sqrt_sum_squares_less dist_Pair_Pair)
huffman@31405
   265
  then show "\<exists>n0. \<forall>m\<ge>n0. \<forall>n\<ge>n0. dist (X m, Y m) (X n, Y n) < r" ..
huffman@31405
   266
qed
huffman@31405
   267
huffman@31405
   268
lemma isCont_Pair [simp]:
huffman@31405
   269
  "\<lbrakk>isCont f x; isCont g x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isCont (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) x"
huffman@31405
   270
  unfolding isCont_def by (rule LIM_Pair)
huffman@31405
   271
huffman@31405
   272
subsection {* Product is a complete metric space *}
huffman@31405
   273
huffman@31405
   274
instance "*" :: (complete_space, complete_space) complete_space
huffman@31405
   275
proof
huffman@31405
   276
  fix X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'b" assume "Cauchy X"
huffman@31405
   277
  have 1: "(\<lambda>n. fst (X n)) ----> lim (\<lambda>n. fst (X n))"
huffman@31405
   278
    using Cauchy_fst [OF `Cauchy X`]
huffman@31405
   279
    by (simp add: Cauchy_convergent_iff convergent_LIMSEQ_iff)
huffman@31405
   280
  have 2: "(\<lambda>n. snd (X n)) ----> lim (\<lambda>n. snd (X n))"
huffman@31405
   281
    using Cauchy_snd [OF `Cauchy X`]
huffman@31405
   282
    by (simp add: Cauchy_convergent_iff convergent_LIMSEQ_iff)
huffman@31405
   283
  have "X ----> (lim (\<lambda>n. fst (X n)), lim (\<lambda>n. snd (X n)))"
huffman@31405
   284
    using LIMSEQ_Pair [OF 1 2] by simp
huffman@31405
   285
  then show "convergent X"
huffman@31405
   286
    by (rule convergentI)
huffman@31405
   287
qed
huffman@31405
   288
huffman@30019
   289
subsection {* Product is a normed vector space *}
huffman@30019
   290
huffman@30019
   291
instantiation
huffman@30019
   292
  "*" :: (real_normed_vector, real_normed_vector) real_normed_vector
huffman@30019
   293
begin
huffman@30019
   294
huffman@30019
   295
definition norm_prod_def:
huffman@30019
   296
  "norm x = sqrt ((norm (fst x))\<twosuperior> + (norm (snd x))\<twosuperior>)"
huffman@30019
   297
huffman@30019
   298
definition sgn_prod_def:
huffman@30019
   299
  "sgn (x::'a \<times> 'b) = scaleR (inverse (norm x)) x"
huffman@30019
   300
huffman@30019
   301
lemma norm_Pair: "norm (a, b) = sqrt ((norm a)\<twosuperior> + (norm b)\<twosuperior>)"
huffman@30019
   302
  unfolding norm_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
   303
huffman@30019
   304
instance proof
huffman@30019
   305
  fix r :: real and x y :: "'a \<times> 'b"
huffman@30019
   306
  show "0 \<le> norm x"
huffman@30019
   307
    unfolding norm_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
   308
  show "norm x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"
huffman@30019
   309
    unfolding norm_prod_def
huffman@30019
   310
    by (simp add: expand_prod_eq)
huffman@30019
   311
  show "norm (x + y) \<le> norm x + norm y"
huffman@30019
   312
    unfolding norm_prod_def
huffman@30019
   313
    apply (rule order_trans [OF _ real_sqrt_sum_squares_triangle_ineq])
huffman@30019
   314
    apply (simp add: add_mono power_mono norm_triangle_ineq)
huffman@30019
   315
    done
huffman@30019
   316
  show "norm (scaleR r x) = \<bar>r\<bar> * norm x"
huffman@30019
   317
    unfolding norm_prod_def
huffman@30019
   318
    apply (simp add: norm_scaleR power_mult_distrib)
huffman@30019
   319
    apply (simp add: right_distrib [symmetric])
huffman@30019
   320
    apply (simp add: real_sqrt_mult_distrib)
huffman@30019
   321
    done
huffman@30019
   322
  show "sgn x = scaleR (inverse (norm x)) x"
huffman@30019
   323
    by (rule sgn_prod_def)
huffman@31290
   324
  show "dist x y = norm (x - y)"
huffman@31339
   325
    unfolding dist_prod_def norm_prod_def
huffman@31339
   326
    by (simp add: dist_norm)
huffman@30019
   327
qed
huffman@30019
   328
huffman@30019
   329
end
huffman@30019
   330
huffman@31405
   331
instance "*" :: (banach, banach) banach ..
huffman@31405
   332
huffman@30019
   333
subsection {* Product is an inner product space *}
huffman@30019
   334
huffman@30019
   335
instantiation "*" :: (real_inner, real_inner) real_inner
huffman@30019
   336
begin
huffman@30019
   337
huffman@30019
   338
definition inner_prod_def:
huffman@30019
   339
  "inner x y = inner (fst x) (fst y) + inner (snd x) (snd y)"
huffman@30019
   340
huffman@30019
   341
lemma inner_Pair [simp]: "inner (a, b) (c, d) = inner a c + inner b d"
huffman@30019
   342
  unfolding inner_prod_def by simp
huffman@30019
   343
huffman@30019
   344
instance proof
huffman@30019
   345
  fix r :: real
huffman@30019
   346
  fix x y z :: "'a::real_inner * 'b::real_inner"
huffman@30019
   347
  show "inner x y = inner y x"
huffman@30019
   348
    unfolding inner_prod_def
huffman@30019
   349
    by (simp add: inner_commute)
huffman@30019
   350
  show "inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z"
huffman@30019
   351
    unfolding inner_prod_def
huffman@30019
   352
    by (simp add: inner_left_distrib)
huffman@30019
   353
  show "inner (scaleR r x) y = r * inner x y"
huffman@30019
   354
    unfolding inner_prod_def
huffman@30019
   355
    by (simp add: inner_scaleR_left right_distrib)
huffman@30019
   356
  show "0 \<le> inner x x"
huffman@30019
   357
    unfolding inner_prod_def
huffman@30019
   358
    by (intro add_nonneg_nonneg inner_ge_zero)
huffman@30019
   359
  show "inner x x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"
huffman@30019
   360
    unfolding inner_prod_def expand_prod_eq
huffman@30019
   361
    by (simp add: add_nonneg_eq_0_iff)
huffman@30019
   362
  show "norm x = sqrt (inner x x)"
huffman@30019
   363
    unfolding norm_prod_def inner_prod_def
huffman@30019
   364
    by (simp add: power2_norm_eq_inner)
huffman@30019
   365
qed
huffman@30019
   366
huffman@30019
   367
end
huffman@30019
   368
huffman@31405
   369
subsection {* Pair operations are linear *}
huffman@30019
   370
wenzelm@30729
   371
interpretation fst: bounded_linear fst
huffman@30019
   372
  apply (unfold_locales)
huffman@30019
   373
  apply (rule fst_add)
huffman@30019
   374
  apply (rule fst_scaleR)
huffman@30019
   375
  apply (rule_tac x="1" in exI, simp add: norm_Pair)
huffman@30019
   376
  done
huffman@30019
   377
wenzelm@30729
   378
interpretation snd: bounded_linear snd
huffman@30019
   379
  apply (unfold_locales)
huffman@30019
   380
  apply (rule snd_add)
huffman@30019
   381
  apply (rule snd_scaleR)
huffman@30019
   382
  apply (rule_tac x="1" in exI, simp add: norm_Pair)
huffman@30019
   383
  done
huffman@30019
   384
huffman@30019
   385
text {* TODO: move to NthRoot *}
huffman@30019
   386
lemma sqrt_add_le_add_sqrt:
huffman@30019
   387
  assumes x: "0 \<le> x" and y: "0 \<le> y"
huffman@30019
   388
  shows "sqrt (x + y) \<le> sqrt x + sqrt y"
huffman@30019
   389
apply (rule power2_le_imp_le)
huffman@30019
   390
apply (simp add: real_sum_squared_expand add_nonneg_nonneg x y)
huffman@30019
   391
apply (simp add: mult_nonneg_nonneg x y)
huffman@30019
   392
apply (simp add: add_nonneg_nonneg x y)
huffman@30019
   393
done
huffman@30019
   394
huffman@30019
   395
lemma bounded_linear_Pair:
huffman@30019
   396
  assumes f: "bounded_linear f"
huffman@30019
   397
  assumes g: "bounded_linear g"
huffman@30019
   398
  shows "bounded_linear (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))"
huffman@30019
   399
proof
huffman@30019
   400
  interpret f: bounded_linear f by fact
huffman@30019
   401
  interpret g: bounded_linear g by fact
huffman@30019
   402
  fix x y and r :: real
huffman@30019
   403
  show "(f (x + y), g (x + y)) = (f x, g x) + (f y, g y)"
huffman@30019
   404
    by (simp add: f.add g.add)
huffman@30019
   405
  show "(f (r *\<^sub>R x), g (r *\<^sub>R x)) = r *\<^sub>R (f x, g x)"
huffman@30019
   406
    by (simp add: f.scaleR g.scaleR)
huffman@30019
   407
  obtain Kf where "0 < Kf" and norm_f: "\<And>x. norm (f x) \<le> norm x * Kf"
huffman@30019
   408
    using f.pos_bounded by fast
huffman@30019
   409
  obtain Kg where "0 < Kg" and norm_g: "\<And>x. norm (g x) \<le> norm x * Kg"
huffman@30019
   410
    using g.pos_bounded by fast
huffman@30019
   411
  have "\<forall>x. norm (f x, g x) \<le> norm x * (Kf + Kg)"
huffman@30019
   412
    apply (rule allI)
huffman@30019
   413
    apply (simp add: norm_Pair)
huffman@30019
   414
    apply (rule order_trans [OF sqrt_add_le_add_sqrt], simp, simp)
huffman@30019
   415
    apply (simp add: right_distrib)
huffman@30019
   416
    apply (rule add_mono [OF norm_f norm_g])
huffman@30019
   417
    done
huffman@30019
   418
  then show "\<exists>K. \<forall>x. norm (f x, g x) \<le> norm x * K" ..
huffman@30019
   419
qed
huffman@30019
   420
huffman@30019
   421
subsection {* Frechet derivatives involving pairs *}
huffman@30019
   422
huffman@30019
   423
lemma FDERIV_Pair:
huffman@30019
   424
  assumes f: "FDERIV f x :> f'" and g: "FDERIV g x :> g'"
huffman@30019
   425
  shows "FDERIV (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) x :> (\<lambda>h. (f' h, g' h))"
huffman@30019
   426
apply (rule FDERIV_I)
huffman@30019
   427
apply (rule bounded_linear_Pair)
huffman@30019
   428
apply (rule FDERIV_bounded_linear [OF f])
huffman@30019
   429
apply (rule FDERIV_bounded_linear [OF g])
huffman@30019
   430
apply (simp add: norm_Pair)
huffman@30019
   431
apply (rule real_LIM_sandwich_zero)
huffman@30019
   432
apply (rule LIM_add_zero)
huffman@30019
   433
apply (rule FDERIV_D [OF f])
huffman@30019
   434
apply (rule FDERIV_D [OF g])
huffman@30019
   435
apply (rename_tac h)
huffman@30019
   436
apply (simp add: divide_nonneg_pos)
huffman@30019
   437
apply (rename_tac h)
huffman@30019
   438
apply (subst add_divide_distrib [symmetric])
huffman@30019
   439
apply (rule divide_right_mono [OF _ norm_ge_zero])
huffman@30019
   440
apply (rule order_trans [OF sqrt_add_le_add_sqrt])
huffman@30019
   441
apply simp
huffman@30019
   442
apply simp
huffman@30019
   443
apply simp
huffman@30019
   444
done
huffman@30019
   445
huffman@30019
   446
end