(* Author: Fabian Immler, TUM *)
section \Sequence of Properties on Subsequences\
theory Diagonal_Subsequence
imports Complex_Main
begin
locale subseqs =
fixes P::"nat\(nat\nat)\bool"
assumes ex_subseq: "\n s. subseq s \ \r'. subseq r' \ P n (s o r')"
begin
definition reduce where "reduce s n = (SOME r'. subseq r' \ P n (s o r'))"
lemma subseq_reduce[intro, simp]:
"subseq s \ subseq (reduce s n)"
unfolding reduce_def by (rule someI2_ex[OF ex_subseq]) auto
lemma reduce_holds:
"subseq s \ P n (s o reduce s n)"
unfolding reduce_def by (rule someI2_ex[OF ex_subseq]) (auto simp: o_def)
primrec seqseq where
"seqseq 0 = id"
| "seqseq (Suc n) = seqseq n o reduce (seqseq n) n"
lemma subseq_seqseq[intro, simp]: "subseq (seqseq n)"
proof (induct n)
case 0 thus ?case by (simp add: subseq_def)
next
case (Suc n) thus ?case by (subst seqseq.simps) (auto intro!: subseq_o)
qed
lemma seqseq_holds:
"P n (seqseq (Suc n))"
proof -
have "P n (seqseq n o reduce (seqseq n) n)"
by (intro reduce_holds subseq_seqseq)
thus ?thesis by simp
qed
definition diagseq where "diagseq i = seqseq i i"
lemma subseq_mono: "subseq f \ a \ b \ f a \ f b"
by (metis le_eq_less_or_eq subseq_mono)
lemma subseq_strict_mono: "subseq f \ a < b \ f a < f b"
by (simp add: subseq_def)
lemma diagseq_mono: "diagseq n < diagseq (Suc n)"
proof -
have "diagseq n < seqseq n (Suc n)"
using subseq_seqseq[of n] by (simp add: diagseq_def subseq_def)
also have "\ \ seqseq n (reduce (seqseq n) n (Suc n))"
by (auto intro: subseq_mono seq_suble)
also have "\ = diagseq (Suc n)" by (simp add: diagseq_def)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma subseq_diagseq: "subseq diagseq"
using diagseq_mono by (simp add: subseq_Suc_iff diagseq_def)
primrec fold_reduce where
"fold_reduce n 0 = id"
| "fold_reduce n (Suc k) = fold_reduce n k o reduce (seqseq (n + k)) (n + k)"
lemma subseq_fold_reduce[intro, simp]: "subseq (fold_reduce n k)"
proof (induct k)
case (Suc k) from subseq_o[OF this subseq_reduce] show ?case by (simp add: o_def)
qed (simp add: subseq_def)
lemma ex_subseq_reduce_index: "seqseq (n + k) = seqseq n o fold_reduce n k"
by (induct k) simp_all
lemma seqseq_fold_reduce: "seqseq n = fold_reduce 0 n"
by (induct n) (simp_all)
lemma diagseq_fold_reduce: "diagseq n = fold_reduce 0 n n"
using seqseq_fold_reduce by (simp add: diagseq_def)
lemma fold_reduce_add: "fold_reduce 0 (m + n) = fold_reduce 0 m o fold_reduce m n"
by (induct n) simp_all
lemma diagseq_add: "diagseq (k + n) = (seqseq k o (fold_reduce k n)) (k + n)"
proof -
have "diagseq (k + n) = fold_reduce 0 (k + n) (k + n)"
by (simp add: diagseq_fold_reduce)
also have "\ = (seqseq k o fold_reduce k n) (k + n)"
unfolding fold_reduce_add seqseq_fold_reduce ..
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma diagseq_sub:
assumes "m \ n" shows "diagseq n = (seqseq m o (fold_reduce m (n - m))) n"
using diagseq_add[of m "n - m"] assms by simp
lemma subseq_diagonal_rest: "subseq (\x. fold_reduce k x (k + x))"
unfolding subseq_Suc_iff fold_reduce.simps o_def
proof
fix n
have "fold_reduce k n (k + n) < fold_reduce k n (k + Suc n)" (is "?lhs < _")
by (auto intro: subseq_strict_mono)
also have "\ \ fold_reduce k n (reduce (seqseq (k + n)) (k + n) (k + Suc n))"
by (rule subseq_mono) (auto intro!: seq_suble subseq_mono)
finally show "?lhs < \" .
qed
lemma diagseq_seqseq: "diagseq o (op + k) = (seqseq k o (\x. fold_reduce k x (k + x)))"
by (auto simp: o_def diagseq_add)
lemma diagseq_holds:
assumes subseq_stable: "\r s n. subseq r \ P n s \ P n (s o r)"
shows "P k (diagseq o (op + (Suc k)))"
unfolding diagseq_seqseq by (intro subseq_stable subseq_diagonal_rest seqseq_holds)
end
end