src/HOL/Sum_Type.thy
 author blanchet Wed Feb 12 08:35:56 2014 +0100 (2014-02-12) changeset 55393 ce5cebfaedda parent 53010 ec5e6f69bd65 child 55403 677569668824 permissions -rw-r--r--
se 'wrap_free_constructors' to register 'sum' , 'prod', 'unit', 'bool' with their discriminators/selectors
* * *
cleaner simp/iff sets
 nipkow@10213 ` 1` ```(* Title: HOL/Sum_Type.thy ``` nipkow@10213 ` 2` ``` Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory ``` nipkow@10213 ` 3` ``` Copyright 1992 University of Cambridge ``` nipkow@10213 ` 4` ```*) ``` nipkow@10213 ` 5` paulson@15391 ` 6` ```header{*The Disjoint Sum of Two Types*} ``` nipkow@10213 ` 7` paulson@15391 ` 8` ```theory Sum_Type ``` haftmann@33961 ` 9` ```imports Typedef Inductive Fun ``` paulson@15391 ` 10` ```begin ``` paulson@15391 ` 11` haftmann@33962 ` 12` ```subsection {* Construction of the sum type and its basic abstract operations *} ``` nipkow@10213 ` 13` haftmann@33962 ` 14` ```definition Inl_Rep :: "'a \ 'a \ 'b \ bool \ bool" where ``` haftmann@33962 ` 15` ``` "Inl_Rep a x y p \ x = a \ p" ``` nipkow@10213 ` 16` haftmann@33962 ` 17` ```definition Inr_Rep :: "'b \ 'a \ 'b \ bool \ bool" where ``` haftmann@33962 ` 18` ``` "Inr_Rep b x y p \ y = b \ \ p" ``` paulson@15391 ` 19` wenzelm@45694 ` 20` ```definition "sum = {f. (\a. f = Inl_Rep (a::'a)) \ (\b. f = Inr_Rep (b::'b))}" ``` wenzelm@45694 ` 21` wenzelm@49834 ` 22` ```typedef ('a, 'b) sum (infixr "+" 10) = "sum :: ('a => 'b => bool => bool) set" ``` wenzelm@45694 ` 23` ``` unfolding sum_def by auto ``` nipkow@10213 ` 24` haftmann@37388 ` 25` ```lemma Inl_RepI: "Inl_Rep a \ sum" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 26` ``` by (auto simp add: sum_def) ``` paulson@15391 ` 27` haftmann@37388 ` 28` ```lemma Inr_RepI: "Inr_Rep b \ sum" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 29` ``` by (auto simp add: sum_def) ``` paulson@15391 ` 30` haftmann@37388 ` 31` ```lemma inj_on_Abs_sum: "A \ sum \ inj_on Abs_sum A" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 32` ``` by (rule inj_on_inverseI, rule Abs_sum_inverse) auto ``` paulson@15391 ` 33` haftmann@33962 ` 34` ```lemma Inl_Rep_inject: "inj_on Inl_Rep A" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 35` ```proof (rule inj_onI) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 36` ``` show "\a c. Inl_Rep a = Inl_Rep c \ a = c" ``` nipkow@39302 ` 37` ``` by (auto simp add: Inl_Rep_def fun_eq_iff) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 38` ```qed ``` paulson@15391 ` 39` haftmann@33962 ` 40` ```lemma Inr_Rep_inject: "inj_on Inr_Rep A" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 41` ```proof (rule inj_onI) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 42` ``` show "\b d. Inr_Rep b = Inr_Rep d \ b = d" ``` nipkow@39302 ` 43` ``` by (auto simp add: Inr_Rep_def fun_eq_iff) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 44` ```qed ``` paulson@15391 ` 45` haftmann@33962 ` 46` ```lemma Inl_Rep_not_Inr_Rep: "Inl_Rep a \ Inr_Rep b" ``` nipkow@39302 ` 47` ``` by (auto simp add: Inl_Rep_def Inr_Rep_def fun_eq_iff) ``` paulson@15391 ` 48` haftmann@33962 ` 49` ```definition Inl :: "'a \ 'a + 'b" where ``` haftmann@37388 ` 50` ``` "Inl = Abs_sum \ Inl_Rep" ``` paulson@15391 ` 51` haftmann@33962 ` 52` ```definition Inr :: "'b \ 'a + 'b" where ``` haftmann@37388 ` 53` ``` "Inr = Abs_sum \ Inr_Rep" ``` paulson@15391 ` 54` huffman@29025 ` 55` ```lemma inj_Inl [simp]: "inj_on Inl A" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 56` ```by (auto simp add: Inl_def intro!: comp_inj_on Inl_Rep_inject inj_on_Abs_sum Inl_RepI) ``` huffman@29025 ` 57` haftmann@33962 ` 58` ```lemma Inl_inject: "Inl x = Inl y \ x = y" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 59` ```using inj_Inl by (rule injD) ``` paulson@15391 ` 60` huffman@29025 ` 61` ```lemma inj_Inr [simp]: "inj_on Inr A" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 62` ```by (auto simp add: Inr_def intro!: comp_inj_on Inr_Rep_inject inj_on_Abs_sum Inr_RepI) ``` paulson@15391 ` 63` haftmann@33962 ` 64` ```lemma Inr_inject: "Inr x = Inr y \ x = y" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 65` ```using inj_Inr by (rule injD) ``` paulson@15391 ` 66` haftmann@33962 ` 67` ```lemma Inl_not_Inr: "Inl a \ Inr b" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 68` ```proof - ``` haftmann@37388 ` 69` ``` from Inl_RepI [of a] Inr_RepI [of b] have "{Inl_Rep a, Inr_Rep b} \ sum" by auto ``` haftmann@37388 ` 70` ``` with inj_on_Abs_sum have "inj_on Abs_sum {Inl_Rep a, Inr_Rep b}" . ``` haftmann@37388 ` 71` ``` with Inl_Rep_not_Inr_Rep [of a b] inj_on_contraD have "Abs_sum (Inl_Rep a) \ Abs_sum (Inr_Rep b)" by auto ``` haftmann@33962 ` 72` ``` then show ?thesis by (simp add: Inl_def Inr_def) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 73` ```qed ``` paulson@15391 ` 74` haftmann@33962 ` 75` ```lemma Inr_not_Inl: "Inr b \ Inl a" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 76` ``` using Inl_not_Inr by (rule not_sym) ``` paulson@15391 ` 77` paulson@15391 ` 78` ```lemma sumE: ``` haftmann@33962 ` 79` ``` assumes "\x::'a. s = Inl x \ P" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 80` ``` and "\y::'b. s = Inr y \ P" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 81` ``` shows P ``` haftmann@37388 ` 82` ```proof (rule Abs_sum_cases [of s]) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 83` ``` fix f ``` haftmann@37388 ` 84` ``` assume "s = Abs_sum f" and "f \ sum" ``` haftmann@37388 ` 85` ``` with assms show P by (auto simp add: sum_def Inl_def Inr_def) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 86` ```qed ``` haftmann@33961 ` 87` blanchet@55393 ` 88` ```wrap_free_constructors [Inl, Inr] sum_case [isl] [[projl], [projr]] ``` blanchet@55393 ` 89` ```by (erule sumE, assumption) (auto dest: Inl_inject Inr_inject simp add: Inl_not_Inr) ``` blanchet@55393 ` 90` blanchet@55393 ` 91` ```-- {* Avoid name clashes by prefixing the output of @{text rep_datatype} with @{text old}. *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 92` ```setup {* Sign.mandatory_path "old" *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 93` haftmann@37678 ` 94` ```rep_datatype Inl Inr ``` haftmann@33961 ` 95` ```proof - ``` haftmann@33961 ` 96` ``` fix P ``` haftmann@33961 ` 97` ``` fix s :: "'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@33961 ` 98` ``` assume x: "\x\'a. P (Inl x)" and y: "\y\'b. P (Inr y)" ``` haftmann@33961 ` 99` ``` then show "P s" by (auto intro: sumE [of s]) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 100` ```qed (auto dest: Inl_inject Inr_inject simp add: Inl_not_Inr) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 101` blanchet@55393 ` 102` ```setup {* Sign.parent_path *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 103` blanchet@55393 ` 104` ```-- {* But erase the prefix for properties that are not generated by @{text wrap_free_constructors}. *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 105` ```setup {* Sign.mandatory_path "sum" *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 106` blanchet@55393 ` 107` ```declare ``` blanchet@55393 ` 108` ``` old.sum.inject[iff del] ``` blanchet@55393 ` 109` ``` old.sum.distinct(1)[simp del, induct_simp del] ``` blanchet@55393 ` 110` ``` old.sum.cases[simp del] ``` blanchet@55393 ` 111` blanchet@55393 ` 112` ```lemmas induct = old.sum.induct ``` blanchet@55393 ` 113` ```lemmas inducts = old.sum.inducts ``` blanchet@55393 ` 114` ```lemmas recs = old.sum.recs ``` blanchet@55393 ` 115` ```lemmas cases = sum.case ``` blanchet@55393 ` 116` ```lemmas simps = sum.inject sum.distinct sum.case old.sum.recs ``` blanchet@55393 ` 117` blanchet@55393 ` 118` ```setup {* Sign.parent_path *} ``` blanchet@55393 ` 119` haftmann@40610 ` 120` ```primrec sum_map :: "('a \ 'c) \ ('b \ 'd) \ 'a + 'b \ 'c + 'd" where ``` haftmann@40610 ` 121` ``` "sum_map f1 f2 (Inl a) = Inl (f1 a)" ``` haftmann@40610 ` 122` ```| "sum_map f1 f2 (Inr a) = Inr (f2 a)" ``` haftmann@40610 ` 123` haftmann@41505 ` 124` ```enriched_type sum_map: sum_map proof - ``` haftmann@41372 ` 125` ``` fix f g h i ``` haftmann@41372 ` 126` ``` show "sum_map f g \ sum_map h i = sum_map (f \ h) (g \ i)" ``` haftmann@41372 ` 127` ``` proof ``` haftmann@41372 ` 128` ``` fix s ``` haftmann@41372 ` 129` ``` show "(sum_map f g \ sum_map h i) s = sum_map (f \ h) (g \ i) s" ``` haftmann@41372 ` 130` ``` by (cases s) simp_all ``` haftmann@41372 ` 131` ``` qed ``` haftmann@40610 ` 132` ```next ``` haftmann@40610 ` 133` ``` fix s ``` haftmann@41372 ` 134` ``` show "sum_map id id = id" ``` haftmann@41372 ` 135` ``` proof ``` haftmann@41372 ` 136` ``` fix s ``` haftmann@41372 ` 137` ``` show "sum_map id id s = id s" ``` haftmann@41372 ` 138` ``` by (cases s) simp_all ``` haftmann@41372 ` 139` ``` qed ``` haftmann@40610 ` 140` ```qed ``` haftmann@40610 ` 141` kuncar@53010 ` 142` ```lemma split_sum_all: "(\x. P x) \ (\x. P (Inl x)) \ (\x. P (Inr x))" ``` kuncar@53010 ` 143` ``` by (auto intro: sum.induct) ``` kuncar@53010 ` 144` kuncar@53010 ` 145` ```lemma split_sum_ex: "(\x. P x) \ (\x. P (Inl x)) \ (\x. P (Inr x))" ``` kuncar@53010 ` 146` ```using split_sum_all[of "\x. \P x"] by blast ``` haftmann@33961 ` 147` haftmann@33962 ` 148` ```subsection {* Projections *} ``` haftmann@33962 ` 149` haftmann@33962 ` 150` ```lemma sum_case_KK [simp]: "sum_case (\x. a) (\x. a) = (\x. a)" ``` haftmann@33961 ` 151` ``` by (rule ext) (simp split: sum.split) ``` haftmann@33961 ` 152` haftmann@33962 ` 153` ```lemma surjective_sum: "sum_case (\x::'a. f (Inl x)) (\y::'b. f (Inr y)) = f" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 154` ```proof ``` haftmann@33962 ` 155` ``` fix s :: "'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 156` ``` show "(case s of Inl (x\'a) \ f (Inl x) | Inr (y\'b) \ f (Inr y)) = f s" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 157` ``` by (cases s) simp_all ``` haftmann@33962 ` 158` ```qed ``` haftmann@33961 ` 159` haftmann@33962 ` 160` ```lemma sum_case_inject: ``` haftmann@33962 ` 161` ``` assumes a: "sum_case f1 f2 = sum_case g1 g2" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 162` ``` assumes r: "f1 = g1 \ f2 = g2 \ P" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 163` ``` shows P ``` haftmann@33962 ` 164` ```proof (rule r) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 165` ``` show "f1 = g1" proof ``` haftmann@33962 ` 166` ``` fix x :: 'a ``` haftmann@33962 ` 167` ``` from a have "sum_case f1 f2 (Inl x) = sum_case g1 g2 (Inl x)" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 168` ``` then show "f1 x = g1 x" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 169` ``` qed ``` haftmann@33962 ` 170` ``` show "f2 = g2" proof ``` haftmann@33962 ` 171` ``` fix y :: 'b ``` haftmann@33962 ` 172` ``` from a have "sum_case f1 f2 (Inr y) = sum_case g1 g2 (Inr y)" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 173` ``` then show "f2 y = g2 y" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 174` ``` qed ``` haftmann@33962 ` 175` ```qed ``` haftmann@33962 ` 176` haftmann@33962 ` 177` ```primrec Suml :: "('a \ 'c) \ 'a + 'b \ 'c" where ``` haftmann@33962 ` 178` ``` "Suml f (Inl x) = f x" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 179` haftmann@33962 ` 180` ```primrec Sumr :: "('b \ 'c) \ 'a + 'b \ 'c" where ``` haftmann@33962 ` 181` ``` "Sumr f (Inr x) = f x" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 182` haftmann@33962 ` 183` ```lemma Suml_inject: ``` haftmann@33962 ` 184` ``` assumes "Suml f = Suml g" shows "f = g" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 185` ```proof ``` haftmann@33962 ` 186` ``` fix x :: 'a ``` haftmann@33962 ` 187` ``` let ?s = "Inl x \ 'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 188` ``` from assms have "Suml f ?s = Suml g ?s" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 189` ``` then show "f x = g x" by simp ``` haftmann@33961 ` 190` ```qed ``` haftmann@33961 ` 191` haftmann@33962 ` 192` ```lemma Sumr_inject: ``` haftmann@33962 ` 193` ``` assumes "Sumr f = Sumr g" shows "f = g" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 194` ```proof ``` haftmann@33962 ` 195` ``` fix x :: 'b ``` haftmann@33962 ` 196` ``` let ?s = "Inr x \ 'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 197` ``` from assms have "Sumr f ?s = Sumr g ?s" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 198` ``` then show "f x = g x" by simp ``` haftmann@33962 ` 199` ```qed ``` haftmann@33961 ` 200` haftmann@33995 ` 201` haftmann@33962 ` 202` ```subsection {* The Disjoint Sum of Sets *} ``` haftmann@33961 ` 203` haftmann@33962 ` 204` ```definition Plus :: "'a set \ 'b set \ ('a + 'b) set" (infixr "<+>" 65) where ``` haftmann@33962 ` 205` ``` "A <+> B = Inl ` A \ Inr ` B" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 206` nipkow@40271 ` 207` ```hide_const (open) Plus --"Valuable identifier" ``` nipkow@40271 ` 208` haftmann@33962 ` 209` ```lemma InlI [intro!]: "a \ A \ Inl a \ A <+> B" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 210` ```by (simp add: Plus_def) ``` haftmann@33961 ` 211` haftmann@33962 ` 212` ```lemma InrI [intro!]: "b \ B \ Inr b \ A <+> B" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 213` ```by (simp add: Plus_def) ``` haftmann@33961 ` 214` haftmann@33962 ` 215` ```text {* Exhaustion rule for sums, a degenerate form of induction *} ``` haftmann@33962 ` 216` haftmann@33962 ` 217` ```lemma PlusE [elim!]: ``` haftmann@33962 ` 218` ``` "u \ A <+> B \ (\x. x \ A \ u = Inl x \ P) \ (\y. y \ B \ u = Inr y \ P) \ P" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 219` ```by (auto simp add: Plus_def) ``` haftmann@33961 ` 220` haftmann@33962 ` 221` ```lemma Plus_eq_empty_conv [simp]: "A <+> B = {} \ A = {} \ B = {}" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 222` ```by auto ``` haftmann@33961 ` 223` haftmann@33962 ` 224` ```lemma UNIV_Plus_UNIV [simp]: "UNIV <+> UNIV = UNIV" ``` nipkow@39302 ` 225` ```proof (rule set_eqI) ``` haftmann@33962 ` 226` ``` fix u :: "'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@33962 ` 227` ``` show "u \ UNIV <+> UNIV \ u \ UNIV" by (cases u) auto ``` haftmann@33962 ` 228` ```qed ``` haftmann@33961 ` 229` haftmann@49948 ` 230` ```lemma UNIV_sum: ``` haftmann@49948 ` 231` ``` "UNIV = Inl ` UNIV \ Inr ` UNIV" ``` haftmann@49948 ` 232` ```proof - ``` haftmann@49948 ` 233` ``` { fix x :: "'a + 'b" ``` haftmann@49948 ` 234` ``` assume "x \ range Inr" ``` haftmann@49948 ` 235` ``` then have "x \ range Inl" ``` haftmann@49948 ` 236` ``` by (cases x) simp_all ``` haftmann@49948 ` 237` ``` } then show ?thesis by auto ``` haftmann@49948 ` 238` ```qed ``` haftmann@49948 ` 239` blanchet@55393 ` 240` ```hide_const (open) Suml Sumr sum ``` huffman@45204 ` 241` nipkow@10213 ` 242` ```end ```