renamed split_prem_tac to split_asm_tac
split_asm_tac: simplification, debugged first_prem_is_disj
(* Title: Provers/splitter
ID: $Id$
Author: Tobias Nipkow
Copyright 1995 TU Munich
Generic case-splitter, suitable for most logics.
Use:
val split_tac = mk_case_split_tac iffD;
by(split_tac splits i);
where splits = [P(elim(...)) == rhs, ...]
iffD = [| P <-> Q; Q |] ==> P (* is called iffD2 in HOL *)
*)
local
fun mk_case_split_tac_2 iffD order =
let
(************************************************************
Create lift-theorem "trlift" :
[| !! x. Q(x)==R(x) ; P(R) == C |] ==> P(Q)==C
*************************************************************)
val lift =
let val ct = read_cterm (#sign(rep_thm iffD))
("[| !!x::'b::logic. Q(x) == R(x) |] ==> \
\P(%x. Q(x)) == P(%x. R(x))::'a::logic",propT)
in prove_goalw_cterm [] ct
(fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac reflexive_thm 1])
end;
val trlift = lift RS transitive_thm;
val _ $ (Var(P,PT)$_) $ _ = concl_of trlift;
(************************************************************************
Set up term for instantiation of P in the lift-theorem
Ts : types of parameters (i.e. variables bound by meta-quantifiers)
t : lefthand side of meta-equality in subgoal
the lift theorem is applied to (see select)
pos : "path" leading to abstraction, coded as a list
T : type of body of P(...)
maxi : maximum index of Vars
*************************************************************************)
fun mk_cntxt Ts t pos T maxi =
let fun var (t,i) = Var(("X",i),type_of1(Ts,t));
fun down [] t i = Bound 0
| down (p::ps) t i =
let val (h,ts) = strip_comb t
val v1 = ListPair.map var (take(p,ts), i upto (i+p-1))
val u::us = drop(p,ts)
val v2 = ListPair.map var (us, (i+p) upto (i+length(ts)-2))
in list_comb(h,v1@[down ps u (i+length ts)]@v2) end;
in Abs("", T, down (rev pos) t maxi) end;
(************************************************************************
Set up term for instantiation of P in the split-theorem
P(...) == rhs
Ts : types of parameters (i.e. variables bound by meta-quantifiers)
t : lefthand side of meta-equality in subgoal
the split theorem is applied to (see select)
T : type of body of P(...)
tt : the term Const(..,..) $ ...
maxi : maximum index of Vars
lev : abstraction level
*************************************************************************)
fun mk_cntxt_splitthm Ts t tt T maxi =
let fun down lev (Abs(v,T2,t)) = Abs(v,T2,down (lev+1) t)
| down lev (Bound i) = if i >= lev
then Var(("X",maxi+i-lev),nth_elem(i-lev,Ts))
else Bound i
| down lev t =
let val (h,ts) = strip_comb t
val h2 = (case h of Bound _ => down lev h | _ => h)
in if incr_bv(lev,0,tt)=t
then
Bound (lev)
else
list_comb(h2,map (down lev) ts)
end;
in Abs("",T,down 0 t) end;
(* add all loose bound variables in t to list is *)
fun add_lbnos(is,t) = add_loose_bnos(t,0,is);
(* check if the innermost quantifier that needs to be removed
has a body of type T; otherwise the expansion thm will fail later on
*)
fun type_test(T,lbnos,apsns) =
let val (_,U,_) = nth_elem(foldl Int.min (hd lbnos, tl lbnos), apsns)
in T=U end;
(*************************************************************************
Create a "split_pack".
thm : the relevant split-theorem, i.e. P(...) == rhs , where P(...)
is of the form
P( Const(key,...) $ t_1 $ ... $ t_n ) (e.g. key = "if")
T : type of P(...)
n : number of arguments expected by Const(key,...)
ts : list of arguments actually found
apsns : list of tuples of the form (T,U,pos), one tuple for each
abstraction that is encountered on the way to the position where
Const(key, ...) $ ... occurs, where
T : type of the variable bound by the abstraction
U : type of the abstraction's body
pos : "path" leading to the body of the abstraction
pos : "path" leading to the position where Const(key, ...) $ ... occurs.
TB : type of Const(key,...) $ t_1 $ ... $ t_n
t : the term Const(key,...) $ t_1 $ ... $ t_n
A split pack is a tuple of the form
(thm, apsns, pos, TB)
Note : apsns is reversed, so that the outermost quantifier's position
comes first ! If the terms in ts don't contain variables bound
by other than meta-quantifiers, apsns is empty, because no further
lifting is required before applying the split-theorem.
******************************************************************************)
fun mk_split_pack(thm,T,n,ts,apsns,pos,TB,t) =
if n > length ts then []
else let val lev = length apsns
val lbnos = foldl add_lbnos ([],take(n,ts))
val flbnos = filter (fn i => i < lev) lbnos
val tt = incr_bv(~lev,0,t)
in if null flbnos then [(thm,[],pos,TB,tt)]
else if type_test(T,flbnos,apsns) then [(thm, rev apsns,pos,TB,tt)]
else []
end;
(****************************************************************************
Recursively scans term for occurences of Const(key,...) $ ...
Returns a list of "split-packs" (one for each occurence of Const(key,...) )
cmap : association list of split-theorems that should be tried.
The elements have the format (key,(thm,T,n)) , where
key : the theorem's key constant ( Const(key,...) $ ... )
thm : the theorem itself
T : type of P( Const(key,...) $ ... )
n : number of arguments expected by Const(key,...)
Ts : types of parameters
t : the term to be scanned
******************************************************************************)
fun split_posns cmap Ts t =
let fun posns Ts pos apsns (Abs(_,T,t)) =
let val U = fastype_of1(T::Ts,t)
in posns (T::Ts) (0::pos) ((T,U,pos)::apsns) t end
| posns Ts pos apsns t =
let val (h,ts) = strip_comb t
fun iter((i,a),t) = (i+1, (posns Ts (i::pos) apsns t) @ a);
val a = case h of
Const(c,_) =>
(case assoc(cmap,c) of
Some(thm,T,n) => mk_split_pack(thm,T,n,ts,apsns,pos,type_of1(Ts,t),t)
| None => [])
| _ => []
in snd(foldl iter ((0,a),ts)) end
in posns Ts [] [] t end;
fun nth_subgoal i thm = nth_elem(i-1,prems_of thm);
fun shorter((_,ps,pos,_,_),(_,qs,qos,_,_)) =
let val ms = length ps and ns = length qs
in ms < ns orelse (ms = ns andalso order(length pos,length qos)) end;
(************************************************************
call split_posns with appropriate parameters
*************************************************************)
fun select cmap state i =
let val goali = nth_subgoal i state
val Ts = rev(map #2 (Logic.strip_params goali))
val _ $ t $ _ = Logic.strip_assums_concl goali;
in (Ts,t,sort shorter (split_posns cmap Ts t)) end;
(*************************************************************
instantiate lift theorem
if t is of the form
... ( Const(...,...) $ Abs( .... ) ) ...
then
P = %a. ... ( Const(...,...) $ a ) ...
where a has type T --> U
Ts : types of parameters
t : lefthand side of meta-equality in subgoal
the split theorem is applied to (see cmap)
T,U,pos : see mk_split_pack
state : current proof state
lift : the lift theorem
i : no. of subgoal
**************************************************************)
fun inst_lift Ts t (T,U,pos) state lift i =
let val sg = #sign(rep_thm state)
val tsig = #tsig(Sign.rep_sg sg)
val cntxt = mk_cntxt Ts t pos (T-->U) (#maxidx(rep_thm lift))
val cu = cterm_of sg cntxt
val uT = #T(rep_cterm cu)
val cP' = cterm_of sg (Var(P,uT))
val ixnTs = Type.typ_match tsig ([],(PT,uT));
val ixncTs = map (fn (x,y) => (x,ctyp_of sg y)) ixnTs;
in instantiate (ixncTs, [(cP',cu)]) lift end;
(*************************************************************
instantiate split theorem
Ts : types of parameters
t : lefthand side of meta-equality in subgoal
the split theorem is applied to (see cmap)
pos : "path" to the body of P(...)
thm : the split theorem
TB : type of body of P(...)
state : current proof state
**************************************************************)
fun inst_split Ts t tt thm TB state =
let val _$((Var(P2,PT2))$_)$_ = concl_of thm
val sg = #sign(rep_thm state)
val tsig = #tsig(Sign.rep_sg sg)
val cntxt = mk_cntxt_splitthm Ts t tt TB (#maxidx(rep_thm thm))
val cu = cterm_of sg cntxt
val uT = #T(rep_cterm cu)
val cP' = cterm_of sg (Var(P2,uT))
val ixnTs = Type.typ_match tsig ([],(PT2,uT));
val ixncTs = map (fn (x,y) => (x,ctyp_of sg y)) ixnTs;
in instantiate (ixncTs, [(cP',cu)]) thm end;
(*****************************************************************************
The split-tactic
splits : list of split-theorems to be tried
i : number of subgoal the tactic should be applied to
*****************************************************************************)
fun split_tac [] i = no_tac
| split_tac splits i =
let fun const(thm) =
(case concl_of thm of _$(t as _$lhs)$_ =>
(case strip_comb lhs of (Const(a,_),args) =>
(a,(thm,fastype_of t,length args))
| _ => error("Wrong format for split rule"))
| _ => error("Wrong format for split rule"))
val cmap = map const splits;
fun lift_tac Ts t p st = (rtac (inst_lift Ts t p st trlift i) i) st
fun lift_split_tac st = st |>
let val (Ts,t,splits) = select cmap st i
in case splits of
[] => no_tac
| (thm,apsns,pos,TB,tt)::_ =>
(case apsns of
[] => (fn state => state |>
rtac (inst_split Ts t tt thm TB state) i)
| p::_ => EVERY[lift_tac Ts t p,
rtac reflexive_thm (i+1),
lift_split_tac])
end
in COND (has_fewer_prems i) no_tac
(rtac iffD i THEN lift_split_tac)
end;
in split_tac end;
fun mk_case_split_asm_tac split_tac
(disjE,conjE,exE,contrapos,contrapos2,notnotD) =
let
(*****************************************************************************
The split-tactic for premises
splits : list of split-theorems to be tried
i : number of subgoal the tactic should be applied to
*****************************************************************************)
fun split_asm_tac [] = K no_tac
| split_asm_tac splits =
let fun const thm =
(case concl_of thm of Const ("Trueprop",_)$
(Const ("op =", _)$(Var _$t)$_) =>
(case strip_comb t of (Const(a,_),_) => a
| _ => error("Wrong format for split rule"))
| _ => error("Wrong format for split rule"))
val cname_list = map const splits;
fun is_case (a,_) = a mem cname_list;
fun tac (t,i) =
let val n = find_index (exists_Const is_case)
(Logic.strip_assums_hyp t);
fun first_prem_is_disj (Const ("==>", _) $ (Const ("Trueprop", _)
$ (Const ("op |", _) $ _ $ _ )) $ _ ) = true
| first_prem_is_disj (Const("all",_)$Abs(_,_,t)) =
first_prem_is_disj t
| first_prem_is_disj _ = false;
fun flat_prems_tac i = SUBGOAL (fn (t,i) =>
(if first_prem_is_disj t
then EVERY[etac disjE i, rotate_tac ~1 i,
rotate_tac ~1 (i+1),
flat_prems_tac (i+1)]
else all_tac)
THEN REPEAT (eresolve_tac [conjE,exE] i)
THEN REPEAT (dresolve_tac [notnotD] i)) i;
in if n<0 then no_tac else DETERM (EVERY'
[rotate_tac n, etac contrapos2,
split_tac splits,
rotate_tac ~1, etac contrapos, rotate_tac ~1,
flat_prems_tac] i)
end;
in SUBGOAL tac
end;
in split_asm_tac end;
in
fun mk_case_split_tac iffD = mk_case_split_tac_2 iffD (op <=) ;
fun mk_case_split_inside_tac iffD = mk_case_split_tac_2 iffD (op >=) ;
val mk_case_split_asm_tac = mk_case_split_asm_tac;
end;