author  nipkow 
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:36:04 +0100  
changeset 30649  57753e0ec1d4 
parent 30082  43c5b7bfc791 
child 31017  2c227493ea56 
permissions  rwrr 
10751  1 
(* Title : Series.thy 
2 
Author : Jacques D. Fleuriot 

3 
Copyright : 1998 University of Cambridge 

14416  4 

5 
Converted to Isar and polished by lcp 

15539  6 
Converted to setsum and polished yet more by TNN 
16819  7 
Additional contributions by Jeremy Avigad 
10751  8 
*) 
9 

14416  10 
header{*Finite Summation and Infinite Series*} 
10751  11 

15131  12 
theory Series 
29197
6d4cb27ed19c
adapted HOL source structure to distribution layout
haftmann
parents:
28952
diff
changeset

13 
imports SEQ 
15131  14 
begin 
15561  15 

19765  16 
definition 
20692  17 
sums :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool" 
21404
eb85850d3eb7
more robust syntax for definition/abbreviation/notation;
wenzelm
parents:
21141
diff
changeset

18 
(infixr "sums" 80) where 
19765  19 
"f sums s = (%n. setsum f {0..<n}) > s" 
10751  20 

21404
eb85850d3eb7
more robust syntax for definition/abbreviation/notation;
wenzelm
parents:
21141
diff
changeset

21 
definition 
eb85850d3eb7
more robust syntax for definition/abbreviation/notation;
wenzelm
parents:
21141
diff
changeset

22 
summable :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector) \<Rightarrow> bool" where 
19765  23 
"summable f = (\<exists>s. f sums s)" 
14416  24 

21404
eb85850d3eb7
more robust syntax for definition/abbreviation/notation;
wenzelm
parents:
21141
diff
changeset

25 
definition 
eb85850d3eb7
more robust syntax for definition/abbreviation/notation;
wenzelm
parents:
21141
diff
changeset

26 
suminf :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector) \<Rightarrow> 'a" where 
20688  27 
"suminf f = (THE s. f sums s)" 
14416  28 

15546  29 
syntax 
20692  30 
"_suminf" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a" ("\<Sum>_. _" [0, 10] 10) 
15546  31 
translations 
20770  32 
"\<Sum>i. b" == "CONST suminf (%i. b)" 
15546  33 

14416  34 

15539  35 
lemma sumr_diff_mult_const: 
36 
"setsum f {0..<n}  (real n*r) = setsum (%i. f i  r) {0..<n::nat}" 

15536  37 
by (simp add: diff_minus setsum_addf real_of_nat_def) 
38 

15542  39 
lemma real_setsum_nat_ivl_bounded: 
40 
"(!!p. p < n \<Longrightarrow> f(p) \<le> K) 

41 
\<Longrightarrow> setsum f {0..<n::nat} \<le> real n * K" 

42 
using setsum_bounded[where A = "{0..<n}"] 

43 
by (auto simp:real_of_nat_def) 

14416  44 

15539  45 
(* Generalize from real to some algebraic structure? *) 
46 
lemma sumr_minus_one_realpow_zero [simp]: 

15543  47 
"(\<Sum>i=0..<2*n. (1) ^ Suc i) = (0::real)" 
15251  48 
by (induct "n", auto) 
14416  49 

15539  50 
(* FIXME this is an awful lemma! *) 
51 
lemma sumr_one_lb_realpow_zero [simp]: 

52 
"(\<Sum>n=Suc 0..<n. f(n) * (0::real) ^ n) = 0" 

20692  53 
by (rule setsum_0', simp) 
14416  54 

15543  55 
lemma sumr_group: 
15539  56 
"(\<Sum>m=0..<n::nat. setsum f {m * k ..< m*k + k}) = setsum f {0 ..< n * k}" 
15543  57 
apply (subgoal_tac "k = 0  0 < k", auto) 
15251  58 
apply (induct "n") 
15539  59 
apply (simp_all add: setsum_add_nat_ivl add_commute) 
14416  60 
done 
15539  61 

20692  62 
lemma sumr_offset3: 
63 
"setsum f {0::nat..<n+k} = (\<Sum>m=0..<n. f (m+k)) + setsum f {0..<k}" 

64 
apply (subst setsum_shift_bounds_nat_ivl [symmetric]) 

65 
apply (simp add: setsum_add_nat_ivl add_commute) 

66 
done 

67 

16819  68 
lemma sumr_offset: 
20692  69 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ab_group_add" 
70 
shows "(\<Sum>m=0..<n. f(m+k)) = setsum f {0..<n+k}  setsum f {0..<k}" 

71 
by (simp add: sumr_offset3) 

16819  72 

73 
lemma sumr_offset2: 

74 
"\<forall>f. (\<Sum>m=0..<n::nat. f(m+k)::real) = setsum f {0..<n+k}  setsum f {0..<k}" 

20692  75 
by (simp add: sumr_offset) 
16819  76 

77 
lemma sumr_offset4: 

20692  78 
"\<forall>n f. setsum f {0::nat..<n+k} = (\<Sum>m=0..<n. f (m+k)::real) + setsum f {0..<k}" 
79 
by (clarify, rule sumr_offset3) 

16819  80 

81 
(* 

82 
lemma sumr_from_1_from_0: "0 < n ==> 

83 
(\<Sum>n=Suc 0 ..< Suc n. if even(n) then 0 else 

84 
(( 1) ^ ((n  (Suc 0)) div 2))/(real (fact n))) * a ^ n = 

85 
(\<Sum>n=0..<Suc n. if even(n) then 0 else 

86 
(( 1) ^ ((n  (Suc 0)) div 2))/(real (fact n))) * a ^ n" 

87 
by (rule_tac n1 = 1 in sumr_split_add [THEN subst], auto) 

88 
*) 

14416  89 

90 
subsection{* Infinite Sums, by the Properties of Limits*} 

91 

92 
(* 

93 
suminf is the sum 

94 
*) 

95 
lemma sums_summable: "f sums l ==> summable f" 

96 
by (simp add: sums_def summable_def, blast) 

97 

98 
lemma summable_sums: "summable f ==> f sums (suminf f)" 

20688  99 
apply (simp add: summable_def suminf_def sums_def) 
100 
apply (blast intro: theI LIMSEQ_unique) 

14416  101 
done 
102 

103 
lemma summable_sumr_LIMSEQ_suminf: 

15539  104 
"summable f ==> (%n. setsum f {0..<n}) > (suminf f)" 
20688  105 
by (rule summable_sums [unfolded sums_def]) 
14416  106 

107 
(* 

108 
sum is unique 

109 
*) 

110 
lemma sums_unique: "f sums s ==> (s = suminf f)" 

111 
apply (frule sums_summable [THEN summable_sums]) 

112 
apply (auto intro!: LIMSEQ_unique simp add: sums_def) 

113 
done 

114 

16819  115 
lemma sums_split_initial_segment: "f sums s ==> 
116 
(%n. f(n + k)) sums (s  (SUM i = 0..< k. f i))" 

117 
apply (unfold sums_def); 

118 
apply (simp add: sumr_offset); 

119 
apply (rule LIMSEQ_diff_const) 

120 
apply (rule LIMSEQ_ignore_initial_segment) 

121 
apply assumption 

122 
done 

123 

124 
lemma summable_ignore_initial_segment: "summable f ==> 

125 
summable (%n. f(n + k))" 

126 
apply (unfold summable_def) 

127 
apply (auto intro: sums_split_initial_segment) 

128 
done 

129 

130 
lemma suminf_minus_initial_segment: "summable f ==> 

131 
suminf f = s ==> suminf (%n. f(n + k)) = s  (SUM i = 0..< k. f i)" 

132 
apply (frule summable_ignore_initial_segment) 

133 
apply (rule sums_unique [THEN sym]) 

134 
apply (frule summable_sums) 

135 
apply (rule sums_split_initial_segment) 

136 
apply auto 

137 
done 

138 

139 
lemma suminf_split_initial_segment: "summable f ==> 

140 
suminf f = (SUM i = 0..< k. f i) + suminf (%n. f(n + k))" 

141 
by (auto simp add: suminf_minus_initial_segment) 

142 

29803
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

143 
lemma suminf_exist_split: fixes r :: real assumes "0 < r" and "summable a" 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

144 
shows "\<exists> N. \<forall> n \<ge> N. \<bar> \<Sum> i. a (i + n) \<bar> < r" 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

145 
proof  
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

146 
from LIMSEQ_D[OF summable_sumr_LIMSEQ_suminf[OF `summable a`] `0 < r`] 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

147 
obtain N :: nat where "\<forall> n \<ge> N. norm (setsum a {0..<n}  suminf a) < r" by auto 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

148 
thus ?thesis unfolding suminf_minus_initial_segment[OF `summable a` refl] abs_minus_commute real_norm_def 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

149 
by auto 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

150 
qed 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

151 

c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

152 
lemma sums_Suc: assumes sumSuc: "(\<lambda> n. f (Suc n)) sums l" shows "f sums (l + f 0)" 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

153 
proof  
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

154 
from sumSuc[unfolded sums_def] 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

155 
have "(\<lambda>i. \<Sum>n = Suc 0..<Suc i. f n) > l" unfolding setsum_reindex[OF inj_Suc] image_Suc_atLeastLessThan[symmetric] comp_def . 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

156 
from LIMSEQ_add_const[OF this, where b="f 0"] 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

157 
have "(\<lambda>i. \<Sum>n = 0..<Suc i. f n) > l + f 0" unfolding add_commute setsum_head_upt_Suc[OF zero_less_Suc] . 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

158 
thus ?thesis unfolding sums_def by (rule LIMSEQ_imp_Suc) 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

159 
qed 
c56a5571f60a
Added derivation lemmas for power series and theorems for the pi, arcus tangens and logarithm series
hoelzl
parents:
29197
diff
changeset

160 

14416  161 
lemma series_zero: 
15539  162 
"(\<forall>m. n \<le> m > f(m) = 0) ==> f sums (setsum f {0..<n})" 
15537  163 
apply (simp add: sums_def LIMSEQ_def diff_minus[symmetric], safe) 
14416  164 
apply (rule_tac x = n in exI) 
15542  165 
apply (clarsimp simp add:setsum_diff[symmetric] cong:setsum_ivl_cong) 
14416  166 
done 
167 

23121  168 
lemma sums_zero: "(\<lambda>n. 0) sums 0" 
169 
unfolding sums_def by (simp add: LIMSEQ_const) 

15539  170 

23121  171 
lemma summable_zero: "summable (\<lambda>n. 0)" 
172 
by (rule sums_zero [THEN sums_summable]) 

16819  173 

23121  174 
lemma suminf_zero: "suminf (\<lambda>n. 0) = 0" 
175 
by (rule sums_zero [THEN sums_unique, symmetric]) 

16819  176 

23119  177 
lemma (in bounded_linear) sums: 
178 
"(\<lambda>n. X n) sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f (X n)) sums (f a)" 

179 
unfolding sums_def by (drule LIMSEQ, simp only: setsum) 

180 

181 
lemma (in bounded_linear) summable: 

182 
"summable (\<lambda>n. X n) \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f (X n))" 

183 
unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums) 

184 

185 
lemma (in bounded_linear) suminf: 

186 
"summable (\<lambda>n. X n) \<Longrightarrow> f (\<Sum>n. X n) = (\<Sum>n. f (X n))" 

23121  187 
by (intro sums_unique sums summable_sums) 
23119  188 

20692  189 
lemma sums_mult: 
190 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

191 
shows "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. c * f n) sums (c * a)" 

23127  192 
by (rule mult_right.sums) 
14416  193 

20692  194 
lemma summable_mult: 
195 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

23121  196 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (%n. c * f n)" 
23127  197 
by (rule mult_right.summable) 
16819  198 

20692  199 
lemma suminf_mult: 
200 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

201 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf (\<lambda>n. c * f n) = c * suminf f"; 

23127  202 
by (rule mult_right.suminf [symmetric]) 
16819  203 

20692  204 
lemma sums_mult2: 
205 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

206 
shows "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n * c) sums (a * c)" 

23127  207 
by (rule mult_left.sums) 
16819  208 

20692  209 
lemma summable_mult2: 
210 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

211 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n * c)" 

23127  212 
by (rule mult_left.summable) 
16819  213 

20692  214 
lemma suminf_mult2: 
215 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_algebra" 

216 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf f * c = (\<Sum>n. f n * c)" 

23127  217 
by (rule mult_left.suminf) 
16819  218 

20692  219 
lemma sums_divide: 
220 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_field" 

221 
shows "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n / c) sums (a / c)" 

23127  222 
by (rule divide.sums) 
14416  223 

20692  224 
lemma summable_divide: 
225 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_field" 

226 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n / c)" 

23127  227 
by (rule divide.summable) 
16819  228 

20692  229 
lemma suminf_divide: 
230 
fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_field" 

231 
shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf (\<lambda>n. f n / c) = suminf f / c" 

23127  232 
by (rule divide.suminf [symmetric]) 
16819  233 

23121  234 
lemma sums_add: "\<lbrakk>X sums a; Y sums b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n) sums (a + b)" 
235 
unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum_addf LIMSEQ_add) 

16819  236 

23121  237 
lemma summable_add: "\<lbrakk>summable X; summable Y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. X n + Y n)" 
238 
unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_add) 

16819  239 

240 
lemma suminf_add: 

23121  241 
"\<lbrakk>summable X; summable Y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> suminf X + suminf Y = (\<Sum>n. X n + Y n)" 
242 
by (intro sums_unique sums_add summable_sums) 

14416  243 

23121  244 
lemma sums_diff: "\<lbrakk>X sums a; Y sums b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. X n  Y n) sums (a  b)" 
245 
unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum_subtractf LIMSEQ_diff) 

246 

247 
lemma summable_diff: "\<lbrakk>summable X; summable Y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. X n  Y n)" 

248 
unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_diff) 

14416  249 

250 
lemma suminf_diff: 

23121  251 
"\<lbrakk>summable X; summable Y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> suminf X  suminf Y = (\<Sum>n. X n  Y n)" 
252 
by (intro sums_unique sums_diff summable_sums) 

14416  253 

23121  254 
lemma sums_minus: "X sums a ==> (\<lambda>n.  X n) sums ( a)" 
255 
unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum_negf LIMSEQ_minus) 

16819  256 

23121  257 
lemma summable_minus: "summable X \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n.  X n)" 
258 
unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_minus) 

16819  259 

23121  260 
lemma suminf_minus: "summable X \<Longrightarrow> (\<Sum>n.  X n) =  (\<Sum>n. X n)" 
261 
by (intro sums_unique [symmetric] sums_minus summable_sums) 

14416  262 

263 
lemma sums_group: 

15539  264 
"[summable f; 0 < k ] ==> (%n. setsum f {n*k..<n*k+k}) sums (suminf f)" 
14416  265 
apply (drule summable_sums) 
20692  266 
apply (simp only: sums_def sumr_group) 
267 
apply (unfold LIMSEQ_def, safe) 

268 
apply (drule_tac x="r" in spec, safe) 

269 
apply (rule_tac x="no" in exI, safe) 

270 
apply (drule_tac x="n*k" in spec) 

271 
apply (erule mp) 

272 
apply (erule order_trans) 

273 
apply simp 

14416  274 
done 
275 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

276 
text{*A summable series of positive terms has limit that is at least as 
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

277 
great as any partial sum.*} 
14416  278 

20692  279 
lemma series_pos_le: 
280 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 

281 
shows "\<lbrakk>summable f; \<forall>m\<ge>n. 0 \<le> f m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setsum f {0..<n} \<le> suminf f" 

14416  282 
apply (drule summable_sums) 
283 
apply (simp add: sums_def) 

15539  284 
apply (cut_tac k = "setsum f {0..<n}" in LIMSEQ_const) 
285 
apply (erule LIMSEQ_le, blast) 

20692  286 
apply (rule_tac x="n" in exI, clarify) 
15539  287 
apply (rule setsum_mono2) 
288 
apply auto 

14416  289 
done 
290 

291 
lemma series_pos_less: 

20692  292 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 
293 
shows "\<lbrakk>summable f; \<forall>m\<ge>n. 0 < f m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setsum f {0..<n} < suminf f" 

294 
apply (rule_tac y="setsum f {0..<Suc n}" in order_less_le_trans) 

295 
apply simp 

296 
apply (erule series_pos_le) 

297 
apply (simp add: order_less_imp_le) 

298 
done 

299 

300 
lemma suminf_gt_zero: 

301 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 

302 
shows "\<lbrakk>summable f; \<forall>n. 0 < f n\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 0 < suminf f" 

303 
by (drule_tac n="0" in series_pos_less, simp_all) 

304 

305 
lemma suminf_ge_zero: 

306 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 

307 
shows "\<lbrakk>summable f; \<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> suminf f" 

308 
by (drule_tac n="0" in series_pos_le, simp_all) 

309 

310 
lemma sumr_pos_lt_pair: 

311 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 

312 
shows "\<lbrakk>summable f; 

313 
\<forall>d. 0 < f (k + (Suc(Suc 0) * d)) + f (k + ((Suc(Suc 0) * d) + 1))\<rbrakk> 

314 
\<Longrightarrow> setsum f {0..<k} < suminf f" 

30082
43c5b7bfc791
make more proofs work whether or not One_nat_def is a simp rule
huffman
parents:
29803
diff
changeset

315 
unfolding One_nat_def 
20692  316 
apply (subst suminf_split_initial_segment [where k="k"]) 
317 
apply assumption 

318 
apply simp 

319 
apply (drule_tac k="k" in summable_ignore_initial_segment) 

320 
apply (drule_tac k="Suc (Suc 0)" in sums_group, simp) 

321 
apply simp 

322 
apply (frule sums_unique) 

323 
apply (drule sums_summable) 

324 
apply simp 

325 
apply (erule suminf_gt_zero) 

326 
apply (simp add: add_ac) 

14416  327 
done 
328 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

329 
text{*Sum of a geometric progression.*} 
14416  330 

17149
e2b19c92ef51
Lemmas on dvd, power and finite summation added or strengthened.
ballarin
parents:
16819
diff
changeset

331 
lemmas sumr_geometric = geometric_sum [where 'a = real] 
14416  332 

20692  333 
lemma geometric_sums: 
22719
c51667189bd3
lemma geometric_sum no longer needs class division_by_zero
huffman
parents:
21404
diff
changeset

334 
fixes x :: "'a::{real_normed_field,recpower}" 
20692  335 
shows "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. x ^ n) sums (1 / (1  x))" 
336 
proof  

337 
assume less_1: "norm x < 1" 

338 
hence neq_1: "x \<noteq> 1" by auto 

339 
hence neq_0: "x  1 \<noteq> 0" by simp 

340 
from less_1 have lim_0: "(\<lambda>n. x ^ n) > 0" 

341 
by (rule LIMSEQ_power_zero) 

22719
c51667189bd3
lemma geometric_sum no longer needs class division_by_zero
huffman
parents:
21404
diff
changeset

342 
hence "(\<lambda>n. x ^ n / (x  1)  1 / (x  1)) > 0 / (x  1)  1 / (x  1)" 
20692  343 
using neq_0 by (intro LIMSEQ_divide LIMSEQ_diff LIMSEQ_const) 
344 
hence "(\<lambda>n. (x ^ n  1) / (x  1)) > 1 / (1  x)" 

345 
by (simp add: nonzero_minus_divide_right [OF neq_0] diff_divide_distrib) 

346 
thus "(\<lambda>n. x ^ n) sums (1 / (1  x))" 

347 
by (simp add: sums_def geometric_sum neq_1) 

348 
qed 

349 

350 
lemma summable_geometric: 

22719
c51667189bd3
lemma geometric_sum no longer needs class division_by_zero
huffman
parents:
21404
diff
changeset

351 
fixes x :: "'a::{real_normed_field,recpower}" 
20692  352 
shows "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. x ^ n)" 
353 
by (rule geometric_sums [THEN sums_summable]) 

14416  354 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

355 
text{*Cauchytype criterion for convergence of series (c.f. Harrison)*} 
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

356 

15539  357 
lemma summable_convergent_sumr_iff: 
358 
"summable f = convergent (%n. setsum f {0..<n})" 

14416  359 
by (simp add: summable_def sums_def convergent_def) 
360 

20689  361 
lemma summable_LIMSEQ_zero: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> f > 0" 
362 
apply (drule summable_convergent_sumr_iff [THEN iffD1]) 

20692  363 
apply (drule convergent_Cauchy) 
20689  364 
apply (simp only: Cauchy_def LIMSEQ_def, safe) 
365 
apply (drule_tac x="r" in spec, safe) 

366 
apply (rule_tac x="M" in exI, safe) 

367 
apply (drule_tac x="Suc n" in spec, simp) 

368 
apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, simp) 

369 
done 

370 

14416  371 
lemma summable_Cauchy: 
20848  372 
"summable (f::nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach) = 
373 
(\<forall>e > 0. \<exists>N. \<forall>m \<ge> N. \<forall>n. norm (setsum f {m..<n}) < e)" 

374 
apply (simp only: summable_convergent_sumr_iff Cauchy_convergent_iff [symmetric] Cauchy_def, safe) 

20410  375 
apply (drule spec, drule (1) mp) 
376 
apply (erule exE, rule_tac x="M" in exI, clarify) 

377 
apply (rule_tac x="m" and y="n" in linorder_le_cases) 

378 
apply (frule (1) order_trans) 

379 
apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, drule (1) mp) 

380 
apply (drule_tac x="m" in spec, drule (1) mp) 

381 
apply (simp add: setsum_diff [symmetric]) 

382 
apply simp 

383 
apply (drule spec, drule (1) mp) 

384 
apply (erule exE, rule_tac x="N" in exI, clarify) 

385 
apply (rule_tac x="m" and y="n" in linorder_le_cases) 

20552
2c31dd358c21
generalized types of many constants to work over arbitrary vector spaces;
huffman
parents:
20432
diff
changeset

386 
apply (subst norm_minus_commute) 
20410  387 
apply (simp add: setsum_diff [symmetric]) 
388 
apply (simp add: setsum_diff [symmetric]) 

14416  389 
done 
390 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

391 
text{*Comparison test*} 
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

392 

20692  393 
lemma norm_setsum: 
394 
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector" 

395 
shows "norm (setsum f A) \<le> (\<Sum>i\<in>A. norm (f i))" 

396 
apply (case_tac "finite A") 

397 
apply (erule finite_induct) 

398 
apply simp 

399 
apply simp 

400 
apply (erule order_trans [OF norm_triangle_ineq add_left_mono]) 

401 
apply simp 

402 
done 

403 

14416  404 
lemma summable_comparison_test: 
20848  405 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 
406 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f n) \<le> g n; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable f" 

20692  407 
apply (simp add: summable_Cauchy, safe) 
408 
apply (drule_tac x="e" in spec, safe) 

409 
apply (rule_tac x = "N + Na" in exI, safe) 

14416  410 
apply (rotate_tac 2) 
411 
apply (drule_tac x = m in spec) 

412 
apply (auto, rotate_tac 2, drule_tac x = n in spec) 

20848  413 
apply (rule_tac y = "\<Sum>k=m..<n. norm (f k)" in order_le_less_trans) 
414 
apply (rule norm_setsum) 

15539  415 
apply (rule_tac y = "setsum g {m..<n}" in order_le_less_trans) 
22998  416 
apply (auto intro: setsum_mono simp add: abs_less_iff) 
14416  417 
done 
418 

20848  419 
lemma summable_norm_comparison_test: 
420 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 

421 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f n) \<le> g n; summable g\<rbrakk> 

422 
\<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n))" 

423 
apply (rule summable_comparison_test) 

424 
apply (auto) 

425 
done 

426 

14416  427 
lemma summable_rabs_comparison_test: 
20692  428 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 
429 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. \<bar>f n\<bar> \<le> g n; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n\<bar>)" 

14416  430 
apply (rule summable_comparison_test) 
15543  431 
apply (auto) 
14416  432 
done 
433 

23084  434 
text{*Summability of geometric series for real algebras*} 
435 

436 
lemma complete_algebra_summable_geometric: 

437 
fixes x :: "'a::{real_normed_algebra_1,banach,recpower}" 

438 
shows "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. x ^ n)" 

439 
proof (rule summable_comparison_test) 

440 
show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (x ^ n) \<le> norm x ^ n" 

441 
by (simp add: norm_power_ineq) 

442 
show "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. norm x ^ n)" 

443 
by (simp add: summable_geometric) 

444 
qed 

445 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

446 
text{*Limit comparison property for series (c.f. jrh)*} 
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

447 

14416  448 
lemma summable_le: 
20692  449 
fixes f g :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 
450 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<forall>n. f n \<le> g n; summable f; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> suminf f \<le> suminf g" 

14416  451 
apply (drule summable_sums)+ 
20692  452 
apply (simp only: sums_def, erule (1) LIMSEQ_le) 
14416  453 
apply (rule exI) 
15539  454 
apply (auto intro!: setsum_mono) 
14416  455 
done 
456 

457 
lemma summable_le2: 

20692  458 
fixes f g :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 
459 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<forall>n. \<bar>f n\<bar> \<le> g n; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable f \<and> suminf f \<le> suminf g" 

20848  460 
apply (subgoal_tac "summable f") 
461 
apply (auto intro!: summable_le) 

22998  462 
apply (simp add: abs_le_iff) 
20848  463 
apply (rule_tac g="g" in summable_comparison_test, simp_all) 
14416  464 
done 
465 

19106
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

466 
(* specialisation for the common 0 case *) 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

467 
lemma suminf_0_le: 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

468 
fixes f::"nat\<Rightarrow>real" 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

469 
assumes gt0: "\<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n" and sm: "summable f" 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

470 
shows "0 \<le> suminf f" 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

471 
proof  
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

472 
let ?g = "(\<lambda>n. (0::real))" 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

473 
from gt0 have "\<forall>n. ?g n \<le> f n" by simp 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

474 
moreover have "summable ?g" by (rule summable_zero) 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

475 
moreover from sm have "summable f" . 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

476 
ultimately have "suminf ?g \<le> suminf f" by (rule summable_le) 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

477 
then show "0 \<le> suminf f" by (simp add: suminf_zero) 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

478 
qed 
6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

479 

6e6b5b1fdc06
* added Library/ASeries (sum of arithmetic series with instantiation to nat and int)
kleing
parents:
17149
diff
changeset

480 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

481 
text{*Absolute convergence imples normal convergence*} 
20848  482 
lemma summable_norm_cancel: 
483 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 

484 
shows "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n)) \<Longrightarrow> summable f" 

20692  485 
apply (simp only: summable_Cauchy, safe) 
486 
apply (drule_tac x="e" in spec, safe) 

487 
apply (rule_tac x="N" in exI, safe) 

488 
apply (drule_tac x="m" in spec, safe) 

20848  489 
apply (rule order_le_less_trans [OF norm_setsum]) 
490 
apply (rule order_le_less_trans [OF abs_ge_self]) 

20692  491 
apply simp 
14416  492 
done 
493 

20848  494 
lemma summable_rabs_cancel: 
495 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 

496 
shows "summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n\<bar>) \<Longrightarrow> summable f" 

497 
by (rule summable_norm_cancel, simp) 

498 

15085
5693a977a767
removed some [iff] declarations from RealDef.thy, concerning inequalities
paulson
parents:
15053
diff
changeset

499 
text{*Absolute convergence of series*} 
20848  500 
lemma summable_norm: 
501 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 

502 
shows "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n)) \<Longrightarrow> norm (suminf f) \<le> (\<Sum>n. norm (f n))" 

503 
by (auto intro: LIMSEQ_le LIMSEQ_norm summable_norm_cancel 

504 
summable_sumr_LIMSEQ_suminf norm_setsum) 

505 

14416  506 
lemma summable_rabs: 
20692  507 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" 
508 
shows "summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n\<bar>) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>suminf f\<bar> \<le> (\<Sum>n. \<bar>f n\<bar>)" 

20848  509 
by (fold real_norm_def, rule summable_norm) 
14416  510 

511 
subsection{* The Ratio Test*} 

512 

20848  513 
lemma norm_ratiotest_lemma: 
22852  514 
fixes x y :: "'a::real_normed_vector" 
20848  515 
shows "\<lbrakk>c \<le> 0; norm x \<le> c * norm y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x = 0" 
516 
apply (subgoal_tac "norm x \<le> 0", simp) 

517 
apply (erule order_trans) 

518 
apply (simp add: mult_le_0_iff) 

519 
done 

520 

14416  521 
lemma rabs_ratiotest_lemma: "[ c \<le> 0; abs x \<le> c * abs y ] ==> x = (0::real)" 
20848  522 
by (erule norm_ratiotest_lemma, simp) 
14416  523 

524 
lemma le_Suc_ex: "(k::nat) \<le> l ==> (\<exists>n. l = k + n)" 

525 
apply (drule le_imp_less_or_eq) 

526 
apply (auto dest: less_imp_Suc_add) 

527 
done 

528 

529 
lemma le_Suc_ex_iff: "((k::nat) \<le> l) = (\<exists>n. l = k + n)" 

530 
by (auto simp add: le_Suc_ex) 

531 

532 
(*All this trouble just to get 0<c *) 

533 
lemma ratio_test_lemma2: 

20848  534 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 
535 
shows "\<lbrakk>\<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f (Suc n)) \<le> c * norm (f n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 0 < c \<or> summable f" 

14416  536 
apply (simp (no_asm) add: linorder_not_le [symmetric]) 
537 
apply (simp add: summable_Cauchy) 

15543  538 
apply (safe, subgoal_tac "\<forall>n. N < n > f (n) = 0") 
539 
prefer 2 

540 
apply clarify 

30082
43c5b7bfc791
make more proofs work whether or not One_nat_def is a simp rule
huffman
parents:
29803
diff
changeset

541 
apply(erule_tac x = "n  Suc 0" in allE) 
15543  542 
apply (simp add:diff_Suc split:nat.splits) 
20848  543 
apply (blast intro: norm_ratiotest_lemma) 
14416  544 
apply (rule_tac x = "Suc N" in exI, clarify) 
15543  545 
apply(simp cong:setsum_ivl_cong) 
14416  546 
done 
547 

548 
lemma ratio_test: 

20848  549 
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach" 
550 
shows "\<lbrakk>c < 1; \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f (Suc n)) \<le> c * norm (f n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable f" 

14416  551 
apply (frule ratio_test_lemma2, auto) 
20848  552 
apply (rule_tac g = "%n. (norm (f N) / (c ^ N))*c ^ n" 
15234
ec91a90c604e
simplification tweaks for better arithmetic reasoning
paulson
parents:
15229
diff
changeset

553 
in summable_comparison_test) 
14416  554 
apply (rule_tac x = N in exI, safe) 
555 
apply (drule le_Suc_ex_iff [THEN iffD1]) 

22959  556 
apply (auto simp add: power_add field_power_not_zero) 
15539  557 
apply (induct_tac "na", auto) 
20848  558 
apply (rule_tac y = "c * norm (f (N + n))" in order_trans) 
14416  559 
apply (auto intro: mult_right_mono simp add: summable_def) 
20848  560 
apply (rule_tac x = "norm (f N) * (1/ (1  c)) / (c ^ N)" in exI) 
15234
ec91a90c604e
simplification tweaks for better arithmetic reasoning
paulson
parents:
15229
diff
changeset

561 
apply (rule sums_divide) 
27108  562 
apply (rule sums_mult) 
15234
ec91a90c604e
simplification tweaks for better arithmetic reasoning
paulson
parents:
15229
diff
changeset

563 
apply (auto intro!: geometric_sums) 
14416  564 
done 
565 

23111  566 
subsection {* Cauchy Product Formula *} 
567 

568 
(* Proof based on Analysis WebNotes: Chapter 07, Class 41 

569 
http://www.math.unl.edu/~webnotes/classes/class41/prp77.htm *) 

570 

571 
lemma setsum_triangle_reindex: 

572 
fixes n :: nat 

573 
shows "(\<Sum>(i,j)\<in>{(i,j). i+j < n}. f i j) = (\<Sum>k=0..<n. \<Sum>i=0..k. f i (k  i))" 

574 
proof  

575 
have "(\<Sum>(i, j)\<in>{(i, j). i + j < n}. f i j) = 

576 
(\<Sum>(k, i)\<in>(SIGMA k:{0..<n}. {0..k}). f i (k  i))" 

577 
proof (rule setsum_reindex_cong) 

578 
show "inj_on (\<lambda>(k,i). (i, k  i)) (SIGMA k:{0..<n}. {0..k})" 

579 
by (rule inj_on_inverseI [where g="\<lambda>(i,j). (i+j, i)"], auto) 

580 
show "{(i,j). i + j < n} = (\<lambda>(k,i). (i, k  i)) ` (SIGMA k:{0..<n}. {0..k})" 

581 
by (safe, rule_tac x="(a+b,a)" in image_eqI, auto) 

582 
show "\<And>a. (\<lambda>(k, i). f i (k  i)) a = split f ((\<lambda>(k, i). (i, k  i)) a)" 

583 
by clarify 

584 
qed 

585 
thus ?thesis by (simp add: setsum_Sigma) 

586 
qed 

587 

588 
lemma Cauchy_product_sums: 

589 
fixes a b :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{real_normed_algebra,banach}" 

590 
assumes a: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (a k))" 

591 
assumes b: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (b k))" 

592 
shows "(\<lambda>k. \<Sum>i=0..k. a i * b (k  i)) sums ((\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k))" 

593 
proof  

594 
let ?S1 = "\<lambda>n::nat. {0..<n} \<times> {0..<n}" 

595 
let ?S2 = "\<lambda>n::nat. {(i,j). i + j < n}" 

596 
have S1_mono: "\<And>m n. m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> ?S1 m \<subseteq> ?S1 n" by auto 

597 
have S2_le_S1: "\<And>n. ?S2 n \<subseteq> ?S1 n" by auto 

598 
have S1_le_S2: "\<And>n. ?S1 (n div 2) \<subseteq> ?S2 n" by auto 

599 
have finite_S1: "\<And>n. finite (?S1 n)" by simp 

600 
with S2_le_S1 have finite_S2: "\<And>n. finite (?S2 n)" by (rule finite_subset) 

601 

602 
let ?g = "\<lambda>(i,j). a i * b j" 

603 
let ?f = "\<lambda>(i,j). norm (a i) * norm (b j)" 

604 
have f_nonneg: "\<And>x. 0 \<le> ?f x" 

605 
by (auto simp add: mult_nonneg_nonneg) 

606 
hence norm_setsum_f: "\<And>A. norm (setsum ?f A) = setsum ?f A" 

607 
unfolding real_norm_def 

608 
by (simp only: abs_of_nonneg setsum_nonneg [rule_format]) 

609 

610 
have "(\<lambda>n. (\<Sum>k=0..<n. a k) * (\<Sum>k=0..<n. b k)) 

611 
> (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)" 

612 
by (intro LIMSEQ_mult summable_sumr_LIMSEQ_suminf 

613 
summable_norm_cancel [OF a] summable_norm_cancel [OF b]) 

614 
hence 1: "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n)) > (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)" 

615 
by (simp only: setsum_product setsum_Sigma [rule_format] 

616 
finite_atLeastLessThan) 

617 

618 
have "(\<lambda>n. (\<Sum>k=0..<n. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k=0..<n. norm (b k))) 

619 
> (\<Sum>k. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k. norm (b k))" 

620 
using a b by (intro LIMSEQ_mult summable_sumr_LIMSEQ_suminf) 

621 
hence "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n)) > (\<Sum>k. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k. norm (b k))" 

622 
by (simp only: setsum_product setsum_Sigma [rule_format] 

623 
finite_atLeastLessThan) 

624 
hence "convergent (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n))" 

625 
by (rule convergentI) 

626 
hence Cauchy: "Cauchy (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n))" 

627 
by (rule convergent_Cauchy) 

628 
have "Zseq (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n  ?S2 n))" 

629 
proof (rule ZseqI, simp only: norm_setsum_f) 

630 
fix r :: real 

631 
assume r: "0 < r" 

632 
from CauchyD [OF Cauchy r] obtain N 

633 
where "\<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (setsum ?f (?S1 m)  setsum ?f (?S1 n)) < r" .. 

634 
hence "\<And>m n. \<lbrakk>N \<le> n; n \<le> m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> norm (setsum ?f (?S1 m  ?S1 n)) < r" 

635 
by (simp only: setsum_diff finite_S1 S1_mono) 

636 
hence N: "\<And>m n. \<lbrakk>N \<le> n; n \<le> m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setsum ?f (?S1 m  ?S1 n) < r" 

637 
by (simp only: norm_setsum_f) 

638 
show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. setsum ?f (?S1 n  ?S2 n) < r" 

639 
proof (intro exI allI impI) 

640 
fix n assume "2 * N \<le> n" 

641 
hence n: "N \<le> n div 2" by simp 

642 
have "setsum ?f (?S1 n  ?S2 n) \<le> setsum ?f (?S1 n  ?S1 (n div 2))" 

643 
by (intro setsum_mono2 finite_Diff finite_S1 f_nonneg 

644 
Diff_mono subset_refl S1_le_S2) 

645 
also have "\<dots> < r" 

646 
using n div_le_dividend by (rule N) 

647 
finally show "setsum ?f (?S1 n  ?S2 n) < r" . 

648 
qed 

649 
qed 

650 
hence "Zseq (\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n  ?S2 n))" 

651 
apply (rule Zseq_le [rule_format]) 

652 
apply (simp only: norm_setsum_f) 

653 
apply (rule order_trans [OF norm_setsum setsum_mono]) 

654 
apply (auto simp add: norm_mult_ineq) 

655 
done 

656 
hence 2: "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n)  setsum ?g (?S2 n)) > 0" 

657 
by (simp only: LIMSEQ_Zseq_iff setsum_diff finite_S1 S2_le_S1 diff_0_right) 

658 

659 
with 1 have "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S2 n)) > (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)" 

660 
by (rule LIMSEQ_diff_approach_zero2) 

661 
thus ?thesis by (simp only: sums_def setsum_triangle_reindex) 

662 
qed 

663 

664 
lemma Cauchy_product: 

665 
fixes a b :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{real_normed_algebra,banach}" 

666 
assumes a: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (a k))" 

667 
assumes b: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (b k))" 

668 
shows "(\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k) = (\<Sum>k. \<Sum>i=0..k. a i * b (k  i))" 

23441  669 
using a b 
23111  670 
by (rule Cauchy_product_sums [THEN sums_unique]) 
671 

14416  672 
end 