Admin/PLATFORMS
author huffman
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:33:46 +0200
changeset 49759 ecf1d5d87e5e
parent 49144 84699f37481d
child 55391 eae296b5ef33
permissions -rw-r--r--
removed support for set constant definitions in HOLCF {cpo,pcpo,domain}def commands; removed '(open)', '(set_name)' and '(open set_name)' options

Some notes on multi-platform support of Isabelle
================================================

Preamble
--------

The general programming model is that of a stylized ML + Scala + POSIX
environment, with as little system-specific code in user-space tools
as possible.

The basic Isabelle system infrastructure provides some facilities to
make this work, e.g. see the ML and Scala modules File and Path, or
functions like Isabelle_System.bash.  The settings environment also
provides some means for portability, e.g. the bash function "jvmpath"
to keep the impression that Java on Windows/Cygwin adheres to
Isabelle/POSIX standards, although inside the JVM itself there are
many Windows-specific things.

When producing add-on tools, it is important to stay within this clean
room of Isabelle, and refrain from overly ambitious system hacking.
The existing Isabelle scripts follow a peculiar style that reflects
long years of experience in getting system plumbing right.


Supported platforms
-------------------

The following hardware and operating system platforms are officially
supported by the Isabelle distribution (and bundled tools), with the
following reference versions (which have been selected to be neither
too old nor too new):

  x86-linux         Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
  x86_64-linux      Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

  x86_64-darwin     Mac OS Snow Leopard (macbroy2)
                    Mac OS Lion (macbroy6)
                    Mac OS Mountain Lion (macbroy30)

  x86-cygwin        Cygwin 1.7 (vmbroy9)

All of the above platforms are 100% supported by Isabelle -- end-users
should not have to care about the differences (at least in theory).
There are also some additional platforms where Poly/ML might also
happen to work, but they are *not* covered by the official Isabelle
distribution:

  ppc-darwin
  x86-darwin
  sparc-solaris
  x86-solaris
  x86-bsd

There are increasing problems to make contributing components of
Isabelle work on such fringe platforms.  Note that x86-bsd is silently
treated like x86-linux -- this works if certain Linux compatibility
packages are installed on BSD.  Old 32 bit Macintosh hardware is no
longer supported due the its lack of Java 7.


32 bit vs. 64 bit platforms
---------------------------

Most users have 64 bit hardware and are running a 64 bit operating
system by default.  For Linux this often means missing 32 bit shared
libraries, so native x86_64-linux needs to be used by default, despite
its doubled space requirements for Poly/ML heaps.  For Mac OS X, the
x86-darwin personality usually works seamlessly for C/C++ programs,
but the Java 7 platform is only available for x86_64-darwin.

Add-on executables are expected to work without manual user
configuration.  Each component settings script needs to determine the
platform details appropriately.

The Isabelle settings environment provides the following variables to
help configuring platform-dependent tools:

  ISABELLE_PLATFORM64  (potentially empty)
  ISABELLE_PLATFORM32
  ISABELLE_PLATFORM

The ISABELLE_PLATFORM setting variable refers to the 32 bit version of
the platform, even on 64 bit hardware.  Using regular bash notation,
tools may express their preference for 64 bit with a fall-back for 32
bit as follows:

  "${ISABELLE_PLATFORM64:-$ISABELLE_PLATFORM32}"

Moreover note that ML and JVM usually have a different idea of the
platform, depending on the respective binaries that are actually run.
Poly/ML 5.5.x performs best in 32 bit mode, even for large
applications, thanks to its sophisticated heap management.  The JVM
usually works better in 64 bit mode, which allows its heap to grow
beyond 2 GB.

The traditional "uname" Unix tool usually only tells about its own
executable format, not the underlying platform!


Dependable system tools
-----------------------

The following portable system tools can be taken for granted:

* GNU bash as uniform shell on all platforms.  The POSIX "standard"
  shell /bin/sh is *not* appropriate, because there are too many
  non-standard implementations of it.

* Perl as largely portable system programming language.  In some
  situations Python may serve as an alternative, but it usually
  performs not as well in addressing various delicate details of
  operating system concepts (processes, signals, sockets etc.).

* Scala with Java 1.7.  Isabelle/Scala irons out many oddities and
  portability issues of the Java platform.


Known problems
--------------

* Mac OS: If MacPorts is installed there is some danger that
  accidental references to its shared libraries are created
  (e.g. libgmp).  Use otool -L to check if compiled binaries also work
  without MacPorts.

* Mac OS: If MacPorts is installed and its version of Perl takes
  precedence over /usr/bin/perl in the PATH, then the end-user needs
  to take care of installing extra modules, e.g. for HTTP support.
  Such add-ons are usually included in Apple's /usr/bin/perl by
  default.

* The Java runtime has its own idea about the underlying platform,
  which affects Java native libraries in particular.  In
  Isabelle/Scala the function isabelle.Platform.jvm_platform
  identifies the JVM platform.  Since a particular Java version is
  always bundled with Isabelle, the resulting settings also provide
  some clues about its platform, without running it.