(* Title: HOL/Isar_examples/W_correct.thy
ID: $Id$
Author: Markus Wenzel, TU Muenchen
Correctness of Milner's type inference algorithm W (let-free version).
*)
header {* Milner's type inference algorithm~W (let-free version) *}
theory W_correct = Main + Type:
text_raw {*
\footnote{Based upon \url{http://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/HOL/W0/}
by Dieter Nazareth and Tobias Nipkow.}
*}
subsection "Mini ML with type inference rules"
datatype
expr = Var nat | Abs expr | App expr expr
text {* Type inference rules. *}
consts
has_type :: "(typ list * expr * typ) set"
syntax
"_has_type" :: "typ list => expr => typ => bool"
("((_) |-/ (_) :: (_))" [60, 0, 60] 60)
translations
"a |- e :: t" == "(a, e, t) : has_type"
inductive has_type
intros [simp]
Var: "n < length a ==> a |- Var n :: a ! n"
Abs: "t1#a |- e :: t2 ==> a |- Abs e :: t1 -> t2"
App: "a |- e1 :: t2 -> t1 ==> a |- e2 :: t2
==> a |- App e1 e2 :: t1"
text {* Type assigment is closed wrt.\ substitution. *}
lemma has_type_subst_closed: "a |- e :: t ==> $s a |- e :: $s t"
proof -
assume "a |- e :: t"
thus ?thesis (is "?P a e t")
proof (induct (open) ?P a e t)
case Var
hence "n < length (map ($ s) a)" by simp
hence "map ($ s) a |- Var n :: map ($ s) a ! n"
by (rule has_type.Var)
also have "map ($ s) a ! n = $ s (a ! n)"
by (rule nth_map)
also have "map ($ s) a = $ s a"
by (simp only: app_subst_list)
finally show "?P a (Var n) (a ! n)" .
next
case Abs
hence "$ s t1 # map ($ s) a |- e :: $ s t2"
by (simp add: app_subst_list)
hence "map ($ s) a |- Abs e :: $ s t1 -> $ s t2"
by (rule has_type.Abs)
thus "?P a (Abs e) (t1 -> t2)"
by (simp add: app_subst_list)
next
case App
thus "?P a (App e1 e2) t1" by simp
qed
qed
subsection {* Type inference algorithm W *}
consts
W :: "expr => typ list => nat => (subst * typ * nat) maybe"
primrec
"W (Var i) a n =
(if i < length a then Ok (id_subst, a ! i, n) else Fail)"
"W (Abs e) a n =
((s, t, m) := W e (TVar n # a) (Suc n);
Ok (s, (s n) -> t, m))"
"W (App e1 e2) a n =
((s1, t1, m1) := W e1 a n;
(s2, t2, m2) := W e2 ($s1 a) m1;
u := mgu ($ s2 t1) (t2 -> TVar m2);
Ok ($u o $s2 o s1, $u (TVar m2), Suc m2))"
subsection {* Correctness theorem *}
theorem W_correct: "!!a s t m n. Ok (s, t, m) = W e a n ==> $ s a |- e :: t"
(is "PROP ?P e")
proof (induct e)
fix a s t m n
{
fix i
assume "Ok (s, t, m) = W (Var i) a n"
thus "$ s a |- Var i :: t" by (simp split: if_splits)
next
fix e assume hyp: "PROP ?P e"
assume "Ok (s, t, m) = W (Abs e) a n"
then obtain t' where "t = s n -> t'"
and "Ok (s, t', m) = W e (TVar n # a) (Suc n)"
by (auto split: bind_splits)
with hyp show "$ s a |- Abs e :: t"
by (force intro: has_type.Abs)
next
fix e1 e2 assume hyp1: "PROP ?P e1" and hyp2: "PROP ?P e2"
assume "Ok (s, t, m) = W (App e1 e2) a n"
then obtain s1 t1 n1 s2 t2 n2 u where
s: "s = $ u o $ s2 o s1"
and t: "t = u n2"
and mgu_ok: "mgu ($ s2 t1) (t2 -> TVar n2) = Ok u"
and W1_ok: "Ok (s1, t1, n1) = W e1 a n"
and W2_ok: "Ok (s2, t2, n2) = W e2 ($ s1 a) n1"
by (auto split: bind_splits simp: that)
show "$ s a |- App e1 e2 :: t"
proof (rule has_type.App)
from s have s': "$ u ($ s2 ($ s1 a)) = $s a"
by (simp add: subst_comp_tel o_def)
show "$s a |- e1 :: $ u t2 -> t"
proof -
from W1_ok have "$ s1 a |- e1 :: t1" by (rule hyp1)
hence "$ u ($ s2 ($ s1 a)) |- e1 :: $ u ($ s2 t1)"
by (intro has_type_subst_closed)
with s' t mgu_ok show ?thesis by simp
qed
show "$ s a |- e2 :: $ u t2"
proof -
from W2_ok have "$ s2 ($ s1 a) |- e2 :: t2" by (rule hyp2)
hence "$ u ($ s2 ($ s1 a)) |- e2 :: $ u t2"
by (rule has_type_subst_closed)
with s' show ?thesis by simp
qed
qed
}
qed
end