src/HOL/Algebra/Exponent.thy
 author ballarin Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:10:53 +0100 changeset 29237 e90d9d51106b parent 27717 21bbd410ba04 child 30011 cc264a9a033d child 30240 5b25fee0362c permissions -rw-r--r--
More porting to new locales.
```
(*  Title:      HOL/Algebra/Exponent.thy
ID:         \$Id\$
Author:     Florian Kammueller, with new proofs by L C Paulson

exponent p s   yields the greatest power of p that divides s.
*)

theory Exponent
imports Main Primes Binomial
begin

section {*Sylow's Theorem*}

subsection {*The Combinatorial Argument Underlying the First Sylow Theorem*}

definition exponent :: "nat => nat => nat" where
"exponent p s == if prime p then (GREATEST r. p^r dvd s) else 0"

text{*Prime Theorems*}

lemma prime_imp_one_less: "prime p ==> Suc 0 < p"
by (unfold prime_def, force)

lemma prime_iff:
"(prime p) = (Suc 0 < p & (\<forall>a b. p dvd a*b --> (p dvd a) | (p dvd b)))"
apply (blast dest!: prime_dvd_mult)
apply (erule dvdE)
apply (case_tac "k=0", simp)
apply (drule_tac x = m in spec)
apply (drule_tac x = k in spec)
done

lemma zero_less_prime_power: "prime p ==> 0 < p^a"

lemma zero_less_card_empty: "[| finite S; S \<noteq> {} |] ==> 0 < card(S)"
by (rule ccontr, simp)

lemma prime_dvd_cases:
"[| p*k dvd m*n;  prime p |]
==> (\<exists>x. k dvd x*n & m = p*x) | (\<exists>y. k dvd m*y & n = p*y)"
apply (frule dvd_mult_left)
apply (subgoal_tac "p dvd m | p dvd n")
prefer 2 apply blast
apply (erule disjE)
apply (rule disjI1)
apply (rule_tac [2] disjI2)
apply (auto elim!: dvdE)
done

lemma prime_power_dvd_cases [rule_format (no_asm)]: "prime p
==> \<forall>m n. p^c dvd m*n -->
(\<forall>a b. a+b = Suc c --> p^a dvd m | p^b dvd n)"
apply (induct c)
apply clarify
apply (case_tac "a")
apply simp
apply simp
(*inductive step*)
apply simp
apply clarify
apply (erule prime_dvd_cases [THEN disjE], assumption, auto)
(*case 1: p dvd m*)
apply (case_tac "a")
apply simp
apply clarify
apply (drule spec, drule spec, erule (1) notE impE)
apply (drule_tac x = nat in spec)
apply (drule_tac x = b in spec)
apply simp
(*case 2: p dvd n*)
apply (case_tac "b")
apply simp
apply clarify
apply (drule spec, drule spec, erule (1) notE impE)
apply (drule_tac x = a in spec)
apply (drule_tac x = nat in spec, simp)
done

(*needed in this form in Sylow.ML*)
lemma div_combine:
"[| prime p; ~ (p ^ (Suc r) dvd n);  p^(a+r) dvd n*k |]
==> p ^ a dvd k"
by (drule_tac a = "Suc r" and b = a in prime_power_dvd_cases, assumption, auto)

(*Lemma for power_dvd_bound*)
lemma Suc_le_power: "Suc 0 < p ==> Suc n <= p^n"
apply (induct n)
apply (simp (no_asm_simp))
apply simp
apply (subgoal_tac "2 * n + 2 <= p * p^n", simp)
apply (subgoal_tac "2 * p^n <= p * p^n")
apply arith
apply (drule_tac k = 2 in mult_le_mono2, simp)
done

(*An upper bound for the n such that p^n dvd a: needed for GREATEST to exist*)
lemma power_dvd_bound: "[|p^n dvd a;  Suc 0 < p;  a > 0|] ==> n < a"
apply (drule dvd_imp_le)
apply (drule_tac [2] n = n in Suc_le_power, auto)
done

text{*Exponent Theorems*}

lemma exponent_ge [rule_format]:
"[|p^k dvd n;  prime p;  0<n|] ==> k <= exponent p n"
apply (erule Greatest_le)
apply (blast dest: prime_imp_one_less power_dvd_bound)
done

lemma power_exponent_dvd: "s>0 ==> (p ^ exponent p s) dvd s"
apply clarify
apply (rule_tac k = 0 in GreatestI)
prefer 2 apply (blast dest: prime_imp_one_less power_dvd_bound, simp)
done

lemma power_Suc_exponent_Not_dvd:
"[|(p * p ^ exponent p s) dvd s;  prime p |] ==> s=0"
apply (subgoal_tac "p ^ Suc (exponent p s) dvd s")
prefer 2 apply simp
apply (rule ccontr)
apply (drule exponent_ge, auto)
done

lemma exponent_power_eq [simp]: "prime p ==> exponent p (p^a) = a"
apply (rule Greatest_equality, simp)
apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: prime_imp_one_less power_dvd_imp_le)
done

lemma exponent_equalityI:
"!r::nat. (p^r dvd a) = (p^r dvd b) ==> exponent p a = exponent p b"

lemma exponent_eq_0 [simp]: "\<not> prime p ==> exponent p s = 0"

(* exponent_mult_add, easy inclusion.  Could weaken p \<in> prime to Suc 0 < p *)
lemma exponent_mult_add1: "[| a > 0; b > 0 |]
==> (exponent p a) + (exponent p b) <= exponent p (a * b)"
apply (case_tac "prime p")
apply (rule exponent_ge)
apply (blast intro: prime_imp_one_less power_exponent_dvd mult_dvd_mono)
done

lemma exponent_mult_add2: "[| a > 0; b > 0 |]
==> exponent p (a * b) <= (exponent p a) + (exponent p b)"
apply (case_tac "prime p")
apply (rule leI, clarify)
apply (cut_tac p = p and s = "a*b" in power_exponent_dvd, auto)
apply (subgoal_tac "p ^ (Suc (exponent p a + exponent p b)) dvd a * b")
apply (rule_tac [2] le_imp_power_dvd [THEN dvd_trans])
prefer 3 apply assumption
prefer 2 apply simp
apply (frule_tac a = "Suc (exponent p a) " and b = "Suc (exponent p b) " in prime_power_dvd_cases)
apply (assumption, force, simp)
apply (blast dest: power_Suc_exponent_Not_dvd)
done

lemma exponent_mult_add: "[| a > 0; b > 0 |]
==> exponent p (a * b) = (exponent p a) + (exponent p b)"

lemma not_divides_exponent_0: "~ (p dvd n) ==> exponent p n = 0"
apply (case_tac "exponent p n", simp)
apply (case_tac "n", simp)
apply (cut_tac s = n and p = p in power_exponent_dvd)
apply (auto dest: dvd_mult_left)
done

lemma exponent_1_eq_0 [simp]: "exponent p (Suc 0) = 0"
apply (case_tac "prime p")
apply (auto simp add: prime_iff not_divides_exponent_0)
done

text{*Main Combinatorial Argument*}

lemma le_extend_mult: "[| c > 0; a <= b |] ==> a <= b * (c::nat)"
apply (rule_tac P = "%x. x <= b * c" in subst)
apply (rule mult_1_right)
apply (rule mult_le_mono, auto)
done

lemma p_fac_forw_lemma:
"[| (m::nat) > 0; k > 0; k < p^a; (p^r) dvd (p^a)* m - k |] ==> r <= a"
apply (rule notnotD)
apply (rule notI)
apply (drule contrapos_nn [OF _ leI, THEN notnotD], assumption)
apply (drule less_imp_le [of a])
apply (drule le_imp_power_dvd)
apply (drule_tac b = "p ^ r" in dvd_trans, assumption)
apply(metis dvd_diffD1 dvd_triv_right le_extend_mult linorder_linear linorder_not_less mult_commute nat_dvd_not_less neq0_conv)
done

lemma p_fac_forw: "[| (m::nat) > 0; k>0; k < p^a; (p^r) dvd (p^a)* m - k |]
==> (p^r) dvd (p^a) - k"
apply (frule_tac k1 = k and i = p in p_fac_forw_lemma [THEN le_imp_power_dvd], auto)
apply (subgoal_tac "p^r dvd p^a*m")
prefer 2 apply (blast intro: dvd_mult2)
apply (drule dvd_diffD1)
apply assumption
prefer 2 apply (blast intro: dvd_diff)
apply (drule gr0_implies_Suc, auto)
done

lemma r_le_a_forw:
"[| (k::nat) > 0; k < p^a; p>0; (p^r) dvd (p^a) - k |] ==> r <= a"
by (rule_tac m = "Suc 0" in p_fac_forw_lemma, auto)

lemma p_fac_backw: "[| m>0; k>0; (p::nat)\<noteq>0;  k < p^a;  (p^r) dvd p^a - k |]
==> (p^r) dvd (p^a)*m - k"
apply (frule_tac k1 = k and i = p in r_le_a_forw [THEN le_imp_power_dvd], auto)
apply (subgoal_tac "p^r dvd p^a*m")
prefer 2 apply (blast intro: dvd_mult2)
apply (drule dvd_diffD1)
apply assumption
prefer 2 apply (blast intro: dvd_diff)
done

lemma exponent_p_a_m_k_equation: "[| m>0; k>0; (p::nat)\<noteq>0;  k < p^a |]
==> exponent p (p^a * m - k) = exponent p (p^a - k)"
apply (blast intro: exponent_equalityI p_fac_forw p_fac_backw)
done

text{*Suc rules that we have to delete from the simpset*}
lemmas bad_Sucs = binomial_Suc_Suc mult_Suc mult_Suc_right

(*The bound K is needed; otherwise it's too weak to be used.*)
lemma p_not_div_choose_lemma [rule_format]:
"[| \<forall>i. Suc i < K --> exponent p (Suc i) = exponent p (Suc(j+i))|]
==> k<K --> exponent p ((j+k) choose k) = 0"
apply (cases "prime p")
prefer 2 apply simp
apply (induct k)
apply (simp (no_asm))
(*induction step*)
apply (subgoal_tac "(Suc (j+k) choose Suc k) > 0")
prefer 2 apply (simp add: zero_less_binomial_iff, clarify)
apply (subgoal_tac "exponent p ((Suc (j+k) choose Suc k) * Suc k) =
exponent p (Suc k)")
txt{*First, use the assumed equation.  We simplify the LHS to
@{term "exponent p (Suc (j + k) choose Suc k) + exponent p (Suc k)"}
the common terms cancel, proving the conclusion.*}
txt{*Establishing the equation requires first applying
@{text Suc_times_binomial_eq} ...*}
txt{*...then @{text exponent_mult_add} and the quantified premise.*}
done

(*The lemma above, with two changes of variables*)
lemma p_not_div_choose:
"[| k<K;  k<=n;
\<forall>j. 0<j & j<K --> exponent p (n - k + (K - j)) = exponent p (K - j)|]
==> exponent p (n choose k) = 0"
apply (cut_tac j = "n-k" and k = k and p = p in p_not_div_choose_lemma)
prefer 3 apply simp
prefer 2 apply assumption
apply (drule_tac x = "K - Suc i" in spec)
done

lemma const_p_fac_right:
"m>0 ==> exponent p ((p^a * m - Suc 0) choose (p^a - Suc 0)) = 0"
apply (case_tac "prime p")
prefer 2 apply simp
apply (frule_tac a = a in zero_less_prime_power)
apply (rule_tac K = "p^a" in p_not_div_choose)
apply simp
apply simp
apply (case_tac "m")
apply (case_tac [2] "p^a")
apply auto
(*now the hard case, simplified to
exponent p (Suc (p ^ a * m + i - p ^ a)) = exponent p (Suc i) *)
apply (subgoal_tac "0<p")
prefer 2 apply (force dest!: prime_imp_one_less)
apply (subst exponent_p_a_m_k_equation, auto)
done

lemma const_p_fac:
"m>0 ==> exponent p (((p^a) * m) choose p^a) = exponent p m"
apply (case_tac "prime p")
prefer 2 apply simp
apply (subgoal_tac "0 < p^a * m & p^a <= p^a * m")
prefer 2 apply (force simp add: prime_iff)
txt{*A similar trick to the one used in @{text p_not_div_choose_lemma}:
insert an equation; use @{text exponent_mult_add} on the LHS; on the RHS,
first
transform the binomial coefficient, then use @{text exponent_mult_add}.*}
apply (subgoal_tac "exponent p ((( (p^a) * m) choose p^a) * p^a) =
a + exponent p m")