src/HOL/Auth/OtwayRees_AN.ML
author paulson
Wed May 07 13:01:43 1997 +0200 (1997-05-07)
changeset 3121 cbb6c0c1c58a
parent 3102 4d01cdc119d2
child 3207 fe79ad367d77
permissions -rw-r--r--
Conversion to use blast_tac (with other improvements)
paulson@2090
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Auth/OtwayRees
paulson@2090
     2
    ID:         $Id$
paulson@2090
     3
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
paulson@2090
     4
    Copyright   1996  University of Cambridge
paulson@2090
     5
paulson@2090
     6
Inductive relation "otway" for the Otway-Rees protocol.
paulson@2090
     7
paulson@2090
     8
Simplified version with minimal encryption but explicit messages
paulson@2090
     9
paulson@2090
    10
From page 11 of
paulson@2090
    11
  Abadi and Needham.  Prudent Engineering Practice for Cryptographic Protocols.
paulson@2090
    12
  IEEE Trans. SE 22 (1), 1996
paulson@2090
    13
*)
paulson@2090
    14
paulson@2090
    15
open OtwayRees_AN;
paulson@2090
    16
paulson@2090
    17
proof_timing:=true;
paulson@2090
    18
HOL_quantifiers := false;
paulson@2090
    19
paulson@2090
    20
paulson@2331
    21
(*A "possibility property": there are traces that reach the end*)
paulson@2090
    22
goal thy 
paulson@2331
    23
 "!!A B. [| A ~= B; A ~= Server; B ~= Server |]                               \
paulson@2331
    24
\        ==> EX K. EX NA. EX evs: otway lost.                                 \
paulson@2284
    25
\             Says B A (Crypt (shrK A) {|Nonce NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}) \
paulson@2090
    26
\             : set_of_list evs";
paulson@2090
    27
by (REPEAT (resolve_tac [exI,bexI] 1));
paulson@2090
    28
by (rtac (otway.Nil RS otway.OR1 RS otway.OR2 RS otway.OR3 RS otway.OR4) 2);
paulson@2516
    29
by possibility_tac;
paulson@2090
    30
result();
paulson@2090
    31
paulson@2090
    32
paulson@2090
    33
(**** Inductive proofs about otway ****)
paulson@2090
    34
paulson@2106
    35
(*Monotonicity*)
paulson@2090
    36
goal thy "!!evs. lost' <= lost ==> otway lost' <= otway lost";
paulson@2090
    37
by (rtac subsetI 1);
paulson@2090
    38
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@2090
    39
by (REPEAT_FIRST
paulson@2090
    40
    (best_tac (!claset addIs (impOfSubs (sees_mono RS analz_mono RS synth_mono)
paulson@2090
    41
                              :: otway.intrs))));
paulson@2090
    42
qed "otway_mono";
paulson@2090
    43
paulson@2090
    44
(*Nobody sends themselves messages*)
paulson@2090
    45
goal thy "!!evs. evs : otway lost ==> ALL A X. Says A A X ~: set_of_list evs";
paulson@2090
    46
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@2090
    47
by (Auto_tac());
paulson@2090
    48
qed_spec_mp "not_Says_to_self";
paulson@2090
    49
Addsimps [not_Says_to_self];
paulson@2090
    50
AddSEs   [not_Says_to_self RSN (2, rev_notE)];
paulson@2090
    51
paulson@2090
    52
paulson@2090
    53
(** For reasoning about the encrypted portion of messages **)
paulson@2090
    54
paulson@2837
    55
goal thy "!!evs. Says S' B {|X, Crypt(shrK B) X'|} : set_of_list evs ==> \
paulson@2090
    56
\                X : analz (sees lost Spy evs)";
paulson@3102
    57
by (blast_tac (!claset addSDs [Says_imp_sees_Spy RS analz.Inj]) 1);
paulson@2090
    58
qed "OR4_analz_sees_Spy";
paulson@2090
    59
paulson@2284
    60
goal thy "!!evs. Says Server B {|X, Crypt K' {|NB, a, Agent B, K|}|} \
paulson@2131
    61
\                  : set_of_list evs ==> K : parts (sees lost Spy evs)";
paulson@3102
    62
by (blast_tac (!claset addSEs sees_Spy_partsEs) 1);
paulson@2131
    63
qed "Oops_parts_sees_Spy";
paulson@2090
    64
paulson@2131
    65
(*OR4_analz_sees_Spy lets us treat those cases using the same 
paulson@2090
    66
  argument as for the Fake case.  This is possible for most, but not all,
paulson@2131
    67
  proofs, since Fake messages originate from the Spy. *)
paulson@2090
    68
paulson@2090
    69
bind_thm ("OR4_parts_sees_Spy",
paulson@2090
    70
          OR4_analz_sees_Spy RS (impOfSubs analz_subset_parts));
paulson@2090
    71
paulson@3121
    72
(*For proving the easier theorems about X ~: parts (sees lost Spy evs).
paulson@3121
    73
  We instantiate the variable to "lost" since leaving it as a Var would
paulson@3121
    74
  interfere with simplification.*)
paulson@3121
    75
val parts_induct_tac = 
paulson@3121
    76
    let val tac = forw_inst_tac [("lost","lost")] 
paulson@3121
    77
    in  etac otway.induct	   1 THEN 
paulson@3121
    78
        tac OR4_parts_sees_Spy     6 THEN
paulson@3121
    79
        tac Oops_parts_sees_Spy    7 THEN
paulson@3121
    80
	prove_simple_subgoals_tac  1
paulson@3121
    81
    end;
paulson@2090
    82
paulson@2090
    83
paulson@2090
    84
(** Theorems of the form X ~: parts (sees lost Spy evs) imply that NOBODY
paulson@2090
    85
    sends messages containing X! **)
paulson@2090
    86
paulson@2090
    87
(*Spy never sees another agent's shared key! (unless it's lost at start)*)
paulson@2090
    88
goal thy 
paulson@2131
    89
 "!!evs. evs : otway lost \
paulson@2131
    90
\        ==> (Key (shrK A) : parts (sees lost Spy evs)) = (A : lost)";
paulson@3121
    91
by parts_induct_tac;
paulson@3121
    92
by (Fake_parts_insert_tac 1);
paulson@3121
    93
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2131
    94
qed "Spy_see_shrK";
paulson@2131
    95
Addsimps [Spy_see_shrK];
paulson@2090
    96
paulson@2131
    97
goal thy 
paulson@2131
    98
 "!!evs. evs : otway lost \
paulson@2131
    99
\        ==> (Key (shrK A) : analz (sees lost Spy evs)) = (A : lost)";
paulson@2131
   100
by (auto_tac(!claset addDs [impOfSubs analz_subset_parts], !simpset));
paulson@2131
   101
qed "Spy_analz_shrK";
paulson@2131
   102
Addsimps [Spy_analz_shrK];
paulson@2090
   103
paulson@2131
   104
goal thy  "!!A. [| Key (shrK A) : parts (sees lost Spy evs);       \
paulson@2131
   105
\                  evs : otway lost |] ==> A:lost";
paulson@3102
   106
by (blast_tac (!claset addDs [Spy_see_shrK]) 1);
paulson@2131
   107
qed "Spy_see_shrK_D";
paulson@2090
   108
paulson@2131
   109
bind_thm ("Spy_analz_shrK_D", analz_subset_parts RS subsetD RS Spy_see_shrK_D);
paulson@2131
   110
AddSDs [Spy_see_shrK_D, Spy_analz_shrK_D];
paulson@2090
   111
paulson@2090
   112
paulson@2516
   113
(*Nobody can have used non-existent keys!*)
paulson@2516
   114
goal thy "!!evs. evs : otway lost ==>          \
paulson@2516
   115
\         Key K ~: used evs --> K ~: keysFor (parts (sees lost Spy evs))";
paulson@3121
   116
by parts_induct_tac;
paulson@2516
   117
(*Fake*)
paulson@2516
   118
by (best_tac
paulson@2516
   119
      (!claset addIs [impOfSubs analz_subset_parts]
paulson@2516
   120
               addDs [impOfSubs (analz_subset_parts RS keysFor_mono),
paulson@2516
   121
                      impOfSubs (parts_insert_subset_Un RS keysFor_mono)]
oheimb@2637
   122
               unsafe_addss (!simpset)) 1);
paulson@2516
   123
(*OR3*)
paulson@3102
   124
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2160
   125
qed_spec_mp "new_keys_not_used";
paulson@2090
   126
paulson@2090
   127
bind_thm ("new_keys_not_analzd",
paulson@2090
   128
          [analz_subset_parts RS keysFor_mono,
paulson@2090
   129
           new_keys_not_used] MRS contra_subsetD);
paulson@2090
   130
paulson@2090
   131
Addsimps [new_keys_not_used, new_keys_not_analzd];
paulson@2090
   132
paulson@2090
   133
paulson@2090
   134
paulson@2090
   135
(*** Proofs involving analz ***)
paulson@2090
   136
paulson@2131
   137
(*Describes the form of K and NA when the Server sends this message.*)
paulson@2090
   138
goal thy 
paulson@2516
   139
 "!!evs. [| Says Server B                                           \
paulson@2516
   140
\              {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},    \
paulson@2516
   141
\                Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}   \
paulson@2516
   142
\             : set_of_list evs;                                    \
paulson@2516
   143
\           evs : otway lost |]                                     \
paulson@2516
   144
\        ==> K ~: range shrK & (EX i. NA = Nonce i) & (EX j. NB = Nonce j)";
paulson@2131
   145
by (etac rev_mp 1);
paulson@2131
   146
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@3102
   147
by (ALLGOALS Asm_simp_tac);
paulson@3102
   148
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2131
   149
qed "Says_Server_message_form";
paulson@2090
   150
paulson@2090
   151
paulson@2090
   152
(*For proofs involving analz.  We again instantiate the variable to "lost".*)
paulson@3121
   153
val analz_sees_tac = 
paulson@2090
   154
    dres_inst_tac [("lost","lost")] OR4_analz_sees_Spy 6 THEN
paulson@2131
   155
    forw_inst_tac [("lost","lost")] Says_Server_message_form 7 THEN
paulson@2516
   156
    assume_tac 7 THEN
paulson@2451
   157
    REPEAT ((eresolve_tac [exE, conjE] ORELSE' hyp_subst_tac) 7);
paulson@2090
   158
paulson@2090
   159
paulson@2090
   160
(****
paulson@2090
   161
 The following is to prove theorems of the form
paulson@2090
   162
paulson@2516
   163
  Key K : analz (insert (Key KAB) (sees lost Spy evs)) ==>
paulson@2451
   164
  Key K : analz (sees lost Spy evs)
paulson@2090
   165
paulson@2090
   166
 A more general formula must be proved inductively.
paulson@2090
   167
****)
paulson@2090
   168
paulson@2090
   169
paulson@2090
   170
(** Session keys are not used to encrypt other session keys **)
paulson@2090
   171
paulson@2090
   172
(*The equality makes the induction hypothesis easier to apply*)
paulson@2090
   173
goal thy  
paulson@2331
   174
 "!!evs. evs : otway lost ==>                                         \
paulson@2516
   175
\  ALL K KK. KK <= Compl (range shrK) -->                      \
paulson@2516
   176
\            (Key K : analz (Key``KK Un (sees lost Spy evs))) = \
paulson@2516
   177
\            (K : KK | Key K : analz (sees lost Spy evs))";
paulson@2090
   178
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@3121
   179
by analz_sees_tac;
paulson@2516
   180
by (REPEAT_FIRST (resolve_tac [allI, impI]));
paulson@2516
   181
by (REPEAT_FIRST (rtac analz_image_freshK_lemma ));
paulson@2516
   182
(*14 seconds*)
paulson@2516
   183
by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac analz_image_freshK_ss));
paulson@2131
   184
(*OR4, Fake*) 
paulson@2516
   185
by (EVERY (map spy_analz_tac [3,2]));
paulson@2516
   186
(*Base*)
paulson@3102
   187
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2516
   188
qed_spec_mp "analz_image_freshK";
paulson@2090
   189
paulson@2090
   190
paulson@2090
   191
goal thy
paulson@2516
   192
 "!!evs. [| evs : otway lost;  KAB ~: range shrK |] ==>             \
paulson@2516
   193
\        Key K : analz (insert (Key KAB) (sees lost Spy evs)) = \
paulson@2516
   194
\        (K = KAB | Key K : analz (sees lost Spy evs))";
paulson@2516
   195
by (asm_simp_tac (analz_image_freshK_ss addsimps [analz_image_freshK]) 1);
paulson@2516
   196
qed "analz_insert_freshK";
paulson@2090
   197
paulson@2090
   198
paulson@2090
   199
(*** The Key K uniquely identifies the Server's  message. **)
paulson@2090
   200
paulson@2090
   201
goal thy 
paulson@2331
   202
 "!!evs. evs : otway lost ==>                              \
paulson@2090
   203
\      EX A' B' NA' NB'. ALL A B NA NB.                    \
paulson@2090
   204
\       Says Server B \
paulson@2331
   205
\         {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, K|},                     \
paulson@2284
   206
\           Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, K|}|} : set_of_list evs  \
paulson@2090
   207
\       --> A=A' & B=B' & NA=NA' & NB=NB'";
paulson@2090
   208
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@2090
   209
by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (!simpset addsimps [all_conj_distrib])));
paulson@2090
   210
by (Step_tac 1);
paulson@2090
   211
(*Remaining cases: OR3 and OR4*)
paulson@2090
   212
by (ex_strip_tac 2);
paulson@3102
   213
by (Blast_tac 2);
paulson@2090
   214
by (expand_case_tac "K = ?y" 1);
paulson@2090
   215
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [refl,exI,impI,conjI] 2));
paulson@2516
   216
(*...we assume X is a recent message and handle this case by contradiction*)
paulson@3102
   217
by (blast_tac (!claset addSEs sees_Spy_partsEs
paulson@3102
   218
                       delrules[conjI] (*prevent splitup into 4 subgoals*)) 1);
paulson@2090
   219
val lemma = result();
paulson@2090
   220
paulson@2090
   221
paulson@2090
   222
goal thy 
paulson@2090
   223
"!!evs. [| Says Server B                                           \
paulson@2284
   224
\            {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, K|},         \
paulson@2284
   225
\              Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, K|}|}        \
paulson@2090
   226
\           : set_of_list evs;                                     \
paulson@2090
   227
\          Says Server B'                                          \
paulson@2284
   228
\            {|Crypt (shrK A') {|NA', Agent A', Agent B', K|},     \
paulson@2284
   229
\              Crypt (shrK B') {|NB', Agent A', Agent B', K|}|}    \
paulson@2090
   230
\           : set_of_list evs;                                     \
paulson@2090
   231
\          evs : otway lost |]                                     \
paulson@2090
   232
\       ==> A=A' & B=B' & NA=NA' & NB=NB'";
paulson@2417
   233
by (prove_unique_tac lemma 1);
paulson@2090
   234
qed "unique_session_keys";
paulson@2090
   235
paulson@2090
   236
paulson@2090
   237
paulson@2090
   238
(**** Authenticity properties relating to NA ****)
paulson@2090
   239
paulson@2090
   240
(*If the encrypted message appears then it originated with the Server!*)
paulson@2090
   241
goal thy 
paulson@2090
   242
 "!!evs. [| A ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]                 \
paulson@2284
   243
\ ==> Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}        \
paulson@2090
   244
\      : parts (sees lost Spy evs)                          \
paulson@2331
   245
\     --> (EX NB. Says Server B                                          \
paulson@2284
   246
\                  {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},     \
paulson@2284
   247
\                    Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}    \
paulson@2090
   248
\                  : set_of_list evs)";
paulson@3121
   249
by parts_induct_tac;
paulson@3121
   250
by (Fake_parts_insert_tac 1);
paulson@2090
   251
by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (!simpset addsimps [ex_disj_distrib])));
paulson@2090
   252
(*OR3*)
paulson@3102
   253
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2090
   254
qed_spec_mp "NA_Crypt_imp_Server_msg";
paulson@2090
   255
paulson@2090
   256
paulson@2454
   257
(*Corollary: if A receives B's OR4 message then it originated with the Server.
paulson@2454
   258
  Freshness may be inferred from nonce NA.*)
paulson@2090
   259
goal thy 
paulson@2284
   260
 "!!evs. [| Says B' A (Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|})  \
paulson@2090
   261
\            : set_of_list evs;                                         \
paulson@2090
   262
\           A ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]                             \
paulson@2090
   263
\        ==> EX NB. Says Server B                                       \
paulson@2284
   264
\                    {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},  \
paulson@2284
   265
\                      Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|} \
paulson@2090
   266
\                   : set_of_list evs";
paulson@3102
   267
by (blast_tac (!claset addSIs [NA_Crypt_imp_Server_msg]
paulson@2516
   268
                      addEs  sees_Spy_partsEs) 1);
paulson@2331
   269
qed "A_trusts_OR4";
paulson@2090
   270
paulson@2090
   271
paulson@2090
   272
(** Crucial secrecy property: Spy does not see the keys sent in msg OR3
paulson@2090
   273
    Does not in itself guarantee security: an attack could violate 
paulson@2090
   274
    the premises, e.g. by having A=Spy **)
paulson@2090
   275
paulson@2090
   276
goal thy 
paulson@2166
   277
 "!!evs. [| A ~: lost;  B ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]                    \
paulson@2090
   278
\        ==> Says Server B                                                 \
paulson@2284
   279
\             {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},            \
paulson@2284
   280
\               Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}           \
paulson@2090
   281
\            : set_of_list evs -->                                         \
paulson@2131
   282
\            Says B Spy {|NA, NB, Key K|} ~: set_of_list evs -->           \
paulson@2090
   283
\            Key K ~: analz (sees lost Spy evs)";
paulson@2090
   284
by (etac otway.induct 1);
paulson@3121
   285
by analz_sees_tac;
paulson@2090
   286
by (ALLGOALS
paulson@2516
   287
    (asm_simp_tac (!simpset addcongs [conj_cong] 
paulson@2516
   288
                            addsimps [not_parts_not_analz,
paulson@2516
   289
                                      analz_insert_freshK]
paulson@2516
   290
                            setloop split_tac [expand_if])));
paulson@2090
   291
(*OR3*)
paulson@3102
   292
by (blast_tac (!claset addSEs sees_Spy_partsEs
paulson@3102
   293
                       addIs [impOfSubs analz_subset_parts]) 2);
paulson@2516
   294
(*Oops*) 
paulson@3102
   295
by (blast_tac (!claset addDs [unique_session_keys]) 3);
paulson@2131
   296
(*OR4, Fake*) 
paulson@2375
   297
by (REPEAT_FIRST spy_analz_tac);
paulson@2090
   298
val lemma = result() RS mp RS mp RSN(2,rev_notE);
paulson@2090
   299
paulson@2090
   300
goal thy 
paulson@2516
   301
 "!!evs. [| Says Server B                                           \
paulson@2516
   302
\              {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},    \
paulson@2516
   303
\                Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}   \
paulson@2516
   304
\             : set_of_list evs;                                    \
paulson@2516
   305
\           Says B Spy {|NA, NB, Key K|} ~: set_of_list evs;        \
paulson@2516
   306
\           A ~: lost;  B ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]             \
paulson@2516
   307
\        ==> Key K ~: analz (sees lost Spy evs)";
paulson@2090
   308
by (forward_tac [Says_Server_message_form] 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
paulson@2891
   309
by (blast_tac (!claset addSEs [lemma]) 1);
paulson@2090
   310
qed "Spy_not_see_encrypted_key";
paulson@2090
   311
paulson@2090
   312
paulson@2090
   313
goal thy 
paulson@2516
   314
 "!!evs. [| C ~: {A,B,Server};                                      \
paulson@2516
   315
\           Says Server B                                           \
paulson@2516
   316
\              {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},    \
paulson@2516
   317
\                Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}   \
paulson@2516
   318
\             : set_of_list evs;                                    \
paulson@2516
   319
\           Says B Spy {|NA, NB, Key K|} ~: set_of_list evs;        \
paulson@2516
   320
\           A ~: lost;  B ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]             \
paulson@2516
   321
\        ==> Key K ~: analz (sees lost C evs)";
paulson@2090
   322
by (rtac (subset_insertI RS sees_mono RS analz_mono RS contra_subsetD) 1);
paulson@2090
   323
by (rtac (sees_lost_agent_subset_sees_Spy RS analz_mono RS contra_subsetD) 1);
paulson@2090
   324
by (FIRSTGOAL (rtac Spy_not_see_encrypted_key));
paulson@2891
   325
by (REPEAT_FIRST (blast_tac (!claset addIs [otway_mono RS subsetD])));
paulson@2090
   326
qed "Agent_not_see_encrypted_key";
paulson@2090
   327
paulson@2090
   328
paulson@2090
   329
(**** Authenticity properties relating to NB ****)
paulson@2090
   330
paulson@2090
   331
(*If the encrypted message appears then it originated with the Server!*)
paulson@2090
   332
goal thy 
paulson@2106
   333
 "!!evs. [| B ~: lost;  evs : otway lost |]                                 \
paulson@2284
   334
\    ==> Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}                     \
paulson@2106
   335
\         : parts (sees lost Spy evs)                                       \
paulson@2090
   336
\        --> (EX NA. Says Server B                                          \
paulson@2284
   337
\                     {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},     \
paulson@2284
   338
\                       Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}    \
paulson@2090
   339
\                     : set_of_list evs)";
paulson@3121
   340
by parts_induct_tac;
paulson@3121
   341
by (Fake_parts_insert_tac 1);
paulson@2090
   342
by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (!simpset addsimps [ex_disj_distrib])));
paulson@2090
   343
(*OR3*)
paulson@3102
   344
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@2090
   345
qed_spec_mp "NB_Crypt_imp_Server_msg";
paulson@2090
   346
paulson@2090
   347
paulson@2454
   348
(*Guarantee for B: if it gets a well-formed certificate then the Server
paulson@2454
   349
  has sent the correct message in round 3.*)
paulson@2090
   350
goal thy 
paulson@2106
   351
 "!!evs. [| B ~: lost;  evs : otway lost;                                   \
paulson@2837
   352
\           Says S' B {|X, Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|} \
paulson@2106
   353
\            : set_of_list evs |]                                           \
paulson@2106
   354
\        ==> EX NA. Says Server B                                           \
paulson@2284
   355
\                     {|Crypt (shrK A) {|NA, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|},     \
paulson@2284
   356
\                       Crypt (shrK B) {|NB, Agent A, Agent B, Key K|}|}    \
paulson@2090
   357
\                     : set_of_list evs";
paulson@3102
   358
by (blast_tac (!claset addSIs [NB_Crypt_imp_Server_msg]
paulson@3102
   359
                       addEs  sees_Spy_partsEs) 1);
paulson@2331
   360
qed "B_trusts_OR3";