src/HOL/Library/FuncSet.thy
author wenzelm
Fri May 13 20:24:10 2016 +0200 (2016-05-13)
changeset 63092 a949b2a5f51d
parent 63060 293ede07b775
child 64910 6108dddad9f0
permissions -rw-r--r--
eliminated use of empty "assms";
paulson@13586
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Library/FuncSet.thy
bulwahn@40631
     2
    Author:     Florian Kammueller and Lawrence C Paulson, Lukas Bulwahn
paulson@13586
     3
*)
paulson@13586
     4
wenzelm@58881
     5
section \<open>Pi and Function Sets\<close>
paulson@13586
     6
nipkow@15131
     7
theory FuncSet
haftmann@30663
     8
imports Hilbert_Choice Main
nipkow@15131
     9
begin
paulson@13586
    10
wenzelm@58783
    11
definition Pi :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b set) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"
wenzelm@58783
    12
  where "Pi A B = {f. \<forall>x. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x}"
paulson@13586
    13
wenzelm@58783
    14
definition extensional :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"
wenzelm@58783
    15
  where "extensional A = {f. \<forall>x. x \<notin> A \<longrightarrow> f x = undefined}"
paulson@13586
    16
wenzelm@58783
    17
definition "restrict" :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
wenzelm@58783
    18
  where "restrict f A = (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> A then f x else undefined)"
paulson@13586
    19
wenzelm@61384
    20
abbreviation funcset :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"  (infixr "\<rightarrow>" 60)
wenzelm@61384
    21
  where "A \<rightarrow> B \<equiv> Pi A (\<lambda>_. B)"
wenzelm@19536
    22
wenzelm@61955
    23
syntax (ASCII)
wenzelm@58783
    24
  "_Pi"  :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"  ("(3PI _:_./ _)" 10)
wenzelm@58783
    25
  "_lam" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b)"  ("(3%_:_./ _)" [0,0,3] 3)
wenzelm@61955
    26
syntax
wenzelm@58783
    27
  "_Pi" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"  ("(3\<Pi> _\<in>_./ _)"   10)
wenzelm@58783
    28
  "_lam" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b)"  ("(3\<lambda>_\<in>_./ _)" [0,0,3] 3)
paulson@13586
    29
translations
wenzelm@58783
    30
  "\<Pi> x\<in>A. B" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST Pi A (\<lambda>x. B)"
wenzelm@58783
    31
  "\<lambda>x\<in>A. f" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST restrict (\<lambda>x. f) A"
paulson@13586
    32
wenzelm@58783
    33
definition "compose" :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'c) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'c)"
wenzelm@58783
    34
  where "compose A g f = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. g (f x))"
paulson@13586
    35
paulson@13586
    36
wenzelm@58783
    37
subsection \<open>Basic Properties of @{term Pi}\<close>
paulson@13586
    38
wenzelm@58783
    39
lemma Pi_I[intro!]: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@14706
    40
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586
    41
wenzelm@58783
    42
lemma Pi_I'[simp]: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@58783
    43
  by (simp add:Pi_def)
nipkow@31731
    44
wenzelm@58783
    45
lemma funcsetI: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
wenzelm@14706
    46
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586
    47
wenzelm@58783
    48
lemma Pi_mem: "f \<in> Pi A B \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x"
wenzelm@14706
    49
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586
    50
hoelzl@47761
    51
lemma Pi_iff: "f \<in> Pi I X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>I. f i \<in> X i)"
hoelzl@47761
    52
  unfolding Pi_def by auto
hoelzl@47761
    53
wenzelm@58783
    54
lemma PiE [elim]: "f \<in> Pi A B \<Longrightarrow> (f x \<in> B x \<Longrightarrow> Q) \<Longrightarrow> (x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> Q) \<Longrightarrow> Q"
wenzelm@58783
    55
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
nipkow@31754
    56
wenzelm@58783
    57
lemma Pi_cong: "(\<And>w. w \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f w = g w) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> Pi A B \<longleftrightarrow> g \<in> Pi A B"
hoelzl@38656
    58
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@38656
    59
haftmann@31769
    60
lemma funcset_id [simp]: "(\<lambda>x. x) \<in> A \<rightarrow> A"
wenzelm@44382
    61
  by auto
haftmann@31769
    62
wenzelm@58783
    63
lemma funcset_mem: "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B"
wenzelm@14706
    64
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586
    65
wenzelm@58783
    66
lemma funcset_image: "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> f ` A \<subseteq> B"
hoelzl@50104
    67
  by auto
hoelzl@50104
    68
hoelzl@50104
    69
lemma image_subset_iff_funcset: "F ` A \<subseteq> B \<longleftrightarrow> F \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
hoelzl@50104
    70
  by auto
paulson@14762
    71
wenzelm@58783
    72
lemma Pi_eq_empty[simp]: "(\<Pi> x \<in> A. B x) = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>A. B x = {})"
wenzelm@58783
    73
  apply (simp add: Pi_def)
wenzelm@58783
    74
  apply auto
wenzelm@58783
    75
  txt \<open>Converse direction requires Axiom of Choice to exhibit a function
wenzelm@58783
    76
  picking an element from each non-empty @{term "B x"}\<close>
wenzelm@58783
    77
  apply (drule_tac x = "\<lambda>u. SOME y. y \<in> B u" in spec)
wenzelm@58783
    78
  apply auto
wenzelm@58783
    79
  apply (cut_tac P = "\<lambda>y. y \<in> B x" in some_eq_ex)
wenzelm@58783
    80
  apply auto
wenzelm@58783
    81
  done
paulson@13586
    82
paulson@13593
    83
lemma Pi_empty [simp]: "Pi {} B = UNIV"
wenzelm@58783
    84
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13593
    85
hoelzl@50123
    86
lemma Pi_Int: "Pi I E \<inter> Pi I F = (\<Pi> i\<in>I. E i \<inter> F i)"
hoelzl@50123
    87
  by auto
hoelzl@50123
    88
hoelzl@50123
    89
lemma Pi_UN:
hoelzl@50123
    90
  fixes A :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'i \<Rightarrow> 'a set"
wenzelm@58783
    91
  assumes "finite I"
wenzelm@58783
    92
    and mono: "\<And>i n m. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> A n i \<subseteq> A m i"
hoelzl@50123
    93
  shows "(\<Union>n. Pi I (A n)) = (\<Pi> i\<in>I. \<Union>n. A n i)"
hoelzl@50123
    94
proof (intro set_eqI iffI)
wenzelm@58783
    95
  fix f
wenzelm@58783
    96
  assume "f \<in> (\<Pi> i\<in>I. \<Union>n. A n i)"
wenzelm@58783
    97
  then have "\<forall>i\<in>I. \<exists>n. f i \<in> A n i"
wenzelm@58783
    98
    by auto
wenzelm@63060
    99
  from bchoice[OF this] obtain n where n: "f i \<in> A (n i) i" if "i \<in> I" for i
wenzelm@58783
   100
    by auto
wenzelm@63060
   101
  obtain k where k: "n i \<le> k" if "i \<in> I" for i
wenzelm@58783
   102
    using \<open>finite I\<close> finite_nat_set_iff_bounded_le[of "n`I"] by auto
hoelzl@50123
   103
  have "f \<in> Pi I (A k)"
hoelzl@50123
   104
  proof (intro Pi_I)
wenzelm@58783
   105
    fix i
wenzelm@58783
   106
    assume "i \<in> I"
hoelzl@50123
   107
    from mono[OF this, of "n i" k] k[OF this] n[OF this]
hoelzl@50123
   108
    show "f i \<in> A k i" by auto
hoelzl@50123
   109
  qed
wenzelm@58783
   110
  then show "f \<in> (\<Union>n. Pi I (A n))"
wenzelm@58783
   111
    by auto
hoelzl@50123
   112
qed auto
hoelzl@50123
   113
wenzelm@58783
   114
lemma Pi_UNIV [simp]: "A \<rightarrow> UNIV = UNIV"
wenzelm@58783
   115
  by (simp add: Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   116
wenzelm@58783
   117
text \<open>Covariance of Pi-sets in their second argument\<close>
wenzelm@58783
   118
lemma Pi_mono: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> B x \<subseteq> C x) \<Longrightarrow> Pi A B \<subseteq> Pi A C"
wenzelm@58783
   119
  by auto
paulson@13586
   120
wenzelm@58783
   121
text \<open>Contravariance of Pi-sets in their first argument\<close>
wenzelm@58783
   122
lemma Pi_anti_mono: "A' \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> Pi A B \<subseteq> Pi A' B"
wenzelm@58783
   123
  by auto
paulson@13586
   124
paulson@33271
   125
lemma prod_final:
wenzelm@58783
   126
  assumes 1: "fst \<circ> f \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@58783
   127
    and 2: "snd \<circ> f \<in> Pi A C"
paulson@33271
   128
  shows "f \<in> (\<Pi> z \<in> A. B z \<times> C z)"
wenzelm@58783
   129
proof (rule Pi_I)
paulson@33271
   130
  fix z
wenzelm@58783
   131
  assume z: "z \<in> A"
wenzelm@58783
   132
  have "f z = (fst (f z), snd (f z))"
paulson@33271
   133
    by simp
wenzelm@58783
   134
  also have "\<dots> \<in> B z \<times> C z"
wenzelm@58783
   135
    by (metis SigmaI PiE o_apply 1 2 z)
paulson@33271
   136
  finally show "f z \<in> B z \<times> C z" .
paulson@33271
   137
qed
paulson@33271
   138
hoelzl@50123
   139
lemma Pi_split_domain[simp]: "x \<in> Pi (I \<union> J) X \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I X \<and> x \<in> Pi J X"
hoelzl@50123
   140
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   141
hoelzl@50123
   142
lemma Pi_split_insert_domain[simp]: "x \<in> Pi (insert i I) X \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I X \<and> x i \<in> X i"
hoelzl@50123
   143
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   144
hoelzl@50123
   145
lemma Pi_cancel_fupd_range[simp]: "i \<notin> I \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I (B(i := b)) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I B"
hoelzl@50123
   146
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   147
hoelzl@50123
   148
lemma Pi_cancel_fupd[simp]: "i \<notin> I \<Longrightarrow> x(i := a) \<in> Pi I B \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I B"
hoelzl@50123
   149
  by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   150
hoelzl@50123
   151
lemma Pi_fupd_iff: "i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> Pi I (B(i := A)) \<longleftrightarrow> f \<in> Pi (I - {i}) B \<and> f i \<in> A"
hoelzl@50123
   152
  apply auto
hoelzl@50123
   153
  apply (drule_tac x=x in Pi_mem)
nipkow@62390
   154
  apply (simp_all split: if_split_asm)
hoelzl@50123
   155
  apply (drule_tac x=i in Pi_mem)
hoelzl@50123
   156
  apply (auto dest!: Pi_mem)
hoelzl@50123
   157
  done
paulson@13586
   158
wenzelm@58783
   159
wenzelm@58783
   160
subsection \<open>Composition With a Restricted Domain: @{term compose}\<close>
paulson@13586
   161
wenzelm@58783
   162
lemma funcset_compose: "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> B \<rightarrow> C \<Longrightarrow> compose A g f \<in> A \<rightarrow> C"
wenzelm@58783
   163
  by (simp add: Pi_def compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   164
paulson@13586
   165
lemma compose_assoc:
wenzelm@58783
   166
  assumes "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
wenzelm@58783
   167
    and "g \<in> B \<rightarrow> C"
wenzelm@58783
   168
    and "h \<in> C \<rightarrow> D"
wenzelm@58783
   169
  shows "compose A h (compose A g f) = compose A (compose B h g) f"
wenzelm@58783
   170
  using assms by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Pi_def compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   171
wenzelm@58783
   172
lemma compose_eq: "x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> compose A g f x = g (f x)"
wenzelm@58783
   173
  by (simp add: compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   174
wenzelm@58783
   175
lemma surj_compose: "f ` A = B \<Longrightarrow> g ` B = C \<Longrightarrow> compose A g f ` A = C"
wenzelm@14706
   176
  by (auto simp add: image_def compose_eq)
paulson@13586
   177
paulson@13586
   178
wenzelm@58783
   179
subsection \<open>Bounded Abstraction: @{term restrict}\<close>
paulson@13586
   180
hoelzl@61359
   181
lemma restrict_cong: "I = J \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. i \<in> J =simp=> f i = g i) \<Longrightarrow> restrict f I = restrict g J"
hoelzl@61359
   182
  by (auto simp: restrict_def fun_eq_iff simp_implies_def)
hoelzl@61359
   183
hoelzl@54417
   184
lemma restrict_in_funcset: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
wenzelm@14706
   185
  by (simp add: Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   186
hoelzl@54417
   187
lemma restrictI[intro!]: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@14706
   188
  by (simp add: Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   189
hoelzl@54417
   190
lemma restrict_apply[simp]: "(\<lambda>y\<in>A. f y) x = (if x \<in> A then f x else undefined)"
wenzelm@14706
   191
  by (simp add: restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   192
hoelzl@54417
   193
lemma restrict_apply': "x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>y\<in>A. f y) x = f x"
hoelzl@54417
   194
  by simp
hoelzl@54417
   195
wenzelm@58783
   196
lemma restrict_ext: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. g x)"
nipkow@39302
   197
  by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   198
hoelzl@58606
   199
lemma restrict_UNIV: "restrict f UNIV = f"
hoelzl@58606
   200
  by (simp add: restrict_def)
hoelzl@58606
   201
paulson@14853
   202
lemma inj_on_restrict_eq [simp]: "inj_on (restrict f A) A = inj_on f A"
wenzelm@14706
   203
  by (simp add: inj_on_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   204
wenzelm@58783
   205
lemma Id_compose: "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> compose A (\<lambda>y\<in>B. y) f = f"
nipkow@39302
   206
  by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff compose_def extensional_def Pi_def)
paulson@13586
   207
wenzelm@58783
   208
lemma compose_Id: "g \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> compose A g (\<lambda>x\<in>A. x) = g"
nipkow@39302
   209
  by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff compose_def extensional_def Pi_def)
paulson@13586
   210
paulson@14853
   211
lemma image_restrict_eq [simp]: "(restrict f A) ` A = f ` A"
wenzelm@19736
   212
  by (auto simp add: restrict_def)
paulson@13586
   213
hoelzl@50123
   214
lemma restrict_restrict[simp]: "restrict (restrict f A) B = restrict f (A \<inter> B)"
hoelzl@50123
   215
  unfolding restrict_def by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
hoelzl@50123
   216
hoelzl@50123
   217
lemma restrict_fupd[simp]: "i \<notin> I \<Longrightarrow> restrict (f (i := x)) I = restrict f I"
hoelzl@50123
   218
  by (auto simp: restrict_def)
hoelzl@50123
   219
wenzelm@58783
   220
lemma restrict_upd[simp]: "i \<notin> I \<Longrightarrow> (restrict f I)(i := y) = restrict (f(i := y)) (insert i I)"
hoelzl@50123
   221
  by (auto simp: fun_eq_iff)
hoelzl@50123
   222
hoelzl@50123
   223
lemma restrict_Pi_cancel: "restrict x I \<in> Pi I A \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> Pi I A"
hoelzl@50123
   224
  by (auto simp: restrict_def Pi_def)
hoelzl@50123
   225
paulson@14745
   226
wenzelm@58783
   227
subsection \<open>Bijections Between Sets\<close>
paulson@14762
   228
wenzelm@61585
   229
text \<open>The definition of @{const bij_betw} is in \<open>Fun.thy\<close>, but most of
wenzelm@58783
   230
the theorems belong here, or need at least @{term Hilbert_Choice}.\<close>
paulson@14762
   231
nipkow@39595
   232
lemma bij_betwI:
wenzelm@58783
   233
  assumes "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
wenzelm@58783
   234
    and "g \<in> B \<rightarrow> A"
wenzelm@58783
   235
    and g_f: "\<And>x. x\<in>A \<Longrightarrow> g (f x) = x"
wenzelm@58783
   236
    and f_g: "\<And>y. y\<in>B \<Longrightarrow> f (g y) = y"
wenzelm@58783
   237
  shows "bij_betw f A B"
wenzelm@58783
   238
  unfolding bij_betw_def
nipkow@39595
   239
proof
wenzelm@58783
   240
  show "inj_on f A"
wenzelm@58783
   241
    by (metis g_f inj_on_def)
wenzelm@58783
   242
  have "f ` A \<subseteq> B"
wenzelm@58783
   243
    using \<open>f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B\<close> by auto
nipkow@39595
   244
  moreover
wenzelm@58783
   245
  have "B \<subseteq> f ` A"
wenzelm@58783
   246
    by auto (metis Pi_mem \<open>g \<in> B \<rightarrow> A\<close> f_g image_iff)
wenzelm@58783
   247
  ultimately show "f ` A = B"
wenzelm@58783
   248
    by blast
nipkow@39595
   249
qed
nipkow@39595
   250
paulson@14762
   251
lemma bij_betw_imp_funcset: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
wenzelm@58783
   252
  by (auto simp add: bij_betw_def)
paulson@14762
   253
wenzelm@58783
   254
lemma inj_on_compose: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> inj_on g B \<Longrightarrow> inj_on (compose A g f) A"
wenzelm@58783
   255
  by (auto simp add: bij_betw_def inj_on_def compose_eq)
paulson@14853
   256
wenzelm@58783
   257
lemma bij_betw_compose: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> bij_betw g B C \<Longrightarrow> bij_betw (compose A g f) A C"
wenzelm@58783
   258
  apply (simp add: bij_betw_def compose_eq inj_on_compose)
wenzelm@58783
   259
  apply (auto simp add: compose_def image_def)
wenzelm@58783
   260
  done
paulson@14762
   261
wenzelm@58783
   262
lemma bij_betw_restrict_eq [simp]: "bij_betw (restrict f A) A B = bij_betw f A B"
wenzelm@58783
   263
  by (simp add: bij_betw_def)
paulson@14853
   264
paulson@14853
   265
wenzelm@58783
   266
subsection \<open>Extensionality\<close>
paulson@14853
   267
hoelzl@50123
   268
lemma extensional_empty[simp]: "extensional {} = {\<lambda>x. undefined}"
hoelzl@50123
   269
  unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   270
wenzelm@58783
   271
lemma extensional_arb: "f \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = undefined"
wenzelm@58783
   272
  by (simp add: extensional_def)
paulson@14853
   273
paulson@14853
   274
lemma restrict_extensional [simp]: "restrict f A \<in> extensional A"
wenzelm@58783
   275
  by (simp add: restrict_def extensional_def)
paulson@14853
   276
paulson@14853
   277
lemma compose_extensional [simp]: "compose A f g \<in> extensional A"
wenzelm@58783
   278
  by (simp add: compose_def)
paulson@14853
   279
paulson@14853
   280
lemma extensionalityI:
wenzelm@58783
   281
  assumes "f \<in> extensional A"
wenzelm@58783
   282
    and "g \<in> extensional A"
wenzelm@58783
   283
    and "\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
wenzelm@58783
   284
  shows "f = g"
wenzelm@58783
   285
  using assms by (force simp add: fun_eq_iff extensional_def)
paulson@14853
   286
nipkow@39595
   287
lemma extensional_restrict:  "f \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> restrict f A = f"
wenzelm@58783
   288
  by (rule extensionalityI[OF restrict_extensional]) auto
nipkow@39595
   289
hoelzl@50123
   290
lemma extensional_subset: "f \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> extensional B"
hoelzl@50123
   291
  unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   292
wenzelm@58783
   293
lemma inv_into_funcset: "f ` A = B \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x\<in>B. inv_into A f x) \<in> B \<rightarrow> A"
wenzelm@58783
   294
  by (unfold inv_into_def) (fast intro: someI2)
paulson@14853
   295
wenzelm@58783
   296
lemma compose_inv_into_id: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> compose A (\<lambda>y\<in>B. inv_into A f y) f = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. x)"
wenzelm@58783
   297
  apply (simp add: bij_betw_def compose_def)
wenzelm@58783
   298
  apply (rule restrict_ext, auto)
wenzelm@58783
   299
  done
paulson@14853
   300
wenzelm@58783
   301
lemma compose_id_inv_into: "f ` A = B \<Longrightarrow> compose B f (\<lambda>y\<in>B. inv_into A f y) = (\<lambda>x\<in>B. x)"
wenzelm@58783
   302
  apply (simp add: compose_def)
wenzelm@58783
   303
  apply (rule restrict_ext)
wenzelm@58783
   304
  apply (simp add: f_inv_into_f)
wenzelm@58783
   305
  done
paulson@14853
   306
hoelzl@50123
   307
lemma extensional_insert[intro, simp]:
hoelzl@50123
   308
  assumes "a \<in> extensional (insert i I)"
hoelzl@50123
   309
  shows "a(i := b) \<in> extensional (insert i I)"
hoelzl@50123
   310
  using assms unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   311
wenzelm@58783
   312
lemma extensional_Int[simp]: "extensional I \<inter> extensional I' = extensional (I \<inter> I')"
hoelzl@50123
   313
  unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   314
hoelzl@50123
   315
lemma extensional_UNIV[simp]: "extensional UNIV = UNIV"
hoelzl@50123
   316
  by (auto simp: extensional_def)
hoelzl@50123
   317
hoelzl@50123
   318
lemma restrict_extensional_sub[intro]: "A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> restrict f A \<in> extensional B"
hoelzl@50123
   319
  unfolding restrict_def extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   320
hoelzl@50123
   321
lemma extensional_insert_undefined[intro, simp]:
hoelzl@50123
   322
  "a \<in> extensional (insert i I) \<Longrightarrow> a(i := undefined) \<in> extensional I"
hoelzl@50123
   323
  unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   324
hoelzl@50123
   325
lemma extensional_insert_cancel[intro, simp]:
hoelzl@50123
   326
  "a \<in> extensional I \<Longrightarrow> a \<in> extensional (insert i I)"
hoelzl@50123
   327
  unfolding extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   328
paulson@14762
   329
wenzelm@58783
   330
subsection \<open>Cardinality\<close>
paulson@14745
   331
wenzelm@58783
   332
lemma card_inj: "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B \<Longrightarrow> inj_on f A \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> card A \<le> card B"
wenzelm@58783
   333
  by (rule card_inj_on_le) auto
paulson@14745
   334
paulson@14745
   335
lemma card_bij:
wenzelm@58783
   336
  assumes "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B" "inj_on f A"
wenzelm@58783
   337
    and "g \<in> B \<rightarrow> A" "inj_on g B"
wenzelm@58783
   338
    and "finite A" "finite B"
wenzelm@58783
   339
  shows "card A = card B"
wenzelm@58783
   340
  using assms by (blast intro: card_inj order_antisym)
paulson@14745
   341
wenzelm@58783
   342
wenzelm@58783
   343
subsection \<open>Extensional Function Spaces\<close>
bulwahn@40631
   344
wenzelm@58783
   345
definition PiE :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b set) \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"
wenzelm@58783
   346
  where "PiE S T = Pi S T \<inter> extensional S"
hoelzl@50123
   347
wenzelm@53015
   348
abbreviation "Pi\<^sub>E A B \<equiv> PiE A B"
bulwahn@40631
   349
wenzelm@61955
   350
syntax (ASCII)
wenzelm@58783
   351
  "_PiE" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"  ("(3PIE _:_./ _)" 10)
wenzelm@61955
   352
syntax
wenzelm@58783
   353
  "_PiE" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set"  ("(3\<Pi>\<^sub>E _\<in>_./ _)" 10)
wenzelm@61955
   354
translations
wenzelm@61955
   355
  "\<Pi>\<^sub>E x\<in>A. B" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST Pi\<^sub>E A (\<lambda>x. B)"
hoelzl@50123
   356
wenzelm@61384
   357
abbreviation extensional_funcset :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set" (infixr "\<rightarrow>\<^sub>E" 60)
wenzelm@61384
   358
  where "A \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E B \<equiv> (\<Pi>\<^sub>E i\<in>A. B)"
bulwahn@40631
   359
wenzelm@58783
   360
lemma extensional_funcset_def: "extensional_funcset S T = (S \<rightarrow> T) \<inter> extensional S"
hoelzl@50123
   361
  by (simp add: PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   362
wenzelm@58783
   363
lemma PiE_empty_domain[simp]: "PiE {} T = {\<lambda>x. undefined}"
hoelzl@50123
   364
  unfolding PiE_def by simp
hoelzl@50123
   365
hoelzl@54417
   366
lemma PiE_UNIV_domain: "PiE UNIV T = Pi UNIV T"
hoelzl@54417
   367
  unfolding PiE_def by simp
hoelzl@54417
   368
wenzelm@58783
   369
lemma PiE_empty_range[simp]: "i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F i = {} \<Longrightarrow> (\<Pi>\<^sub>E i\<in>I. F i) = {}"
hoelzl@50123
   370
  unfolding PiE_def by auto
bulwahn@40631
   371
wenzelm@58783
   372
lemma PiE_eq_empty_iff: "Pi\<^sub>E I F = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>I. F i = {})"
hoelzl@50123
   373
proof
wenzelm@53015
   374
  assume "Pi\<^sub>E I F = {}"
hoelzl@50123
   375
  show "\<exists>i\<in>I. F i = {}"
hoelzl@50123
   376
  proof (rule ccontr)
hoelzl@50123
   377
    assume "\<not> ?thesis"
wenzelm@58783
   378
    then have "\<forall>i. \<exists>y. (i \<in> I \<longrightarrow> y \<in> F i) \<and> (i \<notin> I \<longrightarrow> y = undefined)"
wenzelm@58783
   379
      by auto
wenzelm@53381
   380
    from choice[OF this]
wenzelm@53381
   381
    obtain f where " \<forall>x. (x \<in> I \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> F x) \<and> (x \<notin> I \<longrightarrow> f x = undefined)" ..
wenzelm@58783
   382
    then have "f \<in> Pi\<^sub>E I F"
wenzelm@58783
   383
      by (auto simp: extensional_def PiE_def)
wenzelm@58783
   384
    with \<open>Pi\<^sub>E I F = {}\<close> show False
wenzelm@58783
   385
      by auto
hoelzl@50123
   386
  qed
hoelzl@50123
   387
qed (auto simp: PiE_def)
bulwahn@40631
   388
hoelzl@50123
   389
lemma PiE_arb: "f \<in> PiE S T \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> S \<Longrightarrow> f x = undefined"
hoelzl@50123
   390
  unfolding PiE_def by auto (auto dest!: extensional_arb)
hoelzl@50123
   391
hoelzl@50123
   392
lemma PiE_mem: "f \<in> PiE S T \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> T x"
hoelzl@50123
   393
  unfolding PiE_def by auto
bulwahn@40631
   394
hoelzl@50123
   395
lemma PiE_fun_upd: "y \<in> T x \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> PiE S T \<Longrightarrow> f(x := y) \<in> PiE (insert x S) T"
hoelzl@50123
   396
  unfolding PiE_def extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631
   397
hoelzl@50123
   398
lemma fun_upd_in_PiE: "x \<notin> S \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> PiE (insert x S) T \<Longrightarrow> f(x := undefined) \<in> PiE S T"
hoelzl@50123
   399
  unfolding PiE_def extensional_def by auto
hoelzl@50123
   400
hoelzl@59425
   401
lemma PiE_insert_eq: "PiE (insert x S) T = (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) ` (T x \<times> PiE S T)"
bulwahn@40631
   402
proof -
bulwahn@40631
   403
  {
hoelzl@59425
   404
    fix f assume "f \<in> PiE (insert x S) T" "x \<notin> S"
wenzelm@63092
   405
    then have "f \<in> (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) ` (T x \<times> PiE S T)"
hoelzl@50123
   406
      by (auto intro!: image_eqI[where x="(f x, f(x := undefined))"] intro: fun_upd_in_PiE PiE_mem)
bulwahn@40631
   407
  }
hoelzl@59425
   408
  moreover
hoelzl@59425
   409
  {
hoelzl@59425
   410
    fix f assume "f \<in> PiE (insert x S) T" "x \<in> S"
wenzelm@63092
   411
    then have "f \<in> (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) ` (T x \<times> PiE S T)"
hoelzl@59425
   412
      by (auto intro!: image_eqI[where x="(f x, f)"] intro: fun_upd_in_PiE PiE_mem simp: insert_absorb)
hoelzl@59425
   413
  }
hoelzl@59425
   414
  ultimately show ?thesis
wenzelm@63092
   415
    by (auto intro: PiE_fun_upd)
bulwahn@40631
   416
qed
bulwahn@40631
   417
wenzelm@58783
   418
lemma PiE_Int: "Pi\<^sub>E I A \<inter> Pi\<^sub>E I B = Pi\<^sub>E I (\<lambda>x. A x \<inter> B x)"
hoelzl@50123
   419
  by (auto simp: PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   420
wenzelm@58783
   421
lemma PiE_cong: "(\<And>i. i\<in>I \<Longrightarrow> A i = B i) \<Longrightarrow> Pi\<^sub>E I A = Pi\<^sub>E I B"
hoelzl@50123
   422
  unfolding PiE_def by (auto simp: Pi_cong)
hoelzl@50123
   423
hoelzl@50123
   424
lemma PiE_E [elim]:
wenzelm@58783
   425
  assumes "f \<in> PiE A B"
wenzelm@58783
   426
  obtains "x \<in> A" and "f x \<in> B x"
wenzelm@58783
   427
    | "x \<notin> A" and "f x = undefined"
wenzelm@58783
   428
  using assms by (auto simp: Pi_def PiE_def extensional_def)
hoelzl@50123
   429
wenzelm@58783
   430
lemma PiE_I[intro!]:
wenzelm@58783
   431
  "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> B x) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = undefined) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> PiE A B"
hoelzl@50123
   432
  by (simp add: PiE_def extensional_def)
hoelzl@50123
   433
hoelzl@50123
   434
lemma PiE_mono: "(\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> B x \<subseteq> C x) \<Longrightarrow> PiE A B \<subseteq> PiE A C"
hoelzl@50123
   435
  by auto
hoelzl@50123
   436
hoelzl@50123
   437
lemma PiE_iff: "f \<in> PiE I X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>I. f i \<in> X i) \<and> f \<in> extensional I"
hoelzl@50123
   438
  by (simp add: PiE_def Pi_iff)
hoelzl@50123
   439
hoelzl@50123
   440
lemma PiE_restrict[simp]:  "f \<in> PiE A B \<Longrightarrow> restrict f A = f"
hoelzl@50123
   441
  by (simp add: extensional_restrict PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   442
hoelzl@50123
   443
lemma restrict_PiE[simp]: "restrict f I \<in> PiE I S \<longleftrightarrow> f \<in> Pi I S"
hoelzl@50123
   444
  by (auto simp: PiE_iff)
hoelzl@50123
   445
hoelzl@50123
   446
lemma PiE_eq_subset:
hoelzl@50123
   447
  assumes ne: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F i \<noteq> {}" "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F' i \<noteq> {}"
wenzelm@58783
   448
    and eq: "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F'"
wenzelm@58783
   449
    and "i \<in> I"
hoelzl@50123
   450
  shows "F i \<subseteq> F' i"
hoelzl@50123
   451
proof
wenzelm@58783
   452
  fix x
wenzelm@58783
   453
  assume "x \<in> F i"
wenzelm@58783
   454
  with ne have "\<forall>j. \<exists>y. (j \<in> I \<longrightarrow> y \<in> F j \<and> (i = j \<longrightarrow> x = y)) \<and> (j \<notin> I \<longrightarrow> y = undefined)"
wenzelm@53381
   455
    by auto
wenzelm@53381
   456
  from choice[OF this] obtain f
wenzelm@53381
   457
    where f: " \<forall>j. (j \<in> I \<longrightarrow> f j \<in> F j \<and> (i = j \<longrightarrow> x = f j)) \<and> (j \<notin> I \<longrightarrow> f j = undefined)" ..
wenzelm@58783
   458
  then have "f \<in> Pi\<^sub>E I F"
wenzelm@58783
   459
    by (auto simp: extensional_def PiE_def)
wenzelm@58783
   460
  then have "f \<in> Pi\<^sub>E I F'"
wenzelm@58783
   461
    using assms by simp
wenzelm@58783
   462
  then show "x \<in> F' i"
wenzelm@58783
   463
    using f \<open>i \<in> I\<close> by (auto simp: PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   464
qed
hoelzl@50123
   465
hoelzl@50123
   466
lemma PiE_eq_iff_not_empty:
hoelzl@50123
   467
  assumes ne: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F i \<noteq> {}" "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F' i \<noteq> {}"
wenzelm@53015
   468
  shows "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F' \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>I. F i = F' i)"
hoelzl@50123
   469
proof (intro iffI ballI)
wenzelm@58783
   470
  fix i
wenzelm@58783
   471
  assume eq: "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F'"
wenzelm@58783
   472
  assume i: "i \<in> I"
hoelzl@50123
   473
  show "F i = F' i"
hoelzl@50123
   474
    using PiE_eq_subset[of I F F', OF ne eq i]
hoelzl@50123
   475
    using PiE_eq_subset[of I F' F, OF ne(2,1) eq[symmetric] i]
hoelzl@50123
   476
    by auto
hoelzl@50123
   477
qed (auto simp: PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   478
hoelzl@50123
   479
lemma PiE_eq_iff:
wenzelm@53015
   480
  "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F' \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>I. F i = F' i) \<or> ((\<exists>i\<in>I. F i = {}) \<and> (\<exists>i\<in>I. F' i = {}))"
hoelzl@50123
   481
proof (intro iffI disjCI)
wenzelm@53015
   482
  assume eq[simp]: "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F'"
hoelzl@50123
   483
  assume "\<not> ((\<exists>i\<in>I. F i = {}) \<and> (\<exists>i\<in>I. F' i = {}))"
hoelzl@50123
   484
  then have "(\<forall>i\<in>I. F i \<noteq> {}) \<and> (\<forall>i\<in>I. F' i \<noteq> {})"
hoelzl@50123
   485
    using PiE_eq_empty_iff[of I F] PiE_eq_empty_iff[of I F'] by auto
wenzelm@58783
   486
  with PiE_eq_iff_not_empty[of I F F'] show "\<forall>i\<in>I. F i = F' i"
wenzelm@58783
   487
    by auto
hoelzl@50123
   488
next
hoelzl@50123
   489
  assume "(\<forall>i\<in>I. F i = F' i) \<or> (\<exists>i\<in>I. F i = {}) \<and> (\<exists>i\<in>I. F' i = {})"
wenzelm@53015
   490
  then show "Pi\<^sub>E I F = Pi\<^sub>E I F'"
hoelzl@50123
   491
    using PiE_eq_empty_iff[of I F] PiE_eq_empty_iff[of I F'] by (auto simp: PiE_def)
hoelzl@50123
   492
qed
hoelzl@50123
   493
wenzelm@58783
   494
lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_restricts_rangeI:
wenzelm@58783
   495
  "\<forall>y \<in> S. f x \<noteq> f y \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> (insert x S) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E T \<Longrightarrow> f(x := undefined) \<in> S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (T - {f x})"
hoelzl@50123
   496
  unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def
hoelzl@50123
   497
  apply auto
hoelzl@50123
   498
  apply (case_tac "x = xa")
hoelzl@50123
   499
  apply auto
hoelzl@50123
   500
  done
bulwahn@40631
   501
bulwahn@40631
   502
lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_extends_rangeI:
wenzelm@53015
   503
  assumes "a \<in> T" "f \<in> S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (T - {a})"
wenzelm@58783
   504
  shows "f(x := a) \<in> insert x S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E  T"
bulwahn@40631
   505
  using assms unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631
   506
wenzelm@58783
   507
wenzelm@58783
   508
subsubsection \<open>Injective Extensional Function Spaces\<close>
bulwahn@40631
   509
bulwahn@40631
   510
lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_inj_onI:
wenzelm@58783
   511
  assumes "f \<in> S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (T - {a})"
wenzelm@58783
   512
    and "inj_on f S"
bulwahn@40631
   513
  shows "inj_on (f(x := a)) S"
wenzelm@58783
   514
  using assms
wenzelm@58783
   515
  unfolding extensional_funcset_def by (auto intro!: inj_on_fun_updI)
bulwahn@40631
   516
bulwahn@40631
   517
lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domain_inj_on_eq:
bulwahn@40631
   518
  assumes "x \<notin> S"
wenzelm@58783
   519
  shows "{f. f \<in> (insert x S) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E T \<and> inj_on f (insert x S)} =
wenzelm@58783
   520
    (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x:=y)) ` {(y, g). y \<in> T \<and> g \<in> S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (T - {y}) \<and> inj_on g S}"
wenzelm@58783
   521
  using assms
wenzelm@58783
   522
  apply (auto del: PiE_I PiE_E)
wenzelm@58783
   523
  apply (auto intro: extensional_funcset_fun_upd_inj_onI
wenzelm@58783
   524
    extensional_funcset_fun_upd_extends_rangeI del: PiE_I PiE_E)
wenzelm@58783
   525
  apply (auto simp add: image_iff inj_on_def)
wenzelm@58783
   526
  apply (rule_tac x="xa x" in exI)
wenzelm@58783
   527
  apply (auto intro: PiE_mem del: PiE_I PiE_E)
wenzelm@58783
   528
  apply (rule_tac x="xa(x := undefined)" in exI)
wenzelm@58783
   529
  apply (auto intro!: extensional_funcset_fun_upd_restricts_rangeI)
nipkow@62390
   530
  apply (auto dest!: PiE_mem split: if_split_asm)
wenzelm@58783
   531
  done
bulwahn@40631
   532
bulwahn@40631
   533
lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domain_inj_onI:
bulwahn@40631
   534
  assumes "x \<notin> S"
wenzelm@53015
   535
  shows "inj_on (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) {(y, g). y \<in> T \<and> g \<in> S \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (T - {y}) \<and> inj_on g S}"
wenzelm@58783
   536
  using assms
wenzelm@58783
   537
  apply (auto intro!: inj_onI)
wenzelm@58783
   538
  apply (metis fun_upd_same)
wenzelm@58783
   539
  apply (metis assms PiE_arb fun_upd_triv fun_upd_upd)
wenzelm@58783
   540
  done
bulwahn@40631
   541
bulwahn@40631
   542
wenzelm@58783
   543
subsubsection \<open>Cardinality\<close>
wenzelm@58783
   544
wenzelm@58783
   545
lemma finite_PiE: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. i \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> finite (T i)) \<Longrightarrow> finite (\<Pi>\<^sub>E i \<in> S. T i)"
hoelzl@50123
   546
  by (induct S arbitrary: T rule: finite_induct) (simp_all add: PiE_insert_eq)
hoelzl@50123
   547
wenzelm@53015
   548
lemma inj_combinator: "x \<notin> S \<Longrightarrow> inj_on (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) (T x \<times> Pi\<^sub>E S T)"
hoelzl@50123
   549
proof (safe intro!: inj_onI ext)
wenzelm@58783
   550
  fix f y g z
wenzelm@58783
   551
  assume "x \<notin> S"
wenzelm@58783
   552
  assume fg: "f \<in> Pi\<^sub>E S T" "g \<in> Pi\<^sub>E S T"
hoelzl@50123
   553
  assume "f(x := y) = g(x := z)"
hoelzl@50123
   554
  then have *: "\<And>i. (f(x := y)) i = (g(x := z)) i"
hoelzl@50123
   555
    unfolding fun_eq_iff by auto
hoelzl@50123
   556
  from this[of x] show "y = z" by simp
wenzelm@58783
   557
  fix i from *[of i] \<open>x \<notin> S\<close> fg show "f i = g i"
nipkow@62390
   558
    by (auto split: if_split_asm simp: PiE_def extensional_def)
bulwahn@40631
   559
qed
bulwahn@40631
   560
wenzelm@58783
   561
lemma card_PiE: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> card (\<Pi>\<^sub>E i \<in> S. T i) = (\<Prod> i\<in>S. card (T i))"
hoelzl@50123
   562
proof (induct rule: finite_induct)
wenzelm@58783
   563
  case empty
wenzelm@58783
   564
  then show ?case by auto
hoelzl@50123
   565
next
wenzelm@58783
   566
  case (insert x S)
wenzelm@58783
   567
  then show ?case
hoelzl@50123
   568
    by (simp add: PiE_insert_eq inj_combinator card_image card_cartesian_product)
bulwahn@40631
   569
qed
bulwahn@40631
   570
paulson@13586
   571
end