(* Title: HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_reconstruct.ML
Author: Kong W. Susanto, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Author: Lawrence C. Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Author: Jasmin Blanchette, TU Muenchen
Copyright Cambridge University 2007
Proof reconstruction for Metis.
*)
signature METIS_RECONSTRUCT =
sig
type type_enc = ATP_Problem_Generate.type_enc
exception METIS of string * string
val hol_clause_from_metis :
Proof.context -> type_enc -> int Symtab.table
-> (string * term) list * (string * term) list -> Metis_Thm.thm -> term
val lookth : (Metis_Thm.thm * 'a) list -> Metis_Thm.thm -> 'a
val replay_one_inference :
Proof.context -> type_enc
-> (string * term) list * (string * term) list -> int Symtab.table
-> Metis_Thm.thm * Metis_Proof.inference -> (Metis_Thm.thm * thm) list
-> (Metis_Thm.thm * thm) list
val discharge_skolem_premises :
Proof.context -> (thm * term) option list -> thm -> thm
end;
structure Metis_Reconstruct : METIS_RECONSTRUCT =
struct
open ATP_Problem
open ATP_Problem_Generate
open ATP_Proof_Reconstruct
open Metis_Generate
exception METIS of string * string
fun atp_name_from_metis type_enc s =
case find_first (fn (_, (f, _)) => f type_enc = s) metis_name_table of
SOME ((s, _), (_, swap)) => (s, swap)
| _ => (s, false)
fun atp_term_from_metis type_enc (Metis_Term.Fn (s, tms)) =
let val (s, swap) = atp_name_from_metis type_enc (Metis_Name.toString s) in
ATerm ((s, []), tms |> map (atp_term_from_metis type_enc) |> swap ? rev)
end
| atp_term_from_metis _ (Metis_Term.Var s) =
ATerm ((Metis_Name.toString s, []), [])
fun hol_term_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab =
atp_term_from_metis type_enc #> term_from_atp ctxt false sym_tab NONE
fun atp_literal_from_metis type_enc (pos, atom) =
atom |> Metis_Term.Fn |> atp_term_from_metis type_enc
|> AAtom |> not pos ? mk_anot
fun atp_clause_from_metis _ [] = AAtom (ATerm ((tptp_false, []), []))
| atp_clause_from_metis type_enc lits =
lits |> map (atp_literal_from_metis type_enc) |> mk_aconns AOr
fun polish_hol_terms ctxt (lifted, old_skolems) =
map (reveal_lam_lifted lifted #> reveal_old_skolem_terms old_skolems)
#> Syntax.check_terms (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_pattern ctxt)
fun hol_clause_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed =
Metis_Thm.clause
#> Metis_LiteralSet.toList
#> atp_clause_from_metis type_enc
#> prop_from_atp ctxt false sym_tab
#> singleton (polish_hol_terms ctxt concealed)
fun hol_terms_from_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab fol_tms =
let val ts = map (hol_term_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab) fol_tms
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => " calling type inference:")
val _ = app (fn t => trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t)) ts
val ts' = ts |> polish_hol_terms ctxt concealed
val _ = app (fn t => trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => " final term: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t ^
" of type " ^ Syntax.string_of_typ ctxt (type_of t)))
ts'
in ts' end;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* FOL step Inference Rules *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*for debugging only*)
(*
fun print_thpair ctxt (fth,th) =
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "=============================================");
trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Metis: " ^ Metis_Thm.toString fth);
trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Isabelle: " ^ Display.string_of_thm_without_context th));
*)
fun lookth th_pairs fth =
the (AList.lookup (uncurry Metis_Thm.equal) th_pairs fth)
handle Option.Option =>
raise Fail ("Failed to find Metis theorem " ^ Metis_Thm.toString fth)
fun cterm_incr_types thy idx = cterm_of thy o (map_types (Logic.incr_tvar idx));
(* INFERENCE RULE: AXIOM *)
(* This causes variables to have an index of 1 by default. See also
"term_from_atp" in "ATP_Proof_Reconstruct". *)
val axiom_inference = Thm.incr_indexes 1 oo lookth
(* INFERENCE RULE: ASSUME *)
val EXCLUDED_MIDDLE = @{lemma "P ==> ~ P ==> False" by (rule notE)}
fun inst_excluded_middle thy i_atom =
let val th = EXCLUDED_MIDDLE
val [vx] = Term.add_vars (prop_of th) []
val substs = [(cterm_of thy (Var vx), cterm_of thy i_atom)]
in cterm_instantiate substs th end;
fun assume_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab atom =
inst_excluded_middle
(Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt)
(singleton (hol_terms_from_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab)
(Metis_Term.Fn atom))
(* INFERENCE RULE: INSTANTIATE (SUBST). Type instantiations are ignored. Trying
to reconstruct them admits new possibilities of errors, e.g. concerning
sorts. Instead we try to arrange that new TVars are distinct and that types
can be inferred from terms. *)
fun inst_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs fsubst th =
let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val i_th = lookth th_pairs th
val i_th_vars = Term.add_vars (prop_of i_th) []
fun find_var x = the (List.find (fn ((a,_),_) => a=x) i_th_vars)
fun subst_translation (x,y) =
let val v = find_var x
(* We call "polish_hol_terms" below. *)
val t = hol_term_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab y
in SOME (cterm_of thy (Var v), t) end
handle Option.Option =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "\"find_var\" failed for " ^ x ^
" in " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt i_th);
NONE)
| TYPE _ =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "\"hol_term_from_metis\" failed for " ^ x ^
" in " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt i_th);
NONE)
fun remove_typeinst (a, t) =
let val a = Metis_Name.toString a in
case unprefix_and_unascii schematic_var_prefix a of
SOME b => SOME (b, t)
| NONE =>
case unprefix_and_unascii tvar_prefix a of
SOME _ => NONE (* type instantiations are forbidden *)
| NONE => SOME (a, t) (* internal Metis var? *)
end
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => " isa th: " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt i_th)
val substs = map_filter remove_typeinst (Metis_Subst.toList fsubst)
val (vars, tms) =
ListPair.unzip (map_filter subst_translation substs)
||> polish_hol_terms ctxt concealed
val ctm_of = cterm_incr_types thy (1 + Thm.maxidx_of i_th)
val substs' = ListPair.zip (vars, map ctm_of tms)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
cat_lines ("subst_translations:" ::
(substs' |> map (fn (x, y) =>
Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (term_of x) ^ " |-> " ^
Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (term_of y)))));
in cterm_instantiate substs' i_th end
handle THM (msg, _, _) => raise METIS ("inst_inference", msg)
| ERROR msg => raise METIS ("inst_inference", msg)
(* INFERENCE RULE: RESOLVE *)
(*Increment the indexes of only the type variables*)
fun incr_type_indexes inc th =
let val tvs = Term.add_tvars (Thm.full_prop_of th) []
and thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th
fun inc_tvar ((a,i),s) = pairself (ctyp_of thy) (TVar ((a,i),s), TVar ((a,i+inc),s))
in Thm.instantiate (map inc_tvar tvs, []) th end;
(* Like RSN, but we rename apart only the type variables. Vars here typically
have an index of 1, and the use of RSN would increase this typically to 3.
Instantiations of those Vars could then fail. *)
fun resolve_inc_tyvars thy tha i thb =
let
val tha = incr_type_indexes (1 + Thm.maxidx_of thb) tha
fun aux (tha, thb) =
case Thm.bicompose false (false, tha, nprems_of tha) i thb
|> Seq.list_of |> distinct Thm.eq_thm of
[th] => th
| _ => raise THM ("resolve_inc_tyvars: unique result expected", i,
[tha, thb])
in
aux (tha, thb)
handle TERM z =>
(* The unifier, which is invoked from "Thm.bicompose", will sometimes
refuse to unify "?a::?'a" with "?a::?'b" or "?a::nat" and throw a
"TERM" exception (with "add_ffpair" as first argument). We then
perform unification of the types of variables by hand and try
again. We could do this the first time around but this error
occurs seldom and we don't want to break existing proofs in subtle
ways or slow them down needlessly. *)
case [] |> fold (Term.add_vars o prop_of) [tha, thb]
|> AList.group (op =)
|> maps (fn ((s, _), T :: Ts) =>
map (fn T' => (Free (s, T), Free (s, T'))) Ts)
|> rpair (Envir.empty ~1)
|-> fold (Pattern.unify thy)
|> Envir.type_env |> Vartab.dest
|> map (fn (x, (S, T)) =>
pairself (ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T)) of
[] => raise TERM z
| ps => (tha, thb) |> pairself (Drule.instantiate_normalize (ps, []))
|> aux
end
fun s_not (@{const Not} $ t) = t
| s_not t = HOLogic.mk_not t
fun simp_not_not (@{const Trueprop} $ t) = @{const Trueprop} $ simp_not_not t
| simp_not_not (@{const Not} $ t) = s_not (simp_not_not t)
| simp_not_not t = t
val normalize_literal = simp_not_not o Envir.eta_contract
(* Find the relative location of an untyped term within a list of terms as a
1-based index. Returns 0 in case of failure. *)
fun index_of_literal lit haystack =
let
fun match_lit normalize =
HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> normalize
#> curry Term.aconv_untyped (lit |> normalize)
in
(case find_index (match_lit I) haystack of
~1 => find_index (match_lit (simp_not_not o Envir.eta_contract)) haystack
| j => j) + 1
end
(* Permute a rule's premises to move the i-th premise to the last position. *)
fun make_last i th =
let val n = nprems_of th
in if 1 <= i andalso i <= n
then Thm.permute_prems (i-1) 1 th
else raise THM("select_literal", i, [th])
end;
(* Maps a rule that ends "... ==> P ==> False" to "... ==> ~ P" while avoiding
to create double negations. The "select" wrapper is a trick to ensure that
"P ==> ~ False ==> False" is rewritten to "P ==> False", not to "~ P". We
don't use this trick in general because it makes the proof object uglier than
necessary. FIXME. *)
fun negate_head th =
if exists (fn t => t aconv @{prop "~ False"}) (prems_of th) then
(th RS @{thm select_FalseI})
|> fold (rewrite_rule o single)
@{thms not_atomize_select atomize_not_select}
else
th |> fold (rewrite_rule o single) @{thms not_atomize atomize_not}
(* Maps the clause [P1,...Pn]==>False to [P1,...,P(i-1),P(i+1),...Pn] ==> ~P *)
val select_literal = negate_head oo make_last
fun resolve_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs atom th1 th2 =
let
val (i_th1, i_th2) = pairself (lookth th_pairs) (th1, th2)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
" isa th1 (pos): " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt i_th1 ^ "\n\
\ isa th2 (neg): " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt i_th2)
in
(* Trivial cases where one operand is type info *)
if Thm.eq_thm (TrueI, i_th1) then
i_th2
else if Thm.eq_thm (TrueI, i_th2) then
i_th1
else
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val i_atom =
singleton (hol_terms_from_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab)
(Metis_Term.Fn atom)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
" atom: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt i_atom)
in
case index_of_literal (s_not i_atom) (prems_of i_th1) of
0 =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Failed to find literal in \"th1\"");
i_th1)
| j1 =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => " index th1: " ^ string_of_int j1);
case index_of_literal i_atom (prems_of i_th2) of
0 =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Failed to find literal in \"th2\"");
i_th2)
| j2 =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => " index th2: " ^ string_of_int j2);
resolve_inc_tyvars thy (select_literal j1 i_th1) j2 i_th2
handle TERM (s, _) => raise METIS ("resolve_inference", s)))
end
end
(* INFERENCE RULE: REFL *)
val REFL_THM = Thm.incr_indexes 2 @{lemma "t ~= t ==> False" by simp}
val refl_x = cterm_of @{theory} (Var (hd (Term.add_vars (prop_of REFL_THM) [])));
val refl_idx = 1 + Thm.maxidx_of REFL_THM;
fun refl_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab t =
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val i_t =
singleton (hol_terms_from_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab) t
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => " term: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt i_t)
val c_t = cterm_incr_types thy refl_idx i_t
in cterm_instantiate [(refl_x, c_t)] REFL_THM end
(* INFERENCE RULE: EQUALITY *)
val subst_em = @{lemma "s = t ==> P s ==> ~ P t ==> False" by simp}
val ssubst_em = @{lemma "s = t ==> P t ==> ~ P s ==> False" by simp}
fun equality_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab (pos, atom) fp fr =
let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val m_tm = Metis_Term.Fn atom
val [i_atom, i_tm] =
hol_terms_from_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab [m_tm, fr]
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "sign of the literal: " ^ Bool.toString pos)
fun replace_item_list lx 0 (_::ls) = lx::ls
| replace_item_list lx i (l::ls) = l :: replace_item_list lx (i-1) ls
fun path_finder_fail tm ps t =
raise METIS ("equality_inference (path_finder)",
"path = " ^ space_implode " " (map string_of_int ps) ^
" isa-term: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt tm ^
(case t of
SOME t => " fol-term: " ^ Metis_Term.toString t
| NONE => ""))
fun path_finder tm [] _ = (tm, Bound 0)
| path_finder tm (p :: ps) (t as Metis_Term.Fn (s, ts)) =
let
val s = s |> Metis_Name.toString
|> perhaps (try (unprefix_and_unascii const_prefix
#> the #> unmangled_const_name #> hd))
in
if s = metis_predicator orelse s = predicator_name orelse
s = metis_systematic_type_tag orelse s = metis_ad_hoc_type_tag
orelse s = type_tag_name then
path_finder tm ps (nth ts p)
else if s = metis_app_op orelse s = app_op_name then
let
val (tm1, tm2) = dest_comb tm
val p' = p - (length ts - 2)
in
if p' = 0 then
path_finder tm1 ps (nth ts p) ||> (fn y => y $ tm2)
else
path_finder tm2 ps (nth ts p) ||> (fn y => tm1 $ y)
end
else
let
val (tm1, args) = strip_comb tm
val adjustment = length ts - length args
val p' = if adjustment > p then p else p - adjustment
val tm_p =
nth args p'
handle General.Subscript => path_finder_fail tm (p :: ps) (SOME t)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
"path_finder: " ^ string_of_int p ^ " " ^
Syntax.string_of_term ctxt tm_p)
val (r, t) = path_finder tm_p ps (nth ts p)
in (r, list_comb (tm1, replace_item_list t p' args)) end
end
| path_finder tm ps t = path_finder_fail tm ps (SOME t)
val (tm_subst, body) = path_finder i_atom fp m_tm
val tm_abs = Abs ("x", type_of tm_subst, body)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "abstraction: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt tm_abs)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "i_tm: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt i_tm)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "located term: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt tm_subst)
val imax = maxidx_of_term (i_tm $ tm_abs $ tm_subst) (*ill typed but gives right max*)
val subst' = Thm.incr_indexes (imax+1) (if pos then subst_em else ssubst_em)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "subst' " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt subst')
val eq_terms = map (pairself (cterm_of thy))
(ListPair.zip (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of subst'), [tm_abs, tm_subst, i_tm]))
in cterm_instantiate eq_terms subst' end;
val factor = Seq.hd o distinct_subgoals_tac
fun one_step ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs p =
case p of
(fol_th, Metis_Proof.Axiom _) => axiom_inference th_pairs fol_th |> factor
| (_, Metis_Proof.Assume f_atom) =>
assume_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab f_atom
| (_, Metis_Proof.Metis_Subst (f_subst, f_th1)) =>
inst_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs f_subst f_th1
|> factor
| (_, Metis_Proof.Resolve(f_atom, f_th1, f_th2)) =>
resolve_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs f_atom f_th1
f_th2
|> factor
| (_, Metis_Proof.Refl f_tm) =>
refl_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab f_tm
| (_, Metis_Proof.Equality (f_lit, f_p, f_r)) =>
equality_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab f_lit f_p f_r
fun flexflex_first_order th =
case Thm.tpairs_of th of
[] => th
| pairs =>
let val thy = theory_of_thm th
val (_, tenv) =
fold (Pattern.first_order_match thy) pairs (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
val t_pairs = map Meson.term_pair_of (Vartab.dest tenv)
val th' = Thm.instantiate ([], map (pairself (cterm_of thy)) t_pairs) th
in th' end
handle THM _ => th;
fun is_metis_literal_genuine (_, (s, _)) =
not (String.isPrefix class_prefix (Metis_Name.toString s))
fun is_isabelle_literal_genuine t =
case t of _ $ (Const (@{const_name Meson.skolem}, _) $ _) => false | _ => true
fun count p xs = fold (fn x => if p x then Integer.add 1 else I) xs 0
(* Seldomly needed hack. A Metis clause is represented as a set, so duplicate
disjuncts are impossible. In the Isabelle proof, in spite of efforts to
eliminate them, duplicates sometimes appear with slightly different (but
unifiable) types. *)
fun resynchronize ctxt fol_th th =
let
val num_metis_lits =
count is_metis_literal_genuine
(Metis_LiteralSet.toList (Metis_Thm.clause fol_th))
val num_isabelle_lits = count is_isabelle_literal_genuine (prems_of th)
in
if num_metis_lits >= num_isabelle_lits then
th
else
let
val (prems0, concl) = th |> prop_of |> Logic.strip_horn
val prems = prems0 |> map normalize_literal
|> distinct Term.aconv_untyped
val goal = Logic.list_implies (prems, concl)
val tac = cut_tac th 1
THEN rewrite_goals_tac @{thms not_not [THEN eq_reflection]}
THEN ALLGOALS assume_tac
in
if length prems = length prems0 then
raise METIS ("resynchronize", "Out of sync")
else
Goal.prove ctxt [] [] goal (K tac)
|> resynchronize ctxt fol_th
end
end
fun replay_one_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab (fol_th, inf)
th_pairs =
if not (null th_pairs) andalso
prop_of (snd (hd th_pairs)) aconv @{prop False} then
(* Isabelle sometimes identifies literals (premises) that are distinct in
Metis (e.g., because of type variables). We give the Isabelle proof the
benefice of the doubt. *)
th_pairs
else
let
val _ = trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => "=============================================")
val _ = trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => "METIS THM: " ^ Metis_Thm.toString fol_th)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => "INFERENCE: " ^ Metis_Proof.inferenceToString inf)
val th = one_step ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab th_pairs (fol_th, inf)
|> flexflex_first_order
|> resynchronize ctxt fol_th
val _ = trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => "ISABELLE THM: " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt th)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt
(fn () => "=============================================")
in (fol_th, th) :: th_pairs end
(* It is normally sufficient to apply "assume_tac" to unify the conclusion with
one of the premises. Unfortunately, this sometimes yields "Variable
?SK_a_b_c_x has two distinct types" errors. To avoid this, we instantiate the
variables before applying "assume_tac". Typical constraints are of the form
?SK_a_b_c_x SK_d_e_f_y ... SK_a_b_c_x ... SK_g_h_i_z =?= SK_a_b_c_x,
where the nonvariables are goal parameters. *)
fun unify_first_prem_with_concl thy i th =
let
val goal = Logic.get_goal (prop_of th) i |> Envir.beta_eta_contract
val prem = goal |> Logic.strip_assums_hyp |> hd
val concl = goal |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
fun pair_untyped_aconv (t1, t2) (u1, u2) =
Term.aconv_untyped (t1, u1) andalso Term.aconv_untyped (t2, u2)
fun add_terms tp inst =
if exists (pair_untyped_aconv tp) inst then inst
else tp :: map (apsnd (subst_atomic [tp])) inst
fun is_flex t =
case strip_comb t of
(Var _, args) => forall is_Bound args
| _ => false
fun unify_flex flex rigid =
case strip_comb flex of
(Var (z as (_, T)), args) =>
add_terms (Var z,
fold_rev absdummy (take (length args) (binder_types T)) rigid)
| _ => I
fun unify_potential_flex comb atom =
if is_flex comb then unify_flex comb atom
else if is_Var atom then add_terms (atom, comb)
else I
fun unify_terms (t, u) =
case (t, u) of
(t1 $ t2, u1 $ u2) =>
if is_flex t then unify_flex t u
else if is_flex u then unify_flex u t
else fold unify_terms [(t1, u1), (t2, u2)]
| (_ $ _, _) => unify_potential_flex t u
| (_, _ $ _) => unify_potential_flex u t
| (Var _, _) => add_terms (t, u)
| (_, Var _) => add_terms (u, t)
| _ => I
val t_inst =
[] |> try (unify_terms (prem, concl) #> map (pairself (cterm_of thy)))
|> the_default [] (* FIXME *)
in th |> cterm_instantiate t_inst end
val copy_prem = @{lemma "P ==> (P ==> P ==> Q) ==> Q" by fast}
fun copy_prems_tac [] ns i =
if forall (curry (op =) 1) ns then all_tac else copy_prems_tac (rev ns) [] i
| copy_prems_tac (1 :: ms) ns i =
rotate_tac 1 i THEN copy_prems_tac ms (1 :: ns) i
| copy_prems_tac (m :: ms) ns i =
etac copy_prem i THEN copy_prems_tac ms (m div 2 :: (m + 1) div 2 :: ns) i
(* Metis generates variables of the form _nnn. *)
val is_metis_fresh_variable = String.isPrefix "_"
fun instantiate_forall_tac thy t i st =
let
val params = Logic.strip_params (Logic.get_goal (prop_of st) i) |> rev
fun repair (t as (Var ((s, _), _))) =
(case find_index (fn (s', _) => s' = s) params of
~1 => t
| j => Bound j)
| repair (t $ u) =
(case (repair t, repair u) of
(t as Bound j, u as Bound k) =>
(* This is a rather subtle trick to repair the discrepancy between
the fully skolemized term that MESON gives us (where existentials
were pulled out) and the reality. *)
if k > j then t else t $ u
| (t, u) => t $ u)
| repair t = t
val t' = t |> repair |> fold (absdummy o snd) params
fun do_instantiate th =
case Term.add_vars (prop_of th) []
|> filter_out ((Meson_Clausify.is_zapped_var_name orf
is_metis_fresh_variable) o fst o fst) of
[] => th
| [var as (_, T)] =>
let
val var_binder_Ts = T |> binder_types |> take (length params) |> rev
val var_body_T = T |> funpow (length params) range_type
val tyenv =
Vartab.empty |> Type.raw_unifys (fastype_of t :: map snd params,
var_body_T :: var_binder_Ts)
val env =
Envir.Envir {maxidx = Vartab.fold (Integer.max o snd o fst) tyenv 0,
tenv = Vartab.empty, tyenv = tyenv}
val ty_inst =
Vartab.fold (fn (x, (S, T)) =>
cons (pairself (ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T)))
tyenv []
val t_inst =
[pairself (cterm_of thy o Envir.norm_term env) (Var var, t')]
in th |> Drule.instantiate_normalize (ty_inst, t_inst) end
| _ => raise Fail "expected a single non-zapped, non-Metis Var"
in
(DETERM (etac @{thm allE} i THEN rotate_tac ~1 i)
THEN PRIMITIVE do_instantiate) st
end
fun fix_exists_tac t =
etac @{thm exE} THEN' rename_tac [t |> dest_Var |> fst |> fst]
fun release_quantifier_tac thy (skolem, t) =
(if skolem then fix_exists_tac else instantiate_forall_tac thy) t
fun release_clusters_tac _ _ _ [] = K all_tac
| release_clusters_tac thy ax_counts substs
((ax_no, cluster_no) :: clusters) =
let
val cluster_of_var =
Meson_Clausify.cluster_of_zapped_var_name o fst o fst o dest_Var
fun in_right_cluster ((_, (cluster_no', _)), _) = cluster_no' = cluster_no
val cluster_substs =
substs
|> map_filter (fn (ax_no', (_, (_, tsubst))) =>
if ax_no' = ax_no then
tsubst |> map (apfst cluster_of_var)
|> filter (in_right_cluster o fst)
|> map (apfst snd)
|> SOME
else
NONE)
fun do_cluster_subst cluster_subst =
map (release_quantifier_tac thy) cluster_subst @ [rotate_tac 1]
val first_prem = find_index (fn (ax_no', _) => ax_no' = ax_no) substs
in
rotate_tac first_prem
THEN' (EVERY' (maps do_cluster_subst cluster_substs))
THEN' rotate_tac (~ first_prem - length cluster_substs)
THEN' release_clusters_tac thy ax_counts substs clusters
end
fun cluster_key ((ax_no, (cluster_no, index_no)), skolem) =
(ax_no, (cluster_no, (skolem, index_no)))
fun cluster_ord p =
prod_ord int_ord (prod_ord int_ord (prod_ord bool_ord int_ord))
(pairself cluster_key p)
val tysubst_ord =
list_ord (prod_ord Term_Ord.fast_indexname_ord
(prod_ord Term_Ord.sort_ord Term_Ord.typ_ord))
structure Int_Tysubst_Table =
Table(type key = int * (indexname * (sort * typ)) list
val ord = prod_ord int_ord tysubst_ord)
structure Int_Pair_Graph =
Graph(type key = int * int val ord = prod_ord int_ord int_ord)
fun shuffle_key (((axiom_no, (_, index_no)), _), _) = (axiom_no, index_no)
fun shuffle_ord p = prod_ord int_ord int_ord (pairself shuffle_key p)
(* Attempts to derive the theorem "False" from a theorem of the form
"P1 ==> ... ==> Pn ==> False", where the "Pi"s are to be discharged using the
specified axioms. The axioms have leading "All" and "Ex" quantifiers, which
must be eliminated first. *)
fun discharge_skolem_premises ctxt axioms prems_imp_false =
if prop_of prems_imp_false aconv @{prop False} then
prems_imp_false
else
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
fun match_term p =
let
val (tyenv, tenv) =
Pattern.first_order_match thy p (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
val tsubst =
tenv |> Vartab.dest
|> filter (Meson_Clausify.is_zapped_var_name o fst o fst)
|> sort (cluster_ord
o pairself (Meson_Clausify.cluster_of_zapped_var_name
o fst o fst))
|> map (Meson.term_pair_of
#> pairself (Envir.subst_term_types tyenv))
val tysubst = tyenv |> Vartab.dest
in (tysubst, tsubst) end
fun subst_info_for_prem subgoal_no prem =
case prem of
_ $ (Const (@{const_name Meson.skolem}, _) $ (_ $ t $ num)) =>
let val ax_no = HOLogic.dest_nat num in
(ax_no, (subgoal_no,
match_term (nth axioms ax_no |> the |> snd, t)))
end
| _ => raise TERM ("discharge_skolem_premises: Malformed premise",
[prem])
fun cluster_of_var_name skolem s =
case try Meson_Clausify.cluster_of_zapped_var_name s of
NONE => NONE
| SOME ((ax_no, (cluster_no, _)), skolem') =>
if skolem' = skolem andalso cluster_no > 0 then
SOME (ax_no, cluster_no)
else
NONE
fun clusters_in_term skolem t =
Term.add_var_names t [] |> map_filter (cluster_of_var_name skolem o fst)
fun deps_for_term_subst (var, t) =
case clusters_in_term false var of
[] => NONE
| [(ax_no, cluster_no)] =>
SOME ((ax_no, cluster_no),
clusters_in_term true t
|> cluster_no > 1 ? cons (ax_no, cluster_no - 1))
| _ => raise TERM ("discharge_skolem_premises: Expected Var", [var])
val prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems (prop_of prems_imp_false)
val substs = prems |> map2 subst_info_for_prem (1 upto length prems)
|> sort (int_ord o pairself fst)
val depss = maps (map_filter deps_for_term_subst o snd o snd o snd) substs
val clusters = maps (op ::) depss
val ordered_clusters =
Int_Pair_Graph.empty
|> fold Int_Pair_Graph.default_node (map (rpair ()) clusters)
|> fold Int_Pair_Graph.add_deps_acyclic depss
|> Int_Pair_Graph.topological_order
handle Int_Pair_Graph.CYCLES _ =>
error "Cannot replay Metis proof in Isabelle without \
\\"Hilbert_Choice\"."
val ax_counts =
Int_Tysubst_Table.empty
|> fold (fn (ax_no, (_, (tysubst, _))) =>
Int_Tysubst_Table.map_default ((ax_no, tysubst), 0)
(Integer.add 1)) substs
|> Int_Tysubst_Table.dest
val needed_axiom_props =
0 upto length axioms - 1 ~~ axioms
|> map_filter (fn (_, NONE) => NONE
| (ax_no, SOME (_, t)) =>
if exists (fn ((ax_no', _), n) =>
ax_no' = ax_no andalso n > 0)
ax_counts then
SOME t
else
NONE)
val outer_param_names =
[] |> fold Term.add_var_names needed_axiom_props
|> filter (Meson_Clausify.is_zapped_var_name o fst)
|> map (`(Meson_Clausify.cluster_of_zapped_var_name o fst))
|> filter (fn (((_, (cluster_no, _)), skolem), _) =>
cluster_no = 0 andalso skolem)
|> sort shuffle_ord |> map (fst o snd)
(* for debugging only:
fun string_for_subst_info (ax_no, (subgoal_no, (tysubst, tsubst))) =
"ax: " ^ string_of_int ax_no ^ "; asm: " ^ string_of_int subgoal_no ^
"; tysubst: " ^ PolyML.makestring tysubst ^ "; tsubst: {" ^
commas (map ((fn (s, t) => s ^ " |-> " ^ t)
o pairself (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt)) tsubst) ^ "}"
val _ = tracing ("ORDERED CLUSTERS: " ^ PolyML.makestring ordered_clusters)
val _ = tracing ("AXIOM COUNTS: " ^ PolyML.makestring ax_counts)
val _ = tracing ("OUTER PARAMS: " ^ PolyML.makestring outer_param_names)
val _ = tracing ("SUBSTS (" ^ string_of_int (length substs) ^ "):\n" ^
cat_lines (map string_for_subst_info substs))
*)
fun cut_and_ex_tac axiom =
cut_tac axiom 1
THEN TRY (REPEAT_ALL_NEW (etac @{thm exE}) 1)
fun rotation_for_subgoal i =
find_index (fn (_, (subgoal_no, _)) => subgoal_no = i) substs
in
Goal.prove ctxt [] [] @{prop False}
(K (DETERM (EVERY (map (cut_and_ex_tac o fst o the o nth axioms o fst
o fst) ax_counts)
THEN rename_tac outer_param_names 1
THEN copy_prems_tac (map snd ax_counts) [] 1)
THEN release_clusters_tac thy ax_counts substs ordered_clusters 1
THEN match_tac [prems_imp_false] 1
THEN ALLGOALS (fn i =>
rtac @{thm Meson.skolem_COMBK_I} i
THEN rotate_tac (rotation_for_subgoal i) i
THEN PRIMITIVE (unify_first_prem_with_concl thy i)
THEN assume_tac i
THEN flexflex_tac)))
handle ERROR _ =>
error ("Cannot replay Metis proof in Isabelle:\n\
\Error when discharging Skolem assumptions.")
end
end;