9722
|
1 |
%
|
|
2 |
\begin{isabellebody}%
|
9792
|
3 |
%
|
|
4 |
\isamarkupsubsubsection{Simplifying let-expressions}
|
|
5 |
%
|
|
6 |
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
|
|
7 |
\index{simplification!of let-expressions}
|
|
8 |
Proving a goal containing \isaindex{let}-expressions almost invariably
|
|
9 |
requires the \isa{let}-con\-structs to be expanded at some point. Since
|
|
10 |
\isa{let}-\isa{in} is just syntactic sugar for a predefined constant
|
|
11 |
(called \isa{Let}), expanding \isa{let}-constructs means rewriting with
|
|
12 |
\isa{Let{\isacharunderscore}def}:%
|
|
13 |
\end{isamarkuptext}%
|
9673
|
14 |
\isacommand{lemma}\ {\isachardoublequote}{\isacharparenleft}let\ xs\ {\isacharequal}\ {\isacharbrackleft}{\isacharbrackright}\ in\ xs{\isacharat}ys{\isacharat}xs{\isacharparenright}\ {\isacharequal}\ ys{\isachardoublequote}\isanewline
|
|
15 |
\isacommand{by}{\isacharparenleft}simp\ add{\isacharcolon}\ Let{\isacharunderscore}def{\isacharparenright}%
|
8749
|
16 |
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
|
|
17 |
If, in a particular context, there is no danger of a combinatorial explosion
|
9792
|
18 |
of nested \isa{let}s one could even add \isa{Let{\isacharunderscore}def} permanently:%
|
8749
|
19 |
\end{isamarkuptext}%
|
9722
|
20 |
\isacommand{lemmas}\ {\isacharbrackleft}simp{\isacharbrackright}\ {\isacharequal}\ Let{\isacharunderscore}def\end{isabellebody}%
|
9145
|
21 |
%%% Local Variables:
|
|
22 |
%%% mode: latex
|
|
23 |
%%% TeX-master: "root"
|
|
24 |
%%% End:
|