src/HOL/Arith_Tools.thy
changeset 30752 5272864d6892
parent 30751 36a255c2e428
parent 30748 fe67d729a61c
child 30753 78d12065c638
child 30779 492ca5d4f235
--- a/src/HOL/Arith_Tools.thy	Sat Mar 28 00:11:02 2009 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,388 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/Arith_Tools.thy
-    ID:         $Id$
-    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
-    Author:     Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
-*)
-
-header {* Setup of arithmetic tools *}
-
-theory Arith_Tools
-imports NatBin
-uses
-  "~~/src/Provers/Arith/cancel_numeral_factor.ML"
-  "~~/src/Provers/Arith/extract_common_term.ML"
-  "Tools/int_factor_simprocs.ML"
-  "Tools/nat_simprocs.ML"
-  "Tools/Qelim/qelim.ML"
-begin
-
-subsection {* Simprocs for the Naturals *}
-
-declaration {* K nat_simprocs_setup *}
-
-subsubsection{*For simplifying @{term "Suc m - K"} and  @{term "K - Suc m"}*}
-
-text{*Where K above is a literal*}
-
-lemma Suc_diff_eq_diff_pred: "Numeral0 < n ==> Suc m - n = m - (n - Numeral1)"
-by (simp add: numeral_0_eq_0 numeral_1_eq_1 split add: nat_diff_split)
-
-text {*Now just instantiating @{text n} to @{text "number_of v"} does
-  the right simplification, but with some redundant inequality
-  tests.*}
-lemma neg_number_of_pred_iff_0:
-  "neg (number_of (Int.pred v)::int) = (number_of v = (0::nat))"
-apply (subgoal_tac "neg (number_of (Int.pred v)) = (number_of v < Suc 0) ")
-apply (simp only: less_Suc_eq_le le_0_eq)
-apply (subst less_number_of_Suc, simp)
-done
-
-text{*No longer required as a simprule because of the @{text inverse_fold}
-   simproc*}
-lemma Suc_diff_number_of:
-     "Int.Pls < v ==>
-      Suc m - (number_of v) = m - (number_of (Int.pred v))"
-apply (subst Suc_diff_eq_diff_pred)
-apply simp
-apply (simp del: nat_numeral_1_eq_1)
-apply (auto simp only: diff_nat_number_of less_0_number_of [symmetric]
-                        neg_number_of_pred_iff_0)
-done
-
-lemma diff_Suc_eq_diff_pred: "m - Suc n = (m - 1) - n"
-by (simp add: numerals split add: nat_diff_split)
-
-
-subsubsection{*For @{term nat_case} and @{term nat_rec}*}
-
-lemma nat_case_number_of [simp]:
-     "nat_case a f (number_of v) =
-        (let pv = number_of (Int.pred v) in
-         if neg pv then a else f (nat pv))"
-by (simp split add: nat.split add: Let_def neg_number_of_pred_iff_0)
-
-lemma nat_case_add_eq_if [simp]:
-     "nat_case a f ((number_of v) + n) =
-       (let pv = number_of (Int.pred v) in
-         if neg pv then nat_case a f n else f (nat pv + n))"
-apply (subst add_eq_if)
-apply (simp split add: nat.split
-            del: nat_numeral_1_eq_1
-            add: nat_numeral_1_eq_1 [symmetric]
-                 numeral_1_eq_Suc_0 [symmetric]
-                 neg_number_of_pred_iff_0)
-done
-
-lemma nat_rec_number_of [simp]:
-     "nat_rec a f (number_of v) =
-        (let pv = number_of (Int.pred v) in
-         if neg pv then a else f (nat pv) (nat_rec a f (nat pv)))"
-apply (case_tac " (number_of v) ::nat")
-apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) add: Let_def neg_number_of_pred_iff_0)
-apply (simp split add: split_if_asm)
-done
-
-lemma nat_rec_add_eq_if [simp]:
-     "nat_rec a f (number_of v + n) =
-        (let pv = number_of (Int.pred v) in
-         if neg pv then nat_rec a f n
-                   else f (nat pv + n) (nat_rec a f (nat pv + n)))"
-apply (subst add_eq_if)
-apply (simp split add: nat.split
-            del: nat_numeral_1_eq_1
-            add: nat_numeral_1_eq_1 [symmetric]
-                 numeral_1_eq_Suc_0 [symmetric]
-                 neg_number_of_pred_iff_0)
-done
-
-
-subsubsection{*Various Other Lemmas*}
-
-text {*Evens and Odds, for Mutilated Chess Board*}
-
-text{*Lemmas for specialist use, NOT as default simprules*}
-lemma nat_mult_2: "2 * z = (z+z::nat)"
-proof -
-  have "2*z = (1 + 1)*z" by simp
-  also have "... = z+z" by (simp add: left_distrib)
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma nat_mult_2_right: "z * 2 = (z+z::nat)"
-by (subst mult_commute, rule nat_mult_2)
-
-text{*Case analysis on @{term "n<2"}*}
-lemma less_2_cases: "(n::nat) < 2 ==> n = 0 | n = Suc 0"
-by arith
-
-lemma div2_Suc_Suc [simp]: "Suc(Suc m) div 2 = Suc (m div 2)"
-by arith
-
-lemma add_self_div_2 [simp]: "(m + m) div 2 = (m::nat)"
-by (simp add: nat_mult_2 [symmetric])
-
-lemma mod2_Suc_Suc [simp]: "Suc(Suc(m)) mod 2 = m mod 2"
-apply (subgoal_tac "m mod 2 < 2")
-apply (erule less_2_cases [THEN disjE])
-apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) add: Let_def mod_Suc nat_1)
-done
-
-lemma mod2_gr_0 [simp]: "!!m::nat. (0 < m mod 2) = (m mod 2 = 1)"
-apply (subgoal_tac "m mod 2 < 2")
-apply (force simp del: mod_less_divisor, simp)
-done
-
-text{*Removal of Small Numerals: 0, 1 and (in additive positions) 2*}
-
-lemma add_2_eq_Suc [simp]: "2 + n = Suc (Suc n)"
-by simp
-
-lemma add_2_eq_Suc' [simp]: "n + 2 = Suc (Suc n)"
-by simp
-
-text{*Can be used to eliminate long strings of Sucs, but not by default*}
-lemma Suc3_eq_add_3: "Suc (Suc (Suc n)) = 3 + n"
-by simp
-
-
-text{*These lemmas collapse some needless occurrences of Suc:
-    at least three Sucs, since two and fewer are rewritten back to Suc again!
-    We already have some rules to simplify operands smaller than 3.*}
-
-lemma div_Suc_eq_div_add3 [simp]: "m div (Suc (Suc (Suc n))) = m div (3+n)"
-by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)
-
-lemma mod_Suc_eq_mod_add3 [simp]: "m mod (Suc (Suc (Suc n))) = m mod (3+n)"
-by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)
-
-lemma Suc_div_eq_add3_div: "(Suc (Suc (Suc m))) div n = (3+m) div n"
-by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)
-
-lemma Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod: "(Suc (Suc (Suc m))) mod n = (3+m) mod n"
-by (simp add: Suc3_eq_add_3)
-
-lemmas Suc_div_eq_add3_div_number_of =
-    Suc_div_eq_add3_div [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare Suc_div_eq_add3_div_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod_number_of =
-    Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare Suc_mod_eq_add3_mod_number_of [simp]
-
-
-subsubsection{*Special Simplification for Constants*}
-
-text{*These belong here, late in the development of HOL, to prevent their
-interfering with proofs of abstract properties of instances of the function
-@{term number_of}*}
-
-text{*These distributive laws move literals inside sums and differences.*}
-lemmas left_distrib_number_of = left_distrib [of _ _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare left_distrib_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas right_distrib_number_of = right_distrib [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare right_distrib_number_of [simp]
-
-
-lemmas left_diff_distrib_number_of =
-    left_diff_distrib [of _ _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare left_diff_distrib_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas right_diff_distrib_number_of =
-    right_diff_distrib [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare right_diff_distrib_number_of [simp]
-
-
-text{*These are actually for fields, like real: but where else to put them?*}
-lemmas zero_less_divide_iff_number_of =
-    zero_less_divide_iff [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare zero_less_divide_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas divide_less_0_iff_number_of =
-    divide_less_0_iff [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare divide_less_0_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas zero_le_divide_iff_number_of =
-    zero_le_divide_iff [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare zero_le_divide_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas divide_le_0_iff_number_of =
-    divide_le_0_iff [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare divide_le_0_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-
-(****
-IF times_divide_eq_right and times_divide_eq_left are removed as simprules,
-then these special-case declarations may be useful.
-
-text{*These simprules move numerals into numerators and denominators.*}
-lemma times_recip_eq_right [simp]: "a * (1/c) = a / (c::'a::field)"
-by (simp add: times_divide_eq)
-
-lemma times_recip_eq_left [simp]: "(1/c) * a = a / (c::'a::field)"
-by (simp add: times_divide_eq)
-
-lemmas times_divide_eq_right_number_of =
-    times_divide_eq_right [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare times_divide_eq_right_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas times_divide_eq_right_number_of =
-    times_divide_eq_right [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-declare times_divide_eq_right_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas times_divide_eq_left_number_of =
-    times_divide_eq_left [of _ "number_of w", standard]
-declare times_divide_eq_left_number_of [simp]
-
-lemmas times_divide_eq_left_number_of =
-    times_divide_eq_left [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-declare times_divide_eq_left_number_of [simp]
-
-****)
-
-text {*Replaces @{text "inverse #nn"} by @{text "1/#nn"}.  It looks
-  strange, but then other simprocs simplify the quotient.*}
-
-lemmas inverse_eq_divide_number_of =
-    inverse_eq_divide [of "number_of w", standard]
-declare inverse_eq_divide_number_of [simp]
-
-
-text {*These laws simplify inequalities, moving unary minus from a term
-into the literal.*}
-lemmas less_minus_iff_number_of =
-    less_minus_iff [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare less_minus_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas le_minus_iff_number_of =
-    le_minus_iff [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare le_minus_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas equation_minus_iff_number_of =
-    equation_minus_iff [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare equation_minus_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-
-lemmas minus_less_iff_number_of =
-    minus_less_iff [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare minus_less_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas minus_le_iff_number_of =
-    minus_le_iff [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare minus_le_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas minus_equation_iff_number_of =
-    minus_equation_iff [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare minus_equation_iff_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-
-text{*To Simplify Inequalities Where One Side is the Constant 1*}
-
-lemma less_minus_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes b::"'b::{ordered_idom,number_ring}"
-  shows "(1 < - b) = (b < -1)"
-by auto
-
-lemma le_minus_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes b::"'b::{ordered_idom,number_ring}"
-  shows "(1 \<le> - b) = (b \<le> -1)"
-by auto
-
-lemma equation_minus_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes b::"'b::number_ring"
-  shows "(1 = - b) = (b = -1)"
-by (subst equation_minus_iff, auto)
-
-lemma minus_less_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes a::"'b::{ordered_idom,number_ring}"
-  shows "(- a < 1) = (-1 < a)"
-by auto
-
-lemma minus_le_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes a::"'b::{ordered_idom,number_ring}"
-  shows "(- a \<le> 1) = (-1 \<le> a)"
-by auto
-
-lemma minus_equation_iff_1 [simp,noatp]:
-  fixes a::"'b::number_ring"
-  shows "(- a = 1) = (a = -1)"
-by (subst minus_equation_iff, auto)
-
-
-text {*Cancellation of constant factors in comparisons (@{text "<"} and @{text "\<le>"}) *}
-
-lemmas mult_less_cancel_left_number_of =
-    mult_less_cancel_left [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare mult_less_cancel_left_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas mult_less_cancel_right_number_of =
-    mult_less_cancel_right [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare mult_less_cancel_right_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas mult_le_cancel_left_number_of =
-    mult_le_cancel_left [of "number_of v", standard]
-declare mult_le_cancel_left_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-lemmas mult_le_cancel_right_number_of =
-    mult_le_cancel_right [of _ "number_of v", standard]
-declare mult_le_cancel_right_number_of [simp,noatp]
-
-
-text {*Multiplying out constant divisors in comparisons (@{text "<"}, @{text "\<le>"} and @{text "="}) *}
-
-lemmas le_divide_eq_number_of1 [simp] = le_divide_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_le_eq_number_of1 [simp] = divide_le_eq [of _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas less_divide_eq_number_of1 [simp] = less_divide_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_less_eq_number_of1 [simp] = divide_less_eq [of _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas eq_divide_eq_number_of1 [simp] = eq_divide_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_eq_eq_number_of1 [simp] = divide_eq_eq [of _ "number_of w", standard]
-
-
-subsubsection{*Optional Simplification Rules Involving Constants*}
-
-text{*Simplify quotients that are compared with a literal constant.*}
-
-lemmas le_divide_eq_number_of = le_divide_eq [of "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_le_eq_number_of = divide_le_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas less_divide_eq_number_of = less_divide_eq [of "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_less_eq_number_of = divide_less_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas eq_divide_eq_number_of = eq_divide_eq [of "number_of w", standard]
-lemmas divide_eq_eq_number_of = divide_eq_eq [of _ _ "number_of w", standard]
-
-
-text{*Not good as automatic simprules because they cause case splits.*}
-lemmas divide_const_simps =
-  le_divide_eq_number_of divide_le_eq_number_of less_divide_eq_number_of
-  divide_less_eq_number_of eq_divide_eq_number_of divide_eq_eq_number_of
-  le_divide_eq_1 divide_le_eq_1 less_divide_eq_1 divide_less_eq_1
-
-text{*Division By @{text "-1"}*}
-
-lemma divide_minus1 [simp]:
-     "x/-1 = -(x::'a::{field,division_by_zero,number_ring})"
-by simp
-
-lemma minus1_divide [simp]:
-     "-1 / (x::'a::{field,division_by_zero,number_ring}) = - (1/x)"
-by (simp add: divide_inverse inverse_minus_eq)
-
-lemma half_gt_zero_iff:
-     "(0 < r/2) = (0 < (r::'a::{ordered_field,division_by_zero,number_ring}))"
-by auto
-
-lemmas half_gt_zero = half_gt_zero_iff [THEN iffD2, standard]
-declare half_gt_zero [simp]
-
-(* The following lemma should appear in Divides.thy, but there the proof
-   doesn't work. *)
-
-lemma nat_dvd_not_less:
-  "[| 0 < m; m < n |] ==> \<not> n dvd (m::nat)"
-  by (unfold dvd_def) auto
-
-ML {*
-val divide_minus1 = @{thm divide_minus1};
-val minus1_divide = @{thm minus1_divide};
-*}
-
-end