src/HOL/Probability/Bochner_Integration.thy
author hoelzl
Fri Feb 19 13:40:50 2016 +0100 (2016-02-19)
changeset 62378 85ed00c1fe7c
parent 62093 bd73a2279fcd
child 62379 340738057c8c
permissions -rw-r--r--
generalize more theorems to support enat and ennreal
hoelzl@56993
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Probability/Bochner_Integration.thy
hoelzl@56993
     2
    Author:     Johannes Hölzl, TU München
hoelzl@56993
     3
*)
hoelzl@56993
     4
wenzelm@61808
     5
section \<open>Bochner Integration for Vector-Valued Functions\<close>
hoelzl@56993
     6
hoelzl@56993
     7
theory Bochner_Integration
hoelzl@56993
     8
  imports Finite_Product_Measure
hoelzl@56993
     9
begin
hoelzl@56993
    10
wenzelm@61808
    11
text \<open>
hoelzl@56993
    12
hoelzl@56993
    13
In the following development of the Bochner integral we use second countable topologies instead
hoelzl@56993
    14
of separable spaces. A second countable topology is also separable.
hoelzl@56993
    15
wenzelm@61808
    16
\<close>
hoelzl@56993
    17
hoelzl@56993
    18
lemma borel_measurable_implies_sequence_metric:
hoelzl@56993
    19
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b :: {metric_space, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
    20
  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
wenzelm@61969
    21
  shows "\<exists>F. (\<forall>i. simple_function M (F i)) \<and> (\<forall>x\<in>space M. (\<lambda>i. F i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x) \<and>
hoelzl@56993
    22
    (\<forall>i. \<forall>x\<in>space M. dist (F i x) z \<le> 2 * dist (f x) z)"
hoelzl@56993
    23
proof -
hoelzl@56993
    24
  obtain D :: "'b set" where "countable D" and D: "\<And>X. open X \<Longrightarrow> X \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>d\<in>D. d \<in> X"
hoelzl@56993
    25
    by (erule countable_dense_setE)
hoelzl@56993
    26
hoelzl@56993
    27
  def e \<equiv> "from_nat_into D"
hoelzl@56993
    28
  { fix n x
hoelzl@56993
    29
    obtain d where "d \<in> D" and d: "d \<in> ball x (1 / Suc n)"
hoelzl@56993
    30
      using D[of "ball x (1 / Suc n)"] by auto
wenzelm@61808
    31
    from \<open>d \<in> D\<close> D[of UNIV] \<open>countable D\<close> obtain i where "d = e i"
hoelzl@56993
    32
      unfolding e_def by (auto dest: from_nat_into_surj)
hoelzl@56993
    33
    with d have "\<exists>i. dist x (e i) < 1 / Suc n"
hoelzl@56993
    34
      by auto }
hoelzl@56993
    35
  note e = this
hoelzl@56993
    36
hoelzl@56993
    37
  def A \<equiv> "\<lambda>m n. {x\<in>space M. dist (f x) (e n) < 1 / (Suc m) \<and> 1 / (Suc m) \<le> dist (f x) z}"
hoelzl@56993
    38
  def B \<equiv> "\<lambda>m. disjointed (A m)"
hoelzl@56993
    39
  
hoelzl@56993
    40
  def m \<equiv> "\<lambda>N x. Max {m::nat. m \<le> N \<and> x \<in> (\<Union>n\<le>N. B m n)}"
hoelzl@56993
    41
  def F \<equiv> "\<lambda>N::nat. \<lambda>x. if (\<exists>m\<le>N. x \<in> (\<Union>n\<le>N. B m n)) \<and> (\<exists>n\<le>N. x \<in> B (m N x) n) 
hoelzl@56993
    42
    then e (LEAST n. x \<in> B (m N x) n) else z"
hoelzl@56993
    43
hoelzl@56993
    44
  have B_imp_A[intro, simp]: "\<And>x m n. x \<in> B m n \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A m n"
hoelzl@56993
    45
    using disjointed_subset[of "A m" for m] unfolding B_def by auto
hoelzl@56993
    46
hoelzl@56993
    47
  { fix m
hoelzl@56993
    48
    have "\<And>n. A m n \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@56993
    49
      by (auto simp: A_def)
hoelzl@56993
    50
    then have "\<And>n. B m n \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@56993
    51
      using sets.range_disjointed_sets[of "A m" M] by (auto simp: B_def) }
hoelzl@56993
    52
  note this[measurable]
hoelzl@56993
    53
hoelzl@56993
    54
  { fix N i x assume "\<exists>m\<le>N. x \<in> (\<Union>n\<le>N. B m n)"
hoelzl@56993
    55
    then have "m N x \<in> {m::nat. m \<le> N \<and> x \<in> (\<Union>n\<le>N. B m n)}"
hoelzl@56993
    56
      unfolding m_def by (intro Max_in) auto
hoelzl@56993
    57
    then have "m N x \<le> N" "\<exists>n\<le>N. x \<in> B (m N x) n"
hoelzl@56993
    58
      by auto }
hoelzl@56993
    59
  note m = this
hoelzl@56993
    60
hoelzl@56993
    61
  { fix j N i x assume "j \<le> N" "i \<le> N" "x \<in> B j i"
hoelzl@56993
    62
    then have "j \<le> m N x"
hoelzl@56993
    63
      unfolding m_def by (intro Max_ge) auto }
hoelzl@56993
    64
  note m_upper = this
hoelzl@56993
    65
hoelzl@56993
    66
  show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
    67
    unfolding simple_function_def
hoelzl@56993
    68
  proof (safe intro!: exI[of _ F])
hoelzl@56993
    69
    have [measurable]: "\<And>i. F i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
    70
      unfolding F_def m_def by measurable
hoelzl@56993
    71
    show "\<And>x i. F i -` {x} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@56993
    72
      by measurable
hoelzl@56993
    73
hoelzl@56993
    74
    { fix i
hoelzl@56993
    75
      { fix n x assume "x \<in> B (m i x) n"
hoelzl@56993
    76
        then have "(LEAST n. x \<in> B (m i x) n) \<le> n"
hoelzl@56993
    77
          by (intro Least_le)
hoelzl@56993
    78
        also assume "n \<le> i" 
hoelzl@56993
    79
        finally have "(LEAST n. x \<in> B (m i x) n) \<le> i" . }
hoelzl@56993
    80
      then have "F i ` space M \<subseteq> {z} \<union> e ` {.. i}"
hoelzl@56993
    81
        by (auto simp: F_def)
hoelzl@56993
    82
      then show "finite (F i ` space M)"
hoelzl@56993
    83
        by (rule finite_subset) auto }
hoelzl@56993
    84
    
hoelzl@56993
    85
    { fix N i n x assume "i \<le> N" "n \<le> N" "x \<in> B i n"
wenzelm@60585
    86
      then have 1: "\<exists>m\<le>N. x \<in> (\<Union>n\<le>N. B m n)" by auto
hoelzl@56993
    87
      from m[OF this] obtain n where n: "m N x \<le> N" "n \<le> N" "x \<in> B (m N x) n" by auto
hoelzl@56993
    88
      moreover
hoelzl@56993
    89
      def L \<equiv> "LEAST n. x \<in> B (m N x) n"
hoelzl@56993
    90
      have "dist (f x) (e L) < 1 / Suc (m N x)"
hoelzl@56993
    91
      proof -
hoelzl@56993
    92
        have "x \<in> B (m N x) L"
hoelzl@56993
    93
          using n(3) unfolding L_def by (rule LeastI)
hoelzl@56993
    94
        then have "x \<in> A (m N x) L"
hoelzl@56993
    95
          by auto
hoelzl@56993
    96
        then show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
    97
          unfolding A_def by simp
hoelzl@56993
    98
      qed
hoelzl@56993
    99
      ultimately have "dist (f x) (F N x) < 1 / Suc (m N x)"
hoelzl@56993
   100
        by (auto simp add: F_def L_def) }
hoelzl@56993
   101
    note * = this
hoelzl@56993
   102
hoelzl@56993
   103
    fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
wenzelm@61969
   104
    show "(\<lambda>i. F i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
   105
    proof cases
hoelzl@56993
   106
      assume "f x = z"
hoelzl@56993
   107
      then have "\<And>i n. x \<notin> A i n"
hoelzl@56993
   108
        unfolding A_def by auto
hoelzl@56993
   109
      then have "\<And>i. F i x = z"
hoelzl@56993
   110
        by (auto simp: F_def)
hoelzl@56993
   111
      then show ?thesis
wenzelm@61808
   112
        using \<open>f x = z\<close> by auto
hoelzl@56993
   113
    next
hoelzl@56993
   114
      assume "f x \<noteq> z"
hoelzl@56993
   115
hoelzl@56993
   116
      show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
   117
      proof (rule tendstoI)
hoelzl@56993
   118
        fix e :: real assume "0 < e"
wenzelm@61808
   119
        with \<open>f x \<noteq> z\<close> obtain n where "1 / Suc n < e" "1 / Suc n < dist (f x) z"
hoelzl@56993
   120
          by (metis dist_nz order_less_trans neq_iff nat_approx_posE)
wenzelm@61808
   121
        with \<open>x\<in>space M\<close> \<open>f x \<noteq> z\<close> have "x \<in> (\<Union>i. B n i)"
hoelzl@56993
   122
          unfolding A_def B_def UN_disjointed_eq using e by auto
hoelzl@56993
   123
        then obtain i where i: "x \<in> B n i" by auto
hoelzl@56993
   124
hoelzl@56993
   125
        show "eventually (\<lambda>i. dist (F i x) (f x) < e) sequentially"
hoelzl@56993
   126
          using eventually_ge_at_top[of "max n i"]
hoelzl@56993
   127
        proof eventually_elim
hoelzl@56993
   128
          fix j assume j: "max n i \<le> j"
hoelzl@56993
   129
          with i have "dist (f x) (F j x) < 1 / Suc (m j x)"
hoelzl@56993
   130
            by (intro *[OF _ _ i]) auto
hoelzl@56993
   131
          also have "\<dots> \<le> 1 / Suc n"
hoelzl@56993
   132
            using j m_upper[OF _ _ i]
hoelzl@56993
   133
            by (auto simp: field_simps)
wenzelm@61808
   134
          also note \<open>1 / Suc n < e\<close>
hoelzl@56993
   135
          finally show "dist (F j x) (f x) < e"
hoelzl@56993
   136
            by (simp add: less_imp_le dist_commute)
hoelzl@56993
   137
        qed
hoelzl@56993
   138
      qed
hoelzl@56993
   139
    qed
hoelzl@56993
   140
    fix i 
hoelzl@56993
   141
    { fix n m assume "x \<in> A n m"
hoelzl@56993
   142
      then have "dist (e m) (f x) + dist (f x) z \<le> 2 * dist (f x) z"
hoelzl@56993
   143
        unfolding A_def by (auto simp: dist_commute)
hoelzl@56993
   144
      also have "dist (e m) z \<le> dist (e m) (f x) + dist (f x) z"
hoelzl@56993
   145
        by (rule dist_triangle)
hoelzl@56993
   146
      finally (xtrans) have "dist (e m) z \<le> 2 * dist (f x) z" . }
hoelzl@56993
   147
    then show "dist (F i x) z \<le> 2 * dist (f x) z"
hoelzl@56993
   148
      unfolding F_def
hoelzl@56993
   149
      apply auto
hoelzl@56993
   150
      apply (rule LeastI2)
hoelzl@56993
   151
      apply auto
hoelzl@56993
   152
      done
hoelzl@56993
   153
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   154
qed
hoelzl@56993
   155
lp15@61609
   156
lemma real_indicator: "real_of_ereal (indicator A x :: ereal) = indicator A x"
hoelzl@56993
   157
  unfolding indicator_def by auto
hoelzl@56993
   158
hoelzl@56993
   159
lemma split_indicator_asm:
hoelzl@56993
   160
  "P (indicator S x) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> ((x \<in> S \<and> \<not> P 1) \<or> (x \<notin> S \<and> \<not> P 0))"
hoelzl@56993
   161
  unfolding indicator_def by auto
hoelzl@56993
   162
hoelzl@56993
   163
lemma
hoelzl@56993
   164
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::semiring_1" assumes "finite A"
hoelzl@56993
   165
  shows setsum_mult_indicator[simp]: "(\<Sum>x \<in> A. f x * indicator (B x) (g x)) = (\<Sum>x\<in>{x\<in>A. g x \<in> B x}. f x)"
hoelzl@56993
   166
  and setsum_indicator_mult[simp]: "(\<Sum>x \<in> A. indicator (B x) (g x) * f x) = (\<Sum>x\<in>{x\<in>A. g x \<in> B x}. f x)"
hoelzl@56993
   167
  unfolding indicator_def
haftmann@57418
   168
  using assms by (auto intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_cong_right split: split_if_asm)
hoelzl@56993
   169
hoelzl@56993
   170
lemma borel_measurable_induct_real[consumes 2, case_names set mult add seq]:
hoelzl@56993
   171
  fixes P :: "('a \<Rightarrow> real) \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@56993
   172
  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>x. 0 \<le> u x"
hoelzl@56993
   173
  assumes set: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> P (indicator A)"
hoelzl@56993
   174
  assumes mult: "\<And>u c. 0 \<le> c \<Longrightarrow> u \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. 0 \<le> u x) \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. c * u x)"
hoelzl@56993
   175
  assumes add: "\<And>u v. u \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. 0 \<le> u x) \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> v \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. 0 \<le> v x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x = 0 \<or> v x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> P v \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. v x + u x)"
wenzelm@61969
   176
  assumes seq: "\<And>U. (\<And>i. U i \<in> borel_measurable M) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i x. 0 \<le> U i x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. P (U i)) \<Longrightarrow> incseq U \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. U i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u x) \<Longrightarrow> P u"
hoelzl@56993
   177
  shows "P u"
hoelzl@56993
   178
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   179
  have "(\<lambda>x. ereal (u x)) \<in> borel_measurable M" using u by auto
hoelzl@56993
   180
  from borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence'[OF this]
hoelzl@56993
   181
  obtain U where U: "\<And>i. simple_function M (U i)" "incseq U" "\<And>i. \<infinity> \<notin> range (U i)" and
hoelzl@56993
   182
    sup: "\<And>x. (SUP i. U i x) = max 0 (ereal (u x))" and nn: "\<And>i x. 0 \<le> U i x"
hoelzl@56993
   183
    by blast
hoelzl@56993
   184
lp15@61609
   185
  def U' \<equiv> "\<lambda>i x. indicator (space M) x * real_of_ereal (U i x)"
hoelzl@56993
   186
  then have U'_sf[measurable]: "\<And>i. simple_function M (U' i)"
lp15@61609
   187
    using U by (auto intro!: simple_function_compose1[where g=real_of_ereal])
hoelzl@56993
   188
hoelzl@56993
   189
  show "P u"
hoelzl@56993
   190
  proof (rule seq)
hoelzl@56993
   191
    fix i show "U' i \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>x. 0 \<le> U' i x"
hoelzl@56993
   192
      using U nn by (auto
hoelzl@56993
   193
          intro: borel_measurable_simple_function 
hoelzl@56993
   194
          intro!: borel_measurable_real_of_ereal real_of_ereal_pos borel_measurable_times
hoelzl@56993
   195
          simp: U'_def zero_le_mult_iff)
hoelzl@56993
   196
    show "incseq U'"
hoelzl@56993
   197
      using U(2,3) nn
hoelzl@56993
   198
      by (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def image_iff eq_commute U'_def indicator_def
hoelzl@56993
   199
               intro!: real_of_ereal_positive_mono)
hoelzl@56993
   200
  next
hoelzl@56993
   201
    fix x assume x: "x \<in> space M"
wenzelm@61969
   202
    have "(\<lambda>i. U i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (SUP i. U i x)"
hoelzl@56993
   203
      using U(2) by (intro LIMSEQ_SUP) (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def)
hoelzl@56993
   204
    moreover have "(\<lambda>i. U i x) = (\<lambda>i. ereal (U' i x))"
hoelzl@56993
   205
      using x nn U(3) by (auto simp: fun_eq_iff U'_def ereal_real image_iff eq_commute)
hoelzl@56993
   206
    moreover have "(SUP i. U i x) = ereal (u x)"
hoelzl@56993
   207
      using sup u(2) by (simp add: max_def)
wenzelm@61969
   208
    ultimately show "(\<lambda>i. U' i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u x" 
hoelzl@56993
   209
      by simp
hoelzl@56993
   210
  next
hoelzl@56993
   211
    fix i
lp15@61609
   212
    have "U' i ` space M \<subseteq> real_of_ereal ` (U i ` space M)" "finite (U i ` space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   213
      unfolding U'_def using U(1) by (auto dest: simple_functionD)
hoelzl@56993
   214
    then have fin: "finite (U' i ` space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   215
      by (metis finite_subset finite_imageI)
hoelzl@56993
   216
    moreover have "\<And>z. {y. U' i z = y \<and> y \<in> U' i ` space M \<and> z \<in> space M} = (if z \<in> space M then {U' i z} else {})"
hoelzl@56993
   217
      by auto
hoelzl@56993
   218
    ultimately have U': "(\<lambda>z. \<Sum>y\<in>U' i`space M. y * indicator {x\<in>space M. U' i x = y} z) = U' i"
hoelzl@56993
   219
      by (simp add: U'_def fun_eq_iff)
hoelzl@56993
   220
    have "\<And>x. x \<in> U' i ` space M \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> x"
hoelzl@56993
   221
      using nn by (auto simp: U'_def real_of_ereal_pos)
hoelzl@56993
   222
    with fin have "P (\<lambda>z. \<Sum>y\<in>U' i`space M. y * indicator {x\<in>space M. U' i x = y} z)"
hoelzl@56993
   223
    proof induct
hoelzl@56993
   224
      case empty from set[of "{}"] show ?case
hoelzl@56993
   225
        by (simp add: indicator_def[abs_def])
hoelzl@56993
   226
    next
hoelzl@56993
   227
      case (insert x F)
hoelzl@56993
   228
      then show ?case
hoelzl@56993
   229
        by (auto intro!: add mult set setsum_nonneg split: split_indicator split_indicator_asm
hoelzl@56993
   230
                 simp del: setsum_mult_indicator simp: setsum_nonneg_eq_0_iff )
hoelzl@56993
   231
    qed
hoelzl@56993
   232
    with U' show "P (U' i)" by simp
hoelzl@56993
   233
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   234
qed
hoelzl@56993
   235
hoelzl@56993
   236
lemma scaleR_cong_right:
hoelzl@56993
   237
  fixes x :: "'a :: real_vector"
hoelzl@56993
   238
  shows "(x \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> r = p) \<Longrightarrow> r *\<^sub>R x = p *\<^sub>R x"
hoelzl@56993
   239
  by (cases "x = 0") auto
hoelzl@56993
   240
hoelzl@56993
   241
inductive simple_bochner_integrable :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_vector) \<Rightarrow> bool" for M f where
hoelzl@56993
   242
  "simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {y\<in>space M. f y \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   243
    simple_bochner_integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
   244
hoelzl@56993
   245
lemma simple_bochner_integrable_compose2:
hoelzl@56993
   246
  assumes p_0: "p 0 0 = 0"
hoelzl@56993
   247
  shows "simple_bochner_integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> simple_bochner_integrable M g \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   248
    simple_bochner_integrable M (\<lambda>x. p (f x) (g x))"
hoelzl@56993
   249
proof (safe intro!: simple_bochner_integrable.intros elim!: simple_bochner_integrable.cases del: notI)
hoelzl@56993
   250
  assume sf: "simple_function M f" "simple_function M g"
hoelzl@56993
   251
  then show "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. p (f x) (g x))"
hoelzl@56993
   252
    by (rule simple_function_compose2)
hoelzl@56993
   253
hoelzl@56993
   254
  from sf have [measurable]:
hoelzl@56993
   255
      "f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
hoelzl@56993
   256
      "g \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
hoelzl@56993
   257
    by (auto intro: measurable_simple_function)
hoelzl@56993
   258
hoelzl@56993
   259
  assume fin: "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. f y \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>" "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. g y \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   260
   
hoelzl@56993
   261
  have "emeasure M {x\<in>space M. p (f x) (g x) \<noteq> 0} \<le>
hoelzl@56993
   262
      emeasure M ({x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} \<union> {x\<in>space M. g x \<noteq> 0})"
hoelzl@56993
   263
    by (intro emeasure_mono) (auto simp: p_0)
hoelzl@56993
   264
  also have "\<dots> \<le> emeasure M {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} + emeasure M {x\<in>space M. g x \<noteq> 0}"
hoelzl@56993
   265
    by (intro emeasure_subadditive) auto
hoelzl@56993
   266
  finally show "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. p (f y) (g y) \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   267
    using fin by auto
hoelzl@56993
   268
qed
hoelzl@56993
   269
hoelzl@56993
   270
lemma simple_function_finite_support:
hoelzl@56993
   271
  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" and nn: "\<And>x. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
   272
  shows "emeasure M {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   273
proof cases
hoelzl@56993
   274
  from f have meas[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   275
    by (rule borel_measurable_simple_function)
hoelzl@56993
   276
hoelzl@56993
   277
  assume non_empty: "\<exists>x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   278
hoelzl@56993
   279
  def m \<equiv> "Min (f`space M - {0})"
hoelzl@56993
   280
  have "m \<in> f`space M - {0}"
hoelzl@56993
   281
    unfolding m_def using f non_empty by (intro Min_in) (auto simp: simple_function_def)
hoelzl@56993
   282
  then have m: "0 < m"
hoelzl@56993
   283
    using nn by (auto simp: less_le)
hoelzl@56993
   284
hoelzl@56993
   285
  from m have "m * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. 0 \<noteq> f x} = 
hoelzl@56993
   286
    (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. m * indicator {x\<in>space M. 0 \<noteq> f x} x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   287
    using f by (intro nn_integral_cmult_indicator[symmetric]) auto
hoelzl@56993
   288
  also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   289
    using AE_space
hoelzl@56996
   290
  proof (intro nn_integral_mono_AE, eventually_elim)
hoelzl@56993
   291
    fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
hoelzl@56993
   292
    with nn show "m * indicator {x \<in> space M. 0 \<noteq> f x} x \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
   293
      using f by (auto split: split_indicator simp: simple_function_def m_def)
hoelzl@56993
   294
  qed
wenzelm@61808
   295
  also note \<open>\<dots> < \<infinity>\<close>
hoelzl@56993
   296
  finally show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
   297
    using m by auto 
hoelzl@56993
   298
next
hoelzl@56993
   299
  assume "\<not> (\<exists>x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0)"
hoelzl@56993
   300
  with nn have *: "{x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} = {}"
hoelzl@56993
   301
    by auto
hoelzl@56993
   302
  show ?thesis unfolding * by simp
hoelzl@56993
   303
qed
hoelzl@56993
   304
hoelzl@56993
   305
lemma simple_bochner_integrableI_bounded:
hoelzl@56993
   306
  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   307
  shows "simple_bochner_integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
   308
proof
hoelzl@56993
   309
  have "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. ereal (norm (f y)) \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   310
  proof (rule simple_function_finite_support)
hoelzl@56993
   311
    show "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. ereal (norm (f x)))"
hoelzl@56993
   312
      using f by (rule simple_function_compose1)
hoelzl@56993
   313
    show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ y. ereal (norm (f y)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" by fact
hoelzl@56993
   314
  qed simp
hoelzl@56993
   315
  then show "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. f y \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>" by simp
hoelzl@56993
   316
qed fact
hoelzl@56993
   317
hoelzl@56993
   318
definition simple_bochner_integral :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_vector) \<Rightarrow> 'b" where
hoelzl@56993
   319
  "simple_bochner_integral M f = (\<Sum>y\<in>f`space M. measure M {x\<in>space M. f x = y} *\<^sub>R y)"
hoelzl@56993
   320
hoelzl@56993
   321
lemma simple_bochner_integral_partition:
hoelzl@56993
   322
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f" and g: "simple_function M g"
hoelzl@56993
   323
  assumes sub: "\<And>x y. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> g x = g y \<Longrightarrow> f x = f y"
hoelzl@56993
   324
  assumes v: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x = v (g x)"
hoelzl@56993
   325
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M f = (\<Sum>y\<in>g ` space M. measure M {x\<in>space M. g x = y} *\<^sub>R v y)"
hoelzl@56993
   326
    (is "_ = ?r")
hoelzl@56993
   327
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   328
  from f g have [simp]: "finite (f`space M)" "finite (g`space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   329
    by (auto simp: simple_function_def elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   330
hoelzl@56993
   331
  from f have [measurable]: "f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
hoelzl@56993
   332
    by (auto intro: measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   333
hoelzl@56993
   334
  from g have [measurable]: "g \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
hoelzl@56993
   335
    by (auto intro: measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   336
hoelzl@56993
   337
  { fix y assume "y \<in> space M"
hoelzl@56993
   338
    then have "f ` space M \<inter> {i. \<exists>x\<in>space M. i = f x \<and> g y = g x} = {v (g y)}"
hoelzl@56993
   339
      by (auto cong: sub simp: v[symmetric]) }
hoelzl@56993
   340
  note eq = this
hoelzl@56993
   341
hoelzl@56993
   342
  have "simple_bochner_integral M f =
hoelzl@56993
   343
    (\<Sum>y\<in>f`space M. (\<Sum>z\<in>g`space M. 
hoelzl@56993
   344
      if \<exists>x\<in>space M. y = f x \<and> z = g x then measure M {x\<in>space M. g x = z} else 0) *\<^sub>R y)"
hoelzl@56993
   345
    unfolding simple_bochner_integral_def
haftmann@57418
   346
  proof (safe intro!: setsum.cong scaleR_cong_right)
hoelzl@56993
   347
    fix y assume y: "y \<in> space M" "f y \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   348
    have [simp]: "g ` space M \<inter> {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x} = 
hoelzl@56993
   349
        {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}"
hoelzl@56993
   350
      by auto
hoelzl@56993
   351
    have eq:"{x \<in> space M. f x = f y} =
hoelzl@56993
   352
        (\<Union>i\<in>{z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}. {x \<in> space M. g x = i})"
hoelzl@56993
   353
      by (auto simp: eq_commute cong: sub rev_conj_cong)
hoelzl@56993
   354
    have "finite (g`space M)" by simp
hoelzl@56993
   355
    then have "finite {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}"
hoelzl@56993
   356
      by (rule rev_finite_subset) auto
hoelzl@56993
   357
    moreover
hoelzl@56993
   358
    { fix x assume "x \<in> space M" "f x = f y"
hoelzl@56993
   359
      then have "x \<in> space M" "f x \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   360
        using y by auto
hoelzl@56993
   361
      then have "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. g y = g x} \<le> emeasure M {y \<in> space M. f y \<noteq> 0}"
hoelzl@56993
   362
        by (auto intro!: emeasure_mono cong: sub)
hoelzl@56993
   363
      then have "emeasure M {xa \<in> space M. g xa = g x} < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   364
        using f by (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable.simps) }
hoelzl@56993
   365
    ultimately
hoelzl@56993
   366
    show "measure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y} =
hoelzl@56993
   367
      (\<Sum>z\<in>g ` space M. if \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x then measure M {x \<in> space M. g x = z} else 0)"
haftmann@57418
   368
      apply (simp add: setsum.If_cases eq)
hoelzl@56993
   369
      apply (subst measure_finite_Union[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   370
      apply (auto simp: disjoint_family_on_def)
hoelzl@56993
   371
      done
hoelzl@56993
   372
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   373
  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>f`space M. (\<Sum>z\<in>g`space M. 
hoelzl@56993
   374
      if \<exists>x\<in>space M. y = f x \<and> z = g x then measure M {x\<in>space M. g x = z} *\<^sub>R y else 0))"
haftmann@57418
   375
    by (auto intro!: setsum.cong simp: scaleR_setsum_left)
hoelzl@56993
   376
  also have "\<dots> = ?r"
haftmann@57418
   377
    by (subst setsum.commute)
haftmann@57418
   378
       (auto intro!: setsum.cong simp: setsum.If_cases scaleR_setsum_right[symmetric] eq)
hoelzl@56993
   379
  finally show "simple_bochner_integral M f = ?r" .
hoelzl@56993
   380
qed
hoelzl@56993
   381
hoelzl@56993
   382
lemma simple_bochner_integral_add:
hoelzl@56993
   383
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f" and g: "simple_bochner_integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
   384
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) =
hoelzl@56993
   385
    simple_bochner_integral M f + simple_bochner_integral M g"
hoelzl@56993
   386
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   387
  from f g have "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) =
hoelzl@56993
   388
    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) ` space M. measure M {x \<in> space M. (f x, g x) = y} *\<^sub>R (fst y + snd y))"
hoelzl@56993
   389
    by (intro simple_bochner_integral_partition)
hoelzl@56993
   390
       (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2 elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   391
  moreover from f g have "simple_bochner_integral M f =
hoelzl@56993
   392
    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) ` space M. measure M {x \<in> space M. (f x, g x) = y} *\<^sub>R fst y)"
hoelzl@56993
   393
    by (intro simple_bochner_integral_partition)
hoelzl@56993
   394
       (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2 elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   395
  moreover from f g have "simple_bochner_integral M g =
hoelzl@56993
   396
    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) ` space M. measure M {x \<in> space M. (f x, g x) = y} *\<^sub>R snd y)"
hoelzl@56993
   397
    by (intro simple_bochner_integral_partition)
hoelzl@56993
   398
       (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2 elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   399
  ultimately show ?thesis
haftmann@57418
   400
    by (simp add: setsum.distrib[symmetric] scaleR_add_right)
hoelzl@56993
   401
qed
hoelzl@56993
   402
hoelzl@56993
   403
lemma (in linear) simple_bochner_integral_linear:
hoelzl@56993
   404
  assumes g: "simple_bochner_integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
   405
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) = f (simple_bochner_integral M g)"
hoelzl@56993
   406
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   407
  from g have "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) =
hoelzl@56993
   408
    (\<Sum>y\<in>g ` space M. measure M {x \<in> space M. g x = y} *\<^sub>R f y)"
hoelzl@56993
   409
    by (intro simple_bochner_integral_partition)
hoelzl@56993
   410
       (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2[where p="\<lambda>x y. f x"] zero
hoelzl@56993
   411
             elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   412
  also have "\<dots> = f (simple_bochner_integral M g)"
hoelzl@56993
   413
    by (simp add: simple_bochner_integral_def setsum scaleR)
hoelzl@56993
   414
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@56993
   415
qed
hoelzl@56993
   416
hoelzl@56993
   417
lemma simple_bochner_integral_minus:
hoelzl@56993
   418
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
   419
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. - f x) = - simple_bochner_integral M f"
hoelzl@56993
   420
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   421
  interpret linear uminus by unfold_locales auto
hoelzl@56993
   422
  from f show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
   423
    by (rule simple_bochner_integral_linear)
hoelzl@56993
   424
qed
hoelzl@56993
   425
hoelzl@56993
   426
lemma simple_bochner_integral_diff:
hoelzl@56993
   427
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f" and g: "simple_bochner_integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
   428
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x - g x) =
hoelzl@56993
   429
    simple_bochner_integral M f - simple_bochner_integral M g"
hoelzl@56993
   430
  unfolding diff_conv_add_uminus using f g
hoelzl@56993
   431
  by (subst simple_bochner_integral_add)
hoelzl@56993
   432
     (auto simp: simple_bochner_integral_minus simple_bochner_integrable_compose2[where p="\<lambda>x y. - y"])
hoelzl@56993
   433
hoelzl@56993
   434
lemma simple_bochner_integral_norm_bound:
hoelzl@56993
   435
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
   436
  shows "norm (simple_bochner_integral M f) \<le> simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. norm (f x))"
hoelzl@56993
   437
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   438
  have "norm (simple_bochner_integral M f) \<le> 
hoelzl@56993
   439
    (\<Sum>y\<in>f ` space M. norm (measure M {x \<in> space M. f x = y} *\<^sub>R y))"
hoelzl@56993
   440
    unfolding simple_bochner_integral_def by (rule norm_setsum)
hoelzl@56993
   441
  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>f ` space M. measure M {x \<in> space M. f x = y} *\<^sub>R norm y)"
hoelzl@56993
   442
    by (simp add: measure_nonneg)
hoelzl@56993
   443
  also have "\<dots> = simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. norm (f x))"
hoelzl@56993
   444
    using f
hoelzl@56993
   445
    by (intro simple_bochner_integral_partition[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   446
       (auto intro: f simple_bochner_integrable_compose2 elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   447
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@56993
   448
qed
hoelzl@56993
   449
hoelzl@56996
   450
lemma simple_bochner_integral_eq_nn_integral:
hoelzl@56993
   451
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable M f" "\<And>x. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
   452
  shows "simple_bochner_integral M f = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   453
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   454
  { fix x y z have "(x \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> y = z) \<Longrightarrow> ereal x * y = ereal x * z"
hoelzl@56993
   455
      by (cases "x = 0") (auto simp: zero_ereal_def[symmetric]) }
hoelzl@56993
   456
  note ereal_cong_mult = this
hoelzl@56993
   457
hoelzl@56993
   458
  have [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   459
    using f(1) by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   460
hoelzl@56993
   461
  { fix y assume y: "y \<in> space M" "f y \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   462
    have "ereal (measure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y}) = emeasure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y}"
hoelzl@56993
   463
    proof (rule emeasure_eq_ereal_measure[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   464
      have "emeasure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y} \<le> emeasure M {x \<in> space M. f x \<noteq> 0}"
hoelzl@56993
   465
        using y by (intro emeasure_mono) auto
hoelzl@56993
   466
      with f show "emeasure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   467
        by (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   468
    qed
hoelzl@56993
   469
    moreover have "{x \<in> space M. f x = f y} = (\<lambda>x. ereal (f x)) -` {ereal (f y)} \<inter> space M"
hoelzl@56993
   470
      by auto
hoelzl@56993
   471
    ultimately have "ereal (measure M {x \<in> space M. f x = f y}) =
hoelzl@56993
   472
          emeasure M ((\<lambda>x. ereal (f x)) -` {ereal (f y)} \<inter> space M)" by simp }
hoelzl@56993
   473
  with f have "simple_bochner_integral M f = (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   474
    unfolding simple_integral_def
lp15@61609
   475
    by (subst simple_bochner_integral_partition[OF f(1), where g="\<lambda>x. ereal (f x)" and v=real_of_ereal])
hoelzl@56993
   476
       (auto intro: f simple_function_compose1 elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases
haftmann@57418
   477
             intro!: setsum.cong ereal_cong_mult
haftmann@57514
   478
             simp: setsum_ereal[symmetric] times_ereal.simps(1)[symmetric] ac_simps
hoelzl@56993
   479
             simp del: setsum_ereal times_ereal.simps(1))
hoelzl@56993
   480
  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   481
    using f
hoelzl@56996
   482
    by (intro nn_integral_eq_simple_integral[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   483
       (auto simp: simple_function_compose1 simple_bochner_integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   484
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@56993
   485
qed
hoelzl@56993
   486
hoelzl@56993
   487
lemma simple_bochner_integral_bounded:
hoelzl@56993
   488
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{real_normed_vector, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
   489
  assumes f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   490
  assumes s: "simple_bochner_integrable M s" and t: "simple_bochner_integrable M t"
hoelzl@56993
   491
  shows "ereal (norm (simple_bochner_integral M s - simple_bochner_integral M t)) \<le>
hoelzl@56993
   492
    (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - s x) \<partial>M) + (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - t x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   493
    (is "ereal (norm (?s - ?t)) \<le> ?S + ?T")
hoelzl@56993
   494
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   495
  have [measurable]: "s \<in> borel_measurable M" "t \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   496
    using s t by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   497
hoelzl@56993
   498
  have "ereal (norm (?s - ?t)) = norm (simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. s x - t x))"
hoelzl@56993
   499
    using s t by (subst simple_bochner_integral_diff) auto
hoelzl@56993
   500
  also have "\<dots> \<le> simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. norm (s x - t x))"
hoelzl@56993
   501
    using simple_bochner_integrable_compose2[of "op -" M "s" "t"] s t
hoelzl@56993
   502
    by (auto intro!: simple_bochner_integral_norm_bound)
hoelzl@56993
   503
  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s x - t x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   504
    using simple_bochner_integrable_compose2[of "\<lambda>x y. norm (x - y)" M "s" "t"] s t
hoelzl@56996
   505
    by (auto intro!: simple_bochner_integral_eq_nn_integral)
hoelzl@56993
   506
  also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ereal (norm (f x - s x)) + ereal (norm (f x - t x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   507
    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono)
hoelzl@56993
   508
       (metis (erased, hide_lams) add_diff_cancel_left add_diff_eq diff_add_eq order_trans
hoelzl@56993
   509
              norm_minus_commute norm_triangle_ineq4 order_refl)
hoelzl@56993
   510
  also have "\<dots> = ?S + ?T"
hoelzl@56996
   511
   by (rule nn_integral_add) auto
hoelzl@56993
   512
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@56993
   513
qed
hoelzl@56993
   514
hoelzl@56993
   515
inductive has_bochner_integral :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'b::{real_normed_vector, second_countable_topology} \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@56993
   516
  for M f x where
hoelzl@56993
   517
  "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   518
    (\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)) \<Longrightarrow>
wenzelm@61969
   519
    (\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0 \<Longrightarrow>
wenzelm@61969
   520
    (\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   521
    has_bochner_integral M f x"
hoelzl@56993
   522
hoelzl@56993
   523
lemma has_bochner_integral_cong:
hoelzl@56993
   524
  assumes "M = N" "\<And>x. x \<in> space N \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x" "x = y"
hoelzl@56993
   525
  shows "has_bochner_integral M f x \<longleftrightarrow> has_bochner_integral N g y"
hoelzl@56993
   526
  unfolding has_bochner_integral.simps assms(1,3)
hoelzl@56996
   527
  using assms(2) by (simp cong: measurable_cong_strong nn_integral_cong_strong)
hoelzl@56993
   528
hoelzl@56993
   529
lemma has_bochner_integral_cong_AE:
hoelzl@56993
   530
  "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   531
    has_bochner_integral M f x \<longleftrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M g x"
hoelzl@56993
   532
  unfolding has_bochner_integral.simps
wenzelm@61969
   533
  by (intro arg_cong[where f=Ex] ext conj_cong rev_conj_cong refl arg_cong[where f="\<lambda>x. x \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"]
hoelzl@56996
   534
            nn_integral_cong_AE)
hoelzl@56993
   535
     auto
hoelzl@56993
   536
hoelzl@59353
   537
lemma borel_measurable_has_bochner_integral:
hoelzl@56993
   538
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@59353
   539
  by (rule has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@59353
   540
hoelzl@59353
   541
lemma borel_measurable_has_bochner_integral'[measurable_dest]:
hoelzl@59353
   542
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> measurable N M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) \<in> borel_measurable N"
hoelzl@59353
   543
  using borel_measurable_has_bochner_integral[measurable] by measurable
hoelzl@56993
   544
hoelzl@56993
   545
lemma has_bochner_integral_simple_bochner_integrable:
hoelzl@56993
   546
  "simple_bochner_integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f (simple_bochner_integral M f)"
hoelzl@56993
   547
  by (rule has_bochner_integral.intros[where s="\<lambda>_. f"])
hoelzl@56993
   548
     (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function 
hoelzl@56993
   549
           elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases
hoelzl@56993
   550
           simp: zero_ereal_def[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   551
hoelzl@56993
   552
lemma has_bochner_integral_real_indicator:
hoelzl@56993
   553
  assumes [measurable]: "A \<in> sets M" and A: "emeasure M A < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   554
  shows "has_bochner_integral M (indicator A) (measure M A)"
hoelzl@56993
   555
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   556
  have sbi: "simple_bochner_integrable M (indicator A::'a \<Rightarrow> real)"
hoelzl@56993
   557
  proof
hoelzl@56993
   558
    have "{y \<in> space M. (indicator A y::real) \<noteq> 0} = A"
wenzelm@61808
   559
      using sets.sets_into_space[OF \<open>A\<in>sets M\<close>] by (auto split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@56993
   560
    then show "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. (indicator A y::real) \<noteq> 0} \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   561
      using A by auto
hoelzl@56993
   562
  qed (rule simple_function_indicator assms)+
hoelzl@56993
   563
  moreover have "simple_bochner_integral M (indicator A) = measure M A"
hoelzl@56996
   564
    using simple_bochner_integral_eq_nn_integral[OF sbi] A
hoelzl@56993
   565
    by (simp add: ereal_indicator emeasure_eq_ereal_measure)
hoelzl@56993
   566
  ultimately show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
   567
    by (metis has_bochner_integral_simple_bochner_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
   568
qed
hoelzl@56993
   569
hoelzl@57036
   570
lemma has_bochner_integral_add[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   571
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M g y \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   572
    has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) (x + y)"
hoelzl@56993
   573
proof (safe intro!: has_bochner_integral.intros elim!: has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   574
  fix sf sg
wenzelm@61969
   575
  assume f_sf: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - sf i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
wenzelm@61969
   576
  assume g_sg: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (g x - sg i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   577
hoelzl@56993
   578
  assume sf: "\<forall>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (sf i)"
hoelzl@56993
   579
    and sg: "\<forall>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (sg i)"
hoelzl@56993
   580
  then have [measurable]: "\<And>i. sf i \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>i. sg i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   581
    by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   582
  assume [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   583
hoelzl@56993
   584
  show "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (\<lambda>x. sf i x + sg i x)"
hoelzl@56993
   585
    using sf sg by (simp add: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2)
hoelzl@56993
   586
wenzelm@61969
   587
  show "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (norm (f x + g x - (sf i x + sg i x))) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
wenzelm@61969
   588
    (is "?f \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0")
hoelzl@56993
   589
  proof (rule tendsto_sandwich)
wenzelm@61969
   590
    show "eventually (\<lambda>n. 0 \<le> ?f n) sequentially" "(\<lambda>_. 0) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56996
   591
      by (auto simp: nn_integral_nonneg)
hoelzl@56993
   592
    show "eventually (\<lambda>i. ?f i \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (norm (f x - sf i x)) \<partial>M) + \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (norm (g x - sg i x)) \<partial>M) sequentially"
hoelzl@56993
   593
      (is "eventually (\<lambda>i. ?f i \<le> ?g i) sequentially")
hoelzl@56993
   594
    proof (intro always_eventually allI)
hoelzl@56993
   595
      fix i have "?f i \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (norm (f x - sf i x)) + ereal (norm (g x - sg i x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   596
        by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono norm_diff_triangle_ineq)
hoelzl@56993
   597
      also have "\<dots> = ?g i"
hoelzl@56996
   598
        by (intro nn_integral_add) auto
hoelzl@56993
   599
      finally show "?f i \<le> ?g i" .
hoelzl@56993
   600
    qed
wenzelm@61969
   601
    show "?g \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   602
      using tendsto_add_ereal[OF _ _ f_sf g_sg] by simp
hoelzl@56993
   603
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   604
qed (auto simp: simple_bochner_integral_add tendsto_add)
hoelzl@56993
   605
hoelzl@56993
   606
lemma has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear:
hoelzl@56993
   607
  assumes "bounded_linear T"
hoelzl@56993
   608
  shows "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. T (f x)) (T x)"
hoelzl@56993
   609
proof (safe intro!: has_bochner_integral.intros elim!: has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   610
  interpret T: bounded_linear T by fact
hoelzl@56993
   611
  have [measurable]: "T \<in> borel_measurable borel"
hoelzl@56993
   612
    by (intro borel_measurable_continuous_on1 T.continuous_on continuous_on_id)
hoelzl@56993
   613
  assume [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   614
  then show "(\<lambda>x. T (f x)) \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   615
    by auto
hoelzl@56993
   616
wenzelm@61969
   617
  fix s assume f_s: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   618
  assume s: "\<forall>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
   619
  then show "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (\<lambda>x. T (s i x))"
hoelzl@56993
   620
    by (auto intro: simple_bochner_integrable_compose2 T.zero)
hoelzl@56993
   621
hoelzl@56993
   622
  have [measurable]: "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   623
    using s by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   624
hoelzl@56993
   625
  obtain K where K: "K > 0" "\<And>x i. norm (T (f x) - T (s i x)) \<le> norm (f x - s i x) * K"
hoelzl@56993
   626
    using T.pos_bounded by (auto simp: T.diff[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   627
wenzelm@61969
   628
  show "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (T (f x) - T (s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
wenzelm@61969
   629
    (is "?f \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0")
hoelzl@56993
   630
  proof (rule tendsto_sandwich)
wenzelm@61969
   631
    show "eventually (\<lambda>n. 0 \<le> ?f n) sequentially" "(\<lambda>_. 0) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56996
   632
      by (auto simp: nn_integral_nonneg)
hoelzl@56993
   633
hoelzl@56993
   634
    show "eventually (\<lambda>i. ?f i \<le> K * (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M)) sequentially"
hoelzl@56993
   635
      (is "eventually (\<lambda>i. ?f i \<le> ?g i) sequentially")
hoelzl@56993
   636
    proof (intro always_eventually allI)
hoelzl@56993
   637
      fix i have "?f i \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal K * norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M)"
haftmann@57514
   638
        using K by (intro nn_integral_mono) (auto simp: ac_simps)
hoelzl@56993
   639
      also have "\<dots> = ?g i"
hoelzl@56996
   640
        using K by (intro nn_integral_cmult) auto
hoelzl@56993
   641
      finally show "?f i \<le> ?g i" .
hoelzl@56993
   642
    qed
wenzelm@61969
   643
    show "?g \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@59452
   644
      using tendsto_cmult_ereal[OF _ f_s, of "ereal K"] by simp
hoelzl@56993
   645
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   646
wenzelm@61969
   647
  assume "(\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
wenzelm@61969
   648
  with s show "(\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. T (s i x))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> T x"
hoelzl@56993
   649
    by (auto intro!: T.tendsto simp: T.simple_bochner_integral_linear)
hoelzl@56993
   650
qed
hoelzl@56993
   651
hoelzl@56993
   652
lemma has_bochner_integral_zero[intro]: "has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. 0) 0"
hoelzl@56993
   653
  by (auto intro!: has_bochner_integral.intros[where s="\<lambda>_ _. 0"]
hoelzl@56993
   654
           simp: zero_ereal_def[symmetric] simple_bochner_integrable.simps
hoelzl@56993
   655
                 simple_bochner_integral_def image_constant_conv)
hoelzl@56993
   656
hoelzl@56993
   657
lemma has_bochner_integral_scaleR_left[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   658
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x *\<^sub>R c) (x *\<^sub>R c)"
hoelzl@56993
   659
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_left])
hoelzl@56993
   660
hoelzl@56993
   661
lemma has_bochner_integral_scaleR_right[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   662
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. c *\<^sub>R f x) (c *\<^sub>R x)"
hoelzl@56993
   663
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_right])
hoelzl@56993
   664
hoelzl@56993
   665
lemma has_bochner_integral_mult_left[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   666
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
   667
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x * c) (x * c)"
hoelzl@56993
   668
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_mult_left])
hoelzl@56993
   669
hoelzl@56993
   670
lemma has_bochner_integral_mult_right[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   671
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
   672
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. c * f x) (c * x)"
hoelzl@56993
   673
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_mult_right])
hoelzl@56993
   674
hoelzl@56993
   675
lemmas has_bochner_integral_divide = 
hoelzl@56993
   676
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_divide]
hoelzl@56993
   677
hoelzl@56993
   678
lemma has_bochner_integral_divide_zero[intro]:
haftmann@59867
   679
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_field, field, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
   680
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x / c) (x / c)"
hoelzl@56993
   681
  using has_bochner_integral_divide by (cases "c = 0") auto
hoelzl@56993
   682
hoelzl@56993
   683
lemma has_bochner_integral_inner_left[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   684
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x \<bullet> c) (x \<bullet> c)"
hoelzl@56993
   685
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_inner_left])
hoelzl@56993
   686
hoelzl@56993
   687
lemma has_bochner_integral_inner_right[intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   688
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f x) \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. c \<bullet> f x) (c \<bullet> x)"
hoelzl@56993
   689
  by (cases "c = 0") (auto simp add: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_inner_right])
hoelzl@56993
   690
hoelzl@56993
   691
lemmas has_bochner_integral_minus =
hoelzl@56993
   692
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_minus[OF bounded_linear_ident]]
hoelzl@56993
   693
lemmas has_bochner_integral_Re =
hoelzl@56993
   694
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Re]
hoelzl@56993
   695
lemmas has_bochner_integral_Im =
hoelzl@56993
   696
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Im]
hoelzl@56993
   697
lemmas has_bochner_integral_cnj =
hoelzl@56993
   698
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_cnj]
hoelzl@56993
   699
lemmas has_bochner_integral_of_real =
hoelzl@56993
   700
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56993
   701
lemmas has_bochner_integral_fst =
hoelzl@56993
   702
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_fst]
hoelzl@56993
   703
lemmas has_bochner_integral_snd =
hoelzl@56993
   704
  has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_snd]
hoelzl@56993
   705
hoelzl@56993
   706
lemma has_bochner_integral_indicator:
hoelzl@56993
   707
  "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M A < \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   708
    has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. indicator A x *\<^sub>R c) (measure M A *\<^sub>R c)"
hoelzl@56993
   709
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_scaleR_left has_bochner_integral_real_indicator)
hoelzl@56993
   710
hoelzl@56993
   711
lemma has_bochner_integral_diff:
hoelzl@56993
   712
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M g y \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   713
    has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x - g x) (x - y)"
hoelzl@56993
   714
  unfolding diff_conv_add_uminus
hoelzl@56993
   715
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_add has_bochner_integral_minus)
hoelzl@56993
   716
hoelzl@56993
   717
lemma has_bochner_integral_setsum:
hoelzl@56993
   718
  "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M (f i) (x i)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   719
    has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i x) (\<Sum>i\<in>I. x i)"
hoelzl@57036
   720
  by (induct I rule: infinite_finite_induct) auto
hoelzl@56993
   721
hoelzl@56993
   722
lemma has_bochner_integral_implies_finite_norm:
hoelzl@56993
   723
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   724
proof (elim has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   725
  fix s v
hoelzl@56993
   726
  assume [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and s: "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)" and
wenzelm@61969
   727
    lim_0: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   728
  from order_tendstoD[OF lim_0, of "\<infinity>"]
hoelzl@56993
   729
  obtain i where f_s_fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
lp15@61810
   730
    by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) eventually_False_sequentially eventually_mono
hoelzl@56993
   731
              less_ereal.simps(4) zero_ereal_def)
hoelzl@56993
   732
hoelzl@56993
   733
  have [measurable]: "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   734
    using s by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   735
hoelzl@56993
   736
  def m \<equiv> "if space M = {} then 0 else Max ((\<lambda>x. norm (s i x))`space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   737
  have "finite (s i ` space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   738
    using s by (auto simp: simple_function_def simple_bochner_integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   739
  then have "finite (norm ` s i ` space M)"
hoelzl@56993
   740
    by (rule finite_imageI)
hoelzl@56993
   741
  then have "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> norm (s i x) \<le> m" "0 \<le> m"
hoelzl@56993
   742
    by (auto simp: m_def image_comp comp_def Max_ge_iff)
hoelzl@56993
   743
  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s i x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ereal m * indicator {x\<in>space M. s i x \<noteq> 0} x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   744
    by (auto split: split_indicator intro!: Max_ge nn_integral_mono simp:)
hoelzl@56993
   745
  also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
wenzelm@61808
   746
    using s by (subst nn_integral_cmult_indicator) (auto simp: \<open>0 \<le> m\<close> simple_bochner_integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   747
  finally have s_fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s i x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" .
hoelzl@56993
   748
hoelzl@56993
   749
  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) + ereal (norm (s i x)) \<partial>M)"
haftmann@57512
   750
    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono) (metis add.commute norm_triangle_sub)
hoelzl@56993
   751
  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M) + (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s i x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   752
    by (rule nn_integral_add) auto
hoelzl@56993
   753
  also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
   754
    using s_fin f_s_fin by auto
hoelzl@56993
   755
  finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" .
hoelzl@56993
   756
qed
hoelzl@56993
   757
hoelzl@56993
   758
lemma has_bochner_integral_norm_bound:
hoelzl@56993
   759
  assumes i: "has_bochner_integral M f x"
hoelzl@56993
   760
  shows "norm x \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   761
using assms proof
hoelzl@56993
   762
  fix s assume
wenzelm@61969
   763
    x: "(\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x" (is "?s \<longlonglongrightarrow> x") and
hoelzl@56993
   764
    s[simp]: "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)" and
wenzelm@61969
   765
    lim: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0" and
hoelzl@56993
   766
    f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   767
hoelzl@56993
   768
  have [measurable]: "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   769
    using s by (auto simp: simple_bochner_integrable.simps intro: borel_measurable_simple_function)
hoelzl@56993
   770
hoelzl@56993
   771
  show "norm x \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   772
  proof (rule LIMSEQ_le)
wenzelm@61969
   773
    show "(\<lambda>i. ereal (norm (?s i))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> norm x"
hoelzl@56993
   774
      using x by (intro tendsto_intros lim_ereal[THEN iffD2])
hoelzl@56993
   775
    show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (?s n) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x - s n x) \<partial>M) + (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   776
      (is "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. _ \<le> ?t n")
hoelzl@56993
   777
    proof (intro exI allI impI)
hoelzl@56993
   778
      fix n
hoelzl@56993
   779
      have "ereal (norm (?s n)) \<le> simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. norm (s n x))"
hoelzl@56993
   780
        by (auto intro!: simple_bochner_integral_norm_bound)
hoelzl@56993
   781
      also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s n x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   782
        by (intro simple_bochner_integral_eq_nn_integral)
hoelzl@56993
   783
           (auto intro: s simple_bochner_integrable_compose2)
hoelzl@56993
   784
      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ereal (norm (f x - s n x)) + norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
   785
        by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono)
haftmann@57512
   786
           (metis add.commute norm_minus_commute norm_triangle_sub)
hoelzl@56993
   787
      also have "\<dots> = ?t n" 
hoelzl@56996
   788
        by (rule nn_integral_add) auto
hoelzl@56993
   789
      finally show "norm (?s n) \<le> ?t n" .
hoelzl@56993
   790
    qed
wenzelm@61969
   791
    have "?t \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0 + (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   792
      using has_bochner_integral_implies_finite_norm[OF i]
hoelzl@56993
   793
      by (intro tendsto_add_ereal tendsto_const lim) auto
wenzelm@61969
   794
    then show "?t \<longlonglongrightarrow> \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M"
hoelzl@56993
   795
      by simp
hoelzl@56993
   796
  qed
hoelzl@56993
   797
qed
hoelzl@56993
   798
hoelzl@56993
   799
lemma has_bochner_integral_eq:
hoelzl@56993
   800
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f y \<Longrightarrow> x = y"
hoelzl@56993
   801
proof (elim has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   802
  assume f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   803
hoelzl@56993
   804
  fix s t
wenzelm@61969
   805
  assume "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0" (is "?S \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0")
wenzelm@61969
   806
  assume "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x - t i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0" (is "?T \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0")
hoelzl@56993
   807
  assume s: "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
   808
  assume t: "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (t i)"
hoelzl@56993
   809
hoelzl@56993
   810
  have [measurable]: "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>i. t i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   811
    using s t by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   812
hoelzl@56993
   813
  let ?s = "\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
   814
  let ?t = "\<lambda>i. simple_bochner_integral M (t i)"
wenzelm@61969
   815
  assume "?s \<longlonglongrightarrow> x" "?t \<longlonglongrightarrow> y"
wenzelm@61969
   816
  then have "(\<lambda>i. norm (?s i - ?t i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> norm (x - y)"
hoelzl@56993
   817
    by (intro tendsto_intros)
hoelzl@56993
   818
  moreover
wenzelm@61969
   819
  have "(\<lambda>i. ereal (norm (?s i - ?t i))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0"
hoelzl@56993
   820
  proof (rule tendsto_sandwich)
wenzelm@61969
   821
    show "eventually (\<lambda>i. 0 \<le> ereal (norm (?s i - ?t i))) sequentially" "(\<lambda>_. 0) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0"
hoelzl@56996
   822
      by (auto simp: nn_integral_nonneg zero_ereal_def[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   823
hoelzl@56993
   824
    show "eventually (\<lambda>i. norm (?s i - ?t i) \<le> ?S i + ?T i) sequentially"
hoelzl@56993
   825
      by (intro always_eventually allI simple_bochner_integral_bounded s t f)
wenzelm@61969
   826
    show "(\<lambda>i. ?S i + ?T i) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0"
wenzelm@61969
   827
      using tendsto_add_ereal[OF _ _ \<open>?S \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0\<close> \<open>?T \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0\<close>]
hoelzl@56993
   828
      by (simp add: zero_ereal_def[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
   829
  qed
wenzelm@61969
   830
  then have "(\<lambda>i. norm (?s i - ?t i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   831
    by simp
hoelzl@56993
   832
  ultimately have "norm (x - y) = 0"
hoelzl@56993
   833
    by (rule LIMSEQ_unique)
hoelzl@56993
   834
  then show "x = y" by simp
hoelzl@56993
   835
qed
hoelzl@56993
   836
hoelzl@56993
   837
lemma has_bochner_integralI_AE:
hoelzl@56993
   838
  assumes f: "has_bochner_integral M f x"
hoelzl@56993
   839
    and g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   840
    and ae: "AE x in M. f x = g x"
hoelzl@56993
   841
  shows "has_bochner_integral M g x"
hoelzl@56993
   842
  using f
hoelzl@56993
   843
proof (safe intro!: has_bochner_integral.intros elim!: has_bochner_integral.cases)
wenzelm@61969
   844
  fix s assume "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
   845
  also have "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) = (\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (g x - s i x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
   846
    using ae
hoelzl@56996
   847
    by (intro ext nn_integral_cong_AE, eventually_elim) simp
wenzelm@61969
   848
  finally show "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (g x - s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0" .
hoelzl@56993
   849
qed (auto intro: g)
hoelzl@56993
   850
hoelzl@56993
   851
lemma has_bochner_integral_eq_AE:
hoelzl@56993
   852
  assumes f: "has_bochner_integral M f x"
hoelzl@56993
   853
    and g: "has_bochner_integral M g y"
hoelzl@56993
   854
    and ae: "AE x in M. f x = g x"
hoelzl@56993
   855
  shows "x = y"
hoelzl@56993
   856
proof -
hoelzl@56993
   857
  from assms have "has_bochner_integral M g x"
hoelzl@56993
   858
    by (auto intro: has_bochner_integralI_AE)
hoelzl@56993
   859
  from this g show "x = y"
hoelzl@56993
   860
    by (rule has_bochner_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
   861
qed
hoelzl@56993
   862
hoelzl@57137
   863
lemma simple_bochner_integrable_restrict_space:
hoelzl@57137
   864
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
hoelzl@57137
   865
  assumes \<Omega>: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57137
   866
  shows "simple_bochner_integrable (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f \<longleftrightarrow>
hoelzl@57137
   867
    simple_bochner_integrable M (\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57137
   868
  by (simp add: simple_bochner_integrable.simps space_restrict_space
hoelzl@57137
   869
    simple_function_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>] emeasure_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>] Collect_restrict
hoelzl@57137
   870
    indicator_eq_0_iff conj_ac)
hoelzl@57137
   871
hoelzl@57137
   872
lemma simple_bochner_integral_restrict_space:
hoelzl@57137
   873
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
hoelzl@57137
   874
  assumes \<Omega>: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57137
   875
  assumes f: "simple_bochner_integrable (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f"
hoelzl@57137
   876
  shows "simple_bochner_integral (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f =
hoelzl@57137
   877
    simple_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57137
   878
proof -
hoelzl@57137
   879
  have "finite ((\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)`space M)"
hoelzl@57137
   880
    using f simple_bochner_integrable_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>, of f]
hoelzl@57137
   881
    by (simp add: simple_bochner_integrable.simps simple_function_def)
hoelzl@57137
   882
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@57137
   883
    by (auto simp: space_restrict_space measure_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>(1)] le_infI2
hoelzl@57137
   884
                   simple_bochner_integral_def Collect_restrict
hoelzl@57137
   885
             split: split_indicator split_indicator_asm
haftmann@57418
   886
             intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_cong_left arg_cong2[where f=measure])
hoelzl@57137
   887
qed
hoelzl@57137
   888
wenzelm@61681
   889
context
wenzelm@62093
   890
  notes [[inductive_internals]]
wenzelm@61681
   891
begin
wenzelm@61681
   892
hoelzl@56993
   893
inductive integrable for M f where
hoelzl@56993
   894
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
   895
wenzelm@61681
   896
end
wenzelm@61681
   897
hoelzl@56993
   898
definition lebesgue_integral ("integral\<^sup>L") where
hoelzl@57166
   899
  "integral\<^sup>L M f = (if \<exists>x. has_bochner_integral M f x then THE x. has_bochner_integral M f x else 0)"
hoelzl@56993
   900
hoelzl@56993
   901
syntax
Andreas@59357
   902
  "_lebesgue_integral" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> 'a measure \<Rightarrow> real" ("\<integral>((2 _./ _)/ \<partial>_)" [60,61] 110)
hoelzl@56993
   903
hoelzl@56993
   904
translations
hoelzl@56993
   905
  "\<integral> x. f \<partial>M" == "CONST lebesgue_integral M (\<lambda>x. f)"
hoelzl@56993
   906
hoelzl@61880
   907
syntax
hoelzl@61880
   908
  "_ascii_lebesgue_integral" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a measure \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real" ("(3LINT (1_)/|(_)./ _)" [0,110,60] 60)
hoelzl@61880
   909
hoelzl@61880
   910
translations
hoelzl@61880
   911
  "LINT x|M. f" == "CONST lebesgue_integral M (\<lambda>x. f)"
hoelzl@61880
   912
hoelzl@56993
   913
lemma has_bochner_integral_integral_eq: "has_bochner_integral M f x \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f = x"
hoelzl@56993
   914
  by (metis the_equality has_bochner_integral_eq lebesgue_integral_def)
hoelzl@56993
   915
hoelzl@56993
   916
lemma has_bochner_integral_integrable:
hoelzl@56993
   917
  "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M f (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@56993
   918
  by (auto simp: has_bochner_integral_integral_eq integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   919
hoelzl@56993
   920
lemma has_bochner_integral_iff:
hoelzl@56993
   921
  "has_bochner_integral M f x \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M f \<and> integral\<^sup>L M f = x"
hoelzl@56993
   922
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_integral_eq integrable.intros)
hoelzl@56993
   923
hoelzl@56993
   924
lemma simple_bochner_integrable_eq_integral:
hoelzl@56993
   925
  "simple_bochner_integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> simple_bochner_integral M f = integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
   926
  using has_bochner_integral_simple_bochner_integrable[of M f]
hoelzl@56993
   927
  by (simp add: has_bochner_integral_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
   928
hoelzl@57166
   929
lemma not_integrable_integral_eq: "\<not> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f = 0"
hoelzl@56993
   930
  unfolding integrable.simps lebesgue_integral_def by (auto intro!: arg_cong[where f=The])
hoelzl@56993
   931
hoelzl@56993
   932
lemma integral_eq_cases:
hoelzl@56993
   933
  "integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable N g \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   934
    (integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable N g \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L N g) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   935
    integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L N g"
hoelzl@56993
   936
  by (metis not_integrable_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
   937
hoelzl@56993
   938
lemma borel_measurable_integrable[measurable_dest]: "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
   939
  by (auto elim: integrable.cases has_bochner_integral.cases)
hoelzl@56993
   940
hoelzl@59353
   941
lemma borel_measurable_integrable'[measurable_dest]:
hoelzl@59353
   942
  "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> measurable N M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) \<in> borel_measurable N"
hoelzl@59353
   943
  using borel_measurable_integrable[measurable] by measurable
hoelzl@59353
   944
hoelzl@56993
   945
lemma integrable_cong:
hoelzl@56993
   946
  "M = N \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space N \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable N g"
hoelzl@56993
   947
  using assms by (simp cong: has_bochner_integral_cong add: integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   948
hoelzl@56993
   949
lemma integrable_cong_AE:
hoelzl@56993
   950
  "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> AE x in M. f x = g x \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   951
    integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
   952
  unfolding integrable.simps
hoelzl@56993
   953
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_cong_AE arg_cong[where f=Ex] ext)
hoelzl@56993
   954
hoelzl@56993
   955
lemma integral_cong:
hoelzl@56993
   956
  "M = N \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space N \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L N g"
hoelzl@57166
   957
  using assms by (simp cong: has_bochner_integral_cong cong del: if_cong add: lebesgue_integral_def)
hoelzl@56993
   958
hoelzl@56993
   959
lemma integral_cong_AE:
hoelzl@56993
   960
  "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> AE x in M. f x = g x \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   961
    integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@56993
   962
  unfolding lebesgue_integral_def
hoelzl@57166
   963
  by (rule arg_cong[where x="has_bochner_integral M f"]) (intro has_bochner_integral_cong_AE ext)
hoelzl@56993
   964
hoelzl@56993
   965
lemma integrable_add[simp, intro]: "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x)"
hoelzl@57036
   966
  by (auto simp: integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   967
hoelzl@56993
   968
lemma integrable_zero[simp, intro]: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. 0)"
hoelzl@56993
   969
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_zero integrable.simps) 
hoelzl@56993
   970
hoelzl@56993
   971
lemma integrable_setsum[simp, intro]: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (f i)) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i x)"
hoelzl@56993
   972
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_setsum integrable.simps) 
hoelzl@56993
   973
hoelzl@56993
   974
lemma integrable_indicator[simp, intro]: "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M A < \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   975
  integrable M (\<lambda>x. indicator A x *\<^sub>R c)"
hoelzl@56993
   976
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_indicator integrable.simps) 
hoelzl@56993
   977
hoelzl@56993
   978
lemma integrable_real_indicator[simp, intro]: "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M A < \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
   979
  integrable M (indicator A :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real)"
hoelzl@56993
   980
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_real_indicator integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
   981
hoelzl@56993
   982
lemma integrable_diff[simp, intro]: "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x - g x)"
hoelzl@56993
   983
  by (auto simp: integrable.simps intro: has_bochner_integral_diff)
hoelzl@56993
   984
  
hoelzl@56993
   985
lemma integrable_bounded_linear: "bounded_linear T \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. T (f x))"
hoelzl@56993
   986
  by (auto simp: integrable.simps intro: has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear)
hoelzl@56993
   987
hoelzl@56993
   988
lemma integrable_scaleR_left[simp, intro]: "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x *\<^sub>R c)"
hoelzl@56993
   989
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
   990
hoelzl@56993
   991
lemma integrable_scaleR_right[simp, intro]: "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. c *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@56993
   992
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
   993
hoelzl@56993
   994
lemma integrable_mult_left[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
   995
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
   996
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x * c)"
hoelzl@56993
   997
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
   998
hoelzl@56993
   999
lemma integrable_mult_right[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1000
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1001
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. c * f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1002
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
  1003
hoelzl@56993
  1004
lemma integrable_divide_zero[simp, intro]:
haftmann@59867
  1005
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_field, field, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1006
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x / c)"
hoelzl@56993
  1007
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
  1008
hoelzl@56993
  1009
lemma integrable_inner_left[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1010
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x \<bullet> c)"
hoelzl@56993
  1011
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
  1012
hoelzl@56993
  1013
lemma integrable_inner_right[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1014
  "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. c \<bullet> f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1015
  unfolding integrable.simps by fastforce
hoelzl@56993
  1016
hoelzl@56993
  1017
lemmas integrable_minus[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1018
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_minus[OF bounded_linear_ident]]
hoelzl@56993
  1019
lemmas integrable_divide[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1020
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_divide]
hoelzl@56993
  1021
lemmas integrable_Re[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1022
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Re]
hoelzl@56993
  1023
lemmas integrable_Im[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1024
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Im]
hoelzl@56993
  1025
lemmas integrable_cnj[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1026
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_cnj]
hoelzl@56993
  1027
lemmas integrable_of_real[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1028
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56993
  1029
lemmas integrable_fst[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1030
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_fst]
hoelzl@56993
  1031
lemmas integrable_snd[simp, intro] =
hoelzl@56993
  1032
  integrable_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_snd]
hoelzl@56993
  1033
hoelzl@56993
  1034
lemma integral_zero[simp]: "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. 0) = 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1035
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_zero)
hoelzl@56993
  1036
hoelzl@56993
  1037
lemma integral_add[simp]: "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1038
    integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) = integral\<^sup>L M f + integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1039
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_add has_bochner_integral_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  1040
hoelzl@56993
  1041
lemma integral_diff[simp]: "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1042
    integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. f x - g x) = integral\<^sup>L M f - integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1043
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_diff has_bochner_integral_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  1044
hoelzl@62083
  1045
lemma integral_setsum: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (f i)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1046
  integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i x) = (\<Sum>i\<in>I. integral\<^sup>L M (f i))"
hoelzl@56993
  1047
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_setsum has_bochner_integral_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  1048
hoelzl@62083
  1049
lemma integral_setsum'[simp]: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I =simp=> integrable M (f i)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@62083
  1050
  integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i x) = (\<Sum>i\<in>I. integral\<^sup>L M (f i))"
hoelzl@62083
  1051
  unfolding simp_implies_def by (rule integral_setsum)
hoelzl@62083
  1052
hoelzl@56993
  1053
lemma integral_bounded_linear: "bounded_linear T \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1054
    integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. T (f x)) = T (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@56993
  1055
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_bounded_linear has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
  1056
hoelzl@57166
  1057
lemma integral_bounded_linear':
hoelzl@57166
  1058
  assumes T: "bounded_linear T" and T': "bounded_linear T'"
hoelzl@57166
  1059
  assumes *: "\<not> (\<forall>x. T x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x. T' (T x) = x)"
hoelzl@57166
  1060
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. T (f x)) = T (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@57166
  1061
proof cases
hoelzl@57166
  1062
  assume "(\<forall>x. T x = 0)" then show ?thesis
hoelzl@57166
  1063
    by simp
hoelzl@57166
  1064
next
hoelzl@57166
  1065
  assume **: "\<not> (\<forall>x. T x = 0)"
hoelzl@57166
  1066
  show ?thesis
hoelzl@57166
  1067
  proof cases
hoelzl@57166
  1068
    assume "integrable M f" with T show ?thesis
hoelzl@57166
  1069
      by (rule integral_bounded_linear)
hoelzl@57166
  1070
  next
hoelzl@57166
  1071
    assume not: "\<not> integrable M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1072
    moreover have "\<not> integrable M (\<lambda>x. T (f x))"
hoelzl@57166
  1073
    proof
hoelzl@57166
  1074
      assume "integrable M (\<lambda>x. T (f x))"
hoelzl@57166
  1075
      from integrable_bounded_linear[OF T' this] not *[OF **]
hoelzl@57166
  1076
      show False
hoelzl@57166
  1077
        by auto
hoelzl@57166
  1078
    qed
hoelzl@57166
  1079
    ultimately show ?thesis
hoelzl@57166
  1080
      using T by (simp add: not_integrable_integral_eq linear_simps)
hoelzl@57166
  1081
  qed
hoelzl@57166
  1082
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1083
hoelzl@56993
  1084
lemma integral_scaleR_left[simp]: "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral> x. f x *\<^sub>R c \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f *\<^sub>R c"
hoelzl@56993
  1085
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_scaleR_left)
hoelzl@56993
  1086
hoelzl@57166
  1087
lemma integral_scaleR_right[simp]: "(\<integral> x. c *\<^sub>R f x \<partial>M) = c *\<^sub>R integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1088
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_right bounded_linear_scaleR_right[of "1 / c"]]) simp
hoelzl@56993
  1089
hoelzl@56993
  1090
lemma integral_mult_left[simp]:
hoelzl@56993
  1091
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1092
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral> x. f x * c \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f * c"
hoelzl@56993
  1093
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_mult_left)
hoelzl@56993
  1094
hoelzl@56993
  1095
lemma integral_mult_right[simp]:
hoelzl@56993
  1096
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_algebra,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1097
  shows "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral> x. c * f x \<partial>M) = c * integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1098
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_mult_right)
hoelzl@56993
  1099
hoelzl@57166
  1100
lemma integral_mult_left_zero[simp]:
hoelzl@57166
  1101
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_field,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57166
  1102
  shows "(\<integral> x. f x * c \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f * c"
hoelzl@57166
  1103
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_mult_left bounded_linear_mult_left[of "1 / c"]]) simp
hoelzl@57166
  1104
hoelzl@57166
  1105
lemma integral_mult_right_zero[simp]:
hoelzl@57166
  1106
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_field,second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57166
  1107
  shows "(\<integral> x. c * f x \<partial>M) = c * integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1108
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_mult_right bounded_linear_mult_right[of "1 / c"]]) simp
hoelzl@57166
  1109
hoelzl@56993
  1110
lemma integral_inner_left[simp]: "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral> x. f x \<bullet> c \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f \<bullet> c"
hoelzl@56993
  1111
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_inner_left)
hoelzl@56993
  1112
hoelzl@56993
  1113
lemma integral_inner_right[simp]: "(c \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral> x. c \<bullet> f x \<partial>M) = c \<bullet> integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1114
  by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_inner_right)
hoelzl@56993
  1115
hoelzl@56993
  1116
lemma integral_divide_zero[simp]:
haftmann@59867
  1117
  fixes c :: "_::{real_normed_field, field, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57166
  1118
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. f x / c) = integral\<^sup>L M f / c"
hoelzl@57166
  1119
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_divide bounded_linear_mult_left[of c]]) simp
hoelzl@57166
  1120
hoelzl@57166
  1121
lemma integral_minus[simp]: "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. - f x) = - integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1122
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_minus[OF bounded_linear_ident] bounded_linear_minus[OF bounded_linear_ident]]) simp
hoelzl@56993
  1123
hoelzl@57166
  1124
lemma integral_complex_of_real[simp]: "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. complex_of_real (f x)) = of_real (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@57166
  1125
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_of_real bounded_linear_Re]) simp
hoelzl@57166
  1126
hoelzl@57166
  1127
lemma integral_cnj[simp]: "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. cnj (f x)) = cnj (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@57166
  1128
  by (rule integral_bounded_linear'[OF bounded_linear_cnj bounded_linear_cnj]) simp
hoelzl@57166
  1129
hoelzl@56993
  1130
lemmas integral_divide[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1131
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_divide]
hoelzl@56993
  1132
lemmas integral_Re[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1133
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Re]
hoelzl@56993
  1134
lemmas integral_Im[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1135
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_Im]
hoelzl@56993
  1136
lemmas integral_of_real[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1137
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56993
  1138
lemmas integral_fst[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1139
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_fst]
hoelzl@56993
  1140
lemmas integral_snd[simp] =
hoelzl@56993
  1141
  integral_bounded_linear[OF bounded_linear_snd]
hoelzl@56993
  1142
hoelzl@56993
  1143
lemma integral_norm_bound_ereal:
hoelzl@56993
  1144
  "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> norm (integral\<^sup>L M f) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
  1145
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_integrable has_bochner_integral_norm_bound)
hoelzl@56993
  1146
hoelzl@56993
  1147
lemma integrableI_sequence:
hoelzl@56993
  1148
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1149
  assumes f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1150
  assumes s: "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)"
wenzelm@61969
  1151
  assumes lim: "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x - s i x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0" (is "?S \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0")
hoelzl@56993
  1152
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1153
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1154
  let ?s = "\<lambda>n. simple_bochner_integral M (s n)"
hoelzl@56993
  1155
wenzelm@61969
  1156
  have "\<exists>x. ?s \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
hoelzl@56993
  1157
    unfolding convergent_eq_cauchy
hoelzl@56993
  1158
  proof (rule metric_CauchyI)
hoelzl@56993
  1159
    fix e :: real assume "0 < e"
hoelzl@56993
  1160
    then have "0 < ereal (e / 2)" by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1161
    from order_tendstoD(2)[OF lim this]
hoelzl@56993
  1162
    obtain M where M: "\<And>n. M \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> ?S n < e / 2"
hoelzl@56993
  1163
      by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
hoelzl@56993
  1164
    show "\<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. dist (?s m) (?s n) < e"
hoelzl@56993
  1165
    proof (intro exI allI impI)
hoelzl@56993
  1166
      fix m n assume m: "M \<le> m" and n: "M \<le> n"
hoelzl@56993
  1167
      have "?S n \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1168
        using M[OF n] by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1169
      have "norm (?s n - ?s m) \<le> ?S n + ?S m"
hoelzl@56993
  1170
        by (intro simple_bochner_integral_bounded s f)
hoelzl@56993
  1171
      also have "\<dots> < ereal (e / 2) + e / 2"
wenzelm@61808
  1172
        using ereal_add_strict_mono[OF less_imp_le[OF M[OF n]] _ \<open>?S n \<noteq> \<infinity>\<close> M[OF m]]
hoelzl@56996
  1173
        by (auto simp: nn_integral_nonneg)
hoelzl@56993
  1174
      also have "\<dots> = e" by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1175
      finally show "dist (?s n) (?s m) < e"
hoelzl@56993
  1176
        by (simp add: dist_norm)
hoelzl@56993
  1177
    qed
hoelzl@56993
  1178
  qed
wenzelm@61969
  1179
  then obtain x where "?s \<longlonglongrightarrow> x" ..
hoelzl@56993
  1180
  show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  1181
    by (rule, rule) fact+
hoelzl@56993
  1182
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1183
hoelzl@56996
  1184
lemma nn_integral_dominated_convergence_norm:
hoelzl@56993
  1185
  fixes u' :: "_ \<Rightarrow> _::{real_normed_vector, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1186
  assumes [measurable]:
hoelzl@56993
  1187
       "\<And>i. u i \<in> borel_measurable M" "u' \<in> borel_measurable M" "w \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1188
    and bound: "\<And>j. AE x in M. norm (u j x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1189
    and w: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
wenzelm@61969
  1190
    and u': "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. u i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u' x"
wenzelm@61969
  1191
  shows "(\<lambda>i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (u' x - u i x) \<partial>M)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1192
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1193
  have "AE x in M. \<forall>j. norm (u j x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1194
    unfolding AE_all_countable by rule fact
hoelzl@56993
  1195
  with u' have bnd: "AE x in M. \<forall>j. norm (u' x - u j x) \<le> 2 * w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1196
  proof (eventually_elim, intro allI)
wenzelm@61969
  1197
    fix i x assume "(\<lambda>i. u i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u' x" "\<forall>j. norm (u j x) \<le> w x" "\<forall>j. norm (u j x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1198
    then have "norm (u' x) \<le> w x" "norm (u i x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1199
      by (auto intro: LIMSEQ_le_const2 tendsto_norm)
hoelzl@56993
  1200
    then have "norm (u' x) + norm (u i x) \<le> 2 * w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1201
      by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1202
    also have "norm (u' x - u i x) \<le> norm (u' x) + norm (u i x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1203
      by (rule norm_triangle_ineq4)
hoelzl@56993
  1204
    finally (xtrans) show "norm (u' x - u i x) \<le> 2 * w x" .
hoelzl@56993
  1205
  qed
hoelzl@56993
  1206
  
wenzelm@61969
  1207
  have "(\<lambda>i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (u' x - u i x) \<partial>M)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. 0 \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1208
  proof (rule nn_integral_dominated_convergence)  
hoelzl@56993
  1209
    show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. 2 * w x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56996
  1210
      by (rule nn_integral_mult_bounded_inf[OF _ w, of 2]) auto
wenzelm@61969
  1211
    show "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. ereal (norm (u' x - u i x))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1212
      using u' 
hoelzl@56993
  1213
    proof eventually_elim
wenzelm@61969
  1214
      fix x assume "(\<lambda>i. u i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u' x"
hoelzl@56993
  1215
      from tendsto_diff[OF tendsto_const[of "u' x"] this]
wenzelm@61969
  1216
      show "(\<lambda>i. ereal (norm (u' x - u i x))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1217
        by (simp add: zero_ereal_def tendsto_norm_zero_iff)
hoelzl@56993
  1218
    qed
hoelzl@56993
  1219
  qed (insert bnd, auto)
hoelzl@56993
  1220
  then show ?thesis by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1221
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1222
hoelzl@56993
  1223
lemma integrableI_bounded:
hoelzl@56993
  1224
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1225
  assumes f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1226
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1227
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1228
  from borel_measurable_implies_sequence_metric[OF f, of 0] obtain s where
hoelzl@56993
  1229
    s: "\<And>i. simple_function M (s i)" and
wenzelm@61969
  1230
    pointwise: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x" and
hoelzl@56993
  1231
    bound: "\<And>i x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> norm (s i x) \<le> 2 * norm (f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1232
    by (simp add: norm_conv_dist) metis
hoelzl@56993
  1233
  
hoelzl@56993
  1234
  show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  1235
  proof (rule integrableI_sequence)
hoelzl@56993
  1236
    { fix i
hoelzl@56993
  1237
      have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s i x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. 2 * ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1238
        by (intro nn_integral_mono) (simp add: bound)
hoelzl@56993
  1239
      also have "\<dots> = 2 * (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1240
        by (rule nn_integral_cmult) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1241
      finally have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s i x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1242
        using fin by auto }
hoelzl@56993
  1243
    note fin_s = this
hoelzl@56993
  1244
hoelzl@56993
  1245
    show "\<And>i. simple_bochner_integrable M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1246
      by (rule simple_bochner_integrableI_bounded) fact+
hoelzl@56993
  1247
wenzelm@61969
  1248
    show "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x - s i x)) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56996
  1249
    proof (rule nn_integral_dominated_convergence_norm)
hoelzl@56993
  1250
      show "\<And>j. AE x in M. norm (s j x) \<le> 2 * norm (f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1251
        using bound by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1252
      show "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M" "(\<lambda>x. 2 * norm (f x)) \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1253
        using s by (auto intro: borel_measurable_simple_function)
hoelzl@56993
  1254
      show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (2 * norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56996
  1255
        using fin unfolding times_ereal.simps(1)[symmetric] by (subst nn_integral_cmult) auto
wenzelm@61969
  1256
      show "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1257
        using pointwise by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1258
    qed fact
hoelzl@56993
  1259
  qed fact
hoelzl@56993
  1260
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1261
hoelzl@57275
  1262
lemma integrableI_bounded_set:
hoelzl@57275
  1263
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1264
  assumes [measurable]: "A \<in> sets M" "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57275
  1265
  assumes finite: "emeasure M A < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57275
  1266
    and bnd: "AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> norm (f x) \<le> B"
hoelzl@57275
  1267
    and null: "AE x in M. x \<notin> A \<longrightarrow> f x = 0"
hoelzl@57275
  1268
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57275
  1269
proof (rule integrableI_bounded)
hoelzl@57275
  1270
  { fix x :: 'b have "norm x \<le> B \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> B"
hoelzl@57275
  1271
      using norm_ge_zero[of x] by arith }
hoelzl@57275
  1272
  with bnd null have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (max 0 B) * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57275
  1273
    by (intro nn_integral_mono_AE) (auto split: split_indicator split_max)
hoelzl@57275
  1274
  also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57275
  1275
    using finite by (subst nn_integral_cmult_indicator) (auto simp: max_def)
hoelzl@57275
  1276
  finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" .
hoelzl@57275
  1277
qed simp
hoelzl@57275
  1278
hoelzl@57275
  1279
lemma integrableI_bounded_set_indicator:
hoelzl@57275
  1280
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1281
  shows "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@57275
  1282
    emeasure M A < \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> norm (f x) \<le> B) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@57275
  1283
    integrable M (\<lambda>x. indicator A x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57275
  1284
  by (rule integrableI_bounded_set[where A=A]) auto
hoelzl@57275
  1285
hoelzl@56993
  1286
lemma integrableI_nonneg:
hoelzl@56993
  1287
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1288
  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x" "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1289
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1290
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1291
  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1292
    using assms by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1293
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  1294
    using assms by (intro integrableI_bounded) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1295
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1296
hoelzl@56993
  1297
lemma integrable_iff_bounded:
hoelzl@56993
  1298
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1299
  shows "integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M \<and> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1300
  using integrableI_bounded[of f M] has_bochner_integral_implies_finite_norm[of M f]
hoelzl@56993
  1301
  unfolding integrable.simps has_bochner_integral.simps[abs_def] by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1302
hoelzl@56993
  1303
lemma integrable_bound:
hoelzl@56993
  1304
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1305
    and g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'c::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1306
  shows "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. norm (g x) \<le> norm (f x)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1307
    integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1308
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@56993
  1309
proof safe
hoelzl@56993
  1310
  assume "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1311
  assume "AE x in M. norm (g x) \<le> norm (f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1312
  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (g x)) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1313
    by  (intro nn_integral_mono_AE) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1314
  also assume "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1315
  finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (g x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" .
hoelzl@56993
  1316
qed 
hoelzl@56993
  1317
hoelzl@57275
  1318
lemma integrable_mult_indicator:
hoelzl@57275
  1319
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1320
  shows "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. indicator A x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57275
  1321
  by (rule integrable_bound[of M f]) (auto split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@57275
  1322
hoelzl@59000
  1323
lemma integrable_real_mult_indicator:
hoelzl@59000
  1324
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@59000
  1325
  shows "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator A x)"
hoelzl@59000
  1326
  using integrable_mult_indicator[of A M f] by (simp add: mult_ac)
hoelzl@59000
  1327
hoelzl@56993
  1328
lemma integrable_abs[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1329
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1330
  assumes [measurable]: "integrable M f" shows "integrable M (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x\<bar>)"
hoelzl@56993
  1331
  using assms by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1332
hoelzl@56993
  1333
lemma integrable_norm[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1334
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1335
  assumes [measurable]: "integrable M f" shows "integrable M (\<lambda>x. norm (f x))"
hoelzl@56993
  1336
  using assms by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1337
  
hoelzl@56993
  1338
lemma integrable_norm_cancel:
hoelzl@56993
  1339
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1340
  assumes [measurable]: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. norm (f x))" "f \<in> borel_measurable M" shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1341
  using assms by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1342
hoelzl@57275
  1343
lemma integrable_norm_iff:
hoelzl@57275
  1344
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1345
  shows "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. norm (f x)) \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M f"
hoelzl@57275
  1346
  by (auto intro: integrable_norm_cancel)
hoelzl@57275
  1347
hoelzl@56993
  1348
lemma integrable_abs_cancel:
hoelzl@56993
  1349
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1350
  assumes [measurable]: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x\<bar>)" "f \<in> borel_measurable M" shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1351
  using assms by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1352
hoelzl@57275
  1353
lemma integrable_abs_iff:
hoelzl@57275
  1354
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@57275
  1355
  shows "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x\<bar>) \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M f"
hoelzl@57275
  1356
  by (auto intro: integrable_abs_cancel)
hoelzl@57275
  1357
hoelzl@56993
  1358
lemma integrable_max[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1359
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1360
  assumes fg[measurable]: "integrable M f" "integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1361
  shows "integrable M (\<lambda>x. max (f x) (g x))"
hoelzl@56993
  1362
  using integrable_add[OF integrable_norm[OF fg(1)] integrable_norm[OF fg(2)]]
hoelzl@56993
  1363
  by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1364
hoelzl@56993
  1365
lemma integrable_min[simp, intro]:
hoelzl@56993
  1366
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1367
  assumes fg[measurable]: "integrable M f" "integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1368
  shows "integrable M (\<lambda>x. min (f x) (g x))"
hoelzl@56993
  1369
  using integrable_add[OF integrable_norm[OF fg(1)] integrable_norm[OF fg(2)]]
hoelzl@56993
  1370
  by (rule integrable_bound) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1371
hoelzl@56993
  1372
lemma integral_minus_iff[simp]:
hoelzl@56993
  1373
  "integrable M (\<lambda>x. - f x ::'a::{banach, second_countable_topology}) \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1374
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@56993
  1375
  by (auto intro: borel_measurable_uminus[of "\<lambda>x. - f x" M, simplified])
hoelzl@56993
  1376
hoelzl@56993
  1377
lemma integrable_indicator_iff:
hoelzl@56993
  1378
  "integrable M (indicator A::_ \<Rightarrow> real) \<longleftrightarrow> A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M \<and> emeasure M (A \<inter> space M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56996
  1379
  by (simp add: integrable_iff_bounded borel_measurable_indicator_iff ereal_indicator nn_integral_indicator'
hoelzl@56993
  1380
           cong: conj_cong)
hoelzl@56993
  1381
hoelzl@57166
  1382
lemma integral_indicator[simp]: "integral\<^sup>L M (indicator A) = measure M (A \<inter> space M)"
hoelzl@57166
  1383
proof cases
hoelzl@57166
  1384
  assume *: "A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M \<and> emeasure M (A \<inter> space M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57166
  1385
  have "integral\<^sup>L M (indicator A) = integral\<^sup>L M (indicator (A \<inter> space M))"
hoelzl@57166
  1386
    by (intro integral_cong) (auto split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@57166
  1387
  also have "\<dots> = measure M (A \<inter> space M)"
hoelzl@57166
  1388
    using * by (intro has_bochner_integral_integral_eq has_bochner_integral_real_indicator) auto
hoelzl@57166
  1389
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@57166
  1390
next
hoelzl@57166
  1391
  assume *: "\<not> (A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M \<and> emeasure M (A \<inter> space M) < \<infinity>)"
hoelzl@57166
  1392
  have "integral\<^sup>L M (indicator A) = integral\<^sup>L M (indicator (A \<inter> space M) :: _ \<Rightarrow> real)"
hoelzl@57166
  1393
    by (intro integral_cong) (auto split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@57166
  1394
  also have "\<dots> = 0"
hoelzl@57166
  1395
    using * by (subst not_integrable_integral_eq) (auto simp: integrable_indicator_iff)
hoelzl@57166
  1396
  also have "\<dots> = measure M (A \<inter> space M)"
hoelzl@57166
  1397
    using * by (auto simp: measure_def emeasure_notin_sets)
hoelzl@57166
  1398
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@57166
  1399
qed
hoelzl@57166
  1400
hoelzl@57275
  1401
lemma integrable_discrete_difference:
hoelzl@57275
  1402
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1403
  assumes X: "countable X"
hoelzl@57275
  1404
  assumes null: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {x} = 0" 
hoelzl@57275
  1405
  assumes sets: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> {x} \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57275
  1406
  assumes eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> X \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
hoelzl@57275
  1407
  shows "integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M g"
hoelzl@57275
  1408
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@57275
  1409
proof (rule conj_cong)
hoelzl@57275
  1410
  { assume "f \<in> borel_measurable M" then have "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57275
  1411
      by (rule measurable_discrete_difference[where X=X]) (auto simp: assms) }
hoelzl@57275
  1412
  moreover
hoelzl@57275
  1413
  { assume "g \<in> borel_measurable M" then have "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57275
  1414
      by (rule measurable_discrete_difference[where X=X]) (auto simp: assms) }
hoelzl@57275
  1415
  ultimately show "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<longleftrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M" ..
hoelzl@57275
  1416
next
hoelzl@57275
  1417
  have "AE x in M. x \<notin> X"
hoelzl@57275
  1418
    by (rule AE_discrete_difference) fact+
hoelzl@57275
  1419
  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (g x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57275
  1420
    by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) (auto simp: eq)
hoelzl@57275
  1421
  then show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (g x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57275
  1422
    by simp
hoelzl@57275
  1423
qed
hoelzl@57275
  1424
hoelzl@57275
  1425
lemma integral_discrete_difference:
hoelzl@57275
  1426
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1427
  assumes X: "countable X"
hoelzl@57275
  1428
  assumes null: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {x} = 0" 
hoelzl@57275
  1429
  assumes sets: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> {x} \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57275
  1430
  assumes eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> X \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
hoelzl@57275
  1431
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@57275
  1432
proof (rule integral_eq_cases)
hoelzl@57275
  1433
  show eq: "integrable M f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M g"
hoelzl@57275
  1434
    by (rule integrable_discrete_difference[where X=X]) fact+
hoelzl@57275
  1435
hoelzl@57275
  1436
  assume f: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57275
  1437
  show "integral\<^sup>L M f = integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@57275
  1438
  proof (rule integral_cong_AE)
hoelzl@57275
  1439
    show "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57275
  1440
      using f eq by (auto intro: borel_measurable_integrable)
hoelzl@57275
  1441
hoelzl@57275
  1442
    have "AE x in M. x \<notin> X"
hoelzl@57275
  1443
      by (rule AE_discrete_difference) fact+
hoelzl@57275
  1444
    with AE_space show "AE x in M. f x = g x"
hoelzl@57275
  1445
      by eventually_elim fact
hoelzl@57275
  1446
  qed
hoelzl@57275
  1447
qed
hoelzl@57275
  1448
hoelzl@57275
  1449
lemma has_bochner_integral_discrete_difference:
hoelzl@57275
  1450
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57275
  1451
  assumes X: "countable X"
hoelzl@57275
  1452
  assumes null: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {x} = 0" 
hoelzl@57275
  1453
  assumes sets: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> {x} \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57275
  1454
  assumes eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> X \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
hoelzl@57275
  1455
  shows "has_bochner_integral M f x \<longleftrightarrow> has_bochner_integral M g x"
hoelzl@57275
  1456
  using integrable_discrete_difference[of X M f g, OF assms]
hoelzl@57275
  1457
  using integral_discrete_difference[of X M f g, OF assms]
hoelzl@57275
  1458
  by (metis has_bochner_integral_iff)
hoelzl@57275
  1459
hoelzl@57137
  1460
lemma
hoelzl@56993
  1461
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}" and w :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1462
  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M" "integrable M w"
wenzelm@61969
  1463
  assumes lim: "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1464
  assumes bound: "\<And>i. AE x in M. norm (s i x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@57137
  1465
  shows integrable_dominated_convergence: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57137
  1466
    and integrable_dominated_convergence2: "\<And>i. integrable M (s i)"
wenzelm@61969
  1467
    and integral_dominated_convergence: "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1468
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1469
  have "AE x in M. 0 \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1470
    using bound[of 0] by eventually_elim (auto intro: norm_ge_zero order_trans)
hoelzl@56993
  1471
  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (w x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1472
    by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) auto
wenzelm@61808
  1473
  with \<open>integrable M w\<close> have w: "w \<in> borel_measurable M" "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1474
    unfolding integrable_iff_bounded by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1475
hoelzl@56993
  1476
  show int_s: "\<And>i. integrable M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1477
    unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@56993
  1478
  proof
hoelzl@56993
  1479
    fix i 
hoelzl@56993
  1480
    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (s i x)) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1481
      using bound by (intro nn_integral_mono_AE) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1482
    with w show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (s i x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1483
  qed fact
hoelzl@56993
  1484
hoelzl@56993
  1485
  have all_bound: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. norm (s i x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@56993
  1486
    using bound unfolding AE_all_countable by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1487
hoelzl@56993
  1488
  show int_f: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1489
    unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@56993
  1490
  proof
hoelzl@56993
  1491
    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
  1492
      using all_bound lim
hoelzl@56996
  1493
    proof (intro nn_integral_mono_AE, eventually_elim)
wenzelm@61969
  1494
      fix x assume "\<forall>i. norm (s i x) \<le> w x" "(\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1495
      then show "ereal (norm (f x)) \<le> ereal (w x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1496
        by (intro LIMSEQ_le_const2[where X="\<lambda>i. ereal (norm (s i x))"] tendsto_intros lim_ereal[THEN iffD2]) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1497
    qed
hoelzl@56993
  1498
    with w show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1499
  qed fact
hoelzl@56993
  1500
wenzelm@61969
  1501
  have "(\<lambda>n. ereal (norm (integral\<^sup>L M (s n) - integral\<^sup>L M f))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0" (is "?d \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0")
hoelzl@56993
  1502
  proof (rule tendsto_sandwich)
wenzelm@61969
  1503
    show "eventually (\<lambda>n. ereal 0 \<le> ?d n) sequentially" "(\<lambda>_. ereal 0) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0" by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1504
    show "eventually (\<lambda>n. ?d n \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s n x - f x) \<partial>M)) sequentially"
hoelzl@56993
  1505
    proof (intro always_eventually allI)
hoelzl@56993
  1506
      fix n
hoelzl@56993
  1507
      have "?d n = norm (integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. s n x - f x))"
hoelzl@56993
  1508
        using int_f int_s by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1509
      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s n x - f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
  1510
        by (intro int_f int_s integrable_diff integral_norm_bound_ereal)
hoelzl@56993
  1511
      finally show "?d n \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s n x - f x) \<partial>M)" .
hoelzl@56993
  1512
    qed
wenzelm@61969
  1513
    show "(\<lambda>n. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s n x - f x) \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1514
      unfolding zero_ereal_def[symmetric]
hoelzl@56993
  1515
      apply (subst norm_minus_commute)
hoelzl@56996
  1516
    proof (rule nn_integral_dominated_convergence_norm[where w=w])
hoelzl@56993
  1517
      show "\<And>n. s n \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1518
        using int_s unfolding integrable_iff_bounded by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1519
    qed fact+
hoelzl@56993
  1520
  qed
wenzelm@61969
  1521
  then have "(\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>L M (s n) - integral\<^sup>L M f) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1522
    unfolding lim_ereal tendsto_norm_zero_iff .
hoelzl@56993
  1523
  from tendsto_add[OF this tendsto_const[of "integral\<^sup>L M f"]]
wenzelm@61969
  1524
  show "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f"  by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1525
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1526
hoelzl@61897
  1527
context
hoelzl@61897
  1528
  fixes s :: "real \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}" and w :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@61897
  1529
    and f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b" and M
hoelzl@61897
  1530
  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>t. s t \<in> borel_measurable M" "integrable M w"
wenzelm@61973
  1531
  assumes lim: "AE x in M. ((\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlongrightarrow> f x) at_top"
hoelzl@61897
  1532
  assumes bound: "\<forall>\<^sub>F i in at_top. AE x in M. norm (s i x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@61897
  1533
begin
hoelzl@61897
  1534
wenzelm@61973
  1535
lemma integral_dominated_convergence_at_top: "((\<lambda>t. integral\<^sup>L M (s t)) \<longlongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f) at_top"
hoelzl@61897
  1536
proof (rule tendsto_at_topI_sequentially)
hoelzl@61897
  1537
  fix X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" assume X: "filterlim X at_top sequentially"
hoelzl@61897
  1538
  from filterlim_iff[THEN iffD1, OF this, rule_format, OF bound]
hoelzl@61897
  1539
  obtain N where w: "\<And>n. N \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> AE x in M. norm (s (X n) x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@61897
  1540
    by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
hoelzl@61897
  1541
wenzelm@61969
  1542
  show "(\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>L M (s (X n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@61897
  1543
  proof (rule LIMSEQ_offset, rule integral_dominated_convergence)
hoelzl@61897
  1544
    show "AE x in M. norm (s (X (n + N)) x) \<le> w x" for n
hoelzl@61897
  1545
      by (rule w) auto
wenzelm@61969
  1546
    show "AE x in M. (\<lambda>n. s (X (n + N)) x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@61897
  1547
      using lim
hoelzl@61897
  1548
    proof eventually_elim
wenzelm@61973
  1549
      fix x assume "((\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlongrightarrow> f x) at_top"
wenzelm@61969
  1550
      then show "(\<lambda>n. s (X (n + N)) x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@61897
  1551
        by (intro LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment filterlim_compose[OF _ X])
hoelzl@61897
  1552
    qed
hoelzl@61897
  1553
  qed fact+
hoelzl@61897
  1554
qed
hoelzl@61897
  1555
hoelzl@61897
  1556
lemma integrable_dominated_convergence_at_top: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@61897
  1557
proof -
hoelzl@61897
  1558
  from bound obtain N where w: "\<And>n. N \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> AE x in M. norm (s n x) \<le> w x"
hoelzl@61897
  1559
    by (auto simp: eventually_at_top_linorder)
hoelzl@61897
  1560
  show ?thesis
hoelzl@61897
  1561
  proof (rule integrable_dominated_convergence)
hoelzl@61897
  1562
    show "AE x in M. norm (s (N + i) x) \<le> w x" for i :: nat
hoelzl@61897
  1563
      by (intro w) auto
wenzelm@61969
  1564
    show "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. s (N + real i) x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@61897
  1565
      using lim
hoelzl@61897
  1566
    proof eventually_elim
wenzelm@61973
  1567
      fix x assume "((\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlongrightarrow> f x) at_top"
wenzelm@61969
  1568
      then show "(\<lambda>n. s (N + n) x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@61897
  1569
        by (rule filterlim_compose)
hoelzl@61897
  1570
           (auto intro!: filterlim_tendsto_add_at_top filterlim_real_sequentially)
hoelzl@61897
  1571
    qed
hoelzl@61897
  1572
  qed fact+
hoelzl@61897
  1573
qed
hoelzl@61897
  1574
hoelzl@61897
  1575
end
hoelzl@61897
  1576
hoelzl@56993
  1577
lemma integrable_mult_left_iff:
hoelzl@56993
  1578
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1579
  shows "integrable M (\<lambda>x. c * f x) \<longleftrightarrow> c = 0 \<or> integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1580
  using integrable_mult_left[of c M f] integrable_mult_left[of "1 / c" M "\<lambda>x. c * f x"]
hoelzl@56993
  1581
  by (cases "c = 0") auto
hoelzl@56993
  1582
hoelzl@56996
  1583
lemma nn_integral_eq_integral:
hoelzl@56993
  1584
  assumes f: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1585
  assumes nonneg: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x" 
hoelzl@56993
  1586
  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1587
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1588
  { fix f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real" assume f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>x. 0 \<le> f x" "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1589
    then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1590
    proof (induct rule: borel_measurable_induct_real)
hoelzl@56993
  1591
      case (set A) then show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1592
        by (simp add: integrable_indicator_iff ereal_indicator emeasure_eq_ereal_measure)
hoelzl@56993
  1593
    next
hoelzl@56993
  1594
      case (mult f c) then show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1595
        unfolding times_ereal.simps(1)[symmetric]
hoelzl@56996
  1596
        by (subst nn_integral_cmult)
hoelzl@56993
  1597
           (auto simp add: integrable_mult_left_iff zero_ereal_def[symmetric])
hoelzl@56993
  1598
    next
hoelzl@56993
  1599
      case (add g f)
hoelzl@56993
  1600
      then have "integrable M f" "integrable M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1601
        by (auto intro!: integrable_bound[OF add(8)])
hoelzl@56993
  1602
      with add show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1603
        unfolding plus_ereal.simps(1)[symmetric]
hoelzl@56996
  1604
        by (subst nn_integral_add) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1605
    next
hoelzl@56993
  1606
      case (seq s)
hoelzl@56993
  1607
      { fix i x assume "x \<in> space M" with seq(4) have "s i x \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1608
          by (intro LIMSEQ_le_const[OF seq(5)] exI[of _ i]) (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def) }
hoelzl@56993
  1609
      note s_le_f = this
hoelzl@56993
  1610
hoelzl@56993
  1611
      show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1612
      proof (rule LIMSEQ_unique)
wenzelm@61969
  1613
        show "(\<lambda>i. ereal (integral\<^sup>L M (s i))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ereal (integral\<^sup>L M f)"
hoelzl@56993
  1614
          unfolding lim_ereal
hoelzl@56993
  1615
        proof (rule integral_dominated_convergence[where w=f])
hoelzl@56993
  1616
          show "integrable M f" by fact
hoelzl@56993
  1617
          from s_le_f seq show "\<And>i. AE x in M. norm (s i x) \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1618
            by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1619
        qed (insert seq, auto)
hoelzl@56993
  1620
        have int_s: "\<And>i. integrable M (s i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1621
          using seq f s_le_f by (intro integrable_bound[OF f(3)]) auto
wenzelm@61969
  1622
        have "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. s i x \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M"
hoelzl@56993
  1623
          using seq s_le_f f
hoelzl@56996
  1624
          by (intro nn_integral_dominated_convergence[where w=f])
hoelzl@56993
  1625
             (auto simp: integrable_iff_bounded)
hoelzl@56993
  1626
        also have "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. s i x \<partial>M) = (\<lambda>i. \<integral>x. s i x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
  1627
          using seq int_s by simp
wenzelm@61969
  1628
        finally show "(\<lambda>i. \<integral>x. s i x \<partial>M) \<longlonglongrightarrow> \<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M"
hoelzl@56993
  1629
          by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1630
      qed
hoelzl@56993
  1631
    qed }
hoelzl@56993
  1632
  from this[of "\<lambda>x. max 0 (f x)"] assms have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. max 0 (f x) \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. max 0 (f x))"
hoelzl@56993
  1633
    by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1634
  also have "\<dots> = integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1635
    using assms by (auto intro!: integral_cong_AE)
hoelzl@56993
  1636
  also have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. max 0 (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1637
    using assms by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong_AE simp: max_def)
hoelzl@56993
  1638
  finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@56993
  1639
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1640
hoelzl@57036
  1641
lemma
hoelzl@57036
  1642
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> 'a :: {banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57036
  1643
  assumes integrable[measurable]: "\<And>i. integrable M (f i)"
hoelzl@57036
  1644
  and summable: "AE x in M. summable (\<lambda>i. norm (f i x))"
hoelzl@57036
  1645
  and sums: "summable (\<lambda>i. (\<integral>x. norm (f i x) \<partial>M))"
hoelzl@57036
  1646
  shows integrable_suminf: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. (\<Sum>i. f i x))" (is "integrable M ?S")
hoelzl@57036
  1647
    and sums_integral: "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (f i)) sums (\<integral>x. (\<Sum>i. f i x) \<partial>M)" (is "?f sums ?x")
hoelzl@57036
  1648
    and integral_suminf: "(\<integral>x. (\<Sum>i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>i. integral\<^sup>L M (f i))"
hoelzl@57036
  1649
    and summable_integral: "summable (\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (f i))"
hoelzl@57036
  1650
proof -
hoelzl@57036
  1651
  have 1: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i. norm (f i x))"
hoelzl@57036
  1652
  proof (rule integrableI_bounded)
hoelzl@57036
  1653
    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (\<Sum>i. norm (f i x))) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>i. ereal (norm (f i x))) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57036
  1654
      apply (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) 
hoelzl@57036
  1655
      using summable
hoelzl@57036
  1656
      apply eventually_elim
hoelzl@57036
  1657
      apply (simp add: suminf_ereal' suminf_nonneg)
hoelzl@57036
  1658
      done
hoelzl@57036
  1659
    also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. norm (f i x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57036
  1660
      by (intro nn_integral_suminf) auto
hoelzl@57036
  1661
    also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i. ereal (\<integral>x. norm (f i x) \<partial>M))"
hoelzl@57036
  1662
      by (intro arg_cong[where f=suminf] ext nn_integral_eq_integral integrable_norm integrable) auto
hoelzl@57036
  1663
    finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (\<Sum>i. norm (f i x))) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57036
  1664
      by (simp add: suminf_ereal' sums)
hoelzl@57036
  1665
  qed simp
hoelzl@57036
  1666
wenzelm@61969
  1667
  have 2: "AE x in M. (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<Sum>i. f i x)"
hoelzl@57036
  1668
    using summable by eventually_elim (auto intro: summable_LIMSEQ summable_norm_cancel)
hoelzl@57036
  1669
hoelzl@57036
  1670
  have 3: "\<And>j. AE x in M. norm (\<Sum>i<j. f i x) \<le> (\<Sum>i. norm (f i x))"
hoelzl@57036
  1671
    using summable
hoelzl@57036
  1672
  proof eventually_elim
hoelzl@57036
  1673
    fix j x assume [simp]: "summable (\<lambda>i. norm (f i x))"
hoelzl@57036
  1674
    have "norm (\<Sum>i<j. f i x) \<le> (\<Sum>i<j. norm (f i x))" by (rule norm_setsum)
hoelzl@57036
  1675
    also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i. norm (f i x))"
hoelzl@57036
  1676
      using setsum_le_suminf[of "\<lambda>i. norm (f i x)"] unfolding sums_iff by auto
hoelzl@57036
  1677
    finally show "norm (\<Sum>i<j. f i x) \<le> (\<Sum>i. norm (f i x))" by simp
hoelzl@57036
  1678
  qed
hoelzl@57036
  1679
hoelzl@57137
  1680
  note ibl = integrable_dominated_convergence[OF _ _ 1 2 3]
hoelzl@57137
  1681
  note int = integral_dominated_convergence[OF _ _ 1 2 3]
hoelzl@57036
  1682
hoelzl@57036
  1683
  show "integrable M ?S"
hoelzl@57137
  1684
    by (rule ibl) measurable
hoelzl@57036
  1685
hoelzl@57036
  1686
  show "?f sums ?x" unfolding sums_def
hoelzl@57137
  1687
    using int by (simp add: integrable)
hoelzl@57036
  1688
  then show "?x = suminf ?f" "summable ?f"
hoelzl@57036
  1689
    unfolding sums_iff by auto
hoelzl@57036
  1690
qed
hoelzl@57036
  1691
hoelzl@56993
  1692
lemma integral_norm_bound:
hoelzl@56993
  1693
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'a :: {banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1694
  shows "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> norm (integral\<^sup>L M f) \<le> (\<integral>x. norm (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1695
  using nn_integral_eq_integral[of M "\<lambda>x. norm (f x)"]
hoelzl@56993
  1696
  using integral_norm_bound_ereal[of M f] by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1697
  
hoelzl@57235
  1698
lemma integrableI_nn_integral_finite:
hoelzl@57235
  1699
  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57235
  1700
    and nonneg: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@57235
  1701
    and finite: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) = ereal x"
hoelzl@57235
  1702
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57235
  1703
proof (rule integrableI_bounded)
hoelzl@57235
  1704
  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57235
  1705
    using nonneg by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) auto
hoelzl@57235
  1706
  with finite show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57235
  1707
    by auto
hoelzl@57235
  1708
qed simp
hoelzl@57235
  1709
hoelzl@56996
  1710
lemma integral_eq_nn_integral:
hoelzl@57235
  1711
  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@57235
  1712
  assumes nonneg: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
lp15@61609
  1713
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f = real_of_ereal (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57235
  1714
proof cases
hoelzl@57235
  1715
  assume *: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M) = \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57235
  1716
  also have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57235
  1717
    using nonneg by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) auto
hoelzl@57235
  1718
  finally have "\<not> integrable M f"
hoelzl@57235
  1719
    by (auto simp: integrable_iff_bounded)
hoelzl@57235
  1720
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@57235
  1721
    by (simp add: * not_integrable_integral_eq)
hoelzl@57235
  1722
next
hoelzl@57235
  1723
  assume "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57235
  1724
  then have "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57235
  1725
    by (cases "\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M") (auto intro!: integrableI_nn_integral_finite assms)
hoelzl@57235
  1726
  from nn_integral_eq_integral[OF this nonneg] show ?thesis
hoelzl@57235
  1727
    by simp
hoelzl@57235
  1728
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1729
  
hoelzl@57447
  1730
lemma has_bochner_integral_nn_integral:
hoelzl@57447
  1731
  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@57447
  1732
  assumes "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) = ereal x"
hoelzl@57447
  1733
  shows "has_bochner_integral M f x"
hoelzl@57447
  1734
  unfolding has_bochner_integral_iff
hoelzl@57447
  1735
  using assms by (auto simp: assms integral_eq_nn_integral intro: integrableI_nn_integral_finite)
hoelzl@57447
  1736
hoelzl@56993
  1737
lemma integrableI_simple_bochner_integrable:
hoelzl@56993
  1738
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1739
  shows "simple_bochner_integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1740
  by (intro integrableI_sequence[where s="\<lambda>_. f"] borel_measurable_simple_function)
hoelzl@56993
  1741
     (auto simp: zero_ereal_def[symmetric] simple_bochner_integrable.simps)
hoelzl@56993
  1742
hoelzl@56993
  1743
lemma integrable_induct[consumes 1, case_names base add lim, induct pred: integrable]:
hoelzl@56993
  1744
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  1745
  assumes "integrable M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1746
  assumes base: "\<And>A c. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M A < \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. indicator A x *\<^sub>R c)"
hoelzl@56993
  1747
  assumes add: "\<And>f g. integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> P f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow> P g \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. f x + g x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1748
  assumes lim: "\<And>f s. (\<And>i. integrable M (s i)) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. P (s i)) \<Longrightarrow>
wenzelm@61969
  1749
   (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1750
   (\<And>i x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> norm (s i x) \<le> 2 * norm (f x)) \<Longrightarrow> integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> P f"
hoelzl@56993
  1751
  shows "P f"
hoelzl@56993
  1752
proof -
wenzelm@61808
  1753
  from \<open>integrable M f\<close> have f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (f x) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1754
    unfolding integrable_iff_bounded by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1755
  from borel_measurable_implies_sequence_metric[OF f(1)]
wenzelm@61969
  1756
  obtain s where s: "\<And>i. simple_function M (s i)" "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1757
    "\<And>i x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> norm (s i x) \<le> 2 * norm (f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1758
    unfolding norm_conv_dist by metis
hoelzl@56993
  1759
hoelzl@56993
  1760
  { fix f A 
hoelzl@56993
  1761
    have [simp]: "P (\<lambda>x. 0)"
hoelzl@56993
  1762
      using base[of "{}" undefined] by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1763
    have "(\<And>i::'b. i \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (f i::'a \<Rightarrow> 'b)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  1764
    (\<And>i. i \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> P (f i)) \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>A. f i x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1765
    by (induct A rule: infinite_finite_induct) (auto intro!: add) }
hoelzl@56993
  1766
  note setsum = this
hoelzl@56993
  1767
hoelzl@56993
  1768
  def s' \<equiv> "\<lambda>i z. indicator (space M) z *\<^sub>R s i z"
hoelzl@56993
  1769
  then have s'_eq_s: "\<And>i x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> s' i x = s i x"
hoelzl@56993
  1770
    by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1771
hoelzl@56993
  1772
  have sf[measurable]: "\<And>i. simple_function M (s' i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1773
    unfolding s'_def using s(1)
hoelzl@56993
  1774
    by (intro simple_function_compose2[where h="op *\<^sub>R"] simple_function_indicator) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1775
hoelzl@56993
  1776
  { fix i 
hoelzl@56993
  1777
    have "\<And>z. {y. s' i z = y \<and> y \<in> s' i ` space M \<and> y \<noteq> 0 \<and> z \<in> space M} =
hoelzl@56993
  1778
        (if z \<in> space M \<and> s' i z \<noteq> 0 then {s' i z} else {})"
hoelzl@56993
  1779
      by (auto simp add: s'_def split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@56993
  1780
    then have "\<And>z. s' i = (\<lambda>z. \<Sum>y\<in>s' i`space M - {0}. indicator {x\<in>space M. s' i x = y} z *\<^sub>R y)"
hoelzl@56993
  1781
      using sf by (auto simp: fun_eq_iff simple_function_def s'_def) }
hoelzl@56993
  1782
  note s'_eq = this
hoelzl@56993
  1783
hoelzl@56993
  1784
  show "P f"
hoelzl@56993
  1785
  proof (rule lim)
hoelzl@56993
  1786
    fix i
hoelzl@56993
  1787
hoelzl@56993
  1788
    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. norm (s' i x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. 2 * ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1789
      using s by (intro nn_integral_mono) (auto simp: s'_eq_s)
hoelzl@56993
  1790
    also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56996
  1791
      using f by (subst nn_integral_cmult) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1792
    finally have sbi: "simple_bochner_integrable M (s' i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1793
      using sf by (intro simple_bochner_integrableI_bounded) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1794
    then show "integrable M (s' i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1795
      by (rule integrableI_simple_bochner_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  1796
hoelzl@56993
  1797
    { fix x assume"x \<in> space M" "s' i x \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1798
      then have "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. s' i y = s' i x} \<le> emeasure M {y \<in> space M. s' i y \<noteq> 0}"
hoelzl@56993
  1799
        by (intro emeasure_mono) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1800
      also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@56993
  1801
        using sbi by (auto elim: simple_bochner_integrable.cases)
hoelzl@56993
  1802
      finally have "emeasure M {y \<in> space M. s' i y = s' i x} \<noteq> \<infinity>" by simp }
hoelzl@56993
  1803
    then show "P (s' i)"
hoelzl@56993
  1804
      by (subst s'_eq) (auto intro!: setsum base)
hoelzl@56993
  1805
wenzelm@61969
  1806
    fix x assume "x \<in> space M" with s show "(\<lambda>i. s' i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1807
      by (simp add: s'_eq_s)
hoelzl@56993
  1808
    show "norm (s' i x) \<le> 2 * norm (f x)"
wenzelm@61808
  1809
      using \<open>x \<in> space M\<close> s by (simp add: s'_eq_s)
hoelzl@56993
  1810
  qed fact
hoelzl@56993
  1811
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1812
hoelzl@56993
  1813
lemma integral_nonneg_AE:
hoelzl@56993
  1814
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@57166
  1815
  assumes [measurable]: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1816
  shows "0 \<le> integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1817
proof cases
hoelzl@57166
  1818
  assume [measurable]: "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1819
  then have "0 \<le> ereal (integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. max 0 (f x)))"
hoelzl@57036
  1820
    by (subst integral_eq_nn_integral) (auto intro: real_of_ereal_pos nn_integral_nonneg assms)
hoelzl@56993
  1821
  also have "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. max 0 (f x)) = integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1822
    using assms by (intro integral_cong_AE assms integrable_max) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1823
  finally show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  1824
    by simp
hoelzl@57166
  1825
qed (simp add: not_integrable_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
  1826
hoelzl@56993
  1827
lemma integral_eq_zero_AE:
hoelzl@57166
  1828
  "(AE x in M. f x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M f = 0"
hoelzl@57166
  1829
  using integral_cong_AE[of f M "\<lambda>_. 0"]
hoelzl@57166
  1830
  by (cases "integrable M f") (simp_all add: not_integrable_integral_eq)
hoelzl@56993
  1831
hoelzl@56993
  1832
lemma integral_nonneg_eq_0_iff_AE:
hoelzl@56993
  1833
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1834
  assumes f[measurable]: "integrable M f" and nonneg: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
hoelzl@56993
  1835
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. f x = 0)"
hoelzl@56993
  1836
proof
hoelzl@56993
  1837
  assume "integral\<^sup>L M f = 0"
hoelzl@56996
  1838
  then have "integral\<^sup>N M f = 0"
hoelzl@56996
  1839
    using nn_integral_eq_integral[OF f nonneg] by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1840
  then have "AE x in M. ereal (f x) \<le> 0"
hoelzl@56996
  1841
    by (simp add: nn_integral_0_iff_AE)
hoelzl@56993
  1842
  with nonneg show "AE x in M. f x = 0"
hoelzl@56993
  1843
    by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1844
qed (auto simp add: integral_eq_zero_AE)
hoelzl@56993
  1845
hoelzl@56993
  1846
lemma integral_mono_AE:
hoelzl@56993
  1847
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1848
  assumes "integrable M f" "integrable M g" "AE x in M. f x \<le> g x"
hoelzl@56993
  1849
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f \<le> integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1850
proof -
hoelzl@56993
  1851
  have "0 \<le> integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x - f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1852
    using assms by (intro integral_nonneg_AE integrable_diff assms) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1853
  also have "\<dots> = integral\<^sup>L M g - integral\<^sup>L M f"
hoelzl@56993
  1854
    by (intro integral_diff assms)
hoelzl@56993
  1855
  finally show ?thesis by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1856
qed
hoelzl@56993
  1857
hoelzl@56993
  1858
lemma integral_mono:
hoelzl@56993
  1859
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1860
  shows "integrable M f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M g \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x \<le> g x) \<Longrightarrow> 
hoelzl@56993
  1861
    integral\<^sup>L M f \<le> integral\<^sup>L M g"
hoelzl@56993
  1862
  by (intro integral_mono_AE) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1863
hoelzl@57025
  1864
lemma (in finite_measure) integrable_measure: 
hoelzl@57025
  1865
  assumes I: "disjoint_family_on X I" "countable I"
hoelzl@57025
  1866
  shows "integrable (count_space I) (\<lambda>i. measure M (X i))"
hoelzl@57025
  1867
proof -
hoelzl@57025
  1868
  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+i. measure M (X i) \<partial>count_space I) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. measure M (if X i \<in> sets M then X i else {}) \<partial>count_space I)"
hoelzl@57025
  1869
    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong measure_notin_sets)
hoelzl@57025
  1870
  also have "\<dots> = measure M (\<Union>i\<in>I. if X i \<in> sets M then X i else {})"
hoelzl@57025
  1871
    using I unfolding emeasure_eq_measure[symmetric]
hoelzl@57025
  1872
    by (subst emeasure_UN_countable) (auto simp: disjoint_family_on_def)
hoelzl@57025
  1873
  finally show ?thesis
hoelzl@57025
  1874
    by (auto intro!: integrableI_bounded simp: measure_nonneg)
hoelzl@57025
  1875
qed
hoelzl@57025
  1876
hoelzl@57025
  1877
lemma integrableI_real_bounded:
hoelzl@57025
  1878
  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and ae: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x" and fin: "integral\<^sup>N M f < \<infinity>"
hoelzl@57025
  1879
  shows "integrable M f"
hoelzl@57025
  1880
proof (rule integrableI_bounded)
hoelzl@57025
  1881
  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) = \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (f x) \<partial>M"
hoelzl@57025
  1882
    using ae by (auto intro: nn_integral_cong_AE)
hoelzl@57025
  1883
  also note fin
hoelzl@57025
  1884
  finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (norm (f x)) \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" .
hoelzl@57025
  1885
qed fact
hoelzl@57025
  1886
hoelzl@57025
  1887
lemma integral_real_bounded:
hoelzl@57166
  1888
  assumes "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x" "integral\<^sup>N M f \<le> ereal r"
hoelzl@57025
  1889
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f \<le> r"
hoelzl@57166
  1890
proof cases
hoelzl@57166
  1891
  assume "integrable M f" from nn_integral_eq_integral[OF this] assms show ?thesis
hoelzl@57025
  1892
    by simp
hoelzl@57166
  1893
next
hoelzl@57166
  1894
  assume "\<not> integrable M f"
hoelzl@57166
  1895
  moreover have "0 \<le> ereal r"
hoelzl@57166
  1896
    using nn_integral_nonneg assms(2) by (rule order_trans)
hoelzl@57166
  1897
  ultimately show ?thesis
hoelzl@57166
  1898
    by (simp add: not_integrable_integral_eq)
hoelzl@57025
  1899
qed
hoelzl@57025
  1900
wenzelm@61808
  1901
subsection \<open>Restricted measure spaces\<close>
hoelzl@57137
  1902
hoelzl@57137
  1903
lemma integrable_restrict_space:
hoelzl@57137
  1904
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57137
  1905
  assumes \<Omega>[simp]: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57137
  1906
  shows "integrable (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57137
  1907
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded
hoelzl@57137
  1908
    borel_measurable_restrict_space_iff[OF \<Omega>]
hoelzl@57137
  1909
    nn_integral_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>]
hoelzl@57137
  1910
  by (simp add: ac_simps ereal_indicator times_ereal.simps(1)[symmetric] del: times_ereal.simps)
hoelzl@57137
  1911
hoelzl@57137
  1912
lemma integral_restrict_space:
hoelzl@57137
  1913
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@57137
  1914
  assumes \<Omega>[simp]: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
hoelzl@57137
  1915
  shows "integral\<^sup>L (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f = integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57137
  1916
proof (rule integral_eq_cases)
hoelzl@57137
  1917
  assume "integrable (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f"
hoelzl@57137
  1918
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@57137
  1919
  proof induct
hoelzl@57137
  1920
    case (base A c) then show ?case
hoelzl@57137
  1921
      by (simp add: indicator_inter_arith[symmetric] sets_restrict_space_iff
hoelzl@57137
  1922
                    emeasure_restrict_space Int_absorb1 measure_restrict_space)
hoelzl@57137
  1923
  next
hoelzl@57137
  1924
    case (add g f) then show ?case
hoelzl@57137
  1925
      by (simp add: scaleR_add_right integrable_restrict_space)
hoelzl@57137
  1926
  next
hoelzl@57137
  1927
    case (lim f s)
hoelzl@57137
  1928
    show ?case
hoelzl@57137
  1929
    proof (rule LIMSEQ_unique)
wenzelm@61969
  1930
      show "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L (restrict_space M \<Omega>) (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f"
hoelzl@57137
  1931
        using lim by (intro integral_dominated_convergence[where w="\<lambda>x. 2 * norm (f x)"]) simp_all
hoelzl@57137
  1932
      
wenzelm@61969
  1933
      show "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L (restrict_space M \<Omega>) (s i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<integral> x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@57137
  1934
        unfolding lim
hoelzl@57137
  1935
        using lim
hoelzl@57137
  1936
        by (intro integral_dominated_convergence[where w="\<lambda>x. 2 * norm (indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"])
hoelzl@57137
  1937
           (auto simp add: space_restrict_space integrable_restrict_space
hoelzl@57137
  1938
                 simp del: norm_scaleR
hoelzl@57137
  1939
                 split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@57137
  1940
    qed
hoelzl@57137
  1941
  qed
hoelzl@57137
  1942
qed (simp add: integrable_restrict_space)
hoelzl@57137
  1943
Andreas@60066
  1944
lemma integral_empty:
Andreas@60066
  1945
  assumes "space M = {}"
Andreas@60066
  1946
  shows "integral\<^sup>L M f = 0"
Andreas@60066
  1947
proof -
Andreas@60066
  1948
  have "(\<integral> x. f x \<partial>M) = (\<integral> x. 0 \<partial>M)"
Andreas@60066
  1949
    by(rule integral_cong)(simp_all add: assms)
Andreas@60066
  1950
  thus ?thesis by simp
Andreas@60066
  1951
qed
Andreas@60066
  1952
wenzelm@61808
  1953
subsection \<open>Measure spaces with an associated density\<close>
hoelzl@56993
  1954
hoelzl@56993
  1955
lemma integrable_density:
hoelzl@56993
  1956
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}" and g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1957
  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1958
    and nn: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> g x"
hoelzl@56993
  1959
  shows "integrable (density M g) f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1960
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded using nn
hoelzl@56996
  1961
  apply (simp add: nn_integral_density )
hoelzl@56996
  1962
  apply (intro arg_cong2[where f="op ="] refl nn_integral_cong_AE)
hoelzl@56993
  1963
  apply auto
hoelzl@56993
  1964
  done
hoelzl@56993
  1965
hoelzl@56993
  1966
lemma integral_density:
hoelzl@56993
  1967
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}" and g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  1968
  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1969
    and g[measurable]: "g \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> g x"
hoelzl@56993
  1970
  shows "integral\<^sup>L (density M g) f = integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1971
proof (rule integral_eq_cases)
hoelzl@56993
  1972
  assume "integrable (density M g) f"
hoelzl@56993
  1973
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  1974
  proof induct
hoelzl@56993
  1975
    case (base A c)
hoelzl@56993
  1976
    then have [measurable]: "A \<in> sets M" by auto
hoelzl@56993
  1977
  
hoelzl@56993
  1978
    have int: "integrable M (\<lambda>x. g x * indicator A x)"
hoelzl@56993
  1979
      using g base integrable_density[of "indicator A :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real" M g] by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1980
    then have "integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x * indicator A x) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (g x * indicator A x) \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1981
      using g by (subst nn_integral_eq_integral) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1982
    also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ereal (g x) * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56996
  1983
      by (intro nn_integral_cong) (auto split: split_indicator)
hoelzl@56993
  1984
    also have "\<dots> = emeasure (density M g) A"
hoelzl@56993
  1985
      by (rule emeasure_density[symmetric]) auto
hoelzl@56993
  1986
    also have "\<dots> = ereal (measure (density M g) A)"
hoelzl@56993
  1987
      using base by (auto intro: emeasure_eq_ereal_measure)
hoelzl@56993
  1988
    also have "\<dots> = integral\<^sup>L (density M g) (indicator A)"
hoelzl@56993
  1989
      using base by simp
hoelzl@56993
  1990
    finally show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1991
      using base by (simp add: int)
hoelzl@56993
  1992
  next
hoelzl@56993
  1993
    case (add f h)
hoelzl@56993
  1994
    then have [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "h \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  1995
      by (auto dest!: borel_measurable_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  1996
    from add g show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  1997
      by (simp add: scaleR_add_right integrable_density)
hoelzl@56993
  1998
  next
hoelzl@56993
  1999
    case (lim f s)
hoelzl@56993
  2000
    have [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "\<And>i. s i \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  2001
      using lim(1,5)[THEN borel_measurable_integrable] by auto
hoelzl@56993
  2002
  
hoelzl@56993
  2003
    show ?case
hoelzl@56993
  2004
    proof (rule LIMSEQ_unique)
wenzelm@61969
  2005
      show "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R s i x)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@57137
  2006
      proof (rule integral_dominated_convergence)
hoelzl@56993
  2007
        show "integrable M (\<lambda>x. 2 * norm (g x *\<^sub>R f x))"
hoelzl@56993
  2008
          by (intro integrable_mult_right integrable_norm integrable_density[THEN iffD1] lim g) auto
wenzelm@61969
  2009
        show "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. g x *\<^sub>R s i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> g x *\<^sub>R f x"
hoelzl@56993
  2010
          using lim(3) by (auto intro!: tendsto_scaleR AE_I2[of M])
hoelzl@56993
  2011
        show "\<And>i. AE x in M. norm (g x *\<^sub>R s i x) \<le> 2 * norm (g x *\<^sub>R f x)"
hoelzl@56993
  2012
          using lim(4) g by (auto intro!: AE_I2[of M] mult_left_mono simp: field_simps)
hoelzl@56993
  2013
      qed auto
wenzelm@61969
  2014
      show "(\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R s i x)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>L (density M g) f"
hoelzl@56993
  2015
        unfolding lim(2)[symmetric]
hoelzl@57137
  2016
        by (rule integral_dominated_convergence[where w="\<lambda>x. 2 * norm (f x)"])
hoelzl@57036
  2017
           (insert lim(3-5), auto)
hoelzl@56993
  2018
    qed
hoelzl@56993
  2019
  qed
hoelzl@56993
  2020
qed (simp add: f g integrable_density)
hoelzl@56993
  2021
hoelzl@56993
  2022
lemma
hoelzl@56993
  2023
  fixes g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  2024
  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
hoelzl@56993
  2025
  shows integral_real_density: "integral\<^sup>L (density M f) g = (\<integral> x. f x * g x \<partial>M)"
hoelzl@56993
  2026
    and integrable_real_density: "integrable (density M f) g \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f x * g x)"
hoelzl@56993
  2027
  using assms integral_density[of g M f] integrable_density[of g M f] by auto
hoelzl@56993
  2028
hoelzl@56993
  2029
lemma has_bochner_integral_density:
hoelzl@56993
  2030
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}" and g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@56993
  2031
  shows "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. 0 \<le> g x) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@56993
  2032
    has_bochner_integral M (\<lambda>x. g x *\<^sub>R f x) x \<Longrightarrow> has_bochner_integral (density M g) f x"
hoelzl@56993
  2033
  by (simp add: has_bochner_integral_iff integrable_density integral_density)
hoelzl@56993
  2034
wenzelm@61808
  2035
subsection \<open>Distributions\<close>
hoelzl@56993
  2036
hoelzl@56993
  2037
lemma integrable_distr_eq:
hoelzl@56993
  2038
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  2039
  assumes [measurable]: "g \<in> measurable M N" "f \<in> borel_measurable N"
hoelzl@56993
  2040
  shows "integrable (distr M N g) f \<longleftrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f (g x))"
hoelzl@56996
  2041
  unfolding integrable_iff_bounded by (simp_all add: nn_integral_distr)
hoelzl@56993
  2042
hoelzl@56993
  2043
lemma integrable_distr:
hoelzl@56993
  2044
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  2045
  shows "T \<in> measurable M M' \<Longrightarrow> integrable (distr M M' T) f \<Longrightarrow> integrable M (\<lambda>x. f (T x))"
hoelzl@56993
  2046
  by (subst integrable_distr_eq[symmetric, where g=T])
hoelzl@56993
  2047
     (auto dest: borel_measurable_integrable)
hoelzl@56993
  2048
hoelzl@56993
  2049
lemma integral_distr:
hoelzl@56993
  2050
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{banach, second_countable_topology}"
hoelzl@56993
  2051
  assumes g[measurable]: "g \<in> measurable M N" and f: "f \<in> borel_measurable N"
hoelzl@56993
  2052
  shows "integral\<^sup>L (distr M N g) f = integral\<^sup>L M (\<lambda>x. f (g x))"
hoelzl@56993
  2053
proof (rule integral_eq_cases)
hoelzl@56993
  2054
  assume "integrable (distr M N g) f"
hoelzl@56993
  2055
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@56993
  2056
  proof induct
hoelzl@56993
  2057
    case (base A c)
hoelzl@56993
  2058
    then have [measurable]: "A \<in> sets N" by auto