src/HOL/Real.thy
author wenzelm
Sat Jul 18 22:58:50 2015 +0200 (2015-07-18)
changeset 60758 d8d85a8172b5
parent 60429 d3d1e185cd63
child 61070 b72a990adfe2
permissions -rw-r--r--
isabelle update_cartouches;
hoelzl@51523
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/Real.thy
hoelzl@51523
     2
    Author:     Jacques D. Fleuriot, University of Edinburgh, 1998
hoelzl@51523
     3
    Author:     Larry Paulson, University of Cambridge
hoelzl@51523
     4
    Author:     Jeremy Avigad, Carnegie Mellon University
hoelzl@51523
     5
    Author:     Florian Zuleger, Johannes Hoelzl, and Simon Funke, TU Muenchen
hoelzl@51523
     6
    Conversion to Isar and new proofs by Lawrence C Paulson, 2003/4
hoelzl@51523
     7
    Construction of Cauchy Reals by Brian Huffman, 2010
hoelzl@51523
     8
*)
hoelzl@51523
     9
wenzelm@60758
    10
section \<open>Development of the Reals using Cauchy Sequences\<close>
hoelzl@51523
    11
hoelzl@51523
    12
theory Real
hoelzl@51773
    13
imports Rat Conditionally_Complete_Lattices
hoelzl@51523
    14
begin
hoelzl@51523
    15
wenzelm@60758
    16
text \<open>
hoelzl@51523
    17
  This theory contains a formalization of the real numbers as
hoelzl@51523
    18
  equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rationals.  See
hoelzl@51523
    19
  @{file "~~/src/HOL/ex/Dedekind_Real.thy"} for an alternative
hoelzl@51523
    20
  construction using Dedekind cuts.
wenzelm@60758
    21
\<close>
hoelzl@51523
    22
wenzelm@60758
    23
subsection \<open>Preliminary lemmas\<close>
hoelzl@51523
    24
hoelzl@51523
    25
lemma add_diff_add:
hoelzl@51523
    26
  fixes a b c d :: "'a::ab_group_add"
hoelzl@51523
    27
  shows "(a + c) - (b + d) = (a - b) + (c - d)"
hoelzl@51523
    28
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
    29
hoelzl@51523
    30
lemma minus_diff_minus:
hoelzl@51523
    31
  fixes a b :: "'a::ab_group_add"
hoelzl@51523
    32
  shows "- a - - b = - (a - b)"
hoelzl@51523
    33
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
    34
hoelzl@51523
    35
lemma mult_diff_mult:
hoelzl@51523
    36
  fixes x y a b :: "'a::ring"
hoelzl@51523
    37
  shows "(x * y - a * b) = x * (y - b) + (x - a) * b"
hoelzl@51523
    38
  by (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
    39
hoelzl@51523
    40
lemma inverse_diff_inverse:
hoelzl@51523
    41
  fixes a b :: "'a::division_ring"
hoelzl@51523
    42
  assumes "a \<noteq> 0" and "b \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@51523
    43
  shows "inverse a - inverse b = - (inverse a * (a - b) * inverse b)"
hoelzl@51523
    44
  using assms by (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
    45
hoelzl@51523
    46
lemma obtain_pos_sum:
hoelzl@51523
    47
  fixes r :: rat assumes r: "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
    48
  obtains s t where "0 < s" and "0 < t" and "r = s + t"
hoelzl@51523
    49
proof
hoelzl@51523
    50
    from r show "0 < r/2" by simp
hoelzl@51523
    51
    from r show "0 < r/2" by simp
hoelzl@51523
    52
    show "r = r/2 + r/2" by simp
hoelzl@51523
    53
qed
hoelzl@51523
    54
wenzelm@60758
    55
subsection \<open>Sequences that converge to zero\<close>
hoelzl@51523
    56
hoelzl@51523
    57
definition
hoelzl@51523
    58
  vanishes :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> rat) \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@51523
    59
where
hoelzl@51523
    60
  "vanishes X = (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n\<bar> < r)"
hoelzl@51523
    61
hoelzl@51523
    62
lemma vanishesI: "(\<And>r. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n\<bar> < r) \<Longrightarrow> vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
    63
  unfolding vanishes_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
    64
hoelzl@51523
    65
lemma vanishesD: "\<lbrakk>vanishes X; 0 < r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
    66
  unfolding vanishes_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
    67
hoelzl@51523
    68
lemma vanishes_const [simp]: "vanishes (\<lambda>n. c) \<longleftrightarrow> c = 0"
hoelzl@51523
    69
  unfolding vanishes_def
hoelzl@51523
    70
  apply (cases "c = 0", auto)
hoelzl@51523
    71
  apply (rule exI [where x="\<bar>c\<bar>"], auto)
hoelzl@51523
    72
  done
hoelzl@51523
    73
hoelzl@51523
    74
lemma vanishes_minus: "vanishes X \<Longrightarrow> vanishes (\<lambda>n. - X n)"
hoelzl@51523
    75
  unfolding vanishes_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
    76
hoelzl@51523
    77
lemma vanishes_add:
hoelzl@51523
    78
  assumes X: "vanishes X" and Y: "vanishes Y"
hoelzl@51523
    79
  shows "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
    80
proof (rule vanishesI)
hoelzl@51523
    81
  fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
    82
  then obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and r: "r = s + t"
hoelzl@51523
    83
    by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
    84
  obtain i where i: "\<forall>n\<ge>i. \<bar>X n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
    85
    using vanishesD [OF X s] ..
hoelzl@51523
    86
  obtain j where j: "\<forall>n\<ge>j. \<bar>Y n\<bar> < t"
hoelzl@51523
    87
    using vanishesD [OF Y t] ..
hoelzl@51523
    88
  have "\<forall>n\<ge>max i j. \<bar>X n + Y n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
    89
  proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
    90
    fix n assume n: "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
    91
    have "\<bar>X n + Y n\<bar> \<le> \<bar>X n\<bar> + \<bar>Y n\<bar>" by (rule abs_triangle_ineq)
hoelzl@51523
    92
    also have "\<dots> < s + t" by (simp add: add_strict_mono i j n)
hoelzl@51523
    93
    finally show "\<bar>X n + Y n\<bar> < r" unfolding r .
hoelzl@51523
    94
  qed
hoelzl@51523
    95
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n + Y n\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
    96
qed
hoelzl@51523
    97
hoelzl@51523
    98
lemma vanishes_diff:
hoelzl@51523
    99
  assumes X: "vanishes X" and Y: "vanishes Y"
hoelzl@51523
   100
  shows "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
haftmann@54230
   101
  unfolding diff_conv_add_uminus by (intro vanishes_add vanishes_minus X Y)
hoelzl@51523
   102
hoelzl@51523
   103
lemma vanishes_mult_bounded:
hoelzl@51523
   104
  assumes X: "\<exists>a>0. \<forall>n. \<bar>X n\<bar> < a"
hoelzl@51523
   105
  assumes Y: "vanishes (\<lambda>n. Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   106
  shows "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n * Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   107
proof (rule vanishesI)
hoelzl@51523
   108
  fix r :: rat assume r: "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   109
  obtain a where a: "0 < a" "\<forall>n. \<bar>X n\<bar> < a"
hoelzl@51523
   110
    using X by fast
hoelzl@51523
   111
  obtain b where b: "0 < b" "r = a * b"
hoelzl@51523
   112
  proof
nipkow@56541
   113
    show "0 < r / a" using r a by simp
hoelzl@51523
   114
    show "r = a * (r / a)" using a by simp
hoelzl@51523
   115
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   116
  obtain k where k: "\<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>Y n\<bar> < b"
hoelzl@51523
   117
    using vanishesD [OF Y b(1)] ..
hoelzl@51523
   118
  have "\<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n * Y n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   119
    by (simp add: b(2) abs_mult mult_strict_mono' a k)
hoelzl@51523
   120
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n * Y n\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   121
qed
hoelzl@51523
   122
wenzelm@60758
   123
subsection \<open>Cauchy sequences\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   124
hoelzl@51523
   125
definition
hoelzl@51523
   126
  cauchy :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> rat) \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@51523
   127
where
hoelzl@51523
   128
  "cauchy X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < r)"
hoelzl@51523
   129
hoelzl@51523
   130
lemma cauchyI:
hoelzl@51523
   131
  "(\<And>r. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < r) \<Longrightarrow> cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   132
  unfolding cauchy_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   133
hoelzl@51523
   134
lemma cauchyD:
hoelzl@51523
   135
  "\<lbrakk>cauchy X; 0 < r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   136
  unfolding cauchy_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   137
hoelzl@51523
   138
lemma cauchy_const [simp]: "cauchy (\<lambda>n. x)"
hoelzl@51523
   139
  unfolding cauchy_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   140
hoelzl@51523
   141
lemma cauchy_add [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
   142
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   143
  shows "cauchy (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   144
proof (rule cauchyI)
hoelzl@51523
   145
  fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   146
  then obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and r: "r = s + t"
hoelzl@51523
   147
    by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   148
  obtain i where i: "\<forall>m\<ge>i. \<forall>n\<ge>i. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   149
    using cauchyD [OF X s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   150
  obtain j where j: "\<forall>m\<ge>j. \<forall>n\<ge>j. \<bar>Y m - Y n\<bar> < t"
hoelzl@51523
   151
    using cauchyD [OF Y t] ..
hoelzl@51523
   152
  have "\<forall>m\<ge>max i j. \<forall>n\<ge>max i j. \<bar>(X m + Y m) - (X n + Y n)\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   153
  proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   154
    fix m n assume *: "i \<le> m" "j \<le> m" "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   155
    have "\<bar>(X m + Y m) - (X n + Y n)\<bar> \<le> \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> + \<bar>Y m - Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   156
      unfolding add_diff_add by (rule abs_triangle_ineq)
hoelzl@51523
   157
    also have "\<dots> < s + t"
hoelzl@51523
   158
      by (rule add_strict_mono, simp_all add: i j *)
hoelzl@51523
   159
    finally show "\<bar>(X m + Y m) - (X n + Y n)\<bar> < r" unfolding r .
hoelzl@51523
   160
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   161
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>(X m + Y m) - (X n + Y n)\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   162
qed
hoelzl@51523
   163
hoelzl@51523
   164
lemma cauchy_minus [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
   165
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   166
  shows "cauchy (\<lambda>n. - X n)"
hoelzl@51523
   167
using assms unfolding cauchy_def
hoelzl@51523
   168
unfolding minus_diff_minus abs_minus_cancel .
hoelzl@51523
   169
hoelzl@51523
   170
lemma cauchy_diff [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
   171
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   172
  shows "cauchy (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
haftmann@54230
   173
  using assms unfolding diff_conv_add_uminus by (simp del: add_uminus_conv_diff)
hoelzl@51523
   174
hoelzl@51523
   175
lemma cauchy_imp_bounded:
hoelzl@51523
   176
  assumes "cauchy X" shows "\<exists>b>0. \<forall>n. \<bar>X n\<bar> < b"
hoelzl@51523
   177
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   178
  obtain k where k: "\<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < 1"
hoelzl@51523
   179
    using cauchyD [OF assms zero_less_one] ..
hoelzl@51523
   180
  show "\<exists>b>0. \<forall>n. \<bar>X n\<bar> < b"
hoelzl@51523
   181
  proof (intro exI conjI allI)
hoelzl@51523
   182
    have "0 \<le> \<bar>X 0\<bar>" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   183
    also have "\<bar>X 0\<bar> \<le> Max (abs ` X ` {..k})" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   184
    finally have "0 \<le> Max (abs ` X ` {..k})" .
hoelzl@51523
   185
    thus "0 < Max (abs ` X ` {..k}) + 1" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   186
  next
hoelzl@51523
   187
    fix n :: nat
hoelzl@51523
   188
    show "\<bar>X n\<bar> < Max (abs ` X ` {..k}) + 1"
hoelzl@51523
   189
    proof (rule linorder_le_cases)
hoelzl@51523
   190
      assume "n \<le> k"
hoelzl@51523
   191
      hence "\<bar>X n\<bar> \<le> Max (abs ` X ` {..k})" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   192
      thus "\<bar>X n\<bar> < Max (abs ` X ` {..k}) + 1" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   193
    next
hoelzl@51523
   194
      assume "k \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   195
      have "\<bar>X n\<bar> = \<bar>X k + (X n - X k)\<bar>" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   196
      also have "\<bar>X k + (X n - X k)\<bar> \<le> \<bar>X k\<bar> + \<bar>X n - X k\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   197
        by (rule abs_triangle_ineq)
hoelzl@51523
   198
      also have "\<dots> < Max (abs ` X ` {..k}) + 1"
wenzelm@60758
   199
        by (rule add_le_less_mono, simp, simp add: k \<open>k \<le> n\<close>)
hoelzl@51523
   200
      finally show "\<bar>X n\<bar> < Max (abs ` X ` {..k}) + 1" .
hoelzl@51523
   201
    qed
hoelzl@51523
   202
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   203
qed
hoelzl@51523
   204
hoelzl@51523
   205
lemma cauchy_mult [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
   206
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   207
  shows "cauchy (\<lambda>n. X n * Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   208
proof (rule cauchyI)
hoelzl@51523
   209
  fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   210
  then obtain u v where u: "0 < u" and v: "0 < v" and "r = u + v"
hoelzl@51523
   211
    by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   212
  obtain a where a: "0 < a" "\<forall>n. \<bar>X n\<bar> < a"
hoelzl@51523
   213
    using cauchy_imp_bounded [OF X] by fast
hoelzl@51523
   214
  obtain b where b: "0 < b" "\<forall>n. \<bar>Y n\<bar> < b"
hoelzl@51523
   215
    using cauchy_imp_bounded [OF Y] by fast
hoelzl@51523
   216
  obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and r: "r = a * t + s * b"
hoelzl@51523
   217
  proof
nipkow@56541
   218
    show "0 < v/b" using v b(1) by simp
nipkow@56541
   219
    show "0 < u/a" using u a(1) by simp
hoelzl@51523
   220
    show "r = a * (u/a) + (v/b) * b"
wenzelm@60758
   221
      using a(1) b(1) \<open>r = u + v\<close> by simp
hoelzl@51523
   222
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   223
  obtain i where i: "\<forall>m\<ge>i. \<forall>n\<ge>i. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   224
    using cauchyD [OF X s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   225
  obtain j where j: "\<forall>m\<ge>j. \<forall>n\<ge>j. \<bar>Y m - Y n\<bar> < t"
hoelzl@51523
   226
    using cauchyD [OF Y t] ..
hoelzl@51523
   227
  have "\<forall>m\<ge>max i j. \<forall>n\<ge>max i j. \<bar>X m * Y m - X n * Y n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   228
  proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   229
    fix m n assume *: "i \<le> m" "j \<le> m" "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   230
    have "\<bar>X m * Y m - X n * Y n\<bar> = \<bar>X m * (Y m - Y n) + (X m - X n) * Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   231
      unfolding mult_diff_mult ..
hoelzl@51523
   232
    also have "\<dots> \<le> \<bar>X m * (Y m - Y n)\<bar> + \<bar>(X m - X n) * Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   233
      by (rule abs_triangle_ineq)
hoelzl@51523
   234
    also have "\<dots> = \<bar>X m\<bar> * \<bar>Y m - Y n\<bar> + \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> * \<bar>Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   235
      unfolding abs_mult ..
hoelzl@51523
   236
    also have "\<dots> < a * t + s * b"
hoelzl@51523
   237
      by (simp_all add: add_strict_mono mult_strict_mono' a b i j *)
hoelzl@51523
   238
    finally show "\<bar>X m * Y m - X n * Y n\<bar> < r" unfolding r .
hoelzl@51523
   239
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   240
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X m * Y m - X n * Y n\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   241
qed
hoelzl@51523
   242
hoelzl@51523
   243
lemma cauchy_not_vanishes_cases:
hoelzl@51523
   244
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   245
  assumes nz: "\<not> vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
   246
  shows "\<exists>b>0. \<exists>k. (\<forall>n\<ge>k. b < - X n) \<or> (\<forall>n\<ge>k. b < X n)"
hoelzl@51523
   247
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   248
  obtain r where "0 < r" and r: "\<forall>k. \<exists>n\<ge>k. r \<le> \<bar>X n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   249
    using nz unfolding vanishes_def by (auto simp add: not_less)
hoelzl@51523
   250
  obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and "r = s + t"
wenzelm@60758
   251
    using \<open>0 < r\<close> by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   252
  obtain i where i: "\<forall>m\<ge>i. \<forall>n\<ge>i. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   253
    using cauchyD [OF X s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   254
  obtain k where "i \<le> k" and "r \<le> \<bar>X k\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   255
    using r by fast
hoelzl@51523
   256
  have k: "\<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n - X k\<bar> < s"
wenzelm@60758
   257
    using i \<open>i \<le> k\<close> by auto
hoelzl@51523
   258
  have "X k \<le> - r \<or> r \<le> X k"
wenzelm@60758
   259
    using \<open>r \<le> \<bar>X k\<bar>\<close> by auto
hoelzl@51523
   260
  hence "(\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < - X n) \<or> (\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < X n)"
wenzelm@60758
   261
    unfolding \<open>r = s + t\<close> using k by auto
hoelzl@51523
   262
  hence "\<exists>k. (\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < - X n) \<or> (\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < X n)" ..
hoelzl@51523
   263
  thus "\<exists>t>0. \<exists>k. (\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < - X n) \<or> (\<forall>n\<ge>k. t < X n)"
hoelzl@51523
   264
    using t by auto
hoelzl@51523
   265
qed
hoelzl@51523
   266
hoelzl@51523
   267
lemma cauchy_not_vanishes:
hoelzl@51523
   268
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   269
  assumes nz: "\<not> vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
   270
  shows "\<exists>b>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. b < \<bar>X n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   271
using cauchy_not_vanishes_cases [OF assms]
hoelzl@51523
   272
by clarify (rule exI, erule conjI, rule_tac x=k in exI, auto)
hoelzl@51523
   273
hoelzl@51523
   274
lemma cauchy_inverse [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
   275
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   276
  assumes nz: "\<not> vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
   277
  shows "cauchy (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n))"
hoelzl@51523
   278
proof (rule cauchyI)
hoelzl@51523
   279
  fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   280
  obtain b i where b: "0 < b" and i: "\<forall>n\<ge>i. b < \<bar>X n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   281
    using cauchy_not_vanishes [OF X nz] by fast
hoelzl@51523
   282
  from b i have nz: "\<forall>n\<ge>i. X n \<noteq> 0" by auto
hoelzl@51523
   283
  obtain s where s: "0 < s" and r: "r = inverse b * s * inverse b"
hoelzl@51523
   284
  proof
wenzelm@60758
   285
    show "0 < b * r * b" by (simp add: \<open>0 < r\<close> b)
hoelzl@51523
   286
    show "r = inverse b * (b * r * b) * inverse b"
hoelzl@51523
   287
      using b by simp
hoelzl@51523
   288
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   289
  obtain j where j: "\<forall>m\<ge>j. \<forall>n\<ge>j. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   290
    using cauchyD [OF X s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   291
  have "\<forall>m\<ge>max i j. \<forall>n\<ge>max i j. \<bar>inverse (X m) - inverse (X n)\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   292
  proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   293
    fix m n assume *: "i \<le> m" "j \<le> m" "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   294
    have "\<bar>inverse (X m) - inverse (X n)\<bar> =
hoelzl@51523
   295
          inverse \<bar>X m\<bar> * \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> * inverse \<bar>X n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   296
      by (simp add: inverse_diff_inverse nz * abs_mult)
hoelzl@51523
   297
    also have "\<dots> < inverse b * s * inverse b"
hoelzl@51523
   298
      by (simp add: mult_strict_mono less_imp_inverse_less
nipkow@56544
   299
                    i j b * s)
hoelzl@51523
   300
    finally show "\<bar>inverse (X m) - inverse (X n)\<bar> < r" unfolding r .
hoelzl@51523
   301
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   302
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>m\<ge>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>inverse (X m) - inverse (X n)\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   303
qed
hoelzl@51523
   304
hoelzl@51523
   305
lemma vanishes_diff_inverse:
hoelzl@51523
   306
  assumes X: "cauchy X" "\<not> vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
   307
  assumes Y: "cauchy Y" "\<not> vanishes Y"
hoelzl@51523
   308
  assumes XY: "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   309
  shows "vanishes (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n) - inverse (Y n))"
hoelzl@51523
   310
proof (rule vanishesI)
hoelzl@51523
   311
  fix r :: rat assume r: "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   312
  obtain a i where a: "0 < a" and i: "\<forall>n\<ge>i. a < \<bar>X n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   313
    using cauchy_not_vanishes [OF X] by fast
hoelzl@51523
   314
  obtain b j where b: "0 < b" and j: "\<forall>n\<ge>j. b < \<bar>Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   315
    using cauchy_not_vanishes [OF Y] by fast
hoelzl@51523
   316
  obtain s where s: "0 < s" and "inverse a * s * inverse b = r"
hoelzl@51523
   317
  proof
hoelzl@51523
   318
    show "0 < a * r * b"
nipkow@56544
   319
      using a r b by simp
hoelzl@51523
   320
    show "inverse a * (a * r * b) * inverse b = r"
hoelzl@51523
   321
      using a r b by simp
hoelzl@51523
   322
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   323
  obtain k where k: "\<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>X n - Y n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   324
    using vanishesD [OF XY s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   325
  have "\<forall>n\<ge>max (max i j) k. \<bar>inverse (X n) - inverse (Y n)\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   326
  proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   327
    fix n assume n: "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n" "k \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   328
    have "X n \<noteq> 0" and "Y n \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@51523
   329
      using i j a b n by auto
hoelzl@51523
   330
    hence "\<bar>inverse (X n) - inverse (Y n)\<bar> =
hoelzl@51523
   331
        inverse \<bar>X n\<bar> * \<bar>X n - Y n\<bar> * inverse \<bar>Y n\<bar>"
hoelzl@51523
   332
      by (simp add: inverse_diff_inverse abs_mult)
hoelzl@51523
   333
    also have "\<dots> < inverse a * s * inverse b"
hoelzl@51523
   334
      apply (intro mult_strict_mono' less_imp_inverse_less)
nipkow@56536
   335
      apply (simp_all add: a b i j k n)
hoelzl@51523
   336
      done
wenzelm@60758
   337
    also note \<open>inverse a * s * inverse b = r\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   338
    finally show "\<bar>inverse (X n) - inverse (Y n)\<bar> < r" .
hoelzl@51523
   339
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   340
  thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>inverse (X n) - inverse (Y n)\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   341
qed
hoelzl@51523
   342
wenzelm@60758
   343
subsection \<open>Equivalence relation on Cauchy sequences\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   344
hoelzl@51523
   345
definition realrel :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> rat) \<Rightarrow> (nat \<Rightarrow> rat) \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@51523
   346
  where "realrel = (\<lambda>X Y. cauchy X \<and> cauchy Y \<and> vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n))"
hoelzl@51523
   347
hoelzl@51523
   348
lemma realrelI [intro?]:
hoelzl@51523
   349
  assumes "cauchy X" and "cauchy Y" and "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   350
  shows "realrel X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   351
  using assms unfolding realrel_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   352
hoelzl@51523
   353
lemma realrel_refl: "cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> realrel X X"
hoelzl@51523
   354
  unfolding realrel_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   355
hoelzl@51523
   356
lemma symp_realrel: "symp realrel"
hoelzl@51523
   357
  unfolding realrel_def
hoelzl@51523
   358
  by (rule sympI, clarify, drule vanishes_minus, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   359
hoelzl@51523
   360
lemma transp_realrel: "transp realrel"
hoelzl@51523
   361
  unfolding realrel_def
hoelzl@51523
   362
  apply (rule transpI, clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   363
  apply (drule (1) vanishes_add)
hoelzl@51523
   364
  apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   365
  done
hoelzl@51523
   366
hoelzl@51523
   367
lemma part_equivp_realrel: "part_equivp realrel"
hoelzl@51523
   368
  by (fast intro: part_equivpI symp_realrel transp_realrel
hoelzl@51523
   369
    realrel_refl cauchy_const)
hoelzl@51523
   370
wenzelm@60758
   371
subsection \<open>The field of real numbers\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   372
hoelzl@51523
   373
quotient_type real = "nat \<Rightarrow> rat" / partial: realrel
hoelzl@51523
   374
  morphisms rep_real Real
hoelzl@51523
   375
  by (rule part_equivp_realrel)
hoelzl@51523
   376
hoelzl@51523
   377
lemma cr_real_eq: "pcr_real = (\<lambda>x y. cauchy x \<and> Real x = y)"
hoelzl@51523
   378
  unfolding real.pcr_cr_eq cr_real_def realrel_def by auto
hoelzl@51523
   379
hoelzl@51523
   380
lemma Real_induct [induct type: real]: (* TODO: generate automatically *)
hoelzl@51523
   381
  assumes "\<And>X. cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> P (Real X)" shows "P x"
hoelzl@51523
   382
proof (induct x)
hoelzl@51523
   383
  case (1 X)
hoelzl@51523
   384
  hence "cauchy X" by (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   385
  thus "P (Real X)" by (rule assms)
hoelzl@51523
   386
qed
hoelzl@51523
   387
hoelzl@51523
   388
lemma eq_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   389
  "cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> cauchy Y \<Longrightarrow> Real X = Real Y \<longleftrightarrow> vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   390
  using real.rel_eq_transfer
blanchet@55945
   391
  unfolding real.pcr_cr_eq cr_real_def rel_fun_def realrel_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   392
kuncar@51956
   393
lemma Domainp_pcr_real [transfer_domain_rule]: "Domainp pcr_real = cauchy"
kuncar@51956
   394
by (simp add: real.domain_eq realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   395
haftmann@59867
   396
instantiation real :: field
hoelzl@51523
   397
begin
hoelzl@51523
   398
hoelzl@51523
   399
lift_definition zero_real :: "real" is "\<lambda>n. 0"
hoelzl@51523
   400
  by (simp add: realrel_refl)
hoelzl@51523
   401
hoelzl@51523
   402
lift_definition one_real :: "real" is "\<lambda>n. 1"
hoelzl@51523
   403
  by (simp add: realrel_refl)
hoelzl@51523
   404
hoelzl@51523
   405
lift_definition plus_real :: "real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real" is "\<lambda>X Y n. X n + Y n"
hoelzl@51523
   406
  unfolding realrel_def add_diff_add
hoelzl@51523
   407
  by (simp only: cauchy_add vanishes_add simp_thms)
hoelzl@51523
   408
hoelzl@51523
   409
lift_definition uminus_real :: "real \<Rightarrow> real" is "\<lambda>X n. - X n"
hoelzl@51523
   410
  unfolding realrel_def minus_diff_minus
hoelzl@51523
   411
  by (simp only: cauchy_minus vanishes_minus simp_thms)
hoelzl@51523
   412
hoelzl@51523
   413
lift_definition times_real :: "real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real" is "\<lambda>X Y n. X n * Y n"
hoelzl@51523
   414
  unfolding realrel_def mult_diff_mult
haftmann@57512
   415
  by (subst (4) mult.commute, simp only: cauchy_mult vanishes_add
hoelzl@51523
   416
    vanishes_mult_bounded cauchy_imp_bounded simp_thms)
hoelzl@51523
   417
hoelzl@51523
   418
lift_definition inverse_real :: "real \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@51523
   419
  is "\<lambda>X. if vanishes X then (\<lambda>n. 0) else (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n))"
hoelzl@51523
   420
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   421
  fix X Y assume "realrel X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   422
  hence X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y" and XY: "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   423
    unfolding realrel_def by simp_all
hoelzl@51523
   424
  have "vanishes X \<longleftrightarrow> vanishes Y"
hoelzl@51523
   425
  proof
hoelzl@51523
   426
    assume "vanishes X"
hoelzl@51523
   427
    from vanishes_diff [OF this XY] show "vanishes Y" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   428
  next
hoelzl@51523
   429
    assume "vanishes Y"
hoelzl@51523
   430
    from vanishes_add [OF this XY] show "vanishes X" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   431
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   432
  thus "?thesis X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   433
    unfolding realrel_def
hoelzl@51523
   434
    by (simp add: vanishes_diff_inverse X Y XY)
hoelzl@51523
   435
qed
hoelzl@51523
   436
hoelzl@51523
   437
definition
hoelzl@51523
   438
  "x - y = (x::real) + - y"
hoelzl@51523
   439
hoelzl@51523
   440
definition
haftmann@60429
   441
  "x div y = (x::real) * inverse y"
hoelzl@51523
   442
hoelzl@51523
   443
lemma add_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   444
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   445
  shows "Real X + Real Y = Real (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   446
  using assms plus_real.transfer
blanchet@55945
   447
  unfolding cr_real_eq rel_fun_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   448
hoelzl@51523
   449
lemma minus_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   450
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   451
  shows "- Real X = Real (\<lambda>n. - X n)"
hoelzl@51523
   452
  using assms uminus_real.transfer
blanchet@55945
   453
  unfolding cr_real_eq rel_fun_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   454
hoelzl@51523
   455
lemma diff_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   456
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   457
  shows "Real X - Real Y = Real (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
haftmann@54230
   458
  unfolding minus_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   459
  by (simp add: minus_Real add_Real X Y)
hoelzl@51523
   460
hoelzl@51523
   461
lemma mult_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   462
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   463
  shows "Real X * Real Y = Real (\<lambda>n. X n * Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   464
  using assms times_real.transfer
blanchet@55945
   465
  unfolding cr_real_eq rel_fun_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   466
hoelzl@51523
   467
lemma inverse_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   468
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   469
  shows "inverse (Real X) =
hoelzl@51523
   470
    (if vanishes X then 0 else Real (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n)))"
hoelzl@51523
   471
  using assms inverse_real.transfer zero_real.transfer
blanchet@55945
   472
  unfolding cr_real_eq rel_fun_def by (simp split: split_if_asm, metis)
hoelzl@51523
   473
hoelzl@51523
   474
instance proof
hoelzl@51523
   475
  fix a b c :: real
hoelzl@51523
   476
  show "a + b = b + a"
haftmann@57514
   477
    by transfer (simp add: ac_simps realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   478
  show "(a + b) + c = a + (b + c)"
haftmann@57514
   479
    by transfer (simp add: ac_simps realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   480
  show "0 + a = a"
hoelzl@51523
   481
    by transfer (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   482
  show "- a + a = 0"
hoelzl@51523
   483
    by transfer (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   484
  show "a - b = a + - b"
hoelzl@51523
   485
    by (rule minus_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
   486
  show "(a * b) * c = a * (b * c)"
haftmann@57514
   487
    by transfer (simp add: ac_simps realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   488
  show "a * b = b * a"
haftmann@57514
   489
    by transfer (simp add: ac_simps realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   490
  show "1 * a = a"
haftmann@57514
   491
    by transfer (simp add: ac_simps realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   492
  show "(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c"
hoelzl@51523
   493
    by transfer (simp add: distrib_right realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   494
  show "(0\<Colon>real) \<noteq> (1\<Colon>real)"
hoelzl@51523
   495
    by transfer (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   496
  show "a \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> inverse a * a = 1"
hoelzl@51523
   497
    apply transfer
hoelzl@51523
   498
    apply (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   499
    apply (rule vanishesI)
hoelzl@51523
   500
    apply (frule (1) cauchy_not_vanishes, clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   501
    apply (rule_tac x=k in exI, clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   502
    apply (drule_tac x=n in spec, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   503
    done
haftmann@60429
   504
  show "a div b = a * inverse b"
hoelzl@51523
   505
    by (rule divide_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
   506
  show "inverse (0::real) = 0"
hoelzl@51523
   507
    by transfer (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   508
qed
hoelzl@51523
   509
hoelzl@51523
   510
end
hoelzl@51523
   511
wenzelm@60758
   512
subsection \<open>Positive reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   513
hoelzl@51523
   514
lift_definition positive :: "real \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@51523
   515
  is "\<lambda>X. \<exists>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. r < X n"
hoelzl@51523
   516
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   517
  { fix X Y
hoelzl@51523
   518
    assume "realrel X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   519
    hence XY: "vanishes (\<lambda>n. X n - Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   520
      unfolding realrel_def by simp_all
hoelzl@51523
   521
    assume "\<exists>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. r < X n"
hoelzl@51523
   522
    then obtain r i where "0 < r" and i: "\<forall>n\<ge>i. r < X n"
hoelzl@51523
   523
      by fast
hoelzl@51523
   524
    obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and r: "r = s + t"
wenzelm@60758
   525
      using \<open>0 < r\<close> by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   526
    obtain j where j: "\<forall>n\<ge>j. \<bar>X n - Y n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   527
      using vanishesD [OF XY s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   528
    have "\<forall>n\<ge>max i j. t < Y n"
hoelzl@51523
   529
    proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   530
      fix n assume n: "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   531
      have "\<bar>X n - Y n\<bar> < s" and "r < X n"
hoelzl@51523
   532
        using i j n by simp_all
hoelzl@51523
   533
      thus "t < Y n" unfolding r by simp
hoelzl@51523
   534
    qed
hoelzl@51523
   535
    hence "\<exists>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. r < Y n" using t by fast
hoelzl@51523
   536
  } note 1 = this
hoelzl@51523
   537
  fix X Y assume "realrel X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   538
  hence "realrel X Y" and "realrel Y X"
hoelzl@51523
   539
    using symp_realrel unfolding symp_def by auto
hoelzl@51523
   540
  thus "?thesis X Y"
hoelzl@51523
   541
    by (safe elim!: 1)
hoelzl@51523
   542
qed
hoelzl@51523
   543
hoelzl@51523
   544
lemma positive_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   545
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   546
  shows "positive (Real X) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. r < X n)"
hoelzl@51523
   547
  using assms positive.transfer
blanchet@55945
   548
  unfolding cr_real_eq rel_fun_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   549
hoelzl@51523
   550
lemma positive_zero: "\<not> positive 0"
hoelzl@51523
   551
  by transfer auto
hoelzl@51523
   552
hoelzl@51523
   553
lemma positive_add:
hoelzl@51523
   554
  "positive x \<Longrightarrow> positive y \<Longrightarrow> positive (x + y)"
hoelzl@51523
   555
apply transfer
hoelzl@51523
   556
apply (clarify, rename_tac a b i j)
hoelzl@51523
   557
apply (rule_tac x="a + b" in exI, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   558
apply (rule_tac x="max i j" in exI, clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   559
apply (simp add: add_strict_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   560
done
hoelzl@51523
   561
hoelzl@51523
   562
lemma positive_mult:
hoelzl@51523
   563
  "positive x \<Longrightarrow> positive y \<Longrightarrow> positive (x * y)"
hoelzl@51523
   564
apply transfer
hoelzl@51523
   565
apply (clarify, rename_tac a b i j)
nipkow@56544
   566
apply (rule_tac x="a * b" in exI, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   567
apply (rule_tac x="max i j" in exI, clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   568
apply (rule mult_strict_mono, auto)
hoelzl@51523
   569
done
hoelzl@51523
   570
hoelzl@51523
   571
lemma positive_minus:
hoelzl@51523
   572
  "\<not> positive x \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> positive (- x)"
hoelzl@51523
   573
apply transfer
hoelzl@51523
   574
apply (simp add: realrel_def)
hoelzl@51523
   575
apply (drule (1) cauchy_not_vanishes_cases, safe, fast, fast)
hoelzl@51523
   576
done
hoelzl@51523
   577
haftmann@59867
   578
instantiation real :: linordered_field
hoelzl@51523
   579
begin
hoelzl@51523
   580
hoelzl@51523
   581
definition
hoelzl@51523
   582
  "x < y \<longleftrightarrow> positive (y - x)"
hoelzl@51523
   583
hoelzl@51523
   584
definition
hoelzl@51523
   585
  "x \<le> (y::real) \<longleftrightarrow> x < y \<or> x = y"
hoelzl@51523
   586
hoelzl@51523
   587
definition
hoelzl@51523
   588
  "abs (a::real) = (if a < 0 then - a else a)"
hoelzl@51523
   589
hoelzl@51523
   590
definition
hoelzl@51523
   591
  "sgn (a::real) = (if a = 0 then 0 else if 0 < a then 1 else - 1)"
hoelzl@51523
   592
hoelzl@51523
   593
instance proof
hoelzl@51523
   594
  fix a b c :: real
hoelzl@51523
   595
  show "\<bar>a\<bar> = (if a < 0 then - a else a)"
hoelzl@51523
   596
    by (rule abs_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
   597
  show "a < b \<longleftrightarrow> a \<le> b \<and> \<not> b \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
   598
    unfolding less_eq_real_def less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   599
    by (auto, drule (1) positive_add, simp_all add: positive_zero)
hoelzl@51523
   600
  show "a \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
   601
    unfolding less_eq_real_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   602
  show "a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> b \<le> c \<Longrightarrow> a \<le> c"
hoelzl@51523
   603
    unfolding less_eq_real_def less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   604
    by (auto, drule (1) positive_add, simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   605
  show "a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> b \<le> a \<Longrightarrow> a = b"
hoelzl@51523
   606
    unfolding less_eq_real_def less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   607
    by (auto, drule (1) positive_add, simp add: positive_zero)
hoelzl@51523
   608
  show "a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> c + a \<le> c + b"
haftmann@54230
   609
    unfolding less_eq_real_def less_real_def by auto
hoelzl@51523
   610
    (* FIXME: Procedure int_combine_numerals: c + b - (c + a) \<equiv> b + - a *)
hoelzl@51523
   611
    (* Should produce c + b - (c + a) \<equiv> b - a *)
hoelzl@51523
   612
  show "sgn a = (if a = 0 then 0 else if 0 < a then 1 else - 1)"
hoelzl@51523
   613
    by (rule sgn_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
   614
  show "a \<le> b \<or> b \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
   615
    unfolding less_eq_real_def less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   616
    by (auto dest!: positive_minus)
hoelzl@51523
   617
  show "a < b \<Longrightarrow> 0 < c \<Longrightarrow> c * a < c * b"
hoelzl@51523
   618
    unfolding less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   619
    by (drule (1) positive_mult, simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   620
qed
hoelzl@51523
   621
hoelzl@51523
   622
end
hoelzl@51523
   623
hoelzl@51523
   624
instantiation real :: distrib_lattice
hoelzl@51523
   625
begin
hoelzl@51523
   626
hoelzl@51523
   627
definition
hoelzl@51523
   628
  "(inf :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real) = min"
hoelzl@51523
   629
hoelzl@51523
   630
definition
hoelzl@51523
   631
  "(sup :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real) = max"
hoelzl@51523
   632
hoelzl@51523
   633
instance proof
haftmann@54863
   634
qed (auto simp add: inf_real_def sup_real_def max_min_distrib2)
hoelzl@51523
   635
hoelzl@51523
   636
end
hoelzl@51523
   637
hoelzl@51523
   638
lemma of_nat_Real: "of_nat x = Real (\<lambda>n. of_nat x)"
hoelzl@51523
   639
apply (induct x)
hoelzl@51523
   640
apply (simp add: zero_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
   641
apply (simp add: one_real_def add_Real)
hoelzl@51523
   642
done
hoelzl@51523
   643
hoelzl@51523
   644
lemma of_int_Real: "of_int x = Real (\<lambda>n. of_int x)"
hoelzl@51523
   645
apply (cases x rule: int_diff_cases)
hoelzl@51523
   646
apply (simp add: of_nat_Real diff_Real)
hoelzl@51523
   647
done
hoelzl@51523
   648
hoelzl@51523
   649
lemma of_rat_Real: "of_rat x = Real (\<lambda>n. x)"
hoelzl@51523
   650
apply (induct x)
hoelzl@51523
   651
apply (simp add: Fract_of_int_quotient of_rat_divide)
hoelzl@51523
   652
apply (simp add: of_int_Real divide_inverse)
hoelzl@51523
   653
apply (simp add: inverse_Real mult_Real)
hoelzl@51523
   654
done
hoelzl@51523
   655
hoelzl@51523
   656
instance real :: archimedean_field
hoelzl@51523
   657
proof
hoelzl@51523
   658
  fix x :: real
hoelzl@51523
   659
  show "\<exists>z. x \<le> of_int z"
hoelzl@51523
   660
    apply (induct x)
hoelzl@51523
   661
    apply (frule cauchy_imp_bounded, clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   662
    apply (rule_tac x="ceiling b + 1" in exI)
hoelzl@51523
   663
    apply (rule less_imp_le)
hoelzl@51523
   664
    apply (simp add: of_int_Real less_real_def diff_Real positive_Real)
hoelzl@51523
   665
    apply (rule_tac x=1 in exI, simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   666
    apply (rule_tac x=0 in exI, clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   667
    apply (rule le_less_trans [OF abs_ge_self])
hoelzl@51523
   668
    apply (rule less_le_trans [OF _ le_of_int_ceiling])
hoelzl@51523
   669
    apply simp
hoelzl@51523
   670
    done
hoelzl@51523
   671
qed
hoelzl@51523
   672
hoelzl@51523
   673
instantiation real :: floor_ceiling
hoelzl@51523
   674
begin
hoelzl@51523
   675
hoelzl@51523
   676
definition [code del]:
hoelzl@51523
   677
  "floor (x::real) = (THE z. of_int z \<le> x \<and> x < of_int (z + 1))"
hoelzl@51523
   678
hoelzl@51523
   679
instance proof
hoelzl@51523
   680
  fix x :: real
hoelzl@51523
   681
  show "of_int (floor x) \<le> x \<and> x < of_int (floor x + 1)"
hoelzl@51523
   682
    unfolding floor_real_def using floor_exists1 by (rule theI')
hoelzl@51523
   683
qed
hoelzl@51523
   684
hoelzl@51523
   685
end
hoelzl@51523
   686
wenzelm@60758
   687
subsection \<open>Completeness\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   688
hoelzl@51523
   689
lemma not_positive_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   690
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   691
  shows "\<not> positive (Real X) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. X n \<le> r)"
hoelzl@51523
   692
unfolding positive_Real [OF X]
hoelzl@51523
   693
apply (auto, unfold not_less)
hoelzl@51523
   694
apply (erule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   695
apply (drule_tac x=s in spec, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   696
apply (drule_tac r=t in cauchyD [OF X], clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   697
apply (drule_tac x=k in spec, clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   698
apply (rule_tac x=n in exI, clarify, rename_tac m)
hoelzl@51523
   699
apply (drule_tac x=m in spec, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   700
apply (drule_tac x=n in spec, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   701
apply (drule spec, drule (1) mp, clarify, rename_tac i)
hoelzl@51523
   702
apply (rule_tac x="max i k" in exI, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   703
done
hoelzl@51523
   704
hoelzl@51523
   705
lemma le_Real:
hoelzl@51523
   706
  assumes X: "cauchy X" and Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   707
  shows "Real X \<le> Real Y = (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. X n \<le> Y n + r)"
hoelzl@51523
   708
unfolding not_less [symmetric, where 'a=real] less_real_def
hoelzl@51523
   709
apply (simp add: diff_Real not_positive_Real X Y)
haftmann@57514
   710
apply (simp add: diff_le_eq ac_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   711
done
hoelzl@51523
   712
hoelzl@51523
   713
lemma le_RealI:
hoelzl@51523
   714
  assumes Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   715
  shows "\<forall>n. x \<le> of_rat (Y n) \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> Real Y"
hoelzl@51523
   716
proof (induct x)
hoelzl@51523
   717
  fix X assume X: "cauchy X" and "\<forall>n. Real X \<le> of_rat (Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   718
  hence le: "\<And>m r. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. X n \<le> Y m + r"
hoelzl@51523
   719
    by (simp add: of_rat_Real le_Real)
hoelzl@51523
   720
  {
hoelzl@51523
   721
    fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   722
    then obtain s t where s: "0 < s" and t: "0 < t" and r: "r = s + t"
hoelzl@51523
   723
      by (rule obtain_pos_sum)
hoelzl@51523
   724
    obtain i where i: "\<forall>m\<ge>i. \<forall>n\<ge>i. \<bar>Y m - Y n\<bar> < s"
hoelzl@51523
   725
      using cauchyD [OF Y s] ..
hoelzl@51523
   726
    obtain j where j: "\<forall>n\<ge>j. X n \<le> Y i + t"
hoelzl@51523
   727
      using le [OF t] ..
hoelzl@51523
   728
    have "\<forall>n\<ge>max i j. X n \<le> Y n + r"
hoelzl@51523
   729
    proof (clarsimp)
hoelzl@51523
   730
      fix n assume n: "i \<le> n" "j \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   731
      have "X n \<le> Y i + t" using n j by simp
hoelzl@51523
   732
      moreover have "\<bar>Y i - Y n\<bar> < s" using n i by simp
hoelzl@51523
   733
      ultimately show "X n \<le> Y n + r" unfolding r by simp
hoelzl@51523
   734
    qed
hoelzl@51523
   735
    hence "\<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. X n \<le> Y n + r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   736
  }
hoelzl@51523
   737
  thus "Real X \<le> Real Y"
hoelzl@51523
   738
    by (simp add: of_rat_Real le_Real X Y)
hoelzl@51523
   739
qed
hoelzl@51523
   740
hoelzl@51523
   741
lemma Real_leI:
hoelzl@51523
   742
  assumes X: "cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   743
  assumes le: "\<forall>n. of_rat (X n) \<le> y"
hoelzl@51523
   744
  shows "Real X \<le> y"
hoelzl@51523
   745
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   746
  have "- y \<le> - Real X"
hoelzl@51523
   747
    by (simp add: minus_Real X le_RealI of_rat_minus le)
hoelzl@51523
   748
  thus ?thesis by simp
hoelzl@51523
   749
qed
hoelzl@51523
   750
hoelzl@51523
   751
lemma less_RealD:
hoelzl@51523
   752
  assumes Y: "cauchy Y"
hoelzl@51523
   753
  shows "x < Real Y \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. x < of_rat (Y n)"
hoelzl@51523
   754
by (erule contrapos_pp, simp add: not_less, erule Real_leI [OF Y])
hoelzl@51523
   755
hoelzl@51523
   756
lemma of_nat_less_two_power:
hoelzl@51523
   757
  "of_nat n < (2::'a::linordered_idom) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
   758
apply (induct n)
hoelzl@51523
   759
apply simp
lp15@60162
   760
by (metis add_le_less_mono mult_2 of_nat_Suc one_le_numeral one_le_power power_Suc)
hoelzl@51523
   761
hoelzl@51523
   762
lemma complete_real:
hoelzl@51523
   763
  fixes S :: "real set"
hoelzl@51523
   764
  assumes "\<exists>x. x \<in> S" and "\<exists>z. \<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> z"
hoelzl@51523
   765
  shows "\<exists>y. (\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> y) \<and> (\<forall>z. (\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> z) \<longrightarrow> y \<le> z)"
hoelzl@51523
   766
proof -
hoelzl@51523
   767
  obtain x where x: "x \<in> S" using assms(1) ..
hoelzl@51523
   768
  obtain z where z: "\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> z" using assms(2) ..
hoelzl@51523
   769
hoelzl@51523
   770
  def P \<equiv> "\<lambda>x. \<forall>y\<in>S. y \<le> of_rat x"
hoelzl@51523
   771
  obtain a where a: "\<not> P a"
hoelzl@51523
   772
  proof
hoelzl@51523
   773
    have "of_int (floor (x - 1)) \<le> x - 1" by (rule of_int_floor_le)
hoelzl@51523
   774
    also have "x - 1 < x" by simp
hoelzl@51523
   775
    finally have "of_int (floor (x - 1)) < x" .
hoelzl@51523
   776
    hence "\<not> x \<le> of_int (floor (x - 1))" by (simp only: not_le)
hoelzl@51523
   777
    then show "\<not> P (of_int (floor (x - 1)))"
hoelzl@51523
   778
      unfolding P_def of_rat_of_int_eq using x by fast
hoelzl@51523
   779
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   780
  obtain b where b: "P b"
hoelzl@51523
   781
  proof
hoelzl@51523
   782
    show "P (of_int (ceiling z))"
hoelzl@51523
   783
    unfolding P_def of_rat_of_int_eq
hoelzl@51523
   784
    proof
hoelzl@51523
   785
      fix y assume "y \<in> S"
hoelzl@51523
   786
      hence "y \<le> z" using z by simp
hoelzl@51523
   787
      also have "z \<le> of_int (ceiling z)" by (rule le_of_int_ceiling)
hoelzl@51523
   788
      finally show "y \<le> of_int (ceiling z)" .
hoelzl@51523
   789
    qed
hoelzl@51523
   790
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   791
hoelzl@51523
   792
  def avg \<equiv> "\<lambda>x y :: rat. x/2 + y/2"
hoelzl@51523
   793
  def bisect \<equiv> "\<lambda>(x, y). if P (avg x y) then (x, avg x y) else (avg x y, y)"
hoelzl@51523
   794
  def A \<equiv> "\<lambda>n. fst ((bisect ^^ n) (a, b))"
hoelzl@51523
   795
  def B \<equiv> "\<lambda>n. snd ((bisect ^^ n) (a, b))"
hoelzl@51523
   796
  def C \<equiv> "\<lambda>n. avg (A n) (B n)"
hoelzl@51523
   797
  have A_0 [simp]: "A 0 = a" unfolding A_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   798
  have B_0 [simp]: "B 0 = b" unfolding B_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   799
  have A_Suc [simp]: "\<And>n. A (Suc n) = (if P (C n) then A n else C n)"
hoelzl@51523
   800
    unfolding A_def B_def C_def bisect_def split_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   801
  have B_Suc [simp]: "\<And>n. B (Suc n) = (if P (C n) then C n else B n)"
hoelzl@51523
   802
    unfolding A_def B_def C_def bisect_def split_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
   803
hoelzl@51523
   804
  have width: "\<And>n. B n - A n = (b - a) / 2^n"
hoelzl@51523
   805
    apply (simp add: eq_divide_eq)
hoelzl@51523
   806
    apply (induct_tac n, simp)
lp15@60162
   807
    apply (simp add: C_def avg_def power_Suc algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
   808
    done
hoelzl@51523
   809
hoelzl@51523
   810
  have twos: "\<And>y r :: rat. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. y / 2 ^ n < r"
hoelzl@51523
   811
    apply (simp add: divide_less_eq)
haftmann@57512
   812
    apply (subst mult.commute)
hoelzl@51523
   813
    apply (frule_tac y=y in ex_less_of_nat_mult)
hoelzl@51523
   814
    apply clarify
hoelzl@51523
   815
    apply (rule_tac x=n in exI)
hoelzl@51523
   816
    apply (erule less_trans)
hoelzl@51523
   817
    apply (rule mult_strict_right_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   818
    apply (rule le_less_trans [OF _ of_nat_less_two_power])
hoelzl@51523
   819
    apply simp
hoelzl@51523
   820
    apply assumption
hoelzl@51523
   821
    done
hoelzl@51523
   822
hoelzl@51523
   823
  have PA: "\<And>n. \<not> P (A n)"
hoelzl@51523
   824
    by (induct_tac n, simp_all add: a)
hoelzl@51523
   825
  have PB: "\<And>n. P (B n)"
hoelzl@51523
   826
    by (induct_tac n, simp_all add: b)
hoelzl@51523
   827
  have ab: "a < b"
hoelzl@51523
   828
    using a b unfolding P_def
hoelzl@51523
   829
    apply (clarsimp simp add: not_le)
hoelzl@51523
   830
    apply (drule (1) bspec)
hoelzl@51523
   831
    apply (drule (1) less_le_trans)
hoelzl@51523
   832
    apply (simp add: of_rat_less)
hoelzl@51523
   833
    done
hoelzl@51523
   834
  have AB: "\<And>n. A n < B n"
hoelzl@51523
   835
    by (induct_tac n, simp add: ab, simp add: C_def avg_def)
hoelzl@51523
   836
  have A_mono: "\<And>i j. i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> A i \<le> A j"
hoelzl@51523
   837
    apply (auto simp add: le_less [where 'a=nat])
hoelzl@51523
   838
    apply (erule less_Suc_induct)
hoelzl@51523
   839
    apply (clarsimp simp add: C_def avg_def)
hoelzl@51523
   840
    apply (simp add: add_divide_distrib [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
   841
    apply (rule AB [THEN less_imp_le])
hoelzl@51523
   842
    apply simp
hoelzl@51523
   843
    done
hoelzl@51523
   844
  have B_mono: "\<And>i j. i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> B j \<le> B i"
hoelzl@51523
   845
    apply (auto simp add: le_less [where 'a=nat])
hoelzl@51523
   846
    apply (erule less_Suc_induct)
hoelzl@51523
   847
    apply (clarsimp simp add: C_def avg_def)
hoelzl@51523
   848
    apply (simp add: add_divide_distrib [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
   849
    apply (rule AB [THEN less_imp_le])
hoelzl@51523
   850
    apply simp
hoelzl@51523
   851
    done
hoelzl@51523
   852
  have cauchy_lemma:
hoelzl@51523
   853
    "\<And>X. \<forall>n. \<forall>i\<ge>n. A n \<le> X i \<and> X i \<le> B n \<Longrightarrow> cauchy X"
hoelzl@51523
   854
    apply (rule cauchyI)
hoelzl@51523
   855
    apply (drule twos [where y="b - a"])
hoelzl@51523
   856
    apply (erule exE)
hoelzl@51523
   857
    apply (rule_tac x=n in exI, clarify, rename_tac i j)
hoelzl@51523
   858
    apply (rule_tac y="B n - A n" in le_less_trans) defer
hoelzl@51523
   859
    apply (simp add: width)
hoelzl@51523
   860
    apply (drule_tac x=n in spec)
hoelzl@51523
   861
    apply (frule_tac x=i in spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@51523
   862
    apply (frule_tac x=j in spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@51523
   863
    apply (frule A_mono, drule B_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   864
    apply (frule A_mono, drule B_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   865
    apply arith
hoelzl@51523
   866
    done
hoelzl@51523
   867
  have "cauchy A"
hoelzl@51523
   868
    apply (rule cauchy_lemma [rule_format])
hoelzl@51523
   869
    apply (simp add: A_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   870
    apply (erule order_trans [OF less_imp_le [OF AB] B_mono])
hoelzl@51523
   871
    done
hoelzl@51523
   872
  have "cauchy B"
hoelzl@51523
   873
    apply (rule cauchy_lemma [rule_format])
hoelzl@51523
   874
    apply (simp add: B_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   875
    apply (erule order_trans [OF A_mono less_imp_le [OF AB]])
hoelzl@51523
   876
    done
hoelzl@51523
   877
  have 1: "\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> Real B"
hoelzl@51523
   878
  proof
hoelzl@51523
   879
    fix x assume "x \<in> S"
hoelzl@51523
   880
    then show "x \<le> Real B"
wenzelm@60758
   881
      using PB [unfolded P_def] \<open>cauchy B\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   882
      by (simp add: le_RealI)
hoelzl@51523
   883
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   884
  have 2: "\<forall>z. (\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> z) \<longrightarrow> Real A \<le> z"
hoelzl@51523
   885
    apply clarify
hoelzl@51523
   886
    apply (erule contrapos_pp)
hoelzl@51523
   887
    apply (simp add: not_le)
wenzelm@60758
   888
    apply (drule less_RealD [OF \<open>cauchy A\<close>], clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   889
    apply (subgoal_tac "\<not> P (A n)")
hoelzl@51523
   890
    apply (simp add: P_def not_le, clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   891
    apply (erule rev_bexI)
hoelzl@51523
   892
    apply (erule (1) less_trans)
hoelzl@51523
   893
    apply (simp add: PA)
hoelzl@51523
   894
    done
hoelzl@51523
   895
  have "vanishes (\<lambda>n. (b - a) / 2 ^ n)"
hoelzl@51523
   896
  proof (rule vanishesI)
hoelzl@51523
   897
    fix r :: rat assume "0 < r"
hoelzl@51523
   898
    then obtain k where k: "\<bar>b - a\<bar> / 2 ^ k < r"
hoelzl@51523
   899
      using twos by fast
hoelzl@51523
   900
    have "\<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>(b - a) / 2 ^ n\<bar> < r"
hoelzl@51523
   901
    proof (clarify)
hoelzl@51523
   902
      fix n assume n: "k \<le> n"
hoelzl@51523
   903
      have "\<bar>(b - a) / 2 ^ n\<bar> = \<bar>b - a\<bar> / 2 ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
   904
        by simp
hoelzl@51523
   905
      also have "\<dots> \<le> \<bar>b - a\<bar> / 2 ^ k"
nipkow@56544
   906
        using n by (simp add: divide_left_mono)
hoelzl@51523
   907
      also note k
hoelzl@51523
   908
      finally show "\<bar>(b - a) / 2 ^ n\<bar> < r" .
hoelzl@51523
   909
    qed
hoelzl@51523
   910
    thus "\<exists>k. \<forall>n\<ge>k. \<bar>(b - a) / 2 ^ n\<bar> < r" ..
hoelzl@51523
   911
  qed
hoelzl@51523
   912
  hence 3: "Real B = Real A"
wenzelm@60758
   913
    by (simp add: eq_Real \<open>cauchy A\<close> \<open>cauchy B\<close> width)
hoelzl@51523
   914
  show "\<exists>y. (\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> y) \<and> (\<forall>z. (\<forall>x\<in>S. x \<le> z) \<longrightarrow> y \<le> z)"
hoelzl@51523
   915
    using 1 2 3 by (rule_tac x="Real B" in exI, simp)
hoelzl@51523
   916
qed
hoelzl@51523
   917
hoelzl@51775
   918
instantiation real :: linear_continuum
hoelzl@51523
   919
begin
hoelzl@51523
   920
wenzelm@60758
   921
subsection\<open>Supremum of a set of reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   922
hoelzl@54281
   923
definition "Sup X = (LEAST z::real. \<forall>x\<in>X. x \<le> z)"
hoelzl@54281
   924
definition "Inf (X::real set) = - Sup (uminus ` X)"
hoelzl@51523
   925
hoelzl@51523
   926
instance
hoelzl@51523
   927
proof
hoelzl@54258
   928
  { fix x :: real and X :: "real set"
hoelzl@54258
   929
    assume x: "x \<in> X" "bdd_above X"
hoelzl@51523
   930
    then obtain s where s: "\<forall>y\<in>X. y \<le> s" "\<And>z. \<forall>y\<in>X. y \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> s \<le> z"
hoelzl@54258
   931
      using complete_real[of X] unfolding bdd_above_def by blast
hoelzl@51523
   932
    then show "x \<le> Sup X"
hoelzl@51523
   933
      unfolding Sup_real_def by (rule LeastI2_order) (auto simp: x) }
hoelzl@51523
   934
  note Sup_upper = this
hoelzl@51523
   935
hoelzl@51523
   936
  { fix z :: real and X :: "real set"
hoelzl@51523
   937
    assume x: "X \<noteq> {}" and z: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> z"
hoelzl@51523
   938
    then obtain s where s: "\<forall>y\<in>X. y \<le> s" "\<And>z. \<forall>y\<in>X. y \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> s \<le> z"
hoelzl@51523
   939
      using complete_real[of X] by blast
hoelzl@51523
   940
    then have "Sup X = s"
hoelzl@51523
   941
      unfolding Sup_real_def by (best intro: Least_equality)  
wenzelm@53374
   942
    also from s z have "... \<le> z"
hoelzl@51523
   943
      by blast
hoelzl@51523
   944
    finally show "Sup X \<le> z" . }
hoelzl@51523
   945
  note Sup_least = this
hoelzl@51523
   946
hoelzl@54281
   947
  { fix x :: real and X :: "real set" assume x: "x \<in> X" "bdd_below X" then show "Inf X \<le> x"
hoelzl@54281
   948
      using Sup_upper[of "-x" "uminus ` X"] by (auto simp: Inf_real_def) }
hoelzl@54281
   949
  { fix z :: real and X :: "real set" assume "X \<noteq> {}" "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> z \<le> x" then show "z \<le> Inf X"
hoelzl@54281
   950
      using Sup_least[of "uminus ` X" "- z"] by (force simp: Inf_real_def) }
hoelzl@51775
   951
  show "\<exists>a b::real. a \<noteq> b"
hoelzl@51775
   952
    using zero_neq_one by blast
hoelzl@51523
   953
qed
hoelzl@51523
   954
end
hoelzl@51523
   955
hoelzl@51523
   956
wenzelm@60758
   957
subsection \<open>Hiding implementation details\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   958
hoelzl@51523
   959
hide_const (open) vanishes cauchy positive Real
hoelzl@51523
   960
hoelzl@51523
   961
declare Real_induct [induct del]
hoelzl@51523
   962
declare Abs_real_induct [induct del]
hoelzl@51523
   963
declare Abs_real_cases [cases del]
hoelzl@51523
   964
kuncar@53652
   965
lifting_update real.lifting
kuncar@53652
   966
lifting_forget real.lifting
kuncar@51956
   967
  
wenzelm@60758
   968
subsection\<open>More Lemmas\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   969
wenzelm@60758
   970
text \<open>BH: These lemmas should not be necessary; they should be
wenzelm@60758
   971
covered by existing simp rules and simplification procedures.\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   972
hoelzl@51523
   973
lemma real_mult_less_iff1 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (x*z < y*z) = (x < y)"
hoelzl@51523
   974
by simp (* solved by linordered_ring_less_cancel_factor simproc *)
hoelzl@51523
   975
hoelzl@51523
   976
lemma real_mult_le_cancel_iff1 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (x*z \<le> y*z) = (x\<le>y)"
hoelzl@51523
   977
by simp (* solved by linordered_ring_le_cancel_factor simproc *)
hoelzl@51523
   978
hoelzl@51523
   979
lemma real_mult_le_cancel_iff2 [simp]: "(0::real) < z ==> (z*x \<le> z*y) = (x\<le>y)"
hoelzl@51523
   980
by simp (* solved by linordered_ring_le_cancel_factor simproc *)
hoelzl@51523
   981
hoelzl@51523
   982
wenzelm@60758
   983
subsection \<open>Embedding numbers into the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
   984
hoelzl@51523
   985
abbreviation
hoelzl@51523
   986
  real_of_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@51523
   987
where
hoelzl@51523
   988
  "real_of_nat \<equiv> of_nat"
hoelzl@51523
   989
hoelzl@51523
   990
abbreviation
hoelzl@51523
   991
  real_of_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@51523
   992
where
hoelzl@51523
   993
  "real_of_int \<equiv> of_int"
hoelzl@51523
   994
hoelzl@51523
   995
abbreviation
hoelzl@51523
   996
  real_of_rat :: "rat \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@51523
   997
where
hoelzl@51523
   998
  "real_of_rat \<equiv> of_rat"
hoelzl@51523
   999
hoelzl@58042
  1000
class real_of =
hoelzl@58042
  1001
  fixes real :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
hoelzl@58042
  1002
hoelzl@58042
  1003
instantiation nat :: real_of
hoelzl@58042
  1004
begin
hoelzl@58042
  1005
hoelzl@58042
  1006
definition real_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" where real_of_nat_def [code_unfold]: "real \<equiv> of_nat" 
hoelzl@51523
  1007
hoelzl@58042
  1008
instance ..
hoelzl@58042
  1009
end
hoelzl@58042
  1010
hoelzl@58042
  1011
instantiation int :: real_of
hoelzl@58042
  1012
begin
hoelzl@58042
  1013
hoelzl@58042
  1014
definition real_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> real" where real_of_int_def [code_unfold]: "real \<equiv> of_int" 
hoelzl@58042
  1015
hoelzl@58042
  1016
instance ..
hoelzl@58042
  1017
end
hoelzl@51523
  1018
hoelzl@51523
  1019
declare [[coercion_enabled]]
hoelzl@59000
  1020
hoelzl@59000
  1021
declare [[coercion "of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> int"]]
hoelzl@59000
  1022
declare [[coercion "real   :: nat \<Rightarrow> real"]]
hoelzl@59000
  1023
declare [[coercion "real   :: int \<Rightarrow> real"]]
hoelzl@59000
  1024
hoelzl@59000
  1025
(* We do not add rat to the coerced types, this has often unpleasant side effects when writing
hoelzl@59000
  1026
inverse (Suc n) which sometimes gets two coercions: of_rat (inverse (of_nat (Suc n))) *)
hoelzl@51523
  1027
hoelzl@51523
  1028
declare [[coercion_map map]]
hoelzl@59000
  1029
declare [[coercion_map "\<lambda>f g h x. g (h (f x))"]]
hoelzl@59000
  1030
declare [[coercion_map "\<lambda>f g (x,y). (f x, g y)"]]
hoelzl@51523
  1031
hoelzl@51523
  1032
lemma real_eq_of_nat: "real = of_nat"
hoelzl@51523
  1033
  unfolding real_of_nat_def ..
hoelzl@51523
  1034
hoelzl@51523
  1035
lemma real_eq_of_int: "real = of_int"
hoelzl@51523
  1036
  unfolding real_of_int_def ..
hoelzl@51523
  1037
hoelzl@51523
  1038
lemma real_of_int_zero [simp]: "real (0::int) = 0"  
hoelzl@51523
  1039
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1040
hoelzl@51523
  1041
lemma real_of_one [simp]: "real (1::int) = (1::real)"
hoelzl@51523
  1042
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1043
hoelzl@51523
  1044
lemma real_of_int_add [simp]: "real(x + y) = real (x::int) + real y"
hoelzl@51523
  1045
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1046
hoelzl@51523
  1047
lemma real_of_int_minus [simp]: "real(-x) = -real (x::int)"
hoelzl@51523
  1048
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1049
hoelzl@51523
  1050
lemma real_of_int_diff [simp]: "real(x - y) = real (x::int) - real y"
hoelzl@51523
  1051
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1052
hoelzl@51523
  1053
lemma real_of_int_mult [simp]: "real(x * y) = real (x::int) * real y"
hoelzl@51523
  1054
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1055
hoelzl@51523
  1056
lemma real_of_int_power [simp]: "real (x ^ n) = real (x::int) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1057
by (simp add: real_of_int_def of_int_power)
hoelzl@51523
  1058
hoelzl@51523
  1059
lemmas power_real_of_int = real_of_int_power [symmetric]
hoelzl@51523
  1060
hoelzl@51523
  1061
lemma real_of_int_setsum [simp]: "real ((SUM x:A. f x)::int) = (SUM x:A. real(f x))"
hoelzl@51523
  1062
  apply (subst real_eq_of_int)+
hoelzl@51523
  1063
  apply (rule of_int_setsum)
hoelzl@51523
  1064
done
hoelzl@51523
  1065
hoelzl@51523
  1066
lemma real_of_int_setprod [simp]: "real ((PROD x:A. f x)::int) = 
hoelzl@51523
  1067
    (PROD x:A. real(f x))"
hoelzl@51523
  1068
  apply (subst real_eq_of_int)+
hoelzl@51523
  1069
  apply (rule of_int_setprod)
hoelzl@51523
  1070
done
hoelzl@51523
  1071
hoelzl@51523
  1072
lemma real_of_int_zero_cancel [simp, algebra, presburger]: "(real x = 0) = (x = (0::int))"
hoelzl@51523
  1073
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1074
hoelzl@51523
  1075
lemma real_of_int_inject [iff, algebra, presburger]: "(real (x::int) = real y) = (x = y)"
hoelzl@51523
  1076
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1077
hoelzl@51523
  1078
lemma real_of_int_less_iff [iff, presburger]: "(real (x::int) < real y) = (x < y)"
hoelzl@51523
  1079
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1080
hoelzl@51523
  1081
lemma real_of_int_le_iff [simp, presburger]: "(real (x::int) \<le> real y) = (x \<le> y)"
hoelzl@51523
  1082
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1083
hoelzl@51523
  1084
lemma real_of_int_gt_zero_cancel_iff [simp, presburger]: "(0 < real (n::int)) = (0 < n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1085
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1086
hoelzl@51523
  1087
lemma real_of_int_ge_zero_cancel_iff [simp, presburger]: "(0 <= real (n::int)) = (0 <= n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1088
by (simp add: real_of_int_def) 
hoelzl@51523
  1089
hoelzl@51523
  1090
lemma real_of_int_lt_zero_cancel_iff [simp, presburger]: "(real (n::int) < 0) = (n < 0)" 
hoelzl@51523
  1091
by (simp add: real_of_int_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1092
hoelzl@51523
  1093
lemma real_of_int_le_zero_cancel_iff [simp, presburger]: "(real (n::int) <= 0) = (n <= 0)"
hoelzl@51523
  1094
by (simp add: real_of_int_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1095
hoelzl@51523
  1096
lemma one_less_real_of_int_cancel_iff: "1 < real (i :: int) \<longleftrightarrow> 1 < i"
hoelzl@51523
  1097
  unfolding real_of_one[symmetric] real_of_int_less_iff ..
hoelzl@51523
  1098
hoelzl@51523
  1099
lemma one_le_real_of_int_cancel_iff: "1 \<le> real (i :: int) \<longleftrightarrow> 1 \<le> i"
hoelzl@51523
  1100
  unfolding real_of_one[symmetric] real_of_int_le_iff ..
hoelzl@51523
  1101
hoelzl@51523
  1102
lemma real_of_int_less_one_cancel_iff: "real (i :: int) < 1 \<longleftrightarrow> i < 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1103
  unfolding real_of_one[symmetric] real_of_int_less_iff ..
hoelzl@51523
  1104
hoelzl@51523
  1105
lemma real_of_int_le_one_cancel_iff: "real (i :: int) \<le> 1 \<longleftrightarrow> i \<le> 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1106
  unfolding real_of_one[symmetric] real_of_int_le_iff ..
hoelzl@51523
  1107
hoelzl@51523
  1108
lemma real_of_int_abs [simp]: "real (abs x) = abs(real (x::int))"
hoelzl@51523
  1109
by (auto simp add: abs_if)
hoelzl@51523
  1110
hoelzl@51523
  1111
lemma int_less_real_le: "((n::int) < m) = (real n + 1 <= real m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1112
  apply (subgoal_tac "real n + 1 = real (n + 1)")
hoelzl@51523
  1113
  apply (simp del: real_of_int_add)
hoelzl@51523
  1114
  apply auto
hoelzl@51523
  1115
done
hoelzl@51523
  1116
hoelzl@51523
  1117
lemma int_le_real_less: "((n::int) <= m) = (real n < real m + 1)"
hoelzl@51523
  1118
  apply (subgoal_tac "real m + 1 = real (m + 1)")
hoelzl@51523
  1119
  apply (simp del: real_of_int_add)
hoelzl@51523
  1120
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1121
done
hoelzl@51523
  1122
hoelzl@51523
  1123
lemma real_of_int_div_aux: "(real (x::int)) / (real d) = 
hoelzl@51523
  1124
    real (x div d) + (real (x mod d)) / (real d)"
hoelzl@51523
  1125
proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1126
  have "x = (x div d) * d + x mod d"
hoelzl@51523
  1127
    by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1128
  then have "real x = real (x div d) * real d + real(x mod d)"
hoelzl@51523
  1129
    by (simp only: real_of_int_mult [THEN sym] real_of_int_add [THEN sym])
hoelzl@51523
  1130
  then have "real x / real d = ... / real d"
hoelzl@51523
  1131
    by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1132
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@51523
  1133
    by (auto simp add: add_divide_distrib algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1134
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1135
haftmann@58834
  1136
lemma real_of_int_div:
haftmann@58834
  1137
  fixes d n :: int
haftmann@58834
  1138
  shows "d dvd n \<Longrightarrow> real (n div d) = real n / real d"
haftmann@58834
  1139
  by (simp add: real_of_int_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1140
hoelzl@51523
  1141
lemma real_of_int_div2:
hoelzl@51523
  1142
  "0 <= real (n::int) / real (x) - real (n div x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1143
  apply (case_tac "x = 0")
hoelzl@51523
  1144
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1145
  apply (case_tac "0 < x")
hoelzl@51523
  1146
  apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1147
  apply (subst real_of_int_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1148
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1149
  apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1150
  apply (subst real_of_int_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1151
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1152
  apply (subst zero_le_divide_iff)
hoelzl@51523
  1153
  apply auto
hoelzl@51523
  1154
done
hoelzl@51523
  1155
hoelzl@51523
  1156
lemma real_of_int_div3:
hoelzl@51523
  1157
  "real (n::int) / real (x) - real (n div x) <= 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1158
  apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1159
  apply (subst real_of_int_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1160
  apply (auto simp add: divide_le_eq intro: order_less_imp_le)
hoelzl@51523
  1161
done
hoelzl@51523
  1162
hoelzl@51523
  1163
lemma real_of_int_div4: "real (n div x) <= real (n::int) / real x" 
hoelzl@51523
  1164
by (insert real_of_int_div2 [of n x], simp)
hoelzl@51523
  1165
hoelzl@51523
  1166
lemma Ints_real_of_int [simp]: "real (x::int) \<in> Ints"
hoelzl@51523
  1167
unfolding real_of_int_def by (rule Ints_of_int)
hoelzl@51523
  1168
hoelzl@51523
  1169
wenzelm@60758
  1170
subsection\<open>Embedding the Naturals into the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1171
hoelzl@51523
  1172
lemma real_of_nat_zero [simp]: "real (0::nat) = 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1173
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1174
hoelzl@51523
  1175
lemma real_of_nat_1 [simp]: "real (1::nat) = 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1176
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1177
hoelzl@51523
  1178
lemma real_of_nat_one [simp]: "real (Suc 0) = (1::real)"
hoelzl@51523
  1179
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1180
hoelzl@51523
  1181
lemma real_of_nat_add [simp]: "real (m + n) = real (m::nat) + real n"
hoelzl@51523
  1182
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1183
hoelzl@51523
  1184
(*Not for addsimps: often the LHS is used to represent a positive natural*)
hoelzl@51523
  1185
lemma real_of_nat_Suc: "real (Suc n) = real n + (1::real)"
hoelzl@51523
  1186
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1187
hoelzl@51523
  1188
lemma real_of_nat_less_iff [iff]: 
hoelzl@51523
  1189
     "(real (n::nat) < real m) = (n < m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1190
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1191
hoelzl@51523
  1192
lemma real_of_nat_le_iff [iff]: "(real (n::nat) \<le> real m) = (n \<le> m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1193
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1194
hoelzl@51523
  1195
lemma real_of_nat_ge_zero [iff]: "0 \<le> real (n::nat)"
hoelzl@51523
  1196
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1197
hoelzl@51523
  1198
lemma real_of_nat_Suc_gt_zero: "0 < real (Suc n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1199
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def del: of_nat_Suc)
hoelzl@51523
  1200
hoelzl@51523
  1201
lemma real_of_nat_mult [simp]: "real (m * n) = real (m::nat) * real n"
hoelzl@51523
  1202
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def of_nat_mult)
hoelzl@51523
  1203
hoelzl@51523
  1204
lemma real_of_nat_power [simp]: "real (m ^ n) = real (m::nat) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1205
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def of_nat_power)
hoelzl@51523
  1206
hoelzl@51523
  1207
lemmas power_real_of_nat = real_of_nat_power [symmetric]
hoelzl@51523
  1208
hoelzl@51523
  1209
lemma real_of_nat_setsum [simp]: "real ((SUM x:A. f x)::nat) = 
hoelzl@51523
  1210
    (SUM x:A. real(f x))"
hoelzl@51523
  1211
  apply (subst real_eq_of_nat)+
hoelzl@51523
  1212
  apply (rule of_nat_setsum)
hoelzl@51523
  1213
done
hoelzl@51523
  1214
hoelzl@51523
  1215
lemma real_of_nat_setprod [simp]: "real ((PROD x:A. f x)::nat) = 
hoelzl@51523
  1216
    (PROD x:A. real(f x))"
hoelzl@51523
  1217
  apply (subst real_eq_of_nat)+
hoelzl@51523
  1218
  apply (rule of_nat_setprod)
hoelzl@51523
  1219
done
hoelzl@51523
  1220
hoelzl@51523
  1221
lemma real_of_card: "real (card A) = setsum (%x.1) A"
hoelzl@51523
  1222
  apply (subst card_eq_setsum)
hoelzl@51523
  1223
  apply (subst real_of_nat_setsum)
hoelzl@51523
  1224
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1225
done
hoelzl@51523
  1226
hoelzl@51523
  1227
lemma real_of_nat_inject [iff]: "(real (n::nat) = real m) = (n = m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1228
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1229
hoelzl@51523
  1230
lemma real_of_nat_zero_iff [iff]: "(real (n::nat) = 0) = (n = 0)"
hoelzl@51523
  1231
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1232
hoelzl@51523
  1233
lemma real_of_nat_diff: "n \<le> m ==> real (m - n) = real (m::nat) - real n"
hoelzl@51523
  1234
by (simp add: add: real_of_nat_def of_nat_diff)
hoelzl@51523
  1235
hoelzl@51523
  1236
lemma real_of_nat_gt_zero_cancel_iff [simp]: "(0 < real (n::nat)) = (0 < n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1237
by (auto simp: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1238
hoelzl@51523
  1239
lemma real_of_nat_le_zero_cancel_iff [simp]: "(real (n::nat) \<le> 0) = (n = 0)"
hoelzl@51523
  1240
by (simp add: add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1241
hoelzl@51523
  1242
lemma not_real_of_nat_less_zero [simp]: "~ real (n::nat) < 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1243
by (simp add: add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1244
hoelzl@51523
  1245
lemma nat_less_real_le: "((n::nat) < m) = (real n + 1 <= real m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1246
  apply (subgoal_tac "real n + 1 = real (Suc n)")
hoelzl@51523
  1247
  apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1248
  apply (auto simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
hoelzl@51523
  1249
done
hoelzl@51523
  1250
hoelzl@51523
  1251
lemma nat_le_real_less: "((n::nat) <= m) = (real n < real m + 1)"
hoelzl@51523
  1252
  apply (subgoal_tac "real m + 1 = real (Suc m)")
hoelzl@51523
  1253
  apply (simp add: less_Suc_eq_le)
hoelzl@51523
  1254
  apply (simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
hoelzl@51523
  1255
done
hoelzl@51523
  1256
hoelzl@51523
  1257
lemma real_of_nat_div_aux: "(real (x::nat)) / (real d) = 
hoelzl@51523
  1258
    real (x div d) + (real (x mod d)) / (real d)"
hoelzl@51523
  1259
proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1260
  have "x = (x div d) * d + x mod d"
hoelzl@51523
  1261
    by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1262
  then have "real x = real (x div d) * real d + real(x mod d)"
hoelzl@51523
  1263
    by (simp only: real_of_nat_mult [THEN sym] real_of_nat_add [THEN sym])
hoelzl@51523
  1264
  then have "real x / real d = \<dots> / real d"
hoelzl@51523
  1265
    by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1266
  then show ?thesis
hoelzl@51523
  1267
    by (auto simp add: add_divide_distrib algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1268
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1269
hoelzl@51523
  1270
lemma real_of_nat_div: "(d :: nat) dvd n ==>
hoelzl@51523
  1271
    real(n div d) = real n / real d"
hoelzl@51523
  1272
  by (subst real_of_nat_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1273
    (auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
  1274
hoelzl@51523
  1275
lemma real_of_nat_div2:
hoelzl@51523
  1276
  "0 <= real (n::nat) / real (x) - real (n div x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1277
apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1278
apply (subst real_of_nat_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1279
apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1280
done
hoelzl@51523
  1281
hoelzl@51523
  1282
lemma real_of_nat_div3:
hoelzl@51523
  1283
  "real (n::nat) / real (x) - real (n div x) <= 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1284
apply(case_tac "x = 0")
hoelzl@51523
  1285
apply (simp)
hoelzl@51523
  1286
apply (simp add: algebra_simps)
hoelzl@51523
  1287
apply (subst real_of_nat_div_aux)
hoelzl@51523
  1288
apply simp
hoelzl@51523
  1289
done
hoelzl@51523
  1290
hoelzl@51523
  1291
lemma real_of_nat_div4: "real (n div x) <= real (n::nat) / real x" 
hoelzl@51523
  1292
by (insert real_of_nat_div2 [of n x], simp)
hoelzl@51523
  1293
hoelzl@51523
  1294
lemma real_of_int_of_nat_eq [simp]: "real (of_nat n :: int) = real n"
hoelzl@51523
  1295
by (simp add: real_of_int_def real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1296
hoelzl@51523
  1297
lemma real_nat_eq_real [simp]: "0 <= x ==> real(nat x) = real x"
hoelzl@51523
  1298
  apply (subgoal_tac "real(int(nat x)) = real(nat x)")
hoelzl@51523
  1299
  apply force
hoelzl@51523
  1300
  apply (simp only: real_of_int_of_nat_eq)
hoelzl@51523
  1301
done
hoelzl@51523
  1302
hoelzl@51523
  1303
lemma Nats_real_of_nat [simp]: "real (n::nat) \<in> Nats"
hoelzl@51523
  1304
unfolding real_of_nat_def by (rule of_nat_in_Nats)
hoelzl@51523
  1305
hoelzl@51523
  1306
lemma Ints_real_of_nat [simp]: "real (n::nat) \<in> Ints"
hoelzl@51523
  1307
unfolding real_of_nat_def by (rule Ints_of_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1308
wenzelm@60758
  1309
subsection \<open>The Archimedean Property of the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1310
hoelzl@51523
  1311
theorem reals_Archimedean:
hoelzl@51523
  1312
  assumes x_pos: "0 < x"
hoelzl@51523
  1313
  shows "\<exists>n. inverse (real (Suc n)) < x"
hoelzl@51523
  1314
  unfolding real_of_nat_def using x_pos
hoelzl@51523
  1315
  by (rule ex_inverse_of_nat_Suc_less)
hoelzl@51523
  1316
hoelzl@51523
  1317
lemma reals_Archimedean2: "\<exists>n. (x::real) < real (n::nat)"
hoelzl@51523
  1318
  unfolding real_of_nat_def by (rule ex_less_of_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1319
hoelzl@51523
  1320
lemma reals_Archimedean3:
hoelzl@51523
  1321
  assumes x_greater_zero: "0 < x"
hoelzl@51523
  1322
  shows "\<forall>(y::real). \<exists>(n::nat). y < real n * x"
wenzelm@60758
  1323
  unfolding real_of_nat_def using \<open>0 < x\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1324
  by (auto intro: ex_less_of_nat_mult)
hoelzl@51523
  1325
hoelzl@51523
  1326
wenzelm@60758
  1327
subsection\<open>Rationals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1328
hoelzl@51523
  1329
lemma Rats_real_nat[simp]: "real(n::nat) \<in> \<rat>"
hoelzl@51523
  1330
by (simp add: real_eq_of_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1331
hoelzl@51523
  1332
lemma Rats_eq_int_div_int:
hoelzl@51523
  1333
  "\<rat> = { real(i::int)/real(j::int) |i j. j \<noteq> 0}" (is "_ = ?S")
hoelzl@51523
  1334
proof
hoelzl@51523
  1335
  show "\<rat> \<subseteq> ?S"
hoelzl@51523
  1336
  proof
hoelzl@51523
  1337
    fix x::real assume "x : \<rat>"
hoelzl@51523
  1338
    then obtain r where "x = of_rat r" unfolding Rats_def ..
hoelzl@51523
  1339
    have "of_rat r : ?S"
hoelzl@51523
  1340
      by (cases r)(auto simp add:of_rat_rat real_eq_of_int)
wenzelm@60758
  1341
    thus "x : ?S" using \<open>x = of_rat r\<close> by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1342
  qed
hoelzl@51523
  1343
next
hoelzl@51523
  1344
  show "?S \<subseteq> \<rat>"
hoelzl@51523
  1345
  proof(auto simp:Rats_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1346
    fix i j :: int assume "j \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1347
    hence "real i / real j = of_rat(Fract i j)"
hoelzl@51523
  1348
      by (simp add:of_rat_rat real_eq_of_int)
hoelzl@51523
  1349
    thus "real i / real j \<in> range of_rat" by blast
hoelzl@51523
  1350
  qed
hoelzl@51523
  1351
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1352
hoelzl@51523
  1353
lemma Rats_eq_int_div_nat:
hoelzl@51523
  1354
  "\<rat> = { real(i::int)/real(n::nat) |i n. n \<noteq> 0}"
hoelzl@51523
  1355
proof(auto simp:Rats_eq_int_div_int)
hoelzl@51523
  1356
  fix i j::int assume "j \<noteq> 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1357
  show "EX (i'::int) (n::nat). real i/real j = real i'/real n \<and> 0<n"
hoelzl@51523
  1358
  proof cases
hoelzl@51523
  1359
    assume "j>0"
hoelzl@51523
  1360
    hence "real i/real j = real i/real(nat j) \<and> 0<nat j"
hoelzl@51523
  1361
      by (simp add: real_eq_of_int real_eq_of_nat of_nat_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1362
    thus ?thesis by blast
hoelzl@51523
  1363
  next
hoelzl@51523
  1364
    assume "~ j>0"
wenzelm@60758
  1365
    hence "real i/real j = real(-i)/real(nat(-j)) \<and> 0<nat(-j)" using \<open>j\<noteq>0\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1366
      by (simp add: real_eq_of_int real_eq_of_nat of_nat_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1367
    thus ?thesis by blast
hoelzl@51523
  1368
  qed
hoelzl@51523
  1369
next
hoelzl@51523
  1370
  fix i::int and n::nat assume "0 < n"
hoelzl@51523
  1371
  hence "real i/real n = real i/real(int n) \<and> int n \<noteq> 0" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1372
  thus "\<exists>(i'::int) j::int. real i/real n = real i'/real j \<and> j \<noteq> 0" by blast
hoelzl@51523
  1373
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1374
hoelzl@51523
  1375
lemma Rats_abs_nat_div_natE:
hoelzl@51523
  1376
  assumes "x \<in> \<rat>"
hoelzl@51523
  1377
  obtains m n :: nat
hoelzl@51523
  1378
  where "n \<noteq> 0" and "\<bar>x\<bar> = real m / real n" and "gcd m n = 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1379
proof -
wenzelm@60758
  1380
  from \<open>x \<in> \<rat>\<close> obtain i::int and n::nat where "n \<noteq> 0" and "x = real i / real n"
hoelzl@51523
  1381
    by(auto simp add: Rats_eq_int_div_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1382
  hence "\<bar>x\<bar> = real(nat(abs i)) / real n" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1383
  then obtain m :: nat where x_rat: "\<bar>x\<bar> = real m / real n" by blast
hoelzl@51523
  1384
  let ?gcd = "gcd m n"
wenzelm@60758
  1385
  from \<open>n\<noteq>0\<close> have gcd: "?gcd \<noteq> 0" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1386
  let ?k = "m div ?gcd"
hoelzl@51523
  1387
  let ?l = "n div ?gcd"
hoelzl@51523
  1388
  let ?gcd' = "gcd ?k ?l"
hoelzl@51523
  1389
  have "?gcd dvd m" .. then have gcd_k: "?gcd * ?k = m"
hoelzl@51523
  1390
    by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel)
hoelzl@51523
  1391
  have "?gcd dvd n" .. then have gcd_l: "?gcd * ?l = n"
hoelzl@51523
  1392
    by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel)
wenzelm@60758
  1393
  from \<open>n \<noteq> 0\<close> and gcd_l
haftmann@58834
  1394
  have "?gcd * ?l \<noteq> 0" by simp
haftmann@58834
  1395
  then have "?l \<noteq> 0" by (blast dest!: mult_not_zero) 
hoelzl@51523
  1396
  moreover
hoelzl@51523
  1397
  have "\<bar>x\<bar> = real ?k / real ?l"
hoelzl@51523
  1398
  proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1399
    from gcd have "real ?k / real ?l =
haftmann@58834
  1400
      real (?gcd * ?k) / real (?gcd * ?l)"
haftmann@58834
  1401
      by (simp only: real_of_nat_mult) simp
hoelzl@51523
  1402
    also from gcd_k and gcd_l have "\<dots> = real m / real n" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1403
    also from x_rat have "\<dots> = \<bar>x\<bar>" ..
hoelzl@51523
  1404
    finally show ?thesis ..
hoelzl@51523
  1405
  qed
hoelzl@51523
  1406
  moreover
hoelzl@51523
  1407
  have "?gcd' = 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1408
  proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1409
    have "?gcd * ?gcd' = gcd (?gcd * ?k) (?gcd * ?l)"
hoelzl@51523
  1410
      by (rule gcd_mult_distrib_nat)
hoelzl@51523
  1411
    with gcd_k gcd_l have "?gcd * ?gcd' = ?gcd" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1412
    with gcd show ?thesis by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1413
  qed
hoelzl@51523
  1414
  ultimately show ?thesis ..
hoelzl@51523
  1415
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1416
wenzelm@60758
  1417
subsection\<open>Density of the Rational Reals in the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1418
wenzelm@60758
  1419
text\<open>This density proof is due to Stefan Richter and was ported by TN.  The
hoelzl@51523
  1420
original source is \emph{Real Analysis} by H.L. Royden.
wenzelm@60758
  1421
It employs the Archimedean property of the reals.\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1422
hoelzl@51523
  1423
lemma Rats_dense_in_real:
hoelzl@51523
  1424
  fixes x :: real
hoelzl@51523
  1425
  assumes "x < y" shows "\<exists>r\<in>\<rat>. x < r \<and> r < y"
hoelzl@51523
  1426
proof -
wenzelm@60758
  1427
  from \<open>x<y\<close> have "0 < y-x" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1428
  with reals_Archimedean obtain q::nat 
hoelzl@51523
  1429
    where q: "inverse (real q) < y-x" and "0 < q" by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1430
  def p \<equiv> "ceiling (y * real q) - 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1431
  def r \<equiv> "of_int p / real q"
hoelzl@51523
  1432
  from q have "x < y - inverse (real q)" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1433
  also have "y - inverse (real q) \<le> r"
hoelzl@51523
  1434
    unfolding r_def p_def
wenzelm@60758
  1435
    by (simp add: le_divide_eq left_diff_distrib le_of_int_ceiling \<open>0 < q\<close>)
hoelzl@51523
  1436
  finally have "x < r" .
hoelzl@51523
  1437
  moreover have "r < y"
hoelzl@51523
  1438
    unfolding r_def p_def
wenzelm@60758
  1439
    by (simp add: divide_less_eq diff_less_eq \<open>0 < q\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1440
      less_ceiling_iff [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
  1441
  moreover from r_def have "r \<in> \<rat>" by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1442
  ultimately show ?thesis by fast
hoelzl@51523
  1443
qed
hoelzl@51523
  1444
hoelzl@57447
  1445
lemma of_rat_dense:
hoelzl@57447
  1446
  fixes x y :: real
hoelzl@57447
  1447
  assumes "x < y"
hoelzl@57447
  1448
  shows "\<exists>q :: rat. x < of_rat q \<and> of_rat q < y"
wenzelm@60758
  1449
using Rats_dense_in_real [OF \<open>x < y\<close>]
hoelzl@57447
  1450
by (auto elim: Rats_cases)
hoelzl@51523
  1451
hoelzl@51523
  1452
wenzelm@60758
  1453
subsection\<open>Numerals and Arithmetic\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1454
hoelzl@51523
  1455
lemma [code_abbrev]:
hoelzl@51523
  1456
  "real_of_int (numeral k) = numeral k"
haftmann@54489
  1457
  "real_of_int (- numeral k) = - numeral k"
hoelzl@51523
  1458
  by simp_all
hoelzl@51523
  1459
wenzelm@60758
  1460
text\<open>Collapse applications of @{const real} to @{const numeral}\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1461
lemma real_numeral [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1462
  "real (numeral v :: int) = numeral v"
haftmann@54489
  1463
  "real (- numeral v :: int) = - numeral v"
hoelzl@51523
  1464
by (simp_all add: real_of_int_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1465
hoelzl@57447
  1466
lemma  real_of_nat_numeral [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1467
  "real (numeral v :: nat) = numeral v"
hoelzl@51523
  1468
by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1469
wenzelm@60758
  1470
declaration \<open>
hoelzl@51523
  1471
  K (Lin_Arith.add_inj_thms [@{thm real_of_nat_le_iff} RS iffD2, @{thm real_of_nat_inject} RS iffD2]
hoelzl@51523
  1472
    (* not needed because x < (y::nat) can be rewritten as Suc x <= y: real_of_nat_less_iff RS iffD2 *)
hoelzl@51523
  1473
  #> Lin_Arith.add_inj_thms [@{thm real_of_int_le_iff} RS iffD2, @{thm real_of_int_inject} RS iffD2]
hoelzl@51523
  1474
    (* not needed because x < (y::int) can be rewritten as x + 1 <= y: real_of_int_less_iff RS iffD2 *)
hoelzl@51523
  1475
  #> Lin_Arith.add_simps [@{thm real_of_nat_zero}, @{thm real_of_nat_Suc}, @{thm real_of_nat_add},
hoelzl@51523
  1476
      @{thm real_of_nat_mult}, @{thm real_of_int_zero}, @{thm real_of_one},
hoelzl@51523
  1477
      @{thm real_of_int_add}, @{thm real_of_int_minus}, @{thm real_of_int_diff},
hoelzl@51523
  1478
      @{thm real_of_int_mult}, @{thm real_of_int_of_nat_eq},
hoelzl@58040
  1479
      @{thm real_of_nat_numeral}, @{thm real_numeral(1)}, @{thm real_numeral(2)},
hoelzl@58040
  1480
      @{thm real_of_int_def[symmetric]}, @{thm real_of_nat_def[symmetric]}]
hoelzl@51523
  1481
  #> Lin_Arith.add_inj_const (@{const_name real}, @{typ "nat \<Rightarrow> real"})
hoelzl@58040
  1482
  #> Lin_Arith.add_inj_const (@{const_name real}, @{typ "int \<Rightarrow> real"})
hoelzl@58040
  1483
  #> Lin_Arith.add_inj_const (@{const_name of_nat}, @{typ "nat \<Rightarrow> real"})
hoelzl@58040
  1484
  #> Lin_Arith.add_inj_const (@{const_name of_int}, @{typ "int \<Rightarrow> real"}))
wenzelm@60758
  1485
\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1486
wenzelm@60758
  1487
subsection\<open>Simprules combining x+y and 0: ARE THEY NEEDED?\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1488
hoelzl@51523
  1489
lemma real_add_minus_iff [simp]: "(x + - a = (0::real)) = (x=a)" 
hoelzl@51523
  1490
by arith
hoelzl@51523
  1491
wenzelm@60758
  1492
text \<open>FIXME: redundant with @{text add_eq_0_iff} below\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1493
lemma real_add_eq_0_iff: "(x+y = (0::real)) = (y = -x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1494
by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1495
hoelzl@51523
  1496
lemma real_add_less_0_iff: "(x+y < (0::real)) = (y < -x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1497
by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1498
hoelzl@51523
  1499
lemma real_0_less_add_iff: "((0::real) < x+y) = (-x < y)"
hoelzl@51523
  1500
by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1501
hoelzl@51523
  1502
lemma real_add_le_0_iff: "(x+y \<le> (0::real)) = (y \<le> -x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1503
by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1504
hoelzl@51523
  1505
lemma real_0_le_add_iff: "((0::real) \<le> x+y) = (-x \<le> y)"
hoelzl@51523
  1506
by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1507
wenzelm@60758
  1508
subsection \<open>Lemmas about powers\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1509
wenzelm@60758
  1510
text \<open>FIXME: declare this in Rings.thy or not at all\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1511
declare abs_mult_self [simp]
hoelzl@51523
  1512
hoelzl@51523
  1513
(* used by Import/HOL/real.imp *)
hoelzl@51523
  1514
lemma two_realpow_ge_one: "(1::real) \<le> 2 ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1515
by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1516
hoelzl@51523
  1517
lemma two_realpow_gt [simp]: "real (n::nat) < 2 ^ n"
lp15@60162
  1518
  by (simp add: of_nat_less_two_power real_of_nat_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1519
wenzelm@60758
  1520
text \<open>TODO: no longer real-specific; rename and move elsewhere\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1521
lemma realpow_Suc_le_self:
hoelzl@51523
  1522
  fixes r :: "'a::linordered_semidom"
hoelzl@51523
  1523
  shows "[| 0 \<le> r; r \<le> 1 |] ==> r ^ Suc n \<le> r"
hoelzl@51523
  1524
by (insert power_decreasing [of 1 "Suc n" r], simp)
hoelzl@51523
  1525
wenzelm@60758
  1526
text \<open>TODO: no longer real-specific; rename and move elsewhere\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1527
lemma realpow_minus_mult:
hoelzl@51523
  1528
  fixes x :: "'a::monoid_mult"
hoelzl@51523
  1529
  shows "0 < n \<Longrightarrow> x ^ (n - 1) * x = x ^ n"
lp15@60162
  1530
by (simp add: power_Suc power_commutes split add: nat_diff_split)
hoelzl@51523
  1531
wenzelm@60758
  1532
text \<open>FIXME: declare this [simp] for all types, or not at all\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1533
lemma real_two_squares_add_zero_iff [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1534
  "(x * x + y * y = 0) = ((x::real) = 0 \<and> y = 0)"
hoelzl@51523
  1535
by (rule sum_squares_eq_zero_iff)
hoelzl@51523
  1536
wenzelm@60758
  1537
text \<open>FIXME: declare this [simp] for all types, or not at all\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1538
lemma realpow_two_sum_zero_iff [simp]:
wenzelm@53076
  1539
     "(x\<^sup>2 + y\<^sup>2 = (0::real)) = (x = 0 & y = 0)"
hoelzl@51523
  1540
by (rule sum_power2_eq_zero_iff)
hoelzl@51523
  1541
hoelzl@51523
  1542
lemma real_minus_mult_self_le [simp]: "-(u * u) \<le> (x * (x::real))"
hoelzl@51523
  1543
by (rule_tac y = 0 in order_trans, auto)
hoelzl@51523
  1544
wenzelm@53076
  1545
lemma realpow_square_minus_le [simp]: "- u\<^sup>2 \<le> (x::real)\<^sup>2"
hoelzl@51523
  1546
by (auto simp add: power2_eq_square)
hoelzl@51523
  1547
hoelzl@51523
  1548
immler@58983
  1549
lemma numeral_power_eq_real_of_int_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1550
  "numeral x ^ n = real (y::int) \<longleftrightarrow> numeral x ^ n = y"
immler@58983
  1551
  by (metis real_numeral(1) real_of_int_inject real_of_int_power)
immler@58983
  1552
immler@58983
  1553
lemma real_of_int_eq_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1554
  "real (y::int) = numeral x ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> y = numeral x ^ n"
immler@58983
  1555
  using numeral_power_eq_real_of_int_cancel_iff[of x n y]
immler@58983
  1556
  by metis
immler@58983
  1557
immler@58983
  1558
lemma numeral_power_eq_real_of_nat_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1559
  "numeral x ^ n = real (y::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> numeral x ^ n = y"
immler@58983
  1560
  by (metis of_nat_eq_iff of_nat_numeral real_of_int_eq_numeral_power_cancel_iff
immler@58983
  1561
    real_of_int_of_nat_eq zpower_int)
immler@58983
  1562
immler@58983
  1563
lemma real_of_nat_eq_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1564
  "real (y::nat) = numeral x ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> y = numeral x ^ n"
immler@58983
  1565
  using numeral_power_eq_real_of_nat_cancel_iff[of x n y]
immler@58983
  1566
  by metis
immler@58983
  1567
hoelzl@51523
  1568
lemma numeral_power_le_real_of_nat_cancel_iff[simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1569
  "(numeral x::real) ^ n \<le> real a \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral x::nat) ^ n \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
  1570
  unfolding real_of_nat_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1571
hoelzl@51523
  1572
lemma real_of_nat_le_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1573
  "real a \<le> (numeral x::real) ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a \<le> (numeral x::nat) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1574
  unfolding real_of_nat_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1575
hoelzl@51523
  1576
lemma numeral_power_le_real_of_int_cancel_iff[simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1577
  "(numeral x::real) ^ n \<le> real a \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral x::int) ^ n \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
  1578
  unfolding real_of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1579
hoelzl@51523
  1580
lemma real_of_int_le_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1581
  "real a \<le> (numeral x::real) ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a \<le> (numeral x::int) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1582
  unfolding real_of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1583
immler@58983
  1584
lemma numeral_power_less_real_of_nat_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1585
  "(numeral x::real) ^ n < real a \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral x::nat) ^ n < a"
immler@58983
  1586
  unfolding real_of_nat_less_iff[symmetric] by simp
immler@58983
  1587
immler@58983
  1588
lemma real_of_nat_less_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1589
  "real a < (numeral x::real) ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a < (numeral x::nat) ^ n"
immler@58983
  1590
  unfolding real_of_nat_less_iff[symmetric] by simp
immler@58983
  1591
immler@58983
  1592
lemma numeral_power_less_real_of_int_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1593
  "(numeral x::real) ^ n < real a \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral x::int) ^ n < a"
immler@58983
  1594
  unfolding real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric] by simp
immler@58983
  1595
immler@58983
  1596
lemma real_of_int_less_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
immler@58983
  1597
  "real a < (numeral x::real) ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a < (numeral x::int) ^ n"
immler@58983
  1598
  unfolding real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric] by simp
immler@58983
  1599
hoelzl@51523
  1600
lemma neg_numeral_power_le_real_of_int_cancel_iff[simp]:
haftmann@54489
  1601
  "(- numeral x::real) ^ n \<le> real a \<longleftrightarrow> (- numeral x::int) ^ n \<le> a"
hoelzl@51523
  1602
  unfolding real_of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1603
hoelzl@51523
  1604
lemma real_of_int_le_neg_numeral_power_cancel_iff[simp]:
haftmann@54489
  1605
  "real a \<le> (- numeral x::real) ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a \<le> (- numeral x::int) ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1606
  unfolding real_of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1607
hoelzl@56889
  1608
wenzelm@60758
  1609
subsection\<open>Density of the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1610
hoelzl@51523
  1611
lemma real_lbound_gt_zero:
hoelzl@51523
  1612
     "[| (0::real) < d1; 0 < d2 |] ==> \<exists>e. 0 < e & e < d1 & e < d2"
hoelzl@51523
  1613
apply (rule_tac x = " (min d1 d2) /2" in exI)
hoelzl@51523
  1614
apply (simp add: min_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1615
done
hoelzl@51523
  1616
hoelzl@51523
  1617
wenzelm@60758
  1618
text\<open>Similar results are proved in @{text Fields}\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1619
lemma real_less_half_sum: "x < y ==> x < (x+y) / (2::real)"
hoelzl@51523
  1620
  by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1621
hoelzl@51523
  1622
lemma real_gt_half_sum: "x < y ==> (x+y)/(2::real) < y"
hoelzl@51523
  1623
  by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1624
hoelzl@51523
  1625
lemma real_sum_of_halves: "x/2 + x/2 = (x::real)"
hoelzl@51523
  1626
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1627
wenzelm@60758
  1628
subsection\<open>Absolute Value Function for the Reals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1629
hoelzl@51523
  1630
lemma abs_minus_add_cancel: "abs(x + (-y)) = abs (y + (-(x::real)))"
hoelzl@51523
  1631
by (simp add: abs_if)
hoelzl@51523
  1632
hoelzl@51523
  1633
(* FIXME: redundant, but used by Integration/RealRandVar.thy in AFP *)
hoelzl@51523
  1634
lemma abs_le_interval_iff: "(abs x \<le> r) = (-r\<le>x & x\<le>(r::real))"
hoelzl@51523
  1635
by (force simp add: abs_le_iff)
hoelzl@51523
  1636
hoelzl@51523
  1637
lemma abs_add_one_gt_zero: "(0::real) < 1 + abs(x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1638
by (simp add: abs_if)
hoelzl@51523
  1639
hoelzl@51523
  1640
lemma abs_real_of_nat_cancel [simp]: "abs (real x) = real (x::nat)"
hoelzl@51523
  1641
by (rule abs_of_nonneg [OF real_of_nat_ge_zero])
hoelzl@51523
  1642
hoelzl@51523
  1643
lemma abs_add_one_not_less_self: "~ abs(x) + (1::real) < x"
hoelzl@51523
  1644
by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1645
 
hoelzl@51523
  1646
lemma abs_sum_triangle_ineq: "abs ((x::real) + y + (-l + -m)) \<le> abs(x + -l) + abs(y + -m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1647
by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1648
hoelzl@51523
  1649
wenzelm@60758
  1650
subsection\<open>Floor and Ceiling Functions from the Reals to the Integers\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1651
hoelzl@51523
  1652
(* FIXME: theorems for negative numerals *)
hoelzl@51523
  1653
lemma numeral_less_real_of_int_iff [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1654
     "((numeral n) < real (m::int)) = (numeral n < m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1655
apply auto
hoelzl@51523
  1656
apply (rule real_of_int_less_iff [THEN iffD1])
hoelzl@51523
  1657
apply (drule_tac [2] real_of_int_less_iff [THEN iffD2], auto)
hoelzl@51523
  1658
done
hoelzl@51523
  1659
hoelzl@51523
  1660
lemma numeral_less_real_of_int_iff2 [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1661
     "(real (m::int) < (numeral n)) = (m < numeral n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1662
apply auto
hoelzl@51523
  1663
apply (rule real_of_int_less_iff [THEN iffD1])
hoelzl@51523
  1664
apply (drule_tac [2] real_of_int_less_iff [THEN iffD2], auto)
hoelzl@51523
  1665
done
hoelzl@51523
  1666
hoelzl@56889
  1667
lemma real_of_nat_less_numeral_iff [simp]:
hoelzl@56889
  1668
  "real (n::nat) < numeral w \<longleftrightarrow> n < numeral w"
hoelzl@56889
  1669
  using real_of_nat_less_iff[of n "numeral w"] by simp
hoelzl@56889
  1670
hoelzl@56889
  1671
lemma numeral_less_real_of_nat_iff [simp]:
hoelzl@56889
  1672
  "numeral w < real (n::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> numeral w < n"
hoelzl@56889
  1673
  using real_of_nat_less_iff[of "numeral w" n] by simp
hoelzl@56889
  1674
nipkow@59587
  1675
lemma numeral_le_real_of_nat_iff[simp]:
nipkow@59587
  1676
  "(numeral n \<le> real(m::nat)) = (numeral n \<le> m)"
nipkow@59587
  1677
by (metis not_le real_of_nat_less_numeral_iff)
nipkow@59587
  1678
hoelzl@51523
  1679
lemma numeral_le_real_of_int_iff [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1680
     "((numeral n) \<le> real (m::int)) = (numeral n \<le> m)"
hoelzl@51523
  1681
by (simp add: linorder_not_less [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
  1682
hoelzl@51523
  1683
lemma numeral_le_real_of_int_iff2 [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1684
     "(real (m::int) \<le> (numeral n)) = (m \<le> numeral n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1685
by (simp add: linorder_not_less [symmetric])
hoelzl@51523
  1686
hoelzl@51523
  1687
lemma floor_real_of_nat [simp]: "floor (real (n::nat)) = int n"
hoelzl@51523
  1688
unfolding real_of_nat_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1689
hoelzl@51523
  1690
lemma floor_minus_real_of_nat [simp]: "floor (- real (n::nat)) = - int n"
hoelzl@51523
  1691
unfolding real_of_nat_def by (simp add: floor_minus)
hoelzl@51523
  1692
hoelzl@51523
  1693
lemma floor_real_of_int [simp]: "floor (real (n::int)) = n"
hoelzl@51523
  1694
unfolding real_of_int_def by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1695
hoelzl@51523
  1696
lemma floor_minus_real_of_int [simp]: "floor (- real (n::int)) = - n"
hoelzl@51523
  1697
unfolding real_of_int_def by (simp add: floor_minus)
hoelzl@51523
  1698
hoelzl@51523
  1699
lemma real_lb_ub_int: " \<exists>n::int. real n \<le> r & r < real (n+1)"
hoelzl@51523
  1700
unfolding real_of_int_def by (rule floor_exists)
hoelzl@51523
  1701
hoelzl@58040
  1702
lemma lemma_floor: "real m \<le> r \<Longrightarrow> r < real n + 1 \<Longrightarrow> m \<le> (n::int)"
hoelzl@58040
  1703
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1704
hoelzl@51523
  1705
lemma real_of_int_floor_le [simp]: "real (floor r) \<le> r"
hoelzl@51523
  1706
unfolding real_of_int_def by (rule of_int_floor_le)
hoelzl@51523
  1707
hoelzl@51523
  1708
lemma lemma_floor2: "real n < real (x::int) + 1 ==> n \<le> x"
hoelzl@58040
  1709
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1710
hoelzl@51523
  1711
lemma real_of_int_floor_cancel [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1712
    "(real (floor x) = x) = (\<exists>n::int. x = real n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1713
  using floor_real_of_int by metis
hoelzl@51523
  1714
hoelzl@51523
  1715
lemma floor_eq: "[| real n < x; x < real n + 1 |] ==> floor x = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1716
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1717
hoelzl@51523
  1718
lemma floor_eq2: "[| real n \<le> x; x < real n + 1 |] ==> floor x = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1719
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1720
hoelzl@51523
  1721
lemma floor_eq3: "[| real n < x; x < real (Suc n) |] ==> nat(floor x) = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1722
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1723
hoelzl@51523
  1724
lemma floor_eq4: "[| real n \<le> x; x < real (Suc n) |] ==> nat(floor x) = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1725
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1726
hoelzl@51523
  1727
lemma real_of_int_floor_ge_diff_one [simp]: "r - 1 \<le> real(floor r)"
hoelzl@58040
  1728
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1729
hoelzl@51523
  1730
lemma real_of_int_floor_gt_diff_one [simp]: "r - 1 < real(floor r)"
hoelzl@58040
  1731
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1732
hoelzl@51523
  1733
lemma real_of_int_floor_add_one_ge [simp]: "r \<le> real(floor r) + 1"
hoelzl@58040
  1734
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1735
hoelzl@51523
  1736
lemma real_of_int_floor_add_one_gt [simp]: "r < real(floor r) + 1"
hoelzl@58040
  1737
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1738
hoelzl@51523
  1739
lemma le_floor: "real a <= x ==> a <= floor x"
hoelzl@58040
  1740
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1741
hoelzl@51523
  1742
lemma real_le_floor: "a <= floor x ==> real a <= x"
hoelzl@58040
  1743
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1744
hoelzl@51523
  1745
lemma le_floor_eq: "(a <= floor x) = (real a <= x)"
hoelzl@58040
  1746
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1747
hoelzl@51523
  1748
lemma floor_less_eq: "(floor x < a) = (x < real a)"
hoelzl@58040
  1749
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1750
hoelzl@51523
  1751
lemma less_floor_eq: "(a < floor x) = (real a + 1 <= x)"
hoelzl@58040
  1752
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1753
hoelzl@51523
  1754
lemma floor_le_eq: "(floor x <= a) = (x < real a + 1)"
hoelzl@58040
  1755
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1756
immler@58983
  1757
lemma floor_eq_iff: "floor x = b \<longleftrightarrow> real b \<le> x \<and> x < real (b + 1)"
immler@58983
  1758
  by linarith
immler@58983
  1759
hoelzl@51523
  1760
lemma floor_add [simp]: "floor (x + real a) = floor x + a"
hoelzl@58040
  1761
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1762
immler@58983
  1763
lemma floor_add2[simp]: "floor (real a + x) = a + floor x"
immler@58983
  1764
  by linarith
immler@58983
  1765
hoelzl@51523
  1766
lemma floor_subtract [simp]: "floor (x - real a) = floor x - a"
hoelzl@58040
  1767
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1768
hoelzl@58788
  1769
lemma floor_divide_real_eq_div: "0 \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> floor (a / real b) = floor a div b"
hoelzl@58788
  1770
proof cases
hoelzl@58788
  1771
  assume "0 < b"
hoelzl@58788
  1772
  { fix i j :: int assume "real i \<le> a" "a < 1 + real i"
hoelzl@58788
  1773
      "real j * real b \<le> a" "a < real b + real j * real b"
hoelzl@58788
  1774
    then have "i < b + j * b" "j * b < 1 + i"
hoelzl@58788
  1775
      unfolding real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric] by auto
hoelzl@58788
  1776
    then have "(j - i div b) * b \<le> i mod b" "i mod b < ((j - i div b) + 1) * b"
hoelzl@58788
  1777
      by (auto simp: field_simps)
hoelzl@58788
  1778
    then have "(j - i div b) * b < 1 * b" "0 * b < ((j - i div b) + 1) * b"
wenzelm@60758
  1779
      using pos_mod_bound[OF \<open>0<b\<close>, of i] pos_mod_sign[OF \<open>0<b\<close>, of i] by linarith+
hoelzl@58788
  1780
    then have "j = i div b"
wenzelm@60758
  1781
      using \<open>0 < b\<close> unfolding mult_less_cancel_right by auto }
wenzelm@60758
  1782
  with \<open>0 < b\<close> show ?thesis
hoelzl@58788
  1783
    by (auto split: floor_split simp: field_simps)
hoelzl@58788
  1784
qed auto
hoelzl@58788
  1785
hoelzl@51523
  1786
lemma floor_divide_eq_div:
hoelzl@51523
  1787
  "floor (real a / real b) = a div b"
haftmann@59984
  1788
  using floor_divide_of_int_eq [of a b] real_eq_of_int by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1789
hoelzl@58097
  1790
lemma floor_divide_eq_div_numeral[simp]: "\<lfloor>numeral a / numeral b::real\<rfloor> = numeral a div numeral b"
hoelzl@58097
  1791
  using floor_divide_eq_div[of "numeral a" "numeral b"] by simp
hoelzl@58097
  1792
hoelzl@58097
  1793
lemma floor_minus_divide_eq_div_numeral[simp]: "\<lfloor>- (numeral a / numeral b)::real\<rfloor> = - numeral a div numeral b"
hoelzl@58097
  1794
  using floor_divide_eq_div[of "- numeral a" "numeral b"] by simp
hoelzl@58097
  1795
hoelzl@51523
  1796
lemma ceiling_real_of_nat [simp]: "ceiling (real (n::nat)) = int n"
hoelzl@58040
  1797
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1798
hoelzl@51523
  1799
lemma real_of_int_ceiling_ge [simp]: "r \<le> real (ceiling r)"
hoelzl@58040
  1800
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1801
hoelzl@51523
  1802
lemma ceiling_real_of_int [simp]: "ceiling (real (n::int)) = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1803
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1804
hoelzl@51523
  1805
lemma real_of_int_ceiling_cancel [simp]:
hoelzl@51523
  1806
     "(real (ceiling x) = x) = (\<exists>n::int. x = real n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1807
  using ceiling_real_of_int by metis
hoelzl@51523
  1808
hoelzl@51523
  1809
lemma ceiling_eq: "[| real n < x; x < real n + 1 |] ==> ceiling x = n + 1"
hoelzl@58040
  1810
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1811
hoelzl@51523
  1812
lemma ceiling_eq2: "[| real n < x; x \<le> real n + 1 |] ==> ceiling x = n + 1"
hoelzl@58040
  1813
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1814
hoelzl@51523
  1815
lemma ceiling_eq3: "[| real n - 1 < x; x \<le> real n  |] ==> ceiling x = n"
hoelzl@58040
  1816
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1817
hoelzl@51523
  1818
lemma real_of_int_ceiling_diff_one_le [simp]: "real (ceiling r) - 1 \<le> r"
hoelzl@58040
  1819
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1820
hoelzl@51523
  1821
lemma real_of_int_ceiling_le_add_one [simp]: "real (ceiling r) \<le> r + 1"
hoelzl@58040
  1822
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1823
hoelzl@51523
  1824
lemma ceiling_le: "x <= real a ==> ceiling x <= a"
hoelzl@58040
  1825
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1826
hoelzl@51523
  1827
lemma ceiling_le_real: "ceiling x <= a ==> x <= real a"
hoelzl@58040
  1828
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1829
hoelzl@51523
  1830
lemma ceiling_le_eq: "(ceiling x <= a) = (x <= real a)"
hoelzl@58040
  1831
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1832
hoelzl@51523
  1833
lemma less_ceiling_eq: "(a < ceiling x) = (real a < x)"
hoelzl@58040
  1834
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1835
hoelzl@51523
  1836
lemma ceiling_less_eq: "(ceiling x < a) = (x <= real a - 1)"
hoelzl@58040
  1837
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1838
hoelzl@51523
  1839
lemma le_ceiling_eq: "(a <= ceiling x) = (real a - 1 < x)"
hoelzl@58040
  1840
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1841
hoelzl@51523
  1842
lemma ceiling_add [simp]: "ceiling (x + real a) = ceiling x + a"
hoelzl@58040
  1843
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1844
hoelzl@51523
  1845
lemma ceiling_subtract [simp]: "ceiling (x - real a) = ceiling x - a"
hoelzl@58040
  1846
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1847
hoelzl@58097
  1848
lemma ceiling_divide_eq_div: "\<lceil>real a / real b\<rceil> = - (- a div b)"
hoelzl@58097
  1849
  unfolding ceiling_def minus_divide_left real_of_int_minus[symmetric] floor_divide_eq_div by simp_all
hoelzl@58097
  1850
hoelzl@58097
  1851
lemma ceiling_divide_eq_div_numeral [simp]:
hoelzl@58097
  1852
  "\<lceil>numeral a / numeral b :: real\<rceil> = - (- numeral a div numeral b)"
hoelzl@58097
  1853
  using ceiling_divide_eq_div[of "numeral a" "numeral b"] by simp
hoelzl@58097
  1854
hoelzl@58097
  1855
lemma ceiling_minus_divide_eq_div_numeral [simp]:
hoelzl@58097
  1856
  "\<lceil>- (numeral a / numeral b :: real)\<rceil> = - (numeral a div numeral b)"
hoelzl@58097
  1857
  using ceiling_divide_eq_div[of "- numeral a" "numeral b"] by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1858
wenzelm@60758
  1859
text\<open>The following lemmas are remnants of the erstwhile functions natfloor
wenzelm@60758
  1860
and natceiling.\<close>
hoelzl@58040
  1861
nipkow@59587
  1862
lemma nat_floor_neg: "(x::real) <= 0 ==> nat(floor x) = 0"
hoelzl@58040
  1863
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1864
nipkow@59587
  1865
lemma le_nat_floor: "real x <= a ==> x <= nat(floor a)"
hoelzl@58040
  1866
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1867
nipkow@59587
  1868
lemma le_mult_nat_floor:
nipkow@59587
  1869
  shows "nat(floor a) * nat(floor b) \<le> nat(floor (a * b))"
nipkow@59587
  1870
  by (cases "0 <= a & 0 <= b")
nipkow@59587
  1871
     (auto simp add: nat_mult_distrib[symmetric] nat_mono le_mult_floor)
hoelzl@51523
  1872
nipkow@59587
  1873
lemma nat_ceiling_le_eq: "(nat(ceiling x) <= a) = (x <= real a)"
hoelzl@58040
  1874
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1875
nipkow@59587
  1876
lemma real_nat_ceiling_ge: "x <= real(nat(ceiling x))"
hoelzl@58040
  1877
  by linarith
hoelzl@51523
  1878
hoelzl@51523
  1879
hoelzl@57447
  1880
lemma Rats_no_top_le: "\<exists> q \<in> \<rat>. (x :: real) \<le> q"
nipkow@59587
  1881
  by (auto intro!: bexI[of _ "of_nat (nat(ceiling x))"]) linarith
hoelzl@57275
  1882
hoelzl@57447
  1883
lemma Rats_no_bot_less: "\<exists> q \<in> \<rat>. q < (x :: real)"
hoelzl@57447
  1884
  apply (auto intro!: bexI[of _ "of_int (floor x - 1)"])
hoelzl@57447
  1885
  apply (rule less_le_trans[OF _ of_int_floor_le])
hoelzl@57447
  1886
  apply simp
hoelzl@57447
  1887
  done
hoelzl@57447
  1888
wenzelm@60758
  1889
subsection \<open>Exponentiation with floor\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1890
hoelzl@51523
  1891
lemma floor_power:
hoelzl@51523
  1892
  assumes "x = real (floor x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1893
  shows "floor (x ^ n) = floor x ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1894
proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1895
  have *: "x ^ n = real (floor x ^ n)"
hoelzl@51523
  1896
    using assms by (induct n arbitrary: x) simp_all
hoelzl@51523
  1897
  show ?thesis unfolding real_of_int_inject[symmetric]
hoelzl@51523
  1898
    unfolding * floor_real_of_int ..
hoelzl@51523
  1899
qed
nipkow@59587
  1900
(*
hoelzl@51523
  1901
lemma natfloor_power:
hoelzl@51523
  1902
  assumes "x = real (natfloor x)"
hoelzl@51523
  1903
  shows "natfloor (x ^ n) = natfloor x ^ n"
hoelzl@51523
  1904
proof -
hoelzl@51523
  1905
  from assms have "0 \<le> floor x" by auto
hoelzl@51523
  1906
  note assms[unfolded natfloor_def real_nat_eq_real[OF `0 \<le> floor x`]]
hoelzl@51523
  1907
  from floor_power[OF this]
hoelzl@51523
  1908
  show ?thesis unfolding natfloor_def nat_power_eq[OF `0 \<le> floor x`, symmetric]
hoelzl@51523
  1909
    by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1910
qed
nipkow@59587
  1911
*)
immler@58983
  1912
lemma floor_numeral_power[simp]:
immler@58983
  1913
  "\<lfloor>numeral x ^ n\<rfloor> = numeral x ^ n"
immler@58983
  1914
  by (metis floor_of_int of_int_numeral of_int_power)
immler@58983
  1915
immler@58983
  1916
lemma ceiling_numeral_power[simp]:
immler@58983
  1917
  "\<lceil>numeral x ^ n\<rceil> = numeral x ^ n"
immler@58983
  1918
  by (metis ceiling_of_int of_int_numeral of_int_power)
immler@58983
  1919
hoelzl@51523
  1920
wenzelm@60758
  1921
subsection \<open>Implementation of rational real numbers\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1922
wenzelm@60758
  1923
text \<open>Formal constructor\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1924
hoelzl@51523
  1925
definition Ratreal :: "rat \<Rightarrow> real" where
hoelzl@51523
  1926
  [code_abbrev, simp]: "Ratreal = of_rat"
hoelzl@51523
  1927
hoelzl@51523
  1928
code_datatype Ratreal
hoelzl@51523
  1929
hoelzl@51523
  1930
wenzelm@60758
  1931
text \<open>Numerals\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1932
hoelzl@51523
  1933
lemma [code_abbrev]:
hoelzl@51523
  1934
  "(of_rat (of_int a) :: real) = of_int a"
hoelzl@51523
  1935
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1936
hoelzl@51523
  1937
lemma [code_abbrev]:
hoelzl@51523
  1938
  "(of_rat 0 :: real) = 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1939
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1940
hoelzl@51523
  1941
lemma [code_abbrev]:
hoelzl@51523
  1942
  "(of_rat 1 :: real) = 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1943
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1944
hoelzl@51523
  1945
lemma [code_abbrev]:
haftmann@58134
  1946
  "(of_rat (- 1) :: real) = - 1"
haftmann@58134
  1947
  by simp
haftmann@58134
  1948
haftmann@58134
  1949
lemma [code_abbrev]:
hoelzl@51523
  1950
  "(of_rat (numeral k) :: real) = numeral k"
hoelzl@51523
  1951
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1952
hoelzl@51523
  1953
lemma [code_abbrev]:
haftmann@54489
  1954
  "(of_rat (- numeral k) :: real) = - numeral k"
hoelzl@51523
  1955
  by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1956
hoelzl@51523
  1957
lemma [code_post]:
hoelzl@51523
  1958
  "(of_rat (1 / numeral k) :: real) = 1 / numeral k"
haftmann@58134
  1959
  "(of_rat (numeral k / numeral l) :: real) = numeral k / numeral l"
haftmann@58134
  1960
  "(of_rat (- (1 / numeral k)) :: real) = - (1 / numeral k)"
haftmann@58134
  1961
  "(of_rat (- (numeral k / numeral l)) :: real) = - (numeral k / numeral l)"
haftmann@54489
  1962
  by (simp_all add: of_rat_divide of_rat_minus)
hoelzl@51523
  1963
hoelzl@51523
  1964
wenzelm@60758
  1965
text \<open>Operations\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  1966
hoelzl@51523
  1967
lemma zero_real_code [code]:
hoelzl@51523
  1968
  "0 = Ratreal 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1969
by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1970
hoelzl@51523
  1971
lemma one_real_code [code]:
hoelzl@51523
  1972
  "1 = Ratreal 1"
hoelzl@51523
  1973
by simp
hoelzl@51523
  1974
hoelzl@51523
  1975
instantiation real :: equal
hoelzl@51523
  1976
begin
hoelzl@51523
  1977
hoelzl@51523
  1978
definition "HOL.equal (x\<Colon>real) y \<longleftrightarrow> x - y = 0"
hoelzl@51523
  1979
hoelzl@51523
  1980
instance proof
hoelzl@51523
  1981
qed (simp add: equal_real_def)
hoelzl@51523
  1982
hoelzl@51523
  1983
lemma real_equal_code [code]:
hoelzl@51523
  1984
  "HOL.equal (Ratreal x) (Ratreal y) \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal x y"
hoelzl@51523
  1985
  by (simp add: equal_real_def equal)
hoelzl@51523
  1986
hoelzl@51523
  1987
lemma [code nbe]:
hoelzl@51523
  1988
  "HOL.equal (x::real) x \<longleftrightarrow> True"
hoelzl@51523
  1989
  by (rule equal_refl)
hoelzl@51523
  1990
hoelzl@51523
  1991
end
hoelzl@51523
  1992
hoelzl@51523
  1993
lemma real_less_eq_code [code]: "Ratreal x \<le> Ratreal y \<longleftrightarrow> x \<le> y"
hoelzl@51523
  1994
  by (simp add: of_rat_less_eq)
hoelzl@51523
  1995
hoelzl@51523
  1996
lemma real_less_code [code]: "Ratreal x < Ratreal y \<longleftrightarrow> x < y"
hoelzl@51523
  1997
  by (simp add: of_rat_less)
hoelzl@51523
  1998
hoelzl@51523
  1999
lemma real_plus_code [code]: "Ratreal x + Ratreal y = Ratreal (x + y)"
hoelzl@51523
  2000
  by (simp add: of_rat_add)
hoelzl@51523
  2001
hoelzl@51523
  2002
lemma real_times_code [code]: "Ratreal x * Ratreal y = Ratreal (x * y)"
hoelzl@51523
  2003
  by (simp add: of_rat_mult)
hoelzl@51523
  2004
hoelzl@51523
  2005
lemma real_uminus_code [code]: "- Ratreal x = Ratreal (- x)"
hoelzl@51523
  2006
  by (simp add: of_rat_minus)
hoelzl@51523
  2007
hoelzl@51523
  2008
lemma real_minus_code [code]: "Ratreal x - Ratreal y = Ratreal (x - y)"
hoelzl@51523
  2009
  by (simp add: of_rat_diff)
hoelzl@51523
  2010
hoelzl@51523
  2011
lemma real_inverse_code [code]: "inverse (Ratreal x) = Ratreal (inverse x)"
hoelzl@51523
  2012
  by (simp add: of_rat_inverse)
hoelzl@51523
  2013
 
hoelzl@51523
  2014
lemma real_divide_code [code]: "Ratreal x / Ratreal y = Ratreal (x / y)"
hoelzl@51523
  2015
  by (simp add: of_rat_divide)
hoelzl@51523
  2016
hoelzl@51523
  2017
lemma real_floor_code [code]: "floor (Ratreal x) = floor x"
hoelzl@51523
  2018
  by (metis Ratreal_def floor_le_iff floor_unique le_floor_iff of_int_floor_le of_rat_of_int_eq real_less_eq_code)
hoelzl@51523
  2019
hoelzl@51523
  2020
wenzelm@60758
  2021
text \<open>Quickcheck\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  2022
hoelzl@51523
  2023
definition (in term_syntax)
hoelzl@51523
  2024
  valterm_ratreal :: "rat \<times> (unit \<Rightarrow> Code_Evaluation.term) \<Rightarrow> real \<times> (unit \<Rightarrow> Code_Evaluation.term)" where
hoelzl@51523
  2025
  [code_unfold]: "valterm_ratreal k = Code_Evaluation.valtermify Ratreal {\<cdot>} k"
hoelzl@51523
  2026
hoelzl@51523
  2027
notation fcomp (infixl "\<circ>>" 60)
hoelzl@51523
  2028
notation scomp (infixl "\<circ>\<rightarrow>" 60)
hoelzl@51523
  2029
hoelzl@51523
  2030
instantiation real :: random
hoelzl@51523
  2031
begin
hoelzl@51523
  2032
hoelzl@51523
  2033
definition
hoelzl@51523
  2034
  "Quickcheck_Random.random i = Quickcheck_Random.random i \<circ>\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>r. Pair (valterm_ratreal r))"
hoelzl@51523
  2035
hoelzl@51523
  2036
instance ..
hoelzl@51523
  2037
hoelzl@51523
  2038
end
hoelzl@51523
  2039
hoelzl@51523
  2040
no_notation fcomp (infixl "\<circ>>" 60)
hoelzl@51523
  2041
no_notation scomp (infixl "\<circ>\<rightarrow>" 60)
hoelzl@51523
  2042
hoelzl@51523
  2043
instantiation real :: exhaustive
hoelzl@51523
  2044
begin
hoelzl@51523
  2045
hoelzl@51523
  2046
definition
hoelzl@51523
  2047
  "exhaustive_real f d = Quickcheck_Exhaustive.exhaustive (%r. f (Ratreal r)) d"
hoelzl@51523
  2048
hoelzl@51523
  2049
instance ..
hoelzl@51523
  2050
hoelzl@51523
  2051
end
hoelzl@51523
  2052
hoelzl@51523
  2053
instantiation real :: full_exhaustive
hoelzl@51523
  2054
begin
hoelzl@51523
  2055
hoelzl@51523
  2056
definition
hoelzl@51523
  2057
  "full_exhaustive_real f d = Quickcheck_Exhaustive.full_exhaustive (%r. f (valterm_ratreal r)) d"
hoelzl@51523
  2058
hoelzl@51523
  2059
instance ..
hoelzl@51523
  2060
hoelzl@51523
  2061
end
hoelzl@51523
  2062
hoelzl@51523
  2063
instantiation real :: narrowing
hoelzl@51523
  2064
begin
hoelzl@51523
  2065
hoelzl@51523
  2066
definition
hoelzl@51523
  2067
  "narrowing = Quickcheck_Narrowing.apply (Quickcheck_Narrowing.cons Ratreal) narrowing"
hoelzl@51523
  2068
hoelzl@51523
  2069
instance ..
hoelzl@51523
  2070
hoelzl@51523
  2071
end
hoelzl@51523
  2072
hoelzl@51523
  2073
wenzelm@60758
  2074
subsection \<open>Setup for Nitpick\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  2075
wenzelm@60758
  2076
declaration \<open>
hoelzl@51523
  2077
  Nitpick_HOL.register_frac_type @{type_name real}
hoelzl@51523
  2078
   [(@{const_name zero_real_inst.zero_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.zero_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2079
    (@{const_name one_real_inst.one_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.one_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2080
    (@{const_name plus_real_inst.plus_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.plus_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2081
    (@{const_name times_real_inst.times_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.times_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2082
    (@{const_name uminus_real_inst.uminus_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.uminus_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2083
    (@{const_name inverse_real_inst.inverse_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.inverse_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2084
    (@{const_name ord_real_inst.less_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.less_frac}),
hoelzl@51523
  2085
    (@{const_name ord_real_inst.less_eq_real}, @{const_name Nitpick.less_eq_frac})]
wenzelm@60758
  2086
\<close>
hoelzl@51523
  2087
hoelzl@51523
  2088
lemmas [nitpick_unfold] = inverse_real_inst.inverse_real one_real_inst.one_real
hoelzl@51523
  2089
    ord_real_inst.less_real ord_real_inst.less_eq_real plus_real_inst.plus_real
hoelzl@51523
  2090
    times_real_inst.times_real uminus_real_inst.uminus_real
hoelzl@51523
  2091
    zero_real_inst.zero_real
hoelzl@51523
  2092
blanchet@56078
  2093
wenzelm@60758
  2094
subsection \<open>Setup for SMT\<close>
blanchet@56078
  2095
blanchet@58061
  2096
ML_file "Tools/SMT/smt_real.ML"
blanchet@58061
  2097
ML_file "Tools/SMT/z3_real.ML"
blanchet@56078
  2098
blanchet@58061
  2099
lemma [z3_rule]:
blanchet@56078
  2100
  "0 + (x::real) = x"
blanchet@56078
  2101
  "x + 0 = x"
blanchet@56078
  2102
  "0 * x = 0"
blanchet@56078
  2103
  "1 * x = x"
blanchet@56078
  2104
  "x + y = y + x"
blanchet@56078
  2105
  by auto
hoelzl@51523
  2106
hoelzl@51523
  2107
end