--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/SimCorrectness.thy Thu Dec 31 12:37:16 2015 +0100
+++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,291 +0,0 @@
-(* Title: HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/SimCorrectness.thy
- Author: Olaf Müller
-*)
-
-section \<open>Correctness of Simulations in HOLCF/IOA\<close>
-
-theory SimCorrectness
-imports Simulations
-begin
-
-definition
- (* Note: s2 instead of s1 in last argument type !! *)
- corresp_ex_simC :: "('a,'s2)ioa => (('s1 * 's2)set) => ('a,'s1)pairs
- -> ('s2 => ('a,'s2)pairs)" where
- "corresp_ex_simC A R = (fix$(LAM h ex. (%s. case ex of
- nil => nil
- | x##xs => (flift1 (%pr. let a = (fst pr); t = (snd pr);
- T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s a t'
- in
- (@cex. move A cex s a T')
- @@ ((h$xs) T'))
- $x) )))"
-
-definition
- corresp_ex_sim :: "('a,'s2)ioa => (('s1 *'s2)set) =>
- ('a,'s1)execution => ('a,'s2)execution" where
- "corresp_ex_sim A R ex == let S'= (@s'.(fst ex,s'):R & s': starts_of A)
- in
- (S',(corresp_ex_simC A R$(snd ex)) S')"
-
-
-subsection "corresp_ex_sim"
-
-lemma corresp_ex_simC_unfold: "corresp_ex_simC A R = (LAM ex. (%s. case ex of
- nil => nil
- | x##xs => (flift1 (%pr. let a = (fst pr); t = (snd pr);
- T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s a t'
- in
- (@cex. move A cex s a T')
- @@ ((corresp_ex_simC A R $xs) T'))
- $x) ))"
-apply (rule trans)
-apply (rule fix_eq2)
-apply (simp only: corresp_ex_simC_def)
-apply (rule beta_cfun)
-apply (simp add: flift1_def)
-done
-
-lemma corresp_ex_simC_UU: "(corresp_ex_simC A R$UU) s=UU"
-apply (subst corresp_ex_simC_unfold)
-apply simp
-done
-
-lemma corresp_ex_simC_nil: "(corresp_ex_simC A R$nil) s = nil"
-apply (subst corresp_ex_simC_unfold)
-apply simp
-done
-
-lemma corresp_ex_simC_cons: "(corresp_ex_simC A R$((a,t)\<leadsto>xs)) s =
- (let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s a t'
- in
- (@cex. move A cex s a T')
- @@ ((corresp_ex_simC A R$xs) T'))"
-apply (rule trans)
-apply (subst corresp_ex_simC_unfold)
-apply (simp add: Consq_def flift1_def)
-apply simp
-done
-
-
-declare corresp_ex_simC_UU [simp] corresp_ex_simC_nil [simp] corresp_ex_simC_cons [simp]
-
-
-subsection "properties of move"
-
-declare Let_def [simp del]
-
-lemma move_is_move_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- (t,T'): R & move A (@ex2. move A ex2 s' a T') s' a T'"
-apply (unfold is_simulation_def)
-
-(* Does not perform conditional rewriting on assumptions automatically as
- usual. Instantiate all variables per hand. Ask Tobias?? *)
-apply (subgoal_tac "? t' ex. (t,t') :R & move A ex s' a t'")
-prefer 2
-apply simp
-apply (erule conjE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "s" in allE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "s'" in allE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "t" in allE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "a" in allE)
-apply simp
-(* Go on as usual *)
-apply (erule exE)
-apply (drule_tac x = "t'" and P = "%t'. ? ex. (t,t') :R & move A ex s' a t'" in someI)
-apply (erule exE)
-apply (erule conjE)
-apply (simp add: Let_def)
-apply (rule_tac x = "ex" in someI)
-apply assumption
-done
-
-declare Let_def [simp]
-
-lemma move_subprop1_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- is_exec_frag A (s',@x. move A x s' a T')"
-apply (cut_tac move_is_move_sim)
-defer
-apply assumption+
-apply (simp add: move_def)
-done
-
-lemma move_subprop2_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- Finite (@x. move A x s' a T')"
-apply (cut_tac move_is_move_sim)
-defer
-apply assumption+
-apply (simp add: move_def)
-done
-
-lemma move_subprop3_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- laststate (s',@x. move A x s' a T') = T'"
-apply (cut_tac move_is_move_sim)
-defer
-apply assumption+
-apply (simp add: move_def)
-done
-
-lemma move_subprop4_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- mk_trace A$((@x. move A x s' a T')) =
- (if a:ext A then a\<leadsto>nil else nil)"
-apply (cut_tac move_is_move_sim)
-defer
-apply assumption+
-apply (simp add: move_def)
-done
-
-lemma move_subprop5_sim:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; reachable C s; s \<midarrow>a\<midarrow>C\<rightarrow> t; (s,s'):R|] ==>
- let T' = @t'. ? ex1. (t,t'):R & move A ex1 s' a t' in
- (t,T'):R"
-apply (cut_tac move_is_move_sim)
-defer
-apply assumption+
-apply (simp add: move_def)
-done
-
-
-subsection \<open>TRACE INCLUSION Part 1: Traces coincide\<close>
-
-subsubsection "Lemmata for <=="
-
-(* ------------------------------------------------------
- Lemma 1 :Traces coincide
- ------------------------------------------------------- *)
-
-declare split_if [split del]
-lemma traces_coincide_sim [rule_format (no_asm)]:
- "[|is_simulation R C A; ext C = ext A|] ==>
- !s s'. reachable C s & is_exec_frag C (s,ex) & (s,s'): R -->
- mk_trace C$ex = mk_trace A$((corresp_ex_simC A R$ex) s')"
-
-apply (tactic \<open>pair_induct_tac @{context} "ex" [@{thm is_exec_frag_def}] 1\<close>)
-(* cons case *)
-apply auto
-apply (rename_tac ex a t s s')
-apply (simp add: mk_traceConc)
-apply (frule reachable.reachable_n)
-apply assumption
-apply (erule_tac x = "t" in allE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "@t'. ? ex1. (t,t') :R & move A ex1 s' a t'" in allE)
-apply (simp add: move_subprop5_sim [unfolded Let_def]
- move_subprop4_sim [unfolded Let_def] split add: split_if)
-done
-declare split_if [split]
-
-
-(* ----------------------------------------------------------- *)
-(* Lemma 2 : corresp_ex_sim is execution *)
-(* ----------------------------------------------------------- *)
-
-
-lemma correspsim_is_execution [rule_format (no_asm)]:
- "[| is_simulation R C A |] ==>
- !s s'. reachable C s & is_exec_frag C (s,ex) & (s,s'):R
- --> is_exec_frag A (s',(corresp_ex_simC A R$ex) s')"
-
-apply (tactic \<open>pair_induct_tac @{context} "ex" [@{thm is_exec_frag_def}] 1\<close>)
-(* main case *)
-apply auto
-apply (rename_tac ex a t s s')
-apply (rule_tac t = "@t'. ? ex1. (t,t') :R & move A ex1 s' a t'" in lemma_2_1)
-
-(* Finite *)
-apply (erule move_subprop2_sim [unfolded Let_def])
-apply assumption+
-apply (rule conjI)
-
-(* is_exec_frag *)
-apply (erule move_subprop1_sim [unfolded Let_def])
-apply assumption+
-apply (rule conjI)
-
-(* Induction hypothesis *)
-(* reachable_n looping, therefore apply it manually *)
-apply (erule_tac x = "t" in allE)
-apply (erule_tac x = "@t'. ? ex1. (t,t') :R & move A ex1 s' a t'" in allE)
-apply simp
-apply (frule reachable.reachable_n)
-apply assumption
-apply (simp add: move_subprop5_sim [unfolded Let_def])
-(* laststate *)
-apply (erule move_subprop3_sim [unfolded Let_def, symmetric])
-apply assumption+
-done
-
-
-subsection "Main Theorem: TRACE - INCLUSION"
-
-(* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
-
- (* generate condition (s,S'):R & S':starts_of A, the first being intereting
- for the induction cases concerning the two lemmas correpsim_is_execution and
- traces_coincide_sim, the second for the start state case.
- S':= @s'. (s,s'):R & s':starts_of A, where s:starts_of C *)
-
-lemma simulation_starts:
-"[| is_simulation R C A; s:starts_of C |]
- ==> let S' = @s'. (s,s'):R & s':starts_of A in
- (s,S'):R & S':starts_of A"
- apply (simp add: is_simulation_def corresp_ex_sim_def Int_non_empty Image_def)
- apply (erule conjE)+
- apply (erule ballE)
- prefer 2 apply (blast)
- apply (erule exE)
- apply (rule someI2)
- apply assumption
- apply blast
- done
-
-lemmas sim_starts1 = simulation_starts [unfolded Let_def, THEN conjunct1]
-lemmas sim_starts2 = simulation_starts [unfolded Let_def, THEN conjunct2]
-
-
-lemma trace_inclusion_for_simulations:
- "[| ext C = ext A; is_simulation R C A |]
- ==> traces C <= traces A"
-
- apply (unfold traces_def)
-
- apply (simp (no_asm) add: has_trace_def2)
- apply auto
-
- (* give execution of abstract automata *)
- apply (rule_tac x = "corresp_ex_sim A R ex" in bexI)
-
- (* Traces coincide, Lemma 1 *)
- apply (tactic \<open>pair_tac @{context} "ex" 1\<close>)
- apply (rename_tac s ex)
- apply (simp (no_asm) add: corresp_ex_sim_def)
- apply (rule_tac s = "s" in traces_coincide_sim)
- apply assumption+
- apply (simp add: executions_def reachable.reachable_0 sim_starts1)
-
- (* corresp_ex_sim is execution, Lemma 2 *)
- apply (tactic \<open>pair_tac @{context} "ex" 1\<close>)
- apply (simp add: executions_def)
- apply (rename_tac s ex)
-
- (* start state *)
- apply (rule conjI)
- apply (simp add: sim_starts2 corresp_ex_sim_def)
-
- (* is-execution-fragment *)
- apply (simp add: corresp_ex_sim_def)
- apply (rule_tac s = s in correspsim_is_execution)
- apply assumption
- apply (simp add: reachable.reachable_0 sim_starts1)
- done
-
-end