src/ZF/ZF.ML
 author lcp Fri, 20 Jan 1995 02:00:23 +0100 changeset 868 452f1e6ae3bc parent 854 2e3ca37dfa14 child 1016 2317b680fe58 permissions -rw-r--r--
Deleted semicolon at the end of the qed_goal line, which was preventing not_emptyE from being proved.
```
(*  Title: 	ZF/ZF.ML
ID:         \$Id\$
Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson and Martin D Coen, CU Computer Laboratory

Basic introduction and elimination rules for Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
*)

open ZF;

(*Useful examples:  singletonI RS subst_elem,  subst_elem RSN (2,IntI) *)
goal ZF.thy "!!a b A. [| b:A;  a=b |] ==> a:A";
by (etac ssubst 1);
by (assume_tac 1);
val subst_elem = result();

(*** Bounded universal quantifier ***)

qed_goalw "ballI" ZF.thy [Ball_def]
"[| !!x. x:A ==> P(x) |] ==> ALL x:A. P(x)"
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ [allI,impI]) 1)) ]);

qed_goalw "bspec" ZF.thy [Ball_def]
"[| ALL x:A. P(x);  x: A |] ==> P(x)"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS spec RS mp) 1),
(resolve_tac prems 1) ]);

qed_goalw "ballE" ZF.thy [Ball_def]
"[| ALL x:A. P(x);  P(x) ==> Q;  x~:A ==> Q |] ==> Q"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS allE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac (prems@[asm_rl,impCE]) 1)) ]);

(*Used in the datatype package*)
qed_goal "rev_bspec" ZF.thy
"!!x A P. [| x: A;  ALL x:A. P(x) |] ==> P(x)"
(fn _ =>
[ REPEAT (ares_tac [bspec] 1) ]);

(*Instantiates x first: better for automatic theorem proving?*)
qed_goal "rev_ballE" ZF.thy
"[| ALL x:A. P(x);  x~:A ==> Q;  P(x) ==> Q |] ==> Q"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS ballE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac prems 1)) ]);

(*Takes assumptions ALL x:A.P(x) and a:A; creates assumption P(a)*)
val ball_tac = dtac bspec THEN' assume_tac;

(*Trival rewrite rule;   (ALL x:A.P)<->P holds only if A is nonempty!*)
qed_goal "ball_simp" ZF.thy "(ALL x:A. True) <-> True"
(fn _=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac [TrueI,ballI,iffI] 1)) ]);

(*Congruence rule for rewriting*)
qed_goalw "ball_cong" ZF.thy [Ball_def]
"[| A=A';  !!x. x:A' ==> P(x) <-> P'(x) |] ==> Ball(A,P) <-> Ball(A',P')"
(fn prems=> [ (simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps prems) 1) ]);

(*** Bounded existential quantifier ***)

qed_goalw "bexI" ZF.thy [Bex_def]
"[| P(x);  x: A |] ==> EX x:A. P(x)"
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ [exI,conjI]) 1)) ]);

(*Not of the general form for such rules; ~EX has become ALL~ *)
qed_goal "bexCI" ZF.thy
"[| ALL x:A. ~P(x) ==> P(a);  a: A |] ==> EX x:A.P(x)"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac classical 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[bexI,ballI,notI,notE]) 1)) ]);

qed_goalw "bexE" ZF.thy [Bex_def]
"[| EX x:A. P(x);  !!x. [| x:A; P(x) |] ==> Q \
\    |] ==> Q"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS exE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac (prems @ [asm_rl,conjE]) 1)) ]);

(*We do not even have (EX x:A. True) <-> True unless A is nonempty!!*)

qed_goalw "bex_cong" ZF.thy [Bex_def]
"[| A=A';  !!x. x:A' ==> P(x) <-> P'(x) \
\    |] ==> Bex(A,P) <-> Bex(A',P')"

(*** Rules for subsets ***)

qed_goalw "subsetI" ZF.thy [subset_def]
"(!!x.x:A ==> x:B) ==> A <= B"
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ [ballI]) 1)) ]);

(*Rule in Modus Ponens style [was called subsetE] *)
qed_goalw "subsetD" ZF.thy [subset_def] "[| A <= B;  c:A |] ==> c:B"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS bspec) 1),
(resolve_tac prems 1) ]);

(*Classical elimination rule*)
qed_goalw "subsetCE" ZF.thy [subset_def]
"[| A <= B;  c~:A ==> P;  c:B ==> P |] ==> P"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS ballE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac prems 1)) ]);

(*Takes assumptions A<=B; c:A and creates the assumption c:B *)
val set_mp_tac = dtac subsetD THEN' assume_tac;

(*Sometimes useful with premises in this order*)
qed_goal "rev_subsetD" ZF.thy "!!A B c. [| c:A; A<=B |] ==> c:B"
(fn _=> [REPEAT (ares_tac [subsetD] 1)]);

qed_goal "subset_refl" ZF.thy "A <= A"
(fn _=> [ (rtac subsetI 1), atac 1 ]);

qed_goal "subset_trans" ZF.thy "[| A<=B;  B<=C |] ==> A<=C"
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (ares_tac ([subsetI]@(prems RL [subsetD])) 1)) ]);

(*Useful for proving A<=B by rewriting in some cases*)
qed_goalw "subset_iff" ZF.thy [subset_def,Ball_def]
"A<=B <-> (ALL x. x:A --> x:B)"
(fn _=> [ (rtac iff_refl 1) ]);

(*** Rules for equality ***)

(*Anti-symmetry of the subset relation*)
qed_goal "equalityI" ZF.thy "[| A <= B;  B <= A |] ==> A = B"
(fn prems=> [ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[conjI, extension RS iffD2]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "equality_iffI" ZF.thy "(!!x. x:A <-> x:B) ==> A = B"
(fn [prem] =>
[ (rtac equalityI 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac [subsetI, prem RS iffD1, prem RS iffD2] 1)) ]);

qed_goal "equalityD1" ZF.thy "A = B ==> A<=B"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (extension RS iffD1 RS conjunct1) 1),
(resolve_tac prems 1) ]);

qed_goal "equalityD2" ZF.thy "A = B ==> B<=A"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (extension RS iffD1 RS conjunct2) 1),
(resolve_tac prems 1) ]);

qed_goal "equalityE" ZF.thy
"[| A = B;  [| A<=B; B<=A |] ==> P |]  ==>  P"
(fn prems=>
[ (DEPTH_SOLVE (resolve_tac (prems@[equalityD1,equalityD2]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "equalityCE" ZF.thy
"[| A = B;  [| c:A; c:B |] ==> P;  [| c~:A; c~:B |] ==> P |]  ==>  P"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS equalityE) 1),
(REPEAT (contr_tac 1 ORELSE eresolve_tac ([asm_rl,subsetCE]@prems) 1)) ]);

(*Lemma for creating induction formulae -- for "pattern matching" on p
To make the induction hypotheses usable, apply "spec" or "bspec" to
put universal quantifiers over the free variables in p.
Would it be better to do subgoal_tac "ALL z. p = f(z) --> R(z)" ??*)
qed_goal "setup_induction" ZF.thy
"[| p: A;  !!z. z: A ==> p=z --> R |] ==> R"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac mp 1),
(REPEAT (resolve_tac (refl::prems) 1)) ]);

(*** Rules for Replace -- the derived form of replacement ***)

qed_goalw "Replace_iff" ZF.thy [Replace_def]
"b : {y. x:A, P(x,y)}  <->  (EX x:A. P(x,b) & (ALL y. P(x,y) --> y=b))"
(fn _=>
[ (rtac (replacement RS iff_trans) 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac [refl,bex_cong,iffI,ballI,allI,conjI,impI,ex1I] 1
ORELSE eresolve_tac [conjE, spec RS mp, ex1_functional] 1)) ]);

(*Introduction; there must be a unique y such that P(x,y), namely y=b. *)
qed_goal "ReplaceI" ZF.thy
"[| P(x,b);  x: A;  !!y. P(x,y) ==> y=b |] ==> \
\    b : {y. x:A, P(x,y)}"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (Replace_iff RS iffD2) 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[bexI,conjI,allI,impI]) 1)) ]);

(*Elimination; may asssume there is a unique y such that P(x,y), namely y=b. *)
qed_goal "ReplaceE" ZF.thy
"[| b : {y. x:A, P(x,y)};  \
\       !!x. [| x: A;  P(x,b);  ALL y. P(x,y)-->y=b |] ==> R \
\    |] ==> R"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (Replace_iff RS iffD1 RS bexE) 1),
(etac conjE 2),
(REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)) ]);

(*As above but without the (generally useless) 3rd assumption*)
qed_goal "ReplaceE2" ZF.thy
"[| b : {y. x:A, P(x,y)};  \
\       !!x. [| x: A;  P(x,b) |] ==> R \
\    |] ==> R"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS ReplaceE) 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)) ]);

qed_goal "Replace_cong" ZF.thy
"[| A=B;  !!x y. x:B ==> P(x,y) <-> Q(x,y) |] ==> \
\    Replace(A,P) = Replace(B,Q)"
(fn prems=>
let val substprems = prems RL [subst, ssubst]
and iffprems = prems RL [iffD1,iffD2]
in [ (rtac equalityI 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac (substprems@[asm_rl, ReplaceE, spec RS mp]) 1
ORELSE resolve_tac [subsetI, ReplaceI] 1
ORELSE (resolve_tac iffprems 1 THEN assume_tac 2))) ]
end);

(*** Rules for RepFun ***)

qed_goalw "RepFunI" ZF.thy [RepFun_def]
"!!a A. a : A ==> f(a) : {f(x). x:A}"
(fn _ => [ (REPEAT (ares_tac [ReplaceI,refl] 1)) ]);

(*Useful for coinduction proofs*)
qed_goal "RepFun_eqI" ZF.thy
"!!b a f. [| b=f(a);  a : A |] ==> b : {f(x). x:A}"
(fn _ => [ etac ssubst 1, etac RepFunI 1 ]);

qed_goalw "RepFunE" ZF.thy [RepFun_def]
"[| b : {f(x). x:A};  \
\       !!x.[| x:A;  b=f(x) |] ==> P |] ==> \
\    P"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS ReplaceE) 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)) ]);

qed_goalw "RepFun_cong" ZF.thy [RepFun_def]
"[| A=B;  !!x. x:B ==> f(x)=g(x) |] ==> RepFun(A,f) = RepFun(B,g)"

qed_goalw "RepFun_iff" ZF.thy [Bex_def]
"b : {f(x). x:A} <-> (EX x:A. b=f(x))"
(fn _ => [ (fast_tac (FOL_cs addIs [RepFunI] addSEs [RepFunE]) 1) ]);

(*** Rules for Collect -- forming a subset by separation ***)

(*Separation is derivable from Replacement*)
qed_goalw "separation" ZF.thy [Collect_def]
"a : {x:A. P(x)} <-> a:A & P(a)"
(fn _=> [ (fast_tac (FOL_cs addIs  [bexI,ReplaceI]

qed_goal "CollectI" ZF.thy
"[| a:A;  P(a) |] ==> a : {x:A. P(x)}"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (separation RS iffD2) 1),
(REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[conjI]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "CollectE" ZF.thy
"[| a : {x:A. P(x)};  [| a:A; P(a) |] ==> R |] ==> R"
(fn prems=>
[ (rtac (separation RS iffD1 RS conjE) 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)) ]);

qed_goal "CollectD1" ZF.thy "a : {x:A. P(x)} ==> a:A"
(fn [major]=>
[ (rtac (major RS CollectE) 1),
(assume_tac 1) ]);

qed_goal "CollectD2" ZF.thy "a : {x:A. P(x)} ==> P(a)"
(fn [major]=>
[ (rtac (major RS CollectE) 1),
(assume_tac 1) ]);

qed_goalw "Collect_cong" ZF.thy [Collect_def]
"[| A=B;  !!x. x:B ==> P(x) <-> Q(x) |] ==> Collect(A,P) = Collect(B,Q)"

(*** Rules for Unions ***)

(*The order of the premises presupposes that C is rigid; A may be flexible*)
qed_goal "UnionI" ZF.thy "[| B: C;  A: B |] ==> A: Union(C)"
(fn prems=>
[ (resolve_tac [Union_iff RS iffD2] 1),
(REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems @ [bexI]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "UnionE" ZF.thy
"[| A : Union(C);  !!B.[| A: B;  B: C |] ==> R |] ==> R"
(fn prems=>
[ (resolve_tac [Union_iff RS iffD1 RS bexE] 1),
(REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1)) ]);

(*** Rules for Inter ***)

(*Not obviously useful towards proving InterI, InterD, InterE*)
qed_goalw "Inter_iff" ZF.thy [Inter_def,Ball_def]
"A : Inter(C) <-> (ALL x:C. A: x) & (EX x. x:C)"
(fn _=> [ (rtac (separation RS iff_trans) 1),

(* Intersection is well-behaved only if the family is non-empty! *)
qed_goalw "InterI" ZF.thy [Inter_def]
"[| !!x. x: C ==> A: x;  c:C |] ==> A : Inter(C)"
(fn prems=>
[ (DEPTH_SOLVE (ares_tac ([CollectI,UnionI,ballI] @ prems) 1)) ]);

(*A "destruct" rule -- every B in C contains A as an element, but
A:B can hold when B:C does not!  This rule is analogous to "spec". *)
qed_goalw "InterD" ZF.thy [Inter_def]
"[| A : Inter(C);  B : C |] ==> A : B"
(fn [major,minor]=>
[ (rtac (major RS CollectD2 RS bspec) 1),
(rtac minor 1) ]);

(*"Classical" elimination rule -- does not require exhibiting B:C *)
qed_goalw "InterE" ZF.thy [Inter_def]
"[| A : Inter(C);  A:B ==> R;  B~:C ==> R |] ==> R"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS CollectD2 RS ballE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac prems 1)) ]);

(*** Rules for Unions of families ***)
(* UN x:A. B(x) abbreviates Union({B(x). x:A}) *)

qed_goalw "UN_iff" ZF.thy [Bex_def]
"b : (UN x:A. B(x)) <-> (EX x:A. b : B(x))"
(fn _=> [ (fast_tac (FOL_cs addIs [UnionI, RepFunI]

(*The order of the premises presupposes that A is rigid; b may be flexible*)
qed_goal "UN_I" ZF.thy "[| a: A;  b: B(a) |] ==> b: (UN x:A. B(x))"
(fn prems=>
[ (REPEAT (resolve_tac (prems@[UnionI,RepFunI]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "UN_E" ZF.thy
"[| b : (UN x:A. B(x));  !!x.[| x: A;  b: B(x) |] ==> R |] ==> R"
(fn major::prems=>
[ (rtac (major RS UnionE) 1),
(REPEAT (eresolve_tac (prems@[asm_rl, RepFunE, subst]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "UN_cong" ZF.thy
"[| A=B;  !!x. x:B ==> C(x)=D(x) |] ==> (UN x:A.C(x)) = (UN x:B.D(x))"

(*** Rules for Intersections of families ***)
(* INT x:A. B(x) abbreviates Inter({B(x). x:A}) *)

qed_goal "INT_iff" ZF.thy
"b : (INT x:A. B(x)) <-> (ALL x:A. b : B(x)) & (EX x. x:A)"
(fn _=> [ (simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps [Inter_def, Ball_def, Bex_def,
separation, Union_iff, RepFun_iff]) 1),
(fast_tac FOL_cs 1) ]);

qed_goal "INT_I" ZF.thy
"[| !!x. x: A ==> b: B(x);  a: A |] ==> b: (INT x:A. B(x))"
(fn prems=>
[ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[InterI,RepFunI]) 1
ORELSE eresolve_tac [RepFunE,ssubst] 1)) ]);

qed_goal "INT_E" ZF.thy
"[| b : (INT x:A. B(x));  a: A |] ==> b : B(a)"
(fn [major,minor]=>
[ (rtac (major RS InterD) 1),
(rtac (minor RS RepFunI) 1) ]);

qed_goal "INT_cong" ZF.thy
"[| A=B;  !!x. x:B ==> C(x)=D(x) |] ==> (INT x:A.C(x)) = (INT x:B.D(x))"

(*** Rules for Powersets ***)

qed_goal "PowI" ZF.thy "A <= B ==> A : Pow(B)"
(fn [prem]=> [ (rtac (prem RS (Pow_iff RS iffD2)) 1) ]);

qed_goal "PowD" ZF.thy "A : Pow(B)  ==>  A<=B"
(fn [major]=> [ (rtac (major RS (Pow_iff RS iffD1)) 1) ]);

(*** Rules for the empty set ***)

(*The set {x:0.False} is empty; by foundation it equals 0
See Suppes, page 21.*)
qed_goal "emptyE" ZF.thy "a:0 ==> P"
(fn [major]=>
[ (rtac (foundation RS disjE) 1),
(etac (equalityD2 RS subsetD RS CollectD2 RS FalseE) 1),
(rtac major 1),
(etac bexE 1),
(etac (CollectD2 RS FalseE) 1) ]);

qed_goal "empty_subsetI" ZF.thy "0 <= A"
(fn _ => [ (REPEAT (ares_tac [equalityI,subsetI,emptyE] 1)) ]);

qed_goal "equals0I" ZF.thy "[| !!y. y:A ==> False |] ==> A=0"
(fn prems=>
[ (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[empty_subsetI,subsetI,equalityI]) 1
ORELSE eresolve_tac (prems RL [FalseE]) 1)) ]);

qed_goal "equals0D" ZF.thy "[| A=0;  a:A |] ==> P"
(fn [major,minor]=>
[ (rtac (minor RS (major RS equalityD1 RS subsetD RS emptyE)) 1) ]);

qed_goal "not_emptyI" ZF.thy "!!A a. a:A ==> A ~= 0"
(fn _ => [REPEAT (ares_tac [notI, equals0D] 1)]);

qed_goal "not_emptyE" ZF.thy "[| A ~= 0;  !!x. x:A ==> R |] ==> R"
(fn [major,minor]=>
[ rtac ([major, equals0I] MRS swap) 1,
swap_res_tac [minor] 1,
assume_tac 1 ]);

(*A claset that leaves <= formulae unchanged!*)
val subset0_cs = FOL_cs
addSIs [ballI, InterI, CollectI, PowI, empty_subsetI]
addSEs [bexE, make_elim PowD, UnionE, ReplaceE2, RepFunE,
CollectE, emptyE]
addEs [rev_ballE, InterD, make_elim InterD, subsetD];

(*Standard claset*)

(*** Cantor's Theorem: There is no surjection from a set to its powerset. ***)

val cantor_cs = FOL_cs   (*precisely the rules needed for the proof*)