src/HOL/Nat.thy
author haftmann
Tue Jun 10 15:30:33 2008 +0200 (2008-06-10)
changeset 27104 791607529f6d
parent 26748 4d51ddd6aa5c
child 27129 336807f865ce
permissions -rw-r--r--
rep_datatype command now takes list of constructors as input arguments
clasohm@923
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Nat.thy
clasohm@923
     2
    ID:         $Id$
wenzelm@21243
     3
    Author:     Tobias Nipkow and Lawrence C Paulson and Markus Wenzel
clasohm@923
     4
wenzelm@9436
     5
Type "nat" is a linear order, and a datatype; arithmetic operators + -
wenzelm@9436
     6
and * (for div, mod and dvd, see theory Divides).
clasohm@923
     7
*)
clasohm@923
     8
berghofe@13449
     9
header {* Natural numbers *}
berghofe@13449
    10
nipkow@15131
    11
theory Nat
haftmann@26072
    12
imports Inductive Ring_and_Field
haftmann@23263
    13
uses
haftmann@23263
    14
  "~~/src/Tools/rat.ML"
haftmann@23263
    15
  "~~/src/Provers/Arith/cancel_sums.ML"
haftmann@23263
    16
  ("arith_data.ML")
wenzelm@24091
    17
  "~~/src/Provers/Arith/fast_lin_arith.ML"
wenzelm@24091
    18
  ("Tools/lin_arith.ML")
nipkow@15131
    19
begin
berghofe@13449
    20
berghofe@13449
    21
subsection {* Type @{text ind} *}
berghofe@13449
    22
berghofe@13449
    23
typedecl ind
berghofe@13449
    24
wenzelm@19573
    25
axiomatization
wenzelm@19573
    26
  Zero_Rep :: ind and
wenzelm@19573
    27
  Suc_Rep :: "ind => ind"
wenzelm@19573
    28
where
berghofe@13449
    29
  -- {* the axiom of infinity in 2 parts *}
wenzelm@19573
    30
  inj_Suc_Rep:          "inj Suc_Rep" and
paulson@14267
    31
  Suc_Rep_not_Zero_Rep: "Suc_Rep x \<noteq> Zero_Rep"
wenzelm@19573
    32
berghofe@13449
    33
berghofe@13449
    34
subsection {* Type nat *}
berghofe@13449
    35
berghofe@13449
    36
text {* Type definition *}
berghofe@13449
    37
haftmann@26072
    38
inductive Nat :: "ind \<Rightarrow> bool"
berghofe@22262
    39
where
haftmann@26072
    40
    Zero_RepI: "Nat Zero_Rep"
haftmann@26072
    41
  | Suc_RepI: "Nat i \<Longrightarrow> Nat (Suc_Rep i)"
berghofe@13449
    42
berghofe@13449
    43
global
berghofe@13449
    44
berghofe@13449
    45
typedef (open Nat)
haftmann@27104
    46
  nat = Nat
haftmann@27104
    47
  by (rule exI, unfold mem_def, rule Nat.Zero_RepI)
berghofe@13449
    48
haftmann@26072
    49
constdefs
haftmann@27104
    50
  Suc ::   "nat => nat"
haftmann@27104
    51
  Suc_def: "Suc == (%n. Abs_Nat (Suc_Rep (Rep_Nat n)))"
berghofe@13449
    52
berghofe@13449
    53
local
berghofe@13449
    54
haftmann@25510
    55
instantiation nat :: zero
haftmann@25510
    56
begin
haftmann@25510
    57
haftmann@25510
    58
definition Zero_nat_def [code func del]:
haftmann@25510
    59
  "0 = Abs_Nat Zero_Rep"
haftmann@25510
    60
haftmann@25510
    61
instance ..
haftmann@25510
    62
haftmann@25510
    63
end
haftmann@24995
    64
haftmann@27104
    65
lemma Suc_not_Zero: "Suc m \<noteq> 0"
haftmann@27104
    66
apply (simp add: Zero_nat_def Suc_def Abs_Nat_inject [unfolded mem_def] Rep_Nat [unfolded mem_def] Suc_RepI Zero_RepI Suc_Rep_not_Zero_Rep [unfolded mem_def]) 
haftmann@27104
    67
done
berghofe@13449
    68
haftmann@27104
    69
lemma Zero_not_Suc: "0 \<noteq> Suc m"
berghofe@13449
    70
  by (rule not_sym, rule Suc_not_Zero not_sym)
berghofe@13449
    71
haftmann@27104
    72
rep_datatype "0 \<Colon> nat" Suc
haftmann@27104
    73
apply (unfold Zero_nat_def Suc_def)
haftmann@27104
    74
apply (rule Rep_Nat_inverse [THEN subst]) -- {* types force good instantiation *}
haftmann@27104
    75
apply (erule Rep_Nat [unfolded mem_def, THEN Nat.induct])
haftmann@27104
    76
apply (iprover elim: Abs_Nat_inverse [unfolded mem_def, THEN subst])
haftmann@27104
    77
apply (simp_all add: Abs_Nat_inject [unfolded mem_def] Rep_Nat [unfolded mem_def]
haftmann@27104
    78
  Suc_RepI Zero_RepI Suc_Rep_not_Zero_Rep [unfolded mem_def]
haftmann@27104
    79
  Suc_Rep_not_Zero_Rep [unfolded mem_def, symmetric]
haftmann@27104
    80
  inj_Suc_Rep [THEN inj_eq] Rep_Nat_inject)
haftmann@27104
    81
done
berghofe@13449
    82
haftmann@27104
    83
lemma nat_induct [case_names 0 Suc, induct type: nat]:
haftmann@27104
    84
  -- {* for backward compatibility -- naming of variables differs *}
haftmann@27104
    85
  fixes n
haftmann@27104
    86
  assumes "P 0"
haftmann@27104
    87
    and "\<And>n. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (Suc n)"
haftmann@27104
    88
  shows "P n"
haftmann@27104
    89
  using assms by (rule nat.induct) 
haftmann@21411
    90
haftmann@21411
    91
declare nat.exhaust [case_names 0 Suc, cases type: nat]
berghofe@13449
    92
wenzelm@21672
    93
lemmas nat_rec_0 = nat.recs(1)
wenzelm@21672
    94
  and nat_rec_Suc = nat.recs(2)
wenzelm@21672
    95
wenzelm@21672
    96
lemmas nat_case_0 = nat.cases(1)
wenzelm@21672
    97
  and nat_case_Suc = nat.cases(2)
haftmann@27104
    98
   
haftmann@24995
    99
haftmann@24995
   100
text {* Injectiveness and distinctness lemmas *}
haftmann@24995
   101
haftmann@27104
   102
lemma inj_Suc[simp]: "inj_on Suc N"
haftmann@27104
   103
  by (simp add: inj_on_def)
haftmann@27104
   104
haftmann@26072
   105
lemma Suc_neq_Zero: "Suc m = 0 \<Longrightarrow> R"
nipkow@25162
   106
by (rule notE, rule Suc_not_Zero)
haftmann@24995
   107
haftmann@26072
   108
lemma Zero_neq_Suc: "0 = Suc m \<Longrightarrow> R"
nipkow@25162
   109
by (rule Suc_neq_Zero, erule sym)
haftmann@24995
   110
haftmann@26072
   111
lemma Suc_inject: "Suc x = Suc y \<Longrightarrow> x = y"
nipkow@25162
   112
by (rule inj_Suc [THEN injD])
haftmann@24995
   113
paulson@14267
   114
lemma n_not_Suc_n: "n \<noteq> Suc n"
nipkow@25162
   115
by (induct n) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   116
haftmann@26072
   117
lemma Suc_n_not_n: "Suc n \<noteq> n"
nipkow@25162
   118
by (rule not_sym, rule n_not_Suc_n)
berghofe@13449
   119
berghofe@13449
   120
text {* A special form of induction for reasoning
berghofe@13449
   121
  about @{term "m < n"} and @{term "m - n"} *}
berghofe@13449
   122
haftmann@26072
   123
lemma diff_induct: "(!!x. P x 0) ==> (!!y. P 0 (Suc y)) ==>
berghofe@13449
   124
    (!!x y. P x y ==> P (Suc x) (Suc y)) ==> P m n"
paulson@14208
   125
  apply (rule_tac x = m in spec)
paulson@15251
   126
  apply (induct n)
berghofe@13449
   127
  prefer 2
berghofe@13449
   128
  apply (rule allI)
nipkow@17589
   129
  apply (induct_tac x, iprover+)
berghofe@13449
   130
  done
berghofe@13449
   131
haftmann@24995
   132
haftmann@24995
   133
subsection {* Arithmetic operators *}
haftmann@24995
   134
haftmann@26072
   135
instantiation nat :: "{minus, comm_monoid_add}"
haftmann@25571
   136
begin
haftmann@24995
   137
haftmann@25571
   138
primrec plus_nat
haftmann@25571
   139
where
haftmann@25571
   140
  add_0:      "0 + n = (n\<Colon>nat)"
haftmann@25571
   141
  | add_Suc:  "Suc m + n = Suc (m + n)"
haftmann@24995
   142
haftmann@26072
   143
lemma add_0_right [simp]: "m + 0 = (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   144
  by (induct m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   145
haftmann@26072
   146
lemma add_Suc_right [simp]: "m + Suc n = Suc (m + n)"
haftmann@26072
   147
  by (induct m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   148
haftmann@26072
   149
lemma add_Suc_shift [code]: "Suc m + n = m + Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   150
  by simp
haftmann@26072
   151
haftmann@25571
   152
primrec minus_nat
haftmann@25571
   153
where
haftmann@25571
   154
  diff_0:     "m - 0 = (m\<Colon>nat)"
haftmann@25571
   155
  | diff_Suc: "m - Suc n = (case m - n of 0 => 0 | Suc k => k)"
haftmann@24995
   156
haftmann@26072
   157
declare diff_Suc [simp del, code del]
haftmann@26072
   158
haftmann@26072
   159
lemma diff_0_eq_0 [simp, code]: "0 - n = (0::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   160
  by (induct n) (simp_all add: diff_Suc)
haftmann@26072
   161
haftmann@26072
   162
lemma diff_Suc_Suc [simp, code]: "Suc m - Suc n = m - n"
haftmann@26072
   163
  by (induct n) (simp_all add: diff_Suc)
haftmann@26072
   164
haftmann@26072
   165
instance proof
haftmann@26072
   166
  fix n m q :: nat
haftmann@26072
   167
  show "(n + m) + q = n + (m + q)" by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   168
  show "n + m = m + n" by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   169
  show "0 + n = n" by simp
haftmann@26072
   170
qed
haftmann@26072
   171
haftmann@26072
   172
end
haftmann@26072
   173
haftmann@26072
   174
instantiation nat :: comm_semiring_1_cancel
haftmann@26072
   175
begin
haftmann@26072
   176
haftmann@26072
   177
definition
haftmann@26072
   178
  One_nat_def [simp]: "1 = Suc 0"
haftmann@26072
   179
haftmann@25571
   180
primrec times_nat
haftmann@25571
   181
where
haftmann@25571
   182
  mult_0:     "0 * n = (0\<Colon>nat)"
haftmann@25571
   183
  | mult_Suc: "Suc m * n = n + (m * n)"
haftmann@25571
   184
haftmann@26072
   185
lemma mult_0_right [simp]: "(m::nat) * 0 = 0"
haftmann@26072
   186
  by (induct m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   187
haftmann@26072
   188
lemma mult_Suc_right [simp]: "m * Suc n = m + (m * n)"
haftmann@26072
   189
  by (induct m) (simp_all add: add_left_commute)
haftmann@26072
   190
haftmann@26072
   191
lemma add_mult_distrib: "(m + n) * k = (m * k) + ((n * k)::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   192
  by (induct m) (simp_all add: add_assoc)
haftmann@26072
   193
haftmann@26072
   194
instance proof
haftmann@26072
   195
  fix n m q :: nat
haftmann@26072
   196
  show "0 \<noteq> (1::nat)" by simp
haftmann@26072
   197
  show "1 * n = n" by simp
haftmann@26072
   198
  show "n * m = m * n" by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   199
  show "(n * m) * q = n * (m * q)" by (induct n) (simp_all add: add_mult_distrib)
haftmann@26072
   200
  show "(n + m) * q = n * q + m * q" by (rule add_mult_distrib)
haftmann@26072
   201
  assume "n + m = n + q" thus "m = q" by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   202
qed
haftmann@25571
   203
haftmann@25571
   204
end
haftmann@24995
   205
haftmann@26072
   206
subsubsection {* Addition *}
haftmann@26072
   207
haftmann@26072
   208
lemma nat_add_assoc: "(m + n) + k = m + ((n + k)::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   209
  by (rule add_assoc)
haftmann@26072
   210
haftmann@26072
   211
lemma nat_add_commute: "m + n = n + (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   212
  by (rule add_commute)
haftmann@26072
   213
haftmann@26072
   214
lemma nat_add_left_commute: "x + (y + z) = y + ((x + z)::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   215
  by (rule add_left_commute)
haftmann@26072
   216
haftmann@26072
   217
lemma nat_add_left_cancel [simp]: "(k + m = k + n) = (m = (n::nat))"
haftmann@26072
   218
  by (rule add_left_cancel)
haftmann@26072
   219
haftmann@26072
   220
lemma nat_add_right_cancel [simp]: "(m + k = n + k) = (m=(n::nat))"
haftmann@26072
   221
  by (rule add_right_cancel)
haftmann@26072
   222
haftmann@26072
   223
text {* Reasoning about @{text "m + 0 = 0"}, etc. *}
haftmann@26072
   224
haftmann@26072
   225
lemma add_is_0 [iff]:
haftmann@26072
   226
  fixes m n :: nat
haftmann@26072
   227
  shows "(m + n = 0) = (m = 0 & n = 0)"
haftmann@26072
   228
  by (cases m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   229
haftmann@26072
   230
lemma add_is_1:
haftmann@26072
   231
  "(m+n= Suc 0) = (m= Suc 0 & n=0 | m=0 & n= Suc 0)"
haftmann@26072
   232
  by (cases m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   233
haftmann@26072
   234
lemma one_is_add:
haftmann@26072
   235
  "(Suc 0 = m + n) = (m = Suc 0 & n = 0 | m = 0 & n = Suc 0)"
haftmann@26072
   236
  by (rule trans, rule eq_commute, rule add_is_1)
haftmann@26072
   237
haftmann@26072
   238
lemma add_eq_self_zero:
haftmann@26072
   239
  fixes m n :: nat
haftmann@26072
   240
  shows "m + n = m \<Longrightarrow> n = 0"
haftmann@26072
   241
  by (induct m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   242
haftmann@26072
   243
lemma inj_on_add_nat[simp]: "inj_on (%n::nat. n+k) N"
haftmann@26072
   244
  apply (induct k)
haftmann@26072
   245
   apply simp
haftmann@26072
   246
  apply(drule comp_inj_on[OF _ inj_Suc])
haftmann@26072
   247
  apply (simp add:o_def)
haftmann@26072
   248
  done
haftmann@26072
   249
haftmann@26072
   250
haftmann@26072
   251
subsubsection {* Difference *}
haftmann@26072
   252
haftmann@26072
   253
lemma diff_self_eq_0 [simp]: "(m\<Colon>nat) - m = 0"
haftmann@26072
   254
  by (induct m) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   255
haftmann@26072
   256
lemma diff_diff_left: "(i::nat) - j - k = i - (j + k)"
haftmann@26072
   257
  by (induct i j rule: diff_induct) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   258
haftmann@26072
   259
lemma Suc_diff_diff [simp]: "(Suc m - n) - Suc k = m - n - k"
haftmann@26072
   260
  by (simp add: diff_diff_left)
haftmann@26072
   261
haftmann@26072
   262
lemma diff_commute: "(i::nat) - j - k = i - k - j"
haftmann@26072
   263
  by (simp add: diff_diff_left add_commute)
haftmann@26072
   264
haftmann@26072
   265
lemma diff_add_inverse: "(n + m) - n = (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   266
  by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   267
haftmann@26072
   268
lemma diff_add_inverse2: "(m + n) - n = (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   269
  by (simp add: diff_add_inverse add_commute [of m n])
haftmann@26072
   270
haftmann@26072
   271
lemma diff_cancel: "(k + m) - (k + n) = m - (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   272
  by (induct k) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   273
haftmann@26072
   274
lemma diff_cancel2: "(m + k) - (n + k) = m - (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   275
  by (simp add: diff_cancel add_commute)
haftmann@26072
   276
haftmann@26072
   277
lemma diff_add_0: "n - (n + m) = (0::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   278
  by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   279
haftmann@26072
   280
text {* Difference distributes over multiplication *}
haftmann@26072
   281
haftmann@26072
   282
lemma diff_mult_distrib: "((m::nat) - n) * k = (m * k) - (n * k)"
haftmann@26072
   283
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) (simp_all add: diff_cancel)
haftmann@26072
   284
haftmann@26072
   285
lemma diff_mult_distrib2: "k * ((m::nat) - n) = (k * m) - (k * n)"
haftmann@26072
   286
by (simp add: diff_mult_distrib mult_commute [of k])
haftmann@26072
   287
  -- {* NOT added as rewrites, since sometimes they are used from right-to-left *}
haftmann@26072
   288
haftmann@26072
   289
haftmann@26072
   290
subsubsection {* Multiplication *}
haftmann@26072
   291
haftmann@26072
   292
lemma nat_mult_assoc: "(m * n) * k = m * ((n * k)::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   293
  by (rule mult_assoc)
haftmann@26072
   294
haftmann@26072
   295
lemma nat_mult_commute: "m * n = n * (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   296
  by (rule mult_commute)
haftmann@26072
   297
haftmann@26072
   298
lemma add_mult_distrib2: "k * (m + n) = (k * m) + ((k * n)::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   299
  by (rule right_distrib)
haftmann@26072
   300
haftmann@26072
   301
lemma mult_is_0 [simp]: "((m::nat) * n = 0) = (m=0 | n=0)"
haftmann@26072
   302
  by (induct m) auto
haftmann@26072
   303
haftmann@26072
   304
lemmas nat_distrib =
haftmann@26072
   305
  add_mult_distrib add_mult_distrib2 diff_mult_distrib diff_mult_distrib2
haftmann@26072
   306
haftmann@26072
   307
lemma mult_eq_1_iff [simp]: "(m * n = Suc 0) = (m = 1 & n = 1)"
haftmann@26072
   308
  apply (induct m)
haftmann@26072
   309
   apply simp
haftmann@26072
   310
  apply (induct n)
haftmann@26072
   311
   apply auto
haftmann@26072
   312
  done
haftmann@26072
   313
haftmann@26072
   314
lemma one_eq_mult_iff [simp,noatp]: "(Suc 0 = m * n) = (m = 1 & n = 1)"
haftmann@26072
   315
  apply (rule trans)
haftmann@26072
   316
  apply (rule_tac [2] mult_eq_1_iff, fastsimp)
haftmann@26072
   317
  done
haftmann@26072
   318
haftmann@26072
   319
lemma mult_cancel1 [simp]: "(k * m = k * n) = (m = n | (k = (0::nat)))"
haftmann@26072
   320
proof -
haftmann@26072
   321
  have "k \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> k * m = k * n \<Longrightarrow> m = n"
haftmann@26072
   322
  proof (induct n arbitrary: m)
haftmann@26072
   323
    case 0 then show "m = 0" by simp
haftmann@26072
   324
  next
haftmann@26072
   325
    case (Suc n) then show "m = Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   326
      by (cases m) (simp_all add: eq_commute [of "0"])
haftmann@26072
   327
  qed
haftmann@26072
   328
  then show ?thesis by auto
haftmann@26072
   329
qed
haftmann@26072
   330
haftmann@26072
   331
lemma mult_cancel2 [simp]: "(m * k = n * k) = (m = n | (k = (0::nat)))"
haftmann@26072
   332
  by (simp add: mult_commute)
haftmann@26072
   333
haftmann@26072
   334
lemma Suc_mult_cancel1: "(Suc k * m = Suc k * n) = (m = n)"
haftmann@26072
   335
  by (subst mult_cancel1) simp
haftmann@26072
   336
haftmann@24995
   337
haftmann@24995
   338
subsection {* Orders on @{typ nat} *}
haftmann@24995
   339
haftmann@26072
   340
subsubsection {* Operation definition *}
haftmann@24995
   341
haftmann@26072
   342
instantiation nat :: linorder
haftmann@25510
   343
begin
haftmann@25510
   344
haftmann@26072
   345
primrec less_eq_nat where
haftmann@26072
   346
  "(0\<Colon>nat) \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> True"
haftmann@26072
   347
  | "Suc m \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> (case n of 0 \<Rightarrow> False | Suc n \<Rightarrow> m \<le> n)"
haftmann@26072
   348
haftmann@26072
   349
declare less_eq_nat.simps [simp del, code del]
haftmann@26072
   350
lemma [code]: "(0\<Colon>nat) \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> True" by (simp add: less_eq_nat.simps)
haftmann@26072
   351
lemma le0 [iff]: "0 \<le> (n\<Colon>nat)" by (simp add: less_eq_nat.simps)
haftmann@26072
   352
haftmann@26072
   353
definition less_nat where
haftmann@26072
   354
  less_eq_Suc_le [code func del]: "n < m \<longleftrightarrow> Suc n \<le> m"
haftmann@26072
   355
haftmann@26072
   356
lemma Suc_le_mono [iff]: "Suc n \<le> Suc m \<longleftrightarrow> n \<le> m"
haftmann@26072
   357
  by (simp add: less_eq_nat.simps(2))
haftmann@26072
   358
haftmann@26072
   359
lemma Suc_le_eq [code]: "Suc m \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   360
  unfolding less_eq_Suc_le ..
haftmann@26072
   361
haftmann@26072
   362
lemma le_0_eq [iff]: "(n\<Colon>nat) \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0"
haftmann@26072
   363
  by (induct n) (simp_all add: less_eq_nat.simps(2))
haftmann@26072
   364
haftmann@26072
   365
lemma not_less0 [iff]: "\<not> n < (0\<Colon>nat)"
haftmann@26072
   366
  by (simp add: less_eq_Suc_le)
haftmann@26072
   367
haftmann@26072
   368
lemma less_nat_zero_code [code]: "n < (0\<Colon>nat) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
haftmann@26072
   369
  by simp
haftmann@26072
   370
haftmann@26072
   371
lemma Suc_less_eq [iff]: "Suc m < Suc n \<longleftrightarrow> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   372
  by (simp add: less_eq_Suc_le)
haftmann@26072
   373
haftmann@26072
   374
lemma less_Suc_eq_le [code]: "m < Suc n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   375
  by (simp add: less_eq_Suc_le)
haftmann@26072
   376
haftmann@26072
   377
lemma le_SucI: "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> m \<le> Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   378
  by (induct m arbitrary: n)
haftmann@26072
   379
    (simp_all add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits)
haftmann@26072
   380
haftmann@26072
   381
lemma Suc_leD: "Suc m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   382
  by (cases n) (auto intro: le_SucI)
haftmann@26072
   383
haftmann@26072
   384
lemma less_SucI: "m < n \<Longrightarrow> m < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   385
  by (simp add: less_eq_Suc_le) (erule Suc_leD)
haftmann@24995
   386
haftmann@26072
   387
lemma Suc_lessD: "Suc m < n \<Longrightarrow> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   388
  by (simp add: less_eq_Suc_le) (erule Suc_leD)
haftmann@25510
   389
wenzelm@26315
   390
instance
wenzelm@26315
   391
proof
haftmann@26072
   392
  fix n m :: nat
haftmann@26072
   393
  have less_imp_le: "n < m \<Longrightarrow> n \<le> m"
haftmann@26072
   394
    unfolding less_eq_Suc_le by (erule Suc_leD)
haftmann@26072
   395
  have irrefl: "\<not> m < m" by (induct m) auto
haftmann@26072
   396
  have strict: "n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> n \<noteq> m \<Longrightarrow> n < m"
haftmann@26072
   397
  proof (induct n arbitrary: m)
haftmann@26072
   398
    case 0 then show ?case
haftmann@26072
   399
      by (cases m) (simp_all add: less_eq_Suc_le)
haftmann@26072
   400
  next
haftmann@26072
   401
    case (Suc n) then show ?case
haftmann@26072
   402
      by (cases m) (simp_all add: less_eq_Suc_le)
haftmann@26072
   403
  qed
haftmann@26072
   404
  show "n < m \<longleftrightarrow> n \<le> m \<and> n \<noteq> m"
haftmann@26072
   405
    by (auto simp add: irrefl intro: less_imp_le strict)
haftmann@26072
   406
next
haftmann@26072
   407
  fix n :: nat show "n \<le> n" by (induct n) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   408
next
haftmann@26072
   409
  fix n m :: nat assume "n \<le> m" and "m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   410
  then show "n = m"
haftmann@26072
   411
    by (induct n arbitrary: m)
haftmann@26072
   412
      (simp_all add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits)
haftmann@26072
   413
next
haftmann@26072
   414
  fix n m q :: nat assume "n \<le> m" and "m \<le> q"
haftmann@26072
   415
  then show "n \<le> q"
haftmann@26072
   416
  proof (induct n arbitrary: m q)
haftmann@26072
   417
    case 0 show ?case by simp
haftmann@26072
   418
  next
haftmann@26072
   419
    case (Suc n) then show ?case
haftmann@26072
   420
      by (simp_all (no_asm_use) add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits, clarify,
haftmann@26072
   421
        simp_all (no_asm_use) add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits, clarify,
haftmann@26072
   422
        simp_all (no_asm_use) add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits)
haftmann@26072
   423
  qed
haftmann@26072
   424
next
haftmann@26072
   425
  fix n m :: nat show "n \<le> m \<or> m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   426
    by (induct n arbitrary: m)
haftmann@26072
   427
      (simp_all add: less_eq_nat.simps(2) split: nat.splits)
haftmann@26072
   428
qed
haftmann@25510
   429
haftmann@25510
   430
end
berghofe@13449
   431
haftmann@26072
   432
subsubsection {* Introduction properties *}
berghofe@13449
   433
haftmann@26072
   434
lemma lessI [iff]: "n < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   435
  by (simp add: less_Suc_eq_le)
berghofe@13449
   436
haftmann@26072
   437
lemma zero_less_Suc [iff]: "0 < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   438
  by (simp add: less_Suc_eq_le)
berghofe@13449
   439
berghofe@13449
   440
berghofe@13449
   441
subsubsection {* Elimination properties *}
berghofe@13449
   442
berghofe@13449
   443
lemma less_not_refl: "~ n < (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   444
  by (rule order_less_irrefl)
berghofe@13449
   445
wenzelm@26335
   446
lemma less_not_refl2: "n < m ==> m \<noteq> (n::nat)"
wenzelm@26335
   447
  by (rule not_sym) (rule less_imp_neq) 
berghofe@13449
   448
paulson@14267
   449
lemma less_not_refl3: "(s::nat) < t ==> s \<noteq> t"
haftmann@26072
   450
  by (rule less_imp_neq)
berghofe@13449
   451
wenzelm@26335
   452
lemma less_irrefl_nat: "(n::nat) < n ==> R"
wenzelm@26335
   453
  by (rule notE, rule less_not_refl)
berghofe@13449
   454
berghofe@13449
   455
lemma less_zeroE: "(n::nat) < 0 ==> R"
haftmann@26072
   456
  by (rule notE) (rule not_less0)
berghofe@13449
   457
berghofe@13449
   458
lemma less_Suc_eq: "(m < Suc n) = (m < n | m = n)"
haftmann@26072
   459
  unfolding less_Suc_eq_le le_less ..
berghofe@13449
   460
haftmann@26072
   461
lemma less_one [iff, noatp]: "(n < (1::nat)) = (n = 0)"
haftmann@26072
   462
  by (simp add: less_Suc_eq)
berghofe@13449
   463
berghofe@13449
   464
lemma less_Suc0 [iff]: "(n < Suc 0) = (n = 0)"
haftmann@26072
   465
  by (simp add: less_Suc_eq)
berghofe@13449
   466
berghofe@13449
   467
lemma Suc_mono: "m < n ==> Suc m < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   468
  by simp
berghofe@13449
   469
nipkow@14302
   470
text {* "Less than" is antisymmetric, sort of *}
nipkow@14302
   471
lemma less_antisym: "\<lbrakk> \<not> n < m; n < Suc m \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> m = n"
haftmann@26072
   472
  unfolding not_less less_Suc_eq_le by (rule antisym)
nipkow@14302
   473
paulson@14267
   474
lemma nat_neq_iff: "((m::nat) \<noteq> n) = (m < n | n < m)"
haftmann@26072
   475
  by (rule linorder_neq_iff)
berghofe@13449
   476
berghofe@13449
   477
lemma nat_less_cases: assumes major: "(m::nat) < n ==> P n m"
berghofe@13449
   478
  and eqCase: "m = n ==> P n m" and lessCase: "n<m ==> P n m"
berghofe@13449
   479
  shows "P n m"
berghofe@13449
   480
  apply (rule less_linear [THEN disjE])
berghofe@13449
   481
  apply (erule_tac [2] disjE)
berghofe@13449
   482
  apply (erule lessCase)
berghofe@13449
   483
  apply (erule sym [THEN eqCase])
berghofe@13449
   484
  apply (erule major)
berghofe@13449
   485
  done
berghofe@13449
   486
berghofe@13449
   487
berghofe@13449
   488
subsubsection {* Inductive (?) properties *}
berghofe@13449
   489
paulson@14267
   490
lemma Suc_lessI: "m < n ==> Suc m \<noteq> n ==> Suc m < n"
haftmann@26072
   491
  unfolding less_eq_Suc_le [of m] le_less by simp 
berghofe@13449
   492
haftmann@26072
   493
lemma lessE:
haftmann@26072
   494
  assumes major: "i < k"
haftmann@26072
   495
  and p1: "k = Suc i ==> P" and p2: "!!j. i < j ==> k = Suc j ==> P"
haftmann@26072
   496
  shows P
haftmann@26072
   497
proof -
haftmann@26072
   498
  from major have "\<exists>j. i \<le> j \<and> k = Suc j"
haftmann@26072
   499
    unfolding less_eq_Suc_le by (induct k) simp_all
haftmann@26072
   500
  then have "(\<exists>j. i < j \<and> k = Suc j) \<or> k = Suc i"
haftmann@26072
   501
    by (clarsimp simp add: less_le)
haftmann@26072
   502
  with p1 p2 show P by auto
haftmann@26072
   503
qed
haftmann@26072
   504
haftmann@26072
   505
lemma less_SucE: assumes major: "m < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   506
  and less: "m < n ==> P" and eq: "m = n ==> P" shows P
haftmann@26072
   507
  apply (rule major [THEN lessE])
haftmann@26072
   508
  apply (rule eq, blast)
haftmann@26072
   509
  apply (rule less, blast)
berghofe@13449
   510
  done
berghofe@13449
   511
berghofe@13449
   512
lemma Suc_lessE: assumes major: "Suc i < k"
berghofe@13449
   513
  and minor: "!!j. i < j ==> k = Suc j ==> P" shows P
berghofe@13449
   514
  apply (rule major [THEN lessE])
berghofe@13449
   515
  apply (erule lessI [THEN minor])
paulson@14208
   516
  apply (erule Suc_lessD [THEN minor], assumption)
berghofe@13449
   517
  done
berghofe@13449
   518
berghofe@13449
   519
lemma Suc_less_SucD: "Suc m < Suc n ==> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   520
  by simp
berghofe@13449
   521
berghofe@13449
   522
lemma less_trans_Suc:
berghofe@13449
   523
  assumes le: "i < j" shows "j < k ==> Suc i < k"
paulson@14208
   524
  apply (induct k, simp_all)
berghofe@13449
   525
  apply (insert le)
berghofe@13449
   526
  apply (simp add: less_Suc_eq)
berghofe@13449
   527
  apply (blast dest: Suc_lessD)
berghofe@13449
   528
  done
berghofe@13449
   529
berghofe@13449
   530
text {* Can be used with @{text less_Suc_eq} to get @{term "n = m | n < m"} *}
haftmann@26072
   531
lemma not_less_eq: "\<not> m < n \<longleftrightarrow> n < Suc m"
haftmann@26072
   532
  unfolding not_less less_Suc_eq_le ..
berghofe@13449
   533
haftmann@26072
   534
lemma not_less_eq_eq: "\<not> m \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> Suc n \<le> m"
haftmann@26072
   535
  unfolding not_le Suc_le_eq ..
wenzelm@21243
   536
haftmann@24995
   537
text {* Properties of "less than or equal" *}
berghofe@13449
   538
paulson@14267
   539
lemma le_imp_less_Suc: "m \<le> n ==> m < Suc n"
haftmann@26072
   540
  unfolding less_Suc_eq_le .
berghofe@13449
   541
paulson@14267
   542
lemma Suc_n_not_le_n: "~ Suc n \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   543
  unfolding not_le less_Suc_eq_le ..
berghofe@13449
   544
paulson@14267
   545
lemma le_Suc_eq: "(m \<le> Suc n) = (m \<le> n | m = Suc n)"
haftmann@26072
   546
  by (simp add: less_Suc_eq_le [symmetric] less_Suc_eq)
berghofe@13449
   547
paulson@14267
   548
lemma le_SucE: "m \<le> Suc n ==> (m \<le> n ==> R) ==> (m = Suc n ==> R) ==> R"
haftmann@26072
   549
  by (drule le_Suc_eq [THEN iffD1], iprover+)
berghofe@13449
   550
paulson@14267
   551
lemma Suc_leI: "m < n ==> Suc(m) \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   552
  unfolding Suc_le_eq .
berghofe@13449
   553
berghofe@13449
   554
text {* Stronger version of @{text Suc_leD} *}
paulson@14267
   555
lemma Suc_le_lessD: "Suc m \<le> n ==> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   556
  unfolding Suc_le_eq .
berghofe@13449
   557
wenzelm@26315
   558
lemma less_imp_le_nat: "m < n ==> m \<le> (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   559
  unfolding less_eq_Suc_le by (rule Suc_leD)
berghofe@13449
   560
paulson@14267
   561
text {* For instance, @{text "(Suc m < Suc n) = (Suc m \<le> n) = (m < n)"} *}
wenzelm@26315
   562
lemmas le_simps = less_imp_le_nat less_Suc_eq_le Suc_le_eq
berghofe@13449
   563
berghofe@13449
   564
paulson@14267
   565
text {* Equivalence of @{term "m \<le> n"} and @{term "m < n | m = n"} *}
berghofe@13449
   566
paulson@14267
   567
lemma less_or_eq_imp_le: "m < n | m = n ==> m \<le> (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   568
  unfolding le_less .
berghofe@13449
   569
paulson@14267
   570
lemma le_eq_less_or_eq: "(m \<le> (n::nat)) = (m < n | m=n)"
haftmann@26072
   571
  by (rule le_less)
berghofe@13449
   572
wenzelm@22718
   573
text {* Useful with @{text blast}. *}
paulson@14267
   574
lemma eq_imp_le: "(m::nat) = n ==> m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
   575
  by auto
berghofe@13449
   576
paulson@14267
   577
lemma le_refl: "n \<le> (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   578
  by simp
berghofe@13449
   579
paulson@14267
   580
lemma le_trans: "[| i \<le> j; j \<le> k |] ==> i \<le> (k::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   581
  by (rule order_trans)
berghofe@13449
   582
paulson@14267
   583
lemma le_anti_sym: "[| m \<le> n; n \<le> m |] ==> m = (n::nat)"
haftmann@26072
   584
  by (rule antisym)
berghofe@13449
   585
paulson@14267
   586
lemma nat_less_le: "((m::nat) < n) = (m \<le> n & m \<noteq> n)"
haftmann@26072
   587
  by (rule less_le)
berghofe@13449
   588
paulson@14267
   589
lemma le_neq_implies_less: "(m::nat) \<le> n ==> m \<noteq> n ==> m < n"
haftmann@26072
   590
  unfolding less_le ..
berghofe@13449
   591
haftmann@26072
   592
lemma nat_le_linear: "(m::nat) \<le> n | n \<le> m"
haftmann@26072
   593
  by (rule linear)
paulson@14341
   594
wenzelm@22718
   595
lemmas linorder_neqE_nat = linorder_neqE [where 'a = nat]
nipkow@15921
   596
haftmann@26072
   597
lemma le_less_Suc_eq: "m \<le> n ==> (n < Suc m) = (n = m)"
haftmann@26072
   598
  unfolding less_Suc_eq_le by auto
berghofe@13449
   599
haftmann@26072
   600
lemma not_less_less_Suc_eq: "~ n < m ==> (n < Suc m) = (n = m)"
haftmann@26072
   601
  unfolding not_less by (rule le_less_Suc_eq)
berghofe@13449
   602
berghofe@13449
   603
lemmas not_less_simps = not_less_less_Suc_eq le_less_Suc_eq
berghofe@13449
   604
wenzelm@22718
   605
text {* These two rules ease the use of primitive recursion.
paulson@14341
   606
NOTE USE OF @{text "=="} *}
berghofe@13449
   607
lemma def_nat_rec_0: "(!!n. f n == nat_rec c h n) ==> f 0 = c"
nipkow@25162
   608
by simp
berghofe@13449
   609
berghofe@13449
   610
lemma def_nat_rec_Suc: "(!!n. f n == nat_rec c h n) ==> f (Suc n) = h n (f n)"
nipkow@25162
   611
by simp
berghofe@13449
   612
paulson@14267
   613
lemma not0_implies_Suc: "n \<noteq> 0 ==> \<exists>m. n = Suc m"
nipkow@25162
   614
by (cases n) simp_all
nipkow@25162
   615
nipkow@25162
   616
lemma gr0_implies_Suc: "n > 0 ==> \<exists>m. n = Suc m"
nipkow@25162
   617
by (cases n) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   618
wenzelm@22718
   619
lemma gr_implies_not0: fixes n :: nat shows "m<n ==> n \<noteq> 0"
nipkow@25162
   620
by (cases n) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   621
nipkow@25162
   622
lemma neq0_conv[iff]: fixes n :: nat shows "(n \<noteq> 0) = (0 < n)"
nipkow@25162
   623
by (cases n) simp_all
nipkow@25140
   624
berghofe@13449
   625
text {* This theorem is useful with @{text blast} *}
berghofe@13449
   626
lemma gr0I: "((n::nat) = 0 ==> False) ==> 0 < n"
nipkow@25162
   627
by (rule neq0_conv[THEN iffD1], iprover)
berghofe@13449
   628
paulson@14267
   629
lemma gr0_conv_Suc: "(0 < n) = (\<exists>m. n = Suc m)"
nipkow@25162
   630
by (fast intro: not0_implies_Suc)
berghofe@13449
   631
paulson@24286
   632
lemma not_gr0 [iff,noatp]: "!!n::nat. (~ (0 < n)) = (n = 0)"
nipkow@25134
   633
using neq0_conv by blast
berghofe@13449
   634
paulson@14267
   635
lemma Suc_le_D: "(Suc n \<le> m') ==> (? m. m' = Suc m)"
nipkow@25162
   636
by (induct m') simp_all
berghofe@13449
   637
berghofe@13449
   638
text {* Useful in certain inductive arguments *}
paulson@14267
   639
lemma less_Suc_eq_0_disj: "(m < Suc n) = (m = 0 | (\<exists>j. m = Suc j & j < n))"
nipkow@25162
   640
by (cases m) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   641
berghofe@13449
   642
haftmann@26072
   643
subsubsection {* @{term min} and @{term max} *}
berghofe@13449
   644
haftmann@25076
   645
lemma mono_Suc: "mono Suc"
nipkow@25162
   646
by (rule monoI) simp
haftmann@25076
   647
berghofe@13449
   648
lemma min_0L [simp]: "min 0 n = (0::nat)"
nipkow@25162
   649
by (rule min_leastL) simp
berghofe@13449
   650
berghofe@13449
   651
lemma min_0R [simp]: "min n 0 = (0::nat)"
nipkow@25162
   652
by (rule min_leastR) simp
berghofe@13449
   653
berghofe@13449
   654
lemma min_Suc_Suc [simp]: "min (Suc m) (Suc n) = Suc (min m n)"
nipkow@25162
   655
by (simp add: mono_Suc min_of_mono)
berghofe@13449
   656
paulson@22191
   657
lemma min_Suc1:
paulson@22191
   658
   "min (Suc n) m = (case m of 0 => 0 | Suc m' => Suc(min n m'))"
nipkow@25162
   659
by (simp split: nat.split)
paulson@22191
   660
paulson@22191
   661
lemma min_Suc2:
paulson@22191
   662
   "min m (Suc n) = (case m of 0 => 0 | Suc m' => Suc(min m' n))"
nipkow@25162
   663
by (simp split: nat.split)
paulson@22191
   664
berghofe@13449
   665
lemma max_0L [simp]: "max 0 n = (n::nat)"
nipkow@25162
   666
by (rule max_leastL) simp
berghofe@13449
   667
berghofe@13449
   668
lemma max_0R [simp]: "max n 0 = (n::nat)"
nipkow@25162
   669
by (rule max_leastR) simp
berghofe@13449
   670
berghofe@13449
   671
lemma max_Suc_Suc [simp]: "max (Suc m) (Suc n) = Suc(max m n)"
nipkow@25162
   672
by (simp add: mono_Suc max_of_mono)
berghofe@13449
   673
paulson@22191
   674
lemma max_Suc1:
paulson@22191
   675
   "max (Suc n) m = (case m of 0 => Suc n | Suc m' => Suc(max n m'))"
nipkow@25162
   676
by (simp split: nat.split)
paulson@22191
   677
paulson@22191
   678
lemma max_Suc2:
paulson@22191
   679
   "max m (Suc n) = (case m of 0 => Suc n | Suc m' => Suc(max m' n))"
nipkow@25162
   680
by (simp split: nat.split)
paulson@22191
   681
berghofe@13449
   682
haftmann@26072
   683
subsubsection {* Monotonicity of Addition *}
berghofe@13449
   684
haftmann@26072
   685
lemma Suc_pred [simp]: "n>0 ==> Suc (n - Suc 0) = n"
haftmann@26072
   686
by (simp add: diff_Suc split: nat.split)
berghofe@13449
   687
paulson@14331
   688
lemma nat_add_left_cancel_le [simp]: "(k + m \<le> k + n) = (m\<le>(n::nat))"
nipkow@25162
   689
by (induct k) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   690
paulson@14331
   691
lemma nat_add_left_cancel_less [simp]: "(k + m < k + n) = (m<(n::nat))"
nipkow@25162
   692
by (induct k) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   693
nipkow@25162
   694
lemma add_gr_0 [iff]: "!!m::nat. (m + n > 0) = (m>0 | n>0)"
nipkow@25162
   695
by(auto dest:gr0_implies_Suc)
berghofe@13449
   696
paulson@14341
   697
text {* strict, in 1st argument *}
paulson@14341
   698
lemma add_less_mono1: "i < j ==> i + k < j + (k::nat)"
nipkow@25162
   699
by (induct k) simp_all
paulson@14341
   700
paulson@14341
   701
text {* strict, in both arguments *}
paulson@14341
   702
lemma add_less_mono: "[|i < j; k < l|] ==> i + k < j + (l::nat)"
paulson@14341
   703
  apply (rule add_less_mono1 [THEN less_trans], assumption+)
paulson@15251
   704
  apply (induct j, simp_all)
paulson@14341
   705
  done
paulson@14341
   706
paulson@14341
   707
text {* Deleted @{text less_natE}; use @{text "less_imp_Suc_add RS exE"} *}
paulson@14341
   708
lemma less_imp_Suc_add: "m < n ==> (\<exists>k. n = Suc (m + k))"
paulson@14341
   709
  apply (induct n)
paulson@14341
   710
  apply (simp_all add: order_le_less)
wenzelm@22718
   711
  apply (blast elim!: less_SucE
paulson@14341
   712
               intro!: add_0_right [symmetric] add_Suc_right [symmetric])
paulson@14341
   713
  done
paulson@14341
   714
paulson@14341
   715
text {* strict, in 1st argument; proof is by induction on @{text "k > 0"} *}
nipkow@25134
   716
lemma mult_less_mono2: "(i::nat) < j ==> 0<k ==> k * i < k * j"
nipkow@25134
   717
apply(auto simp: gr0_conv_Suc)
nipkow@25134
   718
apply (induct_tac m)
nipkow@25134
   719
apply (simp_all add: add_less_mono)
nipkow@25134
   720
done
paulson@14341
   721
nipkow@14740
   722
text{*The naturals form an ordered @{text comm_semiring_1_cancel}*}
obua@14738
   723
instance nat :: ordered_semidom
paulson@14341
   724
proof
paulson@14341
   725
  fix i j k :: nat
paulson@14348
   726
  show "0 < (1::nat)" by simp
paulson@14267
   727
  show "i \<le> j ==> k + i \<le> k + j" by simp
paulson@14267
   728
  show "i < j ==> 0 < k ==> k * i < k * j" by (simp add: mult_less_mono2)
paulson@14267
   729
qed
paulson@14267
   730
paulson@14267
   731
lemma nat_mult_1: "(1::nat) * n = n"
nipkow@25162
   732
by simp
paulson@14267
   733
paulson@14267
   734
lemma nat_mult_1_right: "n * (1::nat) = n"
nipkow@25162
   735
by simp
paulson@14267
   736
paulson@14267
   737
krauss@26748
   738
subsubsection {* Additional theorems about @{term "op \<le>"} *}
krauss@26748
   739
krauss@26748
   740
text {* Complete induction, aka course-of-values induction *}
krauss@26748
   741
krauss@26748
   742
lemma less_induct [case_names less]:
krauss@26748
   743
  fixes P :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
krauss@26748
   744
  assumes step: "\<And>x. (\<And>y. y < x \<Longrightarrow> P y) \<Longrightarrow> P x"
krauss@26748
   745
  shows "P a"
krauss@26748
   746
proof - 
krauss@26748
   747
  have "\<And>z. z\<le>a \<Longrightarrow> P z"
krauss@26748
   748
  proof (induct a)
krauss@26748
   749
    case (0 z)
krauss@26748
   750
    have "P 0" by (rule step) auto
krauss@26748
   751
    thus ?case using 0 by auto
krauss@26748
   752
  next
krauss@26748
   753
    case (Suc x z)
krauss@26748
   754
    then have "z \<le> x \<or> z = Suc x" by (simp add: le_Suc_eq)
krauss@26748
   755
    thus ?case
krauss@26748
   756
    proof
krauss@26748
   757
      assume "z \<le> x" thus "P z" by (rule Suc(1))
krauss@26748
   758
    next
krauss@26748
   759
      assume z: "z = Suc x"
krauss@26748
   760
      show "P z"
krauss@26748
   761
        by (rule step) (rule Suc(1), simp add: z le_simps)
krauss@26748
   762
    qed
krauss@26748
   763
  qed
krauss@26748
   764
  thus ?thesis by auto
krauss@26748
   765
qed
krauss@26748
   766
krauss@26748
   767
lemma nat_less_induct:
krauss@26748
   768
  assumes "!!n. \<forall>m::nat. m < n --> P m ==> P n" shows "P n"
krauss@26748
   769
  using assms less_induct by blast
krauss@26748
   770
krauss@26748
   771
lemma measure_induct_rule [case_names less]:
krauss@26748
   772
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
krauss@26748
   773
  assumes step: "\<And>x. (\<And>y. f y < f x \<Longrightarrow> P y) \<Longrightarrow> P x"
krauss@26748
   774
  shows "P a"
krauss@26748
   775
by (induct m\<equiv>"f a" arbitrary: a rule: less_induct) (auto intro: step)
krauss@26748
   776
krauss@26748
   777
text {* old style induction rules: *}
krauss@26748
   778
lemma measure_induct:
krauss@26748
   779
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
krauss@26748
   780
  shows "(\<And>x. \<forall>y. f y < f x \<longrightarrow> P y \<Longrightarrow> P x) \<Longrightarrow> P a"
krauss@26748
   781
  by (rule measure_induct_rule [of f P a]) iprover
krauss@26748
   782
krauss@26748
   783
lemma full_nat_induct:
krauss@26748
   784
  assumes step: "(!!n. (ALL m. Suc m <= n --> P m) ==> P n)"
krauss@26748
   785
  shows "P n"
krauss@26748
   786
  by (rule less_induct) (auto intro: step simp:le_simps)
paulson@14267
   787
paulson@19870
   788
text{*An induction rule for estabilishing binary relations*}
wenzelm@22718
   789
lemma less_Suc_induct:
paulson@19870
   790
  assumes less:  "i < j"
paulson@19870
   791
     and  step:  "!!i. P i (Suc i)"
paulson@19870
   792
     and  trans: "!!i j k. P i j ==> P j k ==> P i k"
paulson@19870
   793
  shows "P i j"
paulson@19870
   794
proof -
wenzelm@22718
   795
  from less obtain k where j: "j = Suc(i+k)" by (auto dest: less_imp_Suc_add)
wenzelm@22718
   796
  have "P i (Suc (i + k))"
paulson@19870
   797
  proof (induct k)
wenzelm@22718
   798
    case 0
wenzelm@22718
   799
    show ?case by (simp add: step)
paulson@19870
   800
  next
paulson@19870
   801
    case (Suc k)
wenzelm@22718
   802
    thus ?case by (auto intro: assms)
paulson@19870
   803
  qed
wenzelm@22718
   804
  thus "P i j" by (simp add: j)
paulson@19870
   805
qed
paulson@19870
   806
krauss@26748
   807
lemma nat_induct2: "[|P 0; P (Suc 0); !!k. P k ==> P (Suc (Suc k))|] ==> P n"
krauss@26748
   808
  apply (rule nat_less_induct)
krauss@26748
   809
  apply (case_tac n)
krauss@26748
   810
  apply (case_tac [2] nat)
krauss@26748
   811
  apply (blast intro: less_trans)+
krauss@26748
   812
  done
krauss@26748
   813
krauss@26748
   814
text {* The method of infinite descent, frequently used in number theory.
krauss@26748
   815
Provided by Roelof Oosterhuis.
krauss@26748
   816
$P(n)$ is true for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$ if
krauss@26748
   817
\begin{itemize}
krauss@26748
   818
  \item case ``0'': given $n=0$ prove $P(n)$,
krauss@26748
   819
  \item case ``smaller'': given $n>0$ and $\neg P(n)$ prove there exists
krauss@26748
   820
        a smaller integer $m$ such that $\neg P(m)$.
krauss@26748
   821
\end{itemize} *}
krauss@26748
   822
krauss@26748
   823
text{* A compact version without explicit base case: *}
krauss@26748
   824
lemma infinite_descent:
krauss@26748
   825
  "\<lbrakk> !!n::nat. \<not> P n \<Longrightarrow>  \<exists>m<n. \<not>  P m \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>  P n"
krauss@26748
   826
by (induct n rule: less_induct, auto)
krauss@26748
   827
krauss@26748
   828
lemma infinite_descent0[case_names 0 smaller]: 
krauss@26748
   829
  "\<lbrakk> P 0; !!n. n>0 \<Longrightarrow> \<not> P n \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>m::nat. m < n \<and> \<not>P m) \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P n"
krauss@26748
   830
by (rule infinite_descent) (case_tac "n>0", auto)
krauss@26748
   831
krauss@26748
   832
text {*
krauss@26748
   833
Infinite descent using a mapping to $\mathbb{N}$:
krauss@26748
   834
$P(x)$ is true for all $x\in D$ if there exists a $V: D \to \mathbb{N}$ and
krauss@26748
   835
\begin{itemize}
krauss@26748
   836
\item case ``0'': given $V(x)=0$ prove $P(x)$,
krauss@26748
   837
\item case ``smaller'': given $V(x)>0$ and $\neg P(x)$ prove there exists a $y \in D$ such that $V(y)<V(x)$ and $~\neg P(y)$.
krauss@26748
   838
\end{itemize}
krauss@26748
   839
NB: the proof also shows how to use the previous lemma. *}
krauss@26748
   840
krauss@26748
   841
corollary infinite_descent0_measure [case_names 0 smaller]:
krauss@26748
   842
  assumes A0: "!!x. V x = (0::nat) \<Longrightarrow> P x"
krauss@26748
   843
    and   A1: "!!x. V x > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<not>P x \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>y. V y < V x \<and> \<not>P y)"
krauss@26748
   844
  shows "P x"
krauss@26748
   845
proof -
krauss@26748
   846
  obtain n where "n = V x" by auto
krauss@26748
   847
  moreover have "\<And>x. V x = n \<Longrightarrow> P x"
krauss@26748
   848
  proof (induct n rule: infinite_descent0)
krauss@26748
   849
    case 0 -- "i.e. $V(x) = 0$"
krauss@26748
   850
    with A0 show "P x" by auto
krauss@26748
   851
  next -- "now $n>0$ and $P(x)$ does not hold for some $x$ with $V(x)=n$"
krauss@26748
   852
    case (smaller n)
krauss@26748
   853
    then obtain x where vxn: "V x = n " and "V x > 0 \<and> \<not> P x" by auto
krauss@26748
   854
    with A1 obtain y where "V y < V x \<and> \<not> P y" by auto
krauss@26748
   855
    with vxn obtain m where "m = V y \<and> m<n \<and> \<not> P y" by auto
krauss@26748
   856
    then show ?case by auto
krauss@26748
   857
  qed
krauss@26748
   858
  ultimately show "P x" by auto
krauss@26748
   859
qed
krauss@26748
   860
krauss@26748
   861
text{* Again, without explicit base case: *}
krauss@26748
   862
lemma infinite_descent_measure:
krauss@26748
   863
assumes "!!x. \<not> P x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>y. (V::'a\<Rightarrow>nat) y < V x \<and> \<not> P y" shows "P x"
krauss@26748
   864
proof -
krauss@26748
   865
  from assms obtain n where "n = V x" by auto
krauss@26748
   866
  moreover have "!!x. V x = n \<Longrightarrow> P x"
krauss@26748
   867
  proof (induct n rule: infinite_descent, auto)
krauss@26748
   868
    fix x assume "\<not> P x"
krauss@26748
   869
    with assms show "\<exists>m < V x. \<exists>y. V y = m \<and> \<not> P y" by auto
krauss@26748
   870
  qed
krauss@26748
   871
  ultimately show "P x" by auto
krauss@26748
   872
qed
krauss@26748
   873
paulson@14267
   874
text {* A [clumsy] way of lifting @{text "<"}
paulson@14267
   875
  monotonicity to @{text "\<le>"} monotonicity *}
paulson@14267
   876
lemma less_mono_imp_le_mono:
nipkow@24438
   877
  "\<lbrakk> !!i j::nat. i < j \<Longrightarrow> f i < f j; i \<le> j \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i \<le> ((f j)::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   878
by (simp add: order_le_less) (blast)
nipkow@24438
   879
paulson@14267
   880
paulson@14267
   881
text {* non-strict, in 1st argument *}
paulson@14267
   882
lemma add_le_mono1: "i \<le> j ==> i + k \<le> j + (k::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   883
by (rule add_right_mono)
paulson@14267
   884
paulson@14267
   885
text {* non-strict, in both arguments *}
paulson@14267
   886
lemma add_le_mono: "[| i \<le> j;  k \<le> l |] ==> i + k \<le> j + (l::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   887
by (rule add_mono)
paulson@14267
   888
paulson@14267
   889
lemma le_add2: "n \<le> ((m + n)::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   890
by (insert add_right_mono [of 0 m n], simp)
berghofe@13449
   891
paulson@14267
   892
lemma le_add1: "n \<le> ((n + m)::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   893
by (simp add: add_commute, rule le_add2)
berghofe@13449
   894
berghofe@13449
   895
lemma less_add_Suc1: "i < Suc (i + m)"
nipkow@24438
   896
by (rule le_less_trans, rule le_add1, rule lessI)
berghofe@13449
   897
berghofe@13449
   898
lemma less_add_Suc2: "i < Suc (m + i)"
nipkow@24438
   899
by (rule le_less_trans, rule le_add2, rule lessI)
berghofe@13449
   900
paulson@14267
   901
lemma less_iff_Suc_add: "(m < n) = (\<exists>k. n = Suc (m + k))"
nipkow@24438
   902
by (iprover intro!: less_add_Suc1 less_imp_Suc_add)
berghofe@13449
   903
paulson@14267
   904
lemma trans_le_add1: "(i::nat) \<le> j ==> i \<le> j + m"
nipkow@24438
   905
by (rule le_trans, assumption, rule le_add1)
berghofe@13449
   906
paulson@14267
   907
lemma trans_le_add2: "(i::nat) \<le> j ==> i \<le> m + j"
nipkow@24438
   908
by (rule le_trans, assumption, rule le_add2)
berghofe@13449
   909
berghofe@13449
   910
lemma trans_less_add1: "(i::nat) < j ==> i < j + m"
nipkow@24438
   911
by (rule less_le_trans, assumption, rule le_add1)
berghofe@13449
   912
berghofe@13449
   913
lemma trans_less_add2: "(i::nat) < j ==> i < m + j"
nipkow@24438
   914
by (rule less_le_trans, assumption, rule le_add2)
berghofe@13449
   915
berghofe@13449
   916
lemma add_lessD1: "i + j < (k::nat) ==> i < k"
nipkow@24438
   917
apply (rule le_less_trans [of _ "i+j"])
nipkow@24438
   918
apply (simp_all add: le_add1)
nipkow@24438
   919
done
berghofe@13449
   920
berghofe@13449
   921
lemma not_add_less1 [iff]: "~ (i + j < (i::nat))"
nipkow@24438
   922
apply (rule notI)
wenzelm@26335
   923
apply (drule add_lessD1)
wenzelm@26335
   924
apply (erule less_irrefl [THEN notE])
nipkow@24438
   925
done
berghofe@13449
   926
berghofe@13449
   927
lemma not_add_less2 [iff]: "~ (j + i < (i::nat))"
krauss@26748
   928
by (simp add: add_commute)
berghofe@13449
   929
paulson@14267
   930
lemma add_leD1: "m + k \<le> n ==> m \<le> (n::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   931
apply (rule order_trans [of _ "m+k"])
nipkow@24438
   932
apply (simp_all add: le_add1)
nipkow@24438
   933
done
berghofe@13449
   934
paulson@14267
   935
lemma add_leD2: "m + k \<le> n ==> k \<le> (n::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   936
apply (simp add: add_commute)
nipkow@24438
   937
apply (erule add_leD1)
nipkow@24438
   938
done
berghofe@13449
   939
paulson@14267
   940
lemma add_leE: "(m::nat) + k \<le> n ==> (m \<le> n ==> k \<le> n ==> R) ==> R"
nipkow@24438
   941
by (blast dest: add_leD1 add_leD2)
berghofe@13449
   942
berghofe@13449
   943
text {* needs @{text "!!k"} for @{text add_ac} to work *}
berghofe@13449
   944
lemma less_add_eq_less: "!!k::nat. k < l ==> m + l = k + n ==> m < n"
nipkow@24438
   945
by (force simp del: add_Suc_right
berghofe@13449
   946
    simp add: less_iff_Suc_add add_Suc_right [symmetric] add_ac)
berghofe@13449
   947
berghofe@13449
   948
haftmann@26072
   949
subsubsection {* More results about difference *}
berghofe@13449
   950
berghofe@13449
   951
text {* Addition is the inverse of subtraction:
paulson@14267
   952
  if @{term "n \<le> m"} then @{term "n + (m - n) = m"}. *}
berghofe@13449
   953
lemma add_diff_inverse: "~  m < n ==> n + (m - n) = (m::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   954
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   955
paulson@14267
   956
lemma le_add_diff_inverse [simp]: "n \<le> m ==> n + (m - n) = (m::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   957
by (simp add: add_diff_inverse linorder_not_less)
berghofe@13449
   958
paulson@14267
   959
lemma le_add_diff_inverse2 [simp]: "n \<le> m ==> (m - n) + n = (m::nat)"
krauss@26748
   960
by (simp add: add_commute)
berghofe@13449
   961
paulson@14267
   962
lemma Suc_diff_le: "n \<le> m ==> Suc m - n = Suc (m - n)"
nipkow@24438
   963
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   964
berghofe@13449
   965
lemma diff_less_Suc: "m - n < Suc m"
nipkow@24438
   966
apply (induct m n rule: diff_induct)
nipkow@24438
   967
apply (erule_tac [3] less_SucE)
nipkow@24438
   968
apply (simp_all add: less_Suc_eq)
nipkow@24438
   969
done
berghofe@13449
   970
paulson@14267
   971
lemma diff_le_self [simp]: "m - n \<le> (m::nat)"
nipkow@24438
   972
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) (simp_all add: le_SucI)
berghofe@13449
   973
haftmann@26072
   974
lemma le_iff_add: "(m::nat) \<le> n = (\<exists>k. n = m + k)"
haftmann@26072
   975
  by (auto simp: le_add1 dest!: le_add_diff_inverse sym [of _ n])
haftmann@26072
   976
berghofe@13449
   977
lemma less_imp_diff_less: "(j::nat) < k ==> j - n < k"
nipkow@24438
   978
by (rule le_less_trans, rule diff_le_self)
berghofe@13449
   979
berghofe@13449
   980
lemma diff_Suc_less [simp]: "0<n ==> n - Suc i < n"
nipkow@24438
   981
by (cases n) (auto simp add: le_simps)
berghofe@13449
   982
paulson@14267
   983
lemma diff_add_assoc: "k \<le> (j::nat) ==> (i + j) - k = i + (j - k)"
nipkow@24438
   984
by (induct j k rule: diff_induct) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   985
paulson@14267
   986
lemma diff_add_assoc2: "k \<le> (j::nat) ==> (j + i) - k = (j - k) + i"
nipkow@24438
   987
by (simp add: add_commute diff_add_assoc)
berghofe@13449
   988
paulson@14267
   989
lemma le_imp_diff_is_add: "i \<le> (j::nat) ==> (j - i = k) = (j = k + i)"
nipkow@24438
   990
by (auto simp add: diff_add_inverse2)
berghofe@13449
   991
paulson@14267
   992
lemma diff_is_0_eq [simp]: "((m::nat) - n = 0) = (m \<le> n)"
nipkow@24438
   993
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) simp_all
berghofe@13449
   994
paulson@14267
   995
lemma diff_is_0_eq' [simp]: "m \<le> n ==> (m::nat) - n = 0"
nipkow@24438
   996
by (rule iffD2, rule diff_is_0_eq)
berghofe@13449
   997
berghofe@13449
   998
lemma zero_less_diff [simp]: "(0 < n - (m::nat)) = (m < n)"
nipkow@24438
   999
by (induct m n rule: diff_induct) simp_all
berghofe@13449
  1000
wenzelm@22718
  1001
lemma less_imp_add_positive:
wenzelm@22718
  1002
  assumes "i < j"
wenzelm@22718
  1003
  shows "\<exists>k::nat. 0 < k & i + k = j"
wenzelm@22718
  1004
proof
wenzelm@22718
  1005
  from assms show "0 < j - i & i + (j - i) = j"
huffman@23476
  1006
    by (simp add: order_less_imp_le)
wenzelm@22718
  1007
qed
wenzelm@9436
  1008
haftmann@26072
  1009
text {* a nice rewrite for bounded subtraction *}
haftmann@26072
  1010
lemma nat_minus_add_max:
haftmann@26072
  1011
  fixes n m :: nat
haftmann@26072
  1012
  shows "n - m + m = max n m"
haftmann@26072
  1013
    by (simp add: max_def not_le order_less_imp_le)
berghofe@13449
  1014
haftmann@26072
  1015
lemma nat_diff_split:
haftmann@26072
  1016
  "P(a - b::nat) = ((a<b --> P 0) & (ALL d. a = b + d --> P d))"
haftmann@26072
  1017
    -- {* elimination of @{text -} on @{text nat} *}
haftmann@26072
  1018
by (cases "a < b")
haftmann@26072
  1019
  (auto simp add: diff_is_0_eq [THEN iffD2] diff_add_inverse
haftmann@26072
  1020
    not_less le_less dest!: sym [of a] sym [of b] add_eq_self_zero)
berghofe@13449
  1021
haftmann@26072
  1022
lemma nat_diff_split_asm:
haftmann@26072
  1023
  "P(a - b::nat) = (~ (a < b & ~ P 0 | (EX d. a = b + d & ~ P d)))"
haftmann@26072
  1024
    -- {* elimination of @{text -} on @{text nat} in assumptions *}
haftmann@26072
  1025
by (auto split: nat_diff_split)
berghofe@13449
  1026
berghofe@13449
  1027
haftmann@26072
  1028
subsubsection {* Monotonicity of Multiplication *}
berghofe@13449
  1029
paulson@14267
  1030
lemma mult_le_mono1: "i \<le> (j::nat) ==> i * k \<le> j * k"
nipkow@24438
  1031
by (simp add: mult_right_mono)
berghofe@13449
  1032
paulson@14267
  1033
lemma mult_le_mono2: "i \<le> (j::nat) ==> k * i \<le> k * j"
nipkow@24438
  1034
by (simp add: mult_left_mono)
berghofe@13449
  1035
paulson@14267
  1036
text {* @{text "\<le>"} monotonicity, BOTH arguments *}
paulson@14267
  1037
lemma mult_le_mono: "i \<le> (j::nat) ==> k \<le> l ==> i * k \<le> j * l"
nipkow@24438
  1038
by (simp add: mult_mono)
berghofe@13449
  1039
berghofe@13449
  1040
lemma mult_less_mono1: "(i::nat) < j ==> 0 < k ==> i * k < j * k"
nipkow@24438
  1041
by (simp add: mult_strict_right_mono)
berghofe@13449
  1042
paulson@14266
  1043
text{*Differs from the standard @{text zero_less_mult_iff} in that
paulson@14266
  1044
      there are no negative numbers.*}
paulson@14266
  1045
lemma nat_0_less_mult_iff [simp]: "(0 < (m::nat) * n) = (0 < m & 0 < n)"
berghofe@13449
  1046
  apply (induct m)
wenzelm@22718
  1047
   apply simp
wenzelm@22718
  1048
  apply (case_tac n)
wenzelm@22718
  1049
   apply simp_all
berghofe@13449
  1050
  done
berghofe@13449
  1051
paulson@14267
  1052
lemma one_le_mult_iff [simp]: "(Suc 0 \<le> m * n) = (1 \<le> m & 1 \<le> n)"
berghofe@13449
  1053
  apply (induct m)
wenzelm@22718
  1054
   apply simp
wenzelm@22718
  1055
  apply (case_tac n)
wenzelm@22718
  1056
   apply simp_all
berghofe@13449
  1057
  done
berghofe@13449
  1058
paulson@14341
  1059
lemma mult_less_cancel2 [simp]: "((m::nat) * k < n * k) = (0 < k & m < n)"
berghofe@13449
  1060
  apply (safe intro!: mult_less_mono1)
paulson@14208
  1061
  apply (case_tac k, auto)
berghofe@13449
  1062
  apply (simp del: le_0_eq add: linorder_not_le [symmetric])
berghofe@13449
  1063
  apply (blast intro: mult_le_mono1)
berghofe@13449
  1064
  done
berghofe@13449
  1065
berghofe@13449
  1066
lemma mult_less_cancel1 [simp]: "(k * (m::nat) < k * n) = (0 < k & m < n)"
nipkow@24438
  1067
by (simp add: mult_commute [of k])
berghofe@13449
  1068
paulson@14267
  1069
lemma mult_le_cancel1 [simp]: "(k * (m::nat) \<le> k * n) = (0 < k --> m \<le> n)"
nipkow@24438
  1070
by (simp add: linorder_not_less [symmetric], auto)
berghofe@13449
  1071
paulson@14267
  1072
lemma mult_le_cancel2 [simp]: "((m::nat) * k \<le> n * k) = (0 < k --> m \<le> n)"
nipkow@24438
  1073
by (simp add: linorder_not_less [symmetric], auto)
berghofe@13449
  1074
berghofe@13449
  1075
lemma Suc_mult_less_cancel1: "(Suc k * m < Suc k * n) = (m < n)"
nipkow@24438
  1076
by (subst mult_less_cancel1) simp
berghofe@13449
  1077
paulson@14267
  1078
lemma Suc_mult_le_cancel1: "(Suc k * m \<le> Suc k * n) = (m \<le> n)"
nipkow@24438
  1079
by (subst mult_le_cancel1) simp
berghofe@13449
  1080
haftmann@26072
  1081
lemma le_square: "m \<le> m * (m::nat)"
haftmann@26072
  1082
  by (cases m) (auto intro: le_add1)
haftmann@26072
  1083
haftmann@26072
  1084
lemma le_cube: "(m::nat) \<le> m * (m * m)"
haftmann@26072
  1085
  by (cases m) (auto intro: le_add1)
berghofe@13449
  1086
berghofe@13449
  1087
text {* Lemma for @{text gcd} *}
berghofe@13449
  1088
lemma mult_eq_self_implies_10: "(m::nat) = m * n ==> n = 1 | m = 0"
berghofe@13449
  1089
  apply (drule sym)
berghofe@13449
  1090
  apply (rule disjCI)
berghofe@13449
  1091
  apply (rule nat_less_cases, erule_tac [2] _)
paulson@25157
  1092
   apply (drule_tac [2] mult_less_mono2)
nipkow@25162
  1093
    apply (auto)
berghofe@13449
  1094
  done
wenzelm@9436
  1095
haftmann@26072
  1096
text {* the lattice order on @{typ nat} *}
haftmann@24995
  1097
haftmann@26072
  1098
instantiation nat :: distrib_lattice
haftmann@26072
  1099
begin
haftmann@24995
  1100
haftmann@26072
  1101
definition
haftmann@26072
  1102
  "(inf \<Colon> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat) = min"
haftmann@24995
  1103
haftmann@26072
  1104
definition
haftmann@26072
  1105
  "(sup \<Colon> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat) = max"
haftmann@24995
  1106
haftmann@26072
  1107
instance by intro_classes
haftmann@26072
  1108
  (auto simp add: inf_nat_def sup_nat_def max_def not_le min_def
haftmann@26072
  1109
    intro: order_less_imp_le antisym elim!: order_trans order_less_trans)
haftmann@24995
  1110
haftmann@26072
  1111
end
haftmann@24995
  1112
haftmann@24995
  1113
haftmann@25193
  1114
subsection {* Embedding of the Naturals into any
haftmann@25193
  1115
  @{text semiring_1}: @{term of_nat} *}
haftmann@24196
  1116
haftmann@24196
  1117
context semiring_1
haftmann@24196
  1118
begin
haftmann@24196
  1119
haftmann@25559
  1120
primrec
haftmann@25559
  1121
  of_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
haftmann@25559
  1122
where
haftmann@25559
  1123
  of_nat_0:     "of_nat 0 = 0"
haftmann@25559
  1124
  | of_nat_Suc: "of_nat (Suc m) = 1 + of_nat m"
haftmann@25193
  1125
haftmann@25193
  1126
lemma of_nat_1 [simp]: "of_nat 1 = 1"
haftmann@25193
  1127
  by simp
haftmann@25193
  1128
haftmann@25193
  1129
lemma of_nat_add [simp]: "of_nat (m + n) = of_nat m + of_nat n"
haftmann@25193
  1130
  by (induct m) (simp_all add: add_ac)
haftmann@25193
  1131
haftmann@25193
  1132
lemma of_nat_mult: "of_nat (m * n) = of_nat m * of_nat n"
haftmann@25193
  1133
  by (induct m) (simp_all add: add_ac left_distrib)
haftmann@25193
  1134
haftmann@25928
  1135
definition
haftmann@25928
  1136
  of_nat_aux :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
haftmann@25928
  1137
where
haftmann@25928
  1138
  [code func del]: "of_nat_aux n i = of_nat n + i"
haftmann@25928
  1139
haftmann@25928
  1140
lemma of_nat_aux_code [code]:
haftmann@25928
  1141
  "of_nat_aux 0 i = i"
haftmann@25928
  1142
  "of_nat_aux (Suc n) i = of_nat_aux n (i + 1)" -- {* tail recursive *}
haftmann@25928
  1143
  by (simp_all add: of_nat_aux_def add_ac)
haftmann@25928
  1144
haftmann@25928
  1145
lemma of_nat_code [code]:
haftmann@25928
  1146
  "of_nat n = of_nat_aux n 0"
haftmann@25928
  1147
  by (simp add: of_nat_aux_def)
haftmann@25928
  1148
haftmann@24196
  1149
end
haftmann@24196
  1150
haftmann@26072
  1151
text{*Class for unital semirings with characteristic zero.
haftmann@26072
  1152
 Includes non-ordered rings like the complex numbers.*}
haftmann@26072
  1153
haftmann@26072
  1154
class semiring_char_0 = semiring_1 +
haftmann@26072
  1155
  assumes of_nat_eq_iff [simp]: "of_nat m = of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> m = n"
haftmann@26072
  1156
begin
haftmann@26072
  1157
haftmann@26072
  1158
text{*Special cases where either operand is zero*}
haftmann@26072
  1159
haftmann@26072
  1160
lemma of_nat_0_eq_iff [simp, noatp]: "0 = of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> 0 = n"
haftmann@26072
  1161
  by (rule of_nat_eq_iff [of 0, simplified])
haftmann@26072
  1162
haftmann@26072
  1163
lemma of_nat_eq_0_iff [simp, noatp]: "of_nat m = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0"
haftmann@26072
  1164
  by (rule of_nat_eq_iff [of _ 0, simplified])
haftmann@26072
  1165
haftmann@26072
  1166
lemma inj_of_nat: "inj of_nat"
haftmann@26072
  1167
  by (simp add: inj_on_def)
haftmann@26072
  1168
haftmann@26072
  1169
end
haftmann@26072
  1170
haftmann@25193
  1171
context ordered_semidom
haftmann@25193
  1172
begin
haftmann@25193
  1173
haftmann@25193
  1174
lemma zero_le_imp_of_nat: "0 \<le> of_nat m"
haftmann@25193
  1175
  apply (induct m, simp_all)
haftmann@25193
  1176
  apply (erule order_trans)
haftmann@25193
  1177
  apply (rule ord_le_eq_trans [OF _ add_commute])
haftmann@25193
  1178
  apply (rule less_add_one [THEN less_imp_le])
haftmann@25193
  1179
  done
haftmann@25193
  1180
haftmann@25193
  1181
lemma less_imp_of_nat_less: "m < n \<Longrightarrow> of_nat m < of_nat n"
haftmann@25193
  1182
  apply (induct m n rule: diff_induct, simp_all)
haftmann@25193
  1183
  apply (insert add_less_le_mono [OF zero_less_one zero_le_imp_of_nat], force)
haftmann@25193
  1184
  done
haftmann@25193
  1185
haftmann@25193
  1186
lemma of_nat_less_imp_less: "of_nat m < of_nat n \<Longrightarrow> m < n"
haftmann@25193
  1187
  apply (induct m n rule: diff_induct, simp_all)
haftmann@25193
  1188
  apply (insert zero_le_imp_of_nat)
haftmann@25193
  1189
  apply (force simp add: not_less [symmetric])
haftmann@25193
  1190
  done
haftmann@25193
  1191
haftmann@25193
  1192
lemma of_nat_less_iff [simp]: "of_nat m < of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> m < n"
haftmann@25193
  1193
  by (blast intro: of_nat_less_imp_less less_imp_of_nat_less)
haftmann@25193
  1194
haftmann@26072
  1195
lemma of_nat_le_iff [simp]: "of_nat m \<le> of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n"
haftmann@26072
  1196
  by (simp add: not_less [symmetric] linorder_not_less [symmetric])
haftmann@25193
  1197
haftmann@26072
  1198
text{*Every @{text ordered_semidom} has characteristic zero.*}
haftmann@25193
  1199
haftmann@26072
  1200
subclass semiring_char_0
haftmann@26072
  1201
  by unfold_locales (simp add: eq_iff order_eq_iff)
haftmann@25193
  1202
haftmann@25193
  1203
text{*Special cases where either operand is zero*}
haftmann@25193
  1204
haftmann@25193
  1205
lemma of_nat_0_le_iff [simp]: "0 \<le> of_nat n"
haftmann@25193
  1206
  by (rule of_nat_le_iff [of 0, simplified])
haftmann@25193
  1207
haftmann@25193
  1208
lemma of_nat_le_0_iff [simp, noatp]: "of_nat m \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0"
haftmann@25193
  1209
  by (rule of_nat_le_iff [of _ 0, simplified])
haftmann@25193
  1210
haftmann@26072
  1211
lemma of_nat_0_less_iff [simp]: "0 < of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < n"
haftmann@26072
  1212
  by (rule of_nat_less_iff [of 0, simplified])
haftmann@26072
  1213
haftmann@26072
  1214
lemma of_nat_less_0_iff [simp]: "\<not> of_nat m < 0"
haftmann@26072
  1215
  by (rule of_nat_less_iff [of _ 0, simplified])
haftmann@26072
  1216
haftmann@26072
  1217
end
haftmann@26072
  1218
haftmann@26072
  1219
context ring_1
haftmann@26072
  1220
begin
haftmann@26072
  1221
haftmann@26072
  1222
lemma of_nat_diff: "n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> of_nat (m - n) = of_nat m - of_nat n"
haftmann@26072
  1223
  by (simp add: compare_rls of_nat_add [symmetric])
haftmann@26072
  1224
haftmann@26072
  1225
end
haftmann@26072
  1226
haftmann@26072
  1227
context ordered_idom
haftmann@26072
  1228
begin
haftmann@26072
  1229
haftmann@26072
  1230
lemma abs_of_nat [simp]: "\<bar>of_nat n\<bar> = of_nat n"
haftmann@26072
  1231
  unfolding abs_if by auto
haftmann@26072
  1232
haftmann@25193
  1233
end
haftmann@25193
  1234
haftmann@25193
  1235
lemma of_nat_id [simp]: "of_nat n = n"
haftmann@25193
  1236
  by (induct n) auto
haftmann@25193
  1237
haftmann@25193
  1238
lemma of_nat_eq_id [simp]: "of_nat = id"
haftmann@25193
  1239
  by (auto simp add: expand_fun_eq)
haftmann@25193
  1240
haftmann@25193
  1241
haftmann@26149
  1242
subsection {* The Set of Natural Numbers *}
haftmann@25193
  1243
haftmann@26072
  1244
context semiring_1
haftmann@25193
  1245
begin
haftmann@25193
  1246
haftmann@26072
  1247
definition
haftmann@26072
  1248
  Nats  :: "'a set" where
haftmann@27104
  1249
  [code func del]: "Nats = range of_nat"
haftmann@26072
  1250
haftmann@26072
  1251
notation (xsymbols)
haftmann@26072
  1252
  Nats  ("\<nat>")
haftmann@25193
  1253
haftmann@26072
  1254
lemma of_nat_in_Nats [simp]: "of_nat n \<in> \<nat>"
haftmann@26072
  1255
  by (simp add: Nats_def)
haftmann@26072
  1256
haftmann@26072
  1257
lemma Nats_0 [simp]: "0 \<in> \<nat>"
haftmann@26072
  1258
apply (simp add: Nats_def)
haftmann@26072
  1259
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@26072
  1260
apply (rule of_nat_0 [symmetric])
haftmann@26072
  1261
done
haftmann@25193
  1262
haftmann@26072
  1263
lemma Nats_1 [simp]: "1 \<in> \<nat>"
haftmann@26072
  1264
apply (simp add: Nats_def)
haftmann@26072
  1265
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@26072
  1266
apply (rule of_nat_1 [symmetric])
haftmann@26072
  1267
done
haftmann@25193
  1268
haftmann@26072
  1269
lemma Nats_add [simp]: "a \<in> \<nat> \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> \<nat> \<Longrightarrow> a + b \<in> \<nat>"
haftmann@26072
  1270
apply (auto simp add: Nats_def)
haftmann@26072
  1271
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@26072
  1272
apply (rule of_nat_add [symmetric])
haftmann@26072
  1273
done
haftmann@26072
  1274
haftmann@26072
  1275
lemma Nats_mult [simp]: "a \<in> \<nat> \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> \<nat> \<Longrightarrow> a * b \<in> \<nat>"
haftmann@26072
  1276
apply (auto simp add: Nats_def)
haftmann@26072
  1277
apply (rule range_eqI)
haftmann@26072
  1278
apply (rule of_nat_mult [symmetric])
haftmann@26072
  1279
done
haftmann@25193
  1280
haftmann@25193
  1281
end
haftmann@25193
  1282
haftmann@25193
  1283
wenzelm@21243
  1284
subsection {* Further Arithmetic Facts Concerning the Natural Numbers *}
wenzelm@21243
  1285
haftmann@22845
  1286
lemma subst_equals:
haftmann@22845
  1287
  assumes 1: "t = s" and 2: "u = t"
haftmann@22845
  1288
  shows "u = s"
haftmann@22845
  1289
  using 2 1 by (rule trans)
haftmann@22845
  1290
wenzelm@21243
  1291
use "arith_data.ML"
haftmann@26101
  1292
declaration {* K ArithData.setup *}
wenzelm@24091
  1293
wenzelm@24091
  1294
use "Tools/lin_arith.ML"
wenzelm@24091
  1295
declaration {* K LinArith.setup *}
wenzelm@24091
  1296
wenzelm@21243
  1297
lemmas [arith_split] = nat_diff_split split_min split_max
wenzelm@21243
  1298
wenzelm@21243
  1299
text{*Subtraction laws, mostly by Clemens Ballarin*}
wenzelm@21243
  1300
wenzelm@21243
  1301
lemma diff_less_mono: "[| a < (b::nat); c \<le> a |] ==> a-c < b-c"
nipkow@24438
  1302
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1303
wenzelm@21243
  1304
lemma less_diff_conv: "(i < j-k) = (i+k < (j::nat))"
nipkow@24438
  1305
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1306
wenzelm@21243
  1307
lemma le_diff_conv: "(j-k \<le> (i::nat)) = (j \<le> i+k)"
nipkow@24438
  1308
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1309
wenzelm@21243
  1310
lemma le_diff_conv2: "k \<le> j ==> (i \<le> j-k) = (i+k \<le> (j::nat))"
nipkow@24438
  1311
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1312
wenzelm@21243
  1313
lemma diff_diff_cancel [simp]: "i \<le> (n::nat) ==> n - (n - i) = i"
nipkow@24438
  1314
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1315
wenzelm@21243
  1316
lemma le_add_diff: "k \<le> (n::nat) ==> m \<le> n + m - k"
nipkow@24438
  1317
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1318
wenzelm@21243
  1319
(*Replaces the previous diff_less and le_diff_less, which had the stronger
wenzelm@21243
  1320
  second premise n\<le>m*)
wenzelm@21243
  1321
lemma diff_less[simp]: "!!m::nat. [| 0<n; 0<m |] ==> m - n < m"
nipkow@24438
  1322
by arith
wenzelm@21243
  1323
haftmann@26072
  1324
text {* Simplification of relational expressions involving subtraction *}
wenzelm@21243
  1325
wenzelm@21243
  1326
lemma diff_diff_eq: "[| k \<le> m;  k \<le> (n::nat) |] ==> ((m-k) - (n-k)) = (m-n)"
nipkow@24438
  1327
by (simp split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1328
wenzelm@21243
  1329
lemma eq_diff_iff: "[| k \<le> m;  k \<le> (n::nat) |] ==> (m-k = n-k) = (m=n)"
nipkow@24438
  1330
by (auto split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1331
wenzelm@21243
  1332
lemma less_diff_iff: "[| k \<le> m;  k \<le> (n::nat) |] ==> (m-k < n-k) = (m<n)"
nipkow@24438
  1333
by (auto split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1334
wenzelm@21243
  1335
lemma le_diff_iff: "[| k \<le> m;  k \<le> (n::nat) |] ==> (m-k \<le> n-k) = (m\<le>n)"
nipkow@24438
  1336
by (auto split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1337
wenzelm@21243
  1338
text{*(Anti)Monotonicity of subtraction -- by Stephan Merz*}
wenzelm@21243
  1339
wenzelm@21243
  1340
(* Monotonicity of subtraction in first argument *)
wenzelm@21243
  1341
lemma diff_le_mono: "m \<le> (n::nat) ==> (m-l) \<le> (n-l)"
nipkow@24438
  1342
by (simp split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1343
wenzelm@21243
  1344
lemma diff_le_mono2: "m \<le> (n::nat) ==> (l-n) \<le> (l-m)"
nipkow@24438
  1345
by (simp split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1346
wenzelm@21243
  1347
lemma diff_less_mono2: "[| m < (n::nat); m<l |] ==> (l-n) < (l-m)"
nipkow@24438
  1348
by (simp split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1349
wenzelm@21243
  1350
lemma diffs0_imp_equal: "!!m::nat. [| m-n = 0; n-m = 0 |] ==>  m=n"
nipkow@24438
  1351
by (simp split add: nat_diff_split)
wenzelm@21243
  1352
bulwahn@26143
  1353
lemma min_diff: "min (m - (i::nat)) (n - i) = min m n - i"
bulwahn@26143
  1354
unfolding min_def by auto
bulwahn@26143
  1355
bulwahn@26143
  1356
lemma inj_on_diff_nat: 
bulwahn@26143
  1357
  assumes k_le_n: "\<forall>n \<in> N. k \<le> (n::nat)"
bulwahn@26143
  1358
  shows "inj_on (\<lambda>n. n - k) N"
bulwahn@26143
  1359
proof (rule inj_onI)
bulwahn@26143
  1360
  fix x y
bulwahn@26143
  1361
  assume a: "x \<in> N" "y \<in> N" "x - k = y - k"
bulwahn@26143
  1362
  with k_le_n have "x - k + k = y - k + k" by auto
bulwahn@26143
  1363
  with a k_le_n show "x = y" by auto
bulwahn@26143
  1364
qed
bulwahn@26143
  1365
haftmann@26072
  1366
text{*Rewriting to pull differences out*}
haftmann@26072
  1367
haftmann@26072
  1368
lemma diff_diff_right [simp]: "k\<le>j --> i - (j - k) = i + (k::nat) - j"
haftmann@26072
  1369
by arith
haftmann@26072
  1370
haftmann@26072
  1371
lemma diff_Suc_diff_eq1 [simp]: "k \<le> j ==> m - Suc (j - k) = m + k - Suc j"
haftmann@26072
  1372
by arith
haftmann@26072
  1373
haftmann@26072
  1374
lemma diff_Suc_diff_eq2 [simp]: "k \<le> j ==> Suc (j - k) - m = Suc j - (k + m)"
haftmann@26072
  1375
by arith
haftmann@26072
  1376
wenzelm@21243
  1377
text{*Lemmas for ex/Factorization*}
wenzelm@21243
  1378
wenzelm@21243
  1379
lemma one_less_mult: "[| Suc 0 < n; Suc 0 < m |] ==> Suc 0 < m*n"
nipkow@24438
  1380
by (cases m) auto
wenzelm@21243
  1381
wenzelm@21243
  1382
lemma n_less_m_mult_n: "[| Suc 0 < n; Suc 0 < m |] ==> n<m*n"
nipkow@24438
  1383
by (cases m) auto
wenzelm@21243
  1384
wenzelm@21243
  1385
lemma n_less_n_mult_m: "[| Suc 0 < n; Suc 0 < m |] ==> n<n*m"
nipkow@24438
  1386
by (cases m) auto
wenzelm@21243
  1387
krauss@23001
  1388
text {* Specialized induction principles that work "backwards": *}
krauss@23001
  1389
krauss@23001
  1390
lemma inc_induct[consumes 1, case_names base step]:
krauss@23001
  1391
  assumes less: "i <= j"
krauss@23001
  1392
  assumes base: "P j"
krauss@23001
  1393
  assumes step: "!!i. [| i < j; P (Suc i) |] ==> P i"
krauss@23001
  1394
  shows "P i"
krauss@23001
  1395
  using less
krauss@23001
  1396
proof (induct d=="j - i" arbitrary: i)
krauss@23001
  1397
  case (0 i)
krauss@23001
  1398
  hence "i = j" by simp
krauss@23001
  1399
  with base show ?case by simp
krauss@23001
  1400
next
krauss@23001
  1401
  case (Suc d i)
krauss@23001
  1402
  hence "i < j" "P (Suc i)"
krauss@23001
  1403
    by simp_all
krauss@23001
  1404
  thus "P i" by (rule step)
krauss@23001
  1405
qed
krauss@23001
  1406
krauss@23001
  1407
lemma strict_inc_induct[consumes 1, case_names base step]:
krauss@23001
  1408
  assumes less: "i < j"
krauss@23001
  1409
  assumes base: "!!i. j = Suc i ==> P i"
krauss@23001
  1410
  assumes step: "!!i. [| i < j; P (Suc i) |] ==> P i"
krauss@23001
  1411
  shows "P i"
krauss@23001
  1412
  using less
krauss@23001
  1413
proof (induct d=="j - i - 1" arbitrary: i)
krauss@23001
  1414
  case (0 i)
krauss@23001
  1415
  with `i < j` have "j = Suc i" by simp
krauss@23001
  1416
  with base show ?case by simp
krauss@23001
  1417
next
krauss@23001
  1418
  case (Suc d i)
krauss@23001
  1419
  hence "i < j" "P (Suc i)"
krauss@23001
  1420
    by simp_all
krauss@23001
  1421
  thus "P i" by (rule step)
krauss@23001
  1422
qed
krauss@23001
  1423
krauss@23001
  1424
lemma zero_induct_lemma: "P k ==> (!!n. P (Suc n) ==> P n) ==> P (k - i)"
krauss@23001
  1425
  using inc_induct[of "k - i" k P, simplified] by blast
krauss@23001
  1426
krauss@23001
  1427
lemma zero_induct: "P k ==> (!!n. P (Suc n) ==> P n) ==> P 0"
krauss@23001
  1428
  using inc_induct[of 0 k P] by blast
wenzelm@21243
  1429
haftmann@26072
  1430
lemma nat_not_singleton: "(\<forall>x. x = (0::nat)) = False"
haftmann@26072
  1431
  by auto
wenzelm@21243
  1432
wenzelm@21243
  1433
(*The others are
wenzelm@21243
  1434
      i - j - k = i - (j + k),
wenzelm@21243
  1435
      k \<le> j ==> j - k + i = j + i - k,
wenzelm@21243
  1436
      k \<le> j ==> i + (j - k) = i + j - k *)
wenzelm@21243
  1437
lemmas add_diff_assoc = diff_add_assoc [symmetric]
wenzelm@21243
  1438
lemmas add_diff_assoc2 = diff_add_assoc2[symmetric]
haftmann@26072
  1439
declare diff_diff_left [simp]  add_diff_assoc [simp] add_diff_assoc2[simp]
wenzelm@21243
  1440
wenzelm@21243
  1441
text{*At present we prove no analogue of @{text not_less_Least} or @{text
wenzelm@21243
  1442
Least_Suc}, since there appears to be no need.*}
wenzelm@21243
  1443
haftmann@26072
  1444
subsection {* size of a datatype value *}
haftmann@25193
  1445
haftmann@26072
  1446
class size = type +
krauss@26748
  1447
  fixes size :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat" -- {* see further theory @{text Wellfounded} *}
haftmann@23852
  1448
haftmann@25193
  1449
end