src/HOL/simpdata.ML
author wenzelm
Fri Mar 31 22:00:36 2000 +0200 (2000-03-31 ago)
changeset 8641 978db2870862
parent 8473 2798d2f71ec2
child 8644 c47735e7bd1c
permissions -rw-r--r--
change_global/local_css move to Provers/clasimp.ML;
fixed 'iff' att syntax;
added 'cong' att;
clasohm@1465
     1
(*  Title:      HOL/simpdata.ML
clasohm@923
     2
    ID:         $Id$
clasohm@1465
     3
    Author:     Tobias Nipkow
clasohm@923
     4
    Copyright   1991  University of Cambridge
clasohm@923
     5
oheimb@5304
     6
Instantiation of the generic simplifier for HOL.
clasohm@923
     7
*)
clasohm@923
     8
paulson@1984
     9
section "Simplifier";
paulson@1984
    10
wenzelm@6514
    11
(*** Addition of rules to simpsets and clasets simultaneously ***)	(* FIXME move to Provers/clasimp.ML? *)
paulson@1984
    12
berghofe@5190
    13
infix 4 addIffs delIffs;
berghofe@5190
    14
paulson@1984
    15
(*Takes UNCONDITIONAL theorems of the form A<->B to 
paulson@2031
    16
        the Safe Intr     rule B==>A and 
paulson@2031
    17
        the Safe Destruct rule A==>B.
paulson@1984
    18
  Also ~A goes to the Safe Elim rule A ==> ?R
paulson@1984
    19
  Failing other cases, A is added as a Safe Intr rule*)
paulson@1984
    20
local
paulson@1984
    21
  val iff_const = HOLogic.eq_const HOLogic.boolT;
paulson@1984
    22
berghofe@5190
    23
  fun addIff ((cla, simp), th) = 
berghofe@5190
    24
      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (#prop (rep_thm th)) of
berghofe@5190
    25
                (Const("Not", _) $ A) =>
berghofe@5190
    26
                    cla addSEs [zero_var_indexes (th RS notE)]
paulson@2031
    27
              | (con $ _ $ _) =>
berghofe@5190
    28
                    if con = iff_const
berghofe@5190
    29
                    then cla addSIs [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD2)]  
berghofe@5190
    30
                              addSDs [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD1)]
berghofe@5190
    31
                    else  cla addSIs [th]
berghofe@5190
    32
              | _ => cla addSIs [th],
berghofe@5190
    33
       simp addsimps [th])
wenzelm@6968
    34
      handle TERM _ => error ("AddIffs: theorem must be unconditional\n" ^ 
berghofe@5190
    35
                         string_of_thm th);
paulson@1984
    36
berghofe@5190
    37
  fun delIff ((cla, simp), th) = 
berghofe@5190
    38
      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (#prop (rep_thm th)) of
berghofe@5190
    39
                (Const ("Not", _) $ A) =>
berghofe@5190
    40
                    cla delrules [zero_var_indexes (th RS notE)]
paulson@2031
    41
              | (con $ _ $ _) =>
berghofe@5190
    42
                    if con = iff_const
berghofe@5190
    43
                    then cla delrules [zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD2),
berghofe@5190
    44
                                       make_elim (zero_var_indexes (th RS iffD1))]
berghofe@5190
    45
                    else cla delrules [th]
berghofe@5190
    46
              | _ => cla delrules [th],
berghofe@5190
    47
       simp delsimps [th])
wenzelm@6968
    48
      handle TERM _ => (warning("DelIffs: ignoring conditional theorem\n" ^ 
berghofe@5190
    49
                          string_of_thm th); (cla, simp));
berghofe@5190
    50
berghofe@5190
    51
  fun store_clasimp (cla, simp) = (claset_ref () := cla; simpset_ref () := simp)
paulson@1984
    52
in
berghofe@5190
    53
val op addIffs = foldl addIff;
berghofe@5190
    54
val op delIffs = foldl delIff;
berghofe@5190
    55
fun AddIffs thms = store_clasimp ((claset (), simpset ()) addIffs thms);
berghofe@5190
    56
fun DelIffs thms = store_clasimp ((claset (), simpset ()) delIffs thms);
paulson@1984
    57
end;
paulson@1984
    58
oheimb@5304
    59
wenzelm@7357
    60
val [prem] = goal (the_context ()) "x==y ==> x=y";
paulson@7031
    61
by (rewtac prem);
paulson@7031
    62
by (rtac refl 1);
paulson@7031
    63
qed "meta_eq_to_obj_eq";
nipkow@4640
    64
clasohm@923
    65
local
clasohm@923
    66
wenzelm@7357
    67
  fun prover s = prove_goal (the_context ()) s (fn _ => [(Blast_tac 1)]);
clasohm@923
    68
nipkow@2134
    69
in
nipkow@2134
    70
oheimb@5552
    71
(*Make meta-equalities.  The operator below is Trueprop*)
oheimb@5552
    72
nipkow@6128
    73
fun mk_meta_eq r = r RS eq_reflection;
nipkow@6128
    74
nipkow@6128
    75
val Eq_TrueI  = mk_meta_eq(prover  "P --> (P = True)"  RS mp);
nipkow@6128
    76
val Eq_FalseI = mk_meta_eq(prover "~P --> (P = False)" RS mp);
oheimb@5304
    77
nipkow@6128
    78
fun mk_eq th = case concl_of th of
nipkow@6128
    79
        Const("==",_)$_$_       => th
nipkow@6128
    80
    |   _$(Const("op =",_)$_$_) => mk_meta_eq th
nipkow@6128
    81
    |   _$(Const("Not",_)$_)    => th RS Eq_FalseI
nipkow@6128
    82
    |   _                       => th RS Eq_TrueI;
nipkow@6128
    83
(* last 2 lines requires all formulae to be of the from Trueprop(.) *)
oheimb@5304
    84
nipkow@6128
    85
fun mk_eq_True r = Some(r RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq RS Eq_TrueI);
oheimb@5552
    86
nipkow@6128
    87
fun mk_meta_cong rl =
nipkow@6128
    88
  standard(mk_meta_eq(replicate (nprems_of rl) meta_eq_to_obj_eq MRS rl))
nipkow@6128
    89
  handle THM _ =>
nipkow@6128
    90
  error("Premises and conclusion of congruence rules must be =-equalities");
nipkow@3896
    91
nipkow@5975
    92
val not_not = prover "(~ ~ P) = P";
clasohm@923
    93
nipkow@5975
    94
val simp_thms = [not_not] @ map prover
paulson@2082
    95
 [ "(x=x) = True",
nipkow@5975
    96
   "(~True) = False", "(~False) = True",
paulson@2082
    97
   "(~P) ~= P", "P ~= (~P)", "(P ~= Q) = (P = (~Q))",
nipkow@4640
    98
   "(True=P) = P", "(P=True) = P", "(False=P) = (~P)", "(P=False) = (~P)",
paulson@2082
    99
   "(True --> P) = P", "(False --> P) = True", 
paulson@2082
   100
   "(P --> True) = True", "(P --> P) = True",
paulson@2082
   101
   "(P --> False) = (~P)", "(P --> ~P) = (~P)",
paulson@2082
   102
   "(P & True) = P", "(True & P) = P", 
nipkow@2800
   103
   "(P & False) = False", "(False & P) = False",
nipkow@2800
   104
   "(P & P) = P", "(P & (P & Q)) = (P & Q)",
paulson@3913
   105
   "(P & ~P) = False",    "(~P & P) = False",
paulson@2082
   106
   "(P | True) = True", "(True | P) = True", 
nipkow@2800
   107
   "(P | False) = P", "(False | P) = P",
nipkow@2800
   108
   "(P | P) = P", "(P | (P | Q)) = (P | Q)",
paulson@3913
   109
   "(P | ~P) = True",    "(~P | P) = True",
paulson@2082
   110
   "((~P) = (~Q)) = (P=Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   111
   "(!x. P) = P", "(? x. P) = P", "? x. x=t", "? x. t=x", 
paulson@4351
   112
(*two needed for the one-point-rule quantifier simplification procs*)
paulson@4351
   113
   "(? x. x=t & P(x)) = P(t)",		(*essential for termination!!*)
paulson@4351
   114
   "(! x. t=x --> P(x)) = P(t)" ];      (*covers a stray case*)
clasohm@923
   115
oheimb@5552
   116
(* Add congruence rules for = (instead of ==) *)
paulson@4351
   117
oheimb@5552
   118
(* ###FIXME: Move to simplifier, 
oheimb@5552
   119
   taking mk_meta_cong as input, eliminating addeqcongs and deleqcongs *)
oheimb@5552
   120
infix 4 addcongs delcongs;
nipkow@4640
   121
fun ss addcongs congs = ss addeqcongs (map mk_meta_cong congs);
nipkow@4640
   122
fun ss delcongs congs = ss deleqcongs (map mk_meta_cong congs);
wenzelm@4086
   123
fun Addcongs congs = (simpset_ref() := simpset() addcongs congs);
wenzelm@4086
   124
fun Delcongs congs = (simpset_ref() := simpset() delcongs congs);
clasohm@1264
   125
wenzelm@8641
   126
val cong_add_global = Simplifier.change_global_ss (op addcongs);
wenzelm@8641
   127
val cong_add_local = Simplifier.change_local_ss (op addcongs);
wenzelm@8641
   128
wenzelm@8641
   129
val cong_attrib_setup =
wenzelm@8641
   130
  [Attrib.add_attributes [("cong", (Attrib.no_args cong_add_global, Attrib.no_args cong_add_local),
wenzelm@8641
   131
    "add rules to simpset and claset simultaneously")]];
wenzelm@8641
   132
oheimb@5552
   133
paulson@1922
   134
val imp_cong = impI RSN
wenzelm@7357
   135
    (2, prove_goal (the_context ()) "(P=P')--> (P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P-->Q) = (P'-->Q'))"
paulson@7031
   136
        (fn _=> [(Blast_tac 1)]) RS mp RS mp);
paulson@1922
   137
paulson@1948
   138
(*Miniscoping: pushing in existential quantifiers*)
wenzelm@7648
   139
val ex_simps = map prover
wenzelm@3842
   140
                ["(EX x. P x & Q)   = ((EX x. P x) & Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   141
                 "(EX x. P & Q x)   = (P & (EX x. Q x))",
wenzelm@3842
   142
                 "(EX x. P x | Q)   = ((EX x. P x) | Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   143
                 "(EX x. P | Q x)   = (P | (EX x. Q x))",
wenzelm@3842
   144
                 "(EX x. P x --> Q) = ((ALL x. P x) --> Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   145
                 "(EX x. P --> Q x) = (P --> (EX x. Q x))"];
paulson@1948
   146
paulson@1948
   147
(*Miniscoping: pushing in universal quantifiers*)
paulson@1948
   148
val all_simps = map prover
wenzelm@3842
   149
                ["(ALL x. P x & Q)   = ((ALL x. P x) & Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   150
                 "(ALL x. P & Q x)   = (P & (ALL x. Q x))",
wenzelm@3842
   151
                 "(ALL x. P x | Q)   = ((ALL x. P x) | Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   152
                 "(ALL x. P | Q x)   = (P | (ALL x. Q x))",
wenzelm@3842
   153
                 "(ALL x. P x --> Q) = ((EX x. P x) --> Q)",
wenzelm@3842
   154
                 "(ALL x. P --> Q x) = (P --> (ALL x. Q x))"];
paulson@1948
   155
clasohm@923
   156
paulson@2022
   157
(* elimination of existential quantifiers in assumptions *)
clasohm@923
   158
clasohm@923
   159
val ex_all_equiv =
wenzelm@7357
   160
  let val lemma1 = prove_goal (the_context ())
clasohm@923
   161
        "(? x. P(x) ==> PROP Q) ==> (!!x. P(x) ==> PROP Q)"
clasohm@923
   162
        (fn prems => [resolve_tac prems 1, etac exI 1]);
wenzelm@7357
   163
      val lemma2 = prove_goalw (the_context ()) [Ex_def]
clasohm@923
   164
        "(!!x. P(x) ==> PROP Q) ==> (? x. P(x) ==> PROP Q)"
paulson@7031
   165
        (fn prems => [(REPEAT(resolve_tac prems 1))])
clasohm@923
   166
  in equal_intr lemma1 lemma2 end;
clasohm@923
   167
clasohm@923
   168
end;
clasohm@923
   169
wenzelm@7648
   170
bind_thms ("ex_simps", ex_simps);
wenzelm@7648
   171
bind_thms ("all_simps", all_simps);
berghofe@7711
   172
bind_thm ("not_not", not_not);
wenzelm@7648
   173
nipkow@3654
   174
(* Elimination of True from asumptions: *)
nipkow@3654
   175
wenzelm@7357
   176
val True_implies_equals = prove_goal (the_context ())
nipkow@3654
   177
 "(True ==> PROP P) == PROP P"
paulson@7031
   178
(fn _ => [rtac equal_intr_rule 1, atac 2,
nipkow@3654
   179
          METAHYPS (fn prems => resolve_tac prems 1) 1,
nipkow@3654
   180
          rtac TrueI 1]);
nipkow@3654
   181
wenzelm@7357
   182
fun prove nm thm  = qed_goal nm (the_context ()) thm (fn _ => [(Blast_tac 1)]);
clasohm@923
   183
paulson@7623
   184
prove "eq_commute" "(a=b)=(b=a)";
paulson@7623
   185
prove "eq_left_commute" "(P=(Q=R)) = (Q=(P=R))";
paulson@7623
   186
prove "eq_assoc" "((P=Q)=R) = (P=(Q=R))";
paulson@7623
   187
val eq_ac = [eq_commute, eq_left_commute, eq_assoc];
paulson@7623
   188
clasohm@923
   189
prove "conj_commute" "(P&Q) = (Q&P)";
clasohm@923
   190
prove "conj_left_commute" "(P&(Q&R)) = (Q&(P&R))";
clasohm@923
   191
val conj_comms = [conj_commute, conj_left_commute];
nipkow@2134
   192
prove "conj_assoc" "((P&Q)&R) = (P&(Q&R))";
clasohm@923
   193
paulson@1922
   194
prove "disj_commute" "(P|Q) = (Q|P)";
paulson@1922
   195
prove "disj_left_commute" "(P|(Q|R)) = (Q|(P|R))";
paulson@1922
   196
val disj_comms = [disj_commute, disj_left_commute];
nipkow@2134
   197
prove "disj_assoc" "((P|Q)|R) = (P|(Q|R))";
paulson@1922
   198
clasohm@923
   199
prove "conj_disj_distribL" "(P&(Q|R)) = (P&Q | P&R)";
clasohm@923
   200
prove "conj_disj_distribR" "((P|Q)&R) = (P&R | Q&R)";
nipkow@1485
   201
paulson@1892
   202
prove "disj_conj_distribL" "(P|(Q&R)) = ((P|Q) & (P|R))";
paulson@1892
   203
prove "disj_conj_distribR" "((P&Q)|R) = ((P|R) & (Q|R))";
paulson@1892
   204
nipkow@2134
   205
prove "imp_conjR" "(P --> (Q&R)) = ((P-->Q) & (P-->R))";
nipkow@2134
   206
prove "imp_conjL" "((P&Q) -->R)  = (P --> (Q --> R))";
nipkow@2134
   207
prove "imp_disjL" "((P|Q) --> R) = ((P-->R)&(Q-->R))";
paulson@1892
   208
paulson@3448
   209
(*These two are specialized, but imp_disj_not1 is useful in Auth/Yahalom.ML*)
paulson@8114
   210
prove "imp_disj_not1" "(P --> Q | R) = (~Q --> P --> R)";
paulson@8114
   211
prove "imp_disj_not2" "(P --> Q | R) = (~R --> P --> Q)";
paulson@3448
   212
paulson@3904
   213
prove "imp_disj1" "((P-->Q)|R) = (P--> Q|R)";
paulson@3904
   214
prove "imp_disj2" "(Q|(P-->R)) = (P--> Q|R)";
paulson@3904
   215
nipkow@1485
   216
prove "de_Morgan_disj" "(~(P | Q)) = (~P & ~Q)";
nipkow@1485
   217
prove "de_Morgan_conj" "(~(P & Q)) = (~P | ~Q)";
paulson@3446
   218
prove "not_imp" "(~(P --> Q)) = (P & ~Q)";
paulson@1922
   219
prove "not_iff" "(P~=Q) = (P = (~Q))";
oheimb@4743
   220
prove "disj_not1" "(~P | Q) = (P --> Q)";
oheimb@4743
   221
prove "disj_not2" "(P | ~Q) = (Q --> P)"; (* changes orientation :-( *)
nipkow@5975
   222
prove "imp_conv_disj" "(P --> Q) = ((~P) | Q)";
nipkow@5975
   223
nipkow@5975
   224
prove "iff_conv_conj_imp" "(P = Q) = ((P --> Q) & (Q --> P))";
nipkow@5975
   225
nipkow@1485
   226
nipkow@4830
   227
(*Avoids duplication of subgoals after split_if, when the true and false 
nipkow@2134
   228
  cases boil down to the same thing.*) 
nipkow@2134
   229
prove "cases_simp" "((P --> Q) & (~P --> Q)) = Q";
nipkow@2134
   230
wenzelm@3842
   231
prove "not_all" "(~ (! x. P(x))) = (? x.~P(x))";
paulson@1922
   232
prove "imp_all" "((! x. P x) --> Q) = (? x. P x --> Q)";
wenzelm@3842
   233
prove "not_ex"  "(~ (? x. P(x))) = (! x.~P(x))";
paulson@1922
   234
prove "imp_ex" "((? x. P x) --> Q) = (! x. P x --> Q)";
oheimb@1660
   235
nipkow@1655
   236
prove "ex_disj_distrib" "(? x. P(x) | Q(x)) = ((? x. P(x)) | (? x. Q(x)))";
nipkow@1655
   237
prove "all_conj_distrib" "(!x. P(x) & Q(x)) = ((! x. P(x)) & (! x. Q(x)))";
nipkow@1655
   238
nipkow@2134
   239
(* '&' congruence rule: not included by default!
nipkow@2134
   240
   May slow rewrite proofs down by as much as 50% *)
nipkow@2134
   241
wenzelm@7357
   242
let val th = prove_goal (the_context ()) 
nipkow@2134
   243
                "(P=P')--> (P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P&Q) = (P'&Q'))"
paulson@7031
   244
                (fn _=> [(Blast_tac 1)])
nipkow@2134
   245
in  bind_thm("conj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   246
wenzelm@7357
   247
let val th = prove_goal (the_context ()) 
nipkow@2134
   248
                "(Q=Q')--> (Q'--> (P=P'))--> ((P&Q) = (P'&Q'))"
paulson@7031
   249
                (fn _=> [(Blast_tac 1)])
nipkow@2134
   250
in  bind_thm("rev_conj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   251
nipkow@2134
   252
(* '|' congruence rule: not included by default! *)
nipkow@2134
   253
wenzelm@7357
   254
let val th = prove_goal (the_context ()) 
nipkow@2134
   255
                "(P=P')--> (~P'--> (Q=Q'))--> ((P|Q) = (P'|Q'))"
paulson@7031
   256
                (fn _=> [(Blast_tac 1)])
nipkow@2134
   257
in  bind_thm("disj_cong",standard (impI RSN (2, th RS mp RS mp)))  end;
nipkow@2134
   258
nipkow@2134
   259
prove "eq_sym_conv" "(x=y) = (y=x)";
nipkow@2134
   260
paulson@5278
   261
paulson@5278
   262
(** if-then-else rules **)
paulson@5278
   263
paulson@7031
   264
Goalw [if_def] "(if True then x else y) = x";
paulson@7031
   265
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   266
qed "if_True";
nipkow@2134
   267
paulson@7031
   268
Goalw [if_def] "(if False then x else y) = y";
paulson@7031
   269
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   270
qed "if_False";
nipkow@2134
   271
paulson@7127
   272
Goalw [if_def] "P ==> (if P then x else y) = x";
paulson@7031
   273
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   274
qed "if_P";
oheimb@5304
   275
paulson@7127
   276
Goalw [if_def] "~P ==> (if P then x else y) = y";
paulson@7031
   277
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   278
qed "if_not_P";
nipkow@2134
   279
paulson@7031
   280
Goal "P(if Q then x else y) = ((Q --> P(x)) & (~Q --> P(y)))";
paulson@7031
   281
by (res_inst_tac [("Q","Q")] (excluded_middle RS disjE) 1);
paulson@7031
   282
by (stac if_P 2);
paulson@7031
   283
by (stac if_not_P 1);
paulson@7031
   284
by (ALLGOALS (Blast_tac));
paulson@7031
   285
qed "split_if";
paulson@7031
   286
nipkow@4830
   287
(* for backwards compatibility: *)
nipkow@4830
   288
val expand_if = split_if;
oheimb@4205
   289
paulson@7031
   290
Goal "P(if Q then x else y) = (~((Q & ~P x) | (~Q & ~P y)))";
paulson@7031
   291
by (stac split_if 1);
paulson@7031
   292
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   293
qed "split_if_asm";
nipkow@2134
   294
paulson@7031
   295
Goal "(if c then x else x) = x";
paulson@7031
   296
by (stac split_if 1);
paulson@7031
   297
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   298
qed "if_cancel";
oheimb@5304
   299
paulson@7031
   300
Goal "(if x = y then y else x) = x";
paulson@7031
   301
by (stac split_if 1);
paulson@7031
   302
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   303
qed "if_eq_cancel";
oheimb@5304
   304
paulson@4769
   305
(*This form is useful for expanding IFs on the RIGHT of the ==> symbol*)
paulson@7127
   306
Goal "(if P then Q else R) = ((P-->Q) & (~P-->R))";
paulson@7031
   307
by (rtac split_if 1);
paulson@7031
   308
qed "if_bool_eq_conj";
paulson@4769
   309
paulson@4769
   310
(*And this form is useful for expanding IFs on the LEFT*)
paulson@7031
   311
Goal "(if P then Q else R) = ((P&Q) | (~P&R))";
paulson@7031
   312
by (stac split_if 1);
paulson@7031
   313
by (Blast_tac 1);
paulson@7031
   314
qed "if_bool_eq_disj";
nipkow@2134
   315
paulson@4351
   316
paulson@4351
   317
(*** make simplification procedures for quantifier elimination ***)
paulson@4351
   318
paulson@4351
   319
structure Quantifier1 = Quantifier1Fun(
paulson@4351
   320
struct
paulson@4351
   321
  (*abstract syntax*)
paulson@4351
   322
  fun dest_eq((c as Const("op =",_)) $ s $ t) = Some(c,s,t)
paulson@4351
   323
    | dest_eq _ = None;
paulson@4351
   324
  fun dest_conj((c as Const("op &",_)) $ s $ t) = Some(c,s,t)
paulson@4351
   325
    | dest_conj _ = None;
paulson@4351
   326
  val conj = HOLogic.conj
paulson@4351
   327
  val imp  = HOLogic.imp
paulson@4351
   328
  (*rules*)
paulson@4351
   329
  val iff_reflection = eq_reflection
paulson@4351
   330
  val iffI = iffI
paulson@4351
   331
  val sym  = sym
paulson@4351
   332
  val conjI= conjI
paulson@4351
   333
  val conjE= conjE
paulson@4351
   334
  val impI = impI
paulson@4351
   335
  val impE = impE
paulson@4351
   336
  val mp   = mp
paulson@4351
   337
  val exI  = exI
paulson@4351
   338
  val exE  = exE
paulson@4351
   339
  val allI = allI
paulson@4351
   340
  val allE = allE
paulson@4351
   341
end);
paulson@4351
   342
nipkow@4320
   343
local
nipkow@4320
   344
val ex_pattern =
wenzelm@7357
   345
  Thm.read_cterm (Theory.sign_of (the_context ())) ("EX x. P(x) & Q(x)",HOLogic.boolT)
paulson@3913
   346
nipkow@4320
   347
val all_pattern =
wenzelm@7357
   348
  Thm.read_cterm (Theory.sign_of (the_context ())) ("ALL x. P(x) & P'(x) --> Q(x)",HOLogic.boolT)
nipkow@4320
   349
nipkow@4320
   350
in
nipkow@4320
   351
val defEX_regroup =
nipkow@4320
   352
  mk_simproc "defined EX" [ex_pattern] Quantifier1.rearrange_ex;
nipkow@4320
   353
val defALL_regroup =
nipkow@4320
   354
  mk_simproc "defined ALL" [all_pattern] Quantifier1.rearrange_all;
nipkow@4320
   355
end;
paulson@3913
   356
paulson@4351
   357
paulson@4351
   358
(*** Case splitting ***)
paulson@3913
   359
oheimb@5304
   360
structure SplitterData =
oheimb@5304
   361
  struct
oheimb@5304
   362
  structure Simplifier = Simplifier
oheimb@5552
   363
  val mk_eq          = mk_eq
oheimb@5304
   364
  val meta_eq_to_iff = meta_eq_to_obj_eq
oheimb@5304
   365
  val iffD           = iffD2
oheimb@5304
   366
  val disjE          = disjE
oheimb@5304
   367
  val conjE          = conjE
oheimb@5304
   368
  val exE            = exE
oheimb@5304
   369
  val contrapos      = contrapos
oheimb@5304
   370
  val contrapos2     = contrapos2
oheimb@5304
   371
  val notnotD        = notnotD
oheimb@5304
   372
  end;
nipkow@4681
   373
oheimb@5304
   374
structure Splitter = SplitterFun(SplitterData);
oheimb@2263
   375
oheimb@5304
   376
val split_tac        = Splitter.split_tac;
oheimb@5304
   377
val split_inside_tac = Splitter.split_inside_tac;
oheimb@5304
   378
val split_asm_tac    = Splitter.split_asm_tac;
oheimb@5307
   379
val op addsplits     = Splitter.addsplits;
oheimb@5307
   380
val op delsplits     = Splitter.delsplits;
oheimb@5304
   381
val Addsplits        = Splitter.Addsplits;
oheimb@5304
   382
val Delsplits        = Splitter.Delsplits;
oheimb@4718
   383
nipkow@2134
   384
(*In general it seems wrong to add distributive laws by default: they
nipkow@2134
   385
  might cause exponential blow-up.  But imp_disjL has been in for a while
nipkow@2134
   386
  and cannot be removed without affecting existing proofs.  Moreover, 
nipkow@2134
   387
  rewriting by "(P|Q --> R) = ((P-->R)&(Q-->R))" might be justified on the
nipkow@2134
   388
  grounds that it allows simplification of R in the two cases.*)
nipkow@2134
   389
oheimb@5304
   390
fun gen_all th = forall_elim_vars (#maxidx(rep_thm th)+1) th;
oheimb@5304
   391
nipkow@2134
   392
val mksimps_pairs =
nipkow@2134
   393
  [("op -->", [mp]), ("op &", [conjunct1,conjunct2]),
nipkow@2134
   394
   ("All", [spec]), ("True", []), ("False", []),
paulson@4769
   395
   ("If", [if_bool_eq_conj RS iffD1])];
nipkow@1758
   396
oheimb@5552
   397
(* ###FIXME: move to Provers/simplifier.ML
oheimb@5304
   398
val mk_atomize:      (string * thm list) list -> thm -> thm list
oheimb@5304
   399
*)
oheimb@5552
   400
(* ###FIXME: move to Provers/simplifier.ML *)
oheimb@5304
   401
fun mk_atomize pairs =
oheimb@5304
   402
  let fun atoms th =
oheimb@5304
   403
        (case concl_of th of
oheimb@5304
   404
           Const("Trueprop",_) $ p =>
oheimb@5304
   405
             (case head_of p of
oheimb@5304
   406
                Const(a,_) =>
oheimb@5304
   407
                  (case assoc(pairs,a) of
oheimb@5304
   408
                     Some(rls) => flat (map atoms ([th] RL rls))
oheimb@5304
   409
                   | None => [th])
oheimb@5304
   410
              | _ => [th])
oheimb@5304
   411
         | _ => [th])
oheimb@5304
   412
  in atoms end;
oheimb@5304
   413
oheimb@5552
   414
fun mksimps pairs = (map mk_eq o mk_atomize pairs o gen_all);
oheimb@5304
   415
nipkow@7570
   416
fun unsafe_solver_tac prems =
nipkow@7570
   417
  FIRST'[resolve_tac(reflexive_thm::TrueI::refl::prems), atac, etac FalseE];
nipkow@7570
   418
val unsafe_solver = mk_solver "HOL unsafe" unsafe_solver_tac;
nipkow@7570
   419
oheimb@2636
   420
(*No premature instantiation of variables during simplification*)
nipkow@7570
   421
fun safe_solver_tac prems =
nipkow@7570
   422
  FIRST'[match_tac(reflexive_thm::TrueI::refl::prems),
nipkow@7570
   423
         eq_assume_tac, ematch_tac [FalseE]];
nipkow@7570
   424
val safe_solver = mk_solver "HOL safe" safe_solver_tac;
oheimb@2443
   425
oheimb@2636
   426
val HOL_basic_ss = empty_ss setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac
nipkow@7570
   427
			    setSSolver safe_solver
oheimb@2636
   428
			    setSolver  unsafe_solver
nipkow@4677
   429
			    setmksimps (mksimps mksimps_pairs)
oheimb@5552
   430
			    setmkeqTrue mk_eq_True;
oheimb@2443
   431
paulson@3446
   432
val HOL_ss = 
paulson@3446
   433
    HOL_basic_ss addsimps 
paulson@3446
   434
     ([triv_forall_equality, (* prunes params *)
nipkow@3654
   435
       True_implies_equals, (* prune asms `True' *)
oheimb@4718
   436
       if_True, if_False, if_cancel, if_eq_cancel,
oheimb@5304
   437
       imp_disjL, conj_assoc, disj_assoc,
paulson@3904
   438
       de_Morgan_conj, de_Morgan_disj, imp_disj1, imp_disj2, not_imp,
nipkow@5447
   439
       disj_not1, not_all, not_ex, cases_simp, Eps_eq, Eps_sym_eq]
paulson@3446
   440
     @ ex_simps @ all_simps @ simp_thms)
nipkow@4032
   441
     addsimprocs [defALL_regroup,defEX_regroup]
wenzelm@4744
   442
     addcongs [imp_cong]
nipkow@4830
   443
     addsplits [split_if];
paulson@2082
   444
paulson@6293
   445
(*Simplifies x assuming c and y assuming ~c*)
paulson@6293
   446
val prems = Goalw [if_def]
paulson@6293
   447
  "[| b=c; c ==> x=u; ~c ==> y=v |] ==> \
paulson@6293
   448
\  (if b then x else y) = (if c then u else v)";
paulson@6293
   449
by (asm_simp_tac (HOL_ss addsimps prems) 1);
paulson@6293
   450
qed "if_cong";
paulson@6293
   451
paulson@7127
   452
(*Prevents simplification of x and y: faster and allows the execution
paulson@7127
   453
  of functional programs. NOW THE DEFAULT.*)
paulson@7031
   454
Goal "b=c ==> (if b then x else y) = (if c then x else y)";
paulson@7031
   455
by (etac arg_cong 1);
paulson@7031
   456
qed "if_weak_cong";
paulson@6293
   457
paulson@6293
   458
(*Prevents simplification of t: much faster*)
paulson@7031
   459
Goal "a = b ==> (let x=a in t(x)) = (let x=b in t(x))";
paulson@7031
   460
by (etac arg_cong 1);
paulson@7031
   461
qed "let_weak_cong";
paulson@6293
   462
paulson@7031
   463
Goal "f(if c then x else y) = (if c then f x else f y)";
paulson@7031
   464
by (simp_tac (HOL_ss setloop (split_tac [split_if])) 1);
paulson@7031
   465
qed "if_distrib";
nipkow@1655
   466
paulson@4327
   467
(*For expand_case_tac*)
paulson@7584
   468
val prems = Goal "[| P ==> Q(True); ~P ==> Q(False) |] ==> Q(P)";
paulson@2948
   469
by (case_tac "P" 1);
paulson@2948
   470
by (ALLGOALS (asm_simp_tac (HOL_ss addsimps prems)));
paulson@7584
   471
qed "expand_case";
paulson@2948
   472
paulson@4327
   473
(*Used in Auth proofs.  Typically P contains Vars that become instantiated
paulson@4327
   474
  during unification.*)
paulson@2948
   475
fun expand_case_tac P i =
paulson@2948
   476
    res_inst_tac [("P",P)] expand_case i THEN
paulson@2948
   477
    Simp_tac (i+1) THEN 
paulson@2948
   478
    Simp_tac i;
paulson@2948
   479
paulson@7584
   480
(*This lemma restricts the effect of the rewrite rule u=v to the left-hand
paulson@7584
   481
  side of an equality.  Used in {Integ,Real}/simproc.ML*)
paulson@7584
   482
Goal "x=y ==> (x=z) = (y=z)";
paulson@7584
   483
by (asm_simp_tac HOL_ss 1);
paulson@7584
   484
qed "restrict_to_left";
paulson@2948
   485
wenzelm@7357
   486
(* default simpset *)
paulson@7584
   487
val simpsetup = 
paulson@7584
   488
    [fn thy => (simpset_ref_of thy := HOL_ss addcongs [if_weak_cong]; 
paulson@7584
   489
		thy)];
berghofe@3615
   490
oheimb@4652
   491
wenzelm@5219
   492
(*** integration of simplifier with classical reasoner ***)
oheimb@2636
   493
wenzelm@5219
   494
structure Clasimp = ClasimpFun
wenzelm@8473
   495
 (structure Simplifier = Simplifier and Splitter = Splitter
wenzelm@8473
   496
   and Classical  = Classical and Blast = Blast);
oheimb@4652
   497
open Clasimp;
oheimb@2636
   498
oheimb@2636
   499
val HOL_css = (HOL_cs, HOL_ss);
nipkow@5975
   500
nipkow@5975
   501
wenzelm@8641
   502
(* "iff" attribute *)
wenzelm@8641
   503
wenzelm@8641
   504
val iff_add_global = Clasimp.change_global_css (op addIffs);
wenzelm@8641
   505
val iff_add_local = Clasimp.change_local_css (op addIffs);
wenzelm@8641
   506
wenzelm@8641
   507
val iff_attrib_setup =
wenzelm@8641
   508
  [Attrib.add_attributes [("iff", (Attrib.no_args iff_add_global, Attrib.no_args iff_add_local),
wenzelm@8641
   509
    "add rules to simpset and claset simultaneously")]];
wenzelm@8641
   510
wenzelm@8641
   511
wenzelm@8641
   512
nipkow@5975
   513
(*** A general refutation procedure ***)
nipkow@5975
   514
 
nipkow@5975
   515
(* Parameters:
nipkow@5975
   516
nipkow@5975
   517
   test: term -> bool
nipkow@5975
   518
   tests if a term is at all relevant to the refutation proof;
nipkow@5975
   519
   if not, then it can be discarded. Can improve performance,
nipkow@5975
   520
   esp. if disjunctions can be discarded (no case distinction needed!).
nipkow@5975
   521
nipkow@5975
   522
   prep_tac: int -> tactic
nipkow@5975
   523
   A preparation tactic to be applied to the goal once all relevant premises
nipkow@5975
   524
   have been moved to the conclusion.
nipkow@5975
   525
nipkow@5975
   526
   ref_tac: int -> tactic
nipkow@5975
   527
   the actual refutation tactic. Should be able to deal with goals
nipkow@5975
   528
   [| A1; ...; An |] ==> False
nipkow@5975
   529
   where the Ai are atomic, i.e. no top-level &, | or ?
nipkow@5975
   530
*)
nipkow@5975
   531
nipkow@5975
   532
fun refute_tac test prep_tac ref_tac =
nipkow@5975
   533
  let val nnf_simps =
nipkow@5975
   534
        [imp_conv_disj,iff_conv_conj_imp,de_Morgan_disj,de_Morgan_conj,
nipkow@5975
   535
         not_all,not_ex,not_not];
nipkow@5975
   536
      val nnf_simpset =
nipkow@5975
   537
        empty_ss setmkeqTrue mk_eq_True
nipkow@5975
   538
                 setmksimps (mksimps mksimps_pairs)
nipkow@5975
   539
                 addsimps nnf_simps;
nipkow@5975
   540
      val prem_nnf_tac = full_simp_tac nnf_simpset;
nipkow@5975
   541
nipkow@5975
   542
      val refute_prems_tac =
nipkow@5975
   543
        REPEAT(eresolve_tac [conjE, exE] 1 ORELSE
nipkow@5975
   544
               filter_prems_tac test 1 ORELSE
paulson@6301
   545
               etac disjE 1) THEN
nipkow@5975
   546
        ref_tac 1;
nipkow@5975
   547
  in EVERY'[TRY o filter_prems_tac test,
nipkow@6128
   548
            DETERM o REPEAT o etac rev_mp, prep_tac, rtac ccontr, prem_nnf_tac,
nipkow@5975
   549
            SELECT_GOAL (DEPTH_SOLVE refute_prems_tac)]
nipkow@5975
   550
  end;