src/Sequents/ex/LK/hardquant.ML
changeset 6252 935f183bf406
parent 6251 4d89d4f0ab17
child 6253 dbaf79ac2ff9
--- a/src/Sequents/ex/LK/hardquant.ML	Fri Feb 05 21:12:45 1999 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,278 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      LK/ex/hard-quant
-    ID:         $Id$
-    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
-    Copyright   1992  University of Cambridge
-
-Hard examples with quantifiers.  Can be read to test the LK system.
-From  F. J. Pelletier,
-  Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers,
-  J. Automated Reasoning 2 (1986), 191-216.
-  Errata, JAR 4 (1988), 236-236.
-
-Uses pc_tac rather than fast_tac when the former is significantly faster.
-*)
-
-writeln"File LK/ex/hard-quant.";
-
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x) & Q(x)) <-> (ALL x. P(x))  &  (ALL x. Q(x))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result(); 
-
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P-->Q(x))  <->  (P --> (EX x. Q(x)))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result(); 
-
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P(x)-->Q)  <->  (ALL x. P(x)) --> Q";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result(); 
-
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x)) | Q  <->  (ALL x. P(x) | Q)";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result(); 
-
-writeln"Problems requiring quantifier duplication";
-
-(*Not provable by fast_tac LK_pack: needs multiple instantiation of ALL*)
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x)-->P(f(x)))  &  P(d)-->P(f(f(f(d))))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-(*Needs double instantiation of the quantifier*)
-goal LK.thy "|- EX x. P(x) --> P(a) & P(b)";
-by (fast_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-goal LK.thy "|- EX z. P(z) --> (ALL x. P(x))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Hard examples with quantifiers";
-
-writeln"Problem 18";
-goal LK.thy "|- EX y. ALL x. P(y)-->P(x)";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result(); 
-
-writeln"Problem 19";
-goal LK.thy "|- EX x. ALL y z. (P(y)-->Q(z)) --> (P(x)-->Q(x))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 20";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x y. EX z. ALL w. (P(x)&Q(y)-->R(z)&S(w)))     \
-\   --> (EX x y. P(x) & Q(y)) --> (EX z. R(z))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1); 
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 21";
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P-->Q(x)) & (EX x. Q(x)-->P) --> (EX x. P<->Q(x))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 22";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P <-> Q(x))  -->  (P <-> (ALL x. Q(x)))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1); 
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 23";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P | Q(x))  <->  (P | (ALL x. Q(x)))";
-by (best_tac LK_pack 1);  
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 24";
-goal LK.thy "|- ~(EX x. S(x)&Q(x)) & (ALL x. P(x) --> Q(x)|R(x)) &  \
-\    ~(EX x. P(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x)) & (ALL x. Q(x)|R(x) --> S(x))  \
-\   --> (EX x. P(x)&R(x))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 25";
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P(x)) &  \
-\       (ALL x. L(x) --> ~ (M(x) & R(x))) &  \
-\       (ALL x. P(x) --> (M(x) & L(x))) &   \
-\       ((ALL x. P(x)-->Q(x)) | (EX x. P(x)&R(x)))  \
-\   --> (EX x. Q(x)&P(x))";
-by (best_tac LK_pack 1);  
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 26";
-goal LK.thy "|- ((EX x. p(x)) <-> (EX x. q(x))) &       \
-\     (ALL x. ALL y. p(x) & q(y) --> (r(x) <-> s(y)))   \
-\ --> ((ALL x. p(x)-->r(x)) <-> (ALL x. q(x)-->s(x)))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 27";
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P(x) & ~Q(x)) &   \
-\             (ALL x. P(x) --> R(x)) &   \
-\             (ALL x. M(x) & L(x) --> P(x)) &   \
-\             ((EX x. R(x) & ~ Q(x)) --> (ALL x. L(x) --> ~ R(x)))  \
-\         --> (ALL x. M(x) --> ~L(x))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1); 
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 28.  AMENDED";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x) --> (ALL x. Q(x))) &   \
-\       ((ALL x. Q(x)|R(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x)&S(x))) &  \
-\       ((EX x. S(x)) --> (ALL x. L(x) --> M(x)))  \
-\   --> (ALL x. P(x) & L(x) --> M(x))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1);  
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 29.  Essentially the same as Principia Mathematica *11.71";
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX x. P(x)) & (EX y. Q(y))  \
-\   --> ((ALL x. P(x)-->R(x)) & (ALL y. Q(y)-->S(y))   <->     \
-\        (ALL x y. P(x) & Q(y) --> R(x) & S(y)))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1); 
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 30";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x) | Q(x) --> ~ R(x)) & \
-\       (ALL x. (Q(x) --> ~ S(x)) --> P(x) & R(x))  \
-\   --> (ALL x. S(x))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);  
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 31";
-goal LK.thy "|- ~(EX x. P(x) & (Q(x) | R(x))) & \
-\       (EX x. L(x) & P(x)) & \
-\       (ALL x. ~ R(x) --> M(x))  \
-\   --> (EX x. L(x) & M(x))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 32";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x) & (Q(x)|R(x))-->S(x)) & \
-\       (ALL x. S(x) & R(x) --> L(x)) & \
-\       (ALL x. M(x) --> R(x))  \
-\   --> (ALL x. P(x) & M(x) --> L(x))";
-by (best_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 33";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(a) & (P(x)-->P(b))-->P(c))  <->    \
-\    (ALL x. (~P(a) | P(x) | P(c)) & (~P(a) | ~P(b) | P(c)))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 34  AMENDED (TWICE!!)  NOT PROVED AUTOMATICALLY";
-(*Andrews's challenge*)
-goal LK.thy "|- ((EX x. ALL y. p(x) <-> p(y))  <->              \
-\              ((EX x. q(x)) <-> (ALL y. p(y))))     <->        \
-\             ((EX x. ALL y. q(x) <-> q(y))  <->                \
-\              ((EX x. p(x)) <-> (ALL y. q(y))))";
-by (safe_goal_tac LK_pack 1);   (*53 secs*) (*13 secs*)
-by (TRYALL (fast_tac LK_pack)); (*165 secs*)  (*117 secs*)  (*138 secs*)
-(*for some reason, pc_tac leaves 14 subgoals instead of 6*)
-by (TRYALL (best_tac LK_dup_pack)); (*55 secs*) (*29 secs*) (*54 secs*)
-result();
-
-
-writeln"Problem 35";
-goal LK.thy "|- EX x y. P(x,y) -->  (ALL u v. P(u,v))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);  (*27 secs??*)
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 36";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. EX y. J(x,y)) & \
-\       (ALL x. EX y. G(x,y)) & \
-\       (ALL x y. J(x,y) | G(x,y) -->   \
-\       (ALL z. J(y,z) | G(y,z) --> H(x,z)))   \
-\   --> (ALL x. EX y. H(x,y))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 37";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL z. EX w. ALL x. EX y. \
-\          (P(x,z)-->P(y,w)) & P(y,z) & (P(y,w) --> (EX u. Q(u,w)))) & \
-\       (ALL x z. ~P(x,z) --> (EX y. Q(y,z))) & \
-\       ((EX x y. Q(x,y)) --> (ALL x. R(x,x)))  \
-\   --> (ALL x. EX y. R(x,y))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 38";
-goal LK.thy
- "|- (ALL x. p(a) & (p(x) --> (EX y. p(y) & r(x,y))) -->        \
-\            (EX z. EX w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z)))  <->         \
-\    (ALL x. (~p(a) | p(x) | (EX z. EX w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z))) &    \
-\            (~p(a) | ~(EX y. p(y) & r(x,y)) |                          \
-\             (EX z. EX w. p(z) & r(x,w) & r(w,z))))";
-by (pc_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 39";
-goal LK.thy "|- ~ (EX x. ALL y. F(y,x) <-> ~F(y,y))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 40.  AMENDED";
-goal LK.thy "|- (EX y. ALL x. F(x,y) <-> F(x,x)) -->  \
-\                    ~(ALL x. EX y. ALL z. F(z,y) <-> ~ F(z,x))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 41";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL z. EX y. ALL x. f(x,y) <-> f(x,z) & ~ f(x,x))      \
-\         --> ~ (EX z. ALL x. f(x,z))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 42";
-goal LK.thy "|- ~ (EX y. ALL x. p(x,y) <-> ~ (EX z. p(x,z) & p(z,x)))";
-
-writeln"Problem 43  NOT PROVED AUTOMATICALLY";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. ALL y. q(x,y) <-> (ALL z. p(z,x) <-> p(z,y))) \
-\         --> (ALL x. (ALL y. q(x,y) <-> q(y,x)))";
-
-writeln"Problem 44";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. f(x) -->                                        \
-\             (EX y. g(y) & h(x,y) & (EX y. g(y) & ~ h(x,y))))  &       \
-\             (EX x. j(x) & (ALL y. g(y) --> h(x,y)))                   \
-\             --> (EX x. j(x) & ~f(x))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 45";
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. f(x) & (ALL y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> j(x,y))        \
-\                     --> (ALL y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> k(y))) &    \
-\     ~ (EX y. l(y) & k(y)) &                                   \
-\     (EX x. f(x) & (ALL y. h(x,y) --> l(y))                    \
-\                  & (ALL y. g(y) & h(x,y) --> j(x,y)))         \
-\     --> (EX x. f(x) & ~ (EX y. g(y) & h(x,y)))";
-by (best_tac LK_pack 1); 
-result();
-
-
-writeln"Problem 50";  
-goal LK.thy
-    "|- (ALL x. P(a,x) | (ALL y. P(x,y))) --> (EX x. ALL y. P(x,y))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 57";
-goal LK.thy
-    "|- P(f(a,b), f(b,c)) & P(f(b,c), f(a,c)) & \
-\    (ALL x y z. P(x,y) & P(y,z) --> P(x,z))    -->   P(f(a,b), f(a,c))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 59";
-(*Unification works poorly here -- the abstraction %sobj prevents efficient
-  operation of the occurs check*)
-Unify.trace_bound := !Unify.search_bound - 1; 
-goal LK.thy "|- (ALL x. P(x) <-> ~P(f(x))) --> (EX x. P(x) & ~P(f(x)))";
-by (best_tac LK_dup_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Problem 60";
-goal LK.thy
-    "|- ALL x. P(x,f(x)) <-> (EX y. (ALL z. P(z,y) --> P(z,f(x))) & P(x,y))";
-by (fast_tac LK_pack 1);
-result();
-
-writeln"Reached end of file.";
-
-(*18 June 92: loaded in 372 secs*)
-(*19 June 92: loaded in 166 secs except #34, using repeat_goal_tac*)
-(*29 June 92: loaded in 370 secs*)