Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:37:25 +0100 more detailed description of completion items;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:37:25 +0100] rev 55977
more detailed description of completion items;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:29:10 +0100 more basic const report (without completion) for known Const within syntax tree, which usually refers to special syntax (without proper @{const_syntax} markers);
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:29:10 +0100] rev 55976
more basic const report (without completion) for known Const within syntax tree, which usually refers to special syntax (without proper @{const_syntax} markers); tuned;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:48:11 +0100 no completion of concealed names;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:48:11 +0100] rev 55975
no completion of concealed names;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:46:26 +0100 more official const syntax: avoid educated guessing by Syntax_Phases.decode_term;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:46:26 +0100] rev 55974
more official const syntax: avoid educated guessing by Syntax_Phases.decode_term;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:41:25 +0100 tuned whitespace;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:41:25 +0100] rev 55973
tuned whitespace;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:34:41 +0100 removed dead code;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:34:41 +0100] rev 55972
removed dead code;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:22:27 +0100 modernized theory setup;
wenzelm [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 10:22:27 +0100] rev 55971
modernized theory setup;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:52:56 +0000 Some new proofs. Tidying up, esp to remove "apply rule".
paulson <lp15@cam.ac.uk> [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:52:56 +0000] rev 55970
Some new proofs. Tidying up, esp to remove "apply rule".
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:21:15 +0100 use balanced tuples in 'primcorec'
blanchet [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:21:15 +0100] rev 55969
use balanced tuples in 'primcorec'
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:21:15 +0100 tuning
blanchet [Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:21:15 +0100] rev 55968
tuning
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip