doc-src/LaTeXsugar/Sugar/Sugar.thy
author haftmann
Wed Jun 01 10:52:17 2005 +0200 (2005-06-01 ago)
changeset 16167 b2e4c4058b71
parent 16166 346bb10d4bbb
child 16175 749e6b68ca84
permissions -rw-r--r--
renamed premise* to prem
nipkow@15337
     1
(*<*)
nipkow@15337
     2
theory Sugar
kleing@15366
     3
imports LaTeXsugar OptionalSugar
nipkow@15337
     4
begin
nipkow@15337
     5
(*>*)
nipkow@15337
     6
nipkow@15337
     7
section "Introduction"
nipkow@15337
     8
kleing@15385
     9
text{* This document is for those Isabelle users who have mastered
nipkow@15337
    10
the art of mixing \LaTeX\ text and Isabelle theories and never want to
nipkow@15337
    11
typeset a theorem by hand anymore because they have experienced the
nipkow@15337
    12
bliss of writing \verb!@!\verb!{thm[display]setsum_cartesian_product[no_vars]}!
nipkow@15337
    13
and seeing Isabelle typeset it for them:
nipkow@15337
    14
@{thm[display,eta_contract=false] setsum_cartesian_product[no_vars]}
nipkow@15342
    15
No typos, no omissions, no sweat.
nipkow@15342
    16
If you have not experienced that joy, read Chapter 4, \emph{Presenting
nipkow@15342
    17
Theories}, \cite{LNCS2283} first.
nipkow@15337
    18
nipkow@15337
    19
If you have mastered the art of Isabelle's \emph{antiquotations},
nipkow@15337
    20
i.e.\ things like the above \verb!@!\verb!{thm...}!, beware: in your vanity
nipkow@15337
    21
you may be tempted to think that all readers of the stunning ps or pdf
nipkow@15337
    22
documents you can now produce at the drop of a hat will be struck with
nipkow@15337
    23
awe at the beauty unfolding in front of their eyes. Until one day you
nipkow@15337
    24
come across that very critical of readers known as the ``common referee''.
nipkow@15337
    25
He has the nasty habit of refusing to understand unfamiliar notation
nipkow@15337
    26
like Isabelle's infamous @{text"\<lbrakk> \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>"} no matter how many times you
nipkow@15337
    27
explain it in your paper. Even worse, he thinks that using @{text"\<lbrakk>
nipkow@15337
    28
\<rbrakk>"} for anything other than denotational semantics is a cardinal sin
nipkow@15342
    29
that must be punished by instant rejection.
nipkow@15337
    30
nipkow@15337
    31
nipkow@15337
    32
This document shows you how to make Isabelle and \LaTeX\ cooperate to
nipkow@15337
    33
produce ordinary looking mathematics that hides the fact that it was
nipkow@15471
    34
typeset by a machine. You merely need to load the right files:
nipkow@15471
    35
\begin{itemize}
nipkow@15471
    36
\item Import theory \texttt{LaTeXsugar} in the header of your own
nipkow@15471
    37
theory.  You may also want bits of \texttt{OptionalSugar}, which you can
nipkow@15471
    38
copy selectively into your own theory or import as a whole.  Both
nipkow@15471
    39
theories live in \texttt{HOL/Library} and are found automatically.
kleing@15378
    40
nipkow@15471
    41
\item Should you need additional \LaTeX\ packages (the text will tell
nipkow@15471
    42
you so), you include them at the beginning of your \LaTeX\ document,
nipkow@16153
    43
typically in \texttt{root.tex}. For a start, you should
nipkow@16153
    44
\verb!\usepackage{amssymb}! --- otherwise typesetting
nipkow@16153
    45
@{prop[source]"\<not>(\<exists>x. P x)"} will fail because the AMS symbol
nipkow@16153
    46
@{text"\<nexists>"} is missing.
nipkow@15471
    47
\end{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    48
*}
nipkow@15342
    49
nipkow@15342
    50
section{* HOL syntax*}
nipkow@15342
    51
nipkow@15342
    52
subsection{* Logic *}
nipkow@15342
    53
nipkow@16153
    54
text{* 
nipkow@16153
    55
  The formula @{prop[source]"\<not>(\<exists>x. P x)"} is typeset as @{prop"~(EX x. P x)"}.
nipkow@16153
    56
nipkow@16153
    57
The predefined constructs @{text"if"}, @{text"let"} and
nipkow@15342
    58
@{text"case"} are set in sans serif font to distinguish them from
nipkow@15342
    59
other functions. This improves readability:
nipkow@15342
    60
\begin{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    61
\item @{term"if b then e\<^isub>1 else e\<^isub>2"} instead of @{text"if b then e\<^isub>1 else e\<^isub>2"}.
nipkow@15342
    62
\item @{term"let x = e\<^isub>1 in e\<^isub>2"} instead of @{text"let x = e\<^isub>1 in e\<^isub>2"}.
nipkow@15342
    63
\item @{term"case x of True \<Rightarrow> e\<^isub>1 | False \<Rightarrow> e\<^isub>2"} instead of\\
nipkow@15342
    64
      @{text"case x of True \<Rightarrow> e\<^isub>1 | False \<Rightarrow> e\<^isub>2"}.
nipkow@15342
    65
\end{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    66
*}
nipkow@15342
    67
nipkow@15342
    68
subsection{* Sets *}
nipkow@15337
    69
nipkow@15342
    70
text{* Although set syntax in HOL is already close to
nipkow@15342
    71
standard, we provide a few further improvements:
nipkow@15342
    72
\begin{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    73
\item @{term"{x. P}"} instead of @{text"{x. P}"}.
nipkow@15342
    74
\item @{term"{}"} instead of @{text"{}"}.
nipkow@15342
    75
\item @{term"insert a (insert b (insert c M))"} instead of @{text"insert a (insert b (insert c M))"}.
nipkow@15342
    76
\end{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    77
*}
nipkow@15342
    78
nipkow@15342
    79
subsection{* Lists *}
nipkow@15342
    80
nipkow@15342
    81
text{* If lists are used heavily, the following notations increase readability:
nipkow@15342
    82
\begin{itemize}
nipkow@15342
    83
\item @{term"x # xs"} instead of @{text"x # xs"}.
nipkow@15342
    84
      Exceptionally, @{term"x # xs"} is also input syntax.
nipkow@15342
    85
If you prefer more space around the $\cdot$ you have to redefine
nipkow@15342
    86
\verb!\isasymcdot! in \LaTeX:
nipkow@15342
    87
\verb!\renewcommand{\isasymcdot}{\isamath{\,\cdot\,}}!
nipkow@15342
    88
nipkow@15342
    89
\item @{term"length xs"} instead of @{text"length xs"}.
kleing@15385
    90
\item @{term"nth xs n"} instead of @{text"nth xs n"},
nipkow@15342
    91
      the $n$th element of @{text xs}.
nipkow@15342
    92
kleing@15366
    93
\item The @{text"@"} operation associates implicitly to the right,
kleing@15366
    94
which leads to unpleasant line breaks if the term is too long for one
kleing@15366
    95
line. To avoid this, \texttt{OptionalSugar} contains syntax to group
kleing@15366
    96
@{text"@"}-terms to the left before printing, which leads to better
kleing@15366
    97
line breaking behaviour:
wenzelm@15673
    98
@{term[display]"term\<^isub>0 @ term\<^isub>1 @ term\<^isub>2 @ term\<^isub>3 @ term\<^isub>4 @ term\<^isub>5 @ term\<^isub>6 @ term\<^isub>7 @ term\<^isub>8 @ term\<^isub>9 @ term\<^isub>1\<^isub>0"}
kleing@15366
    99
nipkow@15342
   100
\end{itemize}
nipkow@15337
   101
*}
nipkow@15337
   102
nipkow@15337
   103
section "Printing theorems"
nipkow@15337
   104
nipkow@15689
   105
subsection "Question marks"
nipkow@15689
   106
nipkow@15689
   107
text{* If you print anything, especially theorems, containing
nipkow@15689
   108
schematic variables they are prefixed with a question mark:
nipkow@15689
   109
\verb!@!\verb!{thm conjI}! results in @{thm conjI}. Most of the time
nipkow@15689
   110
you would rather not see the question marks. There is an attribute
nipkow@15689
   111
\verb!no_vars! that you can attach to the theorem that turns its
nipkow@15689
   112
schematic into ordinary free variables: \verb!@!\verb!{thm conjI[no_vars]}!
nipkow@15689
   113
results in @{thm conjI[no_vars]}.
nipkow@15689
   114
nipkow@15689
   115
This \verb!no_vars! business can become a bit tedious.
nipkow@15689
   116
If you would rather never see question marks, simply put
nipkow@15689
   117
\begin{verbatim}
wenzelm@15983
   118
reset show_question_marks;
nipkow@15689
   119
\end{verbatim}
nipkow@15689
   120
at the beginning of your file \texttt{ROOT.ML}.
nipkow@15689
   121
The rest of this document is produced with this flag reset.
nipkow@16075
   122
nipkow@16075
   123
Hint: Resetting \verb!show_question_marks! only supresses question
nipkow@16075
   124
marks; variables that end in digits, e.g. @{text"x1"}, are still
nipkow@16075
   125
printed with a trailing @{text".0"}, e.g. @{text"x1.0"}, their
nipkow@16075
   126
internal index. This can be avoided by turning the last digit into a
nipkow@16075
   127
subscript: write \verb!x\<^isub>1! and obtain the much nicer @{text"x\<^isub>1"}. *}
nipkow@15689
   128
wenzelm@15983
   129
(*<*)ML"reset show_question_marks"(*>*)
nipkow@15689
   130
nipkow@15337
   131
subsection "Inference rules"
nipkow@15337
   132
nipkow@15342
   133
text{* To print theorems as inference rules you need to include Didier
nipkow@15342
   134
R\'emy's \texttt{mathpartir} package~\cite{mathpartir}
nipkow@15342
   135
for typesetting inference rules in your \LaTeX\ file.
nipkow@15337
   136
nipkow@15689
   137
Writing \verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=Rule] conjI}! produces
nipkow@15689
   138
@{thm[mode=Rule] conjI}, even in the middle of a sentence.
nipkow@15342
   139
If you prefer your inference rule on a separate line, maybe with a name,
nipkow@15342
   140
\begin{center}
nipkow@15689
   141
@{thm[mode=Rule] conjI} {\sc conjI}
nipkow@15342
   142
\end{center}
nipkow@15342
   143
is produced by
nipkow@15337
   144
\begin{quote}
nipkow@15337
   145
\verb!\begin{center}!\\
nipkow@15689
   146
\verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=Rule] conjI} {\sc conjI}!\\
nipkow@15337
   147
\verb!\end{center}!
nipkow@15337
   148
\end{quote}
nipkow@15342
   149
It is not recommended to use the standard \texttt{display} attribute
nipkow@15342
   150
together with \texttt{Rule} because centering does not work and because
nipkow@15342
   151
the line breaking mechanisms of \texttt{display} and \texttt{mathpartir} can
nipkow@15342
   152
clash.
nipkow@15342
   153
nipkow@15337
   154
Of course you can display multiple rules in this fashion:
nipkow@15337
   155
\begin{quote}
nipkow@15337
   156
\verb!\begin{center}\isastyle!\\
nipkow@15689
   157
\verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=Rule] conjI} {\sc conjI} \\[1ex]!\\
nipkow@15689
   158
\verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=Rule] conjE} {\sc disjI$_1$} \qquad!\\
nipkow@15689
   159
\verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=Rule] disjE} {\sc disjI$_2$}!\\
nipkow@15337
   160
\verb!\end{center}!
nipkow@15337
   161
\end{quote}
nipkow@15337
   162
yields
nipkow@15337
   163
\begin{center}\isastyle
nipkow@15689
   164
@{thm[mode=Rule] conjI} {\sc conjI} \\[1ex]
nipkow@15689
   165
@{thm[mode=Rule] disjI1} {\sc disjI$_1$} \qquad
nipkow@15689
   166
@{thm[mode=Rule] disjI2} {\sc disjI$_2$}
nipkow@15337
   167
\end{center}
nipkow@15337
   168
Note that we included \verb!\isastyle! to obtain
nipkow@15337
   169
the smaller font that otherwise comes only with \texttt{display}.
nipkow@15337
   170
nipkow@15342
   171
The \texttt{mathpartir} package copes well if there are too many
nipkow@15342
   172
premises for one line:
nipkow@15342
   173
\begin{center}
nipkow@15342
   174
@{prop[mode=Rule] "\<lbrakk> A \<longrightarrow> B; B \<longrightarrow> C; C \<longrightarrow> D; D \<longrightarrow> E; E \<longrightarrow> F; F \<longrightarrow> G;
nipkow@15342
   175
 G \<longrightarrow> H; H \<longrightarrow> I; I \<longrightarrow> J; J \<longrightarrow> K \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> A \<longrightarrow> K"}
nipkow@15342
   176
\end{center}
nipkow@15342
   177
nipkow@15471
   178
Limitations: 1. Premises and conclusion must each not be longer than
nipkow@15471
   179
the line.  2. Premises that are @{text"\<Longrightarrow>"}-implications are again
nipkow@15471
   180
displayed with a horizontal line, which looks at least unusual.
nipkow@15471
   181
nipkow@15337
   182
*}
nipkow@15342
   183
nipkow@15342
   184
subsection{*If-then*}
nipkow@15342
   185
nipkow@15342
   186
text{* If you prefer a fake ``natural language'' style you can produce
nipkow@15342
   187
the body of
nipkow@15342
   188
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
nipkow@15342
   189
\begin{theorem}
nipkow@15689
   190
@{thm[mode=IfThen] le_trans}
nipkow@15342
   191
\end{theorem}
nipkow@15342
   192
by typing
nipkow@15342
   193
\begin{quote}
nipkow@15689
   194
\verb!@!\verb!{thm[mode=IfThen] le_trans}!
nipkow@15342
   195
\end{quote}
nipkow@15342
   196
nipkow@15342
   197
In order to prevent odd line breaks, the premises are put into boxes.
nipkow@15342
   198
At times this is too drastic:
nipkow@15342
   199
\begin{theorem}
nipkow@15342
   200
@{prop[mode=IfThen] "longpremise \<Longrightarrow> longerpremise \<Longrightarrow> P(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x)))))))))) \<Longrightarrow> longestpremise \<Longrightarrow> conclusion"}
nipkow@15342
   201
\end{theorem}
nipkow@16153
   202
In which case you should use \texttt{IfThenNoBox} instead of
nipkow@16153
   203
\texttt{IfThen}:
nipkow@15342
   204
\begin{theorem}
nipkow@15342
   205
@{prop[mode=IfThenNoBox] "longpremise \<Longrightarrow> longerpremise \<Longrightarrow> P(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x)))))))))) \<Longrightarrow> longestpremise \<Longrightarrow> conclusion"}
nipkow@15342
   206
\end{theorem}
kleing@15366
   207
*}
nipkow@15342
   208
haftmann@16166
   209
subsection{* Doing it yourself\label{sec:yourself}*}
nipkow@16153
   210
nipkow@16153
   211
text{* If for some reason you want or need to present theorems your
nipkow@16153
   212
own way, you can extract the premises and the conclusion explicitly
nipkow@16153
   213
and combine them as you like:
nipkow@16153
   214
\begin{itemize}
haftmann@16167
   215
\item \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style prem1! $thm$\verb!}!
haftmann@16167
   216
prints premise 1 of $thm$ (and similarly up to \texttt{prem9}).
haftmann@16165
   217
\item \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style concl! $thm$\verb!}!
nipkow@16153
   218
prints the conclusion of $thm$.
nipkow@16153
   219
\end{itemize}
haftmann@16167
   220
For example, ``from @{thm_style prem2 conjI} and
haftmann@16167
   221
@{thm_style prem1 conjI} we conclude @{thm_style concl conjI}''
nipkow@16153
   222
is produced by
nipkow@16153
   223
\begin{quote}
haftmann@16167
   224
\verb!from !\verb!@!\verb!{thm_style prem2 conjI}!\\
haftmann@16167
   225
\verb!and !\verb!@!\verb!{thm_style prem1 conjI}!\\
haftmann@16165
   226
\verb!we conclude !\verb!@!\verb!{thm_style concl conjI}!
nipkow@16153
   227
\end{quote}
nipkow@16153
   228
Thus you can rearrange or hide premises and typeset the theorem as you like.
nipkow@16153
   229
The \verb!thm_style! antiquotation is a general mechanism explained
nipkow@16153
   230
in \S\ref{sec:styles}.
nipkow@16153
   231
*}
nipkow@16153
   232
kleing@15366
   233
subsection "Patterns"
kleing@15366
   234
kleing@15366
   235
text {*
kleing@15366
   236
  Sometimes functions ignore one or more of their
kleing@15366
   237
  arguments and some functional languages have nice 
nipkow@15689
   238
  syntax for that as in @{thm hd.simps [where xs=DUMMY]}.
kleing@15366
   239
kleing@15366
   240
  You can simulate this in Isabelle by instantiating the @{term xs} in
nipkow@15689
   241
  definition \mbox{@{thm hd.simps}} with a constant @{text DUMMY} that
kleing@15366
   242
  is printed as @{term DUMMY}. The code for the pattern above is 
nipkow@15689
   243
  \verb!@!\verb!{thm hd.simps [where xs=DUMMY]}!.
kleing@15366
   244
kleing@15366
   245
  You can drive this game even further and extend the syntax of let
kleing@15366
   246
  bindings such that certain functions like @{term fst}, @{term hd}, 
kleing@15368
   247
  etc.\ are printed as patterns. \texttt{OptionalSugar} provides the
kleing@15368
   248
  following:
kleing@15366
   249
  
kleing@15366
   250
  \begin{center}
kleing@15366
   251
  \begin{tabular}{l@ {~~produced by~~}l}
kleing@15366
   252
  @{term "let x = fst p in t"} & \verb!@!\verb!{term "let x = fst p in t"}!\\
kleing@15366
   253
  @{term "let x = snd p in t"} & \verb!@!\verb!{term "let x = snd p in t"}!\\
kleing@15366
   254
  @{term "let x = hd xs in t"} & \verb!@!\verb!{term "let x = hd xs in t"}!\\
kleing@15366
   255
  @{term "let x = tl xs in t"} & \verb!@!\verb!{term "let x = tl xs in t"}!\\
kleing@15366
   256
  @{term "let x = the y in t"} & \verb!@!\verb!{term "let x = the y in t"}!\\
kleing@15366
   257
  \end{tabular}
kleing@15366
   258
  \end{center}
kleing@15366
   259
*}
kleing@15366
   260
nipkow@16155
   261
section "Proofs"
kleing@15366
   262
kleing@15366
   263
text {*
kleing@15367
   264
  Full proofs, even if written in beautiful Isar style, are likely to
kleing@15366
   265
  be too long and detailed to be included in conference papers, but
kleing@15366
   266
  some key lemmas might be of interest.
kleing@15366
   267
kleing@15366
   268
  It is usually easiest to put them in figures like the one in Fig.\
kleing@15366
   269
  \ref{fig:proof}. This was achieved with the \isakeyword{text\_raw}
kleing@15366
   270
  command:
kleing@15366
   271
*}
kleing@15366
   272
text_raw {*
kleing@15366
   273
  \begin{figure}
kleing@15366
   274
  \begin{center}\begin{minipage}{0.6\textwidth}  
kleing@15428
   275
  \isastyle\isamarkuptrue
kleing@15366
   276
*}
kleing@15366
   277
lemma True
kleing@15366
   278
proof -
kleing@15366
   279
  -- "pretty trivial"
kleing@15366
   280
  show True by force
kleing@15366
   281
qed
kleing@15428
   282
text_raw {*    
kleing@15366
   283
  \end{minipage}\end{center}
kleing@15366
   284
  \caption{Example proof in a figure.}\label{fig:proof}
kleing@15366
   285
  \end{figure}
kleing@15366
   286
*}
kleing@15366
   287
text {*
kleing@15366
   288
kleing@15366
   289
\begin{quote}
kleing@15366
   290
\small
kleing@15366
   291
\verb!text_raw {!\verb!*!\\
kleing@15366
   292
\verb!  \begin{figure}!\\
kleing@15366
   293
\verb!  \begin{center}\begin{minipage}{0.6\textwidth}!\\
kleing@15428
   294
\verb!  \isastyle\isamarkuptrue!\\
kleing@15366
   295
\verb!*!\verb!}!\\
kleing@15366
   296
\verb!lemma True!\\
kleing@15366
   297
\verb!proof -!\\
kleing@15366
   298
\verb!  -- "pretty trivial"!\\
kleing@15366
   299
\verb!  show True by force!\\
kleing@15366
   300
\verb!qed!\\
kleing@15366
   301
\verb!text_raw {!\verb!*!\\
kleing@15366
   302
\verb!  \end{minipage}\end{center}!\\
kleing@15366
   303
\verb!  \caption{Example proof in a figure.}\label{fig:proof}!\\
kleing@15366
   304
\verb!  \end{figure}!\\
kleing@15366
   305
\verb!*!\verb!}!
kleing@15366
   306
\end{quote}
kleing@15366
   307
  
nipkow@15342
   308
*}
nipkow@15342
   309
nipkow@16155
   310
section {*Styles\label{sec:styles}*}
haftmann@15917
   311
haftmann@15917
   312
text {*
nipkow@15953
   313
  The \verb!thm! antiquotation works nicely for single theorems, but
haftmann@15917
   314
  sets of equations as used in definitions are more difficult to
haftmann@16040
   315
  typeset nicely: people tend to prefer aligned @{text "="} signs.
haftmann@15917
   316
haftmann@15917
   317
  To deal with such cases where it is desirable to dive into the structure
haftmann@16040
   318
  of terms and theorems, Isabelle offers antiquotations featuring
haftmann@15917
   319
  ``styles'':
haftmann@15917
   320
haftmann@15917
   321
    \begin{quote}
haftmann@15917
   322
    \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style stylename thm}!\\
haftmann@15917
   323
    \verb!@!\verb!{term_style stylename term}!
haftmann@15917
   324
    \end{quote}
haftmann@15917
   325
haftmann@16040
   326
  A ``style'' is a transformation of propositions. There are predefined
haftmann@16167
   327
  styles, namly \verb!lhs! and \verb!rhs!, \verb!prem1! up to \verb!prem9!, and \verb!concl!.
haftmann@16166
   328
  For example, 
kleing@16076
   329
  the output
haftmann@15917
   330
  \begin{center}
haftmann@15917
   331
  \begin{tabular}{l@ {~~@{text "="}~~}l}
haftmann@15917
   332
  @{thm_style lhs foldl_Nil} & @{thm_style rhs foldl_Nil}\\
haftmann@15917
   333
  @{thm_style lhs foldl_Cons} & @{thm_style rhs foldl_Cons}
haftmann@15917
   334
  \end{tabular}
haftmann@15917
   335
  \end{center}
haftmann@15917
   336
  is produced by the following code:
haftmann@15917
   337
  \begin{quote}
haftmann@15917
   338
    \verb!\begin{center}!\\
haftmann@15917
   339
    \verb!\begin{tabular}{l@ {~~!\verb!@!\verb!{text "="}~~}l}!\\
haftmann@15917
   340
    \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style lhs foldl_Nil} & @!\verb!{thm_style rhs foldl_Nil}!\\
haftmann@15917
   341
    \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style lhs foldl_Cons} & @!\verb!{thm_style rhs foldl_Cons}!\\
haftmann@15917
   342
    \verb!\end{tabular}!\\
haftmann@15917
   343
    \verb!\end{center}!
haftmann@15917
   344
  \end{quote}
haftmann@15917
   345
  Note the space between \verb!@! and \verb!{! in the tabular argument.
haftmann@15917
   346
  It prevents Isabelle from interpreting \verb!@ {~~...~~}! 
kleing@16076
   347
  as an antiquotation. The styles \verb!lhs! and \verb!rhs!
haftmann@16040
   348
  extract the left hand side (or right hand side respectivly) from the
kleing@16076
   349
  conclusion of propositions consisting of a binary operator
haftmann@16040
   350
  (e.~g.~@{text "="}, @{text "\<equiv>"}, @{text "<"}).
haftmann@15917
   351
haftmann@16165
   352
  Likewise, \verb!concl! may be used as a style to show just the
kleing@16076
   353
  conclusion of a proposition. For example, take \verb!hd_Cons_tl!:
haftmann@16040
   354
  \begin{center}
haftmann@16040
   355
    @{thm hd_Cons_tl}
haftmann@16040
   356
  \end{center}
haftmann@16040
   357
  To print just the conclusion,
haftmann@15917
   358
  \begin{center}
haftmann@16165
   359
    @{thm_style concl hd_Cons_tl}
haftmann@15917
   360
  \end{center}
haftmann@16040
   361
  type
haftmann@15917
   362
  \begin{quote}
haftmann@15917
   363
    \verb!\begin{center}!\\
haftmann@16165
   364
    \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style concl hd_Cons_tl}!\\
haftmann@15917
   365
    \verb!\end{center}!
haftmann@15917
   366
  \end{quote}
haftmann@15917
   367
haftmann@16166
   368
  Further use cases can be found in \S\ref{sec:yourself}.
haftmann@16166
   369
nipkow@15953
   370
  If you are not afraid of ML, you may also define your own styles.
haftmann@15960
   371
  A style is implemented by an ML function of type
haftmann@15960
   372
  \verb!Proof.context -> term -> term!.
haftmann@15960
   373
  Have a look at the following example:
haftmann@15960
   374
haftmann@16040
   375
*}
nipkow@16075
   376
(*<*)
haftmann@16040
   377
setup {*
haftmann@16040
   378
let
haftmann@16040
   379
  fun my_concl ctxt = Logic.strip_imp_concl
haftmann@16040
   380
  in [TermStyle.add_style "my_concl" my_concl]
haftmann@16040
   381
end;
haftmann@16040
   382
*}
nipkow@16075
   383
(*>*)
haftmann@16040
   384
text {*
haftmann@16040
   385
haftmann@15917
   386
  \begin{quote}
haftmann@15917
   387
    \verb!setup {!\verb!*!\\
haftmann@15917
   388
    \verb!let!\\
haftmann@16040
   389
    \verb!  fun my_concl ctxt = Logic.strip_imp_concl!\\
haftmann@16040
   390
    \verb!  in [TermStyle.add_style "my_concl" my_concl]!\\
haftmann@15917
   391
    \verb!end;!\\
haftmann@15917
   392
    \verb!*!\verb!}!\\
haftmann@15917
   393
  \end{quote}
haftmann@15960
   394
kleing@16076
   395
  \noindent
haftmann@16165
   396
  This example shows how the \verb!concl! style is implemented
kleing@16076
   397
  and may be used as as a ``copy-and-paste'' pattern to write your own styles.
haftmann@15960
   398
kleing@16076
   399
  The code should go into your theory file, separate from the \LaTeX\ text.
haftmann@16040
   400
  The \verb!let! expression avoids polluting the
haftmann@15960
   401
  ML global namespace. Each style receives the current proof context
kleing@16076
   402
  as first argument; this is helpful in situations where the
kleing@16076
   403
  style has some object-logic specific behaviour for example.
haftmann@15960
   404
haftmann@15960
   405
  The mapping from identifier name to the style function
haftmann@16064
   406
  is done by the @{ML_idf TermStyle.add_style} expression which expects the desired
haftmann@15960
   407
  style name and the style function as arguments.
haftmann@15960
   408
  
haftmann@15960
   409
  After this \verb!setup!,
haftmann@16040
   410
  there will be a new style available named \verb!my_concl!, thus allowing
haftmann@16040
   411
  antiquoations like \verb!@!\verb!{thm_style my_concl hd_Cons_tl}!
haftmann@16040
   412
  yielding @{thm_style my_concl hd_Cons_tl}.
haftmann@15917
   413
haftmann@15917
   414
*}
haftmann@15917
   415
nipkow@15337
   416
(*<*)
nipkow@15337
   417
end
nipkow@15337
   418
(*>*)