diff -r 000000000000 -r 7949f97df77a ex/meson-test.ML
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/ex/meson-test.ML	Thu Sep 16 12:21:07 1993 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+(*  Title: 	HOL/ex/meson
+    ID:         $Id$
+    Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+    Copyright   1992  University of Cambridge
+
+Test data for the MESON proof procedure
+   (Excludes the equality problems 51, 52, 56, 58)
+
+show_hyps:=false;
+
+by (rtac ccontr 1);
+val [prem] = gethyps 1;
+val nnf = make_nnf prem;
+val xsko = skolemize nnf;
+by (cut_facts_tac [xsko] 1 THEN REPEAT (etac exE 1));
+val [_,sko] = gethyps 1;
+val clauses = make_clauses [sko];	
+val horns = make_horns clauses;
+val go::_ = neg_clauses clauses;
+
+goal HOL.thy "False";
+by (rtac (make_goal go) 1);
+by (prolog_step_tac horns 1);
+by (depth_prolog_tac horns);
+by (best_prolog_tac size_of_subgoals horns);
+*)
+
+writeln"File HOL/ex/meson-test.";
+
+(**** Interactive examples ****)
+
+(*Generate nice names for Skolem functions*)
+Logic.auto_rename := true; Logic.set_rename_prefix "a";
+
+
+writeln"Problem 25";
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. P(x)) &  \
+\       (! x. L(x) --> ~ (M(x) & R(x))) &  \
+\       (! x. P(x) --> (M(x) & L(x))) &   \
+\       ((! x. P(x)-->Q(x)) | (? x. P(x)&R(x)))  \
+\   --> (? x. Q(x)&P(x))";
+by (rtac ccontr 1);
+val [prem25] = gethyps 1;
+val nnf25 = make_nnf prem25;
+val xsko25 = skolemize nnf25;
+by (cut_facts_tac [xsko25] 1 THEN REPEAT (etac exE 1));
+val [_,sko25] = gethyps 1;
+val clauses25 = make_clauses [sko25];	(*7 clauses*)
+val horns25 = make_horns clauses25;	(*16 Horn clauses*)
+val go25::_ = neg_clauses clauses25;
+
+goal HOL.thy "False";
+by (rtac (make_goal go25) 1);
+by (depth_prolog_tac horns25);
+
+
+writeln"Problem 26";
+goal HOL.thy "((? x. p(x)) = (? x. q(x))) &	\
+\     (! x. ! y. p(x) & q(y) --> (r(x) = s(y)))	\
+\ --> ((! x. p(x)-->r(x)) = (! x. q(x)-->s(x)))";
+by (rtac ccontr 1);
+val [prem26] = gethyps 1;
+val nnf26 = make_nnf prem26;
+val xsko26 = skolemize nnf26;
+by (cut_facts_tac [xsko26] 1 THEN REPEAT (etac exE 1));
+val [_,sko26] = gethyps 1;
+val clauses26 = make_clauses [sko26];			(*9 clauses*)
+val horns26 = make_horns clauses26;			(*24 Horn clauses*)
+val go26::_ = neg_clauses clauses26;
+
+goal HOL.thy "False";
+by (rtac (make_goal go26) 1);
+by (depth_prolog_tac horns26);	(*6 secs*)
+
+
+
+writeln"Problem 43  NOW PROVED AUTOMATICALLY!!";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. ! y. q(x,y) = (! z. p(z,x) = p(z,y)::bool))	\
+\         --> (! x. (! y. q(x,y) = q(y,x)::bool))";
+by (rtac ccontr 1);
+val [prem43] = gethyps 1;
+val nnf43 = make_nnf prem43;
+val xsko43 = skolemize nnf43;
+by (cut_facts_tac [xsko43] 1 THEN REPEAT (etac exE 1));
+val [_,sko43] = gethyps 1;
+val clauses43 = make_clauses [sko43];	(*6*)
+val horns43 = make_horns clauses43;	(*16*)
+val go43::_ = neg_clauses clauses43;
+
+goal HOL.thy "False";
+by (rtac (make_goal go43) 1);
+by (best_prolog_tac size_of_subgoals horns43);
+(*8.7 secs*)
+
+
+(*Restore variable name preservation*)
+Logic.auto_rename := false; 
+
+
+(**** Batch test data ****)
+
+(*Sample problems from 
+  F. J. Pelletier, 
+  Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers,
+  J. Automated Reasoning 2 (1986), 191-216.
+  Errata, JAR 4 (1988), 236-236.
+
+The hardest problems -- judging by experience with several theorem provers,
+including matrix ones -- are 34 and 43.
+*)
+
+writeln"Pelletier's examples";
+(*1*)
+goal HOL.thy "(P-->Q)  =  (~Q --> ~P)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*2*)
+goal HOL.thy "(~ ~ P) =  P";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*3*)
+goal HOL.thy "~(P-->Q) --> (Q-->P)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*4*)
+goal HOL.thy "(~P-->Q)  =  (~Q --> P)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*5*)
+goal HOL.thy "((P|Q)-->(P|R)) --> (P|(Q-->R))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*6*)
+goal HOL.thy "P | ~ P";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*7*)
+goal HOL.thy "P | ~ ~ ~ P";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*8.  Peirce's law*)
+goal HOL.thy "((P-->Q) --> P)  -->  P";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*9*)
+goal HOL.thy "((P|Q) & (~P|Q) & (P| ~Q)) --> ~ (~P | ~Q)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*10*)
+goal HOL.thy "(Q-->R) & (R-->P&Q) & (P-->Q|R) --> (P=Q)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*11.  Proved in each direction (incorrectly, says Pelletier!!)  *)
+goal HOL.thy "P=P::bool";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*12.  "Dijkstra's law"*)
+goal HOL.thy "((P = Q) = R) = (P = (Q = R))";
+by (best_meson_tac size_of_subgoals 1);
+result();
+
+(*13.  Distributive law*)
+goal HOL.thy "(P | (Q & R)) = ((P | Q) & (P | R))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*14*)
+goal HOL.thy "(P = Q) = ((Q | ~P) & (~Q|P))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*15*)
+goal HOL.thy "(P --> Q) = (~P | Q)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*16*)
+goal HOL.thy "(P-->Q) | (Q-->P)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*17*)
+goal HOL.thy "((P & (Q-->R))-->S)  =  ((~P | Q | S) & (~P | ~R | S))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Classical Logic: examples with quantifiers";
+
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x) & Q(x)) = ((! x. P(x)) & (! x. Q(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. P-->Q(x))  =  (P --> (? x.Q(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal HOL.thy "(? x.P(x)-->Q) = ((! x.P(x)) --> Q)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal HOL.thy "((! x.P(x)) | Q)  =  (! x. P(x) | Q)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result(); 
+
+writeln"Testing the complete tactic";
+
+(*Not provable by pc_tac: needs multiple instantiation of !.
+  Could be proved trivially by a PROLOG interpreter*)
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x)-->P(f(x)))  &  P(d)-->P(f(f(f(d))))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+(*Not provable by pc_tac: needs double instantiation of EXISTS*)
+goal HOL.thy "? x. P(x) --> P(a) & P(b)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+goal HOL.thy "? z. P(z) --> (! x. P(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Hard examples with quantifiers";
+
+writeln"Problem 18";
+goal HOL.thy "? y. ! x. P(y)-->P(x)";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result(); 
+
+writeln"Problem 19";
+goal HOL.thy "? x. ! y z. (P(y)-->Q(z)) --> (P(x)-->Q(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 20";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x y. ? z. ! w. (P(x)&Q(y)-->R(z)&S(w)))     \
+\   --> (? x y. P(x) & Q(y)) --> (? z. R(z))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 21";
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. P-->Q(x)) & (? x. Q(x)-->P) --> (? x. P=Q(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 22";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P = Q(x))  -->  (P = (! x. Q(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 23";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P | Q(x))  =  (P | (! x. Q(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 24";
+goal HOL.thy "~(? x. S(x)&Q(x)) & (! x. P(x) --> Q(x)|R(x)) &  \
+\    ~(? x.P(x)) --> (? x.Q(x)) & (! x. Q(x)|R(x) --> S(x))  \
+\   --> (? x. P(x)&R(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 25";
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. P(x)) &  \
+\       (! x. L(x) --> ~ (M(x) & R(x))) &  \
+\       (! x. P(x) --> (M(x) & L(x))) &   \
+\       ((! x. P(x)-->Q(x)) | (? x. P(x)&R(x)))  \
+\   --> (? x. Q(x)&P(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 26";
+goal HOL.thy "((? x. p(x)) = (? x. q(x))) &	\
+\     (! x. ! y. p(x) & q(y) --> (r(x) = s(y)))	\
+\ --> ((! x. p(x)-->r(x)) = (! x. q(x)-->s(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 27";
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. P(x) & ~Q(x)) &   \
+\             (! x. P(x) --> R(x)) &   \
+\             (! x. M(x) & L(x) --> P(x)) &   \
+\             ((? x. R(x) & ~ Q(x)) --> (! x. L(x) --> ~ R(x)))  \
+\         --> (! x. M(x) --> ~L(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 28.  AMENDED";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x) --> (! x. Q(x))) &   \
+\       ((! x. Q(x)|R(x)) --> (? x. Q(x)&S(x))) &  \
+\       ((? x.S(x)) --> (! x. L(x) --> M(x)))  \
+\   --> (! x. P(x) & L(x) --> M(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 29.  Essentially the same as Principia Mathematica *11.71";
+goal HOL.thy "(? x. F(x)) & (? y. G(y))  \
+\   --> ( ((! x. F(x)-->H(x)) & (! y. G(y)-->J(y)))  =   \
+\         (! x y. F(x) & G(y) --> H(x) & J(y)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);		(*5 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 30";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x) | Q(x) --> ~ R(x)) & \
+\       (! x. (Q(x) --> ~ S(x)) --> P(x) & R(x))  \
+\   --> (! x. S(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 31";
+goal HOL.thy "~(? x.P(x) & (Q(x) | R(x))) & \
+\       (? x. L(x) & P(x)) & \
+\       (! x. ~ R(x) --> M(x))  \
+\   --> (? x. L(x) & M(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 32";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x) & (Q(x)|R(x))-->S(x)) & \
+\       (! x. S(x) & R(x) --> L(x)) & \
+\       (! x. M(x) --> R(x))  \
+\   --> (! x. P(x) & M(x) --> L(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 33";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(a) & (P(x)-->P(b))-->P(c))  =    \
+\    (! x. (~P(a) | P(x) | P(c)) & (~P(a) | ~P(b) | P(c)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);		(*5.6 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 34  AMENDED (TWICE!!)";
+(*Andrews's challenge*)
+goal HOL.thy "((? x. ! y. p(x) = p(y))  =		\
+\              ((? x. q(x)) = (! y. p(y))))     =	\
+\             ((? x. ! y. q(x) = q(y))  =		\
+\              ((? x. p(x)) = (! y. q(y))))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);  	(*90 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 35";
+goal HOL.thy "? x y. P(x,y) -->  (! u v. P(u,v))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 36";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. ? y. J(x,y)) & \
+\       (! x. ? y. G(x,y)) & \
+\       (! x y. J(x,y) | G(x,y) -->	\
+\       (! z. J(y,z) | G(y,z) --> H(x,z)))   \
+\   --> (! x. ? y. H(x,y))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 37";
+goal HOL.thy "(! z. ? w. ! x. ? y. \
+\          (P(x,z)-->P(y,w)) & P(y,z) & (P(y,w) --> (? u.Q(u,w)))) & \
+\       (! x z. ~P(x,z) --> (? y. Q(y,z))) & \
+\       ((? x y. Q(x,y)) --> (! x. R(x,x)))  \
+\   --> (! x. ? y. R(x,y))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);   (*causes unification tracing messages*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 38";
+goal HOL.thy
+    "(! x. p(a) & (p(x) --> (? y. p(y) & r(x,y))) -->		\
+\          (? z. ? w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z)))  =			\
+\    (! x. (~p(a) | p(x) | (? z. ? w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z))) &	\
+\          (~p(a) | ~(? y. p(y) & r(x,y)) |				\
+\           (? z. ? w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z))))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);		(*62 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 39";
+goal HOL.thy "~ (? x. ! y. F(y,x) = (~F(y,y)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 40.  AMENDED";
+goal HOL.thy "(? y. ! x. F(x,y) = F(x,x))  \
+\       -->  ~ (! x. ? y. ! z. F(z,y) = (~F(z,x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 41";
+goal HOL.thy "(! z. (? y. (! x. f(x,y) = (f(x,z) & ~ f(x,x)))))	\
+\              --> ~ (? z. ! x. f(x,z))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 42";
+goal HOL.thy "~ (? y. ! x. p(x,y) = (~ (? z. p(x,z) & p(z,x))))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 43  NOW PROVED AUTOMATICALLY!!";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. ! y. q(x,y) = (! z. p(z,x) = p(z,y)::bool))	\
+\         --> (! x. (! y. q(x,y) = q(y,x)::bool))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 44";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. f(x) -->					\
+\             (? y. g(y) & h(x,y) & (? y. g(y) & ~ h(x,y))))  &   	\
+\             (? x. j(x) & (! y. g(y) --> h(x,y)))			\
+\             --> (? x. j(x) & ~f(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 45";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. f(x) & (! y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> j(x,y))	\
+\                     --> (! y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> k(y))) &	\
+\     ~ (? y. l(y) & k(y)) &					\
+\     (? x. f(x) & (! y. h(x,y) --> l(y))			\
+\                  & (! y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> j(x,y)))		\
+\     --> (? x. f(x) & ~ (? y. g(y) & h(x,y)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);  	(*11 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 46";
+goal HOL.thy
+    "(! x. f(x) & (! y. f(y) & h(y,x) --> g(y)) --> g(x)) &	\
+\    ((? x.f(x) & ~g(x)) -->					\
+\     (? x. f(x) & ~g(x) & (! y. f(y) & ~g(y) --> j(x,y)))) &	\
+\    (! x y. f(x) & f(y) & h(x,y) --> ~j(y,x))			\
+\     --> (! x. f(x) --> g(x))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1); 		(*11 secs*)
+result();
+
+(* Example suggested by Johannes Schumann and credited to Pelletier *)
+goal HOL.thy "(!x y z. P(x,y) --> P(y,z) --> P(x,z)) --> \
+\	(!x y z. Q(x,y) --> Q(y,z) --> Q(x,z)) --> \
+\	(!x y.Q(x,y) --> Q(y,x)) -->  (!x y. P(x,y) | Q(x,y)) --> \
+\	(!x y.P(x,y)) | (!x y.Q(x,y))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);		(*32 secs*)
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 50";  
+(*What has this to do with equality?*)
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(a,x) | (! y.P(x,y))) --> (? x. ! y.P(x,y))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 55";
+
+(*Non-equational version, from Manthey and Bry, CADE-9 (Springer, 1988).
+  meson_tac cannot report who killed Agatha. *)
+goal HOL.thy "lives(agatha) & lives(butler) & lives(charles) & \
+\  (killed(agatha,agatha) | killed(butler,agatha) | killed(charles,agatha)) & \
+\  (!x y. killed(x,y) --> hates(x,y) & ~richer(x,y)) & \
+\  (!x. hates(agatha,x) --> ~hates(charles,x)) & \
+\  (hates(agatha,agatha) & hates(agatha,charles)) & \
+\  (!x. lives(x) & ~richer(x,agatha) --> hates(butler,x)) & \
+\  (!x. hates(agatha,x) --> hates(butler,x)) & \
+\  (!x. ~hates(x,agatha) | ~hates(x,butler) | ~hates(x,charles)) --> \
+\  (? x. killed(x,agatha))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 57";
+goal HOL.thy
+    "P(f(a,b), f(b,c)) & P(f(b,c), f(a,c)) & \
+\    (! x y z. P(x,y) & P(y,z) --> P(x,z))    -->   P(f(a,b), f(a,c))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 58";
+(* Challenge found on info-hol *)
+goal HOL.thy
+    "! P Q R x. ? v w. ! y z. P(x) & Q(y) --> (P(v) | R(w)) & (R(z) --> Q(v))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 59";
+goal HOL.thy "(! x. P(x) = (~P(f(x)))) --> (? x. P(x) & ~P(f(x)))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 60";
+goal HOL.thy "! x. P(x,f(x)) = (? y. (! z. P(z,y) --> P(z,f(x))) & P(x,y))";
+by (safe_meson_tac 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Reached end of file.";
+
+(*26 August 1992: loaded in 277 secs.  New Jersey v 75*)