author | clasohm |
Sun, 24 Apr 1994 11:27:38 +0200 | |
changeset 70 | 9459592608e2 |
parent 66 | 14b9286ed036 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
0 | 1 |
(* Title: HOL/hol.ML |
2 |
ID: $Id$ |
|
3 |
Author: Tobias Nipkow |
|
4 |
Copyright 1991 University of Cambridge |
|
5 |
||
6 |
For hol.thy |
|
7 |
Derived rules from Appendix of Mike Gordons HOL Report, Cambridge TR 68 |
|
8 |
*) |
|
9 |
||
10 |
open HOL; |
|
11 |
||
12 |
signature HOL_LEMMAS = |
|
13 |
sig |
|
14 |
val allE: thm |
|
15 |
val all_dupE: thm |
|
16 |
val allI: thm |
|
17 |
val arg_cong: thm |
|
18 |
val fun_cong: thm |
|
19 |
val box_equals: thm |
|
40 | 20 |
val case_tac: string -> int -> tactic |
0 | 21 |
val ccontr: thm |
22 |
val classical: thm |
|
23 |
val cong: thm |
|
24 |
val conjunct1: thm |
|
25 |
val conjunct2: thm |
|
26 |
val conjE: thm |
|
27 |
val conjI: thm |
|
28 |
val contrapos: thm |
|
29 |
val disjCI: thm |
|
30 |
val disjE: thm |
|
31 |
val disjI1: thm |
|
32 |
val disjI2: thm |
|
33 |
val eqTrueI: thm |
|
34 |
val eqTrueE: thm |
|
35 |
val ex1E: thm |
|
36 |
val ex1I: thm |
|
37 |
val exCI: thm |
|
38 |
val exI: thm |
|
39 |
val exE: thm |
|
40 |
val excluded_middle: thm |
|
41 |
val FalseE: thm |
|
42 |
val False_neq_True: thm |
|
43 |
val iffCE : thm |
|
44 |
val iffD1: thm |
|
45 |
val iffD2: thm |
|
46 |
val iffE: thm |
|
47 |
val iffI: thm |
|
48 |
val impCE: thm |
|
49 |
val impE: thm |
|
50 |
val not_sym: thm |
|
51 |
val notE: thm |
|
52 |
val notI: thm |
|
53 |
val notnotD : thm |
|
54 |
val rev_mp: thm |
|
55 |
val select_equality: thm |
|
56 |
val spec: thm |
|
57 |
val sstac: thm list -> int -> tactic |
|
58 |
val ssubst: thm |
|
59 |
val stac: thm -> int -> tactic |
|
60 |
val strip_tac: int -> tactic |
|
61 |
val swap: thm |
|
62 |
val sym: thm |
|
63 |
val trans: thm |
|
64 |
val TrueI: thm |
|
65 |
end; |
|
66 |
||
67 |
structure HOL_Lemmas : HOL_LEMMAS = |
|
68 |
||
69 |
struct |
|
70 |
||
71 |
(** Equality **) |
|
72 |
||
73 |
val sym = prove_goal HOL.thy "s=t ==> t=s" |
|
74 |
(fn prems => [cut_facts_tac prems 1, etac subst 1, rtac refl 1]); |
|
75 |
||
76 |
(*calling "standard" reduces maxidx to 0*) |
|
77 |
val ssubst = standard (sym RS subst); |
|
78 |
||
79 |
val trans = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| r=s; s=t |] ==> r=t" |
|
80 |
(fn prems => |
|
81 |
[rtac subst 1, resolve_tac prems 1, resolve_tac prems 1]); |
|
82 |
||
83 |
(*Useful with eresolve_tac for proving equalties from known equalities. |
|
84 |
a = b |
|
85 |
| | |
|
86 |
c = d *) |
|
87 |
val box_equals = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
88 |
"[| a=b; a=c; b=d |] ==> c=d" |
|
89 |
(fn prems=> |
|
90 |
[ (rtac trans 1), |
|
91 |
(rtac trans 1), |
|
92 |
(rtac sym 1), |
|
93 |
(REPEAT (resolve_tac prems 1)) ]); |
|
94 |
||
95 |
(** Congruence rules for meta-application **) |
|
96 |
||
97 |
(*similar to AP_THM in Gordon's HOL*) |
|
98 |
val fun_cong = prove_goal HOL.thy "(f::'a=>'b) = g ==> f(x)=g(x)" |
|
99 |
(fn [prem] => [rtac (prem RS subst) 1, rtac refl 1]); |
|
100 |
||
101 |
(*similar to AP_TERM in Gordon's HOL and FOL's subst_context*) |
|
102 |
val arg_cong = prove_goal HOL.thy "x=y ==> f(x)=f(y)" |
|
103 |
(fn [prem] => [rtac (prem RS subst) 1, rtac refl 1]); |
|
104 |
||
105 |
val cong = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
106 |
"[| f = g; x::'a = y |] ==> f(x) = g(y)" |
|
107 |
(fn [prem1,prem2] => |
|
108 |
[rtac (prem1 RS subst) 1, rtac (prem2 RS subst) 1, rtac refl 1]); |
|
109 |
||
110 |
(** Equality of booleans -- iff **) |
|
111 |
||
112 |
val iffI = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
113 |
"[| P ==> Q; Q ==> P |] ==> P=Q" |
|
114 |
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[impI, iff RS mp RS mp]) 1)) ]); |
|
115 |
||
116 |
val iffD2 = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P=Q; Q |] ==> P" |
|
117 |
(fn prems => |
|
118 |
[rtac ssubst 1, resolve_tac prems 1, resolve_tac prems 1]); |
|
119 |
||
120 |
val iffD1 = sym RS iffD2; |
|
121 |
||
122 |
val iffE = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
123 |
"[| P=Q; [| P --> Q; Q --> P |] ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
124 |
(fn [p1,p2] => [REPEAT(ares_tac([p1 RS iffD2, p1 RS iffD1, p2, impI])1)]); |
|
125 |
||
126 |
(** True **) |
|
127 |
||
66 | 128 |
val TrueI = prove_goalw HOL.thy [True_def] "True" |
129 |
(fn _ => [rtac refl 1]); |
|
0 | 130 |
|
131 |
val eqTrueI = prove_goal HOL.thy "P ==> P=True" |
|
132 |
(fn prems => [REPEAT(resolve_tac ([iffI,TrueI]@prems) 1)]); |
|
133 |
||
134 |
val eqTrueE = prove_goal HOL.thy "P=True ==> P" |
|
135 |
(fn prems => [REPEAT(resolve_tac (prems@[TrueI,iffD2]) 1)]); |
|
136 |
||
137 |
(** Universal quantifier **) |
|
138 |
||
66 | 139 |
val allI = prove_goalw HOL.thy [All_def] "(!!x::'a. P(x)) ==> !x. P(x)" |
140 |
(fn prems => [resolve_tac (prems RL [eqTrueI RS ext]) 1]); |
|
0 | 141 |
|
66 | 142 |
val spec = prove_goalw HOL.thy [All_def] "! x::'a.P(x) ==> P(x)" |
143 |
(fn prems => [rtac eqTrueE 1, resolve_tac (prems RL [fun_cong]) 1]); |
|
0 | 144 |
|
145 |
val allE = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| !x.P(x); P(x) ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
146 |
(fn major::prems=> |
|
147 |
[ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems @ [major RS spec]) 1)) ]); |
|
148 |
||
149 |
val all_dupE = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
150 |
"[| ! x.P(x); [| P(x); ! x.P(x) |] ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
151 |
(fn prems => |
|
152 |
[ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems @ (prems RL [spec])) 1)) ]); |
|
153 |
||
154 |
||
155 |
(** False ** Depends upon spec; it is impossible to do propositional logic |
|
156 |
before quantifiers! **) |
|
157 |
||
158 |
val FalseE = prove_goal HOL.thy "False ==> P" |
|
66 | 159 |
(fn prems => [rtac spec 1, fold_tac [False_def], resolve_tac prems 1]); |
0 | 160 |
|
161 |
val False_neq_True = prove_goal HOL.thy "False=True ==> P" |
|
162 |
(fn [prem] => [rtac (prem RS eqTrueE RS FalseE) 1]); |
|
163 |
||
164 |
||
165 |
(** Negation **) |
|
166 |
||
66 | 167 |
val notI = prove_goalw HOL.thy [not_def] "(P ==> False) ==> ~P" |
168 |
(fn prems=> [rtac impI 1, eresolve_tac prems 1]); |
|
0 | 169 |
|
66 | 170 |
val notE = prove_goalw HOL.thy [not_def] "[| ~P; P |] ==> R" |
171 |
(fn prems => [rtac (mp RS FalseE) 1, REPEAT(resolve_tac prems 1)]); |
|
0 | 172 |
|
173 |
(** Implication **) |
|
174 |
||
175 |
val impE = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P-->Q; P; Q ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
176 |
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[mp]) 1)) ]); |
|
177 |
||
178 |
(* Reduces Q to P-->Q, allowing substitution in P. *) |
|
179 |
val rev_mp = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P; P --> Q |] ==> Q" |
|
180 |
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[mp]) 1)) ]); |
|
181 |
||
182 |
val contrapos = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| ~Q; P==>Q |] ==> ~P" |
|
183 |
(fn [major,minor]=> |
|
184 |
[ (rtac (major RS notE RS notI) 1), |
|
185 |
(etac minor 1) ]); |
|
186 |
||
187 |
(* ~(?t = ?s) ==> ~(?s = ?t) *) |
|
188 |
val [not_sym] = compose(sym,2,contrapos); |
|
189 |
||
190 |
||
191 |
(** Existential quantifier **) |
|
192 |
||
66 | 193 |
val exI = prove_goalw HOL.thy [Ex_def] "P(x) ==> ? x::'a.P(x)" |
194 |
(fn prems => [rtac selectI 1, resolve_tac prems 1]); |
|
0 | 195 |
|
66 | 196 |
val exE = prove_goalw HOL.thy [Ex_def] |
197 |
"[| ? x::'a.P(x); !!x. P(x) ==> Q |] ==> Q" |
|
198 |
(fn prems => [REPEAT(resolve_tac prems 1)]); |
|
0 | 199 |
|
200 |
||
201 |
(** Conjunction **) |
|
202 |
||
66 | 203 |
val conjI = prove_goalw HOL.thy [and_def] "[| P; Q |] ==> P&Q" |
0 | 204 |
(fn prems => |
66 | 205 |
[REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[allI,impI]) 1 ORELSE etac (mp RS mp) 1)]); |
0 | 206 |
|
66 | 207 |
val conjunct1 = prove_goalw HOL.thy [and_def] "[| P & Q |] ==> P" |
0 | 208 |
(fn prems => |
66 | 209 |
[resolve_tac (prems RL [spec] RL [mp]) 1, REPEAT(ares_tac [impI] 1)]); |
0 | 210 |
|
66 | 211 |
val conjunct2 = prove_goalw HOL.thy [and_def] "[| P & Q |] ==> Q" |
0 | 212 |
(fn prems => |
66 | 213 |
[resolve_tac (prems RL [spec] RL [mp]) 1, REPEAT(ares_tac [impI] 1)]); |
0 | 214 |
|
215 |
val conjE = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P&Q; [| P; Q |] ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
216 |
(fn prems => |
|
217 |
[cut_facts_tac prems 1, resolve_tac prems 1, |
|
218 |
etac conjunct1 1, etac conjunct2 1]); |
|
219 |
||
220 |
(** Disjunction *) |
|
221 |
||
66 | 222 |
val disjI1 = prove_goalw HOL.thy [or_def] "P ==> P|Q" |
223 |
(fn [prem] => [REPEAT(ares_tac [allI,impI, prem RSN (2,mp)] 1)]); |
|
0 | 224 |
|
66 | 225 |
val disjI2 = prove_goalw HOL.thy [or_def] "Q ==> P|Q" |
226 |
(fn [prem] => [REPEAT(ares_tac [allI,impI, prem RSN (2,mp)] 1)]); |
|
0 | 227 |
|
66 | 228 |
val disjE = prove_goalw HOL.thy [or_def] "[| P | Q; P ==> R; Q ==> R |] ==> R" |
0 | 229 |
(fn [a1,a2,a3] => |
66 | 230 |
[rtac (mp RS mp) 1, rtac spec 1, rtac a1 1, |
0 | 231 |
rtac (a2 RS impI) 1, atac 1, rtac (a3 RS impI) 1, atac 1]); |
232 |
||
233 |
(** CCONTR -- classical logic **) |
|
234 |
||
235 |
val ccontr = prove_goal HOL.thy "(~P ==> False) ==> P" |
|
236 |
(fn prems => |
|
237 |
[rtac (True_or_False RS (disjE RS eqTrueE)) 1, atac 1, |
|
66 | 238 |
rtac spec 1, fold_tac [False_def], resolve_tac prems 1, |
239 |
rtac ssubst 1, atac 1, rewtac not_def, |
|
0 | 240 |
REPEAT (ares_tac [impI] 1) ]); |
241 |
||
66 | 242 |
val ccontr = prove_goalw HOL.thy [not_def] "(~P ==> False) ==> P" |
0 | 243 |
(fn prems => |
66 | 244 |
[rtac (True_or_False RS (disjE RS eqTrueE)) 1, atac 1, |
245 |
rtac spec 1, fold_tac [False_def], resolve_tac prems 1, |
|
246 |
rtac ssubst 1, atac 1, REPEAT (ares_tac [impI] 1) ]); |
|
247 |
||
248 |
val classical = prove_goal HOL.thy "(~P ==> P) ==> P" |
|
249 |
(fn prems => [rtac ccontr 1, REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[notE]) 1)]); |
|
0 | 250 |
|
251 |
||
252 |
(*Double negation law*) |
|
253 |
val notnotD = prove_goal HOL.thy "~~P ==> P" |
|
254 |
(fn [major]=> |
|
255 |
[ (rtac classical 1), (eresolve_tac [major RS notE] 1) ]); |
|
256 |
||
257 |
||
258 |
(** Unique existence **) |
|
259 |
||
66 | 260 |
val ex1I = prove_goalw HOL.thy [Ex1_def] |
0 | 261 |
"[| P(a); !!x. P(x) ==> x=a |] ==> ?! x. P(x)" |
262 |
(fn prems => |
|
66 | 263 |
[REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[exI,conjI,allI,impI]) 1)]); |
0 | 264 |
|
66 | 265 |
val ex1E = prove_goalw HOL.thy [Ex1_def] |
0 | 266 |
"[| ?! x.P(x); !!x. [| P(x); ! y. P(y) --> y=x |] ==> R |] ==> R" |
267 |
(fn major::prems => |
|
66 | 268 |
[rtac (major RS exE) 1, REPEAT (etac conjE 1 ORELSE ares_tac prems 1)]); |
0 | 269 |
|
270 |
||
271 |
(** Select: Hilbert's Epsilon-operator **) |
|
272 |
||
273 |
val select_equality = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
274 |
"[| P(a); !!x. P(x) ==> x=a |] ==> (@x.P(x)) = a" |
|
275 |
(fn prems => [ resolve_tac prems 1, |
|
276 |
rtac selectI 1, |
|
277 |
resolve_tac prems 1 ]); |
|
278 |
||
279 |
(** Classical intro rules for disjunction and existential quantifiers *) |
|
280 |
||
281 |
val disjCI = prove_goal HOL.thy "(~Q ==> P) ==> P|Q" |
|
282 |
(fn prems=> |
|
283 |
[ (rtac classical 1), |
|
284 |
(REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[disjI1,notI]) 1)), |
|
285 |
(REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[disjI2,notE]) 1)) ]); |
|
286 |
||
287 |
val excluded_middle = prove_goal HOL.thy "~P | P" |
|
288 |
(fn _ => [ (REPEAT (ares_tac [disjCI] 1)) ]); |
|
289 |
||
290 |
(*Classical implies (-->) elimination. *) |
|
291 |
val impCE = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P-->Q; ~P ==> R; Q ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
292 |
(fn major::prems=> |
|
293 |
[ rtac (excluded_middle RS disjE) 1, |
|
294 |
REPEAT (DEPTH_SOLVE_1 (ares_tac (prems @ [major RS mp]) 1))]); |
|
295 |
||
296 |
(*Classical <-> elimination. *) |
|
297 |
val iffCE = prove_goal HOL.thy |
|
298 |
"[| P=Q; [| P; Q |] ==> R; [| ~P; ~Q |] ==> R |] ==> R" |
|
299 |
(fn major::prems => |
|
300 |
[ (rtac (major RS iffE) 1), |
|
301 |
(REPEAT (DEPTH_SOLVE_1 |
|
302 |
(eresolve_tac ([asm_rl,impCE,notE]@prems) 1))) ]); |
|
303 |
||
304 |
val exCI = prove_goal HOL.thy "(! x. ~P(x) ==> P(a)) ==> ? x.P(x)" |
|
305 |
(fn prems=> |
|
306 |
[ (rtac ccontr 1), |
|
307 |
(REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[exI,allI,notI,notE]) 1)) ]); |
|
308 |
||
309 |
(*Required by the "classical" module*) |
|
310 |
val swap = prove_goal HOL.thy "~P ==> (~Q ==> P) ==> Q" |
|
311 |
(fn major::prems=> |
|
312 |
[ rtac ccontr 1, rtac (major RS notE) 1, REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)]); |
|
313 |
||
40 | 314 |
(* case distinction *) |
315 |
||
316 |
val case_split_thm = prove_goal HOL.thy "[| P ==> Q; ~P ==> Q |] ==> Q" |
|
317 |
(fn [p1,p2] => [cut_facts_tac [excluded_middle] 1, etac disjE 1, |
|
318 |
etac p2 1, etac p1 1]); |
|
319 |
||
320 |
fun case_tac a = res_inst_tac [("P",a)] case_split_thm; |
|
321 |
||
0 | 322 |
(** Standard abbreviations **) |
323 |
||
324 |
fun stac th = rtac(th RS ssubst); |
|
325 |
fun sstac ths = EVERY' (map stac ths); |
|
326 |
fun strip_tac i = REPEAT(resolve_tac [impI,allI] i); |
|
327 |
||
48
21291189b51e
changed "." to "$" and Cons to infix "#" to eliminate ambiguity
clasohm
parents:
40
diff
changeset
|
328 |
|
0 | 329 |
end; |
330 |
||
331 |
open HOL_Lemmas; |