equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
346 by Auto_tac; |
346 by Auto_tac; |
347 by (dres_inst_tac [("w1", "rel")] (impOfSubs subset_preserves_o) 1); |
347 by (dres_inst_tac [("w1", "rel")] (impOfSubs subset_preserves_o) 1); |
348 by (dres_inst_tac [("w1", "ask")] (impOfSubs subset_preserves_o) 2); |
348 by (dres_inst_tac [("w1", "ask")] (impOfSubs subset_preserves_o) 2); |
349 by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [o_def, split_def])); |
349 by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [o_def, split_def])); |
350 qed "OK_lift_rename_Client"; |
350 qed "OK_lift_rename_Client"; |
351 Addsimps [OK_lift_rename_Client]; (*needed in rename_client_map_tac* |
351 Addsimps [OK_lift_rename_Client]; (*needed in rename_client_map_tac*) |
352 |
352 |
353 (*The proofs of rename_Client_Increasing, rename_Client_Bounded and |
353 (*The proofs of rename_Client_Increasing, rename_Client_Bounded and |
354 rename_Client_Progress are similar. All require copying out the original |
354 rename_Client_Progress are similar. All require copying out the original |
355 Client property. A forward proof can be constructed as follows: |
355 Client property. A forward proof can be constructed as follows: |
356 |
356 |
383 inv_inv_eq]) 1, |
383 inv_inv_eq]) 1, |
384 asm_simp_tac |
384 asm_simp_tac |
385 (simpset() addsimps [o_def, non_dummy_def, guarantees_Int_right]) 1]; |
385 (simpset() addsimps [o_def, non_dummy_def, guarantees_Int_right]) 1]; |
386 |
386 |
387 |
387 |
|
388 (* FIXME no longer works -- had been commented out unintentially for a long time |
|
389 |
388 (*Lifting Client_Increasing to systemState*) |
390 (*Lifting Client_Increasing to systemState*) |
389 Goal "i : I \ |
391 Goal "i : I \ |
390 \ ==> rename sysOfClient (plam x: I. rename client_map Client) : \ |
392 \ ==> rename sysOfClient (plam x: I. rename client_map Client) : \ |
391 \ UNIV guarantees \ |
393 \ UNIV guarantees \ |
392 \ Increasing (ask o sub i o client) Int \ |
394 \ Increasing (ask o sub i o client) Int \ |
738 by (rtac fst_inv_equalityI 1); |
740 by (rtac fst_inv_equalityI 1); |
739 by (res_inst_tac [("f","%z. (f z, ?h z)")] surjI 1); |
741 by (res_inst_tac [("f","%z. (f z, ?h z)")] surjI 1); |
740 by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [bij_is_inj, inv_f_f]) 1); |
742 by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [bij_is_inj, inv_f_f]) 1); |
741 by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [bij_is_surj, surj_f_inv_f]) 1); |
743 by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [bij_is_surj, surj_f_inv_f]) 1); |
742 qed "bij_fst_inv_inv_eq"; |
744 qed "bij_fst_inv_inv_eq"; |
|
745 *) |