summary |
shortlog |
changelog |
graph |
tags |
bookmarks |
branches |
files |
changeset |
file |
latest |
revisions |
annotate |
diff |
comparison |
raw |
help

doc-src/Tutorial/basics.tex

changeset 6691 | 8a1b5f9d8420 |

parent 6628 | 12ed4f748f7c |

child 9255 | 2ceb11a2e190 |

--- a/doc-src/Tutorial/basics.tex Fri May 21 11:48:42 1999 +0200 +++ b/doc-src/Tutorial/basics.tex Fri May 21 12:11:13 1999 +0200 @@ -245,9 +245,10 @@ Most of the time you can and should ignore unknowns and work with ordinary variables. Just don't be surprised that after you have finished the -proof of a theorem, Isabelle will turn your free variables into unknowns: it -merely indicates that Isabelle will automatically instantiate those unknowns -suitably when the theorem is used in some other proof. +proof of a theorem, Isabelle (i.e.\ \ttindex{qed} at the end of a proof) will +turn your free variables into unknowns: it merely indicates that Isabelle will +automatically instantiate those unknowns suitably when the theorem is used in +some other proof. \begin{warn} The existential quantifier \texttt{?}\index{$HOLQ@{\tt?}} needs to be followed by a space. Otherwise \texttt{?x} is interpreted as a schematic