src/HOL/ex/ThreeDivides.thy
author nipkow
Mon Sep 01 19:17:47 2008 +0200 (2008-09-01)
changeset 28071 6ab5b4595f64
parent 23373 ead82c82da9e
child 29974 ca93255656a5
permissions -rw-r--r--
renamed lemma
kleing@19022
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Isar_examples/ThreeDivides.thy
kleing@19022
     2
    ID:         $Id$
kleing@19022
     3
    Author:     Benjamin Porter, 2005
kleing@19022
     4
*)
kleing@19022
     5
kleing@19022
     6
header {* Three Divides Theorem *}
kleing@19022
     7
kleing@19022
     8
theory ThreeDivides
kleing@19022
     9
imports Main LaTeXsugar
kleing@19022
    10
begin
kleing@19022
    11
wenzelm@23219
    12
subsection {* Abstract *}
kleing@19022
    13
kleing@19022
    14
text {*
kleing@19022
    15
The following document presents a proof of the Three Divides N theorem
kleing@19022
    16
formalised in the Isabelle/Isar theorem proving system.
kleing@19022
    17
wenzelm@19026
    18
{\em Theorem}: $3$ divides $n$ if and only if $3$ divides the sum of all
wenzelm@19026
    19
digits in $n$.
kleing@19022
    20
kleing@19022
    21
{\em Informal Proof}:
kleing@19022
    22
Take $n = \sum{n_j * 10^j}$ where $n_j$ is the $j$'th least
kleing@19022
    23
significant digit of the decimal denotation of the number n and the
kleing@19022
    24
sum ranges over all digits. Then $$ (n - \sum{n_j}) = \sum{n_j * (10^j
kleing@19022
    25
- 1)} $$ We know $\forall j\; 3|(10^j - 1) $ and hence $3|LHS$,
kleing@19022
    26
therefore $$\forall n\; 3|n \Longleftrightarrow 3|\sum{n_j}$$
kleing@19022
    27
@{text "\<box>"}
kleing@19022
    28
*}
kleing@19022
    29
kleing@19022
    30
wenzelm@23219
    31
subsection {* Formal proof *}
wenzelm@23219
    32
wenzelm@23219
    33
subsubsection {* Miscellaneous summation lemmas *}
kleing@19022
    34
kleing@19022
    35
text {* If $a$ divides @{text "A x"} for all x then $a$ divides any
kleing@19022
    36
sum over terms of the form @{text "(A x)*(P x)"} for arbitrary $P$. *}
kleing@19022
    37
kleing@19022
    38
lemma div_sum:
kleing@19022
    39
  fixes a::nat and n::nat
kleing@19022
    40
  shows "\<forall>x. a dvd A x \<Longrightarrow> a dvd (\<Sum>x<n. A x * D x)"
kleing@19022
    41
proof (induct n)
kleing@19022
    42
  case 0 show ?case by simp
kleing@19022
    43
next
kleing@19022
    44
  case (Suc n)
kleing@19022
    45
  from Suc
kleing@19022
    46
  have "a dvd (A n * D n)" by (simp add: dvd_mult2)
kleing@19022
    47
  with Suc
kleing@19022
    48
  have "a dvd ((\<Sum>x<n. A x * D x) + (A n * D n))" by (simp add: dvd_add)
kleing@19022
    49
  thus ?case by simp
kleing@19022
    50
qed
kleing@19022
    51
wenzelm@23219
    52
wenzelm@23219
    53
subsubsection {* Generalised Three Divides *}
kleing@19022
    54
kleing@19022
    55
text {* This section solves a generalised form of the three divides
kleing@19022
    56
problem. Here we show that for any sequence of numbers the theorem
kleing@19022
    57
holds. In the next section we specialise this theorem to apply
kleing@19022
    58
directly to the decimal expansion of the natural numbers. *}
kleing@19022
    59
kleing@19022
    60
text {* Here we show that the first statement in the informal proof is
kleing@19022
    61
true for all natural numbers. Note we are using @{term "D i"} to
kleing@19022
    62
denote the $i$'th element in a sequence of numbers. *}
kleing@19022
    63
kleing@19022
    64
lemma digit_diff_split:
kleing@19022
    65
  fixes n::nat and nd::nat and x::nat
wenzelm@19026
    66
  shows "n = (\<Sum>x\<in>{..<nd}. (D x)*((10::nat)^x)) \<Longrightarrow>
kleing@19022
    67
             (n - (\<Sum>x<nd. (D x))) = (\<Sum>x<nd. (D x)*(10^x - 1))"
kleing@19022
    68
by (simp add: sum_diff_distrib diff_mult_distrib2)
kleing@19022
    69
kleing@19022
    70
text {* Now we prove that 3 always divides numbers of the form $10^x - 1$. *}
wenzelm@19026
    71
lemma three_divs_0:
kleing@19022
    72
  shows "(3::nat) dvd (10^x - 1)"
kleing@19022
    73
proof (induct x)
kleing@19022
    74
  case 0 show ?case by simp
kleing@19022
    75
next
kleing@19022
    76
  case (Suc n)
kleing@19022
    77
  let ?thr = "(3::nat)"
kleing@19022
    78
  have "?thr dvd 9" by simp
kleing@19022
    79
  moreover
wenzelm@23373
    80
  have "?thr dvd (10*(10^n - 1))" by (rule dvd_mult) (rule Suc)
kleing@19022
    81
  hence "?thr dvd (10^(n+1) - 10)" by (simp add: nat_distrib)
kleing@19022
    82
  ultimately
kleing@19022
    83
  have"?thr dvd ((10^(n+1) - 10) + 9)"
kleing@19022
    84
    by (simp only: add_ac) (rule dvd_add)
kleing@19022
    85
  thus ?case by simp
kleing@19022
    86
qed
kleing@19022
    87
wenzelm@19026
    88
text {* Expanding on the previous lemma and lemma @{text "div_sum"}. *}
kleing@19022
    89
lemma three_divs_1:
kleing@19022
    90
  fixes D :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
kleing@19022
    91
  shows "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * (10^x - 1))"
wenzelm@19026
    92
  by (subst nat_mult_commute, rule div_sum) (simp add: three_divs_0 [simplified])
kleing@19022
    93
kleing@19022
    94
text {* Using lemmas @{text "digit_diff_split"} and 
kleing@19022
    95
@{text "three_divs_1"} we now prove the following lemma. 
kleing@19022
    96
*}
kleing@19022
    97
lemma three_divs_2:
kleing@19022
    98
  fixes nd::nat and D::"nat\<Rightarrow>nat"
kleing@19022
    99
  shows "3 dvd ((\<Sum>x<nd. (D x)*(10^x)) - (\<Sum>x<nd. (D x)))"
wenzelm@19026
   100
proof -
wenzelm@19026
   101
  from three_divs_1 have "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * (10 ^ x - 1))" .
wenzelm@19026
   102
  thus ?thesis by (simp only: digit_diff_split)
kleing@19022
   103
qed
kleing@19022
   104
kleing@19022
   105
text {* 
kleing@19022
   106
We now present the final theorem of this section. For any
kleing@19022
   107
sequence of numbers (defined by a function @{term "D :: (nat\<Rightarrow>nat)"}),
kleing@19022
   108
we show that 3 divides the expansive sum $\sum{(D\;x)*10^x}$ over $x$
kleing@19022
   109
if and only if 3 divides the sum of the individual numbers
kleing@19022
   110
$\sum{D\;x}$. 
kleing@19022
   111
*}
kleing@19022
   112
lemma three_div_general:
kleing@19022
   113
  fixes D :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
kleing@19022
   114
  shows "(3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * 10^x)) = (3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x))"
kleing@19022
   115
proof
kleing@19022
   116
  have mono: "(\<Sum>x<nd. D x) \<le> (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * 10^x)"
wenzelm@19026
   117
    by (rule setsum_mono) simp
kleing@19022
   118
  txt {* This lets us form the term
kleing@19022
   119
         @{term "(\<Sum>x<nd. D x * 10^x) - (\<Sum>x<nd. D x)"} *}
kleing@19022
   120
kleing@19022
   121
  {
kleing@19022
   122
    assume "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x)"
kleing@19022
   123
    with three_divs_2 mono
kleing@19022
   124
    show "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * 10^x)" 
kleing@19022
   125
      by (blast intro: dvd_diffD)
kleing@19022
   126
  }
kleing@19022
   127
  {
kleing@19022
   128
    assume "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x * 10^x)"
kleing@19022
   129
    with three_divs_2 mono
kleing@19022
   130
    show "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nd. D x)"
kleing@19022
   131
      by (blast intro: dvd_diffD1)
kleing@19022
   132
  }
kleing@19022
   133
qed
kleing@19022
   134
kleing@19022
   135
wenzelm@23219
   136
subsubsection {* Three Divides Natural *}
kleing@19022
   137
kleing@19022
   138
text {* This section shows that for all natural numbers we can
kleing@19022
   139
generate a sequence of digits less than ten that represent the decimal
kleing@19022
   140
expansion of the number. We then use the lemma @{text
kleing@19022
   141
"three_div_general"} to prove our final theorem. *}
kleing@19022
   142
wenzelm@23219
   143
wenzelm@23219
   144
text {* \medskip Definitions of length and digit sum. *}
kleing@19022
   145
kleing@19022
   146
text {* This section introduces some functions to calculate the
kleing@19022
   147
required properties of natural numbers. We then proceed to prove some
kleing@19022
   148
properties of these functions.
kleing@19022
   149
kleing@19022
   150
The function @{text "nlen"} returns the number of digits in a natural
kleing@19022
   151
number n. *}
kleing@19022
   152
kleing@19022
   153
consts nlen :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
kleing@19022
   154
recdef nlen "measure id"
kleing@19022
   155
  "nlen 0 = 0"
kleing@19022
   156
  "nlen x = 1 + nlen (x div 10)"
kleing@19022
   157
kleing@19022
   158
text {* The function @{text "sumdig"} returns the sum of all digits in
kleing@19022
   159
some number n. *}
kleing@19022
   160
wenzelm@19736
   161
definition
wenzelm@21404
   162
  sumdig :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where
wenzelm@19736
   163
  "sumdig n = (\<Sum>x < nlen n. n div 10^x mod 10)"
kleing@19022
   164
kleing@19022
   165
text {* Some properties of these functions follow. *}
kleing@19022
   166
kleing@19022
   167
lemma nlen_zero:
kleing@19022
   168
  "0 = nlen x \<Longrightarrow> x = 0"
kleing@19022
   169
  by (induct x rule: nlen.induct) auto
kleing@19022
   170
kleing@19022
   171
lemma nlen_suc:
kleing@19022
   172
  "Suc m = nlen n \<Longrightarrow> m = nlen (n div 10)"
kleing@19022
   173
  by (induct n rule: nlen.induct) simp_all
kleing@19022
   174
kleing@19022
   175
kleing@19022
   176
text {* The following lemma is the principle lemma required to prove
kleing@19022
   177
our theorem. It states that an expansion of some natural number $n$
kleing@19022
   178
into a sequence of its individual digits is always possible. *}
kleing@19022
   179
kleing@19022
   180
lemma exp_exists:
wenzelm@19026
   181
  "m = (\<Sum>x<nlen m. (m div (10::nat)^x mod 10) * 10^x)"
wenzelm@20503
   182
proof (induct nd \<equiv> "nlen m" arbitrary: m)
kleing@19022
   183
  case 0 thus ?case by (simp add: nlen_zero)
kleing@19022
   184
next
kleing@19022
   185
  case (Suc nd)
kleing@19022
   186
  hence IH:
kleing@19022
   187
    "nd = nlen (m div 10) \<Longrightarrow>
kleing@19022
   188
    m div 10 = (\<Sum>x<nd. m div 10 div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x)"
kleing@19022
   189
    by blast
kleing@19022
   190
  have "\<exists>c. m = 10*(m div 10) + c \<and> c < 10" by presburger
wenzelm@19026
   191
  then obtain c where mexp: "m = 10*(m div 10) + c \<and> c < 10" ..
kleing@19022
   192
  then have cdef: "c = m mod 10" by arith
wenzelm@19026
   193
  show "m = (\<Sum>x<nlen m. m div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x)"
kleing@19022
   194
  proof -
wenzelm@19026
   195
    from `Suc nd = nlen m`
wenzelm@19026
   196
    have "nd = nlen (m div 10)" by (rule nlen_suc)
kleing@19022
   197
    with IH have
wenzelm@19026
   198
      "m div 10 = (\<Sum>x<nd. m div 10 div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x)" by simp
kleing@19022
   199
    with mexp have
kleing@19022
   200
      "m = 10*(\<Sum>x<nd. m div 10 div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x) + c" by simp
kleing@19022
   201
    also have
kleing@19022
   202
      "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x<nd. m div 10 div 10^x mod 10 * 10^(x+1)) + c"
ballarin@19279
   203
      by (subst setsum_right_distrib) (simp add: mult_ac)
kleing@19022
   204
    also have
kleing@19022
   205
      "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x<nd. m div 10^(Suc x) mod 10 * 10^(Suc x)) + c"
kleing@19022
   206
      by (simp add: div_mult2_eq[symmetric])
kleing@19022
   207
    also have
kleing@19022
   208
      "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x\<in>{Suc 0..<Suc nd}. m div 10^x  mod 10 * 10^x) + c"
kleing@19022
   209
      by (simp only: setsum_shift_bounds_Suc_ivl)
kleing@19022
   210
         (simp add: atLeast0LessThan)
kleing@19022
   211
    also have
kleing@19022
   212
      "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x<Suc nd. m div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x)"
nipkow@28071
   213
      by (simp add: atLeast0LessThan[symmetric] setsum_head_upt_Suc cdef)
wenzelm@19026
   214
    also note `Suc nd = nlen m`
wenzelm@19026
   215
    finally
wenzelm@19026
   216
    show "m = (\<Sum>x<nlen m. m div 10^x mod 10 * 10^x)" .
kleing@19022
   217
  qed
kleing@19022
   218
qed
kleing@19022
   219
kleing@19022
   220
wenzelm@23219
   221
text {* \medskip Final theorem. *}
kleing@19022
   222
kleing@19022
   223
text {* We now combine the general theorem @{text "three_div_general"}
kleing@19022
   224
and existence result of @{text "exp_exists"} to prove our final
kleing@19022
   225
theorem. *}
kleing@19022
   226
kleing@19022
   227
theorem three_divides_nat:
kleing@19022
   228
  shows "(3 dvd n) = (3 dvd sumdig n)"
kleing@19022
   229
proof (unfold sumdig_def)
wenzelm@19026
   230
  have "n = (\<Sum>x<nlen n. (n div (10::nat)^x mod 10) * 10^x)"
kleing@19022
   231
    by (rule exp_exists)
kleing@19022
   232
  moreover
kleing@19022
   233
  have "3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nlen n. (n div (10::nat)^x mod 10) * 10^x) =
kleing@19022
   234
        (3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nlen n. n div 10^x mod 10))"
kleing@19022
   235
    by (rule three_div_general)
kleing@19022
   236
  ultimately 
kleing@19022
   237
  show "3 dvd n = (3 dvd (\<Sum>x<nlen n. n div 10^x mod 10))" by simp
kleing@19022
   238
qed
kleing@19022
   239
kleing@19022
   240
end