src/HOL/GroupTheory/Sylow.thy
changeset 13870 cf947d1ec5ff
parent 13869 18112403c809
child 13871 26e5f5e624f6
--- a/src/HOL/GroupTheory/Sylow.thy	Tue Mar 18 17:55:54 2003 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,364 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/GroupTheory/Sylow
-    ID:         $Id$
-    Author:     Florian Kammueller, with new proofs by L C Paulson
-
-See Florian Kamm\"uller and L. C. Paulson,
-    A Formal Proof of Sylow's theorem:
-	An Experiment in Abstract Algebra with Isabelle HOL
-    J. Automated Reasoning 23 (1999), 235-264
-*)
-
-header{*Sylow's theorem using locales*}
-
-theory Sylow = Coset:
-
-text{*The combinatorial argument is in theory Exponent*}
-
-locale sylow = coset +
-  fixes p and a and m and calM and RelM
-  assumes prime_p:   "p \<in> prime"
-      and order_G:   "order(G) = (p^a) * m"
-      and finite_G [iff]:  "finite (carrier G)"
-  defines "calM == {s. s <= carrier(G) & card(s) = p^a}"
-      and "RelM == {(N1,N2). N1 \<in> calM & N2 \<in> calM &
-		  	     (\<exists>g \<in> carrier(G). N1 = (N2 #> g) )}"
-
-lemma (in sylow) RelM_refl: "refl calM RelM"
-apply (auto simp add: refl_def RelM_def calM_def) 
-apply (blast intro!: coset_sum_zero [symmetric]) 
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) RelM_sym: "sym RelM"
-proof (unfold sym_def RelM_def, clarify)
-  fix y g
-  assume   "y \<in> calM"
-    and g: "g \<in> carrier G"
-  hence "y = y #> g #> (\<ominus>g)" by (simp add: coset_sum_assoc calM_def)
-  thus "\<exists>g'\<in>carrier G. y = y #> g #> g'"
-   by (blast intro: g minus_closed)
-qed
-
-lemma (in sylow) RelM_trans: "trans RelM"
-by (auto simp add: trans_def RelM_def calM_def coset_sum_assoc) 
-
-lemma (in sylow) RelM_equiv: "equiv calM RelM"
-apply (unfold equiv_def)
-apply (blast intro: RelM_refl RelM_sym RelM_trans)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) M_subset_calM_prep: "M' \<in> calM // RelM  ==> M' <= calM"
-apply (unfold RelM_def)
-apply (blast elim!: quotientE)
-done
-
-subsection{*Main Part of the Proof*}
-
-
-locale sylow_central = sylow +
-  fixes H and M1 and M
-  assumes M_in_quot:  "M \<in> calM // RelM"
-      and not_dvd_M:  "~(p ^ Suc(exponent p m) dvd card(M))"
-      and M1_in_M:    "M1 \<in> M"
-  defines "H == {g. g\<in>carrier G & M1 #> g = M1}"
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M_subset_calM: "M <= calM"
-by (rule M_in_quot [THEN M_subset_calM_prep])
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) card_M1: "card(M1) = p^a"
-apply (cut_tac M_subset_calM M1_in_M)
-apply (simp add: calM_def, blast)
-done
-
-lemma card_nonempty: "0 < card(S) ==> S \<noteq> {}"
-by force
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) exists_x_in_M1: "\<exists>x. x\<in>M1" 
-apply (subgoal_tac "0 < card M1") 
- apply (blast dest: card_nonempty) 
-apply (cut_tac prime_p [THEN prime_imp_one_less])
-apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: card_M1)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M1_subset_G [simp]: "M1 <= carrier G"
-apply (rule subsetD [THEN PowD])
-apply (rule_tac [2] M1_in_M)
-apply (rule M_subset_calM [THEN subset_trans])
-apply (auto simp add: calM_def)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M1_inj_H: "\<exists>f \<in> H\<rightarrow>M1. inj_on f H"
-apply (rule exists_x_in_M1 [THEN exE])
-apply (rule_tac x = "%z: H. sum G x z" in bexI)
- apply (rule inj_onI)
- apply (rule left_cancellation)
-    apply (auto simp add: H_def M1_subset_G [THEN subsetD])
-apply (rule restrictI)
-apply (simp add: H_def, clarify) 
-apply (erule subst)
-apply (simp add: rcosI)
-done
-
-subsection{*Discharging the Assumptions of @{text sylow_central}*}
-
-lemma (in sylow) EmptyNotInEquivSet: "{} \<notin> calM // RelM"
-by (blast elim!: quotientE dest: RelM_equiv [THEN equiv_class_self])
-
-lemma (in sylow) existsM1inM: "M \<in> calM // RelM ==> \<exists>M1. M1 \<in> M"
-apply (subgoal_tac "M \<noteq> {}") 
- apply blast 
-apply (cut_tac EmptyNotInEquivSet, blast)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) zero_less_o_G: "0 < order(G)"
-apply (unfold order_def)
-apply (blast intro: zero_closed zero_less_card_empty)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) zero_less_m: "0 < m"
-apply (cut_tac zero_less_o_G)
-apply (simp add: order_G)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) card_calM: "card(calM) = (p^a) * m choose p^a"
-by (simp add: calM_def n_subsets order_G [symmetric] order_def)
-
-lemma (in sylow) zero_less_card_calM: "0 < card calM"
-by (simp add: card_calM zero_less_binomial le_extend_mult zero_less_m)
-
-lemma (in sylow) max_p_div_calM:
-     "~ (p ^ Suc(exponent p m) dvd card(calM))"
-apply (subgoal_tac "exponent p m = exponent p (card calM) ")
- apply (cut_tac zero_less_card_calM prime_p)
- apply (force dest: power_Suc_exponent_Not_dvd)
-apply (simp add: card_calM zero_less_m [THEN const_p_fac])
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) finite_calM: "finite calM"
-apply (unfold calM_def)
-apply (rule_tac B = "Pow (carrier G) " in finite_subset)
-apply auto
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow) lemma_A1:
-     "\<exists>M \<in> calM // RelM. ~ (p ^ Suc(exponent p m) dvd card(M))"
-apply (rule max_p_div_calM [THEN contrapos_np])
-apply (simp add: finite_calM equiv_imp_dvd_card [OF _ RelM_equiv])
-done
-
-
-subsubsection{*Introduction and Destruct Rules for @{term H}*}
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_I: "[|g \<in> carrier G; M1 #> g = M1|] ==> g \<in> H"
-by (simp add: H_def)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_into_carrier_G: "x \<in> H ==> x \<in> carrier G"
-by (simp add: H_def)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) in_H_imp_eq: "g : H ==> M1 #> g = M1"
-by (simp add: H_def)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_sum_closed: "[| x\<in>H; y\<in>H|] ==> x \<oplus> y \<in> H"
-apply (unfold H_def)
-apply (simp add: coset_sum_assoc [symmetric] sum_closed)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_not_empty: "H \<noteq> {}"
-apply (simp add: H_def)
-apply (rule exI [of _ \<zero>], simp)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_is_subgroup: "subgroup H G"
-apply (rule subgroupI)
-apply (rule subsetI)
-apply (erule H_into_carrier_G)
-apply (rule H_not_empty)
-apply (simp add: H_def, clarify)
-apply (erule_tac P = "%z. ?lhs(z) = M1" in subst)
-apply (simp add: coset_sum_assoc )
-apply (blast intro: H_sum_closed)
-done
-
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) rcosetGM1g_subset_G:
-     "[| g \<in> carrier G; x \<in> M1 #>  g |] ==> x \<in> carrier G"
-by (blast intro: M1_subset_G [THEN r_coset_subset_G, THEN subsetD])
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) finite_M1: "finite M1"
-by (rule finite_subset [OF M1_subset_G finite_G])
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) finite_rcosetGM1g: "g\<in>carrier G ==> finite (M1 #> g)"
-apply (rule finite_subset)
-apply (rule subsetI)
-apply (erule rcosetGM1g_subset_G, assumption)
-apply (rule finite_G)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M1_cardeq_rcosetGM1g:
-     "g \<in> carrier G ==> card(M1 #> g) = card(M1)"
-by (simp (no_asm_simp) add: M1_subset_G card_cosets_equal setrcosI)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M1_RelM_rcosetGM1g:
-     "g \<in> carrier G ==> (M1, M1 #> g) \<in> RelM"
-apply (simp (no_asm) add: RelM_def calM_def card_M1 M1_subset_G)
-apply (rule conjI)
- apply (blast intro: rcosetGM1g_subset_G)
-apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: card_M1 M1_cardeq_rcosetGM1g)
-apply (rule bexI [of _ "\<ominus>g"])
-apply (simp_all add: coset_sum_assoc M1_subset_G)
-done
-
-
-
-subsection{*Equal Cardinalities of @{term M} and @{term "rcosets G H"}*}
-
-text{*Injections between @{term M} and @{term "rcosets G H"} show that
- their cardinalities are equal.*}
-
-lemma ElemClassEquiv: 
-     "[| equiv A r; C\<in>A // r |] ==> \<forall>x \<in> C. \<forall>y \<in> C. (x,y)\<in>r"
-apply (unfold equiv_def quotient_def sym_def trans_def, blast)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M_elem_map:
-     "M2 \<in> M ==> \<exists>g. g \<in> carrier G & M1 #> g = M2"
-apply (cut_tac M1_in_M M_in_quot [THEN RelM_equiv [THEN ElemClassEquiv]])
-apply (simp add: RelM_def)
-apply (blast dest!: bspec)
-done
-
-lemmas (in sylow_central) M_elem_map_carrier = 
-	M_elem_map [THEN someI_ex, THEN conjunct1]
-
-lemmas (in sylow_central) M_elem_map_eq =
-	M_elem_map [THEN someI_ex, THEN conjunct2]
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) M_funcset_setrcos_H:
-     "(%x:M. H #> (SOME g. g \<in> carrier G & M1 #> g = x)) \<in> M \<rightarrow> rcosets G H"
-apply (rule setrcosI [THEN restrictI])
-apply (rule H_is_subgroup [THEN subgroup_imp_subset])
-apply (erule M_elem_map_carrier)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) inj_M_GmodH: "\<exists>f \<in> M\<rightarrow>rcosets G H. inj_on f M"
-apply (rule bexI)
-apply (rule_tac [2] M_funcset_setrcos_H)
-apply (rule inj_onI, simp)
-apply (rule trans [OF _ M_elem_map_eq])
-prefer 2 apply assumption
-apply (rule M_elem_map_eq [symmetric, THEN trans], assumption)
-apply (rule coset_sum_minus1)
-apply (erule_tac [2] M_elem_map_carrier)+
-apply (rule_tac [2] M1_subset_G)
-apply (rule coset_join1 [THEN in_H_imp_eq])
-apply (rule_tac [3] H_is_subgroup)
-prefer 2 apply (blast intro: sum_closed M_elem_map_carrier minus_closed)
-apply (simp add: coset_sum_minus2 H_def M_elem_map_carrier subset_def)
-done
-
-
-(** the opposite injection **)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) H_elem_map:
-     "H1\<in>rcosets G H ==> \<exists>g. g \<in> carrier G & H #> g = H1"
-by (auto simp add: setrcos_eq)
-
-lemmas (in sylow_central) H_elem_map_carrier = 
-	H_elem_map [THEN someI_ex, THEN conjunct1]
-
-lemmas (in sylow_central) H_elem_map_eq =
-	H_elem_map [THEN someI_ex, THEN conjunct2]
-
-
-lemma EquivElemClass: 
-     "[|equiv A r; M\<in>A // r; M1\<in>M; (M1, M2)\<in>r |] ==> M2\<in>M"
-apply (unfold equiv_def quotient_def sym_def trans_def, blast)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) setrcos_H_funcset_M:
-     "(\<lambda>C \<in> rcosets G H. M1 #> (@g. g \<in> carrier G \<and> H #> g = C))
-      \<in> rcosets G H \<rightarrow> M"
-apply (simp add: setrcos_eq)
-apply (fast intro: someI2
-            intro!: restrictI M1_in_M
-              EquivElemClass [OF RelM_equiv M_in_quot _  M1_RelM_rcosetGM1g])
-done
-
-text{*close to a duplicate of @{text inj_M_GmodH}*}
-lemma (in sylow_central) inj_GmodH_M:
-     "\<exists>g \<in> rcosets G H\<rightarrow>M. inj_on g (rcosets G H)"
-apply (rule bexI)
-apply (rule_tac [2] setrcos_H_funcset_M)
-apply (rule inj_onI)
-apply (simp)
-apply (rule trans [OF _ H_elem_map_eq])
-prefer 2 apply assumption
-apply (rule H_elem_map_eq [symmetric, THEN trans], assumption)
-apply (rule coset_sum_minus1)
-apply (erule_tac [2] H_elem_map_carrier)+
-apply (rule_tac [2] H_is_subgroup [THEN subgroup_imp_subset])
-apply (rule coset_join2)
-apply (blast intro: sum_closed minus_closed H_elem_map_carrier)
-apply (rule H_is_subgroup) 
-apply (simp add: H_I coset_sum_minus2 M1_subset_G H_elem_map_carrier)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) calM_subset_PowG: "calM <= Pow(carrier G)"
-by (auto simp add: calM_def)
-
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) finite_M: "finite M"
-apply (rule finite_subset)
-apply (rule M_subset_calM [THEN subset_trans])
-apply (rule calM_subset_PowG, blast)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) cardMeqIndexH: "card(M) = card(rcosets G H)"
-apply (insert inj_M_GmodH inj_GmodH_M) 
-apply (blast intro: card_bij finite_M H_is_subgroup 
-             setrcos_subset_PowG [THEN finite_subset] 
-             finite_Pow_iff [THEN iffD2])
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) index_lem: "card(M) * card(H) = order(G)"
-by (simp add: cardMeqIndexH lagrange H_is_subgroup)
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) lemma_leq1: "p^a <= card(H)"
-apply (rule dvd_imp_le)
- apply (rule div_combine [OF prime_p not_dvd_M])
- prefer 2 apply (blast intro: subgroup_card_positive H_is_subgroup)
-apply (simp add: index_lem order_G power_add mult_dvd_mono power_exponent_dvd
-                 zero_less_m)
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) lemma_leq2: "card(H) <= p^a"
-apply (subst card_M1 [symmetric])
-apply (cut_tac M1_inj_H)
-apply (blast intro!: M1_subset_G intro: 
-             card_inj H_into_carrier_G finite_subset [OF _ finite_G])
-done
-
-lemma (in sylow_central) card_H_eq: "card(H) = p^a"
-by (blast intro: le_anti_sym lemma_leq1 lemma_leq2)
-
-lemma (in sylow) sylow_thm: "\<exists>H. subgroup H G & card(H) = p^a"
-apply (cut_tac lemma_A1, clarify) 
-apply (frule existsM1inM, clarify) 
-apply (subgoal_tac "sylow_central G p a m M1 M")
- apply (blast dest:  sylow_central.H_is_subgroup sylow_central.card_H_eq)
-apply (simp add: sylow_central_def sylow_central_axioms_def prems) 
-done
-
-text{*Needed because the locale's automatic definition refers to
-   @{term "semigroup G"} and @{term "group_axioms G"} rather than 
-  simply to @{term "group G"}.*}
-lemma sylow_eq: "sylow G p a m = (group G & sylow_axioms G p a m)"
-by (simp add: sylow_def group_def)
-
-theorem sylow_thm:
-     "[|p \<in> prime;  group(G);  order(G) = (p^a) * m; finite (carrier G)|]
-      ==> \<exists>H. subgroup H G & card(H) = p^a"
-apply (rule sylow.sylow_thm [of G p a m])
-apply (simp add: sylow_eq sylow_axioms_def) 
-done
-
-end