enhanced simplifier solver for preconditions of rewrite rule, can now deal with conjunctions
(* Title: HOL/MicroJava/BV/EffectMono.thy
Author: Gerwin Klein
Copyright 2000 Technische Universitaet Muenchen
*)
header {* \isaheader{Monotonicity of eff and app} *}
theory EffectMono
imports Effect
begin
lemma PrimT_PrimT: "(G \<turnstile> xb \<preceq> PrimT p) = (xb = PrimT p)"
by (auto elim: widen.cases)
lemma sup_loc_some [rule_format]:
"\<forall>y n. (G \<turnstile> b <=l y) \<longrightarrow> n < length y \<longrightarrow> y!n = OK t \<longrightarrow>
(\<exists>t. b!n = OK t \<and> (G \<turnstile> (b!n) <=o (y!n)))"
proof (induct b)
case Nil
show ?case by simp
next
case (Cons a list)
show ?case
proof (clarsimp simp add: list_all2_Cons1 sup_loc_def Listn.le_def lesub_def)
fix z zs n
assume *:
"G \<turnstile> a <=o z" "list_all2 (sup_ty_opt G) list zs"
"n < Suc (length list)" "(z # zs) ! n = OK t"
show "(\<exists>t. (a # list) ! n = OK t) \<and> G \<turnstile>(a # list) ! n <=o OK t"
proof (cases n)
case 0
with * show ?thesis by (simp add: sup_ty_opt_OK)
next
case Suc
with Cons *
show ?thesis by (simp add: sup_loc_def Listn.le_def lesub_def)
qed
qed
qed
lemma all_widen_is_sup_loc:
"\<forall>b. length a = length b \<longrightarrow>
(\<forall>(x, y)\<in>set (zip a b). G \<turnstile> x \<preceq> y) = (G \<turnstile> (map OK a) <=l (map OK b))"
(is "\<forall>b. length a = length b \<longrightarrow> ?Q a b" is "?P a")
proof (induct "a")
show "?P []" by simp
fix l ls assume Cons: "?P ls"
show "?P (l#ls)"
proof (intro allI impI)
fix b
assume "length (l # ls) = length (b::ty list)"
with Cons
show "?Q (l # ls) b" by - (cases b, auto)
qed
qed
lemma append_length_n [rule_format]:
"\<forall>n. n \<le> length x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>a b. x = a@b \<and> length a = n)"
proof (induct x)
case Nil
show ?case by simp
next
case (Cons l ls)
show ?case
proof (intro allI impI)
fix n
assume l: "n \<le> length (l # ls)"
show "\<exists>a b. l # ls = a @ b \<and> length a = n"
proof (cases n)
assume "n=0" thus ?thesis by simp
next
fix n' assume s: "n = Suc n'"
with l have "n' \<le> length ls" by simp
hence "\<exists>a b. ls = a @ b \<and> length a = n'" by (rule Cons [rule_format])
then obtain a b where "ls = a @ b" "length a = n'" by iprover
with s have "l # ls = (l#a) @ b \<and> length (l#a) = n" by simp
thus ?thesis by blast
qed
qed
qed
lemma rev_append_cons:
"n < length x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a b c. x = (rev a) @ b # c \<and> length a = n"
proof -
assume n: "n < length x"
hence "n \<le> length x" by simp
hence "\<exists>a b. x = a @ b \<and> length a = n" by (rule append_length_n)
then obtain r d where x: "x = r@d" "length r = n" by iprover
with n have "\<exists>b c. d = b#c" by (simp add: neq_Nil_conv)
then obtain b c where "d = b#c" by iprover
with x have "x = (rev (rev r)) @ b # c \<and> length (rev r) = n" by simp
thus ?thesis by blast
qed
lemma sup_loc_length_map:
"G \<turnstile> map f a <=l map g b \<Longrightarrow> length a = length b"
proof -
assume "G \<turnstile> map f a <=l map g b"
hence "length (map f a) = length (map g b)" by (rule sup_loc_length)
thus ?thesis by simp
qed
lemmas [iff] = not_Err_eq
lemma app_mono:
"\<lbrakk>G \<turnstile> s <=' s'; app i G m rT pc et s'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> app i G m rT pc et s"
proof -
{ fix s1 s2
assume G: "G \<turnstile> s2 <=s s1"
assume app: "app i G m rT pc et (Some s1)"
note [simp] = sup_loc_length sup_loc_length_map
have "app i G m rT pc et (Some s2)"
proof (cases i)
case Load
from G Load app
have "G \<turnstile> snd s2 <=l snd s1" by (auto simp add: sup_state_conv)
with G Load app show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_conv dest: sup_loc_some)
next
case Store
with G app show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_loc_Cons2 sup_state_conv)
next
case LitPush
with G app show ?thesis by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_conv)
next
case New
with G app show ?thesis by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_conv)
next
case Getfield
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2, rule widen_trans)
next
case (Putfield vname cname)
with app
obtain vT oT ST LT b
where s1: "s1 = (vT # oT # ST, LT)" and
"field (G, cname) vname = Some (cname, b)"
"is_class G cname" and
oT: "G\<turnstile> oT\<preceq> (Class cname)" and
vT: "G\<turnstile> vT\<preceq> b" and
xc: "Ball (set (match G NullPointer pc et)) (is_class G)"
by force
moreover
from s1 G
obtain vT' oT' ST' LT'
where s2: "s2 = (vT' # oT' # ST', LT')" and
oT': "G\<turnstile> oT' \<preceq> oT" and
vT': "G\<turnstile> vT' \<preceq> vT"
by - (cases s2, simp add: sup_state_Cons2, elim exE conjE, simp)
moreover
from vT' vT
have "G \<turnstile> vT' \<preceq> b" by (rule widen_trans)
moreover
from oT' oT
have "G\<turnstile> oT' \<preceq> (Class cname)" by (rule widen_trans)
ultimately
show ?thesis by (auto simp add: Putfield xc)
next
case Checkcast
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto intro!: widen_RefT2 simp add: sup_state_Cons2)
next
case Return
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_Cons2, rule widen_trans)
next
case Pop
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2)
next
case Dup
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2,
auto dest: sup_state_length)
next
case Dup_x1
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2,
auto dest: sup_state_length)
next
case Dup_x2
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2,
auto dest: sup_state_length)
next
case Swap
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_Cons2)
next
case IAdd
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_Cons2 PrimT_PrimT)
next
case Goto
with app show ?thesis by simp
next
case Ifcmpeq
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2) (auto simp add: sup_state_Cons2 PrimT_PrimT widen_RefT2)
next
case (Invoke cname mname list)
with app
obtain apTs X ST LT mD' rT' b' where
s1: "s1 = (rev apTs @ X # ST, LT)" and
l: "length apTs = length list" and
c: "is_class G cname" and
C: "G \<turnstile> X \<preceq> Class cname" and
w: "\<forall>(x, y) \<in> set (zip apTs list). G \<turnstile> x \<preceq> y" and
m: "method (G, cname) (mname, list) = Some (mD', rT', b')" and
x: "\<forall>C \<in> set (match_any G pc et). is_class G C"
by (simp del: not_None_eq, elim exE conjE) (rule that)
obtain apTs' X' ST' LT' where
s2: "s2 = (rev apTs' @ X' # ST', LT')" and
l': "length apTs' = length list"
proof -
from l s1 G
have "length list < length (fst s2)"
by simp
hence "\<exists>a b c. (fst s2) = rev a @ b # c \<and> length a = length list"
by (rule rev_append_cons [rule_format])
thus ?thesis
by (cases s2) (elim exE conjE, simp, rule that)
qed
from l l'
have "length (rev apTs') = length (rev apTs)" by simp
from this s1 s2 G
obtain
G': "G \<turnstile> (apTs',LT') <=s (apTs,LT)" and
X : "G \<turnstile> X' \<preceq> X" and "G \<turnstile> (ST',LT') <=s (ST,LT)"
by (simp add: sup_state_rev_fst sup_state_append_fst sup_state_Cons1)
with C
have C': "G \<turnstile> X' \<preceq> Class cname"
by - (rule widen_trans, auto)
from G'
have "G \<turnstile> map OK apTs' <=l map OK apTs"
by (simp add: sup_state_conv)
also
from l w
have "G \<turnstile> map OK apTs <=l map OK list"
by (simp add: all_widen_is_sup_loc)
finally
have "G \<turnstile> map OK apTs' <=l map OK list" .
with l'
have w': "\<forall>(x, y) \<in> set (zip apTs' list). G \<turnstile> x \<preceq> y"
by (simp add: all_widen_is_sup_loc)
from Invoke s2 l' w' C' m c x
show ?thesis
by (simp del: split_paired_Ex) blast
next
case Throw
with app G show ?thesis
by (cases s2, clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons2 widen_RefT2)
qed
} note this [simp]
assume "G \<turnstile> s <=' s'" "app i G m rT pc et s'"
thus ?thesis by (cases s, cases s', auto)
qed
lemmas [simp del] = split_paired_Ex
lemma eff'_mono:
"\<lbrakk> app i G m rT pc et (Some s2); G \<turnstile> s1 <=s s2 \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
G \<turnstile> eff' (i,G,s1) <=s eff' (i,G,s2)"
proof (cases s1, cases s2)
fix a1 b1 a2 b2
assume s: "s1 = (a1,b1)" "s2 = (a2,b2)"
assume app2: "app i G m rT pc et (Some s2)"
assume G: "G \<turnstile> s1 <=s s2"
note [simp] = eff_def
with G have "G \<turnstile> (Some s1) <=' (Some s2)" by simp
from this app2
have app1: "app i G m rT pc et (Some s1)" by (rule app_mono)
show ?thesis
proof (cases i)
case (Load n)
with s app1
obtain y where
y: "n < length b1" "b1 ! n = OK y" by clarsimp
from Load s app2
obtain y' where
y': "n < length b2" "b2 ! n = OK y'" by clarsimp
from G s
have "G \<turnstile> b1 <=l b2" by (simp add: sup_state_conv)
with y y'
have "G \<turnstile> y \<preceq> y'"
by - (drule sup_loc_some, simp+)
with Load G y y' s app1 app2
show ?thesis by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_conv)
next
case Store
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_conv sup_loc_update)
next
case LitPush
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case New
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Getfield
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Putfield
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Checkcast
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case (Invoke cname mname list)
with s app1
obtain a X ST where
s1: "s1 = (a @ X # ST, b1)" and
l: "length a = length list"
by (simp, elim exE conjE, simp (no_asm_simp))
from Invoke s app2
obtain a' X' ST' where
s2: "s2 = (a' @ X' # ST', b2)" and
l': "length a' = length list"
by (simp, elim exE conjE, simp (no_asm_simp))
from l l'
have lr: "length a = length a'" by simp
from lr G s1 s2
have "G \<turnstile> (ST, b1) <=s (ST', b2)"
by (simp add: sup_state_append_fst sup_state_Cons1)
moreover
obtain b1' b2' where eff':
"b1' = snd (eff' (i,G,s1))"
"b2' = snd (eff' (i,G,s2))" by simp
from Invoke G s eff' app1 app2
obtain "b1 = b1'" "b2 = b2'" by simp
ultimately
have "G \<turnstile> (ST, b1') <=s (ST', b2')" by simp
with Invoke G s app1 app2 eff' s1 s2 l l'
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_conv)
next
case Return
with G
show ?thesis
by simp
next
case Pop
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Dup
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Dup_x1
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Dup_x2
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Swap
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case IAdd
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Goto
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis by simp
next
case Ifcmpeq
with G s app1 app2
show ?thesis
by (clarsimp simp add: sup_state_Cons1)
next
case Throw
with G
show ?thesis
by simp
qed
qed
lemmas [iff del] = not_Err_eq
end