|
599
|
1 |
$Id$
|
|
|
2 |
ERRATA in the book "Isabelle: A Generic Theorem Prover"
|
|
|
3 |
by Lawrence C. Paulson (contributions by Tobias Nipkow)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
Some of these errors are typographical but most of them are due to continuing
|
|
|
6 |
changes to Isabelle.
|
|
456
|
7 |
|
|
491
|
8 |
Thanks to Sara Kalvala, Tobias Nipkow
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
599
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
INTRODUCTION TO ISABELLE
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
Advanced Methods
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
page 52, middle: the declaration "types bool,nat" should be "types bool nat"
|
|
456
|
16 |
|
|
599
|
17 |
page 57, bottom: should be addsimps in
|
|
|
18 |
val add_ss = FOL_ss addrews [add_0, add_Suc]
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
ISABELLE REFERENCE MANUAL
|
|
456
|
22 |
|
|
599
|
23 |
Introduction
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
page 67: show_brackets is another flag, controlling display of bracketting
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
Tactics
|
|
456
|
28 |
|
|
599
|
29 |
page 85: subgoals_tac is another tactic, for multiple calls to subgoal_tac
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
Theories
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
page 117: the three lines of ML shown can be abbreviated to just
|
|
|
34 |
init_thy_reader();
|
|
456
|
35 |
|
|
599
|
36 |
page 118: extend_theory has been replaced by numerous functions for adding
|
|
|
37 |
types, constants, axioms, etc.
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
Defining Logics
|
|
507
|
40 |
|
|
599
|
41 |
page 127: type constraints ("::") now have a very low priority of 4.
|
|
|
42 |
As in ML, they must usually be enclosed in paretheses.
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
Syntax Transformations
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
page 145, line -5: delete repeated "the" in "before the the .thy file"
|
|
507
|
47 |
|
|
716
|
48 |
Simplification
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
50 |
page 158, "!": Isabelle now permits more general left-hand sides, so called
|
|
|
51 |
higher-order patterns.
|
|
507
|
52 |
|
|
599
|
53 |
ISABELLE'S OBJECT-LOGICS
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
|
|
507
|
56 |
|
|
599
|
57 |
page 209: axioms have been renamed:
|
|
|
58 |
union_iff is now Union_iff
|
|
|
59 |
power_set is now Pow_iff
|
|
456
|
60 |
|
|
599
|
61 |
page 215, bottom of figure 17.10: DiffD2 is now "c : A - B ==> c ~: B"
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
page 215, bottom: rules mem_anti_sym and mem_anti_refl are now mem_asym and
|
|
|
64 |
mem_irrefl
|
|
456
|
65 |
|
|
599
|
66 |
page 222, top: missing braces in qconverse_def (around right-hand side)
|
|
|
67 |
and QSigma_def (around <x;y>)
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
69 |
page 223, top: lfp_def, gfp_def have missing braces around the argument of
|
|
|
70 |
Inter, Union
|
|
458
|
71 |
|
|
599
|
72 |
page 228: now there is also a theory of cardinal numbers and some
|
|
|
73 |
developments involving the Axiom of Choice.
|
|
479
|
74 |
|
|
599
|
75 |
page 229: now there is another examples directory, IMP (a semantics
|
|
|
76 |
equivalence proof for an imperative language)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
78 |
Higher-Order Logic
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
80 |
page 243: Pow is a new constant of type 'a set => 'a set set
|
|
491
|
81 |
|
|
599
|
82 |
page 246: Pow is defined by Pow(A) == {B. B <= A}
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
page 248: Pow has the rules
|
|
|
85 |
PowI A<=B ==> A: Pow(B)
|
|
|
86 |
PowD A: Pow(B) ==> A<=B
|
|
507
|
87 |
|
|
701
|
88 |
page 251: split now has type [['a,'b] => 'c, 'a * 'b] => 'c
|
|
|
89 |
Definition modified accordingly
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
page 252: sum_case now has type ['a=>'c,'b=>'c, 'a+'b] =>'c
|
|
|
92 |
Definition and rules modified accordingly
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
94 |
page 254: nat_case now has type ['a, nat=>'a, nat] =>'a
|
|
|
95 |
Definition modified accordingly
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
97 |
page 256,258: list_case now takes the list as its last argument, not the
|
|
|
98 |
first.
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
601
|
100 |
page 259: HOL theory files may now include datatype declarations, primitive
|
|
614
|
101 |
recursive function definitions, and (co)inductive definitions. (These new
|
|
|
102 |
sections are available separately as the file ml/HOL-extensions.dvi.gz,
|
|
|
103 |
host ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk.)
|
|
599
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
page 259: now there is another examples directory, IMP (a semantics
|
|
|
106 |
equivalence proof for an imperative language)
|