src/ZF/Cardinal.ML
 author lcp Wed, 11 Jan 1995 18:21:39 +0100 changeset 845 825e96b87ef7 parent 833 ba386650df2c child 1031 a53cbb4b06c5 permissions -rw-r--r--
Added Krzysztof's theorem LeastI2. Proof of sum_eqpoll_cong uses lemma sum_bij; proof of prod_eqpoll_cong uses lemma prod_bij.
```
(*  Title: 	ZF/Cardinal.ML
ID:         \$Id\$
Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory

Cardinals in Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory

This theory does NOT assume the Axiom of Choice
*)

open Cardinal;

(*** The Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem -- see Davey & Priestly, page 106 ***)

(** Lemma: Banach's Decomposition Theorem **)

goal Cardinal.thy "bnd_mono(X, %W. X - g``(Y - f``W))";
by (rtac bnd_monoI 1);
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [Diff_subset, subset_refl, Diff_mono, image_mono] 1));
qed "decomp_bnd_mono";

val [gfun] = goal Cardinal.thy
"g: Y->X ==>   					\
\    g``(Y - f`` lfp(X, %W. X - g``(Y - f``W))) = 	\
\    X - lfp(X, %W. X - g``(Y - f``W)) ";
by (res_inst_tac [("P", "%u. ?v = X-u")]
(decomp_bnd_mono RS lfp_Tarski RS ssubst) 1);
by (simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [subset_refl, double_complement,
gfun RS fun_is_rel RS image_subset]) 1);
qed "Banach_last_equation";

val prems = goal Cardinal.thy
"[| f: X->Y;  g: Y->X |] ==>   \
\    EX XA XB YA YB. (XA Int XB = 0) & (XA Un XB = X) &    \
\                    (YA Int YB = 0) & (YA Un YB = Y) &    \
\                    f``XA=YA & g``YB=XB";
by (REPEAT
(FIRSTGOAL
(resolve_tac [refl, exI, conjI, Diff_disjoint, Diff_partition])));
by (rtac Banach_last_equation 3);
by (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[fun_is_rel, image_subset, lfp_subset]) 1));
qed "decomposition";

val prems = goal Cardinal.thy
"[| f: inj(X,Y);  g: inj(Y,X) |] ==> EX h. h: bij(X,Y)";
by (cut_facts_tac prems 1);
by (cut_facts_tac [(prems RL [inj_is_fun]) MRS decomposition] 1);
(* The instantiation of exI to "restrict(f,XA) Un converse(restrict(g,YB))"
is forced by the context!! *)
qed "schroeder_bernstein";

(** Equipollence is an equivalence relation **)

goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def] "!!f A B. f: bij(A,B) ==> A eqpoll B";
by (etac exI 1);
qed "bij_imp_eqpoll";

(*A eqpoll A*)
bind_thm ("eqpoll_refl", id_bij RS bij_imp_eqpoll);

goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def] "!!X Y. X eqpoll Y ==> Y eqpoll X";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [bij_converse_bij]) 1);
qed "eqpoll_sym";

goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def]
"!!X Y. [| X eqpoll Y;  Y eqpoll Z |] ==> X eqpoll Z";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [comp_bij]) 1);
qed "eqpoll_trans";

(** Le-pollence is a partial ordering **)

goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def] "!!X Y. X<=Y ==> X lepoll Y";
by (rtac exI 1);
by (etac id_subset_inj 1);
qed "subset_imp_lepoll";

val lepoll_refl = subset_refl RS subset_imp_lepoll;

goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def, bij_def, lepoll_def]
"!!X Y. X eqpoll Y ==> X lepoll Y";
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1);
qed "eqpoll_imp_lepoll";

goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def]
"!!X Y. [| X lepoll Y;  Y lepoll Z |] ==> X lepoll Z";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [comp_inj]) 1);
qed "lepoll_trans";

(*Asymmetry law*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def,eqpoll_def]
"!!X Y. [| X lepoll Y;  Y lepoll X |] ==> X eqpoll Y";
by (REPEAT (etac exE 1));
by (rtac schroeder_bernstein 1);
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 1));
qed "eqpollI";

val [major,minor] = goal Cardinal.thy
"[| X eqpoll Y; [| X lepoll Y; Y lepoll X |] ==> P |] ==> P";
by (rtac minor 1);
by (REPEAT (resolve_tac [major, eqpoll_imp_lepoll, eqpoll_sym] 1));
qed "eqpollE";

goal Cardinal.thy "X eqpoll Y <-> X lepoll Y & Y lepoll X";
qed "eqpoll_iff";

goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def, inj_def] "!!A. A lepoll 0 ==> A = 0";
by (fast_tac (eq_cs addDs [apply_type]) 1);
qed "lepoll_0_is_0";

(*0 lepoll Y*)
bind_thm ("empty_lepollI", empty_subsetI RS subset_imp_lepoll);

(*A eqpoll 0 ==> A=0*)
bind_thm ("eqpoll_0_is_0",  eqpoll_imp_lepoll RS lepoll_0_is_0);

(*** lesspoll: contributions by Krzysztof Grabczewski ***)

goalw Cardinal.thy [inj_def, surj_def]
"!!f. [| f : inj(A, succ(m)); f ~: surj(A, succ(m)) |] ==> EX f. f:inj(A,m)";
by (safe_tac lemmas_cs);
by (swap_res_tac [exI] 1);
by (res_inst_tac [("a", "lam z:A. if(f`z=m, y, f`z)")] CollectI 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [if_type RS lam_type]
(*Proving it's injective*)
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss setloop split_tac [expand_if]) 1);
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1);
qed "inj_not_surj_succ";

(** Variations on transitivity **)

goalw Cardinal.thy [lesspoll_def]
"!!X. [| X lesspoll Y; Y lesspoll Z |] ==> X lesspoll Z";
qed "lesspoll_trans";

goalw Cardinal.thy [lesspoll_def]
"!!X. [| X lesspoll Y; Y lepoll Z |] ==> X lesspoll Z";
qed "lesspoll_lepoll_lesspoll";

goalw Cardinal.thy [lesspoll_def]
"!!X. [| X lesspoll Y; Z lepoll X |] ==> Z lesspoll Y";
qed "lepoll_lesspoll_lesspoll";

(** LEAST -- the least number operator [from HOL/Univ.ML] **)

val [premP,premOrd,premNot] = goalw Cardinal.thy [Least_def]
"[| P(i);  Ord(i);  !!x. x<i ==> ~P(x) |] ==> (LEAST x.P(x)) = i";
by (rtac the_equality 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [premP,premOrd,premNot]) 1);
by (REPEAT (etac conjE 1));
by (etac (premOrd RS Ord_linear_lt) 1);
qed "Least_equality";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i. [| P(i);  Ord(i) |] ==> P(LEAST x.P(x))";
by (etac rev_mp 1);
by (trans_ind_tac "i" [] 1);
by (rtac impI 1);
by (rtac classical 1);
by (EVERY1 [rtac (Least_equality RS ssubst), assume_tac, assume_tac]);
by (assume_tac 2);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSEs [ltE]) 1);
qed "LeastI";

(*Proof is almost identical to the one above!*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!i. [| P(i);  Ord(i) |] ==> (LEAST x.P(x)) le i";
by (etac rev_mp 1);
by (trans_ind_tac "i" [] 1);
by (rtac impI 1);
by (rtac classical 1);
by (EVERY1 [rtac (Least_equality RS ssubst), assume_tac, assume_tac]);
by (etac le_refl 2);
qed "Least_le";

(*LEAST really is the smallest*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!i. [| P(i);  i < (LEAST x.P(x)) |] ==> Q";
by (rtac (Least_le RSN (2,lt_trans2) RS lt_irrefl) 1);
by (REPEAT (eresolve_tac [asm_rl, ltE] 1));
qed "less_LeastE";

(*Easier to apply than LeastI2: conclusion has only one occurrence of P*)
qed_goal "LeastI2" Cardinal.thy
"[| P(i);  Ord(i);  !!j. P(j) ==> Q(j) |] ==> Q(LEAST j. P(j))"
(fn prems => [ resolve_tac prems 1,
rtac LeastI 1,
resolve_tac prems 1,
resolve_tac prems 1 ]);

(*If there is no such P then LEAST is vacuously 0*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [Least_def]
"!!P. [| ~ (EX i. Ord(i) & P(i)) |] ==> (LEAST x.P(x)) = 0";
by (rtac the_0 1);
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1);
qed "Least_0";

goal Cardinal.thy "Ord(LEAST x.P(x))";
by (excluded_middle_tac "EX i. Ord(i) & P(i)" 1);
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
by (rtac (Least_le RS ltE) 2);
by (REPEAT_SOME assume_tac);
by (etac (Least_0 RS ssubst) 1);
by (rtac Ord_0 1);
qed "Ord_Least";

(** Basic properties of cardinals **)

(*Not needed for simplification, but helpful below*)
val prems = goal Cardinal.thy
"[| !!y. P(y) <-> Q(y) |] ==> (LEAST x.P(x)) = (LEAST x.Q(x))";
by (simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps prems) 1);
qed "Least_cong";

(*Need AC to prove   X lepoll Y ==> |X| le |Y| ;
see well_ord_lepoll_imp_Card_le  *)
goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def,cardinal_def] "!!X Y. X eqpoll Y ==> |X| = |Y|";
by (rtac Least_cong 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addEs [comp_bij,bij_converse_bij]) 1);
qed "cardinal_cong";

(*Under AC, the premise becomes trivial; one consequence is ||A|| = |A|*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [cardinal_def]
"!!A. well_ord(A,r) ==> |A| eqpoll A";
by (rtac LeastI 1);
by (etac Ord_ordertype 2);
by (etac (ordermap_bij RS bij_converse_bij RS bij_imp_eqpoll) 1);
qed "well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll";

bind_thm ("Ord_cardinal_eqpoll", well_ord_Memrel RS well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll);

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!X Y. [| well_ord(X,r);  well_ord(Y,s);  |X| = |Y| |] ==> X eqpoll Y";
by (rtac (eqpoll_sym RS eqpoll_trans) 1);
by (etac well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [well_ord_cardinal_eqpoll]) 1);
qed "well_ord_cardinal_eqE";

(** Observations from Kunen, page 28 **)

goalw Cardinal.thy [cardinal_def] "!!i. Ord(i) ==> |i| le i";
by (etac (eqpoll_refl RS Least_le) 1);
qed "Ord_cardinal_le";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Card_def] "!!K. Card(K) ==> |K| = K";
by (etac sym 1);
qed "Card_cardinal_eq";

(* Could replace the  ~(j eqpoll i)  by  ~(i lepoll j) *)
val prems = goalw Cardinal.thy [Card_def,cardinal_def]
"[| Ord(i);  !!j. j<i ==> ~(j eqpoll i) |] ==> Card(i)";
by (rtac (Least_equality RS ssubst) 1);
by (REPEAT (ares_tac ([refl,eqpoll_refl]@prems) 1));
qed "CardI";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Card_def, cardinal_def] "!!i. Card(i) ==> Ord(i)";
by (etac ssubst 1);
by (rtac Ord_Least 1);
qed "Card_is_Ord";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!K. Card(K) ==> K le |K|";
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [le_refl, Card_is_Ord, Card_cardinal_eq]) 1);
qed "Card_cardinal_le";

goalw Cardinal.thy [cardinal_def] "Ord(|A|)";
by (rtac Ord_Least 1);
qed "Ord_cardinal";

(*The cardinals are the initial ordinals*)
goal Cardinal.thy "Card(K) <-> Ord(K) & (ALL j. j<K --> ~ j eqpoll K)";
by (safe_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [CardI, Card_is_Ord]));
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 2);
by (rewrite_goals_tac [Card_def, cardinal_def]);
by (resolve_tac [less_LeastE] 1);
by (eresolve_tac [subst] 2);
by (ALLGOALS assume_tac);
qed "Card_iff_initial";

goal Cardinal.thy "Card(0)";
by (rtac (Ord_0 RS CardI) 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSEs [ltE]) 1);
qed "Card_0";

val [premK,premL] = goal Cardinal.thy
"[| Card(K);  Card(L) |] ==> Card(K Un L)";
by (rtac ([premK RS Card_is_Ord, premL RS Card_is_Ord] MRS Ord_linear_le) 1);
by (asm_simp_tac
(ZF_ss addsimps [premL, le_imp_subset, subset_Un_iff RS iffD1]) 1);
by (asm_simp_tac
(ZF_ss addsimps [premK, le_imp_subset, subset_Un_iff2 RS iffD1]) 1);
qed "Card_Un";

(*Infinite unions of cardinals?  See Devlin, Lemma 6.7, page 98*)

goalw Cardinal.thy [cardinal_def] "Card(|A|)";
by (excluded_middle_tac "EX i. Ord(i) & i eqpoll A" 1);
by (etac (Least_0 RS ssubst) 1 THEN rtac Card_0 1);
by (rtac (Ord_Least RS CardI) 1);
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
by (rtac less_LeastE 1);
by (assume_tac 2);
by (etac eqpoll_trans 1);
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [LeastI] 1));
qed "Card_cardinal";

(*Kunen's Lemma 10.5*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. [| |i| le j;  j le i |] ==> |j| = |i|";
by (rtac (eqpollI RS cardinal_cong) 1);
by (etac (le_imp_subset RS subset_imp_lepoll) 1);
by (rtac lepoll_trans 1);
by (etac (le_imp_subset RS subset_imp_lepoll) 2);
by (rtac (eqpoll_sym RS eqpoll_imp_lepoll) 1);
by (rtac Ord_cardinal_eqpoll 1);
by (REPEAT (eresolve_tac [ltE, Ord_succD] 1));
qed "cardinal_eq_lemma";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. i le j ==> |i| le |j|";
by (res_inst_tac [("i","|i|"),("j","|j|")] Ord_linear_le 1);
by (REPEAT_FIRST (ares_tac [Ord_cardinal, le_eqI]));
by (rtac cardinal_eq_lemma 1);
by (assume_tac 2);
by (etac le_trans 1);
by (etac ltE 1);
by (etac Ord_cardinal_le 1);
qed "cardinal_mono";

(*Since we have |succ(nat)| le |nat|, the converse of cardinal_mono fails!*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. [| |i| < |j|;  Ord(i);  Ord(j) |] ==> i < j";
by (rtac Ord_linear2 1);
by (REPEAT_SOME assume_tac);
by (etac (lt_trans2 RS lt_irrefl) 1);
by (etac cardinal_mono 1);
qed "cardinal_lt_imp_lt";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. [| |i| < K;  Ord(i);  Card(K) |] ==> i < K";
[cardinal_lt_imp_lt, Card_is_Ord, Card_cardinal_eq]) 1);
qed "Card_lt_imp_lt";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. [| Ord(i);  Card(K) |] ==> (|i| < K) <-> (i < K)";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addEs [Card_lt_imp_lt, Ord_cardinal_le RS lt_trans1]) 1);
qed "Card_lt_iff";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i j. [| Ord(i);  Card(K) |] ==> (K le |i|) <-> (K le i)";
[Card_lt_iff, Card_is_Ord, Ord_cardinal,
not_lt_iff_le RS iff_sym]) 1);
qed "Card_le_iff";

(*** The finite cardinals ***)

goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def, inj_def]
"!!A B. [| cons(u,A) lepoll cons(v,B);  u~:A;  v~:B |] ==> A lepoll B";
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "lam x:A. if(f`x=v, f`u, f`x)")] exI 1);
by (rtac CollectI 1);
(*Proving it's in the function space A->B*)
by (rtac (if_type RS lam_type) 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addEs [apply_funtype RS consE]) 1);
(*Proving it's injective*)
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss setloop split_tac [expand_if]) 1);
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1);
qed "cons_lepoll_consD";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A B. [| cons(u,A) eqpoll cons(v,B);  u~:A;  v~:B |] ==> A eqpoll B";
by (asm_full_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [eqpoll_iff]) 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [cons_lepoll_consD]) 1);
qed "cons_eqpoll_consD";

(*Lemma suggested by Mike Fourman*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def] "!!m n. succ(m) lepoll succ(n) ==> m lepoll n";
by (etac cons_lepoll_consD 1);
by (REPEAT (rtac mem_not_refl 1));
qed "succ_lepoll_succD";

val [prem] = goal Cardinal.thy
"m:nat ==> ALL n: nat. m lepoll n --> m le n";
by (nat_ind_tac "m" [prem] 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [nat_0_le]) 1);
by (rtac ballI 1);
by (eres_inst_tac [("n","n")] natE 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [lepoll_def, inj_def,
succI1 RS Pi_empty2]) 1);
val nat_lepoll_imp_le_lemma = result();

bind_thm ("nat_lepoll_imp_le", nat_lepoll_imp_le_lemma RS bspec RS mp);

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!m n. [| m:nat; n: nat |] ==> m eqpoll n <-> m = n";
by (rtac iffI 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [eqpoll_refl]) 2);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [nat_lepoll_imp_le, le_anti_sym]
qed "nat_eqpoll_iff";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Card_def,cardinal_def]
"!!n. n: nat ==> Card(n)";
by (rtac (Least_equality RS ssubst) 1);
by (REPEAT_FIRST (ares_tac [eqpoll_refl, nat_into_Ord, refl]));
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [lt_nat_in_nat RS nat_eqpoll_iff]) 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSEs [lt_irrefl]) 1);
qed "nat_into_Card";

(*Part of Kunen's Lemma 10.6*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!n. [| succ(n) lepoll n;  n:nat |] ==> P";
by (rtac (nat_lepoll_imp_le RS lt_irrefl) 1);
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [nat_succI] 1));
qed "succ_lepoll_natE";

(** lepoll, lesspoll and natural numbers **)

goalw Cardinal.thy [lesspoll_def]
"!!m. [| A lepoll m; m:nat |] ==> A lesspoll succ(m)";
by (rtac conjI 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [subset_imp_lepoll RSN (2,lepoll_trans)]) 1);
by (rtac notI 1);
by (dresolve_tac [eqpoll_sym RS eqpoll_imp_lepoll] 1);
by (dtac lepoll_trans 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
by (etac succ_lepoll_natE 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
qed "lepoll_imp_lesspoll_succ";

goalw Cardinal.thy [lesspoll_def, lepoll_def, eqpoll_def, bij_def]
"!!m. [| A lesspoll succ(m); m:nat |] ==> A lepoll m";
by (step_tac ZF_cs 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [inj_not_surj_succ]) 1);
qed "lesspoll_succ_imp_lepoll";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!A m. [| A lepoll succ(m);  m:nat |] ==>  \
\                         A lepoll m | A eqpoll succ(m)";
by (rtac disjCI 1);
by (rtac lesspoll_succ_imp_lepoll 1);
by (assume_tac 2);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [lesspoll_def]) 1);
qed "lepoll_succ_disj";

(*** The first infinite cardinal: Omega, or nat ***)

(*This implies Kunen's Lemma 10.6*)
goal Cardinal.thy "!!n. [| n<i;  n:nat |] ==> ~ i lepoll n";
by (rtac notI 1);
by (rtac succ_lepoll_natE 1 THEN assume_tac 2);
by (rtac lepoll_trans 1 THEN assume_tac 2);
by (etac ltE 1);
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [Ord_succ_subsetI RS subset_imp_lepoll] 1));
qed "lt_not_lepoll";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!i n. [| Ord(i);  n:nat |] ==> i eqpoll n <-> i=n";
by (rtac iffI 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [eqpoll_refl]) 2);
by (rtac Ord_linear_lt 1);
by (REPEAT_SOME (eresolve_tac [asm_rl, nat_into_Ord]));
by (etac (lt_nat_in_nat RS nat_eqpoll_iff RS iffD1) 1 THEN
REPEAT (assume_tac 1));
by (rtac (lt_not_lepoll RS notE) 1 THEN (REPEAT (assume_tac 1)));
by (etac eqpoll_imp_lepoll 1);
qed "Ord_nat_eqpoll_iff";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Card_def,cardinal_def] "Card(nat)";
by (rtac (Least_equality RS ssubst) 1);
by (REPEAT_FIRST (ares_tac [eqpoll_refl, Ord_nat, refl]));
by (etac ltE 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [eqpoll_iff, lt_not_lepoll, ltI]) 1);
qed "Card_nat";

(*Allows showing that |i| is a limit cardinal*)
goal Cardinal.thy  "!!i. nat le i ==> nat le |i|";
by (rtac (Card_nat RS Card_cardinal_eq RS subst) 1);
by (etac cardinal_mono 1);
qed "nat_le_cardinal";

(*** Towards Cardinal Arithmetic ***)
(** Congruence laws for successor, cardinal addition and multiplication **)

(*Congruence law for  cons  under equipollence*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [lepoll_def]
"!!A B. [| A lepoll B;  b ~: B |] ==> cons(a,A) lepoll cons(b,B)";
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "lam y: cons(a,A).if(y=a, b, f`y)")] exI 1);
by (res_inst_tac [("d","%z.if(z:B, converse(f)`z, a)")]
lam_injective 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [inj_is_fun RS apply_type, cons_iff]
setloop etac consE') 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [inj_is_fun RS apply_type, left_inverse]
setloop etac consE') 1);
qed "cons_lepoll_cong";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A B. [| A eqpoll B;  a ~: A;  b ~: B |] ==> cons(a,A) eqpoll cons(b,B)";
by (asm_full_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [eqpoll_iff, cons_lepoll_cong]) 1);
qed "cons_eqpoll_cong";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A B. [| a ~: A;  b ~: B |] ==> \
\           cons(a,A) lepoll cons(b,B)  <->  A lepoll B";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [cons_lepoll_cong, cons_lepoll_consD]) 1);
qed "cons_lepoll_cons_iff";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A B. [| a ~: A;  b ~: B |] ==> \
\           cons(a,A) eqpoll cons(b,B)  <->  A eqpoll B";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [cons_eqpoll_cong, cons_eqpoll_consD]) 1);
qed "cons_eqpoll_cons_iff";

goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def] "{a} eqpoll 1";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [eqpoll_refl RS cons_eqpoll_cong]) 1);
qed "singleton_eqpoll_1";

(*Congruence law for  succ  under equipollence*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def]
"!!A B. A eqpoll B ==> succ(A) eqpoll succ(B)";
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [cons_eqpoll_cong, mem_not_refl] 1));
qed "succ_eqpoll_cong";

(*Congruence law for + under equipollence*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def]
"!!A B C D. [| A eqpoll C;  B eqpoll D |] ==> A+B eqpoll C+D";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [sum_bij]) 1);
qed "sum_eqpoll_cong";

(*Congruence law for * under equipollence*)
goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def]
"!!A B C D. [| A eqpoll C;  B eqpoll D |] ==> A*B eqpoll C*D";
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [prod_bij]) 1);
qed "prod_eqpoll_cong";

goalw Cardinal.thy [eqpoll_def]
"!!f. [| f: inj(A,B);  A Int B = 0 |] ==> A Un (B - range(f)) eqpoll B";
by (rtac exI 1);
by (res_inst_tac [("c", "%x. if(x:A, f`x, x)"),
("d", "%y. if(y: range(f), converse(f)`y, y)")]
lam_bijective 1);
by (asm_simp_tac
setloop split_tac [expand_if]) 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [inj_is_fun RS apply_rangeI, left_inverse]
setloop etac UnE') 1);
by (asm_simp_tac
(ZF_ss addsimps [inj_converse_fun RS apply_funtype, right_inverse]
setloop split_tac [expand_if]) 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addEs [equals0D]) 1);
qed "inj_disjoint_eqpoll";

(*** Lemmas by Krzysztof Grabczewski.  New proofs using cons_lepoll_cons.
Could easily generalise from succ to cons. ***)

goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def]
"!!A a n. [| a:A;  A lepoll succ(n) |] ==> A - {a} lepoll n";
by (rtac cons_lepoll_consD 1);
by (rtac mem_not_refl 3);
by (eresolve_tac [cons_Diff RS ssubst] 1);
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
qed "diff_sing_lepoll";

goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def]
"!!A a n. [| a:A; succ(n) lepoll A |] ==> n lepoll A - {a}";
by (rtac cons_lepoll_consD 1);
by (rtac mem_not_refl 2);
by (eresolve_tac [cons_Diff RS ssubst] 1);
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
qed "lepoll_diff_sing";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!A a n. [| a:A; A eqpoll succ(n) |] ==> A - {a} eqpoll n";
qed "diff_sing_eqpoll";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!A. [| A lepoll 1; a:A |] ==> A = {a}";
by (forward_tac [diff_sing_lepoll] 1);
by (assume_tac 1);
by (dtac lepoll_0_is_0 1);
by (fast_tac (eq_cs addEs [equalityE]) 1);
qed "lepoll_1_is_sing";

(*** Finite and infinite sets ***)

goalw Cardinal.thy [Finite_def]
"!!A. [| A lepoll n;  n:nat |] ==> Finite(A)";
by (etac rev_mp 1);
by (etac nat_induct 1);
qed "lepoll_nat_imp_Finite";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Finite_def]
"!!X. [| Y lepoll X;  Finite(X) |] ==> Finite(Y)";
rewrite_rule [Finite_def] lepoll_nat_imp_Finite]) 1);
qed "lepoll_Finite";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Finite_def] "!!x. Finite(x) ==> Finite(cons(y,x))";
by (excluded_middle_tac "y:x" 1);
by (asm_simp_tac (ZF_ss addsimps [cons_absorb]) 2);
by (etac bexE 1);
by (rtac bexI 1);
by (etac nat_succI 2);
by (asm_simp_tac
(ZF_ss addsimps [succ_def, cons_eqpoll_cong, mem_not_refl]) 1);
qed "Finite_imp_cons_Finite";

goalw Cardinal.thy [succ_def] "!!x. Finite(x) ==> Finite(succ(x))";
by (etac Finite_imp_cons_Finite 1);
qed "Finite_imp_succ_Finite";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Finite_def]
"!!i. [| Ord(i);  ~ Finite(i) |] ==> nat le i";
by (eresolve_tac [Ord_nat RSN (2,Ord_linear2)] 1);
by (assume_tac 2);
qed "nat_le_infinite_Ord";

(*Krzysztof Grabczewski's proof that the converse of a finite, well-ordered
set is well-ordered.  Proofs simplified by lcp. *)

goal Nat.thy "!!n. n:nat ==> wf[n](converse(Memrel(n)))";
by (etac nat_induct 1);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addIs [wf_onI]) 1);
by (rtac wf_onI 1);
by (asm_full_simp_tac
(ZF_ss addsimps [wf_on_def, wf_def, converse_iff, Memrel_iff]) 1);
by (excluded_middle_tac "x:Z" 1);
by (dres_inst_tac [("x", "x")] bspec 2 THEN assume_tac 2);
by (dres_inst_tac [("x", "Z")] spec 1);
by (safe_tac ZF_cs);
by (dres_inst_tac [("x", "xa")] bspec 1 THEN assume_tac 1);
by (fast_tac ZF_cs 1);
qed "nat_wf_on_converse_Memrel";

goal Cardinal.thy "!!n. n:nat ==> well_ord(n,converse(Memrel(n)))";
by (forward_tac [Ord_nat RS Ord_in_Ord RS well_ord_Memrel] 1);
by (rewtac well_ord_def);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [tot_ord_converse, nat_wf_on_converse_Memrel]) 1);
qed "nat_well_ord_converse_Memrel";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A. [| well_ord(A,r); 	\
\            well_ord(ordertype(A,r), converse(Memrel(ordertype(A, r)))) \
\         |] ==> well_ord(A,converse(r))";
by (resolve_tac [well_ord_Int_iff RS iffD1] 1);
by (forward_tac [ordermap_bij RS bij_is_inj RS well_ord_rvimage] 1);
by (assume_tac 1);
by (asm_full_simp_tac
ordertype_ord_iso RS ord_iso_rvimage_eq]) 1);
qed "well_ord_converse";

goal Cardinal.thy
"!!A. [| well_ord(A,r);  A eqpoll n;  n:nat |] ==> ordertype(A,r)=n";
by (rtac (Ord_ordertype RS Ord_nat_eqpoll_iff RS iffD1) 1 THEN
REPEAT (assume_tac 1));
by (rtac eqpoll_trans 1 THEN assume_tac 2);
by (rewtac eqpoll_def);
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSIs [ordermap_bij RS bij_converse_bij]) 1);
qed "ordertype_eq_n";

goalw Cardinal.thy [Finite_def]
"!!A. [| Finite(A);  well_ord(A,r) |] ==> well_ord(A,converse(r))";
by (rtac well_ord_converse 1 THEN assume_tac 1);