equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
813 in |
813 in |
814 thy |
814 thy |
815 |> PureThy.note_thmss Thm.lemmaK eqn_attrss |
815 |> PureThy.note_thmss Thm.lemmaK eqn_attrss |
816 |-> (fn facts => `(fn thy => meta_rewrite thy facts)) |
816 |-> (fn facts => `(fn thy => meta_rewrite thy facts)) |
817 end; |
817 end; |
818 |
818 (* |
819 fun after_qed witss eqns = ProofContext.theory (note_eqns eqns |
819 fun after_qed witss eqns = ProofContext.theory (note_eqns eqns |
820 #-> (fn eqns => fold (fn ((dep, morph), wits) => |
820 #-> (fn eqns => fold (fn ((dep, morph), wits) => |
821 Locale.add_registration_eqs (dep, morph $> Element.satisfy_morphism |
821 Locale.add_registration_eqs (dep, morph $> Element.satisfy_morphism |
822 (map (Element.morph_witness export') wits)) eqns export) (deps ~~ witss))); |
822 (map (Element.morph_witness export') wits)) eqns export) (deps ~~ witss))); |
|
823 *) |
|
824 fun after_qed witss eqns = ProofContext.theory (note_eqns eqns |
|
825 #-> (fn eqns => fold (fn ((dep, morph), wits) => |
|
826 Locale.add_registration (dep, morph $> Element.satisfy_morphism |
|
827 (map (Element.morph_witness export') wits)) export |
|
828 #> not (null eqns) ? (fn thy => Locale.amend_registration (Element.eq_morphism thy eqns, true) (dep, morph) thy)) (deps ~~ witss))); |
823 |
829 |
824 in Element.witness_proof_eqs after_qed propss eqns goal_ctxt end; |
830 in Element.witness_proof_eqs after_qed propss eqns goal_ctxt end; |
825 |
831 |
826 in |
832 in |
827 |
833 |