src/ZF/Arith.ML
 author lcp Fri Sep 17 16:16:38 1993 +0200 (1993-09-17) changeset 6 8ce8c4d13d4d parent 0 a5a9c433f639 child 14 1c0926788772 permissions -rw-r--r--
Installation of new simplifier for ZF. Deleted all congruence rules not
involving local assumptions. NB the congruence rules for Sigma and Pi
(dependent type constructions) cause difficulties and are not used by
default.
 clasohm@0 ` 1` ```(* Title: ZF/arith.ML ``` clasohm@0 ` 2` ``` ID: \$Id\$ ``` clasohm@0 ` 3` ``` Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory ``` clasohm@0 ` 4` ``` Copyright 1992 University of Cambridge ``` clasohm@0 ` 5` clasohm@0 ` 6` ```For arith.thy. Arithmetic operators and their definitions ``` clasohm@0 ` 7` clasohm@0 ` 8` ```Proofs about elementary arithmetic: addition, multiplication, etc. ``` clasohm@0 ` 9` clasohm@0 ` 10` ```Could prove def_rec_0, def_rec_succ... ``` clasohm@0 ` 11` ```*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 12` clasohm@0 ` 13` ```open Arith; ``` clasohm@0 ` 14` clasohm@0 ` 15` ```(*"Difference" is subtraction of natural numbers. ``` clasohm@0 ` 16` ``` There are no negative numbers; we have ``` clasohm@0 ` 17` ``` m #- n = 0 iff m<=n and m #- n = succ(k) iff m>n. ``` clasohm@0 ` 18` ``` Also, rec(m, 0, %z w.z) is pred(m). ``` clasohm@0 ` 19` ```*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 20` clasohm@0 ` 21` ```(** rec -- better than nat_rec; the succ case has no type requirement! **) ``` clasohm@0 ` 22` clasohm@0 ` 23` ```val rec_trans = rec_def RS def_transrec RS trans; ``` clasohm@0 ` 24` clasohm@0 ` 25` ```goal Arith.thy "rec(0,a,b) = a"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 26` ```by (rtac rec_trans 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 27` ```by (rtac nat_case_0 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 28` ```val rec_0 = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 29` clasohm@0 ` 30` ```goal Arith.thy "rec(succ(m),a,b) = b(m, rec(m,a,b))"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 31` ```val rec_ss = ZF_ss ``` lcp@6 ` 32` ``` addsimps [nat_case_succ, nat_succI]; ``` clasohm@0 ` 33` ```by (rtac rec_trans 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 34` ```by (simp_tac rec_ss 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 35` ```val rec_succ = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 36` clasohm@0 ` 37` ```val major::prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 38` ``` "[| n: nat; \ ``` clasohm@0 ` 39` ```\ a: C(0); \ ``` clasohm@0 ` 40` ```\ !!m z. [| m: nat; z: C(m) |] ==> b(m,z): C(succ(m)) \ ``` clasohm@0 ` 41` ```\ |] ==> rec(n,a,b) : C(n)"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 42` ```by (rtac (major RS nat_induct) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 43` ```by (ALLGOALS ``` lcp@6 ` 44` ``` (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps (prems@[rec_0,rec_succ])))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 45` ```val rec_type = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 46` clasohm@0 ` 47` ```val nat_typechecks = [rec_type,nat_0I,nat_1I,nat_succI,Ord_nat]; ``` clasohm@0 ` 48` lcp@6 ` 49` ```val nat_ss = ZF_ss addsimps ([rec_0,rec_succ] @ nat_typechecks); ``` clasohm@0 ` 50` clasohm@0 ` 51` clasohm@0 ` 52` ```(** Addition **) ``` clasohm@0 ` 53` clasohm@0 ` 54` ```val add_type = prove_goalw Arith.thy [add_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 55` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #+ n : nat" ``` clasohm@0 ` 56` ``` (fn prems=> [ (typechk_tac (prems@nat_typechecks@ZF_typechecks)) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 57` clasohm@0 ` 58` ```val add_0 = prove_goalw Arith.thy [add_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 59` ``` "0 #+ n = n" ``` clasohm@0 ` 60` ``` (fn _ => [ (rtac rec_0 1) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 61` clasohm@0 ` 62` ```val add_succ = prove_goalw Arith.thy [add_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 63` ``` "succ(m) #+ n = succ(m #+ n)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 64` ``` (fn _=> [ (rtac rec_succ 1) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 65` clasohm@0 ` 66` ```(** Multiplication **) ``` clasohm@0 ` 67` clasohm@0 ` 68` ```val mult_type = prove_goalw Arith.thy [mult_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 69` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #* n : nat" ``` clasohm@0 ` 70` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 71` ``` [ (typechk_tac (prems@[add_type]@nat_typechecks@ZF_typechecks)) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 72` clasohm@0 ` 73` ```val mult_0 = prove_goalw Arith.thy [mult_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 74` ``` "0 #* n = 0" ``` clasohm@0 ` 75` ``` (fn _ => [ (rtac rec_0 1) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 76` clasohm@0 ` 77` ```val mult_succ = prove_goalw Arith.thy [mult_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 78` ``` "succ(m) #* n = n #+ (m #* n)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 79` ``` (fn _ => [ (rtac rec_succ 1) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 80` clasohm@0 ` 81` ```(** Difference **) ``` clasohm@0 ` 82` clasohm@0 ` 83` ```val diff_type = prove_goalw Arith.thy [diff_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 84` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #- n : nat" ``` clasohm@0 ` 85` ``` (fn prems=> [ (typechk_tac (prems@nat_typechecks@ZF_typechecks)) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 86` clasohm@0 ` 87` ```val diff_0 = prove_goalw Arith.thy [diff_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 88` ``` "m #- 0 = m" ``` clasohm@0 ` 89` ``` (fn _ => [ (rtac rec_0 1) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 90` clasohm@0 ` 91` ```val diff_0_eq_0 = prove_goalw Arith.thy [diff_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 92` ``` "n:nat ==> 0 #- n = 0" ``` clasohm@0 ` 93` ``` (fn [prem]=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 94` ``` [ (rtac (prem RS nat_induct) 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 95` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac nat_ss)) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 96` clasohm@0 ` 97` ```(*Must simplify BEFORE the induction!! (Else we get a critical pair) ``` clasohm@0 ` 98` ``` succ(m) #- succ(n) rewrites to pred(succ(m) #- n) *) ``` clasohm@0 ` 99` ```val diff_succ_succ = prove_goalw Arith.thy [diff_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 100` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> succ(m) #- succ(n) = m #- n" ``` clasohm@0 ` 101` ``` (fn prems=> ``` lcp@6 ` 102` ``` [ (asm_simp_tac (nat_ss addsimps prems) 1), ``` clasohm@0 ` 103` ``` (nat_ind_tac "n" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 104` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (nat_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 105` clasohm@0 ` 106` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 107` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #- n : succ(m)"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 108` ```by (res_inst_tac [("m","m"),("n","n")] diff_induct 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 109` ```by (resolve_tac prems 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 110` ```by (resolve_tac prems 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 111` ```by (etac succE 3); ``` clasohm@0 ` 112` ```by (ALLGOALS ``` lcp@6 ` 113` ``` (asm_simp_tac ``` lcp@6 ` 114` ``` (nat_ss addsimps (prems@[diff_0,diff_0_eq_0,diff_succ_succ])))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 115` ```val diff_leq = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 116` clasohm@0 ` 117` ```(*** Simplification over add, mult, diff ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 118` clasohm@0 ` 119` ```val arith_typechecks = [add_type, mult_type, diff_type]; ``` clasohm@0 ` 120` ```val arith_rews = [add_0, add_succ, ``` clasohm@0 ` 121` ``` mult_0, mult_succ, ``` clasohm@0 ` 122` ``` diff_0, diff_0_eq_0, diff_succ_succ]; ``` clasohm@0 ` 123` lcp@6 ` 124` ```val arith_ss = nat_ss addsimps (arith_rews@arith_typechecks); ``` clasohm@0 ` 125` clasohm@0 ` 126` ```(*** Addition ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 127` clasohm@0 ` 128` ```(*Associative law for addition*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 129` ```val add_assoc = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 130` ``` "m:nat ==> (m #+ n) #+ k = m #+ (n #+ k)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 131` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 132` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 133` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 134` clasohm@0 ` 135` ```(*The following two lemmas are used for add_commute and sometimes ``` clasohm@0 ` 136` ``` elsewhere, since they are safe for rewriting.*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 137` ```val add_0_right = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 138` ``` "m:nat ==> m #+ 0 = m" ``` clasohm@0 ` 139` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 140` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 141` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 142` clasohm@0 ` 143` ```val add_succ_right = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 144` ``` "m:nat ==> m #+ succ(n) = succ(m #+ n)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 145` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 146` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 147` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 148` clasohm@0 ` 149` ```(*Commutative law for addition*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 150` ```val add_commute = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 151` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #+ n = n #+ m" ``` clasohm@0 ` 152` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 153` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "n" prems 1), ``` clasohm@0 ` 154` ``` (ALLGOALS ``` lcp@6 ` 155` ``` (asm_simp_tac ``` lcp@6 ` 156` ``` (arith_ss addsimps (prems@[add_0_right, add_succ_right])))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 157` clasohm@0 ` 158` ```(*Cancellation law on the left*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 159` ```val [knat,eqn] = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 160` ``` "[| k:nat; k #+ m = k #+ n |] ==> m=n"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 161` ```by (rtac (eqn RS rev_mp) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 162` ```by (nat_ind_tac "k" [knat] 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 163` ```by (ALLGOALS (simp_tac arith_ss)); ``` clasohm@0 ` 164` ```by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 165` ```val add_left_cancel = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 166` clasohm@0 ` 167` ```(*** Multiplication ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 168` clasohm@0 ` 169` ```(*right annihilation in product*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 170` ```val mult_0_right = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 171` ``` "m:nat ==> m #* 0 = 0" ``` clasohm@0 ` 172` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 173` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 174` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 175` clasohm@0 ` 176` ```(*right successor law for multiplication*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 177` ```val mult_succ_right = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` lcp@6 ` 178` ``` "!!m n. [| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #* succ(n) = m #+ (m #* n)" ``` lcp@6 ` 179` ``` (fn _=> ``` lcp@6 ` 180` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" [] 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 181` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps [add_assoc RS sym]))), ``` clasohm@0 ` 182` ``` (*The final goal requires the commutative law for addition*) ``` lcp@6 ` 183` ``` (rtac (add_commute RS subst_context) 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 184` ``` (REPEAT (assume_tac 1)) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 185` clasohm@0 ` 186` ```(*Commutative law for multiplication*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 187` ```val mult_commute = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 188` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m #* n = n #* m" ``` clasohm@0 ` 189` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 190` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 191` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac ``` lcp@6 ` 192` ``` (arith_ss addsimps (prems@[mult_0_right, mult_succ_right])))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 193` clasohm@0 ` 194` ```(*addition distributes over multiplication*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 195` ```val add_mult_distrib = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 196` ``` "[| m:nat; k:nat |] ==> (m #+ n) #* k = (m #* k) #+ (n #* k)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 197` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 198` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 199` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps ([add_assoc RS sym]@prems)))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 200` clasohm@0 ` 201` ```(*Distributive law on the left; requires an extra typing premise*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 202` ```val add_mult_distrib_left = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 203` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat; k:nat |] ==> k #* (m #+ n) = (k #* m) #+ (k #* n)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 204` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 205` ``` let val mult_commute' = read_instantiate [("m","k")] mult_commute ``` lcp@6 ` 206` ``` val ss = arith_ss addsimps ([mult_commute',add_mult_distrib]@prems) ``` lcp@6 ` 207` ``` in [ (simp_tac ss 1) ] ``` clasohm@0 ` 208` ``` end); ``` clasohm@0 ` 209` clasohm@0 ` 210` ```(*Associative law for multiplication*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 211` ```val mult_assoc = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 212` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat; k:nat |] ==> (m #* n) #* k = m #* (n #* k)" ``` clasohm@0 ` 213` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 214` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 215` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps (prems@[add_mult_distrib])))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 216` clasohm@0 ` 217` clasohm@0 ` 218` ```(*** Difference ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 219` clasohm@0 ` 220` ```val diff_self_eq_0 = prove_goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 221` ``` "m:nat ==> m #- m = 0" ``` clasohm@0 ` 222` ``` (fn prems=> ``` clasohm@0 ` 223` ``` [ (nat_ind_tac "m" prems 1), ``` lcp@6 ` 224` ``` (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps prems))) ]); ``` clasohm@0 ` 225` clasohm@0 ` 226` ```(*Addition is the inverse of subtraction: if n<=m then n+(m-n) = m. *) ``` clasohm@0 ` 227` ```val notless::prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 228` ``` "[| ~m:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> n #+ (m#-n) = m"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 229` ```by (rtac (notless RS rev_mp) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 230` ```by (res_inst_tac [("m","m"),("n","n")] diff_induct 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 231` ```by (resolve_tac prems 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 232` ```by (resolve_tac prems 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 233` ```by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac ``` lcp@6 ` 234` ``` (arith_ss addsimps (prems@[succ_mem_succ_iff, Ord_0_mem_succ, ``` clasohm@0 ` 235` ``` naturals_are_ordinals])))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 236` ```val add_diff_inverse = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 237` clasohm@0 ` 238` clasohm@0 ` 239` ```(*Subtraction is the inverse of addition. *) ``` clasohm@0 ` 240` ```val [mnat,nnat] = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 241` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> (n#+m) #-n = m"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 242` ```by (rtac (nnat RS nat_induct) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 243` ```by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps [mnat]))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 244` ```val diff_add_inverse = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 245` clasohm@0 ` 246` ```val [mnat,nnat] = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 247` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> n #- (n#+m) = 0"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 248` ```by (rtac (nnat RS nat_induct) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 249` ```by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps [mnat]))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 250` ```val diff_add_0 = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 251` clasohm@0 ` 252` clasohm@0 ` 253` ```(*** Remainder ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 254` clasohm@0 ` 255` ```(*In ordinary notation: if 0 m #- n : m"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 257` ```by (etac rev_mp 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 258` ```by (etac rev_mp 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 259` ```by (res_inst_tac [("m","m"),("n","n")] diff_induct 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 260` ```by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (nat_ss addsimps [diff_leq,diff_succ_succ]))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 261` ```val div_termination = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 262` clasohm@0 ` 263` ```val div_rls = ``` clasohm@0 ` 264` ``` [Ord_transrec_type, apply_type, div_termination, if_type] @ ``` clasohm@0 ` 265` ``` nat_typechecks; ``` clasohm@0 ` 266` clasohm@0 ` 267` ```(*Type checking depends upon termination!*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 268` ```val prems = goalw Arith.thy [mod_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 269` ``` "[| 0:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m mod n : nat"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 270` ```by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ div_rls) 1 ORELSE etac Ord_trans 1)); ``` clasohm@0 ` 271` ```val mod_type = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 272` lcp@6 ` 273` ```val div_ss = ZF_ss addsimps [naturals_are_ordinals,div_termination]; ``` clasohm@0 ` 274` clasohm@0 ` 275` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy "[| 0:n; m:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m mod n = m"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 276` ```by (rtac (mod_def RS def_transrec RS trans) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 277` ```by (simp_tac (div_ss addsimps prems) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 278` ```val mod_less = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 279` clasohm@0 ` 280` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 281` ``` "[| 0:n; ~m:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m mod n = (m#-n) mod n"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 282` ```by (rtac (mod_def RS def_transrec RS trans) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 283` ```by (simp_tac (div_ss addsimps prems) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 284` ```val mod_geq = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 285` clasohm@0 ` 286` ```(*** Quotient ***) ``` clasohm@0 ` 287` clasohm@0 ` 288` ```(*Type checking depends upon termination!*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 289` ```val prems = goalw Arith.thy [div_def] ``` clasohm@0 ` 290` ``` "[| 0:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m div n : nat"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 291` ```by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ div_rls) 1 ORELSE etac Ord_trans 1)); ``` clasohm@0 ` 292` ```val div_type = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 293` clasohm@0 ` 294` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 295` ``` "[| 0:n; m:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m div n = 0"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 296` ```by (rtac (div_def RS def_transrec RS trans) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 297` ```by (simp_tac (div_ss addsimps prems) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 298` ```val div_less = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 299` clasohm@0 ` 300` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 301` ``` "[| 0:n; ~m:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m div n = succ((m#-n) div n)"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 302` ```by (rtac (div_def RS def_transrec RS trans) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 303` ```by (simp_tac (div_ss addsimps prems) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 304` ```val div_geq = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 305` clasohm@0 ` 306` ```(*Main Result.*) ``` clasohm@0 ` 307` ```val prems = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 308` ``` "[| 0:n; m:nat; n:nat |] ==> (m div n)#*n #+ m mod n = m"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 309` ```by (res_inst_tac [("i","m")] complete_induct 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 310` ```by (resolve_tac prems 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 311` ```by (res_inst_tac [("Q","x:n")] (excluded_middle RS disjE) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 312` ```by (ALLGOALS ``` lcp@6 ` 313` ``` (asm_simp_tac ``` lcp@6 ` 314` ``` (arith_ss addsimps ([mod_type,div_type] @ prems @ ``` clasohm@0 ` 315` ``` [mod_less,mod_geq, div_less, div_geq, ``` clasohm@0 ` 316` ``` add_assoc, add_diff_inverse, div_termination])))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 317` ```val mod_div_equality = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 318` clasohm@0 ` 319` clasohm@0 ` 320` ```(**** Additional theorems about "less than" ****) ``` clasohm@0 ` 321` clasohm@0 ` 322` ```val [mnat,nnat] = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 323` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> ~ (m #+ n) : n"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 324` ```by (rtac (mnat RS nat_induct) 1); ``` lcp@6 ` 325` ```by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (arith_ss addsimps [mem_not_refl]))); ``` clasohm@0 ` 326` ```by (rtac notI 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 327` ```by (etac notE 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 328` ```by (etac (succI1 RS Ord_trans) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 329` ```by (rtac (nnat RS naturals_are_ordinals) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 330` ```val add_not_less_self = result(); ``` clasohm@0 ` 331` clasohm@0 ` 332` ```val [mnat,nnat] = goal Arith.thy ``` clasohm@0 ` 333` ``` "[| m:nat; n:nat |] ==> m : succ(m #+ n)"; ``` clasohm@0 ` 334` ```by (rtac (mnat RS nat_induct) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 335` ```(*May not simplify even with ZF_ss because it would expand m:succ(...) *) ``` clasohm@0 ` 336` ```by (rtac (add_0 RS ssubst) 1); ``` clasohm@0 ` 337` ```by (rtac (add_succ RS ssubst) 2); ``` clasohm@0 ` 338` ```by (REPEAT (ares_tac [nnat, Ord_0_mem_succ, succ_mem_succI, ``` clasohm@0 ` 339` ``` naturals_are_ordinals, nat_succI, add_type] 1)); ``` clasohm@0 ` 340` ```val add_less_succ_self = result(); ```