moved theorems from AFP/Affine_Arithmetic and AFP/Ordinary_Differential_Equations
(* Author: L C Paulson, University of Cambridge
Author: Amine Chaieb, University of Cambridge
Author: Robert Himmelmann, TU Muenchen
Author: Brian Huffman, Portland State University
*)
section \<open>Elementary topology in Euclidean space.\<close>
theory Topology_Euclidean_Space
imports
"HOL-Library.Indicator_Function"
"HOL-Library.Countable_Set"
"HOL-Library.FuncSet"
Linear_Algebra
Norm_Arith
begin
(* FIXME: move elsewhere *)
lemma Times_eq_image_sum:
fixes S :: "'a :: comm_monoid_add set" and T :: "'b :: comm_monoid_add set"
shows "S \<times> T = {u + v |u v. u \<in> (\<lambda>x. (x, 0)) ` S \<and> v \<in> Pair 0 ` T}"
by force
lemma halfspace_Int_eq:
"{x. a \<bullet> x \<le> b} \<inter> {x. b \<le> a \<bullet> x} = {x. a \<bullet> x = b}"
"{x. b \<le> a \<bullet> x} \<inter> {x. a \<bullet> x \<le> b} = {x. a \<bullet> x = b}"
by auto
definition (in monoid_add) support_on :: "'b set \<Rightarrow> ('b \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'b set"
where "support_on s f = {x\<in>s. f x \<noteq> 0}"
lemma in_support_on: "x \<in> support_on s f \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> s \<and> f x \<noteq> 0"
by (simp add: support_on_def)
lemma support_on_simps[simp]:
"support_on {} f = {}"
"support_on (insert x s) f =
(if f x = 0 then support_on s f else insert x (support_on s f))"
"support_on (s \<union> t) f = support_on s f \<union> support_on t f"
"support_on (s \<inter> t) f = support_on s f \<inter> support_on t f"
"support_on (s - t) f = support_on s f - support_on t f"
"support_on (f ` s) g = f ` (support_on s (g \<circ> f))"
unfolding support_on_def by auto
lemma support_on_cong:
"(\<And>x. x \<in> s \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> g x = 0) \<Longrightarrow> support_on s f = support_on s g"
by (auto simp: support_on_def)
lemma support_on_if: "a \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> support_on A (\<lambda>x. if P x then a else 0) = {x\<in>A. P x}"
by (auto simp: support_on_def)
lemma support_on_if_subset: "support_on A (\<lambda>x. if P x then a else 0) \<subseteq> {x \<in> A. P x}"
by (auto simp: support_on_def)
lemma finite_support[intro]: "finite s \<Longrightarrow> finite (support_on s f)"
unfolding support_on_def by auto
(* TODO: is supp_sum really needed? TODO: Generalize to Finite_Set.fold *)
definition (in comm_monoid_add) supp_sum :: "('b \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'b set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where "supp_sum f s = (\<Sum>x\<in>support_on s f. f x)"
lemma supp_sum_empty[simp]: "supp_sum f {} = 0"
unfolding supp_sum_def by auto
lemma supp_sum_insert[simp]:
"finite (support_on s f) \<Longrightarrow>
supp_sum f (insert x s) = (if x \<in> s then supp_sum f s else f x + supp_sum f s)"
by (simp add: supp_sum_def in_support_on insert_absorb)
lemma supp_sum_divide_distrib: "supp_sum f A / (r::'a::field) = supp_sum (\<lambda>n. f n / r) A"
by (cases "r = 0")
(auto simp: supp_sum_def sum_divide_distrib intro!: sum.cong support_on_cong)
(*END OF SUPPORT, ETC.*)
lemma image_affinity_interval:
fixes c :: "'a::ordered_real_vector"
shows "((\<lambda>x. m *\<^sub>R x + c) ` {a..b}) = (if {a..b}={} then {}
else if 0 <= m then {m *\<^sub>R a + c .. m *\<^sub>R b + c}
else {m *\<^sub>R b + c .. m *\<^sub>R a + c})"
apply (case_tac "m=0", force)
apply (auto simp: scaleR_left_mono)
apply (rule_tac x="inverse m *\<^sub>R (x-c)" in rev_image_eqI, auto simp: pos_le_divideR_eq le_diff_eq scaleR_left_mono_neg)
apply (metis diff_le_eq inverse_inverse_eq order.not_eq_order_implies_strict pos_le_divideR_eq positive_imp_inverse_positive)
apply (rule_tac x="inverse m *\<^sub>R (x-c)" in rev_image_eqI, auto simp: not_le neg_le_divideR_eq diff_le_eq)
using le_diff_eq scaleR_le_cancel_left_neg
apply fastforce
done
lemma countable_PiE:
"finite I \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> countable (F i)) \<Longrightarrow> countable (Pi\<^sub>E I F)"
by (induct I arbitrary: F rule: finite_induct) (auto simp: PiE_insert_eq)
lemma open_sums:
fixes T :: "('b::real_normed_vector) set"
assumes "open S \<or> open T"
shows "open (\<Union>x\<in> S. \<Union>y \<in> T. {x + y})"
using assms
proof
assume S: "open S"
show ?thesis
proof (clarsimp simp: open_dist)
fix x y
assume "x \<in> S" "y \<in> T"
with S obtain e where "e > 0" and e: "\<And>x'. dist x' x < e \<Longrightarrow> x' \<in> S"
by (auto simp: open_dist)
then have "\<And>z. dist z (x + y) < e \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>S. \<exists>y\<in>T. z = x + y"
by (metis \<open>y \<in> T\<close> diff_add_cancel dist_add_cancel2)
then show "\<exists>e>0. \<forall>z. dist z (x + y) < e \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>S. \<exists>y\<in>T. z = x + y)"
using \<open>0 < e\<close> \<open>x \<in> S\<close> by blast
qed
next
assume T: "open T"
show ?thesis
proof (clarsimp simp: open_dist)
fix x y
assume "x \<in> S" "y \<in> T"
with T obtain e where "e > 0" and e: "\<And>x'. dist x' y < e \<Longrightarrow> x' \<in> T"
by (auto simp: open_dist)
then have "\<And>z. dist z (x + y) < e \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>S. \<exists>y\<in>T. z = x + y"
by (metis \<open>x \<in> S\<close> add_diff_cancel_left' add_diff_eq diff_diff_add dist_norm)
then show "\<exists>e>0. \<forall>z. dist z (x + y) < e \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>S. \<exists>y\<in>T. z = x + y)"
using \<open>0 < e\<close> \<open>y \<in> T\<close> by blast
qed
qed
subsection \<open>Topological Basis\<close>
context topological_space
begin
definition "topological_basis B \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>b\<in>B. open b) \<and> (\<forall>x. open x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>B'. B' \<subseteq> B \<and> \<Union>B' = x))"
lemma topological_basis:
"topological_basis B \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. open x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>B'. B' \<subseteq> B \<and> \<Union>B' = x))"
unfolding topological_basis_def
apply safe
apply fastforce
apply fastforce
apply (erule_tac x=x in allE, simp)
apply (rule_tac x="{x}" in exI, auto)
done
lemma topological_basis_iff:
assumes "\<And>B'. B' \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> open B'"
shows "topological_basis B \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>O'. open O' \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>O'. \<exists>B'\<in>B. x \<in> B' \<and> B' \<subseteq> O'))"
(is "_ \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof safe
fix O' and x::'a
assume H: "topological_basis B" "open O'" "x \<in> O'"
then have "(\<exists>B'\<subseteq>B. \<Union>B' = O')" by (simp add: topological_basis_def)
then obtain B' where "B' \<subseteq> B" "O' = \<Union>B'" by auto
then show "\<exists>B'\<in>B. x \<in> B' \<and> B' \<subseteq> O'" using H by auto
next
assume H: ?rhs
show "topological_basis B"
using assms unfolding topological_basis_def
proof safe
fix O' :: "'a set"
assume "open O'"
with H obtain f where "\<forall>x\<in>O'. f x \<in> B \<and> x \<in> f x \<and> f x \<subseteq> O'"
by (force intro: bchoice simp: Bex_def)
then show "\<exists>B'\<subseteq>B. \<Union>B' = O'"
by (auto intro: exI[where x="{f x |x. x \<in> O'}"])
qed
qed
lemma topological_basisI:
assumes "\<And>B'. B' \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> open B'"
and "\<And>O' x. open O' \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> O' \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>B'\<in>B. x \<in> B' \<and> B' \<subseteq> O'"
shows "topological_basis B"
using assms by (subst topological_basis_iff) auto
lemma topological_basisE:
fixes O'
assumes "topological_basis B"
and "open O'"
and "x \<in> O'"
obtains B' where "B' \<in> B" "x \<in> B'" "B' \<subseteq> O'"
proof atomize_elim
from assms have "\<And>B'. B'\<in>B \<Longrightarrow> open B'"
by (simp add: topological_basis_def)
with topological_basis_iff assms
show "\<exists>B'. B' \<in> B \<and> x \<in> B' \<and> B' \<subseteq> O'"
using assms by (simp add: Bex_def)
qed
lemma topological_basis_open:
assumes "topological_basis B"
and "X \<in> B"
shows "open X"
using assms by (simp add: topological_basis_def)
lemma topological_basis_imp_subbasis:
assumes B: "topological_basis B"
shows "open = generate_topology B"
proof (intro ext iffI)
fix S :: "'a set"
assume "open S"
with B obtain B' where "B' \<subseteq> B" "S = \<Union>B'"
unfolding topological_basis_def by blast
then show "generate_topology B S"
by (auto intro: generate_topology.intros dest: topological_basis_open)
next
fix S :: "'a set"
assume "generate_topology B S"
then show "open S"
by induct (auto dest: topological_basis_open[OF B])
qed
lemma basis_dense:
fixes B :: "'a set set"
and f :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assumes "topological_basis B"
and choosefrom_basis: "\<And>B'. B' \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> f B' \<in> B'"
shows "\<forall>X. open X \<longrightarrow> X \<noteq> {} \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>B' \<in> B. f B' \<in> X)"
proof (intro allI impI)
fix X :: "'a set"
assume "open X" and "X \<noteq> {}"
from topological_basisE[OF \<open>topological_basis B\<close> \<open>open X\<close> choosefrom_basis[OF \<open>X \<noteq> {}\<close>]]
obtain B' where "B' \<in> B" "f X \<in> B'" "B' \<subseteq> X" .
then show "\<exists>B'\<in>B. f B' \<in> X"
by (auto intro!: choosefrom_basis)
qed
end
lemma topological_basis_prod:
assumes A: "topological_basis A"
and B: "topological_basis B"
shows "topological_basis ((\<lambda>(a, b). a \<times> b) ` (A \<times> B))"
unfolding topological_basis_def
proof (safe, simp_all del: ex_simps add: subset_image_iff ex_simps(1)[symmetric])
fix S :: "('a \<times> 'b) set"
assume "open S"
then show "\<exists>X\<subseteq>A \<times> B. (\<Union>(a,b)\<in>X. a \<times> b) = S"
proof (safe intro!: exI[of _ "{x\<in>A \<times> B. fst x \<times> snd x \<subseteq> S}"])
fix x y
assume "(x, y) \<in> S"
from open_prod_elim[OF \<open>open S\<close> this]
obtain a b where a: "open a""x \<in> a" and b: "open b" "y \<in> b" and "a \<times> b \<subseteq> S"
by (metis mem_Sigma_iff)
moreover
from A a obtain A0 where "A0 \<in> A" "x \<in> A0" "A0 \<subseteq> a"
by (rule topological_basisE)
moreover
from B b obtain B0 where "B0 \<in> B" "y \<in> B0" "B0 \<subseteq> b"
by (rule topological_basisE)
ultimately show "(x, y) \<in> (\<Union>(a, b)\<in>{X \<in> A \<times> B. fst X \<times> snd X \<subseteq> S}. a \<times> b)"
by (intro UN_I[of "(A0, B0)"]) auto
qed auto
qed (metis A B topological_basis_open open_Times)
subsection \<open>Countable Basis\<close>
locale countable_basis =
fixes B :: "'a::topological_space set set"
assumes is_basis: "topological_basis B"
and countable_basis: "countable B"
begin
lemma open_countable_basis_ex:
assumes "open X"
shows "\<exists>B' \<subseteq> B. X = \<Union>B'"
using assms countable_basis is_basis
unfolding topological_basis_def by blast
lemma open_countable_basisE:
assumes "open X"
obtains B' where "B' \<subseteq> B" "X = \<Union>B'"
using assms open_countable_basis_ex
by atomize_elim simp
lemma countable_dense_exists:
"\<exists>D::'a set. countable D \<and> (\<forall>X. open X \<longrightarrow> X \<noteq> {} \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>d \<in> D. d \<in> X))"
proof -
let ?f = "(\<lambda>B'. SOME x. x \<in> B')"
have "countable (?f ` B)" using countable_basis by simp
with basis_dense[OF is_basis, of ?f] show ?thesis
by (intro exI[where x="?f ` B"]) (metis (mono_tags) all_not_in_conv imageI someI)
qed
lemma countable_dense_setE:
obtains D :: "'a set"
where "countable D" "\<And>X. open X \<Longrightarrow> X \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>d \<in> D. d \<in> X"
using countable_dense_exists by blast
end
lemma (in first_countable_topology) first_countable_basisE:
obtains A where "countable A" "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> a" "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> open a"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S)"
using first_countable_basis[of x]
apply atomize_elim
apply (elim exE)
apply (rule_tac x="range A" in exI, auto)
done
lemma (in first_countable_topology) first_countable_basis_Int_stableE:
obtains A where "countable A" "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> a" "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> open a"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S)"
"\<And>a b. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a \<inter> b \<in> A"
proof atomize_elim
obtain A' where A':
"countable A'"
"\<And>a. a \<in> A' \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> a"
"\<And>a. a \<in> A' \<Longrightarrow> open a"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a\<in>A'. a \<subseteq> S"
by (rule first_countable_basisE) blast
define A where [abs_def]:
"A = (\<lambda>N. \<Inter>((\<lambda>n. from_nat_into A' n) ` N)) ` (Collect finite::nat set set)"
then show "\<exists>A. countable A \<and> (\<forall>a. a \<in> A \<longrightarrow> x \<in> a) \<and> (\<forall>a. a \<in> A \<longrightarrow> open a) \<and>
(\<forall>S. open S \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S)) \<and> (\<forall>a b. a \<in> A \<longrightarrow> b \<in> A \<longrightarrow> a \<inter> b \<in> A)"
proof (safe intro!: exI[where x=A])
show "countable A"
unfolding A_def by (intro countable_image countable_Collect_finite)
fix a
assume "a \<in> A"
then show "x \<in> a" "open a"
using A'(4)[OF open_UNIV] by (auto simp: A_def intro: A' from_nat_into)
next
let ?int = "\<lambda>N. \<Inter>(from_nat_into A' ` N)"
fix a b
assume "a \<in> A" "b \<in> A"
then obtain N M where "a = ?int N" "b = ?int M" "finite (N \<union> M)"
by (auto simp: A_def)
then show "a \<inter> b \<in> A"
by (auto simp: A_def intro!: image_eqI[where x="N \<union> M"])
next
fix S
assume "open S" "x \<in> S"
then obtain a where a: "a\<in>A'" "a \<subseteq> S" using A' by blast
then show "\<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S" using a A'
by (intro bexI[where x=a]) (auto simp: A_def intro: image_eqI[where x="{to_nat_on A' a}"])
qed
qed
lemma (in topological_space) first_countableI:
assumes "countable A"
and 1: "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> a" "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> open a"
and 2: "\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S"
shows "\<exists>A::nat \<Rightarrow> 'a set. (\<forall>i. x \<in> A i \<and> open (A i)) \<and> (\<forall>S. open S \<and> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>i. A i \<subseteq> S))"
proof (safe intro!: exI[of _ "from_nat_into A"])
fix i
have "A \<noteq> {}" using 2[of UNIV] by auto
show "x \<in> from_nat_into A i" "open (from_nat_into A i)"
using range_from_nat_into_subset[OF \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close>] 1 by auto
next
fix S
assume "open S" "x\<in>S" from 2[OF this]
show "\<exists>i. from_nat_into A i \<subseteq> S"
using subset_range_from_nat_into[OF \<open>countable A\<close>] by auto
qed
instance prod :: (first_countable_topology, first_countable_topology) first_countable_topology
proof
fix x :: "'a \<times> 'b"
obtain A where A:
"countable A"
"\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> fst x \<in> a"
"\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> open a"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> fst x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a\<in>A. a \<subseteq> S"
by (rule first_countable_basisE[of "fst x"]) blast
obtain B where B:
"countable B"
"\<And>a. a \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> snd x \<in> a"
"\<And>a. a \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> open a"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> snd x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a\<in>B. a \<subseteq> S"
by (rule first_countable_basisE[of "snd x"]) blast
show "\<exists>A::nat \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'b) set.
(\<forall>i. x \<in> A i \<and> open (A i)) \<and> (\<forall>S. open S \<and> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>i. A i \<subseteq> S))"
proof (rule first_countableI[of "(\<lambda>(a, b). a \<times> b) ` (A \<times> B)"], safe)
fix a b
assume x: "a \<in> A" "b \<in> B"
with A(2, 3)[of a] B(2, 3)[of b] show "x \<in> a \<times> b" and "open (a \<times> b)"
unfolding mem_Times_iff
by (auto intro: open_Times)
next
fix S
assume "open S" "x \<in> S"
then obtain a' b' where a'b': "open a'" "open b'" "x \<in> a' \<times> b'" "a' \<times> b' \<subseteq> S"
by (rule open_prod_elim)
moreover
from a'b' A(4)[of a'] B(4)[of b']
obtain a b where "a \<in> A" "a \<subseteq> a'" "b \<in> B" "b \<subseteq> b'"
by auto
ultimately
show "\<exists>a\<in>(\<lambda>(a, b). a \<times> b) ` (A \<times> B). a \<subseteq> S"
by (auto intro!: bexI[of _ "a \<times> b"] bexI[of _ a] bexI[of _ b])
qed (simp add: A B)
qed
class second_countable_topology = topological_space +
assumes ex_countable_subbasis:
"\<exists>B::'a::topological_space set set. countable B \<and> open = generate_topology B"
begin
lemma ex_countable_basis: "\<exists>B::'a set set. countable B \<and> topological_basis B"
proof -
from ex_countable_subbasis obtain B where B: "countable B" "open = generate_topology B"
by blast
let ?B = "Inter ` {b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B }"
show ?thesis
proof (intro exI conjI)
show "countable ?B"
by (intro countable_image countable_Collect_finite_subset B)
{
fix S
assume "open S"
then have "\<exists>B'\<subseteq>{b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B}. (\<Union>b\<in>B'. \<Inter>b) = S"
unfolding B
proof induct
case UNIV
show ?case by (intro exI[of _ "{{}}"]) simp
next
case (Int a b)
then obtain x y where x: "a = UNION x Inter" "\<And>i. i \<in> x \<Longrightarrow> finite i \<and> i \<subseteq> B"
and y: "b = UNION y Inter" "\<And>i. i \<in> y \<Longrightarrow> finite i \<and> i \<subseteq> B"
by blast
show ?case
unfolding x y Int_UN_distrib2
by (intro exI[of _ "{i \<union> j| i j. i \<in> x \<and> j \<in> y}"]) (auto dest: x(2) y(2))
next
case (UN K)
then have "\<forall>k\<in>K. \<exists>B'\<subseteq>{b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B}. UNION B' Inter = k" by auto
then obtain k where
"\<forall>ka\<in>K. k ka \<subseteq> {b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B} \<and> UNION (k ka) Inter = ka"
unfolding bchoice_iff ..
then show "\<exists>B'\<subseteq>{b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B}. UNION B' Inter = \<Union>K"
by (intro exI[of _ "UNION K k"]) auto
next
case (Basis S)
then show ?case
by (intro exI[of _ "{{S}}"]) auto
qed
then have "(\<exists>B'\<subseteq>Inter ` {b. finite b \<and> b \<subseteq> B}. \<Union>B' = S)"
unfolding subset_image_iff by blast }
then show "topological_basis ?B"
unfolding topological_space_class.topological_basis_def
by (safe intro!: topological_space_class.open_Inter)
(simp_all add: B generate_topology.Basis subset_eq)
qed
qed
end
sublocale second_countable_topology <
countable_basis "SOME B. countable B \<and> topological_basis B"
using someI_ex[OF ex_countable_basis]
by unfold_locales safe
instance prod :: (second_countable_topology, second_countable_topology) second_countable_topology
proof
obtain A :: "'a set set" where "countable A" "topological_basis A"
using ex_countable_basis by auto
moreover
obtain B :: "'b set set" where "countable B" "topological_basis B"
using ex_countable_basis by auto
ultimately show "\<exists>B::('a \<times> 'b) set set. countable B \<and> open = generate_topology B"
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "(\<lambda>(a, b). a \<times> b) ` (A \<times> B)"] topological_basis_prod
topological_basis_imp_subbasis)
qed
instance second_countable_topology \<subseteq> first_countable_topology
proof
fix x :: 'a
define B :: "'a set set" where "B = (SOME B. countable B \<and> topological_basis B)"
then have B: "countable B" "topological_basis B"
using countable_basis is_basis
by (auto simp: countable_basis is_basis)
then show "\<exists>A::nat \<Rightarrow> 'a set.
(\<forall>i. x \<in> A i \<and> open (A i)) \<and> (\<forall>S. open S \<and> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>i. A i \<subseteq> S))"
by (intro first_countableI[of "{b\<in>B. x \<in> b}"])
(fastforce simp: topological_space_class.topological_basis_def)+
qed
instance nat :: second_countable_topology
proof
show "\<exists>B::nat set set. countable B \<and> open = generate_topology B"
by (intro exI[of _ "range lessThan \<union> range greaterThan"]) (auto simp: open_nat_def)
qed
lemma countable_separating_set_linorder1:
shows "\<exists>B::('a::{linorder_topology, second_countable_topology} set). countable B \<and> (\<forall>x y. x < y \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>b \<in> B. x < b \<and> b \<le> y))"
proof -
obtain A::"'a set set" where "countable A" "topological_basis A" using ex_countable_basis by auto
define B1 where "B1 = {(LEAST x. x \<in> U)| U. U \<in> A}"
then have "countable B1" using \<open>countable A\<close> by (simp add: Setcompr_eq_image)
define B2 where "B2 = {(SOME x. x \<in> U)| U. U \<in> A}"
then have "countable B2" using \<open>countable A\<close> by (simp add: Setcompr_eq_image)
have "\<exists>b \<in> B1 \<union> B2. x < b \<and> b \<le> y" if "x < y" for x y
proof (cases)
assume "\<exists>z. x < z \<and> z < y"
then obtain z where z: "x < z \<and> z < y" by auto
define U where "U = {x<..<y}"
then have "open U" by simp
moreover have "z \<in> U" using z U_def by simp
ultimately obtain V where "V \<in> A" "z \<in> V" "V \<subseteq> U" using topological_basisE[OF \<open>topological_basis A\<close>] by auto
define w where "w = (SOME x. x \<in> V)"
then have "w \<in> V" using \<open>z \<in> V\<close> by (metis someI2)
then have "x < w \<and> w \<le> y" using \<open>w \<in> V\<close> \<open>V \<subseteq> U\<close> U_def by fastforce
moreover have "w \<in> B1 \<union> B2" using w_def B2_def \<open>V \<in> A\<close> by auto
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
next
assume "\<not>(\<exists>z. x < z \<and> z < y)"
then have *: "\<And>z. z > x \<Longrightarrow> z \<ge> y" by auto
define U where "U = {x<..}"
then have "open U" by simp
moreover have "y \<in> U" using \<open>x < y\<close> U_def by simp
ultimately obtain "V" where "V \<in> A" "y \<in> V" "V \<subseteq> U" using topological_basisE[OF \<open>topological_basis A\<close>] by auto
have "U = {y..}" unfolding U_def using * \<open>x < y\<close> by auto
then have "V \<subseteq> {y..}" using \<open>V \<subseteq> U\<close> by simp
then have "(LEAST w. w \<in> V) = y" using \<open>y \<in> V\<close> by (meson Least_equality atLeast_iff subsetCE)
then have "y \<in> B1 \<union> B2" using \<open>V \<in> A\<close> B1_def by auto
moreover have "x < y \<and> y \<le> y" using \<open>x < y\<close> by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
qed
moreover have "countable (B1 \<union> B2)" using \<open>countable B1\<close> \<open>countable B2\<close> by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
qed
lemma countable_separating_set_linorder2:
shows "\<exists>B::('a::{linorder_topology, second_countable_topology} set). countable B \<and> (\<forall>x y. x < y \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>b \<in> B. x \<le> b \<and> b < y))"
proof -
obtain A::"'a set set" where "countable A" "topological_basis A" using ex_countable_basis by auto
define B1 where "B1 = {(GREATEST x. x \<in> U) | U. U \<in> A}"
then have "countable B1" using \<open>countable A\<close> by (simp add: Setcompr_eq_image)
define B2 where "B2 = {(SOME x. x \<in> U)| U. U \<in> A}"
then have "countable B2" using \<open>countable A\<close> by (simp add: Setcompr_eq_image)
have "\<exists>b \<in> B1 \<union> B2. x \<le> b \<and> b < y" if "x < y" for x y
proof (cases)
assume "\<exists>z. x < z \<and> z < y"
then obtain z where z: "x < z \<and> z < y" by auto
define U where "U = {x<..<y}"
then have "open U" by simp
moreover have "z \<in> U" using z U_def by simp
ultimately obtain "V" where "V \<in> A" "z \<in> V" "V \<subseteq> U" using topological_basisE[OF \<open>topological_basis A\<close>] by auto
define w where "w = (SOME x. x \<in> V)"
then have "w \<in> V" using \<open>z \<in> V\<close> by (metis someI2)
then have "x \<le> w \<and> w < y" using \<open>w \<in> V\<close> \<open>V \<subseteq> U\<close> U_def by fastforce
moreover have "w \<in> B1 \<union> B2" using w_def B2_def \<open>V \<in> A\<close> by auto
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
next
assume "\<not>(\<exists>z. x < z \<and> z < y)"
then have *: "\<And>z. z < y \<Longrightarrow> z \<le> x" using leI by blast
define U where "U = {..<y}"
then have "open U" by simp
moreover have "x \<in> U" using \<open>x < y\<close> U_def by simp
ultimately obtain "V" where "V \<in> A" "x \<in> V" "V \<subseteq> U" using topological_basisE[OF \<open>topological_basis A\<close>] by auto
have "U = {..x}" unfolding U_def using * \<open>x < y\<close> by auto
then have "V \<subseteq> {..x}" using \<open>V \<subseteq> U\<close> by simp
then have "(GREATEST x. x \<in> V) = x" using \<open>x \<in> V\<close> by (meson Greatest_equality atMost_iff subsetCE)
then have "x \<in> B1 \<union> B2" using \<open>V \<in> A\<close> B1_def by auto
moreover have "x \<le> x \<and> x < y" using \<open>x < y\<close> by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
qed
moreover have "countable (B1 \<union> B2)" using \<open>countable B1\<close> \<open>countable B2\<close> by simp
ultimately show ?thesis by auto
qed
lemma countable_separating_set_dense_linorder:
shows "\<exists>B::('a::{linorder_topology, dense_linorder, second_countable_topology} set). countable B \<and> (\<forall>x y. x < y \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>b \<in> B. x < b \<and> b < y))"
proof -
obtain B::"'a set" where B: "countable B" "\<And>x y. x < y \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>b \<in> B. x < b \<and> b \<le> y)"
using countable_separating_set_linorder1 by auto
have "\<exists>b \<in> B. x < b \<and> b < y" if "x < y" for x y
proof -
obtain z where "x < z" "z < y" using \<open>x < y\<close> dense by blast
then obtain b where "b \<in> B" "x < b \<and> b \<le> z" using B(2) by auto
then have "x < b \<and> b < y" using \<open>z < y\<close> by auto
then show ?thesis using \<open>b \<in> B\<close> by auto
qed
then show ?thesis using B(1) by auto
qed
subsection \<open>Polish spaces\<close>
text \<open>Textbooks define Polish spaces as completely metrizable.
We assume the topology to be complete for a given metric.\<close>
class polish_space = complete_space + second_countable_topology
subsection \<open>General notion of a topology as a value\<close>
definition "istopology L \<longleftrightarrow>
L {} \<and> (\<forall>S T. L S \<longrightarrow> L T \<longrightarrow> L (S \<inter> T)) \<and> (\<forall>K. Ball K L \<longrightarrow> L (\<Union>K))"
typedef 'a topology = "{L::('a set) \<Rightarrow> bool. istopology L}"
morphisms "openin" "topology"
unfolding istopology_def by blast
lemma istopology_openin[intro]: "istopology(openin U)"
using openin[of U] by blast
lemma topology_inverse': "istopology U \<Longrightarrow> openin (topology U) = U"
using topology_inverse[unfolded mem_Collect_eq] .
lemma topology_inverse_iff: "istopology U \<longleftrightarrow> openin (topology U) = U"
using topology_inverse[of U] istopology_openin[of "topology U"] by auto
lemma topology_eq: "T1 = T2 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>S. openin T1 S \<longleftrightarrow> openin T2 S)"
proof
assume "T1 = T2"
then show "\<forall>S. openin T1 S \<longleftrightarrow> openin T2 S" by simp
next
assume H: "\<forall>S. openin T1 S \<longleftrightarrow> openin T2 S"
then have "openin T1 = openin T2" by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
then have "topology (openin T1) = topology (openin T2)" by simp
then show "T1 = T2" unfolding openin_inverse .
qed
text\<open>Infer the "universe" from union of all sets in the topology.\<close>
definition "topspace T = \<Union>{S. openin T S}"
subsubsection \<open>Main properties of open sets\<close>
lemma openin_clauses:
fixes U :: "'a topology"
shows
"openin U {}"
"\<And>S T. openin U S \<Longrightarrow> openin U T \<Longrightarrow> openin U (S\<inter>T)"
"\<And>K. (\<forall>S \<in> K. openin U S) \<Longrightarrow> openin U (\<Union>K)"
using openin[of U] unfolding istopology_def mem_Collect_eq by fast+
lemma openin_subset[intro]: "openin U S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace U"
unfolding topspace_def by blast
lemma openin_empty[simp]: "openin U {}"
by (rule openin_clauses)
lemma openin_Int[intro]: "openin U S \<Longrightarrow> openin U T \<Longrightarrow> openin U (S \<inter> T)"
by (rule openin_clauses)
lemma openin_Union[intro]: "(\<And>S. S \<in> K \<Longrightarrow> openin U S) \<Longrightarrow> openin U (\<Union>K)"
using openin_clauses by blast
lemma openin_Un[intro]: "openin U S \<Longrightarrow> openin U T \<Longrightarrow> openin U (S \<union> T)"
using openin_Union[of "{S,T}" U] by auto
lemma openin_topspace[intro, simp]: "openin U (topspace U)"
by (force simp: openin_Union topspace_def)
lemma openin_subopen: "openin U S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> S. \<exists>T. openin U T \<and> x \<in> T \<and> T \<subseteq> S)"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs by auto
next
assume H: ?rhs
let ?t = "\<Union>{T. openin U T \<and> T \<subseteq> S}"
have "openin U ?t" by (force simp: openin_Union)
also have "?t = S" using H by auto
finally show "openin U S" .
qed
lemma openin_INT [intro]:
assumes "finite I"
"\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> openin T (U i)"
shows "openin T ((\<Inter>i \<in> I. U i) \<inter> topspace T)"
using assms by (induct, auto simp: inf_sup_aci(2) openin_Int)
lemma openin_INT2 [intro]:
assumes "finite I" "I \<noteq> {}"
"\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> openin T (U i)"
shows "openin T (\<Inter>i \<in> I. U i)"
proof -
have "(\<Inter>i \<in> I. U i) \<subseteq> topspace T"
using \<open>I \<noteq> {}\<close> openin_subset[OF assms(3)] by auto
then show ?thesis
using openin_INT[of _ _ U, OF assms(1) assms(3)] by (simp add: inf.absorb2 inf_commute)
qed
lemma openin_Inter [intro]:
assumes "finite \<F>" "\<F> \<noteq> {}" "\<And>X. X \<in> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> openin T X" shows "openin T (\<Inter>\<F>)"
by (metis (full_types) assms openin_INT2 image_ident)
subsubsection \<open>Closed sets\<close>
definition "closedin U S \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace U \<and> openin U (topspace U - S)"
lemma closedin_subset: "closedin U S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace U"
by (metis closedin_def)
lemma closedin_empty[simp]: "closedin U {}"
by (simp add: closedin_def)
lemma closedin_topspace[intro, simp]: "closedin U (topspace U)"
by (simp add: closedin_def)
lemma closedin_Un[intro]: "closedin U S \<Longrightarrow> closedin U T \<Longrightarrow> closedin U (S \<union> T)"
by (auto simp: Diff_Un closedin_def)
lemma Diff_Inter[intro]: "A - \<Inter>S = \<Union>{A - s|s. s\<in>S}"
by auto
lemma closedin_Union:
assumes "finite S" "\<And>T. T \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> closedin U T"
shows "closedin U (\<Union>S)"
using assms by induction auto
lemma closedin_Inter[intro]:
assumes Ke: "K \<noteq> {}"
and Kc: "\<And>S. S \<in>K \<Longrightarrow> closedin U S"
shows "closedin U (\<Inter>K)"
using Ke Kc unfolding closedin_def Diff_Inter by auto
lemma closedin_INT[intro]:
assumes "A \<noteq> {}" "\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> closedin U (B x)"
shows "closedin U (\<Inter>x\<in>A. B x)"
apply (rule closedin_Inter)
using assms
apply auto
done
lemma closedin_Int[intro]: "closedin U S \<Longrightarrow> closedin U T \<Longrightarrow> closedin U (S \<inter> T)"
using closedin_Inter[of "{S,T}" U] by auto
lemma openin_closedin_eq: "openin U S \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace U \<and> closedin U (topspace U - S)"
apply (auto simp: closedin_def Diff_Diff_Int inf_absorb2)
apply (metis openin_subset subset_eq)
done
lemma openin_closedin: "S \<subseteq> topspace U \<Longrightarrow> (openin U S \<longleftrightarrow> closedin U (topspace U - S))"
by (simp add: openin_closedin_eq)
lemma openin_diff[intro]:
assumes oS: "openin U S"
and cT: "closedin U T"
shows "openin U (S - T)"
proof -
have "S - T = S \<inter> (topspace U - T)" using openin_subset[of U S] oS cT
by (auto simp: topspace_def openin_subset)
then show ?thesis using oS cT
by (auto simp: closedin_def)
qed
lemma closedin_diff[intro]:
assumes oS: "closedin U S"
and cT: "openin U T"
shows "closedin U (S - T)"
proof -
have "S - T = S \<inter> (topspace U - T)"
using closedin_subset[of U S] oS cT by (auto simp: topspace_def)
then show ?thesis
using oS cT by (auto simp: openin_closedin_eq)
qed
subsubsection \<open>Subspace topology\<close>
definition "subtopology U V = topology (\<lambda>T. \<exists>S. T = S \<inter> V \<and> openin U S)"
lemma istopology_subtopology: "istopology (\<lambda>T. \<exists>S. T = S \<inter> V \<and> openin U S)"
(is "istopology ?L")
proof -
have "?L {}" by blast
{
fix A B
assume A: "?L A" and B: "?L B"
from A B obtain Sa and Sb where Sa: "openin U Sa" "A = Sa \<inter> V" and Sb: "openin U Sb" "B = Sb \<inter> V"
by blast
have "A \<inter> B = (Sa \<inter> Sb) \<inter> V" "openin U (Sa \<inter> Sb)"
using Sa Sb by blast+
then have "?L (A \<inter> B)" by blast
}
moreover
{
fix K
assume K: "K \<subseteq> Collect ?L"
have th0: "Collect ?L = (\<lambda>S. S \<inter> V) ` Collect (openin U)"
by blast
from K[unfolded th0 subset_image_iff]
obtain Sk where Sk: "Sk \<subseteq> Collect (openin U)" "K = (\<lambda>S. S \<inter> V) ` Sk"
by blast
have "\<Union>K = (\<Union>Sk) \<inter> V"
using Sk by auto
moreover have "openin U (\<Union>Sk)"
using Sk by (auto simp: subset_eq)
ultimately have "?L (\<Union>K)" by blast
}
ultimately show ?thesis
unfolding subset_eq mem_Collect_eq istopology_def by auto
qed
lemma openin_subtopology: "openin (subtopology U V) S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>T. openin U T \<and> S = T \<inter> V)"
unfolding subtopology_def topology_inverse'[OF istopology_subtopology]
by auto
lemma topspace_subtopology: "topspace (subtopology U V) = topspace U \<inter> V"
by (auto simp: topspace_def openin_subtopology)
lemma closedin_subtopology: "closedin (subtopology U V) S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>T. closedin U T \<and> S = T \<inter> V)"
unfolding closedin_def topspace_subtopology
by (auto simp: openin_subtopology)
lemma openin_subtopology_refl: "openin (subtopology U V) V \<longleftrightarrow> V \<subseteq> topspace U"
unfolding openin_subtopology
by auto (metis IntD1 in_mono openin_subset)
lemma subtopology_superset:
assumes UV: "topspace U \<subseteq> V"
shows "subtopology U V = U"
proof -
{
fix S
{
fix T
assume T: "openin U T" "S = T \<inter> V"
from T openin_subset[OF T(1)] UV have eq: "S = T"
by blast
have "openin U S"
unfolding eq using T by blast
}
moreover
{
assume S: "openin U S"
then have "\<exists>T. openin U T \<and> S = T \<inter> V"
using openin_subset[OF S] UV by auto
}
ultimately have "(\<exists>T. openin U T \<and> S = T \<inter> V) \<longleftrightarrow> openin U S"
by blast
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding topology_eq openin_subtopology by blast
qed
lemma subtopology_topspace[simp]: "subtopology U (topspace U) = U"
by (simp add: subtopology_superset)
lemma subtopology_UNIV[simp]: "subtopology U UNIV = U"
by (simp add: subtopology_superset)
lemma openin_subtopology_empty:
"openin (subtopology U {}) S \<longleftrightarrow> S = {}"
by (metis Int_empty_right openin_empty openin_subtopology)
lemma closedin_subtopology_empty:
"closedin (subtopology U {}) S \<longleftrightarrow> S = {}"
by (metis Int_empty_right closedin_empty closedin_subtopology)
lemma closedin_subtopology_refl [simp]:
"closedin (subtopology U X) X \<longleftrightarrow> X \<subseteq> topspace U"
by (metis closedin_def closedin_topspace inf.absorb_iff2 le_inf_iff topspace_subtopology)
lemma openin_imp_subset:
"openin (subtopology U S) T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> S"
by (metis Int_iff openin_subtopology subsetI)
lemma closedin_imp_subset:
"closedin (subtopology U S) T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> S"
by (simp add: closedin_def topspace_subtopology)
lemma openin_subtopology_Un:
"\<lbrakk>openin (subtopology X T) S; openin (subtopology X U) S\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology X (T \<union> U)) S"
by (simp add: openin_subtopology) blast
lemma closedin_subtopology_Un:
"\<lbrakk>closedin (subtopology X T) S; closedin (subtopology X U) S\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology X (T \<union> U)) S"
by (simp add: closedin_subtopology) blast
subsubsection \<open>The standard Euclidean topology\<close>
definition euclidean :: "'a::topological_space topology"
where "euclidean = topology open"
lemma open_openin: "open S \<longleftrightarrow> openin euclidean S"
unfolding euclidean_def
apply (rule cong[where x=S and y=S])
apply (rule topology_inverse[symmetric])
apply (auto simp: istopology_def)
done
declare open_openin [symmetric, simp]
lemma topspace_euclidean [simp]: "topspace euclidean = UNIV"
by (force simp: topspace_def)
lemma topspace_euclidean_subtopology[simp]: "topspace (subtopology euclidean S) = S"
by (simp add: topspace_subtopology)
lemma closed_closedin: "closed S \<longleftrightarrow> closedin euclidean S"
by (simp add: closed_def closedin_def Compl_eq_Diff_UNIV)
declare closed_closedin [symmetric, simp]
lemma open_subopen: "open S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>T. open T \<and> x \<in> T \<and> T \<subseteq> S)"
using openI by auto
lemma openin_subtopology_self [simp]: "openin (subtopology euclidean S) S"
by (metis openin_topspace topspace_euclidean_subtopology)
text \<open>Basic "localization" results are handy for connectedness.\<close>
lemma openin_open: "openin (subtopology euclidean U) S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>T. open T \<and> (S = U \<inter> T))"
by (auto simp: openin_subtopology)
lemma openin_Int_open:
"\<lbrakk>openin (subtopology euclidean U) S; open T\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean U) (S \<inter> T)"
by (metis open_Int Int_assoc openin_open)
lemma openin_open_Int[intro]: "open S \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean U) (U \<inter> S)"
by (auto simp: openin_open)
lemma open_openin_trans[trans]:
"open S \<Longrightarrow> open T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> S \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean S) T"
by (metis Int_absorb1 openin_open_Int)
lemma open_subset: "S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> open S \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (auto simp: openin_open)
lemma closedin_closed: "closedin (subtopology euclidean U) S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>T. closed T \<and> S = U \<inter> T)"
by (simp add: closedin_subtopology Int_ac)
lemma closedin_closed_Int: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean U) (U \<inter> S)"
by (metis closedin_closed)
lemma closed_subset: "S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> closed S \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (auto simp: closedin_closed)
lemma closedin_closed_subset:
"\<lbrakk>closedin (subtopology euclidean U) V; T \<subseteq> U; S = V \<inter> T\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (metis (no_types, lifting) Int_assoc Int_commute closedin_closed inf.orderE)
lemma finite_imp_closedin:
fixes S :: "'a::t1_space set"
shows "\<lbrakk>finite S; S \<subseteq> T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (simp add: finite_imp_closed closed_subset)
lemma closedin_singleton [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::t1_space"
shows "closedin (subtopology euclidean U) {a} \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> U"
using closedin_subset by (force intro: closed_subset)
lemma openin_euclidean_subtopology_iff:
fixes S U :: "'a::metric_space set"
shows "openin (subtopology euclidean U) S \<longleftrightarrow>
S \<subseteq> U \<and> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>e>0. \<forall>x'\<in>U. dist x' x < e \<longrightarrow> x'\<in> S)"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
unfolding openin_open open_dist by blast
next
define T where "T = {x. \<exists>a\<in>S. \<exists>d>0. (\<forall>y\<in>U. dist y a < d \<longrightarrow> y \<in> S) \<and> dist x a < d}"
have 1: "\<forall>x\<in>T. \<exists>e>0. \<forall>y. dist y x < e \<longrightarrow> y \<in> T"
unfolding T_def
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x="d - dist x a" in exI)
apply (clarsimp simp add: less_diff_eq)
by (metis dist_commute dist_triangle_lt)
assume ?rhs then have 2: "S = U \<inter> T"
unfolding T_def
by auto (metis dist_self)
from 1 2 show ?lhs
unfolding openin_open open_dist by fast
qed
lemma connected_openin:
"connected s \<longleftrightarrow>
~(\<exists>e1 e2. openin (subtopology euclidean s) e1 \<and>
openin (subtopology euclidean s) e2 \<and>
s \<subseteq> e1 \<union> e2 \<and> e1 \<inter> e2 = {} \<and> e1 \<noteq> {} \<and> e2 \<noteq> {})"
apply (simp add: connected_def openin_open disjoint_iff_not_equal, safe)
apply (simp_all, blast+) (* SLOW *)
done
lemma connected_openin_eq:
"connected s \<longleftrightarrow>
~(\<exists>e1 e2. openin (subtopology euclidean s) e1 \<and>
openin (subtopology euclidean s) e2 \<and>
e1 \<union> e2 = s \<and> e1 \<inter> e2 = {} \<and>
e1 \<noteq> {} \<and> e2 \<noteq> {})"
apply (simp add: connected_openin, safe, blast)
by (metis Int_lower1 Un_subset_iff openin_open subset_antisym)
lemma connected_closedin:
"connected s \<longleftrightarrow>
~(\<exists>e1 e2.
closedin (subtopology euclidean s) e1 \<and>
closedin (subtopology euclidean s) e2 \<and>
s \<subseteq> e1 \<union> e2 \<and> e1 \<inter> e2 = {} \<and>
e1 \<noteq> {} \<and> e2 \<noteq> {})"
proof -
{ fix A B x x'
assume s_sub: "s \<subseteq> A \<union> B"
and disj: "A \<inter> B \<inter> s = {}"
and x: "x \<in> s" "x \<in> B" and x': "x' \<in> s" "x' \<in> A"
and cl: "closed A" "closed B"
assume "\<forall>e1. (\<forall>T. closed T \<longrightarrow> e1 \<noteq> s \<inter> T) \<or> (\<forall>e2. e1 \<inter> e2 = {} \<longrightarrow> s \<subseteq> e1 \<union> e2 \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>T. closed T \<longrightarrow> e2 \<noteq> s \<inter> T) \<or> e1 = {} \<or> e2 = {})"
then have "\<And>C D. s \<inter> C = {} \<or> s \<inter> D = {} \<or> s \<inter> (C \<inter> (s \<inter> D)) \<noteq> {} \<or> \<not> s \<subseteq> s \<inter> (C \<union> D) \<or> \<not> closed C \<or> \<not> closed D"
by (metis (no_types) Int_Un_distrib Int_assoc)
moreover have "s \<inter> (A \<inter> B) = {}" "s \<inter> (A \<union> B) = s" "s \<inter> B \<noteq> {}"
using disj s_sub x by blast+
ultimately have "s \<inter> A = {}"
using cl by (metis inf.left_commute inf_bot_right order_refl)
then have False
using x' by blast
} note * = this
show ?thesis
apply (simp add: connected_closed closedin_closed)
apply (safe; simp)
apply blast
apply (blast intro: *)
done
qed
lemma connected_closedin_eq:
"connected s \<longleftrightarrow>
~(\<exists>e1 e2.
closedin (subtopology euclidean s) e1 \<and>
closedin (subtopology euclidean s) e2 \<and>
e1 \<union> e2 = s \<and> e1 \<inter> e2 = {} \<and>
e1 \<noteq> {} \<and> e2 \<noteq> {})"
apply (simp add: connected_closedin, safe, blast)
by (metis Int_lower1 Un_subset_iff closedin_closed subset_antisym)
text \<open>These "transitivity" results are handy too\<close>
lemma openin_trans[trans]:
"openin (subtopology euclidean T) S \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean U) T \<Longrightarrow>
openin (subtopology euclidean U) S"
unfolding open_openin openin_open by blast
lemma openin_open_trans: "openin (subtopology euclidean T) S \<Longrightarrow> open T \<Longrightarrow> open S"
by (auto simp: openin_open intro: openin_trans)
lemma closedin_trans[trans]:
"closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean U) T \<Longrightarrow>
closedin (subtopology euclidean U) S"
by (auto simp: closedin_closed closed_Inter Int_assoc)
lemma closedin_closed_trans: "closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S \<Longrightarrow> closed T \<Longrightarrow> closed S"
by (auto simp: closedin_closed intro: closedin_trans)
lemma openin_subtopology_Int_subset:
"\<lbrakk>openin (subtopology euclidean u) (u \<inter> S); v \<subseteq> u\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean v) (v \<inter> S)"
by (auto simp: openin_subtopology)
lemma openin_open_eq: "open s \<Longrightarrow> (openin (subtopology euclidean s) t \<longleftrightarrow> open t \<and> t \<subseteq> s)"
using open_subset openin_open_trans openin_subset by fastforce
subsection \<open>Open and closed balls\<close>
definition ball :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> 'a set"
where "ball x e = {y. dist x y < e}"
definition cball :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> 'a set"
where "cball x e = {y. dist x y \<le> e}"
definition sphere :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> 'a set"
where "sphere x e = {y. dist x y = e}"
lemma mem_ball [simp]: "y \<in> ball x e \<longleftrightarrow> dist x y < e"
by (simp add: ball_def)
lemma mem_cball [simp]: "y \<in> cball x e \<longleftrightarrow> dist x y \<le> e"
by (simp add: cball_def)
lemma mem_sphere [simp]: "y \<in> sphere x e \<longleftrightarrow> dist x y = e"
by (simp add: sphere_def)
lemma ball_trivial [simp]: "ball x 0 = {}"
by (simp add: ball_def)
lemma cball_trivial [simp]: "cball x 0 = {x}"
by (simp add: cball_def)
lemma sphere_trivial [simp]: "sphere x 0 = {x}"
by (simp add: sphere_def)
lemma mem_ball_0 [simp]: "x \<in> ball 0 e \<longleftrightarrow> norm x < e"
for x :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
by (simp add: dist_norm)
lemma mem_cball_0 [simp]: "x \<in> cball 0 e \<longleftrightarrow> norm x \<le> e"
for x :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
by (simp add: dist_norm)
lemma disjoint_ballI: "dist x y \<ge> r+s \<Longrightarrow> ball x r \<inter> ball y s = {}"
using dist_triangle_less_add not_le by fastforce
lemma disjoint_cballI: "dist x y > r + s \<Longrightarrow> cball x r \<inter> cball y s = {}"
by (metis add_mono disjoint_iff_not_equal dist_triangle2 dual_order.trans leD mem_cball)
lemma mem_sphere_0 [simp]: "x \<in> sphere 0 e \<longleftrightarrow> norm x = e"
for x :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
by (simp add: dist_norm)
lemma sphere_empty [simp]: "r < 0 \<Longrightarrow> sphere a r = {}"
for a :: "'a::metric_space"
by auto
lemma centre_in_ball [simp]: "x \<in> ball x e \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < e"
by simp
lemma centre_in_cball [simp]: "x \<in> cball x e \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> e"
by simp
lemma ball_subset_cball [simp, intro]: "ball x e \<subseteq> cball x e"
by (simp add: subset_eq)
lemma mem_ball_imp_mem_cball: "x \<in> ball y e \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> cball y e"
by (auto simp: mem_ball mem_cball)
lemma sphere_cball [simp,intro]: "sphere z r \<subseteq> cball z r"
by force
lemma cball_diff_sphere: "cball a r - sphere a r = ball a r"
by auto
lemma subset_ball[intro]: "d \<le> e \<Longrightarrow> ball x d \<subseteq> ball x e"
by (simp add: subset_eq)
lemma subset_cball[intro]: "d \<le> e \<Longrightarrow> cball x d \<subseteq> cball x e"
by (simp add: subset_eq)
lemma mem_ball_leI: "x \<in> ball y e \<Longrightarrow> e \<le> f \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> ball y f"
by (auto simp: mem_ball mem_cball)
lemma mem_cball_leI: "x \<in> cball y e \<Longrightarrow> e \<le> f \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> cball y f"
by (auto simp: mem_ball mem_cball)
lemma cball_trans: "y \<in> cball z b \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> cball y a \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> cball z (b + a)"
unfolding mem_cball
proof -
have "dist z x \<le> dist z y + dist y x"
by (rule dist_triangle)
also assume "dist z y \<le> b"
also assume "dist y x \<le> a"
finally show "dist z x \<le> b + a" by arith
qed
lemma ball_max_Un: "ball a (max r s) = ball a r \<union> ball a s"
by (simp add: set_eq_iff) arith
lemma ball_min_Int: "ball a (min r s) = ball a r \<inter> ball a s"
by (simp add: set_eq_iff)
lemma cball_max_Un: "cball a (max r s) = cball a r \<union> cball a s"
by (simp add: set_eq_iff) arith
lemma cball_min_Int: "cball a (min r s) = cball a r \<inter> cball a s"
by (simp add: set_eq_iff)
lemma cball_diff_eq_sphere: "cball a r - ball a r = sphere a r"
by (auto simp: cball_def ball_def dist_commute)
lemma image_add_ball [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "(+) b ` ball a r = ball (a+b) r"
apply (intro equalityI subsetI)
apply (force simp: dist_norm)
apply (rule_tac x="x-b" in image_eqI)
apply (auto simp: dist_norm algebra_simps)
done
lemma image_add_cball [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "(+) b ` cball a r = cball (a+b) r"
apply (intro equalityI subsetI)
apply (force simp: dist_norm)
apply (rule_tac x="x-b" in image_eqI)
apply (auto simp: dist_norm algebra_simps)
done
lemma open_ball [intro, simp]: "open (ball x e)"
proof -
have "open (dist x -` {..<e})"
by (intro open_vimage open_lessThan continuous_intros)
also have "dist x -` {..<e} = ball x e"
by auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma open_contains_ball: "open S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>e>0. ball x e \<subseteq> S)"
by (simp add: open_dist subset_eq mem_ball Ball_def dist_commute)
lemma openI [intro?]: "(\<And>x. x\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>e>0. ball x e \<subseteq> S) \<Longrightarrow> open S"
by (auto simp: open_contains_ball)
lemma openE[elim?]:
assumes "open S" "x\<in>S"
obtains e where "e>0" "ball x e \<subseteq> S"
using assms unfolding open_contains_ball by auto
lemma open_contains_ball_eq: "open S \<Longrightarrow> x\<in>S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>e>0. ball x e \<subseteq> S)"
by (metis open_contains_ball subset_eq centre_in_ball)
lemma openin_contains_ball:
"openin (subtopology euclidean t) s \<longleftrightarrow>
s \<subseteq> t \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> s. \<exists>e. 0 < e \<and> ball x e \<inter> t \<subseteq> s)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
apply (simp add: openin_open)
apply (metis Int_commute Int_mono inf.cobounded2 open_contains_ball order_refl subsetCE)
done
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
apply (simp add: openin_euclidean_subtopology_iff)
by (metis (no_types) Int_iff dist_commute inf.absorb_iff2 mem_ball)
qed
lemma openin_contains_cball:
"openin (subtopology euclidean t) s \<longleftrightarrow>
s \<subseteq> t \<and>
(\<forall>x \<in> s. \<exists>e. 0 < e \<and> cball x e \<inter> t \<subseteq> s)"
apply (simp add: openin_contains_ball)
apply (rule iffI)
apply (auto dest!: bspec)
apply (rule_tac x="e/2" in exI, force+)
done
lemma ball_eq_empty[simp]: "ball x e = {} \<longleftrightarrow> e \<le> 0"
unfolding mem_ball set_eq_iff
apply (simp add: not_less)
apply (metis zero_le_dist order_trans dist_self)
done
lemma ball_empty: "e \<le> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ball x e = {}" by simp
lemma closed_cball [iff]: "closed (cball x e)"
proof -
have "closed (dist x -` {..e})"
by (intro closed_vimage closed_atMost continuous_intros)
also have "dist x -` {..e} = cball x e"
by auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma open_contains_cball: "open S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. \<exists>e>0. cball x e \<subseteq> S)"
proof -
{
fix x and e::real
assume "x\<in>S" "e>0" "ball x e \<subseteq> S"
then have "\<exists>d>0. cball x d \<subseteq> S" unfolding subset_eq by (rule_tac x="e/2" in exI, auto)
}
moreover
{
fix x and e::real
assume "x\<in>S" "e>0" "cball x e \<subseteq> S"
then have "\<exists>d>0. ball x d \<subseteq> S"
unfolding subset_eq
apply (rule_tac x="e/2" in exI, auto)
done
}
ultimately show ?thesis
unfolding open_contains_ball by auto
qed
lemma open_contains_cball_eq: "open S \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x. x \<in> S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>e>0. cball x e \<subseteq> S))"
by (metis open_contains_cball subset_eq order_less_imp_le centre_in_cball)
lemma euclidean_dist_l2:
fixes x y :: "'a :: euclidean_space"
shows "dist x y = L2_set (\<lambda>i. dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i)) Basis"
unfolding dist_norm norm_eq_sqrt_inner L2_set_def
by (subst euclidean_inner) (simp add: power2_eq_square inner_diff_left)
lemma norm_nth_le: "norm (x \<bullet> i) \<le> norm x" if "i \<in> Basis"
proof -
have "(x \<bullet> i)\<^sup>2 = (\<Sum>i\<in>{i}. (x \<bullet> i)\<^sup>2)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (x \<bullet> i)\<^sup>2)"
by (intro sum_mono2) (auto simp: that)
finally show ?thesis
unfolding norm_conv_dist euclidean_dist_l2[of x] L2_set_def
by (auto intro!: real_le_rsqrt)
qed
lemma eventually_nhds_ball: "d > 0 \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> ball z d) (nhds z)"
by (rule eventually_nhds_in_open) simp_all
lemma eventually_at_ball: "d > 0 \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>t. t \<in> ball z d \<and> t \<in> A) (at z within A)"
unfolding eventually_at by (intro exI[of _ d]) (simp_all add: dist_commute)
lemma eventually_at_ball': "d > 0 \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>t. t \<in> ball z d \<and> t \<noteq> z \<and> t \<in> A) (at z within A)"
unfolding eventually_at by (intro exI[of _ d]) (simp_all add: dist_commute)
lemma at_within_ball: "e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> dist x y < e \<Longrightarrow> at y within ball x e = at y"
by (subst at_within_open) auto
lemma atLeastAtMost_eq_cball:
fixes a b::real
shows "{a .. b} = cball ((a + b)/2) ((b - a)/2)"
by (auto simp: dist_real_def field_simps mem_cball)
lemma greaterThanLessThan_eq_ball:
fixes a b::real
shows "{a <..< b} = ball ((a + b)/2) ((b - a)/2)"
by (auto simp: dist_real_def field_simps mem_ball)
subsection \<open>Boxes\<close>
abbreviation One :: "'a::euclidean_space"
where "One \<equiv> \<Sum>Basis"
lemma One_non_0: assumes "One = (0::'a::euclidean_space)" shows False
proof -
have "dependent (Basis :: 'a set)"
apply (simp add: dependent_finite)
apply (rule_tac x="\<lambda>i. 1" in exI)
using SOME_Basis apply (auto simp: assms)
done
with independent_Basis show False by force
qed
corollary One_neq_0[iff]: "One \<noteq> 0"
by (metis One_non_0)
corollary Zero_neq_One[iff]: "0 \<noteq> One"
by (metis One_non_0)
definition (in euclidean_space) eucl_less (infix "<e" 50)
where "eucl_less a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i)"
definition box_eucl_less: "box a b = {x. a <e x \<and> x <e b}"
definition "cbox a b = {x. \<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i}"
lemma box_def: "box a b = {x. \<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i < x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i}"
and in_box_eucl_less: "x \<in> box a b \<longleftrightarrow> a <e x \<and> x <e b"
and mem_box: "x \<in> box a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i < x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i)"
"x \<in> cbox a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i)"
by (auto simp: box_eucl_less eucl_less_def cbox_def)
lemma cbox_Pair_eq: "cbox (a, c) (b, d) = cbox a b \<times> cbox c d"
by (force simp: cbox_def Basis_prod_def)
lemma cbox_Pair_iff [iff]: "(x, y) \<in> cbox (a, c) (b, d) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> cbox a b \<and> y \<in> cbox c d"
by (force simp: cbox_Pair_eq)
lemma cbox_Complex_eq: "cbox (Complex a c) (Complex b d) = (\<lambda>(x,y). Complex x y) ` (cbox a b \<times> cbox c d)"
apply (auto simp: cbox_def Basis_complex_def)
apply (rule_tac x = "(Re x, Im x)" in image_eqI)
using complex_eq by auto
lemma cbox_Pair_eq_0: "cbox (a, c) (b, d) = {} \<longleftrightarrow> cbox a b = {} \<or> cbox c d = {}"
by (force simp: cbox_Pair_eq)
lemma swap_cbox_Pair [simp]: "prod.swap ` cbox (c, a) (d, b) = cbox (a,c) (b,d)"
by auto
lemma mem_box_real[simp]:
"(x::real) \<in> box a b \<longleftrightarrow> a < x \<and> x < b"
"(x::real) \<in> cbox a b \<longleftrightarrow> a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b"
by (auto simp: mem_box)
lemma box_real[simp]:
fixes a b:: real
shows "box a b = {a <..< b}" "cbox a b = {a .. b}"
by auto
lemma box_Int_box:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "box a b \<inter> box c d =
box (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. max (a\<bullet>i) (c\<bullet>i) *\<^sub>R i) (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. min (b\<bullet>i) (d\<bullet>i) *\<^sub>R i)"
unfolding set_eq_iff and Int_iff and mem_box by auto
lemma rational_boxes:
fixes x :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "e > 0"
shows "\<exists>a b. (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat> \<and> b \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>) \<and> x \<in> box a b \<and> box a b \<subseteq> ball x e"
proof -
define e' where "e' = e / (2 * sqrt (real (DIM ('a))))"
then have e: "e' > 0"
using assms by (auto simp: DIM_positive)
have "\<forall>i. \<exists>y. y \<in> \<rat> \<and> y < x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i - y < e'" (is "\<forall>i. ?th i")
proof
fix i
from Rats_dense_in_real[of "x \<bullet> i - e'" "x \<bullet> i"] e
show "?th i" by auto
qed
from choice[OF this] obtain a where
a: "\<forall>xa. a xa \<in> \<rat> \<and> a xa < x \<bullet> xa \<and> x \<bullet> xa - a xa < e'" ..
have "\<forall>i. \<exists>y. y \<in> \<rat> \<and> x \<bullet> i < y \<and> y - x \<bullet> i < e'" (is "\<forall>i. ?th i")
proof
fix i
from Rats_dense_in_real[of "x \<bullet> i" "x \<bullet> i + e'"] e
show "?th i" by auto
qed
from choice[OF this] obtain b where
b: "\<forall>xa. b xa \<in> \<rat> \<and> x \<bullet> xa < b xa \<and> b xa - x \<bullet> xa < e'" ..
let ?a = "\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. a i *\<^sub>R i" and ?b = "\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. b i *\<^sub>R i"
show ?thesis
proof (rule exI[of _ ?a], rule exI[of _ ?b], safe)
fix y :: 'a
assume *: "y \<in> box ?a ?b"
have "dist x y = sqrt (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2)"
unfolding L2_set_def[symmetric] by (rule euclidean_dist_l2)
also have "\<dots> < sqrt (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. e^2 / real (DIM('a)))"
proof (rule real_sqrt_less_mono, rule sum_strict_mono)
fix i :: "'a"
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
have "a i < y\<bullet>i \<and> y\<bullet>i < b i"
using * i by (auto simp: box_def)
moreover have "a i < x\<bullet>i" "x\<bullet>i - a i < e'"
using a by auto
moreover have "x\<bullet>i < b i" "b i - x\<bullet>i < e'"
using b by auto
ultimately have "\<bar>x\<bullet>i - y\<bullet>i\<bar> < 2 * e'"
by auto
then have "dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i) < e/sqrt (real (DIM('a)))"
unfolding e'_def by (auto simp: dist_real_def)
then have "(dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2 < (e/sqrt (real (DIM('a))))\<^sup>2"
by (rule power_strict_mono) auto
then show "(dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2 < e\<^sup>2 / real DIM('a)"
by (simp add: power_divide)
qed auto
also have "\<dots> = e"
using \<open>0 < e\<close> by simp
finally show "y \<in> ball x e"
by (auto simp: ball_def)
qed (insert a b, auto simp: box_def)
qed
lemma open_UNION_box:
fixes M :: "'a::euclidean_space set"
assumes "open M"
defines "a' \<equiv> \<lambda>f :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real \<times> real. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
defines "b' \<equiv> \<lambda>f :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real \<times> real. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
defines "I \<equiv> {f\<in>Basis \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E \<rat> \<times> \<rat>. box (a' f) (b' f) \<subseteq> M}"
shows "M = (\<Union>f\<in>I. box (a' f) (b' f))"
proof -
have "x \<in> (\<Union>f\<in>I. box (a' f) (b' f))" if "x \<in> M" for x
proof -
obtain e where e: "e > 0" "ball x e \<subseteq> M"
using openE[OF \<open>open M\<close> \<open>x \<in> M\<close>] by auto
moreover obtain a b where ab:
"x \<in> box a b"
"\<forall>i \<in> Basis. a \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>"
"\<forall>i\<in>Basis. b \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>"
"box a b \<subseteq> ball x e"
using rational_boxes[OF e(1)] by metis
ultimately show ?thesis
by (intro UN_I[of "\<lambda>i\<in>Basis. (a \<bullet> i, b \<bullet> i)"])
(auto simp: euclidean_representation I_def a'_def b'_def)
qed
then show ?thesis by (auto simp: I_def)
qed
corollary open_countable_Union_open_box:
fixes S :: "'a :: euclidean_space set"
assumes "open S"
obtains \<D> where "countable \<D>" "\<D> \<subseteq> Pow S" "\<And>X. X \<in> \<D> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a b. X = box a b" "\<Union>\<D> = S"
proof -
let ?a = "\<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
let ?b = "\<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
let ?I = "{f\<in>Basis \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E \<rat> \<times> \<rat>. box (?a f) (?b f) \<subseteq> S}"
let ?\<D> = "(\<lambda>f. box (?a f) (?b f)) ` ?I"
show ?thesis
proof
have "countable ?I"
by (simp add: countable_PiE countable_rat)
then show "countable ?\<D>"
by blast
show "\<Union>?\<D> = S"
using open_UNION_box [OF assms] by metis
qed auto
qed
lemma rational_cboxes:
fixes x :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "e > 0"
shows "\<exists>a b. (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat> \<and> b \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>) \<and> x \<in> cbox a b \<and> cbox a b \<subseteq> ball x e"
proof -
define e' where "e' = e / (2 * sqrt (real (DIM ('a))))"
then have e: "e' > 0"
using assms by auto
have "\<forall>i. \<exists>y. y \<in> \<rat> \<and> y < x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i - y < e'" (is "\<forall>i. ?th i")
proof
fix i
from Rats_dense_in_real[of "x \<bullet> i - e'" "x \<bullet> i"] e
show "?th i" by auto
qed
from choice[OF this] obtain a where
a: "\<forall>u. a u \<in> \<rat> \<and> a u < x \<bullet> u \<and> x \<bullet> u - a u < e'" ..
have "\<forall>i. \<exists>y. y \<in> \<rat> \<and> x \<bullet> i < y \<and> y - x \<bullet> i < e'" (is "\<forall>i. ?th i")
proof
fix i
from Rats_dense_in_real[of "x \<bullet> i" "x \<bullet> i + e'"] e
show "?th i" by auto
qed
from choice[OF this] obtain b where
b: "\<forall>u. b u \<in> \<rat> \<and> x \<bullet> u < b u \<and> b u - x \<bullet> u < e'" ..
let ?a = "\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. a i *\<^sub>R i" and ?b = "\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. b i *\<^sub>R i"
show ?thesis
proof (rule exI[of _ ?a], rule exI[of _ ?b], safe)
fix y :: 'a
assume *: "y \<in> cbox ?a ?b"
have "dist x y = sqrt (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2)"
unfolding L2_set_def[symmetric] by (rule euclidean_dist_l2)
also have "\<dots> < sqrt (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. e^2 / real (DIM('a)))"
proof (rule real_sqrt_less_mono, rule sum_strict_mono)
fix i :: "'a"
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
have "a i \<le> y\<bullet>i \<and> y\<bullet>i \<le> b i"
using * i by (auto simp: cbox_def)
moreover have "a i < x\<bullet>i" "x\<bullet>i - a i < e'"
using a by auto
moreover have "x\<bullet>i < b i" "b i - x\<bullet>i < e'"
using b by auto
ultimately have "\<bar>x\<bullet>i - y\<bullet>i\<bar> < 2 * e'"
by auto
then have "dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i) < e/sqrt (real (DIM('a)))"
unfolding e'_def by (auto simp: dist_real_def)
then have "(dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2 < (e/sqrt (real (DIM('a))))\<^sup>2"
by (rule power_strict_mono) auto
then show "(dist (x \<bullet> i) (y \<bullet> i))\<^sup>2 < e\<^sup>2 / real DIM('a)"
by (simp add: power_divide)
qed auto
also have "\<dots> = e"
using \<open>0 < e\<close> by simp
finally show "y \<in> ball x e"
by (auto simp: ball_def)
next
show "x \<in> cbox (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. a i *\<^sub>R i) (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. b i *\<^sub>R i)"
using a b less_imp_le by (auto simp: cbox_def)
qed (use a b cbox_def in auto)
qed
lemma open_UNION_cbox:
fixes M :: "'a::euclidean_space set"
assumes "open M"
defines "a' \<equiv> \<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
defines "b' \<equiv> \<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
defines "I \<equiv> {f\<in>Basis \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E \<rat> \<times> \<rat>. cbox (a' f) (b' f) \<subseteq> M}"
shows "M = (\<Union>f\<in>I. cbox (a' f) (b' f))"
proof -
have "x \<in> (\<Union>f\<in>I. cbox (a' f) (b' f))" if "x \<in> M" for x
proof -
obtain e where e: "e > 0" "ball x e \<subseteq> M"
using openE[OF \<open>open M\<close> \<open>x \<in> M\<close>] by auto
moreover obtain a b where ab: "x \<in> cbox a b" "\<forall>i \<in> Basis. a \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>"
"\<forall>i \<in> Basis. b \<bullet> i \<in> \<rat>" "cbox a b \<subseteq> ball x e"
using rational_cboxes[OF e(1)] by metis
ultimately show ?thesis
by (intro UN_I[of "\<lambda>i\<in>Basis. (a \<bullet> i, b \<bullet> i)"])
(auto simp: euclidean_representation I_def a'_def b'_def)
qed
then show ?thesis by (auto simp: I_def)
qed
corollary open_countable_Union_open_cbox:
fixes S :: "'a :: euclidean_space set"
assumes "open S"
obtains \<D> where "countable \<D>" "\<D> \<subseteq> Pow S" "\<And>X. X \<in> \<D> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a b. X = cbox a b" "\<Union>\<D> = S"
proof -
let ?a = "\<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
let ?b = "\<lambda>f. (\<Sum>(i::'a)\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i)"
let ?I = "{f\<in>Basis \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E \<rat> \<times> \<rat>. cbox (?a f) (?b f) \<subseteq> S}"
let ?\<D> = "(\<lambda>f. cbox (?a f) (?b f)) ` ?I"
show ?thesis
proof
have "countable ?I"
by (simp add: countable_PiE countable_rat)
then show "countable ?\<D>"
by blast
show "\<Union>?\<D> = S"
using open_UNION_cbox [OF assms] by metis
qed auto
qed
lemma box_eq_empty:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "(box a b = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. b\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th1)
and "(cbox a b = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. b\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th2)
proof -
{
fix i x
assume i: "i\<in>Basis" and as:"b\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i" and x:"x\<in>box a b"
then have "a \<bullet> i < x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i"
unfolding mem_box by (auto simp: box_def)
then have "a\<bullet>i < b\<bullet>i" by auto
then have False using as by auto
}
moreover
{
assume as: "\<forall>i\<in>Basis. \<not> (b\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i)"
let ?x = "(1/2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)"
{
fix i :: 'a
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
have "a\<bullet>i < b\<bullet>i"
using as[THEN bspec[where x=i]] i by auto
then have "a\<bullet>i < ((1/2) *\<^sub>R (a+b)) \<bullet> i" "((1/2) *\<^sub>R (a+b)) \<bullet> i < b\<bullet>i"
by (auto simp: inner_add_left)
}
then have "box a b \<noteq> {}"
using mem_box(1)[of "?x" a b] by auto
}
ultimately show ?th1 by blast
{
fix i x
assume i: "i \<in> Basis" and as:"b\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i" and x:"x\<in>cbox a b"
then have "a \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i"
unfolding mem_box by auto
then have "a\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i" by auto
then have False using as by auto
}
moreover
{
assume as:"\<forall>i\<in>Basis. \<not> (b\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i)"
let ?x = "(1/2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)"
{
fix i :: 'a
assume i:"i \<in> Basis"
have "a\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i"
using as[THEN bspec[where x=i]] i by auto
then have "a\<bullet>i \<le> ((1/2) *\<^sub>R (a+b)) \<bullet> i" "((1/2) *\<^sub>R (a+b)) \<bullet> i \<le> b\<bullet>i"
by (auto simp: inner_add_left)
}
then have "cbox a b \<noteq> {}"
using mem_box(2)[of "?x" a b] by auto
}
ultimately show ?th2 by blast
qed
lemma box_ne_empty:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "cbox a b \<noteq> {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i)"
and "box a b \<noteq> {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i < b\<bullet>i)"
unfolding box_eq_empty[of a b] by fastforce+
lemma
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows cbox_sing [simp]: "cbox a a = {a}"
and box_sing [simp]: "box a a = {}"
unfolding set_eq_iff mem_box eq_iff [symmetric]
by (auto intro!: euclidean_eqI[where 'a='a])
(metis all_not_in_conv nonempty_Basis)
lemma subset_box_imp:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "(\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i) \<Longrightarrow> cbox c d \<subseteq> cbox a b"
and "(\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i < c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i < b\<bullet>i) \<Longrightarrow> cbox c d \<subseteq> box a b"
and "(\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i) \<Longrightarrow> box c d \<subseteq> cbox a b"
and "(\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i) \<Longrightarrow> box c d \<subseteq> box a b"
unfolding subset_eq[unfolded Ball_def] unfolding mem_box
by (best intro: order_trans less_le_trans le_less_trans less_imp_le)+
lemma box_subset_cbox:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "box a b \<subseteq> cbox a b"
unfolding subset_eq [unfolded Ball_def] mem_box
by (fast intro: less_imp_le)
lemma subset_box:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "cbox c d \<subseteq> cbox a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i \<le> d\<bullet>i) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i)" (is ?th1)
and "cbox c d \<subseteq> box a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i \<le> d\<bullet>i) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i < c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i < b\<bullet>i)" (is ?th2)
and "box c d \<subseteq> cbox a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i < d\<bullet>i) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i)" (is ?th3)
and "box c d \<subseteq> box a b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i < d\<bullet>i) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i)" (is ?th4)
proof -
show ?th1
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
by (auto intro: order_trans)
show ?th2
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
by (auto intro: le_less_trans less_le_trans order_trans less_imp_le)
{
assume as: "box c d \<subseteq> cbox a b" "\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i < d\<bullet>i"
then have "box c d \<noteq> {}"
unfolding box_eq_empty by auto
fix i :: 'a
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
(** TODO combine the following two parts as done in the HOL_light version. **)
{
let ?x = "(\<Sum>j\<in>Basis. (if j=i then ((min (a\<bullet>j) (d\<bullet>j))+c\<bullet>j)/2 else (c\<bullet>j+d\<bullet>j)/2) *\<^sub>R j)::'a"
assume as2: "a\<bullet>i > c\<bullet>i"
{
fix j :: 'a
assume j: "j \<in> Basis"
then have "c \<bullet> j < ?x \<bullet> j \<and> ?x \<bullet> j < d \<bullet> j"
apply (cases "j = i")
using as(2)[THEN bspec[where x=j]] i
apply (auto simp: as2)
done
}
then have "?x\<in>box c d"
using i unfolding mem_box by auto
moreover
have "?x \<notin> cbox a b"
unfolding mem_box
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x=i in bexI)
using as(2)[THEN bspec[where x=i]] and as2 i
apply auto
done
ultimately have False using as by auto
}
then have "a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i" by (rule ccontr) auto
moreover
{
let ?x = "(\<Sum>j\<in>Basis. (if j=i then ((max (b\<bullet>j) (c\<bullet>j))+d\<bullet>j)/2 else (c\<bullet>j+d\<bullet>j)/2) *\<^sub>R j)::'a"
assume as2: "b\<bullet>i < d\<bullet>i"
{
fix j :: 'a
assume "j\<in>Basis"
then have "d \<bullet> j > ?x \<bullet> j \<and> ?x \<bullet> j > c \<bullet> j"
apply (cases "j = i")
using as(2)[THEN bspec[where x=j]]
apply (auto simp: as2)
done
}
then have "?x\<in>box c d"
unfolding mem_box by auto
moreover
have "?x\<notin>cbox a b"
unfolding mem_box
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x=i in bexI)
using as(2)[THEN bspec[where x=i]] and as2 using i
apply auto
done
ultimately have False using as by auto
}
then have "b\<bullet>i \<ge> d\<bullet>i" by (rule ccontr) auto
ultimately
have "a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i" by auto
} note part1 = this
show ?th3
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
apply (rule, rule, rule, rule)
apply (rule part1)
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
prefer 4
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x=xa in allE, erule_tac x=xa in allE, fastforce)+
done
{
assume as: "box c d \<subseteq> box a b" "\<forall>i\<in>Basis. c\<bullet>i < d\<bullet>i"
fix i :: 'a
assume i:"i\<in>Basis"
from as(1) have "box c d \<subseteq> cbox a b"
using box_subset_cbox[of a b] by auto
then have "a\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<and> d\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i"
using part1 and as(2) using i by auto
} note * = this
show ?th4
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
apply (rule, rule, rule, rule)
apply (rule *)
unfolding subset_eq and Ball_def and mem_box
prefer 4
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x=xa in allE, simp)+
done
qed
lemma eq_cbox: "cbox a b = cbox c d \<longleftrightarrow> cbox a b = {} \<and> cbox c d = {} \<or> a = c \<and> b = d"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then have "cbox a b \<subseteq> cbox c d" "cbox c d \<subseteq> cbox a b"
by auto
then show ?rhs
by (force simp: subset_box box_eq_empty intro: antisym euclidean_eqI)
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
by force
qed
lemma eq_cbox_box [simp]: "cbox a b = box c d \<longleftrightarrow> cbox a b = {} \<and> box c d = {}"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then have "cbox a b \<subseteq> box c d" "box c d \<subseteq>cbox a b"
by auto
then show ?rhs
apply (simp add: subset_box)
using \<open>cbox a b = box c d\<close> box_ne_empty box_sing
apply (fastforce simp add:)
done
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
by force
qed
lemma eq_box_cbox [simp]: "box a b = cbox c d \<longleftrightarrow> box a b = {} \<and> cbox c d = {}"
by (metis eq_cbox_box)
lemma eq_box: "box a b = box c d \<longleftrightarrow> box a b = {} \<and> box c d = {} \<or> a = c \<and> b = d"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then have "box a b \<subseteq> box c d" "box c d \<subseteq> box a b"
by auto
then show ?rhs
apply (simp add: subset_box)
using box_ne_empty(2) \<open>box a b = box c d\<close>
apply auto
apply (meson euclidean_eqI less_eq_real_def not_less)+
done
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
by force
qed
lemma subset_box_complex:
"cbox a b \<subseteq> cbox c d \<longleftrightarrow>
(Re a \<le> Re b \<and> Im a \<le> Im b) \<longrightarrow> Re a \<ge> Re c \<and> Im a \<ge> Im c \<and> Re b \<le> Re d \<and> Im b \<le> Im d"
"cbox a b \<subseteq> box c d \<longleftrightarrow>
(Re a \<le> Re b \<and> Im a \<le> Im b) \<longrightarrow> Re a > Re c \<and> Im a > Im c \<and> Re b < Re d \<and> Im b < Im d"
"box a b \<subseteq> cbox c d \<longleftrightarrow>
(Re a < Re b \<and> Im a < Im b) \<longrightarrow> Re a \<ge> Re c \<and> Im a \<ge> Im c \<and> Re b \<le> Re d \<and> Im b \<le> Im d"
"box a b \<subseteq> box c d \<longleftrightarrow>
(Re a < Re b \<and> Im a < Im b) \<longrightarrow> Re a \<ge> Re c \<and> Im a \<ge> Im c \<and> Re b \<le> Re d \<and> Im b \<le> Im d"
by (subst subset_box; force simp: Basis_complex_def)+
lemma Int_interval:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "cbox a b \<inter> cbox c d =
cbox (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. max (a\<bullet>i) (c\<bullet>i) *\<^sub>R i) (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. min (b\<bullet>i) (d\<bullet>i) *\<^sub>R i)"
unfolding set_eq_iff and Int_iff and mem_box
by auto
lemma disjoint_interval:
fixes a::"'a::euclidean_space"
shows "cbox a b \<inter> cbox c d = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. (b\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i < c\<bullet>i \<or> b\<bullet>i < c\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th1)
and "cbox a b \<inter> box c d = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. (b\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<or> b\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th2)
and "box a b \<inter> cbox c d = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. (b\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i < c\<bullet>i \<or> b\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th3)
and "box a b \<inter> box c d = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. (b\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<or> b\<bullet>i \<le> c\<bullet>i \<or> d\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i))" (is ?th4)
proof -
let ?z = "(\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (((max (a\<bullet>i) (c\<bullet>i)) + (min (b\<bullet>i) (d\<bullet>i))) / 2) *\<^sub>R i)::'a"
have **: "\<And>P Q. (\<And>i :: 'a. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> Q ?z i \<Longrightarrow> P i) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<And>i x :: 'a. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> P i \<Longrightarrow> Q x i) \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x. \<exists>i\<in>Basis. Q x i) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i\<in>Basis. P i)"
by blast
note * = set_eq_iff Int_iff empty_iff mem_box ball_conj_distrib[symmetric] eq_False ball_simps(10)
show ?th1 unfolding * by (intro **) auto
show ?th2 unfolding * by (intro **) auto
show ?th3 unfolding * by (intro **) auto
show ?th4 unfolding * by (intro **) auto
qed
lemma UN_box_eq_UNIV: "(\<Union>i::nat. box (- (real i *\<^sub>R One)) (real i *\<^sub>R One)) = UNIV"
proof -
have "\<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar> < real_of_int (\<lceil>Max ((\<lambda>b. \<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar>)`Basis)\<rceil> + 1)"
if [simp]: "b \<in> Basis" for x b :: 'a
proof -
have "\<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar> \<le> real_of_int \<lceil>\<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar>\<rceil>"
by (rule le_of_int_ceiling)
also have "\<dots> \<le> real_of_int \<lceil>Max ((\<lambda>b. \<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar>)`Basis)\<rceil>"
by (auto intro!: ceiling_mono)
also have "\<dots> < real_of_int (\<lceil>Max ((\<lambda>b. \<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar>)`Basis)\<rceil> + 1)"
by simp
finally show ?thesis .
qed
then have "\<exists>n::nat. \<forall>b\<in>Basis. \<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar> < real n" for x :: 'a
by (metis order.strict_trans reals_Archimedean2)
moreover have "\<And>x b::'a. \<And>n::nat. \<bar>x \<bullet> b\<bar> < real n \<longleftrightarrow> - real n < x \<bullet> b \<and> x \<bullet> b < real n"
by auto
ultimately show ?thesis
by (auto simp: box_def inner_sum_left inner_Basis sum.If_cases)
qed
text \<open>Intervals in general, including infinite and mixtures of open and closed.\<close>
definition "is_interval (s::('a::euclidean_space) set) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>a\<in>s. \<forall>b\<in>s. \<forall>x. (\<forall>i\<in>Basis. ((a\<bullet>i \<le> x\<bullet>i \<and> x\<bullet>i \<le> b\<bullet>i) \<or> (b\<bullet>i \<le> x\<bullet>i \<and> x\<bullet>i \<le> a\<bullet>i))) \<longrightarrow> x \<in> s)"
lemma is_interval_1:
"is_interval (s::real set) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>a\<in>s. \<forall>b\<in>s. \<forall> x. a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<longrightarrow> x \<in> s)"
unfolding is_interval_def by auto
lemma is_interval_inter: "is_interval X \<Longrightarrow> is_interval Y \<Longrightarrow> is_interval (X \<inter> Y)"
unfolding is_interval_def
by blast
lemma is_interval_cbox [simp]: "is_interval (cbox a (b::'a::euclidean_space))" (is ?th1)
and is_interval_box [simp]: "is_interval (box a b)" (is ?th2)
unfolding is_interval_def mem_box Ball_def atLeastAtMost_iff
by (meson order_trans le_less_trans less_le_trans less_trans)+
lemma is_interval_empty [iff]: "is_interval {}"
unfolding is_interval_def by simp
lemma is_interval_univ [iff]: "is_interval UNIV"
unfolding is_interval_def by simp
lemma mem_is_intervalI:
assumes "is_interval s"
and "a \<in> s" "b \<in> s"
and "\<And>i. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> a \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i \<or> b \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> a \<bullet> i"
shows "x \<in> s"
by (rule assms(1)[simplified is_interval_def, rule_format, OF assms(2,3,4)])
lemma interval_subst:
fixes S::"'a::euclidean_space set"
assumes "is_interval S"
and "x \<in> S" "y j \<in> S"
and "j \<in> Basis"
shows "(\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (if i = j then y i \<bullet> i else x \<bullet> i) *\<^sub>R i) \<in> S"
by (rule mem_is_intervalI[OF assms(1,2)]) (auto simp: assms)
lemma mem_box_componentwiseI:
fixes S::"'a::euclidean_space set"
assumes "is_interval S"
assumes "\<And>i. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> x \<bullet> i \<in> ((\<lambda>x. x \<bullet> i) ` S)"
shows "x \<in> S"
proof -
from assms have "\<forall>i \<in> Basis. \<exists>s \<in> S. x \<bullet> i = s \<bullet> i"
by auto
with finite_Basis obtain s and bs::"'a list"
where s: "\<And>i. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> x \<bullet> i = s i \<bullet> i" "\<And>i. i \<in> Basis \<Longrightarrow> s i \<in> S"
and bs: "set bs = Basis" "distinct bs"
by (metis finite_distinct_list)
from nonempty_Basis s obtain j where j: "j \<in> Basis" "s j \<in> S"
by blast
define y where
"y = rec_list (s j) (\<lambda>j _ Y. (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (if i = j then s i \<bullet> i else Y \<bullet> i) *\<^sub>R i))"
have "x = (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (if i \<in> set bs then s i \<bullet> i else s j \<bullet> i) *\<^sub>R i)"
using bs by (auto simp: s(1)[symmetric] euclidean_representation)
also have [symmetric]: "y bs = \<dots>"
using bs(2) bs(1)[THEN equalityD1]
by (induct bs) (auto simp: y_def euclidean_representation intro!: euclidean_eqI[where 'a='a])
also have "y bs \<in> S"
using bs(1)[THEN equalityD1]
apply (induct bs)
apply (auto simp: y_def j)
apply (rule interval_subst[OF assms(1)])
apply (auto simp: s)
done
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma cbox01_nonempty [simp]: "cbox 0 One \<noteq> {}"
by (simp add: box_ne_empty inner_Basis inner_sum_left sum_nonneg)
lemma box01_nonempty [simp]: "box 0 One \<noteq> {}"
by (simp add: box_ne_empty inner_Basis inner_sum_left)
lemma empty_as_interval: "{} = cbox One (0::'a::euclidean_space)"
using nonempty_Basis box01_nonempty box_eq_empty(1) box_ne_empty(1) by blast
lemma interval_subset_is_interval:
assumes "is_interval S"
shows "cbox a b \<subseteq> S \<longleftrightarrow> cbox a b = {} \<or> a \<in> S \<and> b \<in> S" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs using box_ne_empty(1) mem_box(2) by fastforce
next
assume ?rhs
have "cbox a b \<subseteq> S" if "a \<in> S" "b \<in> S"
using assms unfolding is_interval_def
apply (clarsimp simp add: mem_box)
using that by blast
with \<open>?rhs\<close> show ?lhs
by blast
qed
lemma is_real_interval_union:
"is_interval (X \<union> Y)"
if X: "is_interval X" and Y: "is_interval Y" and I: "(X \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> Y \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> X \<inter> Y \<noteq> {})"
for X Y::"real set"
proof -
consider "X \<noteq> {}" "Y \<noteq> {}" | "X = {}" | "Y = {}" by blast
then show ?thesis
proof cases
case 1
then obtain r where "r \<in> X \<or> X \<inter> Y = {}" "r \<in> Y \<or> X \<inter> Y = {}"
by blast
then show ?thesis
using I 1 X Y unfolding is_interval_1
by (metis (full_types) Un_iff le_cases)
qed (use that in auto)
qed
lemma is_interval_translationI:
assumes "is_interval X"
shows "is_interval ((+) x ` X)"
unfolding is_interval_def
proof safe
fix b d e
assume "b \<in> X" "d \<in> X"
"\<forall>i\<in>Basis. (x + b) \<bullet> i \<le> e \<bullet> i \<and> e \<bullet> i \<le> (x + d) \<bullet> i \<or>
(x + d) \<bullet> i \<le> e \<bullet> i \<and> e \<bullet> i \<le> (x + b) \<bullet> i"
hence "e - x \<in> X"
by (intro mem_is_intervalI[OF assms \<open>b \<in> X\<close> \<open>d \<in> X\<close>, of "e - x"])
(auto simp: algebra_simps)
thus "e \<in> (+) x ` X" by force
qed
lemma is_interval_uminusI:
assumes "is_interval X"
shows "is_interval (uminus ` X)"
unfolding is_interval_def
proof safe
fix b d e
assume "b \<in> X" "d \<in> X"
"\<forall>i\<in>Basis. (- b) \<bullet> i \<le> e \<bullet> i \<and> e \<bullet> i \<le> (- d) \<bullet> i \<or>
(- d) \<bullet> i \<le> e \<bullet> i \<and> e \<bullet> i \<le> (- b) \<bullet> i"
hence "- e \<in> X"
by (intro mem_is_intervalI[OF assms \<open>b \<in> X\<close> \<open>d \<in> X\<close>, of "- e"])
(auto simp: algebra_simps)
thus "e \<in> uminus ` X" by force
qed
lemma is_interval_uminus[simp]: "is_interval (uminus ` x) = is_interval x"
using is_interval_uminusI[of x] is_interval_uminusI[of "uminus ` x"]
by (auto simp: image_image)
lemma is_interval_neg_translationI:
assumes "is_interval X"
shows "is_interval ((-) x ` X)"
proof -
have "(-) x ` X = (+) x ` uminus ` X"
by (force simp: algebra_simps)
also have "is_interval \<dots>"
by (metis is_interval_uminusI is_interval_translationI assms)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma is_interval_translation[simp]:
"is_interval ((+) x ` X) = is_interval X"
using is_interval_neg_translationI[of "(+) x ` X" x]
by (auto intro!: is_interval_translationI simp: image_image)
lemma is_interval_minus_translation[simp]:
shows "is_interval ((-) x ` X) = is_interval X"
proof -
have "(-) x ` X = (+) x ` uminus ` X"
by (force simp: algebra_simps)
also have "is_interval \<dots> = is_interval X"
by simp
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma is_interval_minus_translation'[simp]:
shows "is_interval ((\<lambda>x. x - c) ` X) = is_interval X"
using is_interval_translation[of "-c" X]
by (metis image_cong uminus_add_conv_diff)
subsection \<open>Limit points\<close>
definition (in topological_space) islimpt:: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> bool" (infixr "islimpt" 60)
where "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>T. x\<in>T \<longrightarrow> open T \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>y\<in>S. y\<in>T \<and> y\<noteq>x))"
lemma islimptI:
assumes "\<And>T. x \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> open T \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>y\<in>S. y \<in> T \<and> y \<noteq> x"
shows "x islimpt S"
using assms unfolding islimpt_def by auto
lemma islimptE:
assumes "x islimpt S" and "x \<in> T" and "open T"
obtains y where "y \<in> S" and "y \<in> T" and "y \<noteq> x"
using assms unfolding islimpt_def by auto
lemma islimpt_iff_eventually: "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> eventually (\<lambda>y. y \<notin> S) (at x)"
unfolding islimpt_def eventually_at_topological by auto
lemma islimpt_subset: "x islimpt S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> x islimpt T"
unfolding islimpt_def by fast
lemma islimpt_approachable:
fixes x :: "'a::metric_space"
shows "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>x'\<in>S. x' \<noteq> x \<and> dist x' x < e)"
unfolding islimpt_iff_eventually eventually_at by fast
lemma islimpt_approachable_le: "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>x'\<in> S. x' \<noteq> x \<and> dist x' x \<le> e)"
for x :: "'a::metric_space"
unfolding islimpt_approachable
using approachable_lt_le [where f="\<lambda>y. dist y x" and P="\<lambda>y. y \<notin> S \<or> y = x",
THEN arg_cong [where f=Not]]
by (simp add: Bex_def conj_commute conj_left_commute)
lemma islimpt_UNIV_iff: "x islimpt UNIV \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> open {x}"
unfolding islimpt_def by (safe, fast, case_tac "T = {x}", fast, fast)
lemma islimpt_punctured: "x islimpt S = x islimpt (S-{x})"
unfolding islimpt_def by blast
text \<open>A perfect space has no isolated points.\<close>
lemma islimpt_UNIV [simp, intro]: "x islimpt UNIV"
for x :: "'a::perfect_space"
unfolding islimpt_UNIV_iff by (rule not_open_singleton)
lemma perfect_choose_dist: "0 < r \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a. a \<noteq> x \<and> dist a x < r"
for x :: "'a::{perfect_space,metric_space}"
using islimpt_UNIV [of x] by (simp add: islimpt_approachable)
lemma closed_limpt: "closed S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. x islimpt S \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S)"
unfolding closed_def
apply (subst open_subopen)
apply (simp add: islimpt_def subset_eq)
apply (metis ComplE ComplI)
done
lemma islimpt_EMPTY[simp]: "\<not> x islimpt {}"
by (auto simp: islimpt_def)
lemma finite_set_avoid:
fixes a :: "'a::metric_space"
assumes fS: "finite S"
shows "\<exists>d>0. \<forall>x\<in>S. x \<noteq> a \<longrightarrow> d \<le> dist a x"
proof (induct rule: finite_induct[OF fS])
case 1
then show ?case by (auto intro: zero_less_one)
next
case (2 x F)
from 2 obtain d where d: "d > 0" "\<forall>x\<in>F. x \<noteq> a \<longrightarrow> d \<le> dist a x"
by blast
show ?case
proof (cases "x = a")
case True
with d show ?thesis by auto
next
case False
let ?d = "min d (dist a x)"
from False d(1) have dp: "?d > 0"
by auto
from d have d': "\<forall>x\<in>F. x \<noteq> a \<longrightarrow> ?d \<le> dist a x"
by auto
with dp False show ?thesis
by (auto intro!: exI[where x="?d"])
qed
qed
lemma islimpt_Un: "x islimpt (S \<union> T) \<longleftrightarrow> x islimpt S \<or> x islimpt T"
by (simp add: islimpt_iff_eventually eventually_conj_iff)
lemma discrete_imp_closed:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
assumes e: "0 < e"
and d: "\<forall>x \<in> S. \<forall>y \<in> S. dist y x < e \<longrightarrow> y = x"
shows "closed S"
proof -
have False if C: "\<forall>e>0. \<exists>x'\<in>S. x' \<noteq> x \<and> dist x' x < e" for x
proof -
from e have e2: "e/2 > 0" by arith
from C[rule_format, OF e2] obtain y where y: "y \<in> S" "y \<noteq> x" "dist y x < e/2"
by blast
let ?m = "min (e/2) (dist x y) "
from e2 y(2) have mp: "?m > 0"
by simp
from C[rule_format, OF mp] obtain z where z: "z \<in> S" "z \<noteq> x" "dist z x < ?m"
by blast
from z y have "dist z y < e"
by (intro dist_triangle_lt [where z=x]) simp
from d[rule_format, OF y(1) z(1) this] y z show ?thesis
by (auto simp: dist_commute)
qed
then show ?thesis
by (metis islimpt_approachable closed_limpt [where 'a='a])
qed
lemma closed_of_nat_image: "closed (of_nat ` A :: 'a::real_normed_algebra_1 set)"
by (rule discrete_imp_closed[of 1]) (auto simp: dist_of_nat)
lemma closed_of_int_image: "closed (of_int ` A :: 'a::real_normed_algebra_1 set)"
by (rule discrete_imp_closed[of 1]) (auto simp: dist_of_int)
lemma closed_Nats [simp]: "closed (\<nat> :: 'a :: real_normed_algebra_1 set)"
unfolding Nats_def by (rule closed_of_nat_image)
lemma closed_Ints [simp]: "closed (\<int> :: 'a :: real_normed_algebra_1 set)"
unfolding Ints_def by (rule closed_of_int_image)
lemma closed_subset_Ints:
fixes A :: "'a :: real_normed_algebra_1 set"
assumes "A \<subseteq> \<int>"
shows "closed A"
proof (intro discrete_imp_closed[OF zero_less_one] ballI impI, goal_cases)
case (1 x y)
with assms have "x \<in> \<int>" and "y \<in> \<int>" by auto
with \<open>dist y x < 1\<close> show "y = x"
by (auto elim!: Ints_cases simp: dist_of_int)
qed
subsection \<open>Interior of a Set\<close>
definition "interior S = \<Union>{T. open T \<and> T \<subseteq> S}"
lemma interiorI [intro?]:
assumes "open T" and "x \<in> T" and "T \<subseteq> S"
shows "x \<in> interior S"
using assms unfolding interior_def by fast
lemma interiorE [elim?]:
assumes "x \<in> interior S"
obtains T where "open T" and "x \<in> T" and "T \<subseteq> S"
using assms unfolding interior_def by fast
lemma open_interior [simp, intro]: "open (interior S)"
by (simp add: interior_def open_Union)
lemma interior_subset: "interior S \<subseteq> S"
by (auto simp: interior_def)
lemma interior_maximal: "T \<subseteq> S \<Longrightarrow> open T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> interior S"
by (auto simp: interior_def)
lemma interior_open: "open S \<Longrightarrow> interior S = S"
by (intro equalityI interior_subset interior_maximal subset_refl)
lemma interior_eq: "interior S = S \<longleftrightarrow> open S"
by (metis open_interior interior_open)
lemma open_subset_interior: "open S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> interior T \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T"
by (metis interior_maximal interior_subset subset_trans)
lemma interior_empty [simp]: "interior {} = {}"
using open_empty by (rule interior_open)
lemma interior_UNIV [simp]: "interior UNIV = UNIV"
using open_UNIV by (rule interior_open)
lemma interior_interior [simp]: "interior (interior S) = interior S"
using open_interior by (rule interior_open)
lemma interior_mono: "S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> interior S \<subseteq> interior T"
by (auto simp: interior_def)
lemma interior_unique:
assumes "T \<subseteq> S" and "open T"
assumes "\<And>T'. T' \<subseteq> S \<Longrightarrow> open T' \<Longrightarrow> T' \<subseteq> T"
shows "interior S = T"
by (intro equalityI assms interior_subset open_interior interior_maximal)
lemma interior_singleton [simp]: "interior {a} = {}"
for a :: "'a::perfect_space"
apply (rule interior_unique, simp_all)
using not_open_singleton subset_singletonD
apply fastforce
done
lemma interior_Int [simp]: "interior (S \<inter> T) = interior S \<inter> interior T"
by (intro equalityI Int_mono Int_greatest interior_mono Int_lower1
Int_lower2 interior_maximal interior_subset open_Int open_interior)
lemma mem_interior: "x \<in> interior S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>e>0. ball x e \<subseteq> S)"
using open_contains_ball_eq [where S="interior S"]
by (simp add: open_subset_interior)
lemma eventually_nhds_in_nhd: "x \<in> interior s \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>y. y \<in> s) (nhds x)"
using interior_subset[of s] by (subst eventually_nhds) blast
lemma interior_limit_point [intro]:
fixes x :: "'a::perfect_space"
assumes x: "x \<in> interior S"
shows "x islimpt S"
using x islimpt_UNIV [of x]
unfolding interior_def islimpt_def
apply (clarsimp, rename_tac T T')
apply (drule_tac x="T \<inter> T'" in spec)
apply (auto simp: open_Int)
done
lemma interior_closed_Un_empty_interior:
assumes cS: "closed S"
and iT: "interior T = {}"
shows "interior (S \<union> T) = interior S"
proof
show "interior S \<subseteq> interior (S \<union> T)"
by (rule interior_mono) (rule Un_upper1)
show "interior (S \<union> T) \<subseteq> interior S"
proof
fix x
assume "x \<in> interior (S \<union> T)"
then obtain R where "open R" "x \<in> R" "R \<subseteq> S \<union> T" ..
show "x \<in> interior S"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "x \<notin> interior S"
with \<open>x \<in> R\<close> \<open>open R\<close> obtain y where "y \<in> R - S"
unfolding interior_def by fast
from \<open>open R\<close> \<open>closed S\<close> have "open (R - S)"
by (rule open_Diff)
from \<open>R \<subseteq> S \<union> T\<close> have "R - S \<subseteq> T"
by fast
from \<open>y \<in> R - S\<close> \<open>open (R - S)\<close> \<open>R - S \<subseteq> T\<close> \<open>interior T = {}\<close> show False
unfolding interior_def by fast
qed
qed
qed
lemma interior_Times: "interior (A \<times> B) = interior A \<times> interior B"
proof (rule interior_unique)
show "interior A \<times> interior B \<subseteq> A \<times> B"
by (intro Sigma_mono interior_subset)
show "open (interior A \<times> interior B)"
by (intro open_Times open_interior)
fix T
assume "T \<subseteq> A \<times> B" and "open T"
then show "T \<subseteq> interior A \<times> interior B"
proof safe
fix x y
assume "(x, y) \<in> T"
then obtain C D where "open C" "open D" "C \<times> D \<subseteq> T" "x \<in> C" "y \<in> D"
using \<open>open T\<close> unfolding open_prod_def by fast
then have "open C" "open D" "C \<subseteq> A" "D \<subseteq> B" "x \<in> C" "y \<in> D"
using \<open>T \<subseteq> A \<times> B\<close> by auto
then show "x \<in> interior A" and "y \<in> interior B"
by (auto intro: interiorI)
qed
qed
lemma interior_Ici:
fixes x :: "'a :: {dense_linorder,linorder_topology}"
assumes "b < x"
shows "interior {x ..} = {x <..}"
proof (rule interior_unique)
fix T
assume "T \<subseteq> {x ..}" "open T"
moreover have "x \<notin> T"
proof
assume "x \<in> T"
obtain y where "y < x" "{y <.. x} \<subseteq> T"
using open_left[OF \<open>open T\<close> \<open>x \<in> T\<close> \<open>b < x\<close>] by auto
with dense[OF \<open>y < x\<close>] obtain z where "z \<in> T" "z < x"
by (auto simp: subset_eq Ball_def)
with \<open>T \<subseteq> {x ..}\<close> show False by auto
qed
ultimately show "T \<subseteq> {x <..}"
by (auto simp: subset_eq less_le)
qed auto
lemma interior_Iic:
fixes x :: "'a ::{dense_linorder,linorder_topology}"
assumes "x < b"
shows "interior {.. x} = {..< x}"
proof (rule interior_unique)
fix T
assume "T \<subseteq> {.. x}" "open T"
moreover have "x \<notin> T"
proof
assume "x \<in> T"
obtain y where "x < y" "{x ..< y} \<subseteq> T"
using open_right[OF \<open>open T\<close> \<open>x \<in> T\<close> \<open>x < b\<close>] by auto
with dense[OF \<open>x < y\<close>] obtain z where "z \<in> T" "x < z"
by (auto simp: subset_eq Ball_def less_le)
with \<open>T \<subseteq> {.. x}\<close> show False by auto
qed
ultimately show "T \<subseteq> {..< x}"
by (auto simp: subset_eq less_le)
qed auto
subsection \<open>Closure of a Set\<close>
definition "closure S = S \<union> {x | x. x islimpt S}"
lemma interior_closure: "interior S = - (closure (- S))"
by (auto simp: interior_def closure_def islimpt_def)
lemma closure_interior: "closure S = - interior (- S)"
by (simp add: interior_closure)
lemma closed_closure[simp, intro]: "closed (closure S)"
by (simp add: closure_interior closed_Compl)
lemma closure_subset: "S \<subseteq> closure S"
by (simp add: closure_def)
lemma closure_hull: "closure S = closed hull S"
by (auto simp: hull_def closure_interior interior_def)
lemma closure_eq: "closure S = S \<longleftrightarrow> closed S"
unfolding closure_hull using closed_Inter by (rule hull_eq)
lemma closure_closed [simp]: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> closure S = S"
by (simp only: closure_eq)
lemma closure_closure [simp]: "closure (closure S) = closure S"
unfolding closure_hull by (rule hull_hull)
lemma closure_mono: "S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> closure S \<subseteq> closure T"
unfolding closure_hull by (rule hull_mono)
lemma closure_minimal: "S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> closed T \<Longrightarrow> closure S \<subseteq> T"
unfolding closure_hull by (rule hull_minimal)
lemma closure_unique:
assumes "S \<subseteq> T"
and "closed T"
and "\<And>T'. S \<subseteq> T' \<Longrightarrow> closed T' \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> T'"
shows "closure S = T"
using assms unfolding closure_hull by (rule hull_unique)
lemma closure_empty [simp]: "closure {} = {}"
using closed_empty by (rule closure_closed)
lemma closure_UNIV [simp]: "closure UNIV = UNIV"
using closed_UNIV by (rule closure_closed)
lemma closure_Un [simp]: "closure (S \<union> T) = closure S \<union> closure T"
by (simp add: closure_interior)
lemma closure_eq_empty [iff]: "closure S = {} \<longleftrightarrow> S = {}"
using closure_empty closure_subset[of S] by blast
lemma closure_subset_eq: "closure S \<subseteq> S \<longleftrightarrow> closed S"
using closure_eq[of S] closure_subset[of S] by simp
lemma open_Int_closure_eq_empty: "open S \<Longrightarrow> (S \<inter> closure T) = {} \<longleftrightarrow> S \<inter> T = {}"
using open_subset_interior[of S "- T"]
using interior_subset[of "- T"]
by (auto simp: closure_interior)
lemma open_Int_closure_subset: "open S \<Longrightarrow> S \<inter> closure T \<subseteq> closure (S \<inter> T)"
proof
fix x
assume *: "open S" "x \<in> S \<inter> closure T"
have "x islimpt (S \<inter> T)" if **: "x islimpt T"
proof (rule islimptI)
fix A
assume "x \<in> A" "open A"
with * have "x \<in> A \<inter> S" "open (A \<inter> S)"
by (simp_all add: open_Int)
with ** obtain y where "y \<in> T" "y \<in> A \<inter> S" "y \<noteq> x"
by (rule islimptE)
then have "y \<in> S \<inter> T" "y \<in> A \<and> y \<noteq> x"
by simp_all
then show "\<exists>y\<in>(S \<inter> T). y \<in> A \<and> y \<noteq> x" ..
qed
with * show "x \<in> closure (S \<inter> T)"
unfolding closure_def by blast
qed
lemma closure_complement: "closure (- S) = - interior S"
by (simp add: closure_interior)
lemma interior_complement: "interior (- S) = - closure S"
by (simp add: closure_interior)
lemma interior_diff: "interior(S - T) = interior S - closure T"
by (simp add: Diff_eq interior_complement)
lemma closure_Times: "closure (A \<times> B) = closure A \<times> closure B"
proof (rule closure_unique)
show "A \<times> B \<subseteq> closure A \<times> closure B"
by (intro Sigma_mono closure_subset)
show "closed (closure A \<times> closure B)"
by (intro closed_Times closed_closure)
fix T
assume "A \<times> B \<subseteq> T" and "closed T"
then show "closure A \<times> closure B \<subseteq> T"
apply (simp add: closed_def open_prod_def, clarify)
apply (rule ccontr)
apply (drule_tac x="(a, b)" in bspec, simp, clarify, rename_tac C D)
apply (simp add: closure_interior interior_def)
apply (drule_tac x=C in spec)
apply (drule_tac x=D in spec, auto)
done
qed
lemma closure_openin_Int_closure:
assumes ope: "openin (subtopology euclidean U) S" and "T \<subseteq> U"
shows "closure(S \<inter> closure T) = closure(S \<inter> T)"
proof
obtain V where "open V" and S: "S = U \<inter> V"
using ope using openin_open by metis
show "closure (S \<inter> closure T) \<subseteq> closure (S \<inter> T)"
proof (clarsimp simp: S)
fix x
assume "x \<in> closure (U \<inter> V \<inter> closure T)"
then have "V \<inter> closure T \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> closure A" for A
by (metis closure_mono subsetD inf.coboundedI2 inf_assoc)
then have "x \<in> closure (T \<inter> V)"
by (metis \<open>open V\<close> closure_closure inf_commute open_Int_closure_subset)
then show "x \<in> closure (U \<inter> V \<inter> T)"
by (metis \<open>T \<subseteq> U\<close> inf.absorb_iff2 inf_assoc inf_commute)
qed
next
show "closure (S \<inter> T) \<subseteq> closure (S \<inter> closure T)"
by (meson Int_mono closure_mono closure_subset order_refl)
qed
lemma islimpt_in_closure: "(x islimpt S) = (x\<in>closure(S-{x}))"
unfolding closure_def using islimpt_punctured by blast
lemma connected_imp_connected_closure: "connected S \<Longrightarrow> connected (closure S)"
by (rule connectedI) (meson closure_subset open_Int open_Int_closure_eq_empty subset_trans connectedD)
lemma limpt_of_limpts: "x islimpt {y. y islimpt S} \<Longrightarrow> x islimpt S"
for x :: "'a::metric_space"
apply (clarsimp simp add: islimpt_approachable)
apply (drule_tac x="e/2" in spec)
apply (auto simp: simp del: less_divide_eq_numeral1)
apply (drule_tac x="dist x' x" in spec)
apply (auto simp: zero_less_dist_iff simp del: less_divide_eq_numeral1)
apply (erule rev_bexI)
apply (metis dist_commute dist_triangle_half_r less_trans less_irrefl)
done
lemma closed_limpts: "closed {x::'a::metric_space. x islimpt S}"
using closed_limpt limpt_of_limpts by blast
lemma limpt_of_closure: "x islimpt closure S \<longleftrightarrow> x islimpt S"
for x :: "'a::metric_space"
by (auto simp: closure_def islimpt_Un dest: limpt_of_limpts)
lemma closedin_limpt:
"closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<and> (\<forall>x. x islimpt S \<and> x \<in> T \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S)"
apply (simp add: closedin_closed, safe)
apply (simp add: closed_limpt islimpt_subset)
apply (rule_tac x="closure S" in exI, simp)
apply (force simp: closure_def)
done
lemma closedin_closed_eq: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean S) T \<longleftrightarrow> closed T \<and> T \<subseteq> S"
by (meson closedin_limpt closed_subset closedin_closed_trans)
lemma connected_closed_set:
"closed S
\<Longrightarrow> connected S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<nexists>A B. closed A \<and> closed B \<and> A \<noteq> {} \<and> B \<noteq> {} \<and> A \<union> B = S \<and> A \<inter> B = {})"
unfolding connected_closedin_eq closedin_closed_eq connected_closedin_eq by blast
lemma closedin_subset_trans:
"closedin (subtopology euclidean U) S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> U \<Longrightarrow>
closedin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (meson closedin_limpt subset_iff)
lemma openin_subset_trans:
"openin (subtopology euclidean U) S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> U \<Longrightarrow>
openin (subtopology euclidean T) S"
by (auto simp: openin_open)
lemma openin_Times:
"openin (subtopology euclidean S) S' \<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean T) T' \<Longrightarrow>
openin (subtopology euclidean (S \<times> T)) (S' \<times> T')"
unfolding openin_open using open_Times by blast
lemma Times_in_interior_subtopology:
fixes U :: "('a::metric_space \<times> 'b::metric_space) set"
assumes "(x, y) \<in> U" "openin (subtopology euclidean (S \<times> T)) U"
obtains V W where "openin (subtopology euclidean S) V" "x \<in> V"
"openin (subtopology euclidean T) W" "y \<in> W" "(V \<times> W) \<subseteq> U"
proof -
from assms obtain e where "e > 0" and "U \<subseteq> S \<times> T"
and e: "\<And>x' y'. \<lbrakk>x'\<in>S; y'\<in>T; dist (x', y') (x, y) < e\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x', y') \<in> U"
by (force simp: openin_euclidean_subtopology_iff)
with assms have "x \<in> S" "y \<in> T"
by auto
show ?thesis
proof
show "openin (subtopology euclidean S) (ball x (e/2) \<inter> S)"
by (simp add: Int_commute openin_open_Int)
show "x \<in> ball x (e / 2) \<inter> S"
by (simp add: \<open>0 < e\<close> \<open>x \<in> S\<close>)
show "openin (subtopology euclidean T) (ball y (e/2) \<inter> T)"
by (simp add: Int_commute openin_open_Int)
show "y \<in> ball y (e / 2) \<inter> T"
by (simp add: \<open>0 < e\<close> \<open>y \<in> T\<close>)
show "(ball x (e / 2) \<inter> S) \<times> (ball y (e / 2) \<inter> T) \<subseteq> U"
by clarify (simp add: e dist_Pair_Pair \<open>0 < e\<close> dist_commute sqrt_sum_squares_half_less)
qed
qed
lemma openin_Times_eq:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set" and T :: "'b::metric_space set"
shows
"openin (subtopology euclidean (S \<times> T)) (S' \<times> T') \<longleftrightarrow>
S' = {} \<or> T' = {} \<or> openin (subtopology euclidean S) S' \<and> openin (subtopology euclidean T) T'"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof (cases "S' = {} \<or> T' = {}")
case True
then show ?thesis by auto
next
case False
then obtain x y where "x \<in> S'" "y \<in> T'"
by blast
show ?thesis
proof
assume ?lhs
have "openin (subtopology euclidean S) S'"
apply (subst openin_subopen, clarify)
apply (rule Times_in_interior_subtopology [OF _ \<open>?lhs\<close>])
using \<open>y \<in> T'\<close>
apply auto
done
moreover have "openin (subtopology euclidean T) T'"
apply (subst openin_subopen, clarify)
apply (rule Times_in_interior_subtopology [OF _ \<open>?lhs\<close>])
using \<open>x \<in> S'\<close>
apply auto
done
ultimately show ?rhs
by simp
next
assume ?rhs
with False show ?lhs
by (simp add: openin_Times)
qed
qed
lemma closedin_Times:
"closedin (subtopology euclidean S) S' \<Longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean T) T' \<Longrightarrow>
closedin (subtopology euclidean (S \<times> T)) (S' \<times> T')"
unfolding closedin_closed using closed_Times by blast
lemma bdd_below_closure:
fixes A :: "real set"
assumes "bdd_below A"
shows "bdd_below (closure A)"
proof -
from assms obtain m where "\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> m \<le> x"
by (auto simp: bdd_below_def)
then have "A \<subseteq> {m..}" by auto
then have "closure A \<subseteq> {m..}"
using closed_real_atLeast by (rule closure_minimal)
then show ?thesis
by (auto simp: bdd_below_def)
qed
subsection \<open>Frontier (also known as boundary)\<close>
definition "frontier S = closure S - interior S"
lemma frontier_closed [iff]: "closed (frontier S)"
by (simp add: frontier_def closed_Diff)
lemma frontier_closures: "frontier S = closure S \<inter> closure (- S)"
by (auto simp: frontier_def interior_closure)
lemma frontier_Int: "frontier(S \<inter> T) = closure(S \<inter> T) \<inter> (frontier S \<union> frontier T)"
proof -
have "closure (S \<inter> T) \<subseteq> closure S" "closure (S \<inter> T) \<subseteq> closure T"
by (simp_all add: closure_mono)
then show ?thesis
by (auto simp: frontier_closures)
qed
lemma frontier_Int_subset: "frontier(S \<inter> T) \<subseteq> frontier S \<union> frontier T"
by (auto simp: frontier_Int)
lemma frontier_Int_closed:
assumes "closed S" "closed T"
shows "frontier(S \<inter> T) = (frontier S \<inter> T) \<union> (S \<inter> frontier T)"
proof -
have "closure (S \<inter> T) = T \<inter> S"
using assms by (simp add: Int_commute closed_Int)
moreover have "T \<inter> (closure S \<inter> closure (- S)) = frontier S \<inter> T"
by (simp add: Int_commute frontier_closures)
ultimately show ?thesis
by (simp add: Int_Un_distrib Int_assoc Int_left_commute assms frontier_closures)
qed
lemma frontier_straddle:
fixes a :: "'a::metric_space"
shows "a \<in> frontier S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. (\<exists>x\<in>S. dist a x < e) \<and> (\<exists>x. x \<notin> S \<and> dist a x < e))"
unfolding frontier_def closure_interior
by (auto simp: mem_interior subset_eq ball_def)
lemma frontier_subset_closed: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> frontier S \<subseteq> S"
by (metis frontier_def closure_closed Diff_subset)
lemma frontier_empty [simp]: "frontier {} = {}"
by (simp add: frontier_def)
lemma frontier_subset_eq: "frontier S \<subseteq> S \<longleftrightarrow> closed S"
proof -
{
assume "frontier S \<subseteq> S"
then have "closure S \<subseteq> S"
using interior_subset unfolding frontier_def by auto
then have "closed S"
using closure_subset_eq by auto
}
then show ?thesis using frontier_subset_closed[of S] ..
qed
lemma frontier_complement [simp]: "frontier (- S) = frontier S"
by (auto simp: frontier_def closure_complement interior_complement)
lemma frontier_Un_subset: "frontier(S \<union> T) \<subseteq> frontier S \<union> frontier T"
by (metis compl_sup frontier_Int_subset frontier_complement)
lemma frontier_disjoint_eq: "frontier S \<inter> S = {} \<longleftrightarrow> open S"
using frontier_complement frontier_subset_eq[of "- S"]
unfolding open_closed by auto
lemma frontier_UNIV [simp]: "frontier UNIV = {}"
using frontier_complement frontier_empty by fastforce
lemma frontier_interiors: "frontier s = - interior(s) - interior(-s)"
by (simp add: Int_commute frontier_def interior_closure)
lemma frontier_interior_subset: "frontier(interior S) \<subseteq> frontier S"
by (simp add: Diff_mono frontier_interiors interior_mono interior_subset)
lemma connected_Int_frontier:
"\<lbrakk>connected s; s \<inter> t \<noteq> {}; s - t \<noteq> {}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (s \<inter> frontier t \<noteq> {})"
apply (simp add: frontier_interiors connected_openin, safe)
apply (drule_tac x="s \<inter> interior t" in spec, safe)
apply (drule_tac [2] x="s \<inter> interior (-t)" in spec)
apply (auto simp: disjoint_eq_subset_Compl dest: interior_subset [THEN subsetD])
done
lemma closure_Un_frontier: "closure S = S \<union> frontier S"
proof -
have "S \<union> interior S = S"
using interior_subset by auto
then show ?thesis
using closure_subset by (auto simp: frontier_def)
qed
subsection \<open>Filters and the ``eventually true'' quantifier\<close>
definition indirection :: "'a::real_normed_vector \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a filter" (infixr "indirection" 70)
where "a indirection v = at a within {b. \<exists>c\<ge>0. b - a = scaleR c v}"
text \<open>Identify Trivial limits, where we can't approach arbitrarily closely.\<close>
lemma trivial_limit_within: "trivial_limit (at a within S) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> a islimpt S"
proof
assume "trivial_limit (at a within S)"
then show "\<not> a islimpt S"
unfolding trivial_limit_def
unfolding eventually_at_topological
unfolding islimpt_def
apply (clarsimp simp add: set_eq_iff)
apply (rename_tac T, rule_tac x=T in exI)
apply (clarsimp, drule_tac x=y in bspec, simp_all)
done
next
assume "\<not> a islimpt S"
then show "trivial_limit (at a within S)"
unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_at_topological islimpt_def
by metis
qed
lemma trivial_limit_at_iff: "trivial_limit (at a) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> a islimpt UNIV"
using trivial_limit_within [of a UNIV] by simp
lemma trivial_limit_at: "\<not> trivial_limit (at a)"
for a :: "'a::perfect_space"
by (rule at_neq_bot)
lemma trivial_limit_at_infinity:
"\<not> trivial_limit (at_infinity :: ('a::{real_normed_vector,perfect_space}) filter)"
unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_at_infinity
apply clarsimp
apply (subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::'a. x \<noteq> 0", clarify)
apply (rule_tac x="scaleR (b / norm x) x" in exI, simp)
apply (cut_tac islimpt_UNIV [of "0::'a", unfolded islimpt_def])
apply (drule_tac x=UNIV in spec, simp)
done
lemma not_trivial_limit_within: "\<not> trivial_limit (at x within S) = (x \<in> closure (S - {x}))"
using islimpt_in_closure by (metis trivial_limit_within)
lemma not_in_closure_trivial_limitI:
"x \<notin> closure s \<Longrightarrow> trivial_limit (at x within s)"
using not_trivial_limit_within[of x s]
by safe (metis Diff_empty Diff_insert0 closure_subset contra_subsetD)
lemma filterlim_at_within_closure_implies_filterlim: "filterlim f l (at x within s)"
if "x \<in> closure s \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f l (at x within s)"
by (metis bot.extremum filterlim_filtercomap filterlim_mono not_in_closure_trivial_limitI that)
lemma at_within_eq_bot_iff: "at c within A = bot \<longleftrightarrow> c \<notin> closure (A - {c})"
using not_trivial_limit_within[of c A] by blast
text \<open>Some property holds "sufficiently close" to the limit point.\<close>
lemma trivial_limit_eventually: "trivial_limit net \<Longrightarrow> eventually P net"
by simp
lemma trivial_limit_eq: "trivial_limit net \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>P. eventually P net)"
by (simp add: filter_eq_iff)
subsection \<open>Limits\<close>
lemma Lim: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net \<longleftrightarrow> trivial_limit net \<or> (\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>x. dist (f x) l < e) net)"
by (auto simp: tendsto_iff trivial_limit_eq)
text \<open>Show that they yield usual definitions in the various cases.\<close>
lemma Lim_within_le: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l)(at a within S) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>e>0. \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x\<in>S. 0 < dist x a \<and> dist x a \<le> d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l < e)"
by (auto simp: tendsto_iff eventually_at_le)
lemma Lim_within: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within S) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>e >0. \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x \<in> S. 0 < dist x a \<and> dist x a < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l < e)"
by (auto simp: tendsto_iff eventually_at)
corollary Lim_withinI [intro?]:
assumes "\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x \<in> S. 0 < dist x a \<and> dist x a < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l \<le> e"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within S)"
apply (simp add: Lim_within, clarify)
apply (rule ex_forward [OF assms [OF half_gt_zero]], auto)
done
lemma Lim_at: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>e >0. \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x. 0 < dist x a \<and> dist x a < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l < e)"
by (auto simp: tendsto_iff eventually_at)
lemma Lim_at_infinity: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) at_infinity \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>b. \<forall>x. norm x \<ge> b \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l < e)"
by (auto simp: tendsto_iff eventually_at_infinity)
corollary Lim_at_infinityI [intro?]:
assumes "\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>B. \<forall>x. norm x \<ge> B \<longrightarrow> dist (f x) l \<le> e"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) at_infinity"
apply (simp add: Lim_at_infinity, clarify)
apply (rule ex_forward [OF assms [OF half_gt_zero]], auto)
done
lemma Lim_eventually: "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = l) net \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
by (rule topological_tendstoI) (auto elim: eventually_mono)
lemma Lim_transform_within_set:
fixes a :: "'a::metric_space" and l :: "'b::metric_space"
shows "\<lbrakk>(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within S); eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> T) (at a)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within T)"
apply (clarsimp simp: eventually_at Lim_within)
apply (drule_tac x=e in spec, clarify)
apply (rename_tac k)
apply (rule_tac x="min d k" in exI, simp)
done
lemma Lim_transform_within_set_eq:
fixes a l :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> s \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> t) (at a)
\<Longrightarrow> ((f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within s) \<longleftrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within t))"
by (force intro: Lim_transform_within_set elim: eventually_mono)
lemma Lim_transform_within_openin:
fixes a :: "'a::metric_space"
assumes f: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within T)"
and "openin (subtopology euclidean T) S" "a \<in> S"
and eq: "\<And>x. \<lbrakk>x \<in> S; x \<noteq> a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
shows "(g \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a within T)"
proof -
obtain \<epsilon> where "0 < \<epsilon>" and \<epsilon>: "ball a \<epsilon> \<inter> T \<subseteq> S"
using assms by (force simp: openin_contains_ball)
then have "a \<in> ball a \<epsilon>"
by simp
show ?thesis
by (rule Lim_transform_within [OF f \<open>0 < \<epsilon>\<close> eq]) (use \<epsilon> in \<open>auto simp: dist_commute subset_iff\<close>)
qed
lemma continuous_transform_within_openin:
fixes a :: "'a::metric_space"
assumes "continuous (at a within T) f"
and "openin (subtopology euclidean T) S" "a \<in> S"
and eq: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
shows "continuous (at a within T) g"
using assms by (simp add: Lim_transform_within_openin continuous_within)
text \<open>The expected monotonicity property.\<close>
lemma Lim_Un:
assumes "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within S)" "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within T)"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within (S \<union> T))"
using assms unfolding at_within_union by (rule filterlim_sup)
lemma Lim_Un_univ:
"(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within S) \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within T) \<Longrightarrow>
S \<union> T = UNIV \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x)"
by (metis Lim_Un)
text \<open>Interrelations between restricted and unrestricted limits.\<close>
lemma Lim_at_imp_Lim_at_within: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x) \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within S)"
by (metis order_refl filterlim_mono subset_UNIV at_le)
lemma eventually_within_interior:
assumes "x \<in> interior S"
shows "eventually P (at x within S) \<longleftrightarrow> eventually P (at x)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
from assms obtain T where T: "open T" "x \<in> T" "T \<subseteq> S" ..
{
assume ?lhs
then obtain A where "open A" and "x \<in> A" and "\<forall>y\<in>A. y \<noteq> x \<longrightarrow> y \<in> S \<longrightarrow> P y"
by (auto simp: eventually_at_topological)
with T have "open (A \<inter> T)" and "x \<in> A \<inter> T" and "\<forall>y \<in> A \<inter> T. y \<noteq> x \<longrightarrow> P y"
by auto
then show ?rhs
by (auto simp: eventually_at_topological)
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
by (auto elim: eventually_mono simp: eventually_at_filter)
}
qed
lemma at_within_interior: "x \<in> interior S \<Longrightarrow> at x within S = at x"
unfolding filter_eq_iff by (intro allI eventually_within_interior)
lemma Lim_within_LIMSEQ:
fixes a :: "'a::first_countable_topology"
assumes "\<forall>S. (\<forall>n. S n \<noteq> a \<and> S n \<in> T) \<and> S \<longlonglongrightarrow> a \<longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. X (S n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> L"
shows "(X \<longlongrightarrow> L) (at a within T)"
using assms unfolding tendsto_def [where l=L]
by (simp add: sequentially_imp_eventually_within)
lemma Lim_right_bound:
fixes f :: "'a :: {linorder_topology, conditionally_complete_linorder, no_top} \<Rightarrow>
'b::{linorder_topology, conditionally_complete_linorder}"
assumes mono: "\<And>a b. a \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> x < a \<Longrightarrow> a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> f a \<le> f b"
and bnd: "\<And>a. a \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> x < a \<Longrightarrow> K \<le> f a"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> Inf (f ` ({x<..} \<inter> I))) (at x within ({x<..} \<inter> I))"
proof (cases "{x<..} \<inter> I = {}")
case True
then show ?thesis by simp
next
case False
show ?thesis
proof (rule order_tendstoI)
fix a
assume a: "a < Inf (f ` ({x<..} \<inter> I))"
{
fix y
assume "y \<in> {x<..} \<inter> I"
with False bnd have "Inf (f ` ({x<..} \<inter> I)) \<le> f y"
by (auto intro!: cInf_lower bdd_belowI2)
with a have "a < f y"
by (blast intro: less_le_trans)
}
then show "eventually (\<lambda>x. a < f x) (at x within ({x<..} \<inter> I))"
by (auto simp: eventually_at_filter intro: exI[of _ 1] zero_less_one)
next
fix a
assume "Inf (f ` ({x<..} \<inter> I)) < a"
from cInf_lessD[OF _ this] False obtain y where y: "x < y" "y \<in> I" "f y < a"
by auto
then have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> I \<longrightarrow> f x < a) (at_right x)"
unfolding eventually_at_right[OF \<open>x < y\<close>] by (metis less_imp_le le_less_trans mono)
then show "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x < a) (at x within ({x<..} \<inter> I))"
unfolding eventually_at_filter by eventually_elim simp
qed
qed
text \<open>Another limit point characterization.\<close>
lemma limpt_sequential_inj:
fixes x :: "'a::metric_space"
shows "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<exists>f. (\<forall>n::nat. f n \<in> S - {x}) \<and> inj f \<and> (f \<longlongrightarrow> x) sequentially)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then have "\<forall>e>0. \<exists>x'\<in>S. x' \<noteq> x \<and> dist x' x < e"
by (force simp: islimpt_approachable)
then obtain y where y: "\<And>e. e>0 \<Longrightarrow> y e \<in> S \<and> y e \<noteq> x \<and> dist (y e) x < e"
by metis
define f where "f \<equiv> rec_nat (y 1) (\<lambda>n fn. y (min (inverse(2 ^ (Suc n))) (dist fn x)))"
have [simp]: "f 0 = y 1"
"f(Suc n) = y (min (inverse(2 ^ (Suc n))) (dist (f n) x))" for n
by (simp_all add: f_def)
have f: "f n \<in> S \<and> (f n \<noteq> x) \<and> dist (f n) x < inverse(2 ^ n)" for n
proof (induction n)
case 0 show ?case
by (simp add: y)
next
case (Suc n) then show ?case
apply (auto simp: y)
by (metis half_gt_zero_iff inverse_positive_iff_positive less_divide_eq_numeral1(1) min_less_iff_conj y zero_less_dist_iff zero_less_numeral zero_less_power)
qed
show ?rhs
proof (rule_tac x=f in exI, intro conjI allI)
show "\<And>n. f n \<in> S - {x}"
using f by blast
have "dist (f n) x < dist (f m) x" if "m < n" for m n
using that
proof (induction n)
case 0 then show ?case by simp
next
case (Suc n)
then consider "m < n" | "m = n" using less_Suc_eq by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
assume "m < n"
have "dist (f(Suc n)) x = dist (y (min (inverse(2 ^ (Suc n))) (dist (f n) x))) x"
by simp
also have "... < dist (f n) x"
by (metis dist_pos_lt f min.strict_order_iff min_less_iff_conj y)
also have "... < dist (f m) x"
using Suc.IH \<open>m < n\<close> by blast
finally show ?thesis .
next
assume "m = n" then show ?case
by simp (metis dist_pos_lt f half_gt_zero_iff inverse_positive_iff_positive min_less_iff_conj y zero_less_numeral zero_less_power)
qed
qed
then show "inj f"
by (metis less_irrefl linorder_injI)
show "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
apply (rule tendstoI)
apply (rule_tac c="nat (ceiling(1/e))" in eventually_sequentiallyI)
apply (rule less_trans [OF f [THEN conjunct2, THEN conjunct2]])
apply (simp add: field_simps)
by (meson le_less_trans mult_less_cancel_left not_le of_nat_less_two_power)
qed
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
by (fastforce simp add: islimpt_approachable lim_sequentially)
qed
(*could prove directly from islimpt_sequential_inj, but only for metric spaces*)
lemma islimpt_sequential:
fixes x :: "'a::first_countable_topology"
shows "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>f. (\<forall>n::nat. f n \<in> S - {x}) \<and> (f \<longlongrightarrow> x) sequentially)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
from countable_basis_at_decseq[of x] obtain A where A:
"\<And>i. open (A i)"
"\<And>i. x \<in> A i"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially"
by blast
define f where "f n = (SOME y. y \<in> S \<and> y \<in> A n \<and> x \<noteq> y)" for n
{
fix n
from \<open>?lhs\<close> have "\<exists>y. y \<in> S \<and> y \<in> A n \<and> x \<noteq> y"
unfolding islimpt_def using A(1,2)[of n] by auto
then have "f n \<in> S \<and> f n \<in> A n \<and> x \<noteq> f n"
unfolding f_def by (rule someI_ex)
then have "f n \<in> S" "f n \<in> A n" "x \<noteq> f n" by auto
}
then have "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S - {x}" by auto
moreover have "(\<lambda>n. f n) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
fix S
assume "open S" "x \<in> S"
from A(3)[OF this] \<open>\<And>n. f n \<in> A n\<close>
show "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> S) sequentially"
by (auto elim!: eventually_mono)
qed
ultimately show ?rhs by fast
next
assume ?rhs
then obtain f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" where f: "\<And>n. f n \<in> S - {x}" and lim: "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
by auto
show ?lhs
unfolding islimpt_def
proof safe
fix T
assume "open T" "x \<in> T"
from lim[THEN topological_tendstoD, OF this] f
show "\<exists>y\<in>S. y \<in> T \<and> y \<noteq> x"
unfolding eventually_sequentially by auto
qed
qed
lemma Lim_null:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net \<longleftrightarrow> ((\<lambda>x. f(x) - l) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
by (simp add: Lim dist_norm)
lemma Lim_null_comparison:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. norm (f x) \<le> g x) net" "(g \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
using assms(2)
proof (rule metric_tendsto_imp_tendsto)
show "eventually (\<lambda>x. dist (f x) 0 \<le> dist (g x) 0) net"
using assms(1) by (rule eventually_mono) (simp add: dist_norm)
qed
lemma Lim_transform_bound:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
and g :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'c::real_normed_vector"
assumes "eventually (\<lambda>n. norm (f n) \<le> norm (g n)) net"
and "(g \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
using assms(1) tendsto_norm_zero [OF assms(2)]
by (rule Lim_null_comparison)
lemma lim_null_mult_right_bounded:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_div_algebra"
assumes f: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F" and g: "eventually (\<lambda>x. norm(g x) \<le> B) F"
shows "((\<lambda>z. f z * g z) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
proof -
have *: "((\<lambda>x. norm (f x) * B) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
by (simp add: f tendsto_mult_left_zero tendsto_norm_zero)
have "((\<lambda>x. norm (f x) * norm (g x)) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
apply (rule Lim_null_comparison [OF _ *])
apply (simp add: eventually_mono [OF g] mult_left_mono)
done
then show ?thesis
by (subst tendsto_norm_zero_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: norm_mult)
qed
lemma lim_null_mult_left_bounded:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_div_algebra"
assumes g: "eventually (\<lambda>x. norm(g x) \<le> B) F" and f: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
shows "((\<lambda>z. g z * f z) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
proof -
have *: "((\<lambda>x. B * norm (f x)) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
by (simp add: f tendsto_mult_right_zero tendsto_norm_zero)
have "((\<lambda>x. norm (g x) * norm (f x)) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F"
apply (rule Lim_null_comparison [OF _ *])
apply (simp add: eventually_mono [OF g] mult_right_mono)
done
then show ?thesis
by (subst tendsto_norm_zero_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: norm_mult)
qed
lemma lim_null_scaleR_bounded:
assumes f: "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net" and gB: "eventually (\<lambda>a. f a = 0 \<or> norm(g a) \<le> B) net"
shows "((\<lambda>n. f n *\<^sub>R g n) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) net"
proof
fix \<epsilon>::real
assume "0 < \<epsilon>"
then have B: "0 < \<epsilon> / (abs B + 1)" by simp
have *: "\<bar>f x\<bar> * norm (g x) < \<epsilon>" if f: "\<bar>f x\<bar> * (\<bar>B\<bar> + 1) < \<epsilon>" and g: "norm (g x) \<le> B" for x
proof -
have "\<bar>f x\<bar> * norm (g x) \<le> \<bar>f x\<bar> * B"
by (simp add: mult_left_mono g)
also have "... \<le> \<bar>f x\<bar> * (\<bar>B\<bar> + 1)"
by (simp add: mult_left_mono)
also have "... < \<epsilon>"
by (rule f)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
show "\<forall>\<^sub>F x in net. dist (f x *\<^sub>R g x) 0 < \<epsilon>"
apply (rule eventually_mono [OF eventually_conj [OF tendstoD [OF f B] gB] ])
apply (auto simp: \<open>0 < \<epsilon>\<close> divide_simps * split: if_split_asm)
done
qed
text\<open>Deducing things about the limit from the elements.\<close>
lemma Lim_in_closed_set:
assumes "closed S"
and "eventually (\<lambda>x. f(x) \<in> S) net"
and "\<not> trivial_limit net" "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
shows "l \<in> S"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "l \<notin> S"
with \<open>closed S\<close> have "open (- S)" "l \<in> - S"
by (simp_all add: open_Compl)
with assms(4) have "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> - S) net"
by (rule topological_tendstoD)
with assms(2) have "eventually (\<lambda>x. False) net"
by (rule eventually_elim2) simp
with assms(3) show "False"
by (simp add: eventually_False)
qed
text\<open>Need to prove closed(cball(x,e)) before deducing this as a corollary.\<close>
lemma Lim_dist_ubound:
assumes "\<not>(trivial_limit net)"
and "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
and "eventually (\<lambda>x. dist a (f x) \<le> e) net"
shows "dist a l \<le> e"
using assms by (fast intro: tendsto_le tendsto_intros)
lemma Lim_norm_ubound:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "\<not>(trivial_limit net)" "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net" "eventually (\<lambda>x. norm(f x) \<le> e) net"
shows "norm(l) \<le> e"
using assms by (fast intro: tendsto_le tendsto_intros)
lemma Lim_norm_lbound:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "\<not> trivial_limit net"
and "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
and "eventually (\<lambda>x. e \<le> norm (f x)) net"
shows "e \<le> norm l"
using assms by (fast intro: tendsto_le tendsto_intros)
text\<open>Limit under bilinear function\<close>
lemma Lim_bilinear:
assumes "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
and "(g \<longlongrightarrow> m) net"
and "bounded_bilinear h"
shows "((\<lambda>x. h (f x) (g x)) \<longlongrightarrow> (h l m)) net"
using \<open>bounded_bilinear h\<close> \<open>(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net\<close> \<open>(g \<longlongrightarrow> m) net\<close>
by (rule bounded_bilinear.tendsto)
text\<open>These are special for limits out of the same vector space.\<close>
lemma Lim_within_id: "(id \<longlongrightarrow> a) (at a within s)"
unfolding id_def by (rule tendsto_ident_at)
lemma Lim_at_id: "(id \<longlongrightarrow> a) (at a)"
unfolding id_def by (rule tendsto_ident_at)
lemma Lim_at_zero:
fixes a :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
and l :: "'b::topological_space"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at a) \<longleftrightarrow> ((\<lambda>x. f(a + x)) \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at 0)"
using LIM_offset_zero LIM_offset_zero_cancel ..
text\<open>It's also sometimes useful to extract the limit point from the filter.\<close>
abbreviation netlimit :: "'a::t2_space filter \<Rightarrow> 'a"
where "netlimit F \<equiv> Lim F (\<lambda>x. x)"
lemma netlimit_within: "\<not> trivial_limit (at a within S) \<Longrightarrow> netlimit (at a within S) = a"
by (rule tendsto_Lim) (auto intro: tendsto_intros)
lemma netlimit_at:
fixes a :: "'a::{perfect_space,t2_space}"
shows "netlimit (at a) = a"
using netlimit_within [of a UNIV] by simp
lemma lim_within_interior:
"x \<in> interior S \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x within S) \<longleftrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) (at x)"
by (metis at_within_interior)
lemma netlimit_within_interior:
fixes x :: "'a::{t2_space,perfect_space}"
assumes "x \<in> interior S"
shows "netlimit (at x within S) = x"
using assms by (metis at_within_interior netlimit_at)
lemma netlimit_at_vector:
fixes a :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "netlimit (at a) = a"
proof (cases "\<exists>x. x \<noteq> a")
case True then obtain x where x: "x \<noteq> a" ..
have "\<not> trivial_limit (at a)"
unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_at dist_norm
apply clarsimp
apply (rule_tac x="a + scaleR (d / 2) (sgn (x - a))" in exI)
apply (simp add: norm_sgn sgn_zero_iff x)
done
then show ?thesis
by (rule netlimit_within [of a UNIV])
qed simp
text\<open>Useful lemmas on closure and set of possible sequential limits.\<close>
lemma closure_sequential:
fixes l :: "'a::first_countable_topology"
shows "l \<in> closure S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>n. x n \<in> S) \<and> (x \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume "?lhs"
moreover
{
assume "l \<in> S"
then have "?rhs" using tendsto_const[of l sequentially] by auto
}
moreover
{
assume "l islimpt S"
then have "?rhs" unfolding islimpt_sequential by auto
}
ultimately show "?rhs"
unfolding closure_def by auto
next
assume "?rhs"
then show "?lhs" unfolding closure_def islimpt_sequential by auto
qed
lemma closed_sequential_limits:
fixes S :: "'a::first_countable_topology set"
shows "closed S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x l. (\<forall>n. x n \<in> S) \<and> (x \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially \<longrightarrow> l \<in> S)"
by (metis closure_sequential closure_subset_eq subset_iff)
lemma closure_approachable:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
shows "x \<in> closure S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>y\<in>S. dist y x < e)"
apply (auto simp: closure_def islimpt_approachable)
apply (metis dist_self)
done
lemma closure_approachable_le:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
shows "x \<in> closure S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>y\<in>S. dist y x \<le> e)"
unfolding closure_approachable
using dense by force
lemma closed_approachable:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
shows "closed S \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>y\<in>S. dist y x < e) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> S"
by (metis closure_closed closure_approachable)
lemma closure_contains_Inf:
fixes S :: "real set"
assumes "S \<noteq> {}" "bdd_below S"
shows "Inf S \<in> closure S"
proof -
have *: "\<forall>x\<in>S. Inf S \<le> x"
using cInf_lower[of _ S] assms by metis
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then have "Inf S < Inf S + e" by simp
with assms obtain x where "x \<in> S" "x < Inf S + e"
by (subst (asm) cInf_less_iff) auto
with * have "\<exists>x\<in>S. dist x (Inf S) < e"
by (intro bexI[of _ x]) (auto simp: dist_real_def)
}
then show ?thesis unfolding closure_approachable by auto
qed
lemma closure_Int_ballI:
fixes S :: "'a :: metric_space set"
assumes "\<And>U. \<lbrakk>openin (subtopology euclidean S) U; U \<noteq> {}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> T \<inter> U \<noteq> {}"
shows "S \<subseteq> closure T"
proof (clarsimp simp: closure_approachable dist_commute)
fix x and e::real
assume "x \<in> S" "0 < e"
with assms [of "S \<inter> ball x e"] show "\<exists>y\<in>T. dist x y < e"
by force
qed
lemma closed_contains_Inf:
fixes S :: "real set"
shows "S \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> bdd_below S \<Longrightarrow> closed S \<Longrightarrow> Inf S \<in> S"
by (metis closure_contains_Inf closure_closed)
lemma closed_subset_contains_Inf:
fixes A C :: "real set"
shows "closed C \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> C \<Longrightarrow> A \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> bdd_below A \<Longrightarrow> Inf A \<in> C"
by (metis closure_contains_Inf closure_minimal subset_eq)
lemma atLeastAtMost_subset_contains_Inf:
fixes A :: "real set" and a b :: real
shows "A \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> {a..b} \<Longrightarrow> Inf A \<in> {a..b}"
by (rule closed_subset_contains_Inf)
(auto intro: closed_real_atLeastAtMost intro!: bdd_belowI[of A a])
lemma not_trivial_limit_within_ball:
"\<not> trivial_limit (at x within S) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. S \<inter> ball x e - {x} \<noteq> {})"
(is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
show ?rhs if ?lhs
proof -
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then obtain y where "y \<in> S - {x}" and "dist y x < e"
using \<open>?lhs\<close> not_trivial_limit_within[of x S] closure_approachable[of x "S - {x}"]
by auto
then have "y \<in> S \<inter> ball x e - {x}"
unfolding ball_def by (simp add: dist_commute)
then have "S \<inter> ball x e - {x} \<noteq> {}" by blast
}
then show ?thesis by auto
qed
show ?lhs if ?rhs
proof -
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then obtain y where "y \<in> S \<inter> ball x e - {x}"
using \<open>?rhs\<close> by blast
then have "y \<in> S - {x}" and "dist y x < e"
unfolding ball_def by (simp_all add: dist_commute)
then have "\<exists>y \<in> S - {x}. dist y x < e"
by auto
}
then show ?thesis
using not_trivial_limit_within[of x S] closure_approachable[of x "S - {x}"]
by auto
qed
qed
lemma tendsto_If_within_closures:
assumes f: "x \<in> s \<union> (closure s \<inter> closure t) \<Longrightarrow>
(f \<longlongrightarrow> l x) (at x within s \<union> (closure s \<inter> closure t))"
assumes g: "x \<in> t \<union> (closure s \<inter> closure t) \<Longrightarrow>
(g \<longlongrightarrow> l x) (at x within t \<union> (closure s \<inter> closure t))"
assumes "x \<in> s \<union> t"
shows "((\<lambda>x. if x \<in> s then f x else g x) \<longlongrightarrow> l x) (at x within s \<union> t)"
proof -
have *: "(s \<union> t) \<inter> {x. x \<in> s} = s" "(s \<union> t) \<inter> {x. x \<notin> s} = t - s"
by auto
have "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l x) (at x within s)"
by (rule filterlim_at_within_closure_implies_filterlim)
(use \<open>x \<in> _\<close> in \<open>auto simp: inf_commute closure_def intro: tendsto_within_subset[OF f]\<close>)
moreover
have "(g \<longlongrightarrow> l x) (at x within t - s)"
by (rule filterlim_at_within_closure_implies_filterlim)
(use \<open>x \<in> _\<close> in
\<open>auto intro!: tendsto_within_subset[OF g] simp: closure_def intro: islimpt_subset\<close>)
ultimately show ?thesis
by (intro filterlim_at_within_If) (simp_all only: *)
qed
subsection \<open>Boundedness\<close>
(* FIXME: This has to be unified with BSEQ!! *)
definition (in metric_space) bounded :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x e. \<forall>y\<in>S. dist x y \<le> e)"
lemma bounded_subset_cball: "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>e x. S \<subseteq> cball x e \<and> 0 \<le> e)"
unfolding bounded_def subset_eq by auto (meson order_trans zero_le_dist)
lemma bounded_any_center: "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>e. \<forall>y\<in>S. dist a y \<le> e)"
unfolding bounded_def
by auto (metis add.commute add_le_cancel_right dist_commute dist_triangle_le)
lemma bounded_iff: "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a. \<forall>x\<in>S. norm x \<le> a)"
unfolding bounded_any_center [where a=0]
by (simp add: dist_norm)
lemma bdd_above_norm: "bdd_above (norm ` X) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded X"
by (simp add: bounded_iff bdd_above_def)
lemma bounded_norm_comp: "bounded ((\<lambda>x. norm (f x)) ` S) = bounded (f ` S)"
by (simp add: bounded_iff)
lemma boundedI:
assumes "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> norm x \<le> B"
shows "bounded S"
using assms bounded_iff by blast
lemma bounded_empty [simp]: "bounded {}"
by (simp add: bounded_def)
lemma bounded_subset: "bounded T \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> bounded S"
by (metis bounded_def subset_eq)
lemma bounded_interior[intro]: "bounded S \<Longrightarrow> bounded(interior S)"
by (metis bounded_subset interior_subset)
lemma bounded_closure[intro]:
assumes "bounded S"
shows "bounded (closure S)"
proof -
from assms obtain x and a where a: "\<forall>y\<in>S. dist x y \<le> a"
unfolding bounded_def by auto
{
fix y
assume "y \<in> closure S"
then obtain f where f: "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S" "(f \<longlongrightarrow> y) sequentially"
unfolding closure_sequential by auto
have "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S \<longrightarrow> dist x (f n) \<le> a" using a by simp
then have "eventually (\<lambda>n. dist x (f n) \<le> a) sequentially"
by (simp add: f(1))
have "dist x y \<le> a"
apply (rule Lim_dist_ubound [of sequentially f])
apply (rule trivial_limit_sequentially)
apply (rule f(2))
apply fact
done
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding bounded_def by auto
qed
lemma bounded_closure_image: "bounded (f ` closure S) \<Longrightarrow> bounded (f ` S)"
by (simp add: bounded_subset closure_subset image_mono)
lemma bounded_cball[simp,intro]: "bounded (cball x e)"
apply (simp add: bounded_def)
apply (rule_tac x=x in exI)
apply (rule_tac x=e in exI, auto)
done
lemma bounded_ball[simp,intro]: "bounded (ball x e)"
by (metis ball_subset_cball bounded_cball bounded_subset)
lemma bounded_Un[simp]: "bounded (S \<union> T) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded S \<and> bounded T"
by (auto simp: bounded_def) (metis Un_iff bounded_any_center le_max_iff_disj)
lemma bounded_Union[intro]: "finite F \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>S\<in>F. bounded S \<Longrightarrow> bounded (\<Union>F)"
by (induct rule: finite_induct[of F]) auto
lemma bounded_UN [intro]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x\<in>A. bounded (B x) \<Longrightarrow> bounded (\<Union>x\<in>A. B x)"
by (induct set: finite) auto
lemma bounded_insert [simp]: "bounded (insert x S) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded S"
proof -
have "\<forall>y\<in>{x}. dist x y \<le> 0"
by simp
then have "bounded {x}"
unfolding bounded_def by fast
then show ?thesis
by (metis insert_is_Un bounded_Un)
qed
lemma bounded_subset_ballI: "S \<subseteq> ball x r \<Longrightarrow> bounded S"
by (meson bounded_ball bounded_subset)
lemma bounded_subset_ballD:
assumes "bounded S" shows "\<exists>r. 0 < r \<and> S \<subseteq> ball x r"
proof -
obtain e::real and y where "S \<subseteq> cball y e" "0 \<le> e"
using assms by (auto simp: bounded_subset_cball)
then show ?thesis
apply (rule_tac x="dist x y + e + 1" in exI)
apply (simp add: add.commute add_pos_nonneg)
apply (erule subset_trans)
apply (clarsimp simp add: cball_def)
by (metis add_le_cancel_right add_strict_increasing dist_commute dist_triangle_le zero_less_one)
qed
lemma finite_imp_bounded [intro]: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> bounded S"
by (induct set: finite) simp_all
lemma bounded_pos: "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>b>0. \<forall>x\<in> S. norm x \<le> b)"
apply (simp add: bounded_iff)
apply (subgoal_tac "\<And>x (y::real). 0 < 1 + \<bar>y\<bar> \<and> (x \<le> y \<longrightarrow> x \<le> 1 + \<bar>y\<bar>)")
apply metis
apply arith
done
lemma bounded_pos_less: "bounded S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>b>0. \<forall>x\<in> S. norm x < b)"
apply (simp add: bounded_pos)
apply (safe; rule_tac x="b+1" in exI; force)
done
lemma Bseq_eq_bounded:
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "Bseq f \<longleftrightarrow> bounded (range f)"
unfolding Bseq_def bounded_pos by auto
lemma bounded_Int[intro]: "bounded S \<or> bounded T \<Longrightarrow> bounded (S \<inter> T)"
by (metis Int_lower1 Int_lower2 bounded_subset)
lemma bounded_diff[intro]: "bounded S \<Longrightarrow> bounded (S - T)"
by (metis Diff_subset bounded_subset)
lemma not_bounded_UNIV[simp]:
"\<not> bounded (UNIV :: 'a::{real_normed_vector, perfect_space} set)"
proof (auto simp: bounded_pos not_le)
obtain x :: 'a where "x \<noteq> 0"
using perfect_choose_dist [OF zero_less_one] by fast
fix b :: real
assume b: "b >0"
have b1: "b +1 \<ge> 0"
using b by simp
with \<open>x \<noteq> 0\<close> have "b < norm (scaleR (b + 1) (sgn x))"
by (simp add: norm_sgn)
then show "\<exists>x::'a. b < norm x" ..
qed
corollary cobounded_imp_unbounded:
fixes S :: "'a::{real_normed_vector, perfect_space} set"
shows "bounded (- S) \<Longrightarrow> ~ (bounded S)"
using bounded_Un [of S "-S"] by (simp add: sup_compl_top)
lemma bounded_dist_comp:
assumes "bounded (f ` S)" "bounded (g ` S)"
shows "bounded ((\<lambda>x. dist (f x) (g x)) ` S)"
proof -
from assms obtain M1 M2 where *: "dist (f x) undefined \<le> M1" "dist undefined (g x) \<le> M2" if "x \<in> S" for x
by (auto simp: bounded_any_center[of _ undefined] dist_commute)
have "dist (f x) (g x) \<le> M1 + M2" if "x \<in> S" for x
using *[OF that]
by (rule order_trans[OF dist_triangle add_mono])
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro!: boundedI)
qed
lemma bounded_linear_image:
assumes "bounded S"
and "bounded_linear f"
shows "bounded (f ` S)"
proof -
from assms(1) obtain b where b: "b > 0" "\<forall>x\<in>S. norm x \<le> b"
unfolding bounded_pos by auto
from assms(2) obtain B where B: "B > 0" "\<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> B * norm x"
using bounded_linear.pos_bounded by (auto simp: ac_simps)
{
fix x
assume "x \<in> S"
then have "norm x \<le> b"
using b by auto
then have "norm (f x) \<le> B * b"
using B(2)
apply (erule_tac x=x in allE)
apply (metis B(1) B(2) order_trans mult_le_cancel_left_pos)
done
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding bounded_pos
apply (rule_tac x="b*B" in exI)
using b B by (auto simp: mult.commute)
qed
lemma bounded_scaling:
fixes S :: "'a::real_normed_vector set"
shows "bounded S \<Longrightarrow> bounded ((\<lambda>x. c *\<^sub>R x) ` S)"
apply (rule bounded_linear_image, assumption)
apply (rule bounded_linear_scaleR_right)
done
lemma bounded_scaleR_comp:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "bounded (f ` S)"
shows "bounded ((\<lambda>x. r *\<^sub>R f x) ` S)"
using bounded_scaling[of "f ` S" r] assms
by (auto simp: image_image)
lemma bounded_translation:
fixes S :: "'a::real_normed_vector set"
assumes "bounded S"
shows "bounded ((\<lambda>x. a + x) ` S)"
proof -
from assms obtain b where b: "b > 0" "\<forall>x\<in>S. norm x \<le> b"
unfolding bounded_pos by auto
{
fix x
assume "x \<in> S"
then have "norm (a + x) \<le> b + norm a"
using norm_triangle_ineq[of a x] b by auto
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding bounded_pos
using norm_ge_zero[of a] b(1) and add_strict_increasing[of b 0 "norm a"]
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "b + norm a"])
qed
lemma bounded_translation_minus:
fixes S :: "'a::real_normed_vector set"
shows "bounded S \<Longrightarrow> bounded ((\<lambda>x. x - a) ` S)"
using bounded_translation [of S "-a"] by simp
lemma bounded_uminus [simp]:
fixes X :: "'a::real_normed_vector set"
shows "bounded (uminus ` X) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded X"
by (auto simp: bounded_def dist_norm; rule_tac x="-x" in exI; force simp: add.commute norm_minus_commute)
lemma uminus_bounded_comp [simp]:
fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
shows "bounded ((\<lambda>x. - f x) ` S) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded (f ` S)"
using bounded_uminus[of "f ` S"]
by (auto simp: image_image)
lemma bounded_plus_comp:
fixes f g::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "bounded (f ` S)"
assumes "bounded (g ` S)"
shows "bounded ((\<lambda>x. f x + g x) ` S)"
proof -
{
fix B C
assume "\<And>x. x\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> norm (f x) \<le> B" "\<And>x. x\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> norm (g x) \<le> C"
then have "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> norm (f x + g x) \<le> B + C"
by (auto intro!: norm_triangle_le add_mono)
} then show ?thesis
using assms by (fastforce simp: bounded_iff)
qed
lemma bounded_minus_comp:
"bounded (f ` S) \<Longrightarrow> bounded (g ` S) \<Longrightarrow> bounded ((\<lambda>x. f x - g x) ` S)"
for f g::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
using bounded_plus_comp[of "f" S "\<lambda>x. - g x"]
by auto
subsection \<open>Compactness\<close>
subsubsection \<open>Bolzano-Weierstrass property\<close>
lemma heine_borel_imp_bolzano_weierstrass:
assumes "compact s"
and "infinite t"
and "t \<subseteq> s"
shows "\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "\<not> (\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t)"
then obtain f where f: "\<forall>x\<in>s. x \<in> f x \<and> open (f x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>t. y \<in> f x \<longrightarrow> y = x)"
unfolding islimpt_def
using bchoice[of s "\<lambda> x T. x \<in> T \<and> open T \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>t. y \<in> T \<longrightarrow> y = x)"]
by auto
obtain g where g: "g \<subseteq> {t. \<exists>x. x \<in> s \<and> t = f x}" "finite g" "s \<subseteq> \<Union>g"
using assms(1)[unfolded compact_eq_heine_borel, THEN spec[where x="{t. \<exists>x. x\<in>s \<and> t = f x}"]]
using f by auto
from g(1,3) have g':"\<forall>x\<in>g. \<exists>xa \<in> s. x = f xa"
by auto
{
fix x y
assume "x \<in> t" "y \<in> t" "f x = f y"
then have "x \<in> f x" "y \<in> f x \<longrightarrow> y = x"
using f[THEN bspec[where x=x]] and \<open>t \<subseteq> s\<close> by auto
then have "x = y"
using \<open>f x = f y\<close> and f[THEN bspec[where x=y]] and \<open>y \<in> t\<close> and \<open>t \<subseteq> s\<close>
by auto
}
then have "inj_on f t"
unfolding inj_on_def by simp
then have "infinite (f ` t)"
using assms(2) using finite_imageD by auto
moreover
{
fix x
assume "x \<in> t" "f x \<notin> g"
from g(3) assms(3) \<open>x \<in> t\<close> obtain h where "h \<in> g" and "x \<in> h"
by auto
then obtain y where "y \<in> s" "h = f y"
using g'[THEN bspec[where x=h]] by auto
then have "y = x"
using f[THEN bspec[where x=y]] and \<open>x\<in>t\<close> and \<open>x\<in>h\<close>[unfolded \<open>h = f y\<close>]
by auto
then have False
using \<open>f x \<notin> g\<close> \<open>h \<in> g\<close> unfolding \<open>h = f y\<close>
by auto
}
then have "f ` t \<subseteq> g" by auto
ultimately show False
using g(2) using finite_subset by auto
qed
lemma acc_point_range_imp_convergent_subsequence:
fixes l :: "'a :: first_countable_topology"
assumes l: "\<forall>U. l\<in>U \<longrightarrow> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> range f)"
shows "\<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
proof -
from countable_basis_at_decseq[of l]
obtain A where A:
"\<And>i. open (A i)"
"\<And>i. l \<in> A i"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> l \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially"
by blast
define s where "s n i = (SOME j. i < j \<and> f j \<in> A (Suc n))" for n i
{
fix n i
have "infinite (A (Suc n) \<inter> range f - f`{.. i})"
using l A by auto
then have "\<exists>x. x \<in> A (Suc n) \<inter> range f - f`{.. i}"
unfolding ex_in_conv by (intro notI) simp
then have "\<exists>j. f j \<in> A (Suc n) \<and> j \<notin> {.. i}"
by auto
then have "\<exists>a. i < a \<and> f a \<in> A (Suc n)"
by (auto simp: not_le)
then have "i < s n i" "f (s n i) \<in> A (Suc n)"
unfolding s_def by (auto intro: someI2_ex)
}
note s = this
define r where "r = rec_nat (s 0 0) s"
have "strict_mono r"
by (auto simp: r_def s strict_mono_Suc_iff)
moreover
have "(\<lambda>n. f (r n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
fix S
assume "open S" "l \<in> S"
with A(3) have "eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially"
by auto
moreover
{
fix i
assume "Suc 0 \<le> i"
then have "f (r i) \<in> A i"
by (cases i) (simp_all add: r_def s)
}
then have "eventually (\<lambda>i. f (r i) \<in> A i) sequentially"
by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
ultimately show "eventually (\<lambda>i. f (r i) \<in> S) sequentially"
by eventually_elim auto
qed
ultimately show "\<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by (auto simp: convergent_def comp_def)
qed
lemma sequence_infinite_lemma:
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::t1_space"
assumes "\<forall>n. f n \<noteq> l"
and "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
shows "infinite (range f)"
proof
assume "finite (range f)"
then have "closed (range f)"
by (rule finite_imp_closed)
then have "open (- range f)"
by (rule open_Compl)
from assms(1) have "l \<in> - range f"
by auto
from assms(2) have "eventually (\<lambda>n. f n \<in> - range f) sequentially"
using \<open>open (- range f)\<close> \<open>l \<in> - range f\<close>
by (rule topological_tendstoD)
then show False
unfolding eventually_sequentially
by auto
qed
lemma closure_insert:
fixes x :: "'a::t1_space"
shows "closure (insert x s) = insert x (closure s)"
apply (rule closure_unique)
apply (rule insert_mono [OF closure_subset])
apply (rule closed_insert [OF closed_closure])
apply (simp add: closure_minimal)
done
lemma islimpt_insert:
fixes x :: "'a::t1_space"
shows "x islimpt (insert a s) \<longleftrightarrow> x islimpt s"
proof
assume *: "x islimpt (insert a s)"
show "x islimpt s"
proof (rule islimptI)
fix t
assume t: "x \<in> t" "open t"
show "\<exists>y\<in>s. y \<in> t \<and> y \<noteq> x"
proof (cases "x = a")
case True
obtain y where "y \<in> insert a s" "y \<in> t" "y \<noteq> x"
using * t by (rule islimptE)
with \<open>x = a\<close> show ?thesis by auto
next
case False
with t have t': "x \<in> t - {a}" "open (t - {a})"
by (simp_all add: open_Diff)
obtain y where "y \<in> insert a s" "y \<in> t - {a}" "y \<noteq> x"
using * t' by (rule islimptE)
then show ?thesis by auto
qed
qed
next
assume "x islimpt s"
then show "x islimpt (insert a s)"
by (rule islimpt_subset) auto
qed
lemma islimpt_finite:
fixes x :: "'a::t1_space"
shows "finite s \<Longrightarrow> \<not> x islimpt s"
by (induct set: finite) (simp_all add: islimpt_insert)
lemma islimpt_Un_finite:
fixes x :: "'a::t1_space"
shows "finite s \<Longrightarrow> x islimpt (s \<union> t) \<longleftrightarrow> x islimpt t"
by (simp add: islimpt_Un islimpt_finite)
lemma islimpt_eq_acc_point:
fixes l :: "'a :: t1_space"
shows "l islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>U. l\<in>U \<longrightarrow> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> S))"
proof (safe intro!: islimptI)
fix U
assume "l islimpt S" "l \<in> U" "open U" "finite (U \<inter> S)"
then have "l islimpt S" "l \<in> (U - (U \<inter> S - {l}))" "open (U - (U \<inter> S - {l}))"
by (auto intro: finite_imp_closed)
then show False
by (rule islimptE) auto
next
fix T
assume *: "\<forall>U. l\<in>U \<longrightarrow> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> S)" "l \<in> T" "open T"
then have "infinite (T \<inter> S - {l})"
by auto
then have "\<exists>x. x \<in> (T \<inter> S - {l})"
unfolding ex_in_conv by (intro notI) simp
then show "\<exists>y\<in>S. y \<in> T \<and> y \<noteq> l"
by auto
qed
corollary infinite_openin:
fixes S :: "'a :: t1_space set"
shows "\<lbrakk>openin (subtopology euclidean U) S; x \<in> S; x islimpt U\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> infinite S"
by (clarsimp simp add: openin_open islimpt_eq_acc_point inf_commute)
lemma islimpt_range_imp_convergent_subsequence:
fixes l :: "'a :: {t1_space, first_countable_topology}"
assumes l: "l islimpt (range f)"
shows "\<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using l unfolding islimpt_eq_acc_point
by (rule acc_point_range_imp_convergent_subsequence)
lemma islimpt_eq_infinite_ball: "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. infinite(S \<inter> ball x e))"
apply (simp add: islimpt_eq_acc_point, safe)
apply (metis Int_commute open_ball centre_in_ball)
by (metis open_contains_ball Int_mono finite_subset inf_commute subset_refl)
lemma islimpt_eq_infinite_cball: "x islimpt S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. infinite(S \<inter> cball x e))"
apply (simp add: islimpt_eq_infinite_ball, safe)
apply (meson Int_mono ball_subset_cball finite_subset order_refl)
by (metis open_ball centre_in_ball finite_Int inf.absorb_iff2 inf_assoc open_contains_cball_eq)
lemma sequence_unique_limpt:
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::t2_space"
assumes "(f \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
and "l' islimpt (range f)"
shows "l' = l"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "l' \<noteq> l"
obtain s t where "open s" "open t" "l' \<in> s" "l \<in> t" "s \<inter> t = {}"
using hausdorff [OF \<open>l' \<noteq> l\<close>] by auto
have "eventually (\<lambda>n. f n \<in> t) sequentially"
using assms(1) \<open>open t\<close> \<open>l \<in> t\<close> by (rule topological_tendstoD)
then obtain N where "\<forall>n\<ge>N. f n \<in> t"
unfolding eventually_sequentially by auto
have "UNIV = {..<N} \<union> {N..}"
by auto
then have "l' islimpt (f ` ({..<N} \<union> {N..}))"
using assms(2) by simp
then have "l' islimpt (f ` {..<N} \<union> f ` {N..})"
by (simp add: image_Un)
then have "l' islimpt (f ` {N..})"
by (simp add: islimpt_Un_finite)
then obtain y where "y \<in> f ` {N..}" "y \<in> s" "y \<noteq> l'"
using \<open>l' \<in> s\<close> \<open>open s\<close> by (rule islimptE)
then obtain n where "N \<le> n" "f n \<in> s" "f n \<noteq> l'"
by auto
with \<open>\<forall>n\<ge>N. f n \<in> t\<close> have "f n \<in> s \<inter> t"
by simp
with \<open>s \<inter> t = {}\<close> show False
by simp
qed
lemma bolzano_weierstrass_imp_closed:
fixes s :: "'a::{first_countable_topology,t2_space} set"
assumes "\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> t \<subseteq> s --> (\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t)"
shows "closed s"
proof -
{
fix x l
assume as: "\<forall>n::nat. x n \<in> s" "(x \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
then have "l \<in> s"
proof (cases "\<forall>n. x n \<noteq> l")
case False
then show "l\<in>s" using as(1) by auto
next
case True note cas = this
with as(2) have "infinite (range x)"
using sequence_infinite_lemma[of x l] by auto
then obtain l' where "l'\<in>s" "l' islimpt (range x)"
using assms[THEN spec[where x="range x"]] as(1) by auto
then show "l\<in>s" using sequence_unique_limpt[of x l l']
using as cas by auto
qed
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding closed_sequential_limits by fast
qed
lemma compact_imp_bounded:
assumes "compact U"
shows "bounded U"
proof -
have "compact U" "\<forall>x\<in>U. open (ball x 1)" "U \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>U. ball x 1)"
using assms by auto
then obtain D where D: "D \<subseteq> U" "finite D" "U \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>D. ball x 1)"
by (metis compactE_image)
from \<open>finite D\<close> have "bounded (\<Union>x\<in>D. ball x 1)"
by (simp add: bounded_UN)
then show "bounded U" using \<open>U \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>D. ball x 1)\<close>
by (rule bounded_subset)
qed
text\<open>In particular, some common special cases.\<close>
lemma compact_Un [intro]:
assumes "compact s"
and "compact t"
shows " compact (s \<union> t)"
proof (rule compactI)
fix f
assume *: "Ball f open" "s \<union> t \<subseteq> \<Union>f"
from * \<open>compact s\<close> obtain s' where "s' \<subseteq> f \<and> finite s' \<and> s \<subseteq> \<Union>s'"
unfolding compact_eq_heine_borel by (auto elim!: allE[of _ f])
moreover
from * \<open>compact t\<close> obtain t' where "t' \<subseteq> f \<and> finite t' \<and> t \<subseteq> \<Union>t'"
unfolding compact_eq_heine_borel by (auto elim!: allE[of _ f])
ultimately show "\<exists>f'\<subseteq>f. finite f' \<and> s \<union> t \<subseteq> \<Union>f'"
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "s' \<union> t'"])
qed
lemma compact_Union [intro]: "finite S \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>T. T \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> compact T) \<Longrightarrow> compact (\<Union>S)"
by (induct set: finite) auto
lemma compact_UN [intro]:
"finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> compact (B x)) \<Longrightarrow> compact (\<Union>x\<in>A. B x)"
by (rule compact_Union) auto
lemma closed_Int_compact [intro]:
assumes "closed s"
and "compact t"
shows "compact (s \<inter> t)"
using compact_Int_closed [of t s] assms
by (simp add: Int_commute)
lemma compact_Int [intro]:
fixes s t :: "'a :: t2_space set"
assumes "compact s"
and "compact t"
shows "compact (s \<inter> t)"
using assms by (intro compact_Int_closed compact_imp_closed)
lemma compact_sing [simp]: "compact {a}"
unfolding compact_eq_heine_borel by auto
lemma compact_insert [simp]:
assumes "compact s"
shows "compact (insert x s)"
proof -
have "compact ({x} \<union> s)"
using compact_sing assms by (rule compact_Un)
then show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma finite_imp_compact: "finite s \<Longrightarrow> compact s"
by (induct set: finite) simp_all
lemma open_delete:
fixes s :: "'a::t1_space set"
shows "open s \<Longrightarrow> open (s - {x})"
by (simp add: open_Diff)
lemma openin_delete:
fixes a :: "'a :: t1_space"
shows "openin (subtopology euclidean u) s
\<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean u) (s - {a})"
by (metis Int_Diff open_delete openin_open)
text\<open>Compactness expressed with filters\<close>
lemma closure_iff_nhds_not_empty:
"x \<in> closure X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>A. \<forall>S\<subseteq>A. open S \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> X \<inter> A \<noteq> {})"
proof safe
assume x: "x \<in> closure X"
fix S A
assume "open S" "x \<in> S" "X \<inter> A = {}" "S \<subseteq> A"
then have "x \<notin> closure (-S)"
by (auto simp: closure_complement subset_eq[symmetric] intro: interiorI)
with x have "x \<in> closure X - closure (-S)"
by auto
also have "\<dots> \<subseteq> closure (X \<inter> S)"
using \<open>open S\<close> open_Int_closure_subset[of S X] by (simp add: closed_Compl ac_simps)
finally have "X \<inter> S \<noteq> {}" by auto
then show False using \<open>X \<inter> A = {}\<close> \<open>S \<subseteq> A\<close> by auto
next
assume "\<forall>A S. S \<subseteq> A \<longrightarrow> open S \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<longrightarrow> X \<inter> A \<noteq> {}"
from this[THEN spec, of "- X", THEN spec, of "- closure X"]
show "x \<in> closure X"
by (simp add: closure_subset open_Compl)
qed
corollary closure_Int_ball_not_empty:
assumes "S \<subseteq> closure T" "x \<in> S" "r > 0"
shows "T \<inter> ball x r \<noteq> {}"
using assms centre_in_ball closure_iff_nhds_not_empty by blast
lemma compact_filter:
"compact U \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>F. F \<noteq> bot \<longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U) F \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>U. inf (nhds x) F \<noteq> bot))"
proof (intro allI iffI impI compact_fip[THEN iffD2] notI)
fix F
assume "compact U"
assume F: "F \<noteq> bot" "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U) F"
then have "U \<noteq> {}"
by (auto simp: eventually_False)
define Z where "Z = closure ` {A. eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A) F}"
then have "\<forall>z\<in>Z. closed z"
by auto
moreover
have ev_Z: "\<And>z. z \<in> Z \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> z) F"
unfolding Z_def by (auto elim: eventually_mono intro: set_mp[OF closure_subset])
have "(\<forall>B \<subseteq> Z. finite B \<longrightarrow> U \<inter> \<Inter>B \<noteq> {})"
proof (intro allI impI)
fix B assume "finite B" "B \<subseteq> Z"
with \<open>finite B\<close> ev_Z F(2) have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U \<inter> (\<Inter>B)) F"
by (auto simp: eventually_ball_finite_distrib eventually_conj_iff)
with F show "U \<inter> \<Inter>B \<noteq> {}"
by (intro notI) (simp add: eventually_False)
qed
ultimately have "U \<inter> \<Inter>Z \<noteq> {}"
using \<open>compact U\<close> unfolding compact_fip by blast
then obtain x where "x \<in> U" and x: "\<And>z. z \<in> Z \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> z"
by auto
have "\<And>P. eventually P (inf (nhds x) F) \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> bot"
unfolding eventually_inf eventually_nhds
proof safe
fix P Q R S
assume "eventually R F" "open S" "x \<in> S"
with open_Int_closure_eq_empty[of S "{x. R x}"] x[of "closure {x. R x}"]
have "S \<inter> {x. R x} \<noteq> {}" by (auto simp: Z_def)
moreover assume "Ball S Q" "\<forall>x. Q x \<and> R x \<longrightarrow> bot x"
ultimately show False by (auto simp: set_eq_iff)
qed
with \<open>x \<in> U\<close> show "\<exists>x\<in>U. inf (nhds x) F \<noteq> bot"
by (metis eventually_bot)
next
fix A
assume A: "\<forall>a\<in>A. closed a" "\<forall>B\<subseteq>A. finite B \<longrightarrow> U \<inter> \<Inter>B \<noteq> {}" "U \<inter> \<Inter>A = {}"
define F where "F = (INF a:insert U A. principal a)"
have "F \<noteq> bot"
unfolding F_def
proof (rule INF_filter_not_bot)
fix X
assume X: "X \<subseteq> insert U A" "finite X"
with A(2)[THEN spec, of "X - {U}"] have "U \<inter> \<Inter>(X - {U}) \<noteq> {}"
by auto
with X show "(INF a:X. principal a) \<noteq> bot"
by (auto simp: INF_principal_finite principal_eq_bot_iff)
qed
moreover
have "F \<le> principal U"
unfolding F_def by auto
then have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U) F"
by (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_principal)
moreover
assume "\<forall>F. F \<noteq> bot \<longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U) F \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>U. inf (nhds x) F \<noteq> bot)"
ultimately obtain x where "x \<in> U" and x: "inf (nhds x) F \<noteq> bot"
by auto
{ fix V assume "V \<in> A"
then have "F \<le> principal V"
unfolding F_def by (intro INF_lower2[of V]) auto
then have V: "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> V) F"
by (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_principal)
have "x \<in> closure V"
unfolding closure_iff_nhds_not_empty
proof (intro impI allI)
fix S A
assume "open S" "x \<in> S" "S \<subseteq> A"
then have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A) (nhds x)"
by (auto simp: eventually_nhds)
with V have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> V \<inter> A) (inf (nhds x) F)"
by (auto simp: eventually_inf)
with x show "V \<inter> A \<noteq> {}"
by (auto simp del: Int_iff simp add: trivial_limit_def)
qed
then have "x \<in> V"
using \<open>V \<in> A\<close> A(1) by simp
}
with \<open>x\<in>U\<close> have "x \<in> U \<inter> \<Inter>A" by auto
with \<open>U \<inter> \<Inter>A = {}\<close> show False by auto
qed
definition "countably_compact U \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>A. countable A \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>a\<in>A. open a) \<longrightarrow> U \<subseteq> \<Union>A \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>T\<subseteq>A. finite T \<and> U \<subseteq> \<Union>T))"
lemma countably_compactE:
assumes "countably_compact s" and "\<forall>t\<in>C. open t" and "s \<subseteq> \<Union>C" "countable C"
obtains C' where "C' \<subseteq> C" and "finite C'" and "s \<subseteq> \<Union>C'"
using assms unfolding countably_compact_def by metis
lemma countably_compactI:
assumes "\<And>C. \<forall>t\<in>C. open t \<Longrightarrow> s \<subseteq> \<Union>C \<Longrightarrow> countable C \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>C'\<subseteq>C. finite C' \<and> s \<subseteq> \<Union>C')"
shows "countably_compact s"
using assms unfolding countably_compact_def by metis
lemma compact_imp_countably_compact: "compact U \<Longrightarrow> countably_compact U"
by (auto simp: compact_eq_heine_borel countably_compact_def)
lemma countably_compact_imp_compact:
assumes "countably_compact U"
and ccover: "countable B" "\<forall>b\<in>B. open b"
and basis: "\<And>T x. open T \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>b\<in>B. x \<in> b \<and> b \<inter> U \<subseteq> T"
shows "compact U"
using \<open>countably_compact U\<close>
unfolding compact_eq_heine_borel countably_compact_def
proof safe
fix A
assume A: "\<forall>a\<in>A. open a" "U \<subseteq> \<Union>A"
assume *: "\<forall>A. countable A \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>a\<in>A. open a) \<longrightarrow> U \<subseteq> \<Union>A \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>T\<subseteq>A. finite T \<and> U \<subseteq> \<Union>T)"
moreover define C where "C = {b\<in>B. \<exists>a\<in>A. b \<inter> U \<subseteq> a}"
ultimately have "countable C" "\<forall>a\<in>C. open a"
unfolding C_def using ccover by auto
moreover
have "\<Union>A \<inter> U \<subseteq> \<Union>C"
proof safe
fix x a
assume "x \<in> U" "x \<in> a" "a \<in> A"
with basis[of a x] A obtain b where "b \<in> B" "x \<in> b" "b \<inter> U \<subseteq> a"
by blast
with \<open>a \<in> A\<close> show "x \<in> \<Union>C"
unfolding C_def by auto
qed
then have "U \<subseteq> \<Union>C" using \<open>U \<subseteq> \<Union>A\<close> by auto
ultimately obtain T where T: "T\<subseteq>C" "finite T" "U \<subseteq> \<Union>T"
using * by metis
then have "\<forall>t\<in>T. \<exists>a\<in>A. t \<inter> U \<subseteq> a"
by (auto simp: C_def)
then obtain f where "\<forall>t\<in>T. f t \<in> A \<and> t \<inter> U \<subseteq> f t"
unfolding bchoice_iff Bex_def ..
with T show "\<exists>T\<subseteq>A. finite T \<and> U \<subseteq> \<Union>T"
unfolding C_def by (intro exI[of _ "f`T"]) fastforce
qed
lemma countably_compact_imp_compact_second_countable:
"countably_compact U \<Longrightarrow> compact (U :: 'a :: second_countable_topology set)"
proof (rule countably_compact_imp_compact)
fix T and x :: 'a
assume "open T" "x \<in> T"
from topological_basisE[OF is_basis this] obtain b where
"b \<in> (SOME B. countable B \<and> topological_basis B)" "x \<in> b" "b \<subseteq> T" .
then show "\<exists>b\<in>SOME B. countable B \<and> topological_basis B. x \<in> b \<and> b \<inter> U \<subseteq> T"
by blast
qed (insert countable_basis topological_basis_open[OF is_basis], auto)
lemma countably_compact_eq_compact:
"countably_compact U \<longleftrightarrow> compact (U :: 'a :: second_countable_topology set)"
using countably_compact_imp_compact_second_countable compact_imp_countably_compact by blast
subsubsection\<open>Sequential compactness\<close>
definition seq_compact :: "'a::topological_space set \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "seq_compact S \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>f. (\<forall>n. f n \<in> S) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>l\<in>S. \<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially))"
lemma seq_compactI:
assumes "\<And>f. \<forall>n. f n \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>l\<in>S. \<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
shows "seq_compact S"
unfolding seq_compact_def using assms by fast
lemma seq_compactE:
assumes "seq_compact S" "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S"
obtains l r where "l \<in> S" "strict_mono (r :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat)" "((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using assms unfolding seq_compact_def by fast
lemma closed_sequentially: (* TODO: move upwards *)
assumes "closed s" and "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s" and "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
shows "l \<in> s"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "l \<notin> s"
with \<open>closed s\<close> and \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l\<close> have "eventually (\<lambda>n. f n \<in> - s) sequentially"
by (fast intro: topological_tendstoD)
with \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> s\<close> show "False"
by simp
qed
lemma seq_compact_Int_closed:
assumes "seq_compact s" and "closed t"
shows "seq_compact (s \<inter> t)"
proof (rule seq_compactI)
fix f assume "\<forall>n::nat. f n \<in> s \<inter> t"
hence "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s" and "\<forall>n. f n \<in> t"
by simp_all
from \<open>seq_compact s\<close> and \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> s\<close>
obtain l r where "l \<in> s" and r: "strict_mono r" and l: "(f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by (rule seq_compactE)
from \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> t\<close> have "\<forall>n. (f \<circ> r) n \<in> t"
by simp
from \<open>closed t\<close> and this and l have "l \<in> t"
by (rule closed_sequentially)
with \<open>l \<in> s\<close> and r and l show "\<exists>l\<in>s \<inter> t. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by fast
qed
lemma seq_compact_closed_subset:
assumes "closed s" and "s \<subseteq> t" and "seq_compact t"
shows "seq_compact s"
using assms seq_compact_Int_closed [of t s] by (simp add: Int_absorb1)
lemma seq_compact_imp_countably_compact:
fixes U :: "'a :: first_countable_topology set"
assumes "seq_compact U"
shows "countably_compact U"
proof (safe intro!: countably_compactI)
fix A
assume A: "\<forall>a\<in>A. open a" "U \<subseteq> \<Union>A" "countable A"
have subseq: "\<And>X. range X \<subseteq> U \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>r x. x \<in> U \<and> strict_mono (r :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat) \<and> (X \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
using \<open>seq_compact U\<close> by (fastforce simp: seq_compact_def subset_eq)
show "\<exists>T\<subseteq>A. finite T \<and> U \<subseteq> \<Union>T"
proof cases
assume "finite A"
with A show ?thesis by auto
next
assume "infinite A"
then have "A \<noteq> {}" by auto
show ?thesis
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "\<not> (\<exists>T\<subseteq>A. finite T \<and> U \<subseteq> \<Union>T)"
then have "\<forall>T. \<exists>x. T \<subseteq> A \<and> finite T \<longrightarrow> (x \<in> U - \<Union>T)"
by auto
then obtain X' where T: "\<And>T. T \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> finite T \<Longrightarrow> X' T \<in> U - \<Union>T"
by metis
define X where "X n = X' (from_nat_into A ` {.. n})" for n
have X: "\<And>n. X n \<in> U - (\<Union>i\<le>n. from_nat_into A i)"
using \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close> unfolding X_def by (intro T) (auto intro: from_nat_into)
then have "range X \<subseteq> U"
by auto
with subseq[of X] obtain r x where "x \<in> U" and r: "strict_mono r" "(X \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
by auto
from \<open>x\<in>U\<close> \<open>U \<subseteq> \<Union>A\<close> from_nat_into_surj[OF \<open>countable A\<close>]
obtain n where "x \<in> from_nat_into A n" by auto
with r(2) A(1) from_nat_into[OF \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close>, of n]
have "eventually (\<lambda>i. X (r i) \<in> from_nat_into A n) sequentially"
unfolding tendsto_def by (auto simp: comp_def)
then obtain N where "\<And>i. N \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> X (r i) \<in> from_nat_into A n"
by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
moreover from X have "\<And>i. n \<le> r i \<Longrightarrow> X (r i) \<notin> from_nat_into A n"
by auto
moreover from \<open>strict_mono r\<close>[THEN seq_suble, of "max n N"] have "\<exists>i. n \<le> r i \<and> N \<le> i"
by (auto intro!: exI[of _ "max n N"])
ultimately show False
by auto
qed
qed
qed
lemma compact_imp_seq_compact:
fixes U :: "'a :: first_countable_topology set"
assumes "compact U"
shows "seq_compact U"
unfolding seq_compact_def
proof safe
fix X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume "\<forall>n. X n \<in> U"
then have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> U) (filtermap X sequentially)"
by (auto simp: eventually_filtermap)
moreover
have "filtermap X sequentially \<noteq> bot"
by (simp add: trivial_limit_def eventually_filtermap)
ultimately
obtain x where "x \<in> U" and x: "inf (nhds x) (filtermap X sequentially) \<noteq> bot" (is "?F \<noteq> _")
using \<open>compact U\<close> by (auto simp: compact_filter)
from countable_basis_at_decseq[of x]
obtain A where A:
"\<And>i. open (A i)"
"\<And>i. x \<in> A i"
"\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially"
by blast
define s where "s n i = (SOME j. i < j \<and> X j \<in> A (Suc n))" for n i
{
fix n i
have "\<exists>a. i < a \<and> X a \<in> A (Suc n)"
proof (rule ccontr)
assume "\<not> (\<exists>a>i. X a \<in> A (Suc n))"
then have "\<And>a. Suc i \<le> a \<Longrightarrow> X a \<notin> A (Suc n)"
by auto
then have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<notin> A (Suc n)) (filtermap X sequentially)"
by (auto simp: eventually_filtermap eventually_sequentially)
moreover have "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A (Suc n)) (nhds x)"
using A(1,2)[of "Suc n"] by (auto simp: eventually_nhds)
ultimately have "eventually (\<lambda>x. False) ?F"
by (auto simp: eventually_inf)
with x show False
by (simp add: eventually_False)
qed
then have "i < s n i" "X (s n i) \<in> A (Suc n)"
unfolding s_def by (auto intro: someI2_ex)
}
note s = this
define r where "r = rec_nat (s 0 0) s"
have "strict_mono r"
by (auto simp: r_def s strict_mono_Suc_iff)
moreover
have "(\<lambda>n. X (r n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
fix S
assume "open S" "x \<in> S"
with A(3) have "eventually (\<lambda>i. A i \<subseteq> S) sequentially"
by auto
moreover
{
fix i
assume "Suc 0 \<le> i"
then have "X (r i) \<in> A i"
by (cases i) (simp_all add: r_def s)
}
then have "eventually (\<lambda>i. X (r i) \<in> A i) sequentially"
by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
ultimately show "eventually (\<lambda>i. X (r i) \<in> S) sequentially"
by eventually_elim auto
qed
ultimately show "\<exists>x \<in> U. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> (X \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
using \<open>x \<in> U\<close> by (auto simp: convergent_def comp_def)
qed
lemma countably_compact_imp_acc_point:
assumes "countably_compact s"
and "countable t"
and "infinite t"
and "t \<subseteq> s"
shows "\<exists>x\<in>s. \<forall>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> t)"
proof (rule ccontr)
define C where "C = (\<lambda>F. interior (F \<union> (- t))) ` {F. finite F \<and> F \<subseteq> t }"
note \<open>countably_compact s\<close>
moreover have "\<forall>t\<in>C. open t"
by (auto simp: C_def)
moreover
assume "\<not> (\<exists>x\<in>s. \<forall>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> t))"
then have s: "\<And>x. x \<in> s \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<and> finite (U \<inter> t)" by metis
have "s \<subseteq> \<Union>C"
using \<open>t \<subseteq> s\<close>
unfolding C_def
apply (safe dest!: s)
apply (rule_tac a="U \<inter> t" in UN_I)
apply (auto intro!: interiorI simp add: finite_subset)
done
moreover
from \<open>countable t\<close> have "countable C"
unfolding C_def by (auto intro: countable_Collect_finite_subset)
ultimately
obtain D where "D \<subseteq> C" "finite D" "s \<subseteq> \<Union>D"
by (rule countably_compactE)
then obtain E where E: "E \<subseteq> {F. finite F \<and> F \<subseteq> t }" "finite E"
and s: "s \<subseteq> (\<Union>F\<in>E. interior (F \<union> (- t)))"
by (metis (lifting) finite_subset_image C_def)
from s \<open>t \<subseteq> s\<close> have "t \<subseteq> \<Union>E"
using interior_subset by blast
moreover have "finite (\<Union>E)"
using E by auto
ultimately show False using \<open>infinite t\<close>
by (auto simp: finite_subset)
qed
lemma countable_acc_point_imp_seq_compact:
fixes s :: "'a::first_countable_topology set"
assumes "\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> countable t \<and> t \<subseteq> s \<longrightarrow>
(\<exists>x\<in>s. \<forall>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> t))"
shows "seq_compact s"
proof -
{
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume f: "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s"
have "\<exists>l\<in>s. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
proof (cases "finite (range f)")
case True
obtain l where "infinite {n. f n = f l}"
using pigeonhole_infinite[OF _ True] by auto
then obtain r :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where "strict_mono r" and fr: "\<forall>n. f (r n) = f l"
using infinite_enumerate by blast
then have "strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> f l"
by (simp add: fr o_def)
with f show "\<exists>l\<in>s. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by auto
next
case False
with f assms have "\<exists>x\<in>s. \<forall>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> range f)"
by auto
then obtain l where "l \<in> s" "\<forall>U. l\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> range f)" ..
from this(2) have "\<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using acc_point_range_imp_convergent_subsequence[of l f] by auto
with \<open>l \<in> s\<close> show "\<exists>l\<in>s. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially" ..
qed
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding seq_compact_def by auto
qed
lemma seq_compact_eq_countably_compact:
fixes U :: "'a :: first_countable_topology set"
shows "seq_compact U \<longleftrightarrow> countably_compact U"
using
countable_acc_point_imp_seq_compact
countably_compact_imp_acc_point
seq_compact_imp_countably_compact
by metis
lemma seq_compact_eq_acc_point:
fixes s :: "'a :: first_countable_topology set"
shows "seq_compact s \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> countable t \<and> t \<subseteq> s --> (\<exists>x\<in>s. \<forall>U. x\<in>U \<and> open U \<longrightarrow> infinite (U \<inter> t)))"
using
countable_acc_point_imp_seq_compact[of s]
countably_compact_imp_acc_point[of s]
seq_compact_imp_countably_compact[of s]
by metis
lemma seq_compact_eq_compact:
fixes U :: "'a :: second_countable_topology set"
shows "seq_compact U \<longleftrightarrow> compact U"
using seq_compact_eq_countably_compact countably_compact_eq_compact by blast
lemma bolzano_weierstrass_imp_seq_compact:
fixes s :: "'a::{t1_space, first_countable_topology} set"
shows "\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> t \<subseteq> s \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t) \<Longrightarrow> seq_compact s"
by (rule countable_acc_point_imp_seq_compact) (metis islimpt_eq_acc_point)
subsubsection\<open>Totally bounded\<close>
lemma cauchy_def: "Cauchy s \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>N. \<forall>m n. m \<ge> N \<and> n \<ge> N \<longrightarrow> dist (s m) (s n) < e)"
unfolding Cauchy_def by metis
lemma seq_compact_imp_totally_bounded:
assumes "seq_compact s"
shows "\<forall>e>0. \<exists>k. finite k \<and> k \<subseteq> s \<and> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>k. ball x e)"
proof -
{ fix e::real assume "e > 0" assume *: "\<And>k. finite k \<Longrightarrow> k \<subseteq> s \<Longrightarrow> \<not> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>k. ball x e)"
let ?Q = "\<lambda>x n r. r \<in> s \<and> (\<forall>m < (n::nat). \<not> (dist (x m) r < e))"
have "\<exists>x. \<forall>n::nat. ?Q x n (x n)"
proof (rule dependent_wellorder_choice)
fix n x assume "\<And>y. y < n \<Longrightarrow> ?Q x y (x y)"
then have "\<not> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>x ` {0..<n}. ball x e)"
using *[of "x ` {0 ..< n}"] by (auto simp: subset_eq)
then obtain z where z:"z\<in>s" "z \<notin> (\<Union>x\<in>x ` {0..<n}. ball x e)"
unfolding subset_eq by auto
show "\<exists>r. ?Q x n r"
using z by auto
qed simp
then obtain x where "\<forall>n::nat. x n \<in> s" and x:"\<And>n m. m < n \<Longrightarrow> \<not> (dist (x m) (x n) < e)"
by blast
then obtain l r where "l \<in> s" and r:"strict_mono r" and "((x \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using assms by (metis seq_compact_def)
from this(3) have "Cauchy (x \<circ> r)"
using LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy by auto
then obtain N::nat where "\<And>m n. N \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> N \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> dist ((x \<circ> r) m) ((x \<circ> r) n) < e"
unfolding cauchy_def using \<open>e > 0\<close> by blast
then have False
using x[of "r N" "r (N+1)"] r by (auto simp: strict_mono_def) }
then show ?thesis
by metis
qed
subsubsection\<open>Heine-Borel theorem\<close>
lemma seq_compact_imp_heine_borel:
fixes s :: "'a :: metric_space set"
assumes "seq_compact s"
shows "compact s"
proof -
from seq_compact_imp_totally_bounded[OF \<open>seq_compact s\<close>]
obtain f where f: "\<forall>e>0. finite (f e) \<and> f e \<subseteq> s \<and> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>f e. ball x e)"
unfolding choice_iff' ..
define K where "K = (\<lambda>(x, r). ball x r) ` ((\<Union>e \<in> \<rat> \<inter> {0 <..}. f e) \<times> \<rat>)"
have "countably_compact s"
using \<open>seq_compact s\<close> by (rule seq_compact_imp_countably_compact)
then show "compact s"
proof (rule countably_compact_imp_compact)
show "countable K"
unfolding K_def using f
by (auto intro: countable_finite countable_subset countable_rat
intro!: countable_image countable_SIGMA countable_UN)
show "\<forall>b\<in>K. open b" by (auto simp: K_def)
next
fix T x
assume T: "open T" "x \<in> T" and x: "x \<in> s"
from openE[OF T] obtain e where "0 < e" "ball x e \<subseteq> T"
by auto
then have "0 < e / 2" "ball x (e / 2) \<subseteq> T"
by auto
from Rats_dense_in_real[OF \<open>0 < e / 2\<close>] obtain r where "r \<in> \<rat>" "0 < r" "r < e / 2"
by auto
from f[rule_format, of r] \<open>0 < r\<close> \<open>x \<in> s\<close> obtain k where "k \<in> f r" "x \<in> ball k r"
by auto
from \<open>r \<in> \<rat>\<close> \<open>0 < r\<close> \<open>k \<in> f r\<close> have "ball k r \<in> K"
by (auto simp: K_def)
then show "\<exists>b\<in>K. x \<in> b \<and> b \<inter> s \<subseteq> T"
proof (rule bexI[rotated], safe)
fix y
assume "y \<in> ball k r"
with \<open>r < e / 2\<close> \<open>x \<in> ball k r\<close> have "dist x y < e"
by (intro dist_triangle_half_r [of k _ e]) (auto simp: dist_commute)
with \<open>ball x e \<subseteq> T\<close> show "y \<in> T"
by auto
next
show "x \<in> ball k r" by fact
qed
qed
qed
lemma compact_eq_seq_compact_metric:
"compact (s :: 'a::metric_space set) \<longleftrightarrow> seq_compact s"
using compact_imp_seq_compact seq_compact_imp_heine_borel by blast
lemma compact_def: \<comment> \<open>this is the definition of compactness in HOL Light\<close>
"compact (S :: 'a::metric_space set) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>f. (\<forall>n. f n \<in> S) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>l\<in>S. \<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l))"
unfolding compact_eq_seq_compact_metric seq_compact_def by auto
subsubsection \<open>Complete the chain of compactness variants\<close>
lemma compact_eq_bolzano_weierstrass:
fixes s :: "'a::metric_space set"
shows "compact s \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> t \<subseteq> s --> (\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
using heine_borel_imp_bolzano_weierstrass[of s] by auto
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
unfolding compact_eq_seq_compact_metric by (rule bolzano_weierstrass_imp_seq_compact)
qed
lemma bolzano_weierstrass_imp_bounded:
"\<forall>t. infinite t \<and> t \<subseteq> s \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x \<in> s. x islimpt t) \<Longrightarrow> bounded s"
using compact_imp_bounded unfolding compact_eq_bolzano_weierstrass .
subsection \<open>Metric spaces with the Heine-Borel property\<close>
text \<open>
A metric space (or topological vector space) is said to have the
Heine-Borel property if every closed and bounded subset is compact.
\<close>
class heine_borel = metric_space +
assumes bounded_imp_convergent_subsequence:
"bounded (range f) \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>l r. strict_mono (r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat) \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
lemma bounded_closed_imp_seq_compact:
fixes s::"'a::heine_borel set"
assumes "bounded s"
and "closed s"
shows "seq_compact s"
proof (unfold seq_compact_def, clarify)
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume f: "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s"
with \<open>bounded s\<close> have "bounded (range f)"
by (auto intro: bounded_subset)
obtain l r where r: "strict_mono (r :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat)" and l: "((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using bounded_imp_convergent_subsequence [OF \<open>bounded (range f)\<close>] by auto
from f have fr: "\<forall>n. (f \<circ> r) n \<in> s"
by simp
have "l \<in> s" using \<open>closed s\<close> fr l
by (rule closed_sequentially)
show "\<exists>l\<in>s. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using \<open>l \<in> s\<close> r l by blast
qed
lemma compact_eq_bounded_closed:
fixes s :: "'a::heine_borel set"
shows "compact s \<longleftrightarrow> bounded s \<and> closed s"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
using compact_imp_closed compact_imp_bounded
by blast
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
using bounded_closed_imp_seq_compact[of s]
unfolding compact_eq_seq_compact_metric
by auto
qed
lemma compact_Inter:
fixes \<F> :: "'a :: heine_borel set set"
assumes com: "\<And>S. S \<in> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> compact S" and "\<F> \<noteq> {}"
shows "compact(\<Inter> \<F>)"
using assms
by (meson Inf_lower all_not_in_conv bounded_subset closed_Inter compact_eq_bounded_closed)
lemma compact_closure [simp]:
fixes S :: "'a::heine_borel set"
shows "compact(closure S) \<longleftrightarrow> bounded S"
by (meson bounded_closure bounded_subset closed_closure closure_subset compact_eq_bounded_closed)
lemma not_compact_UNIV[simp]:
fixes s :: "'a::{real_normed_vector,perfect_space,heine_borel} set"
shows "~ compact (UNIV::'a set)"
by (simp add: compact_eq_bounded_closed)
instance real :: heine_borel
proof
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
assume f: "bounded (range f)"
obtain r :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where r: "strict_mono r" "monoseq (f \<circ> r)"
unfolding comp_def by (metis seq_monosub)
then have "Bseq (f \<circ> r)"
unfolding Bseq_eq_bounded using f by (force intro: bounded_subset)
with r show "\<exists>l r. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using Bseq_monoseq_convergent[of "f \<circ> r"] by (auto simp: convergent_def)
qed
lemma compact_lemma_general:
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
fixes proj::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'c::heine_borel" (infixl "proj" 60)
fixes unproj:: "('b \<Rightarrow> 'c) \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assumes finite_basis: "finite basis"
assumes bounded_proj: "\<And>k. k \<in> basis \<Longrightarrow> bounded ((\<lambda>x. x proj k) ` range f)"
assumes proj_unproj: "\<And>e k. k \<in> basis \<Longrightarrow> (unproj e) proj k = e k"
assumes unproj_proj: "\<And>x. unproj (\<lambda>k. x proj k) = x"
shows "\<forall>d\<subseteq>basis. \<exists>l::'a. \<exists> r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat.
strict_mono r \<and> (\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r n) proj i) (l proj i) < e) sequentially)"
proof safe
fix d :: "'b set"
assume d: "d \<subseteq> basis"
with finite_basis have "finite d"
by (blast intro: finite_subset)
from this d show "\<exists>l::'a. \<exists>r::nat\<Rightarrow>nat. strict_mono r \<and>
(\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r n) proj i) (l proj i) < e) sequentially)"
proof (induct d)
case empty
then show ?case
unfolding strict_mono_def by auto
next
case (insert k d)
have k[intro]: "k \<in> basis"
using insert by auto
have s': "bounded ((\<lambda>x. x proj k) ` range f)"
using k
by (rule bounded_proj)
obtain l1::"'a" and r1 where r1: "strict_mono r1"
and lr1: "\<forall>e > 0. eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r1 n) proj i) (l1 proj i) < e) sequentially"
using insert(3) using insert(4) by auto
have f': "\<forall>n. f (r1 n) proj k \<in> (\<lambda>x. x proj k) ` range f"
by simp
have "bounded (range (\<lambda>i. f (r1 i) proj k))"
by (metis (lifting) bounded_subset f' image_subsetI s')
then obtain l2 r2 where r2:"strict_mono r2" and lr2:"((\<lambda>i. f (r1 (r2 i)) proj k) \<longlongrightarrow> l2) sequentially"
using bounded_imp_convergent_subsequence[of "\<lambda>i. f (r1 i) proj k"]
by (auto simp: o_def)
define r where "r = r1 \<circ> r2"
have r:"strict_mono r"
using r1 and r2 unfolding r_def o_def strict_mono_def by auto
moreover
define l where "l = unproj (\<lambda>i. if i = k then l2 else l1 proj i)"
{
fix e::real
assume "e > 0"
from lr1 \<open>e > 0\<close> have N1: "eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r1 n) proj i) (l1 proj i) < e) sequentially"
by blast
from lr2 \<open>e > 0\<close> have N2:"eventually (\<lambda>n. dist (f (r1 (r2 n)) proj k) l2 < e) sequentially"
by (rule tendstoD)
from r2 N1 have N1': "eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r1 (r2 n)) proj i) (l1 proj i) < e) sequentially"
by (rule eventually_subseq)
have "eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>(insert k d). dist (f (r n) proj i) (l proj i) < e) sequentially"
using N1' N2
by eventually_elim (insert insert.prems, auto simp: l_def r_def o_def proj_unproj)
}
ultimately show ?case by auto
qed
qed
lemma compact_lemma:
fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "bounded (range f)"
shows "\<forall>d\<subseteq>Basis. \<exists>l::'a. \<exists> r.
strict_mono r \<and> (\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>d. dist (f (r n) \<bullet> i) (l \<bullet> i) < e) sequentially)"
by (rule compact_lemma_general[where unproj="\<lambda>e. \<Sum>i\<in>Basis. e i *\<^sub>R i"])
(auto intro!: assms bounded_linear_inner_left bounded_linear_image
simp: euclidean_representation)
instance euclidean_space \<subseteq> heine_borel
proof
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume f: "bounded (range f)"
then obtain l::'a and r where r: "strict_mono r"
and l: "\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>Basis. dist (f (r n) \<bullet> i) (l \<bullet> i) < e) sequentially"
using compact_lemma [OF f] by blast
{
fix e::real
assume "e > 0"
hence "e / real_of_nat DIM('a) > 0" by (simp add: DIM_positive)
with l have "eventually (\<lambda>n. \<forall>i\<in>Basis. dist (f (r n) \<bullet> i) (l \<bullet> i) < e / (real_of_nat DIM('a))) sequentially"
by simp
moreover
{
fix n
assume n: "\<forall>i\<in>Basis. dist (f (r n) \<bullet> i) (l \<bullet> i) < e / (real_of_nat DIM('a))"
have "dist (f (r n)) l \<le> (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. dist (f (r n) \<bullet> i) (l \<bullet> i))"
apply (subst euclidean_dist_l2)
using zero_le_dist
apply (rule L2_set_le_sum)
done
also have "\<dots> < (\<Sum>i\<in>(Basis::'a set). e / (real_of_nat DIM('a)))"
apply (rule sum_strict_mono)
using n
apply auto
done
finally have "dist (f (r n)) l < e"
by auto
}
ultimately have "eventually (\<lambda>n. dist (f (r n)) l < e) sequentially"
by (rule eventually_mono)
}
then have *: "((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
unfolding o_def tendsto_iff by simp
with r show "\<exists>l r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
by auto
qed
lemma bounded_fst: "bounded s \<Longrightarrow> bounded (fst ` s)"
unfolding bounded_def
by (metis (erased, hide_lams) dist_fst_le image_iff order_trans)
lemma bounded_snd: "bounded s \<Longrightarrow> bounded (snd ` s)"
unfolding bounded_def
by (metis (no_types, hide_lams) dist_snd_le image_iff order.trans)
instance prod :: (heine_borel, heine_borel) heine_borel
proof
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'b"
assume f: "bounded (range f)"
then have "bounded (fst ` range f)"
by (rule bounded_fst)
then have s1: "bounded (range (fst \<circ> f))"
by (simp add: image_comp)
obtain l1 r1 where r1: "strict_mono r1" and l1: "(\<lambda>n. fst (f (r1 n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l1"
using bounded_imp_convergent_subsequence [OF s1] unfolding o_def by fast
from f have s2: "bounded (range (snd \<circ> f \<circ> r1))"
by (auto simp: image_comp intro: bounded_snd bounded_subset)
obtain l2 r2 where r2: "strict_mono r2" and l2: "((\<lambda>n. snd (f (r1 (r2 n)))) \<longlongrightarrow> l2) sequentially"
using bounded_imp_convergent_subsequence [OF s2]
unfolding o_def by fast
have l1': "((\<lambda>n. fst (f (r1 (r2 n)))) \<longlongrightarrow> l1) sequentially"
using LIMSEQ_subseq_LIMSEQ [OF l1 r2] unfolding o_def .
have l: "((f \<circ> (r1 \<circ> r2)) \<longlongrightarrow> (l1, l2)) sequentially"
using tendsto_Pair [OF l1' l2] unfolding o_def by simp
have r: "strict_mono (r1 \<circ> r2)"
using r1 r2 unfolding strict_mono_def by simp
show "\<exists>l r. strict_mono r \<and> ((f \<circ> r) \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using l r by fast
qed
subsubsection \<open>Completeness\<close>
lemma (in metric_space) completeI:
assumes "\<And>f. \<forall>n. f n \<in> s \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy f \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>l\<in>s. f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
shows "complete s"
using assms unfolding complete_def by fast
lemma (in metric_space) completeE:
assumes "complete s" and "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s" and "Cauchy f"
obtains l where "l \<in> s" and "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using assms unfolding complete_def by fast
(* TODO: generalize to uniform spaces *)
lemma compact_imp_complete:
fixes s :: "'a::metric_space set"
assumes "compact s"
shows "complete s"
proof -
{
fix f
assume as: "(\<forall>n::nat. f n \<in> s)" "Cauchy f"
from as(1) obtain l r where lr: "l\<in>s" "strict_mono r" "(f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using assms unfolding compact_def by blast
note lr' = seq_suble [OF lr(2)]
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
from as(2) obtain N where N:"\<forall>m n. N \<le> m \<and> N \<le> n \<longrightarrow> dist (f m) (f n) < e/2"
unfolding cauchy_def
using \<open>e > 0\<close>
apply (erule_tac x="e/2" in allE, auto)
done
from lr(3)[unfolded lim_sequentially, THEN spec[where x="e/2"]]
obtain M where M:"\<forall>n\<ge>M. dist ((f \<circ> r) n) l < e/2"
using \<open>e > 0\<close> by auto
{
fix n :: nat
assume n: "n \<ge> max N M"
have "dist ((f \<circ> r) n) l < e/2"
using n M by auto
moreover have "r n \<ge> N"
using lr'[of n] n by auto
then have "dist (f n) ((f \<circ> r) n) < e / 2"
using N and n by auto
ultimately have "dist (f n) l < e"
using dist_triangle_half_r[of "f (r n)" "f n" e l]
by (auto simp: dist_commute)
}
then have "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (f n) l < e" by blast
}
then have "\<exists>l\<in>s. (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially" using \<open>l\<in>s\<close>
unfolding lim_sequentially by auto
}
then show ?thesis unfolding complete_def by auto
qed
lemma compact_eq_totally_bounded:
"compact s \<longleftrightarrow> complete s \<and> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>k. finite k \<and> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>k. ball x e))"
(is "_ \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof
assume assms: "?rhs"
then obtain k where k: "\<And>e. 0 < e \<Longrightarrow> finite (k e)" "\<And>e. 0 < e \<Longrightarrow> s \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>k e. ball x e)"
by (auto simp: choice_iff')
show "compact s"
proof cases
assume "s = {}"
then show "compact s" by (simp add: compact_def)
next
assume "s \<noteq> {}"
show ?thesis
unfolding compact_def
proof safe
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume f: "\<forall>n. f n \<in> s"
define e where "e n = 1 / (2 * Suc n)" for n
then have [simp]: "\<And>n. 0 < e n" by auto
define B where "B n U = (SOME b. infinite {n. f n \<in> b} \<and> (\<exists>x. b \<subseteq> ball x (e n) \<inter> U))" for n U
{
fix n U
assume "infinite {n. f n \<in> U}"
then have "\<exists>b\<in>k (e n). infinite {i\<in>{n. f n \<in> U}. f i \<in> ball b (e n)}"
using k f by (intro pigeonhole_infinite_rel) (auto simp: subset_eq)
then obtain a where
"a \<in> k (e n)"
"infinite {i \<in> {n. f n \<in> U}. f i \<in> ball a (e n)}" ..
then have "\<exists>b. infinite {i. f i \<in> b} \<and> (\<exists>x. b \<subseteq> ball x (e n) \<inter> U)"
by (intro exI[of _ "ball a (e n) \<inter> U"] exI[of _ a]) (auto simp: ac_simps)
from someI_ex[OF this]
have "infinite {i. f i \<in> B n U}" "\<exists>x. B n U \<subseteq> ball x (e n) \<inter> U"
unfolding B_def by auto
}
note B = this
define F where "F = rec_nat (B 0 UNIV) B"
{
fix n
have "infinite {i. f i \<in> F n}"
by (induct n) (auto simp: F_def B)
}
then have F: "\<And>n. \<exists>x. F (Suc n) \<subseteq> ball x (e n) \<inter> F n"
using B by (simp add: F_def)
then have F_dec: "\<And>m n. m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> F n \<subseteq> F m"
using decseq_SucI[of F] by (auto simp: decseq_def)
obtain sel where sel: "\<And>k i. i < sel k i" "\<And>k i. f (sel k i) \<in> F k"
proof (atomize_elim, unfold all_conj_distrib[symmetric], intro choice allI)
fix k i
have "infinite ({n. f n \<in> F k} - {.. i})"
using \<open>infinite {n. f n \<in> F k}\<close> by auto
from infinite_imp_nonempty[OF this]
show "\<exists>x>i. f x \<in> F k"
by (simp add: set_eq_iff not_le conj_commute)
qed
define t where "t = rec_nat (sel 0 0) (\<lambda>n i. sel (Suc n) i)"
have "strict_mono t"
unfolding strict_mono_Suc_iff by (simp add: t_def sel)
moreover have "\<forall>i. (f \<circ> t) i \<in> s"
using f by auto
moreover
{
fix n
have "(f \<circ> t) n \<in> F n"
by (cases n) (simp_all add: t_def sel)
}
note t = this
have "Cauchy (f \<circ> t)"
proof (safe intro!: metric_CauchyI exI elim!: nat_approx_posE)
fix r :: real and N n m
assume "1 / Suc N < r" "Suc N \<le> n" "Suc N \<le> m"
then have "(f \<circ> t) n \<in> F (Suc N)" "(f \<circ> t) m \<in> F (Suc N)" "2 * e N < r"
using F_dec t by (auto simp: e_def field_simps of_nat_Suc)
with F[of N] obtain x where "dist x ((f \<circ> t) n) < e N" "dist x ((f \<circ> t) m) < e N"
by (auto simp: subset_eq)
with dist_triangle[of "(f \<circ> t) m" "(f \<circ> t) n" x] \<open>2 * e N < r\<close>
show "dist ((f \<circ> t) m) ((f \<circ> t) n) < r"
by (simp add: dist_commute)
qed
ultimately show "\<exists>l\<in>s. \<exists>r. strict_mono r \<and> (f \<circ> r) \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using assms unfolding complete_def by blast
qed
qed
qed (metis compact_imp_complete compact_imp_seq_compact seq_compact_imp_totally_bounded)
lemma cauchy_imp_bounded:
assumes "Cauchy s"
shows "bounded (range s)"
proof -
from assms obtain N :: nat where "\<forall>m n. N \<le> m \<and> N \<le> n \<longrightarrow> dist (s m) (s n) < 1"
unfolding cauchy_def by force
then have N:"\<forall>n. N \<le> n \<longrightarrow> dist (s N) (s n) < 1" by auto
moreover
have "bounded (s ` {0..N})"
using finite_imp_bounded[of "s ` {1..N}"] by auto
then obtain a where a:"\<forall>x\<in>s ` {0..N}. dist (s N) x \<le> a"
unfolding bounded_any_center [where a="s N"] by auto
ultimately show "?thesis"
unfolding bounded_any_center [where a="s N"]
apply (rule_tac x="max a 1" in exI, auto)
apply (erule_tac x=y in allE)
apply (erule_tac x=y in ballE, auto)
done
qed
instance heine_borel < complete_space
proof
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" assume "Cauchy f"
then have "bounded (range f)"
by (rule cauchy_imp_bounded)
then have "compact (closure (range f))"
unfolding compact_eq_bounded_closed by auto
then have "complete (closure (range f))"
by (rule compact_imp_complete)
moreover have "\<forall>n. f n \<in> closure (range f)"
using closure_subset [of "range f"] by auto
ultimately have "\<exists>l\<in>closure (range f). (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially"
using \<open>Cauchy f\<close> unfolding complete_def by auto
then show "convergent f"
unfolding convergent_def by auto
qed
instance euclidean_space \<subseteq> banach ..
lemma complete_UNIV: "complete (UNIV :: ('a::complete_space) set)"
proof (rule completeI)
fix f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" assume "Cauchy f"
then have "convergent f" by (rule Cauchy_convergent)
then show "\<exists>l\<in>UNIV. f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l" unfolding convergent_def by simp
qed
lemma complete_imp_closed:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
assumes "complete S"
shows "closed S"
proof (unfold closed_sequential_limits, clarify)
fix f x assume "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S" and "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> x"
from \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> x\<close> have "Cauchy f"
by (rule LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy)
with \<open>complete S\<close> and \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> S\<close> obtain l where "l \<in> S" and "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by (rule completeE)
from \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> x\<close> and \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l\<close> have "x = l"
by (rule LIMSEQ_unique)
with \<open>l \<in> S\<close> show "x \<in> S"
by simp
qed
lemma complete_Int_closed:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
assumes "complete S" and "closed t"
shows "complete (S \<inter> t)"
proof (rule completeI)
fix f assume "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S \<inter> t" and "Cauchy f"
then have "\<forall>n. f n \<in> S" and "\<forall>n. f n \<in> t"
by simp_all
from \<open>complete S\<close> obtain l where "l \<in> S" and "f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
using \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> S\<close> and \<open>Cauchy f\<close> by (rule completeE)
from \<open>closed t\<close> and \<open>\<forall>n. f n \<in> t\<close> and \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l\<close> have "l \<in> t"
by (rule closed_sequentially)
with \<open>l \<in> S\<close> and \<open>f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l\<close> show "\<exists>l\<in>S \<inter> t. f \<longlonglongrightarrow> l"
by fast
qed
lemma complete_closed_subset:
fixes S :: "'a::metric_space set"
assumes "closed S" and "S \<subseteq> t" and "complete t"
shows "complete S"
using assms complete_Int_closed [of t S] by (simp add: Int_absorb1)
lemma complete_eq_closed:
fixes S :: "('a::complete_space) set"
shows "complete S \<longleftrightarrow> closed S"
proof
assume "closed S" then show "complete S"
using subset_UNIV complete_UNIV by (rule complete_closed_subset)
next
assume "complete S" then show "closed S"
by (rule complete_imp_closed)
qed
lemma convergent_eq_Cauchy:
fixes S :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::complete_space"
shows "(\<exists>l. (S \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially) \<longleftrightarrow> Cauchy S"
unfolding Cauchy_convergent_iff convergent_def ..
lemma convergent_imp_bounded:
fixes S :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::metric_space"
shows "(S \<longlongrightarrow> l) sequentially \<Longrightarrow> bounded (range S)"
by (intro cauchy_imp_bounded LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy)
lemma frontier_subset_compact:
fixes S :: "'a::heine_borel set"
shows "compact S \<Longrightarrow> frontier S \<subseteq> S"
using frontier_subset_closed compact_eq_bounded_closed
by blast
subsection \<open>Continuity\<close>
text\<open>Derive the epsilon-delta forms, which we often use as "definitions"\<close>
lemma continuous_within_eps_delta:
"continuous (at x within s) f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x'\<in> s. dist x' x < d --> dist (f x') (f x) < e)"
unfolding continuous_within and Lim_within
apply auto
apply (metis dist_nz dist_self, blast)
done
corollary continuous_at_eps_delta:
"continuous (at x) f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e > 0. \<exists>d > 0. \<forall>x'. dist x' x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e)"
using continuous_within_eps_delta [of x UNIV f] by simp
lemma continuous_at_right_real_increasing:
fixes f :: "real \<Rightarrow> real"
assumes nondecF: "\<And>x y. x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> f x \<le> f y"
shows "continuous (at_right a) f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>d>0. f (a + d) - f a < e)"
apply (simp add: greaterThan_def dist_real_def continuous_within Lim_within_le)
apply (intro all_cong ex_cong, safe)
apply (erule_tac x="a + d" in allE, simp)
apply (simp add: nondecF field_simps)
apply (drule nondecF, simp)
done
lemma continuous_at_left_real_increasing:
assumes nondecF: "\<And> x y. x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> f x \<le> ((f y) :: real)"
shows "(continuous (at_left (a :: real)) f) = (\<forall>e > 0. \<exists>delta > 0. f a - f (a - delta) < e)"
apply (simp add: lessThan_def dist_real_def continuous_within Lim_within_le)
apply (intro all_cong ex_cong, safe)
apply (erule_tac x="a - d" in allE, simp)
apply (simp add: nondecF field_simps)
apply (cut_tac x="a - d" and y=x in nondecF, simp_all)
done
text\<open>Versions in terms of open balls.\<close>
lemma continuous_within_ball:
"continuous (at x within s) f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>e > 0. \<exists>d > 0. f ` (ball x d \<inter> s) \<subseteq> ball (f x) e)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then obtain d where d: "d>0" "\<forall>xa\<in>s. 0 < dist xa x \<and> dist xa x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f xa) (f x) < e"
using \<open>?lhs\<close>[unfolded continuous_within Lim_within] by auto
{
fix y
assume "y \<in> f ` (ball x d \<inter> s)"
then have "y \<in> ball (f x) e"
using d(2)
apply (auto simp: dist_commute)
apply (erule_tac x=xa in ballE, auto)
using \<open>e > 0\<close>
apply auto
done
}
then have "\<exists>d>0. f ` (ball x d \<inter> s) \<subseteq> ball (f x) e"
using \<open>d > 0\<close>
unfolding subset_eq ball_def by (auto simp: dist_commute)
}
then show ?rhs by auto
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
unfolding continuous_within Lim_within ball_def subset_eq
apply (auto simp: dist_commute)
apply (erule_tac x=e in allE, auto)
done
qed
lemma continuous_at_ball:
"continuous (at x) f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>d>0. f ` (ball x d) \<subseteq> ball (f x) e)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
unfolding continuous_at Lim_at subset_eq Ball_def Bex_def image_iff mem_ball
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x=e in allE, auto)
apply (rule_tac x=d in exI, auto)
apply (erule_tac x=xa in allE)
apply (auto simp: dist_commute)
done
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
unfolding continuous_at Lim_at subset_eq Ball_def Bex_def image_iff mem_ball
apply auto
apply (erule_tac x=e in allE, auto)
apply (rule_tac x=d in exI, auto)
apply (erule_tac x="f xa" in allE)
apply (auto simp: dist_commute)
done
qed
text\<open>Define setwise continuity in terms of limits within the set.\<close>
lemma continuous_on_iff:
"continuous_on s f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>x\<in>s. \<forall>e>0. \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x'\<in>s. dist x' x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e)"
unfolding continuous_on_def Lim_within
by (metis dist_pos_lt dist_self)
lemma continuous_within_E:
assumes "continuous (at x within s) f" "e>0"
obtains d where "d>0" "\<And>x'. \<lbrakk>x'\<in> s; dist x' x \<le> d\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
using assms apply (simp add: continuous_within_eps_delta)
apply (drule spec [of _ e], clarify)
apply (rule_tac d="d/2" in that, auto)
done
lemma continuous_onI [intro?]:
assumes "\<And>x e. \<lbrakk>e > 0; x \<in> s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>d>0. \<forall>x'\<in>s. dist x' x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) \<le> e"
shows "continuous_on s f"
apply (simp add: continuous_on_iff, clarify)
apply (rule ex_forward [OF assms [OF half_gt_zero]], auto)
done
text\<open>Some simple consequential lemmas.\<close>
lemma continuous_onE:
assumes "continuous_on s f" "x\<in>s" "e>0"
obtains d where "d>0" "\<And>x'. \<lbrakk>x' \<in> s; dist x' x \<le> d\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
using assms
apply (simp add: continuous_on_iff)
apply (elim ballE allE)
apply (auto intro: that [where d="d/2" for d])
done
lemma uniformly_continuous_onE:
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f" "0 < e"
obtains d where "d>0" "\<And>x x'. \<lbrakk>x\<in>s; x'\<in>s; dist x' x < d\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
using assms
by (auto simp: uniformly_continuous_on_def)
lemma continuous_at_imp_continuous_within:
"continuous (at x) f \<Longrightarrow> continuous (at x within s) f"
unfolding continuous_within continuous_at using Lim_at_imp_Lim_at_within by auto
lemma Lim_trivial_limit: "trivial_limit net \<Longrightarrow> (f \<longlongrightarrow> l) net"
by simp
lemmas continuous_on = continuous_on_def \<comment> \<open>legacy theorem name\<close>
lemma continuous_within_subset:
"continuous (at x within s) f \<Longrightarrow> t \<subseteq> s \<Longrightarrow> continuous (at x within t) f"
unfolding continuous_within by(metis tendsto_within_subset)
lemma continuous_on_interior:
"continuous_on s f \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> interior s \<Longrightarrow> continuous (at x) f"
by (metis continuous_on_eq_continuous_at continuous_on_subset interiorE)
lemma continuous_on_eq:
"\<lbrakk>continuous_on s f; \<And>x. x \<in> s \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> continuous_on s g"
unfolding continuous_on_def tendsto_def eventually_at_topological
by simp
text \<open>Characterization of various kinds of continuity in terms of sequences.\<close>
lemma continuous_within_sequentially:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::topological_space"
shows "continuous (at a within s) f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>x. (\<forall>n::nat. x n \<in> s) \<and> (x \<longlongrightarrow> a) sequentially
\<longrightarrow> ((f \<circ> x) \<longlongrightarrow> f a) sequentially)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
{
fix x :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assume x: "\<forall>n. x n \<in> s" "\<forall>e>0. eventually (\<lambda>n. dist (x n) a < e) sequentially"
fix T :: "'b set"
assume "open T" and "f a \<in> T"
with \<open>?lhs\<close> obtain d where "d>0" and d:"\<forall>x\<in>s. 0 < dist x a \<and> dist x a < d \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> T"
unfolding continuous_within tendsto_def eventually_at by auto
have "eventually (\<lambda>n. dist (x n) a < d) sequentially"
using x(2) \<open>d>0\<close> by simp
then have "eventually (\<lambda>n. (f \<circ> x) n \<in> T) sequentially"
proof eventually_elim
case (elim n)
then show ?case
using d x(1) \<open>f a \<in> T\<close> by auto
qed
}
then show ?rhs
unfolding tendsto_iff tendsto_def by simp
next
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
unfolding continuous_within tendsto_def [where l="f a"]
by (simp add: sequentially_imp_eventually_within)
qed
lemma continuous_at_sequentially:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::topological_space"
shows "continuous (at a) f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>x. (x \<longlongrightarrow> a) sequentially --> ((f \<circ> x) \<longlongrightarrow> f a) sequentially)"
using continuous_within_sequentially[of a UNIV f] by simp
lemma continuous_on_sequentially:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::topological_space"
shows "continuous_on s f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>x. \<forall>a \<in> s. (\<forall>n. x(n) \<in> s) \<and> (x \<longlongrightarrow> a) sequentially
--> ((f \<circ> x) \<longlongrightarrow> f a) sequentially)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?rhs
then show ?lhs
using continuous_within_sequentially[of _ s f]
unfolding continuous_on_eq_continuous_within
by auto
next
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
unfolding continuous_on_eq_continuous_within
using continuous_within_sequentially[of _ s f]
by auto
qed
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_sequentially:
"uniformly_continuous_on s f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x y. (\<forall>n. x n \<in> s) \<and> (\<forall>n. y n \<in> s) \<and>
(\<lambda>n. dist (x n) (y n)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0 \<longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. dist (f(x n)) (f(y n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0)" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
{
fix x y
assume x: "\<forall>n. x n \<in> s"
and y: "\<forall>n. y n \<in> s"
and xy: "((\<lambda>n. dist (x n) (y n)) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) sequentially"
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then obtain d where "d > 0" and d: "\<forall>x\<in>s. \<forall>x'\<in>s. dist x' x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
using \<open>?lhs\<close>[unfolded uniformly_continuous_on_def, THEN spec[where x=e]] by auto
obtain N where N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (x n) (y n) < d"
using xy[unfolded lim_sequentially dist_norm] and \<open>d>0\<close> by auto
{
fix n
assume "n\<ge>N"
then have "dist (f (x n)) (f (y n)) < e"
using N[THEN spec[where x=n]]
using d[THEN bspec[where x="x n"], THEN bspec[where x="y n"]]
using x and y
by (simp add: dist_commute)
}
then have "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (f (x n)) (f (y n)) < e"
by auto
}
then have "((\<lambda>n. dist (f(x n)) (f(y n))) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) sequentially"
unfolding lim_sequentially and dist_real_def by auto
}
then show ?rhs by auto
next
assume ?rhs
{
assume "\<not> ?lhs"
then obtain e where "e > 0" "\<forall>d>0. \<exists>x\<in>s. \<exists>x'\<in>s. dist x' x < d \<and> \<not> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_def by auto
then obtain fa where fa:
"\<forall>x. 0 < x \<longrightarrow> fst (fa x) \<in> s \<and> snd (fa x) \<in> s \<and> dist (fst (fa x)) (snd (fa x)) < x \<and> \<not> dist (f (fst (fa x))) (f (snd (fa x))) < e"
using choice[of "\<lambda>d x. d>0 \<longrightarrow> fst x \<in> s \<and> snd x \<in> s \<and> dist (snd x) (fst x) < d \<and> \<not> dist (f (snd x)) (f (fst x)) < e"]
unfolding Bex_def
by (auto simp: dist_commute)
define x where "x n = fst (fa (inverse (real n + 1)))" for n
define y where "y n = snd (fa (inverse (real n + 1)))" for n
have xyn: "\<forall>n. x n \<in> s \<and> y n \<in> s"
and xy0: "\<forall>n. dist (x n) (y n) < inverse (real n + 1)"
and fxy:"\<forall>n. \<not> dist (f (x n)) (f (y n)) < e"
unfolding x_def and y_def using fa
by auto
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then obtain N :: nat where "N \<noteq> 0" and N: "0 < inverse (real N) \<and> inverse (real N) < e"
unfolding real_arch_inverse[of e] by auto
{
fix n :: nat
assume "n \<ge> N"
then have "inverse (real n + 1) < inverse (real N)"
using of_nat_0_le_iff and \<open>N\<noteq>0\<close> by auto
also have "\<dots> < e" using N by auto
finally have "inverse (real n + 1) < e" by auto
then have "dist (x n) (y n) < e"
using xy0[THEN spec[where x=n]] by auto
}
then have "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (x n) (y n) < e" by auto
}
then have "\<forall>e>0. \<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. dist (f (x n)) (f (y n)) < e"
using \<open>?rhs\<close>[THEN spec[where x=x], THEN spec[where x=y]] and xyn
unfolding lim_sequentially dist_real_def by auto
then have False using fxy and \<open>e>0\<close> by auto
}
then show ?lhs
unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_def by blast
qed
lemma continuous_closed_imp_Cauchy_continuous:
fixes S :: "('a::complete_space) set"
shows "\<lbrakk>continuous_on S f; closed S; Cauchy \<sigma>; \<And>n. (\<sigma> n) \<in> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cauchy(f o \<sigma>)"
apply (simp add: complete_eq_closed [symmetric] continuous_on_sequentially)
by (meson LIMSEQ_imp_Cauchy complete_def)
text\<open>The usual transformation theorems.\<close>
lemma continuous_transform_within:
fixes f g :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::topological_space"
assumes "continuous (at x within s) f"
and "0 < d"
and "x \<in> s"
and "\<And>x'. \<lbrakk>x' \<in> s; dist x' x < d\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f x' = g x'"
shows "continuous (at x within s) g"
using assms
unfolding continuous_within
by (force intro: Lim_transform_within)
subsubsection \<open>Structural rules for pointwise continuity\<close>
lemma continuous_infnorm[continuous_intros]:
"continuous F f \<Longrightarrow> continuous F (\<lambda>x. infnorm (f x))"
unfolding continuous_def by (rule tendsto_infnorm)
lemma continuous_inner[continuous_intros]:
assumes "continuous F f"
and "continuous F g"
shows "continuous F (\<lambda>x. inner (f x) (g x))"
using assms unfolding continuous_def by (rule tendsto_inner)
subsubsection \<open>Structural rules for setwise continuity\<close>
lemma continuous_on_infnorm[continuous_intros]:
"continuous_on s f \<Longrightarrow> continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. infnorm (f x))"
unfolding continuous_on by (fast intro: tendsto_infnorm)
lemma continuous_on_inner[continuous_intros]:
fixes g :: "'a::topological_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_inner"
assumes "continuous_on s f"
and "continuous_on s g"
shows "continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. inner (f x) (g x))"
using bounded_bilinear_inner assms
by (rule bounded_bilinear.continuous_on)
subsubsection \<open>Structural rules for uniform continuity\<close>
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_dist[continuous_intros]:
fixes f g :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::metric_space"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f"
and "uniformly_continuous_on s g"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. dist (f x) (g x))"
proof -
{
fix a b c d :: 'b
have "\<bar>dist a b - dist c d\<bar> \<le> dist a c + dist b d"
using dist_triangle2 [of a b c] dist_triangle2 [of b c d]
using dist_triangle3 [of c d a] dist_triangle [of a d b]
by arith
} note le = this
{
fix x y
assume f: "(\<lambda>n. dist (f (x n)) (f (y n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
assume g: "(\<lambda>n. dist (g (x n)) (g (y n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
have "(\<lambda>n. \<bar>dist (f (x n)) (g (x n)) - dist (f (y n)) (g (y n))\<bar>) \<longlonglongrightarrow> 0"
by (rule Lim_transform_bound [OF _ tendsto_add_zero [OF f g]],
simp add: le)
}
then show ?thesis
using assms unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_sequentially
unfolding dist_real_def by simp
qed
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_norm[continuous_intros]:
fixes f :: "'a :: metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b :: real_normed_vector"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. norm (f x))"
unfolding norm_conv_dist using assms
by (intro uniformly_continuous_on_dist uniformly_continuous_on_const)
lemma (in bounded_linear) uniformly_continuous_on[continuous_intros]:
fixes g :: "_::metric_space \<Rightarrow> _"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s g"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. f (g x))"
using assms unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_sequentially
unfolding dist_norm tendsto_norm_zero_iff diff[symmetric]
by (auto intro: tendsto_zero)
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_cmul[continuous_intros]:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. c *\<^sub>R f(x))"
using bounded_linear_scaleR_right assms
by (rule bounded_linear.uniformly_continuous_on)
lemma dist_minus:
fixes x y :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "dist (- x) (- y) = dist x y"
unfolding dist_norm minus_diff_minus norm_minus_cancel ..
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_minus[continuous_intros]:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s f \<Longrightarrow> uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. - f x)"
unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_def dist_minus .
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_add[continuous_intros]:
fixes f g :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f"
and "uniformly_continuous_on s g"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. f x + g x)"
using assms
unfolding uniformly_continuous_on_sequentially
unfolding dist_norm tendsto_norm_zero_iff add_diff_add
by (auto intro: tendsto_add_zero)
lemma uniformly_continuous_on_diff[continuous_intros]:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::real_normed_vector"
assumes "uniformly_continuous_on s f"
and "uniformly_continuous_on s g"
shows "uniformly_continuous_on s (\<lambda>x. f x - g x)"
using assms uniformly_continuous_on_add [of s f "- g"]
by (simp add: fun_Compl_def uniformly_continuous_on_minus)
text \<open>Continuity in terms of open preimages.\<close>
lemma continuous_at_open:
"continuous (at x) f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>t. open t \<and> f x \<in> t --> (\<exists>s. open s \<and> x \<in> s \<and> (\<forall>x' \<in> s. (f x') \<in> t)))"
unfolding continuous_within_topological [of x UNIV f]
unfolding imp_conjL
by (intro all_cong imp_cong ex_cong conj_cong refl) auto
lemma continuous_imp_tendsto:
assumes "continuous (at x0) f"
and "x \<longlonglongrightarrow> x0"
shows "(f \<circ> x) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (f x0)"
proof (rule topological_tendstoI)
fix S
assume "open S" "f x0 \<in> S"
then obtain T where T_def: "open T" "x0 \<in> T" "\<forall>x\<in>T. f x \<in> S"
using assms continuous_at_open by metis
then have "eventually (\<lambda>n. x n \<in> T) sequentially"
using assms T_def by (auto simp: tendsto_def)
then show "eventually (\<lambda>n. (f \<circ> x) n \<in> S) sequentially"
using T_def by (auto elim!: eventually_mono)
qed
lemma continuous_on_open:
"continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>T. openin (subtopology euclidean (f ` S)) T \<longrightarrow>
openin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T))"
unfolding continuous_on_open_invariant openin_open Int_def vimage_def Int_commute
by (simp add: imp_ex imageI conj_commute eq_commute cong: conj_cong)
lemma continuous_on_open_gen:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::metric_space"
assumes "f ` S \<subseteq> T"
shows "continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>U. openin (subtopology euclidean T) U
\<longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` U))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
assume ?lhs
then show ?rhs
apply (clarsimp simp: openin_euclidean_subtopology_iff continuous_on_iff)
by (metis assms image_subset_iff)
next
have ope: "openin (subtopology euclidean T) (ball y e \<inter> T)" for y e
by (simp add: Int_commute openin_open_Int)
assume R [rule_format]: ?rhs
show ?lhs
proof (clarsimp simp add: continuous_on_iff)
fix x and e::real
assume "x \<in> S" and "0 < e"
then have x: "x \<in> S \<inter> (f -` ball (f x) e \<inter> f -` T)"
using assms by auto
show "\<exists>d>0. \<forall>x'\<in>S. dist x' x < d \<longrightarrow> dist (f x') (f x) < e"
using R [of "ball (f x) e \<inter> T"] x
by (fastforce simp add: ope openin_euclidean_subtopology_iff [of S] dist_commute)
qed
qed
lemma continuous_openin_preimage:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::metric_space"
shows
"\<lbrakk>continuous_on S f; f ` S \<subseteq> T; openin (subtopology euclidean T) U\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` U)"
by (simp add: continuous_on_open_gen)
text \<open>Similarly in terms of closed sets.\<close>
lemma continuous_on_closed:
"continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>T. closedin (subtopology euclidean (f ` S)) T \<longrightarrow>
closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T))"
unfolding continuous_on_closed_invariant closedin_closed Int_def vimage_def Int_commute
by (simp add: imp_ex imageI conj_commute eq_commute cong: conj_cong)
lemma continuous_on_closed_gen:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::metric_space"
assumes "f ` S \<subseteq> T"
shows "continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>U. closedin (subtopology euclidean T) U
\<longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` U))"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
have *: "U \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> S \<inter> f -` (T - U) = S - (S \<inter> f -` U)" for U
using assms by blast
show ?thesis
proof
assume L: ?lhs
show ?rhs
proof clarify
fix U
assume "closedin (subtopology euclidean T) U"
then show "closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` U)"
using L unfolding continuous_on_open_gen [OF assms]
by (metis * closedin_def inf_le1 topspace_euclidean_subtopology)
qed
next
assume R [rule_format]: ?rhs
show ?lhs
unfolding continuous_on_open_gen [OF assms]
by (metis * R inf_le1 openin_closedin_eq topspace_euclidean_subtopology)
qed
qed
lemma continuous_closedin_preimage_gen:
fixes f :: "'a::metric_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::metric_space"
assumes "continuous_on S f" "f ` S \<subseteq> T" "closedin (subtopology euclidean T) U"
shows "closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` U)"
using assms continuous_on_closed_gen by blast
lemma continuous_on_imp_closedin:
assumes "continuous_on S f" "closedin (subtopology euclidean (f ` S)) T"
shows "closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T)"
using assms continuous_on_closed by blast
subsection \<open>Half-global and completely global cases.\<close>
lemma continuous_openin_preimage_gen:
assumes "continuous_on S f" "open T"
shows "openin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T)"
proof -
have *: "(S \<inter> f -` T) = (S \<inter> f -` (T \<inter> f ` S))"
by auto
have "openin (subtopology euclidean (f ` S)) (T \<inter> f ` S)"
using openin_open_Int[of T "f ` S", OF assms(2)] unfolding openin_open by auto
then show ?thesis
using assms(1)[unfolded continuous_on_open, THEN spec[where x="T \<inter> f ` S"]]
using * by auto
qed
lemma continuous_closedin_preimage:
assumes "continuous_on S f" and "closed T"
shows "closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T)"
proof -
have *: "(S \<inter> f -` T) = (S \<inter> f -` (T \<inter> f ` S))"
by auto
have "closedin (subtopology euclidean (f ` S)) (T \<inter> f ` S)"
using closedin_closed_Int[of T "f ` S", OF assms(2)]
by (simp add: Int_commute)
then show ?thesis
using assms(1)[unfolded continuous_on_closed, THEN spec[where x="T \<inter> f ` S"]]
using * by auto
qed
lemma continuous_openin_preimage_eq:
"continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>T. open T \<longrightarrow> openin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T))"
apply safe
apply (simp add: continuous_openin_preimage_gen)
apply (fastforce simp add: continuous_on_open openin_open)
done
lemma continuous_closedin_preimage_eq:
"continuous_on S f \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>T. closed T \<longrightarrow> closedin (subtopology euclidean S) (S \<inter> f -` T))"
apply safe
apply (simp add: continuous_closedin_preimage)
apply (fastforce simp add: continuous_on_closed closedin_closed)
done
lemma continuous_open_preimage:
assumes contf: "continuous_on S f" and "open S" "open T"
shows "open (S \<inter> f -` T)"
proof-
obtain U where "open U" "(S \<inter> f -` T) = S \<inter> U"
using continuous_openin_preimage_gen[OF contf \<open>open T\<close>]
unfolding openin_open by auto
then show ?thesis
using open_Int[of S U, OF \<open>open S\<close>] by auto
qed
lemma continuous_closed_preimage:
assumes contf: "continuous_on S f" and "closed S" "closed T"
shows "closed (S \<inter> f -` T)"
proof-
obtain U where "closed U" "(S \<inter> f -` T) = S \<inter> U"
using continuous_closedin_preimage[OF contf \<open>closed T\<close>]
unfolding closedin_closed by auto
then show ?thesis using closed_Int[of S U, OF \<open>closed S\<close>] by auto
qed
lemma continuous_open_vimage: "open S \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. continuous (at x) f) \<Longrightarrow> open (f -` S)"
by (metis continuous_on_eq_continuous_within open_vimage)
lemma continuous_closed_vimage: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. continuous (at x) f) \<Longrightarrow> closed (f -` S)"
by (simp add: closed_vimage continuous_on_eq_continuous_within)
lemma interior_image_subset:
assumes "inj f" "\<And>x. continuous (at x) f"
shows "interior (f ` S) \<subseteq> f ` (interior S)"
proof
fix x assume "x \<in> interior (f ` S)"
then obtain T where as: "open T" "x \<in> T" "T \<subseteq> f ` S" ..
then have "x \<in> f ` S" by auto
then obtain y where y: "y \<in> S" "x = f y" by auto
have "open (f -` T)"
using assms \<open>open T\<close> by (simp add: continuous_at_imp_continuous_on open_vimage)
moreover have "y \<in> vimage f T"
using \<open>x = f y\<close> \<open>x \<in> T\<close> by simp
moreover have "vimage f T \<subseteq> S"
using \<open>T \<subseteq> image f S\<close> \<open>inj f\<close> unfolding inj_on_def subset_eq by auto
ultimately have "y \<in> interior S" ..
with \<open>x = f y\<close> show "x \<in> f ` interior S" ..
qed
subsection \<open>Topological properties of linear functions.\<close>
lemma linear_lim_0:
assumes "bounded_linear f"
shows "(f \<longlongrightarrow> 0) (at (0))"
proof -
interpret f: bounded_linear f by fact
have "(f \<longlongrightarrow> f 0) (at 0)"
using tendsto_ident_at by (rule f.tendsto)
then show ?thesis unfolding f.zero .
qed
lemma linear_continuous_at:
assumes "bounded_linear f"
shows "continuous (at a) f"
unfolding continuous_at using assms
apply (rule bounded_linear.tendsto)
apply (rule tendsto_ident_at)
done
lemma linear_continuous_within:
"bounded_linear f \<Longrightarrow> continuous (at x within s) f"
using continuous_at_imp_continuous_within[of x f s] using linear_continuous_at[of f] by auto
lemma linear_continuous_on:
"bounded_linear f \<Longrightarrow> continuous_on s f"
using continuous_at_imp_continuous_on[of s f] using linear_continuous_at[of f] by auto
subsection \<open>Intervals\<close>
text \<open>Openness of halfspaces.\<close>
lemma open_halfspace_lt: "open {x. inner a x < b}"
by (simp add: open_Collect_less continuous_on_inner continuous_on_const continuous_on_id)
lemma open_halfspace_gt: "open {x. inner a x > b}"
by (simp add: open_Collect_less continuous_on_inner continuous_on_const continuous_on_id)
lemma open_halfspace_component_lt: "open {x::'a::euclidean_space. x\<bullet>i < a}"
by (simp add: open_Collect_less continuous_on_inner continuous_on_const continuous_on_id)
lemma open_halfspace_component_gt: "open {x::'a::euclidean_space. x\<bullet>i > a}"
by (simp add: open_Collect_less continuous_on_inner continuous_on_const continuous_on_id)
text \<open>This gives a simple derivation of limit component bounds.\<close>
lemma open_box[intro]: "open (box a b)"
proof -
have "open (\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. ((\<bullet>) i) -` {a \<bullet> i <..< b \<bullet> i})"
by (auto intro!: continuous_open_vimage continuous_inner continuous_ident continuous_const)
also have "(\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. ((\<bullet>) i) -` {a \<bullet> i <..< b \<bullet> i}) = box a b"
by (auto simp: box_def inner_commute)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
instance euclidean_space \<subseteq> second_countable_topology
proof
define a where "a f = (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i)" for f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real \<times> real"
then have a: "\<And>f. (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. fst (f i) *\<^sub>R i) = a f"
by simp
define b where "b f = (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i)" for f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> real \<times> real"
then have b: "\<And>f. (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. snd (f i) *\<^sub>R i) = b f"
by simp
define B where "B = (\<lambda>f. box (a f) (b f)) ` (Basis \<rightarrow>\<^sub>E (\<rat> \<times> \<rat>))"
have "Ball B open" by (simp add: B_def open_box)
moreover have "(\<forall>A. open A \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>B'\<subseteq>B. \<Union>B' = A))"
proof safe
fix A::"'a set"
assume "open A"
show "\<exists>B'\<subseteq>B. \<Union>B' = A"
apply (rule exI[of _ "{b\<in>B. b \<subseteq> A}"])
apply (subst (3) open_UNION_box[OF \<open>open A\<close>])
apply (auto simp: a b B_def)
done
qed
ultimately
have "topological_basis B"
unfolding topological_basis_def by blast
moreover
have "countable B"
unfolding B_def
by (intro countable_image countable_PiE finite_Basis countable_SIGMA countable_rat)
ultimately show "\<exists>B::'a set set. countable B \<and> open = generate_topology B"
by (blast intro: topological_basis_imp_subbasis)
qed
instance euclidean_space \<subseteq> polish_space ..
lemma closed_cbox[intro]:
fixes a b :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "closed (cbox a b)"
proof -
have "closed (\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. (\<lambda>x. x\<bullet>i) -` {a\<bullet>i .. b\<bullet>i})"
by (intro closed_INT ballI continuous_closed_vimage allI
linear_continuous_at closed_real_atLeastAtMost finite_Basis bounded_linear_inner_left)
also have "(\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. (\<lambda>x. x\<bullet>i) -` {a\<bullet>i .. b\<bullet>i}) = cbox a b"
by (auto simp: cbox_def)
finally show "closed (cbox a b)" .
qed
lemma interior_cbox [simp]:
fixes a b :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "interior (cbox a b) = box a b" (is "?L = ?R")
proof(rule subset_antisym)
show "?R \<subseteq> ?L"
using box_subset_cbox open_box
by (rule interior_maximal)
{
fix x
assume "x \<in> interior (cbox a b)"
then obtain s where s: "open s" "x \<in> s" "s \<subseteq> cbox a b" ..
then obtain e where "e>0" and e:"\<forall>x'. dist x' x < e \<longrightarrow> x' \<in> cbox a b"
unfolding open_dist and subset_eq by auto
{
fix i :: 'a
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
have "dist (x - (e / 2) *\<^sub>R i) x < e"
and "dist (x + (e / 2) *\<^sub>R i) x < e"
unfolding dist_norm
apply auto
unfolding norm_minus_cancel
using norm_Basis[OF i] \<open>e>0\<close>
apply auto
done
then have "a \<bullet> i \<le> (x - (e / 2) *\<^sub>R i) \<bullet> i" and "(x + (e / 2) *\<^sub>R i) \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i"
using e[THEN spec[where x="x - (e/2) *\<^sub>R i"]]
and e[THEN spec[where x="x + (e/2) *\<^sub>R i"]]
unfolding mem_box
using i
by blast+
then have "a \<bullet> i < x \<bullet> i" and "x \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i"
using \<open>e>0\<close> i
by (auto simp: inner_diff_left inner_Basis inner_add_left)
}
then have "x \<in> box a b"
unfolding mem_box by auto
}
then show "?L \<subseteq> ?R" ..
qed
lemma bounded_cbox [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "bounded (cbox a b)"
proof -
let ?b = "\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. \<bar>a\<bullet>i\<bar> + \<bar>b\<bullet>i\<bar>"
{
fix x :: "'a"
assume x: "\<forall>i\<in>Basis. a \<bullet> i \<le> x \<bullet> i \<and> x \<bullet> i \<le> b \<bullet> i"
{
fix i :: 'a
assume "i \<in> Basis"
then have "\<bar>x\<bullet>i\<bar> \<le> \<bar>a\<bullet>i\<bar> + \<bar>b\<bullet>i\<bar>"
using x[THEN bspec[where x=i]] by auto
}
then have "(\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. \<bar>x \<bullet> i\<bar>) \<le> ?b"
apply -
apply (rule sum_mono, auto)
done
then have "norm x \<le> ?b"
using norm_le_l1[of x] by auto
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding cbox_def bounded_iff by auto
qed
lemma bounded_box [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "bounded (box a b)"
using bounded_cbox[of a b]
using box_subset_cbox[of a b]
using bounded_subset[of "cbox a b" "box a b"]
by simp
lemma not_interval_UNIV [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "cbox a b \<noteq> UNIV" "box a b \<noteq> UNIV"
using bounded_box[of a b] bounded_cbox[of a b] by force+
lemma not_interval_UNIV2 [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "UNIV \<noteq> cbox a b" "UNIV \<noteq> box a b"
using bounded_box[of a b] bounded_cbox[of a b] by force+
lemma compact_cbox [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "compact (cbox a b)"
using bounded_closed_imp_seq_compact[of "cbox a b"] using bounded_cbox[of a b]
by (auto simp: compact_eq_seq_compact_metric)
lemma box_midpoint:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "box a b \<noteq> {}"
shows "((1/2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)) \<in> box a b"
proof -
{
fix i :: 'a
assume "i \<in> Basis"
then have "a \<bullet> i < ((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)) \<bullet> i \<and> ((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)) \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i"
using assms[unfolded box_ne_empty, THEN bspec[where x=i]] by (auto simp: inner_add_left)
}
then show ?thesis unfolding mem_box by auto
qed
lemma open_cbox_convex:
fixes x :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes x: "x \<in> box a b"
and y: "y \<in> cbox a b"
and e: "0 < e" "e \<le> 1"
shows "(e *\<^sub>R x + (1 - e) *\<^sub>R y) \<in> box a b"
proof -
{
fix i :: 'a
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
have "a \<bullet> i = e * (a \<bullet> i) + (1 - e) * (a \<bullet> i)"
unfolding left_diff_distrib by simp
also have "\<dots> < e * (x \<bullet> i) + (1 - e) * (y \<bullet> i)"
apply (rule add_less_le_mono)
using e unfolding mult_less_cancel_left and mult_le_cancel_left
apply simp_all
using x unfolding mem_box using i
apply simp
using y unfolding mem_box using i
apply simp
done
finally have "a \<bullet> i < (e *\<^sub>R x + (1 - e) *\<^sub>R y) \<bullet> i"
unfolding inner_simps by auto
moreover
{
have "b \<bullet> i = e * (b\<bullet>i) + (1 - e) * (b\<bullet>i)"
unfolding left_diff_distrib by simp
also have "\<dots> > e * (x \<bullet> i) + (1 - e) * (y \<bullet> i)"
proof (rule add_less_le_mono)
show "e * (x \<bullet> i) < e * (b \<bullet> i)"
using e(1) i mem_box(1) x by auto
show "(1 - e) * (y \<bullet> i) \<le> (1 - e) * (b \<bullet> i)"
by (meson diff_ge_0_iff_ge e(2) i mem_box(2) ordered_comm_semiring_class.comm_mult_left_mono y)
qed
finally have "(e *\<^sub>R x + (1 - e) *\<^sub>R y) \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i"
unfolding inner_simps by auto
}
ultimately have "a \<bullet> i < (e *\<^sub>R x + (1 - e) *\<^sub>R y) \<bullet> i \<and> (e *\<^sub>R x + (1 - e) *\<^sub>R y) \<bullet> i < b \<bullet> i"
by auto
}
then show ?thesis
unfolding mem_box by auto
qed
lemma closure_cbox [simp]: "closure (cbox a b) = cbox a b"
by (simp add: closed_cbox)
lemma closure_box [simp]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "box a b \<noteq> {}"
shows "closure (box a b) = cbox a b"
proof -
have ab: "a <e b"
using assms by (simp add: eucl_less_def box_ne_empty)
let ?c = "(1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)"
{
fix x
assume as:"x \<in> cbox a b"
define f where [abs_def]: "f n = x + (inverse (real n + 1)) *\<^sub>R (?c - x)" for n
{
fix n
assume fn: "f n <e b \<longrightarrow> a <e f n \<longrightarrow> f n = x" and xc: "x \<noteq> ?c"
have *: "0 < inverse (real n + 1)" "inverse (real n + 1) \<le> 1"
unfolding inverse_le_1_iff by auto
have "(inverse (real n + 1)) *\<^sub>R ((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)) + (1 - inverse (real n + 1)) *\<^sub>R x =
x + (inverse (real n + 1)) *\<^sub>R (((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b)) - x)"
by (auto simp: algebra_simps)
then have "f n <e b" and "a <e f n"
using open_cbox_convex[OF box_midpoint[OF assms] as *]
unfolding f_def by (auto simp: box_def eucl_less_def)
then have False
using fn unfolding f_def using xc by auto
}
moreover
{
assume "\<not> (f \<longlongrightarrow> x) sequentially"
{
fix e :: real
assume "e > 0"
then have "\<exists>N::nat. inverse (real (N + 1)) < e"
using real_arch_inverse[of e]
apply (auto simp: Suc_pred')
apply (metis Suc_pred' of_nat_Suc)
done
then obtain N :: nat where N: "inverse (real (N + 1)) < e"
by auto
have "inverse (real n + 1) < e" if "N \<le> n" for n
by (auto intro!: that le_less_trans [OF _ N])
then have "\<exists>N::nat. \<forall>n\<ge>N. inverse (real n + 1) < e" by auto
}
then have "((\<lambda>n. inverse (real n + 1)) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) sequentially"
unfolding lim_sequentially by(auto simp: dist_norm)
then have "(f \<longlongrightarrow> x) sequentially"
unfolding f_def
using tendsto_add[OF tendsto_const, of "\<lambda>n::nat. (inverse (real n + 1)) *\<^sub>R ((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b) - x)" 0 sequentially x]
using tendsto_scaleR [OF _ tendsto_const, of "\<lambda>n::nat. inverse (real n + 1)" 0 sequentially "((1 / 2) *\<^sub>R (a + b) - x)"]
by auto
}
ultimately have "x \<in> closure (box a b)"
using as and box_midpoint[OF assms]
unfolding closure_def
unfolding islimpt_sequential
by (cases "x=?c") (auto simp: in_box_eucl_less)
}
then show ?thesis
using closure_minimal[OF box_subset_cbox, of a b] by blast
qed
lemma bounded_subset_box_symmetric:
fixes s::"('a::euclidean_space) set"
assumes "bounded s"
shows "\<exists>a. s \<subseteq> box (-a) a"
proof -
obtain b where "b>0" and b: "\<forall>x\<in>s. norm x \<le> b"
using assms[unfolded bounded_pos] by auto
define a :: 'a where "a = (\<Sum>i\<in>Basis. (b + 1) *\<^sub>R i)"
{
fix x
assume "x \<in> s"
fix i :: 'a
assume i: "i \<in> Basis"
then have "(-a)\<bullet>i < x\<bullet>i" and "x\<bullet>i < a\<bullet>i"
using b[THEN bspec[where x=x], OF \<open>x\<in>s\<close>]
using Basis_le_norm[OF i, of x]
unfolding inner_simps and a_def
by auto
}
then show ?thesis
by (auto intro: exI[where x=a] simp add: box_def)
qed
lemma bounded_subset_open_interval:
fixes s :: "('a::euclidean_space) set"
shows "bounded s \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>a b. s \<subseteq> box a b)"
by (auto dest!: bounded_subset_box_symmetric)
lemma bounded_subset_cbox_symmetric:
fixes s :: "('a::euclidean_space) set"
assumes "bounded s"
shows "\<exists>a. s \<subseteq> cbox (-a) a"
proof -
obtain a where "s \<subseteq> box (-a) a"
using bounded_subset_box_symmetric[OF assms] by auto
then show ?thesis
using box_subset_cbox[of "-a" a] by auto
qed
lemma bounded_subset_cbox:
fixes s :: "('a::euclidean_space) set"
shows "bounded s \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>a b. s \<subseteq> cbox a b"
using bounded_subset_cbox_symmetric[of s] by auto
lemma frontier_cbox:
fixes a b :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "frontier (cbox a b) = cbox a b - box a b"
unfolding frontier_def unfolding interior_cbox and closure_closed[OF closed_cbox] ..
lemma frontier_box:
fixes a b :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "frontier (box a b) = (if box a b = {} then {} else cbox a b - box a b)"
proof (cases "box a b = {}")
case True
then show ?thesis
using frontier_empty by auto
next
case False
then show ?thesis
unfolding frontier_def and closure_box[OF False] and interior_open[OF open_box]
by auto
qed
lemma Int_interval_mixed_eq_empty:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
assumes "box c d \<noteq> {}"
shows "box a b \<inter> cbox c d = {} \<longleftrightarrow> box a b \<inter> box c d = {}"
unfolding closure_box[OF assms, symmetric]
unfolding open_Int_closure_eq_empty[OF open_box] ..
lemma eucl_less_eq_halfspaces:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "{x. x <e a} = (\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. {x. x \<bullet> i < a \<bullet> i})"
"{x. a <e x} = (\<Inter>i\<in>Basis. {x. a \<bullet> i < x \<bullet> i})"
by (auto simp: eucl_less_def)
lemma open_Collect_eucl_less[simp, intro]:
fixes a :: "'a::euclidean_space"
shows "open {x. x <e a}"
"open {x. a <e x}"
by (auto simp: eucl_less_eq_halfspaces open_halfspace_component_lt open_halfspace_component_gt)
no_notation
eucl_less (infix "<e" 50)
end