src/HOL/GCD.thy
 author Manuel Eberl Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:35:15 +0200 changeset 63359 99b51ba8da1c parent 63145 703edebd1d92 child 63489 cd540c8031a4 permissions -rw-r--r--
More lemmas on Gcd/Lcm
```
(*  Authors:    Christophe Tabacznyj, Lawrence C. Paulson, Amine Chaieb,
Thomas M. Rasmussen, Jeremy Avigad, Tobias Nipkow

This file deals with the functions gcd and lcm.  Definitions and
lemmas are proved uniformly for the natural numbers and integers.

This file combines and revises a number of prior developments.

The original theories "GCD" and "Primes" were by Christophe Tabacznyj
and Lawrence C. Paulson, based on @{cite davenport92}. They introduced
gcd, lcm, and prime for the natural numbers.

The original theory "IntPrimes" was by Thomas M. Rasmussen, and
extended gcd, lcm, primes to the integers. Amine Chaieb provided
another extension of the notions to the integers, and added a number
of results to "Primes" and "GCD". IntPrimes also defined and developed
the congruence relations on the integers. The notion was extended to
the natural numbers by Chaieb.

natural numbers and the integers, and added a number of new theorems.

Tobias Nipkow cleaned up a lot.
*)

section \<open>Greatest common divisor and least common multiple\<close>

theory GCD
imports Main
begin

subsection \<open>Abstract GCD and LCM\<close>

class gcd = zero + one + dvd +
fixes gcd :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
and lcm :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
begin

abbreviation coprime :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "coprime x y \<equiv> gcd x y = 1"

end

class Gcd = gcd +
fixes Gcd :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
and Lcm :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
begin

abbreviation GREATEST_COMMON_DIVISOR :: "'b set \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
"GREATEST_COMMON_DIVISOR A f \<equiv> Gcd (f ` A)"

abbreviation LEAST_COMMON_MULTIPLE :: "'b set \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where
"LEAST_COMMON_MULTIPLE A f \<equiv> Lcm (f ` A)"

end

syntax
"_GCD1"     :: "pttrns \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"           ("(3GCD _./ _)" [0, 10] 10)
"_GCD"      :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3GCD _\<in>_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
"_LCM1"     :: "pttrns \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"           ("(3LCM _./ _)" [0, 10] 10)
"_LCM"      :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3LCM _\<in>_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)

translations
"GCD x y. B"   \<rightleftharpoons> "GCD x. GCD y. B"
"GCD x. B"     \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST GREATEST_COMMON_DIVISOR CONST UNIV (\<lambda>x. B)"
"GCD x. B"     \<rightleftharpoons> "GCD x \<in> CONST UNIV. B"
"GCD x\<in>A. B"   \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST GREATEST_COMMON_DIVISOR A (\<lambda>x. B)"
"LCM x y. B"   \<rightleftharpoons> "LCM x. LCM y. B"
"LCM x. B"     \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST LEAST_COMMON_MULTIPLE CONST UNIV (\<lambda>x. B)"
"LCM x. B"     \<rightleftharpoons> "LCM x \<in> CONST UNIV. B"
"LCM x\<in>A. B"   \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST LEAST_COMMON_MULTIPLE A (\<lambda>x. B)"

print_translation \<open>
[Syntax_Trans.preserve_binder_abs2_tr' @{const_syntax GREATEST_COMMON_DIVISOR} @{syntax_const "_GCD"},
Syntax_Trans.preserve_binder_abs2_tr' @{const_syntax LEAST_COMMON_MULTIPLE} @{syntax_const "_LCM"}]
\<close> \<comment> \<open>to avoid eta-contraction of body\<close>

class semiring_gcd = normalization_semidom + gcd +
assumes gcd_dvd1 [iff]: "gcd a b dvd a"
and gcd_dvd2 [iff]: "gcd a b dvd b"
and gcd_greatest: "c dvd a \<Longrightarrow> c dvd b \<Longrightarrow> c dvd gcd a b"
and normalize_gcd [simp]: "normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b"
and lcm_gcd: "lcm a b = normalize (a * b) div gcd a b"
begin

lemma gcd_greatest_iff [simp]:
"a dvd gcd b c \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd b \<and> a dvd c"
by (blast intro!: gcd_greatest intro: dvd_trans)

lemma gcd_dvdI1:
"a dvd c \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b dvd c"
by (rule dvd_trans) (rule gcd_dvd1)

lemma gcd_dvdI2:
"b dvd c \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b dvd c"
by (rule dvd_trans) (rule gcd_dvd2)

lemma dvd_gcdD1:
"a dvd gcd b c \<Longrightarrow> a dvd b"
using gcd_dvd1 [of b c] by (blast intro: dvd_trans)

lemma dvd_gcdD2:
"a dvd gcd b c \<Longrightarrow> a dvd c"
using gcd_dvd2 [of b c] by (blast intro: dvd_trans)

lemma gcd_0_left [simp]:
"gcd 0 a = normalize a"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all

lemma gcd_0_right [simp]:
"gcd a 0 = normalize a"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all

lemma gcd_eq_0_iff [simp]:
"gcd a b = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0 \<and> b = 0" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
proof
assume ?P then have "0 dvd gcd a b" by simp
then have "0 dvd a" and "0 dvd b" by (blast intro: dvd_trans)+
then show ?Q by simp
next
assume ?Q then show ?P by simp
qed

lemma unit_factor_gcd:
"unit_factor (gcd a b) = (if a = 0 \<and> b = 0 then 0 else 1)"
proof (cases "gcd a b = 0")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
have "unit_factor (gcd a b) * normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b"
by (rule unit_factor_mult_normalize)
then have "unit_factor (gcd a b) * gcd a b = gcd a b"
by simp
then have "unit_factor (gcd a b) * gcd a b div gcd a b = gcd a b div gcd a b"
by simp
with False show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma is_unit_gcd [simp]:
"is_unit (gcd a b) \<longleftrightarrow> coprime a b"
by (cases "a = 0 \<and> b = 0") (auto simp add: unit_factor_gcd dest: is_unit_unit_factor)

sublocale gcd: abel_semigroup gcd
proof
fix a b c
show "gcd a b = gcd b a"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all
from gcd_dvd1 have "gcd (gcd a b) c dvd a"
by (rule dvd_trans) simp
moreover from gcd_dvd1 have "gcd (gcd a b) c dvd b"
by (rule dvd_trans) simp
ultimately have P1: "gcd (gcd a b) c dvd gcd a (gcd b c)"
by (auto intro!: gcd_greatest)
from gcd_dvd2 have "gcd a (gcd b c) dvd b"
by (rule dvd_trans) simp
moreover from gcd_dvd2 have "gcd a (gcd b c) dvd c"
by (rule dvd_trans) simp
ultimately have P2: "gcd a (gcd b c) dvd gcd (gcd a b) c"
by (auto intro!: gcd_greatest)
from P1 P2 show "gcd (gcd a b) c = gcd a (gcd b c)"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all
qed

lemma gcd_self [simp]:
"gcd a a = normalize a"
proof -
have "a dvd gcd a a"
by (rule gcd_greatest) simp_all
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)
qed

lemma gcd_left_idem [simp]:
"gcd a (gcd a b) = gcd a b"
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)

lemma gcd_right_idem [simp]:
"gcd (gcd a b) b = gcd a b"
unfolding gcd.commute [of a] gcd.commute [of "gcd b a"] by simp

lemma coprime_1_left [simp]:
"coprime 1 a"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all

lemma coprime_1_right [simp]:
"coprime a 1"
using coprime_1_left [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma gcd_mult_left:
"gcd (c * a) (c * b) = normalize c * gcd a b"
proof (cases "c = 0")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
then have "c * gcd a b dvd gcd (c * a) (c * b)"
by (auto intro: gcd_greatest)
moreover from calculation False have "gcd (c * a) (c * b) dvd c * gcd a b"
by (metis div_dvd_iff_mult dvd_mult_left gcd_dvd1 gcd_dvd2 gcd_greatest mult_commute)
ultimately have "normalize (gcd (c * a) (c * b)) = normalize (c * gcd a b)"
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)
then show ?thesis by (simp add: normalize_mult)
qed

lemma gcd_mult_right:
"gcd (a * c) (b * c) = gcd b a * normalize c"
using gcd_mult_left [of c a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma mult_gcd_left:
"c * gcd a b = unit_factor c * gcd (c * a) (c * b)"
by (simp add: gcd_mult_left mult.assoc [symmetric])

lemma mult_gcd_right:
"gcd a b * c = gcd (a * c) (b * c) * unit_factor c"
using mult_gcd_left [of c a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma dvd_lcm1 [iff]:
"a dvd lcm a b"
proof -
have "normalize (a * b) div gcd a b = normalize a * (normalize b div gcd a b)"
by (simp add: lcm_gcd normalize_mult div_mult_swap)
then show ?thesis
qed

lemma dvd_lcm2 [iff]:
"b dvd lcm a b"
proof -
have "normalize (a * b) div gcd a b = normalize b * (normalize a div gcd a b)"
by (simp add: lcm_gcd normalize_mult div_mult_swap ac_simps)
then show ?thesis
qed

lemma dvd_lcmI1:
"a dvd b \<Longrightarrow> a dvd lcm b c"
by (rule dvd_trans) (assumption, blast)

lemma dvd_lcmI2:
"a dvd c \<Longrightarrow> a dvd lcm b c"
by (rule dvd_trans) (assumption, blast)

lemma lcm_dvdD1:
"lcm a b dvd c \<Longrightarrow> a dvd c"
using dvd_lcm1 [of a b] by (blast intro: dvd_trans)

lemma lcm_dvdD2:
"lcm a b dvd c \<Longrightarrow> b dvd c"
using dvd_lcm2 [of a b] by (blast intro: dvd_trans)

lemma lcm_least:
assumes "a dvd c" and "b dvd c"
shows "lcm a b dvd c"
proof (cases "c = 0")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False then have U: "is_unit (unit_factor c)" by simp
show ?thesis
proof (cases "gcd a b = 0")
case True with assms show ?thesis by simp
next
case False then have "a \<noteq> 0 \<or> b \<noteq> 0" by simp
with \<open>c \<noteq> 0\<close> assms have "a * b dvd a * c" "a * b dvd c * b"
then have "normalize (a * b) dvd gcd (a * c) (b * c)"
by (auto intro: gcd_greatest simp add: ac_simps)
then have "normalize (a * b) dvd gcd (a * c) (b * c) * unit_factor c"
using U by (simp add: dvd_mult_unit_iff)
then have "normalize (a * b) dvd gcd a b * c"
by (simp add: mult_gcd_right [of a b c])
then have "normalize (a * b) div gcd a b dvd c"
using False by (simp add: div_dvd_iff_mult ac_simps)
then show ?thesis by (simp add: lcm_gcd)
qed
qed

lemma lcm_least_iff [simp]:
"lcm a b dvd c \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd c \<and> b dvd c"
by (blast intro!: lcm_least intro: dvd_trans)

lemma normalize_lcm [simp]:
"normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b"

lemma lcm_0_left [simp]:
"lcm 0 a = 0"

lemma lcm_0_right [simp]:
"lcm a 0 = 0"

lemma lcm_eq_0_iff:
"lcm a b = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0 \<or> b = 0" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
proof
assume ?P then have "0 dvd lcm a b" by simp
then have "0 dvd normalize (a * b) div gcd a b"
then have "0 * gcd a b dvd normalize (a * b)"
using dvd_div_iff_mult [of "gcd a b" _ 0] by (cases "gcd a b = 0") simp_all
then have "normalize (a * b) = 0"
by simp
then show ?Q by simp
next
assume ?Q then show ?P by auto
qed

lemma lcm_eq_1_iff [simp]:
"lcm a b = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> is_unit a \<and> is_unit b"
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)

lemma unit_factor_lcm :
"unit_factor (lcm a b) = (if a = 0 \<or> b = 0 then 0 else 1)"
by (simp add: unit_factor_gcd dvd_unit_factor_div lcm_gcd)

sublocale lcm: abel_semigroup lcm
proof
fix a b c
show "lcm a b = lcm b a"
by (simp add: lcm_gcd ac_simps normalize_mult dvd_normalize_div)
have "lcm (lcm a b) c dvd lcm a (lcm b c)"
and "lcm a (lcm b c) dvd lcm (lcm a b) c"
by (auto intro: lcm_least
dvd_trans [of b "lcm b c" "lcm a (lcm b c)"]
dvd_trans [of c "lcm b c" "lcm a (lcm b c)"]
dvd_trans [of a "lcm a b" "lcm (lcm a b) c"]
dvd_trans [of b "lcm a b" "lcm (lcm a b) c"])
then show "lcm (lcm a b) c = lcm a (lcm b c)"
by (rule associated_eqI) simp_all
qed

lemma lcm_self [simp]:
"lcm a a = normalize a"
proof -
have "lcm a a dvd a"
by (rule lcm_least) simp_all
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)
qed

lemma lcm_left_idem [simp]:
"lcm a (lcm a b) = lcm a b"
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)

lemma lcm_right_idem [simp]:
"lcm (lcm a b) b = lcm a b"
unfolding lcm.commute [of a] lcm.commute [of "lcm b a"] by simp

lemma gcd_mult_lcm [simp]:
"gcd a b * lcm a b = normalize a * normalize b"

lemma lcm_mult_gcd [simp]:
"lcm a b * gcd a b = normalize a * normalize b"
using gcd_mult_lcm [of a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma gcd_lcm:
assumes "a \<noteq> 0" and "b \<noteq> 0"
shows "gcd a b = normalize (a * b) div lcm a b"
proof -
from assms have "lcm a b \<noteq> 0"
have "gcd a b * lcm a b = normalize a * normalize b" by simp
then have "gcd a b * lcm a b div lcm a b = normalize (a * b) div lcm a b"
with \<open>lcm a b \<noteq> 0\<close> show ?thesis
using nonzero_mult_divide_cancel_right [of "lcm a b" "gcd a b"] by simp
qed

lemma lcm_1_left [simp]:
"lcm 1 a = normalize a"

lemma lcm_1_right [simp]:
"lcm a 1 = normalize a"

lemma lcm_mult_left:
"lcm (c * a) (c * b) = normalize c * lcm a b"
by (cases "c = 0")
(simp_all add: gcd_mult_right lcm_gcd div_mult_swap normalize_mult ac_simps,
simp add: dvd_div_mult2_eq mult.left_commute [of "normalize c", symmetric])

lemma lcm_mult_right:
"lcm (a * c) (b * c) = lcm b a * normalize c"
using lcm_mult_left [of c a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma mult_lcm_left:
"c * lcm a b = unit_factor c * lcm (c * a) (c * b)"
by (simp add: lcm_mult_left mult.assoc [symmetric])

lemma mult_lcm_right:
"lcm a b * c = lcm (a * c) (b * c) * unit_factor c"
using mult_lcm_left [of c a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma gcdI:
assumes "c dvd a" and "c dvd b" and greatest: "\<And>d. d dvd a \<Longrightarrow> d dvd b \<Longrightarrow> d dvd c"
and "normalize c = c"
shows "c = gcd a b"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto simp: assms intro: gcd_greatest)

lemma gcd_unique: "d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
normalize d = d \<and>
(\<forall>e. e dvd a \<and> e dvd b \<longrightarrow> e dvd d) \<longleftrightarrow> d = gcd a b"
by rule (auto intro: gcdI simp: gcd_greatest)

lemma gcd_dvd_prod: "gcd a b dvd k * b"
using mult_dvd_mono [of 1] by auto

lemma gcd_proj2_if_dvd: "b dvd a \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = normalize b"
by (rule gcdI [symmetric]) simp_all

lemma gcd_proj1_if_dvd: "a dvd b \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = normalize a"
by (rule gcdI [symmetric]) simp_all

lemma gcd_proj1_iff: "gcd m n = normalize m \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
proof
assume A: "gcd m n = normalize m"
show "m dvd n"
proof (cases "m = 0")
assume [simp]: "m \<noteq> 0"
from A have B: "m = gcd m n * unit_factor m"
show ?thesis by (subst B, simp add: mult_unit_dvd_iff)
qed (insert A, simp)
next
assume "m dvd n"
then show "gcd m n = normalize m" by (rule gcd_proj1_if_dvd)
qed

lemma gcd_proj2_iff: "gcd m n = normalize n \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
using gcd_proj1_iff [of n m] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma gcd_mult_distrib': "normalize c * gcd a b = gcd (c * a) (c * b)"
by (rule gcdI) (auto simp: normalize_mult gcd_greatest mult_dvd_mono gcd_mult_left[symmetric])

lemma gcd_mult_distrib:
"k * gcd a b = gcd (k * a) (k * b) * unit_factor k"
proof-
have "normalize k * gcd a b = gcd (k * a) (k * b)"
then have "normalize k * gcd a b * unit_factor k = gcd (k * a) (k * b) * unit_factor k"
by simp
then have "normalize k * unit_factor k * gcd a b  = gcd (k * a) (k * b) * unit_factor k"
by (simp only: ac_simps)
then show ?thesis
by simp
qed

lemma lcm_mult_unit1:
"is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> lcm (b * a) c = lcm b c"
by (rule associated_eqI) (simp_all add: mult_unit_dvd_iff dvd_lcmI1)

lemma lcm_mult_unit2:
"is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> lcm b (c * a) = lcm b c"
using lcm_mult_unit1 [of a c b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma lcm_div_unit1:
"is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> lcm (b div a) c = lcm b c"
by (erule is_unitE [of _ b]) (simp add: lcm_mult_unit1)

lemma lcm_div_unit2:
"is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> lcm b (c div a) = lcm b c"
by (erule is_unitE [of _ c]) (simp add: lcm_mult_unit2)

lemma normalize_lcm_left [simp]:
"lcm (normalize a) b = lcm a b"
proof (cases "a = 0")
case True then show ?thesis
by simp
next
case False then have "is_unit (unit_factor a)"
by simp
moreover have "normalize a = a div unit_factor a"
by simp
ultimately show ?thesis
by (simp only: lcm_div_unit1)
qed

lemma normalize_lcm_right [simp]:
"lcm a (normalize b) = lcm a b"
using normalize_lcm_left [of b a] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma gcd_mult_unit1: "is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> gcd (b * a) c = gcd b c"
apply (rule gcdI)
apply simp_all
apply (rule dvd_trans, rule gcd_dvd1, simp add: unit_simps)
done

lemma gcd_mult_unit2: "is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> gcd b (c * a) = gcd b c"
by (subst gcd.commute, subst gcd_mult_unit1, assumption, rule gcd.commute)

lemma gcd_div_unit1: "is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> gcd (b div a) c = gcd b c"
by (erule is_unitE [of _ b]) (simp add: gcd_mult_unit1)

lemma gcd_div_unit2: "is_unit a \<Longrightarrow> gcd b (c div a) = gcd b c"
by (erule is_unitE [of _ c]) (simp add: gcd_mult_unit2)

lemma normalize_gcd_left [simp]:
"gcd (normalize a) b = gcd a b"
proof (cases "a = 0")
case True then show ?thesis
by simp
next
case False then have "is_unit (unit_factor a)"
by simp
moreover have "normalize a = a div unit_factor a"
by simp
ultimately show ?thesis
by (simp only: gcd_div_unit1)
qed

lemma normalize_gcd_right [simp]:
"gcd a (normalize b) = gcd a b"
using normalize_gcd_left [of b a] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma comp_fun_idem_gcd: "comp_fun_idem gcd"
by standard (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff ac_simps)

lemma comp_fun_idem_lcm: "comp_fun_idem lcm"
by standard (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff ac_simps)

lemma gcd_dvd_antisym:
"gcd a b dvd gcd c d \<Longrightarrow> gcd c d dvd gcd a b \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = gcd c d"
proof (rule gcdI)
assume A: "gcd a b dvd gcd c d" and B: "gcd c d dvd gcd a b"
have "gcd c d dvd c" by simp
with A show "gcd a b dvd c" by (rule dvd_trans)
have "gcd c d dvd d" by simp
with A show "gcd a b dvd d" by (rule dvd_trans)
show "normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b"
by simp
fix l assume "l dvd c" and "l dvd d"
hence "l dvd gcd c d" by (rule gcd_greatest)
from this and B show "l dvd gcd a b" by (rule dvd_trans)
qed

lemma coprime_dvd_mult:
assumes "coprime a b" and "a dvd c * b"
shows "a dvd c"
proof (cases "c = 0")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
then have unit: "is_unit (unit_factor c)" by simp
from \<open>coprime a b\<close> mult_gcd_left [of c a b]
have "gcd (c * a) (c * b) * unit_factor c = c"
moreover from \<open>a dvd c * b\<close> have "a dvd gcd (c * a) (c * b) * unit_factor c"
ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma coprime_dvd_mult_iff:
assumes "coprime a c"
shows "a dvd b * c \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd b"
using assms by (auto intro: coprime_dvd_mult)

lemma gcd_mult_cancel:
"coprime c b \<Longrightarrow> gcd (c * a) b = gcd a b"
apply (rule associated_eqI)
apply (rule gcd_greatest)
apply (rule_tac b = c in coprime_dvd_mult)
done

lemma coprime_crossproduct:
fixes a b c d
assumes "coprime a d" and "coprime b c"
shows "normalize a * normalize c = normalize b * normalize d
\<longleftrightarrow> normalize a = normalize b \<and> normalize c = normalize d" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume ?rhs then show ?lhs by simp
next
assume ?lhs
from \<open>?lhs\<close> have "normalize a dvd normalize b * normalize d"
by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym)
with \<open>coprime a d\<close> have "a dvd b"
by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff normalize_mult [symmetric])
from \<open>?lhs\<close> have "normalize b dvd normalize a * normalize c"
by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym)
with \<open>coprime b c\<close> have "b dvd a"
by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff normalize_mult [symmetric])
from \<open>?lhs\<close> have "normalize c dvd normalize d * normalize b"
by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym simp add: mult.commute)
with \<open>coprime b c\<close> have "c dvd d"
by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff gcd.commute normalize_mult [symmetric])
from \<open>?lhs\<close> have "normalize d dvd normalize c * normalize a"
by (auto intro: dvdI dest: sym simp add: mult.commute)
with \<open>coprime a d\<close> have "d dvd c"
by (simp add: coprime_dvd_mult_iff gcd.commute normalize_mult [symmetric])
from \<open>a dvd b\<close> \<open>b dvd a\<close> have "normalize a = normalize b"
by (rule associatedI)
moreover from \<open>c dvd d\<close> \<open>d dvd c\<close> have "normalize c = normalize d"
by (rule associatedI)
ultimately show ?rhs ..
qed

lemma gcd_add1 [simp]: "gcd (m + n) n = gcd m n"

lemma gcd_add2 [simp]: "gcd m (m + n) = gcd m n"

lemma gcd_add_mult: "gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n"

lemma coprimeI: "(\<And>l. \<lbrakk>l dvd a; l dvd b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> l dvd 1) \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = 1"
by (rule sym, rule gcdI, simp_all)

lemma coprime: "gcd a b = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> is_unit d)"
by (auto intro: coprimeI gcd_greatest dvd_gcdD1 dvd_gcdD2)

lemma div_gcd_coprime:
assumes nz: "a \<noteq> 0 \<or> b \<noteq> 0"
shows "coprime (a div gcd a b) (b div gcd a b)"
proof -
let ?g = "gcd a b"
let ?a' = "a div ?g"
let ?b' = "b div ?g"
let ?g' = "gcd ?a' ?b'"
have dvdg: "?g dvd a" "?g dvd b" by simp_all
have dvdg': "?g' dvd ?a'" "?g' dvd ?b'" by simp_all
from dvdg dvdg' obtain ka kb ka' kb' where
kab: "a = ?g * ka" "b = ?g * kb" "?a' = ?g' * ka'" "?b' = ?g' * kb'"
unfolding dvd_def by blast
from this [symmetric] have "?g * ?a' = (?g * ?g') * ka'" "?g * ?b' = (?g * ?g') * kb'"
by (simp_all add: mult.assoc mult.left_commute [of "gcd a b"])
then have dvdgg':"?g * ?g' dvd a" "?g* ?g' dvd b"
by (auto simp add: dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF dvdg(1)]
dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF dvdg(2)] dvd_def)
have "?g \<noteq> 0" using nz by simp
moreover from gcd_greatest [OF dvdgg'] have "?g * ?g' dvd ?g" .
thm dvd_mult_cancel_left
ultimately show ?thesis using dvd_times_left_cancel_iff [of "gcd a b" _ 1] by simp
qed

lemma divides_mult:
assumes "a dvd c" and nr: "b dvd c" and "coprime a b"
shows "a * b dvd c"
proof-
from \<open>b dvd c\<close> obtain b' where"c = b * b'" ..
with \<open>a dvd c\<close> have "a dvd b' * b"
with \<open>coprime a b\<close> have "a dvd b'"
then obtain a' where "b' = a * a'" ..
with \<open>c = b * b'\<close> have "c = (a * b) * a'"
then show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma coprime_lmult:
assumes dab: "gcd d (a * b) = 1"
shows "gcd d a = 1"
proof (rule coprimeI)
fix l assume "l dvd d" and "l dvd a"
hence "l dvd a * b" by simp
with \<open>l dvd d\<close> and dab show "l dvd 1" by (auto intro: gcd_greatest)
qed

lemma coprime_rmult:
assumes dab: "gcd d (a * b) = 1"
shows "gcd d b = 1"
proof (rule coprimeI)
fix l assume "l dvd d" and "l dvd b"
hence "l dvd a * b" by simp
with \<open>l dvd d\<close> and dab show "l dvd 1" by (auto intro: gcd_greatest)
qed

lemma coprime_mult:
assumes da: "coprime d a" and db: "coprime d b"
shows "coprime d (a * b)"
apply (subst gcd.commute)
using da apply (subst gcd_mult_cancel)
apply (subst gcd.commute, assumption)
apply (subst gcd.commute, rule db)
done

lemma coprime_mul_eq: "gcd d (a * b) = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> gcd d a = 1 \<and> gcd d b = 1"
using coprime_rmult[of d a b] coprime_lmult[of d a b] coprime_mult[of d a b] by blast

lemma gcd_coprime:
assumes c: "gcd a b \<noteq> 0" and a: "a = a' * gcd a b" and b: "b = b' * gcd a b"
shows "gcd a' b' = 1"
proof -
from c have "a \<noteq> 0 \<or> b \<noteq> 0" by simp
with div_gcd_coprime have "gcd (a div gcd a b) (b div gcd a b) = 1" .
also from assms have "a div gcd a b = a'" using dvd_div_eq_mult local.gcd_dvd1 by blast
also from assms have "b div gcd a b = b'" using dvd_div_eq_mult local.gcd_dvd1 by blast
finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma coprime_power:
assumes "0 < n"
shows "gcd a (b ^ n) = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> gcd a b = 1"
using assms proof (induct n)
case (Suc n) then show ?case
by (cases n) (simp_all add: coprime_mul_eq)
qed simp

lemma gcd_coprime_exists:
assumes nz: "gcd a b \<noteq> 0"
shows "\<exists>a' b'. a = a' * gcd a b \<and> b = b' * gcd a b \<and> gcd a' b' = 1"
apply (rule_tac x = "a div gcd a b" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "b div gcd a b" in exI)
apply (insert nz, auto intro: div_gcd_coprime)
done

lemma coprime_exp:
"gcd d a = 1 \<Longrightarrow> gcd d (a^n) = 1"
by (induct n, simp_all add: coprime_mult)

lemma coprime_exp_left:
assumes "coprime a b"
shows "coprime (a ^ n) b"
using assms by (induct n) (simp_all add: gcd_mult_cancel)

lemma coprime_exp2:
assumes "coprime a b"
shows "coprime (a ^ n) (b ^ m)"
proof (rule coprime_exp_left)
from assms show "coprime a (b ^ m)"
by (induct m) (simp_all add: gcd_mult_cancel gcd.commute [of a])
qed

lemma gcd_exp:
"gcd (a ^ n) (b ^ n) = gcd a b ^ n"
proof (cases "a = 0 \<and> b = 0")
case True
then show ?thesis by (cases n) simp_all
next
case False
then have "1 = gcd ((a div gcd a b) ^ n) ((b div gcd a b) ^ n)"
using coprime_exp2[OF div_gcd_coprime[of a b], of n n, symmetric] by simp
then have "gcd a b ^ n = gcd a b ^ n * ..." by simp
also note gcd_mult_distrib
also have "unit_factor (gcd a b ^ n) = 1"
using False by (auto simp add: unit_factor_power unit_factor_gcd)
also have "(gcd a b)^n * (a div gcd a b)^n = a^n"
by (subst ac_simps, subst div_power, simp, rule dvd_div_mult_self, rule dvd_power_same, simp)
also have "(gcd a b)^n * (b div gcd a b)^n = b^n"
by (subst ac_simps, subst div_power, simp, rule dvd_div_mult_self, rule dvd_power_same, simp)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma coprime_common_divisor:
"gcd a b = 1 \<Longrightarrow> a dvd a \<Longrightarrow> a dvd b \<Longrightarrow> is_unit a"
apply (subgoal_tac "a dvd gcd a b")
apply simp
apply (erule (1) gcd_greatest)
done

lemma division_decomp:
assumes dc: "a dvd b * c"
shows "\<exists>b' c'. a = b' * c' \<and> b' dvd b \<and> c' dvd c"
proof (cases "gcd a b = 0")
assume "gcd a b = 0"
hence "a = 0 \<and> b = 0" by simp
hence "a = 0 * c \<and> 0 dvd b \<and> c dvd c" by simp
then show ?thesis by blast
next
let ?d = "gcd a b"
assume "?d \<noteq> 0"
from gcd_coprime_exists[OF this]
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?d" "b = b' * ?d" "gcd a' b' = 1"
by blast
from ab'(1) have "a' dvd a" unfolding dvd_def by blast
with dc have "a' dvd b*c" using dvd_trans[of a' a "b*c"] by simp
from dc ab'(1,2) have "a'*?d dvd (b'*?d) * c" by simp
hence "?d * a' dvd ?d * (b' * c)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
with \<open>?d \<noteq> 0\<close> have "a' dvd b' * c" by simp
with coprime_dvd_mult[OF ab'(3)]
have "a' dvd c" by (subst (asm) ac_simps, blast)
with ab'(1) have "a = ?d * a' \<and> ?d dvd b \<and> a' dvd c" by (simp add: mult_ac)
then show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma pow_divs_pow:
assumes ab: "a ^ n dvd b ^ n" and n: "n \<noteq> 0"
shows "a dvd b"
proof (cases "gcd a b = 0")
assume "gcd a b = 0"
then show ?thesis by simp
next
let ?d = "gcd a b"
assume "?d \<noteq> 0"
from n obtain m where m: "n = Suc m" by (cases n, simp_all)
from \<open>?d \<noteq> 0\<close> have zn: "?d ^ n \<noteq> 0" by (rule power_not_zero)
from gcd_coprime_exists[OF \<open>?d \<noteq> 0\<close>]
obtain a' b' where ab': "a = a' * ?d" "b = b' * ?d" "gcd a' b' = 1"
by blast
from ab have "(a' * ?d) ^ n dvd (b' * ?d) ^ n"
hence "?d^n * a'^n dvd ?d^n * b'^n"
by (simp only: power_mult_distrib ac_simps)
with zn have "a'^n dvd b'^n" by simp
hence "a' dvd b'^n" using dvd_trans[of a' "a'^n" "b'^n"] by (simp add: m)
hence "a' dvd b'^m * b'" by (simp add: m ac_simps)
with coprime_dvd_mult[OF coprime_exp[OF ab'(3), of m]]
have "a' dvd b'" by (subst (asm) ac_simps, blast)
hence "a'*?d dvd b'*?d" by (rule mult_dvd_mono, simp)
with ab'(1,2) show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma pow_divs_eq [simp]:
"n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> a ^ n dvd b ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd b"
by (auto intro: pow_divs_pow dvd_power_same)

lemma coprime_plus_one [simp]: "gcd (n + 1) n = 1"

lemma setprod_coprime [rule_format]:
"(\<forall>i\<in>A. gcd (f i) a = 1) \<longrightarrow> gcd (\<Prod>i\<in>A. f i) a = 1"
apply (cases "finite A")
apply (induct set: finite)
done

lemma listprod_coprime:
"(\<And>x. x \<in> set xs \<Longrightarrow> coprime x y) \<Longrightarrow> coprime (listprod xs) y"
by (induction xs) (simp_all add: gcd_mult_cancel)

lemma coprime_divisors:
assumes "d dvd a" "e dvd b" "gcd a b = 1"
shows "gcd d e = 1"
proof -
from assms obtain k l where "a = d * k" "b = e * l"
unfolding dvd_def by blast
with assms have "gcd (d * k) (e * l) = 1" by simp
hence "gcd (d * k) e = 1" by (rule coprime_lmult)
also have "gcd (d * k) e = gcd e (d * k)" by (simp add: ac_simps)
finally have "gcd e d = 1" by (rule coprime_lmult)
then show ?thesis by (simp add: ac_simps)
qed

lemma lcm_gcd_prod:
"lcm a b * gcd a b = normalize (a * b)"

declare unit_factor_lcm [simp]

lemma lcmI:
assumes "a dvd c" and "b dvd c" and "\<And>d. a dvd d \<Longrightarrow> b dvd d \<Longrightarrow> c dvd d"
and "normalize c = c"
shows "c = lcm a b"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto simp: assms intro: lcm_least)

lemma gcd_dvd_lcm [simp]:
"gcd a b dvd lcm a b"
using gcd_dvd2 by (rule dvd_lcmI2)

lemmas lcm_0 = lcm_0_right

lemma lcm_unique:
"a dvd d \<and> b dvd d \<and>
normalize d = d \<and>
(\<forall>e. a dvd e \<and> b dvd e \<longrightarrow> d dvd e) \<longleftrightarrow> d = lcm a b"
by rule (auto intro: lcmI simp: lcm_least lcm_eq_0_iff)

lemma lcm_coprime:
"gcd a b = 1 \<Longrightarrow> lcm a b = normalize (a * b)"
by (subst lcm_gcd) simp

lemma lcm_proj1_if_dvd:
"b dvd a \<Longrightarrow> lcm a b = normalize a"
by (cases "a = 0") (simp, rule sym, rule lcmI, simp_all)

lemma lcm_proj2_if_dvd:
"a dvd b \<Longrightarrow> lcm a b = normalize b"
using lcm_proj1_if_dvd [of a b] by (simp add: ac_simps)

lemma lcm_proj1_iff:
"lcm m n = normalize m \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
proof
assume A: "lcm m n = normalize m"
show "n dvd m"
proof (cases "m = 0")
assume [simp]: "m \<noteq> 0"
from A have B: "m = lcm m n * unit_factor m"
show ?thesis by (subst B, simp)
qed simp
next
assume "n dvd m"
then show "lcm m n = normalize m" by (rule lcm_proj1_if_dvd)
qed

lemma lcm_proj2_iff:
"lcm m n = normalize n \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
using lcm_proj1_iff [of n m] by (simp add: ac_simps)

end

class ring_gcd = comm_ring_1 + semiring_gcd
begin

lemma coprime_minus_one: "coprime (n - 1) n"
using coprime_plus_one[of "n - 1"] by (simp add: gcd.commute)

lemma gcd_neg1 [simp]:
"gcd (-a) b = gcd a b"
by (rule sym, rule gcdI, simp_all add: gcd_greatest)

lemma gcd_neg2 [simp]:
"gcd a (-b) = gcd a b"
by (rule sym, rule gcdI, simp_all add: gcd_greatest)

lemma gcd_neg_numeral_1 [simp]:
"gcd (- numeral n) a = gcd (numeral n) a"
by (fact gcd_neg1)

lemma gcd_neg_numeral_2 [simp]:
"gcd a (- numeral n) = gcd a (numeral n)"
by (fact gcd_neg2)

lemma gcd_diff1: "gcd (m - n) n = gcd m n"

lemma gcd_diff2: "gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n"
by (subst gcd_neg1[symmetric], simp only: minus_diff_eq gcd_diff1)

lemma lcm_neg1 [simp]: "lcm (-a) b = lcm a b"
by (rule sym, rule lcmI, simp_all add: lcm_least lcm_eq_0_iff)

lemma lcm_neg2 [simp]: "lcm a (-b) = lcm a b"
by (rule sym, rule lcmI, simp_all add: lcm_least lcm_eq_0_iff)

lemma lcm_neg_numeral_1 [simp]: "lcm (- numeral n) a = lcm (numeral n) a"
by (fact lcm_neg1)

lemma lcm_neg_numeral_2 [simp]: "lcm a (- numeral n) = lcm a (numeral n)"
by (fact lcm_neg2)

end

class semiring_Gcd = semiring_gcd + Gcd +
assumes Gcd_dvd: "a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> Gcd A dvd a"
and Gcd_greatest: "(\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a dvd b) \<Longrightarrow> a dvd Gcd A"
and normalize_Gcd [simp]: "normalize (Gcd A) = Gcd A"
assumes dvd_Lcm: "a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a dvd Lcm A"
and Lcm_least: "(\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b dvd a) \<Longrightarrow> Lcm A dvd a"
and normalize_Lcm [simp]: "normalize (Lcm A) = Lcm A"
begin

lemma Lcm_Gcd:
"Lcm A = Gcd {b. \<forall>a\<in>A. a dvd b}"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto intro: Gcd_dvd dvd_Lcm Gcd_greatest Lcm_least)

lemma Gcd_Lcm:
"Gcd A = Lcm {b. \<forall>a\<in>A. b dvd a}"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto intro: Gcd_dvd dvd_Lcm Gcd_greatest Lcm_least)

lemma Gcd_empty [simp]:
"Gcd {} = 0"
by (rule dvd_0_left, rule Gcd_greatest) simp

lemma Lcm_empty [simp]:
"Lcm {} = 1"
by (auto intro: associated_eqI Lcm_least)

lemma Gcd_insert [simp]:
"Gcd (insert a A) = gcd a (Gcd A)"
proof -
have "Gcd (insert a A) dvd gcd a (Gcd A)"
by (auto intro: Gcd_dvd Gcd_greatest)
moreover have "gcd a (Gcd A) dvd Gcd (insert a A)"
proof (rule Gcd_greatest)
fix b
assume "b \<in> insert a A"
then show "gcd a (Gcd A) dvd b"
proof
assume "b = a" then show ?thesis by simp
next
assume "b \<in> A"
then have "Gcd A dvd b" by (rule Gcd_dvd)
moreover have "gcd a (Gcd A) dvd Gcd A" by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by (blast intro: dvd_trans)
qed
qed
ultimately show ?thesis
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)
qed

lemma Lcm_insert [simp]:
"Lcm (insert a A) = lcm a (Lcm A)"
proof (rule sym)
have "lcm a (Lcm A) dvd Lcm (insert a A)"
by (auto intro: dvd_Lcm Lcm_least)
moreover have "Lcm (insert a A) dvd lcm a (Lcm A)"
proof (rule Lcm_least)
fix b
assume "b \<in> insert a A"
then show "b dvd lcm a (Lcm A)"
proof
assume "b = a" then show ?thesis by simp
next
assume "b \<in> A"
then have "b dvd Lcm A" by (rule dvd_Lcm)
moreover have "Lcm A dvd lcm a (Lcm A)" by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by (blast intro: dvd_trans)
qed
qed
ultimately show "lcm a (Lcm A) = Lcm (insert a A)"
by (rule associated_eqI) (simp_all add: lcm_eq_0_iff)
qed

lemma LcmI:
assumes "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a dvd b" and "\<And>c. (\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a dvd c) \<Longrightarrow> b dvd c"
and "normalize b = b" shows "b = Lcm A"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto simp: assms dvd_Lcm intro: Lcm_least)

lemma Lcm_subset:
"A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> Lcm A dvd Lcm B"
by (blast intro: Lcm_least dvd_Lcm)

lemma Lcm_Un:
"Lcm (A \<union> B) = lcm (Lcm A) (Lcm B)"
apply (rule lcmI)
apply (blast intro: Lcm_subset)
apply (blast intro: Lcm_subset)
apply (intro Lcm_least ballI, elim UnE)
apply (rule dvd_trans, erule dvd_Lcm, assumption)
apply (rule dvd_trans, erule dvd_Lcm, assumption)
apply simp
done

lemma Gcd_0_iff [simp]:
"Gcd A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> A \<subseteq> {0}" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
proof
assume ?P
show ?Q
proof
fix a
assume "a \<in> A"
then have "Gcd A dvd a" by (rule Gcd_dvd)
with \<open>?P\<close> have "a = 0" by simp
then show "a \<in> {0}" by simp
qed
next
assume ?Q
have "0 dvd Gcd A"
proof (rule Gcd_greatest)
fix a
assume "a \<in> A"
with \<open>?Q\<close> have "a = 0" by auto
then show "0 dvd a" by simp
qed
then show ?P by simp
qed

lemma Lcm_1_iff [simp]:
"Lcm A = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>a\<in>A. is_unit a)" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
proof
assume ?P
show ?Q
proof
fix a
assume "a \<in> A"
then have "a dvd Lcm A"
by (rule dvd_Lcm)
with \<open>?P\<close> show "is_unit a"
by simp
qed
next
assume ?Q
then have "is_unit (Lcm A)"
by (blast intro: Lcm_least)
then have "normalize (Lcm A) = 1"
by (rule is_unit_normalize)
then show ?P
by simp
qed

lemma unit_factor_Lcm:
"unit_factor (Lcm A) = (if Lcm A = 0 then 0 else 1)"
proof (cases "Lcm A = 0")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
with unit_factor_normalize have "unit_factor (normalize (Lcm A)) = 1"
by blast
with False show ?thesis
by simp
qed

lemma unit_factor_Gcd: "unit_factor (Gcd A) = (if Gcd A = 0 then 0 else 1)"
proof -
show "unit_factor (Gcd A) = (if Gcd A = 0 then 0 else 1)"
qed

lemma GcdI:
assumes "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b dvd a" and "\<And>c. (\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> c dvd a) \<Longrightarrow> c dvd b"
and "normalize b = b"
shows "b = Gcd A"
by (rule associated_eqI) (auto simp: assms Gcd_dvd intro: Gcd_greatest)

lemma Gcd_eq_1_I:
assumes "is_unit a" and "a \<in> A"
shows "Gcd A = 1"
proof -
from assms have "is_unit (Gcd A)"
by (blast intro: Gcd_dvd dvd_unit_imp_unit)
then have "normalize (Gcd A) = 1"
by (rule is_unit_normalize)
then show ?thesis
by simp
qed

lemma Lcm_eq_0_I:
assumes "0 \<in> A"
shows "Lcm A = 0"
proof -
from assms have "0 dvd Lcm A"
by (rule dvd_Lcm)
then show ?thesis
by simp
qed

lemma Gcd_UNIV [simp]:
"Gcd UNIV = 1"
using dvd_refl by (rule Gcd_eq_1_I) simp

lemma Lcm_UNIV [simp]:
"Lcm UNIV = 0"
by (rule Lcm_eq_0_I) simp

lemma Lcm_0_iff:
assumes "finite A"
shows "Lcm A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<in> A"
proof (cases "A = {}")
case True then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False with assms show ?thesis
by (induct A rule: finite_ne_induct)
qed

lemma Gcd_finite:
assumes "finite A"
shows "Gcd A = Finite_Set.fold gcd 0 A"
by (induct rule: finite.induct[OF \<open>finite A\<close>])

lemma Gcd_set [code_unfold]: "Gcd (set as) = foldl gcd 0 as"
by (simp add: Gcd_finite comp_fun_idem.fold_set_fold[OF comp_fun_idem_gcd]
foldl_conv_fold gcd.commute)

lemma Lcm_finite:
assumes "finite A"
shows "Lcm A = Finite_Set.fold lcm 1 A"
by (induct rule: finite.induct[OF \<open>finite A\<close>])

lemma Lcm_set [code_unfold]:
"Lcm (set as) = foldl lcm 1 as"
by (simp add: Lcm_finite comp_fun_idem.fold_set_fold[OF comp_fun_idem_lcm]
foldl_conv_fold lcm.commute)

lemma Gcd_image_normalize [simp]:
"Gcd (normalize ` A) = Gcd A"
proof -
have "Gcd (normalize ` A) dvd a" if "a \<in> A" for a
proof -
from that obtain B where "A = insert a B" by blast
moreover have "gcd (normalize a) (Gcd (normalize ` B)) dvd normalize a"
by (rule gcd_dvd1)
ultimately show "Gcd (normalize ` A) dvd a"
by simp
qed
then have "Gcd (normalize ` A) dvd Gcd A" and "Gcd A dvd Gcd (normalize ` A)"
by (auto intro!: Gcd_greatest intro: Gcd_dvd)
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro: associated_eqI)
qed

lemma Gcd_eqI:
assumes "normalize a = a"
assumes "\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a dvd b"
and "\<And>c. (\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> c dvd b) \<Longrightarrow> c dvd a"
shows "Gcd A = a"
using assms by (blast intro: associated_eqI Gcd_greatest Gcd_dvd normalize_Gcd)

lemma dvd_GcdD:
assumes "x dvd Gcd A" "y \<in> A"
shows   "x dvd y"
using assms Gcd_dvd dvd_trans by blast

lemma dvd_Gcd_iff:
"x dvd Gcd A \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y\<in>A. x dvd y)"
by (blast dest: dvd_GcdD intro: Gcd_greatest)

lemma Gcd_mult: "Gcd (op * c ` A) = normalize c * Gcd A"
proof (cases "c = 0")
case [simp]: False
have "Gcd (op * c ` A) div c dvd Gcd A"
by (intro Gcd_greatest, subst div_dvd_iff_mult)
(auto intro!: Gcd_greatest Gcd_dvd simp: mult.commute[of _ c])
hence "Gcd (op * c ` A) dvd c * Gcd A"
by (subst (asm) div_dvd_iff_mult) (auto intro: Gcd_greatest simp: mult_ac)
also have "c * Gcd A = (normalize c * Gcd A) * unit_factor c"
by (subst unit_factor_mult_normalize [symmetric]) (simp only: mult_ac)
also have "Gcd (op * c ` A) dvd \<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> Gcd (op * c ` A) dvd normalize c * Gcd A"
finally have "Gcd (op * c ` A) dvd normalize c * Gcd A" .
moreover have "normalize c * Gcd A dvd Gcd (op * c ` A)"
by (intro Gcd_greatest) (auto intro: mult_dvd_mono Gcd_dvd)
ultimately have "normalize (Gcd (op * c ` A)) = normalize (normalize c * Gcd A)"
by (rule associatedI)
thus ?thesis by (simp add: normalize_mult)
qed auto

lemma Lcm_eqI:
assumes "normalize a = a"
assumes "\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b dvd a"
and "\<And>c. (\<And>b. b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b dvd c) \<Longrightarrow> a dvd c"
shows "Lcm A = a"
using assms by (blast intro: associated_eqI Lcm_least dvd_Lcm normalize_Lcm)

lemma Lcm_dvdD:
assumes "Lcm A dvd x" "y \<in> A"
shows   "y dvd x"
using assms dvd_Lcm dvd_trans by blast

lemma Lcm_dvd_iff:
"Lcm A dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y\<in>A. y dvd x)"
by (blast dest: Lcm_dvdD intro: Lcm_least)

lemma Lcm_mult:
assumes "A \<noteq> {}"
shows   "Lcm (op * c ` A) = normalize c * Lcm A"
proof (cases "c = 0")
case True
moreover from assms this have "op * c ` A = {0}" by auto
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
next
case [simp]: False
from assms obtain x where x: "x \<in> A" by blast
have "c dvd c * x" by simp
also from x have "c * x dvd Lcm (op * c ` A)" by (intro dvd_Lcm) auto
finally have dvd: "c dvd Lcm (op * c ` A)" .

have "Lcm A dvd Lcm (op * c ` A) div c"
by (intro Lcm_least dvd_mult_imp_div)
(auto intro!: Lcm_least dvd_Lcm simp: mult.commute[of _ c])
hence "c * Lcm A dvd Lcm (op * c ` A)"
by (subst (asm) dvd_div_iff_mult) (auto intro!: Lcm_least simp: mult_ac dvd)
also have "c * Lcm A = (normalize c * Lcm A) * unit_factor c"
by (subst unit_factor_mult_normalize [symmetric]) (simp only: mult_ac)
also have "\<dots> dvd Lcm (op * c ` A) \<longleftrightarrow> normalize c * Lcm A dvd Lcm (op * c ` A)"
finally have "normalize c * Lcm A dvd Lcm (op * c ` A)" .
moreover have "Lcm (op * c ` A) dvd normalize c * Lcm A"
by (intro Lcm_least) (auto intro: mult_dvd_mono dvd_Lcm)
ultimately have "normalize (normalize c * Lcm A) = normalize (Lcm (op * c ` A))"
by (rule associatedI)
thus ?thesis by (simp add: normalize_mult)
qed

lemma Lcm_no_units:
"Lcm A = Lcm (A - {a. is_unit a})"
proof -
have "(A - {a. is_unit a}) \<union> {a\<in>A. is_unit a} = A" by blast
hence "Lcm A = lcm (Lcm (A - {a. is_unit a})) (Lcm {a\<in>A. is_unit a})"
also have "Lcm {a\<in>A. is_unit a} = 1" by (simp add: Lcm_1_iff)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma Lcm_0_iff': "Lcm A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not>(\<exists>l. l \<noteq> 0 \<and> (\<forall>a\<in>A. a dvd l))"
by (metis Lcm_least dvd_0_left dvd_Lcm)

lemma Lcm_no_multiple: "(\<forall>m. m \<noteq> 0 \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. \<not>a dvd m)) \<Longrightarrow> Lcm A = 0"
by (auto simp: Lcm_0_iff')

lemma Lcm_singleton [simp]:
"Lcm {a} = normalize a"
by simp

lemma Lcm_2 [simp]:
"Lcm {a,b} = lcm a b"
by simp

lemma Lcm_coprime:
assumes "finite A" and "A \<noteq> {}"
assumes "\<And>a b. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a \<noteq> b \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = 1"
shows "Lcm A = normalize (\<Prod>A)"
using assms proof (induct rule: finite_ne_induct)
case (insert a A)
have "Lcm (insert a A) = lcm a (Lcm A)" by simp
also from insert have "Lcm A = normalize (\<Prod>A)" by blast
also have "lcm a \<dots> = lcm a (\<Prod>A)" by (cases "\<Prod>A = 0") (simp_all add: lcm_div_unit2)
also from insert have "gcd a (\<Prod>A) = 1" by (subst gcd.commute, intro setprod_coprime) auto
with insert have "lcm a (\<Prod>A) = normalize (\<Prod>(insert a A))"
finally show ?case .
qed simp

lemma Lcm_coprime':
"card A \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a b. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a \<noteq> b \<Longrightarrow> gcd a b = 1)
\<Longrightarrow> Lcm A = normalize (\<Prod>A)"
by (rule Lcm_coprime) (simp_all add: card_eq_0_iff)

lemma Gcd_1:
"1 \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> Gcd A = 1"
by (auto intro!: Gcd_eq_1_I)

lemma Gcd_singleton [simp]: "Gcd {a} = normalize a"
by simp

lemma Gcd_2 [simp]: "Gcd {a,b} = gcd a b"
by simp

definition pairwise_coprime where
"pairwise_coprime A = (\<forall>x y. x \<in> A \<and> y \<in> A \<and> x \<noteq> y \<longrightarrow> coprime x y)"

lemma pairwise_coprimeI [intro?]:
"(\<And>x y. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow> coprime x y) \<Longrightarrow> pairwise_coprime A"

lemma pairwise_coprimeD:
"pairwise_coprime A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<noteq> y \<Longrightarrow> coprime x y"

lemma pairwise_coprime_subset: "pairwise_coprime A \<Longrightarrow> B \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> pairwise_coprime B"
by (force simp: pairwise_coprime_def)

end

subsection \<open>GCD and LCM on @{typ nat} and @{typ int}\<close>

instantiation nat :: gcd
begin

fun gcd_nat  :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
where "gcd_nat x y =
(if y = 0 then x else gcd y (x mod y))"

definition lcm_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"lcm_nat x y = x * y div (gcd x y)"

instance proof qed

end

instantiation int :: gcd
begin

definition gcd_int  :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
where "gcd_int x y = int (gcd (nat \<bar>x\<bar>) (nat \<bar>y\<bar>))"

definition lcm_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
where "lcm_int x y = int (lcm (nat \<bar>x\<bar>) (nat \<bar>y\<bar>))"

instance ..

end

text \<open>Transfer setup\<close>

lemma transfer_nat_int_gcd:
"(x::int) >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (nat x) (nat y) = nat (gcd x y)"
"(x::int) >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm (nat x) (nat y) = nat (lcm x y)"
unfolding gcd_int_def lcm_int_def
by auto

lemma transfer_nat_int_gcd_closures:
"x >= (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y >= 0"
"x >= (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y >= 0"
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def lcm_int_def)

transfer_nat_int_gcd transfer_nat_int_gcd_closures]

lemma transfer_int_nat_gcd:
"gcd (int x) (int y) = int (gcd x y)"
"lcm (int x) (int y) = int (lcm x y)"
by (unfold gcd_int_def lcm_int_def, auto)

lemma transfer_int_nat_gcd_closures:
"is_nat x \<Longrightarrow> is_nat y \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y >= 0"
"is_nat x \<Longrightarrow> is_nat y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y >= 0"
by (auto simp add: gcd_int_def lcm_int_def)

transfer_int_nat_gcd transfer_int_nat_gcd_closures]

lemma gcd_nat_induct:
fixes m n :: nat
assumes "\<And>m. P m 0"
and "\<And>m n. 0 < n \<Longrightarrow> P n (m mod n) \<Longrightarrow> P m n"
shows "P m n"
apply (rule gcd_nat.induct)
apply (case_tac "y = 0")
using assms apply simp_all
done

(* specific to int *)

lemma gcd_eq_int_iff:
"gcd k l = int n \<longleftrightarrow> gcd (nat \<bar>k\<bar>) (nat \<bar>l\<bar>) = n"

lemma lcm_eq_int_iff:
"lcm k l = int n \<longleftrightarrow> lcm (nat \<bar>k\<bar>) (nat \<bar>l\<bar>) = n"

lemma gcd_neg1_int [simp]: "gcd (-x::int) y = gcd x y"

lemma gcd_neg2_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) (-y) = gcd x y"

lemma abs_gcd_int [simp]: "\<bar>gcd (x::int) y\<bar> = gcd x y"

lemma gcd_abs_int: "gcd (x::int) y = gcd \<bar>x\<bar> \<bar>y\<bar>"

lemma gcd_abs1_int [simp]: "gcd \<bar>x\<bar> (y::int) = gcd x y"
by (metis abs_idempotent gcd_abs_int)

lemma gcd_abs2_int [simp]: "gcd x \<bar>y::int\<bar> = gcd x y"
by (metis abs_idempotent gcd_abs_int)

lemma gcd_cases_int:
fixes x :: int and y
assumes "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd x y)"
and "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd x (-y))"
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd (-x) y)"
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (gcd (-x) (-y))"
shows "P (gcd x y)"
by (insert assms, auto, arith)

lemma gcd_ge_0_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) y >= 0"

lemma lcm_neg1_int: "lcm (-x::int) y = lcm x y"

lemma lcm_neg2_int: "lcm (x::int) (-y) = lcm x y"

lemma lcm_abs_int: "lcm (x::int) y = lcm \<bar>x\<bar> \<bar>y\<bar>"

lemma abs_lcm_int [simp]: "\<bar>lcm i j::int\<bar> = lcm i j"

lemma lcm_abs1_int [simp]: "lcm \<bar>x\<bar> (y::int) = lcm x y"
by (metis abs_idempotent lcm_int_def)

lemma lcm_abs2_int [simp]: "lcm x \<bar>y::int\<bar> = lcm x y"
by (metis abs_idempotent lcm_int_def)

lemma lcm_cases_int:
fixes x :: int and y
assumes "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm x y)"
and "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm x (-y))"
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm (-x) y)"
and "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (lcm (-x) (-y))"
shows "P (lcm x y)"
using assms by (auto simp add: lcm_neg1_int lcm_neg2_int) arith

lemma lcm_ge_0_int [simp]: "lcm (x::int) y >= 0"

lemma gcd_0_nat: "gcd (x::nat) 0 = x"
by simp

lemma gcd_0_int [simp]: "gcd (x::int) 0 = \<bar>x\<bar>"
by (unfold gcd_int_def, auto)

lemma gcd_0_left_nat: "gcd 0 (x::nat) = x"
by simp

lemma gcd_0_left_int [simp]: "gcd 0 (x::int) = \<bar>x\<bar>"
by (unfold gcd_int_def, auto)

lemma gcd_red_nat: "gcd (x::nat) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
by (case_tac "y = 0", auto)

(* weaker, but useful for the simplifier *)

lemma gcd_non_0_nat: "y \<noteq> (0::nat) \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::nat) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
by simp

lemma gcd_1_nat [simp]: "gcd (m::nat) 1 = 1"
by simp

lemma gcd_Suc_0 [simp]: "gcd (m::nat) (Suc 0) = Suc 0"
by simp

lemma gcd_1_int [simp]: "gcd (m::int) 1 = 1"

lemma gcd_idem_nat: "gcd (x::nat) x = x"
by simp

lemma gcd_idem_int: "gcd (x::int) x = \<bar>x\<bar>"

declare gcd_nat.simps [simp del]

text \<open>
\medskip @{term "gcd m n"} divides \<open>m\<close> and \<open>n\<close>.  The
conjunctions don't seem provable separately.
\<close>

instance nat :: semiring_gcd
proof
fix m n :: nat
show "gcd m n dvd m" and "gcd m n dvd n"
proof (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct)
fix m n :: nat
assume "gcd n (m mod n) dvd m mod n" and "gcd n (m mod n) dvd n"
then have "gcd n (m mod n) dvd m"
by (rule dvd_mod_imp_dvd)
moreover assume "0 < n"
ultimately show "gcd m n dvd m"
next
fix m n k :: nat
assume "k dvd m" and "k dvd n"
then show "k dvd gcd m n"
by (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct) (simp_all add: gcd_non_0_nat dvd_mod gcd_0_nat)

instance int :: ring_gcd
by standard
(simp_all add: dvd_int_unfold_dvd_nat gcd_int_def lcm_int_def zdiv_int nat_abs_mult_distrib [symmetric] lcm_gcd gcd_greatest)

lemma gcd_le1_nat [simp]: "a \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::nat) b \<le> a"
by (rule dvd_imp_le, auto)

lemma gcd_le2_nat [simp]: "b \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::nat) b \<le> b"
by (rule dvd_imp_le, auto)

lemma gcd_le1_int [simp]: "a > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::int) b \<le> a"
by (rule zdvd_imp_le, auto)

lemma gcd_le2_int [simp]: "b > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (a::int) b \<le> b"
by (rule zdvd_imp_le, auto)

lemma gcd_pos_nat [simp]: "(gcd (m::nat) n > 0) = (m ~= 0 | n ~= 0)"
by (insert gcd_eq_0_iff [of m n], arith)

lemma gcd_pos_int [simp]: "(gcd (m::int) n > 0) = (m ~= 0 | n ~= 0)"
by (insert gcd_eq_0_iff [of m n], insert gcd_ge_0_int [of m n], arith)

lemma gcd_unique_nat: "(d::nat) dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
(\<forall>e. e dvd a \<and> e dvd b \<longrightarrow> e dvd d) \<longleftrightarrow> d = gcd a b"
apply auto
apply (rule dvd_antisym)
apply (erule (1) gcd_greatest)
apply auto
done

lemma gcd_unique_int: "d >= 0 & (d::int) dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
(\<forall>e. e dvd a \<and> e dvd b \<longrightarrow> e dvd d) \<longleftrightarrow> d = gcd a b"
apply (case_tac "d = 0")
apply simp
apply (rule iffI)
apply (rule zdvd_antisym_nonneg)
apply (auto intro: gcd_greatest)
done

interpretation gcd_nat:
semilattice_neutr_order gcd "0::nat" Rings.dvd "\<lambda>m n. m dvd n \<and> m \<noteq> n"
by standard (auto simp add: gcd_unique_nat [symmetric] intro: dvd_antisym dvd_trans)

lemma gcd_proj1_if_dvd_int [simp]: "x dvd y \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::int) y = \<bar>x\<bar>"
by (metis abs_dvd_iff gcd_0_left_int gcd_abs_int gcd_unique_int)

lemma gcd_proj2_if_dvd_int [simp]: "y dvd x \<Longrightarrow> gcd (x::int) y = \<bar>y\<bar>"
by (metis gcd_proj1_if_dvd_int gcd.commute)

text \<open>
\medskip Multiplication laws
\<close>

lemma gcd_mult_distrib_nat: "(k::nat) * gcd m n = gcd (k * m) (k * n)"
\<comment> \<open>@{cite \<open>page 27\<close> davenport92}\<close>
apply (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct)
apply simp
apply (case_tac "k = 0")
done

lemma gcd_mult_distrib_int: "\<bar>k::int\<bar> * gcd m n = gcd (k * m) (k * n)"
apply (subst (1 2) gcd_abs_int)
apply (subst (1 2) abs_mult)
apply (rule gcd_mult_distrib_nat [transferred])
apply auto
done

lemma coprime_crossproduct_nat:
fixes a b c d :: nat
assumes "coprime a d" and "coprime b c"
shows "a * c = b * d \<longleftrightarrow> a = b \<and> c = d"
using assms coprime_crossproduct [of a d b c] by simp

lemma coprime_crossproduct_int:
fixes a b c d :: int
assumes "coprime a d" and "coprime b c"
shows "\<bar>a\<bar> * \<bar>c\<bar> = \<bar>b\<bar> * \<bar>d\<bar> \<longleftrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> = \<bar>b\<bar> \<and> \<bar>c\<bar> = \<bar>d\<bar>"
using assms coprime_crossproduct [of a d b c] by simp

(* to do: add the other variations? *)

lemma gcd_diff1_nat: "(m::nat) >= n \<Longrightarrow> gcd (m - n) n = gcd m n"

lemma gcd_diff2_nat: "(n::nat) >= m \<Longrightarrow> gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n"
apply (subst gcd.commute)
apply (subst gcd_diff1_nat [symmetric])
apply auto
apply (subst gcd.commute)
apply (subst gcd_diff1_nat)
apply assumption
apply (rule gcd.commute)
done

lemma gcd_non_0_int: "(y::int) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = gcd y (x mod y)"
apply (frule_tac b = y and a = x in pos_mod_sign)
apply (simp del: pos_mod_sign add: gcd_int_def abs_if nat_mod_distrib)
apply (auto simp add: gcd_non_0_nat nat_mod_distrib [symmetric]
zmod_zminus1_eq_if)
apply (frule_tac a = x in pos_mod_bound)
apply (subst (1 2) gcd.commute)
apply (simp del: pos_mod_bound add: nat_diff_distrib gcd_diff2_nat
nat_le_eq_zle)
done

lemma gcd_red_int: "gcd (x::int) y = gcd y (x mod y)"
apply (case_tac "y = 0")
apply force
apply (case_tac "y > 0")
apply (subst gcd_non_0_int, auto)
apply (insert gcd_non_0_int [of "-y" "-x"])
apply auto
done

(* to do: differences, and all variations of addition rules
as simplification rules for nat and int *)

(* to do: add the three variations of these, and for ints? *)

lemma finite_divisors_nat [simp]: \<comment> \<open>FIXME move\<close>
fixes m :: nat
assumes "m > 0"
shows "finite {d. d dvd m}"
proof-
from assms have "{d. d dvd m} \<subseteq> {d. d \<le> m}"
by (auto dest: dvd_imp_le)
then show ?thesis
using finite_Collect_le_nat by (rule finite_subset)
qed

lemma finite_divisors_int [simp]:
fixes i :: int
assumes "i \<noteq> 0"
shows "finite {d. d dvd i}"
proof -
have "{d. \<bar>d\<bar> \<le> \<bar>i\<bar>} = {- \<bar>i\<bar>..\<bar>i\<bar>}"
by (auto simp: abs_if)
then have "finite {d. \<bar>d\<bar> <= \<bar>i\<bar>}"
by simp
from finite_subset [OF _ this] show ?thesis using assms
qed

lemma Max_divisors_self_nat [simp]: "n\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> Max{d::nat. d dvd n} = n"
apply(rule antisym)
apply (fastforce intro: Max_le_iff[THEN iffD2] simp: dvd_imp_le)
apply simp
done

lemma Max_divisors_self_int [simp]: "n\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> Max{d::int. d dvd n} = \<bar>n\<bar>"
apply(rule antisym)
apply(rule Max_le_iff [THEN iffD2])
apply (auto intro: abs_le_D1 dvd_imp_le_int)
done

lemma gcd_is_Max_divisors_nat:
"m > 0 \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> gcd (m::nat) n = Max {d. d dvd m \<and> d dvd n}"
apply(rule Max_eqI[THEN sym])
apply (metis finite_Collect_conjI finite_divisors_nat)
apply simp
apply(metis Suc_diff_1 Suc_neq_Zero dvd_imp_le gcd_greatest_iff gcd_pos_nat)
apply simp
done

lemma gcd_is_Max_divisors_int:
"m ~= 0 ==> n ~= 0 ==> gcd (m::int) n = (Max {d. d dvd m & d dvd n})"
apply(rule Max_eqI[THEN sym])
apply (metis finite_Collect_conjI finite_divisors_int)
apply simp
apply (metis gcd_greatest_iff gcd_pos_int zdvd_imp_le)
apply simp
done

lemma gcd_code_int [code]:
"gcd k l = \<bar>if l = (0::int) then k else gcd l (\<bar>k\<bar> mod \<bar>l\<bar>)\<bar>"
by (simp add: gcd_int_def nat_mod_distrib gcd_non_0_nat)

subsection \<open>Coprimality\<close>

lemma coprime_nat:
"coprime (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = 1)"
using coprime [of a b] by simp

lemma coprime_Suc_0_nat:
"coprime (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = Suc 0)"
using coprime_nat by simp

lemma coprime_int:
"coprime (a::int) b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>d. d \<ge> 0 \<and> d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<longleftrightarrow> d = 1)"
using gcd_unique_int [of 1 a b]
apply clarsimp
apply (erule subst)
apply (rule iffI)
apply force
using abs_dvd_iff abs_ge_zero apply blast
done

lemma pow_divides_eq_nat [simp]:
"n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> (a::nat) ^ n dvd b ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd b"
using pow_divs_eq[of n] by simp

lemma coprime_Suc_nat [simp]: "coprime (Suc n) n"
using coprime_plus_one[of n] by simp

lemma coprime_minus_one_nat: "(n::nat) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> coprime (n - 1) n"
using coprime_Suc_nat [of "n - 1"] gcd.commute [of "n - 1" n] by auto

lemma coprime_common_divisor_nat:
"coprime (a::nat) b \<Longrightarrow> x dvd a \<Longrightarrow> x dvd b \<Longrightarrow> x = 1"
by (metis gcd_greatest_iff nat_dvd_1_iff_1)

lemma coprime_common_divisor_int:
"coprime (a::int) b \<Longrightarrow> x dvd a \<Longrightarrow> x dvd b \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>x\<bar> = 1"
using gcd_greatest_iff [of x a b] by auto

lemma invertible_coprime_nat: "(x::nat) * y mod m = 1 \<Longrightarrow> coprime x m"
by (metis coprime_lmult gcd_1_nat gcd.commute gcd_red_nat)

lemma invertible_coprime_int: "(x::int) * y mod m = 1 \<Longrightarrow> coprime x m"
by (metis coprime_lmult gcd_1_int gcd.commute gcd_red_int)

subsection \<open>Bezout's theorem\<close>

(* Function bezw returns a pair of witnesses to Bezout's theorem --
see the theorems that follow the definition. *)
fun
bezw  :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> int * int"
where
"bezw x y =
(if y = 0 then (1, 0) else
(snd (bezw y (x mod y)),
fst (bezw y (x mod y)) - snd (bezw y (x mod y)) * int(x div y)))"

lemma bezw_0 [simp]: "bezw x 0 = (1, 0)" by simp

lemma bezw_non_0: "y > 0 \<Longrightarrow> bezw x y = (snd (bezw y (x mod y)),
fst (bezw y (x mod y)) - snd (bezw y (x mod y)) * int(x div y))"
by simp

declare bezw.simps [simp del]

lemma bezw_aux [rule_format]:
"fst (bezw x y) * int x + snd (bezw x y) * int y = int (gcd x y)"
proof (induct x y rule: gcd_nat_induct)
fix m :: nat
show "fst (bezw m 0) * int m + snd (bezw m 0) * int 0 = int (gcd m 0)"
by auto
next fix m :: nat and n
assume ngt0: "n > 0" and
ih: "fst (bezw n (m mod n)) * int n +
snd (bezw n (m mod n)) * int (m mod n) =
int (gcd n (m mod n))"
thus "fst (bezw m n) * int m + snd (bezw m n) * int n = int (gcd m n)"
apply (erule subst)
apply (subst mod_div_equality [of m n, symmetric])
(* applying simp here undoes the last substitution!
what is procedure cancel_div_mod? *)
apply (simp only: NO_MATCH_def field_simps of_nat_add of_nat_mult)
done
qed

lemma bezout_int:
fixes x y
shows "EX u v. u * (x::int) + v * y = gcd x y"
proof -
have bezout_aux: "!!x y. x \<ge> (0::int) \<Longrightarrow> y \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow>
EX u v. u * x + v * y = gcd x y"
apply (rule_tac x = "fst (bezw (nat x) (nat y))" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "snd (bezw (nat x) (nat y))" in exI)
apply (unfold gcd_int_def)
apply simp
apply (subst bezw_aux [symmetric])
apply auto
done
have "(x \<ge> 0 \<and> y \<ge> 0) | (x \<ge> 0 \<and> y \<le> 0) | (x \<le> 0 \<and> y \<ge> 0) |
(x \<le> 0 \<and> y \<le> 0)"
by auto
moreover have "x \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> y \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
by (erule (1) bezout_aux)
moreover have "x >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
apply (insert bezout_aux [of x "-y"])
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = u in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "-v" in exI)
apply (subst gcd_neg2_int [symmetric])
apply auto
done
moreover have "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y >= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
apply (insert bezout_aux [of "-x" y])
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "-u" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = v in exI)
apply (subst gcd_neg1_int [symmetric])
apply auto
done
moreover have "x <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> y <= 0 \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
apply (insert bezout_aux [of "-x" "-y"])
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = "-u" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x = "-v" in exI)
apply (subst gcd_neg1_int [symmetric])
apply (subst gcd_neg2_int [symmetric])
apply auto
done
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

text \<open>versions of Bezout for nat, by Amine Chaieb\<close>

lemma ind_euclid:
assumes c: " \<forall>a b. P (a::nat) b \<longleftrightarrow> P b a" and z: "\<forall>a. P a 0"
and add: "\<forall>a b. P a b \<longrightarrow> P a (a + b)"
shows "P a b"
proof(induct "a + b" arbitrary: a b rule: less_induct)
case less
have "a = b \<or> a < b \<or> b < a" by arith
moreover {assume eq: "a= b"
from add[rule_format, OF z[rule_format, of a]] have "P a b" using eq
by simp}
moreover
{assume lt: "a < b"
hence "a + b - a < a + b \<or> a = 0" by arith
moreover
{assume "a =0" with z c have "P a b" by blast }
moreover
{assume "a + b - a < a + b"
also have th0: "a + b - a = a + (b - a)" using lt by arith
finally have "a + (b - a) < a + b" .
then have "P a (a + (b - a))" by (rule add[rule_format, OF less])
then have "P a b" by (simp add: th0[symmetric])}
ultimately have "P a b" by blast}
moreover
{assume lt: "a > b"
hence "b + a - b < a + b \<or> b = 0" by arith
moreover
{assume "b =0" with z c have "P a b" by blast }
moreover
{assume "b + a - b < a + b"
also have th0: "b + a - b = b + (a - b)" using lt by arith
finally have "b + (a - b) < a + b" .
then have "P b (b + (a - b))" by (rule add[rule_format, OF less])
then have "P b a" by (simp add: th0[symmetric])
hence "P a b" using c by blast }
ultimately have "P a b" by blast}
ultimately  show "P a b" by blast
qed

lemma bezout_lemma_nat:
assumes ex: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
(a * x = b * y + d \<or> b * x = a * y + d)"
shows "\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd a + b \<and>
(a * x = (a + b) * y + d \<or> (a + b) * x = a * y + d)"
using ex
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI, simp)
apply (case_tac "a * x = b * y + d" , simp_all)
apply (rule_tac x="x + y" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply algebra
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="x + y" in exI)
apply algebra
done

lemma bezout_add_nat: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
(a * x = b * y + d \<or> b * x = a * y + d)"
apply(induct a b rule: ind_euclid)
apply blast
apply clarify
apply (rule_tac x="a" in exI, simp)
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI)
apply (case_tac "a * x = b * y + d", simp_all)
apply (rule_tac x="x+y" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply algebra
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="x+y" in exI)
apply algebra
done

lemma bezout1_nat: "\<exists>(d::nat) x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and>
(a * x - b * y = d \<or> b * x - a * y = d)"
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x="d" in exI, simp)
apply (rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply (rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply auto
done

lemma bezout_add_strong_nat: assumes nz: "a \<noteq> (0::nat)"
shows "\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> a * x = b * y + d"
proof-
from nz have ap: "a > 0" by simp
have "(\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> a * x = b * y + d) \<or>
(\<exists>d x y. d dvd a \<and> d dvd b \<and> b * x = a * y + d)" by blast
moreover
{fix d x y assume H: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "a * x = b * y + d"
from H have ?thesis by blast }
moreover
{fix d x y assume H: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "b * x = a * y + d"
{assume b0: "b = 0" with H  have ?thesis by simp}
moreover
{assume b: "b \<noteq> 0" hence bp: "b > 0" by simp
from b dvd_imp_le [OF H(2)] have "d < b \<or> d = b"
by auto
moreover
{assume db: "d=b"
with nz H have ?thesis apply simp
apply (rule exI[where x = b], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x = b])
by (rule exI[where x = "a - 1"], simp add: diff_mult_distrib2)}
moreover
{assume db: "d < b"
{assume "x=0" hence ?thesis using nz H by simp }
moreover
{assume x0: "x \<noteq> 0" hence xp: "x > 0" by simp
from db have "d \<le> b - 1" by simp
hence "d*b \<le> b*(b - 1)" by simp
with xp mult_mono[of "1" "x" "d*b" "b*(b - 1)"]
have dble: "d*b \<le> x*b*(b - 1)" using bp by simp
from H (3) have "d + (b - 1) * (b*x) = d + (b - 1) * (a*y + d)"
by simp
hence "d + (b - 1) * a * y + (b - 1) * d = d + (b - 1) * b * x"
by (simp only: mult.assoc distrib_left)
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) + d * (b - 1 + 1) = d + x*b*(b - 1)"
by algebra
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = d + x*b*(b - 1) - d*b" using bp by simp
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = d + (x*b*(b - 1) - d*b)"
by (simp only: diff_add_assoc[OF dble, of d, symmetric])
hence "a * ((b - 1) * y) = b*(x*(b - 1) - d) + d"
by (simp only: diff_mult_distrib2 ac_simps)
hence ?thesis using H(1,2)
apply -
apply (rule exI[where x=d], simp)
apply (rule exI[where x="(b - 1) * y"])
by (rule exI[where x="x*(b - 1) - d"], simp)}
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma bezout_nat: assumes a: "(a::nat) \<noteq> 0"
shows "\<exists>x y. a * x = b * y + gcd a b"
proof-
let ?g = "gcd a b"
obtain d x y where d: "d dvd a" "d dvd b" "a * x = b * y + d" by blast
from d(1,2) have "d dvd ?g" by simp
then obtain k where k: "?g = d*k" unfolding dvd_def by blast
from d(3) have "a * x * k = (b * y + d) *k " by auto
hence "a * (x * k) = b * (y*k) + ?g" by (algebra add: k)
thus ?thesis by blast
qed

subsection \<open>LCM properties  on @{typ nat} and @{typ int}\<close>

lemma lcm_altdef_int [code]: "lcm (a::int) b = \<bar>a\<bar> * \<bar>b\<bar> div gcd a b"
by (simp add: lcm_int_def lcm_nat_def zdiv_int gcd_int_def)

lemma prod_gcd_lcm_nat: "(m::nat) * n = gcd m n * lcm m n"
unfolding lcm_nat_def
by (simp add: dvd_mult_div_cancel [OF gcd_dvd_prod])

lemma prod_gcd_lcm_int: "\<bar>m::int\<bar> * \<bar>n\<bar> = gcd m n * lcm m n"
unfolding lcm_int_def gcd_int_def
apply (subst of_nat_mult [symmetric])
apply (subst prod_gcd_lcm_nat [symmetric])
apply (subst nat_abs_mult_distrib [symmetric])
done

lemma lcm_pos_nat:
"(m::nat) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> n>0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm m n > 0"
by (metis gr0I mult_is_0 prod_gcd_lcm_nat)

lemma lcm_pos_int:
"(m::int) ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> n ~= 0 \<Longrightarrow> lcm m n > 0"
apply (subst lcm_abs_int)
apply (rule lcm_pos_nat [transferred])
apply auto
done

lemma dvd_pos_nat: \<comment> \<open>FIXME move\<close>
fixes n m :: nat
assumes "n > 0" and "m dvd n"
shows "m > 0"
using assms by (cases m) auto

lemma lcm_unique_nat: "(a::nat) dvd d \<and> b dvd d \<and>
(\<forall>e. a dvd e \<and> b dvd e \<longrightarrow> d dvd e) \<longleftrightarrow> d = lcm a b"
by (auto intro: dvd_antisym lcm_least)

lemma lcm_unique_int: "d >= 0 \<and> (a::int) dvd d \<and> b dvd d \<and>
(\<forall>e. a dvd e \<and> b dvd e \<longrightarrow> d dvd e) \<longleftrightarrow> d = lcm a b"
using lcm_least zdvd_antisym_nonneg by auto

lemma lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y = y"
apply (rule sym)
apply (subst lcm_unique_nat [symmetric])
apply auto
done

lemma lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int [simp]: "(x::int) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm x y = \<bar>y\<bar>"
apply (rule sym)
apply (subst lcm_unique_int [symmetric])
apply auto
done

lemma lcm_proj1_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm y x = y"
by (subst lcm.commute, erule lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat)

lemma lcm_proj1_if_dvd_int [simp]: "(x::int) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> lcm y x = \<bar>y\<bar>"
by (subst lcm.commute, erule lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int)

lemma lcm_proj1_iff_nat [simp]: "lcm m n = (m::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
by (metis lcm_proj1_if_dvd_nat lcm_unique_nat)

lemma lcm_proj2_iff_nat [simp]: "lcm m n = (n::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
by (metis lcm_proj2_if_dvd_nat lcm_unique_nat)

lemma lcm_proj1_iff_int [simp]: "lcm m n = \<bar>m::int\<bar> \<longleftrightarrow> n dvd m"
by (metis dvd_abs_iff lcm_proj1_if_dvd_int lcm_unique_int)

lemma lcm_proj2_iff_int [simp]: "lcm m n = \<bar>n::int\<bar> \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n"
by (metis dvd_abs_iff lcm_proj2_if_dvd_int lcm_unique_int)

lemma lcm_1_iff_nat [simp]:
"lcm (m::nat) n = Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m = Suc 0 \<and> n = Suc 0"
using lcm_eq_1_iff [of m n] by simp

lemma lcm_1_iff_int [simp]:
"lcm (m::int) n = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> (m=1 \<or> m = -1) \<and> (n=1 \<or> n = -1)"
by auto

subsection \<open>The complete divisibility lattice on @{typ nat} and @{typ int}\<close>

text\<open>Lifting gcd and lcm to sets (Gcd/Lcm).
Gcd is defined via Lcm to facilitate the proof that we have a complete lattice.
\<close>

instantiation nat :: semiring_Gcd
begin

interpretation semilattice_neutr_set lcm "1::nat"
by standard simp_all

definition
"Lcm (M::nat set) = (if finite M then F M else 0)"

lemma Lcm_nat_empty:
"Lcm {} = (1::nat)"
by (simp add: Lcm_nat_def del: One_nat_def)

lemma Lcm_nat_insert:
"Lcm (insert n M) = lcm (n::nat) (Lcm M)"
by (cases "finite M") (auto simp add: Lcm_nat_def simp del: One_nat_def)

lemma Lcm_nat_infinite:
"infinite M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M = (0::nat)"

lemma dvd_Lcm_nat [simp]:
fixes M :: "nat set"
assumes "m \<in> M"
shows "m dvd Lcm M"
proof -
from assms have "insert m M = M" by auto
moreover have "m dvd Lcm (insert m M)"
ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma Lcm_dvd_nat [simp]:
fixes M :: "nat set"
assumes "\<forall>m\<in>M. m dvd n"
shows "Lcm M dvd n"
proof (cases "n > 0")
case False then show ?thesis by simp
next
case True
then have "finite {d. d dvd n}" by (rule finite_divisors_nat)
moreover have "M \<subseteq> {d. d dvd n}" using assms by fast
ultimately have "finite M" by (rule rev_finite_subset)
then show ?thesis using assms
by (induct M) (simp_all add: Lcm_nat_empty Lcm_nat_insert)
qed

definition
"Gcd (M::nat set) = Lcm {d. \<forall>m\<in>M. d dvd m}"

instance proof
show "Gcd N dvd n" if "n \<in> N" for N and n :: nat
using that by (induct N rule: infinite_finite_induct)
show "n dvd Gcd N" if "\<And>m. m \<in> N \<Longrightarrow> n dvd m" for N and n :: nat
using that by (induct N rule: infinite_finite_induct)
show "n dvd Lcm N" if "n \<in> N" for N and n ::nat
using that by (induct N rule: infinite_finite_induct)
auto
show "Lcm N dvd n" if "\<And>m. m \<in> N \<Longrightarrow> m dvd n" for N and n ::nat
using that by (induct N rule: infinite_finite_induct)
auto
qed simp_all

end

lemma Gcd_nat_eq_one:
"1 \<in> N \<Longrightarrow> Gcd N = (1::nat)"
by (rule Gcd_eq_1_I) auto

text\<open>Alternative characterizations of Gcd:\<close>

lemma Gcd_eq_Max:
fixes M :: "nat set"
assumes "finite (M::nat set)" and "M \<noteq> {}" and "0 \<notin> M"
shows "Gcd M = Max (\<Inter>m\<in>M. {d. d dvd m})"
proof (rule antisym)
from assms obtain m where "m \<in> M" and "m > 0"
by auto
from \<open>m > 0\<close> have "finite {d. d dvd m}"
by (blast intro: finite_divisors_nat)
with \<open>m \<in> M\<close> have fin: "finite (\<Inter>m\<in>M. {d. d dvd m})"
by blast
from fin show "Gcd M \<le> Max (\<Inter>m\<in>M. {d. d dvd m})"
by (auto intro: Max_ge Gcd_dvd)
from fin show "Max (\<Inter>m\<in>M. {d. d dvd m}) \<le> Gcd M"
apply (rule Max.boundedI)
apply auto
apply (meson Gcd_dvd Gcd_greatest \<open>0 < m\<close> \<open>m \<in> M\<close> dvd_imp_le dvd_pos_nat)
done
qed

lemma Gcd_remove0_nat: "finite M \<Longrightarrow> Gcd M = Gcd (M - {0::nat})"
apply(induct pred:finite)
apply simp
apply(case_tac "x=0")
apply simp
apply(subgoal_tac "insert x F - {0} = insert x (F - {0})")
apply simp
apply blast
done

lemma Lcm_in_lcm_closed_set_nat:
"finite M \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> ALL m n :: nat. m:M \<longrightarrow> n:M \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M : M"
apply(induct rule:finite_linorder_min_induct)
apply simp
apply simp
apply(subgoal_tac "ALL m n :: nat. m:A \<longrightarrow> n:A \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : A")
apply simp
apply(case_tac "A={}")
apply simp
apply simp
apply (metis lcm_pos_nat lcm_unique_nat linorder_neq_iff nat_dvd_not_less not_less0)
done

lemma Lcm_eq_Max_nat:
"finite M \<Longrightarrow> M \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<notin> M \<Longrightarrow> ALL m n :: nat. m:M \<longrightarrow> n:M \<longrightarrow> lcm m n : M \<Longrightarrow> Lcm M = Max M"
apply(rule antisym)
apply(rule Max_ge, assumption)
apply(erule (2) Lcm_in_lcm_closed_set_nat)
apply (auto simp add: not_le Lcm_0_iff dvd_imp_le leD le_neq_trans)
done

lemma mult_inj_if_coprime_nat:
"inj_on f A \<Longrightarrow> inj_on g B \<Longrightarrow> ALL a:A. ALL b:B. coprime (f a) (g b)
\<Longrightarrow> inj_on (%(a,b). f a * g b::nat) (A \<times> B)"
by (auto simp add: inj_on_def coprime_crossproduct_nat simp del: One_nat_def)

text\<open>Nitpick:\<close>

lemma gcd_eq_nitpick_gcd [nitpick_unfold]: "gcd x y = Nitpick.nat_gcd x y"
by (induct x y rule: nat_gcd.induct)

lemma lcm_eq_nitpick_lcm [nitpick_unfold]: "lcm x y = Nitpick.nat_lcm x y"
by (simp only: lcm_nat_def Nitpick.nat_lcm_def gcd_eq_nitpick_gcd)

subsubsection \<open>Setwise gcd and lcm for integers\<close>

instantiation int :: semiring_Gcd
begin

definition
"Lcm M = int (LCM m\<in>M. (nat \<circ> abs) m)"

definition
"Gcd M = int (GCD m\<in>M. (nat \<circ> abs) m)"

instance by standard
(auto intro!: Gcd_dvd Gcd_greatest simp add: Gcd_int_def
Lcm_int_def int_dvd_iff dvd_int_iff dvd_int_unfold_dvd_nat [symmetric])

end

lemma abs_Gcd [simp]:
fixes K :: "int set"
shows "\<bar>Gcd K\<bar> = Gcd K"
using normalize_Gcd [of K] by simp

lemma abs_Lcm [simp]:
fixes K :: "int set"
shows "\<bar>Lcm K\<bar> = Lcm K"
using normalize_Lcm [of K] by simp

lemma Gcm_eq_int_iff:
"Gcd K = int n \<longleftrightarrow> Gcd ((nat \<circ> abs) ` K) = n"
by (simp add: Gcd_int_def comp_def image_image)

lemma Lcm_eq_int_iff:
"Lcm K = int n \<longleftrightarrow> Lcm ((nat \<circ> abs) ` K) = n"
by (simp add: Lcm_int_def comp_def image_image)

subsection \<open>GCD and LCM on @{typ integer}\<close>

instantiation integer :: gcd
begin

context
includes integer.lifting
begin

lift_definition gcd_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
is gcd .
lift_definition lcm_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
is lcm .

end
instance ..

end

lifting_update integer.lifting
lifting_forget integer.lifting

context
includes integer.lifting
begin

lemma gcd_code_integer [code]:
"gcd k l = \<bar>if l = (0::integer) then k else gcd l (\<bar>k\<bar> mod \<bar>l\<bar>)\<bar>"
by transfer (fact gcd_code_int)

lemma lcm_code_integer [code]: "lcm (a::integer) b = \<bar>a\<bar> * \<bar>b\<bar> div gcd a b"
by transfer (fact lcm_altdef_int)

end

code_printing constant "gcd :: integer \<Rightarrow> _"
\<rightharpoonup> (OCaml) "Big'_int.gcd'_big'_int"
and (Scala) "_.gcd'((_)')"
\<comment> \<open>There is no gcd operation in the SML standard library, so no code setup for SML\<close>

text \<open>Some code equations\<close>

lemmas Lcm_set_nat [code, code_unfold] = Lcm_set[where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Gcd_set_nat [code] = Gcd_set[where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Lcm_set_int [code, code_unfold] = Lcm_set[where ?'a = int]
lemmas Gcd_set_int [code] = Gcd_set[where ?'a = int]

text \<open>Fact aliasses\<close>

lemma lcm_0_iff_nat [simp]: "lcm (m::nat) n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0 \<or> n = 0"
by (fact lcm_eq_0_iff)

lemma lcm_0_iff_int [simp]: "lcm (m::int) n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0 \<or> n = 0"
by (fact lcm_eq_0_iff)

lemma dvd_lcm_I1_nat [simp]: "(k::nat) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> k dvd lcm m n"
by (fact dvd_lcmI1)

lemma dvd_lcm_I2_nat [simp]: "(k::nat) dvd n \<Longrightarrow> k dvd lcm m n"
by (fact dvd_lcmI2)

lemma dvd_lcm_I1_int [simp]: "(i::int) dvd m \<Longrightarrow> i dvd lcm m n"
by (fact dvd_lcmI1)

lemma dvd_lcm_I2_int [simp]: "(i::int) dvd n \<Longrightarrow> i dvd lcm m n"
by (fact dvd_lcmI2)

lemma coprime_exp2_nat [intro]: "coprime (a::nat) b \<Longrightarrow> coprime (a^n) (b^m)"
by (fact coprime_exp2)

lemma coprime_exp2_int [intro]: "coprime (a::int) b \<Longrightarrow> coprime (a^n) (b^m)"
by (fact coprime_exp2)

lemmas Gcd_dvd_nat [simp] = Gcd_dvd [where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Gcd_dvd_int [simp] = Gcd_dvd [where ?'a = int]
lemmas Gcd_greatest_nat [simp] = Gcd_greatest [where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Gcd_greatest_int [simp] = Gcd_greatest [where ?'a = int]

lemma dvd_Lcm_int [simp]:
fixes M :: "int set" assumes "m \<in> M" shows "m dvd Lcm M"
using assms by (fact dvd_Lcm)

lemma gcd_neg_numeral_1_int [simp]:
"gcd (- numeral n :: int) x = gcd (numeral n) x"
by (fact gcd_neg1_int)

lemma gcd_neg_numeral_2_int [simp]:
"gcd x (- numeral n :: int) = gcd x (numeral n)"
by (fact gcd_neg2_int)

lemma gcd_proj1_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(x::nat) dvd y \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = x"
by (fact gcd_nat.absorb1)

lemma gcd_proj2_if_dvd_nat [simp]: "(y::nat) dvd x \<Longrightarrow> gcd x y = y"
by (fact gcd_nat.absorb2)

lemmas Lcm_eq_0_I_nat [simp] = Lcm_eq_0_I [where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Lcm_0_iff_nat [simp] = Lcm_0_iff [where ?'a = nat]
lemmas Lcm_least_int [simp] = Lcm_least [where ?'a = int]

end
```