33 qed |
55 qed |
34 show "x < b ^ (floorlog b x)" |
56 show "x < b ^ (floorlog b x)" |
35 proof - |
57 proof - |
36 have "x \<le> b powr (log b x)" using \<open>x > 0\<close> \<open>b > 1\<close> by simp |
58 have "x \<le> b powr (log b x)" using \<open>x > 0\<close> \<open>b > 1\<close> by simp |
37 also have "\<dots> < b powr (\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> + 1)" |
59 also have "\<dots> < b powr (\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> + 1)" |
38 using assms by (intro powr_less_mono) auto |
60 using that by (intro powr_less_mono) auto |
39 also have "\<dots> = b ^ nat (\<lfloor>log b (real_of_int x)\<rfloor> + 1)" |
61 also have "\<dots> = b ^ nat (\<lfloor>log b (real_of_int x)\<rfloor> + 1)" |
40 using assms by (simp flip: powr_realpow) |
62 using that by (simp flip: powr_realpow) |
41 finally |
63 finally |
42 have "x < b ^ nat (\<lfloor>log b (int x)\<rfloor> + 1)" |
64 have "x < b ^ nat (\<lfloor>log b (int x)\<rfloor> + 1)" |
43 by (rule of_nat_less_imp_less) |
65 by (rule of_nat_less_imp_less) |
44 then show ?thesis |
66 then show ?thesis |
45 using \<open>x > 0\<close> \<open>b > 1\<close> by (simp add: floorlog_def nat_add_distrib) |
67 using \<open>x > 0\<close> \<open>b > 1\<close> by (simp add: floorlog_def nat_add_distrib) |
46 qed |
68 qed |
47 qed |
69 qed |
48 |
70 |
49 lemma floorlog_power[simp]: |
71 lemma floorlog_power [simp]: |
50 assumes "a > 0" "b > 1" |
72 "floorlog b (a * b ^ c) = floorlog b a + c" if "a > 0" "b > 1" |
51 shows "floorlog b (a * b ^ c) = floorlog b a + c" |
|
52 proof - |
73 proof - |
53 have "\<lfloor>log b a + real c\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + c" by arith |
74 have "\<lfloor>log b a + real c\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + c" by arith |
54 then show ?thesis using assms |
75 then show ?thesis using that |
55 by (auto simp: floorlog_def log_mult powr_realpow[symmetric] nat_add_distrib) |
76 by (auto simp: floorlog_def log_mult powr_realpow[symmetric] nat_add_distrib) |
56 qed |
77 qed |
57 |
78 |
58 lemma floor_log_add_eqI: |
79 lemma floor_log_add_eqI: |
59 fixes a::nat and b::nat and r::real |
80 "\<lfloor>log b (a + r)\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor>" if "b > 1" "a \<ge> 1" "0 \<le> r" "r < 1" |
60 assumes "b > 1" "a \<ge> 1" "0 \<le> r" "r < 1" |
81 for a b :: nat and r :: real |
61 shows "\<lfloor>log b (a + r)\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor>" |
|
62 proof (rule floor_eq2) |
82 proof (rule floor_eq2) |
63 have "log b a \<le> log b (a + r)" using assms by force |
83 have "log b a \<le> log b (a + r)" using that by force |
64 then show "\<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> \<le> log b (a + r)" by arith |
84 then show "\<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> \<le> log b (a + r)" by arith |
65 next |
85 next |
66 define l::int where "l = int b ^ (nat \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1)" |
86 define l::int where "l = int b ^ (nat \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1)" |
67 have l_def_real: "l = b powr (\<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1)" |
87 have l_def_real: "l = b powr (\<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1)" |
68 using assms by (simp add: l_def powr_add powr_real_of_int) |
88 using that by (simp add: l_def powr_add powr_real_of_int) |
69 have "a < l" |
89 have "a < l" |
70 proof - |
90 proof - |
71 have "a = b powr (log b a)" using assms by simp |
91 have "a = b powr (log b a)" using that by simp |
72 also have "\<dots> < b powr floor ((log b a) + 1)" |
92 also have "\<dots> < b powr floor ((log b a) + 1)" |
73 using assms(1) by auto |
93 using that(1) by auto |
74 also have "\<dots> = l" |
94 also have "\<dots> = l" |
75 using assms by (simp add: l_def powr_real_of_int powr_add) |
95 using that by (simp add: l_def powr_real_of_int powr_add) |
76 finally show ?thesis by simp |
96 finally show ?thesis by simp |
77 qed |
97 qed |
78 then have "a + r < l" using assms by simp |
98 then have "a + r < l" using that by simp |
79 then have "log b (a + r) < log b l" using assms by simp |
99 then have "log b (a + r) < log b l" using that by simp |
80 also have "\<dots> = real_of_int \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1" |
100 also have "\<dots> = real_of_int \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1" |
81 using assms by (simp add: l_def_real) |
101 using that by (simp add: l_def_real) |
82 finally show "log b (a + r) < real_of_int \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1" . |
102 finally show "log b (a + r) < real_of_int \<lfloor>log b a\<rfloor> + 1" . |
83 qed |
103 qed |
84 |
104 |
85 lemma divide_nat_diff_div_nat_less_one: |
|
86 fixes x b::nat shows "x / b - x div b < 1" |
|
87 proof - |
|
88 have "int 0 \<noteq> \<lfloor>1::real\<rfloor>" by simp |
|
89 thus ?thesis |
|
90 by (metis add_diff_cancel_left' floor_divide_of_nat_eq less_eq_real_def |
|
91 mod_div_trivial real_of_nat_div3 real_of_nat_div_aux) |
|
92 qed |
|
93 |
|
94 lemma floor_log_div: |
105 lemma floor_log_div: |
95 fixes b x :: nat assumes "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b > 0" |
106 "\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b)\<rfloor> + 1" if "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b > 0" |
96 shows "\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b)\<rfloor> + 1" |
107 for b x :: nat |
97 proof- |
108 proof- |
98 have "\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b * b)\<rfloor>" using assms by simp |
109 have "\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b * b)\<rfloor>" using that by simp |
99 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b) + log b b\<rfloor>" |
110 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b) + log b b\<rfloor>" |
100 using assms by (subst log_mult) auto |
111 using that by (subst log_mult) auto |
101 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b)\<rfloor> + 1" using assms by simp |
112 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x / b)\<rfloor> + 1" using that by simp |
102 also have "\<lfloor>log b (x / b)\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b + (x / b - x div b))\<rfloor>" by simp |
113 also have "\<lfloor>log b (x / b)\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b + (x / b - x div b))\<rfloor>" by simp |
103 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b)\<rfloor>" |
114 also have "\<dots> = \<lfloor>log b (x div b)\<rfloor>" |
104 using assms real_of_nat_div4 divide_nat_diff_div_nat_less_one |
115 using that real_of_nat_div4 divide_nat_diff_div_nat_less_one |
105 by (intro floor_log_add_eqI) auto |
116 by (intro floor_log_add_eqI) auto |
106 finally show ?thesis . |
117 finally show ?thesis . |
107 qed |
118 qed |
108 |
119 |
109 lemma compute_floorlog[code]: |
120 lemma compute_floorlog [code]: |
110 "floorlog b x = (if x > 0 \<and> b > 1 then floorlog b (x div b) + 1 else 0)" |
121 "floorlog b x = (if x > 0 \<and> b > 1 then floorlog b (x div b) + 1 else 0)" |
111 by (auto simp: floorlog_def floor_log_div[of b x] div_eq_0_iff nat_add_distrib |
122 by (auto simp: floorlog_def floor_log_div[of b x] div_eq_0_iff nat_add_distrib |
112 intro!: floor_eq2) |
123 intro!: floor_eq2) |
113 |
124 |
114 lemma floor_log_eq_if: |
125 lemma floor_log_eq_if: |
115 fixes b x y :: nat |
126 "\<lfloor>log b x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>log b y\<rfloor>" if "x div b = y div b" "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b \<ge> 1" |
116 assumes "x div b = y div b" "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b \<ge> 1" |
127 for b x y :: nat |
117 shows "floor(log b x) = floor(log b y)" |
128 proof - |
118 proof - |
129 have "y > 0" using that by (auto intro: ccontr) |
119 have "y > 0" using assms by(auto intro: ccontr) |
130 thus ?thesis using that by (simp add: floor_log_div) |
120 thus ?thesis using assms by (simp add: floor_log_div) |
|
121 qed |
131 qed |
122 |
132 |
123 lemma floorlog_eq_if: |
133 lemma floorlog_eq_if: |
124 fixes b x y :: nat |
134 "floorlog b x = floorlog b y" if "x div b = y div b" "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b \<ge> 1" |
125 assumes "x div b = y div b" "b > 1" "x > 0" "x div b \<ge> 1" |
135 for b x y :: nat |
126 shows "floorlog b x = floorlog b y" |
136 proof - |
127 proof - |
137 have "y > 0" using that by (auto intro: ccontr) |
128 have "y > 0" using assms by(auto intro: ccontr) |
138 then show ?thesis using that |
129 thus ?thesis using assms |
139 by (auto simp add: floorlog_def eq_nat_nat_iff intro: floor_log_eq_if) |
130 by(auto simp add: floorlog_def eq_nat_nat_iff intro: floor_log_eq_if) |
140 qed |
131 qed |
141 |
132 |
142 lemma floorlog_leD: |
133 |
143 "floorlog b x \<le> w \<Longrightarrow> b > 1 \<Longrightarrow> x < b ^ w" |
134 lemma powr_eq_one_iff[simp]: "a powr x = 1 \<longleftrightarrow> (x = 0)" |
|
135 if "a > 1" |
|
136 for a x::real |
|
137 using that |
|
138 by (auto simp: powr_def split: if_splits) |
|
139 |
|
140 lemma floorlog_leD: "floorlog b x \<le> w \<Longrightarrow> b > 1 \<Longrightarrow> x < b ^ w" |
|
141 by (metis floorlog_bounds leD linorder_neqE_nat order.strict_trans power_strict_increasing_iff |
144 by (metis floorlog_bounds leD linorder_neqE_nat order.strict_trans power_strict_increasing_iff |
142 zero_less_one zero_less_power) |
145 zero_less_one zero_less_power) |
143 |
146 |
144 lemma floorlog_leI: "x < b ^ w \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> w \<Longrightarrow> b > 1 \<Longrightarrow> floorlog b x \<le> w" |
147 lemma floorlog_leI: |
|
148 "x < b ^ w \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> w \<Longrightarrow> b > 1 \<Longrightarrow> floorlog b x \<le> w" |
145 by (drule less_imp_of_nat_less[where 'a=real]) |
149 by (drule less_imp_of_nat_less[where 'a=real]) |
146 (auto simp: floorlog_def Suc_le_eq nat_less_iff floor_less_iff log_of_power_less) |
150 (auto simp: floorlog_def Suc_le_eq nat_less_iff floor_less_iff log_of_power_less) |
147 |
151 |
148 lemma floorlog_eq_zero_iff: |
152 lemma floorlog_eq_zero_iff: |
149 "floorlog b x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (b \<le> 1 \<or> x \<le> 0)" |
153 "floorlog b x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> 1 \<or> x \<le> 0" |
150 by (auto simp: floorlog_def) |
154 by (auto simp: floorlog_def) |
151 |
155 |
152 lemma floorlog_le_iff: "floorlog b x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> 1 \<or> b > 1 \<and> 0 \<le> w \<and> x < b ^ w" |
156 lemma floorlog_le_iff: |
|
157 "floorlog b x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> 1 \<or> b > 1 \<and> 0 \<le> w \<and> x < b ^ w" |
153 using floorlog_leD[of b x w] floorlog_leI[of x b w] |
158 using floorlog_leD[of b x w] floorlog_leI[of x b w] |
154 by (auto simp: floorlog_eq_zero_iff[THEN iffD2]) |
159 by (auto simp: floorlog_eq_zero_iff[THEN iffD2]) |
155 |
160 |
156 lemma floorlog_ge_SucI: "Suc w \<le> floorlog b x" if "b ^ w \<le> x" "b > 1" |
161 lemma floorlog_ge_SucI: |
|
162 "Suc w \<le> floorlog b x" if "b ^ w \<le> x" "b > 1" |
157 using that le_log_of_power[of b w x] power_not_zero |
163 using that le_log_of_power[of b w x] power_not_zero |
158 by (force simp: floorlog_def Suc_le_eq powr_realpow not_less Suc_nat_eq_nat_zadd1 |
164 by (force simp: floorlog_def Suc_le_eq powr_realpow not_less Suc_nat_eq_nat_zadd1 |
159 zless_nat_eq_int_zless int_add_floor less_floor_iff |
165 zless_nat_eq_int_zless int_add_floor less_floor_iff |
160 simp del: floor_add2) |
166 simp del: floor_add2) |
161 |
167 |
162 lemma floorlog_geI: "w \<le> floorlog b x" if "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" "b > 1" |
168 lemma floorlog_geI: |
|
169 "w \<le> floorlog b x" if "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" "b > 1" |
163 using floorlog_ge_SucI[of b "w - 1" x] that |
170 using floorlog_ge_SucI[of b "w - 1" x] that |
164 by auto |
171 by auto |
165 |
172 |
166 lemma floorlog_geD: "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" if "w \<le> floorlog b x" "w > 0" |
173 lemma floorlog_geD: |
|
174 "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" if "w \<le> floorlog b x" "w > 0" |
167 proof - |
175 proof - |
168 have "b > 1" "0 < x" |
176 have "b > 1" "0 < x" |
169 using that by (auto simp: floorlog_def split: if_splits) |
177 using that by (auto simp: floorlog_def split: if_splits) |
170 have "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" if "b ^ w \<le> x" |
178 have "b ^ (w - 1) \<le> x" if "b ^ w \<le> x" |
171 proof - |
179 proof - |
193 by (auto simp: floorlog_def le_nat_iff le_floor_iff le_log_iff powr_realpow |
201 by (auto simp: floorlog_def le_nat_iff le_floor_iff le_log_iff powr_realpow |
194 split: if_splits elim!: le_SucE) |
202 split: if_splits elim!: le_SucE) |
195 qed |
203 qed |
196 |
204 |
197 |
205 |
198 definition bitlen :: "int \<Rightarrow> int" where "bitlen a = floorlog 2 (nat a)" |
206 subsection \<open>Bitlen\<close> |
199 |
207 |
200 lemma bitlen_alt_def: "bitlen a = (if a > 0 then \<lfloor>log 2 a\<rfloor> + 1 else 0)" |
208 definition bitlen :: "int \<Rightarrow> int" |
201 by (simp add: bitlen_def floorlog_def) |
209 where "bitlen a = floorlog 2 (nat a)" |
202 |
210 |
203 lemma bitlen_zero[simp]: "bitlen 0 = 0" |
211 lemma bitlen_alt_def: |
|
212 "bitlen a = (if a > 0 then \<lfloor>log 2 a\<rfloor> + 1 else 0)" |
|
213 by (simp add: bitlen_def floorlog_def) |
|
214 |
|
215 lemma bitlen_zero [simp]: |
|
216 "bitlen 0 = 0" |
204 by (auto simp: bitlen_def floorlog_def) |
217 by (auto simp: bitlen_def floorlog_def) |
205 |
218 |
206 lemma bitlen_nonneg: "0 \<le> bitlen x" |
219 lemma bitlen_nonneg: |
|
220 "0 \<le> bitlen x" |
207 by (simp add: bitlen_def) |
221 by (simp add: bitlen_def) |
208 |
222 |
209 lemma bitlen_bounds: |
223 lemma bitlen_bounds: |
210 assumes "x > 0" |
224 "2 ^ nat (bitlen x - 1) \<le> x \<and> x < 2 ^ nat (bitlen x)" if "x > 0" |
211 shows "2 ^ nat (bitlen x - 1) \<le> x \<and> x < 2 ^ nat (bitlen x)" |
225 proof - |
212 proof - |
226 from that have "bitlen x \<ge> 1" by (auto simp: bitlen_alt_def) |
213 from assms have "bitlen x \<ge> 1" by (auto simp: bitlen_alt_def) |
227 with that floorlog_bounds[of "nat x" 2] show ?thesis |
214 with assms floorlog_bounds[of "nat x" 2] show ?thesis |
|
215 by (auto simp add: bitlen_def le_nat_iff nat_less_iff nat_diff_distrib) |
228 by (auto simp add: bitlen_def le_nat_iff nat_less_iff nat_diff_distrib) |
216 qed |
229 qed |
217 |
230 |
218 lemma bitlen_pow2[simp]: |
231 lemma bitlen_pow2 [simp]: |
219 assumes "b > 0" |
232 "bitlen (b * 2 ^ c) = bitlen b + c" if "b > 0" |
220 shows "bitlen (b * 2 ^ c) = bitlen b + c" |
233 using that by (simp add: bitlen_def nat_mult_distrib nat_power_eq) |
221 using assms |
234 |
222 by (simp add: bitlen_def nat_mult_distrib nat_power_eq) |
235 lemma compute_bitlen [code]: |
223 |
|
224 lemma compute_bitlen[code]: |
|
225 "bitlen x = (if x > 0 then bitlen (x div 2) + 1 else 0)" |
236 "bitlen x = (if x > 0 then bitlen (x div 2) + 1 else 0)" |
226 by (simp add: bitlen_def nat_div_distrib compute_floorlog) |
237 by (simp add: bitlen_def nat_div_distrib compute_floorlog) |
227 |
238 |
228 lemma bitlen_eq_zero_iff: "bitlen x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x \<le> 0" |
239 lemma bitlen_eq_zero_iff: |
229 by (auto simp add: bitlen_alt_def) |
240 "bitlen x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> x \<le> 0" |
|
241 by (auto simp add: bitlen_alt_def) |
230 (metis compute_bitlen add.commute bitlen_alt_def bitlen_nonneg less_add_same_cancel2 |
242 (metis compute_bitlen add.commute bitlen_alt_def bitlen_nonneg less_add_same_cancel2 |
231 not_less zero_less_one) |
243 not_less zero_less_one) |
232 |
244 |
233 lemma bitlen_div: |
245 lemma bitlen_div: |
234 assumes "0 < m" |
246 "1 \<le> real_of_int m / 2^nat (bitlen m - 1)" |
235 shows "1 \<le> real_of_int m / 2^nat (bitlen m - 1)" |
247 and "real_of_int m / 2^nat (bitlen m - 1) < 2" if "0 < m" |
236 and "real_of_int m / 2^nat (bitlen m - 1) < 2" |
|
237 proof - |
248 proof - |
238 let ?B = "2^nat (bitlen m - 1)" |
249 let ?B = "2^nat (bitlen m - 1)" |
239 |
250 |
240 have "?B \<le> m" using bitlen_bounds[OF \<open>0 <m\<close>] .. |
251 have "?B \<le> m" using bitlen_bounds[OF \<open>0 <m\<close>] .. |
241 then have "1 * ?B \<le> real_of_int m" |
252 then have "1 * ?B \<le> real_of_int m" |
242 unfolding of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by auto |
253 unfolding of_int_le_iff[symmetric] by auto |
243 then show "1 \<le> real_of_int m / ?B" by auto |
254 then show "1 \<le> real_of_int m / ?B" by auto |
244 |
255 |
245 from assms have "m \<noteq> 0" by auto |
256 from that have "0 \<le> bitlen m - 1" by (auto simp: bitlen_alt_def) |
246 from assms have "0 \<le> bitlen m - 1" by (auto simp: bitlen_alt_def) |
257 |
247 |
258 have "m < 2^nat(bitlen m)" using bitlen_bounds[OF that] .. |
248 have "m < 2^nat(bitlen m)" using bitlen_bounds[OF assms] .. |
259 also from that have "\<dots> = 2^nat(bitlen m - 1 + 1)" |
249 also from assms have "\<dots> = 2^nat(bitlen m - 1 + 1)" |
|
250 by (auto simp: bitlen_def) |
260 by (auto simp: bitlen_def) |
251 also have "\<dots> = ?B * 2" |
261 also have "\<dots> = ?B * 2" |
252 unfolding nat_add_distrib[OF \<open>0 \<le> bitlen m - 1\<close> zero_le_one] by auto |
262 unfolding nat_add_distrib[OF \<open>0 \<le> bitlen m - 1\<close> zero_le_one] by auto |
253 finally have "real_of_int m < 2 * ?B" |
263 finally have "real_of_int m < 2 * ?B" |
254 by (metis (full_types) mult.commute power.simps(2) of_int_less_numeral_power_cancel_iff) |
264 by (metis (full_types) mult.commute power.simps(2) of_int_less_numeral_power_cancel_iff) |
255 then have "real_of_int m / ?B < 2 * ?B / ?B" |
265 then have "real_of_int m / ?B < 2 * ?B / ?B" |
256 by (rule divide_strict_right_mono) auto |
266 by (rule divide_strict_right_mono) auto |
257 then show "real_of_int m / ?B < 2" by auto |
267 then show "real_of_int m / ?B < 2" by auto |
258 qed |
268 qed |
259 |
269 |
260 lemma bitlen_le_iff_floorlog: "bitlen x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> w \<ge> 0 \<and> floorlog 2 (nat x) \<le> nat w" |
270 lemma bitlen_le_iff_floorlog: |
|
271 "bitlen x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> w \<ge> 0 \<and> floorlog 2 (nat x) \<le> nat w" |
261 by (auto simp: bitlen_def) |
272 by (auto simp: bitlen_def) |
262 |
273 |
263 lemma bitlen_le_iff_power: "bitlen x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> w \<ge> 0 \<and> x < 2 ^ nat w" |
274 lemma bitlen_le_iff_power: |
|
275 "bitlen x \<le> w \<longleftrightarrow> w \<ge> 0 \<and> x < 2 ^ nat w" |
264 by (auto simp: bitlen_le_iff_floorlog floorlog_le_iff) |
276 by (auto simp: bitlen_le_iff_floorlog floorlog_le_iff) |
265 |
277 |
266 lemma less_power_nat_iff_bitlen: "x < 2 ^ w \<longleftrightarrow> bitlen (int x) \<le> w" |
278 lemma less_power_nat_iff_bitlen: |
|
279 "x < 2 ^ w \<longleftrightarrow> bitlen (int x) \<le> w" |
267 using bitlen_le_iff_power[of x w] |
280 using bitlen_le_iff_power[of x w] |
268 by auto |
281 by auto |
269 |
282 |
270 lemma bitlen_ge_iff_power: "w \<le> bitlen x \<longleftrightarrow> w \<le> 0 \<or> 2 ^ (nat w - 1) \<le> x" |
283 lemma bitlen_ge_iff_power: |
|
284 "w \<le> bitlen x \<longleftrightarrow> w \<le> 0 \<or> 2 ^ (nat w - 1) \<le> x" |
271 unfolding bitlen_def |
285 unfolding bitlen_def |
272 by (auto simp flip: nat_le_iff intro: floorlog_geI dest: floorlog_geD) |
286 by (auto simp flip: nat_le_iff intro: floorlog_geI dest: floorlog_geD) |
273 |
287 |
274 lemma bitlen_twopow_add_eq: "bitlen (2 ^ w + b) = w + 1" if "0 \<le> b" "b < 2 ^ w" |
288 lemma bitlen_twopow_add_eq: |
|
289 "bitlen (2 ^ w + b) = w + 1" if "0 \<le> b" "b < 2 ^ w" |
275 by (auto simp: that nat_add_distrib bitlen_le_iff_power bitlen_ge_iff_power intro!: antisym) |
290 by (auto simp: that nat_add_distrib bitlen_le_iff_power bitlen_ge_iff_power intro!: antisym) |
276 |
291 |
277 end |
292 end |