author | hoelzl |
Mon, 23 May 2011 19:21:05 +0200 | |
changeset 42950 | 6e5c2a3c69da |
parent 42866 | b0746bd57a41 |
child 43679 | 052eaf7509cf |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
42147 | 1 |
(* Title: HOL/Probability/Infinite_Product_Measure.thy |
2 |
Author: Johannes Hölzl, TU München |
|
3 |
*) |
|
4 |
||
5 |
header {*Infinite Product Measure*} |
|
6 |
||
7 |
theory Infinite_Product_Measure |
|
42148 | 8 |
imports Probability_Measure |
42147 | 9 |
begin |
10 |
||
11 |
lemma restrict_extensional_sub[intro]: "A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> restrict f A \<in> extensional B" |
|
12 |
unfolding restrict_def extensional_def by auto |
|
13 |
||
14 |
lemma restrict_restrict[simp]: "restrict (restrict f A) B = restrict f (A \<inter> B)" |
|
15 |
unfolding restrict_def by (simp add: fun_eq_iff) |
|
16 |
||
17 |
lemma split_merge: "P (merge I x J y i) \<longleftrightarrow> (i \<in> I \<longrightarrow> P (x i)) \<and> (i \<in> J - I \<longrightarrow> P (y i)) \<and> (i \<notin> I \<union> J \<longrightarrow> P undefined)" |
|
18 |
unfolding merge_def by auto |
|
19 |
||
20 |
lemma extensional_merge_sub: "I \<union> J \<subseteq> K \<Longrightarrow> merge I x J y \<in> extensional K" |
|
21 |
unfolding merge_def extensional_def by auto |
|
22 |
||
23 |
lemma injective_vimage_restrict: |
|
24 |
assumes J: "J \<subseteq> I" |
|
25 |
and sets: "A \<subseteq> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. S i)" "B \<subseteq> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. S i)" and ne: "(\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>I. S i) \<noteq> {}" |
|
26 |
and eq: "(\<lambda>x. restrict x J) -` A \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>I. S i) = (\<lambda>x. restrict x J) -` B \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>I. S i)" |
|
27 |
shows "A = B" |
|
28 |
proof (intro set_eqI) |
|
29 |
fix x |
|
30 |
from ne obtain y where y: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> y i \<in> S i" by auto |
|
31 |
have "J \<inter> (I - J) = {}" by auto |
|
32 |
show "x \<in> A \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> B" |
|
33 |
proof cases |
|
34 |
assume x: "x \<in> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. S i)" |
|
35 |
have "x \<in> A \<longleftrightarrow> merge J x (I - J) y \<in> (\<lambda>x. restrict x J) -` A \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>I. S i)" |
|
36 |
using y x `J \<subseteq> I` by (auto simp add: Pi_iff extensional_restrict extensional_merge_sub split: split_merge) |
|
37 |
then show "x \<in> A \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> B" |
|
38 |
using y x `J \<subseteq> I` by (auto simp add: Pi_iff extensional_restrict extensional_merge_sub eq split: split_merge) |
|
39 |
next |
|
40 |
assume "x \<notin> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. S i)" with sets show "x \<in> A \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> B" by auto |
|
41 |
qed |
|
42 |
qed |
|
43 |
||
44 |
locale product_prob_space = |
|
45 |
fixes M :: "'i \<Rightarrow> ('a,'b) measure_space_scheme" and I :: "'i set" |
|
46 |
assumes prob_spaces: "\<And>i. prob_space (M i)" |
|
47 |
and I_not_empty: "I \<noteq> {}" |
|
48 |
||
49 |
locale finite_product_prob_space = product_prob_space M I |
|
50 |
for M :: "'i \<Rightarrow> ('a,'b) measure_space_scheme" and I :: "'i set" + |
|
51 |
assumes finite_index'[intro]: "finite I" |
|
52 |
||
53 |
sublocale product_prob_space \<subseteq> M: prob_space "M i" for i |
|
54 |
by (rule prob_spaces) |
|
55 |
||
56 |
sublocale product_prob_space \<subseteq> product_sigma_finite |
|
57 |
by default |
|
58 |
||
59 |
sublocale finite_product_prob_space \<subseteq> finite_product_sigma_finite |
|
60 |
by default (fact finite_index') |
|
61 |
||
62 |
sublocale finite_product_prob_space \<subseteq> prob_space "Pi\<^isub>M I M" |
|
63 |
proof |
|
64 |
show "measure P (space P) = 1" |
|
65 |
by (simp add: measure_times measure_space_1 setprod_1) |
|
66 |
qed |
|
67 |
||
68 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measure_preserving_restrict: |
|
69 |
assumes "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> K" "finite K" |
|
70 |
shows "(\<lambda>f. restrict f J) \<in> measure_preserving (\<Pi>\<^isub>M i\<in>K. M i) (\<Pi>\<^isub>M i\<in>J. M i)" (is "?R \<in> _") |
|
71 |
proof - |
|
72 |
interpret K: finite_product_prob_space M K |
|
73 |
by default (insert assms, auto) |
|
74 |
have J: "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" using assms by (auto simp add: finite_subset) |
|
75 |
interpret J: finite_product_prob_space M J |
|
76 |
by default (insert J, auto) |
|
77 |
from J.sigma_finite_pairs guess F .. note F = this |
|
78 |
then have [simp,intro]: "\<And>k i. k \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> F k i \<in> sets (M k)" |
|
79 |
by auto |
|
80 |
let "?F i" = "\<Pi>\<^isub>E k\<in>J. F k i" |
|
81 |
let ?J = "product_algebra_generator J M \<lparr> measure := measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<rparr>" |
|
82 |
have "?R \<in> measure_preserving (\<Pi>\<^isub>M i\<in>K. M i) (sigma ?J)" |
|
83 |
proof (rule K.measure_preserving_Int_stable) |
|
84 |
show "Int_stable ?J" |
|
85 |
by (auto simp: Int_stable_def product_algebra_generator_def PiE_Int) |
|
86 |
show "range ?F \<subseteq> sets ?J" "incseq ?F" "(\<Union>i. ?F i) = space ?J" |
|
87 |
using F by auto |
|
88 |
show "\<And>i. measure ?J (?F i) \<noteq> \<infinity>" |
|
89 |
using F by (simp add: J.measure_times setprod_PInf) |
|
90 |
have "measure_space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" by default |
|
91 |
then show "measure_space (sigma ?J)" |
|
92 |
by (simp add: product_algebra_def sigma_def) |
|
93 |
show "?R \<in> measure_preserving (Pi\<^isub>M K M) ?J" |
|
94 |
proof (simp add: measure_preserving_def measurable_def product_algebra_generator_def del: vimage_Int, |
|
95 |
safe intro!: restrict_extensional) |
|
96 |
fix x k assume "k \<in> J" "x \<in> (\<Pi> i\<in>K. space (M i))" |
|
97 |
then show "x k \<in> space (M k)" using `J \<subseteq> K` by auto |
|
98 |
next |
|
99 |
fix E assume "E \<in> (\<Pi> i\<in>J. sets (M i))" |
|
100 |
then have E: "\<And>j. j \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> E j \<in> sets (M j)" by auto |
|
101 |
then have *: "?R -` Pi\<^isub>E J E \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>K. space (M i)) = (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>K. if i \<in> J then E i else space (M i))" |
|
102 |
(is "?X = Pi\<^isub>E K ?M") |
|
103 |
using `J \<subseteq> K` sets_into_space by (auto simp: Pi_iff split: split_if_asm) blast+ |
|
104 |
with E show "?X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M K M)" |
|
105 |
by (auto intro!: product_algebra_generatorI) |
|
106 |
have "measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) (Pi\<^isub>E J E) = (\<Prod>i\<in>J. measure (M i) (?M i))" |
|
107 |
using E by (simp add: J.measure_times) |
|
108 |
also have "\<dots> = measure (Pi\<^isub>M K M) ?X" |
|
109 |
unfolding * using E `finite K` `J \<subseteq> K` |
|
110 |
by (auto simp: K.measure_times M.measure_space_1 |
|
111 |
cong del: setprod_cong |
|
112 |
intro!: setprod_mono_one_left) |
|
113 |
finally show "measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) (Pi\<^isub>E J E) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M K M) ?X" . |
|
114 |
qed |
|
115 |
qed |
|
116 |
then show ?thesis |
|
117 |
by (simp add: product_algebra_def sigma_def) |
|
118 |
qed |
|
119 |
||
120 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measurable_restrict: |
|
121 |
assumes *: "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> K" "finite K" |
|
122 |
shows "(\<lambda>f. restrict f J) \<in> measurable (\<Pi>\<^isub>M i\<in>K. M i) (\<Pi>\<^isub>M i\<in>J. M i)" |
|
123 |
using measure_preserving_restrict[OF *] |
|
124 |
by (rule measure_preservingD2) |
|
125 |
||
126 |
definition (in product_prob_space) |
|
127 |
"emb J K X = (\<lambda>x. restrict x K) -` X \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
128 |
||
129 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_trans[simp]: |
|
130 |
"J \<subseteq> K \<Longrightarrow> K \<subseteq> L \<Longrightarrow> emb L K (emb K J X) = emb L J X" |
|
131 |
by (auto simp add: Int_absorb1 emb_def) |
|
132 |
||
133 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_empty[simp]: |
|
134 |
"emb K J {} = {}" |
|
135 |
by (simp add: emb_def) |
|
136 |
||
137 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_Pi: |
|
138 |
assumes "X \<in> (\<Pi> j\<in>J. sets (M j))" "J \<subseteq> K" |
|
139 |
shows "emb K J (Pi\<^isub>E J X) = (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>K. if i \<in> J then X i else space (M i))" |
|
140 |
using assms space_closed |
|
141 |
by (auto simp: emb_def Pi_iff split: split_if_asm) blast+ |
|
142 |
||
143 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_injective: |
|
144 |
assumes "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> L" "finite J" and sets: "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" "Y \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
145 |
assumes "emb L J X = emb L J Y" |
|
146 |
shows "X = Y" |
|
147 |
proof - |
|
148 |
interpret J: finite_product_sigma_finite M J by default fact |
|
149 |
show "X = Y" |
|
150 |
proof (rule injective_vimage_restrict) |
|
151 |
show "X \<subseteq> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. space (M i))" "Y \<subseteq> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>J. space (M i))" |
|
152 |
using J.sets_into_space sets by auto |
|
153 |
have "\<forall>i\<in>L. \<exists>x. x \<in> space (M i)" |
|
154 |
using M.not_empty by auto |
|
155 |
from bchoice[OF this] |
|
156 |
show "(\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>L. space (M i)) \<noteq> {}" by auto |
|
157 |
show "(\<lambda>x. restrict x J) -` X \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>L. space (M i)) = (\<lambda>x. restrict x J) -` Y \<inter> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>L. space (M i))" |
|
158 |
using `emb L J X = emb L J Y` by (simp add: emb_def) |
|
159 |
qed fact |
|
160 |
qed |
|
161 |
||
162 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_id: |
|
163 |
"B \<subseteq> (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>L. space (M i)) \<Longrightarrow> emb L L B = B" |
|
164 |
by (auto simp: emb_def Pi_iff subset_eq extensional_restrict) |
|
165 |
||
166 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_simps: |
|
167 |
shows "emb L K (A \<union> B) = emb L K A \<union> emb L K B" |
|
168 |
and "emb L K (A \<inter> B) = emb L K A \<inter> emb L K B" |
|
169 |
and "emb L K (A - B) = emb L K A - emb L K B" |
|
170 |
by (auto simp: emb_def) |
|
171 |
||
172 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measurable_emb[intro,simp]: |
|
173 |
assumes *: "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> L" "finite L" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
174 |
shows "emb L J X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M L M)" |
|
175 |
using measurable_restrict[THEN measurable_sets, OF *] by (simp add: emb_def) |
|
176 |
||
177 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measure_emb[intro,simp]: |
|
178 |
assumes *: "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> L" "finite L" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
179 |
shows "measure (Pi\<^isub>M L M) (emb L J X) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
180 |
using measure_preserving_restrict[THEN measure_preservingD, OF *] |
|
181 |
by (simp add: emb_def) |
|
182 |
||
183 |
definition (in product_prob_space) generator :: "('i \<Rightarrow> 'a) measure_space" where |
|
184 |
"generator = \<lparr> |
|
185 |
space = (\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>I. space (M i)), |
|
186 |
sets = (\<Union>J\<in>{J. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I}. emb I J ` sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)), |
|
187 |
measure = undefined |
|
188 |
\<rparr>" |
|
189 |
||
190 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) generatorI: |
|
191 |
"J \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> finite J \<Longrightarrow> J \<subseteq> I \<Longrightarrow> X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<Longrightarrow> A = emb I J X \<Longrightarrow> A \<in> sets generator" |
|
192 |
unfolding generator_def by auto |
|
193 |
||
194 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) generatorI': |
|
195 |
"J \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> finite J \<Longrightarrow> J \<subseteq> I \<Longrightarrow> X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<Longrightarrow> emb I J X \<in> sets generator" |
|
196 |
unfolding generator_def by auto |
|
197 |
||
198 |
lemma (in product_sigma_finite) |
|
199 |
assumes "I \<inter> J = {}" "finite I" "finite J" and A: "A \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (I \<union> J) M)" |
|
200 |
shows measure_fold_integral: |
|
201 |
"measure (Pi\<^isub>M (I \<union> J) M) A = (\<integral>\<^isup>+x. measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) (merge I x J -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M I M)" (is ?I) |
|
202 |
and measure_fold_measurable: |
|
203 |
"(\<lambda>x. measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) (merge I x J -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M))) \<in> borel_measurable (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" (is ?B) |
|
204 |
proof - |
|
205 |
interpret I: finite_product_sigma_finite M I by default fact |
|
206 |
interpret J: finite_product_sigma_finite M J by default fact |
|
207 |
interpret IJ: pair_sigma_finite I.P J.P .. |
|
208 |
show ?I |
|
209 |
unfolding measure_fold[OF assms] |
|
210 |
apply (subst IJ.pair_measure_alt) |
|
211 |
apply (intro measurable_sets[OF _ A] measurable_merge assms) |
|
212 |
apply (auto simp: vimage_compose[symmetric] comp_def space_pair_measure |
|
213 |
intro!: I.positive_integral_cong) |
|
214 |
done |
|
215 |
||
216 |
have "(\<lambda>(x, y). merge I x J y) -` A \<inter> space (I.P \<Otimes>\<^isub>M J.P) \<in> sets (I.P \<Otimes>\<^isub>M J.P)" |
|
217 |
by (intro measurable_sets[OF _ A] measurable_merge assms) |
|
218 |
from IJ.measure_cut_measurable_fst[OF this] |
|
219 |
show ?B |
|
220 |
apply (auto simp: vimage_compose[symmetric] comp_def space_pair_measure) |
|
221 |
apply (subst (asm) measurable_cong) |
|
222 |
apply auto |
|
223 |
done |
|
224 |
qed |
|
225 |
||
226 |
definition (in product_prob_space) |
|
227 |
"\<mu>G A = |
|
228 |
(THE x. \<forall>J. J \<noteq> {} \<longrightarrow> finite J \<longrightarrow> J \<subseteq> I \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>X\<in>sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M). A = emb I J X \<longrightarrow> x = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X))" |
|
229 |
||
230 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) \<mu>G_spec: |
|
231 |
assumes J: "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "A = emb I J X" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
232 |
shows "\<mu>G A = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
233 |
unfolding \<mu>G_def |
|
234 |
proof (intro the_equality allI impI ballI) |
|
235 |
fix K Y assume K: "K \<noteq> {}" "finite K" "K \<subseteq> I" "A = emb I K Y" "Y \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M K M)" |
|
236 |
have "measure (Pi\<^isub>M K M) Y = measure (Pi\<^isub>M (K \<union> J) M) (emb (K \<union> J) K Y)" |
|
237 |
using K J by simp |
|
238 |
also have "emb (K \<union> J) K Y = emb (K \<union> J) J X" |
|
239 |
using K J by (simp add: emb_injective[of "K \<union> J" I]) |
|
240 |
also have "measure (Pi\<^isub>M (K \<union> J) M) (emb (K \<union> J) J X) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
241 |
using K J by simp |
|
242 |
finally show "measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X = measure (Pi\<^isub>M K M) Y" .. |
|
243 |
qed (insert J, force) |
|
244 |
||
245 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) \<mu>G_eq: |
|
246 |
"J \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> finite J \<Longrightarrow> J \<subseteq> I \<Longrightarrow> X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<Longrightarrow> \<mu>G (emb I J X) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
247 |
by (intro \<mu>G_spec) auto |
|
248 |
||
249 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) generator_Ex: |
|
250 |
assumes *: "A \<in> sets generator" |
|
251 |
shows "\<exists>J X. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I \<and> X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<and> A = emb I J X \<and> \<mu>G A = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
252 |
proof - |
|
253 |
from * obtain J X where J: "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "A = emb I J X" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
254 |
unfolding generator_def by auto |
|
255 |
with \<mu>G_spec[OF this] show ?thesis by auto |
|
256 |
qed |
|
257 |
||
258 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) generatorE: |
|
259 |
assumes A: "A \<in> sets generator" |
|
260 |
obtains J X where "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" "emb I J X = A" "\<mu>G A = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
261 |
proof - |
|
262 |
from generator_Ex[OF A] obtain X J where "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" "emb I J X = A" |
|
263 |
"\<mu>G A = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" by auto |
|
264 |
then show thesis by (intro that) auto |
|
265 |
qed |
|
266 |
||
267 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) merge_sets: |
|
268 |
assumes "finite J" "finite K" "J \<inter> K = {}" and A: "A \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (J \<union> K) M)" and x: "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
269 |
shows "merge J x K -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M K M) \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M K M)" |
|
270 |
proof - |
|
271 |
interpret J: finite_product_sigma_algebra M J by default fact |
|
272 |
interpret K: finite_product_sigma_algebra M K by default fact |
|
273 |
interpret JK: pair_sigma_algebra J.P K.P .. |
|
274 |
||
275 |
from JK.measurable_cut_fst[OF |
|
276 |
measurable_merge[THEN measurable_sets, OF `J \<inter> K = {}`], OF A, of x] x |
|
277 |
show ?thesis |
|
278 |
by (simp add: space_pair_measure comp_def vimage_compose[symmetric]) |
|
279 |
qed |
|
280 |
||
281 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) merge_emb: |
|
282 |
assumes "K \<subseteq> I" "J \<subseteq> I" and y: "y \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
283 |
shows "(merge J y (I - J) -` emb I K X \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) = |
|
284 |
emb I (K - J) (merge J y (K - J) -` emb (J \<union> K) K X \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M))" |
|
285 |
proof - |
|
286 |
have [simp]: "\<And>x J K L. merge J y K (restrict x L) = merge J y (K \<inter> L) x" |
|
287 |
by (auto simp: restrict_def merge_def) |
|
288 |
have [simp]: "\<And>x J K L. restrict (merge J y K x) L = merge (J \<inter> L) y (K \<inter> L) x" |
|
289 |
by (auto simp: restrict_def merge_def) |
|
290 |
have [simp]: "(I - J) \<inter> K = K - J" using `K \<subseteq> I` `J \<subseteq> I` by auto |
|
291 |
have [simp]: "(K - J) \<inter> (K \<union> J) = K - J" by auto |
|
292 |
have [simp]: "(K - J) \<inter> K = K - J" by auto |
|
293 |
from y `K \<subseteq> I` `J \<subseteq> I` show ?thesis |
|
294 |
by (simp split: split_merge add: emb_def Pi_iff extensional_merge_sub set_eq_iff) auto |
|
295 |
qed |
|
296 |
||
297 |
definition (in product_prob_space) infprod_algebra :: "('i \<Rightarrow> 'a) measure_space" where |
|
298 |
"infprod_algebra = sigma generator \<lparr> measure := |
|
299 |
(SOME \<mu>. (\<forall>s\<in>sets generator. \<mu> s = \<mu>G s) \<and> |
|
300 |
measure_space \<lparr>space = space generator, sets = sets (sigma generator), measure = \<mu>\<rparr>)\<rparr>" |
|
301 |
||
302 |
syntax |
|
303 |
"_PiP" :: "[pttrn, 'i set, ('b, 'd) measure_space_scheme] => ('i => 'b, 'd) measure_space_scheme" ("(3PIP _:_./ _)" 10) |
|
304 |
||
305 |
syntax (xsymbols) |
|
306 |
"_PiP" :: "[pttrn, 'i set, ('b, 'd) measure_space_scheme] => ('i => 'b, 'd) measure_space_scheme" ("(3\<Pi>\<^isub>P _\<in>_./ _)" 10) |
|
307 |
||
308 |
syntax (HTML output) |
|
309 |
"_PiP" :: "[pttrn, 'i set, ('b, 'd) measure_space_scheme] => ('i => 'b, 'd) measure_space_scheme" ("(3\<Pi>\<^isub>P _\<in>_./ _)" 10) |
|
310 |
||
311 |
abbreviation |
|
312 |
"Pi\<^isub>P I M \<equiv> product_prob_space.infprod_algebra M I" |
|
313 |
||
314 |
translations |
|
315 |
"PIP x:I. M" == "CONST Pi\<^isub>P I (%x. M)" |
|
316 |
||
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
317 |
sublocale product_prob_space \<subseteq> G!: algebra generator |
42147 | 318 |
proof |
319 |
let ?G = generator |
|
320 |
show "sets ?G \<subseteq> Pow (space ?G)" |
|
321 |
by (auto simp: generator_def emb_def) |
|
322 |
from I_not_empty |
|
323 |
obtain i where "i \<in> I" by auto |
|
324 |
then show "{} \<in> sets ?G" |
|
325 |
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "{i}"] image_eqI[where x="\<lambda>i. {}"] |
|
326 |
simp: product_algebra_def sigma_def sigma_sets.Empty generator_def emb_def) |
|
327 |
from `i \<in> I` show "space ?G \<in> sets ?G" |
|
328 |
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "{i}"] image_eqI[where x="Pi\<^isub>E {i} (\<lambda>i. space (M i))"] |
|
329 |
simp: generator_def emb_def) |
|
330 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets ?G" |
|
331 |
then obtain JA XA where XA: "JA \<noteq> {}" "finite JA" "JA \<subseteq> I" "XA \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M JA M)" and A: "A = emb I JA XA" |
|
332 |
by (auto simp: generator_def) |
|
333 |
fix B assume "B \<in> sets ?G" |
|
334 |
then obtain JB XB where XB: "JB \<noteq> {}" "finite JB" "JB \<subseteq> I" "XB \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M JB M)" and B: "B = emb I JB XB" |
|
335 |
by (auto simp: generator_def) |
|
336 |
let ?RA = "emb (JA \<union> JB) JA XA" |
|
337 |
let ?RB = "emb (JA \<union> JB) JB XB" |
|
338 |
interpret JAB: finite_product_sigma_algebra M "JA \<union> JB" |
|
339 |
by default (insert XA XB, auto) |
|
340 |
have *: "A - B = emb I (JA \<union> JB) (?RA - ?RB)" "A \<union> B = emb I (JA \<union> JB) (?RA \<union> ?RB)" |
|
341 |
using XA A XB B by (auto simp: emb_simps) |
|
342 |
then show "A - B \<in> sets ?G" "A \<union> B \<in> sets ?G" |
|
343 |
using XA XB by (auto intro!: generatorI') |
|
344 |
qed |
|
345 |
||
346 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) positive_\<mu>G: "positive generator \<mu>G" |
|
347 |
proof (intro positive_def[THEN iffD2] conjI ballI) |
|
348 |
from generatorE[OF G.empty_sets] guess J X . note this[simp] |
|
349 |
interpret J: finite_product_sigma_finite M J by default fact |
|
350 |
have "X = {}" |
|
351 |
by (rule emb_injective[of J I]) simp_all |
|
352 |
then show "\<mu>G {} = 0" by simp |
|
353 |
next |
|
354 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets generator" |
|
355 |
from generatorE[OF this] guess J X . note this[simp] |
|
356 |
interpret J: finite_product_sigma_finite M J by default fact |
|
357 |
show "0 \<le> \<mu>G A" by simp |
|
358 |
qed |
|
359 |
||
360 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) additive_\<mu>G: "additive generator \<mu>G" |
|
361 |
proof (intro additive_def[THEN iffD2] ballI impI) |
|
362 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets generator" with generatorE guess J X . note J = this |
|
363 |
fix B assume "B \<in> sets generator" with generatorE guess K Y . note K = this |
|
364 |
assume "A \<inter> B = {}" |
|
365 |
have JK: "J \<union> K \<noteq> {}" "J \<union> K \<subseteq> I" "finite (J \<union> K)" |
|
366 |
using J K by auto |
|
367 |
interpret JK: finite_product_sigma_finite M "J \<union> K" by default fact |
|
368 |
have JK_disj: "emb (J \<union> K) J X \<inter> emb (J \<union> K) K Y = {}" |
|
369 |
apply (rule emb_injective[of "J \<union> K" I]) |
|
370 |
apply (insert `A \<inter> B = {}` JK J K) |
|
371 |
apply (simp_all add: JK.Int emb_simps) |
|
372 |
done |
|
373 |
have AB: "A = emb I (J \<union> K) (emb (J \<union> K) J X)" "B = emb I (J \<union> K) (emb (J \<union> K) K Y)" |
|
374 |
using J K by simp_all |
|
375 |
then have "\<mu>G (A \<union> B) = \<mu>G (emb I (J \<union> K) (emb (J \<union> K) J X \<union> emb (J \<union> K) K Y))" |
|
376 |
by (simp add: emb_simps) |
|
377 |
also have "\<dots> = measure (Pi\<^isub>M (J \<union> K) M) (emb (J \<union> K) J X \<union> emb (J \<union> K) K Y)" |
|
378 |
using JK J(1, 4) K(1, 4) by (simp add: \<mu>G_eq JK.Un) |
|
379 |
also have "\<dots> = \<mu>G A + \<mu>G B" |
|
380 |
using J K JK_disj by (simp add: JK.measure_additive[symmetric]) |
|
381 |
finally show "\<mu>G (A \<union> B) = \<mu>G A + \<mu>G B" . |
|
382 |
qed |
|
383 |
||
384 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) finite_index_eq_finite_product: |
|
385 |
assumes "finite I" |
|
386 |
shows "sets (sigma generator) = sets (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" |
|
387 |
proof safe |
|
388 |
interpret I: finite_product_sigma_algebra M I by default fact |
|
389 |
have [simp]: "space generator = space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" |
|
390 |
by (simp add: generator_def product_algebra_def) |
|
391 |
{ fix A assume "A \<in> sets (sigma generator)" |
|
392 |
then show "A \<in> sets I.P" unfolding sets_sigma |
|
393 |
proof induct |
|
394 |
case (Basic A) |
|
395 |
from generatorE[OF this] guess J X . note J = this |
|
396 |
with `finite I` have "emb I J X \<in> sets I.P" by auto |
|
397 |
with `emb I J X = A` show "A \<in> sets I.P" by simp |
|
398 |
qed auto } |
|
399 |
{ fix A assume "A \<in> sets I.P" |
|
400 |
moreover with I.sets_into_space have "emb I I A = A" by (intro emb_id) auto |
|
401 |
ultimately show "A \<in> sets (sigma generator)" |
|
402 |
using `finite I` I_not_empty unfolding sets_sigma |
|
403 |
by (intro sigma_sets.Basic generatorI[of I A]) auto } |
|
404 |
qed |
|
405 |
||
406 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) extend_\<mu>G: |
|
407 |
"\<exists>\<mu>. (\<forall>s\<in>sets generator. \<mu> s = \<mu>G s) \<and> |
|
408 |
measure_space \<lparr>space = space generator, sets = sets (sigma generator), measure = \<mu>\<rparr>" |
|
409 |
proof cases |
|
410 |
assume "finite I" |
|
411 |
interpret I: finite_product_sigma_finite M I by default fact |
|
412 |
show ?thesis |
|
413 |
proof (intro exI[of _ "measure (Pi\<^isub>M I M)"] ballI conjI) |
|
414 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets generator" |
|
415 |
from generatorE[OF this] guess J X . note J = this |
|
416 |
from J(1-4) `finite I` show "measure I.P A = \<mu>G A" |
|
417 |
unfolding J(6) |
|
418 |
by (subst J(5)[symmetric]) (simp add: measure_emb) |
|
419 |
next |
|
420 |
have [simp]: "space generator = space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" |
|
421 |
by (simp add: generator_def product_algebra_def) |
|
422 |
have "\<lparr>space = space generator, sets = sets (sigma generator), measure = measure I.P\<rparr> |
|
423 |
= I.P" (is "?P = _") |
|
424 |
by (auto intro!: measure_space.equality simp: finite_index_eq_finite_product[OF `finite I`]) |
|
425 |
then show "measure_space ?P" by simp default |
|
426 |
qed |
|
427 |
next |
|
428 |
let ?G = generator |
|
429 |
assume "\<not> finite I" |
|
430 |
note \<mu>G_mono = |
|
431 |
G.additive_increasing[OF positive_\<mu>G additive_\<mu>G, THEN increasingD] |
|
432 |
||
433 |
{ fix Z J assume J: "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" and Z: "Z \<in> sets ?G" |
|
434 |
||
435 |
from `infinite I` `finite J` obtain k where k: "k \<in> I" "k \<notin> J" |
|
436 |
by (metis rev_finite_subset subsetI) |
|
437 |
moreover from Z guess K' X' by (rule generatorE) |
|
438 |
moreover def K \<equiv> "insert k K'" |
|
439 |
moreover def X \<equiv> "emb K K' X'" |
|
440 |
ultimately have K: "K \<noteq> {}" "finite K" "K \<subseteq> I" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M K M)" "Z = emb I K X" |
|
441 |
"K - J \<noteq> {}" "K - J \<subseteq> I" "\<mu>G Z = measure (Pi\<^isub>M K M) X" |
|
442 |
by (auto simp: subset_insertI) |
|
443 |
||
444 |
let "?M y" = "merge J y (K - J) -` emb (J \<union> K) K X \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M)" |
|
445 |
{ fix y assume y: "y \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
446 |
note * = merge_emb[OF `K \<subseteq> I` `J \<subseteq> I` y, of X] |
|
447 |
moreover |
|
448 |
have **: "?M y \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M)" |
|
449 |
using J K y by (intro merge_sets) auto |
|
450 |
ultimately |
|
451 |
have ***: "(merge J y (I - J) -` Z \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) \<in> sets ?G" |
|
452 |
using J K by (intro generatorI) auto |
|
453 |
have "\<mu>G (merge J y (I - J) -` emb I K X \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M) (?M y)" |
|
454 |
unfolding * using K J by (subst \<mu>G_eq[OF _ _ _ **]) auto |
|
455 |
note * ** *** this } |
|
456 |
note merge_in_G = this |
|
457 |
||
458 |
have "finite (K - J)" using K by auto |
|
459 |
||
460 |
interpret J: finite_product_prob_space M J by default fact+ |
|
461 |
interpret KmJ: finite_product_prob_space M "K - J" by default fact+ |
|
462 |
||
463 |
have "\<mu>G Z = measure (Pi\<^isub>M (J \<union> (K - J)) M) (emb (J \<union> (K - J)) K X)" |
|
464 |
using K J by simp |
|
465 |
also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^isup>+ x. measure (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M) (?M x) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
466 |
using K J by (subst measure_fold_integral) auto |
|
467 |
also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^isup>+ y. \<mu>G (merge J y (I - J) -` Z \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
468 |
(is "_ = (\<integral>\<^isup>+x. \<mu>G (?MZ x) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M J M)") |
|
469 |
proof (intro J.positive_integral_cong) |
|
470 |
fix x assume x: "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
471 |
with K merge_in_G(2)[OF this] |
|
472 |
show "measure (Pi\<^isub>M (K - J) M) (?M x) = \<mu>G (?MZ x)" |
|
473 |
unfolding `Z = emb I K X` merge_in_G(1)[OF x] by (subst \<mu>G_eq) auto |
|
474 |
qed |
|
475 |
finally have fold: "\<mu>G Z = (\<integral>\<^isup>+x. \<mu>G (?MZ x) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M J M)" . |
|
476 |
||
477 |
{ fix x assume x: "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
478 |
then have "\<mu>G (?MZ x) \<le> 1" |
|
479 |
unfolding merge_in_G(4)[OF x] `Z = emb I K X` |
|
480 |
by (intro KmJ.measure_le_1 merge_in_G(2)[OF x]) } |
|
481 |
note le_1 = this |
|
482 |
||
483 |
let "?q y" = "\<mu>G (merge J y (I - J) -` Z \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M))" |
|
484 |
have "?q \<in> borel_measurable (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
485 |
unfolding `Z = emb I K X` using J K merge_in_G(3) |
|
486 |
by (simp add: merge_in_G \<mu>G_eq measure_fold_measurable |
|
487 |
del: space_product_algebra cong: measurable_cong) |
|
488 |
note this fold le_1 merge_in_G(3) } |
|
489 |
note fold = this |
|
490 |
||
491 |
show ?thesis |
|
492 |
proof (rule G.caratheodory_empty_continuous[OF positive_\<mu>G additive_\<mu>G]) |
|
493 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets ?G" |
|
494 |
with generatorE guess J X . note JX = this |
|
495 |
interpret JK: finite_product_prob_space M J by default fact+ |
|
496 |
with JX show "\<mu>G A \<noteq> \<infinity>" by simp |
|
497 |
next |
|
498 |
fix A assume A: "range A \<subseteq> sets ?G" "decseq A" "(\<Inter>i. A i) = {}" |
|
499 |
then have "decseq (\<lambda>i. \<mu>G (A i))" |
|
500 |
by (auto intro!: \<mu>G_mono simp: decseq_def) |
|
501 |
moreover |
|
502 |
have "(INF i. \<mu>G (A i)) = 0" |
|
503 |
proof (rule ccontr) |
|
504 |
assume "(INF i. \<mu>G (A i)) \<noteq> 0" (is "?a \<noteq> 0") |
|
505 |
moreover have "0 \<le> ?a" |
|
506 |
using A positive_\<mu>G by (auto intro!: le_INFI simp: positive_def) |
|
507 |
ultimately have "0 < ?a" by auto |
|
508 |
||
509 |
have "\<forall>n. \<exists>J X. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I \<and> X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<and> A n = emb I J X \<and> \<mu>G (A n) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
|
510 |
using A by (intro allI generator_Ex) auto |
|
511 |
then obtain J' X' where J': "\<And>n. J' n \<noteq> {}" "\<And>n. finite (J' n)" "\<And>n. J' n \<subseteq> I" "\<And>n. X' n \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (J' n) M)" |
|
512 |
and A': "\<And>n. A n = emb I (J' n) (X' n)" |
|
513 |
unfolding choice_iff by blast |
|
514 |
moreover def J \<equiv> "\<lambda>n. (\<Union>i\<le>n. J' i)" |
|
515 |
moreover def X \<equiv> "\<lambda>n. emb (J n) (J' n) (X' n)" |
|
516 |
ultimately have J: "\<And>n. J n \<noteq> {}" "\<And>n. finite (J n)" "\<And>n. J n \<subseteq> I" "\<And>n. X n \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (J n) M)" |
|
517 |
by auto |
|
518 |
with A' have A_eq: "\<And>n. A n = emb I (J n) (X n)" "\<And>n. A n \<in> sets ?G" |
|
519 |
unfolding J_def X_def by (subst emb_trans) (insert A, auto) |
|
520 |
||
521 |
have J_mono: "\<And>n m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> J n \<subseteq> J m" |
|
522 |
unfolding J_def by force |
|
523 |
||
524 |
interpret J: finite_product_prob_space M "J i" for i by default fact+ |
|
525 |
||
526 |
have a_le_1: "?a \<le> 1" |
|
527 |
using \<mu>G_spec[of "J 0" "A 0" "X 0"] J A_eq |
|
528 |
by (auto intro!: INF_leI2[of 0] J.measure_le_1) |
|
529 |
||
530 |
let "?M K Z y" = "merge K y (I - K) -` Z \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" |
|
531 |
||
532 |
{ fix Z k assume Z: "range Z \<subseteq> sets ?G" "decseq Z" "\<forall>n. ?a / 2^k \<le> \<mu>G (Z n)" |
|
533 |
then have Z_sets: "\<And>n. Z n \<in> sets ?G" by auto |
|
534 |
fix J' assume J': "J' \<noteq> {}" "finite J'" "J' \<subseteq> I" |
|
535 |
interpret J': finite_product_prob_space M J' by default fact+ |
|
536 |
||
537 |
let "?q n y" = "\<mu>G (?M J' (Z n) y)" |
|
538 |
let "?Q n" = "?q n -` {?a / 2^(k+1) ..} \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
539 |
{ fix n |
|
540 |
have "?q n \<in> borel_measurable (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
541 |
using Z J' by (intro fold(1)) auto |
|
542 |
then have "?Q n \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
543 |
by (rule measurable_sets) auto } |
|
544 |
note Q_sets = this |
|
545 |
||
546 |
have "?a / 2^(k+1) \<le> (INF n. measure (Pi\<^isub>M J' M) (?Q n))" |
|
547 |
proof (intro le_INFI) |
|
548 |
fix n |
|
549 |
have "?a / 2^k \<le> \<mu>G (Z n)" using Z by auto |
|
550 |
also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^isup>+ x. indicator (?Q n) x + ?a / 2^(k+1) \<partial>Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
551 |
unfolding fold(2)[OF J' `Z n \<in> sets ?G`] |
|
552 |
proof (intro J'.positive_integral_mono) |
|
553 |
fix x assume x: "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
554 |
then have "?q n x \<le> 1 + 0" |
|
555 |
using J' Z fold(3) Z_sets by auto |
|
556 |
also have "\<dots> \<le> 1 + ?a / 2^(k+1)" |
|
557 |
using `0 < ?a` by (intro add_mono) auto |
|
558 |
finally have "?q n x \<le> 1 + ?a / 2^(k+1)" . |
|
559 |
with x show "?q n x \<le> indicator (?Q n) x + ?a / 2^(k+1)" |
|
560 |
by (auto split: split_indicator simp del: power_Suc) |
|
561 |
qed |
|
562 |
also have "\<dots> = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J' M) (?Q n) + ?a / 2^(k+1)" |
|
563 |
using `0 \<le> ?a` Q_sets J'.measure_space_1 |
|
564 |
by (subst J'.positive_integral_add) auto |
|
565 |
finally show "?a / 2^(k+1) \<le> measure (Pi\<^isub>M J' M) (?Q n)" using `?a \<le> 1` |
|
566 |
by (cases rule: extreal2_cases[of ?a "measure (Pi\<^isub>M J' M) (?Q n)"]) |
|
567 |
(auto simp: field_simps) |
|
568 |
qed |
|
569 |
also have "\<dots> = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J' M) (\<Inter>n. ?Q n)" |
|
570 |
proof (intro J'.continuity_from_above) |
|
571 |
show "range ?Q \<subseteq> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" using Q_sets by auto |
|
572 |
show "decseq ?Q" |
|
573 |
unfolding decseq_def |
|
574 |
proof (safe intro!: vimageI[OF refl]) |
|
575 |
fix m n :: nat assume "m \<le> n" |
|
576 |
fix x assume x: "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M J' M)" |
|
577 |
assume "?a / 2^(k+1) \<le> ?q n x" |
|
578 |
also have "?q n x \<le> ?q m x" |
|
579 |
proof (rule \<mu>G_mono) |
|
580 |
from fold(4)[OF J', OF Z_sets x] |
|
581 |
show "?M J' (Z n) x \<in> sets ?G" "?M J' (Z m) x \<in> sets ?G" by auto |
|
582 |
show "?M J' (Z n) x \<subseteq> ?M J' (Z m) x" |
|
583 |
using `decseq Z`[THEN decseqD, OF `m \<le> n`] by auto |
|
584 |
qed |
|
585 |
finally show "?a / 2^(k+1) \<le> ?q m x" . |
|
586 |
qed |
|
587 |
qed (intro J'.finite_measure Q_sets) |
|
588 |
finally have "(\<Inter>n. ?Q n) \<noteq> {}" |
|
589 |
using `0 < ?a` `?a \<le> 1` by (cases ?a) (auto simp: divide_le_0_iff power_le_zero_eq) |
|
590 |
then have "\<exists>w\<in>space (Pi\<^isub>M J' M). \<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ (k + 1) \<le> ?q n w" by auto } |
|
591 |
note Ex_w = this |
|
592 |
||
593 |
let "?q k n y" = "\<mu>G (?M (J k) (A n) y)" |
|
594 |
||
595 |
have "\<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ 0 \<le> \<mu>G (A n)" by (auto intro: INF_leI) |
|
596 |
from Ex_w[OF A(1,2) this J(1-3), of 0] guess w0 .. note w0 = this |
|
597 |
||
598 |
let "?P k wk w" = |
|
599 |
"w \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J (Suc k)) M) \<and> restrict w (J k) = wk \<and> (\<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ (Suc k + 1) \<le> ?q (Suc k) n w)" |
|
600 |
def w \<equiv> "nat_rec w0 (\<lambda>k wk. Eps (?P k wk))" |
|
601 |
||
602 |
{ fix k have w: "w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J k) M) \<and> |
|
603 |
(\<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ (k + 1) \<le> ?q k n (w k)) \<and> (k \<noteq> 0 \<longrightarrow> restrict (w k) (J (k - 1)) = w (k - 1))" |
|
604 |
proof (induct k) |
|
605 |
case 0 with w0 show ?case |
|
606 |
unfolding w_def nat_rec_0 by auto |
|
607 |
next |
|
608 |
case (Suc k) |
|
609 |
then have wk: "w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J k) M)" by auto |
|
610 |
have "\<exists>w'. ?P k (w k) w'" |
|
611 |
proof cases |
|
612 |
assume [simp]: "J k = J (Suc k)" |
|
613 |
show ?thesis |
|
614 |
proof (intro exI[of _ "w k"] conjI allI) |
|
615 |
fix n |
|
616 |
have "?a / 2 ^ (Suc k + 1) \<le> ?a / 2 ^ (k + 1)" |
|
617 |
using `0 < ?a` `?a \<le> 1` by (cases ?a) (auto simp: field_simps) |
|
618 |
also have "\<dots> \<le> ?q k n (w k)" using Suc by auto |
|
619 |
finally show "?a / 2 ^ (Suc k + 1) \<le> ?q (Suc k) n (w k)" by simp |
|
620 |
next |
|
621 |
show "w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J (Suc k)) M)" |
|
622 |
using Suc by simp |
|
623 |
then show "restrict (w k) (J k) = w k" |
|
624 |
by (simp add: extensional_restrict) |
|
625 |
qed |
|
626 |
next |
|
627 |
assume "J k \<noteq> J (Suc k)" |
|
628 |
with J_mono[of k "Suc k"] have "J (Suc k) - J k \<noteq> {}" (is "?D \<noteq> {}") by auto |
|
629 |
have "range (\<lambda>n. ?M (J k) (A n) (w k)) \<subseteq> sets ?G" |
|
630 |
"decseq (\<lambda>n. ?M (J k) (A n) (w k))" |
|
631 |
"\<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ (k + 1) \<le> \<mu>G (?M (J k) (A n) (w k))" |
|
632 |
using `decseq A` fold(4)[OF J(1-3) A_eq(2), of "w k" k] Suc |
|
633 |
by (auto simp: decseq_def) |
|
634 |
from Ex_w[OF this `?D \<noteq> {}`] J[of "Suc k"] |
|
635 |
obtain w' where w': "w' \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M ?D M)" |
|
636 |
"\<forall>n. ?a / 2 ^ (Suc k + 1) \<le> \<mu>G (?M ?D (?M (J k) (A n) (w k)) w')" by auto |
|
637 |
let ?w = "merge (J k) (w k) ?D w'" |
|
638 |
have [simp]: "\<And>x. merge (J k) (w k) (I - J k) (merge ?D w' (I - ?D) x) = |
|
639 |
merge (J (Suc k)) ?w (I - (J (Suc k))) x" |
|
640 |
using J(3)[of "Suc k"] J(3)[of k] J_mono[of k "Suc k"] |
|
641 |
by (auto intro!: ext split: split_merge) |
|
642 |
have *: "\<And>n. ?M ?D (?M (J k) (A n) (w k)) w' = ?M (J (Suc k)) (A n) ?w" |
|
643 |
using w'(1) J(3)[of "Suc k"] |
|
644 |
by (auto split: split_merge intro!: extensional_merge_sub) force+ |
|
645 |
show ?thesis |
|
646 |
apply (rule exI[of _ ?w]) |
|
647 |
using w' J_mono[of k "Suc k"] wk unfolding * |
|
648 |
apply (auto split: split_merge intro!: extensional_merge_sub ext) |
|
649 |
apply (force simp: extensional_def) |
|
650 |
done |
|
651 |
qed |
|
652 |
then have "?P k (w k) (w (Suc k))" |
|
653 |
unfolding w_def nat_rec_Suc unfolding w_def[symmetric] |
|
654 |
by (rule someI_ex) |
|
655 |
then show ?case by auto |
|
656 |
qed |
|
657 |
moreover |
|
658 |
then have "w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J k) M)" by auto |
|
659 |
moreover |
|
660 |
from w have "?a / 2 ^ (k + 1) \<le> ?q k k (w k)" by auto |
|
661 |
then have "?M (J k) (A k) (w k) \<noteq> {}" |
|
662 |
using positive_\<mu>G[unfolded positive_def] `0 < ?a` `?a \<le> 1` |
|
663 |
by (cases ?a) (auto simp: divide_le_0_iff power_le_zero_eq) |
|
664 |
then obtain x where "x \<in> ?M (J k) (A k) (w k)" by auto |
|
665 |
then have "merge (J k) (w k) (I - J k) x \<in> A k" by auto |
|
666 |
then have "\<exists>x\<in>A k. restrict x (J k) = w k" |
|
667 |
using `w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J k) M)` |
|
668 |
by (intro rev_bexI) (auto intro!: ext simp: extensional_def) |
|
669 |
ultimately have "w k \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (J k) M)" |
|
670 |
"\<exists>x\<in>A k. restrict x (J k) = w k" |
|
671 |
"k \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> restrict (w k) (J (k - 1)) = w (k - 1)" |
|
672 |
by auto } |
|
673 |
note w = this |
|
674 |
||
675 |
{ fix k l i assume "k \<le> l" "i \<in> J k" |
|
676 |
{ fix l have "w k i = w (k + l) i" |
|
677 |
proof (induct l) |
|
678 |
case (Suc l) |
|
679 |
from `i \<in> J k` J_mono[of k "k + l"] have "i \<in> J (k + l)" by auto |
|
680 |
with w(3)[of "k + Suc l"] |
|
681 |
have "w (k + l) i = w (k + Suc l) i" |
|
682 |
by (auto simp: restrict_def fun_eq_iff split: split_if_asm) |
|
683 |
with Suc show ?case by simp |
|
684 |
qed simp } |
|
685 |
from this[of "l - k"] `k \<le> l` have "w l i = w k i" by simp } |
|
686 |
note w_mono = this |
|
687 |
||
688 |
def w' \<equiv> "\<lambda>i. if i \<in> (\<Union>k. J k) then w (LEAST k. i \<in> J k) i else if i \<in> I then (SOME x. x \<in> space (M i)) else undefined" |
|
689 |
{ fix i k assume k: "i \<in> J k" |
|
690 |
have "w k i = w (LEAST k. i \<in> J k) i" |
|
691 |
by (intro w_mono Least_le k LeastI[of _ k]) |
|
692 |
then have "w' i = w k i" |
|
693 |
unfolding w'_def using k by auto } |
|
694 |
note w'_eq = this |
|
695 |
have w'_simps1: "\<And>i. i \<notin> I \<Longrightarrow> w' i = undefined" |
|
696 |
using J by (auto simp: w'_def) |
|
697 |
have w'_simps2: "\<And>i. i \<notin> (\<Union>k. J k) \<Longrightarrow> i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> w' i \<in> space (M i)" |
|
698 |
using J by (auto simp: w'_def intro!: someI_ex[OF M.not_empty[unfolded ex_in_conv[symmetric]]]) |
|
699 |
{ fix i assume "i \<in> I" then have "w' i \<in> space (M i)" |
|
700 |
using w(1) by (cases "i \<in> (\<Union>k. J k)") (force simp: w'_simps2 w'_eq)+ } |
|
701 |
note w'_simps[simp] = w'_eq w'_simps1 w'_simps2 this |
|
702 |
||
703 |
have w': "w' \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)" |
|
704 |
using w(1) by (auto simp add: Pi_iff extensional_def) |
|
705 |
||
706 |
{ fix n |
|
707 |
have "restrict w' (J n) = w n" using w(1) |
|
708 |
by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff restrict_def Pi_iff extensional_def) |
|
709 |
with w[of n] obtain x where "x \<in> A n" "restrict x (J n) = restrict w' (J n)" by auto |
|
710 |
then have "w' \<in> A n" unfolding A_eq using w' by (auto simp: emb_def) } |
|
711 |
then have "w' \<in> (\<Inter>i. A i)" by auto |
|
712 |
with `(\<Inter>i. A i) = {}` show False by auto |
|
713 |
qed |
|
714 |
ultimately show "(\<lambda>i. \<mu>G (A i)) ----> 0" |
|
715 |
using LIMSEQ_extreal_INFI[of "\<lambda>i. \<mu>G (A i)"] by simp |
|
716 |
qed |
|
717 |
qed |
|
718 |
||
719 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) infprod_spec: |
|
720 |
shows "(\<forall>s\<in>sets generator. measure (Pi\<^isub>P I M) s = \<mu>G s) \<and> measure_space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
|
721 |
proof - |
|
722 |
let ?P = "\<lambda>\<mu>. (\<forall>A\<in>sets generator. \<mu> A = \<mu>G A) \<and> |
|
723 |
measure_space \<lparr>space = space generator, sets = sets (sigma generator), measure = \<mu>\<rparr>" |
|
724 |
have **: "measure infprod_algebra = (SOME \<mu>. ?P \<mu>)" |
|
725 |
unfolding infprod_algebra_def by simp |
|
726 |
have *: "Pi\<^isub>P I M = \<lparr>space = space generator, sets = sets (sigma generator), measure = measure (Pi\<^isub>P I M)\<rparr>" |
|
727 |
unfolding infprod_algebra_def by auto |
|
728 |
show ?thesis |
|
729 |
apply (subst (2) *) |
|
730 |
apply (unfold **) |
|
731 |
apply (rule someI_ex[where P="?P"]) |
|
732 |
apply (rule extend_\<mu>G) |
|
733 |
done |
|
734 |
qed |
|
735 |
||
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
736 |
sublocale product_prob_space \<subseteq> P: measure_space "Pi\<^isub>P I M" |
42147 | 737 |
using infprod_spec by auto |
738 |
||
739 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measure_infprod_emb: |
|
740 |
assumes "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
|
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
741 |
shows "\<mu> (emb I J X) = measure (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
42147 | 742 |
proof - |
743 |
have "emb I J X \<in> sets generator" |
|
744 |
using assms by (rule generatorI') |
|
745 |
with \<mu>G_eq[OF assms] infprod_spec show ?thesis by auto |
|
746 |
qed |
|
747 |
||
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
748 |
sublocale product_prob_space \<subseteq> P: prob_space "Pi\<^isub>P I M" |
42166
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
749 |
proof |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
750 |
obtain i where "i \<in> I" using I_not_empty by auto |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
751 |
interpret i: finite_product_sigma_finite M "{i}" by default auto |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
752 |
let ?X = "\<Pi>\<^isub>E i\<in>{i}. space (M i)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
753 |
have "?X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M {i} M)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
754 |
by auto |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
755 |
from measure_infprod_emb[OF _ _ _ this] `i \<in> I` |
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
756 |
have "\<mu> (emb I {i} ?X) = measure (M i) (space (M i))" |
42166
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
757 |
by (simp add: i.measure_times) |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
758 |
also have "emb I {i} ?X = space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
759 |
using `i \<in> I` by (auto simp: emb_def infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
760 |
finally show "\<mu> (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) = 1" |
42166
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
761 |
using M.measure_space_1 by simp |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
762 |
qed |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
763 |
|
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
764 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measurable_component: |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
765 |
assumes "i \<in> I" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
766 |
shows "(\<lambda>x. x i) \<in> measurable (Pi\<^isub>P I M) (M i)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
767 |
proof (unfold measurable_def, safe) |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
768 |
fix x assume "x \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
769 |
then show "x i \<in> space (M i)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
770 |
using `i \<in> I` by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
771 |
next |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
772 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets (M i)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
773 |
with `i \<in> I` have |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
774 |
"(\<Pi>\<^isub>E x \<in> {i}. A) \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M {i} M)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
775 |
"(\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = emb I {i} (\<Pi>\<^isub>E x \<in> {i}. A)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
776 |
by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def emb_def) |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
777 |
from generatorI[OF _ _ _ this] `i \<in> I` |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
778 |
show "(\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
779 |
unfolding infprod_algebra_def by auto |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
780 |
qed |
efd229daeb2c
products of probability measures are probability measures
hoelzl
parents:
42148
diff
changeset
|
781 |
|
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
782 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_in_infprod_algebra[intro]: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
783 |
fixes J assumes J: "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" and X: "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
784 |
shows "emb I J X \<in> sets (\<Pi>\<^isub>P i\<in>I. M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
785 |
proof cases |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
786 |
assume "J = {}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
787 |
with X have "emb I J X = space (\<Pi>\<^isub>P i\<in>I. M i) \<or> emb I J X = {}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
788 |
by (auto simp: emb_def infprod_algebra_def generator_def |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
789 |
product_algebra_def product_algebra_generator_def image_constant sigma_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
790 |
then show ?thesis by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
791 |
next |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
792 |
assume "J \<noteq> {}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
793 |
show ?thesis unfolding infprod_algebra_def |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
794 |
by simp (intro in_sigma generatorI' `J \<noteq> {}` J X) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
795 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
796 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
797 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) finite_measure_infprod_emb: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
798 |
assumes "J \<noteq> {}" "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
799 |
shows "\<mu>' (emb I J X) = finite_measure.\<mu>' (Pi\<^isub>M J M) X" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
800 |
proof - |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
801 |
interpret J: finite_product_prob_space M J by default fact+ |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
802 |
from assms have "emb I J X \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
803 |
with assms show "\<mu>' (emb I J X) = J.\<mu>' X" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
804 |
unfolding \<mu>'_def J.\<mu>'_def |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
805 |
unfolding measure_infprod_emb[OF assms] |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
806 |
by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
807 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
808 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
809 |
lemma (in finite_product_prob_space) finite_measure_times: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
810 |
assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> A i \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
811 |
shows "\<mu>' (Pi\<^isub>E I A) = (\<Prod>i\<in>I. M.\<mu>' i (A i))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
812 |
using assms |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
813 |
unfolding \<mu>'_def M.\<mu>'_def |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
814 |
by (subst measure_times[OF assms]) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
815 |
(auto simp: finite_measure_eq M.finite_measure_eq setprod_extreal) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
816 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
817 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) finite_measure_infprod_emb_Pi: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
818 |
assumes J: "finite J" "J \<subseteq> I" "\<And>j. j \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> X j \<in> sets (M j)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
819 |
shows "\<mu>' (emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J X)) = (\<Prod>j\<in>J. M.\<mu>' j (X j))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
820 |
proof cases |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
821 |
assume "J = {}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
822 |
then have "emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J X) = space infprod_algebra" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
823 |
by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def sigma_def emb_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
824 |
then show ?thesis using `J = {}` prob_space by simp |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
825 |
next |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
826 |
assume "J \<noteq> {}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
827 |
interpret J: finite_product_prob_space M J by default fact+ |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
828 |
have "(\<Prod>i\<in>J. M.\<mu>' i (X i)) = J.\<mu>' (Pi\<^isub>E J X)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
829 |
using J `J \<noteq> {}` by (subst J.finite_measure_times) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
830 |
also have "\<dots> = \<mu>' (emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J X))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
831 |
using J `J \<noteq> {}` by (intro finite_measure_infprod_emb[symmetric]) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
832 |
finally show ?thesis by simp |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
833 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
834 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
835 |
lemma sigma_sets_mono: assumes "A \<subseteq> sigma_sets X B" shows "sigma_sets X A \<subseteq> sigma_sets X B" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
836 |
proof |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
837 |
fix x assume "x \<in> sigma_sets X A" then show "x \<in> sigma_sets X B" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
838 |
by induct (insert `A \<subseteq> sigma_sets X B`, auto intro: sigma_sets.intros) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
839 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
840 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
841 |
lemma sigma_sets_mono': assumes "A \<subseteq> B" shows "sigma_sets X A \<subseteq> sigma_sets X B" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
842 |
proof |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
843 |
fix x assume "x \<in> sigma_sets X A" then show "x \<in> sigma_sets X B" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
844 |
by induct (insert `A \<subseteq> B`, auto intro: sigma_sets.intros) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
845 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
846 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
847 |
lemma sigma_sets_subseteq: "A \<subseteq> sigma_sets X A" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
848 |
by (auto intro: sigma_sets.Basic) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
849 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
850 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) infprod_algebra_alt: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
851 |
"Pi\<^isub>P I M = sigma \<lparr> space = space (Pi\<^isub>P I M), |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
852 |
sets = (\<Union>J\<in>{J. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I}. emb I J ` Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i \<in> J. sets (M i))), |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
853 |
measure = measure (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<rparr>" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
854 |
(is "_ = sigma \<lparr> space = ?O, sets = ?M, measure = ?m \<rparr>") |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
855 |
proof (rule measure_space.equality) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
856 |
let ?G = "\<Union>J\<in>{J. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I}. emb I J ` sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
857 |
have "sigma_sets ?O ?M = sigma_sets ?O ?G" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
858 |
proof (intro equalityI sigma_sets_mono UN_least) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
859 |
fix J assume J: "J \<in> {J. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I}" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
860 |
have "emb I J ` Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i\<in>J. sets (M i)) \<subseteq> emb I J ` sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M)" by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
861 |
also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> ?G" using J by (rule UN_upper) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
862 |
also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> sigma_sets ?O ?G" by (rule sigma_sets_subseteq) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
863 |
finally show "emb I J ` Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i\<in>J. sets (M i)) \<subseteq> sigma_sets ?O ?G" . |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
864 |
have "emb I J ` sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) = emb I J ` sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>M J M)) (Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i \<in> J. sets (M i)))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
865 |
by (simp add: sets_sigma product_algebra_generator_def product_algebra_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
866 |
also have "\<dots> = sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) (emb I J ` Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i \<in> J. sets (M i)))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
867 |
using J M.sets_into_space |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
868 |
by (auto simp: emb_def_raw intro!: sigma_sets_vimage[symmetric]) blast |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
869 |
also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>M I M)) ?M" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
870 |
using J by (intro sigma_sets_mono') auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
871 |
finally show "emb I J ` sets (Pi\<^isub>M J M) \<subseteq> sigma_sets ?O ?M" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
872 |
by (simp add: infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
873 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
874 |
then show "sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = sets (sigma \<lparr> space = ?O, sets = ?M, measure = ?m \<rparr>)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
875 |
by (simp_all add: infprod_algebra_def generator_def sets_sigma) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
876 |
qed simp_all |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
877 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
878 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) infprod_algebra_alt2: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
879 |
"Pi\<^isub>P I M = sigma \<lparr> space = space (Pi\<^isub>P I M), |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
880 |
sets = (\<Union>i\<in>I. (\<lambda>A. (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ` sets (M i)), |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
881 |
measure = measure (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<rparr>" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
882 |
(is "_ = ?S") |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
883 |
proof (rule measure_space.equality) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
884 |
let "sigma \<lparr> space = ?O, sets = ?A, \<dots> = _ \<rparr>" = ?S |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
885 |
let ?G = "(\<Union>J\<in>{J. J \<noteq> {} \<and> finite J \<and> J \<subseteq> I}. emb I J ` Pi\<^isub>E J ` (\<Pi> i \<in> J. sets (M i)))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
886 |
have "sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = sigma_sets ?O ?G" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
887 |
by (subst infprod_algebra_alt) (simp add: sets_sigma) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
888 |
also have "\<dots> = sigma_sets ?O ?A" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
889 |
proof (intro equalityI sigma_sets_mono subsetI) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
890 |
interpret A: sigma_algebra ?S |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
891 |
by (rule sigma_algebra_sigma) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
892 |
fix A assume "A \<in> ?G" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
893 |
then obtain J B where "finite J" "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> I" "A = emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J B)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
894 |
and B: "\<And>i. i \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> B i \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
895 |
by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
896 |
then have A: "A = (\<Inter>j\<in>J. (\<lambda>x. x j) -` (B j) \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
897 |
by (auto simp: emb_def infprod_algebra_def generator_def Pi_iff) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
898 |
{ fix j assume "j\<in>J" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
899 |
with `J \<subseteq> I` have "j \<in> I" by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
900 |
with `j \<in> J` B have "(\<lambda>x. x j) -` (B j) \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<in> sets ?S" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
901 |
by (auto simp: sets_sigma intro: sigma_sets.Basic) } |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
902 |
with `finite J` `J \<noteq> {}` have "A \<in> sets ?S" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
903 |
unfolding A by (intro A.finite_INT) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
904 |
then show "A \<in> sigma_sets ?O ?A" by (simp add: sets_sigma) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
905 |
next |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
906 |
fix A assume "A \<in> ?A" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
907 |
then obtain i B where i: "i \<in> I" "B \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
908 |
and "A = (\<lambda>x. x i) -` B \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
909 |
by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
910 |
then have "A = emb I {i} (Pi\<^isub>E {i} (\<lambda>_. B))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
911 |
by (auto simp: emb_def infprod_algebra_def generator_def Pi_iff) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
912 |
with i show "A \<in> sigma_sets ?O ?G" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
913 |
by (intro sigma_sets.Basic UN_I[where a="{i}"]) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
914 |
qed |
42866 | 915 |
also have "\<dots> = sets ?S" |
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
916 |
by (simp add: sets_sigma) |
42866 | 917 |
finally show "sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = sets ?S" . |
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
918 |
qed simp_all |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
919 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
920 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measurable_into_infprod_algebra: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
921 |
assumes "sigma_algebra N" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
922 |
assumes f: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. f x i) \<in> measurable N (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
923 |
assumes ext: "\<And>x. x \<in> space N \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> extensional I" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
924 |
shows "f \<in> measurable N (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
925 |
proof - |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
926 |
interpret N: sigma_algebra N by fact |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
927 |
have f_in: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. f x i) \<in> space N \<rightarrow> space (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
928 |
using f by (auto simp: measurable_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
929 |
{ fix i A assume i: "i \<in> I" "A \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
930 |
then have "f -` (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> f -` space infprod_algebra \<inter> space N = (\<lambda>x. f x i) -` A \<inter> space N" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
931 |
using f_in ext by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
932 |
also have "\<dots> \<in> sets N" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
933 |
by (rule measurable_sets f i)+ |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
934 |
finally have "f -` (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> f -` space infprod_algebra \<inter> space N \<in> sets N" . } |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
935 |
with f_in ext show ?thesis |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
936 |
by (subst infprod_algebra_alt2) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
937 |
(auto intro!: N.measurable_sigma simp: Pi_iff infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
938 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
939 |
|
42865 | 940 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) measurable_singleton_infprod: |
941 |
assumes "i \<in> I" |
|
942 |
shows "(\<lambda>x. x i) \<in> measurable (Pi\<^isub>P I M) (M i)" |
|
943 |
proof (unfold measurable_def, intro CollectI conjI ballI) |
|
944 |
show "(\<lambda>x. x i) \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<rightarrow> space (M i)" |
|
945 |
using M.sets_into_space `i \<in> I` |
|
946 |
by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def) |
|
947 |
fix A assume "A \<in> sets (M i)" |
|
948 |
have "(\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = emb I {i} (\<Pi>\<^isub>E _\<in>{i}. A)" |
|
949 |
by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def emb_def) |
|
950 |
also have "\<dots> \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" |
|
951 |
using `i \<in> I` `A \<in> sets (M i)` |
|
952 |
by (intro emb_in_infprod_algebra product_algebraI) auto |
|
953 |
finally show "(\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M) \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M)" . |
|
954 |
qed |
|
955 |
||
956 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) sigma_product_algebra_sigma_eq: |
|
957 |
assumes M: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> M i = sigma (E i)" |
|
958 |
shows "sets (Pi\<^isub>P I M) = sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) (\<Union>i\<in>I. (\<lambda>A. (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ` sets (E i))" |
|
959 |
proof - |
|
960 |
let ?E = "(\<Union>i\<in>I. (\<lambda>A. (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ` sets (E i))" |
|
961 |
let ?M = "(\<Union>i\<in>I. (\<lambda>A. (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ` sets (M i))" |
|
962 |
{ fix i A assume "i\<in>I" "A \<in> sets (E i)" |
|
963 |
then have "A \<in> sets (M i)" using M by auto |
|
964 |
then have "A \<in> Pow (space (M i))" using M.sets_into_space by auto |
|
965 |
then have "A \<in> Pow (space (E i))" using M[OF `i \<in> I`] by auto } |
|
966 |
moreover |
|
967 |
have "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>x. x i) \<in> space infprod_algebra \<rightarrow> space (E i)" |
|
968 |
by (auto simp: M infprod_algebra_def generator_def Pi_iff) |
|
969 |
ultimately have "sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ?M \<subseteq> sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ?E" |
|
970 |
apply (intro sigma_sets_mono UN_least) |
|
971 |
apply (simp add: sets_sigma M) |
|
972 |
apply (subst sigma_sets_vimage[symmetric]) |
|
973 |
apply (auto intro!: sigma_sets_mono') |
|
974 |
done |
|
975 |
moreover have "sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ?E \<subseteq> sigma_sets (space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) ?M" |
|
976 |
by (intro sigma_sets_mono') (auto simp: M) |
|
977 |
ultimately show ?thesis |
|
978 |
by (subst infprod_algebra_alt2) (auto simp: sets_sigma) |
|
979 |
qed |
|
980 |
||
981 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) Int_proj_eq_emb: |
|
982 |
assumes "J \<noteq> {}" "J \<subseteq> I" |
|
983 |
shows "(\<Inter>i\<in>J. (\<lambda>x. x i) -` A i \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) = emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J A)" |
|
984 |
using assms by (auto simp: infprod_algebra_def generator_def emb_def Pi_iff) |
|
985 |
||
986 |
lemma (in product_prob_space) emb_insert: |
|
987 |
"i \<notin> J \<Longrightarrow> emb I J (Pi\<^isub>E J f) \<inter> ((\<lambda>x. x i) -` A \<inter> space (Pi\<^isub>P I M)) = |
|
988 |
emb I (insert i J) (Pi\<^isub>E (insert i J) (f(i := A)))" |
|
989 |
by (auto simp: emb_def Pi_iff infprod_algebra_def generator_def split: split_if_asm) |
|
990 |
||
42257
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
991 |
subsection {* Sequence space *} |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
992 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
993 |
locale sequence_space = product_prob_space M "UNIV :: nat set" for M |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
994 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
995 |
lemma (in sequence_space) infprod_in_sets[intro]: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
996 |
fixes E :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a set" assumes E: "\<And>i. E i \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
997 |
shows "Pi UNIV E \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>P UNIV M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
998 |
proof - |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
999 |
have "Pi UNIV E = (\<Inter>i. emb UNIV {..i} (\<Pi>\<^isub>E j\<in>{..i}. E j))" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1000 |
using E E[THEN M.sets_into_space] |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1001 |
by (auto simp: emb_def Pi_iff extensional_def) blast |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1002 |
with E show ?thesis |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1003 |
by (auto intro: emb_in_infprod_algebra) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1004 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1005 |
|
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1006 |
lemma (in sequence_space) measure_infprod: |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1007 |
fixes E :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a set" assumes E: "\<And>i. E i \<in> sets (M i)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1008 |
shows "(\<lambda>n. \<Prod>i\<le>n. M.\<mu>' i (E i)) ----> \<mu>' (Pi UNIV E)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1009 |
proof - |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1010 |
let "?E n" = "emb UNIV {..n} (Pi\<^isub>E {.. n} E)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1011 |
{ fix n :: nat |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1012 |
interpret n: finite_product_prob_space M "{..n}" by default auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1013 |
have "(\<Prod>i\<le>n. M.\<mu>' i (E i)) = n.\<mu>' (Pi\<^isub>E {.. n} E)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1014 |
using E by (subst n.finite_measure_times) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1015 |
also have "\<dots> = \<mu>' (?E n)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1016 |
using E by (intro finite_measure_infprod_emb[symmetric]) auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1017 |
finally have "(\<Prod>i\<le>n. M.\<mu>' i (E i)) = \<mu>' (?E n)" . } |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1018 |
moreover have "Pi UNIV E = (\<Inter>n. ?E n)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1019 |
using E E[THEN M.sets_into_space] |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1020 |
by (auto simp: emb_def extensional_def Pi_iff) blast |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1021 |
moreover have "range ?E \<subseteq> sets (Pi\<^isub>P UNIV M)" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1022 |
using E by auto |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1023 |
moreover have "decseq ?E" |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1024 |
by (auto simp: emb_def Pi_iff decseq_def) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1025 |
ultimately show ?thesis |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1026 |
by (simp add: finite_continuity_from_above) |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1027 |
qed |
08d717c82828
prove measurable_into_infprod_algebra and measure_infprod
hoelzl
parents:
42166
diff
changeset
|
1028 |
|
42147 | 1029 |
end |