# HG changeset patch
# User paulson
# Date 827343751 -3600
# Node ID 69ed69a9c32a206b4cac3f260704698db91898f8
# Parent d89d5ff2397f0cdfa524fa39acf1f2fac3488838
New module for proof objects (deriviations)
diff -r d89d5ff2397f -r 69ed69a9c32a src/Pure/deriv.ML
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/Pure/deriv.ML Wed Mar 20 18:42:31 1996 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+(* Title: Pure/deriv.ML
+ ID: $Id$
+ Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+ Copyright 1996 University of Cambridge
+
+Derivations (proof objects) and functions for examining them
+*)
+
+signature DERIV =
+ sig
+ (*Object-level rules*)
+ datatype orule = Subgoal of cterm
+ | Asm of int
+ | Res of deriv
+ | Equal of deriv
+ | Thm of theory * string
+ | Other of deriv;
+
+ val size : deriv -> int
+ val drop : 'a mtree * int -> 'a mtree
+ val linear : deriv -> deriv list
+ val tree : deriv -> orule mtree
+ end;
+
+structure Deriv : DERIV =
+struct
+
+fun size (Join(Theorem _, _)) = 1
+ | size (Join(_, ders)) = foldl op+ (1, map size ders);
+
+(*Conversion to linear format. Children of a node are the LIST of inferences
+ justifying ONE of the premises*)
+fun rev_deriv (Join (rl, [])) = [Join(rl,[])]
+ | rev_deriv (Join (Theorem arg, _)) = [Join(Theorem arg, [])]
+ | rev_deriv (Join (Assumption arg, [der])) =
+ Join(Assumption arg,[]) :: rev_deriv der
+ | rev_deriv (Join (Bicompose arg, [rder, sder])) =
+ Join (Bicompose arg, linear rder) :: rev_deriv sder
+ | rev_deriv (Join (_, [der])) = rev_deriv der
+ | rev_deriv (Join (rl, der::ders)) = (*catch-all case; doubtful?*)
+ Join(rl, flat (map linear ders)) :: rev_deriv der
+and linear der = rev (rev_deriv der);
+
+
+(*** Conversion of object-level proof trees ***)
+
+(*Object-level rules*)
+datatype orule = Subgoal of cterm
+ | Asm of int
+ | Res of deriv
+ | Equal of deriv
+ | Thm of theory * string
+ | Other of deriv;
+
+(*At position i, splice in value x, removing ngoal elements*)
+fun splice (i,x,ngoal,prfs) =
+ let val prfs0 = take(i-1,prfs)
+ and prfs1 = drop(i-1,prfs)
+ val prfs2 = Join (x, take(ngoal, prfs1)) :: drop(ngoal, prfs1)
+ in prfs0 @ prfs2 end;
+
+(*Deletes trivial uses of Equal_elim; hides derivations of Theorems*)
+fun simp_deriv (Join (Equal_elim, [Join (Rewrite_cterm _, []), der])) =
+ simp_deriv der
+ | simp_deriv (Join (Equal_elim, [Join (Reflexive _, []), der])) =
+ simp_deriv der
+ | simp_deriv (Join (rule as Theorem arg, [_])) = Join (rule, [])
+ | simp_deriv (Join (rule, ders)) = Join (rule, map simp_deriv ders);
+
+(*Proof term is an equality: first premise of equal_elim.
+ Attempt to decode proof terms made by Drule.goals_conv.
+ Subgoal numbers are returned; they are wrong if original subgoal
+ had flexflex pairs!
+ NEGATIVE i means "could affect all subgoals starting from i"*)
+fun scan_equals (i, Join (Combination,
+ [Join (Combination, [_, der1]), der2])) =
+ (case der1 of (*ignore trivial cases*)
+ Join (Reflexive _, _) => scan_equals (i+1, der2)
+ | Join (Rewrite_cterm _, []) => scan_equals (i+1, der2)
+ | Join (Rewrite_cterm _, _) => (i,der1) :: scan_equals (i+1, der2)
+ | _ (*impossible in gconv*) => [])
+ | scan_equals (i, Join (Reflexive _, [])) = []
+ | scan_equals (i, Join (Rewrite_cterm _, [])) = []
+ (*Anything else could affect ALL following goals*)
+ | scan_equals (i, der) = [(~i,der)];
+
+(*Record uses of equality reasoning on 1 or more subgoals*)
+fun update_equals ((i,der), prfs) =
+ if i>0 then splice (i, Equal (simp_deriv der), 1, prfs)
+ else take (~i-1, prfs) @
+ map (fn prf => Join (Equal (simp_deriv der), [prf]))
+ (drop (~i-1, prfs));
+
+fun delift (Join (Lift_rule _, [der])) = der
+ | delift der = der;
+
+(*Conversion to an object-level proof tree.
+ Uses embedded Lift_rules to "annotate" the proof tree with subgoals;
+ -- assumes that Lift_rule never occurs except with resolution
+ -- may contain Vars that, in fact, are instantiated in that step*)
+fun tree_aux (Join (Trivial ct, []), prfs) = Join(Subgoal ct, prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (Assumption(i,_), [der]), prfs) =
+ tree_aux (der, splice (i, Asm i, 0, prfs))
+ | tree_aux (Join (Equal_elim, [der1,der2]), prfs) =
+ tree_aux (der2, foldr update_equals (scan_equals (1, der1), prfs))
+ | tree_aux (Join (Bicompose (match,true,i,ngoal,env), ders), prfs) =
+ (*change eresolve_tac to proof by assumption*)
+ tree_aux (Join (Assumption(i, Some env),
+ [Join (Bicompose (match,false,i,ngoal,env), ders)]),
+ prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (Lift_rule (ct,i), [der]), prfs) =
+ tree_aux (der, splice (i, Subgoal ct, 1, prfs))
+ | tree_aux (Join (Bicompose arg,
+ [Join (Instantiate _, [rder]), sder]), prfs) =
+ (*Ignore Instantiate*)
+ tree_aux (Join (Bicompose arg, [rder, sder]), prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (Bicompose arg,
+ [Join (Lift_rule larg, [rder]), sder]), prfs) =
+ (*Move Lift_rule: to make a Subgoal on the result*)
+ tree_aux (Join (Bicompose arg, [rder,
+ Join(Lift_rule larg, [sder])]), prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (Bicompose (match,ef,i,ngoal,env),
+ [Join (Bicompose (match',ef',i',ngoal',env'),
+ [der1,der2]),
+ der3]), prfs) =
+ (*associate resolutions to the right*)
+ tree_aux (Join (Bicompose (match', ef', i'+i-1, ngoal', env'),
+ [delift der1, (*This Lift_rule would be wrong!*)
+ Join (Bicompose (match, ef, i, ngoal-ngoal'+1, env),
+ [der2, der3])]), prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (Bicompose (arg as (_,_,i,ngoal,_)),
+ [rder, sder]), prfs) =
+ (*resolution with basic rule/assumption -- we hope!*)
+ tree_aux (sder, splice (i, Res (simp_deriv rder), ngoal, prfs))
+ | tree_aux (Join (Theorem arg, _), prfs) = Join(Thm arg, prfs)
+ | tree_aux (Join (_, [der]), prfs) = tree_aux (der,prfs)
+ | tree_aux (der, prfs) = Join(Other (simp_deriv der), prfs);
+
+
+fun tree der = tree_aux (der,[]);
+
+(*Currently declared at end, to avoid conflicting with library's drop
+ Can put it after "size" once we switch to List.drop*)
+fun drop (der,0) = der
+ | drop (Join (_, der::_), n) = drop (der, n-1);
+
+end;
+
+
+(*We do NOT open this structure*)