src/HOL/Library/Euclidean_Space.thy
 author huffman Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:52:44 -0800 changeset 30066 9223483cc927 parent 30045 b8ddd7667eed child 30242 aea5d7fa7ef5 child 30303 9c4f4ac0d038 permissions -rw-r--r--
remove duplicate instance declaration
```
(* Title:      Library/Euclidean_Space
ID:         \$Id:
Author:     Amine Chaieb, University of Cambridge
*)

header {* (Real) Vectors in Euclidean space, and elementary linear algebra.*}

theory Euclidean_Space
imports "~~/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order" Complex_Main
Finite_Cartesian_Product Glbs Infinite_Set Numeral_Type
Inner_Product
uses ("normarith.ML")
begin

text{* Some common special cases.*}

lemma forall_1: "(\<forall>(i::'a::{order,one}). 1 <= i \<and> i <= 1 --> P i) \<longleftrightarrow> P 1"
by (metis order_eq_iff)
lemma forall_dimindex_1: "(\<forall>i \<in> {1..dimindex(UNIV:: 1 set)}. P i) \<longleftrightarrow> P 1"

lemma forall_2: "(\<forall>(i::nat). 1 <= i \<and> i <= 2 --> P i) \<longleftrightarrow> P 1 \<and> P 2"
proof-
have "\<And>i::nat. 1 <= i \<and> i <= 2 \<longleftrightarrow> i = 1 \<or> i = 2" by arith
thus ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma forall_3: "(\<forall>(i::nat). 1 <= i \<and> i <= 3 --> P i) \<longleftrightarrow> P 1 \<and> P 2 \<and> P 3"
proof-
have "\<And>i::nat. 1 <= i \<and> i <= 3 \<longleftrightarrow> i = 1 \<or> i = 2 \<or> i = 3" by arith
thus ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma setsum_singleton[simp]: "setsum f {x} = f x" by simp
lemma setsum_1: "setsum f {(1::'a::{order,one})..1} = f 1"

lemma setsum_2: "setsum f {1::nat..2} = f 1 + f 2"

lemma setsum_3: "setsum f {1::nat..3} = f 1 + f 2 + f 3"

subsection{* Basic componentwise operations on vectors. *}

instantiation "^" :: (plus,type) plus
begin
definition  vector_add_def : "op + \<equiv> (\<lambda> x y.  (\<chi> i. (x\$i) + (y\$i)))"
instance ..
end

instantiation "^" :: (times,type) times
begin
definition vector_mult_def : "op * \<equiv> (\<lambda> x y.  (\<chi> i. (x\$i) * (y\$i)))"
instance ..
end

instantiation "^" :: (minus,type) minus begin
definition vector_minus_def : "op - \<equiv> (\<lambda> x y.  (\<chi> i. (x\$i) - (y\$i)))"
instance ..
end

instantiation "^" :: (uminus,type) uminus begin
definition vector_uminus_def : "uminus \<equiv> (\<lambda> x.  (\<chi> i. - (x\$i)))"
instance ..
end
instantiation "^" :: (zero,type) zero begin
definition vector_zero_def : "0 \<equiv> (\<chi> i. 0)"
instance ..
end

instantiation "^" :: (one,type) one begin
definition vector_one_def : "1 \<equiv> (\<chi> i. 1)"
instance ..
end

instantiation "^" :: (ord,type) ord
begin
definition vector_less_eq_def:
"less_eq (x :: 'a ^'b) y = (ALL i : {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'b set)}.
x\$i <= y\$i)"
definition vector_less_def: "less (x :: 'a ^'b) y = (ALL i : {1 ..
dimindex (UNIV :: 'b set)}. x\$i < y\$i)"

instance by (intro_classes)
end

instantiation "^" :: (scaleR, type) scaleR
begin
definition vector_scaleR_def: "scaleR = (\<lambda> r x.  (\<chi> i. scaleR r (x\$i)))"
instance ..
end

text{* Also the scalar-vector multiplication. *}

definition vector_scalar_mult:: "'a::times \<Rightarrow> 'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'n" (infixr "*s" 75)
where "c *s x = (\<chi> i. c * (x\$i))"

text{* Constant Vectors *}

definition "vec x = (\<chi> i. x)"

text{* Dot products. *}

definition dot :: "'a::{comm_monoid_add, times} ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> 'a" (infix "\<bullet>" 70) where
"x \<bullet> y = setsum (\<lambda>i. x\$i * y\$i) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV:: 'n set)}"
lemma dot_1[simp]: "(x::'a::{comm_monoid_add, times}^1) \<bullet> y = (x\$1) * (y\$1)"

lemma dot_2[simp]: "(x::'a::{comm_monoid_add, times}^2) \<bullet> y = (x\$1) * (y\$1) + (x\$2) * (y\$2)"
by (simp add: dot_def dimindex_def nat_number)

lemma dot_3[simp]: "(x::'a::{comm_monoid_add, times}^3) \<bullet> y = (x\$1) * (y\$1) + (x\$2) * (y\$2) + (x\$3) * (y\$3)"
by (simp add: dot_def dimindex_def nat_number)

subsection {* A naive proof procedure to lift really trivial arithmetic stuff from the basis of the vector space. *}

lemmas Cart_lambda_beta' = Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format]
method_setup vector = {*
let
@{thm setsum_subtractf} RS sym, @{thm setsum_right_distrib},
@{thm setsum_left_distrib}, @{thm setsum_negf} RS sym]
@{thm vector_minus_def}, @{thm vector_uminus_def},
@{thm vector_one_def}, @{thm vector_zero_def}, @{thm vec_def},
@{thm vector_scaleR_def},
@{thm Cart_lambda_beta'}, @{thm vector_scalar_mult_def}]
fun vector_arith_tac ths =
simp_tac ss1
THEN' (fn i => rtac @{thm setsum_cong2} i
ORELSE rtac @{thm setsum_0'} i
ORELSE simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [@{thm "Cart_eq"}]) i)
(* THEN' TRY o clarify_tac HOL_cs  THEN' (TRY o rtac @{thm iffI}) *)
in
Method.thms_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o vector_arith_tac)
end
*} "Lifts trivial vector statements to real arith statements"

lemma vec_0[simp]: "vec 0 = 0" by (vector vector_zero_def)
lemma vec_1[simp]: "vec 1 = 1" by (vector vector_one_def)

text{* Obvious "component-pushing". *}

lemma vec_component: " i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} \<Longrightarrow> (vec x :: 'a ^ 'n)\$i = x"
by (vector vec_def)

fixes x y :: "'a::{plus} ^ 'n"  assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(x + y)\$i = x\$i + y\$i"
using i by vector

lemma vector_minus_component:
fixes x y :: "'a::{minus} ^ 'n"  assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(x - y)\$i = x\$i - y\$i"
using i  by vector

lemma vector_mult_component:
fixes x y :: "'a::{times} ^ 'n"  assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(x * y)\$i = x\$i * y\$i"
using i by vector

lemma vector_smult_component:
fixes y :: "'a::{times} ^ 'n"  assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(c *s y)\$i = c * (y\$i)"
using i by vector

lemma vector_uminus_component:
fixes x :: "'a::{uminus} ^ 'n"  assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(- x)\$i = - (x\$i)"
using i by vector

lemma vector_scaleR_component:
fixes x :: "'a::scaleR ^ 'n"
assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "(scaleR r x)\$i = scaleR r (x\$i)"
using i by vector

lemma cond_component: "(if b then x else y)\$i = (if b then x\$i else y\$i)" by vector

lemmas vector_component =
vector_smult_component vector_minus_component vector_uminus_component
vector_scaleR_component cond_component

subsection {* Some frequently useful arithmetic lemmas over vectors. *}

apply (intro_classes) by vector+

apply (intro_classes) by (vector algebra_simps)+

apply (intro_classes) by vector

apply (intro_classes) by vector+

apply (intro_classes)
by (vector Cart_eq)+

apply (intro_classes)
by (vector Cart_eq)

instance "^" :: (real_vector, type) real_vector
by default (vector scaleR_left_distrib scaleR_right_distrib)+

instance "^" :: (semigroup_mult,type) semigroup_mult
apply (intro_classes) by (vector mult_assoc)

instance "^" :: (monoid_mult,type) monoid_mult
apply (intro_classes) by vector+

instance "^" :: (ab_semigroup_mult,type) ab_semigroup_mult
apply (intro_classes) by (vector mult_commute)

instance "^" :: (ab_semigroup_idem_mult,type) ab_semigroup_idem_mult
apply (intro_classes) by (vector mult_idem)

instance "^" :: (comm_monoid_mult,type) comm_monoid_mult
apply (intro_classes) by vector

fun vector_power :: "('a::{one,times} ^'n) \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n" where
"vector_power x 0 = 1"
| "vector_power x (Suc n) = x * vector_power x n"

instantiation "^" :: (recpower,type) recpower
begin
definition vec_power_def: "op ^ \<equiv> vector_power"
instance
apply (intro_classes) by (simp_all add: vec_power_def)
end

instance "^" :: (semiring,type) semiring
apply (intro_classes) by (vector ring_simps)+

instance "^" :: (semiring_0,type) semiring_0
apply (intro_classes) by (vector ring_simps)+
instance "^" :: (semiring_1,type) semiring_1
apply (intro_classes) apply vector using dimindex_ge_1 by auto
instance "^" :: (comm_semiring,type) comm_semiring
apply (intro_classes) by (vector ring_simps)+

instance "^" :: (comm_semiring_0,type) comm_semiring_0 by (intro_classes)
instance "^" :: (semiring_0_cancel,type) semiring_0_cancel by (intro_classes)
instance "^" :: (comm_semiring_0_cancel,type) comm_semiring_0_cancel by (intro_classes)
instance "^" :: (ring,type) ring by (intro_classes)
instance "^" :: (semiring_1_cancel,type) semiring_1_cancel by (intro_classes)
instance "^" :: (comm_semiring_1,type) comm_semiring_1 by (intro_classes)

instance "^" :: (ring_1,type) ring_1 ..

instance "^" :: (real_algebra,type) real_algebra
apply intro_classes
apply vector
apply vector
done

instance "^" :: (real_algebra_1,type) real_algebra_1 ..

lemma of_nat_index:
"i\<in>{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} \<Longrightarrow> (of_nat n :: 'a::semiring_1 ^'n)\$i = of_nat n"
apply (induct n)
apply vector
apply vector
done
lemma zero_index[simp]:
"i\<in>{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} \<Longrightarrow> (0 :: 'a::zero ^'n)\$i = 0" by vector

lemma one_index[simp]:
"i\<in>{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} \<Longrightarrow> (1 :: 'a::one ^'n)\$i = 1" by vector

lemma one_plus_of_nat_neq_0: "(1::'a::semiring_char_0) + of_nat n \<noteq> 0"
proof-
have "(1::'a) + of_nat n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> of_nat 1 + of_nat n = (of_nat 0 :: 'a)" by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> 1 + n = 0" by (simp only: of_nat_add[symmetric] of_nat_eq_iff)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed

instance "^" :: (semiring_char_0,type) semiring_char_0
proof (intro_classes)
fix m n ::nat
show "(of_nat m :: 'a^'b) = of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> m = n"
proof(induct m arbitrary: n)
case 0 thus ?case apply vector
apply (induct n,auto simp add: ring_simps)
using dimindex_ge_1 apply auto
apply vector
by (auto simp add: of_nat_index one_plus_of_nat_neq_0)
next
case (Suc n m)
thus ?case  apply vector
apply (induct m, auto simp add: ring_simps of_nat_index zero_index)
using dimindex_ge_1 apply simp apply blast
using dimindex_ge_1 apply simp apply blast
apply (simp add: vector_component one_index of_nat_index)
apply (simp only: of_nat.simps(2)[where ?'a = 'a, symmetric] of_nat_eq_iff)
using  dimindex_ge_1 apply simp apply blast
apply (simp add: vector_component one_index of_nat_index)
apply (simp only: of_nat.simps(2)[where ?'a = 'a, symmetric] of_nat_eq_iff)
using dimindex_ge_1 apply simp apply blast
apply (simp add: vector_component one_index of_nat_index)
done
qed
qed

instance "^" :: (comm_ring_1,type) comm_ring_1 by intro_classes
instance "^" :: (ring_char_0,type) ring_char_0 by intro_classes

lemma vector_smult_assoc: "a *s (b *s x) = ((a::'a::semigroup_mult) * b) *s x"
by (vector mult_assoc)
lemma vector_sadd_rdistrib: "((a::'a::semiring) + b) *s x = a *s x + b *s x"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma vector_add_ldistrib: "(c::'a::semiring) *s (x + y) = c *s x + c *s y"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma vector_smult_lzero[simp]: "(0::'a::mult_zero) *s x = 0" by vector
lemma vector_smult_lid[simp]: "(1::'a::monoid_mult) *s x = x" by vector
lemma vector_ssub_ldistrib: "(c::'a::ring) *s (x - y) = c *s x - c *s y"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma vector_smult_rneg: "(c::'a::ring) *s -x = -(c *s x)" by vector
lemma vector_smult_lneg: "- (c::'a::ring) *s x = -(c *s x)" by vector
lemma vector_sneg_minus1: "-x = (- (1::'a::ring_1)) *s x" by vector
lemma vector_smult_rzero[simp]: "c *s 0 = (0::'a::mult_zero ^ 'n)" by vector
lemma vector_sub_rdistrib: "((a::'a::ring) - b) *s x = a *s x - b *s x"
by (vector ring_simps)

lemma vec_eq[simp]: "(vec m = vec n) \<longleftrightarrow> (m = n)"
apply (auto simp add: vec_def Cart_eq vec_component Cart_lambda_beta )
using dimindex_ge_1 apply auto done

subsection {* Square root of sum of squares *}

definition
"setL2 f A = sqrt (\<Sum>i\<in>A. (f i)\<twosuperior>)"

lemma setL2_cong:
"\<lbrakk>A = B; \<And>x. x \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A = setL2 g B"
unfolding setL2_def by simp

lemma strong_setL2_cong:
"\<lbrakk>A = B; \<And>x. x \<in> B =simp=> f x = g x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A = setL2 g B"
unfolding setL2_def simp_implies_def by simp

lemma setL2_infinite [simp]: "\<not> finite A \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A = 0"
unfolding setL2_def by simp

lemma setL2_empty [simp]: "setL2 f {} = 0"
unfolding setL2_def by simp

lemma setL2_insert [simp]:
"\<lbrakk>finite F; a \<notin> F\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
setL2 f (insert a F) = sqrt ((f a)\<twosuperior> + (setL2 f F)\<twosuperior>)"
unfolding setL2_def by (simp add: setsum_nonneg)

lemma setL2_nonneg [simp]: "0 \<le> setL2 f A"
unfolding setL2_def by (simp add: setsum_nonneg)

lemma setL2_0': "\<forall>a\<in>A. f a = 0 \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A = 0"
unfolding setL2_def by simp

lemma setL2_mono:
assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> K \<Longrightarrow> f i \<le> g i"
assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> K \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> f i"
shows "setL2 f K \<le> setL2 g K"
unfolding setL2_def
by (simp add: setsum_nonneg setsum_mono power_mono prems)

lemma setL2_right_distrib:
"0 \<le> r \<Longrightarrow> r * setL2 f A = setL2 (\<lambda>x. r * f x) A"
unfolding setL2_def
done

lemma setL2_left_distrib:
"0 \<le> r \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A * r = setL2 (\<lambda>x. f x * r) A"
unfolding setL2_def
done

lemma setsum_nonneg_eq_0_iff:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::pordered_ab_group_add"
shows "\<lbrakk>finite A; \<forall>x\<in>A. 0 \<le> f x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setsum f A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. f x = 0)"
apply (induct set: finite, simp)
done

lemma setL2_eq_0_iff: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> setL2 f A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. f x = 0)"
unfolding setL2_def

lemma setL2_triangle_ineq:
shows "setL2 (\<lambda>i. f i + g i) A \<le> setL2 f A + setL2 g A"
proof (cases "finite A")
case False
thus ?thesis by simp
next
case True
thus ?thesis
proof (induct set: finite)
case empty
show ?case by simp
next
case (insert x F)
hence "sqrt ((f x + g x)\<twosuperior> + (setL2 (\<lambda>i. f i + g i) F)\<twosuperior>) \<le>
sqrt ((f x + g x)\<twosuperior> + (setL2 f F + setL2 g F)\<twosuperior>)"
by (intro real_sqrt_le_mono add_left_mono power_mono insert
also have
"\<dots> \<le> sqrt ((f x)\<twosuperior> + (setL2 f F)\<twosuperior>) + sqrt ((g x)\<twosuperior> + (setL2 g F)\<twosuperior>)"
by (rule real_sqrt_sum_squares_triangle_ineq)
finally show ?case
using insert by simp
qed
qed

lemma sqrt_sum_squares_le_sum:
"\<lbrakk>0 \<le> x; 0 \<le> y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> sqrt (x\<twosuperior> + y\<twosuperior>) \<le> x + y"
apply (rule power2_le_imp_le)
done

lemma setL2_le_setsum [rule_format]:
"(\<forall>i\<in>A. 0 \<le> f i) \<longrightarrow> setL2 f A \<le> setsum f A"
apply (cases "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
apply simp
apply clarsimp
apply (erule order_trans [OF sqrt_sum_squares_le_sum])
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp
done

lemma sqrt_sum_squares_le_sum_abs: "sqrt (x\<twosuperior> + y\<twosuperior>) \<le> \<bar>x\<bar> + \<bar>y\<bar>"
apply (rule power2_le_imp_le)
done

lemma setL2_le_setsum_abs: "setL2 f A \<le> (\<Sum>i\<in>A. \<bar>f i\<bar>)"
apply (cases "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
apply simp
apply simp
apply (rule order_trans [OF sqrt_sum_squares_le_sum_abs])
apply simp
apply simp
done

lemma setL2_mult_ineq_lemma:
fixes a b c d :: real
shows "2 * (a * c) * (b * d) \<le> a\<twosuperior> * d\<twosuperior> + b\<twosuperior> * c\<twosuperior>"
proof -
have "0 \<le> (a * d - b * c)\<twosuperior>" by simp
also have "\<dots> = a\<twosuperior> * d\<twosuperior> + b\<twosuperior> * c\<twosuperior> - 2 * (a * d) * (b * c)"
by (simp only: power2_diff power_mult_distrib)
also have "\<dots> = a\<twosuperior> * d\<twosuperior> + b\<twosuperior> * c\<twosuperior> - 2 * (a * c) * (b * d)"
by simp
finally show "2 * (a * c) * (b * d) \<le> a\<twosuperior> * d\<twosuperior> + b\<twosuperior> * c\<twosuperior>"
by simp
qed

lemma setL2_mult_ineq: "(\<Sum>i\<in>A. \<bar>f i\<bar> * \<bar>g i\<bar>) \<le> setL2 f A * setL2 g A"
apply (cases "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
apply simp
apply (rule power2_le_imp_le, simp)
apply (rule order_trans)
apply (rule power_mono)
apply (rule ord_le_eq_trans)
apply (rule setL2_mult_ineq_lemma)
apply simp
apply (intro mult_nonneg_nonneg setL2_nonneg)
apply simp
done

lemma member_le_setL2: "\<lbrakk>finite A; i \<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i \<le> setL2 f A"
apply (rule_tac s="insert i (A - {i})" and t="A" in subst)
apply fast
apply (subst setL2_insert)
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp
done

subsection {* Norms *}

instantiation "^" :: (real_normed_vector, type) real_normed_vector
begin

definition vector_norm_def:
"norm (x::'a^'b) = setL2 (\<lambda>i. norm (x\$i)) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV:: 'b set)}"

definition vector_sgn_def:
"sgn (x::'a^'b) = scaleR (inverse (norm x)) x"

instance proof
fix a :: real and x y :: "'a ^ 'b"
show "0 \<le> norm x"
unfolding vector_norm_def
by (rule setL2_nonneg)
show "norm x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"
unfolding vector_norm_def
show "norm (x + y) \<le> norm x + norm y"
unfolding vector_norm_def
apply (rule order_trans [OF _ setL2_triangle_ineq])
apply (rule setL2_mono)
apply simp
done
show "norm (scaleR a x) = \<bar>a\<bar> * norm x"
unfolding vector_norm_def
by (simp add: vector_component norm_scaleR setL2_right_distrib
cong: strong_setL2_cong)
show "sgn x = scaleR (inverse (norm x)) x"
by (rule vector_sgn_def)
qed

end

subsection {* Inner products *}

instantiation "^" :: (real_inner, type) real_inner
begin

definition vector_inner_def:
"inner x y = setsum (\<lambda>i. inner (x\$i) (y\$i)) {1 .. dimindex(UNIV::'b set)}"

instance proof
fix r :: real and x y z :: "'a ^ 'b"
show "inner x y = inner y x"
unfolding vector_inner_def
show "inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z"
unfolding vector_inner_def
by (vector inner_left_distrib)
show "inner (scaleR r x) y = r * inner x y"
unfolding vector_inner_def
by (vector inner_scaleR_left)
show "0 \<le> inner x x"
unfolding vector_inner_def
show "inner x x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"
unfolding vector_inner_def
show "norm x = sqrt (inner x x)"
unfolding vector_inner_def vector_norm_def setL2_def
qed

end

subsection{* Properties of the dot product.  *}

lemma dot_sym: "(x::'a:: {comm_monoid_add, ab_semigroup_mult} ^ 'n) \<bullet> y = y \<bullet> x"
by (vector mult_commute)
lemma dot_ladd: "((x::'a::ring ^ 'n) + y) \<bullet> z = (x \<bullet> z) + (y \<bullet> z)"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_radd: "x \<bullet> (y + (z::'a::ring ^ 'n)) = (x \<bullet> y) + (x \<bullet> z)"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_lsub: "((x::'a::ring ^ 'n) - y) \<bullet> z = (x \<bullet> z) - (y \<bullet> z)"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_rsub: "(x::'a::ring ^ 'n) \<bullet> (y - z) = (x \<bullet> y) - (x \<bullet> z)"
by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_lmult: "(c *s x) \<bullet> y = (c::'a::ring) * (x \<bullet> y)" by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_rmult: "x \<bullet> (c *s y) = (c::'a::comm_ring) * (x \<bullet> y)" by (vector ring_simps)
lemma dot_lneg: "(-x) \<bullet> (y::'a::ring ^ 'n) = -(x \<bullet> y)" by vector
lemma dot_rneg: "(x::'a::ring ^ 'n) \<bullet> (-y) = -(x \<bullet> y)" by vector
lemma dot_lzero[simp]: "0 \<bullet> x = (0::'a::{comm_monoid_add, mult_zero})" by vector
lemma dot_rzero[simp]: "x \<bullet> 0 = (0::'a::{comm_monoid_add, mult_zero})" by vector
lemma dot_pos_le[simp]: "(0::'a\<Colon>ordered_ring_strict) <= x \<bullet> x"

lemma setsum_squares_eq_0_iff: assumes fS: "finite F" and fp: "\<forall>x \<in> F. f x \<ge> (0 ::'a::pordered_ab_group_add)" shows "setsum f F = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (ALL x:F. f x = 0)"
using fS fp setsum_nonneg[OF fp]
proof (induct set: finite)
case empty thus ?case by simp
next
case (insert x F)
from insert.prems have Fx: "f x \<ge> 0" and Fp: "\<forall> a \<in> F. f a \<ge> 0" by simp_all
from insert.hyps Fp setsum_nonneg[OF Fp]
have h: "setsum f F = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>a \<in>F. f a = 0)" by metis
from sum_nonneg_eq_zero_iff[OF Fx  setsum_nonneg[OF Fp]] insert.hyps(1,2)
show ?case by (simp add: h)
qed

lemma dot_eq_0: "x \<bullet> x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (x::'a::{ordered_ring_strict,ring_no_zero_divisors} ^ 'n) = 0"
proof-
{assume f: "finite (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?S = "{Suc 0 .. card (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
have fS: "finite ?S" using f by simp
have fp: "\<forall> i\<in> ?S. x\$i * x\$i>= 0" by simp
have ?thesis by (vector dimindex_def f setsum_squares_eq_0_iff[OF fS fp])}
moreover
{assume "\<not> finite (UNIV :: 'n set)" then have ?thesis by (vector dimindex_def)}
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma dot_pos_lt: "(0 < x \<bullet> x) \<longleftrightarrow> (x::'a::{ordered_ring_strict,ring_no_zero_divisors} ^ 'n) \<noteq> 0" using dot_eq_0[of x] dot_pos_le[of x]

subsection{* The collapse of the general concepts to dimension one. *}

lemma vector_one: "(x::'a ^1) = (\<chi> i. (x\$1))"
by (vector dimindex_def)

lemma forall_one: "(\<forall>(x::'a ^1). P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P(\<chi> i. x))"
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x= "x\$1" in allE)
apply (simp only: vector_one[symmetric])
done

lemma norm_vector_1: "norm (x :: _^1) = norm (x\$1)"

lemma norm_real: "norm(x::real ^ 1) = abs(x\$1)"

text{* Metric *}

text {* FIXME: generalize to arbitrary @{text real_normed_vector} types *}
definition dist:: "real ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> real" where
"dist x y = norm (x - y)"

lemma dist_real: "dist(x::real ^ 1) y = abs((x\$1) - (y\$1))"
using dimindex_ge_1[of "UNIV :: 1 set"]
by (auto simp add: norm_real dist_def vector_component Cart_lambda_beta[where ?'a = "1"] )

subsection {* A connectedness or intermediate value lemma with several applications. *}

lemma connected_real_lemma:
fixes f :: "real \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'n"
assumes ab: "a \<le> b" and fa: "f a \<in> e1" and fb: "f b \<in> e2"
and dst: "\<And>e x. a <= x \<Longrightarrow> x <= b \<Longrightarrow> 0 < e ==> \<exists>d > 0. \<forall>y. abs(y - x) < d \<longrightarrow> dist(f y) (f x) < e"
and e1: "\<forall>y \<in> e1. \<exists>e > 0. \<forall>y'. dist y' y < e \<longrightarrow> y' \<in> e1"
and e2: "\<forall>y \<in> e2. \<exists>e > 0. \<forall>y'. dist y' y < e \<longrightarrow> y' \<in> e2"
and e12: "~(\<exists>x \<ge> a. x <= b \<and> f x \<in> e1 \<and> f x \<in> e2)"
shows "\<exists>x \<ge> a. x <= b \<and> f x \<notin> e1 \<and> f x \<notin> e2" (is "\<exists> x. ?P x")
proof-
let ?S = "{c. \<forall>x \<ge> a. x <= c \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> e1}"
have Se: " \<exists>x. x \<in> ?S" apply (rule exI[where x=a]) by (auto simp add: fa)
have Sub: "\<exists>y. isUb UNIV ?S y"
apply (rule exI[where x= b])
using ab fb e12 by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)
from reals_complete[OF Se Sub] obtain l where
l: "isLub UNIV ?S l"by blast
have alb: "a \<le> l" "l \<le> b" using l ab fa fb e12
apply (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def isUb_def setle_def setge_def)
by (metis linorder_linear)
have ale1: "\<forall>z \<ge> a. z < l \<longrightarrow> f z \<in> e1" using l
apply (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def isUb_def setle_def setge_def)
by (metis linorder_linear not_le)
have th1: "\<And>z x e d :: real. z <= x + e \<Longrightarrow> e < d ==> z < x \<or> abs(z - x) < d" by arith
have th2: "\<And>e x:: real. 0 < e ==> ~(x + e <= x)" by arith
have th3: "\<And>d::real. d > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>e > 0. e < d" by dlo
{assume le2: "f l \<in> e2"
from le2 fa fb e12 alb have la: "l \<noteq> a" by metis
hence lap: "l - a > 0" using alb by arith
from e2[rule_format, OF le2] obtain e where
e: "e > 0" "\<forall>y. dist y (f l) < e \<longrightarrow> y \<in> e2" by metis
from dst[OF alb e(1)] obtain d where
d: "d > 0" "\<forall>y. \<bar>y - l\<bar> < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f y) (f l) < e" by metis
have "\<exists>d'. d' < d \<and> d' >0 \<and> l - d' > a" using lap d(1)
apply ferrack by arith
then obtain d' where d': "d' > 0" "d' < d" "l - d' > a" by metis
from d e have th0: "\<forall>y. \<bar>y - l\<bar> < d \<longrightarrow> f y \<in> e2" by metis
from th0[rule_format, of "l - d'"] d' have "f (l - d') \<in> e2" by auto
moreover
have "f (l - d') \<in> e1" using ale1[rule_format, of "l -d'"] d' by auto
ultimately have False using e12 alb d' by auto}
moreover
{assume le1: "f l \<in> e1"
from le1 fa fb e12 alb have lb: "l \<noteq> b" by metis
hence blp: "b - l > 0" using alb by arith
from e1[rule_format, OF le1] obtain e where
e: "e > 0" "\<forall>y. dist y (f l) < e \<longrightarrow> y \<in> e1" by metis
from dst[OF alb e(1)] obtain d where
d: "d > 0" "\<forall>y. \<bar>y - l\<bar> < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f y) (f l) < e" by metis
have "\<exists>d'. d' < d \<and> d' >0" using d(1) by dlo
then obtain d' where d': "d' > 0" "d' < d" by metis
from d e have th0: "\<forall>y. \<bar>y - l\<bar> < d \<longrightarrow> f y \<in> e1" by auto
hence "\<forall>y. l \<le> y \<and> y \<le> l + d' \<longrightarrow> f y \<in> e1" using d' by auto
with ale1 have "\<forall>y. a \<le> y \<and> y \<le> l + d' \<longrightarrow> f y \<in> e1" by auto
with l d' have False
by (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def setle_def setge_def leastP_def) }
ultimately show ?thesis using alb by metis
qed

text{* One immediately useful corollary is the existence of square roots! --- Should help to get rid of all the development of square-root for reals as a special case @{typ "real^1"} *}

lemma square_bound_lemma: "(x::real) < (1 + x) * (1 + x)"
proof-
have "(x + 1/2)^2 + 3/4 > 0" using zero_le_power2[of "x+1/2"] by arith
thus ?thesis by (simp add: ring_simps power2_eq_square)
qed

lemma square_continuous: "0 < (e::real) ==> \<exists>d. 0 < d \<and> (\<forall>y. abs(y - x) < d \<longrightarrow> abs(y * y - x * x) < e)"
using isCont_power[OF isCont_ident, of 2, unfolded isCont_def LIM_def, rule_format, of e x] apply (auto simp add: power2_eq_square)
apply (rule_tac x="s" in exI)
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x=y in allE)
apply auto
done

lemma real_le_lsqrt: "0 <= x \<Longrightarrow> 0 <= y \<Longrightarrow> x <= y^2 ==> sqrt x <= y"
using real_sqrt_le_iff[of x "y^2"] by simp

lemma real_le_rsqrt: "x^2 \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> sqrt y"
using real_sqrt_le_mono[of "x^2" y] by simp

lemma real_less_rsqrt: "x^2 < y \<Longrightarrow> x < sqrt y"
using real_sqrt_less_mono[of "x^2" y] by simp

lemma sqrt_even_pow2: assumes n: "even n"
shows "sqrt(2 ^ n) = 2 ^ (n div 2)"
proof-
from n obtain m where m: "n = 2*m" unfolding even_nat_equiv_def2
from m  have "sqrt(2 ^ n) = sqrt ((2 ^ m) ^ 2)"
by (simp only: power_mult[symmetric] mult_commute)
then show ?thesis  using m by simp
qed

lemma real_div_sqrt: "0 <= x ==> x / sqrt(x) = sqrt(x)"
apply (cases "x = 0", simp_all)
using sqrt_divide_self_eq[of x]
apply (simp add: inverse_eq_divide real_sqrt_ge_0_iff field_simps)
done

text{* Hence derive more interesting properties of the norm. *}

lemma norm_0: "norm (0::real ^ 'n) = 0"
by (rule norm_zero)

lemma norm_mul: "norm(a *s x) = abs(a) * norm x"
by (simp add: vector_norm_def vector_component setL2_right_distrib
abs_mult cong: strong_setL2_cong)
lemma norm_eq_0_dot: "(norm x = 0) \<longleftrightarrow> (x \<bullet> x = (0::real))"
by (simp add: vector_norm_def dot_def setL2_def power2_eq_square)
lemma real_vector_norm_def: "norm x = sqrt (x \<bullet> x)"
by (simp add: vector_norm_def setL2_def dot_def power2_eq_square)
lemma norm_pow_2: "norm x ^ 2 = x \<bullet> x"
lemma norm_eq_0_imp: "norm x = 0 ==> x = (0::real ^'n)" by (metis norm_eq_zero)
lemma vector_mul_eq_0: "(a *s x = 0) \<longleftrightarrow> a = (0::'a::idom) \<or> x = 0"
by vector
lemma vector_mul_lcancel: "a *s x = a *s y \<longleftrightarrow> a = (0::real) \<or> x = y"
by (metis eq_iff_diff_eq_0 vector_mul_eq_0 vector_ssub_ldistrib)
lemma vector_mul_rcancel: "a *s x = b *s x \<longleftrightarrow> (a::real) = b \<or> x = 0"
by (metis eq_iff_diff_eq_0 vector_mul_eq_0 vector_sub_rdistrib)
lemma vector_mul_lcancel_imp: "a \<noteq> (0::real) ==>  a *s x = a *s y ==> (x = y)"
by (metis vector_mul_lcancel)
lemma vector_mul_rcancel_imp: "x \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> (a::real) *s x = b *s x ==> a = b"
by (metis vector_mul_rcancel)
lemma norm_cauchy_schwarz: "x \<bullet> y <= norm x * norm y"
proof-
{assume "norm x = 0"
hence ?thesis by (simp add: dot_lzero dot_rzero)}
moreover
{assume "norm y = 0"
hence ?thesis by (simp add: dot_lzero dot_rzero)}
moreover
{assume h: "norm x \<noteq> 0" "norm y \<noteq> 0"
let ?z = "norm y *s x - norm x *s y"
from h have p: "norm x * norm y > 0" by (metis norm_ge_zero le_less zero_compare_simps)
from dot_pos_le[of ?z]
have "(norm x * norm y) * (x \<bullet> y) \<le> norm x ^2 * norm y ^2"
apply (simp add: dot_rsub dot_lsub dot_lmult dot_rmult ring_simps)
by (simp add: norm_pow_2[symmetric] power2_eq_square dot_sym)
hence "x\<bullet>y \<le> (norm x ^2 * norm y ^2) / (norm x * norm y)" using p
hence ?thesis using h by (simp add: power2_eq_square)}
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma norm_cauchy_schwarz_abs: "\<bar>x \<bullet> y\<bar> \<le> norm x * norm y"
using norm_cauchy_schwarz[of x y] norm_cauchy_schwarz[of x "-y"]

lemma norm_triangle_sub: "norm (x::real ^'n) <= norm(y) + norm(x - y)"
using norm_triangle_ineq[of "y" "x - y"] by (simp add: ring_simps)
lemma norm_triangle_le: "norm(x::real ^'n) + norm y <= e ==> norm(x + y) <= e"
by (metis order_trans norm_triangle_ineq)
lemma norm_triangle_lt: "norm(x::real ^'n) + norm(y) < e ==> norm(x + y) < e"
by (metis basic_trans_rules(21) norm_triangle_ineq)

lemma setsum_delta:
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "setsum (\<lambda>k. if k=a then b k else 0) S = (if a \<in> S then b a else 0)"
proof-
let ?f = "(\<lambda>k. if k=a then b k else 0)"
{assume a: "a \<notin> S"
hence "\<forall> k\<in> S. ?f k = 0" by simp
hence ?thesis  using a by simp}
moreover
{assume a: "a \<in> S"
let ?A = "S - {a}"
let ?B = "{a}"
have eq: "S = ?A \<union> ?B" using a by blast
have dj: "?A \<inter> ?B = {}" by simp
from fS have fAB: "finite ?A" "finite ?B" by auto
have "setsum ?f S = setsum ?f ?A + setsum ?f ?B"
using setsum_Un_disjoint[OF fAB dj, of ?f, unfolded eq[symmetric]]
by simp
then have ?thesis  using a by simp}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma component_le_norm: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)} ==> \<bar>x\$i\<bar> <= norm (x::real ^ 'n)"
apply (rule member_le_setL2, simp_all)
done

lemma norm_bound_component_le: "norm(x::real ^ 'n) <= e
==> \<forall>i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}. \<bar>x\$i\<bar> <= e"
by (metis component_le_norm order_trans)

lemma norm_bound_component_lt: "norm(x::real ^ 'n) < e
==> \<forall>i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}. \<bar>x\$i\<bar> < e"
by (metis component_le_norm basic_trans_rules(21))

lemma norm_le_l1: "norm (x:: real ^'n) <= setsum(\<lambda>i. \<bar>x\$i\<bar>) {1..dimindex(UNIV::'n set)}"

lemma real_abs_norm: "\<bar> norm x\<bar> = norm (x :: real ^'n)"
by (rule abs_norm_cancel)
lemma real_abs_sub_norm: "\<bar>norm(x::real ^'n) - norm y\<bar> <= norm(x - y)"
by (rule norm_triangle_ineq3)
lemma norm_le: "norm(x::real ^ 'n) <= norm(y) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<bullet> x <= y \<bullet> y"
lemma norm_lt: "norm(x::real ^'n) < norm(y) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<bullet> x < y \<bullet> y"
lemma norm_eq: "norm (x::real ^'n) = norm y \<longleftrightarrow> x \<bullet> x = y \<bullet> y"
lemma norm_eq_1: "norm(x::real ^ 'n) = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> x \<bullet> x = 1"

text{* Squaring equations and inequalities involving norms.  *}

lemma dot_square_norm: "x \<bullet> x = norm(x)^2"
by (simp add: real_vector_norm_def  dot_pos_le )

lemma norm_eq_square: "norm(x) = a \<longleftrightarrow> 0 <= a \<and> x \<bullet> x = a^2"

lemma real_abs_le_square_iff: "\<bar>x\<bar> \<le> \<bar>y\<bar> \<longleftrightarrow> (x::real)^2 \<le> y^2"
proof-
have "x^2 \<le> y^2 \<longleftrightarrow> (x -y) * (y + x) \<le> 0" by (simp add: ring_simps power2_eq_square)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> \<bar>x\<bar> \<le> \<bar>y\<bar>" apply (simp add: zero_compare_simps real_abs_def not_less) by arith
finally show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma norm_le_square: "norm(x) <= a \<longleftrightarrow> 0 <= a \<and> x \<bullet> x <= a^2"
using norm_ge_zero[of x]
apply arith
done

lemma norm_ge_square: "norm(x) >= a \<longleftrightarrow> a <= 0 \<or> x \<bullet> x >= a ^ 2"
using norm_ge_zero[of x]
apply arith
done

lemma norm_lt_square: "norm(x) < a \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < a \<and> x \<bullet> x < a^2"
by (metis not_le norm_ge_square)
lemma norm_gt_square: "norm(x) > a \<longleftrightarrow> a < 0 \<or> x \<bullet> x > a^2"
by (metis norm_le_square not_less)

text{* Dot product in terms of the norm rather than conversely. *}

lemma dot_norm: "x \<bullet> y = (norm(x + y) ^2 - norm x ^ 2 - norm y ^ 2) / 2"

lemma dot_norm_neg: "x \<bullet> y = ((norm x ^ 2 + norm y ^ 2) - norm(x - y) ^ 2) / 2"

text{* Equality of vectors in terms of @{term "op \<bullet>"} products.    *}

lemma vector_eq: "(x:: real ^ 'n) = y \<longleftrightarrow> x \<bullet> x = x \<bullet> y\<and> y \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> x" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume "?lhs" then show ?rhs by simp
next
assume ?rhs
then have "x \<bullet> x - x \<bullet> y = 0 \<and> x \<bullet> y - y\<bullet> y = 0" by simp
hence "x \<bullet> (x - y) = 0 \<and> y \<bullet> (x - y) = 0"
by (simp add: dot_rsub dot_lsub dot_sym)
then have "(x - y) \<bullet> (x - y) = 0" by (simp add: ring_simps dot_lsub dot_rsub)
then show "x = y" by (simp add: dot_eq_0)
qed

subsection{* General linear decision procedure for normed spaces. *}

lemma norm_cmul_rule_thm: "b >= norm(x) ==> \<bar>c\<bar> * b >= norm(c *s x)"
apply (rule mult_mono1)
apply simp_all
done

lemma norm_add_rule_thm: "b1 >= norm(x1 :: real ^'n) \<Longrightarrow> b2 >= norm(x2) ==> b1 + b2 >= norm(x1 + x2)"
apply (rule norm_triangle_le) by simp

lemma ge_iff_diff_ge_0: "(a::'a::ordered_ring) \<ge> b == a - b \<ge> 0"

lemma pth_1: "(x::real^'n) == 1 *s x" by (simp only: vector_smult_lid)
lemma pth_2: "x - (y::real^'n) == x + -y" by (atomize (full)) simp
lemma pth_3: "(-x::real^'n) == -1 *s x" by vector
lemma pth_4: "0 *s (x::real^'n) == 0" "c *s 0 = (0::real ^ 'n)" by vector+
lemma pth_5: "c *s (d *s x) == (c * d) *s (x::real ^ 'n)" by (atomize (full)) vector
lemma pth_6: "(c::real) *s (x + y) == c *s x + c *s y" by (atomize (full)) (vector ring_simps)
lemma pth_7: "0 + x == (x::real^'n)" "x + 0 == x" by simp_all
lemma pth_8: "(c::real) *s x + d *s x == (c + d) *s x" by (atomize (full)) (vector ring_simps)
lemma pth_9: "((c::real) *s x + z) + d *s x == (c + d) *s x + z"
"c *s x + (d *s x + z) == (c + d) *s x + z"
"(c *s x + w) + (d *s x + z) == (c + d) *s x + (w + z)" by ((atomize (full)), vector ring_simps)+
lemma pth_a: "(0::real) *s x + y == y" by (atomize (full)) vector
lemma pth_b: "(c::real) *s x + d *s y == c *s x + d *s y"
"(c *s x + z) + d *s y == c *s x + (z + d *s y)"
"c *s x + (d *s y + z) == c *s x + (d *s y + z)"
"(c *s x + w) + (d *s y + z) == c *s x + (w + (d *s y + z))"
by ((atomize (full)), vector)+
lemma pth_c: "(c::real) *s x + d *s y == d *s y + c *s x"
"(c *s x + z) + d *s y == d *s y + (c *s x + z)"
"c *s x + (d *s y + z) == d *s y + (c *s x + z)"
"(c *s x + w) + (d *s y + z) == d *s y + ((c *s x + w) + z)" by ((atomize (full)), vector)+
lemma pth_d: "x + (0::real ^'n) == x" by (atomize (full)) vector

lemma norm_imp_pos_and_ge: "norm (x::real ^ 'n) == n \<Longrightarrow> norm x \<ge> 0 \<and> n \<ge> norm x"
by (atomize) (auto simp add: norm_ge_zero)

lemma real_eq_0_iff_le_ge_0: "(x::real) = 0 == x \<ge> 0 \<and> -x \<ge> 0" by arith

lemma norm_pths:
"(x::real ^'n) = y \<longleftrightarrow> norm (x - y) \<le> 0"
"x \<noteq> y \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (norm (x - y) \<le> 0)"
using norm_ge_zero[of "x - y"] by auto

use "normarith.ML"

method_setup norm = {* Method.ctxt_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o NormArith.norm_arith_tac)
*} "Proves simple linear statements about vector norms"

text{* Hence more metric properties. *}

lemma dist_refl: "dist x x = 0" by norm

lemma dist_sym: "dist x y = dist y x"by norm

lemma dist_pos_le: "0 <= dist x y" by norm

lemma dist_triangle: "dist x z <= dist x y + dist y z" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_alt: "dist y z <= dist x y + dist x z" by norm

lemma dist_eq_0: "dist x y = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = y" by norm

lemma dist_pos_lt: "x \<noteq> y ==> 0 < dist x y" by norm
lemma dist_nz:  "x \<noteq> y \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < dist x y" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_le: "dist x z + dist y z <= e \<Longrightarrow> dist x y <= e" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_lt: "dist x z + dist y z < e ==> dist x y < e" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_half_l: "dist x1 y < e / 2 \<Longrightarrow> dist x2 y < e / 2 ==> dist x1 x2 < e" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_half_r: "dist y x1 < e / 2 \<Longrightarrow> dist y x2 < e / 2 ==> dist x1 x2 < e" by norm

lemma dist_triangle_add: "dist (x + y) (x' + y') <= dist x x' + dist y y'"
by norm

lemma dist_mul: "dist (c *s x) (c *s y) = \<bar>c\<bar> * dist x y"
unfolding dist_def vector_ssub_ldistrib[symmetric] norm_mul ..

lemma dist_triangle_add_half: " dist x x' < e / 2 \<Longrightarrow> dist y y' < e / 2 ==> dist(x + y) (x' + y') < e" by norm

lemma dist_le_0: "dist x y <= 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = y" by norm

lemma setsum_eq: "setsum f S = (\<chi> i. setsum (\<lambda>x. (f x)\$i ) S)"
apply vector
apply auto
apply (cases "finite S")
apply (rule finite_induct[of S])
apply (auto simp add: vector_component zero_index)
done

lemma setsum_clauses:
shows "setsum f {} = 0"
and "finite S \<Longrightarrow> setsum f (insert x S) =
(if x \<in> S then setsum f S else f x + setsum f S)"

lemma setsum_cmul:
fixes f:: "'c \<Rightarrow> ('a::semiring_1)^'n"
shows "setsum (\<lambda>x. c *s f x) S = c *s setsum f S"
by (simp add: setsum_eq Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta vector_component setsum_right_distrib)

lemma setsum_component:
fixes f:: " 'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::semiring_1) ^'n"
assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
shows "(setsum f S)\$i = setsum (\<lambda>x. (f x)\$i) S"
using i by (simp add: setsum_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

(* This needs finiteness assumption due to the definition of fold!!! *)

lemma setsum_superset:
assumes fb: "finite B" and ab: "A \<subseteq> B"
and f0: "\<forall>x \<in> B - A. f x = 0"
shows "setsum f B = setsum f A"
proof-
from ab fb have fa: "finite A" by (metis finite_subset)
from fb have fba: "finite (B - A)" by (metis finite_Diff)
have d: "A \<inter> (B - A) = {}" by blast
from ab have b: "B = A \<union> (B - A)" by blast
from setsum_Un_disjoint[OF fa fba d, of f] b
setsum_0'[OF f0]
show "setsum f B = setsum f A" by simp
qed

lemma setsum_restrict_set:
assumes fA: "finite A"
shows "setsum f (A \<inter> B) = setsum (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> B then f x else 0) A"
proof-
from fA have fab: "finite (A \<inter> B)" by auto
have aba: "A \<inter> B \<subseteq> A" by blast
let ?g = "\<lambda>x. if x \<in> A\<inter>B then f x else 0"
from setsum_superset[OF fA aba, of ?g]
show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma setsum_cases:
assumes fA: "finite A"
shows "setsum (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> B then f x else g x) A =
setsum f (A \<inter> B) + setsum g (A \<inter> - B)"
proof-
have a: "A = A \<inter> B \<union> A \<inter> -B" "(A \<inter> B) \<inter> (A \<inter> -B) = {}"
by blast+
from fA
have f: "finite (A \<inter> B)" "finite (A \<inter> -B)" by auto
let ?g = "\<lambda>x. if x \<in> B then f x else g x"
from setsum_Un_disjoint[OF f a(2), of ?g] a(1)
show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma setsum_norm:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "norm (setsum f S) <= setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S"
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 thus ?case by simp
next
case (2 x S)
from "2.hyps" have "norm (setsum f (insert x S)) \<le> norm (f x) + norm (setsum f S)" by (simp add: norm_triangle_ineq)
also have "\<dots> \<le> norm (f x) + setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S"
using "2.hyps" by simp
finally  show ?case  using "2.hyps" by simp
qed

lemma real_setsum_norm:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "norm (setsum f S) <= setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S"
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 thus ?case by simp
next
case (2 x S)
from "2.hyps" have "norm (setsum f (insert x S)) \<le> norm (f x) + norm (setsum f S)" by (simp add: norm_triangle_ineq)
also have "\<dots> \<le> norm (f x) + setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S"
using "2.hyps" by simp
finally  show ?case  using "2.hyps" by simp
qed

lemma setsum_norm_le:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes fS: "finite S"
and fg: "\<forall>x \<in> S. norm (f x) \<le> g x"
shows "norm (setsum f S) \<le> setsum g S"
proof-
from fg have "setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S <= setsum g S"
by - (rule setsum_mono, simp)
then show ?thesis using setsum_norm[OF fS, of f] fg
by arith
qed

lemma real_setsum_norm_le:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'n"
assumes fS: "finite S"
and fg: "\<forall>x \<in> S. norm (f x) \<le> g x"
shows "norm (setsum f S) \<le> setsum g S"
proof-
from fg have "setsum (\<lambda>x. norm(f x)) S <= setsum g S"
by - (rule setsum_mono, simp)
then show ?thesis using real_setsum_norm[OF fS, of f] fg
by arith
qed

lemma setsum_norm_bound:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes fS: "finite S"
and K: "\<forall>x \<in> S. norm (f x) \<le> K"
shows "norm (setsum f S) \<le> of_nat (card S) * K"
using setsum_norm_le[OF fS K] setsum_constant[symmetric]
by simp

lemma real_setsum_norm_bound:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'n"
assumes fS: "finite S"
and K: "\<forall>x \<in> S. norm (f x) \<le> K"
shows "norm (setsum f S) \<le> of_nat (card S) * K"
using real_setsum_norm_le[OF fS K] setsum_constant[symmetric]
by simp

lemma setsum_vmul:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::{real_normed_vector,semiring, mult_zero}"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "setsum f S *s v = setsum (\<lambda>x. f x *s v) S"
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 then show ?case by (simp add: vector_smult_lzero)
next
case (2 x F)
from "2.hyps" have "setsum f (insert x F) *s v = (f x + setsum f F) *s v"
by simp
also have "\<dots> = f x *s v + setsum f F *s v"
also have "\<dots> = setsum (\<lambda>x. f x *s v) (insert x F)" using "2.hyps" by simp
finally show ?case .
qed

(* FIXME : Problem thm setsum_vmul[of _ "f:: 'a \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"]  ---
Get rid of *s and use real_vector instead! Also prove that ^ creates a real_vector !! *)

lemma setsum_add_split: assumes mn: "(m::nat) \<le> n + 1"
shows "setsum f {m..n + p} = setsum f {m..n} + setsum f {n + 1..n + p}"
proof-
let ?A = "{m .. n}"
let ?B = "{n + 1 .. n + p}"
have eq: "{m .. n+p} = ?A \<union> ?B" using mn by auto
have d: "?A \<inter> ?B = {}" by auto
from setsum_Un_disjoint[of "?A" "?B" f] eq d show ?thesis by auto
qed

lemma setsum_reindex_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S"
and nz: "\<And> x y. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow> f x = f y \<Longrightarrow> h (f x) = 0"
shows "setsum h (f ` S) = setsum (h o f) S"
using nz
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 thus ?case by simp
next
case (2 x F)
{assume fxF: "f x \<in> f ` F" hence "\<exists>y \<in> F . f y = f x" by auto
then obtain y where y: "y \<in> F" "f x = f y" by auto
from "2.hyps" y have xy: "x \<noteq> y" by auto

from "2.prems"[of x y] "2.hyps" xy y have h0: "h (f x) = 0" by simp
have "setsum h (f ` insert x F) = setsum h (f ` F)" using fxF by auto
also have "\<dots> = setsum (h o f) (insert x F)"
using "2.hyps" "2.prems" h0  by auto
finally have ?case .}
moreover
{assume fxF: "f x \<notin> f ` F"
have "setsum h (f ` insert x F) = h (f x) + setsum h (f ` F)"
using fxF "2.hyps" by simp
also have "\<dots> = setsum (h o f) (insert x F)"
using "2.hyps" "2.prems" fxF
apply auto apply metis done
finally have ?case .}
ultimately show ?case by blast
qed

lemma setsum_Un_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fF: "finite F"
and f: "\<forall> x\<in> S \<inter> F . f x = (0::'a::ab_group_add)"
shows "setsum f (S \<union> F) = setsum f S + setsum f F"
using setsum_Un[OF fS fF, of f] setsum_0'[OF f] by simp

lemma setsum_natinterval_left:
assumes mn: "(m::nat) <= n"
shows "setsum f {m..n} = f m + setsum f {m + 1..n}"
proof-
from mn have "{m .. n} = insert m {m+1 .. n}" by auto
then show ?thesis by auto
qed

lemma setsum_natinterval_difff:
shows  "setsum (\<lambda>k. f k - f(k + 1)) {(m::nat) .. n} =
(if m <= n then f m - f(n + 1) else 0)"
by (induct n, auto simp add: ring_simps not_le le_Suc_eq)

lemmas setsum_restrict_set' = setsum_restrict_set[unfolded Int_def]

lemma setsum_setsum_restrict:
"finite S \<Longrightarrow> finite T \<Longrightarrow> setsum (\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>y. f x y) {y. y\<in> T \<and> R x y}) S = setsum (\<lambda>y. setsum (\<lambda>x. f x y) {x. x \<in> S \<and> R x y}) T"
apply (simp add: setsum_restrict_set'[unfolded mem_def] mem_def)
by (rule setsum_commute)

lemma setsum_image_gen: assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "setsum g S = setsum (\<lambda>y. setsum g {x. x \<in> S \<and> f x = y}) (f ` S)"
proof-
{fix x assume "x \<in> S" then have "{y. y\<in> f`S \<and> f x = y} = {f x}" by auto}
note th0 = this
have "setsum g S = setsum (\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>y. g x) {y. y\<in> f`S \<and> f x = y}) S"
apply (rule setsum_cong2)
also have "\<dots> = setsum (\<lambda>y. setsum g {x. x \<in> S \<and> f x = y}) (f ` S)"
apply (rule setsum_setsum_restrict[OF fS])
by (rule finite_imageI[OF fS])
finally show ?thesis .
qed

(* FIXME: Here too need stupid finiteness assumption on T!!! *)
lemma setsum_group:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T" and fST: "f ` S \<subseteq> T"
shows "setsum (\<lambda>y. setsum g {x. x\<in> S \<and> f x = y}) T = setsum g S"

apply (subst setsum_image_gen[OF fS, of g f])
apply (rule setsum_superset[OF fT fST])
by (auto intro: setsum_0')

(* FIXME: Change the name to fold_image\<dots> *)
lemma (in comm_monoid_mult) fold_1': "finite S \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. f x = 1) \<Longrightarrow> fold_image op * f 1 S = 1"
apply (induct set: finite)
apply simp by (auto simp add: fold_image_insert)

lemma (in comm_monoid_mult) fold_union_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T"
and I0: "\<forall>x \<in> S\<inter>T. f x = 1"
shows "fold_image (op *) f 1 (S \<union> T) = fold_image (op *) f 1 S * fold_image (op *) f 1 T"
proof-
have "fold_image op * f 1 (S \<inter> T) = 1"
apply (rule fold_1')
using fS fT I0 by auto
with fold_image_Un_Int[OF fS fT] show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma setsum_union_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T"
and I0: "\<forall>x \<in> S\<inter>T. f x = 0"
shows "setsum f (S \<union> T) = setsum f S  + setsum f T"
using fS fT
using I0 by auto

lemma setprod_union_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T"
and I0: "\<forall>x \<in> S\<inter>T. f x = 1"
shows "setprod f (S \<union> T) = setprod f S  * setprod f T"
using fS fT
apply (rule fold_union_nonzero)
using I0 by auto

lemma setsum_unions_nonzero:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fSS: "\<forall>T \<in> S. finite T"
and f0: "\<And>T1 T2 x. T1\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> T2\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> T1 \<noteq> T2 \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> T1 \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> T2 \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0"
shows "setsum f (\<Union>S) = setsum (\<lambda>T. setsum f T) S"
using fSS f0
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 thus ?case by simp
next
case (2 T F)
then have fTF: "finite T" "\<forall>T\<in>F. finite T" "finite F" and TF: "T \<notin> F"
and H: "setsum f (\<Union> F) = setsum (setsum f) F" by (auto simp add: finite_insert)
from fTF have fUF: "finite (\<Union>F)" by (auto intro: finite_Union)
from "2.prems" TF fTF
show ?case
by (auto simp add: H[symmetric] intro: setsum_union_nonzero[OF fTF(1) fUF, of f])
qed

(* FIXME : Copied from Pocklington --- should be moved to Finite_Set!!!!!!!! *)

lemma (in comm_monoid_mult) fold_related:
assumes Re: "R e e"
and Rop: "\<forall>x1 y1 x2 y2. R x1 x2 \<and> R y1 y2 \<longrightarrow> R (x1 * y1) (x2 * y2)"
and fS: "finite S" and Rfg: "\<forall>x\<in>S. R (h x) (g x)"
shows "R (fold_image (op *) h e S) (fold_image (op *) g e S)"
using fS by (rule finite_subset_induct) (insert assms, auto)

(* FIXME: I think we can get rid of the finite assumption!! *)
lemma (in comm_monoid_mult)
fold_eq_general:
assumes fS: "finite S"
and h: "\<forall>y\<in>S'. \<exists>!x. x\<in> S \<and> h(x) = y"
and f12:  "\<forall>x\<in>S. h x \<in> S' \<and> f2(h x) = f1 x"
shows "fold_image (op *) f1 e S = fold_image (op *) f2 e S'"
proof-
from h f12 have hS: "h ` S = S'" by auto
{fix x y assume H: "x \<in> S" "y \<in> S" "h x = h y"
from f12 h H  have "x = y" by auto }
hence hinj: "inj_on h S" unfolding inj_on_def Ex1_def by blast
from f12 have th: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> (f2 \<circ> h) x = f1 x" by auto
from hS have "fold_image (op *) f2 e S' = fold_image (op *) f2 e (h ` S)" by simp
also have "\<dots> = fold_image (op *) (f2 o h) e S"
using fold_image_reindex[OF fS hinj, of f2 e] .
also have "\<dots> = fold_image (op *) f1 e S " using th fold_image_cong[OF fS, of "f2 o h" f1 e]
by blast
finally show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma (in comm_monoid_mult) fold_eq_general_inverses:
assumes fS: "finite S"
and kh: "\<And>y. y \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> k y \<in> S \<and> h (k y) = y"
and hk: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> h x \<in> T \<and> k (h x) = x  \<and> g (h x) = f x"
shows "fold_image (op *) f e S = fold_image (op *) g e T"
using fold_eq_general[OF fS, of T h g f e] kh hk by metis

lemma setsum_eq_general_reverses:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T"
and kh: "\<And>y. y \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> k y \<in> S \<and> h (k y) = y"
and hk: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> h x \<in> T \<and> k (h x) = x  \<and> g (h x) = f x"
shows "setsum f S = setsum g T"
apply (simp add: setsum_def fS fT)
apply (erule kh)
apply (erule hk)
done

lemma vsum_norm_allsubsets_bound:
fixes f:: "'a \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
assumes fP: "finite P" and fPs: "\<And>Q. Q \<subseteq> P \<Longrightarrow> norm (setsum f Q) \<le> e"
shows "setsum (\<lambda>x. norm (f x)) P \<le> 2 * real (dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)) *  e"
proof-
let ?d = "real (dimindex (UNIV ::'n set))"
let ?nf = "\<lambda>x. norm (f x)"
let ?U = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
have th0: "setsum (\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>i. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?U) P = setsum (\<lambda>i. setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) P) ?U"
by (rule setsum_commute)
have th1: "2 * ?d * e = of_nat (card ?U) * (2 * e)" by (simp add: real_of_nat_def)
have "setsum ?nf P \<le> setsum (\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>i. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?U) P"
apply (rule setsum_mono)
by (rule norm_le_l1)
also have "\<dots> \<le> 2 * ?d * e"
unfolding th0 th1
proof(rule setsum_bounded)
fix i assume i: "i \<in> ?U"
let ?Pp = "{x. x\<in> P \<and> f x \$ i \<ge> 0}"
let ?Pn = "{x. x \<in> P \<and> f x \$ i < 0}"
have thp: "P = ?Pp \<union> ?Pn" by auto
have thp0: "?Pp \<inter> ?Pn ={}" by auto
have PpP: "?Pp \<subseteq> P" and PnP: "?Pn \<subseteq> P" by blast+
have Ppe:"setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?Pp \<le> e"
using i component_le_norm[OF i, of "setsum (\<lambda>x. f x) ?Pp"]  fPs[OF PpP]
by (auto simp add: setsum_component intro: abs_le_D1)
have Pne: "setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?Pn \<le> e"
using i component_le_norm[OF i, of "setsum (\<lambda>x. - f x) ?Pn"]  fPs[OF PnP]
by (auto simp add: setsum_negf setsum_component vector_component intro: abs_le_D1)
have "setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) P = setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?Pp + setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) ?Pn"
apply (subst thp)
apply (rule setsum_Un_nonzero)
using fP thp0 by auto
also have "\<dots> \<le> 2*e" using Pne Ppe by arith
finally show "setsum (\<lambda>x. \<bar>f x \$ i\<bar>) P \<le> 2*e" .
qed
finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma dot_lsum: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> setsum f S \<bullet> (y::'a::{comm_ring}^'n) = setsum (\<lambda>x. f x \<bullet> y) S "

lemma dot_rsum: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> (y::'a::{comm_ring}^'n) \<bullet> setsum f S = setsum (\<lambda>x. y \<bullet> f x) S "

subsection{* Basis vectors in coordinate directions. *}

definition "basis k = (\<chi> i. if i = k then 1 else 0)"

lemma delta_mult_idempotent:
"(if k=a then 1 else (0::'a::semiring_1)) * (if k=a then 1 else 0) = (if k=a then 1 else 0)" by (cases "k=a", auto)

lemma norm_basis:
assumes k: "k \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "norm (basis k :: real ^'n) = 1"
using k
apply (simp add: basis_def real_vector_norm_def dot_def)
apply (vector delta_mult_idempotent)
using setsum_delta[of "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}" "k" "\<lambda>k. 1::real"]
apply auto
done

lemma norm_basis_1: "norm(basis 1 :: real ^'n) = 1"
apply (simp add: basis_def real_vector_norm_def dot_def)
apply (vector delta_mult_idempotent)
using setsum_delta[of "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}" "1" "\<lambda>k. 1::real"] dimindex_nonzero[of "UNIV :: 'n set"]
apply auto
done

lemma vector_choose_size: "0 <= c ==> \<exists>(x::real^'n). norm x = c"
apply (rule exI[where x="c *s basis 1"])
by (simp only: norm_mul norm_basis_1)

lemma vector_choose_dist: assumes e: "0 <= e"
shows "\<exists>(y::real^'n). dist x y = e"
proof-
from vector_choose_size[OF e] obtain c:: "real ^'n"  where "norm c = e"
by blast
then have "dist x (x - c) = e" by (simp add: dist_def)
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma basis_inj: "inj_on (basis :: nat \<Rightarrow> real ^'n) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
by (auto simp add: inj_on_def basis_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

lemma basis_component: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)} ==> (basis k ::('a::semiring_1)^'n)\$i = (if k=i then 1 else 0)"

lemma cond_value_iff: "f (if b then x else y) = (if b then f x else f y)"
by auto

lemma basis_expansion:
"setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s basis i) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} = (x::('a::ring_1) ^'n)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs" is "setsum ?f ?S = _")
by (auto simp add: Cart_eq basis_component[where ?'n = "'n"] setsum_component vector_component cond_value_iff setsum_delta[of "?S", where ?'b = "'a", simplified] cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma basis_expansion_unique:
"setsum (\<lambda>i. f i *s basis i) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)} = (x::('a::comm_ring_1) ^'n) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>{1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}. f i = x\$i)"
by (simp add: Cart_eq setsum_component vector_component basis_component setsum_delta cond_value_iff cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma cond_application_beta: "(if b then f else g) x = (if b then f x else g x)"
by auto

lemma dot_basis:
assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "basis i \<bullet> x = x\$i" "x \<bullet> (basis i :: 'a^'n) = (x\$i :: 'a::semiring_1)"
using i
by (auto simp add: dot_def basis_def Cart_lambda_beta cond_application_beta  cond_value_iff setsum_delta cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma basis_eq_0: "basis i = (0::'a::semiring_1^'n) \<longleftrightarrow> i \<notin> {1..dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}"
by (auto simp add: Cart_eq basis_component zero_index)

lemma basis_nonzero:
assumes k: "k \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}"
shows "basis k \<noteq> (0:: 'a::semiring_1 ^'n)"
using k by (simp add: basis_eq_0)

lemma vector_eq_ldot: "(\<forall>x. x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> z) \<longleftrightarrow> y = (z::'a::semiring_1^'n)"
apply (auto simp add: Cart_eq dot_basis)
apply (erule_tac x="basis i" in allE)
apply (subgoal_tac "y = z")
apply simp
apply vector
done

lemma vector_eq_rdot: "(\<forall>z. x \<bullet> z = y \<bullet> z) \<longleftrightarrow> x = (y::'a::semiring_1^'n)"
apply (auto simp add: Cart_eq dot_basis)
apply (erule_tac x="basis i" in allE)
apply (subgoal_tac "x = y")
apply simp
apply vector
done

subsection{* Orthogonality. *}

definition "orthogonal x y \<longleftrightarrow> (x \<bullet> y = 0)"

lemma orthogonal_basis:
assumes i:"i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}"
shows "orthogonal (basis i :: 'a^'n) x \<longleftrightarrow> x\$i = (0::'a::ring_1)"
using i
by (auto simp add: orthogonal_def dot_def basis_def Cart_lambda_beta cond_value_iff cond_application_beta setsum_delta cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma orthogonal_basis_basis:
assumes i:"i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}"
and j: "j \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}"
shows "orthogonal (basis i :: 'a::ring_1^'n) (basis j) \<longleftrightarrow> i \<noteq> j"
unfolding orthogonal_basis[OF i] basis_component[OF i] by simp

(* FIXME : Maybe some of these require less than comm_ring, but not all*)
lemma orthogonal_clauses:
"orthogonal a (0::'a::comm_ring ^'n)"
"orthogonal a x ==> orthogonal a (c *s x)"
"orthogonal a x ==> orthogonal a (-x)"
"orthogonal a x \<Longrightarrow> orthogonal a y ==> orthogonal a (x + y)"
"orthogonal a x \<Longrightarrow> orthogonal a y ==> orthogonal a (x - y)"
"orthogonal 0 a"
"orthogonal x a ==> orthogonal (c *s x) a"
"orthogonal x a ==> orthogonal (-x) a"
"orthogonal x a \<Longrightarrow> orthogonal y a ==> orthogonal (x + y) a"
"orthogonal x a \<Longrightarrow> orthogonal y a ==> orthogonal (x - y) a"
unfolding orthogonal_def dot_rneg dot_rmult dot_radd dot_rsub
dot_lzero dot_rzero dot_lneg dot_lmult dot_ladd dot_lsub
by simp_all

lemma orthogonal_commute: "orthogonal (x::'a::{ab_semigroup_mult,comm_monoid_add} ^'n)y \<longleftrightarrow> orthogonal y x"

subsection{* Explicit vector construction from lists. *}

lemma Cart_lambda_beta_1[simp]: "(Cart_lambda g)\$1 = g 1"
apply (rule Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format])
using dimindex_ge_1 apply auto done

lemma Cart_lambda_beta_1'[simp]: "(Cart_lambda g)\$(Suc 0) = g 1"
by (simp only: One_nat_def[symmetric] Cart_lambda_beta_1)

definition "vector l = (\<chi> i. if i <= length l then l ! (i - 1) else 0)"

lemma vector_1: "(vector[x]) \$1 = x"
using dimindex_ge_1
by (auto simp add: vector_def Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format])
lemma dimindex_2[simp]: "2 \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 2 set)}"
lemma dimindex_2'[simp]: "2 \<in> {Suc 0 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 2 set)}"
lemma dimindex_3[simp]: "2 \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 3 set)}" "3 \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 3 set)}"

lemma dimindex_3'[simp]: "2 \<in> {Suc 0 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 3 set)}" "3 \<in> {Suc 0 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 3 set)}"

lemma vector_2:
"(vector[x,y]) \$1 = x"
"(vector[x,y] :: 'a^2)\$2 = (y::'a::zero)"
using Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format, OF dimindex_2, of "\<lambda>i. if i \<le> length [x,y] then [x,y] ! (i - 1) else (0::'a)"]
apply (simp only: vector_def )
apply auto
done

lemma vector_3:
"(vector [x,y,z] ::('a::zero)^3)\$1 = x"
"(vector [x,y,z] ::('a::zero)^3)\$2 = y"
"(vector [x,y,z] ::('a::zero)^3)\$3 = z"
apply (simp_all add: vector_def Cart_lambda_beta dimindex_3)
using Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format, OF dimindex_3(1), of "\<lambda>i. if i \<le> length [x,y,z] then [x,y,z] ! (i - 1) else (0::'a)"]   using Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format, OF dimindex_3(2), of "\<lambda>i. if i \<le> length [x,y,z] then [x,y,z] ! (i - 1) else (0::'a)"]
by simp_all

lemma forall_vector_1: "(\<forall>v::'a::zero^1. P v) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P(vector[x]))"
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="v\$1" in allE)
apply (subgoal_tac "vector [v\$1] = v")
apply simp
by (vector vector_def dimindex_def)

lemma forall_vector_2: "(\<forall>v::'a::zero^2. P v) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x y. P(vector[x, y]))"
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="v\$1" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x="v\$2" in allE)
apply (subgoal_tac "vector [v\$1, v\$2] = v")
apply simp
apply (vector vector_def dimindex_def)
apply auto
apply (subgoal_tac "i = 1 \<or> i =2", auto)
done

lemma forall_vector_3: "(\<forall>v::'a::zero^3. P v) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x y z. P(vector[x, y, z]))"
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="v\$1" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x="v\$2" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x="v\$3" in allE)
apply (subgoal_tac "vector [v\$1, v\$2, v\$3] = v")
apply simp
apply (vector vector_def dimindex_def)
apply auto
apply (subgoal_tac "i = 1 \<or> i =2 \<or> i = 3", auto)
done

subsection{* Linear functions. *}

definition "linear f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x y. f(x + y) = f x + f y) \<and> (\<forall>c x. f(c *s x) = c *s f x)"

lemma linear_compose_cmul: "linear f ==> linear (\<lambda>x. (c::'a::comm_semiring) *s f x)"
by (vector linear_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta[rule_format] ring_simps)

lemma linear_compose_neg: "linear (f :: 'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a::comm_ring ^'m) ==> linear (\<lambda>x. -(f(x)))" by (vector linear_def Cart_eq)

lemma linear_compose_add: "linear (f :: 'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1 ^'m) \<Longrightarrow> linear g ==> linear (\<lambda>x. f(x) + g(x))"
by (vector linear_def Cart_eq ring_simps)

lemma linear_compose_sub: "linear (f :: 'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a::ring_1 ^'m) \<Longrightarrow> linear g ==> linear (\<lambda>x. f x - g x)"
by (vector linear_def Cart_eq ring_simps)

lemma linear_compose: "linear f \<Longrightarrow> linear g ==> linear (g o f)"

lemma linear_id: "linear id" by (simp add: linear_def id_def)

lemma linear_zero: "linear (\<lambda>x. 0::'a::semiring_1 ^ 'n)" by (simp add: linear_def)

lemma linear_compose_setsum:
assumes fS: "finite S" and lS: "\<forall>a \<in> S. linear (f a :: 'a::semiring_1 ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm)"
shows "linear(\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>a. f a x :: 'a::semiring_1 ^'m) S)"
using lS
apply (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])

lemma linear_vmul_component:
fixes f:: "'a::semiring_1^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n"
assumes lf: "linear f" and k: "k \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "linear (\<lambda>x. f x \$ k *s v)"
using lf k
apply (auto simp add: linear_def )
by (vector ring_simps)+

lemma linear_0: "linear f ==> f 0 = (0::'a::semiring_1 ^'n)"
unfolding linear_def
apply clarsimp
apply (erule allE[where x="0::'a"])
apply simp
done

lemma linear_cmul: "linear f ==> f(c*s x) = c *s f x" by (simp add: linear_def)

lemma linear_neg: "linear (f :: 'a::ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> _) ==> f (-x) = - f x"
unfolding vector_sneg_minus1
using linear_cmul[of f] by auto

lemma linear_add: "linear f ==> f(x + y) = f x + f y" by (metis linear_def)

lemma linear_sub: "linear (f::'a::ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> _) ==> f(x - y) = f x - f y"

lemma linear_setsum:
fixes f:: "'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _"
assumes lf: "linear f" and fS: "finite S"
shows "f (setsum g S) = setsum (f o g) S"
proof (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1 thus ?case by (simp add: linear_0[OF lf])
next
case (2 x F)
have "f (setsum g (insert x F)) = f (g x + setsum g F)" using "2.hyps"
by simp
also have "\<dots> = f (g x) + f (setsum g F)" using linear_add[OF lf] by simp
also have "\<dots> = setsum (f o g) (insert x F)" using "2.hyps" by simp
finally show ?case .
qed

lemma linear_setsum_mul:
fixes f:: "'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1^'m"
assumes lf: "linear f" and fS: "finite S"
shows "f (setsum (\<lambda>i. c i *s v i) S) = setsum (\<lambda>i. c i *s f (v i)) S"
using linear_setsum[OF lf fS, of "\<lambda>i. c i *s v i" , unfolded o_def]
linear_cmul[OF lf] by simp

lemma linear_injective_0:
assumes lf: "linear (f:: 'a::ring_1 ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> _)"
shows "inj f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. f x = 0 \<longrightarrow> x = 0)"
proof-
have "inj f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x y. f x = f y \<longrightarrow> x = y)" by (simp add: inj_on_def)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x y. f x - f y = 0 \<longrightarrow> x - y = 0)" by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x y. f (x - y) = 0 \<longrightarrow> x - y = 0)"
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x. f x = 0 \<longrightarrow> x = 0)" by auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma linear_bounded:
fixes f:: "real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "\<exists>B. \<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> B * norm x"
proof-
let ?S = "{1..dimindex(UNIV:: 'm set)}"
let ?B = "setsum (\<lambda>i. norm(f(basis i))) ?S"
have fS: "finite ?S" by simp
{fix x:: "real ^ 'm"
let ?g = "(\<lambda>i::nat. (x\$i) *s (basis i) :: real ^ 'm)"
have "norm (f x) = norm (f (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s (basis i)) ?S))"
by (simp only:  basis_expansion)
also have "\<dots> = norm (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s f (basis i))?S)"
using linear_setsum[OF lf fS, of ?g, unfolded o_def] linear_cmul[OF lf]
by auto
finally have th0: "norm (f x) = norm (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s f (basis i))?S)" .
{fix i assume i: "i \<in> ?S"
from component_le_norm[OF i, of x]
have "norm ((x\$i) *s f (basis i :: real ^'m)) \<le> norm (f (basis i)) * norm x"
unfolding norm_mul
apply (simp only: mult_commute)
apply (rule mult_mono)
by (auto simp add: ring_simps norm_ge_zero) }
then have th: "\<forall>i\<in> ?S. norm ((x\$i) *s f (basis i :: real ^'m)) \<le> norm (f (basis i)) * norm x" by metis
from real_setsum_norm_le[OF fS, of "\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s (f (basis i))", OF th]
have "norm (f x) \<le> ?B * norm x" unfolding th0 setsum_left_distrib by metis}
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma linear_bounded_pos:
fixes f:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "\<exists>B > 0. \<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> B * norm x"
proof-
from linear_bounded[OF lf] obtain B where
B: "\<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> B * norm x" by blast
let ?K = "\<bar>B\<bar> + 1"
have Kp: "?K > 0" by arith
{assume C: "B < 0"
have "norm (1::real ^ 'n) > 0" by (simp add: zero_less_norm_iff)
with C have "B * norm (1:: real ^ 'n) < 0"
with B[rule_format, of 1] norm_ge_zero[of "f 1"] have False by simp
}
then have Bp: "B \<ge> 0" by ferrack
{fix x::"real ^ 'n"
have "norm (f x) \<le> ?K *  norm x"
using B[rule_format, of x] norm_ge_zero[of x] norm_ge_zero[of "f x"] Bp
apply (erule order_trans, simp)
done
}
then show ?thesis using Kp by blast
qed

subsection{* Bilinear functions. *}

definition "bilinear f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. linear(\<lambda>y. f x y)) \<and> (\<forall>y. linear(\<lambda>x. f x y))"

lemma bilinear_ladd: "bilinear h ==> h (x + y) z = (h x z) + (h y z)"
lemma bilinear_radd: "bilinear h ==> h x (y + z) = (h x y) + (h x z)"

lemma bilinear_lmul: "bilinear h ==> h (c *s x) y = c *s (h x y)"

lemma bilinear_rmul: "bilinear h ==> h x (c *s y) = c *s (h x y)"

lemma bilinear_lneg: "bilinear h ==> h (- (x:: 'a::ring_1 ^ 'n)) y = -(h x y)"
by (simp only: vector_sneg_minus1 bilinear_lmul)

lemma bilinear_rneg: "bilinear h ==> h x (- (y:: 'a::ring_1 ^ 'n)) = - h x y"
by (simp only: vector_sneg_minus1 bilinear_rmul)

lemma  (in ab_group_add) eq_add_iff: "x = x + y \<longleftrightarrow> y = 0"
using add_imp_eq[of x y 0] by auto

lemma bilinear_lzero:
fixes h :: "'a::ring^'n \<Rightarrow> _" assumes bh: "bilinear h" shows "h 0 x = 0"
using bilinear_ladd[OF bh, of 0 0 x]

lemma bilinear_rzero:
fixes h :: "'a::ring^'n \<Rightarrow> _" assumes bh: "bilinear h" shows "h x 0 = 0"
using bilinear_radd[OF bh, of x 0 0 ]

lemma bilinear_lsub: "bilinear h ==> h (x - (y:: 'a::ring_1 ^ 'n)) z = h x z - h y z"

lemma bilinear_rsub: "bilinear h ==> h z (x - (y:: 'a::ring_1 ^ 'n)) = h z x - h z y"

lemma bilinear_setsum:
fixes h:: "'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'k"
assumes bh: "bilinear h" and fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T"
shows "h (setsum f S) (setsum g T) = setsum (\<lambda>(i,j). h (f i) (g j)) (S \<times> T) "
proof-
have "h (setsum f S) (setsum g T) = setsum (\<lambda>x. h (f x) (setsum g T)) S"
apply (rule linear_setsum[unfolded o_def])
using bh fS by (auto simp add: bilinear_def)
also have "\<dots> = setsum (\<lambda>x. setsum (\<lambda>y. h (f x) (g y)) T) S"
apply (rule setsum_cong, simp)
apply (rule linear_setsum[unfolded o_def])
using bh fT by (auto simp add: bilinear_def)
finally show ?thesis unfolding setsum_cartesian_product .
qed

lemma bilinear_bounded:
fixes h:: "real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'k"
assumes bh: "bilinear h"
shows "\<exists>B. \<forall>x y. norm (h x y) \<le> B * norm x * norm y"
proof-
let ?M = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
let ?N = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
let ?B = "setsum (\<lambda>(i,j). norm (h (basis i) (basis j))) (?M \<times> ?N)"
have fM: "finite ?M" and fN: "finite ?N" by simp_all
{fix x:: "real ^ 'm" and  y :: "real^'n"
have "norm (h x y) = norm (h (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s basis i) ?M) (setsum (\<lambda>i. (y\$i) *s basis i) ?N))" unfolding basis_expansion ..
also have "\<dots> = norm (setsum (\<lambda> (i,j). h ((x\$i) *s basis i) ((y\$j) *s basis j)) (?M \<times> ?N))"  unfolding bilinear_setsum[OF bh fM fN] ..
finally have th: "norm (h x y) = \<dots>" .
have "norm (h x y) \<le> ?B * norm x * norm y"
apply (rule real_setsum_norm_le)
using fN fM
apply simp
apply (auto simp add: bilinear_rmul[OF bh] bilinear_lmul[OF bh] norm_mul ring_simps)
apply (rule mult_mono)
apply (auto simp add: norm_ge_zero zero_le_mult_iff component_le_norm)
apply (rule mult_mono)
apply (auto simp add: norm_ge_zero zero_le_mult_iff component_le_norm)
done}
then show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma bilinear_bounded_pos:
fixes h:: "real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^ 'k"
assumes bh: "bilinear h"
shows "\<exists>B > 0. \<forall>x y. norm (h x y) \<le> B * norm x * norm y"
proof-
from bilinear_bounded[OF bh] obtain B where
B: "\<forall>x y. norm (h x y) \<le> B * norm x * norm y" by blast
let ?K = "\<bar>B\<bar> + 1"
have Kp: "?K > 0" by arith
have KB: "B < ?K" by arith
{fix x::"real ^'m" and y :: "real ^'n"
from KB Kp
have "B * norm x * norm y \<le> ?K * norm x * norm y"
apply -
apply (rule mult_right_mono, rule mult_right_mono)
then have "norm (h x y) \<le> ?K * norm x * norm y"
using B[rule_format, of x y] by simp}
with Kp show ?thesis by blast
qed

definition "adjoint f = (SOME f'. \<forall>x y. f x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> f' y)"

lemma choice_iff: "(\<forall>x. \<exists>y. P x y) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>f. \<forall>x. P x (f x))" by metis

fixes f:: "'a::ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "\<forall>x y. f x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> adjoint f y"
proof-
let ?N = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
let ?M = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
have fN: "finite ?N" by simp
have fM: "finite ?M" by simp
{fix y:: "'a ^ 'm"
let ?w = "(\<chi> i. (f (basis i) \<bullet> y)) :: 'a ^ 'n"
{fix x
have "f x \<bullet> y = f (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s basis i) ?N) \<bullet> y"
by (simp only: basis_expansion)
also have "\<dots> = (setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s f (basis i)) ?N) \<bullet> y"
unfolding linear_setsum[OF lf fN]
finally have "f x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> ?w"
apply (simp only: )
apply (simp add: dot_def setsum_component Cart_lambda_beta setsum_left_distrib setsum_right_distrib vector_component setsum_commute[of _ ?M ?N] ring_simps del: One_nat_def)
done}
}
some_eq_ex[of "\<lambda>f'. \<forall>x y. f x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> f' y"]
using choice_iff[of "\<lambda>a b. \<forall>x. f x \<bullet> a = x \<bullet> b "]
by metis
qed

fixes f:: "'a::ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "x \<bullet> adjoint f y = f x \<bullet> y"

fixes f :: "'a::comm_ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f"

fixes f:: "'a::comm_ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "x \<bullet> adjoint f y = f x \<bullet> y"
and "adjoint f y \<bullet> x = y \<bullet> f x"

fixes f:: "'a::comm_ring_1 ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> _"
assumes lf: "linear f"
apply (rule ext)

fixes f:: "'a::comm_ring_1 ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"
assumes lf: "linear f" and u: "\<forall>x y. f' x \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> f y"
apply (rule ext)
using u

text{* Matrix notation. NB: an MxN matrix is of type @{typ "'a^'n^'m"}, not @{typ "'a^'m^'n"} *}

consts generic_mult :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'c" (infixr "\<star>" 75)

matrix_matrix_mult_def: "(m:: ('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m) \<star> (m' :: 'a ^'p^'n) \<equiv> (\<chi> i j. setsum (\<lambda>k. ((m\$i)\$k) * ((m'\$k)\$j)) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}) ::'a ^ 'p ^'m"

abbreviation
matrix_matrix_mult' :: "('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^'p^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'p ^'m"  (infixl "**" 70)
where "m ** m' == m\<star> m'"

matrix_vector_mult_def: "(m::('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m) \<star> (x::'a ^'n) \<equiv> (\<chi> i. setsum (\<lambda>j. ((m\$i)\$j) * (x\$j)) {1..dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)}) :: 'a^'m"

abbreviation
matrix_vector_mult' :: "('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm"  (infixl "*v" 70)
where
"m *v v == m \<star> v"

vector_matrix_mult_def: "(x::'a^'m) \<star> (m::('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m) \<equiv> (\<chi> j. setsum (\<lambda>i. ((m\$i)\$j) * (x\$i)) {1..dimindex(UNIV :: 'm set)}) :: 'a^'n"

abbreviation
vactor_matrix_mult' :: "'a ^ 'm \<Rightarrow> ('a::semiring_1) ^'n^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^'n "  (infixl "v*" 70)
where
"v v* m == v \<star> m"

definition "(mat::'a::zero => 'a ^'n^'m) k = (\<chi> i j. if i = j then k else 0)"
definition "(transp::'a^'n^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a^'m^'n) A = (\<chi> i j. ((A\$j)\$i))"
definition "(row::nat => 'a ^'n^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^'n) i A = (\<chi> j. ((A\$i)\$j))"
definition "(column::nat =>'a^'n^'m =>'a^'m) j A = (\<chi> i. ((A\$i)\$j))"
definition "rows(A::'a^'n^'m) = { row i A | i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'm set)}}"
definition "columns(A::'a^'n^'m) = { column i A | i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}}"

lemma mat_0[simp]: "mat 0 = 0" by (vector mat_def)
lemma matrix_add_ldistrib: "(A ** (B + C)) = (A \<star> B) + (A \<star> C)"

lemma setsum_delta':
assumes fS: "finite S" shows
"setsum (\<lambda>k. if a = k then b k else 0) S =
(if a\<in> S then b a else 0)"
using setsum_delta[OF fS, of a b, symmetric]
by (auto intro: setsum_cong)

lemma matrix_mul_lid: "mat 1 ** A = A"
apply vector
by (auto simp only: cond_value_iff cond_application_beta setsum_delta'[OF finite_atLeastAtMost]  mult_1_left mult_zero_left if_True)

lemma matrix_mul_rid: "A ** mat 1 = A"
apply vector
by (auto simp only: cond_value_iff cond_application_beta setsum_delta[OF finite_atLeastAtMost]  mult_1_right mult_zero_right if_True cong: if_cong)

lemma matrix_mul_assoc: "A ** (B ** C) = (A ** B) ** C"
apply (vector matrix_matrix_mult_def setsum_right_distrib setsum_left_distrib mult_assoc)
apply (subst setsum_commute)
apply simp
done

lemma matrix_vector_mul_assoc: "A *v (B *v x) = (A ** B) *v x"
apply (vector matrix_matrix_mult_def matrix_vector_mult_def setsum_right_distrib setsum_left_distrib mult_assoc)
apply (subst setsum_commute)
apply simp
done

lemma matrix_vector_mul_lid: "mat 1 *v x = x"
apply (vector matrix_vector_mult_def mat_def)
setsum_delta' cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma matrix_transp_mul: "transp(A ** B) = transp B ** transp (A::'a::comm_semiring_1^'m^'n)"
by (simp add: matrix_matrix_mult_def transp_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta mult_commute)

lemma matrix_eq: "A = B \<longleftrightarrow>  (\<forall>x. A *v x = B *v x)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
apply auto
apply (subst Cart_eq)
apply clarify
apply (clarsimp simp add: matrix_vector_mult_def basis_def cond_value_iff cond_application_beta Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta cong del: if_weak_cong)
apply (erule_tac x="basis ia" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x="i" in ballE)
by (auto simp add: basis_def cond_value_iff cond_application_beta Cart_lambda_beta setsum_delta[OF finite_atLeastAtMost] cong del: if_weak_cong)

lemma matrix_vector_mul_component:
assumes k: "k \<in> {1.. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
shows "((A::'a::semiring_1^'n'^'m) *v x)\$k = (A\$k) \<bullet> x"
using k
by (simp add: matrix_vector_mult_def Cart_lambda_beta dot_def)

lemma dot_lmul_matrix: "((x::'a::comm_semiring_1 ^'n) v* A) \<bullet> y = x \<bullet> (A *v y)"
apply (simp add: dot_def matrix_vector_mult_def vector_matrix_mult_def setsum_left_distrib setsum_right_distrib Cart_lambda_beta mult_ac)
apply (subst setsum_commute)
by simp

lemma transp_mat: "transp (mat n) = mat n"
by (vector transp_def mat_def)

lemma transp_transp: "transp(transp A) = A"
by (vector transp_def)

lemma row_transp:
fixes A:: "'a::semiring_1^'n^'m"
assumes i: "i \<in> {1.. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "row i (transp A) = column i A"
using i
by (simp add: row_def column_def transp_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

lemma column_transp:
fixes A:: "'a::semiring_1^'n^'m"
assumes i: "i \<in> {1.. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
shows "column i (transp A) = row i A"
using i
by (simp add: row_def column_def transp_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

lemma rows_transp: "rows(transp (A::'a::semiring_1^'n^'m)) = columns A"
apply (auto simp add: rows_def columns_def row_transp intro: set_ext)
apply (rule_tac x=i in exI)
done

lemma columns_transp: "columns(transp (A::'a::semiring_1^'n^'m)) = rows A" by (metis transp_transp rows_transp)

text{* Two sometimes fruitful ways of looking at matrix-vector multiplication. *}

lemma matrix_mult_dot: "A *v x = (\<chi> i. A\$i \<bullet> x)"

lemma matrix_mult_vsum: "(A::'a::comm_semiring_1^'n^'m) *v x = setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s column i A) {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
by (simp add: matrix_vector_mult_def Cart_eq setsum_component Cart_lambda_beta vector_component column_def mult_commute)

lemma vector_componentwise:
"(x::'a::ring_1^'n) = (\<chi> j. setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) * (basis i :: 'a^'n)\$j) {1..dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)})"
apply (subst basis_expansion[symmetric])
by (vector Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta setsum_component)

lemma linear_componentwise:
fixes f:: "'a::ring_1 ^ 'm \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'n"
assumes lf: "linear f" and j: "j \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "(f x)\$j = setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) * (f (basis i)\$j)) {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof-
let ?M = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
let ?N = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
have fM: "finite ?M" by simp
have "?rhs = (setsum (\<lambda>i.(x\$i) *s f (basis i) ) ?M)\$j"
unfolding vector_smult_component[OF j, symmetric]
unfolding setsum_component[OF j, of "(\<lambda>i.(x\$i) *s f (basis i :: 'a^'m))" ?M]
..
then show ?thesis unfolding linear_setsum_mul[OF lf fM, symmetric] basis_expansion ..
qed

text{* Inverse matrices  (not necessarily square) *}

definition "invertible(A::'a::semiring_1^'n^'m) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>A'::'a^'m^'n. A ** A' = mat 1 \<and> A' ** A = mat 1)"

definition "matrix_inv(A:: 'a::semiring_1^'n^'m) =
(SOME A'::'a^'m^'n. A ** A' = mat 1 \<and> A' ** A = mat 1)"

text{* Correspondence between matrices and linear operators. *}

definition matrix:: "('a::{plus,times, one, zero}^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'n) \<Rightarrow> 'a^'m^'n"
where "matrix f = (\<chi> i j. (f(basis j))\$i)"

lemma matrix_vector_mul_linear: "linear(\<lambda>x. A *v (x::'a::comm_semiring_1 ^ 'n))"

lemma matrix_works: assumes lf: "linear f" shows "matrix f *v x = f (x::'a::comm_ring_1 ^ 'n)"
apply (simp add: matrix_def matrix_vector_mult_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta mult_commute del: One_nat_def)
apply clarify
apply (rule linear_componentwise[OF lf, symmetric])
apply simp
done

lemma matrix_vector_mul: "linear f ==> f = (\<lambda>x. matrix f *v (x::'a::comm_ring_1 ^ 'n))" by (simp add: ext matrix_works)

lemma matrix_of_matrix_vector_mul: "matrix(\<lambda>x. A *v (x :: 'a:: comm_ring_1 ^ 'n)) = A"
by (simp add: matrix_eq matrix_vector_mul_linear matrix_works)

lemma matrix_compose:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::comm_ring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _)" and lg: "linear g"
shows "matrix (g o f) = matrix g ** matrix f"
using lf lg linear_compose[OF lf lg] matrix_works[OF linear_compose[OF lf lg]]
by (simp  add: matrix_eq matrix_works matrix_vector_mul_assoc[symmetric] o_def)

lemma matrix_vector_column:"(A::'a::comm_semiring_1^'n^'m) *v x = setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s ((transp A)\$i)) {1..dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}"
by (simp add: matrix_vector_mult_def transp_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta setsum_component vector_component mult_commute)

lemma adjoint_matrix: "adjoint(\<lambda>x. (A::'a::comm_ring_1^'n^'m) *v x) = (\<lambda>x. transp A *v x)"
apply (rule matrix_vector_mul_linear)
apply (simp add: transp_def dot_def Cart_lambda_beta matrix_vector_mult_def setsum_left_distrib setsum_right_distrib)
apply (subst setsum_commute)
done

lemma matrix_adjoint: assumes lf: "linear (f :: 'a::comm_ring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 'm)"
shows "matrix(adjoint f) = transp(matrix f)"
apply (subst matrix_vector_mul[OF lf])

subsection{* Interlude: Some properties of real sets *}

lemma seq_mono_lemma: assumes "\<forall>(n::nat) \<ge> m. (d n :: real) < e n" and "\<forall>n \<ge> m. e n <= e m"
shows "\<forall>n \<ge> m. d n < e m"
using prems apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="n" in allE)
apply (erule_tac x="n" in allE)
apply auto
done

lemma real_convex_bound_lt:
assumes xa: "(x::real) < a" and ya: "y < a" and u: "0 <= u" and v: "0 <= v"
and uv: "u + v = 1"
shows "u * x + v * y < a"
proof-
have uv': "u = 0 \<longrightarrow> v \<noteq> 0" using u v uv by arith
have "a = a * (u + v)" unfolding uv  by simp
hence th: "u * a + v * a = a" by (simp add: ring_simps)
from xa u have "u \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> u*x < u*a" by (simp add: mult_compare_simps)
from ya v have "v \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> v * y < v * a" by (simp add: mult_compare_simps)
from xa ya u v have "u * x + v * y < u * a + v * a"
apply (cases "u = 0", simp_all add: uv')
apply(rule mult_strict_left_mono)
using uv' apply simp_all

apply(rule mult_strict_left_mono)
apply simp_all
apply (rule mult_left_mono)
apply simp_all
done
thus ?thesis unfolding th .
qed

lemma real_convex_bound_le:
assumes xa: "(x::real) \<le> a" and ya: "y \<le> a" and u: "0 <= u" and v: "0 <= v"
and uv: "u + v = 1"
shows "u * x + v * y \<le> a"
proof-
from xa ya u v have "u * x + v * y \<le> u * a + v * a" by (simp add: add_mono mult_left_mono)
also have "\<dots> \<le> (u + v) * a" by (simp add: ring_simps)
finally show ?thesis unfolding uv by simp
qed

lemma infinite_enumerate: assumes fS: "infinite S"
shows "\<exists>r. subseq r \<and> (\<forall>n. r n \<in> S)"
unfolding subseq_def
using enumerate_in_set[OF fS] enumerate_mono[of _ _ S] fS by auto

lemma approachable_lt_le: "(\<exists>(d::real)>0. \<forall>x. f x < d \<longrightarrow> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>d>0. \<forall>x. f x \<le> d \<longrightarrow> P x)"
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x="d/2" in exI)
apply auto
done

lemma triangle_lemma:
assumes x: "0 <= (x::real)" and y:"0 <= y" and z: "0 <= z" and xy: "x^2 <= y^2 + z^2"
shows "x <= y + z"
proof-
have "y^2 + z^2 \<le> y^2 + 2*y*z + z^2" using z y  by (simp add: zero_compare_simps)
with xy have th: "x ^2 \<le> (y+z)^2" by (simp add: power2_eq_square ring_simps)
from y z have yz: "y + z \<ge> 0" by arith
from power2_le_imp_le[OF th yz] show ?thesis .
qed

lemma lambda_skolem: "(\<forall>i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}. \<exists>x. P i x) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<exists>x::'a ^ 'n. \<forall>i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}. P i (x\$i))" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
let ?S = "{1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}"
{assume H: "?rhs"
then have ?lhs by auto}
moreover
{assume H: "?lhs"
then obtain f where f:"\<forall>i\<in> ?S. P i (f i)" unfolding Ball_def choice_iff by metis
let ?x = "(\<chi> i. (f i)) :: 'a ^ 'n"
{fix i assume i: "i \<in> ?S"
with f i have "P i (f i)" by metis
then have "P i (?x\$i)" using Cart_lambda_beta[of f, rule_format, OF i] by auto
}
hence "\<forall>i \<in> ?S. P i (?x\$i)" by metis
hence ?rhs by metis }
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

(* Supremum and infimum of real sets *)

definition rsup:: "real set \<Rightarrow> real" where
"rsup S = (SOME a. isLub UNIV S a)"

lemma rsup_alt: "rsup S = (SOME a. (\<forall>x \<in> S. x \<le> a) \<and> (\<forall>b. (\<forall>x \<in> S. x \<le> b) \<longrightarrow> a \<le> b))"  by (auto simp  add: isLub_def rsup_def leastP_def isUb_def setle_def setge_def)

lemma rsup: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and b: "\<exists>b. S *<= b"
shows "isLub UNIV S (rsup S)"
using Se b
unfolding rsup_def
apply clarify
apply (rule someI_ex)
apply (rule reals_complete)
by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_le: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and Sb: "S *<= b" shows "rsup S \<le> b"
proof-
from Sb have bu: "isUb UNIV S b" by (simp add: isUb_def setle_def)
from rsup[OF Se] Sb have "isLub UNIV S (rsup S)"  by blast
then show ?thesis using bu by (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def setle_def setge_def)
qed

lemma rsup_finite_Max: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "rsup S = Max S"
using fS Se
proof-
let ?m = "Max S"
from Max_ge[OF fS] have Sm: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> ?m" by metis
with rsup[OF Se] have lub: "isLub UNIV S (rsup S)" by (metis setle_def)
from Max_in[OF fS Se] lub have mrS: "?m \<le> rsup S"
by (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def setle_def setge_def isUb_def)
moreover
have "rsup S \<le> ?m" using Sm lub
by (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def isUb_def setle_def setge_def)
ultimately  show ?thesis by arith
qed

lemma rsup_finite_in: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "rsup S \<in> S"
using rsup_finite_Max[OF fS Se] Max_in[OF fS Se] by metis

lemma rsup_finite_Ub: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "isUb S S (rsup S)"
using rsup_finite_Max[OF fS Se] rsup_finite_in[OF fS Se] Max_ge[OF fS]
unfolding isUb_def setle_def by metis

lemma rsup_finite_ge_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a \<le> rsup S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> x \<in> S. a \<le> x)"
using rsup_finite_Ub[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_finite_le_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a \<ge> rsup S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x \<in> S. a \<ge> x)"
using rsup_finite_Ub[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_finite_gt_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a < rsup S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> x \<in> S. a < x)"
using rsup_finite_Ub[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_finite_lt_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a > rsup S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x \<in> S. a > x)"
using rsup_finite_Ub[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isUb_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_unique: assumes b: "S *<= b" and S: "\<forall>b' < b. \<exists>x \<in> S. b' < x"
shows "rsup S = b"
using b S
unfolding setle_def rsup_alt
apply -
apply (rule some_equality)
apply (metis  linorder_not_le order_eq_iff[symmetric])+
done

lemma rsup_le_subset: "S\<noteq>{} \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>b. T *<= b) \<Longrightarrow> rsup S \<le> rsup T"
apply (rule rsup_le)
apply simp
using rsup[of T] by (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def setge_def setle_def isUb_def)

lemma isUb_def': "isUb R S = (\<lambda>x. S *<= x \<and> x \<in> R)"
apply (rule ext)
by (metis isUb_def)

lemma UNIV_trivial: "UNIV x" using UNIV_I[of x] by (metis mem_def)
lemma rsup_bounds: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and l: "a <=* S" and u: "S *<= b"
shows "a \<le> rsup S \<and> rsup S \<le> b"
proof-
from rsup[OF Se] u have lub: "isLub UNIV S (rsup S)" by blast
hence b: "rsup S \<le> b" using u by (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def setle_def setge_def isUb_def')
from Se obtain y where y: "y \<in> S" by blast
from lub l have "a \<le> rsup S" apply (auto simp add: isLub_def leastP_def setle_def setge_def isUb_def')
apply (erule ballE[where x=y])
apply (erule ballE[where x=y])
apply arith
using y apply auto
done
with b show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma rsup_abs_le: "S \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<bar>x\<bar> \<le> a) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>rsup S\<bar> \<le> a"
unfolding abs_le_interval_iff  using rsup_bounds[of S "-a" a]
by (auto simp add: setge_def setle_def)

lemma rsup_asclose: assumes S:"S \<noteq> {}" and b: "\<forall>x\<in>S. \<bar>x - l\<bar> \<le> e" shows "\<bar>rsup S - l\<bar> \<le> e"
proof-
have th: "\<And>(x::real) l e. \<bar>x - l\<bar> \<le> e \<longleftrightarrow> l - e \<le> x \<and> x \<le> l + e" by arith
show ?thesis using S b rsup_bounds[of S "l - e" "l+e"] unfolding th
by  (auto simp add: setge_def setle_def)
qed

definition rinf:: "real set \<Rightarrow> real" where
"rinf S = (SOME a. isGlb UNIV S a)"

lemma rinf_alt: "rinf S = (SOME a. (\<forall>x \<in> S. x \<ge> a) \<and> (\<forall>b. (\<forall>x \<in> S. x \<ge> b) \<longrightarrow> a \<ge> b))"  by (auto simp  add: isGlb_def rinf_def greatestP_def isLb_def setle_def setge_def)

lemma reals_complete_Glb: assumes Se: "\<exists>x. x \<in> S" and lb: "\<exists> y. isLb UNIV S y"
shows "\<exists>(t::real). isGlb UNIV S t"
proof-
let ?M = "uminus ` S"
from lb have th: "\<exists>y. isUb UNIV ?M y" apply (auto simp add: isUb_def isLb_def setle_def setge_def)
by (rule_tac x="-y" in exI, auto)
from Se have Me: "\<exists>x. x \<in> ?M" by blast
from reals_complete[OF Me th] obtain t where t: "isLub UNIV ?M t" by blast
have "isGlb UNIV S (- t)" using t
apply (auto simp add: isLub_def isGlb_def leastP_def greatestP_def setle_def setge_def isUb_def isLb_def)
apply (erule_tac x="-y" in allE)
apply auto
done
then show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma rinf: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and b: "\<exists>b. b <=* S"
shows "isGlb UNIV S (rinf S)"
using Se b
unfolding rinf_def
apply clarify
apply (rule someI_ex)
apply (rule reals_complete_Glb)
apply (auto simp add: isLb_def setle_def setge_def)
done

lemma rinf_ge: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and Sb: "b <=* S" shows "rinf S \<ge> b"
proof-
from Sb have bu: "isLb UNIV S b" by (simp add: isLb_def setge_def)
from rinf[OF Se] Sb have "isGlb UNIV S (rinf S)"  by blast
then show ?thesis using bu by (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def setle_def setge_def)
qed

lemma rinf_finite_Min: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "rinf S = Min S"
using fS Se
proof-
let ?m = "Min S"
from Min_le[OF fS] have Sm: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<ge> ?m" by metis
with rinf[OF Se] have glb: "isGlb UNIV S (rinf S)" by (metis setge_def)
from Min_in[OF fS Se] glb have mrS: "?m \<ge> rinf S"
by (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def setle_def setge_def isLb_def)
moreover
have "rinf S \<ge> ?m" using Sm glb
by (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def isLb_def setle_def setge_def)
ultimately  show ?thesis by arith
qed

lemma rinf_finite_in: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "rinf S \<in> S"
using rinf_finite_Min[OF fS Se] Min_in[OF fS Se] by metis

lemma rinf_finite_Lb: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "isLb S S (rinf S)"
using rinf_finite_Min[OF fS Se] rinf_finite_in[OF fS Se] Min_le[OF fS]
unfolding isLb_def setge_def by metis

lemma rinf_finite_ge_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a \<le> rinf S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x \<in> S. a \<le> x)"
using rinf_finite_Lb[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isLb_def setge_def)

lemma rinf_finite_le_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a \<ge> rinf S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> x \<in> S. a \<ge> x)"
using rinf_finite_Lb[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isLb_def setge_def)

lemma rinf_finite_gt_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a < rinf S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> x \<in> S. a < x)"
using rinf_finite_Lb[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isLb_def setge_def)

lemma rinf_finite_lt_iff: assumes fS: "finite S" and Se: "S \<noteq> {}"
shows "a > rinf S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> x \<in> S. a > x)"
using rinf_finite_Lb[OF fS Se] by (auto simp add: isLb_def setge_def)

lemma rinf_unique: assumes b: "b <=* S" and S: "\<forall>b' > b. \<exists>x \<in> S. b' > x"
shows "rinf S = b"
using b S
unfolding setge_def rinf_alt
apply -
apply (rule some_equality)
apply (metis  linorder_not_le order_eq_iff[symmetric])+
done

lemma rinf_ge_subset: "S\<noteq>{} \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>b. b <=* T) \<Longrightarrow> rinf S >= rinf T"
apply (rule rinf_ge)
apply simp
using rinf[of T] by (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def setge_def setle_def isLb_def)

lemma isLb_def': "isLb R S = (\<lambda>x. x <=* S \<and> x \<in> R)"
apply (rule ext)
by (metis isLb_def)

lemma rinf_bounds: assumes Se: "S \<noteq> {}" and l: "a <=* S" and u: "S *<= b"
shows "a \<le> rinf S \<and> rinf S \<le> b"
proof-
from rinf[OF Se] l have lub: "isGlb UNIV S (rinf S)" by blast
hence b: "a \<le> rinf S" using l by (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def setle_def setge_def isLb_def')
from Se obtain y where y: "y \<in> S" by blast
from lub u have "b \<ge> rinf S" apply (auto simp add: isGlb_def greatestP_def setle_def setge_def isLb_def')
apply (erule ballE[where x=y])
apply (erule ballE[where x=y])
apply arith
using y apply auto
done
with b show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma rinf_abs_ge: "S \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<bar>x\<bar> \<le> a) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>rinf S\<bar> \<le> a"
unfolding abs_le_interval_iff  using rinf_bounds[of S "-a" a]
by (auto simp add: setge_def setle_def)

lemma rinf_asclose: assumes S:"S \<noteq> {}" and b: "\<forall>x\<in>S. \<bar>x - l\<bar> \<le> e" shows "\<bar>rinf S - l\<bar> \<le> e"
proof-
have th: "\<And>(x::real) l e. \<bar>x - l\<bar> \<le> e \<longleftrightarrow> l - e \<le> x \<and> x \<le> l + e" by arith
show ?thesis using S b rinf_bounds[of S "l - e" "l+e"] unfolding th
by  (auto simp add: setge_def setle_def)
qed

subsection{* Operator norm. *}

definition "onorm f = rsup {norm (f x)| x. norm x = 1}"

lemma norm_bound_generalize:
fixes f:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real^'m"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "(\<forall>x. norm x = 1 \<longrightarrow> norm (f x) \<le> b) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume H: ?rhs
{fix x :: "real^'n" assume x: "norm x = 1"
from H[rule_format, of x] x have "norm (f x) \<le> b" by simp}
then have ?lhs by blast }

moreover
{assume H: ?lhs
from H[rule_format, of "basis 1"]
have bp: "b \<ge> 0" using norm_ge_zero[of "f (basis 1)"] dimindex_ge_1[of "UNIV:: 'n set"]
by (auto simp add: norm_basis elim: order_trans [OF norm_ge_zero])
{fix x :: "real ^'n"
{assume "x = 0"
then have "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x" by (simp add: linear_0[OF lf] bp)}
moreover
{assume x0: "x \<noteq> 0"
hence n0: "norm x \<noteq> 0" by (metis norm_eq_zero)
let ?c = "1/ norm x"
have "norm (?c*s x) = 1" using x0 by (simp add: n0 norm_mul)
with H have "norm (f(?c*s x)) \<le> b" by blast
hence "?c * norm (f x) \<le> b"
by (simp add: linear_cmul[OF lf] norm_mul)
hence "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x"
using n0 norm_ge_zero[of x] by (auto simp add: field_simps)}
ultimately have "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x" by blast}
then have ?rhs by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma onorm:
fixes f:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m"
assumes lf: "linear f"
shows "norm (f x) <= onorm f * norm x"
and "\<forall>x. norm (f x) <= b * norm x \<Longrightarrow> onorm f <= b"
proof-
{
let ?S = "{norm (f x) |x. norm x = 1}"
have Se: "?S \<noteq> {}" using  norm_basis_1 by auto
from linear_bounded[OF lf] have b: "\<exists> b. ?S *<= b"
unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric] by (auto simp add: setle_def)
{from rsup[OF Se b, unfolded onorm_def[symmetric]]
show "norm (f x) <= onorm f * norm x"
apply -
apply (rule spec[where x = x])
unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric]
by (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def leastP_def setge_def setle_def)}
{
show "\<forall>x. norm (f x) <= b * norm x \<Longrightarrow> onorm f <= b"
using rsup[OF Se b, unfolded onorm_def[symmetric]]
unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric]
by (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def leastP_def setge_def setle_def)}
}
qed

lemma onorm_pos_le: assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)" shows "0 <= onorm f"
using order_trans[OF norm_ge_zero onorm(1)[OF lf, of "basis 1"], unfolded norm_basis_1] by simp

lemma onorm_eq_0: assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)"
shows "onorm f = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. f x = 0)"
using onorm[OF lf]
apply atomize
apply (erule allE[where x="0::real"])
using onorm_pos_le[OF lf]
apply arith
done

lemma onorm_const: "onorm(\<lambda>x::real^'n. (y::real ^ 'm)) = norm y"
proof-
let ?f = "\<lambda>x::real^'n. (y::real ^ 'm)"
have th: "{norm (?f x)| x. norm x = 1} = {norm y}"
by(auto intro: vector_choose_size set_ext)
show ?thesis
unfolding onorm_def th
apply (rule rsup_unique) by (simp_all  add: setle_def)
qed

lemma onorm_pos_lt: assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^ 'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)"
shows "0 < onorm f \<longleftrightarrow> ~(\<forall>x. f x = 0)"
unfolding onorm_eq_0[OF lf, symmetric]
using onorm_pos_le[OF lf] by arith

lemma onorm_compose:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)" and lg: "linear g"
shows "onorm (f o g) <= onorm f * onorm g"
apply (rule onorm(2)[OF linear_compose[OF lg lf], rule_format])
unfolding o_def
apply (subst mult_assoc)
apply (rule order_trans)
apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lf])
apply (rule mult_mono1)
apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lg])
apply (rule onorm_pos_le[OF lf])
done

lemma onorm_neg_lemma: assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real^'m)"
shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. - f x) \<le> onorm f"
using onorm[OF linear_compose_neg[OF lf]] onorm[OF lf]
unfolding norm_minus_cancel by metis

lemma onorm_neg: assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real^'m)"
shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. - f x) = onorm f"
using onorm_neg_lemma[OF lf] onorm_neg_lemma[OF linear_compose_neg[OF lf]]
by simp

lemma onorm_triangle:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)" and lg: "linear g"
shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) <= onorm f + onorm g"
apply(rule onorm(2)[OF linear_compose_add[OF lf lg], rule_format])
apply (rule order_trans)
apply (rule norm_triangle_ineq)
apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lf])
apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lg])
done

lemma onorm_triangle_le: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m) \<Longrightarrow> linear g \<Longrightarrow> onorm(f) + onorm(g) <= e
\<Longrightarrow> onorm(\<lambda>x. f x + g x) <= e"
apply (rule order_trans)
apply (rule onorm_triangle)
apply assumption+
done

lemma onorm_triangle_lt: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m) \<Longrightarrow> linear g \<Longrightarrow> onorm(f) + onorm(g) < e
==> onorm(\<lambda>x. f x + g x) < e"
apply (rule order_le_less_trans)
apply (rule onorm_triangle)
by assumption+

(* "lift" from 'a to 'a^1 and "drop" from 'a^1 to 'a -- FIXME: potential use of transfer *)

definition vec1:: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a ^ 1" where "vec1 x = (\<chi> i. x)"

definition dest_vec1:: "'a ^1 \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where "dest_vec1 x = (x\$1)"

lemma vec1_component[simp]: "(vec1 x)\$1 = x"

lemma vec1_dest_vec1[simp]: "vec1(dest_vec1 x) = x" "dest_vec1(vec1 y) = y"
by (simp_all add: vec1_def dest_vec1_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta dimindex_def del: One_nat_def)

lemma forall_vec1: "(\<forall>x. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P (vec1 x))" by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma exists_vec1: "(\<exists>x. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. P(vec1 x))" by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma forall_dest_vec1: "(\<forall>x. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P(dest_vec1 x))"  by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma exists_dest_vec1: "(\<exists>x. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. P(dest_vec1 x))"by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma vec1_eq[simp]:  "vec1 x = vec1 y \<longleftrightarrow> x = y" by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma dest_vec1_eq[simp]: "dest_vec1 x = dest_vec1 y \<longleftrightarrow> x = y" by (metis vec1_dest_vec1)

lemma vec1_in_image_vec1: "vec1 x \<in> (vec1 ` S) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> S" by auto

lemma vec1_vec: "vec1 x = vec x" by (vector vec1_def)

lemma vec1_add: "vec1(x + y) = vec1 x + vec1 y" by (vector vec1_def)
lemma vec1_sub: "vec1(x - y) = vec1 x - vec1 y" by (vector vec1_def)
lemma vec1_cmul: "vec1(c* x) = c *s vec1 x " by (vector vec1_def)
lemma vec1_neg: "vec1(- x) = - vec1 x " by (vector vec1_def)

lemma vec1_setsum: assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "vec1(setsum f S) = setsum (vec1 o f) S"
apply (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
done

lemma dest_vec1_lambda: "dest_vec1(\<chi> i. x i) = x 1"

lemma dest_vec1_vec: "dest_vec1(vec x) = x"

lemma dest_vec1_add: "dest_vec1(x + y) = dest_vec1 x + dest_vec1 y"

lemma dest_vec1_sub: "dest_vec1(x - y) = dest_vec1 x - dest_vec1 y"
by (metis vec1_dest_vec1 vec1_sub)

lemma dest_vec1_cmul: "dest_vec1(c*sx) = c * dest_vec1 x"
by (metis vec1_dest_vec1 vec1_cmul)

lemma dest_vec1_neg: "dest_vec1(- x) = - dest_vec1 x"
by (metis vec1_dest_vec1 vec1_neg)

lemma dest_vec1_0[simp]: "dest_vec1 0 = 0" by (metis vec_0 dest_vec1_vec)

lemma dest_vec1_sum: assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "dest_vec1(setsum f S) = setsum (dest_vec1 o f) S"
apply (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
done

lemma norm_vec1: "norm(vec1 x) = abs(x)"

lemma dist_vec1: "dist(vec1 x) (vec1 y) = abs(x - y)"
by (simp only: dist_real vec1_component)
lemma abs_dest_vec1: "norm x = \<bar>dest_vec1 x\<bar>"
by (metis vec1_dest_vec1 norm_vec1)

lemma linear_vmul_dest_vec1:
fixes f:: "'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a^1"
shows "linear f \<Longrightarrow> linear (\<lambda>x. dest_vec1(f x) *s v)"
unfolding dest_vec1_def
apply (rule linear_vmul_component)

lemma linear_from_scalars:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::comm_ring_1 ^1 \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n)"
shows "f = (\<lambda>x. dest_vec1 x *s column 1 (matrix f))"
apply (rule ext)
apply (subst matrix_works[OF lf, symmetric])
apply (auto simp add: Cart_eq matrix_vector_mult_def dest_vec1_def column_def Cart_lambda_beta vector_component dimindex_def mult_commute del: One_nat_def )
done

lemma linear_to_scalars: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::comm_ring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a^1)"
shows "f = (\<lambda>x. vec1(row 1 (matrix f) \<bullet> x))"
apply (rule ext)
apply (subst matrix_works[OF lf, symmetric])
apply (auto simp add: Cart_eq matrix_vector_mult_def vec1_def row_def Cart_lambda_beta vector_component dimindex_def dot_def mult_commute)
done

lemma dest_vec1_eq_0: "dest_vec1 x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"

lemma setsum_scalars: assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "setsum f S = vec1 (setsum (dest_vec1 o f) S)"
unfolding vec1_setsum[OF fS] by simp

lemma dest_vec1_wlog_le: "(\<And>(x::'a::linorder ^ 1) y. P x y \<longleftrightarrow> P y x)  \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x y. dest_vec1 x <= dest_vec1 y ==> P x y) \<Longrightarrow> P x y"
apply (cases "dest_vec1 x \<le> dest_vec1 y")
apply simp
apply (subgoal_tac "dest_vec1 y \<le> dest_vec1 x")
apply (auto)
done

text{* Pasting vectors. *}

lemma linear_fstcart: "linear fstcart"
by (auto simp add: linear_def fstcart_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta vector_component dimindex_finite_sum)

lemma linear_sndcart: "linear sndcart"
by (auto simp add: linear_def sndcart_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta vector_component dimindex_finite_sum)

lemma fstcart_vec[simp]: "fstcart(vec x) = vec x"
by (vector fstcart_def vec_def dimindex_finite_sum)

lemma fstcart_add[simp]:"fstcart(x + y) = fstcart (x::'a::{plus,times}^('b,'c) finite_sum) + fstcart y"
using linear_fstcart[unfolded linear_def] by blast

lemma fstcart_cmul[simp]:"fstcart(c*s x) = c*s fstcart (x::'a::{plus,times}^('b,'c) finite_sum)"
using linear_fstcart[unfolded linear_def] by blast

lemma fstcart_neg[simp]:"fstcart(- x) = - fstcart (x::'a::ring_1^('b,'c) finite_sum)"
unfolding vector_sneg_minus1 fstcart_cmul ..

lemma fstcart_sub[simp]:"fstcart(x - y) = fstcart (x::'a::ring_1^('b,'c) finite_sum) - fstcart y"

lemma fstcart_setsum:
fixes f:: "'d \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1^_"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "fstcart (setsum f S) = setsum (\<lambda>i. fstcart (f i)) S"
by (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS], simp_all add: vec_0[symmetric] del: vec_0)

lemma sndcart_vec[simp]: "sndcart(vec x) = vec x"
by (vector sndcart_def vec_def dimindex_finite_sum)

lemma sndcart_add[simp]:"sndcart(x + y) = sndcart (x::'a::{plus,times}^('b,'c) finite_sum) + sndcart y"
using linear_sndcart[unfolded linear_def] by blast

lemma sndcart_cmul[simp]:"sndcart(c*s x) = c*s sndcart (x::'a::{plus,times}^('b,'c) finite_sum)"
using linear_sndcart[unfolded linear_def] by blast

lemma sndcart_neg[simp]:"sndcart(- x) = - sndcart (x::'a::ring_1^('b,'c) finite_sum)"
unfolding vector_sneg_minus1 sndcart_cmul ..

lemma sndcart_sub[simp]:"sndcart(x - y) = sndcart (x::'a::ring_1^('b,'c) finite_sum) - sndcart y"

lemma sndcart_setsum:
fixes f:: "'d \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1^_"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "sndcart (setsum f S) = setsum (\<lambda>i. sndcart (f i)) S"
by (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS], simp_all add: vec_0[symmetric] del: vec_0)

lemma pastecart_vec[simp]: "pastecart (vec x) (vec x) = vec x"
by (simp add: pastecart_eq fstcart_vec sndcart_vec fstcart_pastecart sndcart_pastecart)

lemma pastecart_add[simp]:"pastecart (x1::'a::{plus,times}^_) y1 + pastecart x2 y2 = pastecart (x1 + x2) (y1 + y2)"

lemma pastecart_cmul[simp]: "pastecart (c *s (x1::'a::{plus,times}^_)) (c *s y1) = c *s pastecart x1 y1"
by (simp add: pastecart_eq fstcart_pastecart sndcart_pastecart)

lemma pastecart_neg[simp]: "pastecart (- (x::'a::ring_1^_)) (- y) = - pastecart x y"
unfolding vector_sneg_minus1 pastecart_cmul ..

lemma pastecart_sub: "pastecart (x1::'a::ring_1^_) y1 - pastecart x2 y2 = pastecart (x1 - x2) (y1 - y2)"
by (simp add: diff_def pastecart_neg[symmetric] del: pastecart_neg)

lemma pastecart_setsum:
fixes f:: "'d \<Rightarrow> 'a::semiring_1^_"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "pastecart (setsum f S) (setsum g S) = setsum (\<lambda>i. pastecart (f i) (g i)) S"
by (simp  add: pastecart_eq fstcart_setsum[OF fS] sndcart_setsum[OF fS] fstcart_pastecart sndcart_pastecart)

lemma norm_fstcart: "norm(fstcart x) <= norm (x::real ^('n,'m) finite_sum)"
proof-
let ?n = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?m = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)"
let ?N = "{1 .. ?n}"
let ?M = "{1 .. ?m}"
let ?NM = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: ('n,'m) finite_sum set)}"
have th_0: "1 \<le> ?n +1" by simp
have th0: "norm x = norm (pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x))"
have th1: "fstcart x \<bullet> fstcart x \<le> pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x) \<bullet> pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x)"
by (simp add: dot_def setsum_add_split[OF th_0, of _ ?m] pastecart_def dimindex_finite_sum Cart_lambda_beta setsum_nonneg zero_le_square del: One_nat_def)
then show ?thesis
unfolding th0
unfolding real_vector_norm_def real_sqrt_le_iff id_def
by (simp add: dot_def dimindex_finite_sum Cart_lambda_beta)
qed

lemma dist_fstcart: "dist(fstcart (x::real^_)) (fstcart y) <= dist x y"
by (metis dist_def fstcart_sub[symmetric] norm_fstcart)

lemma norm_sndcart: "norm(sndcart x) <= norm (x::real ^('n,'m) finite_sum)"
proof-
let ?n = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?m = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)"
let ?N = "{1 .. ?n}"
let ?M = "{1 .. ?m}"
let ?nm = "dimindex (UNIV :: ('n,'m) finite_sum set)"
let ?NM = "{1 .. ?nm}"
have thnm[simp]: "?nm = ?n + ?m" by (simp add: dimindex_finite_sum)
have th_0: "1 \<le> ?n +1" by simp
have th0: "norm x = norm (pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x))"
let ?f = "\<lambda>n. n - ?n"
let ?S = "{?n+1 .. ?nm}"
have finj:"inj_on ?f ?S"
using dimindex_nonzero[of "UNIV :: 'n set"] dimindex_nonzero[of "UNIV :: 'm set"]
apply (simp add: Ball_def atLeastAtMost_iff inj_on_def dimindex_finite_sum del: One_nat_def)
by arith
have fS: "?f ` ?S = ?M"
apply (rule set_ext)
apply (simp add: image_iff Bex_def) using dimindex_nonzero[of "UNIV :: 'n set"] dimindex_nonzero[of "UNIV :: 'm set"] by arith
have th1: "sndcart x \<bullet> sndcart x \<le> pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x) \<bullet> pastecart (fstcart x) (sndcart x)"
by (simp add: dot_def setsum_add_split[OF th_0, of _ ?m] pastecart_def dimindex_finite_sum Cart_lambda_beta setsum_nonneg zero_le_square setsum_reindex[OF finj, unfolded fS] del: One_nat_def)
then show ?thesis
unfolding th0
unfolding real_vector_norm_def real_sqrt_le_iff id_def
by (simp add: dot_def dimindex_finite_sum Cart_lambda_beta)
qed

lemma dist_sndcart: "dist(sndcart (x::real^_)) (sndcart y) <= dist x y"
by (metis dist_def sndcart_sub[symmetric] norm_sndcart)

lemma dot_pastecart: "(pastecart (x1::'a::{times,comm_monoid_add}^'n) (x2::'a::{times,comm_monoid_add}^'m)) \<bullet> (pastecart y1 y2) =  x1 \<bullet> y1 + x2 \<bullet> y2"
proof-
let ?n = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?m = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)"
let ?N = "{1 .. ?n}"
let ?M = "{1 .. ?m}"
let ?nm = "dimindex (UNIV :: ('n,'m) finite_sum set)"
let ?NM = "{1 .. ?nm}"
have thnm: "?nm = ?n + ?m" by (simp add: dimindex_finite_sum)
have th_0: "1 \<le> ?n +1" by simp
have th_1: "\<And>i. i \<in> {?m + 1 .. ?nm} \<Longrightarrow> i - ?m \<in> ?N" apply (simp add: thnm) by arith
let ?f = "\<lambda>a b i. (a\$i) * (b\$i)"
let ?g = "?f (pastecart x1 x2) (pastecart y1 y2)"
let ?S = "{?n +1 .. ?nm}"
{fix i
assume i: "i \<in> ?N"
have "?g i = ?f x1 y1 i"
using i
apply (simp add: pastecart_def Cart_lambda_beta thnm) done
}
hence th2: "setsum ?g ?N = setsum (?f x1 y1) ?N"
apply -
apply (rule setsum_cong)
apply auto
done
{fix i
assume i: "i \<in> ?S"
have "?g i = ?f x2 y2 (i - ?n)"
using i
apply (simp add: pastecart_def Cart_lambda_beta thnm) done
}
hence th3: "setsum ?g ?S = setsum (\<lambda>i. ?f x2 y2 (i -?n)) ?S"
apply -
apply (rule setsum_cong)
apply auto
done
let ?r = "\<lambda>n. n - ?n"
have rinj: "inj_on ?r ?S" apply (simp add: inj_on_def Ball_def thnm) by arith
have rS: "?r ` ?S = ?M" apply (rule set_ext)
apply (simp add: thnm image_iff Bex_def) by arith
have "pastecart x1 x2 \<bullet> (pastecart y1 y2) = setsum ?g ?NM" by (simp add: dot_def)
also have "\<dots> = setsum ?g ?N + setsum ?g ?S"
by (simp add: dot_def thnm setsum_add_split[OF th_0, of _ ?m] del: One_nat_def)
also have "\<dots> = setsum (?f x1 y1) ?N + setsum (?f x2 y2) ?M"
unfolding setsum_reindex[OF rinj, unfolded rS o_def] th2 th3 ..
finally
show ?thesis by (simp add: dot_def)
qed

lemma norm_pastecart: "norm(pastecart x y) <= norm(x :: real ^ _) + norm(y)"
unfolding real_vector_norm_def dot_pastecart real_sqrt_le_iff id_def
apply (rule power2_le_imp_le)
apply (auto simp add: power2_eq_square ring_simps)
apply (rule mult_nonneg_nonneg)
done

subsection {* A generic notion of "hull" (convex, affine, conic hull and closure). *}

definition hull :: "'a set set \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a set" (infixl "hull" 75) where
"S hull s = Inter {t. t \<in> S \<and> s \<subseteq> t}"

lemma hull_same: "s \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> S hull s = s"
unfolding hull_def by auto

lemma hull_in: "(\<And>T. T \<subseteq> S ==> Inter T \<in> S) ==> (S hull s) \<in> S"
unfolding hull_def subset_iff by auto

lemma hull_eq: "(\<And>T. T \<subseteq> S ==> Inter T \<in> S) ==> (S hull s) = s \<longleftrightarrow> s \<in> S"
using hull_same[of s S] hull_in[of S s] by metis

lemma hull_hull: "S hull (S hull s) = S hull s"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_subset: "s \<subseteq> (S hull s)"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_mono: " s \<subseteq> t ==> (S hull s) \<subseteq> (S hull t)"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_antimono: "S \<subseteq> T ==> (T hull s) \<subseteq> (S hull s)"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_minimal: "s \<subseteq> t \<Longrightarrow> t \<in> S ==> (S hull s) \<subseteq> t"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma subset_hull: "t \<in> S ==> S hull s \<subseteq> t \<longleftrightarrow>  s \<subseteq> t"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_unique: "s \<subseteq> t \<Longrightarrow> t \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>t'. s \<subseteq> t' \<Longrightarrow> t' \<in> S ==> t \<subseteq> t')
==> (S hull s = t)"
unfolding hull_def by auto

lemma hull_induct: "(\<And>x. x\<in> S \<Longrightarrow> P x) \<Longrightarrow> Q {x. P x} \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x\<in> Q hull S. P x"
using hull_minimal[of S "{x. P x}" Q]
by (auto simp add: subset_eq Collect_def mem_def)

lemma hull_inc: "x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> P hull S" by (metis hull_subset subset_eq)

lemma hull_union_subset: "(S hull s) \<union> (S hull t) \<subseteq> (S hull (s \<union> t))"
unfolding Un_subset_iff by (metis hull_mono Un_upper1 Un_upper2)

lemma hull_union: assumes T: "\<And>T. T \<subseteq> S ==> Inter T \<in> S"
shows "S hull (s \<union> t) = S hull (S hull s \<union> S hull t)"
apply rule
apply (rule hull_mono)
unfolding Un_subset_iff
apply (metis hull_subset Un_upper1 Un_upper2 subset_trans)
apply (rule hull_minimal)
apply (metis hull_union_subset)
apply (metis hull_in T)
done

lemma hull_redundant_eq: "a \<in> (S hull s) \<longleftrightarrow> (S hull (insert a s) = S hull s)"
unfolding hull_def by blast

lemma hull_redundant: "a \<in> (S hull s) ==> (S hull (insert a s) = S hull s)"
by (metis hull_redundant_eq)

text{* Archimedian properties and useful consequences. *}

lemma real_arch_simple: "\<exists>n. x <= real (n::nat)"
using reals_Archimedean2[of x] apply auto by (rule_tac x="Suc n" in exI, auto)
lemmas real_arch_lt = reals_Archimedean2

lemmas real_arch = reals_Archimedean3

lemma real_arch_inv: "0 < e \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>n::nat. n \<noteq> 0 \<and> 0 < inverse (real n) \<and> inverse (real n) < e)"
using reals_Archimedean
apply (auto simp add: field_simps inverse_positive_iff_positive)
apply (subgoal_tac "inverse (real n) > 0")
apply arith
apply simp
done

lemma real_pow_lbound: "0 <= x ==> 1 + real n * x <= (1 + x) ^ n"
proof(induct n)
case 0 thus ?case by simp
next
case (Suc n)
hence h: "1 + real n * x \<le> (1 + x) ^ n" by simp
from h have p: "1 \<le> (1 + x) ^ n" using Suc.prems by simp
from h have "1 + real n * x + x \<le> (1 + x) ^ n + x" by simp
also have "\<dots> \<le> (1 + x) ^ Suc n" apply (subst diff_le_0_iff_le[symmetric])
using mult_left_mono[OF p Suc.prems] by simp
finally show ?case  by (simp add: real_of_nat_Suc ring_simps)
qed

lemma real_arch_pow: assumes x: "1 < (x::real)" shows "\<exists>n. y < x^n"
proof-
from x have x0: "x - 1 > 0" by arith
from real_arch[OF x0, rule_format, of y]
obtain n::nat where n:"y < real n * (x - 1)" by metis
from x0 have x00: "x- 1 \<ge> 0" by arith
from real_pow_lbound[OF x00, of n] n
have "y < x^n" by auto
then show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma real_arch_pow2: "\<exists>n. (x::real) < 2^ n"
using real_arch_pow[of 2 x] by simp

lemma real_arch_pow_inv: assumes y: "(y::real) > 0" and x1: "x < 1"
shows "\<exists>n. x^n < y"
proof-
{assume x0: "x > 0"
from x0 x1 have ix: "1 < 1/x" by (simp add: field_simps)
from real_arch_pow[OF ix, of "1/y"]
obtain n where n: "1/y < (1/x)^n" by blast
then
have ?thesis using y x0 by (auto simp add: field_simps power_divide) }
moreover
{assume "\<not> x > 0" with y x1 have ?thesis apply auto by (rule exI[where x=1], auto)}
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma forall_pos_mono: "(\<And>d e::real. d < e \<Longrightarrow> P d ==> P e) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>n::nat. n \<noteq> 0 ==> P(inverse(real n))) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>e. 0 < e ==> P e)"
by (metis real_arch_inv)

lemma forall_pos_mono_1: "(\<And>d e::real. d < e \<Longrightarrow> P d ==> P e) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>n. P(inverse(real (Suc n)))) ==> 0 < e ==> P e"
apply (rule forall_pos_mono)
apply auto
apply (atomize)
apply (erule_tac x="n - 1" in allE)
apply auto
done

lemma real_archimedian_rdiv_eq_0: assumes x0: "x \<ge> 0" and c: "c \<ge> 0" and xc: "\<forall>(m::nat)>0. real m * x \<le> c"
shows "x = 0"
proof-
{assume "x \<noteq> 0" with x0 have xp: "x > 0" by arith
from real_arch[OF xp, rule_format, of c] obtain n::nat where n: "c < real n * x"  by blast
with xc[rule_format, of n] have "n = 0" by arith
with n c have False by simp}
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Relate max and min to sup and inf.                                        *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

lemma real_max_rsup: "max x y = rsup {x,y}"
proof-
have f: "finite {x, y}" "{x,y} \<noteq> {}"  by simp_all
from rsup_finite_le_iff[OF f, of "max x y"] have "rsup {x,y} \<le> max x y" by simp
moreover
have "max x y \<le> rsup {x,y}" using rsup_finite_ge_iff[OF f, of "max x y"]
ultimately show ?thesis by arith
qed

lemma real_min_rinf: "min x y = rinf {x,y}"
proof-
have f: "finite {x, y}" "{x,y} \<noteq> {}"  by simp_all
from rinf_finite_le_iff[OF f, of "min x y"] have "rinf {x,y} \<le> min x y"
moreover
have "min x y \<le> rinf {x,y}" using rinf_finite_ge_iff[OF f, of "min x y"]
by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by arith
qed

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Geometric progression.                                                    *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

lemma sum_gp_basic: "((1::'a::{field, recpower}) - x) * setsum (\<lambda>i. x^i) {0 .. n} = (1 - x^(Suc n))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof-
{assume x1: "x = 1" hence ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume x1: "x\<noteq>1"
hence x1': "x - 1 \<noteq> 0" "1 - x \<noteq> 0" "x - 1 = - (1 - x)" "- (1 - x) \<noteq> 0" by auto
from geometric_sum[OF x1, of "Suc n", unfolded x1']
have "(- (1 - x)) * setsum (\<lambda>i. x^i) {0 .. n} = - (1 - x^(Suc n))"
unfolding atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost
using x1' apply (auto simp only: field_simps)
done
then have ?thesis by (simp add: ring_simps) }
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma sum_gp_multiplied: assumes mn: "m <= n"
shows "((1::'a::{field, recpower}) - x) * setsum (op ^ x) {m..n} = x^m - x^ Suc n"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof-
let ?S = "{0..(n - m)}"
from mn have mn': "n - m \<ge> 0" by arith
let ?f = "op + m"
have i: "inj_on ?f ?S" unfolding inj_on_def by auto
have f: "?f ` ?S = {m..n}"
using mn apply (auto simp add: image_iff Bex_def) by arith
have th: "op ^ x o op + m = (\<lambda>i. x^m * x^i)"
from setsum_reindex[OF i, of "op ^ x", unfolded f th setsum_right_distrib[symmetric]]
have "?lhs = x^m * ((1 - x) * setsum (op ^ x) {0..n - m})" by simp
then show ?thesis unfolding sum_gp_basic using mn
qed

lemma sum_gp: "setsum (op ^ (x::'a::{field, recpower})) {m .. n} =
(if n < m then 0 else if x = 1 then of_nat ((n + 1) - m)
else (x^ m - x^ (Suc n)) / (1 - x))"
proof-
{assume nm: "n < m" hence ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume "\<not> n < m" hence nm: "m \<le> n" by arith
{assume x: "x = 1"  hence ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume x: "x \<noteq> 1" hence nz: "1 - x \<noteq> 0" by simp
from sum_gp_multiplied[OF nm, of x] nz have ?thesis by (simp add: field_simps)}
ultimately have ?thesis by metis
}
ultimately show ?thesis by metis
qed

lemma sum_gp_offset: "setsum (op ^ (x::'a::{field,recpower})) {m .. m+n} =
(if x = 1 then of_nat n + 1 else x^m * (1 - x^Suc n) / (1 - x))"
unfolding sum_gp[of x m "m + n"] power_Suc

subsection{* A bit of linear algebra. *}

definition "subspace S \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<in> S \<and> (\<forall>x\<in> S. \<forall>y \<in>S. x + y \<in> S) \<and> (\<forall>c. \<forall>x \<in>S. c *s x \<in>S )"
definition "span S = (subspace hull S)"
definition "dependent S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a \<in> S. a \<in> span(S - {a}))"
abbreviation "independent s == ~(dependent s)"

(* Closure properties of subspaces.                                          *)

lemma subspace_UNIV[simp]: "subspace(UNIV)" by (simp add: subspace_def)

lemma subspace_0: "subspace S ==> 0 \<in> S" by (metis subspace_def)

lemma subspace_add: "subspace S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> S ==> x + y \<in> S"
by (metis subspace_def)

lemma subspace_mul: "subspace S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> c *s x \<in> S"
by (metis subspace_def)

lemma subspace_neg: "subspace S \<Longrightarrow> (x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> - x \<in> S"
by (metis vector_sneg_minus1 subspace_mul)

lemma subspace_sub: "subspace S \<Longrightarrow> (x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> x - y \<in> S"

lemma subspace_setsum:
assumes sA: "subspace A" and fB: "finite B"
and f: "\<forall>x\<in> B. f x \<in> A"
shows "setsum f B \<in> A"
using  fB f sA
apply(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fB])

lemma subspace_linear_image:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _)" and sS: "subspace S"
shows "subspace(f ` S)"
using lf sS linear_0[OF lf]
unfolding linear_def subspace_def
apply (rule_tac x="x + y" in bexI, auto)
apply (rule_tac x="c*s x" in bexI, auto)
done

lemma subspace_linear_preimage: "linear (f::'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _) ==> subspace S ==> subspace {x. f x \<in> S}"
by (auto simp add: subspace_def linear_def linear_0[of f])

lemma subspace_trivial: "subspace {0::'a::semiring_1 ^_}"

lemma subspace_inter: "subspace A \<Longrightarrow> subspace B ==> subspace (A \<inter> B)"

lemma span_mono: "A \<subseteq> B ==> span A \<subseteq> span B"
by (metis span_def hull_mono)

lemma subspace_span: "subspace(span S)"
unfolding span_def
apply (rule hull_in[unfolded mem_def])
apply (simp only: subspace_def Inter_iff Int_iff subset_eq)
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply blast
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply (erule_tac x="X" in ballE)
apply simp
apply simp
done

lemma span_clauses:
"a \<in> S ==> a \<in> span S"
"0 \<in> span S"
"x\<in> span S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> span S ==> x + y \<in> span S"
"x \<in> span S \<Longrightarrow> c *s x \<in> span S"
by (metis span_def hull_subset subset_eq subspace_span subspace_def)+

lemma span_induct: assumes SP: "\<And>x. x \<in> S ==> P x"
and P: "subspace P" and x: "x \<in> span S" shows "P x"
proof-
from SP have SP': "S \<subseteq> P" by (simp add: mem_def subset_eq)
from P have P': "P \<in> subspace" by (simp add: mem_def)
from x hull_minimal[OF SP' P', unfolded span_def[symmetric]]
show "P x" by (metis mem_def subset_eq)
qed

lemma span_empty: "span {} = {(0::'a::semiring_0 ^ 'n)}"
apply (rule hull_unique)
apply (auto simp add: mem_def subspace_def)
unfolding mem_def[of "0::'a^'n", symmetric]
apply simp
done

lemma independent_empty: "independent {}"

lemma independent_mono: "independent A \<Longrightarrow> B \<subseteq> A ==> independent B"
apply (clarsimp simp add: dependent_def span_mono)
apply (subgoal_tac "span (B - {a}) \<le> span (A - {a})")
apply force
apply (rule span_mono)
apply auto
done

lemma span_subspace: "A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> B \<le> span A \<Longrightarrow>  subspace B \<Longrightarrow> span A = B"
by (metis order_antisym span_def hull_minimal mem_def)

lemma span_induct': assumes SP: "\<forall>x \<in> S. P x"
and P: "subspace P" shows "\<forall>x \<in> span S. P x"
using span_induct SP P by blast

inductive span_induct_alt_help for S:: "'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
span_induct_alt_help_0: "span_induct_alt_help S 0"
| span_induct_alt_help_S: "x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> span_induct_alt_help S z \<Longrightarrow> span_induct_alt_help S (c *s x + z)"

lemma span_induct_alt':
assumes h0: "h (0::'a::semiring_1^'n)" and hS: "\<And>c x y. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> h y \<Longrightarrow> h (c*s x + y)" shows "\<forall>x \<in> span S. h x"
proof-
{fix x:: "'a^'n" assume x: "span_induct_alt_help S x"
have "h x"
apply (rule span_induct_alt_help.induct[OF x])
apply (rule h0)
apply (rule hS, assumption, assumption)
done}
note th0 = this
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> span S"

have "span_induct_alt_help S x"
proof(rule span_induct[where x=x and S=S])
show "x \<in> span S" using x .
next
fix x assume xS : "x \<in> S"
from span_induct_alt_help_S[OF xS span_induct_alt_help_0, of 1]
show "span_induct_alt_help S x" by simp
next
have "span_induct_alt_help S 0" by (rule span_induct_alt_help_0)
moreover
{fix x y assume h: "span_induct_alt_help S x" "span_induct_alt_help S y"
from h
have "span_induct_alt_help S (x + y)"
apply (induct rule: span_induct_alt_help.induct)
apply simp
apply (rule span_induct_alt_help_S)
apply assumption
apply simp
done}
moreover
{fix c x assume xt: "span_induct_alt_help S x"
then have "span_induct_alt_help S (c*s x)"
apply (induct rule: span_induct_alt_help.induct)
apply (rule span_induct_alt_help_S)
apply assumption
apply simp
done
}
ultimately show "subspace (span_induct_alt_help S)"
unfolding subspace_def mem_def Ball_def by blast
qed}
with th0 show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma span_induct_alt:
assumes h0: "h (0::'a::semiring_1^'n)" and hS: "\<And>c x y. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> h y \<Longrightarrow> h (c*s x + y)" and x: "x \<in> span S"
shows "h x"
using span_induct_alt'[of h S] h0 hS x by blast

(* Individual closure properties. *)

lemma span_superset: "x \<in> S ==> x \<in> span S" by (metis span_clauses)

lemma span_0: "0 \<in> span S" by (metis subspace_span subspace_0)

lemma span_add: "x \<in> span S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> span S ==> x + y \<in> span S"

lemma span_mul: "x \<in> span S ==> (c *s x) \<in> span S"
by (metis subspace_span subspace_mul)

lemma span_neg: "x \<in> span S ==> - (x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> span S"
by (metis subspace_neg subspace_span)

lemma span_sub: "(x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> span S \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> span S ==> x - y \<in> span S"
by (metis subspace_span subspace_sub)

lemma span_setsum: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x \<in> A. f x \<in> span S ==> setsum f A \<in> span S"
apply (rule subspace_setsum)
by (metis subspace_span subspace_setsum)+

lemma span_add_eq: "(x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> span S \<Longrightarrow> x + y \<in> span S \<longleftrightarrow> y \<in> span S"
apply (auto simp only: span_add span_sub)
apply (subgoal_tac "(x + y) - x \<in> span S", simp)

(* Mapping under linear image. *)

lemma span_linear_image: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::semiring_1 ^ 'n => _)"
shows "span (f ` S) = f ` (span S)"
proof-
{fix x
assume x: "x \<in> span (f ` S)"
have "x \<in> f ` span S"
apply (rule span_induct[where x=x and S = "f ` S"])
apply (frule span_superset)
apply blast
apply (simp only: mem_def)
apply (rule subspace_linear_image[OF lf])
apply (rule subspace_span)
apply (rule x)
done}
moreover
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> span S"
have th0:"(\<lambda>a. f a \<in> span (f ` S)) = {x. f x \<in> span (f ` S)}" apply (rule set_ext)
unfolding mem_def Collect_def ..
have "f x \<in> span (f ` S)"
apply (rule span_induct[where S=S])
apply (rule span_superset)
apply simp
apply (subst th0)
apply (rule subspace_linear_preimage[OF lf subspace_span, of "f ` S"])
apply (rule x)
done}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* The key breakdown property. *)

lemma span_breakdown:
assumes bS: "(b::'a::ring_1 ^ 'n) \<in> S" and aS: "a \<in> span S"
shows "\<exists>k. a - k*s b \<in> span (S - {b})" (is "?P a")
proof-
{fix x assume xS: "x \<in> S"
{assume ab: "x = b"
then have "?P x"
apply simp
apply (rule exI[where x="1"], simp)
by (rule span_0)}
moreover
{assume ab: "x \<noteq> b"
then have "?P x"  using xS
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x=0])
apply (rule span_superset)
by simp}
ultimately have "?P x" by blast}
moreover have "subspace ?P"
unfolding subspace_def
apply auto
apply (rule exI[where x=0])
using span_0[of "S - {b}"]
apply (rule_tac x="k + ka" in exI)
apply (subgoal_tac "x + y - (k + ka) *s b = (x - k*s b) + (y - ka *s b)")
apply (simp only: )
apply assumption+
apply (vector ring_simps)
apply (rule_tac x= "c*k" in exI)
apply (subgoal_tac "c *s x - (c * k) *s b = c*s (x - k*s b)")
apply (simp only: )
apply (rule span_mul[unfolded mem_def])
apply assumption
by (vector ring_simps)
ultimately show "?P a" using aS span_induct[where S=S and P= "?P"] by metis
qed

lemma span_breakdown_eq:
"(x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> span (insert a S) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k. (x - k *s a) \<in> span S)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume x: "x \<in> span (insert a S)"
from x span_breakdown[of "a" "insert a S" "x"]
have ?rhs apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x= "k" in exI)
apply (rule set_rev_mp[of _ "span (S - {a})" _])
apply assumption
apply (rule span_mono)
apply blast
done}
moreover
{ fix k assume k: "x - k *s a \<in> span S"
have eq: "x = (x - k *s a) + k *s a" by vector
have "(x - k *s a) + k *s a \<in> span (insert a S)"
apply (rule set_rev_mp[of _ "span S" _])
apply (rule k)
apply (rule span_mono)
apply blast
apply (rule span_mul)
apply (rule span_superset)
apply blast
done
then have ?lhs using eq by metis}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* Hence some "reversal" results.*)

lemma in_span_insert:
assumes a: "(a::'a::field^'n) \<in> span (insert b S)" and na: "a \<notin> span S"
shows "b \<in> span (insert a S)"
proof-
from span_breakdown[of b "insert b S" a, OF insertI1 a]
obtain k where k: "a - k*s b \<in> span (S - {b})" by auto
{assume k0: "k = 0"
with k have "a \<in> span S"
apply (simp)
apply (rule set_rev_mp)
apply assumption
apply (rule span_mono)
apply blast
done
with na  have ?thesis by blast}
moreover
{assume k0: "k \<noteq> 0"
have eq: "b = (1/k) *s a - ((1/k) *s a - b)" by vector
from k0 have eq': "(1/k) *s (a - k*s b) = (1/k) *s a - b"
by (vector field_simps)
from k have "(1/k) *s (a - k*s b) \<in> span (S - {b})"
by (rule span_mul)
hence th: "(1/k) *s a - b \<in> span (S - {b})"
unfolding eq' .

from k
have ?thesis
apply (subst eq)
apply (rule span_sub)
apply (rule span_mul)
apply (rule span_superset)
apply blast
apply (rule set_rev_mp)
apply (rule th)
apply (rule span_mono)
using na by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma in_span_delete:
assumes a: "(a::'a::field^'n) \<in> span S"
and na: "a \<notin> span (S-{b})"
shows "b \<in> span (insert a (S - {b}))"
apply (rule in_span_insert)
apply (rule set_rev_mp)
apply (rule a)
apply (rule span_mono)
apply blast
apply (rule na)
done

(* Transitivity property. *)

lemma span_trans:
assumes x: "(x::'a::ring_1^'n) \<in> span S" and y: "y \<in> span (insert x S)"
shows "y \<in> span S"
proof-
from span_breakdown[of x "insert x S" y, OF insertI1 y]
obtain k where k: "y -k*s x \<in> span (S - {x})" by auto
have eq: "y = (y - k *s x) + k *s x" by vector
show ?thesis
apply (subst eq)
apply (rule set_rev_mp)
apply (rule k)
apply (rule span_mono)
apply blast
apply (rule span_mul)
by (rule x)
qed

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* An explicit expansion is sometimes needed.                                *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

lemma span_explicit:
"span P = {y::'a::semiring_1^'n. \<exists>S u. finite S \<and> S \<subseteq> P \<and> setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = y}"
(is "_ = ?E" is "_ = {y. ?h y}" is "_ = {y. \<exists>S u. ?Q S u y}")
proof-
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> ?E"
then obtain S u where fS: "finite S" and SP: "S\<subseteq>P" and u: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = x"
by blast
have "x \<in> span P"
unfolding u[symmetric]
apply (rule span_setsum[OF fS])
using span_mono[OF SP]
by (auto intro: span_superset span_mul)}
moreover
have "\<forall>x \<in> span P. x \<in> ?E"
unfolding mem_def Collect_def
proof(rule span_induct_alt')
show "?h 0"
apply (rule exI[where x="{}"]) by simp
next
fix c x y
assume x: "x \<in> P" and hy: "?h y"
from hy obtain S u where fS: "finite S" and SP: "S\<subseteq>P"
and u: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = y" by blast
let ?S = "insert x S"
let ?u = "\<lambda>y. if y = x then (if x \<in> S then u y + c else c)
else u y"
from fS SP x have th0: "finite (insert x S)" "insert x S \<subseteq> P" by blast+
{assume xS: "x \<in> S"
have S1: "S = (S - {x}) \<union> {x}"
and Sss:"finite (S - {x})" "finite {x}" "(S -{x}) \<inter> {x} = {}" using xS fS by auto
have "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) ?S =(\<Sum>v\<in>S - {x}. u v *s v) + (u x + c) *s x"
using xS
by (simp add: setsum_Un_disjoint[OF Sss, unfolded S1[symmetric]]
setsum_clauses(2)[OF fS] cong del: if_weak_cong)
also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>v\<in>S. u v *s v) + c *s x"
apply (simp add: setsum_Un_disjoint[OF Sss, unfolded S1[symmetric]])
by (vector ring_simps)
also have "\<dots> = c*s x + y"
finally have "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) ?S = c*s x + y" .
then have "?Q ?S ?u (c*s x + y)" using th0 by blast}
moreover
{assume xS: "x \<notin> S"
have th00: "(\<Sum>v\<in>S. (if v = x then c else u v) *s v) = y"
unfolding u[symmetric]
apply (rule setsum_cong2)
using xS by auto
have "?Q ?S ?u (c*s x + y)" using fS xS th0
ultimately have "?Q ?S ?u (c*s x + y)"
by (cases "x \<in> S", simp, simp)
then show "?h (c*s x + y)"
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x="?S"])
apply (rule exI[where x="?u"]) by metis
qed
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma dependent_explicit:
"dependent P \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>S u. finite S \<and> S \<subseteq> P \<and> (\<exists>(v::'a::{idom,field}^'n) \<in>S. u v \<noteq> 0 \<and> setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = 0))" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof-
{assume dP: "dependent P"
then obtain a S u where aP: "a \<in> P" and fS: "finite S"
and SP: "S \<subseteq> P - {a}" and ua: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = a"
unfolding dependent_def span_explicit by blast
let ?S = "insert a S"
let ?u = "\<lambda>y. if y = a then - 1 else u y"
let ?v = a
from aP SP have aS: "a \<notin> S" by blast
from fS SP aP have th0: "finite ?S" "?S \<subseteq> P" "?v \<in> ?S" "?u ?v \<noteq> 0" by auto
have s0: "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) ?S = 0"
using fS aS
apply (simp add: vector_smult_lneg vector_smult_lid setsum_clauses ring_simps )
apply (subst (2) ua[symmetric])
apply (rule setsum_cong2)
by auto
with th0 have ?rhs
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x= "?S"])
apply (rule exI[where x= "?u"])
by clarsimp}
moreover
{fix S u v assume fS: "finite S"
and SP: "S \<subseteq> P" and vS: "v \<in> S" and uv: "u v \<noteq> 0"
and u: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = 0"
let ?a = v
let ?S = "S - {v}"
let ?u = "\<lambda>i. (- u i) / u v"
have th0: "?a \<in> P" "finite ?S" "?S \<subseteq> P"       using fS SP vS by auto
have "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) ?S = setsum (\<lambda>v. (- (inverse (u ?a))) *s (u v *s v)) S - ?u v *s v"
using fS vS uv
by (simp add: setsum_diff1 vector_smult_lneg divide_inverse
vector_smult_assoc field_simps)
also have "\<dots> = ?a"
unfolding setsum_cmul u
using uv by (simp add: vector_smult_lneg)
finally  have "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) ?S = ?a" .
with th0 have ?lhs
unfolding dependent_def span_explicit
apply -
apply (rule bexI[where x= "?a"])
apply simp_all
apply (rule exI[where x= "?S"])
by auto}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma span_finite:
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "span S = {(y::'a::semiring_1^'n). \<exists>u. setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = y}"
(is "_ = ?rhs")
proof-
{fix y assume y: "y \<in> span S"
from y obtain S' u where fS': "finite S'" and SS': "S' \<subseteq> S" and
u: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S' = y" unfolding span_explicit by blast
let ?u = "\<lambda>x. if x \<in> S' then u x else 0"
from setsum_restrict_set[OF fS, of "\<lambda>v. u v *s v" S', symmetric] SS'
have "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) S = setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S'"
unfolding cond_value_iff cond_application_beta
apply (simp add: cond_value_iff cong del: if_weak_cong)
apply (rule setsum_cong)
apply auto
done
hence "setsum (\<lambda>v. ?u v *s v) S = y" by (metis u)
hence "y \<in> ?rhs" by auto}
moreover
{fix y u assume u: "setsum (\<lambda>v. u v *s v) S = y"
then have "y \<in> span S" using fS unfolding span_explicit by auto}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* Standard bases are a spanning set, and obviously finite.                  *)

lemma span_stdbasis:"span {basis i :: 'a::ring_1^'n | i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}} = UNIV"
apply (rule set_ext)
apply auto
apply (subst basis_expansion[symmetric])
apply (rule span_setsum)
apply simp
apply auto
apply (rule span_mul)
apply (rule span_superset)
apply (auto simp add: Collect_def mem_def)
done

lemma has_size_stdbasis: "{basis i ::real ^'n | i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}} hassize (dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set))" (is "?S hassize ?n")
proof-
have eq: "?S = basis ` {1 .. ?n}" by blast
show ?thesis unfolding eq
apply (rule hassize_image_inj[OF basis_inj])
qed

lemma finite_stdbasis: "finite {basis i ::real^'n |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)}}"
using has_size_stdbasis[unfolded hassize_def]
..

lemma card_stdbasis: "card {basis i ::real^'n |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}} = dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)"
using has_size_stdbasis[unfolded hassize_def]
..

lemma independent_stdbasis_lemma:
assumes x: "(x::'a::semiring_1 ^ 'n) \<in> span (basis ` S)"
and i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
and iS: "i \<notin> S"
shows "(x\$i) = 0"
proof-
let ?n = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?U = "{1 .. ?n}"
let ?B = "basis ` S"
let ?P = "\<lambda>(x::'a^'n). \<forall>i\<in> ?U. i \<notin> S \<longrightarrow> x\$i =0"
{fix x::"'a^'n" assume xS: "x\<in> ?B"
from xS have "?P x" by (auto simp add: basis_component)}
moreover
have "subspace ?P"
by (auto simp add: subspace_def Collect_def mem_def zero_index vector_component)
ultimately show ?thesis
using x span_induct[of ?B ?P x] i iS by blast
qed

lemma independent_stdbasis: "independent {basis i ::real^'n |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}}"
proof-
let ?n = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
let ?I = "{1 .. ?n}"
let ?b = "basis :: nat \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
let ?B = "?b ` ?I"
have eq: "{?b i|i. i \<in> ?I} = ?B"
by auto
{assume d: "dependent ?B"
then obtain k where k: "k \<in> ?I" "?b k \<in> span (?B - {?b k})"
unfolding dependent_def by auto
have eq1: "?B - {?b k} = ?B - ?b ` {k}"  by simp
have eq2: "?B - {?b k} = ?b ` (?I - {k})"
unfolding eq1
apply (rule inj_on_image_set_diff[symmetric])
apply (rule basis_inj) using k(1) by auto
from k(2) have th0: "?b k \<in> span (?b ` (?I - {k}))" unfolding eq2 .
from independent_stdbasis_lemma[OF th0 k(1), simplified]
have False by (simp add: basis_component[OF k(1), of k])}
then show ?thesis unfolding eq dependent_def ..
qed

(* This is useful for building a basis step-by-step.                         *)

lemma independent_insert:
"independent(insert (a::'a::field ^'n) S) \<longleftrightarrow>
(if a \<in> S then independent S
else independent S \<and> a \<notin> span S)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume aS: "a \<in> S"
hence ?thesis using insert_absorb[OF aS] by simp}
moreover
{assume aS: "a \<notin> S"
{assume i: ?lhs
then have ?rhs using aS
apply simp
apply (rule conjI)
apply (rule independent_mono)
apply assumption
apply blast
moreover
{assume i: ?rhs
have ?lhs using i aS
apply simp
apply (case_tac "aa = a", auto)
apply (subgoal_tac "insert a S - {aa} = insert a (S - {aa})")
apply simp
apply (subgoal_tac "a \<in> span (insert aa (S - {aa}))")
apply (subgoal_tac "insert aa (S - {aa}) = S")
apply simp
apply blast
apply (rule in_span_insert)
apply assumption
apply blast
apply blast
done}
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* The degenerate case of the Exchange Lemma.  *)

lemma mem_delete: "x \<in> (A - {a}) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<noteq> a \<and> x \<in> A"
by blast

lemma span_span: "span (span A) = span A"
unfolding span_def hull_hull ..

lemma span_inc: "S \<subseteq> span S"
by (metis subset_eq span_superset)

lemma spanning_subset_independent:
assumes BA: "B \<subseteq> A" and iA: "independent (A::('a::field ^'n) set)"
and AsB: "A \<subseteq> span B"
shows "A = B"
proof
from BA show "B \<subseteq> A" .
next
from span_mono[OF BA] span_mono[OF AsB]
have sAB: "span A = span B" unfolding span_span by blast

{fix x assume x: "x \<in> A"
from iA have th0: "x \<notin> span (A - {x})"
unfolding dependent_def using x by blast
from x have xsA: "x \<in> span A" by (blast intro: span_superset)
have "A - {x} \<subseteq> A" by blast
hence th1:"span (A - {x}) \<subseteq> span A" by (metis span_mono)
{assume xB: "x \<notin> B"
from xB BA have "B \<subseteq> A -{x}" by blast
hence "span B \<subseteq> span (A - {x})" by (metis span_mono)
with th1 th0 sAB have "x \<notin> span A" by blast
with x have False by (metis span_superset)}
then have "x \<in> B" by blast}
then show "A \<subseteq> B" by blast
qed

(* The general case of the Exchange Lemma, the key to what follows.  *)

lemma exchange_lemma:
assumes f:"finite (t:: ('a::field^'n) set)" and i: "independent s"
and sp:"s \<subseteq> span t"
shows "\<exists>t'. (t' hassize card t) \<and> s \<subseteq> t' \<and> t' \<subseteq> s \<union> t \<and> s \<subseteq> span t'"
using f i sp
proof(induct c\<equiv>"card(t - s)" arbitrary: s t rule: nat_less_induct)
fix n:: nat and s t :: "('a ^'n) set"
assume H: " \<forall>m<n. \<forall>(x:: ('a ^'n) set) xa.
finite xa \<longrightarrow>
independent x \<longrightarrow>
x \<subseteq> span xa \<longrightarrow>
m = card (xa - x) \<longrightarrow>
(\<exists>t'. (t' hassize card xa) \<and>
x \<subseteq> t' \<and> t' \<subseteq> x \<union> xa \<and> x \<subseteq> span t')"
and ft: "finite t" and s: "independent s" and sp: "s \<subseteq> span t"
and n: "n = card (t - s)"
let ?P = "\<lambda>t'. (t' hassize card t) \<and> s \<subseteq> t' \<and> t' \<subseteq> s \<union> t \<and> s \<subseteq> span t'"
let ?ths = "\<exists>t'. ?P t'"
{assume st: "s \<subseteq> t"
from st ft span_mono[OF st] have ?ths apply - apply (rule exI[where x=t])
by (auto simp add: hassize_def intro: span_superset)}
moreover
{assume st: "t \<subseteq> s"

from spanning_subset_independent[OF st s sp]
st ft span_mono[OF st] have ?ths apply - apply (rule exI[where x=t])
by (auto simp add: hassize_def intro: span_superset)}
moreover
{assume st: "\<not> s \<subseteq> t" "\<not> t \<subseteq> s"
from st(2) obtain b where b: "b \<in> t" "b \<notin> s" by blast
from b have "t - {b} - s \<subset> t - s" by blast
then have cardlt: "card (t - {b} - s) < n" using n ft
by (auto intro: psubset_card_mono)
from b ft have ct0: "card t \<noteq> 0" by auto
{assume stb: "s \<subseteq> span(t -{b})"
from ft have ftb: "finite (t -{b})" by auto
from H[rule_format, OF cardlt ftb s stb]
obtain u where u: "u hassize card (t-{b})" "s \<subseteq> u" "u \<subseteq> s \<union> (t - {b})" "s \<subseteq> span u" by blast
let ?w = "insert b u"
have th0: "s \<subseteq> insert b u" using u by blast
from u(3) b have "u \<subseteq> s \<union> t" by blast
then have th1: "insert b u \<subseteq> s \<union> t" using u b by blast
have bu: "b \<notin> u" using b u by blast
from u(1) have fu: "finite u" by (simp add: hassize_def)
from u(1) ft b have "u hassize (card t - 1)" by auto
then
have th2: "insert b u hassize card t"
using  card_insert_disjoint[OF fu bu] ct0 by (auto simp add: hassize_def)
from u(4) have "s \<subseteq> span u" .
also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> span (insert b u)" apply (rule span_mono) by blast
finally have th3: "s \<subseteq> span (insert b u)" .      from th0 th1 th2 th3 have th: "?P ?w"  by blast
from th have ?ths by blast}
moreover
{assume stb: "\<not> s \<subseteq> span(t -{b})"
from stb obtain a where a: "a \<in> s" "a \<notin> span (t - {b})" by blast
have ab: "a \<noteq> b" using a b by blast
have at: "a \<notin> t" using a ab span_superset[of a "t- {b}"] by auto
have mlt: "card ((insert a (t - {b})) - s) < n"
using cardlt ft n  a b by auto
have ft': "finite (insert a (t - {b}))" using ft by auto
{fix x assume xs: "x \<in> s"
have t: "t \<subseteq> (insert b (insert a (t -{b})))" using b by auto
from b(1) have "b \<in> span t" by (simp add: span_superset)
have bs: "b \<in> span (insert a (t - {b}))"
by (metis in_span_delete a sp mem_def subset_eq)
from xs sp have "x \<in> span t" by blast
with span_mono[OF t]
have x: "x \<in> span (insert b (insert a (t - {b})))" ..
from span_trans[OF bs x] have "x \<in> span (insert a (t - {b}))"  .}
then have sp': "s \<subseteq> span (insert a (t - {b}))" by blast

from H[rule_format, OF mlt ft' s sp' refl] obtain u where
u: "u hassize card (insert a (t -{b}))" "s \<subseteq> u" "u \<subseteq> s \<union> insert a (t -{b})"
"s \<subseteq> span u" by blast
from u a b ft at ct0 have "?P u" by (auto simp add: hassize_def)
then have ?ths by blast }
ultimately have ?ths by blast
}
ultimately
show ?ths  by blast
qed

(* This implies corresponding size bounds.                                   *)

lemma independent_span_bound:
assumes f: "finite t" and i: "independent (s::('a::field^'n) set)" and sp:"s \<subseteq> span t"
shows "finite s \<and> card s \<le> card t"
by (metis exchange_lemma[OF f i sp] hassize_def finite_subset card_mono)

lemma finite_Atleast_Atmost[simp]: "finite {f x |x. x\<in> {(i::'a::finite_intvl_succ) .. j}}"
proof-
have eq: "{f x |x. x\<in> {i .. j}} = f ` {i .. j}" by auto
show ?thesis unfolding eq
apply (rule finite_imageI)
apply (rule finite_intvl)
done
qed

lemma finite_Atleast_Atmost_nat[simp]: "finite {f x |x. x\<in> {(i::nat) .. j}}"
proof-
have eq: "{f x |x. x\<in> {i .. j}} = f ` {i .. j}" by auto
show ?thesis unfolding eq
apply (rule finite_imageI)
apply (rule finite_atLeastAtMost)
done
qed

lemma independent_bound:
fixes S:: "(real^'n) set"
shows "independent S \<Longrightarrow> finite S \<and> card S <= dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)"
apply (subst card_stdbasis[symmetric])
apply (rule independent_span_bound)
apply (rule finite_Atleast_Atmost_nat)
apply assumption
unfolding span_stdbasis
apply (rule subset_UNIV)
done

lemma dependent_biggerset: "(finite (S::(real ^'n) set) ==> card S > dimindex(UNIV:: 'n set)) ==> dependent S"
by (metis independent_bound not_less)

(* Hence we can create a maximal independent subset.                         *)

lemma maximal_independent_subset_extend:
assumes sv: "(S::(real^'n) set) \<subseteq> V" and iS: "independent S"
shows "\<exists>B. S \<subseteq> B \<and> B \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B"
using sv iS
proof(induct d\<equiv> "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set) - card S" arbitrary: S rule: nat_less_induct)
fix n and S:: "(real^'n) set"
assume H: "\<forall>m<n. \<forall>S \<subseteq> V. independent S \<longrightarrow> m = dimindex (UNIV::'n set) - card S \<longrightarrow>
(\<exists>B. S \<subseteq> B \<and> B \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B)"
and sv: "S \<subseteq> V" and i: "independent S" and n: "n = dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set) - card S"
let ?P = "\<lambda>B. S \<subseteq> B \<and> B \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B"
let ?ths = "\<exists>x. ?P x"
let ?d = "dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
{assume "V \<subseteq> span S"
then have ?ths  using sv i by blast }
moreover
{assume VS: "\<not> V \<subseteq> span S"
from VS obtain a where a: "a \<in> V" "a \<notin> span S" by blast
from a have aS: "a \<notin> S" by (auto simp add: span_superset)
have th0: "insert a S \<subseteq> V" using a sv by blast
from independent_insert[of a S]  i a
have th1: "independent (insert a S)" by auto
have mlt: "?d - card (insert a S) < n"
using aS a n independent_bound[OF th1] dimindex_ge_1[of "UNIV :: 'n set"]
by auto

from H[rule_format, OF mlt th0 th1 refl]
obtain B where B: "insert a S \<subseteq> B" "B \<subseteq> V" "independent B" " V \<subseteq> span B"
by blast
from B have "?P B" by auto
then have ?ths by blast}
ultimately show ?ths by blast
qed

lemma maximal_independent_subset:
"\<exists>(B:: (real ^'n) set). B\<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B"
by (metis maximal_independent_subset_extend[of "{}:: (real ^'n) set"] empty_subsetI independent_empty)

(* Notion of dimension.                                                      *)

definition "dim V = (SOME n. \<exists>B. B \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B \<and> (B hassize n))"

lemma basis_exists:  "\<exists>B. (B :: (real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B \<and> (B hassize dim V)"
unfolding dim_def some_eq_ex[of "\<lambda>n. \<exists>B. B \<subseteq> V \<and> independent B \<and> V \<subseteq> span B \<and> (B hassize n)"]
unfolding hassize_def
using maximal_independent_subset[of V] independent_bound
by auto

(* Consequences of independence or spanning for cardinality.                 *)

lemma independent_card_le_dim: "(B::(real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V \<Longrightarrow> independent B \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<and> card B \<le> dim V"
by (metis basis_exists[of V] independent_span_bound[where ?'a=real] hassize_def subset_trans)

lemma span_card_ge_dim:  "(B::(real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V \<Longrightarrow> V \<subseteq> span B \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> dim V \<le> card B"
by (metis basis_exists[of V] independent_span_bound hassize_def subset_trans)

lemma basis_card_eq_dim:
"B \<subseteq> (V:: (real ^'n) set) \<Longrightarrow> V \<subseteq> span B \<Longrightarrow> independent B \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<and> card B = dim V"
by (metis order_eq_iff independent_card_le_dim span_card_ge_dim independent_mono)

lemma dim_unique: "(B::(real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V \<Longrightarrow> V \<subseteq> span B \<Longrightarrow> independent B \<Longrightarrow> B hassize n \<Longrightarrow> dim V = n"
by (metis basis_card_eq_dim hassize_def)

(* More lemmas about dimension.                                              *)

lemma dim_univ: "dim (UNIV :: (real^'n) set) = dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
apply (rule dim_unique[of "{basis i |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}}"])
by (auto simp only: span_stdbasis has_size_stdbasis independent_stdbasis)

lemma dim_subset:
"(S:: (real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> dim S \<le> dim T"
using basis_exists[of T] basis_exists[of S]
by (metis independent_span_bound[where ?'a = real and ?'n = 'n] subset_eq hassize_def)

lemma dim_subset_univ: "dim (S:: (real^'n) set) \<le> dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
by (metis dim_subset subset_UNIV dim_univ)

(* Converses to those.                                                       *)

lemma card_ge_dim_independent:
assumes BV:"(B::(real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V" and iB:"independent B" and dVB:"dim V \<le> card B"
shows "V \<subseteq> span B"
proof-
{fix a assume aV: "a \<in> V"
{assume aB: "a \<notin> span B"
then have iaB: "independent (insert a B)" using iB aV  BV by (simp add: independent_insert)
from aV BV have th0: "insert a B \<subseteq> V" by blast
from aB have "a \<notin>B" by (auto simp add: span_superset)
with independent_card_le_dim[OF th0 iaB] dVB  have False by auto}
then have "a \<in> span B"  by blast}
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma card_le_dim_spanning:
assumes BV: "(B:: (real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V" and VB: "V \<subseteq> span B"
and fB: "finite B" and dVB: "dim V \<ge> card B"
shows "independent B"
proof-
{fix a assume a: "a \<in> B" "a \<in> span (B -{a})"
from a fB have c0: "card B \<noteq> 0" by auto
from a fB have cb: "card (B -{a}) = card B - 1" by auto
from BV a have th0: "B -{a} \<subseteq> V" by blast
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> V"
from a have eq: "insert a (B -{a}) = B" by blast
from x VB have x': "x \<in> span B" by blast
from span_trans[OF a(2), unfolded eq, OF x']
have "x \<in> span (B -{a})" . }
then have th1: "V \<subseteq> span (B -{a})" by blast
have th2: "finite (B -{a})" using fB by auto
from span_card_ge_dim[OF th0 th1 th2]
have c: "dim V \<le> card (B -{a})" .
from c c0 dVB cb have False by simp}
then show ?thesis unfolding dependent_def by blast
qed

lemma card_eq_dim: "(B:: (real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> V \<Longrightarrow> B hassize dim V \<Longrightarrow> independent B \<longleftrightarrow> V \<subseteq> span B"
by (metis hassize_def order_eq_iff card_le_dim_spanning
card_ge_dim_independent)

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* More general size bound lemmas.                                           *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

lemma independent_bound_general:
"independent (S:: (real^'n) set) \<Longrightarrow> finite S \<and> card S \<le> dim S"
by (metis independent_card_le_dim independent_bound subset_refl)

lemma dependent_biggerset_general: "(finite (S:: (real^'n) set) \<Longrightarrow> card S > dim S) \<Longrightarrow> dependent S"
using independent_bound_general[of S] by (metis linorder_not_le)

lemma dim_span: "dim (span (S:: (real ^'n) set)) = dim S"
proof-
have th0: "dim S \<le> dim (span S)"
by (auto simp add: subset_eq intro: dim_subset span_superset)
from basis_exists[of S]
obtain B where B: "B \<subseteq> S" "independent B" "S \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim S" by blast
from B have fB: "finite B" "card B = dim S" unfolding hassize_def by blast+
have bSS: "B \<subseteq> span S" using B(1) by (metis subset_eq span_inc)
have sssB: "span S \<subseteq> span B" using span_mono[OF B(3)] by (simp add: span_span)
from span_card_ge_dim[OF bSS sssB fB(1)] th0 show ?thesis
using fB(2)  by arith
qed

lemma subset_le_dim: "(S:: (real ^'n) set) \<subseteq> span T \<Longrightarrow> dim S \<le> dim T"
by (metis dim_span dim_subset)

lemma span_eq_dim: "span (S:: (real ^'n) set) = span T ==> dim S = dim T"
by (metis dim_span)

lemma spans_image:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::semiring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _)" and VB: "V \<subseteq> span B"
shows "f ` V \<subseteq> span (f ` B)"
unfolding span_linear_image[OF lf]
by (metis VB image_mono)

lemma dim_image_le: assumes lf: "linear f" shows "dim (f ` S) \<le> dim (S:: (real ^'n) set)"
proof-
from basis_exists[of S] obtain B where
B: "B \<subseteq> S" "independent B" "S \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim S" by blast
from B have fB: "finite B" "card B = dim S" unfolding hassize_def by blast+
have "dim (f ` S) \<le> card (f ` B)"
apply (rule span_card_ge_dim)
using lf B fB by (auto simp add: span_linear_image spans_image subset_image_iff)
also have "\<dots> \<le> dim S" using card_image_le[OF fB(1)] fB by simp
finally show ?thesis .
qed

(* Relation between bases and injectivity/surjectivity of map.               *)

lemma spanning_surjective_image:
assumes us: "UNIV \<subseteq> span (S:: ('a::semiring_1 ^'n) set)"
and lf: "linear f" and sf: "surj f"
shows "UNIV \<subseteq> span (f ` S)"
proof-
have "UNIV \<subseteq> f ` UNIV" using sf by (auto simp add: surj_def)
also have " \<dots> \<subseteq> span (f ` S)" using spans_image[OF lf us] .
finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma independent_injective_image:
assumes iS: "independent (S::('a::semiring_1^'n) set)" and lf: "linear f" and fi: "inj f"
shows "independent (f ` S)"
proof-
{fix a assume a: "a \<in> S" "f a \<in> span (f ` S - {f a})"
have eq: "f ` S - {f a} = f ` (S - {a})" using fi
from a have "f a \<in> f ` span (S -{a})"
unfolding eq span_linear_image[OF lf, of "S - {a}"]  by blast
hence "a \<in> span (S -{a})" using fi by (auto simp add: inj_on_def)
with a(1) iS  have False by (simp add: dependent_def) }
then show ?thesis unfolding dependent_def by blast
qed

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Picking an orthogonal replacement for a spanning set.                     *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* FIXME : Move to some general theory ?*)
definition "pairwise R S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> S. \<forall>y\<in> S. x\<noteq>y \<longrightarrow> R x y)"

lemma vector_sub_project_orthogonal: "(b::'a::ordered_field^'n) \<bullet> (x - ((b \<bullet> x) / (b\<bullet>b)) *s b) = 0"
apply (cases "b = 0", simp)
unfolding times_divide_eq_right[symmetric]

lemma basis_orthogonal:
fixes B :: "(real ^'n) set"
assumes fB: "finite B"
shows "\<exists>C. finite C \<and> card C \<le> card B \<and> span C = span B \<and> pairwise orthogonal C"
(is " \<exists>C. ?P B C")
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fB])
case 1 thus ?case apply (rule exI[where x="{}"]) by (auto simp add: pairwise_def)
next
case (2 a B)
note fB = `finite B` and aB = `a \<notin> B`
from `\<exists>C. finite C \<and> card C \<le> card B \<and> span C = span B \<and> pairwise orthogonal C`
obtain C where C: "finite C" "card C \<le> card B"
"span C = span B" "pairwise orthogonal C" by blast
let ?a = "a - setsum (\<lambda>x. (x\<bullet>a / (x\<bullet>x)) *s x) C"
let ?C = "insert ?a C"
from C(1) have fC: "finite ?C" by simp
from fB aB C(1,2) have cC: "card ?C \<le> card (insert a B)" by (simp add: card_insert_if)
{fix x k
have th0: "\<And>(a::'b::comm_ring) b c. a - (b - c) = c + (a - b)" by (simp add: ring_simps)
have "x - k *s (a - (\<Sum>x\<in>C. (x \<bullet> a / (x \<bullet> x)) *s x)) \<in> span C \<longleftrightarrow> x - k *s a \<in> span C"
apply (simp only: vector_ssub_ldistrib th0)
apply (rule span_mul)
apply (rule span_setsum[OF C(1)])
apply clarify
apply (rule span_mul)
by (rule span_superset)}
then have SC: "span ?C = span (insert a B)"
unfolding expand_set_eq span_breakdown_eq C(3)[symmetric] by auto
thm pairwise_def
{fix x y assume xC: "x \<in> ?C" and yC: "y \<in> ?C" and xy: "x \<noteq> y"
{assume xa: "x = ?a" and ya: "y = ?a"
have "orthogonal x y" using xa ya xy by blast}
moreover
{assume xa: "x = ?a" and ya: "y \<noteq> ?a" "y \<in> C"
from ya have Cy: "C = insert y (C - {y})" by blast
have fth: "finite (C - {y})" using C by simp
have "orthogonal x y"
using xa ya
unfolding orthogonal_def xa dot_lsub dot_rsub diff_eq_0_iff_eq
apply simp
apply (subst Cy)
using C(1) fth
apply (simp only: setsum_clauses)
apply (auto simp add: dot_ladd dot_lmult dot_eq_0 dot_sym[of y a] dot_lsum[OF fth])
apply (rule setsum_0')
apply clarsimp
apply (rule C(4)[unfolded pairwise_def orthogonal_def, rule_format])
by auto}
moreover
{assume xa: "x \<noteq> ?a" "x \<in> C" and ya: "y = ?a"
from xa have Cx: "C = insert x (C - {x})" by blast
have fth: "finite (C - {x})" using C by simp
have "orthogonal x y"
using xa ya
unfolding orthogonal_def ya dot_rsub dot_lsub diff_eq_0_iff_eq
apply simp
apply (subst Cx)
using C(1) fth
apply (simp only: setsum_clauses)
apply (subst dot_sym[of x])
apply (auto simp add: dot_radd dot_rmult dot_eq_0 dot_sym[of x a] dot_rsum[OF fth])
apply (rule setsum_0')
apply clarsimp
apply (rule C(4)[unfolded pairwise_def orthogonal_def, rule_format])
by auto}
moreover
{assume xa: "x \<in> C" and ya: "y \<in> C"
have "orthogonal x y" using xa ya xy C(4) unfolding pairwise_def by blast}
ultimately have "orthogonal x y" using xC yC by blast}
then have CPO: "pairwise orthogonal ?C" unfolding pairwise_def by blast
from fC cC SC CPO have "?P (insert a B) ?C" by blast
then show ?case by blast
qed

lemma orthogonal_basis_exists:
fixes V :: "(real ^'n) set"
shows "\<exists>B. independent B \<and> B \<subseteq> span V \<and> V \<subseteq> span B \<and> (B hassize dim V) \<and> pairwise orthogonal B"
proof-
from basis_exists[of V] obtain B where B: "B \<subseteq> V" "independent B" "V \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim V" by blast
from B have fB: "finite B" "card B = dim V" by (simp_all add: hassize_def)
from basis_orthogonal[OF fB(1)] obtain C where
C: "finite C" "card C \<le> card B" "span C = span B" "pairwise orthogonal C" by blast
from C B
have CSV: "C \<subseteq> span V" by (metis span_inc span_mono subset_trans)
from span_mono[OF B(3)]  C have SVC: "span V \<subseteq> span C" by (simp add: span_span)
from card_le_dim_spanning[OF CSV SVC C(1)] C(2,3) fB
have iC: "independent C" by (simp add: dim_span)
from C fB have "card C \<le> dim V" by simp
moreover have "dim V \<le> card C" using span_card_ge_dim[OF CSV SVC C(1)]
ultimately have CdV: "C hassize dim V" unfolding hassize_def using C(1) by simp
from C B CSV CdV iC show ?thesis by auto
qed

lemma span_eq: "span S = span T \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> span T \<and> T \<subseteq> span S"
by (metis set_eq_subset span_mono span_span span_inc)

(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Low-dimensional subset is in a hyperplane (weak orthogonal complement).   *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)

lemma span_not_univ_orthogonal:
assumes sU: "span S \<noteq> UNIV"
shows "\<exists>(a:: real ^'n). a \<noteq>0 \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> span S. a \<bullet> x = 0)"
proof-
from sU obtain a where a: "a \<notin> span S" by blast
from orthogonal_basis_exists obtain B where
B: "independent B" "B \<subseteq> span S" "S \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim S" "pairwise orthogonal B"
by blast
from B have fB: "finite B" "card B = dim S" by (simp_all add: hassize_def)
from span_mono[OF B(2)] span_mono[OF B(3)]
have sSB: "span S = span B" by (simp add: span_span)
let ?a = "a - setsum (\<lambda>b. (a\<bullet>b / (b\<bullet>b)) *s b) B"
have "setsum (\<lambda>b. (a\<bullet>b / (b\<bullet>b)) *s b) B \<in> span S"
unfolding sSB
apply (rule span_setsum[OF fB(1)])
apply clarsimp
apply (rule span_mul)
by (rule span_superset)
with a have a0:"?a  \<noteq> 0" by auto
have "\<forall>x\<in>span B. ?a \<bullet> x = 0"
proof(rule span_induct')
show "subspace (\<lambda>x. ?a \<bullet> x = 0)"
next
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> B"
from x have B': "B = insert x (B - {x})" by blast
have fth: "finite (B - {x})" using fB by simp
have "?a \<bullet> x = 0"
apply (subst B') using fB fth
unfolding setsum_clauses(2)[OF fth]
apply simp
apply (rule setsum_0', rule ballI)
unfolding dot_sym
by (auto simp add: x field_simps dot_eq_0 intro: B(5)[unfolded pairwise_def orthogonal_def, rule_format])}
then show "\<forall>x \<in> B. ?a \<bullet> x = 0" by blast
qed
with a0 show ?thesis unfolding sSB by (auto intro: exI[where x="?a"])
qed

lemma span_not_univ_subset_hyperplane:
assumes SU: "span S \<noteq> (UNIV ::(real^'n) set)"
shows "\<exists> a. a \<noteq>0 \<and> span S \<subseteq> {x. a \<bullet> x = 0}"
using span_not_univ_orthogonal[OF SU] by auto

lemma lowdim_subset_hyperplane:
assumes d: "dim S < dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)"
shows "\<exists>(a::real ^'n). a  \<noteq> 0 \<and> span S \<subseteq> {x. a \<bullet> x = 0}"
proof-
{assume "span S = UNIV"
hence "dim (span S) = dim (UNIV :: (real ^'n) set)" by simp
hence "dim S = dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)" by (simp add: dim_span dim_univ)
with d have False by arith}
hence th: "span S \<noteq> UNIV" by blast
from span_not_univ_subset_hyperplane[OF th] show ?thesis .
qed

(* We can extend a linear basis-basis injection to the whole set.            *)

lemma linear_indep_image_lemma:
assumes lf: "linear f" and fB: "finite B"
and ifB: "independent (f ` B)"
and fi: "inj_on f B" and xsB: "x \<in> span B"
and fx: "f (x::'a::field^'n) = 0"
shows "x = 0"
using fB ifB fi xsB fx
proof(induct arbitrary: x rule: finite_induct[OF fB])
case 1 thus ?case by (auto simp add:  span_empty)
next
case (2 a b x)
have fb: "finite b" using "2.prems" by simp
have th0: "f ` b \<subseteq> f ` (insert a b)"
apply (rule image_mono) by blast
from independent_mono[ OF "2.prems"(2) th0]
have ifb: "independent (f ` b)"  .
have fib: "inj_on f b"
apply (rule subset_inj_on [OF "2.prems"(3)])
by blast
from span_breakdown[of a "insert a b", simplified, OF "2.prems"(4)]
obtain k where k: "x - k*s a \<in> span (b -{a})" by blast
have "f (x - k*s a) \<in> span (f ` b)"
unfolding span_linear_image[OF lf]
apply (rule imageI)
using k span_mono[of "b-{a}" b] by blast
hence "f x - k*s f a \<in> span (f ` b)"
by (simp add: linear_sub[OF lf] linear_cmul[OF lf])
hence th: "-k *s f a \<in> span (f ` b)"
using "2.prems"(5) by (simp add: vector_smult_lneg)
{assume k0: "k = 0"
from k0 k have "x \<in> span (b -{a})" by simp
then have "x \<in> span b" using span_mono[of "b-{a}" b]
by blast}
moreover
{assume k0: "k \<noteq> 0"
from span_mul[OF th, of "- 1/ k"] k0
have th1: "f a \<in> span (f ` b)"
from inj_on_image_set_diff[OF "2.prems"(3), of "insert a b " "{a}", symmetric]
have tha: "f ` insert a b - f ` {a} = f ` (insert a b - {a})" by blast
from "2.prems"(2)[unfolded dependent_def bex_simps(10), rule_format, of "f a"]
have "f a \<notin> span (f ` b)" using tha
using "2.hyps"(2)
"2.prems"(3) by auto
with th1 have False by blast
then have "x \<in> span b" by blast}
ultimately have xsb: "x \<in> span b" by blast
from "2.hyps"(3)[OF fb ifb fib xsb "2.prems"(5)]
show "x = 0" .
qed

(* We can extend a linear mapping from basis.                                *)

lemma linear_independent_extend_lemma:
assumes fi: "finite B" and ib: "independent B"
shows "\<exists>g. (\<forall>x\<in> span B. \<forall>y\<in> span B. g ((x::'a::field^'n) + y) = g x + g y)
\<and> (\<forall>x\<in> span B. \<forall>c. g (c*s x) = c *s g x)
\<and> (\<forall>x\<in> B. g x = f x)"
using ib fi
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF fi])
case 1 thus ?case by (auto simp add: span_empty)
next
case (2 a b)
from "2.prems" "2.hyps" have ibf: "independent b" "finite b"
from "2.hyps"(3)[OF ibf] obtain g where
g: "\<forall>x\<in>span b. \<forall>y\<in>span b. g (x + y) = g x + g y"
"\<forall>x\<in>span b. \<forall>c. g (c *s x) = c *s g x" "\<forall>x\<in>b. g x = f x" by blast
let ?h = "\<lambda>z. SOME k. (z - k *s a) \<in> span b"
{fix z assume z: "z \<in> span (insert a b)"
have th0: "z - ?h z *s a \<in> span b"
apply (rule someI_ex)
unfolding span_breakdown_eq[symmetric]
using z .
{fix k assume k: "z - k *s a \<in> span b"
have eq: "z - ?h z *s a - (z - k*s a) = (k - ?h z) *s a"
from span_sub[OF th0 k]
have khz: "(k - ?h z) *s a \<in> span b" by (simp add: eq)
{assume "k \<noteq> ?h z" hence k0: "k - ?h z \<noteq> 0" by simp
from k0 span_mul[OF khz, of "1 /(k - ?h z)"]
have "a \<in> span b" by (simp add: vector_smult_assoc)
with "2.prems"(1) "2.hyps"(2) have False
then have "k = ?h z" by blast}
with th0 have "z - ?h z *s a \<in> span b \<and> (\<forall>k. z - k *s a \<in> span b \<longrightarrow> k = ?h z)" by blast}
note h = this
let ?g = "\<lambda>z. ?h z *s f a + g (z - ?h z *s a)"
{fix x y assume x: "x \<in> span (insert a b)" and y: "y \<in> span (insert a b)"
have tha: "\<And>(x::'a^'n) y a k l. (x + y) - (k + l) *s a = (x - k *s a) + (y - l *s a)"
by (vector ring_simps)
have addh: "?h (x + y) = ?h x + ?h y"
apply (rule conjunct2[OF h, rule_format, symmetric])
unfolding tha
by (metis span_add x y conjunct1[OF h, rule_format])
have "?g (x + y) = ?g x + ?g y"
g(1)[rule_format,OF conjunct1[OF h, OF x] conjunct1[OF h, OF y]]
moreover
{fix x:: "'a^'n" and c:: 'a  assume x: "x \<in> span (insert a b)"
have tha: "\<And>(x::'a^'n) c k a. c *s x - (c * k) *s a = c *s (x - k *s a)"
by (vector ring_simps)
have hc: "?h (c *s x) = c * ?h x"
apply (rule conjunct2[OF h, rule_format, symmetric])
apply (metis span_mul x)
by (metis tha span_mul x conjunct1[OF h])
have "?g (c *s x) = c*s ?g x"
unfolding hc tha g(2)[rule_format, OF conjunct1[OF h, OF x]]
by (vector ring_simps)}
moreover
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> (insert a b)"
{assume xa: "x = a"
have ha1: "1 = ?h a"
apply (rule conjunct2[OF h, rule_format])
apply (metis span_superset insertI1)
using conjunct1[OF h, OF span_superset, OF insertI1]

from xa ha1[symmetric] have "?g x = f x"
apply simp
using g(2)[rule_format, OF span_0, of 0]
by simp}
moreover
{assume xb: "x \<in> b"
have h0: "0 = ?h x"
apply (rule conjunct2[OF h, rule_format])
apply (metis  span_superset insertI1 xb x)
apply simp
apply (metis span_superset xb)
done
have "?g x = f x"
by (simp add: h0[symmetric] g(3)[rule_format, OF xb])}
ultimately have "?g x = f x" using x by blast }
ultimately show ?case apply - apply (rule exI[where x="?g"]) by blast
qed

lemma linear_independent_extend:
assumes iB: "independent (B:: (real ^'n) set)"
shows "\<exists>g. linear g \<and> (\<forall>x\<in>B. g x = f x)"
proof-
from maximal_independent_subset_extend[of B "UNIV"] iB
obtain C where C: "B \<subseteq> C" "independent C" "\<And>x. x \<in> span C" by auto

from C(2) independent_bound[of C] linear_independent_extend_lemma[of C f]
obtain g where g: "(\<forall>x\<in> span C. \<forall>y\<in> span C. g (x + y) = g x + g y)
\<and> (\<forall>x\<in> span C. \<forall>c. g (c*s x) = c *s g x)
\<and> (\<forall>x\<in> C. g x = f x)" by blast
from g show ?thesis unfolding linear_def using C
apply clarsimp by blast
qed

(* Can construct an isomorphism between spaces of same dimension.            *)

lemma card_le_inj: assumes fA: "finite A" and fB: "finite B"
and c: "card A \<le> card B" shows "(\<exists>f. f ` A \<subseteq> B \<and> inj_on f A)"
using fB c
proof(induct arbitrary: B rule: finite_induct[OF fA])
case 1 thus ?case by simp
next
case (2 x s t)
thus ?case
proof(induct rule: finite_induct[OF "2.prems"(1)])
case 1    then show ?case by simp
next
case (2 y t)
from "2.prems"(1,2,5) "2.hyps"(1,2) have cst:"card s \<le> card t" by simp
from "2.prems"(3) [OF "2.hyps"(1) cst] obtain f where
f: "f ` s \<subseteq> t \<and> inj_on f s" by blast
from f "2.prems"(2) "2.hyps"(2) show ?case
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x = "\<lambda>z. if z = x then y else f z"])
qed
qed

lemma card_subset_eq: assumes fB: "finite B" and AB: "A \<subseteq> B" and
c: "card A = card B"
shows "A = B"
proof-
from fB AB have fA: "finite A" by (auto intro: finite_subset)
from fA fB have fBA: "finite (B - A)" by auto
have e: "A \<inter> (B - A) = {}" by blast
have eq: "A \<union> (B - A) = B" using AB by blast
from card_Un_disjoint[OF fA fBA e, unfolded eq c]
have "card (B - A) = 0" by arith
hence "B - A = {}" unfolding card_eq_0_iff using fA fB by simp
with AB show "A = B" by blast
qed

lemma subspace_isomorphism:
assumes s: "subspace (S:: (real ^'n) set)" and t: "subspace T"
and d: "dim S = dim T"
shows "\<exists>f. linear f \<and> f ` S = T \<and> inj_on f S"
proof-
from basis_exists[of S] obtain B where
B: "B \<subseteq> S" "independent B" "S \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim S" by blast
from basis_exists[of T] obtain C where
C: "C \<subseteq> T" "independent C" "T \<subseteq> span C" "C hassize dim T" by blast
from B(4) C(4) card_le_inj[of B C] d obtain f where
f: "f ` B \<subseteq> C" "inj_on f B" unfolding hassize_def by auto
from linear_independent_extend[OF B(2)] obtain g where
g: "linear g" "\<forall>x\<in> B. g x = f x" by blast
from B(4) have fB: "finite B" by (simp add: hassize_def)
from C(4) have fC: "finite C" by (simp add: hassize_def)
from inj_on_iff_eq_card[OF fB, of f] f(2)
have "card (f ` B) = card B" by simp
with B(4) C(4) have ceq: "card (f ` B) = card C" using d
have "g ` B = f ` B" using g(2)
also have "\<dots> = C" using card_subset_eq[OF fC f(1) ceq] .
finally have gBC: "g ` B = C" .
have gi: "inj_on g B" using f(2) g(2)
note g0 = linear_indep_image_lemma[OF g(1) fB, unfolded gBC, OF C(2) gi]
{fix x y assume x: "x \<in> S" and y: "y \<in> S" and gxy:"g x = g y"
from B(3) x y have x': "x \<in> span B" and y': "y \<in> span B" by blast+
from gxy have th0: "g (x - y) = 0" by (simp add: linear_sub[OF g(1)])
have th1: "x - y \<in> span B" using x' y' by (metis span_sub)
have "x=y" using g0[OF th1 th0] by simp }
then have giS: "inj_on g S"
unfolding inj_on_def by blast
from span_subspace[OF B(1,3) s]
have "g ` S = span (g ` B)" by (simp add: span_linear_image[OF g(1)])
also have "\<dots> = span C" unfolding gBC ..
also have "\<dots> = T" using span_subspace[OF C(1,3) t] .
finally have gS: "g ` S = T" .
from g(1) gS giS show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* linear functions are equal on a subspace if they are on a spanning set.   *)

lemma subspace_kernel:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::semiring_1 ^'n \<Rightarrow> _)"
shows "subspace {x. f x = 0}"

lemma linear_eq_0_span:
assumes lf: "linear f" and f0: "\<forall>x\<in>B. f x = 0"
shows "\<forall>x \<in> span B. f x = (0::'a::semiring_1 ^'n)"
proof
fix x assume x: "x \<in> span B"
let ?P = "\<lambda>x. f x = 0"
from subspace_kernel[OF lf] have "subspace ?P" unfolding Collect_def .
with x f0 span_induct[of B "?P" x] show "f x = 0" by blast
qed

lemma linear_eq_0:
assumes lf: "linear f" and SB: "S \<subseteq> span B" and f0: "\<forall>x\<in>B. f x = 0"
shows "\<forall>x \<in> S. f x = (0::'a::semiring_1^'n)"
by (metis linear_eq_0_span[OF lf] subset_eq SB f0)

lemma linear_eq:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::ring_1^'n \<Rightarrow> _)" and lg: "linear g" and S: "S \<subseteq> span B"
and fg: "\<forall> x\<in> B. f x = g x"
shows "\<forall>x\<in> S. f x = g x"
proof-
let ?h = "\<lambda>x. f x - g x"
from fg have fg': "\<forall>x\<in> B. ?h x = 0" by simp
from linear_eq_0[OF linear_compose_sub[OF lf lg] S fg']
show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma linear_eq_stdbasis:
assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::ring_1^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n)" and lg: "linear g"
and fg: "\<forall>i \<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'm set)}. f (basis i) = g(basis i)"
shows "f = g"
proof-
let ?U = "UNIV :: 'm set"
let ?I = "{basis i:: 'a^'m|i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex ?U}}"
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> (UNIV :: ('a^'m) set)"
from equalityD2[OF span_stdbasis]
have IU: " (UNIV :: ('a^'m) set) \<subseteq> span ?I" by blast
from linear_eq[OF lf lg IU] fg x
have "f x = g x" unfolding Collect_def  Ball_def mem_def by metis}
then show ?thesis by (auto intro: ext)
qed

(* Similar results for bilinear functions.                                   *)

lemma bilinear_eq:
assumes bf: "bilinear (f:: 'a::ring^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a^'p)"
and bg: "bilinear g"
and SB: "S \<subseteq> span B" and TC: "T \<subseteq> span C"
and fg: "\<forall>x\<in> B. \<forall>y\<in> C. f x y = g x y"
shows "\<forall>x\<in>S. \<forall>y\<in>T. f x y = g x y "
proof-
let ?P = "\<lambda>x. \<forall>y\<in> span C. f x y = g x y"
from bf bg have sp: "subspace ?P"
unfolding bilinear_def linear_def subspace_def bf bg

have "\<forall>x \<in> span B. \<forall>y\<in> span C. f x y = g x y"
apply -
apply (rule ballI)
apply (rule span_induct[of B ?P])
defer
apply (rule sp)
apply assumption
apply (rule_tac P="\<lambda>y. f xa y = g xa y" and S=C in span_induct)
using fg
using bf bg unfolding bilinear_def linear_def
then show ?thesis using SB TC by (auto intro: ext)
qed

lemma bilinear_eq_stdbasis:
assumes bf: "bilinear (f:: 'a::ring_1^'m \<Rightarrow> 'a^'n \<Rightarrow> 'a^'p)"
and bg: "bilinear g"
and fg: "\<forall>i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}. \<forall>j\<in>  {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}. f (basis i) (basis j) = g (basis i) (basis j)"
shows "f = g"
proof-
from fg have th: "\<forall>x \<in> {basis i| i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}}. \<forall>y\<in>  {basis j |j. j \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}}. f x y = g x y" by blast
from bilinear_eq[OF bf bg equalityD2[OF span_stdbasis] equalityD2[OF span_stdbasis] th] show ?thesis by (blast intro: ext)
qed

(* Detailed theorems about left and right invertibility in general case.     *)

lemma left_invertible_transp:
"(\<exists>(B::'a^'n^'m). B ** transp (A::'a^'n^'m) = mat (1::'a::comm_semiring_1)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(B::'a^'m^'n). A ** B = mat 1)"
by (metis matrix_transp_mul transp_mat transp_transp)

lemma right_invertible_transp:
"(\<exists>(B::'a^'n^'m). transp (A::'a^'n^'m) ** B = mat (1::'a::comm_semiring_1)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(B::'a^'m^'n). B ** A = mat 1)"
by (metis matrix_transp_mul transp_mat transp_transp)

lemma linear_injective_left_inverse:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m)" and fi: "inj f"
shows "\<exists>g. linear g \<and> g o f = id"
proof-
from linear_independent_extend[OF independent_injective_image, OF independent_stdbasis, OF lf fi]
obtain h:: "real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real ^'n" where h: "linear h" " \<forall>x \<in> f ` {basis i|i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV::'n set)}}. h x = inv f x" by blast
from h(2)
have th: "\<forall>i\<in>{1..dimindex (UNIV::'n set)}. (h \<circ> f) (basis i) = id (basis i)"
using inv_o_cancel[OF fi, unfolded stupid_ext[symmetric] id_def o_def]
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x="basis i" in allE)
by auto

from linear_eq_stdbasis[OF linear_compose[OF lf h(1)] linear_id th]
have "h o f = id" .
then show ?thesis using h(1) by blast
qed

lemma linear_surjective_right_inverse:
assumes lf: "linear (f:: real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and sf: "surj f"
shows "\<exists>g. linear g \<and> f o g = id"
proof-
from linear_independent_extend[OF independent_stdbasis]
obtain h:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'m" where
h: "linear h" "\<forall> x\<in> {basis i| i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}}. h x = inv f x" by blast
from h(2)
have th: "\<forall>i\<in>{1..dimindex (UNIV::'n set)}. (f o h) (basis i) = id (basis i)"
using sf
apply (auto simp add: surj_iff o_def stupid_ext[symmetric])
apply (erule_tac x="basis i" in allE)
by auto

from linear_eq_stdbasis[OF linear_compose[OF h(1) lf] linear_id th]
have "f o h = id" .
then show ?thesis using h(1) by blast
qed

lemma matrix_left_invertible_injective:
"(\<exists>B. (B::real^'m^'n) ** (A::real^'n^'m) = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x y. A *v x = A *v y \<longrightarrow> x = y)"
proof-
{fix B:: "real^'m^'n" and x y assume B: "B ** A = mat 1" and xy: "A *v x = A*v y"
from xy have "B*v (A *v x) = B *v (A*v y)" by simp
hence "x = y"
unfolding matrix_vector_mul_assoc B matrix_vector_mul_lid .}
moreover
{assume A: "\<forall>x y. A *v x = A *v y \<longrightarrow> x = y"
hence i: "inj (op *v A)" unfolding inj_on_def by auto
from linear_injective_left_inverse[OF matrix_vector_mul_linear i]
obtain g where g: "linear g" "g o op *v A = id" by blast
have "matrix g ** A = mat 1"
unfolding matrix_eq matrix_vector_mul_lid matrix_vector_mul_assoc[symmetric] matrix_works[OF g(1)]
using g(2) by (simp add: o_def id_def stupid_ext)
then have "\<exists>B. (B::real ^'m^'n) ** A = mat 1" by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma matrix_left_invertible_ker:
"(\<exists>B. (B::real ^'m^'n) ** (A::real^'n^'m) = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. A *v x = 0 \<longrightarrow> x = 0)"
unfolding matrix_left_invertible_injective
using linear_injective_0[OF matrix_vector_mul_linear, of A]

lemma matrix_right_invertible_surjective:
"(\<exists>B. (A::real^'n^'m) ** (B::real^'m^'n) = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> surj (\<lambda>x. A *v x)"
proof-
{fix B :: "real ^'m^'n"  assume AB: "A ** B = mat 1"
{fix x :: "real ^ 'm"
have "A *v (B *v x) = x"
by (simp add: matrix_vector_mul_lid matrix_vector_mul_assoc AB)}
hence "surj (op *v A)" unfolding surj_def by metis }
moreover
{assume sf: "surj (op *v A)"
from linear_surjective_right_inverse[OF matrix_vector_mul_linear sf]
obtain g:: "real ^'m \<Rightarrow> real ^'n" where g: "linear g" "op *v A o g = id"
by blast

have "A ** (matrix g) = mat 1"
unfolding matrix_eq  matrix_vector_mul_lid
matrix_vector_mul_assoc[symmetric] matrix_works[OF g(1)]
using g(2) unfolding o_def stupid_ext[symmetric] id_def
.
hence "\<exists>B. A ** (B::real^'m^'n) = mat 1" by blast
}
ultimately show ?thesis unfolding surj_def by blast
qed

lemma matrix_left_invertible_independent_columns:
fixes A :: "real^'n^'m"
shows "(\<exists>(B::real ^'m^'n). B ** A = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>c. setsum (\<lambda>i. c i *s column i A) {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)} = 0 \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}. c i = 0))"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
let ?U = "{1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}"
{assume k: "\<forall>x. A *v x = 0 \<longrightarrow> x = 0"
{fix c i assume c: "setsum (\<lambda>i. c i *s column i A) ?U = 0"
and i: "i \<in> ?U"
let ?x = "\<chi> i. c i"
have th0:"A *v ?x = 0"
using c
unfolding matrix_mult_vsum Cart_eq
by (auto simp add: vector_component zero_index setsum_component Cart_lambda_beta)
from k[rule_format, OF th0] i
have "c i = 0" by (vector Cart_eq)}
hence ?rhs by blast}
moreover
{assume H: ?rhs
{fix x assume x: "A *v x = 0"
let ?c = "\<lambda>i. ((x\$i ):: real)"
from H[rule_format, of ?c, unfolded matrix_mult_vsum[symmetric], OF x]
have "x = 0" by vector}}
ultimately show ?thesis unfolding matrix_left_invertible_ker by blast
qed

lemma matrix_right_invertible_independent_rows:
fixes A :: "real^'n^'m"
shows "(\<exists>(B::real^'m^'n). A ** B = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>c. setsum (\<lambda>i. c i *s row i A) {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'm set)} = 0 \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}. c i = 0))"
unfolding left_invertible_transp[symmetric]
matrix_left_invertible_independent_columns

lemma matrix_right_invertible_span_columns:
"(\<exists>(B::real ^'n^'m). (A::real ^'m^'n) ** B = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> span (columns A) = UNIV" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof-
let ?U = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'm set)}"
have fU: "finite ?U" by simp
have lhseq: "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y. \<exists>(x::real^'m). setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s column i A) ?U = y)"
unfolding matrix_right_invertible_surjective matrix_mult_vsum surj_def
apply (subst eq_commute) ..
have rhseq: "?rhs \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. x \<in> span (columns A))" by blast
{assume h: ?lhs
{fix x:: "real ^'n"
from h[unfolded lhseq, rule_format, of x] obtain y:: "real ^'m"
where y: "setsum (\<lambda>i. (y\$i) *s column i A) ?U = x" by blast
have "x \<in> span (columns A)"
unfolding y[symmetric]
apply (rule span_setsum[OF fU])
apply clarify
apply (rule span_mul)
apply (rule span_superset)
unfolding columns_def
by blast}
then have ?rhs unfolding rhseq by blast}
moreover
{assume h:?rhs
let ?P = "\<lambda>(y::real ^'n). \<exists>(x::real^'m). setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s column i A) ?U = y"
{fix y have "?P y"
proof(rule span_induct_alt[of ?P "columns A"])
show "\<exists>x\<Colon>real ^ 'm. setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s column i A) ?U = 0"
apply (rule exI[where x=0])
next
fix c y1 y2 assume y1: "y1 \<in> columns A" and y2: "?P y2"
from y1 obtain i where i: "i \<in> ?U" "y1 = column i A"
unfolding columns_def by blast
from y2 obtain x:: "real ^'m" where
x: "setsum (\<lambda>i. (x\$i) *s column i A) ?U = y2" by blast
let ?x = "(\<chi> j. if j = i then c + (x\$i) else (x\$j))::real^'m"
show "?P (c*s y1 + y2)"
proof(rule exI[where x= "?x"], vector, auto simp add: i x[symmetric]Cart_lambda_beta setsum_component cond_value_iff right_distrib cond_application_beta vector_component cong del: if_weak_cong, simp only: One_nat_def[symmetric])
fix j
have th: "\<forall>xa \<in> ?U. (if xa = i then (c + (x\$i)) * ((column xa A)\$j)
else (x\$xa) * ((column xa A\$j))) = (if xa = i then c * ((column i A)\$j) else 0) + ((x\$xa) * ((column xa A)\$j))" using i(1)
have "setsum (\<lambda>xa. if xa = i then (c + (x\$i)) * ((column xa A)\$j)
else (x\$xa) * ((column xa A\$j))) ?U = setsum (\<lambda>xa. (if xa = i then c * ((column i A)\$j) else 0) + ((x\$xa) * ((column xa A)\$j))) ?U"
apply (rule setsum_cong[OF refl])
using th by blast
also have "\<dots> = setsum (\<lambda>xa. if xa = i then c * ((column i A)\$j) else 0) ?U + setsum (\<lambda>xa. ((x\$xa) * ((column xa A)\$j))) ?U"
also have "\<dots> = c * ((column i A)\$j) + setsum (\<lambda>xa. ((x\$xa) * ((column xa A)\$j))) ?U"
unfolding setsum_delta[OF fU]
using i(1) by simp
finally show "setsum (\<lambda>xa. if xa = i then (c + (x\$i)) * ((column xa A)\$j)
else (x\$xa) * ((column xa A\$j))) ?U = c * ((column i A)\$j) + setsum (\<lambda>xa. ((x\$xa) * ((column xa A)\$j))) ?U" .
qed
next
show "y \<in> span (columns A)" unfolding h by blast
qed}
then have ?lhs unfolding lhseq ..}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma matrix_left_invertible_span_rows:
"(\<exists>(B::real^'m^'n). B ** (A::real^'n^'m) = mat 1) \<longleftrightarrow> span (rows A) = UNIV"
unfolding right_invertible_transp[symmetric]
unfolding columns_transp[symmetric]
unfolding matrix_right_invertible_span_columns
..

(* An injective map real^'n->real^'n is also surjective.                       *)

lemma linear_injective_imp_surjective:
assumes lf: "linear (f:: real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and fi: "inj f"
shows "surj f"
proof-
let ?U = "UNIV :: (real ^'n) set"
from basis_exists[of ?U] obtain B
where B: "B \<subseteq> ?U" "independent B" "?U \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim ?U"
by blast
from B(4) have d: "dim ?U = card B" by (simp add: hassize_def)
have th: "?U \<subseteq> span (f ` B)"
apply (rule card_ge_dim_independent)
apply blast
apply (rule independent_injective_image[OF B(2) lf fi])
apply (rule order_eq_refl)
apply (rule sym)
unfolding d
apply (rule card_image)
apply (rule subset_inj_on[OF fi])
by blast
from th show ?thesis
unfolding span_linear_image[OF lf] surj_def
using B(3) by blast
qed

(* And vice versa.                                                           *)

lemma surjective_iff_injective_gen:
assumes fS: "finite S" and fT: "finite T" and c: "card S = card T"
and ST: "f ` S \<subseteq> T"
shows "(\<forall>y \<in> T. \<exists>x \<in> S. f x = y) \<longleftrightarrow> inj_on f S" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume h: "?lhs"
{fix x y assume x: "x \<in> S" and y: "y \<in> S" and f: "f x = f y"
from x fS have S0: "card S \<noteq> 0" by auto
{assume xy: "x \<noteq> y"
have th: "card S \<le> card (f ` (S - {y}))"
unfolding c
apply (rule card_mono)
apply (rule finite_imageI)
using fS apply simp
using h xy x y f unfolding subset_eq image_iff
apply auto
apply (case_tac "xa = f x")
apply (rule bexI[where x=x])
apply auto
done
also have " \<dots> \<le> card (S -{y})"
apply (rule card_image_le)
using fS by simp
also have "\<dots> \<le> card S - 1" using y fS by simp
finally have False  using S0 by arith }
then have "x = y" by blast}
then have ?rhs unfolding inj_on_def by blast}
moreover
{assume h: ?rhs
have "f ` S = T"
apply (rule card_subset_eq[OF fT ST])
unfolding card_image[OF h] using c .
then have ?lhs by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma linear_surjective_imp_injective:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n => real ^'n)" and sf: "surj f"
shows "inj f"
proof-
let ?U = "UNIV :: (real ^'n) set"
from basis_exists[of ?U] obtain B
where B: "B \<subseteq> ?U" "independent B" "?U \<subseteq> span B" "B hassize dim ?U"
by blast
{fix x assume x: "x \<in> span B" and fx: "f x = 0"
from B(4) have fB: "finite B" by (simp add: hassize_def)
from B(4) have d: "dim ?U = card B" by (simp add: hassize_def)
have fBi: "independent (f ` B)"
apply (rule card_le_dim_spanning[of "f ` B" ?U])
apply blast
using sf B(3)
unfolding span_linear_image[OF lf] surj_def subset_eq image_iff
apply blast
using fB apply (blast intro: finite_imageI)
unfolding d
apply (rule card_image_le)
apply (rule fB)
done
have th0: "dim ?U \<le> card (f ` B)"
apply (rule span_card_ge_dim)
apply blast
unfolding span_linear_image[OF lf]
apply (rule subset_trans[where B = "f ` UNIV"])
using sf unfolding surj_def apply blast
apply (rule image_mono)
apply (rule B(3))
apply (metis finite_imageI fB)
done

moreover have "card (f ` B) \<le> card B"
by (rule card_image_le, rule fB)
ultimately have th1: "card B = card (f ` B)" unfolding d by arith
have fiB: "inj_on f B"
unfolding surjective_iff_injective_gen[OF fB finite_imageI[OF fB] th1 subset_refl, symmetric] by blast
from linear_indep_image_lemma[OF lf fB fBi fiB x] fx
have "x = 0" by blast}
note th = this
from th show ?thesis unfolding linear_injective_0[OF lf]
using B(3) by blast
qed

(* Hence either is enough for isomorphism.                                   *)

lemma left_right_inverse_eq:
assumes fg: "f o g = id" and gh: "g o h = id"
shows "f = h"
proof-
have "f = f o (g o h)" unfolding gh by simp
also have "\<dots> = (f o g) o h" by (simp add: o_assoc)
finally show "f = h" unfolding fg by simp
qed

lemma isomorphism_expand:
"f o g = id \<and> g o f = id \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. f(g x) = x) \<and> (\<forall>x. g(f x) = x)"
by (simp add: expand_fun_eq o_def id_def)

lemma linear_injective_isomorphism:
assumes lf: "linear (f :: real^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and fi: "inj f"
shows "\<exists>f'. linear f' \<and> (\<forall>x. f' (f x) = x) \<and> (\<forall>x. f (f' x) = x)"
unfolding isomorphism_expand[symmetric]
using linear_surjective_right_inverse[OF lf linear_injective_imp_surjective[OF lf fi]] linear_injective_left_inverse[OF lf fi]
by (metis left_right_inverse_eq)

lemma linear_surjective_isomorphism:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and sf: "surj f"
shows "\<exists>f'. linear f' \<and> (\<forall>x. f' (f x) = x) \<and> (\<forall>x. f (f' x) = x)"
unfolding isomorphism_expand[symmetric]
using linear_surjective_right_inverse[OF lf sf] linear_injective_left_inverse[OF lf linear_surjective_imp_injective[OF lf sf]]
by (metis left_right_inverse_eq)

(* Left and right inverses are the same for R^N->R^N.                        *)

lemma linear_inverse_left:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and lf': "linear f'"
shows "f o f' = id \<longleftrightarrow> f' o f = id"
proof-
{fix f f':: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
assume lf: "linear f" "linear f'" and f: "f o f' = id"
from f have sf: "surj f"

apply (auto simp add: o_def stupid_ext[symmetric] id_def surj_def)
by metis
from linear_surjective_isomorphism[OF lf(1) sf] lf f
have "f' o f = id" unfolding stupid_ext[symmetric] o_def id_def
by metis}
then show ?thesis using lf lf' by metis
qed

(* Moreover, a one-sided inverse is automatically linear.                    *)

lemma left_inverse_linear:
assumes lf: "linear (f::real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and gf: "g o f = id"
shows "linear g"
proof-
from gf have fi: "inj f" apply (auto simp add: inj_on_def o_def id_def stupid_ext[symmetric])
by metis
from linear_injective_isomorphism[OF lf fi]
obtain h:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n" where
h: "linear h" "\<forall>x. h (f x) = x" "\<forall>x. f (h x) = x" by blast
have "h = g" apply (rule ext) using gf h(2,3)
apply (simp add: o_def id_def stupid_ext[symmetric])
by metis
with h(1) show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma right_inverse_linear:
assumes lf: "linear (f:: real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n)" and gf: "f o g = id"
shows "linear g"
proof-
from gf have fi: "surj f" apply (auto simp add: surj_def o_def id_def stupid_ext[symmetric])
by metis
from linear_surjective_isomorphism[OF lf fi]
obtain h:: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n" where
h: "linear h" "\<forall>x. h (f x) = x" "\<forall>x. f (h x) = x" by blast
have "h = g" apply (rule ext) using gf h(2,3)
apply (simp add: o_def id_def stupid_ext[symmetric])
by metis
with h(1) show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* The same result in terms of square matrices.                              *)

lemma matrix_left_right_inverse:
fixes A A' :: "real ^'n^'n"
shows "A ** A' = mat 1 \<longleftrightarrow> A' ** A = mat 1"
proof-
{fix A A' :: "real ^'n^'n" assume AA': "A ** A' = mat 1"
have sA: "surj (op *v A)"
unfolding surj_def
apply clarify
apply (rule_tac x="(A' *v y)" in exI)
by (simp add: matrix_vector_mul_assoc AA' matrix_vector_mul_lid)
from linear_surjective_isomorphism[OF matrix_vector_mul_linear sA]
obtain f' :: "real ^'n \<Rightarrow> real ^'n"
where f': "linear f'" "\<forall>x. f' (A *v x) = x" "\<forall>x. A *v f' x = x" by blast
have th: "matrix f' ** A = mat 1"
by (simp add: matrix_eq matrix_works[OF f'(1)] matrix_vector_mul_assoc[symmetric] matrix_vector_mul_lid f'(2)[rule_format])
hence "(matrix f' ** A) ** A' = mat 1 ** A'" by simp
hence "matrix f' = A'" by (simp add: matrix_mul_assoc[symmetric] AA' matrix_mul_rid matrix_mul_lid)
hence "matrix f' ** A = A' ** A" by simp
hence "A' ** A = mat 1" by (simp add: th)}
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* Considering an n-element vector as an n-by-1 or 1-by-n matrix.            *)

definition "rowvector v = (\<chi> i j. (v\$j))"

definition "columnvector v = (\<chi> i j. (v\$i))"

lemma transp_columnvector:
"transp(columnvector v) = rowvector v"
by (simp add: transp_def rowvector_def columnvector_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

lemma transp_rowvector: "transp(rowvector v) = columnvector v"
by (simp add: transp_def columnvector_def rowvector_def Cart_eq Cart_lambda_beta)

lemma dot_rowvector_columnvector:
"columnvector (A *v v) = A ** columnvector v"
by (vector columnvector_def matrix_matrix_mult_def matrix_vector_mult_def)

lemma dot_matrix_product: "(x::'a::semiring_1^'n) \<bullet> y = (((rowvector x ::'a^'n^1) ** (columnvector y :: 'a^1^'n))\$1)\$1"
apply (vector matrix_matrix_mult_def rowvector_def columnvector_def dot_def)

lemma dot_matrix_vector_mul:
fixes A B :: "real ^'n ^'n" and x y :: "real ^'n"
shows "(A *v x) \<bullet> (B *v y) =
(((rowvector x :: real^'n^1) ** ((transp A ** B) ** (columnvector y :: real ^1^'n)))\$1)\$1"
unfolding dot_matrix_product transp_columnvector[symmetric]
dot_rowvector_columnvector matrix_transp_mul matrix_mul_assoc ..

(* Infinity norm.                                                            *)

definition "infnorm (x::real^'n) = rsup {abs(x\$i) |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}}"

lemma numseg_dimindex_nonempty: "\<exists>i. i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
using dimindex_ge_1 by auto

lemma infnorm_set_image:
"{abs(x\$i) |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}} =
(\<lambda>i. abs(x\$i)) ` {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}" by blast

lemma infnorm_set_lemma:
shows "finite {abs((x::'a::abs ^'n)\$i) |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}}"
and "{abs(x\$i) |i. i\<in> {1 .. dimindex(UNIV :: 'n set)}} \<noteq> {}"
unfolding infnorm_set_image
using dimindex_ge_1[of "UNIV :: 'n set"]
by (auto intro: finite_imageI)

lemma infnorm_pos_le: "0 \<le> infnorm x"
unfolding infnorm_def
unfolding rsup_finite_ge_iff[ OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image
using dimindex_ge_1
by auto

lemma infnorm_triangle: "infnorm ((x::real^'n) + y) \<le> infnorm x + infnorm y"
proof-
have th: "\<And>x y (z::real). x - y <= z \<longleftrightarrow> x - z <= y" by arith
have th1: "\<And>S f. f ` S = { f i| i. i \<in> S}" by blast
have th2: "\<And>x (y::real). abs(x + y) - abs(x) <= abs(y)" by arith
show ?thesis
unfolding infnorm_def
unfolding rsup_finite_le_iff[ OF infnorm_set_lemma]
apply (subst diff_le_eq[symmetric])
unfolding rsup_finite_ge_iff[ OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image bex_simps
apply (subst th)
unfolding th1
unfolding rsup_finite_ge_iff[ OF infnorm_set_lemma]

unfolding infnorm_set_image ball_simps bex_simps
apply (metis numseg_dimindex_nonempty th2)
done
qed

lemma infnorm_eq_0: "infnorm x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (x::real ^'n) = 0"
proof-
have "infnorm x <= 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0"
unfolding infnorm_def
unfolding rsup_finite_le_iff[OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image ball_simps
by vector
then show ?thesis using infnorm_pos_le[of x] by simp
qed

lemma infnorm_0: "infnorm 0 = 0"

lemma infnorm_neg: "infnorm (- x) = infnorm x"
unfolding infnorm_def
apply (rule cong[of "rsup" "rsup"])
apply blast
apply (rule set_ext)
apply (auto simp add: vector_component abs_minus_cancel)
apply (rule_tac x="i" in exI)
done

lemma infnorm_sub: "infnorm (x - y) = infnorm (y - x)"
proof-
have "y - x = - (x - y)" by simp
then show ?thesis  by (metis infnorm_neg)
qed

lemma real_abs_sub_infnorm: "\<bar> infnorm x - infnorm y\<bar> \<le> infnorm (x - y)"
proof-
have th: "\<And>(nx::real) n ny. nx <= n + ny \<Longrightarrow> ny <= n + nx ==> \<bar>nx - ny\<bar> <= n"
by arith
from infnorm_triangle[of "x - y" " y"] infnorm_triangle[of "x - y" "-x"]
have ths: "infnorm x \<le> infnorm (x - y) + infnorm y"
"infnorm y \<le> infnorm (x - y) + infnorm x"
by (simp_all add: ring_simps infnorm_neg diff_def[symmetric])
from th[OF ths]  show ?thesis .
qed

lemma real_abs_infnorm: " \<bar>infnorm x\<bar> = infnorm x"
using infnorm_pos_le[of x] by arith

lemma component_le_infnorm: assumes i: "i \<in> {1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
shows "\<bar>x\$i\<bar> \<le> infnorm (x::real^'n)"
proof-
let ?U = "{1 .. dimindex (UNIV :: 'n set)}"
let ?S = "{\<bar>x\$i\<bar> |i. i\<in> ?U}"
have fS: "finite ?S" unfolding image_Collect[symmetric]
apply (rule finite_imageI) unfolding Collect_def mem_def by simp
have S0: "?S \<noteq> {}" using numseg_dimindex_nonempty by blast
have th1: "\<And>S f. f ` S = { f i| i. i \<in> S}" by blast
from rsup_finite_in[OF fS S0] rsup_finite_Ub[OF fS S0] i
show ?thesis unfolding infnorm_def isUb_def setle_def
unfolding infnorm_set_image ball_simps by auto
qed

lemma infnorm_mul_lemma: "infnorm(a *s x) <= \<bar>a\<bar> * infnorm x"
apply (subst infnorm_def)
unfolding rsup_finite_le_iff[OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image ball_simps
apply (simp add: abs_mult vector_component del: One_nat_def)
apply (rule ballI)
apply (drule component_le_infnorm[of _ x])
apply (rule mult_mono)
apply auto
done

lemma infnorm_mul: "infnorm(a *s x) = abs a * infnorm x"
proof-
{assume a0: "a = 0" hence ?thesis by (simp add: infnorm_0) }
moreover
{assume a0: "a \<noteq> 0"
from a0 have th: "(1/a) *s (a *s x) = x"
from a0 have ap: "\<bar>a\<bar> > 0" by arith
from infnorm_mul_lemma[of "1/a" "a *s x"]
have "infnorm x \<le> 1/\<bar>a\<bar> * infnorm (a*s x)"
unfolding th by simp
with ap have "\<bar>a\<bar> * infnorm x \<le> \<bar>a\<bar> * (1/\<bar>a\<bar> * infnorm (a *s x))" by (simp add: field_simps)
then have "\<bar>a\<bar> * infnorm x \<le> infnorm (a*s x)"
using ap by (simp add: field_simps)
with infnorm_mul_lemma[of a x] have ?thesis by arith }
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma infnorm_pos_lt: "infnorm x > 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x \<noteq> 0"
using infnorm_pos_le[of x] infnorm_eq_0[of x] by arith

(* Prove that it differs only up to a bound from Euclidean norm.             *)

lemma infnorm_le_norm: "infnorm x \<le> norm x"
unfolding infnorm_def rsup_finite_le_iff[OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image  ball_simps
by (metis component_le_norm)
lemma card_enum: "card {1 .. n} = n" by auto
lemma norm_le_infnorm: "norm(x) <= sqrt(real (dimindex(UNIV ::'n set))) * infnorm(x::real ^'n)"
proof-
let ?d = "dimindex(UNIV ::'n set)"
have d: "?d = card {1 .. ?d}" by auto
have "real ?d \<ge> 0" by simp
hence d2: "(sqrt (real ?d))^2 = real ?d"
by (auto intro: real_sqrt_pow2)
have th: "sqrt (real ?d) * infnorm x \<ge> 0"
by (simp add: dimindex_ge_1 zero_le_mult_iff real_sqrt_ge_0_iff infnorm_pos_le)
have th1: "x\<bullet>x \<le> (sqrt (real ?d) * infnorm x)^2"
unfolding power_mult_distrib d2
apply (subst d)
apply (subst power2_abs[symmetric])
unfolding real_of_nat_def dot_def power2_eq_square[symmetric]
apply (subst power2_abs[symmetric])
apply (rule setsum_bounded)
apply (rule power_mono)
unfolding abs_of_nonneg[OF infnorm_pos_le]
unfolding infnorm_def  rsup_finite_ge_iff[OF infnorm_set_lemma]
unfolding infnorm_set_image bex_simps
apply blast
by (rule abs_ge_zero)
from real_le_lsqrt[OF dot_pos_le th th1]
show ?thesis unfolding real_vector_norm_def id_def .
qed

(* Equality in Cauchy-Schwarz and triangle inequalities.                     *)

lemma norm_cauchy_schwarz_eq: "(x::real ^'n) \<bullet> y = norm x * norm y \<longleftrightarrow> norm x *s y = norm y *s x" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume h: "x = 0"
hence ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume h: "y = 0"
hence ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume x: "x \<noteq> 0" and y: "y \<noteq> 0"
from dot_eq_0[of "norm y *s x - norm x *s y"]
have "?rhs \<longleftrightarrow> (norm y * (norm y * norm x * norm x - norm x * (x \<bullet> y)) - norm x * (norm y * (y \<bullet> x) - norm x * norm y * norm y) =  0)"
using x y
unfolding dot_rsub dot_lsub dot_lmult dot_rmult
unfolding norm_pow_2[symmetric] power2_eq_square diff_eq_0_iff_eq apply (simp add: dot_sym)
apply metis
done
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (2 * norm x * norm y * (norm x * norm y - x \<bullet> y) = 0)" using x y
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?lhs" using x y
apply simp
by metis
finally have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma norm_cauchy_schwarz_abs_eq: "abs(x \<bullet> y) = norm x * norm y \<longleftrightarrow>
norm x *s y = norm y *s x \<or> norm(x) *s y = - norm y *s x" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
have th: "\<And>(x::real) a. a \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> abs x = a \<longleftrightarrow> x = a \<or> x = - a" by arith
have "?rhs \<longleftrightarrow> norm x *s y = norm y *s x \<or> norm (- x) *s y = norm y *s (- x)"
apply simp by vector
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow>(x \<bullet> y = norm x * norm y \<or>
(-x) \<bullet> y = norm x * norm y)"
unfolding norm_cauchy_schwarz_eq[symmetric]
unfolding norm_minus_cancel
norm_mul by blast
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?lhs"
unfolding th[OF mult_nonneg_nonneg, OF norm_ge_zero[of x] norm_ge_zero[of y]] dot_lneg
by arith
finally show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma norm_triangle_eq: "norm(x + y) = norm x + norm y \<longleftrightarrow> norm x *s y = norm y *s x"
proof-
{assume x: "x =0 \<or> y =0"
hence ?thesis by (cases "x=0", simp_all)}
moreover
{assume x: "x \<noteq> 0" and y: "y \<noteq> 0"
hence "norm x \<noteq> 0" "norm y \<noteq> 0"
by simp_all
hence n: "norm x > 0" "norm y > 0"
using norm_ge_zero[of x] norm_ge_zero[of y]
by arith+
have th: "\<And>(a::real) b c. a + b + c \<noteq> 0 ==> (a = b + c \<longleftrightarrow> a^2 = (b + c)^2)" by algebra
have "norm(x + y) = norm x + norm y \<longleftrightarrow> norm(x + y)^ 2 = (norm x + norm y) ^2"
apply (rule th) using n norm_ge_zero[of "x + y"]
by arith
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> norm x *s y = norm y *s x"
unfolding norm_cauchy_schwarz_eq[symmetric]
by (simp add: norm_pow_2[symmetric] power2_eq_square dot_sym ring_simps)
finally have ?thesis .}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

(* Collinearity.*)

definition "collinear S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>u. \<forall>x \<in> S. \<forall> y \<in> S. \<exists>c. x - y = c *s u)"

lemma collinear_empty:  "collinear {}" by (simp add: collinear_def)

lemma collinear_sing: "collinear {(x::'a::ring_1^'n)}"
apply (rule exI[where x=0])
by simp

lemma collinear_2: "collinear {(x::'a::ring_1^'n),y}"
apply (rule exI[where x="x - y"])
apply auto
apply (rule exI[where x=0], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x=1], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="- 1"], simp add: vector_sneg_minus1[symmetric])
apply (rule exI[where x=0], simp)
done

lemma collinear_lemma: "collinear {(0::real^'n),x,y} \<longleftrightarrow> x = 0 \<or> y = 0 \<or> (\<exists>c. y = c *s x)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
{assume "x=0 \<or> y = 0" hence ?thesis
by (cases "x = 0", simp_all add: collinear_2 insert_commute)}
moreover
{assume x: "x \<noteq> 0" and y: "y \<noteq> 0"
{assume h: "?lhs"
then obtain u where u: "\<forall> x\<in> {0,x,y}. \<forall>y\<in> {0,x,y}. \<exists>c. x - y = c *s u" unfolding collinear_def by blast
from u[rule_format, of x 0] u[rule_format, of y 0]
obtain cx and cy where
cx: "x = cx*s u" and cy: "y = cy*s u"
by auto
from cx x have cx0: "cx \<noteq> 0" by auto
from cy y have cy0: "cy \<noteq> 0" by auto
let ?d = "cy / cx"
from cx cy cx0 have "y = ?d *s x"
hence ?rhs using x y by blast}
moreover
{assume h: "?rhs"
then obtain c where c: "y = c*s x" using x y by blast
have ?lhs unfolding collinear_def c
apply (rule exI[where x=x])
apply auto
apply (rule exI[where x=0], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="- 1"], simp only: vector_smult_lneg vector_smult_lid)
apply (rule exI[where x= "-c"], simp only: vector_smult_lneg)
apply (rule exI[where x=1], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x=0], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="1 - c"], simp add: vector_smult_lneg vector_sub_rdistrib)
apply (rule exI[where x="c - 1"], simp add: vector_smult_lneg vector_sub_rdistrib)
apply (rule exI[where x=0], simp)
done}
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma norm_cauchy_schwarz_equal: "abs(x \<bullet> y) = norm x * norm y \<longleftrightarrow> collinear {(0::real^'n),x,y}"
unfolding norm_cauchy_schwarz_abs_eq
apply (cases "x=0", simp_all add: collinear_2)
apply (cases "y=0", simp_all add: collinear_2 insert_commute)
unfolding collinear_lemma
apply simp
apply (subgoal_tac "norm x \<noteq> 0")
apply (subgoal_tac "norm y \<noteq> 0")
apply (rule iffI)
apply (cases "norm x *s y = norm y *s x")
apply (rule exI[where x="(1/norm x) * norm y"])
apply (drule sym)
unfolding vector_smult_assoc[symmetric]
apply (rule exI[where x="(1/norm x) * - norm y"])
apply clarify
apply (drule sym)
unfolding vector_smult_assoc[symmetric]
apply (erule exE)
apply (erule ssubst)
unfolding vector_smult_assoc
unfolding norm_mul
apply (subgoal_tac "norm x * c = \<bar>c\<bar> * norm x \<or> norm x * c = - \<bar>c\<bar> * norm x")
apply (case_tac "c <= 0", simp add: ring_simps)