src/HOL/Algebra/UnivPoly.thy
author ballarin
Wed Apr 30 18:32:06 2003 +0200 (2003-04-30)
changeset 13940 c67798653056
child 13949 0ce528cd6f19
permissions -rw-r--r--
HOL-Algebra: New polynomial development added.
ballarin@13940
     1
(*
ballarin@13940
     2
  Title:     Univariate Polynomials
ballarin@13940
     3
  Id:        $Id$
ballarin@13940
     4
  Author:    Clemens Ballarin, started 9 December 1996
ballarin@13940
     5
  Copyright: Clemens Ballarin
ballarin@13940
     6
*)
ballarin@13940
     7
ballarin@13940
     8
theory UnivPoly = Module:
ballarin@13940
     9
ballarin@13940
    10
section {* Univariate Polynomials *}
ballarin@13940
    11
ballarin@13940
    12
subsection
ballarin@13940
    13
  {* Definition of the Constructor for Univariate Polynomials @{term UP} *}
ballarin@13940
    14
ballarin@13940
    15
(* Could alternatively use locale ...
ballarin@13940
    16
locale bound = cring + var bound +
ballarin@13940
    17
  defines ...
ballarin@13940
    18
*)
ballarin@13940
    19
ballarin@13940
    20
constdefs
ballarin@13940
    21
  bound  :: "['a, nat, nat => 'a] => bool"
ballarin@13940
    22
  "bound z n f == (ALL i. n < i --> f i = z)"
ballarin@13940
    23
ballarin@13940
    24
lemma boundI [intro!]:
ballarin@13940
    25
  "[| !! m. n < m ==> f m = z |] ==> bound z n f"
ballarin@13940
    26
  by (unfold bound_def) fast
ballarin@13940
    27
ballarin@13940
    28
lemma boundE [elim?]:
ballarin@13940
    29
  "[| bound z n f; (!! m. n < m ==> f m = z) ==> P |] ==> P"
ballarin@13940
    30
  by (unfold bound_def) fast
ballarin@13940
    31
ballarin@13940
    32
lemma boundD [dest]:
ballarin@13940
    33
  "[| bound z n f; n < m |] ==> f m = z"
ballarin@13940
    34
  by (unfold bound_def) fast
ballarin@13940
    35
ballarin@13940
    36
lemma bound_below:
ballarin@13940
    37
  assumes bound: "bound z m f" and nonzero: "f n ~= z" shows "n <= m"
ballarin@13940
    38
proof (rule classical)
ballarin@13940
    39
  assume "~ ?thesis"
ballarin@13940
    40
  then have "m < n" by arith
ballarin@13940
    41
  with bound have "f n = z" ..
ballarin@13940
    42
  with nonzero show ?thesis by contradiction
ballarin@13940
    43
qed
ballarin@13940
    44
ballarin@13940
    45
record ('a, 'p) up_ring = "('a, 'p) module" +
ballarin@13940
    46
  monom :: "['a, nat] => 'p"
ballarin@13940
    47
  coeff :: "['p, nat] => 'a"
ballarin@13940
    48
ballarin@13940
    49
constdefs
ballarin@13940
    50
  up :: "('a, 'm) ring_scheme => (nat => 'a) set"
ballarin@13940
    51
  "up R == {f. f \<in> UNIV -> carrier R & (EX n. bound (zero R) n f)}"
ballarin@13940
    52
  UP :: "('a, 'm) ring_scheme => ('a, nat => 'a) up_ring"
ballarin@13940
    53
  "UP R == (|
ballarin@13940
    54
    carrier = up R,
ballarin@13940
    55
    mult = (%p:up R. %q:up R. %n. finsum R (%i. mult R (p i) (q (n-i))) {..n}),
ballarin@13940
    56
    one = (%i. if i=0 then one R else zero R),
ballarin@13940
    57
    zero = (%i. zero R),
ballarin@13940
    58
    add = (%p:up R. %q:up R. %i. add R (p i) (q i)),
ballarin@13940
    59
    smult = (%a:carrier R. %p:up R. %i. mult R a (p i)),
ballarin@13940
    60
    monom = (%a:carrier R. %n i. if i=n then a else zero R),
ballarin@13940
    61
    coeff = (%p:up R. %n. p n) |)"
ballarin@13940
    62
ballarin@13940
    63
text {*
ballarin@13940
    64
  Properties of the set of polynomials @{term up}.
ballarin@13940
    65
*}
ballarin@13940
    66
ballarin@13940
    67
lemma mem_upI [intro]:
ballarin@13940
    68
  "[| !!n. f n \<in> carrier R; EX n. bound (zero R) n f |] ==> f \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    69
  by (simp add: up_def Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
    70
ballarin@13940
    71
lemma mem_upD [dest]:
ballarin@13940
    72
  "f \<in> up R ==> f n \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
    73
  by (simp add: up_def Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
    74
ballarin@13940
    75
lemma (in cring) bound_upD [dest]:
ballarin@13940
    76
  "f \<in> up R ==> EX n. bound \<zero> n f"
ballarin@13940
    77
  by (simp add: up_def)
ballarin@13940
    78
ballarin@13940
    79
lemma (in cring) up_one_closed:
ballarin@13940
    80
   "(%n. if n = 0 then \<one> else \<zero>) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    81
  using up_def by force
ballarin@13940
    82
ballarin@13940
    83
lemma (in cring) up_smult_closed:
ballarin@13940
    84
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> up R |] ==> (%i. a \<otimes> p i) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    85
  by force
ballarin@13940
    86
ballarin@13940
    87
lemma (in cring) up_add_closed:
ballarin@13940
    88
  "[| p \<in> up R; q \<in> up R |] ==> (%i. p i \<oplus> q i) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    89
proof
ballarin@13940
    90
  fix n
ballarin@13940
    91
  assume "p \<in> up R" and "q \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    92
  then show "p n \<oplus> q n \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
    93
    by auto
ballarin@13940
    94
next
ballarin@13940
    95
  assume UP: "p \<in> up R" "q \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
    96
  show "EX n. bound \<zero> n (%i. p i \<oplus> q i)"
ballarin@13940
    97
  proof -
ballarin@13940
    98
    from UP obtain n where boundn: "bound \<zero> n p" by fast
ballarin@13940
    99
    from UP obtain m where boundm: "bound \<zero> m q" by fast
ballarin@13940
   100
    have "bound \<zero> (max n m) (%i. p i \<oplus> q i)"
ballarin@13940
   101
    proof
ballarin@13940
   102
      fix i
ballarin@13940
   103
      assume "max n m < i"
ballarin@13940
   104
      with boundn and boundm and UP show "p i \<oplus> q i = \<zero>" by fastsimp
ballarin@13940
   105
    qed
ballarin@13940
   106
    then show ?thesis ..
ballarin@13940
   107
  qed
ballarin@13940
   108
qed
ballarin@13940
   109
ballarin@13940
   110
lemma (in cring) up_a_inv_closed:
ballarin@13940
   111
  "p \<in> up R ==> (%i. \<ominus> (p i)) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   112
proof
ballarin@13940
   113
  assume R: "p \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   114
  then obtain n where "bound \<zero> n p" by auto
ballarin@13940
   115
  then have "bound \<zero> n (%i. \<ominus> p i)" by auto
ballarin@13940
   116
  then show "EX n. bound \<zero> n (%i. \<ominus> p i)" by auto
ballarin@13940
   117
qed auto
ballarin@13940
   118
ballarin@13940
   119
lemma (in cring) up_mult_closed:
ballarin@13940
   120
  "[| p \<in> up R; q \<in> up R |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   121
  (%n. finsum R (%i. p i \<otimes> q (n-i)) {..n}) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   122
proof
ballarin@13940
   123
  fix n
ballarin@13940
   124
  assume "p \<in> up R" "q \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   125
  then show "finsum R (%i. p i \<otimes> q (n-i)) {..n} \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   126
    by (simp add: mem_upD  funcsetI)
ballarin@13940
   127
next
ballarin@13940
   128
  assume UP: "p \<in> up R" "q \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   129
  show "EX n. bound \<zero> n (%n. finsum R (%i. p i \<otimes> q (n - i)) {..n})"
ballarin@13940
   130
  proof -
ballarin@13940
   131
    from UP obtain n where boundn: "bound \<zero> n p" by fast
ballarin@13940
   132
    from UP obtain m where boundm: "bound \<zero> m q" by fast
ballarin@13940
   133
    have "bound \<zero> (n + m) (%n. finsum R (%i. p i \<otimes> q (n - i)) {..n})"
ballarin@13940
   134
    proof
ballarin@13940
   135
      fix k
ballarin@13940
   136
      assume bound: "n + m < k"
ballarin@13940
   137
      {
ballarin@13940
   138
	fix i
ballarin@13940
   139
	have "p i \<otimes> q (k-i) = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   140
	proof (cases "n < i")
ballarin@13940
   141
	  case True
ballarin@13940
   142
	  with boundn have "p i = \<zero>" by auto
ballarin@13940
   143
          moreover from UP have "q (k-i) \<in> carrier R" by auto
ballarin@13940
   144
	  ultimately show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   145
	next
ballarin@13940
   146
	  case False
ballarin@13940
   147
	  with bound have "m < k-i" by arith
ballarin@13940
   148
	  with boundm have "q (k-i) = \<zero>" by auto
ballarin@13940
   149
	  moreover from UP have "p i \<in> carrier R" by auto
ballarin@13940
   150
	  ultimately show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   151
	qed
ballarin@13940
   152
      }
ballarin@13940
   153
      then show "finsum R (%i. p i \<otimes> q (k-i)) {..k} = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   154
	by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   155
    qed
ballarin@13940
   156
    then show ?thesis by fast
ballarin@13940
   157
  qed
ballarin@13940
   158
qed
ballarin@13940
   159
ballarin@13940
   160
subsection {* Effect of operations on coefficients *}
ballarin@13940
   161
ballarin@13940
   162
locale UP = struct R + struct P +
ballarin@13940
   163
  defines P_def: "P == UP R"
ballarin@13940
   164
ballarin@13940
   165
locale UP_cring = UP + cring R
ballarin@13940
   166
ballarin@13940
   167
locale UP_domain = UP_cring + "domain" R
ballarin@13940
   168
ballarin@13940
   169
text {*
ballarin@13940
   170
  Temporarily declare UP.P\_def as simp rule.
ballarin@13940
   171
*}
ballarin@13940
   172
(* TODO: use antiquotation once text (in locale) is supported. *)
ballarin@13940
   173
ballarin@13940
   174
declare (in UP) P_def [simp]
ballarin@13940
   175
ballarin@13940
   176
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_monom [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   177
  "a \<in> carrier R ==>
ballarin@13940
   178
  coeff P (monom P a m) n = (if m=n then a else \<zero>)"
ballarin@13940
   179
proof -
ballarin@13940
   180
  assume R: "a \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   181
  then have "(%n. if n = m then a else \<zero>) \<in> up R"
ballarin@13940
   182
    using up_def by force
ballarin@13940
   183
  with R show ?thesis by (simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   184
qed
ballarin@13940
   185
ballarin@13940
   186
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_zero [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   187
  "coeff P \<zero>\<^sub>2 n = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   188
  by (auto simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   189
ballarin@13940
   190
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   191
  "coeff P \<one>\<^sub>2 n = (if n=0 then \<one> else \<zero>)"
ballarin@13940
   192
  using up_one_closed by (simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   193
ballarin@13940
   194
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_smult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   195
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   196
  coeff P (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) n = a \<otimes> coeff P p n"
ballarin@13940
   197
  by (simp add: UP_def up_smult_closed)
ballarin@13940
   198
ballarin@13940
   199
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_add [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   200
  "[| p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   201
  coeff P (p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q) n = coeff P p n \<oplus> coeff P q n"
ballarin@13940
   202
  by (simp add: UP_def up_add_closed)
ballarin@13940
   203
ballarin@13940
   204
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_mult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   205
  "[| p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   206
  coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) n = finsum R (%i. coeff P p i \<otimes> coeff P q (n-i)) {..n}"
ballarin@13940
   207
  by (simp add: UP_def up_mult_closed)
ballarin@13940
   208
ballarin@13940
   209
lemma (in UP) up_eqI:
ballarin@13940
   210
  assumes prem: "!!n. coeff P p n = coeff P q n"
ballarin@13940
   211
    and R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   212
  shows "p = q"
ballarin@13940
   213
proof
ballarin@13940
   214
  fix x
ballarin@13940
   215
  from prem and R show "p x = q x" by (simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   216
qed
ballarin@13940
   217
  
ballarin@13940
   218
subsection {* Polynomials form a commutative ring. *}
ballarin@13940
   219
ballarin@13940
   220
text {* Operations are closed over @{term "P"}. *}
ballarin@13940
   221
ballarin@13940
   222
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_mult_closed [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   223
  "[| p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==> p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   224
  by (simp add: UP_def up_mult_closed)
ballarin@13940
   225
ballarin@13940
   226
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_one_closed [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   227
  "\<one>\<^sub>2 \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   228
  by (simp add: UP_def up_one_closed)
ballarin@13940
   229
ballarin@13940
   230
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_zero_closed [intro, simp]:
ballarin@13940
   231
  "\<zero>\<^sub>2 \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   232
  by (auto simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   233
ballarin@13940
   234
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_a_closed [intro, simp]:
ballarin@13940
   235
  "[| p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==> p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   236
  by (simp add: UP_def up_add_closed)
ballarin@13940
   237
ballarin@13940
   238
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_closed [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   239
  "a \<in> carrier R ==> monom P a n \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   240
  by (auto simp add: UP_def up_def Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   241
ballarin@13940
   242
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_closed [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   243
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==> a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   244
  by (simp add: UP_def up_smult_closed)
ballarin@13940
   245
ballarin@13940
   246
lemma (in UP) coeff_closed [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   247
  "p \<in> carrier P ==> coeff P p n \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   248
  by (auto simp add: UP_def)
ballarin@13940
   249
ballarin@13940
   250
declare (in UP) P_def [simp del]
ballarin@13940
   251
ballarin@13940
   252
text {* Algebraic ring properties *}
ballarin@13940
   253
ballarin@13940
   254
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_a_assoc:
ballarin@13940
   255
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" "r \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   256
  shows "(p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q) \<oplus>\<^sub>2 r = p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 (q \<oplus>\<^sub>2 r)"
ballarin@13940
   257
  by (rule up_eqI, simp add: a_assoc R, simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   258
ballarin@13940
   259
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_l_zero [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   260
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   261
  shows "\<zero>\<^sub>2 \<oplus>\<^sub>2 p = p"
ballarin@13940
   262
  by (rule up_eqI, simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   263
ballarin@13940
   264
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_l_neg_ex:
ballarin@13940
   265
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   266
  shows "EX q : carrier P. q \<oplus>\<^sub>2 p = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
   267
proof -
ballarin@13940
   268
  let ?q = "%i. \<ominus> (p i)"
ballarin@13940
   269
  from R have closed: "?q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   270
    by (simp add: UP_def P_def up_a_inv_closed)
ballarin@13940
   271
  from R have coeff: "!!n. coeff P ?q n = \<ominus> (coeff P p n)"
ballarin@13940
   272
    by (simp add: UP_def P_def up_a_inv_closed)
ballarin@13940
   273
  show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   274
  proof
ballarin@13940
   275
    show "?q \<oplus>\<^sub>2 p = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
   276
      by (auto intro!: up_eqI simp add: R closed coeff R.l_neg)
ballarin@13940
   277
  qed (rule closed)
ballarin@13940
   278
qed
ballarin@13940
   279
ballarin@13940
   280
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_a_comm:
ballarin@13940
   281
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   282
  shows "p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q = q \<oplus>\<^sub>2 p"
ballarin@13940
   283
  by (rule up_eqI, simp add: a_comm R, simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   284
ballarin@13940
   285
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   286
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   287
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   288
ballarin@13940
   289
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_m_assoc:
ballarin@13940
   290
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" "r \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   291
  shows "(p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r = p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 (q \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r)"
ballarin@13940
   292
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   293
  fix n
ballarin@13940
   294
  {
ballarin@13940
   295
    fix k and a b c :: "nat=>'a"
ballarin@13940
   296
    assume R: "a \<in> UNIV -> carrier R" "b \<in> UNIV -> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   297
      "c \<in> UNIV -> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   298
    then have "k <= n ==>
ballarin@13940
   299
      finsum R (%j. finsum R (%i. a i \<otimes> b (j-i)) {..j} \<otimes> c (n-j)) {..k} =
ballarin@13940
   300
      finsum R (%j. a j \<otimes> finsum R (%i. b i \<otimes> c (n-j-i)) {..k-j}) {..k}"
ballarin@13940
   301
      (is "_ ==> ?eq k")
ballarin@13940
   302
    proof (induct k)
ballarin@13940
   303
      case 0 then show ?case by (simp add: Pi_def m_assoc)
ballarin@13940
   304
    next
ballarin@13940
   305
      case (Suc k)
ballarin@13940
   306
      then have "k <= n" by arith
ballarin@13940
   307
      then have "?eq k" by (rule Suc)
ballarin@13940
   308
      with R show ?case
ballarin@13940
   309
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
   310
             add: Suc_diff_le Pi_def l_distr r_distr m_assoc)
ballarin@13940
   311
          (simp cong: finsum_cong add: Pi_def a_ac finsum_ldistr m_assoc)
ballarin@13940
   312
    qed
ballarin@13940
   313
  }
ballarin@13940
   314
  with R show "coeff P ((p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r) n = coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 (q \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r)) n"
ballarin@13940
   315
    by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   316
qed (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   317
ballarin@13940
   318
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   319
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   320
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   321
ballarin@13940
   322
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_l_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   323
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   324
  shows "\<one>\<^sub>2 \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p = p"
ballarin@13940
   325
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   326
  fix n
ballarin@13940
   327
  show "coeff P (\<one>\<^sub>2 \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p) n = coeff P p n"
ballarin@13940
   328
  proof (cases n)
ballarin@13940
   329
    case 0 with R show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   330
  next
ballarin@13940
   331
    case Suc with R show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   332
      by (simp del: finsum_Suc add: finsum_Suc2 Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   333
  qed
ballarin@13940
   334
qed (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   335
ballarin@13940
   336
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_l_distr:
ballarin@13940
   337
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" "r \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   338
  shows "(p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r = (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r) \<oplus>\<^sub>2 (q \<otimes>\<^sub>2 r)"
ballarin@13940
   339
  by (rule up_eqI) (simp add: l_distr R Pi_def, simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   340
ballarin@13940
   341
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_m_comm:
ballarin@13940
   342
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   343
  shows "p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q = q \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p"
ballarin@13940
   344
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   345
  fix n 
ballarin@13940
   346
  {
ballarin@13940
   347
    fix k and a b :: "nat=>'a"
ballarin@13940
   348
    assume R: "a \<in> UNIV -> carrier R" "b \<in> UNIV -> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   349
    then have "k <= n ==> 
ballarin@13940
   350
      finsum R (%i. a i \<otimes> b (n-i)) {..k} =
ballarin@13940
   351
      finsum R (%i. a (k-i) \<otimes> b (i+n-k)) {..k}"
ballarin@13940
   352
      (is "_ ==> ?eq k")
ballarin@13940
   353
    proof (induct k)
ballarin@13940
   354
      case 0 then show ?case by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   355
    next
ballarin@13940
   356
      case (Suc k) then show ?case
ballarin@13940
   357
	by (subst finsum_Suc2) (simp add: Pi_def a_comm)+
ballarin@13940
   358
    qed
ballarin@13940
   359
  }
ballarin@13940
   360
  note l = this
ballarin@13940
   361
  from R show "coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) n =  coeff P (q \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p) n"
ballarin@13940
   362
    apply (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   363
    apply (subst l)
ballarin@13940
   364
    apply (auto simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   365
    apply (simp add: m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   366
    done
ballarin@13940
   367
qed (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   368
ballarin@13940
   369
theorem (in UP_cring) UP_cring:
ballarin@13940
   370
  "cring P"
ballarin@13940
   371
  by (auto intro!: cringI abelian_groupI comm_monoidI UP_a_assoc UP_l_zero
ballarin@13940
   372
    UP_l_neg_ex UP_a_comm UP_m_assoc UP_l_one UP_m_comm UP_l_distr)
ballarin@13940
   373
ballarin@13940
   374
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_a_inv_closed [intro, simp]:
ballarin@13940
   375
  "p \<in> carrier P ==> \<ominus>\<^sub>2 p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   376
  by (rule abelian_group.a_inv_closed
ballarin@13940
   377
    [OF cring.is_abelian_group [OF UP_cring]])
ballarin@13940
   378
ballarin@13940
   379
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_a_inv [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   380
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   381
  shows "coeff P (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p) n = \<ominus> (coeff P p n)"
ballarin@13940
   382
proof -
ballarin@13940
   383
  from R coeff_closed UP_a_inv_closed have
ballarin@13940
   384
    "coeff P (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p) n = \<ominus> coeff P p n \<oplus> (coeff P p n \<oplus> coeff P (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p) n)"
ballarin@13940
   385
    by algebra
ballarin@13940
   386
  also from R have "... =  \<ominus> (coeff P p n)"
ballarin@13940
   387
    by (simp del: coeff_add add: coeff_add [THEN sym]
ballarin@13940
   388
      abelian_group.r_neg [OF cring.is_abelian_group [OF UP_cring]])
ballarin@13940
   389
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   390
qed
ballarin@13940
   391
ballarin@13940
   392
text {*
ballarin@13940
   393
  Instantiation of lemmas from @{term cring}.
ballarin@13940
   394
*}
ballarin@13940
   395
ballarin@13940
   396
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_monoid:
ballarin@13940
   397
  "monoid P"
ballarin@13940
   398
  by (fast intro!: cring.is_comm_monoid comm_monoid.axioms monoid.intro
ballarin@13940
   399
    UP_cring)
ballarin@13940
   400
(* TODO: provide cring.is_monoid *)
ballarin@13940
   401
ballarin@13940
   402
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_comm_semigroup:
ballarin@13940
   403
  "comm_semigroup P"
ballarin@13940
   404
  by (fast intro!: cring.is_comm_monoid comm_monoid.axioms comm_semigroup.intro
ballarin@13940
   405
    UP_cring)
ballarin@13940
   406
ballarin@13940
   407
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_comm_monoid:
ballarin@13940
   408
  "comm_monoid P"
ballarin@13940
   409
  by (fast intro!: cring.is_comm_monoid UP_cring)
ballarin@13940
   410
ballarin@13940
   411
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_abelian_monoid:
ballarin@13940
   412
  "abelian_monoid P"
ballarin@13940
   413
  by (fast intro!: abelian_group.axioms cring.is_abelian_group UP_cring)
ballarin@13940
   414
ballarin@13940
   415
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_abelian_group:
ballarin@13940
   416
  "abelian_group P"
ballarin@13940
   417
  by (fast intro!: cring.is_abelian_group UP_cring)
ballarin@13940
   418
ballarin@13940
   419
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_one [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   420
  monoid.r_one [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   421
ballarin@13940
   422
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_closed [intro, simp] =
ballarin@13940
   423
  monoid.nat_pow_closed [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   424
ballarin@13940
   425
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_0 [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   426
  monoid.nat_pow_0 [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   427
ballarin@13940
   428
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_Suc [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   429
  monoid.nat_pow_Suc [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   430
ballarin@13940
   431
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_one [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   432
  monoid.nat_pow_one [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   433
ballarin@13940
   434
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_mult =
ballarin@13940
   435
  monoid.nat_pow_mult [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   436
ballarin@13940
   437
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_pow =
ballarin@13940
   438
  monoid.nat_pow_pow [OF UP_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   439
ballarin@13940
   440
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_m_lcomm =
ballarin@13940
   441
  comm_semigroup.m_lcomm [OF UP_comm_semigroup]
ballarin@13940
   442
ballarin@13940
   443
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_m_ac = UP_m_assoc UP_m_comm UP_m_lcomm
ballarin@13940
   444
ballarin@13940
   445
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_nat_pow_distr =
ballarin@13940
   446
  comm_monoid.nat_pow_distr [OF UP_comm_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   447
ballarin@13940
   448
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_a_lcomm = abelian_monoid.a_lcomm [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   449
ballarin@13940
   450
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_zero [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   451
  abelian_monoid.r_zero [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   452
ballarin@13940
   453
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_a_ac = UP_a_assoc UP_a_comm UP_a_lcomm
ballarin@13940
   454
ballarin@13940
   455
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_empty [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   456
  abelian_monoid.finsum_empty [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   457
ballarin@13940
   458
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_insert [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   459
  abelian_monoid.finsum_insert [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   460
ballarin@13940
   461
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_zero [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   462
  abelian_monoid.finsum_zero [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   463
ballarin@13940
   464
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_closed [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   465
  abelian_monoid.finsum_closed [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   466
ballarin@13940
   467
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_Un_Int =
ballarin@13940
   468
  abelian_monoid.finsum_Un_Int [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   469
ballarin@13940
   470
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_Un_disjoint =
ballarin@13940
   471
  abelian_monoid.finsum_Un_disjoint [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   472
ballarin@13940
   473
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_addf =
ballarin@13940
   474
  abelian_monoid.finsum_addf [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   475
ballarin@13940
   476
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_cong' =
ballarin@13940
   477
  abelian_monoid.finsum_cong' [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   478
ballarin@13940
   479
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_0 [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   480
  abelian_monoid.finsum_0 [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   481
ballarin@13940
   482
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_Suc [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   483
  abelian_monoid.finsum_Suc [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   484
ballarin@13940
   485
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_Suc2 =
ballarin@13940
   486
  abelian_monoid.finsum_Suc2 [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   487
ballarin@13940
   488
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_add [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   489
  abelian_monoid.finsum_add [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   490
ballarin@13940
   491
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_cong =
ballarin@13940
   492
  abelian_monoid.finsum_cong [OF UP_abelian_monoid]
ballarin@13940
   493
ballarin@13940
   494
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_minus_closed [intro, simp] =
ballarin@13940
   495
  abelian_group.minus_closed [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   496
ballarin@13940
   497
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_a_l_cancel [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   498
  abelian_group.a_l_cancel [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   499
ballarin@13940
   500
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_a_r_cancel [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   501
  abelian_group.a_r_cancel [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   502
ballarin@13940
   503
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_l_neg =
ballarin@13940
   504
  abelian_group.l_neg [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   505
ballarin@13940
   506
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_neg =
ballarin@13940
   507
  abelian_group.r_neg [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   508
ballarin@13940
   509
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_minus_zero [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   510
  abelian_group.minus_zero [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   511
ballarin@13940
   512
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_minus_minus [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   513
  abelian_group.minus_minus [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   514
ballarin@13940
   515
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_minus_add =
ballarin@13940
   516
  abelian_group.minus_add [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   517
ballarin@13940
   518
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_neg2 =
ballarin@13940
   519
  abelian_group.r_neg2 [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   520
ballarin@13940
   521
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_neg1 =
ballarin@13940
   522
  abelian_group.r_neg1 [OF UP_abelian_group]
ballarin@13940
   523
ballarin@13940
   524
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_distr =
ballarin@13940
   525
  cring.r_distr [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   526
ballarin@13940
   527
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_l_null [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   528
  cring.l_null [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   529
ballarin@13940
   530
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_null [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   531
  cring.r_null [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   532
ballarin@13940
   533
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_l_minus =
ballarin@13940
   534
  cring.l_minus [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   535
ballarin@13940
   536
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_r_minus =
ballarin@13940
   537
  cring.r_minus [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   538
ballarin@13940
   539
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_ldistr =
ballarin@13940
   540
  cring.finsum_ldistr [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   541
ballarin@13940
   542
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_finsum_rdistr =
ballarin@13940
   543
  cring.finsum_rdistr [OF UP_cring]
ballarin@13940
   544
ballarin@13940
   545
subsection {* Polynomials form an Algebra *}
ballarin@13940
   546
ballarin@13940
   547
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_l_distr:
ballarin@13940
   548
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   549
  (a \<oplus> b) \<odot>\<^sub>2 p = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 b \<odot>\<^sub>2 p"
ballarin@13940
   550
  by (rule up_eqI) (simp_all add: R.l_distr)
ballarin@13940
   551
ballarin@13940
   552
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_r_distr:
ballarin@13940
   553
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   554
  a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q) = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 a \<odot>\<^sub>2 q"
ballarin@13940
   555
  by (rule up_eqI) (simp_all add: R.r_distr)
ballarin@13940
   556
ballarin@13940
   557
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_assoc1:
ballarin@13940
   558
      "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   559
      (a \<otimes> b) \<odot>\<^sub>2 p = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (b \<odot>\<^sub>2 p)"
ballarin@13940
   560
  by (rule up_eqI) (simp_all add: R.m_assoc)
ballarin@13940
   561
ballarin@13940
   562
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   563
      "p \<in> carrier P ==> \<one> \<odot>\<^sub>2 p = p"
ballarin@13940
   564
  by (rule up_eqI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   565
ballarin@13940
   566
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_smult_assoc2:
ballarin@13940
   567
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   568
  (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q)"
ballarin@13940
   569
  by (rule up_eqI) (simp_all add: R.finsum_rdistr R.m_assoc Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   570
ballarin@13940
   571
text {*
ballarin@13940
   572
  Instantiation of lemmas from @{term algebra}.
ballarin@13940
   573
*}
ballarin@13940
   574
ballarin@13940
   575
(* TODO: move to CRing.thy, really a fact missing from the locales package *)
ballarin@13940
   576
ballarin@13940
   577
lemma (in cring) cring:
ballarin@13940
   578
  "cring R"
ballarin@13940
   579
  by (fast intro: cring.intro prems)
ballarin@13940
   580
ballarin@13940
   581
lemma (in UP_cring) UP_algebra:
ballarin@13940
   582
  "algebra R P"
ballarin@13940
   583
  by (auto intro: algebraI cring UP_cring UP_smult_l_distr UP_smult_r_distr
ballarin@13940
   584
    UP_smult_assoc1 UP_smult_assoc2)
ballarin@13940
   585
ballarin@13940
   586
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_smult_l_null [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   587
  algebra.smult_l_null [OF UP_algebra]
ballarin@13940
   588
ballarin@13940
   589
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_smult_r_null [simp] =
ballarin@13940
   590
  algebra.smult_r_null [OF UP_algebra]
ballarin@13940
   591
ballarin@13940
   592
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_smult_l_minus =
ballarin@13940
   593
  algebra.smult_l_minus [OF UP_algebra]
ballarin@13940
   594
ballarin@13940
   595
lemmas (in UP_cring) UP_smult_r_minus =
ballarin@13940
   596
  algebra.smult_r_minus [OF UP_algebra]
ballarin@13940
   597
ballarin@13940
   598
subsection {* Further Lemmas Involving @{term monom} *}
ballarin@13940
   599
ballarin@13940
   600
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_zero [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   601
  "monom P \<zero> n = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
   602
  by (simp add: UP_def P_def)
ballarin@13940
   603
ballarin@13940
   604
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   605
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   606
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   607
ballarin@13940
   608
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_mult_is_smult:
ballarin@13940
   609
  assumes R: "a \<in> carrier R" "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   610
  shows "monom P a 0 \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p"
ballarin@13940
   611
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   612
  fix n
ballarin@13940
   613
  have "coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P a 0) n = coeff P (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) n"
ballarin@13940
   614
  proof (cases n)
ballarin@13940
   615
    case 0 with R show ?thesis by (simp add: R.m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   616
  next
ballarin@13940
   617
    case Suc with R show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   618
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: R.r_null Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   619
        (simp add: m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   620
  qed
ballarin@13940
   621
  with R show "coeff P (monom P a 0 \<otimes>\<^sub>2 p) n = coeff P (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) n"
ballarin@13940
   622
    by (simp add: UP_m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   623
qed (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   624
ballarin@13940
   625
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   626
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   627
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   628
ballarin@13940
   629
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_add [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   630
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   631
  monom P (a \<oplus> b) n = monom P a n \<oplus>\<^sub>2 monom P b n"
ballarin@13940
   632
  by (rule up_eqI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   633
ballarin@13940
   634
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   635
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   636
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   637
ballarin@13940
   638
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_one_Suc:
ballarin@13940
   639
  "monom P \<one> (Suc n) = monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> 1"
ballarin@13940
   640
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   641
  fix k
ballarin@13940
   642
  show "coeff P (monom P \<one> (Suc n)) k = coeff P (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> 1) k"
ballarin@13940
   643
  proof (cases "k = Suc n")
ballarin@13940
   644
    case True show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   645
    proof -
ballarin@13940
   646
      from True have less_add_diff: 
ballarin@13940
   647
	"!!i. [| n < i; i <= n + m |] ==> n + m - i < m" by arith
ballarin@13940
   648
      from True have "coeff P (monom P \<one> (Suc n)) k = \<one>" by simp
ballarin@13940
   649
      also from True
ballarin@13940
   650
      have "... = finsum R (%i. coeff P (monom P \<one> n) i \<otimes>
ballarin@13940
   651
	coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) (k - i)) ({..n(} Un {n})"
ballarin@13940
   652
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   653
      also have "... = finsum R (%i. coeff P (monom P \<one> n) i \<otimes>
ballarin@13940
   654
	coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) (k - i)) {..n}"
ballarin@13940
   655
	by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
   656
      also from True have "... = finsum R (%i. coeff P (monom P \<one> n) i \<otimes>
ballarin@13940
   657
	coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) (k - i)) ({..n} Un {)n..k})"
ballarin@13940
   658
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one
ballarin@13940
   659
	  order_less_imp_not_eq Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   660
      also from True have "... = coeff P (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> 1) k"
ballarin@13940
   661
	by (simp add: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
   662
      finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   663
    qed
ballarin@13940
   664
  next
ballarin@13940
   665
    case False
ballarin@13940
   666
    note neq = False
ballarin@13940
   667
    let ?s =
ballarin@13940
   668
      "(\<lambda>i. (if n = i then \<one> else \<zero>) \<otimes> (if Suc 0 = k - i then \<one> else \<zero>))"
ballarin@13940
   669
    from neq have "coeff P (monom P \<one> (Suc n)) k = \<zero>" by simp
ballarin@13940
   670
    also have "... = finsum R ?s {..k}"
ballarin@13940
   671
    proof -
ballarin@13940
   672
      have f1: "finsum R ?s {..n(} = \<zero>" by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   673
      from neq have f2: "finsum R ?s {n} = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   674
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: Pi_def) arith
ballarin@13940
   675
      have f3: "n < k ==> finsum R ?s {)n..k} = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   676
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: order_less_imp_not_eq Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   677
      show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   678
      proof (cases "k < n")
ballarin@13940
   679
	case True then show ?thesis by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   680
      next
ballarin@13940
   681
	case False then have n_le_k: "n <= k" by arith
ballarin@13940
   682
	show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   683
	proof (cases "n = k")
ballarin@13940
   684
	  case True
ballarin@13940
   685
	  then have "\<zero> = finsum R ?s ({..n(} \<union> {n})"
ballarin@13940
   686
	    by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint
ballarin@13940
   687
	      ivl_disj_int_singleton Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   688
	  also from True have "... = finsum R ?s {..k}"
ballarin@13940
   689
	    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
   690
	  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   691
	next
ballarin@13940
   692
	  case False with n_le_k have n_less_k: "n < k" by arith
ballarin@13940
   693
	  with neq have "\<zero> = finsum R ?s ({..n(} \<union> {n})"
ballarin@13940
   694
	    by (simp add: finsum_Un_disjoint f1 f2
ballarin@13940
   695
	      ivl_disj_int_singleton Pi_def del: Un_insert_right)
ballarin@13940
   696
	  also have "... = finsum R ?s {..n}"
ballarin@13940
   697
	    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
   698
	  also from n_less_k neq have "... = finsum R ?s ({..n} \<union> {)n..k})"
ballarin@13940
   699
	    by (simp add: finsum_Un_disjoint f3 ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   700
	  also from n_less_k have "... = finsum R ?s {..k}"
ballarin@13940
   701
	    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
   702
	  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   703
	qed
ballarin@13940
   704
      qed
ballarin@13940
   705
    qed
ballarin@13940
   706
    also have "... = coeff P (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> 1) k" by simp
ballarin@13940
   707
    finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   708
  qed
ballarin@13940
   709
qed (simp_all)
ballarin@13940
   710
ballarin@13940
   711
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   712
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   713
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   714
ballarin@13940
   715
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_mult_smult:
ballarin@13940
   716
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; b \<in> carrier R |] ==> monom P (a \<otimes> b) n = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P b n"
ballarin@13940
   717
  by (rule up_eqI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   718
ballarin@13940
   719
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   720
  "monom P \<one> 0 = \<one>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
   721
  by (rule up_eqI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   722
ballarin@13940
   723
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_one_mult:
ballarin@13940
   724
  "monom P \<one> (n + m) = monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m"
ballarin@13940
   725
proof (induct n)
ballarin@13940
   726
  case 0 show ?case by simp
ballarin@13940
   727
next
ballarin@13940
   728
  case Suc then show ?case
ballarin@13940
   729
    by (simp only: add_Suc monom_one_Suc) (simp add: UP_m_ac)
ballarin@13940
   730
qed
ballarin@13940
   731
ballarin@13940
   732
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_mult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   733
  assumes R: "a \<in> carrier R" "b \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
   734
  shows "monom P (a \<otimes> b) (n + m) = monom P a n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P b m"
ballarin@13940
   735
proof -
ballarin@13940
   736
  from R have "monom P (a \<otimes> b) (n + m) = monom P (a \<otimes> b \<otimes> \<one>) (n + m)" by simp
ballarin@13940
   737
  also from R have "... = a \<otimes> b \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> (n + m)"
ballarin@13940
   738
    by (simp add: monom_mult_smult del: r_one)
ballarin@13940
   739
  also have "... = a \<otimes> b \<odot>\<^sub>2 (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m)"
ballarin@13940
   740
    by (simp only: monom_one_mult)
ballarin@13940
   741
  also from R have "... = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (b \<odot>\<^sub>2 (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m))"
ballarin@13940
   742
    by (simp add: UP_smult_assoc1)
ballarin@13940
   743
  also from R have "... = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (b \<odot>\<^sub>2 (monom P \<one> m \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> n))"
ballarin@13940
   744
    by (simp add: UP_m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   745
  also from R have "... = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 ((b \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> n)"
ballarin@13940
   746
    by (simp add: UP_smult_assoc2)
ballarin@13940
   747
  also from R have "... = a \<odot>\<^sub>2 (monom P \<one> n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 (b \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m))"
ballarin@13940
   748
    by (simp add: UP_m_comm)
ballarin@13940
   749
  also from R have "... = (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> n) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 (b \<odot>\<^sub>2 monom P \<one> m)"
ballarin@13940
   750
    by (simp add: UP_smult_assoc2)
ballarin@13940
   751
  also from R have "... = monom P (a \<otimes> \<one>) n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P (b \<otimes> \<one>) m"
ballarin@13940
   752
    by (simp add: monom_mult_smult del: r_one)
ballarin@13940
   753
  also from R have "... = monom P a n \<otimes>\<^sub>2 monom P b m" by simp
ballarin@13940
   754
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
   755
qed
ballarin@13940
   756
ballarin@13940
   757
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_a_inv [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   758
  "a \<in> carrier R ==> monom P (\<ominus> a) n = \<ominus>\<^sub>2 monom P a n"
ballarin@13940
   759
  by (rule up_eqI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   760
ballarin@13940
   761
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_inj:
ballarin@13940
   762
  "inj_on (%a. monom P a n) (carrier R)"
ballarin@13940
   763
proof (rule inj_onI)
ballarin@13940
   764
  fix x y
ballarin@13940
   765
  assume R: "x \<in> carrier R" "y \<in> carrier R" and eq: "monom P x n = monom P y n"
ballarin@13940
   766
  then have "coeff P (monom P x n) n = coeff P (monom P y n) n" by simp
ballarin@13940
   767
  with R show "x = y" by simp
ballarin@13940
   768
qed
ballarin@13940
   769
ballarin@13940
   770
subsection {* The Degree Function *}
ballarin@13940
   771
ballarin@13940
   772
constdefs
ballarin@13940
   773
  deg :: "[('a, 'm) ring_scheme, nat => 'a] => nat"
ballarin@13940
   774
  "deg R p == LEAST n. bound (zero R) n (coeff (UP R) p)"
ballarin@13940
   775
ballarin@13940
   776
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_aboveI:
ballarin@13940
   777
  "[| (!!m. n < m ==> coeff P p m = \<zero>); p \<in> carrier P |] ==> deg R p <= n" 
ballarin@13940
   778
  by (unfold deg_def P_def) (fast intro: Least_le)
ballarin@13940
   779
(*
ballarin@13940
   780
lemma coeff_bound_ex: "EX n. bound n (coeff p)"
ballarin@13940
   781
proof -
ballarin@13940
   782
  have "(%n. coeff p n) : UP" by (simp add: coeff_def Rep_UP)
ballarin@13940
   783
  then obtain n where "bound n (coeff p)" by (unfold UP_def) fast
ballarin@13940
   784
  then show ?thesis ..
ballarin@13940
   785
qed
ballarin@13940
   786
  
ballarin@13940
   787
lemma bound_coeff_obtain:
ballarin@13940
   788
  assumes prem: "(!!n. bound n (coeff p) ==> P)" shows "P"
ballarin@13940
   789
proof -
ballarin@13940
   790
  have "(%n. coeff p n) : UP" by (simp add: coeff_def Rep_UP)
ballarin@13940
   791
  then obtain n where "bound n (coeff p)" by (unfold UP_def) fast
ballarin@13940
   792
  with prem show P .
ballarin@13940
   793
qed
ballarin@13940
   794
*)
ballarin@13940
   795
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_aboveD:
ballarin@13940
   796
  "[| deg R p < m; p \<in> carrier P |] ==> coeff P p m = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   797
proof -
ballarin@13940
   798
  assume R: "p \<in> carrier P" and "deg R p < m"
ballarin@13940
   799
  from R obtain n where "bound \<zero> n (coeff P p)" 
ballarin@13940
   800
    by (auto simp add: UP_def P_def)
ballarin@13940
   801
  then have "bound \<zero> (deg R p) (coeff P p)"
ballarin@13940
   802
    by (auto simp: deg_def P_def dest: LeastI)
ballarin@13940
   803
  then show ?thesis by (rule boundD)
ballarin@13940
   804
qed
ballarin@13940
   805
ballarin@13940
   806
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_belowI:
ballarin@13940
   807
  assumes non_zero: "n ~= 0 ==> coeff P p n ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   808
    and R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   809
  shows "n <= deg R p"
ballarin@13940
   810
-- {* Logically, this is a slightly stronger version of 
ballarin@13940
   811
  @{thm [source] deg_aboveD} *}
ballarin@13940
   812
proof (cases "n=0")
ballarin@13940
   813
  case True then show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   814
next
ballarin@13940
   815
  case False then have "coeff P p n ~= \<zero>" by (rule non_zero)
ballarin@13940
   816
  then have "~ deg R p < n" by (fast dest: deg_aboveD intro: R)
ballarin@13940
   817
  then show ?thesis by arith
ballarin@13940
   818
qed
ballarin@13940
   819
ballarin@13940
   820
lemma (in UP_cring) lcoeff_nonzero_deg:
ballarin@13940
   821
  assumes deg: "deg R p ~= 0" and R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   822
  shows "coeff P p (deg R p) ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   823
proof -
ballarin@13940
   824
  from R obtain m where "deg R p <= m" and m_coeff: "coeff P p m ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   825
  proof -
ballarin@13940
   826
    have minus: "!!(n::nat) m. n ~= 0 ==> (n - Suc 0 < m) = (n <= m)"
ballarin@13940
   827
      by arith
ballarin@13940
   828
(* TODO: why does proof not work with "1" *)
ballarin@13940
   829
    from deg have "deg R p - 1 < (LEAST n. bound \<zero> n (coeff P p))"
ballarin@13940
   830
      by (unfold deg_def P_def) arith
ballarin@13940
   831
    then have "~ bound \<zero> (deg R p - 1) (coeff P p)" by (rule not_less_Least)
ballarin@13940
   832
    then have "EX m. deg R p - 1 < m & coeff P p m ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   833
      by (unfold bound_def) fast
ballarin@13940
   834
    then have "EX m. deg R p <= m & coeff P p m ~= \<zero>" by (simp add: deg minus)
ballarin@13940
   835
    then show ?thesis by auto 
ballarin@13940
   836
  qed
ballarin@13940
   837
  with deg_belowI R have "deg R p = m" by fastsimp
ballarin@13940
   838
  with m_coeff show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   839
qed
ballarin@13940
   840
ballarin@13940
   841
lemma (in UP_cring) lcoeff_nonzero_nonzero:
ballarin@13940
   842
  assumes deg: "deg R p = 0" and nonzero: "p ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2" and R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   843
  shows "coeff P p 0 ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   844
proof -
ballarin@13940
   845
  have "EX m. coeff P p m ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   846
  proof (rule classical)
ballarin@13940
   847
    assume "~ ?thesis"
ballarin@13940
   848
    with R have "p = \<zero>\<^sub>2" by (auto intro: up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
   849
    with nonzero show ?thesis by contradiction
ballarin@13940
   850
  qed
ballarin@13940
   851
  then obtain m where coeff: "coeff P p m ~= \<zero>" ..
ballarin@13940
   852
  then have "m <= deg R p" by (rule deg_belowI)
ballarin@13940
   853
  then have "m = 0" by (simp add: deg)
ballarin@13940
   854
  with coeff show ?thesis by simp
ballarin@13940
   855
qed
ballarin@13940
   856
ballarin@13940
   857
lemma (in UP_cring) lcoeff_nonzero:
ballarin@13940
   858
  assumes neq: "p ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2" and R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   859
  shows "coeff P p (deg R p) ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   860
proof (cases "deg R p = 0")
ballarin@13940
   861
  case True with neq R show ?thesis by (simp add: lcoeff_nonzero_nonzero)
ballarin@13940
   862
next
ballarin@13940
   863
  case False with neq R show ?thesis by (simp add: lcoeff_nonzero_deg)
ballarin@13940
   864
qed
ballarin@13940
   865
ballarin@13940
   866
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_eqI:
ballarin@13940
   867
  "[| !!m. n < m ==> coeff P p m = \<zero>;
ballarin@13940
   868
      !!n. n ~= 0 ==> coeff P p n ~= \<zero>; p \<in> carrier P |] ==> deg R p = n"
ballarin@13940
   869
by (fast intro: le_anti_sym deg_aboveI deg_belowI)
ballarin@13940
   870
ballarin@13940
   871
(* Degree and polynomial operations *)
ballarin@13940
   872
ballarin@13940
   873
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_add [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   874
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   875
  shows "deg R (p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 q) <= max (deg R p) (deg R q)"
ballarin@13940
   876
proof (cases "deg R p <= deg R q")
ballarin@13940
   877
  case True show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   878
    by (rule deg_aboveI) (simp_all add: True R deg_aboveD) 
ballarin@13940
   879
next
ballarin@13940
   880
  case False show ?thesis
ballarin@13940
   881
    by (rule deg_aboveI) (simp_all add: False R deg_aboveD)
ballarin@13940
   882
qed
ballarin@13940
   883
ballarin@13940
   884
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_monom_le:
ballarin@13940
   885
  "a \<in> carrier R ==> deg R (monom P a n) <= n"
ballarin@13940
   886
  by (intro deg_aboveI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   887
ballarin@13940
   888
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_monom [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   889
  "[| a ~= \<zero>; a \<in> carrier R |] ==> deg R (monom P a n) = n"
ballarin@13940
   890
  by (fastsimp intro: le_anti_sym deg_aboveI deg_belowI)
ballarin@13940
   891
ballarin@13940
   892
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_const [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   893
  assumes R: "a \<in> carrier R" shows "deg R (monom P a 0) = 0"
ballarin@13940
   894
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   895
  show "deg R (monom P a 0) <= 0" by (rule deg_aboveI) (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   896
next
ballarin@13940
   897
  show "0 <= deg R (monom P a 0)" by (rule deg_belowI) (simp_all add: R)
ballarin@13940
   898
qed
ballarin@13940
   899
ballarin@13940
   900
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_zero [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   901
  "deg R \<zero>\<^sub>2 = 0"
ballarin@13940
   902
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   903
  show "deg R \<zero>\<^sub>2 <= 0" by (rule deg_aboveI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   904
next
ballarin@13940
   905
  show "0 <= deg R \<zero>\<^sub>2" by (rule deg_belowI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   906
qed
ballarin@13940
   907
ballarin@13940
   908
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   909
  "deg R \<one>\<^sub>2 = 0"
ballarin@13940
   910
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   911
  show "deg R \<one>\<^sub>2 <= 0" by (rule deg_aboveI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   912
next
ballarin@13940
   913
  show "0 <= deg R \<one>\<^sub>2" by (rule deg_belowI) simp_all
ballarin@13940
   914
qed
ballarin@13940
   915
ballarin@13940
   916
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_uminus [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   917
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" shows "deg R (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p) = deg R p"
ballarin@13940
   918
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   919
  show "deg R (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p) <= deg R p" by (simp add: deg_aboveI deg_aboveD R)
ballarin@13940
   920
next
ballarin@13940
   921
  show "deg R p <= deg R (\<ominus>\<^sub>2 p)" 
ballarin@13940
   922
    by (simp add: deg_belowI lcoeff_nonzero_deg
ballarin@13940
   923
      inj_on_iff [OF a_inv_inj, of _ "\<zero>", simplified] R)
ballarin@13940
   924
qed
ballarin@13940
   925
ballarin@13940
   926
lemma (in UP_domain) deg_smult_ring:
ballarin@13940
   927
  "[| a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   928
  deg R (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) <= (if a = \<zero> then 0 else deg R p)"
ballarin@13940
   929
  by (cases "a = \<zero>") (simp add: deg_aboveI deg_aboveD)+
ballarin@13940
   930
ballarin@13940
   931
lemma (in UP_domain) deg_smult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   932
  assumes R: "a \<in> carrier R" "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   933
  shows "deg R (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) = (if a = \<zero> then 0 else deg R p)"
ballarin@13940
   934
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   935
  show "deg R (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p) <= (if a = \<zero> then 0 else deg R p)"
ballarin@13940
   936
    by (rule deg_smult_ring)
ballarin@13940
   937
next
ballarin@13940
   938
  show "(if a = \<zero> then 0 else deg R p) <= deg R (a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p)"
ballarin@13940
   939
  proof (cases "a = \<zero>")
ballarin@13940
   940
  qed (simp, simp add: deg_belowI lcoeff_nonzero_deg integral_iff R)
ballarin@13940
   941
qed
ballarin@13940
   942
ballarin@13940
   943
lemma (in UP_cring) deg_mult_cring:
ballarin@13940
   944
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   945
  shows "deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) <= deg R p + deg R q"
ballarin@13940
   946
proof (rule deg_aboveI)
ballarin@13940
   947
  fix m
ballarin@13940
   948
  assume boundm: "deg R p + deg R q < m"
ballarin@13940
   949
  {
ballarin@13940
   950
    fix k i
ballarin@13940
   951
    assume boundk: "deg R p + deg R q < k"
ballarin@13940
   952
    then have "coeff P p i \<otimes> coeff P q (k - i) = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   953
    proof (cases "deg R p < i")
ballarin@13940
   954
      case True then show ?thesis by (simp add: deg_aboveD R)
ballarin@13940
   955
    next
ballarin@13940
   956
      case False with boundk have "deg R q < k - i" by arith
ballarin@13940
   957
      then show ?thesis by (simp add: deg_aboveD R)
ballarin@13940
   958
    qed
ballarin@13940
   959
  }
ballarin@13940
   960
  with boundm R show "coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) m = \<zero>" by simp
ballarin@13940
   961
qed (simp add: R)
ballarin@13940
   962
ballarin@13940
   963
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
   964
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
   965
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
   966
ballarin@13940
   967
lemma (in UP_domain) deg_mult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
   968
  "[| p ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2; q ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
   969
  deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) = deg R p + deg R q"
ballarin@13940
   970
proof (rule le_anti_sym)
ballarin@13940
   971
  assume "p \<in> carrier P" " q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
   972
  show "deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) <= deg R p + deg R q" by (rule deg_mult_cring)
ballarin@13940
   973
next
ballarin@13940
   974
  let ?s = "(%i. coeff P p i \<otimes> coeff P q (deg R p + deg R q - i))"
ballarin@13940
   975
  assume R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" and nz: "p ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2" "q ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
   976
  have less_add_diff: "!!(k::nat) n m. k < n ==> m < n + m - k" by arith
ballarin@13940
   977
  show "deg R p + deg R q <= deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q)"
ballarin@13940
   978
  proof (rule deg_belowI, simp add: R)
ballarin@13940
   979
    have "finsum R ?s {.. deg R p + deg R q}
ballarin@13940
   980
      = finsum R ?s ({.. deg R p(} Un {deg R p .. deg R p + deg R q})"
ballarin@13940
   981
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
   982
    also have "... = finsum R ?s {deg R p .. deg R p + deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
   983
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one
ballarin@13940
   984
        deg_aboveD less_add_diff R Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   985
    also have "...= finsum R ?s ({deg R p} Un {)deg R p .. deg R p + deg R q})"
ballarin@13940
   986
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
   987
    also have "... = coeff P p (deg R p) \<otimes> coeff P q (deg R q)" 
ballarin@13940
   988
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint
ballarin@13940
   989
	ivl_disj_int_singleton deg_aboveD R Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
   990
    finally have "finsum R ?s {.. deg R p + deg R q} 
ballarin@13940
   991
      = coeff P p (deg R p) \<otimes> coeff P q (deg R q)" .
ballarin@13940
   992
    with nz show "finsum R ?s {.. deg R p + deg R q} ~= \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
   993
      by (simp add: integral_iff lcoeff_nonzero R)
ballarin@13940
   994
    qed (simp add: R)
ballarin@13940
   995
  qed
ballarin@13940
   996
ballarin@13940
   997
lemma (in UP_cring) coeff_finsum:
ballarin@13940
   998
  assumes fin: "finite A"
ballarin@13940
   999
  shows "p \<in> A -> carrier P ==>
ballarin@13940
  1000
    coeff P (finsum P p A) k == finsum R (%i. coeff P (p i) k) A"
ballarin@13940
  1001
  using fin by induct (auto simp: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1002
ballarin@13940
  1003
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
  1004
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
  1005
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
  1006
ballarin@13940
  1007
lemma (in UP_cring) up_repr:
ballarin@13940
  1008
  assumes R: "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
  1009
  shows "finsum P (%i. monom P (coeff P p i) i) {..deg R p} = p"
ballarin@13940
  1010
proof (rule up_eqI)
ballarin@13940
  1011
  let ?s = "(%i. monom P (coeff P p i) i)"
ballarin@13940
  1012
  fix k
ballarin@13940
  1013
  from R have RR: "!!i. (if i = k then coeff P p i else \<zero>) \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1014
    by simp
ballarin@13940
  1015
  show "coeff P (finsum P ?s {..deg R p}) k = coeff P p k"
ballarin@13940
  1016
  proof (cases "k <= deg R p")
ballarin@13940
  1017
    case True
ballarin@13940
  1018
    hence "coeff P (finsum P ?s {..deg R p}) k = 
ballarin@13940
  1019
          coeff P (finsum P ?s ({..k} Un {)k..deg R p})) k"
ballarin@13940
  1020
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
  1021
    also from True
ballarin@13940
  1022
    have "... = coeff P (finsum P ?s {..k}) k"
ballarin@13940
  1023
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_Un_disjoint
ballarin@13940
  1024
	ivl_disj_int_one order_less_imp_not_eq2 coeff_finsum R RR Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1025
    also
ballarin@13940
  1026
    have "... = coeff P (finsum P ?s ({..k(} Un {k})) k"
ballarin@13940
  1027
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
  1028
    also have "... = coeff P p k"
ballarin@13940
  1029
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: setsum_Un_disjoint
ballarin@13940
  1030
	ivl_disj_int_singleton coeff_finsum deg_aboveD R RR Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1031
    finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1032
  next
ballarin@13940
  1033
    case False
ballarin@13940
  1034
    hence "coeff P (finsum P ?s {..deg R p}) k = 
ballarin@13940
  1035
          coeff P (finsum P ?s ({..deg R p(} Un {deg R p})) k"
ballarin@13940
  1036
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
ballarin@13940
  1037
    also from False have "... = coeff P p k"
ballarin@13940
  1038
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: setsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_singleton
ballarin@13940
  1039
        coeff_finsum deg_aboveD R Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1040
    finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1041
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1042
qed (simp_all add: R Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1043
ballarin@13940
  1044
lemma (in UP_cring) up_repr_le:
ballarin@13940
  1045
  "[| deg R p <= n; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1046
  finsum P (%i. monom P (coeff P p i) i) {..n} = p"
ballarin@13940
  1047
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1048
  let ?s = "(%i. monom P (coeff P p i) i)"
ballarin@13940
  1049
  assume R: "p \<in> carrier P" and "deg R p <= n"
ballarin@13940
  1050
  then have "finsum P ?s {..n} = finsum P ?s ({..deg R p} Un {)deg R p..n})"
ballarin@13940
  1051
    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
  1052
  also have "... = finsum P ?s {..deg R p}"
ballarin@13940
  1053
    by (simp cong: UP_finsum_cong add: UP_finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one
ballarin@13940
  1054
      deg_aboveD R Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1055
  also have "... = p" by (rule up_repr)
ballarin@13940
  1056
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1057
qed
ballarin@13940
  1058
ballarin@13940
  1059
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
  1060
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
  1061
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
  1062
ballarin@13940
  1063
subsection {* Polynomial over an Integral Domain are an Integral Domain *}
ballarin@13940
  1064
ballarin@13940
  1065
lemma domainI:
ballarin@13940
  1066
  assumes cring: "cring R"
ballarin@13940
  1067
    and one_not_zero: "one R ~= zero R"
ballarin@13940
  1068
    and integral: "!!a b. [| mult R a b = zero R; a \<in> carrier R;
ballarin@13940
  1069
      b \<in> carrier R |] ==> a = zero R | b = zero R"
ballarin@13940
  1070
  shows "domain R"
ballarin@13940
  1071
  by (auto intro!: domain.intro domain_axioms.intro cring.axioms prems
ballarin@13940
  1072
    del: disjCI)
ballarin@13940
  1073
ballarin@13940
  1074
lemma (in UP_domain) UP_one_not_zero:
ballarin@13940
  1075
  "\<one>\<^sub>2 ~= \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1076
proof
ballarin@13940
  1077
  assume "\<one>\<^sub>2 = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1078
  hence "coeff P \<one>\<^sub>2 0 = (coeff P \<zero>\<^sub>2 0)" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1079
  hence "\<one> = \<zero>" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1080
  with one_not_zero show "False" by contradiction
ballarin@13940
  1081
qed
ballarin@13940
  1082
ballarin@13940
  1083
lemma (in UP_domain) UP_integral:
ballarin@13940
  1084
  "[| p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q = \<zero>\<^sub>2; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==> p = \<zero>\<^sub>2 | q = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1085
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1086
  fix p q
ballarin@13940
  1087
  assume pq: "p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q = \<zero>\<^sub>2" and R: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
  1088
  show "p = \<zero>\<^sub>2 | q = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1089
  proof (rule classical)
ballarin@13940
  1090
    assume c: "~ (p = \<zero>\<^sub>2 | q = \<zero>\<^sub>2)"
ballarin@13940
  1091
    with R have "deg R p + deg R q = deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q)" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1092
    also from pq have "... = 0" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1093
    finally have "deg R p + deg R q = 0" .
ballarin@13940
  1094
    then have f1: "deg R p = 0 & deg R q = 0" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1095
    from f1 R have "p = finsum P (%i. (monom P (coeff P p i) i)) {..0}"
ballarin@13940
  1096
      by (simp only: up_repr_le)
ballarin@13940
  1097
    also from R have "... = monom P (coeff P p 0) 0" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1098
    finally have p: "p = monom P (coeff P p 0) 0" .
ballarin@13940
  1099
    from f1 R have "q = finsum P (%i. (monom P (coeff P q i) i)) {..0}"
ballarin@13940
  1100
      by (simp only: up_repr_le)
ballarin@13940
  1101
    also from R have "... = monom P (coeff P q 0) 0" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1102
    finally have q: "q = monom P (coeff P q 0) 0" .
ballarin@13940
  1103
    from R have "coeff P p 0 \<otimes> coeff P q 0 = coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 q) 0" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1104
    also from pq have "... = \<zero>" by simp
ballarin@13940
  1105
    finally have "coeff P p 0 \<otimes> coeff P q 0 = \<zero>" .
ballarin@13940
  1106
    with R have "coeff P p 0 = \<zero> | coeff P q 0 = \<zero>"
ballarin@13940
  1107
      by (simp add: R.integral_iff)
ballarin@13940
  1108
    with p q show "p = \<zero>\<^sub>2 | q = \<zero>\<^sub>2" by fastsimp
ballarin@13940
  1109
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1110
qed
ballarin@13940
  1111
ballarin@13940
  1112
theorem (in UP_domain) UP_domain:
ballarin@13940
  1113
  "domain P"
ballarin@13940
  1114
  by (auto intro!: domainI UP_cring UP_one_not_zero UP_integral del: disjCI)
ballarin@13940
  1115
ballarin@13940
  1116
text {*
ballarin@13940
  1117
  Instantiation of results from @{term domain}.
ballarin@13940
  1118
*}
ballarin@13940
  1119
ballarin@13940
  1120
lemmas (in UP_domain) UP_zero_not_one [simp] =
ballarin@13940
  1121
  domain.zero_not_one [OF UP_domain]
ballarin@13940
  1122
ballarin@13940
  1123
lemmas (in UP_domain) UP_integral_iff =
ballarin@13940
  1124
  domain.integral_iff [OF UP_domain]
ballarin@13940
  1125
ballarin@13940
  1126
lemmas (in UP_domain) UP_m_lcancel =
ballarin@13940
  1127
  domain.m_lcancel [OF UP_domain]
ballarin@13940
  1128
ballarin@13940
  1129
lemmas (in UP_domain) UP_m_rcancel =
ballarin@13940
  1130
  domain.m_rcancel [OF UP_domain]
ballarin@13940
  1131
ballarin@13940
  1132
lemma (in UP_domain) smult_integral:
ballarin@13940
  1133
  "[| a \<odot>\<^sub>2 p = \<zero>\<^sub>2; a \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==> a = \<zero> | p = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1134
  by (simp add: monom_mult_is_smult [THEN sym] UP_integral_iff
ballarin@13940
  1135
    inj_on_iff [OF monom_inj, of _ "\<zero>", simplified])
ballarin@13940
  1136
ballarin@13940
  1137
subsection {* Evaluation Homomorphism *}
ballarin@13940
  1138
ballarin@13940
  1139
ML_setup {*
ballarin@13940
  1140
Context.>> (fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy :=
ballarin@13940
  1141
  simpset_of thy setsubgoaler asm_full_simp_tac; thy)) *}
ballarin@13940
  1142
ballarin@13940
  1143
(* alternative congruence rule (more efficient)
ballarin@13940
  1144
lemma (in abelian_monoid) finsum_cong2:
ballarin@13940
  1145
  "[| !!i. i \<in> A ==> f i \<in> carrier G = True; A = B;
ballarin@13940
  1146
  !!i. i \<in> B ==> f i = g i |] ==> finsum G f A = finsum G g B"
ballarin@13940
  1147
  sorry
ballarin@13940
  1148
*)
ballarin@13940
  1149
ballarin@13940
  1150
theorem (in cring) diagonal_sum:
ballarin@13940
  1151
  "[| f \<in> {..n + m::nat} -> carrier R; g \<in> {..n + m} -> carrier R |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1152
  finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f i \<otimes> g (k - i)) {..k}) {..n + m} =
ballarin@13940
  1153
  finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..n + m - k}) {..n + m}"
ballarin@13940
  1154
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1155
  assume Rf: "f \<in> {..n + m} -> carrier R" and Rg: "g \<in> {..n + m} -> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1156
  {
ballarin@13940
  1157
    fix j
ballarin@13940
  1158
    have "j <= n + m ==>
ballarin@13940
  1159
      finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f i \<otimes> g (k - i)) {..k}) {..j} =
ballarin@13940
  1160
      finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..j - k}) {..j}"
ballarin@13940
  1161
    proof (induct j)
ballarin@13940
  1162
      case 0 from Rf Rg show ?case by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1163
    next
ballarin@13940
  1164
      case (Suc j) 
ballarin@13940
  1165
      (* The following could be simplified if there was a reasoner for
ballarin@13940
  1166
	total orders integrated with simip. *)
ballarin@13940
  1167
      have R6: "!!i k. [| k <= j; i <= Suc j - k |] ==> g i \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1168
	using Suc by (auto intro!: funcset_mem [OF Rg]) arith
ballarin@13940
  1169
      have R8: "!!i k. [| k <= Suc j; i <= k |] ==> g (k - i) \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1170
	using Suc by (auto intro!: funcset_mem [OF Rg]) arith
ballarin@13940
  1171
      have R9: "!!i k. [| k <= Suc j |] ==> f k \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1172
	using Suc by (auto intro!: funcset_mem [OF Rf])
ballarin@13940
  1173
      have R10: "!!i k. [| k <= Suc j; i <= Suc j - k |] ==> g i \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1174
	using Suc by (auto intro!: funcset_mem [OF Rg]) arith
ballarin@13940
  1175
      have R11: "g 0 \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1176
	using Suc by (auto intro!: funcset_mem [OF Rg])
ballarin@13940
  1177
      from Suc show ?case
ballarin@13940
  1178
	by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: Suc_diff_le a_ac
ballarin@13940
  1179
	  Pi_def R6 R8 R9 R10 R11)
ballarin@13940
  1180
    qed
ballarin@13940
  1181
  }
ballarin@13940
  1182
  then show ?thesis by fast
ballarin@13940
  1183
qed
ballarin@13940
  1184
ballarin@13940
  1185
lemma (in abelian_monoid) boundD_carrier:
ballarin@13940
  1186
  "[| bound \<zero> n f; n < m |] ==> f m \<in> carrier G"
ballarin@13940
  1187
  by auto
ballarin@13940
  1188
ballarin@13940
  1189
theorem (in cring) cauchy_product:
ballarin@13940
  1190
  assumes bf: "bound \<zero> n f" and bg: "bound \<zero> m g"
ballarin@13940
  1191
    and Rf: "f \<in> {..n} -> carrier R" and Rg: "g \<in> {..m} -> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1192
  shows "finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f i \<otimes> g (k-i)) {..k}) {..n + m} =
ballarin@13940
  1193
    finsum R f {..n} \<otimes> finsum R g {..m}"
ballarin@13940
  1194
(* State revese direction? *)
ballarin@13940
  1195
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1196
  have f: "!!x. f x \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1197
  proof -
ballarin@13940
  1198
    fix x
ballarin@13940
  1199
    show "f x \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1200
      using Rf bf boundD_carrier by (cases "x <= n") (auto simp: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1201
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1202
  have g: "!!x. g x \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1203
  proof -
ballarin@13940
  1204
    fix x
ballarin@13940
  1205
    show "g x \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1206
      using Rg bg boundD_carrier by (cases "x <= m") (auto simp: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1207
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1208
  from f g have "finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f i \<otimes> g (k-i)) {..k}) {..n + m} =
ballarin@13940
  1209
    finsum R (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..n + m - k}) {..n + m}"
ballarin@13940
  1210
    by (simp add: diagonal_sum Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1211
  also have "... = finsum R
ballarin@13940
  1212
      (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..n + m - k}) ({..n} Un {)n..n + m})"
ballarin@13940
  1213
    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
  1214
  also from f g have "... = finsum R
ballarin@13940
  1215
      (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..n + m - k}) {..n}"
ballarin@13940
  1216
    by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1217
      add: boundD [OF bf] finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1218
  also from f g have "... = finsum R
ballarin@13940
  1219
      (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) ({..m} Un {)m..n + m - k})) {..n}"
ballarin@13940
  1220
    by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: ivl_disj_un_one le_add_diff Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1221
  also from f g have "... = finsum R
ballarin@13940
  1222
      (%k. finsum R (%i. f k \<otimes> g i) {..m}) {..n}"
ballarin@13940
  1223
    by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1224
      add: boundD [OF bg] finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1225
  also from f g have "... = finsum R f {..n} \<otimes> finsum R g {..m}"
ballarin@13940
  1226
    by (simp add: finsum_ldistr diagonal_sum Pi_def,
ballarin@13940
  1227
      simp cong: finsum_cong add: finsum_rdistr Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1228
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1229
qed
ballarin@13940
  1230
ballarin@13940
  1231
lemma (in UP_cring) const_ring_hom:
ballarin@13940
  1232
  "(%a. monom P a 0) \<in> ring_hom R P"
ballarin@13940
  1233
  by (auto intro!: ring_hom_memI intro: up_eqI simp: monom_mult_is_smult)
ballarin@13940
  1234
ballarin@13940
  1235
constdefs
ballarin@13940
  1236
  eval :: "[('a, 'm) ring_scheme, ('b, 'n) ring_scheme,
ballarin@13940
  1237
          'a => 'b, 'b, nat => 'a] => 'b"
ballarin@13940
  1238
  "eval R S phi s == (\<lambda>p \<in> carrier (UP R).
ballarin@13940
  1239
    finsum S (%i. mult S (phi (coeff (UP R) p i)) (pow S s i)) {..deg R p})"
ballarin@13940
  1240
(*
ballarin@13940
  1241
  "eval R S phi s p == if p \<in> carrier (UP R)
ballarin@13940
  1242
  then finsum S (%i. mult S (phi (coeff (UP R) p i)) (pow S s i)) {..deg R p}
ballarin@13940
  1243
  else arbitrary"
ballarin@13940
  1244
*)
ballarin@13940
  1245
                                                         
ballarin@13940
  1246
locale ring_hom_UP_cring = ring_hom_cring R S + UP_cring R
ballarin@13940
  1247
ballarin@13940
  1248
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_on_carrier:
ballarin@13940
  1249
  "p \<in> carrier P ==>
ballarin@13940
  1250
    eval R S phi s p =
ballarin@13940
  1251
    finsum S (%i. mult S (phi (coeff P p i)) (pow S s i)) {..deg R p}"
ballarin@13940
  1252
  by (unfold eval_def, fold P_def) simp
ballarin@13940
  1253
ballarin@13940
  1254
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_extensional:
ballarin@13940
  1255
  "eval R S phi s \<in> extensional (carrier P)"
ballarin@13940
  1256
  by (unfold eval_def, fold P_def) simp
ballarin@13940
  1257
ballarin@13940
  1258
theorem (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_ring_hom:
ballarin@13940
  1259
  "s \<in> carrier S ==> eval R S h s \<in> ring_hom P S"
ballarin@13940
  1260
proof (rule ring_hom_memI)
ballarin@13940
  1261
  fix p
ballarin@13940
  1262
  assume RS: "p \<in> carrier P" "s \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1263
  then show "eval R S h s p \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1264
    by (simp only: eval_on_carrier) (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1265
next
ballarin@13940
  1266
  fix p q
ballarin@13940
  1267
  assume RS: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" "s \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1268
  then show "eval R S h s (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) = eval R S h s p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 eval R S h s q"
ballarin@13940
  1269
  proof (simp only: eval_on_carrier UP_mult_closed)
ballarin@13940
  1270
    from RS have
ballarin@13940
  1271
      "finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q)} =
ballarin@13940
  1272
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1273
        ({..deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q)} Un {)deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q)..deg R p + deg R q})"
ballarin@13940
  1274
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1275
	add: deg_aboveD finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def
ballarin@13940
  1276
	del: coeff_mult)
ballarin@13940
  1277
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1278
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R p + deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
  1279
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one deg_mult_cring)
ballarin@13940
  1280
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1281
      finsum S (%i.
ballarin@13940
  1282
        finsum S (%k. 
ballarin@13940
  1283
        (h (coeff P p k) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 h (coeff P q (i-k))) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 (s (^)\<^sub>2 k \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 (i-k)))
ballarin@13940
  1284
      {..i}) {..deg R p + deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
  1285
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong add: nat_pow_mult Pi_def
ballarin@13940
  1286
	S.m_ac S.finsum_rdistr)
ballarin@13940
  1287
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1288
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R p} \<otimes>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1289
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
  1290
      by (simp add: S.cauchy_product [THEN sym] boundI deg_aboveD S.m_ac
ballarin@13940
  1291
	Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1292
    finally show
ballarin@13940
  1293
      "finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q)} =
ballarin@13940
  1294
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R p} \<otimes>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1295
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R q}" .
ballarin@13940
  1296
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1297
next
ballarin@13940
  1298
  fix p q
ballarin@13940
  1299
  assume RS: "p \<in> carrier P" "q \<in> carrier P" "s \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1300
  then show "eval R S h s (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) = eval R S h s p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 eval R S h s q"
ballarin@13940
  1301
  proof (simp only: eval_on_carrier UP_a_closed)
ballarin@13940
  1302
    from RS have
ballarin@13940
  1303
      "finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q)} =
ballarin@13940
  1304
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1305
        ({..deg R (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q)} Un {)deg R (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q)..max (deg R p) (deg R q)})"
ballarin@13940
  1306
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1307
	add: deg_aboveD finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def
ballarin@13940
  1308
	del: coeff_add)
ballarin@13940
  1309
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1310
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1311
        {..max (deg R p) (deg R q)}"
ballarin@13940
  1312
      by (simp add: ivl_disj_un_one)
ballarin@13940
  1313
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1314
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..max (deg R p) (deg R q)} \<oplus>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1315
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..max (deg R p) (deg R q)}"
ballarin@13940
  1316
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1317
	add: l_distr deg_aboveD finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1318
    also have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1319
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1320
        ({..deg R p} Un {)deg R p..max (deg R p) (deg R q)}) \<oplus>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1321
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1322
        ({..deg R q} Un {)deg R q..max (deg R p) (deg R q)})"
ballarin@13940
  1323
      by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one le_maxI1 le_maxI2)
ballarin@13940
  1324
    also from RS have "... =
ballarin@13940
  1325
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R p} \<oplus>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1326
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
  1327
      by (simp cong: finsum_cong
ballarin@13940
  1328
	add: deg_aboveD finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1329
    finally show
ballarin@13940
  1330
      "finsum S (%i. h (coeff P (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q)} =
ballarin@13940
  1331
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P p i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R p} \<oplus>\<^sub>2
ballarin@13940
  1332
      finsum S (%i. h (coeff P q i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..deg R q}"
ballarin@13940
  1333
      .
ballarin@13940
  1334
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1335
next
ballarin@13940
  1336
  assume S: "s \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1337
  then show "eval R S h s \<one>\<^sub>3 = \<one>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1338
    by (simp only: eval_on_carrier UP_one_closed) simp
ballarin@13940
  1339
qed
ballarin@13940
  1340
ballarin@13940
  1341
text {* Instantiation of ring homomorphism lemmas. *}
ballarin@13940
  1342
ballarin@13940
  1343
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) ring_hom_cring_P_S:
ballarin@13940
  1344
  "s \<in> carrier S ==> ring_hom_cring P S (eval R S h s)"
ballarin@13940
  1345
  by (fast intro!: ring_hom_cring.intro UP_cring cring.axioms prems
ballarin@13940
  1346
  intro: ring_hom_cring_axioms.intro eval_ring_hom)
ballarin@13940
  1347
ballarin@13940
  1348
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_closed [intro, simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1349
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; p \<in> carrier P |] ==> eval R S h s p \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1350
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_closed [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1351
ballarin@13940
  1352
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_mult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1353
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1354
  eval R S h s (p \<otimes>\<^sub>3 q) = eval R S h s p \<otimes>\<^sub>2 eval R S h s q"
ballarin@13940
  1355
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_mult [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1356
ballarin@13940
  1357
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_add [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1358
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; p \<in> carrier P; q \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1359
  eval R S h s (p \<oplus>\<^sub>3 q) = eval R S h s p \<oplus>\<^sub>2 eval R S h s q"
ballarin@13940
  1360
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_add [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1361
ballarin@13940
  1362
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_one [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1363
  "s \<in> carrier S ==> eval R S h s \<one>\<^sub>3 = \<one>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1364
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_one [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1365
ballarin@13940
  1366
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_zero [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1367
  "s \<in> carrier S ==> eval R S h s \<zero>\<^sub>3 = \<zero>\<^sub>2"
ballarin@13940
  1368
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_zero [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1369
ballarin@13940
  1370
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_a_inv [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1371
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1372
  (eval R S h s) (\<ominus>\<^sub>3 p) = \<ominus>\<^sub>2 (eval R S h s) p"
ballarin@13940
  1373
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_a_inv [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1374
ballarin@13940
  1375
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_finsum [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1376
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; finite A; f \<in> A -> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1377
  (eval R S h s) (finsum P f A) = finsum S (eval R S h s o f) A"
ballarin@13940
  1378
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_finsum [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1379
ballarin@13940
  1380
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_finprod [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1381
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; finite A; f \<in> A -> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1382
  (eval R S h s) (finprod P f A) = finprod S (eval R S h s o f) A"
ballarin@13940
  1383
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_finprod [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1384
ballarin@13940
  1385
text {* Further properties of the evaluation homomorphism. *}
ballarin@13940
  1386
ballarin@13940
  1387
(* The following lemma could be proved in UP\_cring with the additional
ballarin@13940
  1388
   assumption that h is closed. *)
ballarin@13940
  1389
ballarin@13940
  1390
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_const:
ballarin@13940
  1391
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; r \<in> carrier R |] ==> eval R S h s (monom P r 0) = h r"
ballarin@13940
  1392
  by (simp only: eval_on_carrier monom_closed) simp
ballarin@13940
  1393
ballarin@13940
  1394
text {* The following proof is complicated by the fact that in arbitrary
ballarin@13940
  1395
  rings one might have @{term "one R = zero R"}. *}
ballarin@13940
  1396
ballarin@13940
  1397
(* TODO: simplify by cases "one R = zero R" *)
ballarin@13940
  1398
ballarin@13940
  1399
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_monom1:
ballarin@13940
  1400
  "s \<in> carrier S ==> eval R S h s (monom P \<one> 1) = s"
ballarin@13940
  1401
proof (simp only: eval_on_carrier monom_closed R.one_closed)
ballarin@13940
  1402
  assume S: "s \<in> carrier S"
ballarin@13940
  1403
  then have "finsum S (\<lambda>i. h (coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1404
      {..deg R (monom P \<one> 1)} =
ballarin@13940
  1405
    finsum S (\<lambda>i. h (coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1406
      ({..deg R (monom P \<one> 1)} Un {)deg R (monom P \<one> 1)..1})"
ballarin@13940
  1407
    by (simp cong: finsum_cong del: coeff_monom
ballarin@13940
  1408
      add: deg_aboveD finsum_Un_disjoint ivl_disj_int_one Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1409
  also have "... = 
ballarin@13940
  1410
    finsum S (\<lambda>i. h (coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i) {..1}"
ballarin@13940
  1411
    by (simp only: ivl_disj_un_one deg_monom_le R.one_closed)
ballarin@13940
  1412
  also have "... = s"
ballarin@13940
  1413
  proof (cases "s = \<zero>\<^sub>2")
ballarin@13940
  1414
    case True then show ?thesis by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1415
  next
ballarin@13940
  1416
    case False with S show ?thesis by (simp add: Pi_def)
ballarin@13940
  1417
  qed
ballarin@13940
  1418
  finally show "finsum S (\<lambda>i. h (coeff P (monom P \<one> 1) i) \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 i)
ballarin@13940
  1419
      {..deg R (monom P \<one> 1)} = s" .
ballarin@13940
  1420
qed
ballarin@13940
  1421
ballarin@13940
  1422
lemma (in UP_cring) monom_pow:
ballarin@13940
  1423
  assumes R: "a \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1424
  shows "(monom P a n) (^)\<^sub>2 m = monom P (a (^) m) (n * m)"
ballarin@13940
  1425
proof (induct m)
ballarin@13940
  1426
  case 0 from R show ?case by simp
ballarin@13940
  1427
next
ballarin@13940
  1428
  case Suc with R show ?case
ballarin@13940
  1429
    by (simp del: monom_mult add: monom_mult [THEN sym] add_commute)
ballarin@13940
  1430
qed
ballarin@13940
  1431
ballarin@13940
  1432
lemma (in ring_hom_cring) hom_pow [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1433
  "x \<in> carrier R ==> h (x (^) n) = h x (^)\<^sub>2 (n::nat)"
ballarin@13940
  1434
  by (induct n) simp_all
ballarin@13940
  1435
ballarin@13940
  1436
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_pow [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1437
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1438
  (eval R S h s) (p (^)\<^sub>3 n) = eval R S h s p (^)\<^sub>2 (n::nat)"
ballarin@13940
  1439
  by (rule ring_hom_cring.hom_pow [OF ring_hom_cring_P_S])
ballarin@13940
  1440
ballarin@13940
  1441
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_monom:
ballarin@13940
  1442
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; r \<in> carrier R |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1443
  eval R S h s (monom P r n) = h r \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 n"
ballarin@13940
  1444
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1445
  assume RS: "s \<in> carrier S" "r \<in> carrier R"
ballarin@13940
  1446
  then have "eval R S h s (monom P r n) =
ballarin@13940
  1447
    eval R S h s (monom P r 0 \<otimes>\<^sub>3 (monom P \<one> 1) (^)\<^sub>3 n)"
ballarin@13940
  1448
    by (simp del: monom_mult UP_hom_mult UP_hom_pow
ballarin@13940
  1449
      add: monom_mult [THEN sym] monom_pow)
ballarin@13940
  1450
  also from RS eval_monom1 have "... = h r \<otimes>\<^sub>2 s (^)\<^sub>2 n"
ballarin@13940
  1451
    by (simp add: eval_const)
ballarin@13940
  1452
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1453
qed
ballarin@13940
  1454
ballarin@13940
  1455
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) eval_smult:
ballarin@13940
  1456
  "[| s \<in> carrier S; r \<in> carrier R; p \<in> carrier P |] ==>
ballarin@13940
  1457
  eval R S h s (r \<odot>\<^sub>3 p) = h r \<otimes>\<^sub>2 eval R S h s p"
ballarin@13940
  1458
  by (simp add: monom_mult_is_smult [THEN sym] eval_const)
ballarin@13940
  1459
ballarin@13940
  1460
lemma ring_hom_cringI:
ballarin@13940
  1461
  assumes "cring R"
ballarin@13940
  1462
    and "cring S"
ballarin@13940
  1463
    and "h \<in> ring_hom R S"
ballarin@13940
  1464
  shows "ring_hom_cring R S h"
ballarin@13940
  1465
  by (fast intro: ring_hom_cring.intro ring_hom_cring_axioms.intro
ballarin@13940
  1466
    cring.axioms prems)
ballarin@13940
  1467
ballarin@13940
  1468
lemma (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_hom_unique:
ballarin@13940
  1469
  assumes Phi: "Phi \<in> ring_hom P S" "Phi (monom P \<one> (Suc 0)) = s"
ballarin@13940
  1470
      "!!r. r \<in> carrier R ==> Phi (monom P r 0) = h r"
ballarin@13940
  1471
    and Psi: "Psi \<in> ring_hom P S" "Psi (monom P \<one> (Suc 0)) = s"
ballarin@13940
  1472
      "!!r. r \<in> carrier R ==> Psi (monom P r 0) = h r"
ballarin@13940
  1473
    and RS: "s \<in> carrier S" "p \<in> carrier P"
ballarin@13940
  1474
  shows "Phi p = Psi p"
ballarin@13940
  1475
proof -
ballarin@13940
  1476
  have Phi_hom: "ring_hom_cring P S Phi"
ballarin@13940
  1477
    by (auto intro: ring_hom_cringI UP_cring S.cring Phi)
ballarin@13940
  1478
  have Psi_hom: "ring_hom_cring P S Psi"
ballarin@13940
  1479
    by (auto intro: ring_hom_cringI UP_cring S.cring Psi)
ballarin@13940
  1480
thm monom_mult
ballarin@13940
  1481
  have "Phi p = Phi (finsum P
ballarin@13940
  1482
    (%i. monom P (coeff P p i) 0 \<otimes>\<^sub>3 (monom P \<one> 1) (^)\<^sub>3 i) {..deg R p})"
ballarin@13940
  1483
    by (simp add: up_repr RS monom_mult [THEN sym] monom_pow del: monom_mult)
ballarin@13940
  1484
  also have "... = Psi (finsum P
ballarin@13940
  1485
    (%i. monom P (coeff P p i) 0 \<otimes>\<^sub>3 (monom P \<one> 1) (^)\<^sub>3 i) {..deg R p})"
ballarin@13940
  1486
    by (simp add: ring_hom_cring.hom_finsum [OF Phi_hom] 
ballarin@13940
  1487
      ring_hom_cring.hom_mult [OF Phi_hom]
ballarin@13940
  1488
      ring_hom_cring.hom_pow [OF Phi_hom] Phi
ballarin@13940
  1489
      ring_hom_cring.hom_finsum [OF Psi_hom] 
ballarin@13940
  1490
      ring_hom_cring.hom_mult [OF Psi_hom]
ballarin@13940
  1491
      ring_hom_cring.hom_pow [OF Psi_hom] Psi RS Pi_def comp_def)
ballarin@13940
  1492
  also have "... = Psi p"
ballarin@13940
  1493
    by (simp add: up_repr RS monom_mult [THEN sym] monom_pow del: monom_mult)
ballarin@13940
  1494
  finally show ?thesis .
ballarin@13940
  1495
qed
ballarin@13940
  1496
ballarin@13940
  1497
ballarin@13940
  1498
theorem (in ring_hom_UP_cring) UP_universal_property:
ballarin@13940
  1499
  "s \<in> carrier S ==>
ballarin@13940
  1500
  EX! Phi. Phi \<in> ring_hom P S \<inter> extensional (carrier P) &
ballarin@13940
  1501
    Phi (monom P \<one> 1) = s & 
ballarin@13940
  1502
    (ALL r : carrier R. Phi (monom P r 0) = h r)"
ballarin@13940
  1503
  using eval_monom1                              
ballarin@13940
  1504
  apply (auto intro: eval_ring_hom eval_const eval_extensional)
ballarin@13940
  1505
  apply (rule extensionalityI)                                 
ballarin@13940
  1506
  apply (auto intro: UP_hom_unique)                            
ballarin@13940
  1507
  done                                                         
ballarin@13940
  1508
ballarin@13940
  1509
subsection {* Sample application of evaluation homomorphism *}
ballarin@13940
  1510
ballarin@13940
  1511
lemma ring_hom_UP_cringI:
ballarin@13940
  1512
  assumes "cring R"
ballarin@13940
  1513
    and "cring S"
ballarin@13940
  1514
    and "h \<in> ring_hom R S"
ballarin@13940
  1515
  shows "ring_hom_UP_cring R S h"
ballarin@13940
  1516
  by (fast intro: ring_hom_UP_cring.intro ring_hom_cring_axioms.intro
ballarin@13940
  1517
    cring.axioms prems)
ballarin@13940
  1518
ballarin@13940
  1519
lemma INTEG_id:
ballarin@13940
  1520
  "ring_hom_UP_cring INTEG INTEG id"
ballarin@13940
  1521
  by (fast intro: ring_hom_UP_cringI cring_INTEG id_ring_hom)
ballarin@13940
  1522
ballarin@13940
  1523
text {*
ballarin@13940
  1524
  An instantiation mechanism would now import all theorems and lemmas
ballarin@13940
  1525
  valid in the context of homomorphisms between @{term INTEG} and @{term
ballarin@13940
  1526
  "UP INTEG"}.  *}
ballarin@13940
  1527
ballarin@13940
  1528
lemma INTEG_closed [intro, simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1529
  "z \<in> carrier INTEG"
ballarin@13940
  1530
  by (unfold INTEG_def) simp
ballarin@13940
  1531
ballarin@13940
  1532
lemma INTEG_mult [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1533
  "mult INTEG z w = z * w"
ballarin@13940
  1534
  by (unfold INTEG_def) simp
ballarin@13940
  1535
ballarin@13940
  1536
lemma INTEG_pow [simp]:
ballarin@13940
  1537
  "pow INTEG z n = z ^ n"
ballarin@13940
  1538
  by (induct n) (simp_all add: INTEG_def nat_pow_def)
ballarin@13940
  1539
ballarin@13940
  1540
lemma "eval INTEG INTEG id 10 (monom (UP INTEG) 5 2) = 500"
ballarin@13940
  1541
  by (simp add: ring_hom_UP_cring.eval_monom [OF INTEG_id])
ballarin@13940
  1542
ballarin@13940
  1543
-- {* Calculates @{term "x = 500"} *}
ballarin@13940
  1544
ballarin@13940
  1545
ballarin@13940
  1546
end