src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/Nonnegative_Lebesgue_Integration.thy

-(*  Title:      HOL/Probability/Nonnegative_Lebesgue_Integration.thy
-    Author:     Johannes Hölzl, TU München
-    Author:     Armin Heller, TU München
-*)
-
-section \<open>Lebesgue Integration for Nonnegative Functions\<close>
-
-theory Nonnegative_Lebesgue_Integration
-  imports Measure_Space Borel_Space
-begin
-
-subsection "Simple function"
-
-text \<open>
-
-Our simple functions are not restricted to nonnegative real numbers. Instead
-they are just functions with a finite range and are measurable when singleton
-sets are measurable.
-
-\<close>
-
-definition "simple_function M g \<longleftrightarrow>
-    finite (g ` space M) \<and>
-    (\<forall>x \<in> g ` space M. g -` {x} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M)"
-
-lemma simple_functionD:
-  assumes "simple_function M g"
-  shows "finite (g ` space M)" and "g -` X \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-proof -
-  show "finite (g ` space M)"
-    using assms unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-  have "g -` X \<inter> space M = g -` (X \<inter> g`space M) \<inter> space M" by auto
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Union>x\<in>X \<inter> g`space M. g-`{x} \<inter> space M)" by auto
-  finally show "g -` X \<inter> space M \<in> sets M" using assms
-    by (auto simp del: UN_simps simp: simple_function_def)
-qed
-
-lemma measurable_simple_function[measurable_dest]:
-  "simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
-  unfolding simple_function_def measurable_def
-proof safe
-  fix A assume "finite (f ` space M)" "\<forall>x\<in>f ` space M. f -` {x} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  then have "(\<Union>x\<in>f ` space M. if x \<in> A then f -` {x} \<inter> space M else {}) \<in> sets M"
-    by (intro sets.finite_UN) auto
-  also have "(\<Union>x\<in>f ` space M. if x \<in> A then f -` {x} \<inter> space M else {}) = f -` A \<inter> space M"
-    by (auto split: if_split_asm)
-  finally show "f -` A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M" .
-qed simp
-
-lemma borel_measurable_simple_function:
-  "simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  by (auto dest!: measurable_simple_function simp: measurable_def)
-
-lemma simple_function_measurable2[intro]:
-  assumes "simple_function M f" "simple_function M g"
-  shows "f -` A \<inter> g -` B \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-proof -
-  have "f -` A \<inter> g -` B \<inter> space M = (f -` A \<inter> space M) \<inter> (g -` B \<inter> space M)"
-    by auto
-  then show ?thesis using assms[THEN simple_functionD(2)] by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_indicator_representation:
-  fixes f ::"'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and x: "x \<in> space M"
-  shows "f x = (\<Sum>y \<in> f ` space M. y * indicator (f -` {y} \<inter> space M) x)"
-  (is "?l = ?r")
-proof -
-  have "?r = (\<Sum>y \<in> f ` space M.
-    (if y = f x then y * indicator (f -` {y} \<inter> space M) x else 0))"
-    by (auto intro!: setsum.cong)
-  also have "... =  f x *  indicator (f -` {f x} \<inter> space M) x"
-    using assms by (auto dest: simple_functionD simp: setsum.delta)
-  also have "... = f x" using x by (auto simp: indicator_def)
-  finally show ?thesis by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_notspace:
-  "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. h x * indicator (- space M) x::ennreal)" (is "simple_function M ?h")
-proof -
-  have "?h ` space M \<subseteq> {0}" unfolding indicator_def by auto
-  hence [simp, intro]: "finite (?h ` space M)" by (auto intro: finite_subset)
-  have "?h -` {0} \<inter> space M = space M" by auto
-  thus ?thesis unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_cong:
-  assumes "\<And>t. t \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f t = g t"
-  shows "simple_function M f \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function M g"
-proof -
-  have "\<And>x. f -` {x} \<inter> space M = g -` {x} \<inter> space M"
-    using assms by auto
-  with assms show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: simple_function_def cong: image_cong)
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_cong_algebra:
-  assumes "sets N = sets M" "space N = space M"
-  shows "simple_function M f \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function N f"
-  unfolding simple_function_def assms ..
-
-lemma simple_function_borel_measurable:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'x::{t2_space}"
-  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and "finite (f ` space M)"
-  shows "simple_function M f"
-  using assms unfolding simple_function_def
-  by (auto intro: borel_measurable_vimage)
-
-lemma simple_function_iff_borel_measurable:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'x::{t2_space}"
-  shows "simple_function M f \<longleftrightarrow> finite (f ` space M) \<and> f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  by (metis borel_measurable_simple_function simple_functionD(1) simple_function_borel_measurable)
-
-lemma simple_function_eq_measurable:
-  "simple_function M f \<longleftrightarrow> finite (f`space M) \<and> f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
-  using measurable_simple_function[of M f] by (fastforce simp: simple_function_def)
-
-lemma simple_function_const[intro, simp]:
-  "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. c)"
-  by (auto intro: finite_subset simp: simple_function_def)
-lemma simple_function_compose[intro, simp]:
-  assumes "simple_function M f"
-  shows "simple_function M (g \<circ> f)"
-  unfolding simple_function_def
-proof safe
-  show "finite ((g \<circ> f) ` space M)"
-    using assms unfolding simple_function_def by (auto simp: image_comp [symmetric])
-next
-  fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-  let ?G = "g -` {g (f x)} \<inter> (f`space M)"
-  have *: "(g \<circ> f) -` {(g \<circ> f) x} \<inter> space M =
-    (\<Union>x\<in>?G. f -` {x} \<inter> space M)" by auto
-  show "(g \<circ> f) -` {(g \<circ> f) x} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-    using assms unfolding simple_function_def *
-    by (rule_tac sets.finite_UN) auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_indicator[intro, simp]:
-  assumes "A \<in> sets M"
-  shows "simple_function M (indicator A)"
-proof -
-  have "indicator A ` space M \<subseteq> {0, 1}" (is "?S \<subseteq> _")
-    by (auto simp: indicator_def)
-  hence "finite ?S" by (rule finite_subset) simp
-  moreover have "- A \<inter> space M = space M - A" by auto
-  ultimately show ?thesis unfolding simple_function_def
-    using assms by (auto simp: indicator_def [abs_def])
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_Pair[intro, simp]:
-  assumes "simple_function M f"
-  assumes "simple_function M g"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))" (is "simple_function M ?p")
-  unfolding simple_function_def
-proof safe
-  show "finite (?p ` space M)"
-    using assms unfolding simple_function_def
-    by (rule_tac finite_subset[of _ "f`space M \<times> g`space M"]) auto
-next
-  fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-  have "(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) -` {(f x, g x)} \<inter> space M =
-      (f -` {f x} \<inter> space M) \<inter> (g -` {g x} \<inter> space M)"
-    by auto
-  with \<open>x \<in> space M\<close> show "(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)) -` {(f x, g x)} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-    using assms unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_compose1:
-  assumes "simple_function M f"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. g (f x))"
-  using simple_function_compose[OF assms, of g]
-  by (simp add: comp_def)
-
-lemma simple_function_compose2:
-  assumes "simple_function M f" and "simple_function M g"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. h (f x) (g x))"
-proof -
-  have "simple_function M ((\<lambda>(x, y). h x y) \<circ> (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x)))"
-    using assms by auto
-  thus ?thesis by (simp_all add: comp_def)
-qed
-
-lemmas simple_function_add[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose2[where h="op +"]
-  and simple_function_diff[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose2[where h="op -"]
-  and simple_function_uminus[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose[where g="uminus"]
-  and simple_function_mult[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose2[where h="op *"]
-  and simple_function_div[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose2[where h="op /"]
-  and simple_function_inverse[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose[where g="inverse"]
-  and simple_function_max[intro, simp] = simple_function_compose2[where h=max]
-
-lemma simple_function_setsum[intro, simp]:
-  assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> P \<Longrightarrow> simple_function M (f i)"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>i\<in>P. f i x)"
-proof cases
-  assume "finite P" from this assms show ?thesis by induct auto
-qed auto
-
-lemma simple_function_ennreal[intro, simp]:
-  fixes f g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real" assumes sf: "simple_function M f"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. ennreal (f x))"
-  by (rule simple_function_compose1[OF sf])
-
-lemma simple_function_real_of_nat[intro, simp]:
-  fixes f g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat" assumes sf: "simple_function M f"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. real (f x))"
-  by (rule simple_function_compose1[OF sf])
-
-lemma borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence:
-  fixes u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u[measurable]: "u \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "\<exists>f. incseq f \<and> (\<forall>i. (\<forall>x. f i x < top) \<and> simple_function M (f i)) \<and> u = (SUP i. f i)"
-proof -
-  define f where [abs_def]:
-    "f i x = real_of_int (floor (enn2real (min i (u x)) * 2^i)) / 2^i" for i x
-
-  have [simp]: "0 \<le> f i x" for i x
-    by (auto simp: f_def intro!: divide_nonneg_nonneg mult_nonneg_nonneg enn2real_nonneg)
-
-  have *: "2^n * real_of_int x = real_of_int (2^n * x)" for n x
-    by simp
-
-  have "real_of_int \<lfloor>real i * 2 ^ i\<rfloor> = real_of_int \<lfloor>i * 2 ^ i\<rfloor>" for i
-    by (intro arg_cong[where f=real_of_int]) simp
-  then have [simp]: "real_of_int \<lfloor>real i * 2 ^ i\<rfloor> = i * 2 ^ i" for i
-    unfolding floor_of_nat by simp
-
-  have "incseq f"
-  proof (intro monoI le_funI)
-    fix m n :: nat and x assume "m \<le> n"
-    moreover
-    { fix d :: nat
-      have "\<lfloor>2^d::real\<rfloor> * \<lfloor>2^m * enn2real (min (of_nat m) (u x))\<rfloor> \<le>
-        \<lfloor>2^d * (2^m * enn2real (min (of_nat m) (u x)))\<rfloor>"
-        by (rule le_mult_floor) (auto simp: enn2real_nonneg)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> \<lfloor>2^d * (2^m * enn2real (min (of_nat d + of_nat m) (u x)))\<rfloor>"
-        by (intro floor_mono mult_mono enn2real_mono min.mono)
-           (auto simp: enn2real_nonneg min_less_iff_disj of_nat_less_top)
-      finally have "f m x \<le> f (m + d) x"
-        unfolding f_def
-        by (auto simp: field_simps power_add * simp del: of_int_mult) }
-    ultimately show "f m x \<le> f n x"
-      by (auto simp add: le_iff_add)
-  qed
-  then have inc_f: "incseq (\<lambda>i. ennreal (f i x))" for x
-    by (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def)
-  then have "incseq (\<lambda>i x. ennreal (f i x))"
-    by (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def)
-  moreover
-  have "simple_function M (f i)" for i
-  proof (rule simple_function_borel_measurable)
-    have "\<lfloor>enn2real (min (of_nat i) (u x)) * 2 ^ i\<rfloor> \<le> \<lfloor>int i * 2 ^ i\<rfloor>" for x
-      by (cases "u x" rule: ennreal_cases)
-         (auto split: split_min intro!: floor_mono)
-    then have "f i ` space M \<subseteq> (\<lambda>n. real_of_int n / 2^i) ` {0 .. of_nat i * 2^i}"
-      unfolding floor_of_int by (auto simp: f_def enn2real_nonneg intro!: imageI)
-    then show "finite (f i ` space M)"
-      by (rule finite_subset) auto
-    show "f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-      unfolding f_def enn2real_def by measurable
-  qed
-  moreover
-  { fix x
-    have "(SUP i. ennreal (f i x)) = u x"
-    proof (cases "u x" rule: ennreal_cases)
-      case top then show ?thesis
-        by (simp add: f_def inf_min[symmetric] ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat[symmetric]
-                      ennreal_SUP_of_nat_eq_top)
-    next
-      case (real r)
-      obtain n where "r \<le> of_nat n" using real_arch_simple by auto
-      then have min_eq_r: "\<forall>\<^sub>F x in sequentially. min (real x) r = r"
-        by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially intro!: exI[of _ n] split: split_min)
-
-      have "(\<lambda>i. real_of_int \<lfloor>min (real i) r * 2^i\<rfloor> / 2^i) \<longlonglongrightarrow> r"
-      proof (rule tendsto_sandwich)
-        show "(\<lambda>n. r - (1/2)^n) \<longlonglongrightarrow> r"
-          by (auto intro!: tendsto_eq_intros LIMSEQ_power_zero)
-        show "\<forall>\<^sub>F n in sequentially. real_of_int \<lfloor>min (real n) r * 2 ^ n\<rfloor> / 2 ^ n \<le> r"
-          using min_eq_r by eventually_elim (auto simp: field_simps)
-        have *: "r * (2 ^ n * 2 ^ n) \<le> 2^n + 2^n * real_of_int \<lfloor>r * 2 ^ n\<rfloor>" for n
-          using real_of_int_floor_ge_diff_one[of "r * 2^n", THEN mult_left_mono, of "2^n"]
-          by (auto simp: field_simps)
-        show "\<forall>\<^sub>F n in sequentially. r - (1/2)^n \<le> real_of_int \<lfloor>min (real n) r * 2 ^ n\<rfloor> / 2 ^ n"
-          using min_eq_r by eventually_elim (insert *, auto simp: field_simps)
-      qed auto
-      then have "(\<lambda>i. ennreal (f i x)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ennreal r"
-        by (simp add: real f_def ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat min_ennreal)
-      from LIMSEQ_unique[OF LIMSEQ_SUP[OF inc_f] this]
-      show ?thesis
-        by (simp add: real)
-    qed }
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    by (intro exI[of _ "\<lambda>i x. ennreal (f i x)"]) auto
-qed
-
-lemma borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence':
-  fixes u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  obtains f where
-    "\<And>i. simple_function M (f i)" "incseq f" "\<And>i x. f i x < top" "\<And>x. (SUP i. f i x) = u x"
-  using borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence[OF u] by (auto simp: fun_eq_iff) blast
-
-lemma simple_function_induct[consumes 1, case_names cong set mult add, induct set: simple_function]:
-  fixes u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u: "simple_function M u"
-  assumes cong: "\<And>f g. simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> simple_function M g \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> P f \<Longrightarrow> P g"
-  assumes set: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> P (indicator A)"
-  assumes mult: "\<And>u c. P u \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. c * u x)"
-  assumes add: "\<And>u v. P u \<Longrightarrow> P v \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. v x + u x)"
-  shows "P u"
-proof (rule cong)
-  from AE_space show "AE x in M. (\<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x) = u x"
-  proof eventually_elim
-    fix x assume x: "x \<in> space M"
-    from simple_function_indicator_representation[OF u x]
-    show "(\<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x) = u x" ..
-  qed
-next
-  from u have "finite (u ` space M)"
-    unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-  then show "P (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x)"
-  proof induct
-    case empty show ?case
-      using set[of "{}"] by (simp add: indicator_def[abs_def])
-  qed (auto intro!: add mult set simple_functionD u)
-next
-  show "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. (\<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x))"
-    apply (subst simple_function_cong)
-    apply (rule simple_function_indicator_representation[symmetric])
-    apply (auto intro: u)
-    done
-qed fact
-
-lemma simple_function_induct_nn[consumes 1, case_names cong set mult add]:
-  fixes u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u: "simple_function M u"
-  assumes cong: "\<And>f g. simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> simple_function M g \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> P f \<Longrightarrow> P g"
-  assumes set: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> P (indicator A)"
-  assumes mult: "\<And>u c. simple_function M u \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. c * u x)"
-  assumes add: "\<And>u v. simple_function M u \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> simple_function M v \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x = 0 \<or> v x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> P v \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. v x + u x)"
-  shows "P u"
-proof -
-  show ?thesis
-  proof (rule cong)
-    fix x assume x: "x \<in> space M"
-    from simple_function_indicator_representation[OF u x]
-    show "(\<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x) = u x" ..
-  next
-    show "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. (\<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x))"
-      apply (subst simple_function_cong)
-      apply (rule simple_function_indicator_representation[symmetric])
-      apply (auto intro: u)
-      done
-  next
-    from u have "finite (u ` space M)"
-      unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-    then show "P (\<lambda>x. \<Sum>y\<in>u ` space M. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) x)"
-    proof induct
-      case empty show ?case
-        using set[of "{}"] by (simp add: indicator_def[abs_def])
-    next
-      case (insert x S)
-      { fix z have "(\<Sum>y\<in>S. y * indicator (u -` {y} \<inter> space M) z) = 0 \<or>
-          x * indicator (u -` {x} \<inter> space M) z = 0"
-          using insert by (subst setsum_eq_0_iff) (auto simp: indicator_def) }
-      note disj = this
-      from insert show ?case
-        by (auto intro!: add mult set simple_functionD u simple_function_setsum disj)
-    qed
-  qed fact
-qed
-
-lemma borel_measurable_induct[consumes 1, case_names cong set mult add seq, induct set: borel_measurable]:
-  fixes u :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes cong: "\<And>f g. f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x) \<Longrightarrow> P g \<Longrightarrow> P f"
-  assumes set: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> P (indicator A)"
-  assumes mult': "\<And>u c. c < top \<Longrightarrow> u \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x < top) \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. c * u x)"
-  assumes add: "\<And>u v. u \<in> borel_measurable M\<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x < top) \<Longrightarrow> P u \<Longrightarrow> v \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> v x < top) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x = 0 \<or> v x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> P v \<Longrightarrow> P (\<lambda>x. v x + u x)"
-  assumes seq: "\<And>U. (\<And>i. U i \<in> borel_measurable M) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> U i x < top) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. P (U i)) \<Longrightarrow> incseq U \<Longrightarrow> u = (SUP i. U i) \<Longrightarrow> P (SUP i. U i)"
-  shows "P u"
-  using u
-proof (induct rule: borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence')
-  fix U assume U: "\<And>i. simple_function M (U i)" "incseq U" "\<And>i x. U i x < top" and sup: "\<And>x. (SUP i. U i x) = u x"
-  have u_eq: "u = (SUP i. U i)"
-    using u sup by auto
-
-  have not_inf: "\<And>x i. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> U i x < top"
-    using U by (auto simp: image_iff eq_commute)
-
-  from U have "\<And>i. U i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    by (simp add: borel_measurable_simple_function)
-
-  show "P u"
-    unfolding u_eq
-  proof (rule seq)
-    fix i show "P (U i)"
-      using \<open>simple_function M (U i)\<close> not_inf[of _ i]
-    proof (induct rule: simple_function_induct_nn)
-      case (mult u c)
-      show ?case
-      proof cases
-        assume "c = 0 \<or> space M = {} \<or> (\<forall>x\<in>space M. u x = 0)"
-        with mult(1) show ?thesis
-          by (intro cong[of "\<lambda>x. c * u x" "indicator {}"] set)
-             (auto dest!: borel_measurable_simple_function)
-      next
-        assume "\<not> (c = 0 \<or> space M = {} \<or> (\<forall>x\<in>space M. u x = 0))"
-        then obtain x where "space M \<noteq> {}" and x: "x \<in> space M" "u x \<noteq> 0" "c \<noteq> 0"
-          by auto
-        with mult(3)[of x] have "c < top"
-          by (auto simp: ennreal_mult_less_top)
-        then have u_fin: "x' \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x' < top" for x'
-          using mult(3)[of x'] \<open>c \<noteq> 0\<close> by (auto simp: ennreal_mult_less_top)
-        then have "P u"
-          by (rule mult)
-        with u_fin \<open>c < top\<close> mult(1) show ?thesis
-          by (intro mult') (auto dest!: borel_measurable_simple_function)
-      qed
-    qed (auto intro: cong intro!: set add dest!: borel_measurable_simple_function)
-  qed fact+
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_If_set:
-  assumes sf: "simple_function M f" "simple_function M g" and A: "A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> A then f x else g x)" (is "simple_function M ?IF")
-proof -
-  define F where "F x = f -` {x} \<inter> space M" for x
-  define G where "G x = g -` {x} \<inter> space M" for x
-  show ?thesis unfolding simple_function_def
-  proof safe
-    have "?IF ` space M \<subseteq> f ` space M \<union> g ` space M" by auto
-    from finite_subset[OF this] assms
-    show "finite (?IF ` space M)" unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-  next
-    fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    then have *: "?IF -` {?IF x} \<inter> space M = (if x \<in> A
-      then ((F (f x) \<inter> (A \<inter> space M)) \<union> (G (f x) - (G (f x) \<inter> (A \<inter> space M))))
-      else ((F (g x) \<inter> (A \<inter> space M)) \<union> (G (g x) - (G (g x) \<inter> (A \<inter> space M)))))"
-      using sets.sets_into_space[OF A] by (auto split: if_split_asm simp: G_def F_def)
-    have [intro]: "\<And>x. F x \<in> sets M" "\<And>x. G x \<in> sets M"
-      unfolding F_def G_def using sf[THEN simple_functionD(2)] by auto
-    show "?IF -` {?IF x} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M" unfolding * using A by auto
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_If:
-  assumes sf: "simple_function M f" "simple_function M g" and P: "{x\<in>space M. P x} \<in> sets M"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. if P x then f x else g x)"
-proof -
-  have "{x\<in>space M. P x} = {x. P x} \<inter> space M" by auto
-  with simple_function_If_set[OF sf, of "{x. P x}"] P show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_subalgebra:
-  assumes "simple_function N f"
-  and N_subalgebra: "sets N \<subseteq> sets M" "space N = space M"
-  shows "simple_function M f"
-  using assms unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-
-lemma simple_function_comp:
-  assumes T: "T \<in> measurable M M'"
-    and f: "simple_function M' f"
-  shows "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. f (T x))"
-proof (intro simple_function_def[THEN iffD2] conjI ballI)
-  have "(\<lambda>x. f (T x)) ` space M \<subseteq> f ` space M'"
-    using T unfolding measurable_def by auto
-  then show "finite ((\<lambda>x. f (T x)) ` space M)"
-    using f unfolding simple_function_def by (auto intro: finite_subset)
-  fix i assume i: "i \<in> (\<lambda>x. f (T x)) ` space M"
-  then have "i \<in> f ` space M'"
-    using T unfolding measurable_def by auto
-  then have "f -` {i} \<inter> space M' \<in> sets M'"
-    using f unfolding simple_function_def by auto
-  then have "T -` (f -` {i} \<inter> space M') \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-    using T unfolding measurable_def by auto
-  also have "T -` (f -` {i} \<inter> space M') \<inter> space M = (\<lambda>x. f (T x)) -` {i} \<inter> space M"
-    using T unfolding measurable_def by auto
-  finally show "(\<lambda>x. f (T x)) -` {i} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M" .
-qed
-
-subsection "Simple integral"
-
-definition simple_integral :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> ennreal) \<Rightarrow> ennreal" ("integral\<^sup>S") where
-  "integral\<^sup>S M f = (\<Sum>x \<in> f ` space M. x * emeasure M (f -` {x} \<inter> space M))"
-
-syntax
-  "_simple_integral" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> ennreal \<Rightarrow> 'a measure \<Rightarrow> ennreal" ("\<integral>\<^sup>S _. _ \<partial>_" [60,61] 110)
-
-translations
-  "\<integral>\<^sup>S x. f \<partial>M" == "CONST simple_integral M (%x. f)"
-
-lemma simple_integral_cong:
-  assumes "\<And>t. t \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f t = g t"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f = integral\<^sup>S M g"
-proof -
-  have "f ` space M = g ` space M"
-    "\<And>x. f -` {x} \<inter> space M = g -` {x} \<inter> space M"
-    using assms by (auto intro!: image_eqI)
-  thus ?thesis unfolding simple_integral_def by simp
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_const[simp]:
-  "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. c \<partial>M) = c * (emeasure M) (space M)"
-proof (cases "space M = {}")
-  case True thus ?thesis unfolding simple_integral_def by simp
-next
-  case False hence "(\<lambda>x. c) ` space M = {c}" by auto
-  thus ?thesis unfolding simple_integral_def by simp
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_partition:
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and g: "simple_function M g"
-  assumes sub: "\<And>x y. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> g x = g y \<Longrightarrow> f x = f y"
-  assumes v: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x = v (g x)"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f = (\<Sum>y\<in>g ` space M. v y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. g x = y})"
-    (is "_ = ?r")
-proof -
-  from f g have [simp]: "finite (f`space M)" "finite (g`space M)"
-    by (auto simp: simple_function_def)
-  from f g have [measurable]: "f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)" "g \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
-    by (auto intro: measurable_simple_function)
-
-  { fix y assume "y \<in> space M"
-    then have "f ` space M \<inter> {i. \<exists>x\<in>space M. i = f x \<and> g y = g x} = {v (g y)}"
-      by (auto cong: sub simp: v[symmetric]) }
-  note eq = this
-
-  have "integral\<^sup>S M f =
-    (\<Sum>y\<in>f`space M. y * (\<Sum>z\<in>g`space M.
-      if \<exists>x\<in>space M. y = f x \<and> z = g x then emeasure M {x\<in>space M. g x = z} else 0))"
-    unfolding simple_integral_def
-  proof (safe intro!: setsum.cong ennreal_mult_left_cong)
-    fix y assume y: "y \<in> space M" "f y \<noteq> 0"
-    have [simp]: "g ` space M \<inter> {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x} =
-        {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}"
-      by auto
-    have eq:"(\<Union>i\<in>{z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}. {x \<in> space M. g x = i}) =
-        f -` {f y} \<inter> space M"
-      by (auto simp: eq_commute cong: sub rev_conj_cong)
-    have "finite (g`space M)" by simp
-    then have "finite {z. \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x}"
-      by (rule rev_finite_subset) auto
-    then show "emeasure M (f -` {f y} \<inter> space M) =
-      (\<Sum>z\<in>g ` space M. if \<exists>x\<in>space M. f y = f x \<and> z = g x then emeasure M {x \<in> space M. g x = z} else 0)"
-      apply (simp add: setsum.If_cases)
-      apply (subst setsum_emeasure)
-      apply (auto simp: disjoint_family_on_def eq)
-      done
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>f`space M. (\<Sum>z\<in>g`space M.
-      if \<exists>x\<in>space M. y = f x \<and> z = g x then y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. g x = z} else 0))"
-    by (auto intro!: setsum.cong simp: setsum_right_distrib)
-  also have "\<dots> = ?r"
-    by (subst setsum.commute)
-       (auto intro!: setsum.cong simp: setsum.If_cases scaleR_setsum_right[symmetric] eq)
-  finally show "integral\<^sup>S M f = ?r" .
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_add[simp]:
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and "\<And>x. 0 \<le> f x" and g: "simple_function M g" and "\<And>x. 0 \<le> g x"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x + g x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>S M f + integral\<^sup>S M g"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x + g x \<partial>M) =
-    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. (fst y + snd y) * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, g x) = y})"
-    by (intro simple_function_partition) (auto intro: f g)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. fst y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, g x) = y}) +
-    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. snd y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, g x) = y})"
-    using assms(2,4) by (auto intro!: setsum.cong distrib_right simp: setsum.distrib[symmetric])
-  also have "(\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. fst y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, g x) = y}) = (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro simple_function_partition[symmetric]) (auto intro: f g)
-  also have "(\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. snd y * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, g x) = y}) = (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. g x \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro simple_function_partition[symmetric]) (auto intro: f g)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_setsum[simp]:
-  assumes "\<And>i x. i \<in> P \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> f i x"
-  assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> P \<Longrightarrow> simple_function M (f i)"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. (\<Sum>i\<in>P. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>i\<in>P. integral\<^sup>S M (f i))"
-proof cases
-  assume "finite P"
-  from this assms show ?thesis
-    by induct (auto simp: simple_function_setsum simple_integral_add setsum_nonneg)
-qed auto
-
-lemma simple_integral_mult[simp]:
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. c * f x \<partial>M) = c * integral\<^sup>S M f"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. c * f x \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>y\<in>f ` space M. (c * y) * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. f x = y})"
-    using f by (intro simple_function_partition) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = c * integral\<^sup>S M f"
-    using f unfolding simple_integral_def
-    by (subst setsum_right_distrib) (auto simp: mult.assoc Int_def conj_commute)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_mono_AE:
-  assumes f[measurable]: "simple_function M f" and g[measurable]: "simple_function M g"
-  and mono: "AE x in M. f x \<le> g x"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f \<le> integral\<^sup>S M g"
-proof -
-  let ?\<mu> = "\<lambda>P. emeasure M {x\<in>space M. P x}"
-  have "integral\<^sup>S M f = (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. fst y * ?\<mu> (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x) = y))"
-    using f g by (intro simple_function_partition) auto
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, g x))`space M. snd y * ?\<mu> (\<lambda>x. (f x, g x) = y))"
-  proof (clarsimp intro!: setsum_mono)
-    fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    let ?M = "?\<mu> (\<lambda>y. f y = f x \<and> g y = g x)"
-    show "f x * ?M \<le> g x * ?M"
-    proof cases
-      assume "?M \<noteq> 0"
-      then have "0 < ?M"
-        by (simp add: less_le)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> ?\<mu> (\<lambda>y. f x \<le> g x)"
-        using mono by (intro emeasure_mono_AE) auto
-      finally have "\<not> \<not> f x \<le> g x"
-        by (intro notI) auto
-      then show ?thesis
-        by (intro mult_right_mono) auto
-    qed simp
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> = integral\<^sup>S M g"
-    using f g by (intro simple_function_partition[symmetric]) auto
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_mono:
-  assumes "simple_function M f" and "simple_function M g"
-  and mono: "\<And> x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x \<le> g x"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f \<le> integral\<^sup>S M g"
-  using assms by (intro simple_integral_mono_AE) auto
-
-lemma simple_integral_cong_AE:
-  assumes "simple_function M f" and "simple_function M g"
-  and "AE x in M. f x = g x"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f = integral\<^sup>S M g"
-  using assms by (auto simp: eq_iff intro!: simple_integral_mono_AE)
-
-lemma simple_integral_cong':
-  assumes sf: "simple_function M f" "simple_function M g"
-  and mea: "(emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> g x} = 0"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f = integral\<^sup>S M g"
-proof (intro simple_integral_cong_AE sf AE_I)
-  show "(emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> g x} = 0" by fact
-  show "{x \<in> space M. f x \<noteq> g x} \<in> sets M"
-    using sf[THEN borel_measurable_simple_function] by auto
-qed simp
-
-lemma simple_integral_indicator:
-  assumes A: "A \<in> sets M"
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) =
-    (\<Sum>x \<in> f ` space M. x * emeasure M (f -` {x} \<inter> space M \<inter> A))"
-proof -
-  have eq: "(\<lambda>x. (f x, indicator A x)) ` space M \<inter> {x. snd x = 1} = (\<lambda>x. (f x, 1::ennreal))`A"
-    using A[THEN sets.sets_into_space] by (auto simp: indicator_def image_iff split: if_split_asm)
-  have eq2: "\<And>x. f x \<notin> f ` A \<Longrightarrow> f -` {f x} \<inter> space M \<inter> A = {}"
-    by (auto simp: image_iff)
-
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) =
-    (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, indicator A x))`space M. (fst y * snd y) * emeasure M {x\<in>space M. (f x, indicator A x) = y})"
-    using assms by (intro simple_function_partition) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, indicator A x::ennreal))`space M.
-    if snd y = 1 then fst y * emeasure M (f -` {fst y} \<inter> space M \<inter> A) else 0)"
-    by (auto simp: indicator_def split: if_split_asm intro!: arg_cong2[where f="op *"] arg_cong2[where f=emeasure] setsum.cong)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>(\<lambda>x. (f x, 1::ennreal))`A. fst y * emeasure M (f -` {fst y} \<inter> space M \<inter> A))"
-    using assms by (subst setsum.If_cases) (auto intro!: simple_functionD(1) simp: eq)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>y\<in>fst`(\<lambda>x. (f x, 1::ennreal))`A. y * emeasure M (f -` {y} \<inter> space M \<inter> A))"
-    by (subst setsum.reindex [of fst]) (auto simp: inj_on_def)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x \<in> f ` space M. x * emeasure M (f -` {x} \<inter> space M \<inter> A))"
-    using A[THEN sets.sets_into_space]
-    by (intro setsum.mono_neutral_cong_left simple_functionD f) (auto simp: image_comp comp_def eq2)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_indicator_only[simp]:
-  assumes "A \<in> sets M"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M (indicator A) = emeasure M A"
-  using simple_integral_indicator[OF assms, of "\<lambda>x. 1"] sets.sets_into_space[OF assms]
-  by (simp_all add: image_constant_conv Int_absorb1 split: if_split_asm)
-
-lemma simple_integral_null_set:
-  assumes "simple_function M u" "\<And>x. 0 \<le> u x" and "N \<in> null_sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. u x * indicator N x \<partial>M) = 0"
-proof -
-  have "AE x in M. indicator N x = (0 :: ennreal)"
-    using \<open>N \<in> null_sets M\<close> by (auto simp: indicator_def intro!: AE_I[of _ _ N])
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. u x * indicator N x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. 0 \<partial>M)"
-    using assms apply (intro simple_integral_cong_AE) by auto
-  then show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_cong_AE_mult_indicator:
-  assumes sf: "simple_function M f" and eq: "AE x in M. x \<in> S" and "S \<in> sets M"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>S M f = (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. f x * indicator S x \<partial>M)"
-  using assms by (intro simple_integral_cong_AE) auto
-
-lemma simple_integral_cmult_indicator:
-  assumes A: "A \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. c * indicator A x \<partial>M) = c * emeasure M A"
-  using simple_integral_mult[OF simple_function_indicator[OF A]]
-  unfolding simple_integral_indicator_only[OF A] by simp
-
-lemma simple_integral_nonneg:
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f" and ae: "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
-  shows "0 \<le> integral\<^sup>S M f"
-proof -
-  have "integral\<^sup>S M (\<lambda>x. 0) \<le> integral\<^sup>S M f"
-    using simple_integral_mono_AE[OF _ f ae] by auto
-  then show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-subsection \<open>Integral on nonnegative functions\<close>
-
-definition nn_integral :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> ennreal) \<Rightarrow> ennreal" ("integral\<^sup>N") where
-  "integral\<^sup>N M f = (SUP g : {g. simple_function M g \<and> g \<le> f}. integral\<^sup>S M g)"
-
-syntax
-  "_nn_integral" :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> ennreal \<Rightarrow> 'a measure \<Rightarrow> ennreal" ("\<integral>\<^sup>+((2 _./ _)/ \<partial>_)" [60,61] 110)
-
-translations
-  "\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f \<partial>M" == "CONST nn_integral M (\<lambda>x. f)"
-
-lemma nn_integral_def_finite:
-  "integral\<^sup>N M f = (SUP g : {g. simple_function M g \<and> g \<le> f \<and> (\<forall>x. g x < top)}. integral\<^sup>S M g)"
-    (is "_ = SUPREMUM ?A ?f")
-  unfolding nn_integral_def
-proof (safe intro!: antisym SUP_least)
-  fix g assume g[measurable]: "simple_function M g" "g \<le> f"
-
-  show "integral\<^sup>S M g \<le> SUPREMUM ?A ?f"
-  proof cases
-    assume ae: "AE x in M. g x \<noteq> top"
-    let ?G = "{x \<in> space M. g x \<noteq> top}"
-    have "integral\<^sup>S M g = integral\<^sup>S M (\<lambda>x. g x * indicator ?G x)"
-    proof (rule simple_integral_cong_AE)
-      show "AE x in M. g x = g x * indicator ?G x"
-        using ae AE_space by eventually_elim auto
-    qed (insert g, auto)
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> SUPREMUM ?A ?f"
-      using g by (intro SUP_upper) (auto simp: le_fun_def less_top split: split_indicator)
-    finally show ?thesis .
-  next
-    assume nAE: "\<not> (AE x in M. g x \<noteq> top)"
-    then have "emeasure M {x\<in>space M. g x = top} \<noteq> 0" (is "emeasure M ?G \<noteq> 0")
-      by (subst (asm) AE_iff_measurable[OF _ refl]) auto
-    then have "top = (SUP n. (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. of_nat n * indicator ?G x \<partial>M))"
-      by (simp add: ennreal_SUP_of_nat_eq_top ennreal_top_eq_mult_iff SUP_mult_right_ennreal[symmetric])
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> SUPREMUM ?A ?f"
-      using g
-      by (safe intro!: SUP_least SUP_upper)
-         (auto simp: le_fun_def of_nat_less_top top_unique[symmetric] split: split_indicator
-               intro: order_trans[of _ "g x" "f x" for x, OF order_trans[of _ top]])
-    finally show ?thesis
-      by (simp add: top_unique del: SUP_eq_top_iff Sup_eq_top_iff)
-  qed
-qed (auto intro: SUP_upper)
-
-lemma nn_integral_mono_AE:
-  assumes ae: "AE x in M. u x \<le> v x" shows "integral\<^sup>N M u \<le> integral\<^sup>N M v"
-  unfolding nn_integral_def
-proof (safe intro!: SUP_mono)
-  fix n assume n: "simple_function M n" "n \<le> u"
-  from ae[THEN AE_E] guess N . note N = this
-  then have ae_N: "AE x in M. x \<notin> N" by (auto intro: AE_not_in)
-  let ?n = "\<lambda>x. n x * indicator (space M - N) x"
-  have "AE x in M. n x \<le> ?n x" "simple_function M ?n"
-    using n N ae_N by auto
-  moreover
-  { fix x have "?n x \<le> v x"
-    proof cases
-      assume x: "x \<in> space M - N"
-      with N have "u x \<le> v x" by auto
-      with n(2)[THEN le_funD, of x] x show ?thesis
-        by (auto simp: max_def split: if_split_asm)
-    qed simp }
-  then have "?n \<le> v" by (auto simp: le_funI)
-  moreover have "integral\<^sup>S M n \<le> integral\<^sup>S M ?n"
-    using ae_N N n by (auto intro!: simple_integral_mono_AE)
-  ultimately show "\<exists>m\<in>{g. simple_function M g \<and> g \<le> v}. integral\<^sup>S M n \<le> integral\<^sup>S M m"
-    by force
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_mono:
-  "(\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x \<le> v x) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u \<le> integral\<^sup>N M v"
-  by (auto intro: nn_integral_mono_AE)
-
-lemma mono_nn_integral: "mono F \<Longrightarrow> mono (\<lambda>x. integral\<^sup>N M (F x))"
-  by (auto simp add: mono_def le_fun_def intro!: nn_integral_mono)
-
-lemma nn_integral_cong_AE:
-  "AE x in M. u x = v x \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u = integral\<^sup>N M v"
-  by (auto simp: eq_iff intro!: nn_integral_mono_AE)
-
-lemma nn_integral_cong:
-  "(\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x = v x) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u = integral\<^sup>N M v"
-  by (auto intro: nn_integral_cong_AE)
-
-lemma nn_integral_cong_simp:
-  "(\<And>x. x \<in> space M =simp=> u x = v x) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u = integral\<^sup>N M v"
-  by (auto intro: nn_integral_cong simp: simp_implies_def)
-
-lemma nn_integral_cong_strong:
-  "M = N \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> u x = v x) \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u = integral\<^sup>N N v"
-  by (auto intro: nn_integral_cong)
-
-lemma incseq_nn_integral:
-  assumes "incseq f" shows "incseq (\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof -
-  have "\<And>i x. f i x \<le> f (Suc i) x"
-    using assms by (auto dest!: incseq_SucD simp: le_fun_def)
-  then show ?thesis
-    by (auto intro!: incseq_SucI nn_integral_mono)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_eq_simple_integral:
-  assumes f: "simple_function M f" shows "integral\<^sup>N M f = integral\<^sup>S M f"
-proof -
-  let ?f = "\<lambda>x. f x * indicator (space M) x"
-  have f': "simple_function M ?f" using f by auto
-  have "integral\<^sup>N M ?f \<le> integral\<^sup>S M ?f" using f'
-    by (force intro!: SUP_least simple_integral_mono simp: le_fun_def nn_integral_def)
-  moreover have "integral\<^sup>S M ?f \<le> integral\<^sup>N M ?f"
-    unfolding nn_integral_def
-    using f' by (auto intro!: SUP_upper)
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    by (simp cong: nn_integral_cong simple_integral_cong)
-qed
-
-text \<open>Beppo-Levi monotone convergence theorem\<close>
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP:
-  assumes f: "incseq f" and [measurable]: "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (SUP i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof (rule antisym)
-  show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M) \<le> (SUP i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M))"
-    unfolding nn_integral_def_finite[of _ "\<lambda>x. SUP i. f i x"]
-  proof (safe intro!: SUP_least)
-    fix u assume sf_u[simp]: "simple_function M u" and
-      u: "u \<le> (\<lambda>x. SUP i. f i x)" and u_range: "\<forall>x. u x < top"
-    note sf_u[THEN borel_measurable_simple_function, measurable]
-    show "integral\<^sup>S M u \<le> (SUP j. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. f j x \<partial>M)"
-    proof (rule ennreal_approx_unit)
-      fix a :: ennreal assume "a < 1"
-      let ?au = "\<lambda>x. a * u x"
-
-      let ?B = "\<lambda>c i. {x\<in>space M. ?au x = c \<and> c \<le> f i x}"
-      have "integral\<^sup>S M ?au = (\<Sum>c\<in>?au`space M. c * (SUP i. emeasure M (?B c i)))"
-        unfolding simple_integral_def
-      proof (intro setsum.cong ennreal_mult_left_cong refl)
-        fix c assume "c \<in> ?au ` space M" "c \<noteq> 0"
-        { fix x' assume x': "x' \<in> space M" "?au x' = c"
-          with \<open>c \<noteq> 0\<close> u_range have "?au x' < 1 * u x'"
-            by (intro ennreal_mult_strict_right_mono \<open>a < 1\<close>) (auto simp: less_le)
-          also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP i. f i x')"
-            using u by (auto simp: le_fun_def)
-          finally have "\<exists>i. ?au x' \<le> f i x'"
-            by (auto simp: less_SUP_iff intro: less_imp_le) }
-        then have *: "?au -` {c} \<inter> space M = (\<Union>i. ?B c i)"
-          by auto
-        show "emeasure M (?au -` {c} \<inter> space M) = (SUP i. emeasure M (?B c i))"
-          unfolding * using f
-          by (intro SUP_emeasure_incseq[symmetric])
-             (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def intro: order_trans)
-      qed
-      also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. \<Sum>c\<in>?au`space M. c * emeasure M (?B c i))"
-        unfolding SUP_mult_left_ennreal using f
-        by (intro ennreal_SUP_setsum[symmetric])
-           (auto intro!: mult_mono emeasure_mono simp: incseq_def le_fun_def intro: order_trans)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-      proof (intro SUP_subset_mono order_refl)
-        fix i
-        have "(\<Sum>c\<in>?au`space M. c * emeasure M (?B c i)) =
-          (\<integral>\<^sup>Sx. (a * u x) * indicator {x\<in>space M. a * u x \<le> f i x} x \<partial>M)"
-          by (subst simple_integral_indicator)
-             (auto intro!: setsum.cong ennreal_mult_left_cong arg_cong2[where f=emeasure])
-        also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (a * u x) * indicator {x\<in>space M. a * u x \<le> f i x} x \<partial>M)"
-          by (rule nn_integral_eq_simple_integral[symmetric]) simp
-        also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f i x \<partial>M)"
-          by (intro nn_integral_mono) (auto split: split_indicator)
-        finally show "(\<Sum>c\<in>?au`space M. c * emeasure M (?B c i)) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f i x \<partial>M)" .
-      qed
-      finally show "a * integral\<^sup>S M u \<le> (SUP i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-        by simp
-    qed
-  qed
-qed (auto intro!: SUP_least SUP_upper nn_integral_mono)
-
-lemma sup_continuous_nn_integral[order_continuous_intros]:
-  assumes f: "\<And>y. sup_continuous (f y)"
-  assumes [measurable]: "\<And>x. (\<lambda>y. f y x) \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "sup_continuous (\<lambda>x. (\<integral>\<^sup>+y. f y x \<partial>M))"
-  unfolding sup_continuous_def
-proof safe
-  fix C :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'b" assume C: "incseq C"
-  with sup_continuous_mono[OF f] show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ y. f y (SUPREMUM UNIV C) \<partial>M) = (SUP i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ y. f y (C i) \<partial>M)"
-    unfolding sup_continuousD[OF f C]
-    by (subst nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP) (auto simp: mono_def le_fun_def)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_AE:
-  assumes f: "\<And>i. AE x in M. f i x \<le> f (Suc i) x" "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (SUP i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof -
-  from f have "AE x in M. \<forall>i. f i x \<le> f (Suc i) x"
-    by (simp add: AE_all_countable)
-  from this[THEN AE_E] guess N . note N = this
-  let ?f = "\<lambda>i x. if x \<in> space M - N then f i x else 0"
-  have f_eq: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. ?f i x = f i x" using N by (auto intro!: AE_I[of _ _ N])
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. ?f i x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong_AE)
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ?f i x \<partial>M))"
-  proof (rule nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP)
-    show "incseq ?f" using N(1) by (force intro!: incseq_SucI le_funI)
-    { fix i show "(\<lambda>x. if x \<in> space M - N then f i x else 0) \<in> borel_measurable M"
-        using f N(3) by (intro measurable_If_set) auto }
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M))"
-    using f_eq by (force intro!: arg_cong[where f="SUPREMUM UNIV"] nn_integral_cong_AE ext)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple:
-  "incseq f \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. simple_function M (f i)) \<Longrightarrow> (SUP i. \<integral>\<^sup>S x. f i x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M)"
-  using nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP[of f M]
-  by (simp add: nn_integral_eq_simple_integral[symmetric] borel_measurable_simple_function)
-
-lemma SUP_simple_integral_sequences:
-  assumes f: "incseq f" "\<And>i. simple_function M (f i)"
-  and g: "incseq g" "\<And>i. simple_function M (g i)"
-  and eq: "AE x in M. (SUP i. f i x) = (SUP i. g i x)"
-  shows "(SUP i. integral\<^sup>S M (f i)) = (SUP i. integral\<^sup>S M (g i))"
-    (is "SUPREMUM _ ?F = SUPREMUM _ ?G")
-proof -
-  have "(SUP i. integral\<^sup>S M (f i)) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP i. f i x) \<partial>M)"
-    using f by (rule nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP i. g i x) \<partial>M)"
-    unfolding eq[THEN nn_integral_cong_AE] ..
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. ?G i)"
-    using g by (rule nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple[symmetric])
-  finally show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_const[simp]: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. c \<partial>M) = c * emeasure M (space M)"
-  by (subst nn_integral_eq_simple_integral) auto
-
-lemma nn_integral_linear:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. a * f x + g x \<partial>M) = a * integral\<^sup>N M f + integral\<^sup>N M g"
-    (is "integral\<^sup>N M ?L = _")
-proof -
-  from borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence'[OF f(1)] guess u .
-  note u = nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple[OF this(2,1)] this
-  from borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence'[OF g(1)] guess v .
-  note v = nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple[OF this(2,1)] this
-  let ?L' = "\<lambda>i x. a * u i x + v i x"
-
-  have "?L \<in> borel_measurable M" using assms by auto
-  from borel_measurable_implies_simple_function_sequence'[OF this] guess l .
-  note l = nn_integral_monotone_convergence_simple[OF this(2,1)] this
-
-  have inc: "incseq (\<lambda>i. a * integral\<^sup>S M (u i))" "incseq (\<lambda>i. integral\<^sup>S M (v i))"
-    using u v by (auto simp: incseq_Suc_iff le_fun_def intro!: add_mono mult_left_mono simple_integral_mono)
-
-  have l': "(SUP i. integral\<^sup>S M (l i)) = (SUP i. integral\<^sup>S M (?L' i))"
-  proof (rule SUP_simple_integral_sequences[OF l(3,2)])
-    show "incseq ?L'" "\<And>i. simple_function M (?L' i)"
-      using u v unfolding incseq_Suc_iff le_fun_def
-      by (auto intro!: add_mono mult_left_mono)
-    { fix x
-      have "(SUP i. a * u i x + v i x) = a * (SUP i. u i x) + (SUP i. v i x)"
-        using u(3) v(3) u(4)[of _ x] v(4)[of _ x] unfolding SUP_mult_left_ennreal
-        by (auto intro!: ennreal_SUP_add simp: incseq_Suc_iff le_fun_def add_mono mult_left_mono) }
-    then show "AE x in M. (SUP i. l i x) = (SUP i. ?L' i x)"
-      unfolding l(5) using u(5) v(5) by (intro AE_I2) auto
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. a * integral\<^sup>S M (u i) + integral\<^sup>S M (v i))"
-    using u(2) v(2) by auto
-  finally show ?thesis
-    unfolding l(5)[symmetric] l(1)[symmetric]
-    by (simp add: ennreal_SUP_add[OF inc] v u SUP_mult_left_ennreal[symmetric])
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_cmult: "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. c * f x \<partial>M) = c * integral\<^sup>N M f"
-  using nn_integral_linear[of f M "\<lambda>x. 0" c] by simp
-
-lemma nn_integral_multc: "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * c \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>N M f * c"
-  unfolding mult.commute[of _ c] nn_integral_cmult by simp
-
-lemma nn_integral_divide: "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x / c \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M) / c"
-   unfolding divide_ennreal_def by (rule nn_integral_multc)
-
-lemma nn_integral_indicator[simp]: "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator A x\<partial>M) = (emeasure M) A"
-  by (subst nn_integral_eq_simple_integral) (auto simp: simple_integral_indicator)
-
-lemma nn_integral_cmult_indicator: "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. c * indicator A x \<partial>M) = c * emeasure M A"
-  by (subst nn_integral_eq_simple_integral)
-     (auto simp: simple_function_indicator simple_integral_indicator)
-
-lemma nn_integral_indicator':
-  assumes [measurable]: "A \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator A x \<partial>M) = emeasure M (A \<inter> space M)"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator A x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator (A \<inter> space M) x \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro nn_integral_cong) (simp split: split_indicator)
-  also have "\<dots> = emeasure M (A \<inter> space M)"
-    by simp
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_indicator_singleton[simp]:
-  assumes [measurable]: "{y} \<in> sets M" shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator {y} x \<partial>M) = f y * emeasure M {y}"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator {y} x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f y * indicator {y} x \<partial>M)"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong split: split_indicator)
-  then show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_cmult)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_set_ennreal:
-  "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ennreal (f x) * indicator A x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ennreal (f x * indicator A x) \<partial>M)"
-  by (rule nn_integral_cong) (simp split: split_indicator)
-
-lemma nn_integral_indicator_singleton'[simp]:
-  assumes [measurable]: "{y} \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ennreal (f x * indicator {y} x) \<partial>M) = f y * emeasure M {y}"
-  by (subst nn_integral_set_ennreal[symmetric]) (simp add: nn_integral_indicator_singleton)
-
-lemma nn_integral_add:
-  "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x + g x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>N M f + integral\<^sup>N M g"
-  using nn_integral_linear[of f M g 1] by simp
-
-lemma nn_integral_setsum:
-  "(\<And>i. i \<in> P \<Longrightarrow> f i \<in> borel_measurable M) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>i\<in>P. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>i\<in>P. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-  by (induction P rule: infinite_finite_induct) (auto simp: nn_integral_add)
-
-lemma nn_integral_suminf:
-  assumes f: "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof -
-  have all_pos: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. 0 \<le> f i x"
-    using assms by (auto simp: AE_all_countable)
-  have "(\<Sum>i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i)) = (SUP n. \<Sum>i<n. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-    by (rule suminf_eq_SUP)
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP n. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. (\<Sum>i<n. f i x) \<partial>M)"
-    unfolding nn_integral_setsum[OF f] ..
-  also have "\<dots> = \<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP n. \<Sum>i<n. f i x) \<partial>M" using f all_pos
-    by (intro nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_AE[symmetric])
-       (elim AE_mp, auto simp: setsum_nonneg simp del: setsum_lessThan_Suc intro!: AE_I2 setsum_mono3)
-  also have "\<dots> = \<integral>\<^sup>+x. (\<Sum>i. f i x) \<partial>M" using all_pos
-    by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE) (auto simp: suminf_eq_SUP)
-  finally show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_bound_simple_function:
-  assumes bnd: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> f x < \<infinity>"
-  assumes f[measurable]: "simple_function M f"
-  assumes supp: "emeasure M {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} < \<infinity>"
-  shows "nn_integral M f < \<infinity>"
-proof cases
-  assume "space M = {}"
-  then have "nn_integral M f = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. 0 \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro nn_integral_cong) auto
-  then show ?thesis by simp
-next
-  assume "space M \<noteq> {}"
-  with simple_functionD(1)[OF f] bnd have bnd: "0 \<le> Max (f`space M) \<and> Max (f`space M) < \<infinity>"
-    by (subst Max_less_iff) (auto simp: Max_ge_iff)
-
-  have "nn_integral M f \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. Max (f`space M) * indicator {x\<in>space M. f x \<noteq> 0} x \<partial>M)"
-  proof (rule nn_integral_mono)
-    fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    with f show "f x \<le> Max (f ` space M) * indicator {x \<in> space M. f x \<noteq> 0} x"
-      by (auto split: split_indicator intro!: Max_ge simple_functionD)
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> < \<infinity>"
-    using bnd supp by (subst nn_integral_cmult) (auto simp: ennreal_mult_less_top)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_Markov_inequality:
-  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M" and "A \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(emeasure M) ({x\<in>space M. 1 \<le> c * u x} \<inter> A) \<le> c * (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u x * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
-    (is "(emeasure M) ?A \<le> _ * ?PI")
-proof -
-  have "?A \<in> sets M"
-    using \<open>A \<in> sets M\<close> u by auto
-  hence "(emeasure M) ?A = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator ?A x \<partial>M)"
-    using nn_integral_indicator by simp
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. c * (u x * indicator A x) \<partial>M)"
-    using u by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono_AE simp: indicator_def)
-  also have "\<dots> = c * (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u x * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
-    using assms by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cmult)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_noteq_infinite:
-  assumes g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M" and "integral\<^sup>N M g \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  shows "AE x in M. g x \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-proof (rule ccontr)
-  assume c: "\<not> (AE x in M. g x \<noteq> \<infinity>)"
-  have "(emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. g x = \<infinity>} \<noteq> 0"
-    using c g by (auto simp add: AE_iff_null)
-  then have "0 < (emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. g x = \<infinity>}"
-    by (auto simp: zero_less_iff_neq_zero)
-  then have "\<infinity> = \<infinity> * (emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. g x = \<infinity>}"
-    by (auto simp: ennreal_top_eq_mult_iff)
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. \<infinity> * indicator {x\<in>space M. g x = \<infinity>} x \<partial>M)"
-    using g by (subst nn_integral_cmult_indicator) auto
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> integral\<^sup>N M g"
-    using assms by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono_AE simp: indicator_def)
-  finally show False
-    using \<open>integral\<^sup>N M g \<noteq> \<infinity>\<close> by (auto simp: top_unique)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_PInf:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and not_Inf: "integral\<^sup>N M f \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  shows "emeasure M (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) = 0"
-proof -
-  have "\<infinity> * emeasure M (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. \<infinity> * indicator (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) x \<partial>M)"
-    using f by (subst nn_integral_cmult_indicator) (auto simp: measurable_sets)
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> integral\<^sup>N M f"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono simp: indicator_def)
-  finally have "\<infinity> * (emeasure M) (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) \<le> integral\<^sup>N M f"
-    by simp
-  then show ?thesis
-    using assms by (auto simp: ennreal_top_mult top_unique split: if_split_asm)
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_PInf:
-  "simple_function M f \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>S M f \<noteq> \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) = 0"
-  by (rule nn_integral_PInf) (auto simp: nn_integral_eq_simple_integral borel_measurable_simple_function)
-
-lemma nn_integral_PInf_AE:
-  assumes "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "integral\<^sup>N M f \<noteq> \<infinity>" shows "AE x in M. f x \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-proof (rule AE_I)
-  show "(emeasure M) (f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M) = 0"
-    by (rule nn_integral_PInf[OF assms])
-  show "f -` {\<infinity>} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-    using assms by (auto intro: borel_measurable_vimage)
-qed auto
-
-lemma nn_integral_diff:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  and g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  and fin: "integral\<^sup>N M g \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  and mono: "AE x in M. g x \<le> f x"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x - g x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>N M f - integral\<^sup>N M g"
-proof -
-  have diff: "(\<lambda>x. f x - g x) \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    using assms by auto
-  have "AE x in M. f x = f x - g x + g x"
-    using diff_add_cancel_ennreal mono nn_integral_noteq_infinite[OF g fin] assms by auto
-  then have **: "integral\<^sup>N M f = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x - g x \<partial>M) + integral\<^sup>N M g"
-    unfolding nn_integral_add[OF diff g, symmetric]
-    by (rule nn_integral_cong_AE)
-  show ?thesis unfolding **
-    using fin
-    by (cases rule: ennreal2_cases[of "\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x - g x \<partial>M" "integral\<^sup>N M g"]) auto
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_mult_bounded_inf:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>" and c: "c \<noteq> \<infinity>" and ae: "AE x in M. g x \<le> c * f x"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. c * f x \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro nn_integral_mono_AE ae)
-  also have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. c * f x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-    using c f by (subst nn_integral_cmult) (auto simp: ennreal_mult_less_top top_unique not_less)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-text \<open>Fatou's lemma: convergence theorem on limes inferior\<close>
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_AE':
-  assumes f: "\<And>i. AE x in M. f (Suc i) x \<le> f i x" and [measurable]: "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    and *: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f 0 x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (INF i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof (rule ennreal_minus_cancel)
-  have "integral\<^sup>N M (f 0) - (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f 0 x - (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M)"
-  proof (rule nn_integral_diff[symmetric])
-    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f 0 x \<partial>M)"
-      by (intro nn_integral_mono INF_lower) simp
-    with * show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-      by simp
-  qed (auto intro: INF_lower)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP i. f 0 x - f i x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (simp add: ennreal_INF_const_minus)
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f 0 x - f i x \<partial>M))"
-  proof (intro nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_AE)
-    show "AE x in M. f 0 x - f i x \<le> f 0 x - f (Suc i) x" for i
-      using f[of i] by eventually_elim (auto simp: ennreal_mono_minus)
-  qed simp
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. nn_integral M (f 0) - (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f i x \<partial>M))"
-  proof (subst nn_integral_diff[symmetric])
-    fix i
-    have dec: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. f (Suc i) x \<le> f i x"
-      unfolding AE_all_countable using f by auto
-    then show "AE x in M. f i x \<le> f 0 x"
-      using dec by eventually_elim (auto intro: lift_Suc_antimono_le[of "\<lambda>i. f i x" 0 i for x])
-    then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f 0 x \<partial>M)"
-      by (rule nn_integral_mono_AE)
-    with * show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-      by simp
-  qed (insert f, auto simp: decseq_def le_fun_def)
-  finally show "integral\<^sup>N M (f 0) - (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) =
-    integral\<^sup>N M (f 0) - (INF i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M)"
-    by (simp add: ennreal_INF_const_minus)
-qed (insert *, auto intro!: nn_integral_mono intro: INF_lower)
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_AE:
-  fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes f: "\<And>i. AE x in M. f (Suc i) x \<le> f i x"
-    and [measurable]: "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    and fin: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (INF i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-proof -
-  { fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> ennreal" and j assume "decseq f"
-    then have "(INF i. f i) = (INF i. f (i + j))"
-      apply (intro INF_eq)
-      apply (rule_tac x="i" in bexI)
-      apply (auto simp: decseq_def le_fun_def)
-      done }
-  note INF_shift = this
-  have mono: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. f (Suc i) x \<le> f i x"
-    using f by (auto simp: AE_all_countable)
-  then have "AE x in M. (INF i. f i x) = (INF n. f (n + i) x)"
-    by eventually_elim (auto intro!: decseq_SucI INF_shift)
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF n. f (n + i) x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (rule nn_integral_cong_AE)
-  also have "\<dots> = (INF n. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f (n + i) x \<partial>M))"
-    by (rule nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_AE') (insert assms, auto)
-  also have "\<dots> = (INF n. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f n x \<partial>M))"
-    by (intro INF_shift[symmetric] decseq_SucI nn_integral_mono_AE f)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_decseq:
-  assumes f: "decseq f" and *: "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M" "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i. f i x) \<partial>M) = (INF i. integral\<^sup>N M (f i))"
-  using nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_AE[of f M i, OF _ *] f by (auto simp: decseq_Suc_iff le_fun_def)
-
-lemma nn_integral_liminf:
-  fixes u :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes u: "\<And>i. u i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. liminf (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) \<le> liminf (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n))"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. liminf (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) = (SUP n. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (INF i:{n..}. u i x) \<partial>M)"
-    unfolding liminf_SUP_INF using u
-    by (intro nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_AE)
-       (auto intro!: AE_I2 intro: INF_greatest INF_superset_mono)
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> liminf (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n))"
-    by (auto simp: liminf_SUP_INF intro!: SUP_mono INF_greatest nn_integral_mono INF_lower)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_limsup:
-  fixes u :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes [measurable]: "\<And>i. u i \<in> borel_measurable M" "w \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes bounds: "\<And>i. AE x in M. u i x \<le> w x" and w: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-  shows "limsup (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n)) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. limsup (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M)"
-proof -
-  have bnd: "AE x in M. \<forall>i. u i x \<le> w x"
-    using bounds by (auto simp: AE_all_countable)
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP n. u n x) \<partial>M) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. w x \<partial>M)"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_mono_AE elim: eventually_mono intro: SUP_least)
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. limsup (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) = (INF n. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i:{n..}. u i x) \<partial>M)"
-    unfolding limsup_INF_SUP using bnd w
-    by (intro nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_AE')
-       (auto intro!: AE_I2 intro: SUP_least SUP_subset_mono)
-  also have "\<dots> \<ge> limsup (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n))"
-    by (auto simp: limsup_INF_SUP intro!: INF_mono SUP_least exI nn_integral_mono SUP_upper)
-  finally (xtrans) show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_LIMSEQ:
-  assumes f: "incseq f" "\<And>i. f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    and u: "\<And>x. (\<lambda>i. f i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u x"
-  shows "(\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (f n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M u"
-proof -
-  have "(\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (f n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (SUP n. integral\<^sup>N M (f n))"
-    using f by (intro LIMSEQ_SUP[of "\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (f n)"] incseq_nn_integral)
-  also have "(SUP n. integral\<^sup>N M (f n)) = integral\<^sup>N M (\<lambda>x. SUP n. f n x)"
-    using f by (intro nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP[symmetric])
-  also have "integral\<^sup>N M (\<lambda>x. SUP n. f n x) = integral\<^sup>N M (\<lambda>x. u x)"
-    using f by (subst LIMSEQ_SUP[THEN LIMSEQ_unique, OF _ u]) (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_dominated_convergence:
-  assumes [measurable]:
-       "\<And>i. u i \<in> borel_measurable M" "u' \<in> borel_measurable M" "w \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    and bound: "\<And>j. AE x in M. u j x \<le> w x"
-    and w: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. w x \<partial>M) < \<infinity>"
-    and u': "AE x in M. (\<lambda>i. u i x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> u' x"
-  shows "(\<lambda>i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. u i x \<partial>M)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. u' x \<partial>M)"
-proof -
-  have "limsup (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n)) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. limsup (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro nn_integral_limsup[OF _ _ bound w]) auto
-  moreover have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. limsup (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u' x \<partial>M)"
-    using u' by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE, eventually_elim) (metis tendsto_iff_Liminf_eq_Limsup sequentially_bot)
-  moreover have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. liminf (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u' x \<partial>M)"
-    using u' by (intro nn_integral_cong_AE, eventually_elim) (metis tendsto_iff_Liminf_eq_Limsup sequentially_bot)
-  moreover have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. liminf (\<lambda>n. u n x) \<partial>M) \<le> liminf (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n))"
-    by (intro nn_integral_liminf) auto
-  moreover have "liminf (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n)) \<le> limsup (\<lambda>n. integral\<^sup>N M (u n))"
-    by (intro Liminf_le_Limsup sequentially_bot)
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    by (intro Liminf_eq_Limsup) auto
-qed
-
-lemma inf_continuous_nn_integral[order_continuous_intros]:
-  assumes f: "\<And>y. inf_continuous (f y)"
-  assumes [measurable]: "\<And>x. (\<lambda>y. f y x) \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes bnd: "\<And>x. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ y. f y x \<partial>M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  shows "inf_continuous (\<lambda>x. (\<integral>\<^sup>+y. f y x \<partial>M))"
-  unfolding inf_continuous_def
-proof safe
-  fix C :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'b" assume C: "decseq C"
-  then show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ y. f y (INFIMUM UNIV C) \<partial>M) = (INF i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ y. f y (C i) \<partial>M)"
-    using inf_continuous_mono[OF f] bnd
-    by (auto simp add: inf_continuousD[OF f C] fun_eq_iff antimono_def mono_def le_fun_def less_top
-             intro!: nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_decseq)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_null_set:
-  assumes "N \<in> null_sets M" shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u x * indicator N x \<partial>M) = 0"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u x * indicator N x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. 0 \<partial>M)"
-  proof (intro nn_integral_cong_AE AE_I)
-    show "{x \<in> space M. u x * indicator N x \<noteq> 0} \<subseteq> N"
-      by (auto simp: indicator_def)
-    show "(emeasure M) N = 0" "N \<in> sets M"
-      using assms by auto
-  qed
-  then show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_0_iff:
-  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N M u = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> emeasure M {x\<in>space M. u x \<noteq> 0} = 0"
-    (is "_ \<longleftrightarrow> (emeasure M) ?A = 0")
-proof -
-  have u_eq: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. u x * indicator ?A x \<partial>M) = integral\<^sup>N M u"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong simp: indicator_def)
-  show ?thesis
-  proof
-    assume "(emeasure M) ?A = 0"
-    with nn_integral_null_set[of ?A M u] u
-    show "integral\<^sup>N M u = 0" by (simp add: u_eq null_sets_def)
-  next
-    assume *: "integral\<^sup>N M u = 0"
-    let ?M = "\<lambda>n. {x \<in> space M. 1 \<le> real (n::nat) * u x}"
-    have "0 = (SUP n. (emeasure M) (?M n \<inter> ?A))"
-    proof -
-      { fix n :: nat
-        from nn_integral_Markov_inequality[OF u, of ?A "of_nat n"] u
-        have "(emeasure M) (?M n \<inter> ?A) \<le> 0"
-          by (simp add: ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat u_eq *)
-        moreover have "0 \<le> (emeasure M) (?M n \<inter> ?A)" using u by auto
-        ultimately have "(emeasure M) (?M n \<inter> ?A) = 0" by auto }
-      thus ?thesis by simp
-    qed
-    also have "\<dots> = (emeasure M) (\<Union>n. ?M n \<inter> ?A)"
-    proof (safe intro!: SUP_emeasure_incseq)
-      fix n show "?M n \<inter> ?A \<in> sets M"
-        using u by (auto intro!: sets.Int)
-    next
-      show "incseq (\<lambda>n. {x \<in> space M. 1 \<le> real n * u x} \<inter> {x \<in> space M. u x \<noteq> 0})"
-      proof (safe intro!: incseq_SucI)
-        fix n :: nat and x
-        assume *: "1 \<le> real n * u x"
-        also have "real n * u x \<le> real (Suc n) * u x"
-          by (auto intro!: mult_right_mono)
-        finally show "1 \<le> real (Suc n) * u x" by auto
-      qed
-    qed
-    also have "\<dots> = (emeasure M) {x\<in>space M. 0 < u x}"
-    proof (safe intro!: arg_cong[where f="(emeasure M)"])
-      fix x assume "0 < u x" and [simp, intro]: "x \<in> space M"
-      show "x \<in> (\<Union>n. ?M n \<inter> ?A)"
-      proof (cases "u x" rule: ennreal_cases)
-        case (real r) with \<open>0 < u x\<close> have "0 < r" by auto
-        obtain j :: nat where "1 / r \<le> real j" using real_arch_simple ..
-        hence "1 / r * r \<le> real j * r" unfolding mult_le_cancel_right using \<open>0 < r\<close> by auto
-        hence "1 \<le> real j * r" using real \<open>0 < r\<close> by auto
-        thus ?thesis using \<open>0 < r\<close> real
-          by (auto simp: ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat ennreal_1[symmetric] ennreal_mult[symmetric]
-                   simp del: ennreal_1)
-      qed (insert \<open>0 < u x\<close>, auto simp: ennreal_mult_top)
-    qed (auto simp: zero_less_iff_neq_zero)
-    finally show "emeasure M ?A = 0"
-      by (simp add: zero_less_iff_neq_zero)
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_0_iff_AE:
-  assumes u: "u \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N M u = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. u x = 0)"
-proof -
-  have sets: "{x\<in>space M. u x \<noteq> 0} \<in> sets M"
-    using u by auto
-  show "integral\<^sup>N M u = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. u x = 0)"
-    using nn_integral_0_iff[of u] AE_iff_null[OF sets] u by auto
-qed
-
-lemma AE_iff_nn_integral:
-  "{x\<in>space M. P x} \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N M (indicator {x. \<not> P x}) = 0"
-  by (subst nn_integral_0_iff_AE) (auto simp: indicator_def[abs_def])
-
-lemma nn_integral_less:
-  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes f: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  assumes ord: "AE x in M. f x \<le> g x" "\<not> (AE x in M. g x \<le> f x)"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M) < (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x \<partial>M)"
-proof -
-  have "0 < (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x - f x \<partial>M)"
-  proof (intro order_le_neq_trans notI)
-    assume "0 = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x - f x \<partial>M)"
-    then have "AE x in M. g x - f x = 0"
-      using nn_integral_0_iff_AE[of "\<lambda>x. g x - f x" M] by simp
-    with ord(1) have "AE x in M. g x \<le> f x"
-      by eventually_elim (auto simp: ennreal_minus_eq_0)
-    with ord show False
-      by simp
-  qed simp
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. g x \<partial>M) - (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>M)"
-    using f by (subst nn_integral_diff) (auto simp: ord)
-  finally show ?thesis
-    using f by (auto dest!: ennreal_minus_pos_iff[rotated] simp: less_top)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_subalgebra:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable N"
-  and N: "sets N \<subseteq> sets M" "space N = space M" "\<And>A. A \<in> sets N \<Longrightarrow> emeasure N A = emeasure M A"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N N f = integral\<^sup>N M f"
-proof -
-  have [simp]: "\<And>f :: 'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal. f \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-    using N by (auto simp: measurable_def)
-  have [simp]: "\<And>P. (AE x in N. P x) \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. P x)"
-    using N by (auto simp add: eventually_ae_filter null_sets_def subset_eq)
-  have [simp]: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets N \<Longrightarrow> A \<in> sets M"
-    using N by auto
-  from f show ?thesis
-    apply induct
-    apply (simp_all add: nn_integral_add nn_integral_cmult nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP N)
-    apply (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong cong: nn_integral_cong simp: N(2)[symmetric])
-    done
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_nat_function:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat"
-  assumes "f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. of_nat (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>t. emeasure M {x\<in>space M. t < f x})"
-proof -
-  define F where "F i = {x\<in>space M. i < f x}" for i
-  with assms have [measurable]: "\<And>i. F i \<in> sets M"
-    by auto
-
-  { fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    have "(\<lambda>i. if i < f x then 1 else 0) sums (of_nat (f x)::real)"
-      using sums_If_finite[of "\<lambda>i. i < f x" "\<lambda>_. 1::real"] by simp
-    then have "(\<lambda>i. ennreal (if i < f x then 1 else 0)) sums of_nat(f x)"
-      unfolding ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat
-      by (subst sums_ennreal) auto
-    moreover have "\<And>i. ennreal (if i < f x then 1 else 0) = indicator (F i) x"
-      using \<open>x \<in> space M\<close> by (simp add: one_ennreal_def F_def)
-    ultimately have "of_nat (f x) = (\<Sum>i. indicator (F i) x :: ennreal)"
-      by (simp add: sums_iff) }
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. of_nat (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (\<Sum>i. indicator (F i) x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (simp cong: nn_integral_cong)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i. emeasure M (F i))"
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_suminf)
-  finally show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: F_def)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_lfp:
-  assumes sets[simp]: "\<And>s. sets (M s) = sets N"
-  assumes f: "sup_continuous f"
-  assumes g: "sup_continuous g"
-  assumes meas: "\<And>F. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> f F \<in> borel_measurable N"
-  assumes step: "\<And>F s. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N (M s) (f F) = g (\<lambda>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) F) s"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+\<omega>. lfp f \<omega> \<partial>M s) = lfp g s"
-proof (subst lfp_transfer_bounded[where \<alpha>="\<lambda>F s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. F x \<partial>M s" and g=g and f=f and P="\<lambda>f. f \<in> borel_measurable N", symmetric])
-  fix C :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> ennreal" assume "incseq C" "\<And>i. C i \<in> borel_measurable N"
-  then show "(\<lambda>s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. (SUP i. C i) x \<partial>M s) = (SUP i. (\<lambda>s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. C i x \<partial>M s))"
-    unfolding SUP_apply[abs_def]
-    by (subst nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP)
-       (auto simp: mono_def fun_eq_iff intro!: arg_cong2[where f=emeasure] cong: measurable_cong_sets)
-qed (auto simp add: step le_fun_def SUP_apply[abs_def] bot_fun_def bot_ennreal intro!: meas f g)
-
-lemma nn_integral_gfp:
-  assumes sets[simp]: "\<And>s. sets (M s) = sets N"
-  assumes f: "inf_continuous f" and g: "inf_continuous g"
-  assumes meas: "\<And>F. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> f F \<in> borel_measurable N"
-  assumes bound: "\<And>F s. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f F x \<partial>M s) < \<infinity>"
-  assumes non_zero: "\<And>s. emeasure (M s) (space (M s)) \<noteq> 0"
-  assumes step: "\<And>F s. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N (M s) (f F) = g (\<lambda>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) F) s"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+\<omega>. gfp f \<omega> \<partial>M s) = gfp g s"
-proof (subst gfp_transfer_bounded[where \<alpha>="\<lambda>F s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. F x \<partial>M s" and g=g and f=f
-    and P="\<lambda>F. F \<in> borel_measurable N \<and> (\<forall>s. (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. F x \<partial>M s) < \<infinity>)", symmetric])
-  fix C :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> ennreal" assume "decseq C" "\<And>i. C i \<in> borel_measurable N \<and> (\<forall>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) (C i) < \<infinity>)"
-  then show "(\<lambda>s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. (INF i. C i) x \<partial>M s) = (INF i. (\<lambda>s. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. C i x \<partial>M s))"
-    unfolding INF_apply[abs_def]
-    by (subst nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_decseq)
-       (auto simp: mono_def fun_eq_iff intro!: arg_cong2[where f=emeasure] cong: measurable_cong_sets)
-next
-  show "\<And>x. g x \<le> (\<lambda>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) (f top))"
-    by (subst step)
-       (auto simp add: top_fun_def less_le non_zero le_fun_def ennreal_top_mult
-             cong del: if_weak_cong intro!: monoD[OF inf_continuous_mono[OF g], THEN le_funD])
-next
-  fix C assume "\<And>i::nat. C i \<in> borel_measurable N \<and> (\<forall>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) (C i) < \<infinity>)" "decseq C"
-  with bound show "INFIMUM UNIV C \<in> borel_measurable N \<and> (\<forall>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) (INFIMUM UNIV C) < \<infinity>)"
-    unfolding INF_apply[abs_def]
-    by (subst nn_integral_monotone_convergence_INF_decseq)
-       (auto simp: INF_less_iff cong: measurable_cong_sets intro!: borel_measurable_INF)
-next
-  show "\<And>x. x \<in> borel_measurable N \<and> (\<forall>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) x < \<infinity>) \<Longrightarrow>
-         (\<lambda>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) (f x)) = g (\<lambda>s. integral\<^sup>N (M s) x)"
-    by (subst step) auto
-qed (insert bound, auto simp add: le_fun_def INF_apply[abs_def] top_fun_def intro!: meas f g)
-
-subsection \<open>Integral under concrete measures\<close>
-
-lemma nn_integral_mono_measure:
-  assumes "sets M = sets N" "M \<le> N" shows "nn_integral M f \<le> nn_integral N f"
-  unfolding nn_integral_def
-proof (intro SUP_subset_mono)
-  note \<open>sets M = sets N\<close>[simp]  \<open>sets M = sets N\<close>[THEN sets_eq_imp_space_eq, simp]
-  show "{g. simple_function M g \<and> g \<le> f} \<subseteq> {g. simple_function N g \<and> g \<le> f}"
-    by (simp add: simple_function_def)
-  show "integral\<^sup>S M x \<le> integral\<^sup>S N x" for x
-    using le_measureD3[OF \<open>M \<le> N\<close>]
-    by (auto simp add: simple_integral_def intro!: setsum_mono mult_mono)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_empty:
-  assumes "space M = {}"
-  shows "nn_integral M f = 0"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. 0 \<partial>M)"
-    by(rule nn_integral_cong)(simp add: assms)
-  thus ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_bot[simp]: "nn_integral bot f = 0"
-  by (simp add: nn_integral_empty)
-
-subsubsection \<open>Distributions\<close>
-
-lemma nn_integral_distr:
-  assumes T: "T \<in> measurable M M'" and f: "f \<in> borel_measurable (distr M M' T)"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N (distr M M' T) f = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f (T x) \<partial>M)"
-  using f
-proof induct
-  case (cong f g)
-  with T show ?case
-    apply (subst nn_integral_cong[of _ f g])
-    apply simp
-    apply (subst nn_integral_cong[of _ "\<lambda>x. f (T x)" "\<lambda>x. g (T x)"])
-    apply (simp add: measurable_def Pi_iff)
-    apply simp
-    done
-next
-  case (set A)
-  then have eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> space M \<Longrightarrow> indicator A (T x) = indicator (T -` A \<inter> space M) x"
-    by (auto simp: indicator_def)
-  from set T show ?case
-    by (subst nn_integral_cong[OF eq])
-       (auto simp add: emeasure_distr intro!: nn_integral_indicator[symmetric] measurable_sets)
-qed (simp_all add: measurable_compose[OF T] T nn_integral_cmult nn_integral_add
-                   nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP le_fun_def incseq_def)
-
-subsubsection \<open>Counting space\<close>
-
-lemma simple_function_count_space[simp]:
-  "simple_function (count_space A) f \<longleftrightarrow> finite (f ` A)"
-  unfolding simple_function_def by simp
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space:
-  assumes A: "finite {a\<in>A. 0 < f a}"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N (count_space A) f = (\<Sum>a|a\<in>A \<and> 0 < f a. f a)"
-proof -
-  have *: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. max 0 (f x) \<partial>count_space A) =
-    (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>a|a\<in>A \<and> 0 < f a. f a * indicator {a} x) \<partial>count_space A)"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong
-             simp add: indicator_def if_distrib setsum.If_cases[OF A] max_def le_less)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>a|a\<in>A \<and> 0 < f a. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f a * indicator {a} x \<partial>count_space A)"
-    by (subst nn_integral_setsum) (simp_all add: AE_count_space  less_imp_le)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>a|a\<in>A \<and> 0 < f a. f a)"
-    by (auto intro!: setsum.cong simp: one_ennreal_def[symmetric] max_def)
-  finally show ?thesis by (simp add: max.absorb2)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space_finite:
-    "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space A) = (\<Sum>a\<in>A. f a)"
-  by (auto intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_left simp: nn_integral_count_space less_le)
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space':
-  assumes "finite A" "\<And>x. x \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0" "A \<subseteq> B"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space B) = (\<Sum>x\<in>A. f x)"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space B) = (\<Sum>a | a \<in> B \<and> 0 < f a. f a)"
-    using assms(2,3)
-    by (intro nn_integral_count_space finite_subset[OF _ \<open>finite A\<close>]) (auto simp: less_le)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>a\<in>A. f a)"
-    using assms by (intro setsum.mono_neutral_cong_left) (auto simp: less_le)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_bij_count_space:
-  assumes g: "bij_betw g A B"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f (g x) \<partial>count_space A) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space B)"
-  using g[THEN bij_betw_imp_funcset]
-  by (subst distr_bij_count_space[OF g, symmetric])
-     (auto intro!: nn_integral_distr[symmetric])
-
-lemma nn_integral_indicator_finite:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes f: "finite A" and [measurable]: "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> {a} \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>x\<in>A. f x * emeasure M {x})"
-proof -
-  from f have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (\<Sum>a\<in>A. f a * indicator {a} x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (intro nn_integral_cong) (auto simp: indicator_def if_distrib[where f="\<lambda>a. x * a" for x] setsum.If_cases)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>a\<in>A. f a * emeasure M {a})"
-    by (subst nn_integral_setsum) auto
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space_nat:
-  fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+i. f i \<partial>count_space UNIV) = (\<Sum>i. f i)"
-proof -
-  have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+i. f i \<partial>count_space UNIV) =
-    (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. (\<Sum>j. f j * indicator {j} i) \<partial>count_space UNIV)"
-  proof (intro nn_integral_cong)
-    fix i
-    have "f i = (\<Sum>j\<in>{i}. f j * indicator {j} i)"
-      by simp
-    also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>j. f j * indicator {j} i)"
-      by (rule suminf_finite[symmetric]) auto
-    finally show "f i = (\<Sum>j. f j * indicator {j} i)" .
-  qed
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>j. (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. f j * indicator {j} i \<partial>count_space UNIV))"
-    by (rule nn_integral_suminf) auto
-  finally show ?thesis
-    by simp
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_enat_function:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> measurable M (count_space UNIV)"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. ennreal_of_enat (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<Sum>t. emeasure M {x \<in> space M. t < f x})"
-proof -
-  define F where "F i = {x\<in>space M. i < f x}" for i :: nat
-  with assms have [measurable]: "\<And>i. F i \<in> sets M"
-    by auto
-
-  { fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    have "(\<lambda>i::nat. if i < f x then 1 else 0) sums ennreal_of_enat (f x)"
-      using sums_If_finite[of "\<lambda>r. r < f x" "\<lambda>_. 1 :: ennreal"]
-      by (cases "f x") (simp_all add: sums_def of_nat_tendsto_top_ennreal)
-    also have "(\<lambda>i. (if i < f x then 1 else 0)) = (\<lambda>i. indicator (F i) x)"
-      using \<open>x \<in> space M\<close> by (simp add: one_ennreal_def F_def fun_eq_iff)
-    finally have "ennreal_of_enat (f x) = (\<Sum>i. indicator (F i) x)"
-      by (simp add: sums_iff) }
-  then have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. ennreal_of_enat (f x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (\<Sum>i. indicator (F i) x) \<partial>M)"
-    by (simp cong: nn_integral_cong)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i. emeasure M (F i))"
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_suminf)
-  finally show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: F_def)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space_nn_integral:
-  fixes f :: "'i \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes "countable I" and [measurable]: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> f i \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. \<integral>\<^sup>+i. f i x \<partial>count_space I \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. f i x \<partial>M \<partial>count_space I)"
-proof cases
-  assume "finite I" then show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_count_space_finite nn_integral_setsum)
-next
-  assume "infinite I"
-  then have [simp]: "I \<noteq> {}"
-    by auto
-  note * = bij_betw_from_nat_into[OF \<open>countable I\<close> \<open>infinite I\<close>]
-  have **: "\<And>f. (\<And>i. 0 \<le> f i) \<Longrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. f i \<partial>count_space I) = (\<Sum>n. f (from_nat_into I n))"
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_bij_count_space[symmetric, OF *] nn_integral_count_space_nat)
-  show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: ** nn_integral_suminf from_nat_into)
-qed
-
-lemma emeasure_UN_countable:
-  assumes sets[measurable]: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> X i \<in> sets M" and I[simp]: "countable I"
-  assumes disj: "disjoint_family_on X I"
-  shows "emeasure M (UNION I X) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. emeasure M (X i) \<partial>count_space I)"
-proof -
-  have eq: "\<And>x. indicator (UNION I X) x = \<integral>\<^sup>+ i. indicator (X i) x \<partial>count_space I"
-  proof cases
-    fix x assume x: "x \<in> UNION I X"
-    then obtain j where j: "x \<in> X j" "j \<in> I"
-      by auto
-    with disj have "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> indicator (X i) x = (indicator {j} i::ennreal)"
-      by (auto simp: disjoint_family_on_def split: split_indicator)
-    with x j show "?thesis x"
-      by (simp cong: nn_integral_cong_simp)
-  qed (auto simp: nn_integral_0_iff_AE)
-
-  note sets.countable_UN'[unfolded subset_eq, measurable]
-  have "emeasure M (UNION I X) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. indicator (UNION I X) x \<partial>M)"
-    by simp
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+i. \<integral>\<^sup>+x. indicator (X i) x \<partial>M \<partial>count_space I)"
-    by (simp add: eq nn_integral_count_space_nn_integral)
-  finally show ?thesis
-    by (simp cong: nn_integral_cong_simp)
-qed
-
-lemma emeasure_countable_singleton:
-  assumes sets: "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> {x} \<in> sets M" and X: "countable X"
-  shows "emeasure M X = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. emeasure M {x} \<partial>count_space X)"
-proof -
-  have "emeasure M (\<Union>i\<in>X. {i}) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. emeasure M {x} \<partial>count_space X)"
-    using assms by (intro emeasure_UN_countable) (auto simp: disjoint_family_on_def)
-  also have "(\<Union>i\<in>X. {i}) = X" by auto
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma measure_eqI_countable:
-  assumes [simp]: "sets M = Pow A" "sets N = Pow A" and A: "countable A"
-  assumes eq: "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {a} = emeasure N {a}"
-  shows "M = N"
-proof (rule measure_eqI)
-  fix X assume "X \<in> sets M"
-  then have X: "X \<subseteq> A" by auto
-  moreover from A X have "countable X" by (auto dest: countable_subset)
-  ultimately have
-    "emeasure M X = (\<integral>\<^sup>+a. emeasure M {a} \<partial>count_space X)"
-    "emeasure N X = (\<integral>\<^sup>+a. emeasure N {a} \<partial>count_space X)"
-    by (auto intro!: emeasure_countable_singleton)
-  moreover have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+a. emeasure M {a} \<partial>count_space X) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+a. emeasure N {a} \<partial>count_space X)"
-    using X by (intro nn_integral_cong eq) auto
-  ultimately show "emeasure M X = emeasure N X"
-    by simp
-qed simp
-
-lemma measure_eqI_countable_AE:
-  assumes [simp]: "sets M = UNIV" "sets N = UNIV"
-  assumes ae: "AE x in M. x \<in> \<Omega>" "AE x in N. x \<in> \<Omega>" and [simp]: "countable \<Omega>"
-  assumes eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> \<Omega> \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M {x} = emeasure N {x}"
-  shows "M = N"
-proof (rule measure_eqI)
-  fix A
-  have "emeasure N A = emeasure N {x\<in>\<Omega>. x \<in> A}"
-    using ae by (intro emeasure_eq_AE) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. emeasure N {x} \<partial>count_space {x\<in>\<Omega>. x \<in> A})"
-    by (intro emeasure_countable_singleton) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. emeasure M {x} \<partial>count_space {x\<in>\<Omega>. x \<in> A})"
-    by (intro nn_integral_cong eq[symmetric]) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = emeasure M {x\<in>\<Omega>. x \<in> A}"
-    by (intro emeasure_countable_singleton[symmetric]) auto
-  also have "\<dots> = emeasure M A"
-    using ae by (intro emeasure_eq_AE) auto
-  finally show "emeasure M A = emeasure N A" ..
-qed simp
-
-lemma nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_nat:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes chain: "Complete_Partial_Order.chain op \<le> (f ` Y)"
-  and nonempty: "Y \<noteq> {}"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i:Y. f i x) \<partial>count_space UNIV) = (SUP i:Y. (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>count_space UNIV))"
-  (is "?lhs = ?rhs" is "integral\<^sup>N ?M _ = _")
-proof (rule order_class.order.antisym)
-  show "?rhs \<le> ?lhs"
-    by (auto intro!: SUP_least SUP_upper nn_integral_mono)
-next
-  have "\<exists>g. incseq g \<and> range g \<subseteq> (\<lambda>i. f i x) ` Y \<and> (SUP i:Y. f i x) = (SUP i. g i)" for x
-    by (rule ennreal_Sup_countable_SUP) (simp add: nonempty)
-  then obtain g where incseq: "\<And>x. incseq (g x)"
-    and range: "\<And>x. range (g x) \<subseteq> (\<lambda>i. f i x) ` Y"
-    and sup: "\<And>x. (SUP i:Y. f i x) = (SUP i. g x i)" by moura
-  from incseq have incseq': "incseq (\<lambda>i x. g x i)"
-    by(blast intro: incseq_SucI le_funI dest: incseq_SucD)
-
-  have "?lhs = \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (SUP i. g x i) \<partial>?M" by(simp add: sup)
-  also have "\<dots> = (SUP i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. g x i \<partial>?M)" using incseq'
-    by(rule nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP) simp
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP i:Y. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>?M)"
-  proof(rule SUP_least)
-    fix n
-    have "\<And>x. \<exists>i. g x n = f i x \<and> i \<in> Y" using range by blast
-    then obtain I where I: "\<And>x. g x n = f (I x) x" "\<And>x. I x \<in> Y" by moura
-
-    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. g x n \<partial>count_space UNIV) = (\<Sum>x. g x n)"
-      by(rule nn_integral_count_space_nat)
-    also have "\<dots> = (SUP m. \<Sum>x<m. g x n)"
-      by(rule suminf_eq_SUP)
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP i:Y. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f i x \<partial>?M)"
-    proof(rule SUP_mono)
-      fix m
-      show "\<exists>m'\<in>Y. (\<Sum>x<m. g x n) \<le> (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f m' x \<partial>?M)"
-      proof(cases "m > 0")
-        case False
-        thus ?thesis using nonempty by auto
-      next
-        case True
-        let ?Y = "I ` {..<m}"
-        have "f ` ?Y \<subseteq> f ` Y" using I by auto
-        with chain have chain': "Complete_Partial_Order.chain op \<le> (f ` ?Y)" by(rule chain_subset)
-        hence "Sup (f ` ?Y) \<in> f ` ?Y"
-          by(rule ccpo_class.in_chain_finite)(auto simp add: True lessThan_empty_iff)
-        then obtain m' where "m' < m" and m': "(SUP i:?Y. f i) = f (I m')" by auto
-        have "I m' \<in> Y" using I by blast
-        have "(\<Sum>x<m. g x n) \<le> (\<Sum>x<m. f (I m') x)"
-        proof(rule setsum_mono)
-          fix x
-          assume "x \<in> {..<m}"
-          hence "x < m" by simp
-          have "g x n = f (I x) x" by(simp add: I)
-          also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP i:?Y. f i) x" unfolding Sup_fun_def image_image
-            using \<open>x \<in> {..<m}\<close> by (rule Sup_upper [OF imageI])
-          also have "\<dots> = f (I m') x" unfolding m' by simp
-          finally show "g x n \<le> f (I m') x" .
-        qed
-        also have "\<dots> \<le> (SUP m. (\<Sum>x<m. f (I m') x))"
-          by(rule SUP_upper) simp
-        also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>x. f (I m') x)"
-          by(rule suminf_eq_SUP[symmetric])
-        also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f (I m') x \<partial>?M)"
-          by(rule nn_integral_count_space_nat[symmetric])
-        finally show ?thesis using \<open>I m' \<in> Y\<close> by blast
-      qed
-    qed
-    finally show "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. g x n \<partial>count_space UNIV) \<le> \<dots>" .
-  qed
-  finally show "?lhs \<le> ?rhs" .
-qed
-
-lemma power_series_tendsto_at_left:
-  assumes nonneg: "\<And>i. 0 \<le> f i" and summable: "\<And>z. 0 \<le> z \<Longrightarrow> z < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n * z^n)"
-  shows "((\<lambda>z. ennreal (\<Sum>n. f n * z^n)) \<longlongrightarrow> (\<Sum>n. ennreal (f n))) (at_left (1::real))"
-proof (intro tendsto_at_left_sequentially)
-  show "0 < (1::real)" by simp
-  fix S :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real" assume S: "\<And>n. S n < 1" "\<And>n. 0 < S n" "S \<longlonglongrightarrow> 1" "incseq S"
-  then have S_nonneg: "\<And>i. 0 \<le> S i" by (auto intro: less_imp_le)
-
-  have "(\<lambda>i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+n. f n * S i^n \<partial>count_space UNIV)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<integral>\<^sup>+n. ennreal (f n) \<partial>count_space UNIV)"
-  proof (rule nn_integral_LIMSEQ)
-    show "incseq (\<lambda>i n. ennreal (f n * S i^n))"
-      using S by (auto intro!: mult_mono power_mono nonneg ennreal_leI
-                       simp: incseq_def le_fun_def less_imp_le)
-    fix n have "(\<lambda>i. ennreal (f n * S i^n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ennreal (f n * 1^n)"
-      by (intro tendsto_intros tendsto_ennrealI S)
-    then show "(\<lambda>i. ennreal (f n * S i^n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> ennreal (f n)"
-      by simp
-  qed (auto simp: S_nonneg intro!: mult_nonneg_nonneg nonneg)
-  also have "(\<lambda>i. (\<integral>\<^sup>+n. f n * S i^n \<partial>count_space UNIV)) = (\<lambda>i. \<Sum>n. f n * S i^n)"
-    by (subst nn_integral_count_space_nat)
-       (intro ext suminf_ennreal2 mult_nonneg_nonneg nonneg S_nonneg
-              zero_le_power summable S)+
-  also have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+n. ennreal (f n) \<partial>count_space UNIV) = (\<Sum>n. ennreal (f n))"
-    by (simp add: nn_integral_count_space_nat nonneg)
-  finally show "(\<lambda>n. ennreal (\<Sum>na. f na * S n ^ na)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<Sum>n. ennreal (f n))" .
-qed
-
-subsubsection \<open>Measures with Restricted Space\<close>
-
-lemma simple_function_restrict_space_ennreal:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ennreal"
-  assumes "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  shows "simple_function (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function M (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-proof -
-  { assume "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>))"
-    then have "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>) \<union> {0})" by simp
-    then have "finite ((\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x) ` space M)"
-      by (rule rev_finite_subset) (auto split: split_indicator simp: space_restrict_space) }
-  moreover
-  { assume "finite ((\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x) ` space M)"
-    then have "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>))"
-      by (rule rev_finite_subset) (auto split: split_indicator simp: space_restrict_space) }
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    unfolding
-      simple_function_iff_borel_measurable borel_measurable_restrict_space_iff_ennreal[OF assms]
-    by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_function_restrict_space:
-  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
-  assumes "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  shows "simple_function (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function M (\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x)"
-proof -
-  { assume "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>))"
-    then have "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>) \<union> {0})" by simp
-    then have "finite ((\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x) ` space M)"
-      by (rule rev_finite_subset) (auto split: split_indicator simp: space_restrict_space) }
-  moreover
-  { assume "finite ((\<lambda>x. indicator \<Omega> x *\<^sub>R f x) ` space M)"
-    then have "finite (f ` space (restrict_space M \<Omega>))"
-      by (rule rev_finite_subset) (auto split: split_indicator simp: space_restrict_space) }
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    unfolding simple_function_iff_borel_measurable
-      borel_measurable_restrict_space_iff[OF assms]
-    by auto
-qed
-
-lemma simple_integral_restrict_space:
-  assumes \<Omega>: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M" "simple_function (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f"
-  shows "simple_integral (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f = simple_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-  using simple_function_restrict_space_ennreal[THEN iffD1, OF \<Omega>, THEN simple_functionD(1)]
-  by (auto simp add: space_restrict_space emeasure_restrict_space[OF \<Omega>(1)] le_infI2 simple_integral_def
-           split: split_indicator split_indicator_asm
-           intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_cong_left ennreal_mult_left_cong arg_cong2[where f=emeasure])
-
-lemma nn_integral_restrict_space:
-  assumes \<Omega>[simp]: "\<Omega> \<inter> space M \<in> sets M"
-  shows "nn_integral (restrict_space M \<Omega>) f = nn_integral M (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-proof -
-  let ?R = "restrict_space M \<Omega>" and ?X = "\<lambda>M f. {s. simple_function M s \<and> s \<le> f \<and> (\<forall>x. s x < top)}"
-  have "integral\<^sup>S ?R ` ?X ?R f = integral\<^sup>S M ` ?X M (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-  proof (safe intro!: image_eqI)
-    fix s assume s: "simple_function ?R s" "s \<le> f" "\<forall>x. s x < top"
-    from s show "integral\<^sup>S (restrict_space M \<Omega>) s = integral\<^sup>S M (\<lambda>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-      by (intro simple_integral_restrict_space) auto
-    from s show "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-      by (simp add: simple_function_restrict_space_ennreal)
-    from s show "(\<lambda>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x) \<le> (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-      "\<And>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x < top"
-      by (auto split: split_indicator simp: le_fun_def image_subset_iff)
-  next
-    fix s assume s: "simple_function M s" "s \<le> (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator \<Omega> x)" "\<forall>x. s x < top"
-    then have "simple_function M (\<lambda>x. s x * indicator (\<Omega> \<inter> space M) x)" (is ?s')
-      by (intro simple_function_mult simple_function_indicator) auto
-    also have "?s' \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function M (\<lambda>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-      by (rule simple_function_cong) (auto split: split_indicator)
-    finally show sf: "simple_function (restrict_space M \<Omega>) s"
-      by (simp add: simple_function_restrict_space_ennreal)
-
-    from s have s_eq: "s = (\<lambda>x. s x * indicator \<Omega> x)"
-      by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff le_fun_def image_subset_iff
-                  split: split_indicator split_indicator_asm
-                  intro: antisym)
-
-    show "integral\<^sup>S M s = integral\<^sup>S (restrict_space M \<Omega>) s"
-      by (subst s_eq) (rule simple_integral_restrict_space[symmetric, OF \<Omega> sf])
-    show "\<And>x. s x < top"
-      using s by (auto simp: image_subset_iff)
-    from s show "s \<le> f"
-      by (subst s_eq) (auto simp: image_subset_iff le_fun_def split: split_indicator split_indicator_asm)
-  qed
-  then show ?thesis
-    unfolding nn_integral_def_finite by (simp cong del: strong_SUP_cong)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space_indicator:
-  assumes "NO_MATCH (UNIV::'a set) (X::'a set)"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space X) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator X x \<partial>count_space UNIV)"
-  by (simp add: nn_integral_restrict_space[symmetric] restrict_count_space)
-
-lemma nn_integral_count_space_eq:
-  "(\<And>x. x \<in> A - B \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> B - A \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0) \<Longrightarrow>
-    (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space A) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>count_space B)"
-  by (auto simp: nn_integral_count_space_indicator intro!: nn_integral_cong split: split_indicator)
-
-lemma nn_integral_ge_point:
-  assumes "x \<in> A"
-  shows "p x \<le> \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. p x \<partial>count_space A"
-proof -
-  from assms have "p x \<le> \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. p x \<partial>count_space {x}"
-    by(auto simp add: nn_integral_count_space_finite max_def)
-  also have "\<dots> = \<integral>\<^sup>+ x'. p x' * indicator {x} x' \<partial>count_space A"
-    using assms by(auto simp add: nn_integral_count_space_indicator indicator_def intro!: nn_integral_cong)
-  also have "\<dots> \<le> \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. p x \<partial>count_space A"
-    by(rule nn_integral_mono)(simp add: indicator_def)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-subsubsection \<open>Measure spaces with an associated density\<close>
-
-definition density :: "'a measure \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> ennreal) \<Rightarrow> 'a measure" where
-  "density M f = measure_of (space M) (sets M) (\<lambda>A. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
-
-lemma
-  shows sets_density[simp, measurable_cong]: "sets (density M f) = sets M"
-    and space_density[simp]: "space (density M f) = space M"
-  by (auto simp: density_def)
-
-(* FIXME: add conversion to simplify space, sets and measurable *)
-lemma space_density_imp[measurable_dest]:
-  "\<And>x M f. x \<in> space (density M f) \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> space M" by auto
-
-lemma
-  shows measurable_density_eq1[simp]: "g \<in> measurable (density Mg f) Mg' \<longleftrightarrow> g \<in> measurable Mg Mg'"
-    and measurable_density_eq2[simp]: "h \<in> measurable Mh (density Mh' f) \<longleftrightarrow> h \<in> measurable Mh Mh'"
-    and simple_function_density_eq[simp]: "simple_function (density Mu f) u \<longleftrightarrow> simple_function Mu u"
-  unfolding measurable_def simple_function_def by simp_all
-
-lemma density_cong: "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> f' \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow>
-  (AE x in M. f x = f' x) \<Longrightarrow> density M f = density M f'"
-  unfolding density_def by (auto intro!: measure_of_eq nn_integral_cong_AE sets.space_closed)
-
-lemma emeasure_density:
-  assumes f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and A[measurable]: "A \<in> sets M"
-  shows "emeasure (density M f) A = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M)"
-    (is "_ = ?\<mu> A")
-  unfolding density_def
-proof (rule emeasure_measure_of_sigma)
-  show "sigma_algebra (space M) (sets M)" ..
-  show "positive (sets M) ?\<mu>"
-    using f by (auto simp: positive_def)
-  show "countably_additive (sets M) ?\<mu>"
-  proof (intro countably_additiveI)
-    fix A :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a set" assume "range A \<subseteq> sets M"
-    then have "\<And>i. A i \<in> sets M" by auto
-    then have *: "\<And>i. (\<lambda>x. f x * indicator (A i) x) \<in> borel_measurable M"
-      by auto
-    assume disj: "disjoint_family A"
-    then have "(\<Sum>n. ?\<mu> (A n)) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>n. f x * indicator (A n) x) \<partial>M)"
-       using f * by (subst nn_integral_suminf) auto
-    also have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. (\<Sum>n. f x * indicator (A n) x) \<partial>M) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * (\<Sum>n. indicator (A n) x) \<partial>M)"
-      using f by (auto intro!: ennreal_suminf_cmult nn_integral_cong_AE)
-    also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator (\<Union>n. A n) x \<partial>M)"
-      unfolding suminf_indicator[OF disj] ..
-    finally show "(\<Sum>i. \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator (A i) x \<partial>M) = \<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator (\<Union>i. A i) x \<partial>M" .
-  qed
-qed fact
-
-lemma null_sets_density_iff:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "A \<in> null_sets (density M f) \<longleftrightarrow> A \<in> sets M \<and> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x = 0)"
-proof -
-  { assume "A \<in> sets M"
-    have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> emeasure M {x \<in> space M. f x * indicator A x \<noteq> 0} = 0"
-      using f \<open>A \<in> sets M\<close> by (intro nn_integral_0_iff) auto
-    also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. f x * indicator A x = 0)"
-      using f \<open>A \<in> sets M\<close> by (intro AE_iff_measurable[OF _ refl, symmetric]) auto
-    also have "(AE x in M. f x * indicator A x = 0) \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x \<le> 0)"
-      by (auto simp add: indicator_def max_def split: if_split_asm)
-    finally have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator A x \<partial>M) = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x \<le> 0)" . }
-  with f show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: null_sets_def emeasure_density cong: conj_cong)
-qed
-
-lemma AE_density:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "(AE x in density M f. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. 0 < f x \<longrightarrow> P x)"
-proof
-  assume "AE x in density M f. P x"
-  with f obtain N where "{x \<in> space M. \<not> P x} \<subseteq> N" "N \<in> sets M" and ae: "AE x in M. x \<in> N \<longrightarrow> f x = 0"
-    by (auto simp: eventually_ae_filter null_sets_density_iff)
-  then have "AE x in M. x \<notin> N \<longrightarrow> P x" by auto
-  with ae show "AE x in M. 0 < f x \<longrightarrow> P x"
-    by (rule eventually_elim2) auto
-next
-  fix N assume ae: "AE x in M. 0 < f x \<longrightarrow> P x"
-  then obtain N where "{x \<in> space M. \<not> (0 < f x \<longrightarrow> P x)} \<subseteq> N" "N \<in> null_sets M"
-    by (auto simp: eventually_ae_filter)
-  then have *: "{x \<in> space (density M f). \<not> P x} \<subseteq> N \<union> {x\<in>space M. f x = 0}"
-    "N \<union> {x\<in>space M. f x = 0} \<in> sets M" and ae2: "AE x in M. x \<notin> N"
-    using f by (auto simp: subset_eq zero_less_iff_neq_zero intro!: AE_not_in)
-  show "AE x in density M f. P x"
-    using ae2
-    unfolding eventually_ae_filter[of _ "density M f"] Bex_def null_sets_density_iff[OF f]
-    by (intro exI[of _ "N \<union> {x\<in>space M. f x = 0}"] conjI *) (auto elim: eventually_elim2)
-qed
-
-lemma nn_integral_density:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "integral\<^sup>N (density M f) g = (\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * g x \<partial>M)"
-using g proof induct
-  case (cong u v)
-  then show ?case
-    apply (subst nn_integral_cong[OF cong(3)])
-    apply (simp_all cong: nn_integral_cong)
-    done
-next
-  case (set A) then show ?case
-    by (simp add: emeasure_density f)
-next
-  case (mult u c)
-  moreover have "\<And>x. f x * (c * u x) = c * (f x * u x)" by (simp add: field_simps)
-  ultimately show ?case
-    using f by (simp add: nn_integral_cmult)
-next
-  case (add u v)
-  then have "\<And>x. f x * (v x + u x) = f x * v x + f x * u x"
-    by (simp add: distrib_left)
-  with add f show ?case
-    by (auto simp add: nn_integral_add intro!: nn_integral_add[symmetric])
-next
-  case (seq U)
-  have eq: "AE x in M. f x * (SUP i. U i x) = (SUP i. f x * U i x)"
-    by eventually_elim (simp add: SUP_mult_left_ennreal seq)
-  from seq f show ?case
-    apply (simp add: nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP)
-    apply (subst nn_integral_cong_AE[OF eq])
-    apply (subst nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP_AE)
-    apply (auto simp: incseq_def le_fun_def intro!: mult_left_mono)
-    done
-qed
-
-lemma density_distr:
-  assumes [measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable N" "X \<in> measurable M N"
-  shows "density (distr M N X) f = distr (density M (\<lambda>x. f (X x))) N X"
-  by (intro measure_eqI)
-     (auto simp add: emeasure_density nn_integral_distr emeasure_distr
-           split: split_indicator intro!: nn_integral_cong)
-
-lemma emeasure_restricted:
-  assumes S: "S \<in> sets M" and X: "X \<in> sets M"
-  shows "emeasure (density M (indicator S)) X = emeasure M (S \<inter> X)"
-proof -
-  have "emeasure (density M (indicator S)) X = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. indicator S x * indicator X x \<partial>M)"
-    using S X by (simp add: emeasure_density)
-  also have "\<dots> = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. indicator (S \<inter> X) x \<partial>M)"
-    by (auto intro!: nn_integral_cong simp: indicator_def)
-  also have "\<dots> = emeasure M (S \<inter> X)"
-    using S X by (simp add: sets.Int)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma measure_restricted:
-  "S \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> X \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> measure (density M (indicator S)) X = measure M (S \<inter> X)"
-  by (simp add: emeasure_restricted measure_def)
-
-lemma (in finite_measure) finite_measure_restricted:
-  "S \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> finite_measure (density M (indicator S))"
-  by standard (simp add: emeasure_restricted)
-
-lemma emeasure_density_const:
-  "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> emeasure (density M (\<lambda>_. c)) A = c * emeasure M A"
-  by (auto simp: nn_integral_cmult_indicator emeasure_density)
-
-lemma measure_density_const:
-  "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> c \<noteq> \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> measure (density M (\<lambda>_. c)) A = enn2real c * measure M A"
-  by (auto simp: emeasure_density_const measure_def enn2real_mult)
-
-lemma density_density_eq:
-   "f \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> borel_measurable M \<Longrightarrow>
-   density (density M f) g = density M (\<lambda>x. f x * g x)"
-  by (auto intro!: measure_eqI simp: emeasure_density nn_integral_density ac_simps)
-
-lemma distr_density_distr:
-  assumes T: "T \<in> measurable M M'" and T': "T' \<in> measurable M' M"
-    and inv: "\<forall>x\<in>space M. T' (T x) = x"
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M'"
-  shows "distr (density (distr M M' T) f) M T' = density M (f \<circ> T)" (is "?R = ?L")
-proof (rule measure_eqI)
-  fix A assume A: "A \<in> sets ?R"
-  { fix x assume "x \<in> space M"
-    with sets.sets_into_space[OF A]
-    have "indicator (T' -` A \<inter> space M') (T x) = (indicator A x :: ennreal)"
-      using T inv by (auto simp: indicator_def measurable_space) }
-  with A T T' f show "emeasure ?R A = emeasure ?L A"
-    by (simp add: measurable_comp emeasure_density emeasure_distr
-                  nn_integral_distr measurable_sets cong: nn_integral_cong)
-qed simp
-
-lemma density_density_divide:
-  fixes f g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real"
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> f x"
-  assumes g: "g \<in> borel_measurable M" "AE x in M. 0 \<le> g x"
-  assumes ac: "AE x in M. f x = 0 \<longrightarrow> g x = 0"
-  shows "density (density M f) (\<lambda>x. g x / f x) = density M g"
-proof -
-  have "density M g = density M (\<lambda>x. ennreal (f x) * ennreal (g x / f x))"
-    using f g ac by (auto intro!: density_cong measurable_If simp: ennreal_mult[symmetric])
-  then show ?thesis
-    using f g by (subst density_density_eq) auto
-qed
-
-lemma density_1: "density M (\<lambda>_. 1) = M"
-  by (intro measure_eqI) (auto simp: emeasure_density)
-
-lemma emeasure_density_add:
-  assumes X: "X \<in> sets M"
-  assumes Mf[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  assumes Mg[measurable]: "g \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "emeasure (density M f) X + emeasure (density M g) X =
-           emeasure (density M (\<lambda>x. f x + g x)) X"
-  using assms
-  apply (subst (1 2 3) emeasure_density, simp_all) []
-  apply (subst nn_integral_add[symmetric], simp_all) []
-  apply (intro nn_integral_cong, simp split: split_indicator)
-  done
-
-subsubsection \<open>Point measure\<close>
-
-definition point_measure :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> ennreal) \<Rightarrow> 'a measure" where
-  "point_measure A f = density (count_space A) f"
-
-lemma
-  shows space_point_measure: "space (point_measure A f) = A"
-    and sets_point_measure: "sets (point_measure A f) = Pow A"
-  by (auto simp: point_measure_def)
-
-lemma sets_point_measure_count_space[measurable_cong]: "sets (point_measure A f) = sets (count_space A)"
-  by (simp add: sets_point_measure)
-
-lemma measurable_point_measure_eq1[simp]:
-  "g \<in> measurable (point_measure A f) M \<longleftrightarrow> g \<in> A \<rightarrow> space M"
-  unfolding point_measure_def by simp
-
-lemma measurable_point_measure_eq2_finite[simp]:
-  "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
-   g \<in> measurable M (point_measure A f) \<longleftrightarrow>
-    (g \<in> space M \<rightarrow> A \<and> (\<forall>a\<in>A. g -` {a} \<inter> space M \<in> sets M))"
-  unfolding point_measure_def by (simp add: measurable_count_space_eq2)
-
-lemma simple_function_point_measure[simp]:
-  "simple_function (point_measure A f) g \<longleftrightarrow> finite (g ` A)"
-  by (simp add: point_measure_def)
-
-lemma emeasure_point_measure:
-  assumes A: "finite {a\<in>X. 0 < f a}" "X \<subseteq> A"
-  shows "emeasure (point_measure A f) X = (\<Sum>a|a\<in>X \<and> 0 < f a. f a)"
-proof -
-  have "{a. (a \<in> X \<longrightarrow> a \<in> A \<and> 0 < f a) \<and> a \<in> X} = {a\<in>X. 0 < f a}"
-    using \<open>X \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
-  with A show ?thesis
-    by (simp add: emeasure_density nn_integral_count_space point_measure_def indicator_def)
-qed
-
-lemma emeasure_point_measure_finite:
-  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> X \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> emeasure (point_measure A f) X = (\<Sum>a\<in>X. f a)"
-  by (subst emeasure_point_measure) (auto dest: finite_subset intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_left simp: less_le)
-
-lemma emeasure_point_measure_finite2:
-  "X \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> finite X \<Longrightarrow> emeasure (point_measure A f) X = (\<Sum>a\<in>X. f a)"
-  by (subst emeasure_point_measure)
-     (auto dest: finite_subset intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_left simp: less_le)
-
-lemma null_sets_point_measure_iff:
-  "X \<in> null_sets (point_measure A f) \<longleftrightarrow> X \<subseteq> A \<and> (\<forall>x\<in>X. f x = 0)"
- by (auto simp: AE_count_space null_sets_density_iff point_measure_def)
-
-lemma AE_point_measure:
-  "(AE x in point_measure A f. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. 0 < f x \<longrightarrow> P x)"
-  unfolding point_measure_def
-  by (subst AE_density) (auto simp: AE_density AE_count_space point_measure_def)
-
-lemma nn_integral_point_measure:
-  "finite {a\<in>A. 0 < f a \<and> 0 < g a} \<Longrightarrow>
-    integral\<^sup>N (point_measure A f) g = (\<Sum>a|a\<in>A \<and> 0 < f a \<and> 0 < g a. f a * g a)"
-  unfolding point_measure_def
-  by (subst nn_integral_density)
-     (simp_all add: nn_integral_density nn_integral_count_space ennreal_zero_less_mult_iff)
-
-lemma nn_integral_point_measure_finite:
-  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> integral\<^sup>N (point_measure A f) g = (\<Sum>a\<in>A. f a * g a)"
-  by (subst nn_integral_point_measure) (auto intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_left simp: less_le)
-
-subsubsection \<open>Uniform measure\<close>
-
-definition "uniform_measure M A = density M (\<lambda>x. indicator A x / emeasure M A)"
-
-lemma
-  shows sets_uniform_measure[simp, measurable_cong]: "sets (uniform_measure M A) = sets M"
-    and space_uniform_measure[simp]: "space (uniform_measure M A) = space M"
-  by (auto simp: uniform_measure_def)
-
-lemma emeasure_uniform_measure[simp]:
-  assumes A: "A \<in> sets M" and B: "B \<in> sets M"
-  shows "emeasure (uniform_measure M A) B = emeasure M (A \<inter> B) / emeasure M A"
-proof -
-  from A B have "emeasure (uniform_measure M A) B = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. (1 / emeasure M A) * indicator (A \<inter> B) x \<partial>M)"
-    by (auto simp add: uniform_measure_def emeasure_density divide_ennreal_def split: split_indicator
-             intro!: nn_integral_cong)
-  also have "\<dots> = emeasure M (A \<inter> B) / emeasure M A"
-    using A B
-    by (subst nn_integral_cmult_indicator) (simp_all add: sets.Int divide_ennreal_def mult.commute)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma measure_uniform_measure[simp]:
-  assumes A: "emeasure M A \<noteq> 0" "emeasure M A \<noteq> \<infinity>" and B: "B \<in> sets M"
-  shows "measure (uniform_measure M A) B = measure M (A \<inter> B) / measure M A"
-  using emeasure_uniform_measure[OF emeasure_neq_0_sets[OF A(1)] B] A
-  by (cases "emeasure M A" "emeasure M (A \<inter> B)" rule: ennreal2_cases)
-     (simp_all add: measure_def divide_ennreal top_ennreal.rep_eq top_ereal_def ennreal_top_divide)
-
-lemma AE_uniform_measureI:
-  "A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> P x) \<Longrightarrow> (AE x in uniform_measure M A. P x)"
-  unfolding uniform_measure_def by (auto simp: AE_density divide_ennreal_def)
-
-lemma emeasure_uniform_measure_1:
-  "emeasure M S \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M S \<noteq> \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> emeasure (uniform_measure M S) S = 1"
-  by (subst emeasure_uniform_measure)
-     (simp_all add: emeasure_neq_0_sets emeasure_eq_ennreal_measure divide_ennreal
-                    zero_less_iff_neq_zero[symmetric])
-
-lemma nn_integral_uniform_measure:
-  assumes f[measurable]: "f \<in> borel_measurable M" and S[measurable]: "S \<in> sets M"
-  shows "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>uniform_measure M S) = (\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x * indicator S x \<partial>M) / emeasure M S"
-proof -
-  { assume "emeasure M S = \<infinity>"
-    then have ?thesis
-      by (simp add: uniform_measure_def nn_integral_density f) }
-  moreover
-  { assume [simp]: "emeasure M S = 0"
-    then have ae: "AE x in M. x \<notin> S"
-      using sets.sets_into_space[OF S]
-      by (subst AE_iff_measurable[OF _ refl]) (simp_all add: subset_eq cong: rev_conj_cong)
-    from ae have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. indicator S x / 0 * f x \<partial>M) = 0"
-      by (subst nn_integral_0_iff_AE) auto
-    moreover from ae have "(\<integral>\<^sup>+ x. f x * indicator S x \<partial>M) = 0"
-      by (subst nn_integral_0_iff_AE) auto
-    ultimately have ?thesis
-      by (simp add: uniform_measure_def nn_integral_density f) }
-  moreover have "emeasure M S \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> emeasure M S \<noteq> \<infinity> \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
-    unfolding uniform_measure_def
-    by (subst nn_integral_density)
-       (auto simp: ennreal_times_divide f nn_integral_divide[symmetric] mult.commute)
-  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma AE_uniform_measure:
-  assumes "emeasure M A \<noteq> 0" "emeasure M A < \<infinity>"
-  shows "(AE x in uniform_measure M A. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (AE x in M. x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> P x)"
-proof -
-  have "A \<in> sets M"
-    using \<open>emeasure M A \<noteq> 0\<close> by (metis emeasure_notin_sets)
-  moreover have "\<And>x. 0 < indicator A x / emeasure M A \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> A"
-    using assms
-    by (cases "emeasure M A") (auto split: split_indicator simp: ennreal_zero_less_divide)
-  ultimately show ?thesis
-    unfolding uniform_measure_def by (simp add: AE_density)
-qed
-
-subsubsection \<open>Null measure\<close>
-
-lemma null_measure_eq_density: "null_measure M = density M (\<lambda>_. 0)"
-  by (intro measure_eqI) (simp_all add: emeasure_density)
-
-lemma nn_integral_null_measure[simp]: "(\<integral>\<^sup>+x. f x \<partial>null_measure M) = 0"
-  by (auto simp add: nn_integral_def simple_integral_def SUP_constant bot_ennreal_def le_fun_def
-           intro!: exI[of _ "\<lambda>x. 0"])
-
-lemma density_null_measure[simp]: "density (null_measure M) f = null_measure M"
-proof (intro measure_eqI)
-  fix A show "emeasure (density (null_measure M) f) A = emeasure (null_measure M) A"
-    by (simp add: density_def) (simp only: null_measure_def[symmetric] emeasure_null_measure)
-qed simp
-
-subsubsection \<open>Uniform count measure\<close>
-
-definition "uniform_count_measure A = point_measure A (\<lambda>x. 1 / card A)"
-
-lemma
-  shows space_uniform_count_measure: "space (uniform_count_measure A) = A"
-    and sets_uniform_count_measure: "sets (uniform_count_measure A) = Pow A"
-    unfolding uniform_count_measure_def by (auto simp: space_point_measure sets_point_measure)
-
-lemma sets_uniform_count_measure_count_space[measurable_cong]:
-  "sets (uniform_count_measure A) = sets (count_space A)"
-  by (simp add: sets_uniform_count_measure)
-
-lemma emeasure_uniform_count_measure:
-  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> X \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> emeasure (uniform_count_measure A) X = card X / card A"
-  by (simp add: emeasure_point_measure_finite uniform_count_measure_def divide_inverse ennreal_mult
-                ennreal_of_nat_eq_real_of_nat)
-
-lemma measure_uniform_count_measure:
-  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> X \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> measure (uniform_count_measure A) X = card X / card A"
-  by (simp add: emeasure_point_measure_finite uniform_count_measure_def measure_def enn2real_mult)
-
-lemma space_uniform_count_measure_empty_iff [simp]:
-  "space (uniform_count_measure X) = {} \<longleftrightarrow> X = {}"
-by(simp add: space_uniform_count_measure)
-
-lemma sets_uniform_count_measure_eq_UNIV [simp]:
-  "sets (uniform_count_measure UNIV) = UNIV \<longleftrightarrow> True"
-  "UNIV = sets (uniform_count_measure UNIV) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
-by(simp_all add: sets_uniform_count_measure)
-
-subsubsection \<open>Scaled measure\<close>
-
-lemma nn_integral_scale_measure:
-  assumes f: "f \<in> borel_measurable M"
-  shows "nn_integral (scale_measure r M) f = r * nn_integral M f"
-  using f
-proof induction
-  case (cong f g)
-  thus ?case
-    by(simp add: cong.hyps space_scale_measure cong: nn_integral_cong_simp)
-next
-  case (mult f c)
-  thus ?case
-    by(simp add: nn_integral_cmult max_def mult.assoc mult.left_commute)
-next
-  case (add f g)
-  thus ?case
-    by(simp add: nn_integral_add distrib_left)
-next
-  case (seq U)
-  thus ?case
-    by(simp add: nn_integral_monotone_convergence_SUP SUP_mult_left_ennreal)
-qed simp
-
-end