src/HOL/Number_Theory/Cong.thy
 author haftmann Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:58:13 +0200 changeset 37765 26bdfb7b680b parent 37293 2c9ed7478e6e child 41541 1fa4725c4656 permissions -rw-r--r--
dropped superfluous [code del]s
```
(*  Title:      HOL/Library/Cong.thy
ID:
Authors:    Christophe Tabacznyj, Lawrence C. Paulson, Amine Chaieb,

Defines congruence (notation: [x = y] (mod z)) for natural numbers and
integers.

This file combines and revises a number of prior developments.

The original theories "GCD" and "Primes" were by Christophe Tabacznyj
and Lawrence C. Paulson, based on \cite{davenport92}. They introduced
gcd, lcm, and prime for the natural numbers.

The original theory "IntPrimes" was by Thomas M. Rasmussen, and
extended gcd, lcm, primes to the integers. Amine Chaieb provided
another extension of the notions to the integers, and added a number
of results to "Primes" and "GCD".

The original theory, "IntPrimes", by Thomas M. Rasmussen, defined and
developed the congruence relations on the integers. The notion was
extended to the natural numbers by Chaieb. Jeremy Avigad combined
these, revised and tidied them, made the development uniform for the
natural numbers and the integers, and added a number of new theorems.

*)

theory Cong
imports Primes
begin

subsection {* Turn off One_nat_def *}

lemma induct'_nat [case_names zero plus1, induct type: nat]:
"\<lbrakk> P (0::nat); !!n. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (n + 1)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P n"

lemma cases_nat [case_names zero plus1, cases type: nat]:
"P (0::nat) \<Longrightarrow> (!!n. P (n + 1)) \<Longrightarrow> P n"
by(metis induct'_nat)

lemma power_plus_one [simp]: "(x::'a::power)^(n + 1) = x * x^n"

lemma power_eq_one_eq_nat [simp]:
"((x::nat)^m = 1) = (m = 0 | x = 1)"
by (induct m, auto)

lemma card_insert_if' [simp]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
card (insert x A) = (if x \<in> A then (card A) else (card A) + 1)"

(* why wasn't card_insert_if a simp rule? *)
declare card_insert_disjoint [simp del]

lemma nat_1' [simp]: "nat 1 = 1"
by simp

(* For those annoying moments where Suc reappears, use Suc_eq_plus1 *)

declare nat_1 [simp del]

declare mod_pos_pos_trivial [simp]

subsection {* Main definitions *}

class cong =

fixes
cong :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool" ("(1[_ = _] '(mod _'))")

begin

abbreviation
notcong :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool" ("(1[_ \<noteq> _] '(mod _'))")
where
"notcong x y m == (~cong x y m)"

end

(* definitions for the natural numbers *)

instantiation nat :: cong

begin

definition
cong_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"cong_nat x y m = ((x mod m) = (y mod m))"

instance proof qed

end

(* definitions for the integers *)

instantiation int :: cong

begin

definition
cong_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"cong_int x y m = ((x mod m) = (y mod m))"

instance proof qed

end

subsection {* Set up Transfer *}

lemma transfer_nat_int_cong:
"(x::int) >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> m >= 0 \<Longrightarrow>
([(nat x) = (nat y)] (mod (nat m))) = ([x = y] (mod m))"
unfolding cong_int_def cong_nat_def
apply (auto simp add: nat_mod_distrib [symmetric])
apply (subst (asm) eq_nat_nat_iff)
apply (case_tac "m = 0", force, rule pos_mod_sign, force)+
apply assumption
done

transfer_nat_int_cong]

lemma transfer_int_nat_cong:
"[(int x) = (int y)] (mod (int m)) = [x = y] (mod m)"
apply (auto simp add: cong_int_def cong_nat_def)
apply (auto simp add: zmod_int [symmetric])
done

transfer_int_nat_cong]

subsection {* Congruence *}

(* was zcong_0, etc. *)
lemma cong_0_nat [simp, presburger]: "([(a::nat) = b] (mod 0)) = (a = b)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_0_int [simp, presburger]: "([(a::int) = b] (mod 0)) = (a = b)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_1_nat [simp, presburger]: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod 1)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_Suc_0_nat [simp, presburger]: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod Suc 0)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto simp add: One_nat_def)

lemma cong_1_int [simp, presburger]: "[(a::int) = b] (mod 1)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_refl_nat [simp]: "[(k::nat) = k] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_refl_int [simp]: "[(k::int) = k] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_sym_nat: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [b = a] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_sym_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [b = a] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_sym_eq_nat: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) = [b = a] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_sym_eq_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) = [b = a] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_trans_nat [trans]:
"[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [b = c] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a = c] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_trans_int [trans]:
"[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [b = c] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a = c] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

"[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a + c = b + d] (mod m)"
apply (unfold cong_nat_def)
apply simp
done

"[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a + c = b + d] (mod m)"
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
apply simp
done

lemma cong_diff_int:
"[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a - c = b - d] (mod m)"
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
apply (subst (1 2) mod_diff_eq)
apply simp
done

lemma cong_diff_aux_int:
"(a::int) >= c \<Longrightarrow> b >= d \<Longrightarrow> [(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow>
[c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [tsub a c = tsub b d] (mod m)"
apply (subst (1 2) tsub_eq)
apply (auto intro: cong_diff_int)
done;

lemma cong_diff_nat:
assumes "(a::nat) >= c" and "b >= d" and "[a = b] (mod m)" and
"[c = d] (mod m)"
shows "[a - c = b - d] (mod m)"

using prems by (rule cong_diff_aux_int [transferred]);

lemma cong_mult_nat:
"[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a * c = b * d] (mod m)"
apply (unfold cong_nat_def)
apply (subst (1 2) mod_mult_eq)
apply simp
done

lemma cong_mult_int:
"[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [c = d] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a * c = b * d] (mod m)"
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
apply (subst (1 2) zmod_zmult1_eq)
apply (subst (1 2) mult_commute)
apply (subst (1 2) zmod_zmult1_eq)
apply simp
done

lemma cong_exp_nat: "[(x::nat) = y] (mod n) \<Longrightarrow> [x^k = y^k] (mod n)"
apply (induct k)
apply (auto simp add: cong_refl_nat cong_mult_nat)
done

lemma cong_exp_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod n) \<Longrightarrow> [x^k = y^k] (mod n)"
apply (induct k)
apply (auto simp add: cong_refl_int cong_mult_int)
done

lemma cong_setsum_nat [rule_format]:
"(ALL x: A. [((f x)::nat) = g x] (mod m)) \<longrightarrow>
[(SUM x:A. f x) = (SUM x:A. g x)] (mod m)"
apply (case_tac "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
done

lemma cong_setsum_int [rule_format]:
"(ALL x: A. [((f x)::int) = g x] (mod m)) \<longrightarrow>
[(SUM x:A. f x) = (SUM x:A. g x)] (mod m)"
apply (case_tac "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
done

lemma cong_setprod_nat [rule_format]:
"(ALL x: A. [((f x)::nat) = g x] (mod m)) \<longrightarrow>
[(PROD x:A. f x) = (PROD x:A. g x)] (mod m)"
apply (case_tac "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
apply (auto intro: cong_mult_nat)
done

lemma cong_setprod_int [rule_format]:
"(ALL x: A. [((f x)::int) = g x] (mod m)) \<longrightarrow>
[(PROD x:A. f x) = (PROD x:A. g x)] (mod m)"
apply (case_tac "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
apply (auto intro: cong_mult_int)
done

lemma cong_scalar_nat: "[(a::nat)= b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a * k = b * k] (mod m)"
by (rule cong_mult_nat, simp_all)

lemma cong_scalar_int: "[(a::int)= b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a * k = b * k] (mod m)"
by (rule cong_mult_int, simp_all)

lemma cong_scalar2_nat: "[(a::nat)= b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [k * a = k * b] (mod m)"
by (rule cong_mult_nat, simp_all)

lemma cong_scalar2_int: "[(a::int)= b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [k * a = k * b] (mod m)"
by (rule cong_mult_int, simp_all)

lemma cong_mult_self_nat: "[(a::nat) * m = 0] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_mult_self_int: "[(a::int) * m = 0] (mod m)"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto)

lemma cong_eq_diff_cong_0_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) = [a - b = 0] (mod m)"
apply (rule iffI)
apply (erule cong_diff_int [of a b m b b, simplified])
apply (erule cong_add_int [of "a - b" 0 m b b, simplified])
done

lemma cong_eq_diff_cong_0_aux_int: "a >= b \<Longrightarrow>
[(a::int) = b] (mod m) = [tsub a b = 0] (mod m)"
by (subst tsub_eq, assumption, rule cong_eq_diff_cong_0_int)

lemma cong_eq_diff_cong_0_nat:
assumes "(a::nat) >= b"
shows "[a = b] (mod m) = [a - b = 0] (mod m)"

using prems by (rule cong_eq_diff_cong_0_aux_int [transferred])

lemma cong_diff_cong_0'_nat:
"[(x::nat) = y] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow>
(if x <= y then [y - x = 0] (mod n) else [x - y = 0] (mod n))"
apply (case_tac "y <= x")
apply (frule cong_eq_diff_cong_0_nat [where m = n])
apply auto [1]
apply (subgoal_tac "x <= y")
apply (frule cong_eq_diff_cong_0_nat [where m = n])
apply (subst cong_sym_eq_nat)
apply auto
done

lemma cong_altdef_nat: "(a::nat) >= b \<Longrightarrow> [a = b] (mod m) = (m dvd (a - b))"
apply (subst cong_eq_diff_cong_0_nat, assumption)
apply (unfold cong_nat_def)
done

lemma cong_altdef_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) = (m dvd (a - b))"
apply (subst cong_eq_diff_cong_0_int)
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
done

lemma cong_abs_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod abs m) = [x = y] (mod m)"

lemma cong_square_int:
"\<lbrakk> prime (p::int); 0 < a; [a * a = 1] (mod p) \<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> [a = 1] (mod p) \<or> [a = - 1] (mod p)"
apply (simp only: cong_altdef_int)
apply (subst prime_dvd_mult_eq_int [symmetric], assumption)
(* any way around this? *)
apply (subgoal_tac "a * a - 1 = (a - 1) * (a - -1)")
done

lemma cong_mult_rcancel_int:
"coprime k (m::int) \<Longrightarrow> [a * k = b * k] (mod m) = [a = b] (mod m)"
apply (subst (1 2) cong_altdef_int)
apply (subst left_diff_distrib [symmetric])
apply (rule coprime_dvd_mult_iff_int)
apply (subst gcd_commute_int, assumption)
done

lemma cong_mult_rcancel_nat:
assumes  "coprime k (m::nat)"
shows "[a * k = b * k] (mod m) = [a = b] (mod m)"

apply (rule cong_mult_rcancel_int [transferred])
using prems apply auto
done

lemma cong_mult_lcancel_nat:
"coprime k (m::nat) \<Longrightarrow> [k * a = k * b ] (mod m) = [a = b] (mod m)"

lemma cong_mult_lcancel_int:
"coprime k (m::int) \<Longrightarrow> [k * a = k * b] (mod m) = [a = b] (mod m)"

(* was zcong_zgcd_zmult_zmod *)
lemma coprime_cong_mult_int:
"[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> [a = b] (mod n) \<Longrightarrow> coprime m n
\<Longrightarrow> [a = b] (mod m * n)"
apply (simp only: cong_altdef_int)
apply (erule (2) divides_mult_int)
done

lemma coprime_cong_mult_nat:
assumes "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m)" and "[a = b] (mod n)" and "coprime m n"
shows "[a = b] (mod m * n)"

apply (rule coprime_cong_mult_int [transferred])
using prems apply auto
done

lemma cong_less_imp_eq_nat: "0 \<le> (a::nat) \<Longrightarrow>
a < m \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> b < m \<Longrightarrow> [a = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> a = b"
by (auto simp add: cong_nat_def mod_pos_pos_trivial)

lemma cong_less_imp_eq_int: "0 \<le> (a::int) \<Longrightarrow>
a < m \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> b < m \<Longrightarrow> [a = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> a = b"
by (auto simp add: cong_int_def mod_pos_pos_trivial)

lemma cong_less_unique_nat:
"0 < (m::nat) \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>!b. 0 \<le> b \<and> b < m \<and> [a = b] (mod m))"
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "a mod m" in exI)
apply (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)
done

lemma cong_less_unique_int:
"0 < (m::int) \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>!b. 0 \<le> b \<and> b < m \<and> [a = b] (mod m))"
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "a mod m" in exI)
apply (unfold cong_int_def, auto simp add: mod_pos_pos_trivial)
done

lemma cong_iff_lin_int: "([(a::int) = b] (mod m)) = (\<exists>k. b = a + m * k)"
apply (auto simp add: cong_altdef_int dvd_def field_simps)
apply (rule_tac [!] x = "-k" in exI, auto)
done

lemma cong_iff_lin_nat: "([(a::nat) = b] (mod m)) =
(\<exists>k1 k2. b + k1 * m = a + k2 * m)"
apply (rule iffI)
apply (case_tac "b <= a")
apply (subst (asm) cong_altdef_nat, assumption)
apply (unfold dvd_def, auto)
apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = 0 in exI)
apply (subst (asm) cong_sym_eq_nat)
apply (subst (asm) cong_altdef_nat)
apply force
apply (unfold dvd_def, auto)
apply (rule_tac x = 0 in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
apply (unfold cong_nat_def)
apply (subgoal_tac "a mod m = (a + k2 * m) mod m")
apply (erule ssubst)back
apply (erule subst)
apply auto
done

lemma cong_gcd_eq_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> gcd a m = gcd b m"
apply (subst (asm) cong_iff_lin_int, auto)
apply (subst (2) gcd_commute_int)
apply (subst mult_commute)
apply (rule gcd_commute_int)
done

lemma cong_gcd_eq_nat:
assumes "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m)"
shows "gcd a m = gcd b m"

apply (rule cong_gcd_eq_int [transferred])
using prems apply auto
done

lemma cong_imp_coprime_nat: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> coprime a m \<Longrightarrow>
coprime b m"

lemma cong_imp_coprime_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> coprime a m \<Longrightarrow>
coprime b m"

lemma cong_cong_mod_nat: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod m) =
[a mod m = b mod m] (mod m)"

lemma cong_cong_mod_int: "[(a::int) = b] (mod m) =
[a mod m = b mod m] (mod m)"

lemma cong_minus_int [iff]: "[(a::int) = b] (mod -m) = [a = b] (mod m)"
by (subst (1 2) cong_altdef_int, auto)

lemma cong_zero_nat [iff]: "[(a::nat) = b] (mod 0) = (a = b)"

lemma cong_zero_int [iff]: "[(a::int) = b] (mod 0) = (a = b)"

(*
lemma mod_dvd_mod_int:
"0 < (m::int) \<Longrightarrow> m dvd b \<Longrightarrow> (a mod b mod m) = (a mod m)"
apply (unfold dvd_def, auto)
apply (rule mod_mod_cancel)
apply auto
done

lemma mod_dvd_mod:
assumes "0 < (m::nat)" and "m dvd b"
shows "(a mod b mod m) = (a mod m)"

apply (rule mod_dvd_mod_int [transferred])
using prems apply auto
done
*)

"[(a::nat) + x = a + y] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod n)"

"[(a::int) + x = a + y] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_rcancel_nat: "[(x::nat) + a = y + a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_rcancel_int: "[(x::int) + a = y + a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_lcancel_0_nat: "[(a::nat) + x = a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = 0] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_lcancel_0_int: "[(a::int) + x = a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = 0] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_rcancel_0_nat: "[x + (a::nat) = a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = 0] (mod n)"

lemma cong_add_rcancel_0_int: "[x + (a::int) = a] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = 0] (mod n)"

lemma cong_dvd_modulus_nat: "[(x::nat) = y] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> n dvd m \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod n)"
apply (auto simp add: cong_iff_lin_nat dvd_def)
apply (rule_tac x="k1 * k" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="k2 * k" in exI)
done

lemma cong_dvd_modulus_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> n dvd m \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod n)"
by (auto simp add: cong_altdef_int dvd_def)

lemma cong_dvd_eq_nat: "[(x::nat) = y] (mod n) \<Longrightarrow> n dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd y"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)

lemma cong_dvd_eq_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod n) \<Longrightarrow> n dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd y"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)

lemma cong_mod_nat: "(n::nat) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> [a mod n = a] (mod n)"

lemma cong_mod_int: "(n::int) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> [a mod n = a] (mod n)"

lemma mod_mult_cong_nat: "(a::nat) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> b ~= 0
\<Longrightarrow> [x mod (a * b) = y] (mod a) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod a)"

lemma neg_cong_int: "([(a::int) = b] (mod m)) = ([-a = -b] (mod m))"
apply (subst dvd_minus_iff [symmetric])
done

lemma cong_modulus_neg_int: "([(a::int) = b] (mod m)) = ([a = b] (mod -m))"

lemma mod_mult_cong_int: "(a::int) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> b ~= 0
\<Longrightarrow> [x mod (a * b) = y] (mod a) \<longleftrightarrow> [x = y] (mod a)"
apply (case_tac "b > 0")
apply (subst (1 2) cong_modulus_neg_int)
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
apply (subgoal_tac "a * b = (-a * -b)")
apply (erule ssubst)
apply (subst zmod_zmult2_eq)
done

lemma cong_to_1_nat: "([(a::nat) = 1] (mod n)) \<Longrightarrow> (n dvd (a - 1))"
apply (case_tac "a = 0")
apply force
apply (subst (asm) cong_altdef_nat)
apply auto
done

lemma cong_0_1_nat: "[(0::nat) = 1] (mod n) = (n = 1)"
by (unfold cong_nat_def, auto)

lemma cong_0_1_int: "[(0::int) = 1] (mod n) = ((n = 1) | (n = -1))"
by (unfold cong_int_def, auto simp add: zmult_eq_1_iff)

lemma cong_to_1'_nat: "[(a::nat) = 1] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow>
a = 0 \<and> n = 1 \<or> (\<exists>m. a = 1 + m * n)"
apply (case_tac "n = 1")
apply auto [1]
apply (drule_tac x = "a - 1" in spec)
apply force
apply (case_tac "a = 0")
apply (auto simp add: cong_0_1_nat) [1]
apply (rule iffI)
apply (drule cong_to_1_nat)
apply (unfold dvd_def)
apply auto [1]
apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
apply (auto simp add: field_simps) [1]
apply (subst cong_altdef_nat)
done

lemma cong_le_nat: "(y::nat) <= x \<Longrightarrow> [x = y] (mod n) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>q. x = q * n + y)"
apply (subst cong_altdef_nat)
apply assumption
apply (unfold dvd_def, auto simp add: field_simps)
apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
apply auto
done

lemma cong_solve_nat: "(a::nat) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> EX x. [a * x = gcd a n] (mod n)"
apply (case_tac "n = 0")
apply force
apply (frule bezout_nat [of a n], auto)
apply (rule exI, erule ssubst)
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
apply (subst mult_commute)
apply (rule cong_mult_self_nat)
prefer 2
apply simp
apply (rule cong_refl_nat)
apply (rule cong_refl_nat)
done

lemma cong_solve_int: "(a::int) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> EX x. [a * x = gcd a n] (mod n)"
apply (case_tac "n = 0")
apply (case_tac "a \<ge> 0")
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "-1" in exI)
apply auto
apply (insert bezout_int [of a n], auto)
apply (rule exI)
apply (erule subst)
apply (rule cong_trans_int)
prefer 2
apply (rule cong_refl_int)
apply (rule cong_sym_int)
apply (rule cong_mult_self_int)
apply simp
apply (subst mult_commute)
apply (rule cong_refl_int)
done

lemma cong_solve_dvd_nat:
assumes a: "(a::nat) \<noteq> 0" and b: "gcd a n dvd d"
shows "EX x. [a * x = d] (mod n)"
proof -
from cong_solve_nat [OF a] obtain x where
"[a * x = gcd a n](mod n)"
by auto
hence "[(d div gcd a n) * (a * x) = (d div gcd a n) * gcd a n] (mod n)"
by (elim cong_scalar2_nat)
also from b have "(d div gcd a n) * gcd a n = d"
by (rule dvd_div_mult_self)
also have "(d div gcd a n) * (a * x) = a * (d div gcd a n * x)"
by auto
finally show ?thesis
by auto
qed

lemma cong_solve_dvd_int:
assumes a: "(a::int) \<noteq> 0" and b: "gcd a n dvd d"
shows "EX x. [a * x = d] (mod n)"
proof -
from cong_solve_int [OF a] obtain x where
"[a * x = gcd a n](mod n)"
by auto
hence "[(d div gcd a n) * (a * x) = (d div gcd a n) * gcd a n] (mod n)"
by (elim cong_scalar2_int)
also from b have "(d div gcd a n) * gcd a n = d"
by (rule dvd_div_mult_self)
also have "(d div gcd a n) * (a * x) = a * (d div gcd a n * x)"
by auto
finally show ?thesis
by auto
qed

lemma cong_solve_coprime_nat: "coprime (a::nat) n \<Longrightarrow>
EX x. [a * x = 1] (mod n)"
apply (case_tac "a = 0")
apply force
apply (frule cong_solve_nat [of a n])
apply auto
done

lemma cong_solve_coprime_int: "coprime (a::int) n \<Longrightarrow>
EX x. [a * x = 1] (mod n)"
apply (case_tac "a = 0")
apply auto
apply (case_tac "n \<ge> 0")
apply auto
apply (subst cong_int_def, auto)
apply (frule cong_solve_int [of a n])
apply auto
done

lemma coprime_iff_invertible_nat: "m > (1::nat) \<Longrightarrow> coprime a m =
(EX x. [a * x = 1] (mod m))"
apply (auto intro: cong_solve_coprime_nat)
apply (unfold cong_nat_def, auto intro: invertible_coprime_nat)
done

lemma coprime_iff_invertible_int: "m > (1::int) \<Longrightarrow> coprime a m =
(EX x. [a * x = 1] (mod m))"
apply (auto intro: cong_solve_coprime_int)
apply (unfold cong_int_def)
apply (auto intro: invertible_coprime_int)
done

lemma coprime_iff_invertible'_int: "m > (1::int) \<Longrightarrow> coprime a m =
(EX x. 0 <= x & x < m & [a * x = 1] (mod m))"
apply (subst coprime_iff_invertible_int)
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "x mod m" in exI)
apply (auto simp add: mod_mult_right_eq [symmetric])
done

lemma cong_cong_lcm_nat: "[(x::nat) = y] (mod a) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod b) \<Longrightarrow> [x = y] (mod lcm a b)"
apply (case_tac "y \<le> x")
apply (auto simp add: cong_altdef_nat lcm_least_nat) [1]
apply (rule cong_sym_nat)
apply (subst (asm) (1 2) cong_sym_eq_nat)
apply (auto simp add: cong_altdef_nat lcm_least_nat)
done

lemma cong_cong_lcm_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod a) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod b) \<Longrightarrow> [x = y] (mod lcm a b)"
by (auto simp add: cong_altdef_int lcm_least_int) [1]

lemma cong_cong_coprime_nat: "coprime a b \<Longrightarrow> [(x::nat) = y] (mod a) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod b) \<Longrightarrow> [x = y] (mod a * b)"
apply (frule (1) cong_cong_lcm_nat)back
done

lemma cong_cong_coprime_int: "coprime a b \<Longrightarrow> [(x::int) = y] (mod a) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod b) \<Longrightarrow> [x = y] (mod a * b)"
apply (frule (1) cong_cong_lcm_int)back
apply (simp add: lcm_altdef_int cong_abs_int abs_mult [symmetric])
done

lemma cong_cong_setprod_coprime_nat [rule_format]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
(ALL i:A. (ALL j:A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))) \<longrightarrow>
(ALL i:A. [(x::nat) = y] (mod m i)) \<longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod (PROD i:A. m i))"
apply (induct set: finite)
apply auto
apply (rule cong_cong_coprime_nat)
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
apply (rule setprod_coprime_nat)
apply auto
done

lemma cong_cong_setprod_coprime_int [rule_format]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
(ALL i:A. (ALL j:A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))) \<longrightarrow>
(ALL i:A. [(x::int) = y] (mod m i)) \<longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod (PROD i:A. m i))"
apply (induct set: finite)
apply auto
apply (rule cong_cong_coprime_int)
apply (subst gcd_commute_int)
apply (rule setprod_coprime_int)
apply auto
done

lemma binary_chinese_remainder_aux_nat:
assumes a: "coprime (m1::nat) m2"
shows "EX b1 b2. [b1 = 1] (mod m1) \<and> [b1 = 0] (mod m2) \<and>
[b2 = 0] (mod m1) \<and> [b2 = 1] (mod m2)"
proof -
from cong_solve_coprime_nat [OF a]
obtain x1 where one: "[m1 * x1 = 1] (mod m2)"
by auto
from a have b: "coprime m2 m1"
by (subst gcd_commute_nat)
from cong_solve_coprime_nat [OF b]
obtain x2 where two: "[m2 * x2 = 1] (mod m1)"
by auto
have "[m1 * x1 = 0] (mod m1)"
by (subst mult_commute, rule cong_mult_self_nat)
moreover have "[m2 * x2 = 0] (mod m2)"
by (subst mult_commute, rule cong_mult_self_nat)
moreover note one two
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma binary_chinese_remainder_aux_int:
assumes a: "coprime (m1::int) m2"
shows "EX b1 b2. [b1 = 1] (mod m1) \<and> [b1 = 0] (mod m2) \<and>
[b2 = 0] (mod m1) \<and> [b2 = 1] (mod m2)"
proof -
from cong_solve_coprime_int [OF a]
obtain x1 where one: "[m1 * x1 = 1] (mod m2)"
by auto
from a have b: "coprime m2 m1"
by (subst gcd_commute_int)
from cong_solve_coprime_int [OF b]
obtain x2 where two: "[m2 * x2 = 1] (mod m1)"
by auto
have "[m1 * x1 = 0] (mod m1)"
by (subst mult_commute, rule cong_mult_self_int)
moreover have "[m2 * x2 = 0] (mod m2)"
by (subst mult_commute, rule cong_mult_self_int)
moreover note one two
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma binary_chinese_remainder_nat:
assumes a: "coprime (m1::nat) m2"
shows "EX x. [x = u1] (mod m1) \<and> [x = u2] (mod m2)"
proof -
from binary_chinese_remainder_aux_nat [OF a] obtain b1 b2
where "[b1 = 1] (mod m1)" and "[b1 = 0] (mod m2)" and
"[b2 = 0] (mod m1)" and "[b2 = 1] (mod m2)"
by blast
let ?x = "u1 * b1 + u2 * b2"
have "[?x = u1 * 1 + u2 * 0] (mod m1)"
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
apply (rule `[b1 = 1] (mod m1)`)
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
apply (rule `[b2 = 0] (mod m1)`)
done
hence "[?x = u1] (mod m1)" by simp
have "[?x = u1 * 0 + u2 * 1] (mod m2)"
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
apply (rule `[b1 = 0] (mod m2)`)
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
apply (rule `[b2 = 1] (mod m2)`)
done
hence "[?x = u2] (mod m2)" by simp
with `[?x = u1] (mod m1)` show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma binary_chinese_remainder_int:
assumes a: "coprime (m1::int) m2"
shows "EX x. [x = u1] (mod m1) \<and> [x = u2] (mod m2)"
proof -
from binary_chinese_remainder_aux_int [OF a] obtain b1 b2
where "[b1 = 1] (mod m1)" and "[b1 = 0] (mod m2)" and
"[b2 = 0] (mod m1)" and "[b2 = 1] (mod m2)"
by blast
let ?x = "u1 * b1 + u2 * b2"
have "[?x = u1 * 1 + u2 * 0] (mod m1)"
apply (rule cong_scalar2_int)
apply (rule `[b1 = 1] (mod m1)`)
apply (rule cong_scalar2_int)
apply (rule `[b2 = 0] (mod m1)`)
done
hence "[?x = u1] (mod m1)" by simp
have "[?x = u1 * 0 + u2 * 1] (mod m2)"
apply (rule cong_scalar2_int)
apply (rule `[b1 = 0] (mod m2)`)
apply (rule cong_scalar2_int)
apply (rule `[b2 = 1] (mod m2)`)
done
hence "[?x = u2] (mod m2)" by simp
with `[?x = u1] (mod m1)` show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma cong_modulus_mult_nat: "[(x::nat) = y] (mod m * n) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod m)"
apply (case_tac "y \<le> x")
apply (erule dvd_mult_left)
apply (rule cong_sym_nat)
apply (subst (asm) cong_sym_eq_nat)
apply (erule dvd_mult_left)
done

lemma cong_modulus_mult_int: "[(x::int) = y] (mod m * n) \<Longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod m)"
apply (erule dvd_mult_left)
done

lemma cong_less_modulus_unique_nat:
"[(x::nat) = y] (mod m) \<Longrightarrow> x < m \<Longrightarrow> y < m \<Longrightarrow> x = y"

lemma binary_chinese_remainder_unique_nat:
assumes a: "coprime (m1::nat) m2" and
nz: "m1 \<noteq> 0" "m2 \<noteq> 0"
shows "EX! x. x < m1 * m2 \<and> [x = u1] (mod m1) \<and> [x = u2] (mod m2)"
proof -
from binary_chinese_remainder_nat [OF a] obtain y where
"[y = u1] (mod m1)" and "[y = u2] (mod m2)"
by blast
let ?x = "y mod (m1 * m2)"
from nz have less: "?x < m1 * m2"
by auto
have one: "[?x = u1] (mod m1)"
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
prefer 2
apply (rule `[y = u1] (mod m1)`)
apply (rule cong_modulus_mult_nat)
apply (rule cong_mod_nat)
using nz apply auto
done
have two: "[?x = u2] (mod m2)"
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
prefer 2
apply (rule `[y = u2] (mod m2)`)
apply (subst mult_commute)
apply (rule cong_modulus_mult_nat)
apply (rule cong_mod_nat)
using nz apply auto
done
have "ALL z. z < m1 * m2 \<and> [z = u1] (mod m1) \<and> [z = u2] (mod m2) \<longrightarrow>
z = ?x"
proof (clarify)
fix z
assume "z < m1 * m2"
assume "[z = u1] (mod m1)" and  "[z = u2] (mod m2)"
have "[?x = z] (mod m1)"
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
apply (rule `[?x = u1] (mod m1)`)
apply (rule cong_sym_nat)
apply (rule `[z = u1] (mod m1)`)
done
moreover have "[?x = z] (mod m2)"
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
apply (rule `[?x = u2] (mod m2)`)
apply (rule cong_sym_nat)
apply (rule `[z = u2] (mod m2)`)
done
ultimately have "[?x = z] (mod m1 * m2)"
by (auto intro: coprime_cong_mult_nat a)
with `z < m1 * m2` `?x < m1 * m2` show "z = ?x"
apply (intro cong_less_modulus_unique_nat)
apply (auto, erule cong_sym_nat)
done
qed
with less one two show ?thesis
by auto
qed

lemma chinese_remainder_aux_nat:
fixes A :: "'a set" and
m :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
assumes fin: "finite A" and
cop: "ALL i : A. (ALL j : A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))"
shows "EX b. (ALL i : A.
[b i = 1] (mod m i) \<and> [b i = 0] (mod (PROD j : A - {i}. m j)))"
proof (rule finite_set_choice, rule fin, rule ballI)
fix i
assume "i : A"
with cop have "coprime (PROD j : A - {i}. m j) (m i)"
by (intro setprod_coprime_nat, auto)
hence "EX x. [(PROD j : A - {i}. m j) * x = 1] (mod m i)"
by (elim cong_solve_coprime_nat)
then obtain x where "[(PROD j : A - {i}. m j) * x = 1] (mod m i)"
by auto
moreover have "[(PROD j : A - {i}. m j) * x = 0]
(mod (PROD j : A - {i}. m j))"
by (subst mult_commute, rule cong_mult_self_nat)
ultimately show "\<exists>a. [a = 1] (mod m i) \<and> [a = 0]
(mod setprod m (A - {i}))"
by blast
qed

lemma chinese_remainder_nat:
fixes A :: "'a set" and
m :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat" and
u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
assumes
fin: "finite A" and
cop: "ALL i:A. (ALL j : A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))"
shows "EX x. (ALL i:A. [x = u i] (mod m i))"
proof -
from chinese_remainder_aux_nat [OF fin cop] obtain b where
bprop: "ALL i:A. [b i = 1] (mod m i) \<and>
[b i = 0] (mod (PROD j : A - {i}. m j))"
by blast
let ?x = "SUM i:A. (u i) * (b i)"
show "?thesis"
proof (rule exI, clarify)
fix i
assume a: "i : A"
show "[?x = u i] (mod m i)"
proof -
from fin a have "?x = (SUM j:{i}. u j * b j) +
(SUM j:A-{i}. u j * b j)"
by (subst setsum_Un_disjoint [symmetric], auto intro: setsum_cong)
hence "[?x = u i * b i + (SUM j:A-{i}. u j * b j)] (mod m i)"
by auto
also have "[u i * b i + (SUM j:A-{i}. u j * b j) =
u i * 1 + (SUM j:A-{i}. u j * 0)] (mod m i)"
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
using bprop a apply blast
apply (rule cong_setsum_nat)
apply (rule cong_scalar2_nat)
using bprop apply auto
apply (rule cong_dvd_modulus_nat)
apply (drule (1) bspec)
apply (erule conjE)
apply assumption
apply (rule dvd_setprod)
using fin a apply auto
done
finally show ?thesis
by simp
qed
qed
qed

lemma coprime_cong_prod_nat [rule_format]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
(ALL i: A. (ALL j: A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))) \<longrightarrow>
(ALL i: A. [(x::nat) = y] (mod m i)) \<longrightarrow>
[x = y] (mod (PROD i:A. m i))"
apply (induct set: finite)
apply auto
apply (erule (1) coprime_cong_mult_nat)
apply (subst gcd_commute_nat)
apply (rule setprod_coprime_nat)
apply auto
done

lemma chinese_remainder_unique_nat:
fixes A :: "'a set" and
m :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat" and
u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
assumes
fin: "finite A" and
nz: "ALL i:A. m i \<noteq> 0" and
cop: "ALL i:A. (ALL j : A. i \<noteq> j \<longrightarrow> coprime (m i) (m j))"
shows "EX! x. x < (PROD i:A. m i) \<and> (ALL i:A. [x = u i] (mod m i))"
proof -
from chinese_remainder_nat [OF fin cop] obtain y where
one: "(ALL i:A. [y = u i] (mod m i))"
by blast
let ?x = "y mod (PROD i:A. m i)"
from fin nz have prodnz: "(PROD i:A. m i) \<noteq> 0"
by auto
hence less: "?x < (PROD i:A. m i)"
by auto
have cong: "ALL i:A. [?x = u i] (mod m i)"
apply auto
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
prefer 2
using one apply auto
apply (rule cong_dvd_modulus_nat)
apply (rule cong_mod_nat)
using prodnz apply auto
apply (rule dvd_setprod)
apply (rule fin)
apply assumption
done
have unique: "ALL z. z < (PROD i:A. m i) \<and>
(ALL i:A. [z = u i] (mod m i)) \<longrightarrow> z = ?x"
proof (clarify)
fix z
assume zless: "z < (PROD i:A. m i)"
assume zcong: "(ALL i:A. [z = u i] (mod m i))"
have "ALL i:A. [?x = z] (mod m i)"
apply clarify
apply (rule cong_trans_nat)
using cong apply (erule bspec)
apply (rule cong_sym_nat)
using zcong apply auto
done
with fin cop have "[?x = z] (mod (PROD i:A. m i))"
by (intro coprime_cong_prod_nat, auto)
with zless less show "z = ?x"
apply (intro cong_less_modulus_unique_nat)
apply (auto, erule cong_sym_nat)
done
qed
from less cong unique show ?thesis
by blast
qed

end
```