doc-src/Logics/syntax.tex
changeset 48942 75d8778f94d3
parent 48941 fbf60999dc31
child 48943 54da920baf38
equal deleted inserted replaced
48941:fbf60999dc31 48942:75d8778f94d3
     1 %% THIS FILE IS COMMON TO ALL LOGIC MANUALS
       
     2 
       
     3 \chapter{Syntax definitions}
       
     4 The syntax of each logic is presented using a context-free grammar.
       
     5 These grammars obey the following conventions:
       
     6 \begin{itemize}
       
     7 \item identifiers denote nonterminal symbols
       
     8 \item \texttt{typewriter} font denotes terminal symbols
       
     9 \item parentheses $(\ldots)$ express grouping
       
    10 \item constructs followed by a Kleene star, such as $id^*$ and $(\ldots)^*$
       
    11 can be repeated~0 or more times 
       
    12 \item alternatives are separated by a vertical bar,~$|$
       
    13 \item the symbol for alphanumeric identifiers is~{\it id\/} 
       
    14 \item the symbol for scheme variables is~{\it var}
       
    15 \end{itemize}
       
    16 To reduce the number of nonterminals and grammar rules required, Isabelle's
       
    17 syntax module employs {\bf priorities},\index{priorities} or precedences.
       
    18 Each grammar rule is given by a mixfix declaration, which has a priority,
       
    19 and each argument place has a priority.  This general approach handles
       
    20 infix operators that associate either to the left or to the right, as well
       
    21 as prefix and binding operators.
       
    22 
       
    23 In a syntactically valid expression, an operator's arguments never involve
       
    24 an operator of lower priority unless brackets are used.  Consider
       
    25 first-order logic, where $\exists$ has lower priority than $\disj$,
       
    26 which has lower priority than $\conj$.  There, $P\conj Q \disj R$
       
    27 abbreviates $(P\conj Q) \disj R$ rather than $P\conj (Q\disj R)$.  Also,
       
    28 $\exists x.P\disj Q$ abbreviates $\exists x.(P\disj Q)$ rather than
       
    29 $(\exists x.P)\disj Q$.  Note especially that $P\disj(\exists x.Q)$
       
    30 becomes syntactically invalid if the brackets are removed.
       
    31 
       
    32 A {\bf binder} is a symbol associated with a constant of type
       
    33 $(\sigma\To\tau)\To\tau'$.  For instance, we may declare~$\forall$ as a binder
       
    34 for the constant~$All$, which has type $(\alpha\To o)\To o$.  This defines the
       
    35 syntax $\forall x.t$ to mean $All(\lambda x.t)$.  We can also write $\forall
       
    36 x@1\ldots x@m.t$ to abbreviate $\forall x@1.  \ldots \forall x@m.t$; this is
       
    37 possible for any constant provided that $\tau$ and $\tau'$ are the same type.
       
    38 The Hilbert description operator $\varepsilon x.P\,x$ has type $(\alpha\To
       
    39 bool)\To\alpha$ and normally binds only one variable.  
       
    40 ZF's bounded quantifier $\forall x\in A.P(x)$ cannot be declared as a
       
    41 binder because it has type $[i, i\To o]\To o$.  The syntax for binders allows
       
    42 type constraints on bound variables, as in
       
    43 \[ \forall (x{::}\alpha) \; (y{::}\beta) \; z{::}\gamma. Q(x,y,z) \]
       
    44 
       
    45 To avoid excess detail, the logic descriptions adopt a semi-formal style.
       
    46 Infix operators and binding operators are listed in separate tables, which
       
    47 include their priorities.  Grammar descriptions do not include numeric
       
    48 priorities; instead, the rules appear in order of decreasing priority.
       
    49 This should suffice for most purposes; for full details, please consult the
       
    50 actual syntax definitions in the {\tt.thy} files.
       
    51 
       
    52 Each nonterminal symbol is associated with some Isabelle type.  For
       
    53 example, the formulae of first-order logic have type~$o$.  Every
       
    54 Isabelle expression of type~$o$ is therefore a formula.  These include
       
    55 atomic formulae such as $P$, where $P$ is a variable of type~$o$, and more
       
    56 generally expressions such as $P(t,u)$, where $P$, $t$ and~$u$ have
       
    57 suitable types.  Therefore, `expression of type~$o$' is listed as a
       
    58 separate possibility in the grammar for formulae.
       
    59 
       
    60