(* Title: HOL/HOLCF/Compact_Basis.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
section \<open>A compact basis for powerdomains\<close>
theory Compact_Basis
imports Universal
begin
default_sort bifinite
subsection \<open>A compact basis for powerdomains\<close>
definition "pd_basis = {S::'a compact_basis set. finite S \<and> S \<noteq> {}}"
typedef 'a pd_basis = "pd_basis :: 'a compact_basis set set"
unfolding pd_basis_def
apply (rule_tac x="{_}" in exI)
apply simp
done
lemma finite_Rep_pd_basis [simp]: "finite (Rep_pd_basis u)"
by (insert Rep_pd_basis [of u, unfolded pd_basis_def]) simp
lemma Rep_pd_basis_nonempty [simp]: "Rep_pd_basis u \<noteq> {}"
by (insert Rep_pd_basis [of u, unfolded pd_basis_def]) simp
text \<open>The powerdomain basis type is countable.\<close>
lemma pd_basis_countable: "\<exists>f::'a pd_basis \<Rightarrow> nat. inj f"
proof -
obtain g :: "'a compact_basis \<Rightarrow> nat" where "inj g"
using compact_basis.countable ..
hence image_g_eq: "\<And>A B. g ` A = g ` B \<longleftrightarrow> A = B"
by (rule inj_image_eq_iff)
have "inj (\<lambda>t. set_encode (g ` Rep_pd_basis t))"
by (simp add: inj_on_def set_encode_eq image_g_eq Rep_pd_basis_inject)
thus ?thesis by - (rule exI)
(* FIXME: why doesn't ".." or "by (rule exI)" work? *)
qed
subsection \<open>Unit and plus constructors\<close>
definition
PDUnit :: "'a compact_basis \<Rightarrow> 'a pd_basis" where
"PDUnit = (\<lambda>x. Abs_pd_basis {x})"
definition
PDPlus :: "'a pd_basis \<Rightarrow> 'a pd_basis \<Rightarrow> 'a pd_basis" where
"PDPlus t u = Abs_pd_basis (Rep_pd_basis t \<union> Rep_pd_basis u)"
lemma Rep_PDUnit:
"Rep_pd_basis (PDUnit x) = {x}"
unfolding PDUnit_def by (rule Abs_pd_basis_inverse) (simp add: pd_basis_def)
lemma Rep_PDPlus:
"Rep_pd_basis (PDPlus u v) = Rep_pd_basis u \<union> Rep_pd_basis v"
unfolding PDPlus_def by (rule Abs_pd_basis_inverse) (simp add: pd_basis_def)
lemma PDUnit_inject [simp]: "(PDUnit a = PDUnit b) = (a = b)"
unfolding Rep_pd_basis_inject [symmetric] Rep_PDUnit by simp
lemma PDPlus_assoc: "PDPlus (PDPlus t u) v = PDPlus t (PDPlus u v)"
unfolding Rep_pd_basis_inject [symmetric] Rep_PDPlus by (rule Un_assoc)
lemma PDPlus_commute: "PDPlus t u = PDPlus u t"
unfolding Rep_pd_basis_inject [symmetric] Rep_PDPlus by (rule Un_commute)
lemma PDPlus_absorb: "PDPlus t t = t"
unfolding Rep_pd_basis_inject [symmetric] Rep_PDPlus by (rule Un_absorb)
lemma pd_basis_induct1:
assumes PDUnit: "\<And>a. P (PDUnit a)"
assumes PDPlus: "\<And>a t. P t \<Longrightarrow> P (PDPlus (PDUnit a) t)"
shows "P x"
apply (induct x, unfold pd_basis_def, clarify)
apply (erule (1) finite_ne_induct)
apply (cut_tac a=x in PDUnit)
apply (simp add: PDUnit_def)
apply (drule_tac a=x in PDPlus)
apply (simp add: PDUnit_def PDPlus_def
Abs_pd_basis_inverse [unfolded pd_basis_def])
done
lemma pd_basis_induct:
assumes PDUnit: "\<And>a. P (PDUnit a)"
assumes PDPlus: "\<And>t u. \<lbrakk>P t; P u\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P (PDPlus t u)"
shows "P x"
apply (induct x rule: pd_basis_induct1)
apply (rule PDUnit, erule PDPlus [OF PDUnit])
done
subsection \<open>Fold operator\<close>
definition
fold_pd ::
"('a compact_basis \<Rightarrow> 'b::type) \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'a pd_basis \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where "fold_pd g f t = semilattice_set.F f (g ` Rep_pd_basis t)"
lemma fold_pd_PDUnit:
assumes "semilattice f"
shows "fold_pd g f (PDUnit x) = g x"
proof -
from assms interpret semilattice_set f by (rule semilattice_set.intro)
show ?thesis by (simp add: fold_pd_def Rep_PDUnit)
qed
lemma fold_pd_PDPlus:
assumes "semilattice f"
shows "fold_pd g f (PDPlus t u) = f (fold_pd g f t) (fold_pd g f u)"
proof -
from assms interpret semilattice_set f by (rule semilattice_set.intro)
show ?thesis by (simp add: image_Un fold_pd_def Rep_PDPlus union)
qed
end