src/HOL/SEQ.thy
 author immler Thu Nov 15 10:49:58 2012 +0100 (2012-11-15) changeset 50087 635d73673b5e parent 44714 a8990b5d7365 child 50331 4b6dc5077e98 permissions -rw-r--r--
regularity of measures, therefore:
characterization of closure with infimum distance;
characterize of compact sets as totally bounded;
introduced (enumerable) topological basis;
rational boxes as basis of ordered euclidean space;
moved some lemmas upwards
```     1 (*  Title:      HOL/SEQ.thy
```
```     2     Author:     Jacques D. Fleuriot, University of Cambridge
```
```     3     Author:     Lawrence C Paulson
```
```     4     Author:     Jeremy Avigad
```
```     5     Author:     Brian Huffman
```
```     6
```
```     7 Convergence of sequences and series.
```
```     8 *)
```
```     9
```
```    10 header {* Sequences and Convergence *}
```
```    11
```
```    12 theory SEQ
```
```    13 imports Limits RComplete
```
```    14 begin
```
```    15
```
```    16 subsection {* Monotone sequences and subsequences *}
```
```    17
```
```    18 definition
```
```    19   monoseq :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::order) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```    20     --{*Definition of monotonicity.
```
```    21         The use of disjunction here complicates proofs considerably.
```
```    22         One alternative is to add a Boolean argument to indicate the direction.
```
```    23         Another is to develop the notions of increasing and decreasing first.*}
```
```    24   "monoseq X = ((\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. X m \<le> X n) | (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. X n \<le> X m))"
```
```    25
```
```    26 definition
```
```    27   incseq :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::order) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```    28     --{*Increasing sequence*}
```
```    29   "incseq X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. X m \<le> X n)"
```
```    30
```
```    31 definition
```
```    32   decseq :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::order) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```    33     --{*Decreasing sequence*}
```
```    34   "decseq X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. X n \<le> X m)"
```
```    35
```
```    36 definition
```
```    37   subseq :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> nat) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```    38     --{*Definition of subsequence*}
```
```    39   "subseq f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n>m. f m < f n)"
```
```    40
```
```    41 lemma incseq_mono: "mono f \<longleftrightarrow> incseq f"
```
```    42   unfolding mono_def incseq_def by auto
```
```    43
```
```    44 lemma incseq_SucI:
```
```    45   "(\<And>n. X n \<le> X (Suc n)) \<Longrightarrow> incseq X"
```
```    46   using lift_Suc_mono_le[of X]
```
```    47   by (auto simp: incseq_def)
```
```    48
```
```    49 lemma incseqD: "\<And>i j. incseq f \<Longrightarrow> i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> f i \<le> f j"
```
```    50   by (auto simp: incseq_def)
```
```    51
```
```    52 lemma incseq_SucD: "incseq A \<Longrightarrow> A i \<le> A (Suc i)"
```
```    53   using incseqD[of A i "Suc i"] by auto
```
```    54
```
```    55 lemma incseq_Suc_iff: "incseq f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. f n \<le> f (Suc n))"
```
```    56   by (auto intro: incseq_SucI dest: incseq_SucD)
```
```    57
```
```    58 lemma incseq_const[simp, intro]: "incseq (\<lambda>x. k)"
```
```    59   unfolding incseq_def by auto
```
```    60
```
```    61 lemma decseq_SucI:
```
```    62   "(\<And>n. X (Suc n) \<le> X n) \<Longrightarrow> decseq X"
```
```    63   using order.lift_Suc_mono_le[OF dual_order, of X]
```
```    64   by (auto simp: decseq_def)
```
```    65
```
```    66 lemma decseqD: "\<And>i j. decseq f \<Longrightarrow> i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> f j \<le> f i"
```
```    67   by (auto simp: decseq_def)
```
```    68
```
```    69 lemma decseq_SucD: "decseq A \<Longrightarrow> A (Suc i) \<le> A i"
```
```    70   using decseqD[of A i "Suc i"] by auto
```
```    71
```
```    72 lemma decseq_Suc_iff: "decseq f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. f (Suc n) \<le> f n)"
```
```    73   by (auto intro: decseq_SucI dest: decseq_SucD)
```
```    74
```
```    75 lemma decseq_const[simp, intro]: "decseq (\<lambda>x. k)"
```
```    76   unfolding decseq_def by auto
```
```    77
```
```    78 lemma monoseq_iff: "monoseq X \<longleftrightarrow> incseq X \<or> decseq X"
```
```    79   unfolding monoseq_def incseq_def decseq_def ..
```
```    80
```
```    81 lemma monoseq_Suc:
```
```    82   "monoseq X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. X n \<le> X (Suc n)) \<or> (\<forall>n. X (Suc n) \<le> X n)"
```
```    83   unfolding monoseq_iff incseq_Suc_iff decseq_Suc_iff ..
```
```    84
```
```    85 lemma monoI1: "\<forall>m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. X m \<le> X n ==> monoseq X"
```
```    86 by (simp add: monoseq_def)
```
```    87
```
```    88 lemma monoI2: "\<forall>m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. X n \<le> X m ==> monoseq X"
```
```    89 by (simp add: monoseq_def)
```
```    90
```
```    91 lemma mono_SucI1: "\<forall>n. X n \<le> X (Suc n) ==> monoseq X"
```
```    92 by (simp add: monoseq_Suc)
```
```    93
```
```    94 lemma mono_SucI2: "\<forall>n. X (Suc n) \<le> X n ==> monoseq X"
```
```    95 by (simp add: monoseq_Suc)
```
```    96
```
```    97 lemma monoseq_minus:
```
```    98   fixes a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ordered_ab_group_add"
```
```    99   assumes "monoseq a"
```
```   100   shows "monoseq (\<lambda> n. - a n)"
```
```   101 proof (cases "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. a m \<le> a n")
```
```   102   case True
```
```   103   hence "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. - a n \<le> - a m" by auto
```
```   104   thus ?thesis by (rule monoI2)
```
```   105 next
```
```   106   case False
```
```   107   hence "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. - a m \<le> - a n" using `monoseq a`[unfolded monoseq_def] by auto
```
```   108   thus ?thesis by (rule monoI1)
```
```   109 qed
```
```   110
```
```   111 text{*Subsequence (alternative definition, (e.g. Hoskins)*}
```
```   112
```
```   113 lemma subseq_Suc_iff: "subseq f = (\<forall>n. (f n) < (f (Suc n)))"
```
```   114 apply (simp add: subseq_def)
```
```   115 apply (auto dest!: less_imp_Suc_add)
```
```   116 apply (induct_tac k)
```
```   117 apply (auto intro: less_trans)
```
```   118 done
```
```   119
```
```   120 text{* for any sequence, there is a monotonic subsequence *}
```
```   121 lemma seq_monosub:
```
```   122   fixes s :: "nat => 'a::linorder"
```
```   123   shows "\<exists>f. subseq f \<and> monoseq (\<lambda> n. (s (f n)))"
```
```   124 proof cases
```
```   125   let "?P p n" = "p > n \<and> (\<forall>m\<ge>p. s m \<le> s p)"
```
```   126   assume *: "\<forall>n. \<exists>p. ?P p n"
```
```   127   def f \<equiv> "nat_rec (SOME p. ?P p 0) (\<lambda>_ n. SOME p. ?P p n)"
```
```   128   have f_0: "f 0 = (SOME p. ?P p 0)" unfolding f_def by simp
```
```   129   have f_Suc: "\<And>i. f (Suc i) = (SOME p. ?P p (f i))" unfolding f_def nat_rec_Suc ..
```
```   130   have P_0: "?P (f 0) 0" unfolding f_0 using *[rule_format] by (rule someI2_ex) auto
```
```   131   have P_Suc: "\<And>i. ?P (f (Suc i)) (f i)" unfolding f_Suc using *[rule_format] by (rule someI2_ex) auto
```
```   132   then have "subseq f" unfolding subseq_Suc_iff by auto
```
```   133   moreover have "monoseq (\<lambda>n. s (f n))" unfolding monoseq_Suc
```
```   134   proof (intro disjI2 allI)
```
```   135     fix n show "s (f (Suc n)) \<le> s (f n)"
```
```   136     proof (cases n)
```
```   137       case 0 with P_Suc[of 0] P_0 show ?thesis by auto
```
```   138     next
```
```   139       case (Suc m)
```
```   140       from P_Suc[of n] Suc have "f (Suc m) \<le> f (Suc (Suc m))" by simp
```
```   141       with P_Suc Suc show ?thesis by simp
```
```   142     qed
```
```   143   qed
```
```   144   ultimately show ?thesis by auto
```
```   145 next
```
```   146   let "?P p m" = "m < p \<and> s m < s p"
```
```   147   assume "\<not> (\<forall>n. \<exists>p>n. (\<forall>m\<ge>p. s m \<le> s p))"
```
```   148   then obtain N where N: "\<And>p. p > N \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>m>p. s p < s m" by (force simp: not_le le_less)
```
```   149   def f \<equiv> "nat_rec (SOME p. ?P p (Suc N)) (\<lambda>_ n. SOME p. ?P p n)"
```
```   150   have f_0: "f 0 = (SOME p. ?P p (Suc N))" unfolding f_def by simp
```
```   151   have f_Suc: "\<And>i. f (Suc i) = (SOME p. ?P p (f i))" unfolding f_def nat_rec_Suc ..
```
```   152   have P_0: "?P (f 0) (Suc N)"
```
```   153     unfolding f_0 some_eq_ex[of "\<lambda>p. ?P p (Suc N)"] using N[of "Suc N"] by auto
```
```   154   { fix i have "N < f i \<Longrightarrow> ?P (f (Suc i)) (f i)"
```
```   155       unfolding f_Suc some_eq_ex[of "\<lambda>p. ?P p (f i)"] using N[of "f i"] . }
```
```   156   note P' = this
```
```   157   { fix i have "N < f i \<and> ?P (f (Suc i)) (f i)"
```
```   158       by (induct i) (insert P_0 P', auto) }
```
```   159   then have "subseq f" "monoseq (\<lambda>x. s (f x))"
```
```   160     unfolding subseq_Suc_iff monoseq_Suc by (auto simp: not_le intro: less_imp_le)
```
```   161   then show ?thesis by auto
```
```   162 qed
```
```   163
```
```   164 lemma seq_suble: assumes sf: "subseq f" shows "n \<le> f n"
```
```   165 proof(induct n)
```
```   166   case 0 thus ?case by simp
```
```   167 next
```
```   168   case (Suc n)
```
```   169   from sf[unfolded subseq_Suc_iff, rule_format, of n] Suc.hyps
```
```   170   have "n < f (Suc n)" by arith
```
```   171   thus ?case by arith
```
```   172 qed
```
```   173
```
```   174 lemma subseq_o: "subseq r \<Longrightarrow> subseq s \<Longrightarrow> subseq (r \<circ> s)"
```
```   175   unfolding subseq_def by simp
```
```   176
```
```   177 lemma subseq_mono: assumes "subseq r" "m < n" shows "r m < r n"
```
```   178   using assms by (auto simp: subseq_def)
```
```   179
```
```   180 lemma incseq_imp_monoseq:  "incseq X \<Longrightarrow> monoseq X"
```
```   181   by (simp add: incseq_def monoseq_def)
```
```   182
```
```   183 lemma decseq_imp_monoseq:  "decseq X \<Longrightarrow> monoseq X"
```
```   184   by (simp add: decseq_def monoseq_def)
```
```   185
```
```   186 lemma decseq_eq_incseq:
```
```   187   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ordered_ab_group_add" shows "decseq X = incseq (\<lambda>n. - X n)"
```
```   188   by (simp add: decseq_def incseq_def)
```
```   189
```
```   190 lemma INT_decseq_offset:
```
```   191   assumes "decseq F"
```
```   192   shows "(\<Inter>i. F i) = (\<Inter>i\<in>{n..}. F i)"
```
```   193 proof safe
```
```   194   fix x i assume x: "x \<in> (\<Inter>i\<in>{n..}. F i)"
```
```   195   show "x \<in> F i"
```
```   196   proof cases
```
```   197     from x have "x \<in> F n" by auto
```
```   198     also assume "i \<le> n" with `decseq F` have "F n \<subseteq> F i"
```
```   199       unfolding decseq_def by simp
```
```   200     finally show ?thesis .
```
```   201   qed (insert x, simp)
```
```   202 qed auto
```
```   203
```
```   204 subsection {* Defintions of limits *}
```
```   205
```
```   206 abbreviation (in topological_space)
```
```   207   LIMSEQ :: "[nat \<Rightarrow> 'a, 'a] \<Rightarrow> bool"
```
```   208     ("((_)/ ----> (_))" [60, 60] 60) where
```
```   209   "X ----> L \<equiv> (X ---> L) sequentially"
```
```   210
```
```   211 definition
```
```   212   lim :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::t2_space) \<Rightarrow> 'a" where
```
```   213     --{*Standard definition of limit using choice operator*}
```
```   214   "lim X = (THE L. X ----> L)"
```
```   215
```
```   216 definition (in topological_space) convergent :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```   217   "convergent X = (\<exists>L. X ----> L)"
```
```   218
```
```   219 definition
```
```   220   Bseq :: "(nat => 'a::real_normed_vector) => bool" where
```
```   221     --{*Standard definition for bounded sequence*}
```
```   222   "Bseq X = (\<exists>K>0.\<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K)"
```
```   223
```
```   224 definition (in metric_space) Cauchy :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
```
```   225   "Cauchy X = (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>M. \<forall>m \<ge> M. \<forall>n \<ge> M. dist (X m) (X n) < e)"
```
```   226
```
```   227
```
```   228 subsection {* Bounded Sequences *}
```
```   229
```
```   230 lemma BseqI': assumes K: "\<And>n. norm (X n) \<le> K" shows "Bseq X"
```
```   231 unfolding Bseq_def
```
```   232 proof (intro exI conjI allI)
```
```   233   show "0 < max K 1" by simp
```
```   234 next
```
```   235   fix n::nat
```
```   236   have "norm (X n) \<le> K" by (rule K)
```
```   237   thus "norm (X n) \<le> max K 1" by simp
```
```   238 qed
```
```   239
```
```   240 lemma BseqE: "\<lbrakk>Bseq X; \<And>K. \<lbrakk>0 < K; \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Q"
```
```   241 unfolding Bseq_def by auto
```
```   242
```
```   243 lemma BseqI2': assumes K: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X n) \<le> K" shows "Bseq X"
```
```   244 proof (rule BseqI')
```
```   245   let ?A = "norm ` X ` {..N}"
```
```   246   have 1: "finite ?A" by simp
```
```   247   fix n::nat
```
```   248   show "norm (X n) \<le> max K (Max ?A)"
```
```   249   proof (cases rule: linorder_le_cases)
```
```   250     assume "n \<ge> N"
```
```   251     hence "norm (X n) \<le> K" using K by simp
```
```   252     thus "norm (X n) \<le> max K (Max ?A)" by simp
```
```   253   next
```
```   254     assume "n \<le> N"
```
```   255     hence "norm (X n) \<in> ?A" by simp
```
```   256     with 1 have "norm (X n) \<le> Max ?A" by (rule Max_ge)
```
```   257     thus "norm (X n) \<le> max K (Max ?A)" by simp
```
```   258   qed
```
```   259 qed
```
```   260
```
```   261 lemma Bseq_ignore_initial_segment: "Bseq X \<Longrightarrow> Bseq (\<lambda>n. X (n + k))"
```
```   262 unfolding Bseq_def by auto
```
```   263
```
```   264 lemma Bseq_offset: "Bseq (\<lambda>n. X (n + k)) \<Longrightarrow> Bseq X"
```
```   265 apply (erule BseqE)
```
```   266 apply (rule_tac N="k" and K="K" in BseqI2')
```
```   267 apply clarify
```
```   268 apply (drule_tac x="n - k" in spec, simp)
```
```   269 done
```
```   270
```
```   271 lemma Bseq_conv_Bfun: "Bseq X \<longleftrightarrow> Bfun X sequentially"
```
```   272 unfolding Bfun_def eventually_sequentially
```
```   273 apply (rule iffI)
```
```   274 apply (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   275 apply (auto intro: BseqI2')
```
```   276 done
```
```   277
```
```   278
```
```   279 subsection {* Limits of Sequences *}
```
```   280
```
```   281 lemma [trans]: "X=Y ==> Y ----> z ==> X ----> z"
```
```   282   by simp
```
```   283
```
```   284 lemma LIMSEQ_def: "X ----> L = (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. dist (X n) L < r)"
```
```   285 unfolding tendsto_iff eventually_sequentially ..
```
```   286
```
```   287 lemma LIMSEQ_iff:
```
```   288   fixes L :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   289   shows "(X ----> L) = (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>no. \<forall>n \<ge> no. norm (X n - L) < r)"
```
```   290 unfolding LIMSEQ_def dist_norm ..
```
```   291
```
```   292 lemma LIMSEQ_iff_nz: "X ----> L = (\<forall>r>0. \<exists>no>0. \<forall>n\<ge>no. dist (X n) L < r)"
```
```   293   unfolding LIMSEQ_def by (metis Suc_leD zero_less_Suc)
```
```   294
```
```   295 lemma metric_LIMSEQ_I:
```
```   296   "(\<And>r. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. dist (X n) L < r) \<Longrightarrow> X ----> L"
```
```   297 by (simp add: LIMSEQ_def)
```
```   298
```
```   299 lemma metric_LIMSEQ_D:
```
```   300   "\<lbrakk>X ----> L; 0 < r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. dist (X n) L < r"
```
```   301 by (simp add: LIMSEQ_def)
```
```   302
```
```   303 lemma LIMSEQ_I:
```
```   304   fixes L :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   305   shows "(\<And>r. 0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. norm (X n - L) < r) \<Longrightarrow> X ----> L"
```
```   306 by (simp add: LIMSEQ_iff)
```
```   307
```
```   308 lemma LIMSEQ_D:
```
```   309   fixes L :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   310   shows "\<lbrakk>X ----> L; 0 < r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. norm (X n - L) < r"
```
```   311 by (simp add: LIMSEQ_iff)
```
```   312
```
```   313 lemma LIMSEQ_const_iff:
```
```   314   fixes k l :: "'a::t2_space"
```
```   315   shows "(\<lambda>n. k) ----> l \<longleftrightarrow> k = l"
```
```   316   using trivial_limit_sequentially by (rule tendsto_const_iff)
```
```   317
```
```   318 lemma LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment:
```
```   319   "f ----> a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f (n + k)) ----> a"
```
```   320 apply (rule topological_tendstoI)
```
```   321 apply (drule (2) topological_tendstoD)
```
```   322 apply (simp only: eventually_sequentially)
```
```   323 apply (erule exE, rename_tac N)
```
```   324 apply (rule_tac x=N in exI)
```
```   325 apply simp
```
```   326 done
```
```   327
```
```   328 lemma LIMSEQ_offset:
```
```   329   "(\<lambda>n. f (n + k)) ----> a \<Longrightarrow> f ----> a"
```
```   330 apply (rule topological_tendstoI)
```
```   331 apply (drule (2) topological_tendstoD)
```
```   332 apply (simp only: eventually_sequentially)
```
```   333 apply (erule exE, rename_tac N)
```
```   334 apply (rule_tac x="N + k" in exI)
```
```   335 apply clarify
```
```   336 apply (drule_tac x="n - k" in spec)
```
```   337 apply (simp add: le_diff_conv2)
```
```   338 done
```
```   339
```
```   340 lemma LIMSEQ_Suc: "f ----> l \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f (Suc n)) ----> l"
```
```   341 by (drule_tac k="Suc 0" in LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment, simp)
```
```   342
```
```   343 lemma LIMSEQ_imp_Suc: "(\<lambda>n. f (Suc n)) ----> l \<Longrightarrow> f ----> l"
```
```   344 by (rule_tac k="Suc 0" in LIMSEQ_offset, simp)
```
```   345
```
```   346 lemma LIMSEQ_Suc_iff: "(\<lambda>n. f (Suc n)) ----> l = f ----> l"
```
```   347 by (blast intro: LIMSEQ_imp_Suc LIMSEQ_Suc)
```
```   348
```
```   349 lemma LIMSEQ_linear: "\<lbrakk> X ----> x ; l > 0 \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda> n. X (n * l)) ----> x"
```
```   350   unfolding tendsto_def eventually_sequentially
```
```   351   by (metis div_le_dividend div_mult_self1_is_m le_trans nat_mult_commute)
```
```   352
```
```   353 lemma LIMSEQ_unique:
```
```   354   fixes a b :: "'a::t2_space"
```
```   355   shows "\<lbrakk>X ----> a; X ----> b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> a = b"
```
```   356   using trivial_limit_sequentially by (rule tendsto_unique)
```
```   357
```
```   358 lemma increasing_LIMSEQ:
```
```   359   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   360   assumes inc: "!!n. f n \<le> f (Suc n)"
```
```   361       and bdd: "!!n. f n \<le> l"
```
```   362       and en: "!!e. 0 < e \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>n. l \<le> f n + e"
```
```   363   shows "f ----> l"
```
```   364 proof (auto simp add: LIMSEQ_def)
```
```   365   fix e :: real
```
```   366   assume e: "0 < e"
```
```   367   then obtain N where "l \<le> f N + e/2"
```
```   368     by (metis half_gt_zero e en that)
```
```   369   hence N: "l < f N + e" using e
```
```   370     by simp
```
```   371   { fix k
```
```   372     have [simp]: "!!n. \<bar>f n - l\<bar> = l - f n"
```
```   373       by (simp add: bdd)
```
```   374     have "\<bar>f (N+k) - l\<bar> < e"
```
```   375     proof (induct k)
```
```   376       case 0 show ?case using N
```
```   377         by simp
```
```   378     next
```
```   379       case (Suc k) thus ?case using N inc [of "N+k"]
```
```   380         by simp
```
```   381     qed
```
```   382   } note 1 = this
```
```   383   { fix n
```
```   384     have "N \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>f n - l\<bar> < e" using 1 [of "n-N"]
```
```   385       by simp
```
```   386   } note [intro] = this
```
```   387   show " \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. dist (f n) l < e"
```
```   388     by (auto simp add: dist_real_def)
```
```   389   qed
```
```   390
```
```   391 lemma Bseq_inverse_lemma:
```
```   392   fixes x :: "'a::real_normed_div_algebra"
```
```   393   shows "\<lbrakk>r \<le> norm x; 0 < r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> norm (inverse x) \<le> inverse r"
```
```   394 apply (subst nonzero_norm_inverse, clarsimp)
```
```   395 apply (erule (1) le_imp_inverse_le)
```
```   396 done
```
```   397
```
```   398 lemma Bseq_inverse:
```
```   399   fixes a :: "'a::real_normed_div_algebra"
```
```   400   shows "\<lbrakk>X ----> a; a \<noteq> 0\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Bseq (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n))"
```
```   401 unfolding Bseq_conv_Bfun by (rule Bfun_inverse)
```
```   402
```
```   403 lemma LIMSEQ_diff_approach_zero:
```
```   404   fixes L :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   405   shows "g ----> L ==> (%x. f x - g x) ----> 0 ==> f ----> L"
```
```   406   by (drule (1) tendsto_add, simp)
```
```   407
```
```   408 lemma LIMSEQ_diff_approach_zero2:
```
```   409   fixes L :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   410   shows "f ----> L ==> (%x. f x - g x) ----> 0 ==> g ----> L"
```
```   411   by (drule (1) tendsto_diff, simp)
```
```   412
```
```   413 text{*An unbounded sequence's inverse tends to 0*}
```
```   414
```
```   415 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_zero:
```
```   416   "\<forall>r::real. \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. r < X n \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. inverse (X n)) ----> 0"
```
```   417 apply (rule LIMSEQ_I)
```
```   418 apply (drule_tac x="inverse r" in spec, safe)
```
```   419 apply (rule_tac x="N" in exI, safe)
```
```   420 apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, safe)
```
```   421 apply (frule positive_imp_inverse_positive)
```
```   422 apply (frule (1) less_imp_inverse_less)
```
```   423 apply (subgoal_tac "0 < X n", simp)
```
```   424 apply (erule (1) order_less_trans)
```
```   425 done
```
```   426
```
```   427 text{*The sequence @{term "1/n"} tends to 0 as @{term n} tends to infinity*}
```
```   428
```
```   429 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat: "(%n. inverse(real(Suc n))) ----> 0"
```
```   430 apply (rule LIMSEQ_inverse_zero, safe)
```
```   431 apply (cut_tac x = r in reals_Archimedean2)
```
```   432 apply (safe, rule_tac x = n in exI)
```
```   433 apply (auto simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
```
```   434 done
```
```   435
```
```   436 text{*The sequence @{term "r + 1/n"} tends to @{term r} as @{term n} tends to
```
```   437 infinity is now easily proved*}
```
```   438
```
```   439 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat_add:
```
```   440      "(%n. r + inverse(real(Suc n))) ----> r"
```
```   441   using tendsto_add [OF tendsto_const LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat] by auto
```
```   442
```
```   443 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat_add_minus:
```
```   444      "(%n. r + -inverse(real(Suc n))) ----> r"
```
```   445   using tendsto_add [OF tendsto_const
```
```   446     tendsto_minus [OF LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat]] by auto
```
```   447
```
```   448 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat_add_minus_mult:
```
```   449      "(%n. r*( 1 + -inverse(real(Suc n)))) ----> r"
```
```   450   using tendsto_mult [OF tendsto_const
```
```   451     LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat_add_minus [of 1]]
```
```   452   by auto
```
```   453
```
```   454 lemma LIMSEQ_le_const:
```
```   455   "\<lbrakk>X ----> (x::real); \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. a \<le> X n\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> a \<le> x"
```
```   456 apply (rule ccontr, simp only: linorder_not_le)
```
```   457 apply (drule_tac r="a - x" in LIMSEQ_D, simp)
```
```   458 apply clarsimp
```
```   459 apply (drule_tac x="max N no" in spec, drule mp, rule le_maxI1)
```
```   460 apply (drule_tac x="max N no" in spec, drule mp, rule le_maxI2)
```
```   461 apply simp
```
```   462 done
```
```   463
```
```   464 lemma LIMSEQ_le_const2:
```
```   465   "\<lbrakk>X ----> (x::real); \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. X n \<le> a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> a"
```
```   466 apply (subgoal_tac "- a \<le> - x", simp)
```
```   467 apply (rule LIMSEQ_le_const)
```
```   468 apply (erule tendsto_minus)
```
```   469 apply simp
```
```   470 done
```
```   471
```
```   472 lemma LIMSEQ_le:
```
```   473   "\<lbrakk>X ----> x; Y ----> y; \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. X n \<le> Y n\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> (y::real)"
```
```   474 apply (subgoal_tac "0 \<le> y - x", simp)
```
```   475 apply (rule LIMSEQ_le_const)
```
```   476 apply (erule (1) tendsto_diff)
```
```   477 apply (simp add: le_diff_eq)
```
```   478 done
```
```   479
```
```   480
```
```   481 subsection {* Convergence *}
```
```   482
```
```   483 lemma limI: "X ----> L ==> lim X = L"
```
```   484 apply (simp add: lim_def)
```
```   485 apply (blast intro: LIMSEQ_unique)
```
```   486 done
```
```   487
```
```   488 lemma convergentD: "convergent X ==> \<exists>L. (X ----> L)"
```
```   489 by (simp add: convergent_def)
```
```   490
```
```   491 lemma convergentI: "(X ----> L) ==> convergent X"
```
```   492 by (auto simp add: convergent_def)
```
```   493
```
```   494 lemma convergent_LIMSEQ_iff: "convergent X = (X ----> lim X)"
```
```   495 by (auto intro: theI LIMSEQ_unique simp add: convergent_def lim_def)
```
```   496
```
```   497 lemma convergent_const: "convergent (\<lambda>n. c)"
```
```   498   by (rule convergentI, rule tendsto_const)
```
```   499
```
```   500 lemma convergent_add:
```
```   501   fixes X Y :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   502   assumes "convergent (\<lambda>n. X n)"
```
```   503   assumes "convergent (\<lambda>n. Y n)"
```
```   504   shows "convergent (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n)"
```
```   505   using assms unfolding convergent_def by (fast intro: tendsto_add)
```
```   506
```
```   507 lemma convergent_setsum:
```
```   508   fixes X :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
```
```   509   assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> convergent (\<lambda>n. X i n)"
```
```   510   shows "convergent (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i\<in>A. X i n)"
```
```   511 proof (cases "finite A")
```
```   512   case True from this and assms show ?thesis
```
```   513     by (induct A set: finite) (simp_all add: convergent_const convergent_add)
```
```   514 qed (simp add: convergent_const)
```
```   515
```
```   516 lemma (in bounded_linear) convergent:
```
```   517   assumes "convergent (\<lambda>n. X n)"
```
```   518   shows "convergent (\<lambda>n. f (X n))"
```
```   519   using assms unfolding convergent_def by (fast intro: tendsto)
```
```   520
```
```   521 lemma (in bounded_bilinear) convergent:
```
```   522   assumes "convergent (\<lambda>n. X n)" and "convergent (\<lambda>n. Y n)"
```
```   523   shows "convergent (\<lambda>n. X n ** Y n)"
```
```   524   using assms unfolding convergent_def by (fast intro: tendsto)
```
```   525
```
```   526 lemma convergent_minus_iff:
```
```   527   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   528   shows "convergent X \<longleftrightarrow> convergent (\<lambda>n. - X n)"
```
```   529 apply (simp add: convergent_def)
```
```   530 apply (auto dest: tendsto_minus)
```
```   531 apply (drule tendsto_minus, auto)
```
```   532 done
```
```   533
```
```   534 lemma lim_le:
```
```   535   fixes x :: real
```
```   536   assumes f: "convergent f" and fn_le: "!!n. f n \<le> x"
```
```   537   shows "lim f \<le> x"
```
```   538 proof (rule classical)
```
```   539   assume "\<not> lim f \<le> x"
```
```   540   hence 0: "0 < lim f - x" by arith
```
```   541   have 1: "f----> lim f"
```
```   542     by (metis convergent_LIMSEQ_iff f)
```
```   543   thus ?thesis
```
```   544     proof (simp add: LIMSEQ_iff)
```
```   545       assume "\<forall>r>0. \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < r"
```
```   546       hence "\<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < lim f - x"
```
```   547         by (metis 0)
```
```   548       from this obtain no where "\<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < lim f - x"
```
```   549         by blast
```
```   550       thus "lim f \<le> x"
```
```   551         by (metis 1 LIMSEQ_le_const2 fn_le)
```
```   552     qed
```
```   553 qed
```
```   554
```
```   555 lemma monoseq_le:
```
```   556   fixes a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   557   assumes "monoseq a" and "a ----> x"
```
```   558   shows "((\<forall> n. a n \<le> x) \<and> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. a m \<le> a n)) \<or>
```
```   559          ((\<forall> n. x \<le> a n) \<and> (\<forall>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. a n \<le> a m))"
```
```   560 proof -
```
```   561   { fix x n fix a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   562     assume "a ----> x" and "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. a m \<le> a n"
```
```   563     hence monotone: "\<And> m n. m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> a m \<le> a n" by auto
```
```   564     have "a n \<le> x"
```
```   565     proof (rule ccontr)
```
```   566       assume "\<not> a n \<le> x" hence "x < a n" by auto
```
```   567       hence "0 < a n - x" by auto
```
```   568       from `a ----> x`[THEN LIMSEQ_D, OF this]
```
```   569       obtain no where "\<And>n'. no \<le> n' \<Longrightarrow> norm (a n' - x) < a n - x" by blast
```
```   570       hence "norm (a (max no n) - x) < a n - x" by auto
```
```   571       moreover
```
```   572       { fix n' have "n \<le> n' \<Longrightarrow> x < a n'" using monotone[where m=n and n=n'] and `x < a n` by auto }
```
```   573       hence "x < a (max no n)" by auto
```
```   574       ultimately
```
```   575       have "a (max no n) < a n" by auto
```
```   576       with monotone[where m=n and n="max no n"]
```
```   577       show False by (auto simp:max_def split:split_if_asm)
```
```   578     qed
```
```   579   } note top_down = this
```
```   580   { fix x n m fix a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   581     assume "a ----> x" and "monoseq a" and "a m < x"
```
```   582     have "a n \<le> x \<and> (\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. a m \<le> a n)"
```
```   583     proof (cases "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. a m \<le> a n")
```
```   584       case True with top_down and `a ----> x` show ?thesis by auto
```
```   585     next
```
```   586       case False with `monoseq a`[unfolded monoseq_def] have "\<forall> m. \<forall> n \<ge> m. - a m \<le> - a n" by auto
```
```   587       hence "- a m \<le> - x" using top_down[OF tendsto_minus[OF `a ----> x`]] by blast
```
```   588       hence False using `a m < x` by auto
```
```   589       thus ?thesis ..
```
```   590     qed
```
```   591   } note when_decided = this
```
```   592
```
```   593   show ?thesis
```
```   594   proof (cases "\<exists> m. a m \<noteq> x")
```
```   595     case True then obtain m where "a m \<noteq> x" by auto
```
```   596     show ?thesis
```
```   597     proof (cases "a m < x")
```
```   598       case True with when_decided[OF `a ----> x` `monoseq a`, where m2=m]
```
```   599       show ?thesis by blast
```
```   600     next
```
```   601       case False hence "- a m < - x" using `a m \<noteq> x` by auto
```
```   602       with when_decided[OF tendsto_minus[OF `a ----> x`] monoseq_minus[OF `monoseq a`], where m2=m]
```
```   603       show ?thesis by auto
```
```   604     qed
```
```   605   qed auto
```
```   606 qed
```
```   607
```
```   608 lemma LIMSEQ_subseq_LIMSEQ:
```
```   609   "\<lbrakk> X ----> L; subseq f \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (X o f) ----> L"
```
```   610 apply (rule topological_tendstoI)
```
```   611 apply (drule (2) topological_tendstoD)
```
```   612 apply (simp only: eventually_sequentially)
```
```   613 apply (clarify, rule_tac x=N in exI, clarsimp)
```
```   614 apply (blast intro: seq_suble le_trans dest!: spec)
```
```   615 done
```
```   616
```
```   617 lemma convergent_subseq_convergent:
```
```   618   "\<lbrakk>convergent X; subseq f\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> convergent (X o f)"
```
```   619   unfolding convergent_def by (auto intro: LIMSEQ_subseq_LIMSEQ)
```
```   620
```
```   621
```
```   622 subsection {* Bounded Monotonic Sequences *}
```
```   623
```
```   624 text{*Bounded Sequence*}
```
```   625
```
```   626 lemma BseqD: "Bseq X ==> \<exists>K. 0 < K & (\<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K)"
```
```   627 by (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   628
```
```   629 lemma BseqI: "[| 0 < K; \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K |] ==> Bseq X"
```
```   630 by (auto simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   631
```
```   632 lemma lemma_NBseq_def:
```
```   633      "(\<exists>K > 0. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K) =
```
```   634       (\<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> real(Suc N))"
```
```   635 proof auto
```
```   636   fix K :: real
```
```   637   from reals_Archimedean2 obtain n :: nat where "K < real n" ..
```
```   638   then have "K \<le> real (Suc n)" by auto
```
```   639   assume "\<forall>m. norm (X m) \<le> K"
```
```   640   have "\<forall>m. norm (X m) \<le> real (Suc n)"
```
```   641   proof
```
```   642     fix m :: 'a
```
```   643     from `\<forall>m. norm (X m) \<le> K` have "norm (X m) \<le> K" ..
```
```   644     with `K \<le> real (Suc n)` show "norm (X m) \<le> real (Suc n)" by auto
```
```   645   qed
```
```   646   then show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> real (Suc N)" ..
```
```   647 next
```
```   648   fix N :: nat
```
```   649   have "real (Suc N) > 0" by (simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
```
```   650   moreover assume "\<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> real (Suc N)"
```
```   651   ultimately show "\<exists>K>0. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K" by blast
```
```   652 qed
```
```   653
```
```   654
```
```   655 text{* alternative definition for Bseq *}
```
```   656 lemma Bseq_iff: "Bseq X = (\<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> real(Suc N))"
```
```   657 apply (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   658 apply (simp (no_asm) add: lemma_NBseq_def)
```
```   659 done
```
```   660
```
```   661 lemma lemma_NBseq_def2:
```
```   662      "(\<exists>K > 0. \<forall>n. norm (X n) \<le> K) = (\<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm (X n) < real(Suc N))"
```
```   663 apply (subst lemma_NBseq_def, auto)
```
```   664 apply (rule_tac x = "Suc N" in exI)
```
```   665 apply (rule_tac [2] x = N in exI)
```
```   666 apply (auto simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
```
```   667  prefer 2 apply (blast intro: order_less_imp_le)
```
```   668 apply (drule_tac x = n in spec, simp)
```
```   669 done
```
```   670
```
```   671 (* yet another definition for Bseq *)
```
```   672 lemma Bseq_iff1a: "Bseq X = (\<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm (X n) < real(Suc N))"
```
```   673 by (simp add: Bseq_def lemma_NBseq_def2)
```
```   674
```
```   675 subsubsection{*Upper Bounds and Lubs of Bounded Sequences*}
```
```   676
```
```   677 lemma Bseq_isUb:
```
```   678   "!!(X::nat=>real). Bseq X ==> \<exists>U. isUb (UNIV::real set) {x. \<exists>n. X n = x} U"
```
```   679 by (auto intro: isUbI setleI simp add: Bseq_def abs_le_iff)
```
```   680
```
```   681 text{* Use completeness of reals (supremum property)
```
```   682    to show that any bounded sequence has a least upper bound*}
```
```   683
```
```   684 lemma Bseq_isLub:
```
```   685   "!!(X::nat=>real). Bseq X ==>
```
```   686    \<exists>U. isLub (UNIV::real set) {x. \<exists>n. X n = x} U"
```
```   687 by (blast intro: reals_complete Bseq_isUb)
```
```   688
```
```   689 subsubsection{*A Bounded and Monotonic Sequence Converges*}
```
```   690
```
```   691 (* TODO: delete *)
```
```   692 (* FIXME: one use in NSA/HSEQ.thy *)
```
```   693 lemma Bmonoseq_LIMSEQ: "\<forall>n. m \<le> n --> X n = X m ==> \<exists>L. (X ----> L)"
```
```   694 unfolding tendsto_def eventually_sequentially
```
```   695 apply (rule_tac x = "X m" in exI, safe)
```
```   696 apply (rule_tac x = m in exI, safe)
```
```   697 apply (drule spec, erule impE, auto)
```
```   698 done
```
```   699
```
```   700 text {* A monotone sequence converges to its least upper bound. *}
```
```   701
```
```   702 lemma isLub_mono_imp_LIMSEQ:
```
```   703   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   704   assumes u: "isLub UNIV {x. \<exists>n. X n = x} u" (* FIXME: use 'range X' *)
```
```   705   assumes X: "\<forall>m n. m \<le> n \<longrightarrow> X m \<le> X n"
```
```   706   shows "X ----> u"
```
```   707 proof (rule LIMSEQ_I)
```
```   708   have 1: "\<forall>n. X n \<le> u"
```
```   709     using isLubD2 [OF u] by auto
```
```   710   have "\<forall>y. (\<forall>n. X n \<le> y) \<longrightarrow> u \<le> y"
```
```   711     using isLub_le_isUb [OF u] by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)
```
```   712   hence 2: "\<forall>y<u. \<exists>n. y < X n"
```
```   713     by (metis not_le)
```
```   714   fix r :: real assume "0 < r"
```
```   715   hence "u - r < u" by simp
```
```   716   hence "\<exists>m. u - r < X m" using 2 by simp
```
```   717   then obtain m where "u - r < X m" ..
```
```   718   with X have "\<forall>n\<ge>m. u - r < X n"
```
```   719     by (fast intro: less_le_trans)
```
```   720   hence "\<exists>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. u - r < X n" ..
```
```   721   thus "\<exists>m. \<forall>n\<ge>m. norm (X n - u) < r"
```
```   722     using 1 by (simp add: diff_less_eq add_commute)
```
```   723 qed
```
```   724
```
```   725 text{*A standard proof of the theorem for monotone increasing sequence*}
```
```   726
```
```   727 lemma Bseq_mono_convergent:
```
```   728      "[| Bseq X; \<forall>m. \<forall>n \<ge> m. X m \<le> X n |] ==> convergent (X::nat=>real)"
```
```   729 proof -
```
```   730   assume "Bseq X"
```
```   731   then obtain u where u: "isLub UNIV {x. \<exists>n. X n = x} u"
```
```   732     using Bseq_isLub by fast
```
```   733   assume "\<forall>m n. m \<le> n \<longrightarrow> X m \<le> X n"
```
```   734   with u have "X ----> u"
```
```   735     by (rule isLub_mono_imp_LIMSEQ)
```
```   736   thus "convergent X"
```
```   737     by (rule convergentI)
```
```   738 qed
```
```   739
```
```   740 lemma Bseq_minus_iff: "Bseq (%n. -(X n)) = Bseq X"
```
```   741 by (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   742
```
```   743 text{*Main monotonicity theorem*}
```
```   744 lemma Bseq_monoseq_convergent: "[| Bseq X; monoseq X |] ==> convergent (X::nat\<Rightarrow>real)"
```
```   745 apply (simp add: monoseq_def, safe)
```
```   746 apply (rule_tac [2] convergent_minus_iff [THEN ssubst])
```
```   747 apply (drule_tac [2] Bseq_minus_iff [THEN ssubst])
```
```   748 apply (auto intro!: Bseq_mono_convergent)
```
```   749 done
```
```   750
```
```   751 subsubsection{*Increasing and Decreasing Series*}
```
```   752
```
```   753 lemma incseq_le:
```
```   754   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   755   assumes inc: "incseq X" and lim: "X ----> L" shows "X n \<le> L"
```
```   756   using monoseq_le [OF incseq_imp_monoseq [OF inc] lim]
```
```   757 proof
```
```   758   assume "(\<forall>n. X n \<le> L) \<and> (\<forall>m n. m \<le> n \<longrightarrow> X m \<le> X n)"
```
```   759   thus ?thesis by simp
```
```   760 next
```
```   761   assume "(\<forall>n. L \<le> X n) \<and> (\<forall>m n. m \<le> n \<longrightarrow> X n \<le> X m)"
```
```   762   hence const: "(!!m n. m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> X n = X m)" using inc
```
```   763     by (auto simp add: incseq_def intro: order_antisym)
```
```   764   have X: "!!n. X n = X 0"
```
```   765     by (blast intro: const [of 0])
```
```   766   have "X = (\<lambda>n. X 0)"
```
```   767     by (blast intro: X)
```
```   768   hence "L = X 0" using tendsto_const [of "X 0" sequentially]
```
```   769     by (auto intro: LIMSEQ_unique lim)
```
```   770   thus ?thesis
```
```   771     by (blast intro: eq_refl X)
```
```   772 qed
```
```   773
```
```   774 lemma decseq_le:
```
```   775   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" assumes dec: "decseq X" and lim: "X ----> L" shows "L \<le> X n"
```
```   776 proof -
```
```   777   have inc: "incseq (\<lambda>n. - X n)" using dec
```
```   778     by (simp add: decseq_eq_incseq)
```
```   779   have "- X n \<le> - L"
```
```   780     by (blast intro: incseq_le [OF inc] tendsto_minus lim)
```
```   781   thus ?thesis
```
```   782     by simp
```
```   783 qed
```
```   784
```
```   785 subsubsection{*A Few More Equivalence Theorems for Boundedness*}
```
```   786
```
```   787 text{*alternative formulation for boundedness*}
```
```   788 lemma Bseq_iff2: "Bseq X = (\<exists>k > 0. \<exists>x. \<forall>n. norm (X(n) + -x) \<le> k)"
```
```   789 apply (unfold Bseq_def, safe)
```
```   790 apply (rule_tac [2] x = "k + norm x" in exI)
```
```   791 apply (rule_tac x = K in exI, simp)
```
```   792 apply (rule exI [where x = 0], auto)
```
```   793 apply (erule order_less_le_trans, simp)
```
```   794 apply (drule_tac x=n in spec, fold diff_minus)
```
```   795 apply (drule order_trans [OF norm_triangle_ineq2])
```
```   796 apply simp
```
```   797 done
```
```   798
```
```   799 text{*alternative formulation for boundedness*}
```
```   800 lemma Bseq_iff3: "Bseq X = (\<exists>k > 0. \<exists>N. \<forall>n. norm(X(n) + -X(N)) \<le> k)"
```
```   801 apply safe
```
```   802 apply (simp add: Bseq_def, safe)
```
```   803 apply (rule_tac x = "K + norm (X N)" in exI)
```
```   804 apply auto
```
```   805 apply (erule order_less_le_trans, simp)
```
```   806 apply (rule_tac x = N in exI, safe)
```
```   807 apply (drule_tac x = n in spec)
```
```   808 apply (rule order_trans [OF norm_triangle_ineq], simp)
```
```   809 apply (auto simp add: Bseq_iff2)
```
```   810 done
```
```   811
```
```   812 lemma BseqI2: "(\<forall>n. k \<le> f n & f n \<le> (K::real)) ==> Bseq f"
```
```   813 apply (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   814 apply (rule_tac x = " (\<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>K\<bar>) + 1" in exI, auto)
```
```   815 apply (drule_tac x = n in spec, arith)
```
```   816 done
```
```   817
```
```   818
```
```   819 subsection {* Cauchy Sequences *}
```
```   820
```
```   821 lemma metric_CauchyI:
```
```   822   "(\<And>e. 0 < e \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. dist (X m) (X n) < e) \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy X"
```
```   823 by (simp add: Cauchy_def)
```
```   824
```
```   825 lemma metric_CauchyD:
```
```   826   "\<lbrakk>Cauchy X; 0 < e\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. dist (X m) (X n) < e"
```
```   827 by (simp add: Cauchy_def)
```
```   828
```
```   829 lemma Cauchy_iff:
```
```   830   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   831   shows "Cauchy X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. norm (X m - X n) < e)"
```
```   832 unfolding Cauchy_def dist_norm ..
```
```   833
```
```   834 lemma Cauchy_iff2:
```
```   835      "Cauchy X =
```
```   836       (\<forall>j. (\<exists>M. \<forall>m \<ge> M. \<forall>n \<ge> M. \<bar>X m - X n\<bar> < inverse(real (Suc j))))"
```
```   837 apply (simp add: Cauchy_iff, auto)
```
```   838 apply (drule reals_Archimedean, safe)
```
```   839 apply (drule_tac x = n in spec, auto)
```
```   840 apply (rule_tac x = M in exI, auto)
```
```   841 apply (drule_tac x = m in spec, simp)
```
```   842 apply (drule_tac x = na in spec, auto)
```
```   843 done
```
```   844
```
```   845 lemma CauchyI:
```
```   846   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   847   shows "(\<And>e. 0 < e \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. norm (X m - X n) < e) \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy X"
```
```   848 by (simp add: Cauchy_iff)
```
```   849
```
```   850 lemma CauchyD:
```
```   851   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
```
```   852   shows "\<lbrakk>Cauchy X; 0 < e\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>M. \<forall>m\<ge>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. norm (X m - X n) < e"
```
```   853 by (simp add: Cauchy_iff)
```
```   854
```
```   855 lemma Cauchy_subseq_Cauchy:
```
```   856   "\<lbrakk> Cauchy X; subseq f \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy (X o f)"
```
```   857 apply (auto simp add: Cauchy_def)
```
```   858 apply (drule_tac x=e in spec, clarify)
```
```   859 apply (rule_tac x=M in exI, clarify)
```
```   860 apply (blast intro: le_trans [OF _ seq_suble] dest!: spec)
```
```   861 done
```
```   862
```
```   863 subsubsection {* Cauchy Sequences are Bounded *}
```
```   864
```
```   865 text{*A Cauchy sequence is bounded -- this is the standard
```
```   866   proof mechanization rather than the nonstandard proof*}
```
```   867
```
```   868 lemma lemmaCauchy: "\<forall>n \<ge> M. norm (X M - X n) < (1::real)
```
```   869           ==>  \<forall>n \<ge> M. norm (X n :: 'a::real_normed_vector) < 1 + norm (X M)"
```
```   870 apply (clarify, drule spec, drule (1) mp)
```
```   871 apply (simp only: norm_minus_commute)
```
```   872 apply (drule order_le_less_trans [OF norm_triangle_ineq2])
```
```   873 apply simp
```
```   874 done
```
```   875
```
```   876 lemma Cauchy_Bseq: "Cauchy X ==> Bseq X"
```
```   877 apply (simp add: Cauchy_iff)
```
```   878 apply (drule spec, drule mp, rule zero_less_one, safe)
```
```   879 apply (drule_tac x="M" in spec, simp)
```
```   880 apply (drule lemmaCauchy)
```
```   881 apply (rule_tac k="M" in Bseq_offset)
```
```   882 apply (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```   883 apply (rule_tac x="1 + norm (X M)" in exI)
```
```   884 apply (rule conjI, rule order_less_le_trans [OF zero_less_one], simp)
```
```   885 apply (simp add: order_less_imp_le)
```
```   886 done
```
```   887
```
```   888 subsubsection {* Cauchy Sequences are Convergent *}
```
```   889
```
```   890 class complete_space = metric_space +
```
```   891   assumes Cauchy_convergent: "Cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> convergent X"
```
```   892
```
```   893 class banach = real_normed_vector + complete_space
```
```   894
```
```   895 theorem LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy:
```
```   896   assumes X: "X ----> a" shows "Cauchy X"
```
```   897 proof (rule metric_CauchyI)
```
```   898   fix e::real assume "0 < e"
```
```   899   hence "0 < e/2" by simp
```
```   900   with X have "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (X n) a < e/2" by (rule metric_LIMSEQ_D)
```
```   901   then obtain N where N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (X n) a < e/2" ..
```
```   902   show "\<exists>N. \<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (X m) (X n) < e"
```
```   903   proof (intro exI allI impI)
```
```   904     fix m assume "N \<le> m"
```
```   905     hence m: "dist (X m) a < e/2" using N by fast
```
```   906     fix n assume "N \<le> n"
```
```   907     hence n: "dist (X n) a < e/2" using N by fast
```
```   908     have "dist (X m) (X n) \<le> dist (X m) a + dist (X n) a"
```
```   909       by (rule dist_triangle2)
```
```   910     also from m n have "\<dots> < e" by simp
```
```   911     finally show "dist (X m) (X n) < e" .
```
```   912   qed
```
```   913 qed
```
```   914
```
```   915 lemma convergent_Cauchy: "convergent X \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy X"
```
```   916 unfolding convergent_def
```
```   917 by (erule exE, erule LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy)
```
```   918
```
```   919 lemma Cauchy_convergent_iff:
```
```   920   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::complete_space"
```
```   921   shows "Cauchy X = convergent X"
```
```   922 by (fast intro: Cauchy_convergent convergent_Cauchy)
```
```   923
```
```   924 text {*
```
```   925 Proof that Cauchy sequences converge based on the one from
```
```   926 http://pirate.shu.edu/~wachsmut/ira/numseq/proofs/cauconv.html
```
```   927 *}
```
```   928
```
```   929 text {*
```
```   930   If sequence @{term "X"} is Cauchy, then its limit is the lub of
```
```   931   @{term "{r::real. \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. r < X n}"}
```
```   932 *}
```
```   933
```
```   934 lemma isUb_UNIV_I: "(\<And>y. y \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> y \<le> u) \<Longrightarrow> isUb UNIV S u"
```
```   935 by (simp add: isUbI setleI)
```
```   936
```
```   937 locale real_Cauchy =
```
```   938   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```   939   assumes X: "Cauchy X"
```
```   940   fixes S :: "real set"
```
```   941   defines S_def: "S \<equiv> {x::real. \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. x < X n}"
```
```   942
```
```   943 lemma real_CauchyI:
```
```   944   assumes "Cauchy X"
```
```   945   shows "real_Cauchy X"
```
```   946   proof qed (fact assms)
```
```   947
```
```   948 lemma (in real_Cauchy) mem_S: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. x < X n \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S"
```
```   949 by (unfold S_def, auto)
```
```   950
```
```   951 lemma (in real_Cauchy) bound_isUb:
```
```   952   assumes N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X n < x"
```
```   953   shows "isUb UNIV S x"
```
```   954 proof (rule isUb_UNIV_I)
```
```   955   fix y::real assume "y \<in> S"
```
```   956   hence "\<exists>M. \<forall>n\<ge>M. y < X n"
```
```   957     by (simp add: S_def)
```
```   958   then obtain M where "\<forall>n\<ge>M. y < X n" ..
```
```   959   hence "y < X (max M N)" by simp
```
```   960   also have "\<dots> < x" using N by simp
```
```   961   finally show "y \<le> x"
```
```   962     by (rule order_less_imp_le)
```
```   963 qed
```
```   964
```
```   965 lemma (in real_Cauchy) isLub_ex: "\<exists>u. isLub UNIV S u"
```
```   966 proof (rule reals_complete)
```
```   967   obtain N where "\<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X m - X n) < 1"
```
```   968     using CauchyD [OF X zero_less_one] by auto
```
```   969   hence N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X n - X N) < 1" by simp
```
```   970   show "\<exists>x. x \<in> S"
```
```   971   proof
```
```   972     from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - 1 < X n"
```
```   973       by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
```
```   974     thus "X N - 1 \<in> S" by (rule mem_S)
```
```   975   qed
```
```   976   show "\<exists>u. isUb UNIV S u"
```
```   977   proof
```
```   978     from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X n < X N + 1"
```
```   979       by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
```
```   980     thus "isUb UNIV S (X N + 1)"
```
```   981       by (rule bound_isUb)
```
```   982   qed
```
```   983 qed
```
```   984
```
```   985 lemma (in real_Cauchy) isLub_imp_LIMSEQ:
```
```   986   assumes x: "isLub UNIV S x"
```
```   987   shows "X ----> x"
```
```   988 proof (rule LIMSEQ_I)
```
```   989   fix r::real assume "0 < r"
```
```   990   hence r: "0 < r/2" by simp
```
```   991   obtain N where "\<forall>n\<ge>N. \<forall>m\<ge>N. norm (X n - X m) < r/2"
```
```   992     using CauchyD [OF X r] by auto
```
```   993   hence "\<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X n - X N) < r/2" by simp
```
```   994   hence N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - r/2 < X n \<and> X n < X N + r/2"
```
```   995     by (simp only: real_norm_def abs_diff_less_iff)
```
```   996
```
```   997   from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - r/2 < X n" by fast
```
```   998   hence "X N - r/2 \<in> S" by (rule mem_S)
```
```   999   hence 1: "X N - r/2 \<le> x" using x isLub_isUb isUbD by fast
```
```  1000
```
```  1001   from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X n < X N + r/2" by fast
```
```  1002   hence "isUb UNIV S (X N + r/2)" by (rule bound_isUb)
```
```  1003   hence 2: "x \<le> X N + r/2" using x isLub_le_isUb by fast
```
```  1004
```
```  1005   show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X n - x) < r"
```
```  1006   proof (intro exI allI impI)
```
```  1007     fix n assume n: "N \<le> n"
```
```  1008     from N n have "X n < X N + r/2" and "X N - r/2 < X n" by simp+
```
```  1009     thus "norm (X n - x) < r" using 1 2
```
```  1010       by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
```
```  1011   qed
```
```  1012 qed
```
```  1013
```
```  1014 lemma (in real_Cauchy) LIMSEQ_ex: "\<exists>x. X ----> x"
```
```  1015 proof -
```
```  1016   obtain x where "isLub UNIV S x"
```
```  1017     using isLub_ex by fast
```
```  1018   hence "X ----> x"
```
```  1019     by (rule isLub_imp_LIMSEQ)
```
```  1020   thus ?thesis ..
```
```  1021 qed
```
```  1022
```
```  1023 lemma real_Cauchy_convergent:
```
```  1024   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
```
```  1025   shows "Cauchy X \<Longrightarrow> convergent X"
```
```  1026 unfolding convergent_def
```
```  1027 by (rule real_Cauchy.LIMSEQ_ex)
```
```  1028  (rule real_CauchyI)
```
```  1029
```
```  1030 instance real :: banach
```
```  1031 by intro_classes (rule real_Cauchy_convergent)
```
```  1032
```
```  1033
```
```  1034 subsection {* Power Sequences *}
```
```  1035
```
```  1036 text{*The sequence @{term "x^n"} tends to 0 if @{term "0\<le>x"} and @{term
```
```  1037 "x<1"}.  Proof will use (NS) Cauchy equivalence for convergence and
```
```  1038   also fact that bounded and monotonic sequence converges.*}
```
```  1039
```
```  1040 lemma Bseq_realpow: "[| 0 \<le> (x::real); x \<le> 1 |] ==> Bseq (%n. x ^ n)"
```
```  1041 apply (simp add: Bseq_def)
```
```  1042 apply (rule_tac x = 1 in exI)
```
```  1043 apply (simp add: power_abs)
```
```  1044 apply (auto dest: power_mono)
```
```  1045 done
```
```  1046
```
```  1047 lemma monoseq_realpow: fixes x :: real shows "[| 0 \<le> x; x \<le> 1 |] ==> monoseq (%n. x ^ n)"
```
```  1048 apply (clarify intro!: mono_SucI2)
```
```  1049 apply (cut_tac n = n and N = "Suc n" and a = x in power_decreasing, auto)
```
```  1050 done
```
```  1051
```
```  1052 lemma convergent_realpow:
```
```  1053   "[| 0 \<le> (x::real); x \<le> 1 |] ==> convergent (%n. x ^ n)"
```
```  1054 by (blast intro!: Bseq_monoseq_convergent Bseq_realpow monoseq_realpow)
```
```  1055
```
```  1056 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_realpow_zero_lemma:
```
```  1057   fixes x :: real
```
```  1058   assumes x: "0 \<le> x"
```
```  1059   shows "real n * x + 1 \<le> (x + 1) ^ n"
```
```  1060 apply (induct n)
```
```  1061 apply simp
```
```  1062 apply simp
```
```  1063 apply (rule order_trans)
```
```  1064 prefer 2
```
```  1065 apply (erule mult_left_mono)
```
```  1066 apply (rule add_increasing [OF x], simp)
```
```  1067 apply (simp add: real_of_nat_Suc)
```
```  1068 apply (simp add: ring_distribs)
```
```  1069 apply (simp add: mult_nonneg_nonneg x)
```
```  1070 done
```
```  1071
```
```  1072 lemma LIMSEQ_inverse_realpow_zero:
```
```  1073   "1 < (x::real) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. inverse (x ^ n)) ----> 0"
```
```  1074 proof (rule LIMSEQ_inverse_zero [rule_format])
```
```  1075   fix y :: real
```
```  1076   assume x: "1 < x"
```
```  1077   hence "0 < x - 1" by simp
```
```  1078   hence "\<forall>y. \<exists>N::nat. y < real N * (x - 1)"
```
```  1079     by (rule reals_Archimedean3)
```
```  1080   hence "\<exists>N::nat. y < real N * (x - 1)" ..
```
```  1081   then obtain N::nat where "y < real N * (x - 1)" ..
```
```  1082   also have "\<dots> \<le> real N * (x - 1) + 1" by simp
```
```  1083   also have "\<dots> \<le> (x - 1 + 1) ^ N"
```
```  1084     by (rule LIMSEQ_inverse_realpow_zero_lemma, cut_tac x, simp)
```
```  1085   also have "\<dots> = x ^ N" by simp
```
```  1086   finally have "y < x ^ N" .
```
```  1087   hence "\<forall>n\<ge>N. y < x ^ n"
```
```  1088     apply clarify
```
```  1089     apply (erule order_less_le_trans)
```
```  1090     apply (erule power_increasing)
```
```  1091     apply (rule order_less_imp_le [OF x])
```
```  1092     done
```
```  1093   thus "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. y < x ^ n" ..
```
```  1094 qed
```
```  1095
```
```  1096 lemma LIMSEQ_realpow_zero:
```
```  1097   "\<lbrakk>0 \<le> (x::real); x < 1\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. x ^ n) ----> 0"
```
```  1098 proof (cases)
```
```  1099   assume "x = 0"
```
```  1100   hence "(\<lambda>n. x ^ Suc n) ----> 0" by (simp add: tendsto_const)
```
```  1101   thus ?thesis by (rule LIMSEQ_imp_Suc)
```
```  1102 next
```
```  1103   assume "0 \<le> x" and "x \<noteq> 0"
```
```  1104   hence x0: "0 < x" by simp
```
```  1105   assume x1: "x < 1"
```
```  1106   from x0 x1 have "1 < inverse x"
```
```  1107     by (rule one_less_inverse)
```
```  1108   hence "(\<lambda>n. inverse (inverse x ^ n)) ----> 0"
```
```  1109     by (rule LIMSEQ_inverse_realpow_zero)
```
```  1110   thus ?thesis by (simp add: power_inverse)
```
```  1111 qed
```
```  1112
```
```  1113 lemma LIMSEQ_power_zero:
```
```  1114   fixes x :: "'a::{real_normed_algebra_1}"
```
```  1115   shows "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. x ^ n) ----> 0"
```
```  1116 apply (drule LIMSEQ_realpow_zero [OF norm_ge_zero])
```
```  1117 apply (simp only: tendsto_Zfun_iff, erule Zfun_le)
```
```  1118 apply (simp add: power_abs norm_power_ineq)
```
```  1119 done
```
```  1120
```
```  1121 lemma LIMSEQ_divide_realpow_zero:
```
```  1122   "1 < (x::real) ==> (%n. a / (x ^ n)) ----> 0"
```
```  1123 using tendsto_mult [OF tendsto_const [of a]
```
```  1124   LIMSEQ_realpow_zero [of "inverse x"]]
```
```  1125 apply (auto simp add: divide_inverse power_inverse)
```
```  1126 apply (simp add: inverse_eq_divide pos_divide_less_eq)
```
```  1127 done
```
```  1128
```
```  1129 text{*Limit of @{term "c^n"} for @{term"\<bar>c\<bar> < 1"}*}
```
```  1130
```
```  1131 lemma LIMSEQ_rabs_realpow_zero: "\<bar>c\<bar> < (1::real) ==> (%n. \<bar>c\<bar> ^ n) ----> 0"
```
```  1132 by (rule LIMSEQ_realpow_zero [OF abs_ge_zero])
```
```  1133
```
```  1134 lemma LIMSEQ_rabs_realpow_zero2: "\<bar>c\<bar> < (1::real) ==> (%n. c ^ n) ----> 0"
```
```  1135 apply (rule tendsto_rabs_zero_cancel)
```
```  1136 apply (auto intro: LIMSEQ_rabs_realpow_zero simp add: power_abs)
```
```  1137 done
```
```  1138
```
```  1139 end
```