doc-src/TutorialI/Protocol/NS_Public.thy
changeset 32891 d403b99287ff
parent 27093 66d6da816be7
child 32960 69916a850301
--- a/doc-src/TutorialI/Protocol/NS_Public.thy	Wed Oct 07 16:57:56 2009 +0200
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/Protocol/NS_Public.thy	Thu Oct 08 15:16:13 2009 +0200
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
 From similar assumptions, we can prove that @{text A} started the protocol
 run by sending an instance of message~1 involving the nonce~@{text NA}\@. 
 For this theorem, the conclusion is 
-@{thm_style [display] concl B_trusts_protocol [no_vars]}
+@{thm [display] (concl) B_trusts_protocol [no_vars]}
 Analogous theorems can be proved for~@{text A}, stating that nonce~@{text NA}
 remains secret and that message~2 really originates with~@{text B}.  Even the
 flawed protocol establishes these properties for~@{text A};