(* Author: Tobias Nipkow *)
theory Abs_Int2
imports Abs_Int1
begin
instantiation prod :: (preord,preord) preord
begin
definition "le_prod p1 p2 = (fst p1 \<sqsubseteq> fst p2 \<and> snd p1 \<sqsubseteq> snd p2)"
instance
proof
case goal1 show ?case by(simp add: le_prod_def)
next
case goal2 thus ?case unfolding le_prod_def by(metis le_trans)
qed
end
subsection "Backward Analysis of Expressions"
class L_top_bot = SL_top + Bot +
fixes meet :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a" (infixl "\<sqinter>" 65)
assumes meet_le1 [simp]: "x \<sqinter> y \<sqsubseteq> x"
and meet_le2 [simp]: "x \<sqinter> y \<sqsubseteq> y"
and meet_greatest: "x \<sqsubseteq> y \<Longrightarrow> x \<sqsubseteq> z \<Longrightarrow> x \<sqsubseteq> y \<sqinter> z"
begin
lemma mono_meet: "x \<sqsubseteq> x' \<Longrightarrow> y \<sqsubseteq> y' \<Longrightarrow> x \<sqinter> y \<sqsubseteq> x' \<sqinter> y'"
by (metis meet_greatest meet_le1 meet_le2 le_trans)
end
locale Val_abs1_gamma =
Gamma where \<gamma> = \<gamma> for \<gamma> :: "'av::L_top_bot \<Rightarrow> val set" +
assumes inter_gamma_subset_gamma_meet:
"\<gamma> a1 \<inter> \<gamma> a2 \<subseteq> \<gamma>(a1 \<sqinter> a2)"
and gamma_Bot[simp]: "\<gamma> \<bottom> = {}"
begin
lemma in_gamma_meet: "x : \<gamma> a1 \<Longrightarrow> x : \<gamma> a2 \<Longrightarrow> x : \<gamma>(a1 \<sqinter> a2)"
by (metis IntI inter_gamma_subset_gamma_meet set_mp)
lemma gamma_meet[simp]: "\<gamma>(a1 \<sqinter> a2) = \<gamma> a1 \<inter> \<gamma> a2"
by (metis equalityI inter_gamma_subset_gamma_meet le_inf_iff mono_gamma meet_le1 meet_le2)
end
locale Val_abs1 =
Val_abs1_gamma where \<gamma> = \<gamma>
for \<gamma> :: "'av::L_top_bot \<Rightarrow> val set" +
fixes test_num' :: "val \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> bool"
and filter_plus' :: "'av \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> 'av * 'av"
and filter_less' :: "bool \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> 'av * 'av"
assumes test_num': "test_num' n a = (n : \<gamma> a)"
and filter_plus': "filter_plus' a a1 a2 = (b1,b2) \<Longrightarrow>
n1 : \<gamma> a1 \<Longrightarrow> n2 : \<gamma> a2 \<Longrightarrow> n1+n2 : \<gamma> a \<Longrightarrow> n1 : \<gamma> b1 \<and> n2 : \<gamma> b2"
and filter_less': "filter_less' (n1<n2) a1 a2 = (b1,b2) \<Longrightarrow>
n1 : \<gamma> a1 \<Longrightarrow> n2 : \<gamma> a2 \<Longrightarrow> n1 : \<gamma> b1 \<and> n2 : \<gamma> b2"
locale Abs_Int1 =
Val_abs1 where \<gamma> = \<gamma> for \<gamma> :: "'av::L_top_bot \<Rightarrow> val set"
begin
lemma in_gamma_join_UpI:
"wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> wt S2 X \<Longrightarrow> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S1 \<or> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S2 \<Longrightarrow> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o(S1 \<squnion> S2)"
by (metis (hide_lams, no_types) SL_top_wt_class.join_ge1 SL_top_wt_class.join_ge2 mono_gamma_o subsetD)
fun aval'' :: "aexp \<Rightarrow> 'av st option \<Rightarrow> 'av" where
"aval'' e None = \<bottom>" |
"aval'' e (Some sa) = aval' e sa"
lemma aval''_sound: "s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S \<Longrightarrow> wt S X \<Longrightarrow> vars a \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow> aval a s : \<gamma>(aval'' a S)"
by(simp add: wt_option_def wt_st_def aval'_sound split: option.splits)
subsubsection "Backward analysis"
fun afilter :: "aexp \<Rightarrow> 'av \<Rightarrow> 'av st option \<Rightarrow> 'av st option" where
"afilter (N n) a S = (if test_num' n a then S else None)" |
"afilter (V x) a S = (case S of None \<Rightarrow> None | Some S \<Rightarrow>
let a' = fun S x \<sqinter> a in
if a' \<sqsubseteq> \<bottom> then None else Some(update S x a'))" |
"afilter (Plus e1 e2) a S =
(let (a1,a2) = filter_plus' a (aval'' e1 S) (aval'' e2 S)
in afilter e1 a1 (afilter e2 a2 S))"
text{* The test for @{const bot} in the @{const V}-case is important: @{const
bot} indicates that a variable has no possible values, i.e.\ that the current
program point is unreachable. But then the abstract state should collapse to
@{const None}. Put differently, we maintain the invariant that in an abstract
state of the form @{term"Some s"}, all variables are mapped to non-@{const
bot} values. Otherwise the (pointwise) join of two abstract states, one of
which contains @{const bot} values, may produce too large a result, thus
making the analysis less precise. *}
fun bfilter :: "bexp \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> 'av st option \<Rightarrow> 'av st option" where
"bfilter (Bc v) res S = (if v=res then S else None)" |
"bfilter (Not b) res S = bfilter b (\<not> res) S" |
"bfilter (And b1 b2) res S =
(if res then bfilter b1 True (bfilter b2 True S)
else bfilter b1 False S \<squnion> bfilter b2 False S)" |
"bfilter (Less e1 e2) res S =
(let (res1,res2) = filter_less' res (aval'' e1 S) (aval'' e2 S)
in afilter e1 res1 (afilter e2 res2 S))"
lemma wt_afilter: "wt S X \<Longrightarrow> vars e \<subseteq> X ==> wt (afilter e a S) X"
by(induction e arbitrary: a S)
(auto simp: Let_def update_def wt_st_def
split: option.splits prod.split)
lemma afilter_sound: "wt S X \<Longrightarrow> vars e \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow>
s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S \<Longrightarrow> aval e s : \<gamma> a \<Longrightarrow> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o (afilter e a S)"
proof(induction e arbitrary: a S)
case N thus ?case by simp (metis test_num')
next
case (V x)
obtain S' where "S = Some S'" and "s : \<gamma>\<^isub>f S'" using `s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S`
by(auto simp: in_gamma_option_iff)
moreover hence "s x : \<gamma> (fun S' x)"
using V(1,2) by(simp add: \<gamma>_st_def wt_st_def)
moreover have "s x : \<gamma> a" using V by simp
ultimately show ?case using V(3)
by(simp add: Let_def \<gamma>_st_def)
(metis mono_gamma emptyE in_gamma_meet gamma_Bot subset_empty)
next
case (Plus e1 e2) thus ?case
using filter_plus'[OF _ aval''_sound[OF Plus.prems(3)] aval''_sound[OF Plus.prems(3)]]
by (auto simp: wt_afilter split: prod.split)
qed
lemma wt_bfilter: "wt S X \<Longrightarrow> vars b \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow> wt (bfilter b bv S) X"
by(induction b arbitrary: bv S)
(auto simp: wt_afilter split: prod.split)
lemma bfilter_sound: "wt S X \<Longrightarrow> vars b \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow>
s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o S \<Longrightarrow> bv = bval b s \<Longrightarrow> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>o(bfilter b bv S)"
proof(induction b arbitrary: S bv)
case Bc thus ?case by simp
next
case (Not b) thus ?case by simp
next
case (And b1 b2) thus ?case
by simp (metis And(1) And(2) wt_bfilter in_gamma_join_UpI)
next
case (Less e1 e2) thus ?case
by(auto split: prod.split)
(metis (lifting) wt_afilter afilter_sound aval''_sound filter_less')
qed
fun step' :: "'av st option \<Rightarrow> 'av st option acom \<Rightarrow> 'av st option acom"
where
"step' S (SKIP {P}) = (SKIP {S})" |
"step' S (x ::= e {P}) =
x ::= e {case S of None \<Rightarrow> None | Some S \<Rightarrow> Some(update S x (aval' e S))}" |
"step' S (C1; C2) = step' S C1; step' (post C1) C2" |
"step' S (IF b THEN {P1} C1 ELSE {P2} C2 {Q}) =
(let P1' = bfilter b True S; C1' = step' P1 C1; P2' = bfilter b False S; C2' = step' P2 C2
in IF b THEN {P1'} C1' ELSE {P2'} C2' {post C1 \<squnion> post C2})" |
"step' S ({I} WHILE b DO {p} C {Q}) =
{S \<squnion> post C}
WHILE b DO {bfilter b True I} step' p C
{bfilter b False I}"
definition AI :: "com \<Rightarrow> 'av st option acom option" where
"AI c = lpfp (step' \<top>\<^bsub>c\<^esub>) c"
lemma strip_step'[simp]: "strip(step' S c) = strip c"
by(induct c arbitrary: S) (simp_all add: Let_def)
subsubsection "Soundness"
lemma in_gamma_update:
"\<lbrakk> s : \<gamma>\<^isub>f S; i : \<gamma> a \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> s(x := i) : \<gamma>\<^isub>f(update S x a)"
by(simp add: \<gamma>_st_def)
theorem step_preserves_le:
"\<lbrakk> S \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o S'; C \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C'; wt C' X; wt S' X \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> step S C \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' S' C')"
proof(induction C arbitrary: C' S S')
case SKIP thus ?case by(auto simp:SKIP_le map_acom_SKIP)
next
case Assign thus ?case
by (fastforce simp: Assign_le map_acom_Assign wt_option_def wt_st_def
intro: aval'_sound in_gamma_update split: option.splits del:subsetD)
next
case Seq thus ?case apply (auto simp: Seq_le map_acom_Seq)
by (metis le_post post_map_acom wt_post)
next
case (If b P1 C1 P2 C2 Q)
then obtain P1' C1' P2' C2' Q' where
"C' = IF b THEN {P1'} C1' ELSE {P2'} C2' {Q'}"
"P1 \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o P1'" "P2 \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o P2'" "C1 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C1'" "C2 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C2'" "Q \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o Q'"
by (fastforce simp: If_le map_acom_If)
moreover from this(1) `wt C' X` have wt: "wt C1' X" "wt C2' X" "wt P1' X" "wt P2' X"
and "vars b \<subseteq> X" by simp_all
moreover have "post C1 \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o(post C1' \<squnion> post C2')"
by (metis (no_types) `C1 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C1'` join_ge1 le_post mono_gamma_o order_trans post_map_acom wt_post wt)
moreover have "post C2 \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o(post C1' \<squnion> post C2')"
by (metis (no_types) `C2 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C2'` join_ge2 le_post mono_gamma_o order_trans post_map_acom wt_post wt)
moreover note vars = `wt S' X` `vars b \<subseteq> X`
ultimately show ?case using `S \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o S'`
by (simp add: If.IH subset_iff bfilter_sound[OF vars] wt_bfilter[OF vars])
next
case (While I b P C1 Q)
then obtain C1' I' P' Q' where
"C' = {I'} WHILE b DO {P'} C1' {Q'}"
"I \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o I'" "P \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o P'" "Q \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o Q'" "C1 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C1'"
by (fastforce simp: map_acom_While While_le)
moreover from this(1) `wt C' X`
have wt: "wt C1' X" "wt I' X" "wt P' X" and "vars b \<subseteq> X" by simp_all
moreover note compat = `wt S' X` wt_post[OF wt(1)]
moreover note vars = `wt I' X` `vars b \<subseteq> X`
moreover have "S \<union> post C1 \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o (S' \<squnion> post C1')"
using `S \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o S'` le_post[OF `C1 \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C1'`, simplified]
by (metis (no_types) join_ge1[OF compat] join_ge2[OF compat] le_sup_iff mono_gamma_o order_trans)
ultimately show ?case
by (simp add: While.IH subset_iff bfilter_sound[OF vars] wt_bfilter[OF vars])
qed
lemma wt_step'[simp]:
"\<lbrakk> wt C X; wt S X \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> wt (step' S C) X"
proof(induction C arbitrary: S)
case Assign thus ?case by(simp add: wt_option_def wt_st_def update_def split: option.splits)
qed (auto simp add: wt_bfilter)
theorem AI_sound: "AI c = Some C \<Longrightarrow> CS c \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C"
proof(simp add: CS_def AI_def)
assume 1: "lpfp (step' (top c)) c = Some C"
have "wt C (vars c)"
by(rule lpfp_inv[where P = "%C. wt C (vars c)", OF 1 _ wt_bot])
(erule wt_step'[OF _ wt_top])
have 2: "step' (top c) C \<sqsubseteq> C" by(rule lpfpc_pfp[OF 1])
have 3: "strip (\<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' (top c) C)) = c"
by(simp add: strip_lpfp[OF _ 1])
have "lfp c (step UNIV) \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' (top c) C)"
proof(rule lfp_lowerbound[simplified,OF 3])
show "step UNIV (\<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' (top c) C)) \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' (top c) C)"
proof(rule step_preserves_le[OF _ _ `wt C (vars c)` wt_top])
show "UNIV \<subseteq> \<gamma>\<^isub>o (top c)" by simp
show "\<gamma>\<^isub>c (step' (top c) C) \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C" by(rule mono_gamma_c[OF 2])
qed
qed
from this 2 show "lfp c (step UNIV) \<le> \<gamma>\<^isub>c C"
by (blast intro: mono_gamma_c order_trans)
qed
end
subsubsection "Monotonicity"
locale Abs_Int1_mono = Abs_Int1 +
assumes mono_plus': "a1 \<sqsubseteq> b1 \<Longrightarrow> a2 \<sqsubseteq> b2 \<Longrightarrow> plus' a1 a2 \<sqsubseteq> plus' b1 b2"
and mono_filter_plus': "a1 \<sqsubseteq> b1 \<Longrightarrow> a2 \<sqsubseteq> b2 \<Longrightarrow> r \<sqsubseteq> r' \<Longrightarrow>
filter_plus' r a1 a2 \<sqsubseteq> filter_plus' r' b1 b2"
and mono_filter_less': "a1 \<sqsubseteq> b1 \<Longrightarrow> a2 \<sqsubseteq> b2 \<Longrightarrow>
filter_less' bv a1 a2 \<sqsubseteq> filter_less' bv b1 b2"
begin
lemma mono_aval':
"S1 \<sqsubseteq> S2 \<Longrightarrow> wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> vars e \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow> aval' e S1 \<sqsubseteq> aval' e S2"
by(induction e) (auto simp: le_st_def mono_plus' wt_st_def)
lemma mono_aval'':
"S1 \<sqsubseteq> S2 \<Longrightarrow> wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> vars e \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow> aval'' e S1 \<sqsubseteq> aval'' e S2"
apply(cases S1)
apply simp
apply(cases S2)
apply simp
by (simp add: mono_aval')
lemma mono_afilter: "wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> wt S2 X \<Longrightarrow> vars e \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow>
r1 \<sqsubseteq> r2 \<Longrightarrow> S1 \<sqsubseteq> S2 \<Longrightarrow> afilter e r1 S1 \<sqsubseteq> afilter e r2 S2"
apply(induction e arbitrary: r1 r2 S1 S2)
apply(auto simp: test_num' Let_def mono_meet split: option.splits prod.splits)
apply (metis mono_gamma subsetD)
apply(drule (2) mono_fun_wt)
apply (metis mono_meet le_trans)
apply(metis mono_aval'' mono_filter_plus'[simplified le_prod_def] fst_conv snd_conv wt_afilter)
done
lemma mono_bfilter: "wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> wt S2 X \<Longrightarrow> vars b \<subseteq> X \<Longrightarrow>
S1 \<sqsubseteq> S2 \<Longrightarrow> bfilter b bv S1 \<sqsubseteq> bfilter b bv S2"
apply(induction b arbitrary: bv S1 S2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply simp
apply(metis join_least le_trans[OF _ join_ge1] le_trans[OF _ join_ge2] wt_bfilter)
apply (simp split: prod.splits)
apply(metis mono_aval'' mono_afilter mono_filter_less'[simplified le_prod_def] fst_conv snd_conv wt_afilter)
done
theorem mono_step': "wt S1 X \<Longrightarrow> wt S2 X \<Longrightarrow> wt C1 X \<Longrightarrow> wt C2 X \<Longrightarrow>
S1 \<sqsubseteq> S2 \<Longrightarrow> C1 \<sqsubseteq> C2 \<Longrightarrow> step' S1 C1 \<sqsubseteq> step' S2 C2"
apply(induction C1 C2 arbitrary: S1 S2 rule: le_acom.induct)
apply (auto simp: Let_def mono_bfilter mono_aval' mono_post
le_join_disj le_join_disj[OF wt_post wt_post] wt_bfilter
split: option.split)
done
lemma mono_step'_top: "wt C1 (vars c) \<Longrightarrow> wt C2 (vars c) \<Longrightarrow> C1 \<sqsubseteq> C2 \<Longrightarrow> step' (top c) C1 \<sqsubseteq> step' (top c) C2"
by (metis wt_top mono_step' preord_class.le_refl)
end
end